The World’s Financial Crisis!! By Dr. Mehenou Amouzou
The World’s Financial Crisis!!
Or more commonly known as “Financial Déjà Vu”!!
By Dr. Mehenou Amouzou
History is repeating itself with a human desire to control or rule the world by any means.
This obsession has created three categories of human beings: One that has chosen the
route to rule, one that has chosen the role of servant and a third that considers
themselves to be subordinate to all other humans.
For many centuries the world has been and continues to support the aspects mentioned
above by the actions of its Governments and their failing policies to sustain the well
being of its citizens. To conceal the failure of their policies, Governments have become
more and more aggressive via using military powers and or financing muscle to
intimidate, oppress and take over other less able countries.
From the past several centuries to 1884 in Berlin where European countries had decided
to take over Africa and colonized the Africa continent to the war world I, war world II,
Vietnam War, Korean War, Chinese revolution, all the proxy wars etc; to present. We are
still facing the same scenario; the greed power hunger of few people to add to
government’s economic & social policies failures to hide behind the wars and develop
an imperialism approach due to three categories of humans being: One that is selected
to rule, second to serve and the third is considered like to be less human. The World War I
killed more than 37 million people and other causalities; the World War II killed 85 million
and with other casualties.
European Economy between 1850 and 1884
For a time the European trade balance has shown a growing deficit, with shrinking
exports and continental markets becoming increasingly protectionist because of the
recession. Britain, Germany, France and other industrial countries thought the African
continent to be an “uncivilized, barbarian continent” and open market for their trades’
surplus. Britain, with other European countries, had extensively commenced to run deficit
balance of trade (which was more and more offset, on the other hand, by the oversea
revenue). Still today most of Europe continues to take the stance that “we can import as
much as we need and build and create nothing”-Oh dear!! Until someone eventually
asks-"How do we pay for that??” Simple economics-you must generate more revenue
As a result of an increased problem between European countries during the late 19th
century, the partitioning of Africa may have been seen as a way for the Europeans to
eliminate the war in Europe over Africa.
Britain became the first post-industrial nation in the world; the financial services sector
became increasingly important to its economy. Invisible financial exports keep Britain in
the red, especially investments outside Europe, particularly in the developing and open
markets in Africa as colonies of white settlement in the Middle East, Asia South and
Additionally, extra funds were time and again more beneficially invested overseas, in
inexpensive materials, limited competition, and plentiful raw resources which made
greater the best that was promised. A further encouragement for imperialism occurred
from the need for natural resources that were not accessible in Europe, particularly
copper, cotton, rubber, palm oil, cocoa, diamonds, tea, and tin, to which European
customers had become familiar and upon which European industry had become
dependent, the outdated industrial so called power house countries were damaging
and were facing mounting resistance from other industrializing nations, comparable to
Germany, who had newer plants and cheap labor.
Furthermore, Britain wished to retain the southern and eastern coastlines of Africa for
harbor stopover on the way to Asia and its territories in India. The invasion, occupation,
colonization, and annexation of African territory by European powers during the era of
New Imperialism exploration between 1881 and World War I, (1914) had met some refusal
in acceptance to becoming colonized. By way of the military supremacy, the Europeans
were expecting to succeed, with the exception of Ethiopia and Liberia who remained
independents, merely 10% of Africa was surrendered in 1870 and 90% by 1914.
The African imperialism expedition and domination started at the Berlin convention in
1884, European decided the partition and took possession of Africa and its natural
resources, consequent to the economic, political, stayed away from warring and
competition between themselves.
Wars World I
World War I was a disaster, tragedy on all fronts and destroyed humanity for nothing
more that the goal of imperialism, nationalism, domination, being a war mogul,
exercising economic prowess. The ongoing endeavors of nationalism had created other
issues also such as the unification of Italy and especially Germany power, Germany rose
as a military, political and economic giant.
