October Issue 2015 PDF - The Small Town Texas Mason E
Transcription
October Issue 2015 PDF - The Small Town Texas Mason E
October 2015 The Small Town Texas Masons EE-magazine The Small Town Texas Mason's E-Magazine is not affiliated with any state Grand Lodge or individual Blue Lodge. It was created to enlighten, educate and entertain Masons and non-Masons alike and as title suggests, it does try to feature a small town Texas Masonic Lodge or a story of Texas Masonic history in each issue. Page# Story 3. Thomas Jefferson Rusk, Secretary of War - Brigadier General - Chief Justice - U.S. Senator Tex 5. England: The “Patriot Act” of 1799 That Almost Banned Freemasonry - Part II 10. Britain’s Greatest Masonic Secret? 16. Is Homosexuality Un-masonic? 20. The Irish Connection 22. A Brief History of the Grand Lodge of Ireland 23. My Masonic Ring 24 Don’t Look Behind the Curtain and the Generational Divide 27. The Profound Pontifications of Brother John Deacon Tex 31. Phoenix St. John 35. Cheap Brotherhood 36. Masonic Family Park, Granite Falls, Washington – A Masonic Did U Know? 37. Masonic Trivia- A Lodge Saved 38. Finally – After 179 Years Of Doubt Santa Anna’s Masonic Membership Confirmed Tex 39. THE OLD FOLKS PAGE 39. Surviving The Big Ones Tex 41. The Pine Island Pen Works 42. Australian Gun Law Update Copyright Info. No Copyright - Free To Use — A very sincere effort was made to avoid using any copyrighted material, without permission or giving credit to the author, in the creation of this web site. If you discover something that is yours, without giving you due credit, please let me know and it will be corrected or removed. This month’s cover was found by searching the term “Small Texas Towns” on Google. Name Unknown. Page 2 Thomas Jefferson Rusk Secretary of War - Brigadier General - Chief Justice - U.S. Senator (With a better press agent, Thomas Jefferson Rusk would have been as well-known as Sam Houston.) Thomas J. Rusk was born on December 5, 1803 to John and Mary Sterritt Rusk. His Father was John Rusk was a stonemason who immigrated to America from Ireland in 1791. Mary Sterritt Rusk his mother was a native of the Pendleton District of SC of a prominent in the region. She was known to be a pious and intelligent mother who began her children's education at her knee with the Bible as textbook. At Thomas’s birth, the family was renting a house from statesman John C. Calhoun in SC, which is now the site of Clemson College. Stonemason John Rusk built the nearby Old Stone Church. Tom Rusk grew to manhood at the family home on Cane Creek near the current town of Walhalla. Young Thomas’ future was determined when in about 1824 John C. Calhoun took an interest in the young Rusk, encouraged him to study law. Calhoun loaned him books and tutored him and later helped him land his first position in the office of William Gresham, Pendleton District Clerk. In nearby. Rusk began his law practice in 1825 and practiced law in Clarksville for about nine years In 1827, he married Mary F. (Polly) Cleveland, the daughter of General John Cleveland. Rusk became a business partner of his father-in-law after the marriage. He lived in the gold region of Georgia and made sizable mining investments. A deed dated 18 Oct 1830 shows that for $1000 Rush obtained a 1/8 share to a gold and mineral mine. This and related investments turned out to be worthless, the managers fled with the money to Mexican Texas in 1834. Rusk pursued them to Nacogdoches where he discovered that they had lost his money gambling. In Nacogdoches, Rusk became interested in the politics and the troubles of Texas. He remained there and began a law practice. After Rusk decided to stay in Texas, he became a citizen of Mexico in 1835 and applied for a head right in David G. Burnet's colony. Then he sent for his family and in Dec 1835, his wife and children, John Cleveland and Cicero joined him in Nacogdoches. Rusk was tall and had a commanding presence. He had a dark, ruddy complexion, deep set and benevolent eyes, and kindly and engaging features. A single glance won every heart, and the whole people took him on trust. Without desire or effort upon his part, he became the leader of the people of the old municipality of Nacogdoches in the first faint stirrings of a bloody revolution. Rusk was at the convention which declared Texas an independent Republic when it met at Washington, on the Brazos, March 1, 1836. He was a delegate from Nacogdoches and not only signed the Texas Declaration of Independence, but he also chaired the committee to revise the constitution of the Republic of Texas. He organized volunteers from Nacogdoches and hastened to Gonzales, where his men joined Stephen F. Austin's army in preventing the Mexicans from seizing their cannon. They proceeded to San Antonio, but Rusk left the army before the Siege of Bexar. The provisional government named him inspector general of the army in the Nacogdoches District. As a delegate from Nacogdoches to the Convention of 1836, Rusk The ad interim government, installed on