Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Secretariat on the Conference

Transcription

Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Secretariat on the Conference
Report of the Joint FAO/WHO
Secretariat on the Conference
December 2014
Contents
DATE AND PLACE OF THE CONFERENCE .............................................................................. 1
PARTICIPATION ............................................................................................................................ 1
INAUGURAL CEREMONY ........................................................................................................... 1
OPENING OF THE CONFERENCE .............................................................................................. 2
Election of the Chair and Vice-Chairs.......................................................................................... 2
Adoption of the Agenda and the Timetable.................................................................................. 2
Election of the Chairs of the Roundtables .................................................................................... 2
ADOPTION OF THE CONFERENCE OUTCOME DOCUMENTS ............................................. 3
GENERAL DEBATE....................................................................................................................... 3
PRESENTATION OF THE OUTCOMES OF THE PRE-CONFERENCE EVENTS.................... 3
CHAIRS' SUMMARIES OF THE ROUNDTABLES ..................................................................... 3
SIDE EVENTS ................................................................................................................................. 4
CLOSURE OF THE CONFERENCE .............................................................................................. 4
DOCUMENTATION ....................................................................................................................... 4
APPENDICES
1. Agenda
2. Timetable
3. Rome Declaration on Nutrition
4. Framework for Action
ANNEXES
I. Statements of position
II. Outcomes of the Pre-Conference Events
III. Chairs’ Summaries of the Roundtables
IV. Participating Countries and Organizations
V. List of ICN2 documents
DATE AND PLACE OF THE CONFERENCE
1.
The Second International Conference on Nutrition (ICN2), co-organized by the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization
(WHO), was held at the Headquarters of FAO in Rome, Italy, from 19 to 21 November 2014. The
Conference was convened to (i) review progress made since the 1992 International Conference on
Nutrition, respond to new challenges and opportunities, and identify policy options for improving
nutrition; (ii) bring food, agriculture, health and other sectors together and align their sectoral
policies to improve nutrition in a sustainable manner; (iii) propose adaptable policy options and
institutional frameworks that can adequately address major nutrition challenges in the foreseeable
future; (iv) encourage greater political and policy coherence, alignment, coordination and
cooperation among food, agriculture, health and other sectors; (v) mobilize the political will and
resources to improve nutrition; and (vi) identify priorities for international cooperation on
nutrition in the near and medium terms.
PARTICIPATION
2.
A total of 164 Members of FAO and WHO, including 162 Member States, one Associate
Member and the European Union, as well as three observers, were in attendance at ICN2. Besides
eminent special guests, over 2200 persons participated in the Conference, including 85 Ministers,
23 Vice-Ministers, 82 Ambassadors and 114 other high-level government officials. Accredited
observers included 27 United Nations and other intergovernmental organizations, as well as 164
civil society and private sector organizations.
3.
A list of countries and organizations participating in the Conference is given in Annex IV.
The full list of participants is available on the ICN2 website at: http://www.fao.org/3/aat764e.pdf.
INAUGURAL CEREMONY
4.
Dr José Graziano da Silva, Director-General of FAO, warmly welcomed Dr Margaret
Chan, Director-General of WHO, as well as the special guests and distinguished participants to
the Conference.
5.
Deep appreciation was expressed for the generosity of the Government of Italy in hosting
the Conference.
6.
A message from His Excellency Giorgio Napolitano, President of the Republic of Italy,
was delivered to the Conference.
7.
His Excellency Paolo Gentiloni, High-Level Representative of the Republic of Italy, His
Excellency Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations (via videomessage), Dr José
Graziano da Silva, Director-General of FAO, Dr Margaret Chan, Director-General of WHO, and
Mr Ignazio Marino, Mayor of the City of Rome, addressed the Conference.
8.
The statements delivered during the Inaugural Ceremony are available at:
http://www.fao.org/about/meetings/icn2/wednesday-19-november/en.
1
OPENING OF THE CONFERENCE
Election of the Chair and Vice-Chairs
9.
His Excellency Paolo Gentiloni, Minister of Foreign Affairs and International
Cooperation of the Republic of Italy, was elected Chair of the Conference by acclamation.
10.
The Conference then elected as Vice-Chairs:
Ms Lois Brown, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Development and
La Francophonie, Canada;
His Excellency German Rafael González Díaz, Secretary of Food and Nutrition Security,
Guatemala;
His Excellency Pinkie Manamolele, Minister of Health, Lesotho;
His Excellency Ahmed Al-Bakry, Undersecretary for Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture
and Fisheries, Sultanate of Oman;
His Excellency Le Mamea Ropati Mualia, Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Agriculture
Store, Samoa;
His Excellency Rajata Rajatavin, Minister of Public Health, Thailand.
Adoption of the Agenda and the Timetable
11.
The Conference adopted the agenda and the timetable, as given in Appendices 1 and 2.
Election of the Chairs of the Roundtables
12.
The Chair reported the six following nominees as Co-Chairs of the three Roundtables:
Roundtable 1
His Excellency Charles McClain, Deputy Minister for Agriculture of the Republic of Liberia
Ms Anne Peniston, Chief of the Nutrition Division, Bureau for Global Health of the Agency
for International Development of the United States of America
Roundtable 2
His Excellency Igor Radziewicz-Winnicki, Undersecretary of State of the Ministry of Health
of the Republic of Poland
Mr Tito Pizarro, Head of the Division of Health Public Policies and Promotion of the
Ministry of Health of the Republic of Chile
Roundtable 3
Mr Louis Lahoud, Director-General of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Lebanese Republic
His Excellency Hans Brattskar, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of
Norway.
2
13.
The Conference agreed to the proposed nominations by acclamation.
ADOPTION OF THE CONFERENCE OUTCOME DOCUMENTS
14.
The Conference adopted by acclamation the Rome Declaration on Nutrition and its
companion Framework for Action, as contained in Appendices 3 and 4. Statements of position
were made by Algeria, Canada and the United States of America. The Chair noted that these
statements would be attached to the Report of the Conference (Annex I).
GENERAL DEBATE
15.
In addition to the statements made by special guests and other eminent personalities, 134
Heads of Delegations of the FAO and WHO Members addressed the Conference at the General
Debate, as did 21 representatives of observer organizations, including United Nations and other
intergovernmental organizations, as well as civil society and private sector organizations.
16.
All the statements delivered during the General Debate are available at:
http://www.fao.org/about/meetings/icn2/wednesday-19-november/en;
http://www.fao.org/about/meetings/icn2/wednesday-20-november/en; and
http://www.fao.org/about/meetings/icn2/friday-21-november/en.
17.
At a special segment on 20 November 2014, His Holiness Pope Francis addressed the
Conference. His statement is available at:
http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/icn2/media/statements/doc/201114_PAPA.pdf.
PRESENTATION OF THE OUTCOMES
OF THE PRE-CONFERENCE EVENTS
18.
The outcome of the pre-Conference meeting of parliamentarians, held in Rome on 18
November 2014, was presented to the Conference by the Honorable Pier Ferdinando Casini,
President of the Commission for Foreign Affairs of the Senate of the Republic of Italy. His
statement is contained in Annex II.
19.
The outcome of the pre-Conference meeting of civil society organizations, held in Rome
on 17-18 November 2014, was presented to the Conference by Ms Josephine Atangana, Regional
Platform of Central African Farmers Organization; Ms Munkhbolor Gungaa, World Alliance of
Mobile Indigenous People; and Mr Flavio Valente, Secretary-General of FIAN International.
Their statements are contained in Annex II.
20.
The outcome of the pre-Conference meeting of private sector representatives, held in
Rome on 18 November 2014, was presented to the Conference by Mr David Crean, VicePresident, Corporate Research and Development, Mars Incorporated; Ms Maria Konate, CEO,
Protein Kissée Là, Cote d’Ivoire; and Mr Nico van Belzen, Director-General, International Dairy
Federation. Their statements are contained in Annex II.
CHAIRS' SUMMARIES OF THE ROUNDTABLES
21.
Three Roundtables were held during the Conference on the following themes: (1)
Nutrition in the Post-2015 Development Agenda; (2) Improving Policy Coherence for Nutrition;
3
and (3) Governance and Accountability for Nutrition. The programmes of the Roundtables are
available at: www.fao.org/about/meetings/icn2/roundtables/en.
22.
The Chairs' summaries of the Roundtables were presented to the Conference by: (i) for
Roundtable 1, Ms Anne Peniston, Chief of the Nutrition Division, Bureau for Global Health of the
Agency for International Development of the United States of America ; for Roundtable 2, His
Excellency Igor Radziewicz-Winnicki, Undersecretary of State of the Ministry of Health of the
Republic of Poland; and for Roundtable 3, His Excellency Hans Brattskar, Deputy Minister for
Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Norway.
23.
The Chairs’ summaries of the Roundtables are contained in Annex III.
SIDE EVENTS
24.
Nine side events were held during the Conference on the following topics: (i) targets and
accountability for nutrition and the Post-2015 Development Agenda; (ii) Global Nutrition Report
and Global Hunger Index; (iii) SUN Movement and accountability for nutrition; (iv) agricultural
policies and food systems for improved nutrition; (v) healthy children, growing societies: the UN
nutrition networks’ support to countries’ stunting reduction efforts; (vi) addressing overweight
and obesity; (vii) transition from safety net programs to comprehensive social protection systems:
food security and nutrition perspective; (viii) promoting and achieving the Zero Hunger
Challenge: UN at Expo Milano 2015 and South-South cooperation in Latin America and the
Caribbean; and (ix) food safety: a right or a privilege? Why food safety is an essential element of
food and nutrition security.
25.
The programmes of the side events are available at:
www.fao.org/about/meetings/icn2/side-events/en
CLOSURE OF THE CONFERENCE
26.
Following closing remarks by Dr Oleg Chestnov, Assistant Director-General of WHO,
and Mr José Graziano da Silva, Director-General of FAO, the Second International Conference on
Nutrition concluded its work and was declared closed on 21 November 2014. The closing
statements are available at: http://www.fao.org/about/meetings/icn2/friday-21-november/en.
DOCUMENTATION
27.
A list of the ICN2 documents is given in Annex V. The full texts of the ICN2 documents
are available at: http://www.fao.org/about/meetings/icn2/documents/en.
4
APPENDICES
5
APPENDIX 1 - AGENDA
1.
Inaugural Ceremony
2.
Opening of the Conference
2.1
Election of the Chair and Vice-Chairs
2.2
Adoption of the Agenda and Timetable (ICN2 2014/1 Rev.1; ICN2 2014/INF/1
Rev.1)
2.3
Election of the Chairs of the Roundtables
3.
Adoption of the Conference Outcome Documents (ICN2 2014/2; ICN2 2014/3 Corr.1)
4.
General Debate – Statements by Heads of Delegations
5.
Presentation of the Outcomes of the Pre-Conference Events
6.
Chairs' Summaries of the Roundtables
7.
Closure of the Conference
6
APPENDIX 2 - TIMETABLE
Wednesday 19 November 2014
Plenary
Morning
09.0012:30
hours
Green Room
Inaugural Ceremony
- Address by a High-Level Representative of the
Republic of Italy
- Address by the Secretary-General of the United
Nations
- Address by the Director-General of WHO
- Address by the Director-General of FAO
- Welcome message by the Mayor of Rome
Opening of the Conference
- Election of the Chair and Vice-Chairs
- Adoption of the Agenda and Timetable
- Election of the Chairs of the Roundtables
Adoption of the Conference Outcome Documents
General Debate – Statements by Heads of State and
Government and other Special Guests
Afternoon
14:3017:30
hours
15.30
hours
General Debate (Cont.)
- Statements by Heads of State and Government and
other Special Guests
- Statements by Ministers and other Heads of
Delegations
Press Conference by the Directors-General of FAO
and WHO
7
14:30-16:00
Roundtable 1 – Nutrition in
the Post-2015 Development
Agenda
16:00-17:30
Roundtable 2 – Improving
Policy Coherence for
Nutrition: (i) Coherence
between economic policies
and healthy changes in diets
Thursday 20 November 2014
Plenary
Morning
09.0012:30
hours
Red Room
General Debate (Cont.)
