Document 6603382
Transcription
Document 6603382
— IMPHAL SUNDAY 16 NOVEMBER 2014 SUNDAY SPECIAL — 6 Khongamelei - A Manipuri orchid Diaspora Speak Dr Irengbam Mohendra Singh Having read an article on orchids in The Sangai Express on October 12 2014, my mind started at a gallop with a flashback to my boyhood days, which were so incident-packed that it made me wonder how I had survived like the kombirei. Flowers, working with insects that are many million years older than humans (280 million years before Dinosaurs), have given incredible joy to us. Flowers have an immediate impact on happiness and moods. Seeing flowers at home or in the wilderness triggers happy emotions. Those of you who have seen a lonely Khongamelei, Kombirei or Siroi lily could not have failed to feel how it heightened feelings of life satisfaction. An “Emotional Flower Study” published in the issue of Evolutionary Psychology at Rutgers in America, found that flowers have a positive effect on emotional health. The study also explored why people who display flowers at home, place flowers in areas of the home that are open to visitors, such as halls, lounge and kitchen to make the home more welcoming and create a sharing atmosphere. I also learnt with a dirty look from my wife, when many years ago, I presented a bouquet of red roses to my practice nurse on her birthday. Little did I know that the colour of roses, coveted through the ages for its simple beauty and intoxicating fragrance have different meanings. Red means “I love you”; pink means “thank you”, yellow means “friendship” and white means for “marriage” and any beginning. Flowers also play an important part in religious worship. The Hindu word “puja” stands for ‘pu’ = pushpa – flowers and ‘ja’ for water, both of which they offer to gods. Manipur abounds in beautiful flowers, both in the valley and the hills. Among these Orchids are special. Researchers say that here are about 285 orchid species in Manipur. I only know two: Khongamelei and Kwaklei. There is no Manipuri word for orchid unless the good MEELAL people have one hidden somewhere in the puyas. Orchid is orchid in many languages. In the last few years orchids have become very popular as houseplants in the West, because of so many beautiful hybridised flowers. Commercially they generate into millions of dollars. Apart from a display of fresh flowers in our lounge my wife keeps an orchid that flowers all the tear round in our bathroom. Flowers in Britain are imported daily from Holland. Many varieties of cultivated orchids from all over the world can be bought any day from shops. The Thai orchid - the “Golden shower tree” that is available here reminds me of Manipuri Khongamelei. Thais call orchid “Ueaing” as well as orchid. It is their national flower. If you fly by Thai Airlines the air hostess will welcome you in with a spray of orchids saying ‘sawadeeka’. Thailand is one of the big exporters of cut orchid flowers of more than 10,000 species. The name “orchid” was given by Theophrastus (Greek the father of botany in 370-285 BCE because it has two tubers resembling human testes (testes = orchids in Greek. I am glad to read that there has been some activity in the cultivation and propagation of some orchid species in the Manipur district of Senapati, with the recent distribution of commercial hybrid saplings to a few farmers at Hennbung. It was apparently organised by Orchid Research and development Centre under the sponsorship of Department of Biotechnology, Government of India. And the research team has collected 211 so far, apart from the 26 new species found in Senapati and Ukhrul. A recent survey by Indian agricultural scientists have warned that certain species of orchids found in the Northeast are now severely depleted. It is encouraging that the department of life sciences at the University of Manipur has developed a tissue culture technique for the propagation of approximately 1,000 rare orchid seedlings. Orchid growing is not common in Manipur. Only wild collections from forests are sold for the internal market. Because of this and deforestations some rare species must be in danger of extinction. Only four to five years ago I went to see orchids at Khongampat Orchidarium - only to be told that it was closed. Then my friend Khuraijam Dhirendra took me to see a few varieties of orchids that his nephew Indrajit was growing in his horticultural garden at Kongba. There were many orchids pumping out beautiful robust flowers with luscious colours. India has over 1229 species of orchids - 10 percent of world’s orchid flora. The Northeast has the highest concen- tration with about 700 species, of which 550 species are in Arunachal Pradesh, 523 in Sikkim, while Meghalaya has 300 species. I remember orchids at the hotel in Bangkok against the backdrop of snow-covered Kanchenjunga, where I, with my family and my late nephew Dr Dorendra stayed. Sikkim has a rich orchid flora. Their Cymbidium (boatshaped) orchids are the state’s heartbeat of its booming flower trade. Sikkim Government, which has realised the commercial prospect of orchids, has since about the year 2000 