Notes to the Agenda
Transcription
Notes to the Agenda
Company no. 3157806 THE COMPANIES ACT Charity no. 1058392 FRIENDS OF HIGHGATE CEMETERY TRUST (‘The Charity’) Friends of Highgate Cemetery Trust Annual General Meeting 2015 EXPLANATORY NOTES RESOLUTION 1: Minutes of the 2014 AGM A copy of the minutes is available on our website, www.highgatecemetery.org/about/AGM RESOLUTION 2: Financial Statements The trustees are required to present to the Annual General Meeting (AGM) (the Meeting) the audited accounts and the Trustees’ and Auditor’s Reports for the financial year ended 31 August 2014. A summary of the Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities and Balance Sheet for the last financial year is enclosed with our Annual Review. A full version of the audited Financial Statements is available on our website, www.highgatecemetery.org. Any member wishing to have a printed copy of this material should contact the office. • The Board recommends that members vote in favour of this resolution. RESOLUTION 3: Auditors The auditor is appointed at every general meeting at which accounts are presented to members. The current appointment of Hammonds as the Charity’s auditor will end at the conclusion of the AGM and it has advised of its willingness to stand for reappointment. It is normal practice for trustees to be authorised to agree how much the auditor should be paid and Resolution 3 grants this authority to the Board. • The Board recommends that members vote in favour of this resolution. RESOLUTION 4: Election of Trustees of the Charity This year there were six applications to fill the three vacancies created by the retirement by rotation of Peter Knight, who is seeking re-election, and Eddie Daley and John Shepperd, who are required to step down having reached the end of their permitted terms. Following best practice as recommended by the Charity Commission, the Board seeks to recruit new trustees who can make a strong contribution to its work. To do this, the Board identified which skills and experience it needed to complement those of existing trustees and sought applications from suitable candidates. This year, the Board sought candidates with skills and experience in the following areas: education and outreach, heritage or visitor attractions, or organisational management. The vacancies were advertised to all members by post and on our website, as well as through a number of networks including our Twitter feed, the Ham and High, and various e-newsletters. A nominations committee was set up to interview candidates and to recommend to the Board which should receive their endorsement, considering their individual skills and experience and their ability to work well as part of a team. The nominations committee consisted of the immediate past and current chairmen, the finance trustee and the secretary. The trustee seeking re-election took no part in the process. The nominations committee was very impressed by the outstanding quality of the applicants and it was a very difficult decision as they all interviewed 2015 AGM exceptionally well. The three candidates who secured a Board recommendation are now standing for election; in addition Doreen Aislabie is standing as a candidate without a Board recommendation. After debating long and hard and based on the report of the nominations committee, the Board recommends that members vote in favour of the election of Peter Knight, Lucy Lelliott and Doreen Pastor. The Chairman intends to vote undirected proxies in this way. HOW VOTING WORKS • Only those candidates who receive more ‘For’ votes than ‘Against’ votes will be considered for election as a trustee, and will be elected if vacancies exist. • If the above process would result in there being a greater number of trustees than the maximum number set under the Articles of Association, those candidates with the higher number of ‘For’ votes will be elected, such that the total number of trustees does not exceed the maximum. • If there are candidates who have an equal number of ‘For’ votes, then the one with fewer ‘Against’ votes will be elected. FRIENDS OF HIGHGATE CEMETERY TRUST Page 1 of 4 CANDIDATES’ STATEMENTS Please consider both the candidate’s statement and the Board’s recommendation before voting; you are able to vote for or against each candidate. 4a. DOREEN AISLABIE I've been a Friend for about 8 years and throughout this time I've volunteered at the Cemetery at least fortnightly. During this long apprenticeship, I've acquired excellent first hand knowledge not least about monument preservation, visitors' needs, and about volunteering. I'd now like to join the Board to use this hard-won knowledge to make a stronger contribution in all these areas. Re visitor needs. This needs to be addressed strongly. Ditto monument preservation. Re volunteering, it is widely acknowledged that this unpaid workforce is the financial lifeblood of FoHCT. However, the volunteer ethos seems to be weakening and recently several have left (and tours cancelled). I'd like to help reverse this by improving the volunteer experience. This may need a designated Trustee to keep a watching brief on the matter and I would consider myself well placed to contribute. My professional background is in Health and Safety and Occupational Health. This is currently a highly topical issue at Highgate and I am naturally happy to use my experience to make a practical contribution. • The Board does not recommend this candidate because there are other candidates whose skills and experience better match the needs of the Charity. 