- Statements by Heads of State and Government
and other Special Guests
- Statements by Ministers and other Heads of
Delegations
Address by His Holiness the Pope
11:30-13:00
Roundtable 2 – Improving
Policy Coherence for Nutrition:
(iii) Nutrition in all sectors
Plenary
Green Room
Special Segment
Afternoon
14:3017:30
hours
09:30-11:00
Roundtable 2 – Improving
Policy Coherence for Nutrition:
(ii) Policy coherence for
nutrition-sensitive agriculture
General Debate (Cont.)
- Statements by Ministers and Heads of Delegations
- Statements by Heads of UN agencies and other
international and regional organizations
14:30-16:00
Roundtable 3 – Governance
and Accountability for
Nutrition:
(i) Nutrition Governance
16:00-17:30
Roundtable 3 – Governance
and Accountability for
Nutrition:
(ii) Nutrition Accountability
Friday 21 November 2014
Plenary
Morning
09.0012:30
hours
General Debate (Cont.)
- Statements by Heads of Delegations
- Statements by Heads of international and regional organizations
Presentation of the Outcomes of the Pre-Conference Events
Chairs' Summaries of the Roundtables
Closure of the Conference
8
APPENDIX 3 - ROME DECLARATION ON NUTRITION
Welcoming the participation of Heads of State and Government and other high-level guests,
1.
We, Ministers and Representatives of the Members of the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO), assembled
at the Second International Conference on Nutrition in Rome from 19 to 21 November 2014,
jointly organized by FAO and WHO, to address the multiple challenges of malnutrition in all its
forms and identify opportunities for tackling them in the next decades.
2.
Reaffirming the commitments made at the first International Conference on Nutrition in
1992, and the World Food Summits in 1996 and 2002 and the World Summit on Food Security in
2009, as well as in relevant international targets and action plans, including the WHO 2025
Global Nutrition Targets and the WHO Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of
Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020.
3.
Reaffirming the right of everyone to have access to safe, sufficient, and nutritious food,
consistent with the right to adequate food and the fundamental right of everyone to be free from
hunger consistent with the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and
other relevant United Nations instruments.
Multiple challenges of malnutrition to inclusive and sustainable development and to health
4.
Acknowledge that malnutrition, in all its forms, including undernutrition, micronutrient
deficiencies, overweight and obesity, not only affects people’s health and wellbeing by impacting
negatively on human physical and cognitive development, compromising the immune system,
increasing susceptibility to communicable and noncommunicable diseases, restricting the
attainment of human potential and reducing productivity, but also poses a high burden in the form
of negative social and economic consequences to individuals, families, communities and States.
5.
Recognize that the root causes of and factors leading to malnutrition are complex and
multidimensional:
a) poverty, underdevelopment and low socio-economic status are major contributors to
malnutrition in both rural and urban areas;
b) the lack of access at all times to sufficient food, which is adequate both in quantity and
quality which conforms with the beliefs, culture, traditions, dietary habits and preferences
of individuals in accordance with national and international laws and obligations;
c) malnutrition is often aggravated by poor infant and young child feeding and care
practices, poor sanitation and hygiene, lack of access to education, quality health systems
and safe drinking water, foodborne infections and parasitic infestations, ingestion of
harmful levels of contaminants due to unsafe food from production to consumption;
d) epidemics, such as of the Ebola virus disease, pose tremendous challenges to food
security and nutrition.
6.
Acknowledge that different forms of malnutrition co-exist within most countries; while
dietary risk affects all socio-economic groups, large inequalities exist in nutritional status,
exposure to risk and adequacy of dietary energy and nutrient intake, between and within
countries.
7.
Recognize that some socioeconomic and environmental changes can have an impact on
dietary and physical activity patterns, leading to higher susceptibility to obesity and
noncommunicable diseases through increasing sedentary lifestyles and consumption of food that
is high in fat, especially saturated and trans-fats, sugars, and salt/sodium.
8.
Recognize the need to address the impacts of climate change and other environmental
factors on food security and nutrition, in particular on the quantity, quality and diversity of food
produced, taking appropriate action to tackle negative effects.
9.
Recognize that conflict and post conflict situations, humanitarian emergencies and
protracted crises, including, inter alia, droughts, floods and desertification as well as pandemics,
hinder food security and nutrition.
10.
Acknowledge that current food systems are being increasingly challenged to provide
adequate, safe, diversified and nutrient rich food for all that contribute to healthy diets due to,
inter alia, constraints posed by resource scarcity and environmental degradation, as well as by
unsustainable production and consumption patterns, food losses and waste, and unbalanced
distribution.
11.
Acknowledge that trade is a key element in achieving food security and nutrition and that
trade policies are to be conducive to fostering food security and nutrition for all, through a fair
and market-oriented world trade system, and reaffirm the need to refrain from unilateral measures
not in accordance with international law, including the Charter of the United Nations, and which
endanger food security and nutrition, as stated in the 1996 Rome Declaration.
12.
Note with profound concern that, notwithstanding significant achievements in many
countries, recent decades have seen modest and uneven progress in reducing malnutrition and
estimated figures show that:
a) the prevalence of undernourishment has moderately declined, but absolute numbers
remain unacceptably high with an estimated 805 million people suffering chronically
from hunger in 2012-2014;
b) chronic malnutrition as measured by stunting has declined, but in 2013 still affected 161
million children under five years of age, while acute malnutrition (wasting) affected 51
million children under five years of age;
c) undernutrition was the main underlying cause of death in children under five, causing
45% of all child deaths in the world in 2013;
d) over two billion people suffer from micronutrient deficiencies, in particular vitamin A,
iodine, iron and zinc, among others;
e) overweight and obesity among both children and adults have been increasing rapidly in
all regions, with 42 million children under five years of age affected by overweight in
2013 and over 500 million adults affected by obesity in 2010;
f) dietary risk factors, together with inadequate physical activity, account for almost 10% of
the global burden of disease and disability.
10
A common vision for global action to end all forms of malnutrition
13.
We reaffirm that:
a) the elimination of malnutrition in all its forms is an imperative for health, ethical,
political, social and economic reasons, paying particular attention to the special needs of
children, women, the elderly, persons with disabilities, other vulnerable groups as well as
people in humanitarian emergencies;
b) nutrition policies should promote a diversified, balanced and healthy diet at all stages of
life. In particular, special attention should be given to the first 1,000 days, from the start
of pregnancy to two years of age, pregnant and lactating women, women of reproductive
age, and adolescent girls, by promoting and supporting adequate care and feeding
practices, including exclusive breast feeding during the first six months, and continued
breastfeeding until two years of age and beyond with appropriate complementary feeding.
Healthy diets should be fostered in preschools, schools, public institutions, at the
workplace and at home, as well as healthy eating by families;
c) coordinated action among different actors, across all relevant sectors at international,
regional, national and community levels, needs to be supported through cross-cutting and
coherent policies, programmes and initiatives, including social protection, to address the
multiple burdens of malnutrition and to promote sustainable food systems;
d) food should not be used as an instrument for political or economic pressure;
e) excessive volatility of prices of food and agricultural commodities can negatively impact
food security and nutrition, and needs to be better monitored and addressed for the
challenges it poses;
f) improvements in diet and nutrition require relevant legislative frameworks for food safety
and quality, including for the proper use of agrochemicals, by promoting participation in
the activities of the Codex Alimentarius Commission for the development of international
standards for food safety and quality, as well as for improving information for consumers,
while avoiding inappropriate marketing and publicity of foods and non-alcoholic
beverages to children, as recommended by resolution WHA63.14;
g) nutrition data and indicators, as well as the capacity of, and support to all countries,
especially developing countries, for data collection and analysis, need to be improved in
order to contribute to more effective nutrition surveillance, policy making and
accountability;
h) empowerment of consumers is necessary through improved and evidence-based health
and nutrition information and education to make informed choices regarding consumption
of food products for healthy dietary practices;
i)
national health systems should integrate nutrition while providing access for all to
integrated health services through a continuum of care approach, including health
promotion and disease prevention, treatment and rehabilitation, and contribute to reducing
inequalities through addressing specific nutrition-related needs and vulnerabilities of
different population groups;
j)
nutrition and other related policies should pay special attention to women and empower
women and girls, thereby contributing to women’s full and equal access to social
protection and resources, including, inter alia, income, land, water, finance, education,
11
training, science and technology, and health services, thus promoting food security and
health.
14.
We recognize that:
a) international cooperation and Official Development Assistance for nutrition should
support and complement national nutrition strategies, policies and programmes, and
surveillance initiatives, as appropriate;
b) the progressive realization of the right to adequate food in the context of national food
security is fostered through sustainable, equitable, accessible in all cases, and resilient and
diverse food systems;
c) collective action is instrumental to improve nutrition, requiring collaboration between
governments, the private sector, civil society and communities;
d) non-discriminatory and secure access and utilization of resources in accordance with
international law are important for food security and nutrition;
e) food and agriculture systems, including crops, livestock, forestry, fisheries and
aquaculture, need to be addressed comprehensively through coordinated public policies,
taking into account the resources, investment, environment, people, institutions and
processes with which food is produced, processed, stored, distributed, prepared and
consumed;
f) family farmers and small holders, notably women farmers, play an important role in
reducing malnutrition and should be supported by integrated and multisectoral public
policies, as appropriate, that raise their productive capacity and incomes and strengthen
their resilience;
g) wars, occupations, terrorism, civil disturbances and natural disasters, disease outbreaks
and epidemics, as well as human rights violations and inappropriate socio-economic
policies, have resulted in tens of millions of refugees, displaced persons, war affected
non-combatant civilian populations and migrants, who are among the most nutritionally
vulnerable groups. Resources for rehabilitating and caring for these groups are often
extremely inadequate and nutritional deficiencies are common. All responsible parties
should cooperate to ensure the safe and timely passage and distribution of food and
medical supplies to those in need, which conforms with the beliefs, culture, traditions,
dietary habits and preferences of individuals, in accordance with national legislation and
international law and obligations and the Charter of the United Nations;
h) responsible investment in agriculture1, including small holders and family farming and in
food systems, is essential for overcoming malnutrition;
1
i)
governments should protect consumers, especially children, from inappropriate marketing
and publicity of food;
j)
nutrition improvement requires healthy, balanced, diversified diets, including traditional
diets where appropriate, meeting nutrient requirements of all age groups, and all groups
The term agriculture includes crops, livestock, forestry and fisheries.
12
with special nutrition needs, while avoiding the excessive intake of saturated fat, sugars
and salt/sodium, and virtually eliminating trans-fat, among others;
k) food systems should provide year-round access to foods that cover people’s nutrient
needs and promote healthy dietary practices;
l)
food systems need to contribute to preventing and addressing infectious diseases,
including zoonotic diseases, and tackling antimicrobial resistance;
m) food systems, including all components of production, processing and distribution should
be sustainable, resilient and efficient in providing more diverse foods in an equitable
manner, with due attention to assessing environmental and health impacts;
n) food losses and waste throughout the food chain should be reduced in order to contribute
to food security, nutrition, and sustainable development;
o) the United Nations system, including the Committee on World Food Security, and
international and regional financial institutions should work more effectively together in
order to support national and regional efforts, as appropriate, and enhance international
cooperation and development assistance to accelerate progress in addressing malnutrition;
p) EXPO MILANO 2015, dedicated to “feeding the planet, energy for life”, among other
relevant events and fora, will provide an opportunity to stress the importance of food
security and nutrition, raise public awareness, foster debate, and give visibility to the
ICN2 outcomes.
Commitment to action
15.