March 17, 1836, appointed Rusk as Secretary of War. When informed that the Alamo had fallen and the Mexican army was moving eastward, Rusk helped President David Burnet to move the government to Harrisburg. After the Mexicans massacred James W. Fannin's Texan army at Goliad, Burnet sent Rusk with orders for General Sam Houston to make a stand against the enemy. Rusk participated with bravery in the defeat of Santa Anna on April 21, 1836, in the Battle of Page 3 San Jacinto. From May to October 1836, he served as commander-in-chief of the Army of the Republic of Texas, with the rank of brigadier general. He followed the Mexican troops westward as they retired from Texas to be certain of their retreat beyond the Rio Grande until he got to Goliad. There he called a halt and had the bones of Fannin's four hundred and eighty massacred men to be collected and interred. Over the remains of the martyred dead he delivered an address that moistened the cheeks of every man in the motley group of half-naked, half-starved and illarmed volunteer soldiers, who with him performed these last sad rites. As chairman of the House Military Committee in 1837, he sponsored a militia bill that passed over Houston's veto, and Congress elected Rusk major general of the militia. In the summer of 1838, he commanded the Nacogdoches militia, which suppressed the Córdova Rebellion. In October, when Mexican agents were discovered among the Kickapoo Indians, Rusk defeated those Indians and their Indian allies. He captured marauding Caddo Indians in November 1838 and risked an international incident when he invaded United States territory to return them to the Indian agent in Shreveport, Louisiana. On December 12, 1838, the Texas Congress elected Rusk Chief Justice of the Republic's Supreme Court. He served until June 30, 1840, when he resigned to resume his law practice. Later he headed the bar of the Republic of Texas. He and J. Pinckney Henderson, later the first governor of the state of Texas, formed a law partnership in 1841. Early in 1843, Rusk was called upon once again to serve as a military commander. Concern over the lack of protection on the frontier caused Congress, in a joint ballot on January 16, 1843, to elect Rusk major general of the militia of the Republic of Texas. But he resigned in June when Houston obstructed his plans for aggressive warfare against Mexico. Rusk then turned his energies to establishing Nacogdoches University. He served as vice president of the university when the charter was granted in 1845 and president in 1846. in 1845, when a convention was called to form a constitution for Texas as a proposed State of the Union, he was unanimously elected a delegate from Nacogdoches. When the convention assembled on the fourth of July, he was unanimously elected its president, and when the Legislature, under its new constitution, assembled on the 16th of February, 1846, he was elected by the unanimous vote, of both the Senate and House, to be one of the two first Senators from the State of Texas to the Congress of the United States, his colleague being Gen. Sam. Houston. In 1843 he had been elected Major-General of the Republic. Together, they took their seats in March, 1846---together, by the re-election of each, they sat eleven years, till the melancholy death of Rusk in 1857. Together, they represented the sovereignty and defended the rights of Texas together, they shed luster on their State---together, they sustained President Polk in the prosecution of the Mexican War---together, they, each for himself, declined a pro-offered Major-Generalship in the army of invasion in Mexico---together, they labored to give Texas the full benefit of her mergence into the Union in regard to mail routes, frontier protection and custom house facilities--together, they labored in behalf of the compromises of 1850, the adjustment of the boundary of Texas and sale (as a peace offering), of our Northwest Territory to the United States---and together, they sought to encourage the construction of a transcontinental railway, on the parallel of thirty-two degrees north latitude from the Mississippi river and the Gulf of Mexico, through Texas, to the Pacific Ocean, an achievement that found its final accomplishment December 1, 1881, twenty-four years after the death of Rusk. For several years Gen. Rusk was elected to the honorable position of president pro-tem of the United States Senate and presided with a dignity and impartiality that commanded the respect and esteem of every member of that body. In 1851, with a select band of friends, he traversed Texas from east to west on the parallel of thirty-two degrees to see for his self the practicability of a railway route, and became thoroughly satisfied of its feasibility and cheapness. Page 4 During the special session of March 1857, the Senate elected him President pro tempore. While Rusk attended the spring session of Congress, his wife died of tuberculosis on April 23, 1856. Five of their seven children were still living at the time. Despondent over