The Relationship between Organizational Health with Public Health
Transcription
The Relationship between Organizational Health with Public Health
International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research. Vol., 4 (5), 265-268, 2015 Available online at http://www.isicenter.org ISSN 2147-3749 ©2015 The Relationship between Organizational Health with Public Health and Organizational Silence among Teachers of Elementary Course of Sari (Zone 1 and Chahardangeh) Maryam Taghvaee Yazdi1*, Mohsen Eynali2 1 2 Department of Educational Management, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran Department of Management, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran * Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] Abstract Education is an institution that plays its role by shaping human and intellectual capital as main pillar of society. If education is considered on top of all problems of a society, health of employees’ organization as well as their effectiveness and usefulness will have important place in developing and improving society. The purpose of the research was to examine the relationship between organizational health with public health and organizational silence among teachers of elementary course of Sari (Zone 1 & Chahardangeh). There were participated 283 teachers of elementary course in this study. Organizational Health Inventory, GHQ Inventory and the researcher-made questionnaire were used to collect data, general health and organizational silence respectively. The Spearman Correlation was used to analyze data. The results showed that there is a direct positive relationship between organizational health and public health of teachers. The relationship between organizational health and organizational silence of teachers showed that there is a negative relationship between variables of silence and organizational health of teachers. Keywords: Organizational health, Organizational silence, Public health, teacher. Introduction Education is basis of cultural, social, economic and political development in each community. It is considered as a growth industry in many countries, as which it is allocated the most governmental budget to it following defense budgets. As substantial part of education activities are carried out in schools, they have special and important position as a critical social system. Schools can play their important role in the best of better, if they are healthy and dynamic organizations. Nowadays, trends in education organizations has been developed globally due to expansion of human experiences and and sciences as well as developing technology and industrial progress; such that extent domain of education tasks is considered as one of main indicators for development of a society (Safi, 2004). Myers believes that organizational health refers to compatibility with environment as well as raise and expand organization’s ability for more compromise that depends on organization’s durability and survive in its environment (Hoei & Mixel, 2004). Hezerburg considers some factors to provide and maintain organizational health including employees’ understanding, methods to monitor affairs, organization policy, supervision nature, work security, working conditions, position and status, wage level, mutual bilateral relationships, supervisors, colleagues, subordinates and employees personal life. He also believes that lack of the factors may dissatisfy employees, as which they leave organization and risk its existence. According to Armichel (1990) effective organizations are the most important means to achieve progress in a society, and then organizations will reach effectiveness that they are healthy, in addition to have other necessary conditions (Shokrkon, 2004). Leiden and Klingle (2000) believe that organizational health is a new concept that means organization's ability to perform its duties effectively that improve and grow organization. A healthy organization is a place where people want to stay there and work, and be effective and useful individuals. Health 265 Intl. J. Basic. Sci. Appl. Res. Vol., 4 (5), 265-268, 2015 situation of a population depends on various and complex factors with genetic and environmental features that they have social feature in a greater spectrum (Crant, 2000). Mental health is affected by different factors that society and culture are important factors to protect it because mental health is beyond of lack of sickness. It requires situations that individuals have no abnormal behaviors and thoughts, in addition to enjoy his life. Therefore, he can create appropriate and effective relationship with environment and shows proper, balanced and useful behavior. The purpose of the research was to examine the relationship between organizational health with public health and organizational silence among teachers of elementary course of Sari. Methodology The research was descriptive, correlation type. Its population included all teachers of elementary course (692 subjects) in Sari (Zone 1 & Chahardangeh Zone). According the Morgan Table and based on random sampling, 283 subjects (110 men & 173 women) participated in the study. Organizational health was dependent variable, and public health and organizational silence were independent variables. In implementing the research, there was exactly explained how to answer tests to the participants, after preliminary explanations about tools and purpose of executing the test. According moral considerations, after consenting the people and give necessary awareness, they were assured that the received information will be only used in this research and any abuse will be preserved. The following questionnaires were used to measure the research variables. Organizational Health Inventory (OHI): Hui et al prepared the questionnaire that contains 44 questions (Behrangi, 2006). General Health Questionnaire: In the research, General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) was used to examine public health. This questionnaire examines dimensions of anxiety, depression, social dysfunction and somatic signs that contain 28 questions (Piltan, 2012). Organizational Silence Questionnaire: It was a researcher-made questionnaire containing 10 questions. Professors and experts confirmed validity of the questionnaire. To evaluate reliability of the questionnaires, there were randomly selected 30 teachers reliability was identified among them. Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficients were 0.88, 0.87 and 0.89 for questionnaires of organizational health, general health and organizational silence respectively. The coefficients show that the questionnaires had good reliability. The Spearman correlation was used to analyze data. In all analyzes, there was considered p <0.05 as significance level. Results The Spearman correlation was used to examine the relationship between variables. As seen in Table 1, there is a direct positive relationship between organizational and public health variables of the teachers (r= 0.556) that this relationship is significant at alpha level 0.01. The calculated determination coefficient indicates that organizational health variable explains 30% variance of the teachers’ public health. Table 1. Correlation between organizational health and public health. Variables Organizational health and public health Correlation 0.556 R square (R2) 0.309 Sig. 0.000 Other results showed that there is a negative adverse relationship between variables of organizational health and organizational silence (r= 0.642, Table 2). The calculated determination coefficient indicates that organizational health variable explains 37% variance of the teachers’ public health. In fact, this result suggests that the more organizational health in organization, the less organizational silence of teachers. Table 2. Correlation between organizational health and organizational silence. Variables Organizational health and organizational silence Correlation -0.642 R square (R2) 0.376 Sig. 0.000 There was examined the relationship between components of organizational health with public health (Table 3). As seen in the Table, among organizational health components and their relationship with public health, there is no significant relationship between resources support and structure with public health; while there was a significant relationship between other components of organizational health with public health (p< 0.05). 266 Intl. J. Basic. Sci. Appl. Res. Vol., 4 (5), 265-268, 2015 Table 3. Correlation between variables of organizational health and public health. Variables Scientific emphasize with public health Spirit with public health Resources support with public health Structure with public health Considerateness with public health Manger’s influence with public health Institutional unity with public health Correlation 0.628 0.500 0.156 0.214 0.625 0.418 0.512 R square (R2) 0.394 0.25 0.02 0.04 0.390 0.174 0.289 Sig. 0.000 0.01 0.21 0.07 0.000 0.03 0.000 Other analyzes showed that among all components, there was a significant relationship between of organizational health with organizational silence (Table 4, p <0.05). There was no significant relationship between scientific emphasis of organizational health with organizational silence (p> 0.05). Table 4. Correlation between variables of organizational health and organizational silence. Variables Scientific emphasize with organizational silence Spirit with organizational silence Resources support with organizational silence Structure with organizational silence Considerateness with organizational silence Manger’s influence with organizational silence Institutional unity with organizational silence Correlation 0.189 -0.589 -0.632 0.552 -0.621 -0.454 -0.690 R square (R2) 0.03 0.34 0.39 0.30 0.38 0.20 0.47 Sig. 0.09 0.000 0.02 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.001 Discussion and Conclusion The purpose of the research was to examine the relationship between organizational health with public health and organizational silence among teachers of elementary course of Sari. The results showed that there is a direct and positive relationship between variables of organizational health and public health of the teachers. The coefficient of determination shows that organizational health variable explains 30% of variance in public health of the teacher. The results are consistent with the obtained results by Nikmaram et al (2012), Beheshtifar et al (2012), Afkhami (2012), Polanyi (2004) and Taheri (2002). The results showed that there is a negative relationship between variables of organizational health and organizational silence of the teachers. The coefficient of determination shows that organizational health variable explains 37% of variance in organizational silence of the teacher. In fact, this result suggests that the more organizational health, the less organizational silence of the teachers. The results are consistent with the obtained results by Dimitris et al (2007). The results also showed that among organizational health components and their relationship with public health, there is no significant relationship between resources support and structure with public health; while there was a significant relationship between other components of organizational health with public health. The results are consistent with the obtained results by Nikmaram et al (2012), Beheshtifar et al (2012), Afkhami (2012), Polanyi (2004) and Taheri (2002). There was no significant relationship between scientific emphases of organizational health with organizational silence, while other relationships were significant. To explain these findings, it can be said that the more components of spirit, resources support, considerateness, manager influence and institutional unity, the less organizational silence. The results have shown that only construction component has a direct and positive relationship with organizational silence. It means the more construction, the more organizational silence. The results are consistent with the obtained results by Dimitris et al (2007). According findings of the research, it is suggested that organization’s management should create a trust and support environment for employees to hear their views, in order to prevent organizational silence. Expanding group activities and enhancing interaction increase trust among employees. Organizational silence will be decreased by emphasizing on considerateness characteristic of manager. It means that friendly, supportive, open and collaborative behaviors of manager with employees prevent organizational silence, and they make sure to suggest their opinions. References Afkhami Ardakani M, Khalili Sadrabad A, 2012. Investigating the Relationship between Personality Factors and Silence of Knowledge Employees. General Management Research. 18. Beheshtifar M, Bahrami H, 2012. The Destructive Role of Employees Silence in Organizational Success. International Journal of Scientific Researches in Business and Science Social. Vol. 2. No. 11. 267 Intl. J. Basic. Sci. Appl. Res. Vol., 4 (5), 265-268, 2015 Behrangi et al, 2006. Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Health of Schools with Organizational Commitment and Teachers in Boys Secondary Schools in Ardabil. Psychology Training Studies. Ferdowsi University. 24. Crant JM, 2000. Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management. 26: 435–462. Dimitris B, Vokala M, 2007. Organizational Silence: A New Challenge for Human Resource Management. Athens University of Economics and Business. pp 1-19. Hoei, Mixel, 2004. Theory, Research and Practice in Educational Management. Translated by Seyed Abbaszadeh MM. Vol II. Uremia. Anzali Publication. p. 35. Nikmaram S, Gharibi H, 2012. Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Silence and Organizational Commitment in Iran. Journal of Global Applicable Sciences. 17: 1271-1277. Piltan FS, Ghanei F, 2012. Sociological Evaluation of Factors Affecting Public Health. Journal of Youth Studies Sociological. 5. Polanyi M, 2004. Healthy Organizational Practices: A Synthesis of Emerging Work-Health Research. Saskatchewan Population Health Evaluation and Research Unit. University of Regina. Background Paper for Creating Healthy and Productive Workplace Practices. A Multi-Stakeholder Conference. May 11-13. Safi A, 2004. Elementary, Guidance and High School Education. Tehran: Samt Publishing. Shokrkon H, 2004. People in Organizations and Fields of Organizational Behavior. Written by Armichel. Roshd Publishing. Taheri A, 2002. Investigating the Relationship between Organizational Health and Spirits of Teachers in Public Boys' School in Tehran. MSc Thesis. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. University of Tehran. 268