We commit to:
a) eradicate hunger and prevent all forms of malnutrition worldwide, particularly
undernourishment, stunting, wasting, underweight and overweight in children under five
years of age; and anaemia in women and children among other micronutrient deficiencies;
as well as reverse the rising trends in overweight and obesity and reduce the burden of
diet-related noncommunicable diseases in all age groups;
b) increase investments for effective interventions and actions to improve people’s diets and
nutrition, including in emergency situations;
c) enhance sustainable food systems by developing coherent public policies from production
to consumption and across relevant sectors to provide year-round access to food that
meets people’s nutrition needs and promote safe and diversified healthy diets;
d) raise the profile of nutrition within relevant national strategies, policies, actions plans and
programmes, and align national resources accordingly;
e) improve nutrition by strengthening human and institutional capacities to address all forms
of malnutrition through, inter alia, relevant scientific and socio-economic research and
development, innovation and transfer of appropriate technologies on mutually agreed
terms and conditions;
13
f) strengthen and facilitate contributions and action by all stakeholders to improve nutrition
and promote collaboration within and across countries, including North-South
cooperation, as well as South-South and triangular cooperation;
g) develop policies, programmes and initiatives for ensuring healthy diets throughout the life
course, starting from the early stages of life to adulthood, including of people with special
nutritional needs, before and during pregnancy, in particular during the first 1,000 days,
promoting, protecting and supporting exclusive breastfeeding during the first six months
and continued breastfeeding until two years of age and beyond with appropriate
complementary feeding, healthy eating by families, and at school during childhood, as
well as other specialized feeding;
h) empower people and create an enabling environment for making informed choices about
food products for healthy dietary practices and appropriate infant and young child feeding
practices through improved health and nutrition information and education;
i)
implement the commitments of this Declaration through the Framework for Action which
will also contribute to ensuring accountability and monitoring progress in global nutrition
targets;
j)
give due consideration to integrating the vision and commitments of this Declaration into
the post-2015 development agenda process including a possible related global goal.
16.
We call on FAO and WHO, in collaboration with other United Nations agencies, funds
and programmes, as well as other international organizations, to support national governments,
upon request, in developing, strengthening and implementing their policies, programmes and
plans to address the multiple challenges of malnutrition.
17.
We recommend to the United Nations General Assembly to endorse the Rome
Declaration on Nutrition, as well as the Framework for Action which provides a set of voluntary
policy options and strategies for use by governments, as appropriate, and to consider declaring a
Decade of Action on Nutrition from 2016 to 2025 within existing structures and available
resources.
14
APPENDIX 4 - FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION
FROM COMMITMENTS TO ACTION
Background
1.
There has been a significant improvement in reducing hunger and malnutrition of the
world’s population since the 1992 International Conference on Nutrition (ICN). Yet, progress in
reducing hunger and undernutrition has been uneven and unacceptably slow. The fundamental
challenge today is to sustainably improve nutrition through implementation of coherent policies
and better coordinated actions across all relevant sectors.
Purpose and targets
2.
The nature of this Framework for Action is voluntary. Its purpose is to guide the
implementation of the commitments of the Rome Declaration on Nutrition adopted by the Second
International Conference on Nutrition held in Rome, Italy, on 19-21 November 2014. Building on
existing commitments, goals and targets, this Framework for Action provides a set of policy
options and strategies which governments1, acting in cooperation with other stakeholders, may
incorporate, as appropriate, into their national nutrition, health, agriculture2, development and
investment plans, and consider in negotiating international agreements to achieve better nutrition
for all.
3.
As governments have primary responsibility for taking action at country level, in dialogue
with a wide range of stakeholders, including affected communities, the recommendations are
principally addressed to government leaders. They will consider the appropriateness of the
recommended policies and actions in relation to national needs and conditions, as well as regional
and national priorities, including in legal frameworks. For the purpose of accountability, this
Framework for Action adopts existing global targets for improving maternal, infant and young
child nutrition3 and for noncommunicable disease risk factor reduction4 to be achieved by 2025.
Recommended set of policy and programme options
4.
The following set of policy and programme options are recommended to create an
enabling environment and to improve nutrition in all sectors.
Recommended actions to create an enabling environment for effective action
-
Recommendation 1: Enhance political commitment and social participation for improving
nutrition at the country level through political dialogue and advocacy.
1
The term ‘governments’ is understood to include the European Union and other regional organizations on matters of
their competency.
2
In this document, the term ‘agriculture’ comprises crops, livestock, forestry and fisheries.
3
Namely: (1) 40% reduction of the global number of children under five who are stunted; (2) 50% reduction of anaemia
in women of reproductive age; (3) 30% reduction of low birth weight; (4) no increase in childhood overweight; (5)
increase exclusive breastfeeding rates in the first six months up to at least 50%; and (6) reduce and maintain childhood
wasting to less than 5%.
4
Namely: (1) to reduce salt intake by 30%; and (2) to halt the increase in obesity prevalence in adolescents and adults.
15
-
Recommendation 2: Develop – or revise, as appropriate – and cost National Nutrition Plans,
align policies that impact nutrition across different ministries and agencies, and strengthen
legal frameworks and strategic capacities for nutrition.
-
Recommendation 3: Strengthen and establish, as appropriate, national cross-government,
inter-sector, multi-stakeholder mechanisms for food security and nutrition to oversee
implementation of policies, strategies, programmes and other investments in nutrition. Such
platforms may be needed at various levels, with robust safeguards against abuse and conflicts
of interest.
-
Recommendation 4: Increase responsible and sustainable investment in nutrition, especially at
country level with domestic finance; generate additional resources through innovative
financing tools; engage development partners to increase Official Development Assistance in
nutrition and foster private investments as appropriate.
-
Recommendation 5: Improve the availability, quality, quantity, coverage and management of
multisectoral information systems related to food and nutrition for improved policy
development and accountability.
-
Recommendation 6: Promote inter-country collaboration, such as North-South, South-South
and triangular cooperation, and information exchange on nutrition, food, technology,
research, policies and programmes.
-
Recommendation 7: Strengthen nutrition governance and coordinate policies, strategies and
programmes of United Nations system agencies, programmes and funds within their
respective mandates.
Recommended actions for sustainable food systems promoting healthy diets
-
Recommendation 8: Review national policies and investments and integrate nutrition
objectives into food and agriculture policy, programme design and implementation, to
enhance nutrition sensitive agriculture, ensure food security and enable healthy diets.
-
Recommendation 9: Strengthen local food production and processing, especially by
smallholder5 and family farmers, giving special attention to women’s empowerment, while
recognizing that efficient and effective trade is key to achieving nutrition objectives.
-
Recommendation 10: Promote the diversification of crops including underutilized traditional
crops, more production of fruits and vegetables, and appropriate production of animal-source
products as needed, applying sustainable food production and natural resource management
practices.
-
Recommendation 11: Improve storage, preservation, transport and distribution technologies
and infrastructure to reduce seasonal food insecurity, food and nutrient loss and waste.
-
Recommendation 12: Establish and strengthen institutions, policies, programmes and services
to enhance the resilience of the food supply in crisis-prone areas, including areas affected by
climate change.
5
Smallholder farmers include agriculture and food workers, artisanal fisherfolk, pastoralists, indigenous peoples and
the landless (Committee on World Food Security, Global Strategic Framework for Food Security and Nutrition, 2013).
16
-
Recommendation 13: Develop, adopt and adapt, where appropriate, international guidelines
on healthy diets.
-
Recommendation 14: Encourage gradual reduction of saturated fat, sugars and salt/sodium
and trans-fat from foods and beverages to prevent excessive intake by consumers and improve
nutrient content of foods, as needed.
-
Recommendation 15: Explore regulatory and voluntary instruments – such as marketing,
publicity and labelling policies, economic incentives or disincentives in accordance with
Codex Alimentarius and World Trade Organization rules – to promote healthy diets.
-
Recommendation 16: Establish food or nutrient-based standards to make healthy diets and
safe drinking water accessible in public facilities such as hospitals, childcare facilities,
workplaces, universities, schools, food and catering services, government offices and prisons,
and encourage the establishment of facilities for breastfeeding.
Recommended actions in international trade and investment
-
Recommendation 17: Encourage governments, United Nations agencies, programmes and
funds, the World Trade Organization and other international organizations to identify
opportunities to achieve global food and nutrition targets, through trade and investment
policies.
-
Recommendation 18: Improve the availability and access of the food supply through
appropriate trade agreements and policies and endeavour to ensure that such agreements and
policies do not have a negative impact on the right to adequate food in other countries6.
Recommended actions for nutrition education and information
-
Recommendation 19: Implement nutrition education and information interventions based on
national dietary guidelines and coherent policies related to food and diets, through improved
school curricula, nutrition education in the health, agriculture and social protection services,
community interventions and point-of-sale information, including labelling.
-
Recommendation 20: Build nutrition skills and capacity to undertake nutrition education
activities, particularly for front line workers, social workers, agricultural extension personnel,
teachers and health professionals.
-
Recommendation 21: Conduct appropriate social marketing campaigns and lifestyle change
communication programmes to promote physical activity, dietary diversification,
consumption of micronutrient-rich foods such as fruits and vegetables, including traditional
local foods and taking into consideration cultural aspects, better child and maternal nutrition,
appropriate care practices and adequate breastfeeding and complementary feeding, targeted
and adapted for different audiences and stakeholders in the food system.
Recommended actions on social protection
-
6
Recommendation 22: Incorporate nutrition objectives into social protection programmes and
into humanitarian assistance safety net programmes.
United Nations General Assembly resolution A/RES/68/177, paragraph 25.
17
-
Recommendation 23: Use cash and food transfers, including school feeding programmes and
other forms of social protection for vulnerable populations to improve diets through better
access to food which conforms with the beliefs, culture, traditions, dietary habits and
preferences of individuals in accordance with national and international laws and obligations,
and which is nutritionally adequate for healthy diets.
-
Recommendation 24: Increase income for the most vulnerable populations by creating decent
jobs for all, including through the promotion of self-employment.
Recommended actions for strong and resilient health systems
-
Recommendation 25: Strengthen health systems and promote universal health coverage 7,
particularly through primary health care, to enable national health systems to address
malnutrition in all its forms.
-
Recommendation 26: Improve the integration of nutrition actions into health systems through
appropriate strategies for strengthening human resources, leadership and governance, health
system financing and service delivery, as well as the provision of essential medicines,
information and monitoring.
-
Recommendation 27: Promote universal access to all direct nutrition actions and relevant
health actions impacting nutrition through health programmes.
-
Recommendation 28: Implement the WHO Global Strategy on Infant and Young Child
Feeding, the WHO Comprehensive Implementation Plan on Maternal, Infant and Young
Child Nutrition 2012-2025, and the WHO Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control
of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013-2020 through commensurate financing and adequate
policies.
Recommended actions to promote, protect and support breastfeeding
-
Recommendation 29: Adapt and implement the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes and subsequent relevant World Health Assembly resolutions.
-
Recommendation 30: Implement policies and practices, including labour reforms, as
appropriate, to promote protection of working mothers8.
-
Recommendation 31: Implement policies, programmes and actions to ensure that health
services promote, protect and support breastfeeding, including the Baby-Friendly Hospital
Initiative.
-
Recommendation 32: Encourage and promote – through advocacy, education and capacity
building – an enabling environment where men, particularly fathers, participate actively and
share responsibilities with mothers in caring for their infants and young children, while
7
In accordance with preambular paragraph 9 of resolution WHA67.14, universal health coverage implies that all people
have access without discrimination to nationally determined sets of the needed promotive, preventive, curative,
palliative and rehabilitative essential health services and essential, safe, affordable, effective and quality medicines,
while ensuring that the use of these services does not expose the users to financial hardship with a special emphasis on
the poor, vulnerable and marginalized segments of the population.
8
As specified in the International Labour Organization’s Maternity Protection Convention No. 183 and corresponding
Recommendation 191.
18
empowering women and enhancing their health and nutritional status throughout the life
course.
-
Recommendation 33: Ensure that policies and practices in emergency situations and
humanitarian crises promote, protect and support breastfeeding.
Recommended actions to address wasting
-
Recommendation 34: Adopt policies and actions, and mobilize funding, to improve coverage
of treatment for wasting, using the community-based management of acute malnutrition
approach and improve the integrated management of childhood illnesses.
-
Recommendation 35: Integrate disaster and emergency preparedness into relevant policies
and programmes.
Recommended actions to address stunting
-
Recommendation 36: Establish policies and strengthen interventions to improve maternal
nutrition and health, beginning with adolescent girls and continuing through pregnancy and
lactation.