the death of his wife and ill from a tumor at the base of his neck, Rusk committed suicide by a self-inflicted gunshot wound on July 29, 1857. He was 54 years old. He is buried in Oak Grove Cemetery in Nacogdoches. Thomas Jefferson was a great leader that gave his all to establish our Republic, our State and our fraternity under trying conditions. He was a dedicated Mason. He joined Milam Lodge No. 40 (Later Milam Lodge #2) in Nacogdoches in 1837 and was a founding member of the Grand Lodge of Texas, organized in Houston on December 20, 1837. Compiled from Wikipedia, Texas State Library and Archives Commission, Lone Star Junction, Infoplease.com, Sons Of Dewitt Colony and Handbook of Texas On Line, by John “Corky” Daut, P.M. Waller Masonic Lodge #808, and Contributing Editor to the Grand Lodge of Texas History Committee. England: The “Patriot Act” of 1799 That Almost Banned Freemasonry – Part II Fear of invasion gripped Britain in 1799. In such dire circumstances the Prime Minister took steps to curtail civil liberties: The Unlawful Societies Act of 1799 A Lecture by Prof Andrew Prescott of the Centre for Research into Freemasonry, University of Sheffield. Presented at the second international conference of the Canonbury Masonic Research Centre, 4-5 November 2000. One major difficulty which had become apparent [with proposed restrictive legislation] was the position of freemasons. The provisions of the bill against the use of secret oaths in societies potentially placed freemasons in a difficult position, although arguably these oaths were outside the scope of bill since they were not seditious. More problematic was the requirement that initiations should take place in a public meeting. The grand lodges must also have been uneasily aware that John Murray, 4th Duke they did not have a comprehensive register of members of the of Atholl (1755 –1830) was sort required by the bill, and that the compilation and the son of john Murray, 3rd distribution of such a register would have been an enormous duke of Atholl and his wife, undertaking. Charlotte. The two English Grand Lodges and the Scottish Grand In 1774, he married Jane Lodge had quickly taken action to try and deal with these Cathcart, daughter of the 9th problems before the bill got to committee. On 30 April, the day Lord Cathcart. on which the bill received its second reading, Pitt received a He was Grand Master of request for a meeting with masonic representatives, and a the Antient Grand Lodge of delegation went to Downing Street on 2 May. England from 1775 until 1781 The masonic representatives included Lord Moira, Acting and again from 1791 until Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of England, the Duke of 1812. Atholl, Grand Master of the Ancients' Grand Lodge and Past Grand Master Mason of Scotland, as well as other grand officers. Page 5 The most important official record of this meeting is a note in the minute book of the Hall Committee of the Modern Grand Lodge, reporting that the Prime Minister had 'expressed his good opinion of the Society and said he was willing to recommend any clause to prevent the new act from affecting the Society, provided that the name of the society could be prevented from being made use of as a cover by evilly disposed persons for seditious purposes'. William White, Grand Secretary of the Moderns, afterwards recalled the meeting in similar terms, recalling that Pitt 'paid many compliments to the Society and said there was no imputation against its conduct, and that it was only wished to adopt some regulations to prevent the name of our Society from being perverted by bad people to a cover for their machinations against the government'. Lord Moira also subsequently recalled how 'I have pledged myself to His Majesty's ministers that should any set of men attempt to meet as a lodge without sanction, the Grand Master, or Acting Grand Master (whomsoever he might be), would apprise parliament'. Pitt himself reported to the House of Commons that the freemasons 'were very ready to acquiesce in any security the legislature would require from them for the tranquility of the state'. However, it seems that Pitt probably also pointed out that the government had worrying information which suggested that the masons needed to be more vigilant. Among the documents which had been shown to the secret committee was a letter sent to the Home Office by John Waring, a catholic priest at Stonyhurst, who described how an Irishman named Bernard Kerr had told him he was 'a freemason, a Knight Templar, and belonged to a society of people who called themselves United Englishmen'. Kerr had shown him the printed rules of the United Englishmen, which he kept in a large portfolio together with his papers of admission as a Knight Templar. These concerns about connections between the united bodies and freemasonry were not idle. Many of the United Irishmen were freemasons and many features of their organization, such as the use of oaths and secret signs, were drawn from masonic models. Moreover, the problems were not restricted to Irish masons. On 17 April, shortly before Pitt met the masonic deputation, James Greene, a freemason and lawyer staying in Leeds, wrote to the Home Secretary, describing a meeting of a lodge at Leeds. 