Document - Department of Fertilizers

No: 2601 1/23(I)/2015-Coord
Government of India
Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers
Department of Fertilizers
Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi
24 April, 2015
Dated the
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: Advice of the Ministry of Law in cases in which legal or constitutional issues
are involved
Please rind enclosed a copy of O.M. No. 1 -28015/01/2009 - Admin.IV (LA) dated 3
September, 2009 received from Department of Legal Affairs on the subject mentioned above
for information and compliance.
End: as above
jrivastava)
Under Secretary to e Govt. of India
23389364
Tel.
All the Officers of Department of Fertilizers
to keep a copy at Web Portal.
MMWTcTR Government of India.
fTrw-c14 Ministry of Law & Justice
f4f iT 11TII Department of Legal Affairs
Shastri Bhawan,New Delhi-110001
TelNo: 23382913; PAX 23388028
No. -28015/01/2009-Admn.IV(LA)
Dated : 3' September 2009.
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: Advice of the Ministry of Law in cases in which legal or
constitutional issues are involved.
Under the Government of India (Allocation of Business) Rules,
1961, giving of advice on legal matters and interpretation of laws is
one of the primary functions of the Department of Legal Affairs. As
early as in 1967, vide OM No.F.18(1)/69-O&M dated 20th May 1967,
this Department has emphasized that in a case, if the Ministry!
Department feels that the facts of the case have not been fully
appreciated or further clarification is needed in any matter, the case
may be referred back to this Department for consideration and advice
in the matter. If, after further reference, the Department adheres to
its previous advice, the same should be followed by the Ministry!
Department concerned. It is not appropriate on the part of any
Ministry/Department to say that neither the latter is bound by the
advice given by this Department nor can refuse to follow such advice.
These instructions have been reiterated from time to time in the past.
'1 1
,-
21
2.
InsDite of these instructions, instances have come to notice
where Ministries/Departments keep on making repeated references
insisting for concurrence of this Department to a particular course of
action.
3.
In one such case, the High Court of Delhi in WP(C) No. 2893 of
2008 in the case of UOI vs. Govind Manish has taken a serious view
in the matter and has observed as under:V
C
"Notwithstanding, categorical opinion of the Department
of Legal Affairs that it was not a fit case for filing the
writ petition, the petitioner went ahead and filed the
instant writ petition. Not that we are influenced by the
remarks of the Department of Legal Affairs. For this
reason, we have referred to these remarks only after
considering the matters ourselves on its own merits.
Reason for quoting the aforesaid opinion of the
Department of Legal Affairs is that even when there are
instructions that normally the Department should
concede to such legal advice and should not challenge
the orders by filing frivolous petitions/appeals, many
times such advice is not heeded to. This tendency of
filing appeals till the hghest Court by the Government
Department, and in turn becoming biggest litigant in this
country, is one of the reasons clogging judicial systems
with huge pendency."
4.
It is, therefore, re-iterated that once a considered view has
been expressed by this Department, the Ministries/Departments
should consider acting in terms of the advice tendered. If for some
reasons, reconsideration of advice is desired, it should be done only
with the approval of the Secretary of the concerned Ministry!
Department. On reconsideration, if the advice is re-iterated, the
Department should follow such advice.
The contents of this Memorandum may be brought to the
5.
notice of all concerned officers/staff.
( P.K. Malhotr)
Additional Secretary to the Govt. of India
Copy to:
1.
2.
3.
4.
All Ministries/Departments in the Govt. of India
All Officers of the Department of Legal Affairs
Branch Secretariat, Mumbai/Kolkata/Bangluru/Chennai.
Central Agency Section/Litigation (High Court) Section/
Litigation (Lower Court) Section, New Delhi.
i'r
p
T'111
P. K. Malholra
Sectctry
trn it1-
tM;-Th
w'
GOVERNMENT 01
iPfliA
MINTW' or LAW P JUSTICE
nEp,RTiEr.if 01 UG4I. 'FAIR,
I Jaicil l hv
"
AuuI. I I4
4-hall
I) t
)iirN,vr -tur.