4b. PETER KNIGHT Having been a grave owner for over twenty years and having a great love of the cemetery, I stood and became a Trustee in 2012. I had by then been volunteering at the East gate and as a guide in the West for some time and have continued to do so, so that I am constantly in touch with all the different groups involved, those running, visiting and supporting the cemetery and most importantly grave owners. I helped to found the Pateman Memorial Fund after the death of Jean Pateman and in the summer of last year, I joined the Landscape Sub Committee, following the departure of Alastair Martin, to assist with continuing the excellent work that Eddie Daley has been doing for the last few years. On behalf of the board, I have been producing a contact e-brief for volunteers to keep them up to date with board matters and including each time a profile of someone involved with the cemetery. I would very much like to continue with this work. • The Board specifically recommends this candidate because of his strong performance as a serving trustee over the last three years. 2015 AGM 4c. LUCY LELLIOTT I became a member of the Friends on my return to live in this area three years ago and have a keen interest in both the history and future of the Cemetery. I am a former Chair of Trustees of a national baby bereavement charity (Sands) and have wide ranging experience of governance issues, chairing and facilitating meetings, preparing AGM papers and budget setting. I am an accomplished public speaker addressing both legal and medical audiences of many sizes. During my time with Sands I have experience of liaising with the funeral and memorial industries. Additionally, I spent 31 years as a paralegal working with solicitors in various areas of law including Probate and intestacies and have developed legacy fundraising materials for Sands as well as attending courses on legacy strategy/marketing and corporate fundraising. Alongside Macmillan training in bereavement and loss counselling, I have much personal experience of bereavement and have worked closely with many bereaved families both professionally and through my voluntary work. • The Board specifically recommends this candidate because of her extensive experience in the fields of bereavement, charitable organisations and relevant law. 4d. DOREEN PASTOR Throughout my career so far, I was able to gain experience in a variety of heritage sites: Museum Assistant at Colditz Castle in Germany, Visitor Services Officer with Bristol City Council, Visitor Services Manager with the National Trust and now as Visitor Experience Manager with the RSPB. From 2010-2012, I studied for an MA in Heritage Management which provided me with the theoretical foundations of managing heritage sites. My MA dissertation was focused on the development of historic cemeteries as visitor attractions and I worked intensely with Arnos Vale Cemetery in Bristol. I enjoyed my work with the cemetery so much that I decided to continue as a volunteer. I would value the opportunity of working as a Trustee at Highgate and contributing to the further development of the site as a visitor attraction. As I am very experienced in visitor management, I would be able to support Highgate in developing engaging interpretation, creating new themed guided tours, managing volunteers, supporting a marketing strategy (including visitor segmentation) and assisting with visitor-focused funding applications. • The Board specifically recommends this candidate because of her well-developed background in heritage and visitor attractions, in particular working with historic cemeteries. FRIENDS OF HIGHGATE CEMETERY TRUST Page 2 of 4 RESOLUTION 5: Appointment of Trustee Under our existing Articles of Association, there are three trustees who are appointed by the Board from among candidates put forward by ‘Nominating Organisations’, namely organisations that promote architectural or heritage conservation; those that promote nature conservation; and local organisations. This year the Board was seeking a candidate with skills and experience relating to our natural landscape (as opposed to our built landscape), and invited Capel Manor College to nominate a trustee. We approached Capel Manor College, a specialist land-based college, because nature conservation is an integral part of most land-based education. In addition, its main campus in Enfield is set in an gardens of about 31 acres which are open to the public and attract 80,000 visitors annually so it is on a similar scale to Highgate Cemetery. It also runs a campus in Regent’s Park in association with The Royal Parks. The College nominated April Cameron, who has submitted the following information in her support. The Board is delighted that such a distinguished and competent person has joined the Board. • The Board recommends that members vote in favour of this resolution. APRIL CAMERON The opportunity to work as a horticultural trustee for the Friends of Highgate Cemetery is an exciting one. My former work, as a lecturer in horticulture, planting & garden design at Capel Manor College; then as Head of the Schools of Horticulture (3 