International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology
Transcription
International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology
Alwadani F, Int J Ophthalmic Pathol 2015, 4:1 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2324-8599.1000156 International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology Case Report A SCITECHNOL JOURNAL Waardenburg syndrome (WS) type 1: A Case Report Fahad Al wadani* Departments of Ophthalmology, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia *Corresponding author: Fahad Al wadani, Department of Ophthalmology, King Faisal University, Al Hofuf, Al Ahsa , Zip Code 31982, Saudi Arabia ; E-mail: [email protected] Rec date: Dec 01, 2014, Acc date: Feb 17, 2015, Pub date: Feb 24, 2015 Waardenburg syndrome (WS) type I is a non-progressive auditorypigmentary disorder comprising congenital sensorineural hearing loss and pigmentary disturbances of the iris, hair, and skin, along with dystopia canthorum (lateral displacement of the inner canthi).1,4-6. Waardenburg syndrome affects all races and both sexes equally [1,7].It affects around 1 in 42,000 of population accounting for 2-5% of congenital deafness [7]. Iris hetrochromia is found in 21-28% of individuals with Waaerdenburg syndrome [5] mainly type II [8]. In this paper we report on a new case of Waardenburg syndrome in a Saudi male patient. Case Report Abstract Waardenburg syndrome (WS) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder characterized by congenital haring loss, dystonia canthorum and hair and skin pigmentary disturbances. Depending on additional symptoms, WS is classified into four types which are WS1, WS2, WS3 and WS4. While WS1 and WS3 are attributed to mutations in PAX3, WS2 is heterogeneous, being caused by mutations in the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor gene in some but not all affected families. WS4 is attributed to mutations in the endothelin-3 or the endothelin-B receptor genes and SOX10 gene. Waardenburg syndrome (WS) type I is a nonprogressive auditory-pigmentary disorder comprising congenital sensorineural hearing loss and pigmentary disturbances of the iris, hair, and skin, along with dystopia canthorum (lateral displacement of the inner canthi). This paper presents a case of 9 months old male child with WS type I, which to best of the author’s knowledge is the first reported case in the whole Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. A 9 months old boy presented to OPD with recurrent ocular inflammation. The parents, who are non-consanguineous, also noted abnormal color of the eye since birth. The prenatal natal and postnatal history was unremarkable. The weight, height and head circumference at birth and at presentation was normal. Screening for family history including parents and close siblings revealed no abnormal findings. The child face showed prominent broad nasal root and blepharophimosisand dystopia canthorum (lateral displacement of medial canthi) (Figure 1). Case presentation: We present a 9 months old male child which attended the regular clinic with features of Waardenburg syndrome type I as dystonia canthorum, heterochromiairidis and skin pigmentations anomalies. Conclusion: Early recognition of Waardenberg syndrome is important to decrease the incidence of associated complications. Introduction Figure 1: Dystopia canthorum and broad nasal root. Waardenberg syndrome is a rare genetic disorder characterized by deafness in association with pigmentary anomalies and defects of neural crest-derived tissues [1,2]. The syndrome was named after Waardenburg [3], a Dutch ophthalmologist, who in 1951 described a patient with lateral displacement of the medial canthi (dystopia canthorum), dystopia of the lacrimal punctawith blepharophimosis, broad nasal root and hypertrichosis of the medial part of the eyebrows, white forelock, heterochromiairidis and deafmutism. Later, Depending on additional symptoms, WS is classified into four types which are WS1, WS2, WS3 and WS4. While WS1 and WS3 are attributed to mutations in PAX3, WS2 is heterogeneous, being caused by mutations in the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor gene in some but not all affected families. WS4 is attributed to mutations in the endothelin-3 or the endothelin-B receptor genes and SOX10 gene. Child has patches of skin hypo pigmentation in the left arm with sharply defined, irregular borders and with hyperpigmented islands scattered throughout (Figure 2). Ocular examination revealed bilateral + regurgitation test, congested conjunctival vessels. Heterochromiairidis in the form of sectorial hyper-pigmentation in the lower temporal area of the right iris was evident (Figure 3). Fundus examination revealed no abnormal findings. Cycloplegic refraction results were + 1.5 D bilaterally. Tests for hearing showed Sensorineural hearing loss All articles published in International Journal of Ophthalmic Pathology are the property of SciTechnol, and is protected by copyright laws. Copyright © 2014, SciTechnol, All Rights Reserved. Citation: Alwadani F (2015) Waardenburg syndrome (WS) type 1: A Case Report. Int J Ophthalmic Pathol 4:1. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2324-8599.1000156 hypertrichosis of the medial part of the eyebrows, white forelock, heterochromiairidis and deafmutism). Patients with type II don't have dystonia canthorum. Sensorineural hearing loss and hetrochromiairidis are the most important diagnostic features of this type. Individuals with type III Waardenburg syndrome, also called Klein-Waardenburg syndrome, have same features as type I in addition to musculoskeletal abnormalities as aplasia of ribs and abnormalities in the arm. Type IV of the syndrome (Shah – Waardenburd syndrome) is associated with Hieschsprung disease (agaloclonicmegacolon) [12]. In comparison to the other 3 types, waardenburg syndrome type IV appears to have an autosoaml recessive mode of inheritance [10]. Figure 2: Skin hypopigmented patches Dystopia canthorum is the most prominent features of Wardenburg syndrome. It has been recorded in 41.2-99% of the cases [1,2,5]. Other ocular manifestations of Waardenburg syndrome are mainly hetochromiairidis and fundus pigmentary abnormalities1. Pigmentary changes of the iris observed in Waardemburg syndrome include complete, partial or sectorial hetrochromia iridis [12]. Hetrochromiairidis occurs in 21-28% of patients with Waardenburg syndrome [2,7]. Fundus changes are either diffuse hypo pigmentations (albinnotic fundus) or peripheral hypopigmented motling 1. There are records of patients with Waardenburg syndrome associated with congenital cataract, anisometropic amblyopiaor glaucoma [2,13,14]. In addition to the eye, pigmentary alterations also affects, skin and hair of patients with Waardenburg syndrome 1-3. Color abnormalities of the skin are observed in 8.3-50% of patients. Hair abnormalities include while forelock (17– 85.4%) and premature whitening of the hair of the scalp, eye lashes, eye brows and body hair. Genetic testing for confirmation of diagnosis is available; however, diagnosis of Waardenburg syndrome is made clinically [11]. Case described in this report showed Dystopia canthorum blepharophimosis and sectorial hetrochromiairidis, Sensorineural hearing loss. No pigmentary disturbances of the fundus, increased intraocular pressure or refractive errors were found. Child has patches of skin hypo pigmentation in the left arm. Figure 3: Iris hyperpigmentation of the right eye. Discussion Waardenburg syndrome is hereditary auditory pigmentary syndrome with features characterized by abnormal melanocyte differentiation [1,2]. The mode of inheritance is mostly autosomal dominant10. In more than 90% of cases with Waardenburg syndrome a mutation in the PAX3 gene located in chromosome band 2q35 was found. This gene is involved in the process of regulation of development of melanocytes. The clinical manifestation of Waardenburg syndrome varies widely even between patients in the same family [1,11]. There are 4 recognized types of Waardengurg syndrome [1,10] Type I Waardenburg syndrome (originally described by Waardenburg) is characterized by evidence of all 6 features of the disease (dystopia of the lacrimal punctawith blepharophimosis, broad nasal root, Volume 4 • Issue 1 • 1000156 As genetic studies to confirm the diagnosis were not available. However, considering that the manifestations of Waardenburg syndrome varies widely between patients, description of the findings in our case coincides with characters of Waardengurgsyndrome type I. Hearing loss, although a prominent feature of the syndrome, has been observed in only 69% of type I and 78% of type II [7]. Also, poliosiswerefound in our case. The final diagnosis of Waardenburg syndrome type I is decided for the patient, and regular follow up dates were determined. Conclusion To our knowledge we report the first case of Waardenburg syndrome in eastern region of Saudi Arabia. Its case of waardenburg syndrome type I with bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction. It is important for ophthalmologists to recognize patients with waardenburg syndrome as early diagnosis decreases the possibilities of developing complications associated with it as deafness, glaucoma, and amblyopia. • Page 2 of 3 • Citation: Alwadani F (2015) Waardenburg syndrome (WS) type 1: A Case Report. Int J Ophthalmic Pathol 4:1. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2324-8599.1000156 References: 1. Lyubomir AD(2013) Dermatologic Manifestations of Waardenburg Syndrome. 2. Vichare N, Bhargava N (2013) Waardenburg syndrome: A rare case with bilateral congenital cataract: An unusual entity, Med J Armed Forces Indi 69: 172-174. 3. Waardenburg PJ (1951) A new syndrome combining developmental anomalies of the eyelids, eyebrows and nose root with pigmentary defects of the iris and head hair and with congenital deafness. Am J Hum Genet 3:195-253. 4. Arias S (1971) Genetic heterogeneity in the Waardenburg syndrome. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 7:87-101. 5. Dourmishev AL, Schwartz RA, Janniger CK (1999) Waardenburg syndrome. Int J Dermatol 38:656-663. 6. Read AP, Newton VE (1997) Waardenburg syndrome. J Med Genet. 34:656-665. 7. Nayak CS, Isaacson G (2003) Worldwide distribution of Waardenburg syndrome. Ann OtolRhinolLaryngol 112:817-820. Volume 4 • Issue 1 • 1000156 8. Liu XZ, Newton VE, Read AP (1995) Waardenburg syndrome type II: phenotypic findings and diagnostic criteria. Am L Med Genet 55: 95-100. 9. Wollnok B, Tukel T, Uyguner O, et al. (2003) homozygous and heterozygous inheritance of PAX3 mutation causes different types of Waardenburg syndrome. Am J Med A 122:42-45. 10. Rennie I G (2012) Don’t makes my blue eyes brown: heterochromia and other abnormalities of the iris. Eye 26: 29-50. 11. Tayebi N (2008) Waardenburg syndrome type I in an Iranian female. Iran J pediatr 19: 189-192. 12. Shim WK, Derieg M, Powell BR, Hsia YE (1999) Near-total intestinal aganglionosis in the Waardenburg-Shah syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 34 : 1853-1855. 13. Akai A, Goncu T, Boyaci N Yilmas O (2013) Anisometropic amblyopia in type II Waardenburg syndrome. BMJ Case Rep. 14. Nork TM, Shihab ZM, Young RSL, Price J(1986) Pigment distribution in Waardenburg's syndrome: a new hypothesis. Graefe’s Archives for clinical and experimental Ophthalmology 224: 487-492. • Page 3 of 3 •