rniiiinj zhuiret liy inniiptiI Stcretir i n rhQ Hu,ibk f'rinw Mini.t1.r on 31
L,
1L1tr 201+, ch
ctte 110 31ITM to InsIriictiLn ri' aI f i l-ii -linictnc I 4J1II1I titt1t4
\in,trns
under
wjrnini.,matiku
conirol
I
le
pilrim0lb
1,1
,-ii s.irioIiardc Ainhon flus
ol
Ljw
u
t
tillil
dcp;ifliriitil Iiriiitutio ir. thc
(15P3t froui iiii1iatin
Iii
a
rt-mint Iiiipiihii in iurt
If hi been efTn ol this E)pirtrnciil 1r i-iJuix tts
2
t.t- If has dul bLvil
unit i..diaahle coun lime k Spew in WM'irW )LbC? peiwiin
hen varimpi Miii1ns
IIdIV1IJ, of 11W (wrrii1wnI to I= dial diptiti
IkpIrtTritnt PSIJ. 1i)1r1-- Authorit1Lc uittter tIi ci'ntn'l t' tIii (hi'eTTini&fl1 dii rti io tci
the tLIFt, In thi$ diri1i48. ii trninncrii \1nehiziry 4L Ariiiircitu.pti is ItiittiuiiUi in tht
.itt dhpuI.cs bwe,t Mn Public Stoi
I)pitrniint of Public iiI,rpri.i wI- ii.th
I ridtti.iIini.c. Slalilark. iiihoii'.e tt,1ttnini is %tJ1%ing Iii .iLiTh: i4Ih1 I)tpLLfll11eI1? Of
lifliitW 4tflpUn
F)ipnrii'nciit, All
tlIcmcnt of disputes et4iii- with ih (hworflnwnt
Siih iiwchaiiism frj t.tde Artiin'iwm and i'Lh
In -ipitc JI tiiiSc WTTthLI()fl. tL1tJIII V S1,11
rvM4iIuLilln iiIeCIliRilt4lI
thc Iiriiinii
r esort to courf ;iieidins in
Depanmeflus or with oUxr S1k.
On the ha.si. oldie I 54iIi Rci,iort ot the Ptthli AL1~0U111S (inmittgiven in 0117 4 ,
1
i
7drdio
erc istea vhiih lie bcn reitrited trorn lurie i tin tith rur'1 i
Resolution of cucb ipLti'i. [he tniriurirns mud
lii sn fir US dIHpItLm bereeii 47fle (io'rnmrn LkpiirIninl intl tw,thct ure
w'tsi hc no e1uct,u i-it faking recopurtic to ltLInhi4'n lit t!'.ell
ft i t,fIetII,iilPtl it lIiL Ii:. el iii
irhnrcaion in seding ciiIernini of puinh t t'w
fU51eI
c'ncinwd dre r*'t riniIt in rcemi tlic prnlikni can .iItia. (IV tal;eii
-k ili
cnncerncd. there
it) the Cahimci tiir until kciiiin,
I,tJiI
letwn a 4I1-i'cmnwru1 )ptI1lni.nl tmd puhik
tall
ill
t.r4IjRari1%
i0C
ptIIiIIC
il1IerpriI'1c'
and
riuiuiher
%'OiJtd
uiwrpriett and htr'.een
iii,, IJnrtcoK'ed dipuIe
dtiict of the twc, tiilIn;s nig iIt'glric,.
ía) 'Those -eluiiug to stattiliory II1aftcr. an4
i blThow nlutnig to totiiiit;rt:Iu I it
&'tiiir
itret1tt1i.
(ciiitd
ft$I im. 7IW1
Th,
I
U?IT
.
411 Iko, Stiaii'i UJwari- fJ'uIF fluid. P jfRV
i9IJ1JX
+&1 11 .23Qt4'iITh,
O8 F
f4-t t( CIO l
UIhi-1 1(1 OUt
Friull iikrnItirjIniri:
ft
R&jrdIc t,1' thc Ipt 1 Jipuh. it I,a. L'ci1 dLti&kd dia' .10 t1i.pwc 'hiiild
bt rtkc1 amicably hs mutual ooiisuIthttun or tliruwjh Lhi, gutid iiic 01
iiu_ ol liu (iucrnmn1t n, iInnqJi irbElmlwn und t.iur'e k
IigzUion iJRHJkt bc eIiitiptiatI.
from IIlLc
•\it MIri5rus (.lpiruneIit are. Llicrefive. requicd 4i
I
rn,Islcr,Li:' dcptrimcntaI Iiiau41ns in iiv Loan of Iiw.' and rni.' usti
instnictionti ir this regard jc nil Public ctor I nderr&flitis. UoinI A111110111fiCS LI)ILkI
ilicit ub1149,tr[iIiVe cuntrol, tn cst in i nin pntsihk ro woive rhL dcpILtc rnicith by
it the
nniilinii cinuttatinii or chniug ifw pvoM offim 4 Liijnrcd Agciicii
iii%cn1rn1c or thrttwh Arbitration. tlw ;;pc iirni Id he referred CINI ILI i!it 1itiruc
Sni'iriuL uJ. tticii it, ncc. urv tt IM4 .
Wittv re*irds.
Yiir
i1tL%flI\
I',K I1uIhitit
All Scorvuri
tothe(tiiiirnenlL iol liulia
LI