established a research centre – The National Research Centre for Orchids at Pakyong - 12 km from Gangtok. It is now producing new hybrids to compete with other states such as Assam, Odisa, Maharashtra, Kerala and Tamil Naidu. Sikkim produces rupees two crores-worth of orchids every year for the national and international markets. They have devised facilities for cold chain transport by air to Delhi and Kolkata. Sikkim trails just behind Arunachal Pradesh. While Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh are cashing on their unique orchids, Manipur is crashing on its indigenous orchids. The Government of Arunachal Pradesh has also established an Orchid Research and Development Station at Tipi in West Kameng District. This is Asia’s largest Orchidarium with 500 species. In the month of January every year the Arunachal Pradesh Government organises Orchid Festival at Itanagar. The orchid family has the largest family of plants on earth with 1,000 genera and about 20,000 species. Then, there are modern hybrids(mixed races). There are over 100,000 hybrids and thousands are coming up each year. The classifications are based on the shape of the flowers rather than the colours. There are two types of orchids depending on their habitat – natural home: Epiphytic –plants that grow above the ground, supported by other plants or objects. They derive their nutrients from the air, dust, wood debris and bird droppings, and water from rain by their hanging roots. Manipuri orchidsare of this type. They host friendly organisms like fungi, which in return, provide their cooked food – sugars. Terrestrial - these grow in the ground like ordinary plants with their roots in soil from which they get their water and food. These are the ones that are sold as house plants. They are simple to maintain. There are again two varieties of orchids depending on the mode of their growth. One is called monopodial–such as Negotiating environmental concerns with economic priorities Investment not expense It is a widely accepted view that protecting the environment constitutes a net expense to economy. Corresponding to the global climate change (sic rising temperature), mankind’s concerns for environmental protection have grown multiple times in the past decades. However, despite the much enhanced knowledge and concerns for environment and its preservation, all the human efforts are still not enough to preserve a sustainable environment. Polls conducted across the planet showed that the public attached great value to protecting the environment. Yet, environment is only degrading year after year. One primary reason is mankind’s economic concerns and prioritisation of economic agenda over environmental concerns by almost all the countries. In spite of the ever rising temperature, the imminent threats of melting Arctic glaciers and subsequent rise of sea levels, all the international environmental summits including the latest one could not come up with any effective mechanism to counter environmental degradation. Very often, environmental concerns faded into oblivion during economic hard times, and it is a reflection of the fact that majority of the public and most of the leadership still believe that protecting the environment represents spending money rather than saving it. In other words, it represents consumption rather than investment. Economic activity, both production and consumption, relates to the environment in two fundamental ways — we draw resources (both renewable and non-renewable) from the environment to produce goods and services, and we emit wastes into the environment in the process of both production and consumption. Too often we think and act as if we were not part of nature. Rather than thinking of ourselves as nested in nature and dependent upon it, we think of ourselves as sitting on top of it, managing it. We think there is the human world and the natural world, and we forget that we are ourselves, with all our technology, part of nature. So what is the reality? What will happen to our industrial civilization if the supply of natural resources is constantly diminished relative to demand? The answer is obvious. Our prosperity will be threatened. And the solution is obvious. We must strive to obtain more goods and services from our finite supply of non-renewable resources, and we must protect — from both extraction and waste impacts — the natural productivity of our forests, fisheries, agricultural and range land, and other renewable resources. Its obvious that our continued prosperity depends on protecting both extractive potential and waste absorption capacity. As we look at our interest in the world, we think in sequence — individual, family, community, region, nation and world. Conventional economic thinking says that prosperity is a function of competitiveness, and that competitiveness is a function of efficiency. But when economists think of efficiency, they usually consider only the efficiency of labour and capital. This is outmoded. Japan and Germany produce their products with about half the energy input of American industry. Energy represents about