-
Recommendation 37: Establish health policies, programmes and strategies to promote optimal
infant and young child feeding, particularly exclusive breastfeeding up to six months,
followed by adequate complementary feeding (from six to 24 months).
Recommended actions to address childhood overweight and obesity
-
Recommendation 38: Provide dietary counselling to women during pregnancy for healthy
weight gain and adequate nutrition.
-
Recommendation 39: Improve child nutritional status and growth, particularly by addressing
maternal exposure to the availability and marketing of complementary foods, and by
improving supplementary feeding programmes for infants and young children.
-
Recommendation 40: Regulate the marketing of food and non-alcoholic beverages to children
in accordance with WHO recommendations.
-
Recommendation 41: Create a conducive environment that promotes physical activity to
address sedentary lifestyle from the early stages of life.
Recommended actions to address anaemia in women of reproductive age
-
Recommendation 42: Improve intake of micronutrients through consumption of nutrientdense foods, especially foods rich in iron, where necessary, through fortification and
supplementation strategies, and promote healthy and diversified diets.
-
Recommendation 43: Provide daily iron and folic acid and other micronutrient
supplementation to pregnant women as part of antenatal care; and intermittent iron and folic
acid supplementation to menstruating women where the prevalence of anaemia is 20% or
higher, and deworming, where appropriate.
19
Recommended actions in the health services to improve nutrition
-
Recommendation 44: Implement policies and programmes to ensure universal access to and
use of insecticide-treated nets, and to provide preventive malaria treatment for pregnant
women in areas with moderate to high malaria transmission.
-
Recommendation 45: Provide periodic deworming for all school-age children in endemic
areas.
-
Recommendation 46: Implement policies and programmes to improve health service capacity
to prevent and treat infectious diseases9.
-
Recommendation 47: Provide zinc supplementation to reduce the duration and severity of
diarrhoea, and to prevent subsequent episodes in children.
-
Recommendation 48: Provide iron and, among others, vitamin A supplementation for preschool children to reduce the risk of anaemia.
-
Recommendation 49: Implement policies and strategies to ensure that women have
comprehensive information and access to integral health care services that ensure adequate
support for safe pregnancy and delivery.
Recommended actions on water, sanitation and hygiene
-
Recommendation 50: Implement policies and programmes using participatory approaches to
improve water management in agriculture and food production.10
-
Recommendation 51: Invest in and commit to achieve universal access to safe drinking water,
with the participation of civil society and the support of international partners, as appropriate.
-
Recommendation 52: Implement policies and strategies using participatory approaches to
ensure universal access to adequate sanitation11 and to promote safe hygiene practices,
including hand washing with soap.
Recommended actions on food safety and antimicrobial resistance
-
Recommendation 53: Develop, establish, enforce and strengthen, as appropriate, food control
systems, including reviewing and modernizing national food safety legislation and regulations
to ensure that food producers and suppliers throughout the food chain operate responsibly.
-
Recommendation 54: Actively take part in the work of the Codex Alimentarius Commission
on nutrition and food safety, and implement, as appropriate, internationally adopted standards
at the national level.
9
Including prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, immunization against measles and antibiotic treatment
for girls with urinary infections.
10
Including by reducing water wastage in irrigation, strategies for multiple use of water (including wastewater), and
better use of appropriate technology.
11
Including by implementing effective risk assessment and management practices on safe wastewater use and
sanitation.
20
-
Recommendation 55: Participate in and contribute to international networks to exchange food
safety information, including for managing emergencies12.
-
Recommendation 56: Raise awareness among relevant stakeholders on the problems posed by
antimicrobial resistance, and implement appropriate multisectoral measures to address
antimicrobial resistance, including prudent use of antimicrobials in veterinary and human
medicine.
-
Recommendation 57: Develop and implement national guidelines on prudent use of
antimicrobials in food-producing animals according to internationally recognized standards
adopted by competent international organizations to reduce non-therapeutic use of
antimicrobials and to phase out the use of antimicrobials as growth promoters in the absence
of risk analysis as described in Codex Code of Practice CAC/RCP61-2005.
Recommendations for accountability
-
Recommendation 58: National governments are encouraged to establish nutrition targets and
intermediate milestones, consistent with the timeframe for implementation (2016-2025), as
well as global nutrition and noncommunicable disease targets established by the World Health
Assembly. They are invited to include – in their national monitoring frameworks – agreed
international indicators for nutrition outcomes (to track progress in achieving national
targets), nutrition programme implementation (including coverage of interventions) and the
nutrition policy environment (including institutional arrangements, capacities and investments
in nutrition)13. Monitoring should be conducted, to the fullest possible extent, through existing
mechanisms.
-
Recommendation 59: Reports on implementation of the commitments of the Rome
Declaration on Nutrition will be compiled jointly by FAO and WHO, in close collaboration
with other United Nations agencies, funds and programmes and other relevant regional and
international organizations, as appropriate, based on country self-assessments as well as
information available through other monitoring and accountability mechanisms (e.g. Scaling
Up Nutrition self-assessment reports, reports to the FAO Conference and the World Health
Assembly, and the Global Nutrition Report).
-
Recommendation 60: The governing bodies of FAO and WHO, and other relevant
international organizations are requested to consider the inclusion of reports on the overall
follow-up to ICN2 on the agendas of the regular FAO and WHO governing body meetings,
including FAO regional conferences and WHO regional committee meetings, possibly on a
biennial basis. The Directors- General of FAO and WHO are also requested to transmit such
reports to the United Nations General Assembly as appropriate.
12
FAO/WHO International Network of Food Safety Authorities
(http://www.who.int/foodsafety/areas_work/infosan/en/).
13
Monitoring frameworks may be developed based on the Global Monitoring Framework for Maternal, Infant and
Young Child Nutrition, the Monitoring Framework for the Global Action Plan on Noncommunicable Diseases, as well
as indicators for monitoring food security (FAO prevalence of undernutrition, food insecurity experience scale, and
other widely used indicators).
21
ANNEXES
22
ANNEX I: STATEMENTS OF POSITION
23
ALGERIA
Reservation
The People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria invites the Secretariat of the Second International
Conference on Nutrition (ICN2) to enter the reservation made by Algeria concerning paragraph
14b, formerly 12d ter, of the Policy Statement of the ICN2 in the final report of this Conference.
Algeria reiterates that “paragraph 12d ter” of the policy statement should be retained, which reads
as follows: “That promoting the human right to development also implies the full realization of
the right of people to self-determination and the exercise of their inalienable right to full
sovereignty over all their natural wealth and resources”, as stated by our delegation at the openended working group meeting held in Rome from 10 to 12 October 2014 and mentioned in the
text approved by the said meeting.
We consider that the right of people who are under occupation automatically deprives them of
access to their own natural wealth and resources and to fully exercising their right to
development; this affects and impedes their progress to food security and nutrition.
It should be remembered that this is a policy statement and that the nutrition issue concerns the
whole of the international community, including vulnerable people and in particular people under
occupation.
The deletion of this paragraph (12b ter) and its replacement with the new one (14d), which reads
as follows: “that non-discriminatory and secure access and utilization of resources in accordance
with international law are important for food security and nutrition”, deprives the paragraph in
question of its force and does not meet the food and nutrition needs of such people.
24
CANADA
Explanation of Position
Rome Declaration on Nutrition and Framework for Action
Second International Conference on Nutrition (ICN2)
Canada is pleased to endorse the Rome Declaration on Nutrition and the Framework for Action of
the Second International Conference on Nutrition (ICN2), and reaffirms its commitment to
progressively achieving the full realization of the right of everyone to an adequate standard of
living for his or her family, including adequate food, and the fundamental right of everyone to be
free from hunger, as set out in Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and
Cultural Rights.
25
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Explanation of Position for the Record
The United States views the Political Declaration and the voluntary Framework for Action as
important steps in our collective efforts to advance global food security.
States are responsible for implementing their international obligations, including human rights
obligations. This is true of all obligations a state has assumed, regardless of external factors. The
United States does not concur with any reading of the Declaration or Framework that suggests
states have particular extraterritorial obligations arising from a right to food; and in adopting these
documents today in no way changes appropriate interpretation of any other international
instrument or undermines or modifies commitments of the United States, or any other
government, to trade and investment agreements or the mandates of ongoing trade negotiations.
The United States supports the right of everyone to an adequate standard of living, including food,
as recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. In joining consensus on the Political
Declaration and Framework for Action, the United States does not recognize any change in the
current state of conventional or customary international law or obligations, including regarding
rights related to food, or to the interpretation of trade or investment obligations, including those
related to intellectual property, public health, and sanitary or phytosanitary measures. The United
States also reiterates its view that individuals, and not governments, should make determinations
about what foods comport with each individual’s culture and traditions, and the United States
does not view anything in the Political Declaration or Framework for Action as suggesting
otherwise. The United States does not accept that anything in either the Political Declaration or
Framework for Action can or should be taken to offer any guidance on the interpretation of any
international instrument.
The United States is not a party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural
Rights. Accordingly, we interpret this resolution’s references to the right to food, with respect to
States Parties to that Covenant, in light of its Article 2(1). We also construe these documents’
references to member states’ obligations regarding the right to food as applicable to the extent
they have assumed such domestic obligations. Domestically, the United States pursues policies
that promote access to food, and it is our objective to achieve a world where everyone has
adequate access to food, but we do not treat the right to food as an enforceable obligation.
26
ANNEX II: OUTCOMES OF THE PRE-CONFERENCE EVENTS
27
OUTCOME OF THE MEETING OF PARLIAMENTARIANS
We, Members of Parliament from across the world, assembled on 18 November 2014 in Rome on
the occasion of the Second FAO/WHO International Conference on Nutrition (Rome, 19-21
November 2014), issue the following statement as a contribution to the final outcome of the
Conference.
We express our deep concern that, despite progress made in reducing hunger and
undernourishment across the planet, about 805 million people are still chronically hungry, over
161 million children are stunted, 99 million underweight and 51 million wasted (low weight-forheight), while two billion people suffer various micronutrient deficiencies and more than 500
million adults are obese; and we underscore that the elimination of malnutrition in all its forms is
an imperative which spares no country and must be achieved within our life time.
We are aware of the opportunity that the ICN2 presents to Parliaments as institutions which can
address malnutrition in line with their constitutional mandates.
We note the commitments made through the Rome Declaration on Nutrition and the Framework
for Action, particularly those that pertain to the role of Parliaments in addressing malnutrition and
thereby contributing to our shared vision of a sustainable world with food security and adequate
nutrition for all.
We recognize the support given by FAO, and its Director-General José Graziano da Silva, to
enhancing parliamentary contribution and role in the progress for better nutrition.
We reaffirm the right of everyone to have access to safe, sufficient, and nutritious food, consistent
with the Right to Adequate Food and the fundamental right of everyone to be free from hunger,
and acknowledge the need for its further recognition through specific constitutional and
legislative provisions.
Following the adoption of the Rome Declaration on Nutrition and the Framework for Action, we
see an urgent need for Parliaments to advocate for more effective responses to address
malnutrition, while ensuring that public policies are safeguarded from real or perceived conflict of
interests.
We underscore the importance of parliamentary dialogue in countries, regions and globally, in
order to share good practice and experiences in ensuring food security and adequate nutrition. At
the same time, we encourage colleagues around the world to continue to work to strengthen their
own parliamentary institutions through proactive measures to endow the parliament with greater
accountability and oversight powers.
We therefore call on Parliaments to:
1. Adopt national nutrition targets to be attained by 2025, as well as a set of national
indicators, taking into consideration the six global nutrition targets included in the WHO
Comprehensive Implementation Plan on Maternal, Infant and Young Child Nutrition and
the core set and extended set of outcome and progress indicators, as well as targets set in
the Post-2015 Development agenda.
2. Adopt national nutrition policies and plans to attain national nutrition targets in 2025,
taking into account the vision and commitments included in the Rome Declaration on
Nutrition, the policy options included in Framework for Action.
3. Develop legislation and oversee regulations to create health-promoting environments and
encourage healthy choices for all by protecting, educating and empowering consumers.