years) and Garden Design (6 years) provides me with specifically useful knowledge and experience to work with others to create planting schemes for a range of areas within the cemetery, making most of the opportunities for preserving and increasing environments for wildlife. At the same time the planting should be welcoming to cemetery visitors and enrich their visit. I look forward to working with other trustees and volunteers to implement approved planting schemes.. RESOLUTION 6: Protectors’ Report A copy of the Protectors’ report is enclosed with this mailing and is also available on our website, www.highgatecemetery.org/about/AGM • The Board recommends that members vote in favour of this resolution. RESOLUTION 7: Appointment of Protector Under our Articles of Association, there are to be at least three and no more than five Protectors. The role of the Protectors is to ensure that the Trustees act in accordance with the objects of the Charity and do not act in a manner likely to prejudice the welfare of the Cemetery. Protectors are nominated by the Board having demonstrated a personal commitment to the objects of the Charity, and are appointed by the members. A Protector holds office for a term of three years if appointed at an annual general meeting, and may be reappointed at the expiry of her or his term of office. Dr Janet Wolf has come to the end of her term as a Protector and has indicated her willingness to stand for a further term. • The Board recommends that members vote in favour of this resolution. 2015 AGM DR JANET WOLF My background lies in an academic career and I have lived in Highgate for over thirty years. As a widow I am now a graveowner, and deeply appreciate the unique character of this cemetery and wish to do my best to help preserve its beautiful wild landscape, in combination with the character of its Victorian monuments. I have been a Protector for six years, and would be delighted to be re-appointed. FRIENDS OF HIGHGATE CEMETERY TRUST Page 3 of 4 RESOLUTION 8: Revised Articles of Association Our Articles of Association is one of our governing documents setting out how the Charity is to be administered. One of the duties of a trustee is to ensure that the Charity does not breach any of the rules set out in its Articles. From time to time, charities change their Articles of Association to ensure that they remain up-to-date. The Board proposes a number of changes outlined below. If you would like full copy of the proposed revised Articles of Association please see our website, www.highgatecemetery.org/about/AGM, email [email protected] or telephone Hilary Deeble-Rogers on 020 8340 1834. The Board unanimously believes that the changes are in the best interests of the Charity. The changes enjoy the support of the Protectors. • The Board recommends that members vote in favour of this resolution. SUMMARY OF CHANGES General meetings Presently we are required to have the AGM in April each year. We remove reference to a specific month to give more flexibility and insert a standard clause saying that not more than fifteen months may elapse between successive annual general meetings. Votes of members Presently a member may appoint more than one proxy to attend on the same occasion. This procedure is common in listed companies where members have votes according to how many shares they hold. As each Member of the Friends has only one vote, for simplicity we limit them to one proxy. Trustees Up to three trustee positions may presently be filled by trustees seeking nominations from amongst organisations which promote architectural or heritage conservation, nature conservation, and local organisations. In practice, few organisations are willing 2015 AGM to nominate trustees, and this requirement restricts the ability of the Board to recruit the candidates with skills and experience that they need. Instead, the Board already uses the more common practice of skills audit and targeted recruitment. For that reason we remove references to nominating organisations but will continue to seek to ensure that such skills and experience are represented on the Board. Powers of trustees The powers of trustees are clarified to mention specifically the power to appoint a Chief Executive and to place limits on her or his authority. Election, appointment and retirement of trustees Presently a fixed date, 15 February, is specified as the deadline for trustee nominations, regardless of the date of the annual general meeting. Instead, we specify at least two clear calendar months before a General Meeting that nominations should be sought and papers sent. Clarification of the procedure for (i) the election of trustees by the members on the one hand, and (ii) the appointment of trustees by the Board on the other. In line with common practice we insert a requirement that appointment or election as a trustee requires signature of the Trustee Code of Conduct. Disqualification and removal of trustees A new clause under “disqualification” is inserted to explain the removal mechanism for “a material breach of the Code of Conduct”, a copy of which is available on our website. Minor drafting changes Completing definitions at the beginning Removal of references to paragraphs left blank and the various detailed transitional arrangements Renumbering of paragraphs FRIENDS OF HIGHGATE CEMETERY TRUST Page 4 of 4