The Industrial Revolution through Europe after 1850 had created consumer markets
available for businesses to explore. It had grown the number of producers competing for
those markets, triggering more competition for what was considered a stagnant
economy by the turn of the century. The competition intensified in each country with
fierce nationalistic feelings fostered by an expanding public schooling that preached its
nation's superiority over other nations and the dangers other nations posed. For example,
Britain thought that it was the country’s obligation to “enlighten” barbaric or savage
customs in Africa and Asia, Russia also exercised cultural motivations to validate its
heaviness on the Balkans and Austria in the early twentieth century. The Russian Czar
Nicholas II desired to follow what was identified “pan-Slavism” or an effort to bring
together all Slavic-speaking population under the direction of the Czar. They would use
of defensive levies (import taxes) to raise the cost of foreign goods and make the home
nation's goods likewise more interesting to its customers. Obviously, other nations did the
same thing. Prices went up, commerce deteriorated, and unemployment rose,
producing internal disorder and instability. As consequence, politicians looked for
scapegoats and opportunely held responsible other nations. This led to more tariffs,
lower trade, rising unemployment, unrest, blame, and so on.
This industrial revolution had developed new technologies which were not restrained to
just peaceful consumer ends, but the building of new and enhanced weapons such as
guns, marine vessels, and steel clad battleships. All this mixed with nationalist pride and
an internal domestic worry about another nations ability to compete in an arms race like
the world had never seen, this in association with an insatiable appetite for a/many
countries desire to increase its wealth via the needs to grab someone else’s via military
means. As soon as one nation started building armaments, its competitors would do the
same and try to outdo the first nation. This would only alarm the first power, which would
further increase its armaments, and so on. Each nation acted in what it felt and
considered was self-defense, but to another nation this saw seen as an act of aggression.
Did World War I generate a key advantageous break in the United States? Did the U.S.
financial system transform in some fundamental and durable ways as consequence of
that war? The U.S. economy was in depression when the war started, the access of the
US into war in 1917 let loose substantial US federal expenditure which changed national
fabrication from civilians to war good. They were 3 millions of workers added up to the
military complex and Five hundred thousand to the administration jobs from 1914 to 1918.
The job loss dropped from 7.9 percent to 1.4 percent because of the manufacturing jobs
creation. Europeans started to procure U.S. supplies for the war and later the United
States itself enrolled in the combat.
According to Hugh Rockoff research associate at NBER, estimates the complete cost of
World War I to the United States was roughly speaking $32 billion, or 52 percent of gross
national product at the time. He rundown the financial support of the U.S. war attempt
as result: 22 percent in taxes, 58 percent through borrowings from the public, and 20
percent in money creation. The War Revenue Act of 1917 taxed "surplus profits" -- profits
greater than an amount established by the rate of return on capital in a base period by
some 20 to 60 percent, and the tax rate on income starting at $50,000 rose from 1.5
percent in 1913-15 to more than 18 percent in 1918.
Casualties as %
ALLIED AND ASSOCIATED POWERS
42,188,810 5,142,631 12,800,706
ALLIED AND ASSOCIATED POWERS
65,038,810 8,528,831 21,189,154
The following estimates of deaths, within contemporary borders, during World War I were
made by a Russian journalist Vadim Erlikman in a 2004 handbook of human losses in the
20th century. Erlikman's estimates are based on sources published in the Soviet Union and
Russia. These figures just showed dead soldier not including the civil, war causalities and
also aftermath which are much bigger but was not reported maybe to under estimate
their participation in the war!