'Being no stranger to the disaffected principles of too many in this place and especially among the lower class of freemasons', he wrote, 'I made it a point to visit a lodge of that class; and tho' politics are never introduced while the lodge is sitting, it became a topic out of the lodge when a part of the fraternity withdrew from the lodge room to supper, when a shrewd sensible fellow began to inveigh against the measures of the government, and spoke in very high terms in favour of the Cannibalian government in France, to which I exhibited a seeming pleasure. After the lodge was over, and since, I got a great deal of information from him by seeming to be one of that infernal class, and being desirous to obtain more, I begged to see him as often as he could make it convenient to talk matters over. He called upon me several times at my lodgings, and having given credit to the seeming sincerity of my attachment to that they call the cause, and confiding in my secrecy as a free mason, produced a letter from one of the leaders among the United Irishmen, dated Dublin the 31st of March ult[im]o.' This letter referred to a major United meeting which was to take place, under cover of a masonic gathering, at Paisley in Scotland. Greene concluded his letter as follows: 'Now my Lord, if your Grace will approve of it, as I am in the higher orders of masonry, and as I have every reason to believe that I can be of signal service in this matter, I will very readily undertake to conduct matters as occasion may serve so as to nip the evil in the bud, or let it run to such a length as may come to a riper maturity, and tho' there are too many rotten of the Craft fraternity, I can Page 6 with great truth aver that the general part of the mass are strictly loyal' The aftermath of Pitt's meeting with the masonic delegation suggests that he gave them the gist of the information received from Greene. Although it seems that the lodge in Leeds was not an Antient lodge, it as the Antients who took these concerns most seriously, perhaps because of their greater strength in the north-western industrial towns, where the United groups were strongest, and their closer connections with Irish masonry. Immediately after the meeting with Pitt, the Grand Officers of the Antients met at the Crown and Anchor Tavern in the Strand [London]. They agreed to recommend two emergency measures. The first was 'to inhibit and totally prevent all public masonic processions, and all private meetings of masons, or lodges of emergency, upon any pretence whatever, and to suppress and suspend all masonic meetings, except upon the regular stated lodge meetings and Royal Arch chapters, which shall be held open to all masons to visit, duly qualified as such'. It was also agreed 'that when the usual masonic business is ended, the lodge shall then disperse, the Tyler withdraw from the door, and formality and restraint of admittance shall cease'. These two measures were formally approved on 6 May at a Grand Lodge of Emergency, with the Duke of Atholl himself in the chair. The actions of the Antients and the assurances given to Pitt convinced him that the Grand Lodges were determined to ensure that freemasonry could not be used as a front for radical activity, and at the committee stage of the bill Pitt himself accordingly introduced amendments to exempt them from the act. He proposed what was essentially a system of self-regulation operated by the Grand Lodges. The relevant clause read as follows: '...nothing in this act contained shall extend, or be construed to extend, to prevent the meetings of the Lodge or society of persons which is now held at Free Masons Hall in Great Queen Street in the County of Middlesex, and usually denominated The Grand Lodge of Freemasons of England, or of the Lodge or society of persons usually denominated The Grand Lodge of Masons of England, according to the Old Institution, or of the Lodge or society of persons which is now held at Edinburgh, and usually denominated The Grand Lodge of Free Masons of Scotland, or the meetings of any subordinate lodge or society of persons usually calling themselves Free Masons, the holding whereof shall be sanctioned or approved by any one of the above mentioned lodges or societies...' No amendments were made to the clauses concerning freemasons, but concern was expressed about them in the course of the debate. Lord Grenville himself observed that 'With respect to the clause adopted by the other house of parliament for exempting societies of freemasons from the operations of the bill.., though he did not mean to propose setting it aside, yet it did not appear to him to be fraught with that clearness and certainty which he could wish. He was free to express his belief, that whatever the conduct of masonic societies in foreign countries