Häggström hävdar Guest post by Johan Wästlund: A remarkable pawn promotion
Transcription
Häggström hävdar Guest post by Johan Wästlund: A remarkable pawn promotion
Häggström hävdar: Guest post by Johan Wästlund: A remarkable pawn promotion 0 Ещё Стр. 1 Следующий блог» Создать блог Войти Häggström hävdar En medborgare och matematiker ger synpunkter på samhällsfrågor, litteratur och vetenskap. ti sd a ge n de n 26 : e no ve mb er 20 13 Guest post by Johan Wästlund: A remarkable pawn promotion That chess is simultaneously art, science and sport is an oft-repeated claim with a great deal of truth in it. In my two recent blog posts about the recent world championship match in which the young Norwegian chess genius Magnus Carlsen defeated reigning champion Viswanathan Anand, I emphasized the sports aspect of chess. To make up for this one-sidedness, I am happy to publish the following guest post, in which my friend and colleague Johan Wästlund (known to regular readers of this blog from the posts Back to basics and Om schack och matematik) demonstrates some more artistic aspects of the game. I am sure most readers know that the rules of chess allows a player whose pawn reaches the eighth and final rank to promote the pawn to a queen. What perhaps not all of you know is that the player may alternatively choose to promote the pawn to one of the lesser pieces: rook, bishop or knight. Doing so may sound silly, because the queen is known as the strongest piece, and indeed such minor promotions occur only rarely in tournament chess, but there are exceptional situations where they make good sense. Please enjoy Johan's exploration of some of these cases! /OH *** A remarkable pawn promotion Johan Wästlund The evening's first batch of coffee was almost ready, and in the thirsty crowd, T had found a victim. After a course for aspiring tournament referees, he now knew everything about "insufficient material". B, who felt he knew how the pieces move, found himself listening to a lecture about the rules of chess. "So you mean", said B with a slightly disturbed but still amused voice, "that if my flag falls in an ending King + Bishop versus King + Bishop, then with bishops of the same color the game is drawn, but with opposite colors, I lose?" Om mig Olle Häggström Medborgare och matematiker. Professor i matematisk statistik på Chalmers. Författare till bl.a. Slumpens skördar (Studentlitteratur, 2004) och Riktig vetenskap och dåliga imitationer (Fri Tanke, 2008). Nås enklast på [email protected] Visa hela min profil Bloggarkiv ► 2014 (4) ▼ 2013 (105) ► december (8) ▼ november (8) Guest post by Johan Wästlund: A remarkable pawn pr... Verdens beste Carlsen! Mitt föredrag i Falkenberg om naturvetenskapens vä... Halvtid i Chennai Läsvärd bok om högerpopulismen Hofstadter! Schemaläggningskrock Om rekreationellt kontra reproduktivt sex ► oktober (9) ► september (9) "That's right, same color is insufficient material, you can't construct a sequence of legal moves leading to checkmate." ► augusti (11) "But with opposite colored bishops, I could in theory put my king in a corner of the color of my opponent's bishop, and block one of the flight squares with mine. Like this." He quickly set up the following position on one of the analysis boards: ► juni (7) ► juli (10) ► maj (9) ► april (9) ► mars (9) ► februari (8) ► januari (8) ► 2012 (109) ► 2011 (53) Senaste kommentarer Olle Häggström on viktigt att veta om vetenskap En fråga? Jag räknar till... få se... (more) Anonymous on viktigt att veta om vetenskap Tack. Precis vad jag tänkte säga i en...(more) http://haggstrom.blogspot.com/2013/11/guest-post-by-johan-wastlund-remarkable.html 13.01.2014 11:56:28 Häggström hävdar: Guest post by Johan Wästlund: A remarkable pawn promotion "Because of that possibility, if my flag falls I have lost the game. That's ridiculous!" T went on with the other endings of one piece each, knight against knight, bishop or rook, bishop against rook (where it turns out the bishop can't win). "You also lose with a pawn against a piece", he continued, unable to conceal his excitement. "Aha, because I could promote to a knight or maybe a bishop, and then corner my king. That's the silliest use of under-promotion I've ever heard of!" The moment he pronounced the word "under-promotion", the problemist G entered the discussion. G's favorite topic was helpmates, but under-promotion would do. "In fact there are only two possible motives for promotion to bishop or rook", he explained, "at least if one excludes things like ridiculing one's opponent. One is offensive, to avoid stalemating the opponent in a winning position. The other is defensive, to draw by getting stalemated. You see, except when it comes to stalemate, a queen will be at least as good as a rook or a bishop." He showed them a rare example of a serious under-promotion, the famous game Bremel - Kertis, Budapest 1948: Стр. 2 efterslantare i Hm, Tottenham... tänkte inte på det! Olle Häggström on viktigt att veta om vetenskap Tack för din kommentar, Kjell. Jag...