the publication (PDF 1205KB).
Transcription
the publication (PDF 1205KB).
December 2014 Tax UPDATE A-Z Review of 2014. As Christmas rapidly approaches, it is time for a non-technical review of various tax facts, highlights, and lowlights, from the past year. A is for avoidance: the mainstream media continues to comment on avoidance by multi-nationals and assert that they are not paying ‘their fair share’ of tax. However, as Willy DJ said “There is nothing fair or unfair about the imposition and collection of tax. It is merely that sum which the Parliament considers it should exact from the income earning members of the public...”1. B C is for bankruptcy: the Inland Revenue Department (IRD) is seeking to bankrupt Mr JG Russell having gained judgment against him for in excess of $365 million in unpaid taxes and penalties. Mr Russell, of Securitibank fame, and the IRD have a history of litigation dating back to the early 1980s. Also, there has been two decades of litigation relating to various taxpayers who had adopted his ‘template’, which was found to be an avoidance arrangement. is for capital gains tax (CGT): the proposal to implement a CGT was a major policy of Labour leading into the election. The election result would suggest the majority of New Zealanders do not support its introduction. 1 Case S85 (1996) 17 NZTC 7,534 at p 7,536 Next Tax Update | 1 D is for disbanded: the Rewrite Advisory Committee, which was formed to ensure no unintended changes arose from the rewrite of the income tax legislation (into the Income Tax Act 2007), was disbanded in December as it had fulfilled its purpose. Any further unintended changes are to be dealt with by the policy section of the IRD, as part of its usual work programme. However, why do we get the feeling that unintended changes which have an adverse effect on the tax take will be dealt with promptly, but those that generate a tax overreach will never get addressed (such as the long-standing issue with tainted capital gains)... E F is for employee allowances and benefits: changes were enacted earlier this year, which in part change and in part clarify the tax implications of: expenditure on account of an employee; accommodation allowances and employer-provided accommodation; and employee meals. Most, but not all, of the changes will be effective on 1 April 2015. is for Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA): the deadline date of 31 December 2014 is swiftly approaching for New Zealand financial institutions that need to register with the United States Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for FATCA purposes. The deadline date arises under the intergovernmental agreement between the United States and New Zealand, which came into force on 1 July 2014, and the related Memorandum of Understanding. G is for Google tax: the nickname given to the United Kingdom’s proposal, announced by Chancellor George Osborne in the half-yearly budget statement in early December, to introduce a 25% tax on the profits of multi-nationals that are generated “from economic activity here in the UK which they then artificially shift out of the country”. Australian Treasurer Joe Hockey has announced a similar intention. Although these statements may have a sound bite attraction politically, how in fact these proposals would achieve the stated aim, having regard to the tax treaty network that each country belongs to, remains to be seen. Furthermore, it appears that they may have the potential to undermine the base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project and create an argument over taxing rights between countries (or the risk of double taxation to the taxpayer). J K L I is for interest deductions: the second area coming out of the BEPS process where the IRD is considering domestic law reform. The reforms are likely to centre on limiting deductions for interest, particularly where it relates to related party, high priced debt. is for KiwiSaver: since inception, the tax implications of KiwiSaver have been subject to constant tweaking. The latest, proposed in the December Taxation (KiwiSaver HomeStart and Remedial Matters) Bill, is to extend the scope of the first home withdrawal to include the member tax credit. is for land: changes enacted this year that relate to land include: clarification of the date at which land is acquired for the purposes of the land rules (Subpart CB Income Tax Act 2007); extending the taxing rules regarding lease related payment (e.g. to include certain lease transfer payments and lease termination payments); and excluding Glasgow leases from being depreciable property. Mis for mixed use assets: the tax rules relating to mixed use assets (in essence, land/improvements to land, ships/boats, and aircraft which are used for both personal purposes and for deriving income) were extensively rewritten in 2013. This year, we saw a number of remedial tweaks being made to those rules. N is for nine: $9.3 billion is the amount of debt owed to the IRD, including tax, student loans and child support. O is for online: work is underway designing the replacement computer system for the IRD, and with it comes an over-riding agenda to force taxpayers to interact with the IRD online. The ability of taxpayers to interact with the IRD offline is becoming increasingly limited. Face-to-face contact is virtually a thing of the past, as local offices have been shut down progressively over the past couple of decades. Even telephone contact is becoming harder, with callers facing an increasing wall of automated responses before reaching an actual person. H is for hybrid mismatches: one of two areas coming out of the OECD’s work on BEPS where the IRD is considering domestic law reform. The reforms are likely to centre on limiting the effect of a particular transaction/scenario being characterised as one thing in New Zealand and as something else in another country (e.g. as an equity security generating dividends in one country and as a debt security generating interest in the other). is for Jennings Roadfreight2: at issue in this case was the priority that the IRD receives (as compared to other creditors) in the scenario where a company had deducted tax under the pay-as-you-earn (PAYE) rules but not returned those amounts to the IRD by the due date at the time it entered liquidation. The Court of Appeal finding meant that the IRD got a super-priority, but the Supreme Court reversed that decision. In short, the Supreme Court found that, as a result of the operation of section 167(2) of