might be (where in some instances designs of the most destructive tendency were brought to perfection) these societies in this country harboured no designs inimical to the state, or suffered or entertained such in their lodges. Yet what the clause provided was of an anomalous nature, and new to the functions of parliament. The officers, & c., of the subordinate lodges were to be approved by the grand master and others of the principal lodges before they could be entitled to hold their meetings. Now, how such officers, who were to have the licensing power, were to be constituted and appointed, that house, as a legislative assembly, knew nothing. It was not his own intent to propose any specific amendment to the clause; he only throw out the observation, in order that other lords, more conversant in such matters, might if they were willing, come forward and suggest something...' Grenville thus felt that the idea of self-regulation raised serious constitutional difficulties; it seemed to him inappropriate that Grand Officers should be given statutory Page 7 authority effectively to license masonic lodges when parliament itself had no control over how those grand officers were appointed. The Duke of Norfolk, declaring himself to be a mason, expressed some alarm at Grenville's remarks and 'deplored the idea of setting aside the exempting clause, as tending to their annihilation.' Grenville assured Norfolk that he was not proposing removing the clauses, just asking for a better method of regulating lodges. Norfolk was unable to suggest a new formulation and proposed instead that the act last only for a year, which was unacceptable to Grenville. The clauses concerning the freemasons survived the committee stage in the House of Lords, but the concerns raised by Grenville were soon to resurface and present a serious threat to freemasonry. On 20 June, the bill came up for its third reading in the House of Lords. The first speaker in the debate was the pedantic and cantankerous Earl of Radnor, who proposed an amendment to drop the exemptions for freemasons. He said that 'Not being himself a mason, and having heard that they administered oaths of secrecy, he did not know, whether in times so critical as the present, it was wise to trust the freemasons any more than any other meetings'. He went on to add that 'their meetings were, in other countries at least, made subservient to the purposes of those illuminati who had succeeded in the overthrow of one great government, and were labouring for the destruction of all others. This he conceived to have been proved in a work some time since published by a very learned Professor (Dr Robinson), and he was desirous to guard against any similar practices in this country'. It seems that this was the first point at which Robinson's famous 1797 anti-masonic work was mentioned by name in the course of the discussion of the 1799 legislation. The Duke of Atholl responded to Radnor, and, in the words of the report in The Senator 'defended with great earnestness and ability the institutions of freemasonry'. The fullest account of his speech is in The Senator, and is worth quoting at length: The Noble Duke contended, that the imputations thrown upon freemasons by the Noble Earl, on the authority of a recent publication, however justified by the conduct of the lodges on the continent, were by no means applicable to those of Great Britain. His Grace avowed, that the proceedings in masonic lodges, and all their obligation to secrecy simply related to their own peculiar little tenets and matters of form. There were no set of men in the kingdom, and he had the best opportunities of knowing, having had the honour to preside over a great part of them in England as well as in Scotland, who could possibly be more The Prime Minister, loyal or attached to the person of their sovereign or the cause of their William Pitt, the country. There was nothing in the masonic institution hostile to the law, younger the religion or the established government of the country; on the contrary, they went to support all these, and no person who was not a loyal or religious man could be a good mason. Of those well-established facts perhaps the Noble Earl was ignorant in consequence of his not being a mason, but they were strictly true: added to these considerations, the masonic system was founded on the most exalted system of benevolence, morals, and charity, and many thousands were annually relieved by the charitable benevolence of masons. These very laudable and useful charities must necessarily be quashed did the bill pass into a law, as recommended by the Noble Earl. The very nature and foundation of freemasonry involved in them the most unshaken attachment to religion, unsuspected loyalty to sovereigns, and the practice of Page 8 morality and benevolence, in the strictest sense of the words. To such regulations as went to prevent the perversion of their institution to the purposes of seditious conspiracy, he could have no objection, and as a proof of the readiness with