28
This includes measures such as the establishment of labelling standards (including
information on sugars, salts, fats and trans-fat content) which respect people’s right to
know; marketing regulations in particular for children; and consumer education through
national campaigns and schools. Legislation and regulation for different settings may be
considered for action, for example, in schools, workplaces, households, cities and local
communities.
4. Adopt policies and legislation that supports the production and processing of good quality
foods that are safe and conducive to a healthy diet, including measures to diversify food
production (in particular fruits and vegetables), to establish and implement food quality
standards, and to formulate/reformulate food products that provide healthier options.
Ensure that legislation adopted by Parliaments to improve nutrition pays particular
attention to the important role of family farmers and small holders, notably women
farmers, in reducing malnutrition.
5. Adopt policies and legislation to promote exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months
and protect women’s right to breastfeed.
6. Support policies, programmes and legislation to improve access to healthy diets through
poverty reduction, employment creation and social protection, including school meal
programmes.
7. Develop legislation and support policies to empower women and support them in their
role as producers, income earners, and caretakers, such as the adherence to the ILO
Maternity Protection Convention and increasing access to quality health care (including
ante and post-natal care).
8. Approve increased and prioritized budgetary allocations for addressing malnutrition and
food insecurity and explore the provision of adequate, predictable and sustained
resources, including capacity development programs for policy makers, government
institutions and general public.
9. Oversee different sectors to ensure public policy coherence (trade, economic
development, agriculture, health and education) and that addressing malnutrition receives
a cross-sectoral and holistic response.
10. Promote collaborative arrangements within the Parliament and across Parliaments for
better nutrition, working across party lines, sharing experiences and good practices based
on national and international review, promoting South-South and triangular cooperation,.
11. Request that the IPU include into its 132nd Assembly, in March 2015, an item on the
results of the meeting and the ICN2 follow-up.
29
OUTCOME OF THE MEETING OF CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS
From November 16-18, we, social movements representing peasants, small-scale fishers and
fishing communities, pastoralists, urban poor, consumers, women, youth, Indigenous Peoples and
agricultural and food workers, came together with the representatives of public interest civil
society organizations that have actively engaged in the preparatory process of the Second
International Conference on Nutrition (ICN2), to share our values, and aspirations, to join forces
in our common vision on how to eradicate malnutrition in all its forms, and to hold governments
and intergovernmental organizations to account on their obligations and commitments.
It is unacceptable that in a world of plenty more than 800 million of our brothers and sisters go to
bed hungry every night and over half a billion are obese. More than 150 million children suffer
from stunting, over 50 million children are wasted, more than 40 million children are obese, and
approximately 800,000 babies die every year because they are not optimally breastfed. The
injustice of malnutrition has meant that several thousand of our children have died since this
discussion started. These problems should have been tackled a long time ago.
22 years after ICN1, this conference is taking place without properly evaluating progress or
failures and without significant participation of civil society, in particular those most affected by
hunger and malnutrition in all its forms. We deplore that ICN1 has sunk without trace and we do
not want this to happen for ICN2.
The conclusion of the ICN2 negotiations is a welcome step, in particular its focus on malnutrition
in all its form. However, we consider it inadequate to confront the scale of the global malnutrition
challenge.
We reaffirm that food is the expression of values, cultures, social relations and people’s selfdetermination, and that the act of feeding oneself and others embodies our sovereignty, ownership
and empowerment. When nourishing ourselves and eating with our family, friends, and
community, we reaffirm our cultural identities, interdependence with nature, control of our life
course and human dignity. Understanding the challenge of malnutrition in all its forms therefore
requires a holistic and multidisciplinary analysis, one that combines the political and technical
perspectives.
We recognize that the current hegemonic food system and agro-industrial production model are
not only unable to respond to the existing malnutrition problems but have contributed to the
creation of different forms of malnutrition and the decrease of the diversity and quality of our
diets. Trade agreements, support of agribusiness models and promotion of monoculture and
GMO, corporate grabbing of land, oceans, lakes, rivers and aquatic resources, and lack of
investment in small-scale food production, have led to displacement and impoverishment of
small-scale producers all over the world. The lack of respect to the mobility of many producers,
their forced sedentarization, the lack of respect to communal tenure of their natural resources, and
the privatization or destruction of governance structures, have all caused malnutrition and
environmental damage with irreversible consequences on productive systems.
This has also led to profoundly negative environmental impacts such as soil erosion and
contamination, ocean acidification, loss of fertility, reduction of biodiversity, and climate change.
Marketing of ultra-processed products have contributed to the surge of obesity while unethical
practices by breast milk-substitute producers continue to undermine the life-saving practice of
breastfeeding. The persistence of gender inequalities and the continued violations of women’s
rights are among the root causes of women and child malnutrition. No proper nourishment is
possible if the hearts and minds of people are violated.
30
Taking this into account, we reaffirm that nutrition can only be addressed in the context of vibrant
and flourishing local food systems that are deeply ecologically rooted, environmentally sound and
culturally and socially appropriate. We are convinced that food sovereignty is a fundamental precondition to ensure food security and guarantee the human right to adequate food and nutrition. In
this context, it is necessary to reaffirm the centrality of small-scale and family food producers as
the key actors and drivers of local food systems and the main investors in agriculture. Their secure
access to, and control over, resources such as land, water and aquatic resources, adequate mobility
routes, local seeds, breeds and all other genetic resources, technical and financial resources, as
well as social protection, particularly for women, are all essential factors to ensure diversified
diets and adequate nutrition.
It therefore becomes imperative to tackle the political, social, cultural and economic determinants
of malnutrition in all its forms, including undernourishment, stunting, wasting, micronutrient
deficiencies, overweight and obesity, and diet-related non-communicable diseases. However, the
framing of any policy, programme and action plan on food and nutrition should be the
unambiguous understanding of the rights to adequate food and nutrition, health and safe water, as
fundamental human rights, which identify people as rights-holders and states as duty-bearers with
an obligation to respect, protect and fulfil these and other related rights.
Accountability and Follow-up
ICN2 is another step in addressing a long overdue problem. There is an urgent need to strengthen
governmental commitment and raise the level of ambition. This must be achieved through an
effective follow-up process, with the active participation of social movements and civil society
organizations, with a clear timeline to reach the objectives as well as specific indicators and
benchmarks for monitoring progress.
Strong accountability is imperative for ensuring that the commitments made at ICN2 truly
contribute to ending malnutrition in all its forms. We appreciate the efforts by FAO and WHO to
coordinate their work plans in the light of the ICN2 outcomes and welcome the UN General
Assembly (UNGA) endorsement and oversight. However, we remain concerned that the
governance and accountability mechanisms for the implementation of the ICN2 outcomes appear
unclear, fragmented, disconnected and duplicative. In this context, we call upon Member States to
commit to developing a coherent, accountable and participatory governance mechanism,
safeguarded against undue corporate influence. Such mechanism should be based on principles of
human rights, social justice, transparency, and democracy, and directly engage civil society, in
particular the populations and communities which are most affected by different forms of
malnutrition.
We recommend the following platforms as appropriate for follow-up:
Firstly, we recognize the UN Committee on World Food Security (CFS) - reaffirming its role as
the foremost inclusive government-led global platform among all concerned actors - as the critical
space where policy coherence for food security and nutrition needs to be established. In this
context, it is important to build consistency between the ICN2 follow-up process and the CFS
Global Strategic Framework. As the CFS, despite its mandate, has thus far primarily focused on
food security, we urge CFS Member States to fully integrate nutrition in its workplan and ensure
that the World Health Organization (WHO) is officially included in the Secretariat and Advisory
Group.
Secondly, Member States should ensure that the post-2015 development framework is consistent
with the imperatives of food and nutrition security and includes ambitious goals and targets, with
robust indicators and accountability to those ends across all relevant Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs).
31
Thirdly, Member States must also establish nutrition targets and intermediate milestones,
consistent with the timeframe for the implementation of the agreed six World Health Assembly
(WHA) global nutrition targets (2025) and the relevant targets in the WHO Global Monitoring
Framework for NCDs. As such, reporting and monitoring of progress towards these targets should
take place in the context of the WHA along with reporting on nutrition policy commitments.
Lastly, Member States should request that the Human Rights Council ensure that the ICN2
follow-up and related policies are coherent with the respect, protection and fulfilment of the right
to adequate food and nutrition and related rights.
Human Rights and rights-based approach to food and nutrition security
We call upon Member States to ensure that national and international public policies respect,
protect and fulfil human rights obligations, and act in accordance with the realization of the right
to adequate food and nutrition and related rights.
Women are the primary agents of change in combating malnutrition in all its forms. ICN2 has
thus far failed to take this evidence into due account. The full realization of women’s human
rights is central to the pursuit of the right to adequate food and nutrition for all. As such, we call
upon Member States to institute policies that empower women, including paid maternity leave,
support for breastfeeding in the workplace, and universal social protection. We also call upon
Member States to ensure the social recognition of unpaid work – through social and community
support mechanisms – and to promote the gendered redistribution of household tasks. We further
urge Member States to ensure that all forms of violence against women are eradicated.
Women’s sexual and reproductive rights and health also have a direct impact on combatting
malnutrition and must therefore be guaranteed, including committing to efforts to end child
marriage and prevent unwanted adolescent pregnancies.
Breastfeeding is the first act of food sovereignty in all its dimensions. The support of
breastfeeding and optimal young child feeding must be an integral part of health care systems and
health policies, and free from commercial influence. We call upon Member States to ensure that
the Global Strategy on Infant and Young Child Feeding guides policy and programme action. We
also call upon Member States to protect children from aggressive and inappropriate marketing of
breast-milk substitutes by adopting the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk
Substitutes and relevant WHO resolutions, and establishing effective monitoring and enforcement
mechanisms. Micronutrient interventions and supplementation should not undermine
breastfeeding and local bio-diverse culturally appropriate sustainable foods, and be in-line with
government nutrition policies.
Small-scale farmers, pastoralists, small-scale fishers and fishing communities, agricultural and
food workers, Indigenous Peoples, landless people, rural women and youth, are the main
producers of food around the world and their contribution to guarantee healthy diets is essential.
Nonetheless, they suffer daily violations of their human rights. For this reason, we urge Member
States to respect peasants’ rights and the environment where they live, and welcome and support
the creation of an Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group at the UN Human Rights
Council on the rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas.
Indigenous food systems sustain and nurture our cultures and traditional economies. However,
systemic violations of Indigenous Peoples’ rights to lands, territories, oceans, seas, inland
waterways, lakes, and other resources, has disproportionate and negative impacts on livelihoods,
including access to traditional foods. We emphasize the need for a human-rights based approach
to nutrition and food as understood through the lens of existing human rights standards, including
the 2007 United Nations Declaration on Indigenous People’s Rights as a minimum standard.
32
We call upon Member States to cooperate in supporting productive systems in areas of marginal
productivity, protecting resilience mechanisms such as seasonal mobility corridors, as well as
communal and seasonally used lands, and withdrawing the barriers to mobility, thereby reducing
the need of local communities for humanitarian assistance.
We also request that Member States pay special attention to agricultural and plantation workers.
There are over 200 million hungry and malnourished workers without sufficient income to buy
enough nutritious food for themselves and their families. The solution is not to provide food
supplements: employers should be responsible for paying workers a living wage.
Sovereign local food and agricultural systems based on agroecological principles
Nutrition must be rooted in local food systems based on food sovereignty, small-scale food
producers, agroecological principles, sustainable use of natural resources, local seeds and
livestock breeds, traditional knowledge and practice, and local markets, guaranteeing sustainable
and resilient biodiversity and diversity of diets.
We denounce the negative economic, social, environmental and cultural impacts caused by the
global grabbing of land, oceans, lakes, rivers, and aquatic resources, and their grave impact on
food sovereignty.
We call upon Member States to recognize that small-scale food producer-led sustainable, resilient
local food systems can best respond to the threat of climate change, and commit to concerted
actions that strengthens local food systems, including promoting local and regional markets and
ensuring healthy ecosystems. This will most certainly drive significant improvements in nutrition,
and contribute significantly to the prevention of malnutrition of all its forms.
