China Africa Development Fund: Beyond a foreign policy instrument

13 January 2015
CCS COMMENTARY:
China Africa Development Fund:
Beyond a foreign policy instrument
The 2007- initiated China Africa Development Fund (CADFund), which facilitates Chinese investments
in Africa, has attracted much attention from academics and practitioners. As one of the eight
measurements put forward by former Chinese president Hu Jintao at the 2006 Forum on China Africa
Cooperation (FOCAC), the fund has not been able to shake its reputation as a vehicle for Chinese
political power. Nevertheless, a closer glance reveals that the CADFund is highly diversified, working
more along market principles than as an instrument of government policy.
What the CADFund is not
Existing research on the CADFund focuses on how its role in promoting
Sino-Africa relations will likely limit the growth of the fund itself, making
it inappropriate as a tool in China’s and Africa’s development. One of the
main reasons that CADFund is viewed as a government vehicle is because
various scholars and independent agencies treat it as a sovereign wealth
fund (SWF). Certain studies view the fund as only investing with Chinese
State Owned Enterprises (SOEs), so as to strengthen government
Source: www.cottongrower.com
behaviour; this has led to accusations that the CADFund does not care
about the development of Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) or African enterprises in
general. Strictly speaking, the only pure SWF of China is China Investment Corporation (CIC) which is typically
funded by the Ministry of Finance (MOF) of PRC. Current studies on CADfund mix up the concepts of SWFs,
foreign exchange reserve held by central banks, pension funds, SOEs. CADFund is essentially a private equity
(PE) fund with only background government participation, a point stressed many times by Chi Jianxin, the
president of CADFund.
The CADFund is a market driven PE in which the questions of SOE’s is not the key criteria for partner selection
– reflected in its collaboration with many non-SOEs. Additionally, some research mixes trade and aid-related
aspects of the CADFund. Unlike economic aid, CADFund is market-orientated and bears risks on its own; in the
vein of “win-win” rhetoric, it aims to promote Africa’s development as well as to pursue its own interests.
Putting aside political factors, a key question should be how to maximise the positive effects of the CADFund in
terms of co-operation between Chinese and African enterprises and its own development from financing,
operating and investment perspectives.
Teething Problems
The CADFund currently sits at US$ 3 billion; investments are at US$ 2 billion and in 2013 there were 70
projects in over 30 African countries. However, returns on investments are not very fluid, with some projects
running for several years, with unknown returns. The dividend pay-out of investee companies largely
influences the coming (third) round of fundraising, especially with the intention to attract external investors.
CADFund originally planned to invite market participants to join its second injection effort, which failed. This
was in part due to the fact that Chinese investors are hesitant – still a foreign investment destination with
some high-risk environments. More importantly, running projects have often been at early stages where
investment returns are still unknown. Thus, it is crucial that current projects bring reasonable profits so as to
increase investors’ confidence, which aids in further financing and project operation of the CADFund.
Another aspect is the way in which CADFund reaps its investments and disengages from particular projects.
There are many exit methods varying from project to project. For instance, the fund can exit by initial public
offering (IPO) which relies on the state of stock markets. Because African equity markets, besides South
Africa, are under developed, the CADFund may look for IPO opportunities in other equity markets to sell its
ownership. Moreover, the fund can ask its portfolio companies to repurchase shares, which was adopted, for
instance, in the case of a glass factory in Ethiopia. Another method is to transfer ownership to other investors
by agreements. Only by exiting from an investment smoothly can CADFund ensure the possibility of further
development.
Maximising opportunities
China Development Bank (CDB) is experienced in fund management and has gained significant experience in
African investing; CADFund is one of its useful attempts at outward direct investment in Africa. Nevertheless,
there is still a long way to go in terms of financing, operation and investment. In the meantime, with the
gradual deepening of China-Africa relations, more investment opportunities will be created, and more
investors like the CADFund will distribute their assets on the African continent. Thus, it is of importance to
offer suggestions for further investors by exploring an effective way to boost economic and social
development of host countries as well as investors’ own benefits.
ZHANG Qiaowen
CCS Affiliate
Centre for Chinese Studies
Stellenbosch University
“Commentaries are written by Research Analysts at the Centre and focus on current and topical discussions or media events with
regard to China or China/Africa relations. Occasionally, the CCS accepts commentaries from non-CCS affiliated writers with expertise in specific fields. Their views do not necessarily reflect those of the CCS. Commentaries can be used freely by the media or
other members of the interested public if duly referenced to the author(s) and the CCS.”
For more information, please check the CCS website: www.sun.ac.za/ccs or contact us under [email protected]