which they would be acceded to by the masonic societies, he need only mention that this subject had occupied their attention for several years past... The Bishop of Rochester, Samuel Horsley, who produced a famous edition of Newton's works and was a former secretary of the Royal Society, spoke next. He declared that he was 'a member of the branch of masonry which existed in Scotland' and agreed with everything the Duke of Atholl had said: 'the innocence of these [masonic] institutions was unquestionable, and other objects which it embraced were of the most laudable nature'. However, this applied only to genuine and regular lodges in Britain and was not, in his view, true on the continent. There was a risk that continental influences could affect freemasonry in Britain: 'As secrecy was absolutely necessary, no person could say that the doctrine of innovation, which had diffused itself on the continent, had not found its way into this country'. The Bishop reminded the House that Robison had calculated that there were no less than eight illuminated lodges in Britain. He felt torn between his loyalties as a mason and his duty as a legislator, but in the end his obligations as a member of the House of Lords required him to support Lord Radnor, since 'By the bill as it then stood, the meetings of such lodges were sanctioned, or were approved by persons appointed they knew not how, or by whom; by individuals, however respectable they might be as such, of whom they, as a House of Parliament, had no cognizance'. In other words, the Bishop felt, as Grenville had earlier, that a responsible parliament should not countenance a system of self-regulation by the grand lodges. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ After retiring, I went to the Social Security office to apply for Social Security. The woman behind the counter asked me for my driver's license to verify my age. I looked in my pockets and realized I had left my wallet at home. I told the woman that I was very sorry, but I would have to go home and come back later. The woman said, 'Unbutton your shirt'. So I opened my shirt revealing my curly silver hair. She said, 'That silver hair on your chest is Proof enough for me' and she processed my Social Security application. When I got home, I excitedly told my wife about my experience at the Social Security office. She said, 'You should have dropped your pants. You might have gotten Disability, Page 9 too.' And then the fight started... Britain’s Greatest Masonic Secret? From the Rural Lodge Newsletter PhilipCoppens (Born Filip St Edmund’s Masonic Church might lay claim to being Coppens, 1971) is a writer who Britain’s greatest Masonic secret. Labeled by experts as a started his career as an investigative “temple to Freemasonry” and “a total concept as exotic as Philip Coppens (Born Filip Roslin Chapel in Scotland”, St Edmund’s Church is one of Coppens, 1971) is a writer who England’s hidden gems. So much so, that it is almost totally started his career as an investigative journalist, who specialized on the unknown. subject the world of politics and Philip Coppens intelligence agencies. As a result, http://www.philipcoppens.com/ material uncovered on the life of Though President John F Kennedy’s alleged Rosslyn Chapel, assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, was the star of The used by a US government enquiry in Da Vinci Code, 1994. is often seen as a In 1995, he established Frontier Masonic Magazine (formerly Frontier 2000) The found- together with Herman Hegge, a ation stone was newsstand magazine in the laid in 1870, in Netherlands and Belgium. He has the northeast written in various fringe magazines, church, in truth, only certain modifications from the late 19th both in the UK (Fortean Times, century contain some references to the Craft. St Edmund’s, NEXUS Magazine) and abroad however, was built by Freemasons, and apparently for (HERA, New Dawn Magazine), as Masons, not so much as a church, but as a Temple of well as appearances on radio and television. Since 1995, Solomon. Many Rochdale churches from the 19th century Frontier Sciences Foundation have Masonic symbolism, such as Christ Church in Healey, has grown to incorporate, amongst but none can compare to St Edmund’s. The church was others, Frontier Bookshop and designed by James Medland Taylor, with input from Albert Frontier Publishing. Hudson Royds, sponsor and Freemason, and the first In 1999, he was the principal incumbent, EW Gilbert, artist and Freemason. The church researcher for Lynn Picknett and has been described as “probably James Medland Taylor’s Clive Prince’s The Stargate finest work.corner of the building – as Masonic ritual Conspiracy, which investigated politicians’ apparent stipulates. The lewis bolt with which the stone was current obsession with ancient Egypt. suspended and the working tools with which it was proved, He is the author of The Stone were subsequently handed over to St Chad’s Lodge, No. Puzzle of Rosslyn Chapel (2002), on 1129, in Rochdale. The church was