(more) Anonymous on viktigt att veta om vetenskap Jag såg hela filmen från Falkenberg och...(more) bosjo on skarpsinnig efterslantare i Åkej; vi lägger fråga 2 åt sidan -med...(more) Olle Häggström on skarpsinnig efterslantare i Fråga 1: Det bror på vad som menas med...(more) Widgets by Tips for New Bloggers Sabine Hossenfelder Shooting strings 38 minuter sedan Practical Ethics Three Arguments Against the Belgian Child Euthanasia Bill Criticised 2 timmar sedan Lars Wilderäng 25% höjda avgifter i ny bostadsrättsförening 2 timmar sedan Patrik Lindenfors Livet börjar vid den första snön 2 timmar sedan Lars Grahn "In this position, White won with 1. a8R+! Kb4, 2. Rb8+ Kc3 3. Rxb1. If the rook had been a queen, Black would have been stalemated at this point." Wijk aan Zee – rond 2 10 timmar sedan "The defensive motive, getting oneself stalemeted, is even more exotic. It's been demonstrated numerous times in problems and studies, like this one by Traxler and Dedrle from 1909:" Robin Hanson Tech Regs Are Coming 11 timmar sedan IEET Personhood Beyond the Human: On Posthuman Personhood 11 timmar sedan Paul Krugman The Anti-Scientific Revolution in Macroeconomics 14 timmar sedan Timothy Gowers Introduction to Cambridge IA Analysis I 2014 1 dag sedan Eric Schwitzgebel Skeptical Fog vs. Real Fog 2 dagar sedan "White draws with 1. Ra2+ Kxa2 2. Bxf7+ Qxf7 3. g8B! Rxf8 stalemate. But the defensive under-promotion is a unicorn of chess. Easy to imagine, yet nobody has seen a real one! Amazing, isn't it? Not a single defensive under-promotion is known from the millions of recorded games of chess history." "The most spectacular demonstrations of under-promotion are the realizations of the so-called Babson theme..." And here he was interrupted by P, who reminded everyone that it was six o'clock and the games were about to start. It turned out that B was playing white against T. Their game became the longest of the evening, and when it was about to be decided, a small crowd had gathered in silence around the table. Black would clearly queen first, but his other race, that agianst the clock, was less certain. Karim Jebari Frige Lucy, Himlen och Diamanterna! 2 dagar sedan Uppsalainitiativet "Klimatskeptiker" gör bort sig 2 dagar sedan bosjo Verkligheten är större 3 dagar sedan Ekonomistas Orättvis rättvisesyn 3 dagar sedan Less Wrong The mechanics of my recent productivity 4 dagar sedan http://haggstrom.blogspot.com/2013/11/guest-post-by-johan-wastlund-remarkable.html 13.01.2014 11:56:28 Häggström hävdar: Guest post by Johan Wästlund: A remarkable pawn promotion Стр. 3 Curie Ännu en runda i GM-karusellen 4 dagar sedan Kristen opinion En vandring till Betlehem 5 dagar sedan What If? T-rex Calories 6 dagar sedan RealClimate A Bit More Sensitive… 1 vecka sedan Björn Bengtsson In this position the game continued 61. b6 c1Q 62. b7 Qc5+ 63. Ka8 Qc6 64. a7. T now realized he would have had mate in two with 64. - Qh1 65. Kb8 Qh8 if not the stupid bishop had blocked the eighth rank. So he decided to get it out of the way. 64. - Be7 65. Kb8. With time running out, T had already forgotten his plan and was thinking about 65. - Bd6+, but didn't see how to continue after 66. Ka8. So instead the game went 65. - Qc7+ 66. Ka8. A few minutes later in the calm of the analysis room, he would realize not only that the back-rank mate had still been possible with 65. - Qd6+ 66. Ka8 Qd5 and 67. - Qg8, but also that after 65. - Bd6+ 66. Ka8 Qa6 67. b8Q+ Bxb8, the idea that White gets yet another queen is an illusion. Tre dystopiska actionrullar 2 veckor sedan Christian Munthe This Was Philosophical Comment 2013 2 veckor sedan Katja Grace Discussions for information 2 veckor sedan Anders Sandberg Pardon, but is this reciprocal? 2 veckor sedan Tom Murphy A Physics-Based Diet Plan 3 veckor sedan Thore Husfeldt In the 1950s, w… 4 veckor sedan Thomas Svensson Tanklös satsning på kongressanläggning? 