ten percent of the cost of production, and so they achieve with their efficiency about a five percent competitive advantage in world markets relative to US goods. This advantage is certainly significant, but to it must be added the price edge of using other natural resources more efficiently. These efficiencies benefit countries, companies, and local communities. Using our natural resource base in a more efficient way, and maintaining a larger supply of both nonrenewable and renewable resources relative to demand, makes the products of a nation, a company, or a community more competitive in the marketplace. At the same time, we must begin to calculate into our economic reasoning the costs imposed by wastes. When wastes reduce the productivity of natural systems — forests, fisheries, agricultural and range lands — they reduce our supply of economic inputs. When wastes damage our existing investments — acid rain eating our bridges, etc. — they reduce our wealth. And when wastes damage our health, they impose costs even as they add to GNP by generating demand for health services. A big part is our habit of treating consumption of our stocks of non-renewable resources as pure income — and likewise treating our unsustainable draw of renewable resources as pure income. One eminent environmentalist said: “Valuing forest products as equal to the cost of extracting them is like valuing our life savings by the cost of driving to the bank to withdraw them”. Forests, fisheries, agricultural and range lands, mineral resources, fossil fuel resources, slow to recharge aquifers, and other natural resources are being consumed. Yet in the national accounting system driven by GNP, we fail to calculate net income. Our forests shrink, but we do not subtract the Hoi Polloi & Mundanity Yenning shrinking asset value from gross income to see if we are realizing net income. Our topsoil is lost, but we do not subtract its value from the value of agricultural products. And so on, and so on, as we gradually impoverish ourselves without even counting the costs. A single mature tree can be worth tens of thousands of rupees. The net present worth of a mature tree planted as a seedling today would be less that one cent. At this worth, none will ever be planted. Viewed from a global perspective, we must admit that there is no realistic possibility of increasing per capita incomes and preventing the destruction of the global environment without halting population growth and at the same time promoting massive economic development and economic growth. The real question is the nature and direction of that growth and development. Investment must be directed to those technologies which can improve living standards without destroying the natural resource base. Population stabilization probably depends more than anything else on increasing economic security in the developing world. At the centre of this is improving health care and economic opportunity for women. This requires economic growth — the right kind of economic growth. Protecting the living and productive natural systems in these countries — their forests, fisheries, agricultural lands, etc. — depends in turn on halting the slide into desperate poverty. A starving population will strip every twig and blade of grass to survive, and this unfortunately is the harsh reality in Manipur. We face the prospect of utterly destroying much of the natural world in developing countries unless a successful economic program is created. The world needs a new detente today — one between advocates for economic prosperity and advocates for environmental protection. Change is much in vogue in this political year. And indeed we need change. But to get the right kind of change we will need a massive educational effort. Our contradictory feelings about government taxing and spending — we want the taxing to go down but the spending on our needs to go up — are a reflection of the fact that a large part of government spending represents support for middle class consumption. Over-exploitation of forest resources in Manipur Perhaps, forest resources are the single largest source of livelihood after agriculture for majority of the mass in Manipur. But the sad part is, we continue to see forest resources only as firewoods and tree trunks for obtaining timber. The tendency to disregard or undervalue the public benefits and externalities derived from forest ecosystems, whilst assigning value to the private goods that can be derived by harvesting and over-exploiting them lies at the heart of the ‘biodiversity crisis’ which is fast unfolding in Manipur as elsewhere in different parts of the world. Ignorance, economic compulsion and in some part greed are behind unrestrained exploitation of forest resources. Our people must have certain idea about the roles of forest in environmental protection viz retention of underground water, absorption of harmful carbon emission, balancing seasonal rainfall, prevention of landslides et al. But we doubt how many of our people have clear idea about total economic value of our forests. The carbon absorptive capacity of our forests