Algeria (1914 known as French Algeria): 26,000
Benin (1914 part of French West Africa): 27,000
Burkina Faso (1914 part of French West Africa): 17,000
Cameroon (1914 known as Kamerun): 5,000 military and 50,000
Central African Republic (1914 known as French Oubangui-Chari): 1,000
Chad (1914 part of French Equatorial Africa): 1,500
Republic of the Congo (1914 part of French Equatorial Africa):32,000
Gabon (1914 part of French Equatorial Africa): 10,500
Ghana (1914 known as the Gold Coast): 16,200
Guinea (1914 part of French West Africa): 14,500
Ivory Coast (1914 part of French West Africa): 12,000
Kenya (1914 known as British East Africa): 32,000
Madagascar: 2,500 military
Malawi (1914 known as Nyasaland): 3,000
Mali (1914 part of French West Africa): 60,000
Morocco (1914 known as the French protectorate of Morocco): 8,000
Mozambique The losses of Portuguese Mozambique were estimated by a
Russian journalist Vadim Erlikman in a 2004 handbook of human losses in the 20th
century. Erlikman's estimates are based on sources published in the Soviet Union
and Russia 52,000
Namibia (1914 known as German South-West Africa): 1,000
Niger (1914 part of French West Africa): 1,000
Nigeria (1914 part of British West Africa): 85,000
Rwanda (1914 part of German East Africa) 15,000
Senegal (1914 part of French West Africa): 36,000
Sierra Leone (1914 part of British West Africa): 1,000
Tanzania (1914 part of German East Africa): 50,000
Togo (1914 known as German Togoland): 2,000
Tunisia (1914 known as French Tunisia): 2,000
Uganda (1914 known as the Uganda Protectorate): 1,500
Zambia (1914 known as Northern Rhodesia): 2,000
Zimbabwe (1914 known as Southern Rhodesia): 5,716 persons of European origin served in
the war, 700 were killed, died of wounds or other causes. In Rhodesian units,127 were killed, 24
died of wounds, 101 died of disease or other causes and 294 were wounded. 31 Africans were
killed in action, 142 died of other causes and 116 were wounded.
Following WWI, scholars have decided to research what are the reasons of the World
War and the primary grounds which unavoidably contributing elements to the World War
I. The United States government sponsored a commission thereafter the conclusion of the
war to see why the United States particularly was involved in the war. The agreement
among the panel members was that the United States entered the war to protect their
international business interests, predominantly in the arms trade. The USA was not
engaged in the war to battle for democracy or to free the world. While the United States
initially stayed neutral country, they continued to furnish supplies to both the Triple
Entente (Great Britain, France, and the Russian Empires) and the Triple Alliance
(Germany, Austria-Hungary, Italy). Ultimately, both coalitions made a decision to no
longer recognize impartiality rights, and commenced attacking American business
interests/merchants, which led to intervention. It was the underlying cause why the
United States involved into World War I. The goal of this article's is to also address the
primary causes attributed to the causes of World War I. It is vital to better understand
what leads to such devastating wars, in order to better ensure that they do not occur
The scholars also recognized the beginning of World War I to the fact that the European
economies often conflicted and competition with one another. In essence, during the
late 1800's, the European countries economic became involved in the struggle for
emerging markets, as well as the imperialistic struggle for further colonies. This imperialism
doctrine led to numerous confrontations among the European powers, as the traditional
European powers England and France had to strive to maintain control over their
colonies, as new European powers such as Germany tried to gain control over them. A
diplomatic factor that also was influential in World War I was that in the period following
the Crimean War throughout World War I, European nations engaged in numerous secret
military alliances which led to distrust among one another. In fact, the two main military
alliances during World War I, the Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance, emerged for these
The US is considered to be beneficiary of the world War I, when the war started the
United States economic was in downturn unemployment extremely high and was net
defaulter in international money markets but thereafter the war the US launched to play
a main role by supplying large amount internationally in Latin America, other European
capital exporters and other parts of the world, taking on the traditionally perceived UK
role. New York appeared as equivalent to London or better to grow to be the World
principal monetary center due to the war had weakened UK.
Wars World II
At the end of the First World War, many of the disagreements that ground it still required
to be resolved. When Germany admitted defeated, the German people still suffered an
enormous amount of bitterness for new countries obstructing in the infrastructure of
Germany itself. The stage of awful reaction upcoming from Germany and other countries
was so immense that they weren't even asked to take part in the peace treaties that
were set at the end of the war. The agreement of Versailles, signed at the end of World
War I, placed responsibility for the war solely on Germany and Austria-Hungary.
Because the culpability was placed on the Central Powers alone, they were
accountable for producing reparations for the devastation and debts of France and
Great Britain. Since Germany was previously deeply overwhelmed from their own debts
and the devastation of their homeland, they were forced to borrow in large sums from
the United States in order to pay back France and Britain for war reparations. Once the
Great Recession hit American and European economies, Germany could no longer
have access to a loan from the United States. France and Great Britain still withdrew
monetary resources out of Germany, who believed it would be protected by Woodrow
Wilson's Fourteen Points for peace, which France and England rejected. America's failure
to join the League of Nations kept Europe weakened. The Agreement of Versailles was so
weak and uncoordinated a treaty, that it permitted Adolf Hitler and the Nazi party to rise
to power amidst distraught German citizens and economy. It's fair to presume
consequently that the First World War was the principal reason of the Second World War
because it was the first in the chain of events that eventually led to the announcement
of war in 1939.