the Tax Administration Act 1994, the priorities set out in Schedule 7 of the Companies Act 1993 trumped the trust status that applies to PAYE deductions (which arose under section 167(1)). P is for property speculation: time and time again we hear cries that a CGT is needed to curb property speculation and rising Auckland house prices. Of course, those who make these cries conveniently forget that the proceeds from property speculation are classified as income under current tax law, so the profits are taxable at the taxpayer’s marginal tax rate. 2 Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Jennings Roadfreight Limited (In Liquidation) - [2013] NZCA 455 Next Tax Update | 2 Q is for Qatar: Qatar and the United Arab Emirates shared 1st place for ease of paying taxes in the World Bank’s latest annual Doing Business 2015: Going Beyond Efficiency report. New Zealand was in 22nd place. R S T is for residency: New Zealand bases its right to tax income on the twin grounds of residency and source. The decision of the High Court in the Diamond3 case in August found Mr Diamond, who had ceased living in New Zealand in 2003, was not resident for income tax purposes in the tax years ending 2004 to 2007. This overturned the somewhat bizarre decision of the Taxation Review Authority (TRA), which had held he was resident under the permanent place of abode test due to co-owning residential rental properties with his ex-wife (even though he had never lived in them). is for sugar tax: often advocated for by health professionals in New Zealand, along with other forms of fat tax. Mexico introduced a tax on sugary drinks this year, whereas Denmark has repealed its fat tax after only one year. is for (financial) transactions tax: the drive by Germany and France to introduce a financial transactions tax on banks across the European Union appears to have failed to get the support needed for this to be imposed. The United Kingdom was a major opponent of the new tax. The proponents of the tax are now looking for a voluntary adoption by countries that support the concept, but this is unlikely to occur due to the market distortions that would flow from a piecemeal adoption of it. U is for unclaimed monies: money that has sat untouched for six or more years with a bank or financial institution may be classified as unclaimed money, which is placed within the control of the IRD. The IRD lists the name of the account-holder and the amount held on its website. A quick check of the list should be common practice for anyone who is appointed as the executor of the estate of someone who was mentally infirm and may have lost track of their affairs. This may provide an unexpected Christmas present for the beneficiaries of the estate. V is for value for money: The return from each $1 spent by the IRD on its enforcement action is stated to be, in relation to: Wis for Woodward v R : Mr Woodward, an accountant, was convicted in the Tauranga District Court in 2013 on multiple counts of tax evasion and one count of perjury. In April 2014, his appeal on the perjury conviction was rejected by the Court of Appeal. The charge related to an interview of Mr Woodward by the IRD, conducted pursuant to section 19 of the Tax Administration Act 1994, at which he was required to produce documents relevant to the subject matter of the interview. The IRD was of the view that his answers were misleading, and the Court of Appeal agreed. The case highlights the fact that section 19 specifically states that there is no privilege against self-incrimination at such interviews. It also provides that statements made are generally inadmissible in criminal proceedings, except for a charge of perjury. 4 X is for Xmas gifts: if giving Xmas gifts to your employees, remember to consider whether these will attract fringe benefit tax. If giving a cash bonus, remember this will need to go through the PAYE system. So if you want to give a crispy $100 note to an employee, you will be grossing it up for tax purposes. Y Z is for yesteryear: being what tax litigators long for. In 2014 (with two weeks left), there have been 14 reported TRA decisions and 46 court decisions with a tax focus. Going back ten years to 2004, there were 30 reported TRA decisions and 61 court decisions with a tax focus. Going back 20 years to 1994, to before the current ‘disputes procedure’ was enacted, there were 38 reported TRA decisions and 71 court decisions with a tax focus5. is for zeolite, zinc and zircon: These are three of the approximately 50 listed industrial minerals. The rules dealing with income from mineral mining were modified with effect from 1 April 2014, for the 2014-2015 and subsequent income years. If you have any questions or require further information regarding any aspect of this update, please contact us. Contacts Lynette Smith Special Counsel +64 9 300 3812 [email protected] (i) overdue student loans - $16 (Minister for Tertiary Education, Skills and Employment, 1 December 2014); (ii) property speculation - $8 (Minister of Revenue, 27 November 2014); and (iii) tax fraud - $3.73 (Minister of Revenue, 3 December 2014). 3 Diamond v Commissioner of Inland Revenue [2014] NZHC 1935 4 Woodward v R (2014) 26 NZTC 21-068 5 Reported refers to cases reported in the CCH New Zealand Tax Library Next Tax Update | 3 About DLA Phillips Fox DLA Phillips Fox is a member of DLA Piper Group, an alliance of independent legal practices. It is a separate and distinct legal entity. For more information visit www.dlapf.com DLA Phillips Fox offices are located in Auckland and Wellington. A list of DLA Piper offices can be found at www.dlapiper.com Copyright If you would like to reproduce any of this publication, please contact [email protected] www.dlapf.com © DLA Phillips Fox, December 2014 dla phillips fox offices Contact your nearest DLA Phillips Fox office: www.facebook.com/dlaphillipsfox www.twitter.com/dlaphillipsfox Auckland DLA Phillips Fox Tower 205 Queen Street Auckland NZ 1010 Tel +64 9 303 2019 [email protected] www.linkedin.com/company/dla-phillips-fox bit.ly/dlaphillipsfox Wellington Chartered Accountants House 50 - 64 Customhouse Quay, Wellington NZ 6011 Tel +64 4 472 6289 [email protected] This publication is intended as a first point of reference and should not be relied on as a substitute for professional advice. Specialist legal advice should always be sought in relation to any particular circumstances and no liability will be accepted for any losses incurred by those relying solely on this publication. Tax Update | 4