has its economic value. The concept of carbon credits and carbon trading originated from the Kyoto Protocol of 1997. Total economic value of forest can be assessed either directly via consumptive behaviour such as timber or non-consumptive activities like recreation or indirectly for their functional services such as carbon storage and sequestration and water cycle regulation. It was heartening to learn that Manipur was the third State in India to evaluate the value of its forest produces in scientific manner. According to a study, the State’s forest area is worth Rs 5049.64 lakhs annually on the average (The Sangai Express, February 23, 2011). Now one can guess the economic value of our forests and it is much higher than the annual plan outlay of Manipur. But the problem is, we have little idea about how to use our forest resources judiciously and in sustainable and productive manner. We are rather over-exploiting our forest resources, that too at a pace much faster than the regenerative capacity of our forests. All the negative impacts of over-exploitation are now glaringly visible. We have witnessed flash floods last month and now we enduring an acute drought like situation. Having said this, we don’t expect our people would stop overexploitation of forest resources from tomorrow or next month or next year. It is here State intervention is needed the most. It is in human nature, immediate requirements always precede future security. What we are doing today is sacrificing the entire future generations for our immediate requirements which are peanuts compared to what is in store in our forests. But then, how can one value a treasure without knowing its worth? So let’s start with correct assessment of the importance of forests in environmental protection together with a comprehensive study on their huge economic value. The writer can be reached at [email protected] or visit www.hoipolloiandmundanity.blogspot.com The curious case of Sarita Devi Rajkumar Jenson The results that every Indian have been waiting for, is finally there. All the ifs and buts can be put to bed, for now at least. Boxing’s governing body AIBA has announced that they will punish severely Sarita Devi for refusing to accept her bronze medal at the recently concluded Asian Games. But why is this? Let’s turn back the clock a bit to remind ourselves what happened. It was September 30, 2014 and the former world amateur lightweight boxing champion was fighting for a place in the gold medal bout of the 60-Kg weight class boxing at the 17th Asian Games in Incheon, South Korea against home favourite Park Ji Na. The Manipuri girl dominated the bout so much so that when the final bell rang every Indian fans had the results in the back of their mind and wore gleaming smiles. This was until the plot took a complete U-turn when the judges gave the Korean a 3-0 victory, making everyone utterly spellbound. It was reminiscent of a pretty cliché moment taken straight out of a sports drama film wherein the result goes in favour of the undeserving antagonist, giving the protagonist enough motivation to go for the kill in the rematch. Unfortunately for Sarita that was the finale of the movie. Aghast at the judges’ decision, she complained and even borrowed money from a journalist to do that. What a shame. But what led to AIBA’s decision is not for this, but for the one that is to follow. She took the role of the script writer and added the climax to the drama. Refusing to accept her bronze medal during the medals ceremony, Sarita gave it to Park, leaving the Korean boxer completely perplexed. This infuriated the boxing as- sociation leading to their decision to suspend Sarita and other Indian officials. All these happen at the big events due to the emotions and enormity of the stage. Remember Zinedine Zidane head-butting Marco Materazzi during the final of the 2006 FIFA World Cup? These uncontrolled, overwhelming emotions are there when the stakes are high, really high. What she has done may not be a sporting gesture and it has even reached an extent where the AIBA president CK Wu was quoted as saying “She has damaged her own country, India has been damaged”. But what are the Indian Olympic Association and the Sports Authorities doing? The country’s Sports Minister said “She was saddened by the news (Sarita’s suspension)”. Is that enough? Will that sympathetic quote make AIBA change their decision? Apart from responding few questions, why can’t they get behind their own sportsperson? The Mongolian boxing team threatened to withdraw from the games when their boxer Tugstsogt Nyambayr lost a controversial bout against another South Korean opponent and even had a sit in protest. Not long ago, BCCI was taking everything in their hands in fighting a case against the England Cricket Board after Ravindra Jadeja and James Anderson’s spat. If the cricket board can do that, then why can’t other sporting bodies do that? Does the Indian Sports authority or even the India Government really care about anything apart from cricket? In such a huge country where raw sporting talents are not hard to find, will the