The challenging surroundings to the majority vicious war ever, were the creation of the
German-Italian-Japanese coalition and determined their effort to spread out at the cost
of weaker neighbors and the older colonial powers, especially Britain, France and
Holland. Italy and Germany had long earlier than 1914 went into the colonial struggle but
they expanded late and found all the best territories, strategic positions and trade routes.
The arrangement prior to 1914 was, on the one part, the 'Triple Coalition' of Germany,
Italy and the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and positioned against their expansionist
aspirations the 'Triple Entente' of Britain, France and Russia. The worldwide economic
recession instigated nations to create strict economic "coalitions" in order to defend their
industries and horde significant raw materials. Regrettably, Nations similar to Japan and
Germany had to import critical resources like oil and rubber from places which were
outside their area of authority; and often unfriendly towards them for ideological
purposes. In addition, trade barriers made many resources just too expensive to import
even if exporter nations were willing. The answer to this predicament for Japan and
Germany was to actually acquire hegemony through military invasion, the resources
they required to fuel their economies.
The Great Recession had significant impacts in the political area. In 1932 the United
States economic agony led to the election of the Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt to the
presidency. Roosevelt introduced major changes in the organization of the US economy,
by means of increased government regulation and substantial public-works projects to
support a recovery. But in spite of this energetic involvement, crowd unemployment and
economic stagnation sustained, the recession ended completely soon after the United
States' entry into World War II in 1941. In Europe, the Great Recession strengthened
radical forces and lowered the standing of liberal democracy. In Germany, economic
suffering unswervingly contributed to Adolf Hitler's climb to power in 1933.
The U.S. government lead on such a vigorous role in economic affairs during the war,
concerning their economic ideology, this evolution however should not lead to the
ratcheting up of government role in peacetime. Subsequent increases in federal
expenses resulted for the most part from war-correlated matters (such as veterans'
benefits), and the most of the wartime regulatory agencies soon vanished due to the
efforts of conservative politicians. The successful wartime period "augmented the selfassurance that central planning was the best way to meet a national crisis, certainly in
wartime, and possibly in peacetime as well." This central development was used by the
funding policy to the former Soviet Union; this created confusion, an economy policy
confusion with people who advocate for the free market and the central planning.
Before both World War I and II USA economic was in recession same like the European
but by supplying arms, logistics financing the wars and enter in both wars USA had got off
from the recession and had wealthy economy. Why after 20 to 25 years after the Second
War, USA and the European were still having economic and social problems and have
created the cold war with the exception there were no fights like the World War I and II
but had created three worlds: (capitalism world, Communism World and the Third World
The central planning that was developed through the World War II and after had
appeared to be working for few years during and post the big wars but largely failed due
to Governments continued over spend of money exponentially although the war had
stopped. Major European countries including Russia and the USA were in expansion
crusade based on one ideology, ruthless power politics and economic expansion all over
the world this has created the cold war and its consequences.
The pitiless power politics and economic spreading out has created two social and
political systems each of the system portrayed itself to be the good guy and the other to
be the bad guy with their own definition and interpretation:
“The Soviet Union was a Communist country, financed by “the capitalism funds” for the
Bolsheviks revolution thus creating a society and ideology within. The top 1% and the 99%
call proletarians. This Bolsheviks revolution has allowed the capitalism ideology to survive
and to compare the two ideologies whilst financing by the same Group.
According to the President Truman of the US speech in 1947:
The Soviet Union was a Communist country was ruled by a dictator and put the needs of
the state ahead of personal human rights it relies upon terror and oppression, a
controlled press and radio; fixed elections, and the suppression of personal freedoms”.
“The West was a capitalist democracy which valued freedom, free elections, individual
liberty, freedom of speech and religion and feared Communism.”