4 veckor sedan Ekologistas With only seconds left for the entire game, T was jumping up and down in his chair. How could it be so difficult to finish the opponent off with queen and bishop against a couple of silly pawns? He finally sighed and realized he might have to settle for a draw. With a helpless look on his face, he took a last glance at the clock, 3, 2, 1 second left. And played 66. - Qc8+. Only at this point did B realize he might actually promote one of his pawns. With his last move, Black was clearly offering a draw, but the gentleman he was, B would still not miss an opportunity of a little prank. He reached out for the white queen, but with his eyes still focused on the board, accidentally pushed her over the edge of the table. She bounced through the little crowd and disappeared under a chair. Never mind. For the desired effect, the move would have to be played instantly. B put one of his rooks upside down on b8, removed his b-pawn, and pressed the clock. With his hands flying nervously all over the board, T knocked his own king over, picked it up and managed to put it on d8, but the clock was already flashing with a row of zeros on Black's side. Effektdeklarera energi 4 veckor sedan Magnus Westerstrand Konspirationsteoretiker konspirerar om klimatförändringarna 5 veckor sedan Gil Kalai Many triangulated three-spheres! 1 månad sedan Aron Vallinder Recent reads 4 månader sedan Bo Jonsson Avfolkning och loserstämpel 5 månader sedan George Dvorsky How Much Longer Until Humanity Becomes A Hive Mind? 7 månader sedan The dullest blog in the world Going for a walk 8 månader sedan Anders Emretsson På resa med Arbetet 11 månader sedan Vetenskap och Folkbildning Årets utmärkelser 2012: God journalistik avgörande för folkbildningen 1 år sedan David Sumpter m fl http://haggstrom.blogspot.com/2013/11/guest-post-by-johan-wastlund-remarkable.html 13.01.2014 11:56:28 Häggström hävdar: Guest post by Johan Wästlund: A remarkable pawn promotion Стр. 4 "I seem to have lost on time", he confessed, but all of a sudden recalled what he had learnt in the weekend. "No, wait, it's a draw because of insufficient material!" The following conversation was a bit confused. Some spectator argued that a rook upside down is a generally accepted substitute for a queen, while another pointed out that even a rook is sufficient material. Meanwhile, T tried to explain that since no sequence of legal moves can lead from the current position to one where the black king is checkmated, the game is drawn even though Black's flag has fallen. They were interrupted by G, the problemist. "I'll be darned! Gentlemen..." As he spoke, he swiftly turned the rook on b8 back to its normal orientation and, as the club's chairperson S had joined the group, continued: "...and ladies, this moment goes to history. For centuries, problemists and study composers have thought that the only motives for promotion to rook or bishop are forcing or avoiding stalemate. But tonight our friend B has demonstrated, with his extraordinary 66:th move, that there is another motive: retaining sufficient material." "In the final position, with White to move after Black overstepping time, White has sufficient material because on the forced continuation 67. Rxc8+, Black has the legal move 67. - Kd7 after which he can in principle be checkmated. Had the rook on b8 been a queen, the only legal continuation would have been 67. Qxc8+ Kxc8 stalemate, and therefore 66. - Kd8 would have ended the game. The manoeuver Be7 - Kd8 was brilliant too, and would have saved the game against..." "I don't quite follow", said B, eager to get some coffee and gossip about the other games of the evening, "but in any case the position is dead drawn, everyone can see that." With those words he shook T's hand, signed the protocol saying 1/2-1/2, and went to the analysis room, unaware of his unique contribution to chess history. Epilogue As the problemist G realized later that evening, there is yet another motive for under-promotion, that of forcing insufficient material. A while later, he published a strange little chess problem, clearly inspired by that evening's events: The task was unusual: Draw in 1 move. Acknowledgments http://haggstrom.blogspot.com/2013/11/guest-post-by-johan-wastlund-remarkable.html 13.01.2014 11:56:28 Häggström hävdar: Guest post by Johan Wästlund: A remarkable pawn promotion Стр. 5 This story was inspired by the wonderful people and events that happened or might