We also call on Member States to ensure that Regional Governments and Local Authorities
establish appropriate and multi-actor local food policy governance bodies that include the
consumers and small-scale local food producers. Furthermore, we call for reforms of current local
food procurement practice for school canteens, homes for the elderly and hospitals, and other
public institutions as well as social groceries to include clauses that privilege the provision of
fresh local produce by small-scale local producers.
Coherent and coordinated management of nutrition throughout the lifecycle and at all levels
We support an integrated approach to malnutrition that builds community capacity, promotes
optimal infant and young child feeding, especially breastfeeding, improves dietary intake for
women and children during the first 1,000 days, and improves nutritious diets, along with
supplementation as per the World Health Organization’s recommendation in areas where
micronutrient deficiencies are known to be a public health problem.
The policy and program commitments that must follow ICN2 should address the root causes of
malnutrition in all its forms among all age groups, including infants, young children, adolescents,
adults, the elderly, disabled, and marginalized, working poor and other vulnerable groups. This
includes accelerated progress on all six of the WHA global nutrition targets--stunting, anaemia,
low birth weight, overweight, exclusive breastfeeding and wasting--and Global WHO NCD
targets.
In order to do this, we call upon Member States to recognize that the nutrition of young children,
adolescent girls and women - particularly in the 1,000 day window between pregnancy and age
two - is of paramount importance as it helps set the foundation of human development.
We call upon Member States to fully embrace the “do no harm” principle as the baseline of any
policy, including agriculture, fisheries, forestry and food, and ensure that these policies at a
33
minimum do not harm people’s nutrition and rather aim at improving people’s nutrition status.
Furthermore, situations of crisis and protracted crises often produce international and regional aid
programs that do not meet the real nutritional needs of affected communities and are carried out
without consulting local communities.
The large majority of deaths in children under-five due to malnutrition do not happen in acute
emergencies but in relatively stable countries. It is imperative that the ICN2 follow-up addresses
the profound social, economic and political determinants of malnutrition, and in particular, the
high levels of acute malnutrition. In this context, we urge governments to support appropriate
treatment approaches, such as the Community Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM), and
preventive measures that empower communities and strengthen health and food systems, as well
as resilient livelihoods and production systems. We also call upon Member States to commit to
integrate actions designed to improve nutrition across all sectors and programmes, including those
focused on water and sanitation, education, women’s empowerment, and agriculture. We also
urge Member States to recognise, validate, respect and protect traditional knowledge that
guarantees nutrition.
We further urge Member States to address the underlying causes of malnutrition at the community
level related to food, care and health so that existing product-based approaches are limited to
certain circumstances, including the treatment of acute malnutrition, and do not interfere with
human rights- and food-based, local, bottom-up, capacity-building approaches for the prevention
of all forms of malnutrition.
Consumers have a right to healthy, affordable, accessible and culturally adequate food options,
and to be protected (particularly children) from aggressive marketing of unhealthy food and
beverage that promote malnutrition, obesity and diet-related NCDs. We call upon Member States
to develop and implement policies that encourage the consumption of naturally nutritious diets,
promote physical activity in healthy environmental conditions, and discourage the overconsumption of salt, sugar and saturated fats. Ultra-processed food and beverage products,
especially when they are affordably priced, need to be regulated through economic and legislative
measures.
Consumers have the right to know, in easy to understand terms, the nutritional content of food and
beverages as well as have full information on the presence of potentially harmful substances as
well as ingredients from GMO crops at any level of the production chain.
34
Democratic governance of food and nutrition and global regulatory framework
We are deeply concerned that, under current trade and investment regimes (both bi- and
multilateral), the governmental policy space for advancing public health, food and nutrition
related measures is severely limited.
We therefore urge Member States to protect the public policy space for food, nutrition and health
by ensuring that trade and investment agreements are compliant with existing international
obligations in relation to the right to adequate food and nutrition, the right to health and other
human rights. Furthermore, we call on Member States to guarantee effective public participation
and ensure that the views of the most affected are taken into full consideration in relation to trade
and investment negotiations.
The realization of the right to food and nutrition, and the right to health, are hampered by
economic, social and political inequalities as well as by existing power imbalances. There is an
urgent need to ensure proper regulation and accountability of powerful economic actors, such as
transnational corporations. In this respect, we call upon Member States to regulate those practices
and initiatives of the corporate sector, both intra and extraterritorial, that might negatively
interfere with the enjoyment of the human right to adequate food and nutrition, women´s rights
and the right to health. Among others, these activities may include land and water grabbing; soil,
food, water and human contamination with agrochemicals; the commodification of seeds and
livestock breeds; the marketing of breast milk substitutes; and the production and marketing of
ultra-processed and junk food in particular though not exclusively to children. We therefore
welcome the establishment of an Open-Ended Intergovernmental Working Group on a legally
binding instrument on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to
human rights and stand ready to support governments’ action in this area.
The policy space of Governments must be protected, in all phases and at all levels, against
conflicts of interest introduced by inappropriate relationships with powerful economic actors,
including transnational corporations. In this respect, Member States and UN agencies are urged to
design and implement effective rules and regulations on conflict of interest, and review and
potentially terminate or re-design in conformity with these rules and regulations, all PublicPrivate Partnerships (PPP) and multi-stakeholder arrangements.
Conclusion
22 years – an entire generation – have passed since the first ICN. It is unacceptable that millions
of people continue suffer from and die of preventable causes of malnutrition in all its forms. This
violence must stop immediately.
We call upon Member States to make clear and firm commitments at both national and
international levels to ensure the full realization of the human right to adequate food and nutrition
and related rights. We will not watch idly as another 22 years pass by.
We stand ready to play our part and take up our responsibilities. We demand that Member States
and the UN system live up to their obligations.
We hereby declare a worldwide People’s Decade of Action on Nutrition.
The time for action is now!
35
OUTCOME OF THE MEETING OF PRIVATE SECTOR REPRESENTATIVES
Introduction
The private sector was pleased to be invited to participate in the ICN2 from 19-21 November
2014. More than 90 representatives from companies and other private sector entities attended
ICN2 as ‘observers’. The following networks were identified to coordinate a Private Sector
Steering Committee (PSSC) to develop mechanisms to call for open and transparent participation
of private sector representatives of all sizes and from all regions:
1. The Private Sector Mechanism (PSM) of the UN Committee on World Food Security (CFS)
2. The Sun Business Network (SBN)
3. The International Dairy Federation (IDF) on behalf of the livestock sector.
While the delegation represented a broad cross section of interests, it was united in the belief that
nutritional interventions must be prioritised, particularly those geared towards addressing the
needs of women, children, and the most vulnerable. This requires progressive programming –
geared towards challenges like stunting – and a willingness to work together. Innovation,
research, education and trade are essential to improving access to quality foods. All of which is
underpinned by the essential role of agriculturalists in producing the food we eat.
The Governing Bodies of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Health
Organization (WHO) requested both agencies to ensure consultations with all relevant
stakeholders ahead of the ICN2. In the case of the private sector, the event took place on
November 18, 2014. The report from the event is below.
1. Specific priorities for the Private Sector Mechanism (PSM)
The activities and the influences of the private sector can be seen across the entire food supply
chain—from farm to fork. Food industry representatives are uniquely placed to identify and help
address the full complexity of food issues. Our initiatives can help drive sustained, positive
change to the lives of the people and the communities we impact across the world.
We urge the ICN2 to support businesses, partnerships and new initiatives to drive even greater
positive changes that can help hundreds of millions of people.
Specifically, we urge the ICN2 to ask food businesses and other stakeholders to:
1. Increase sustainable agriculture production by all farmers, especially small holder farmers,
entrepreneurs, and small and medium enterprises;
2. Provide access to safe, nutritious, affordable and diverse diets that promote healthy outcomes;
3. Support purpose-driven nutrition interventions for vulnerable populations, especially
adolescent girls, pregnant and breast feeding women, and children in their first 1000 days;
4. Encourage activities that support nutrition, education, and other initiatives that both empower
women and develop communities.
A focus on food safety is one of the most significant and pervasive problems in sustainable
development efforts. It is a preclusive barrier to the hypothesis that hunger and malnutrition can
be eliminated by 2030.
There is overwhelming evidence linking food safety issues to economic and human development.
The scale and pervasiveness of food safety problems are truly daunting:
36

Even in the developed world food safety is a significant challenge. In the USA 1 in 6 of the
population had food-related illnesses in 2011 causing 50 million illnesses, 3000 deaths and
costing $80 billion. In Africa 2000 people each day die from food safety related illnesses;

25% of staple food crops are contaminated by fungal toxins, including Aflatoxin. Exposure to
high levels of Aflatoxin in the short term can cause death; longer term it can cause liver
cancers, and it is strongly associated with stunting;

Economically it costs Africa between 450 and 670 million USD annually in lost exports to the
EU alone simply by failing to meet export standards;

4.5 billion people are exposed to Aflatoxin-contaminated foods annually.
The causes of these failures are complex but industry experience and learning can be applied to
mitigate and help manage many of these issues. Often businesses have the tools, capabilities and
the expertise to impact food safety and therefore food security solutions. Not only is the private
sector well placed to help raise the standard on food safety globally, but there is also a
responsibility to collaborate with regulators, researchers, and NGOs to make it happen. By using
these collaborations we can ensure that food safety is recognized as a basic human right.
Food security exists when: “all people at all times have access to sufficient, safe, nutritious food”.
It is clear that food security cannot be achieved without food safety.
PRIVATE SECTOR ASK
It is clear that ensuring safe food is one of the biggest public health challenges of our time that
requires collaboration between companies, countries and agencies.
We ask the ICN2 to shout loud and clear for leadership, commitments and collaborations:
1. Leadership by the UN agencies and organizations to convene, facilitate and stimulate
appropriate initiatives and provide needed resources;
2. Commitments by national governments to create a positive enabling environment, eliminate
the negative barriers to action, and provide needed resources; and
3. Collaborations and partnerships across the private sector, research organizations, foundations
and other stakeholders to utilize their capabilities, technical expertise, and provide needed
resources for implementation.
We welcome the continued leadership of ICN2 members and all future collaborative efforts in
support of our mutual goal of the elimination of global poverty, hunger and malnutrition.
2. Specific priorities of the SUN Business Network (SBN)
Women are critical to nutrition – and women are critical to the private sector’s contribution to
nutrition. Food markets and businesses of all kinds have long played a critical role in driving
nutrition outcomes. Yet – in the face of unacceptably high levels of chronic undernutrition – the
challenge is to improve the capacity of business- and market-driven approaches to provide key
foods to the groups most affected by undernutrition.
Women face significant financial and technical barriers, and so do many small and medium
businesses too. More platforms for engagement with governments, civil society and development
agencies, particularly with respect to national laws and regulations, can ensure we align with
national priorities.
37
We need donors to identify sources of financing and co-investment to support our development
and minimize risk for nutritious products targeted to the poor. And we need civil society
organizations to expand our reach through their ties within the community.
Small and medium enterprises also need the support of bigger, multinational companies, we need
technology transfer, access to data and support within their value chains. Beyond the food sector,
there is a role for more businesses. We need mobile phone companies to promote breastfeeding
messages and help us retrieve the data we need from communities. We need water, sanitation and
hygiene companies to recognize the impact they have on nutrition.
We need every company in the world to realize that as an employer they need to provide the best
nutrition possible to their employees and to the communities in which they work. But we need
the support of everyone in the room to talk to business about the role they can play. Reach out and
talk to us, tell business what it is doing well, and where we can do more. If you do not talk to us,
how can we help?
The SUN Movement offers us a way to look at bringing this partnership approach into reality.
The SUN Business Network supports businesses, including those like mine, to work in
partnerships with all actors in SUN countries.
Together, we can do more, we can go further, and faster.
In partnership, we can deliver on the Rome Declaration and this Framework for Action, and let us
recognize this here at ICN2.
3. Specific priorities for the livestock sector
Food and nutrition security are essential for society, including business, to function effectively.
Therefore we are committed to support efforts to eradicate hunger and prevent all forms of
malnutrition.