Two merciless power economic and politics spreading out ideologies were not
contradictory they were radical, aggressive and expansionist. They mutually supposed
that one of the substitute ideologies was measured a danger to their own way of life,
and that the merely secure way for the world to be free and in high spirits was for them
to sell abroad their scrupulous philosophy to take over the world. This combination of
heartless supremacy politics and economic expansion ideological terror and
belligerence meant that in both America and Russia, their viewpoint invaded and
exaggerated their foreign policies. These lacks of trusts were part of the fundamental
ideological between the two sides, but they also provided weapons in the
misinformation, propaganda war which both sides waged against each other.
Consequently to Russian historians, the British Prime Minister, Churchill and Truman the
American President 1945-1953 were responsible during the Cold War with deliberated to
demolish former Soviet Union which only was protecting itself with its rhetoric and political
actions. The westerner’s views blamed former Soviet Union to construct an empire but
later some of the westerner’s historians blamed America, they alleged Truman had not
understood how much Russia had suffered during The World War II and lately historians are
in agreement that the Cold War was principally a conflict of beliefs between
Communism versus Capitalism.
WWII THE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM NEW ORLEANS
Deaths by Country
Total Civilian and
Dutch East Indies
World War II
Disease & Accidents
*World-wide casualty estimates vary widely in several sources. The number of civilian deaths in China
alone might well be more than 50,000,000.
Is capitalism is a prosperous economic model or it is just an illusion?
From the founding Father Adam Smith and up to now we have seen different schools
come out with different theory’s and views on how to apply new theories, old theories
and how to combine both to solve our society’s economics and social problems. There is
also the fact of another issue the development of a chronic capitalism and or predator
capitalism with no basic rule and regulations with negative consequences on the
repartition of the wealth where 99% of the middle class is now in poverty and the other
1% become richer every day. This could draw a parallelism between the Communism
ideologies of class that resumed 1% of the apparatchik enjoyed all the advantage versus
the rest of the population. Although the communism philosophy disappeared in the years
90’s not much has really changed from the former Soviets countries. Citizens still don’t
enjoy free democracy with plenty of food on the table. Their country’s economy systems
are almost bankrupt and other European and world debts represent an average at least
95% plus of their GDP which is unsustainable!
It seems all these theories are there to serve the ruling class which represents barely the
1% of the population and the 99% who work two to three jobs dreaming to be prospered
one day is a myth. In the USA the student loans debts are above 1 Trillions USD. Interest
rate competing with credits cards interests, uncertain jobs security and potential at the
end of your four years colleges all lead to a pending disaster. Zimbabwe has a good
educational system with no bilateral aid or international assistance has maintained his
education system affordable and fundable and with much lowers debt!
The Great Recession could have started earlier with the terrible collapse of prices on the
stock exchange of New York in October 1929. Over the next couple of years, prices
continually sustained a decline in the USA until the end of 1932 and were to a relative
value of only 20 per cent of 1929 prices. In addition to the thousands of individual
investors being harmed, this fall destroyed the banks and affected significantly the value
of assets and other financial institutions, in particular the population and their private
portfolios. With this motive, numerous banks had been mandated by government to
bear out the collapse. 11,000 of the 25,000 financial institutions had gone into liquidation
in the United States in 1933. The crash of certain banks created a loss of self-belief in the
national economy, subsequently given rise to much lower levels of expenditure and
demand and therefore production, hence the downhill. The result considerably reduced
production and the dramatic rise in unemployment. The industrial production had
dropped by 54 per cent in the United States in 1932, compared to its level of 1929 and
job loss had augmented from 12 and 15 million, or 25-30 per cent of the workforce.
It furthermore became obvious that there had been a significant excess of production in
agriculture, accordingly declining prices and a growing debt in the midst of farming. At
the same time there was the banking crisis, as well as the "Wall Street collapse" of 1929.
This situation was irritated by severe policy mistakes of the Federal Reserve, which also led
to a decline in money supply and slowing down of the economy.
In 1932, the total value of world trade had plunged by more than half because most of
the world nations required looking after their domestic production by imposing tariffs,
raising taxes, and setting quotas on foreign imports. The consequence of these
preventive measures, significantly decrease the size of international trade.