authorities take everything casually yet still get all the plaudits when someone wins some sporting event? Today it is Sarita Devi, and tomorrow someone else will come. Will that someone be made the scapegoat again for the decision made by the judges or will someone be brave enough to protest against these decisions? If so, who will be doing that but more importantly, when? As a sports enthusiast, I pray that this happens and soon. cymbidium that has a single main stem which grows to about 30 cm and flowers. When the season ends a new shoot grows from the base forming its own bulb (pseudo-bulb) from which a stem shoots up which eventually flowers. They continue to grow year after year. Today’s orchids are mass produced in this way in greenhouses. The other variety is called sympodial (conjoined feet) such as Manipuri Khongamelei and Kwaklei. These have a specialised rhizome with a lateral growth pattern in which the apical “meristem” ie the growing tissue of the plant is terminated. It can either make an inflorescence (a cluster of flowers) or another determinate structure. So the growth continues by a lateral meristem which repeats the process. So the plants that appears to be continuous, is in fact, a cluster of meristems. What can we do in Manipur? Primarily, it is for the government to give incentives with financial grants to young people especially in the hills, which are the natural habitat of Manipuri orchids. They should be motivated to grow orchids and given a bonus for large production. Horticulture enthusiasts such as Khuraijam Indrajit in the valley and others in Senapati and Ukhrul should be given funds to encourage them to grow enough orchids large enough for export. Indian orchid scientists should be invited to teach these amateurs how to hybridise orchids and also grow them from seeds. Hybridising that began in 1850, is crossing plants of different flowering patterns and colours, and at the same time crossing a bigger plant with a smaller one and so on. They have to be crossed among the same genera (sageies) and that also among the compatible ones (yek thoknadaba sageis). After that, with a lot of patience you have to grow many seedlings from the cross on to the flowering bed. You can produce many characteristics you want. You can register your hybrid with your or anybody’s name if you like. The writer is based in the UK Email: [email protected] Website: [email protected] 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 — WEEKEND POETRY — Slowly I die By Herojit Philem The air I breath Kills me from within Slowly I die. Blood being sucked perpetually Thinner become I steadily. Seeking for some answers I excavate the dead memories; Beating the heart to cry Since the day I breathe alone without you. I asked and keep asking: Why me why? Why chosen me to be leaved? Why you let become your prey? Why you kill me silently and secretly? "True and Evil" By M. Brownanuddin Khan Truth and evil beliefs are terms built actively, upon thou's thought, recognisation and consideration. A female can be beautiful and pretty, Again Dirty, Shabby, Stupid and Ugly!! Too depends upon thou's love, onsideration and ignorance Activities and practices of cowards tongue! (language) Can destroy thou's silent solitude love and belief, Which thou's had sought, maintained and retained, Long years and years since thou's maturity. Many had egothly touched with wild excitement, Every forbidden divinitys path of reality, With dirty approaches, nasty belief and practices Which causeth destruction to thousands existences. With Sunlight spreading its blessing light, With moon light guiding the path of night (hours) Where dreamy cowards with evil practices, Mislead many towards the path of Untroden. Truth and reality had to be filtered from evil path, Like sperating salt, sand and water, For acquiring pure salt, sand and pure water, For life to restore dignity of righteous existences. SANGAI QUIZ SANDEEP L 1. The highest per capita emitter of carbon dioxide in the world is? 2. An aquatic plant introduced from america to check pollution turned out to be troublesome weed in indian water bodies. The name of this invasive alien species is? 3. The Siberian crane, an endangered migratory bird is a regular visitor of which of the following national park/ bird sanctuaries? 4. The unexpected euption of Mount Ontake, which is said to be a favourite hiking destination, has left dozens dead. In which country, this eruption took place? ANSWERS : 1. Qatar 2. Eichhornia 3. Keoladeonational park 4. Japan 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 12345678901234567890123456789012123456789012345678901234567890121234 — JOKES — Slow Mom, Fast Mom! Little Freddie's mother was in the hospital, and he was paying a visit to see his new brother. He wandered into an adjoining room which was occupied by a woman with a broken leg. "Hello," he said. "How long have you been here?" "Oh, about a month." "Let me see your baby," he then asked. "Why, I haven't a baby," the woman replied. "Gee, you're slow," said Freddie. "My mama's been here just two days and she's got one." Courtesy : Santabanta