Livestock products are important for food and nutrition security, because livestock can convert
materials that are inedible to humans, such as grass and leaves as well as residues of food and
biomaterials, into high-quality, nutrient-rich foods.
We would like to propose five opportunities for public-private partnerships.
3.1 The first opportunity is in enabling environments.
The private sector can contribute to improving information systems by providing information on
for instance nutrient composition, food production and consumption.
3.2 The second opportunity is in sustainable food systems.
We recognize the need to improve sustainability of food production, as demonstrated by our
involvement in the Global Agenda for Sustainable Livestock. We welcome the recommendation
of the Framework for Action to improve food production and processing, as well as its
acknowledgement of the need for trade.
Investments in research, development and innovation should bring benefits to all stakeholders,
including smallholders and family farmers.
38
3.3 The third opportunity is addressing wasting and stunting, as well as anaemia in
women of reproductive age.
There is good evidence that dietary diversification strategies using animal source foods are
effective for combating micronutrient deficiencies and improving growth, cognition and
behaviour, particularly in the first 1000 days (Thompson et al 2011, Newmann et al 2007;
Grillenberger et al. 2003, Du Plesis et al. 2013).
3.4 The fourth opportunity is improving access to healthy, diversified diets.
Low intakes of animal source foods are associated with iron, zinc, calcium, riboflavin, vitamin A
and B12 deficiencies and their related illnesses, particularly in infants, children, pregnant and
lactating women (Hambidge et al. 2011, Krebs et al. 2011). Some of these nutrients are only
found in animal source foods and their bioavailability is higher than from other sources (FAO
2013).
The private sector can help address barriers to consumption such as food preparation skills. We
also recognise our responsibility to help consumers choose a healthy, diversified diet. Many
companies are involved in reformulating their products to reduce excessive amounts of fat,
especially industrial trans fats, sugars and sodium.
3.5 The fifth opportunity is nutrition education.
The private sector supports nutrition education through point-of-sale information, marketing
campaigns, school feeding programs, work place promotions and responsible marketing to
children. Aligning resources and funding through public-private partnerships will improve the
impact and consistency of nutrition messages.
3.6 Conclusion: Livestock sector
Nutrient-rich livestock products are important for preventing all forms of malnutrition. The
livestock sector is committed to constructively contributing to the Framework for Action through
public-private partnerships.
39
ANNEX III: CHAIRS’ SUMMARIES OF THE ROUNDTABLES
40
CHAIRS' SUMMARY OF ROUNDTABLE 1
Nutrition in the Post-2015 Development Agenda
The Roundtable “Nutrition in the Post-2015 Development Agenda” underlined the importance of
nutrition in the sustainable development goals and discussed practical ways of ensuring that
nutrition is adequately reflected across the development agenda. Speakers noted the importance
of a comprehensive approach to address malnutrition in all its forms: under-nutrition, overnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies; and to understand its root causes, immediate and longterm consequences. Non-communicable diseases, including those related to nutrition, result in
USD 7 trillion losses annually. The cost of prevention is much lower than the cost to treat
malnutrition and its consequences, and investments in nutrition yield high economic returns for
countries, and benefit individuals across generations.
The session informed participants of current proposals for anchoring nutrition in the Post-2015
Development Agenda. It is currently included in Goal 2, by the Open Working Group, called:
“End hunger, achieve food security and improve nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture”.
The panellists described improving nutrition as “unfinished business” that needs to be at the core
of the Post-2015 Development Agenda.
The Roundtable put into sharp focus the linkages between nutrition, food and agriculture systems
and climate change, and between nutrition and non-communicable diseases. It highlighted, in
particular, the contributions of good nutrition to longer-term economic development. To promote
real integration across these sectors we need clearer definitions and measureable indicators. The
discussion cautioned, however, not to isolate nutrition to its technical components, as sound
strategies need to be linked to basic human rights and considered within the political dimensions
of malnutrition.
The Roundtable called upon the UN agencies and others to revisit proposed sustainable
development goals and indicators, consider more ambitious targets than previously, and develop
more robust systems to measure progress toward achieving nutrition goals at local, national and
global levels. Data should include surveillance for micro-nutrient deficiencies, and geographic
mapping of malnutrition in order to better target nutrition investments. We should focus on what
is achievable, and we should develop strict criteria for prioritizing actions.
Weak systems – health, agriculture, or markets – betray the ability of individuals to obtain the
health care and nutritious food they need to grow and flourish. In such systems, political or health
emergencies, such as Ebola, are devastating; and where the systems are weak they must be
strengthened.
The Roundtable concluded with five key messages:
1. The nutrition community needs to clearly define what is meant by “adequate nutrition” across
societies, age groups, genders and health conditions so that nutrient needs and forecasting for
food security can be appropriately determined.
2. We must continue focusing on the “1,000 days”, promote breastfeeding, and also include
adolescent girls. We must promote good nutrition and physical activity, with immediate-term
good health, and long-term protection against obesity and non-communicable diseases.
3. There is need for consensus to prioritize key indicators for measuring progress in nutrition,
with clear definitions and robust monitoring systems that effectively inform policies and
programs.
41
4. ICN-2 gives all of us an opportunity to contribute substantially to the Post-2015 Development
Agenda for nutrition, and to ensure that malnutrition in all its forms is comprehensively
addressed in all the sustainable development goals.
5. This is a unique time for nutrition with unprecedented global attention, and landmark levels of
commitment with new data showing what works and what doesn’t. Setting nutrition firmly
within the Post-2015 Development Agenda is our opportunity to turn what was once
considered an intractable problem into a global success story.
42
CHAIRS' SUMMARY OF ROUNDTABLE 2
Improving Policy Coherence for Nutrition
First of all, let me thank the moderators, main speakers and panellists, as well as all distinguished
delegates for participating in the discussions within the Roundtable 2 called “Improving Policy
Coherence for Nutrition”. I particularly thank Mr Tito Pizarro, Head of the Division of Health
Public Policies and Promotion of the Ministry of Health of Chile, for his invaluable help in
chairing this Roundtable.
Let me summarize the objectives of the three panels:
Panel 1 on Coherence between economic policies and healthy changes in diets was to assess the
challenges and opportunities of creating greater coherence between and among public policies in
order to improve nutrition and achieve healthy diets.
The objective of the next panel on Policy coherence for nutrition-sensitive agriculture was to
provide concrete examples on how agricultural projects, programmes and policies can be designed
to be more sensitive to nutritional needs.
Finally, the objective of the last panel on Nutrition-in-all sectors was to illustrate the ways in
which countries integrate nutrition in various sectors such as agriculture, health, education, trade
and social welfare.
The discussions were focused on the current situation, identified, opportunities and provided
recommendations. We also considered possible ways to operationalize commitments and turn
them into actions.
Many important issues were raised during the discussions around policy coherence for nutrition
and achieving healthy diets. Many speakers shared with us their national experiences, both
success and failure stories. They raised their concerns about challenges, noted the opportunities
and referred to the existing nutrition policies. All voices in the debate were interesting and very
accurate.
There is no doubt that policy coherence for nutrition is a challenge. It was clearly indicated by
many speakers. Such approach is not free of charge. It is an investment which requires many
resources – money, time, strong engagement and a lot of attention. But it is an investment that
pays off – once completed, it brings high revenues for generations.
We do not lack knowledge on how to achieve this goal - the paradox is that currently we know
enough but we do less than we should. The participants shared with us their national solutions,
among others in fiscal policies, education and health programmes, school food schemes,
breastfeeding promotion, reformulations or food labelling. This is a knowledge we have to use
and let me shortly mention some examples.
We heard about many national experiences in developing and implementing national multisectoral
nutrition policies and strategies in coordination with relevant organizations and ministries, civil
society and the private sector. These policies focus mainly on family farming or school feeding
programmes. Success stories from many countries, like Brazil (with its Zero Hunger Initiative
which lifted 36 million Brazilians out of poverty) and Ireland, were particularly welcomed and
carefully heard. We were also happy to hear that many countries develop legal frameworks and
fiscal policy measures concerning taxes on unhealthy food products, following the experiences of
tobacco taxes.
43
Today, we can also confirm that we have the tools, such as food supply and demand value chain
analysis which helps to focus on the totality of evidence, activities, actors, and incentives in the
food system and can test the assumption of value for nutrition and value for economics.
Unfortunately, we can also notice that although different tools were implemented, in many
countries growing incidence of overweight, obesity and diet-related non-communicable diseases
was still observed. That forces us to take as radical steps as possible to reverse the trends.
In establishing new public policies and strengthening the existing ones we need to increase
availability and affordability of nutrition rich foods and diverse diets. Reducing inequalities and
shaping the consumer demand is equally important. We also need to select value chains more
nutrition-sensitive, for instance by enhancing nutrient content, engaging educator actors,
stimulating demand.
In establishing policies we should be focused on the most vulnerable groups: infants and women.
National school nutrition programmes and supplemental nutrition for children may serve as a
good example of these focused actions.
But there cannot be “one fits all” approach. The policies should also reflect specific national
settings and cultural environment.
When we speak about vulnerable groups we have to notice that special attention during the
session was paid to women. Women’s empowerment, including land ownership, is considered as
crucial for improving nutrition outcomes. Since women are often primary caregivers, they can
directly, through their own nutritional status, influence nutrition of their children and the whole
family.
During our discussion it was underlined that we need to adopt approaches involving all
government departments, ensuring that nutrition issues receive an appropriate cross-sectoral
response. We clearly see the need to include nutrition in development cooperation initiatives,
economic development policies and poverty-reduction strategies. To get high quality food and
strengthen capacity building in its production, the close collaboration between health, agriculture
and trade sectors is obvious. To raise social awareness and improve health literacy of the society,
an active engagement of the education sector is vital. Again, children and their parents are crucial
target groups.
But the government alone will not do everything.
During the discussion there was also a common agreement that we need to engage all parties and
sectors of society, including civil society and the private sector, to generate effective responses to
address malnutrition in all its forms. We should not forget that constructive dialogue with all key
actors is a prerequisite for common success. This dialogue, however, should be supplemented
with necessary regulations, as public health cannot be the hostage of economic profit.
Establishing a national accountability framework for the private sector was one of the ideas we
discussed as a possible option.
Finally, we cannot forget about international cooperation. For many countries seeking the support
through the technical assistance from the UN system, in particular from WHO and FAO, to
reinforce and accelerate national efforts to address policy incoherence is often the first choice
while introducing legal changes.
All relevant policies should be based on the recommendations included in global instruments,
such as WHO Global Strategy on Healthy Diet, Physical Activity and Health, 2011 UN Outcome
44
Document on NCDs, 2014 UN Outcome Document on NCDs or Helsinki Statement on Health-inAll Policies.
Multilateral cooperation in many different formulas is also very much needed and we heard a lot
how much benefit it brings.
We hope that our strong determination presented during the discussions will bring the expected
results in the near future across the countries. Let’s hope that during the next ICN we will all
share the success stories and not the examples of failure policies.
I would like to thank one more time all the participants of the Roundtable. I truly believe the
outcomes of the discussion will encourage us for taking the necessary actions to improve nutrition
and health of the population. After many decades of disinvestment in nutrition, we have a unique
opportunity to make hunger and malnutrition part of history, not of the future. Let’s not waste it.
45
CHAIRS' SUMMARY OF ROUNDTABLE 3
Governance and Accountability for Nutrition
The Roundtable 3 on Governance and Accountability for Nutrition consisted of two panels: one
focusing on governance and the other on accountability.
Panel 1: Nutrition Governance
The panel 1 on governance for nutrition explored key components for effective nutrition
governance at national and international levels and shared experiences across countries.
The Roundtable underlined effective nutrition governance as key for follow-up to the
commitments embedded in the Rome Declaration on Nutrition. Embedding nutrition in a human
rights agenda makes issues of governance and accountability central to effective implementation.