Before and during World War I the world was in aggravated recession due to economic
policy failure and imperial ideology, invade and grab something that does not belong to
you. As mentioned on the above the unemployment was very high, hitting the roof, the total
mobilized armed forces during the first war was 65,038,810; deaths and casualties was
37,466,904 which represented 57.5% without mentioning any further collateral damages due
to the World War I estimated to be another 10 million. During the World War II deaths and
casualties were close to more than 85 million with a collection of deaths and casualties
between the World War I and II to be more than 132 million which ultimately wiped out the
existence of more than 75% of the unemployment rate as detailed before the World War I &
II. The re-construction project created the so called the new economy boomed era. As you
can see with this chart below the US unemployment before the second war was 37.6%,
Germany 36.2% and etc., everything was almost gone during the war.
These countries borrowed funds to go to war and after the war they borrowed to
reconstruct the countries the cost for the wars is passed to the population but not the
According to General Smedley Butler one of the finest strategists of all times said “War is
a racket”, wars are declared to protect a merely 1% of the population. To protect
corporate interests and not Governments interests. A least amount of 21,000 new
millionaires and billionaires were produced in the United States throughout the World
War. Several acknowledged their enormous blood gains in their income tax returns. How
many supplementary warfare millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows? For
General Smedley Butler, how lots of these war millionaires shouldered a rifle? How
countless of them dug a trench? How tons of them knew what it meant to go hungry in a
rat-infested foxhole? How several of them spent sleepless, terrified nights, ducking
ammunitions and shrapnel and machine gun bullets? How lots of them parried a
bayonet shove of an enemy? How many of them were injured or killed in battle?
And what is this bill? This cost renders a horrible accounting, newly placed gravestones,
distorted bodies; traumatized minds, broken hearts and homes, economic instability;
depression and all its attendant miseries; back-breaking taxation for generations and
All these things beg us as again the same question which is: Is the capitalism is a
prosperous economic model or it is just an illusion? We have been told that the middle
class are the corner stone that capitalism has created and everybody dreams of such. If
you work hard you can be successful! The middle class system is a just a temporary
assignment or a lease of one’s wealth’s, it is just a question of timing for the lessee’s to
get control of what belongs to the lessor. It appears with certainty that the entire world is
in financial crisis every five to 10 years!
The United States of America is the only developed country in the world not to be
devastated during the World War II but had spent during many years several hundred
billions on unnecessary rational thinking by forgetting before the war the country was in
severe recession, the unemployment was very high. This irrational spending choice came
back after the Second War by creating economic problems, believing things were going
to be better and went to worse.
Dr. Amouzou received his Master in Business, from the European Advanced Institute of
Management, also a Certificate in Finance and Investment in Paris, France. He completed
his Post Graduation work in Political Strategy, International Relation and Defense Strategies
and earned his Ph.D. in International Finance.
Contribution to this article:
Raymond Bernhard West from West International Petroleum LLC; Fundacion Paraiso Sin
Fronteras; Morgan Lewis; Amouzou Nkrumah Production
Dr. Mehenou Amouzou – Publications on World Economic Crisis
La Sante en Afrique : Couloir de la mort?? Chlore, Fluor = Asthme, Eczema, Cancer de la
vessie, les maladies Cardiaques Etc!!!
“Nigeria the Economy and Military Super Power”
“West Africa Single Currency: The lesson To Learn from European Single
“The Global Banking Financial Crisis’s and Its Impact on Developing Nations:
Case Study Africa.”
“The Economic Decline of the USA Empire: The Airplane without the Pilot”
“The Perspective on Global Economic and Financial Status for 2013 and its
impact on the future of the global economy?”
“Could the World and the European Financial Systems Survive This World War III Financial
Crisis or it is the end of the Western Civilizations?”