have happened at the chess club LASS, Linköping, around ten years ago. While there is no clear correspondence between characters and real people, similarities might not be entirely accidental. Another source of inspiration was a blog post of Bo Sjögren (another former LASS player). Many other examples of under-promotion can be found among the wonderful Chess Curiosities of Tim Krabbé. Upplagd av Olle Häggström kl. 07:15 Rekommenderadettapå Google Etiketter: Johan Wästlund, schack 4 kommentarer: Olle Häggström 27 november 2013 17:31 The underpromotions discussed by Johan are of the most exotic kind where the pawn is promoted to a rook or a bishop. A bit less exotic, and comparatively far more common in tournament play, although on an absolute scale still very uncommon, is the case of promotion to a knight. The reason why knight promotion is by far the most common underpromotion is that the knight is not dominated by a queen in the same crude sense as a rook or a bishop is - unlike the two latter peices, the knight has moves at its disposal that are unavailable to the queen. Remarkably, a promotion to a knight nearly happened in the 6th game of the Anand-Carlsen match. After white's (i.e., Anand's) 67:th move, black (Carlsen) had the option to play 67.- f1Q, promoting his f-pawn to a queen. This would have been a terrible mistake, because Anand would then have had 68. Rf8+ at his disposal, checking the Carlsen's king from behind and picking up the newly promoted queen, with a winning position. Instead the underpromotion 67.- f1N+ would have been enough for a winning position for black: because the knight checks the white king, it has time to get out of harm's way (the X-ray threat on the f-file from the white rook) and with careful play black can utilize his extra knight to force win. Unfortunately, Carlsen had another move at his disposal 67.- Rg1 - which leads to a simpler win, so he chose that one and we didn't get to see the (historic?) occurence of an underpromotion in a world championship match. Svara Jim Bergquist 28 november 2013 02:16 Chess is a game with perfect knowledge and three outcomes: win, lose or draw. In the endgame one has an opportunity to avoid a loss or resign gracefully. When the outcome becomes predictable it's game over. Perhaps this is why Kasparov quit the game against Deep Blue. It was the best way to deny the computer the opportunity to learn from him and improve its game. Perhaps the best strategy was "quit while you're ahead." Svara Steffen 28 november 2013 13:43 Excellent story. For those interested in more of the same I recommend Andrew Buchanans website. http://anselan.com/chess.html Go to the section: "Dead Reckoning". Svara Steffen 2 december 2013 13:20 The topic is also being discussed at the Mat Plus Forum. Tricky stuff: http://matplus.net/start.php? px=1385989915&app=forum&act=posts&fid=gen&tid=1333&pid=11186 Svara http://haggstrom.blogspot.com/2013/11/guest-post-by-johan-wastlund-remarkable.html 13.01.2014 11:56:28 Häggström hävdar: Guest post by Johan Wästlund: A remarkable pawn promotion Kommentera som: Publicera Стр. 6 Välj profil... Förhandsgranska Senaste inlägg Startsida Äldre inlägg Prenumerera på: Kommentarer till inlägget (Atom) Etiketter akademisk frihet Alan Sokal Anders Sandberg artificiell intelligens Bertrand Russell Bo Sjögren Christer Sturmark Chalmers Barack Obama Björn Bengtsson Bill Joy Daniel Dennett Derek Parfit David Chalmers domedagsargumentet Douglas Hofstadter Eliezer Yudkowsky Eric Schwitzgebel Fermis evolutionsbiologi forskningspolitik paradox fri vilja Gud humor Ingemar Nordin Jan Björklund Jesus klimatdebatt klimatpolitik klimatvetenskap kreationism kärnvapen Andersson KVA Lars Karlsson Lena Magnus Carlsen matematik medvetande Mitt Romney moralfilosofi Nick Bostrom Olof Palme Patrik Lindenfors psykologi Ray Kurzweil Republikanska partiet Robin Hanson robotar sannolikhetsteori Singulariteten schack statistik Steven Pinker teleportering teodicéproblemet terrordåden i Norge Stuart Armstrong the great filter transhumanism http://haggstrom.blogspot.com/2013/11/guest-post-by-johan-wastlund-remarkable.html 13.01.2014 11:56:28 Häggström hävdar: Guest post by Johan Wästlund: A remarkable pawn promotion Стр. 7 Uppsalainitiativet USA-valet 2012 utbildningspolitik utomjordingar Vetenskapsrådet xkcd vetenskapsteori Mallen Simple. Drivs av Blogger. http://haggstrom.blogspot.com/2013/11/guest-post-by-johan-wastlund-remarkable.html 13.01.2014 11:56:28