The Roundtable highlighted hurdles to be overcome for strong nutrition governance:
1) the signs of malnutrition are often invisible, and thus remain a hidden problem;
2) in every country in the world, there are people who suffer from malnutrition;
3) those most affected by malnutrition are typically those with the least voice in society, so they
are not heard;
4) malnutrition is often poorly measured and reported;
5) nutrition has become everyone’s business and no one’s responsibility, thus it is unclear who is
accountable for nutrition in existing governance structures; and
6) the range of country perspectives shared in the presentations.
The discussions all highlighted the importance of making nutrition issues visible and establishing
appropriate governance mechanisms across key Ministries and Departments, and that governance
mechanisms were not only important at global and national levels but also at local levels.
Discussions also considered whether there is a need to establish a new international organization
on nutrition. In addition to the substantial resources required to establish and maintain a new
organization, it was recognized that the necessary elements already exist at global, regional,
national and local levels. Resources could be better used reinforcing and building up these
existing governance mechanisms.
The issue of if, how and when the private sector should be involved in both policy-setting and
governance in general was also raised. Different views, opinions and experiences were shared.
There are several key conclusions emerging from the Panel 1. I will mention a few of them here:
1. Make malnutrition visible: many of the effects of nutrition and those worst affected are
invariably invisible and lacking in voice. Raising the visibility of nutrition is thus vital.
In this regard, improving the quality and frequency of data and information on
malnutrition and the impact of programmes, as well as changing the narrative about
nutrition issues will be important steps. For example, if we use the terms “chronic
malnutrition”, we underplay the urgency of addressing nutrition problems.
46
2. Be inclusive and empowering: those who need to act must be empowered to do so,
including with evidence-based facts.
3. Focus on meeting the needs and human rights of people.
4. Work in a multi-stakeholder setting that makes the sectors and stakeholders accountable
on delivering on nutrition targets.
5. Recognize that work on improving nutrition needs to be political but not partisan, so that
transitions in governments will not impede efforts to improve nutrition.
6. Request FAO and WHO to develop a definition of nutrition security.
7. Be results-oriented. Governance should not be an end in itself, but a means to end
malnutrition.
8. Ownership and leadership are critical elements to nutrition governance: ownership and
good leadership at all levels is needed for good governance.
9. Anchoring nutrition targets in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is key and
inputs are urgently needed.
Panel 2: Nutrition Accountability
The panel 2 on accountability for nutrition explored the effectiveness of current accountability
mechanisms. Experiences and selected country examples were discussed. It was recognized that
accountability often is difficult to define – and even more challenging to measure. Why? Many
manifestations of poor nutrition are invisible, or become visible only over time. Likewise,
nutrition improvements reflect the combined and coordinated efforts of many sectors and many
actors, reflecting some of the hindrances to nutrition governance identified in Panel 1.
The panel discussed the importance of accountability mechanisms bringing together different
sectors. Moreover, the country examples emphasized the importance of linking accountability to
government planning, budgeting, expenditures and results. The critical importance of embedding
governance mechanisms – at the global, regional, national and local levels – was underscored.
A model for accountability was presented. This outlines five distinct steps:
1) To identify commitments, including quantifying what governments are spending on nutrition,
so that expenditures are in line with nutrition strategies.
2) To monitor and track progress, including filling data gaps and budget commitments.
3) To assess response to commitments.
4) To leverage commitments, applying global targets at national level, if necessary.
5) To respond to assessments, using results for raising awareness and commitments and research
for indications of what works and what does not work.
The country perspectives shared in the presentations emphasized that accountability is an essential
pillar of good governance. The discussions also stressed this. Accountability must be applied to
nutrition and nutrition outcomes, and in order to ensure this transparent public accounting is
imperative.
47
The discussion also highlighted the need to establish indicators to track national commitment and
coordinating mechanisms within countries to plan for, advocate for and promote better nutrition.
There were several key conclusions from Panel 2; I will mention some of them.
The first one is that accountability is a critical factor in turning commitments to improve nutrition
into results. Progress in nutrition strongly depends upon accountability systems being put in place.
The second is that some outcome and action accountability mechanisms do exist, but they need to
be strengthened. It is important to invest more in them, in order to find more and better
mechanisms. Thirdly, global level agreements provide a useful benchmark for nutrition outcomes
at national level. Fourthly, we need to reach agreement on indicators and data gathering.
Information systems need to be strengthened with regular and more detailed reporting and
publications of results. Fifthly, nutrition is a cross-cutting issue. It requires an integrated, multisectorial engagement, and civil society needs to be included. Sixthly, resource allocation should
be in line with priorities for nutrition improvement, bringing budgeting, planning and
implementing exercises together. The last conclusion is that efforts are needed to embed nutrition
more broadly in the SDGs.
The Roundtable gave us important insights regarding good practice and lessons learned, and also
provided some concrete recommendations for the way forward for the work on nutrition
governance and accountability.
48
ANNEX IV: PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES AND ORGANIZATIONS
COUNTRIES AND EUROPEAN UNION
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Belarus
Belgium
Benin
Bhutan
Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cabo Verde
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Congo
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Croatia
49
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
European Union (Member Organization of FAO)
Finland
France
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Haiti
Honduras
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
50
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Mauritania
Mexico
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Norway
Oman
51
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Republic of Korea
Republic of Moldova
Romania
Russian Federation
Samoa
San Marino
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Tajikistan
Thailand
The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago
52
Tunisia
Turkey
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United Republic of Tanzania
United States of America
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Viet Nam
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Associate Member
Puerto Rico (Associate Member of WHO)
53
OBSERVERS
Holy See
Sovereign Order of Malta
Palestine
54
UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM ORGANIZATIONS
United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
United Nations Educational, Scientific And Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
World Health Organization (WHO)
World Bank (WB)
International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
World Trade Organization (WTO)
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF)
World Food Programme (WFP)
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)
High Level Task Force on the Global Food Security Crisis (HLTF)
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD)
55
OTHER INTERGOVERMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS
African Union (AU)
Arab Maghreb Union (AMU)
Bioversity International
Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC)
International Development Law Organization (IDLO)
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRCRCS)
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
Latin American Economic System (SELA)
New Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD)
Nordic Council of Ministers
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD)
Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC)
South Centre
World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE)
56
CIVIL SOCIETY AND PRIVATE SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS
Civil Society
1,000 Days
Acción Contra el Hambre
Action Against Hunger
Action contre la faim
Action pour la survie et le développement harmonieux de l'enfant
Adventist Development and Relief Agency
Alianza Enfermedades no Transmisibles Chile
Alliance for the Control of Tobacco Use and Health Promotion
American Society for Nutrition
Asian-Pacific Resource and Research Centre for Women
Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University
Bread for the World Institute
Breastfeeding Association of Zambia
Brot für die Welt
CARE International
Catholic Relief Services
Centre for Equity Studies
Centre for Health, Education, Training and Nutrition Awareness
Centro Internazionale Crocevia
Chicago Council on Global Affairs
Church World Service
Civil Society Alliance for Nutrition Nepal
Concern Worldwide
Consorcio por la Mar R.L.
Consumers International
Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance
57
Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights
Enlaces Continentales Mujeres Indígenas Americas
European Centre for Development Policy Management
Fédération internationale des mouvements d’adultes ruraux catholiques
Feed the Children
FIAN International
Food and Nutrition Society of Ethiopia
Food Security Working Group
Global Health Advocates France
GOAL
Gorta-Self Help Africa
Habitat International Coalition
Health Related Information Dissemination Amongst Youth
Healthy Caribbean Coalition
Helen Keller International
Humana People to People
Infant and Pediatric Nutrition Association of the Philippines
Institute of Development Studies
InterAction
Interchurch Organization for Development Cooperation
International Association of Students in Agriculture and Related Sciences
International Baby Food Action Network
International Council of Women
International Diabetes Federation
International Federation of Business and Professional Women
International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements
International Indian Treaty Council
International Medical Corps
International Public Health Agency
58
International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers'
Association
Kenya AIDS NGOs Consortium
La Via Campesina
Max Planck Institute of Social Anthropology
Micronutrient Initiative
Mouvement international de la jeunesse agricole et rurale catholique
Movement of Small Farmers
Movimiento Agroecológico de América Latina y el Caribe
National Council for Food and Nutrition Security
Nutritional Health Alliance
Passionists International
Peoples Health Movement
Plan International
Plateforme des acteurs de la société civile au Bénin
Plate-forme des organisations paysannes de l'Afrique centrale
Prisma
Proyecto AliMente México
Public Health Institute
Réseau des organisations paysannes et de producteurs agricoles de l’Afrique de l'ouest
RESULTS Educational Fund
Rotary International
Save the Children
Scaling Up Nutrition Civil Society Organization Kenya
Slow Food
SNV Netherlands Development Organisation
Society for International Development
Terra Nuova Centro per il Volontariato ONLUS
The Hunger Project
59
The NCD Alliance
Uganda Civil Society Coalition on Scaling up Nutrition
Urbain-Rural: Générer des Echanges Nouveaux entre Citoyens
WaterAid
Welthungerhilfe e.V.
World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action
World Alliance of Mobile Indigenous People
World Cancer Research Fund International
World Chefs/Feeding Good
World Forum of Fish Harvesters and Fish Workers
World Forum of Fisher People
World Heart Federation
World March of Women in Mozambique
World Obesity Federation
World Public Health Nutrition Association
World Vision
World Vision International
Zambia Alliance of Women
Private Sector
Agency for Research and Information on Fruit and Vegetables
Ajinomoto Co. Inc.
Amway Corporation
Associação Brasileira da Indústria da Alimentação
Badische Anilin- und Soda-Fabrik
Bayerische Motoren Werke
Cargill Inc.
Coca-Cola Company
Deere & Company
60
DSM
Dutch Dairy Association
Edesia Inc.
Elanco
Elanco Animal Health
European Food Law Association
Ferrero Group
Firmenich
FoodDrinkEurope
Fromageries Bel
Gallup
German Federation for Food Law and Food Science
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition
Global Dairy Platform Inc.
Global Harvest Initiative
Groupe Spéciale Mobile Association
Grupo Bimbo
International Agri Food Network
International Association of Infant Food Manufacturers
International Co-operative Alliance
International Dairy Federation
International Egg Commission
International Federation for Animal Health
International Feed Industry Federation
International Food and Beverage Alliance
International Meat Secretariat
International Poultry Council
LB Bulgaricum PLC
Mars Inc.
61
McDonald's Corporation
McGill Centre for the Convergence of Health and Economics
Mead Johnson Nutrition
Monsanto International Sarl
National Fisheries Institute
Nutriset
Protein Kissèe-La
P.T. Indofood Sukses Makur Tbk
Pulse Canada
Results for Development Institute
Royal DSM
Royal FrieslandCampina
Scaling Up Nutrition Business Network
Sociedad Química y Minera Europe NV
Unilever
Unione Importatori Esportatori Industriali Commissionari Grossisti Ingrassatori Macellatori Spedizionieri
Carni Bestiame e Prodotti Derivati
US Council for International Business
World Farmers Organisation
Yara International ASA
Foundations
Access to Nutrition Foundation
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Children’s Investment Fund Foundation
HealthBridge Foundation of Canada
Wellcome Trust
Wemos Foundation
62
ANNEX V: LIST OF ICN2 DOCUMENTS
Working Documents
ICN2 2014/1 Rev.1
Provisional Agenda
ICN2 2014/2
Conference Outcome Document: Rome Declaration on
Nutrition
ICN2 2014/3 Corr.1
Conference Outcome Document: Framework for Action
Information Documents
ICN2 2014/INF/1
Rev.1
Provisional Timetable
ICN2 2014/INF/2
Rev.1
Arrangements for the Second International Conference on
Nutrition
ICN2/2014/INF/3
Rev.1
Provisional List of Documents
ICN2 2014/INF/4
No document
ICN2 2014/INF/5 Corr. 1
Co-Chairs’ Cover Note of the Conference Outcome
Documents
Roundtable Concept Notes
ICN2 2014/RT/1
Roundtable 1: Nutrition in the Post-2015 Development
Agenda
ICN2 2014/RT/2
Roundtable 2: Improving Policy Choices and Policy
Coherence
ICN2 2014/RT/3
Roundtable 3: Governance and Accountability for Nutrition
63