”Corruption and Development in the Developing Countries”
“The World Financial Honey Moon is over: Debt Crisis Continues to Wage War
on Economy Policy”
“European Central Bank’s Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT):
The Bazooka Approach”
Aldrich, Robert. Greater France: A History of French Overseas Expansion (1996)
Atkinson, David. "Constructing Italian Africa: Geography and Geopolitics." Italian colonialism (2005):
Brantlinger, Patrick. "Victorians and Africans: The genealogy of the myth of the dark
continent." Critical Inquiry (1985): 166-203. online
Chamberlain, Muriel Evelyn. The scramble for Africa (4th ed. Routledge, 2014) excerpt and text
Curtin, Philip D. Disease and empire: The health of European Troops in the Conquest of
Africa (Cambridge University Press, 1998)
Darwin, John. "Imperialism and the Victorians: The dynamics of territorial expansion." English Historical
Review (1997) 112#447 pp: 614-642.
Finaldi, Giuseppe. Italian National Identity in the Scramble for Africa: Italy's African Wars in the Era of
Nation-building, 1870-1900 (Peter Lang, 2009)
Friedman, Milton, and Anna J. Schwartz. A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960.
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963.
Friedman, Milton, and Anna J. Schwartz. Monetary Statistics of the United States: Estimates, Sources,
and Methods. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.
Gilbert, Martin. The First World War: A Complete History. New York: Henry Holt, 1994.
Kendrick, John W. Productivity Trends in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961
Hammond, Richard James. Portugal and Africa, 1815-1910: a study in uneconomic
imperialism (Stanford University Press, 1966)
Henderson, W. O. The German Colonial Empire, 1884–1919 (London: Frank Cass, 1993)
Hersch, L., La mortalité causée par la guerre mondiale, Metron- The International Review of Statistics,
1927, Vol 7.Pages 80–81
Hochschild, Adam (2006) . King Leopold's Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in
Colonial Africa. London: Pan Books. ISBN 978-0-330-44198-8.
Klein, Martin A. Slavery and colonial rule in French West Africa (Cambridge University Press, 1998)
Koistinen, Paul A. C. Mobilizing for Modern War: The Political Economy of American Warfare, 18651919. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 1997
Lovejoy, Paul E. Transformations in slavery: a history of slavery in Africa (Cambridge University Press,
Lloyd, Trevor Owen. Empire: the history of the British Empire (2001).
Mackenzie J. M. The Partition of Africa, 1880-1900, and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth
Century (London 1983).
Major General Smedley Butler, War is a Racket
Miron, Jeffrey A. and Christina D. Romer. “A New Monthly Index of Industrial Production, 18841940.” Journal of Economic History 50, no. 2 (1990): 321-37
Oliver, Roland, Sir Harry Johnston and the Scramble for Africa (1959) online
Pakenham, Thomas (1992) . The Scramble for Africa. London: Abacus. ISBN 978-0-349-10449-2.
Penrose E. F., ed. European Imperialism and the Partition of Africa (London 1975).
Perraudin, Michael, and Jürgen Zimmerer, eds. German colonialism and national identity (London:
Taylor & Francis, 2010)
Randal Grey. Chronicle of World War I, Vol2 Facts on File 1991 ISBN 0-8160-2139-2 Page 292
Robinson R,. and J. Gallagher, "The partition of Africa", in The New Cambridge Modern History vol XI,
pp 593–640 (Cambridge, 1962).
Rockoff, Hugh. Drastic Measures: A History of Wage and Price Controls in the United States. New York:
Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Rockoff, Hugh. “Until It’s Over, Over There: The U.S. Economy in World War I.” National Bureau of
Economic Research, Working Paper w10580, 2004.
Rotberg, Robert I. The Founder: Cecil Rhodes and the Pursuit of Power (1988) excerpt and text
Sanderson G. N., "The European partition of Africa: Coincidence or conjuncture?" Journal of Imperial
and Commonwealth History (1974) 3#1 pp 1–54.
Statistics of the Military Effort of the British Empire During the Great War 1914–1920, The War Office,
Stoecker, Helmut. German imperialism in Africa: From the beginnings until the Second World
War (Hurst & Co., 1986.)
Thomas, Antony. Rhodes: The Race for Africa (1997) excerpt and text search
Thompson, Virginia, and Richard Adloff. French West Africa (Stanford University Press, 1958)
Urlanis, Boris (1971). Wars and Population. Moscow page 209
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Bicentennial
Edition. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1975.
Wesseling, H.L. and Arnold J. Pomerans. Divide and rule: The partition of Africa, 1880-1914 (Praeger,