Liberia Child Protection Sub

Liberia Child Protection Sub-Cluster
Liberia Child Protection Sub-Cluster Workplan Meeting Logframe
Management of the Child Protection Sub-Cluster
Objective 1; Strengthen CPSC at national and regional level with a view to increase coordination and
partnership
Strategies
Identify CP actors at county level
Roll out CPSC in the counties
Identify lead agencies to assist CPSC
activities at county level.
Hold regular CP meetings
Ensure that all CP partners at field level are
invited to CPSC meetings.
Linkages / networks with other clusters
Ensure efficient data management
between county and central level
Targets
CPSC are established on
county level and have
monthly meetings
Indicator
# and proportion of minutes
from county CPSC meetings
shared with CPSC partners.
80% of minutes from
meetings are shared on a
timely manner
CP data shared on a bi-weekly
basis
# and proportion of CPSC
members feeding regularly
into cluster 5W reporting
Capacity building of members of the Child Protection Sub-Cluster
Objective 1; Increase members capacity on CP and have incorporated CP activities in their regular program.
Objective 2; Agreement on and implementation of minimum standards
Strategies
Ask members what kind of
capacity building they need.
Share best practice and know
how through using each other in
trainings.
Enhancement of ‘regulations and
tools’ developed for protection of
children in institutions
Agree on minimum standards in
Child Protection
Targets
Identify 15 focal points at county
level to coordinate initiatives for
CP training of staff working with
children
Indicators
35 child welfare institutions
(orphanages) are assessed to
ensure that they adhere to the
“Regulations and Tools”
developed
60% of staff of members of the
CPSC have completed Child
Protection in Emergencies
training.
Page 1
Liberia Child Protection Sub-Cluster
Mainstream Child Protection issues in to other program areas
Objective 1; Agreed minimum standards on curriculum and methodology in response to psychosocial
issues
Objective 2; Integration of child focused Ebola risk awareness with existing Ebola awareness programs
Strategies
Advocate for that CP issues are
part of curriculum and
methodology in response to PSS
issues.
Advocate for training of at least
one teacher at each school on CP.
Advocate for children’s issues
addressed in WASH and Health
programs
Regular mapping of child
protection institutions
Advocate for that all schools have
PSS and CP focal points
Targets
All clusters have CP components in
their work plans.
School Clubs are collaborating with the
Social Mobilization Cluster on CP
awareness
The education cluster is monitoring the
number of EVD affected children in the
schools.
Education cluster implementing
training of teachers on how to respond
to PSS issues in schools
Indicators
# and proportion of
teachers trained on CP
Established ‘Therapeutic Care Center’
for EVD affected children, providing
activities and respect of the rights of
the child before the reopening of
schools.
Community based CP systems
Objective 1; Strengthen and expand sustainable community structures to prevent and respond to Child
Protection issues
Strategies
Identify sustainable and motivated
community structures
Enhance the capacity of structures
established for the protection of
children in the communities
Improve community child
protection structures so that they
can take ownership of the case
system
Targets
Functioning community
based structures in all
counties
Indicators
# and proportion of psychological
first aid (PFA) activities undertaken
Communication among SubCluster and CPN members at
community level
# and proportion of children who
have received at least one follow-up
visit by trained social worker within
one month of being (re)united with
caregivers
# and proportion of social workers
recruited, trained and deployed to
priority areas
# and proportion of communities
with active Community Child Welfare
Committees established and
functioning
Standardize community CP
structures.
Map level of activity, and coverage
of CWCs.
Include Community leaders in
CWCs structure.
80% of CWC active in the 5
most affected counties.
Page 2