opened on 7 May 1873, with various the enigmatic Scottish chapel and its relationship with freemasonry and Masonic ceremonies held. The cost of its construction is the Knights Templar The Canopus known to have been at least £28,000, whereas the cost of a Revelation “normal church” in those days was roughly £4000. No CONTINUED wonder therefore that Sir Nikolaus Pevsner [the great architectural historian] catalogues the church as “Rochdale’s temple to Freemasonry, a total concept as exotic as Roslin Chapel in Scotland.” Page 10 Pevsner added that “Almost every fitting and feature has reference to the lore of masonry.” The Masonic design of Philip Coppens Continued this church begins with its placement within the (2004), on the lore of the star landscape. It stands on a Canopus in ancient cultures Land of diamond shaped the Gods (2007), on the Scottish churchyard, the focus of Lothians region, its megaliths and its links with the story of King Arthur four streets, at the highest and Camelot point of the town. Like The New Pyramid Age (2007), a King Solomon’s Temple on survey of the pyramid debate, the top of Mount Moriah, so arguing that most pyramids around St Edmund’s dominates the the world conform to a "pyramid skyline of Rochdale. But template" apart from Masonic Servants of the Grail (2009), an investigation into the medieval Grail planning, the church was also built with legends. He has edited Saunière’s Model intervisibility be-tween the church and Mount Falinge and the Secret of Rennes-le-Château (2001), by André Douzet. (the Royds family home nearby) in mind. Together, they have written The Mount Falinge, of which only the windowless facade Secret Vault (2006), on the existence exists today, is now alas neglected. Alas, so is St Edmund’s. of an underground complex in NotreThe Builder Dame-de-Marceille. St Edmund’s Church is the brain and/or lovechild of In 2008, they co-authored La Albert Hudson Royds, a most prominent and wealthy Quete de Sauniere. He is also the Mason. The earliest traces of the Royds family are to be Vice-president of the French Societe found at Soyland, then a small town approximately five Perillos and president of the English miles south-west of Halifax, and can be traced back to one Societe Perillos. He is the author of three Dutch John del Rode, who died in 1334. The Royds family language books. One was published remained in the Halifax area until approximately 1500, when they relocated to Rochdale, roughly twenty miles away from in 1994, on what he alleges is a their home. Wool apparently made the family rich and in megalithic civilisation of Western 1786, James Royds of Falinge purchased land at Brownhill Europe. In 2004, he wrote De Da Vinci and later, in the same area, built Mount Falinge, which was Code Ontcijferd, a introduction to built in a commanding position on sloping land between the mysteries incorporated in Dan Cronkeyshaw and Falinge Road. Brown's The Da Vinci Code, which Albert Hudson was born on 11 September 1811 and was had a Dutch and Italian translation, baptised at St Mary’s Church in Rochdale. His family had both published in 2005. now largely moved into banking and he took his seat in the family bank in 1827 when he was 16. His brother, William Edward, who was six years younger, joined him some time later. Both men soon became active partners in the firm and, by the 1840s, had became responsible for its general management, replacing their father, Clement, who by this time had become almost wholly involved with public life and a political career. St Edmund’s wasn’t the first church Albert Hudson Royds constructed. Following his father’s death, he opted for a complete change of life and in 1855 purchased an estate of 382 acres, mainly in Rushwick, near Worcester, called Crow Nest or Crown East. He rebuilt Page 11 the house, renamed it Crown East Court, and erected new outbuildings and stables, cottages and a church. Soon afterwards, he sold the estate and bought Ellerslie in Great Malvern and moved there in 1869. He remained there until 22 May 1878, when he moved back to Rochdale, first to Falinge Lawn and later to Brownhill, where he had lived before his father’s death. From the window of Mount Falinge it would have been possible to look out on St Clement’s Church, Spotland, dedicated to that saint out of compliment to his father. From this vantage point it would also have been possible to see Christ Church, Healey, where so many members of the family lie buried; finally, he would be able to see St Edmund’s, the construction of which he had begun in 1870, and saw completed in 1873. St Edmund’s position was similar to King’s Solomon Temple, but the church’s dimensions were equally based on a temple that would inspire Freemasonry. It is four-square in plan and is built on mathematically symbolic principles. Raised on a roughly hewn plinth, the overall dimensions are proportional to those of King Solomon’s Temple; its length is three times and its height one and a half times its breadth. The interior volume is of six cubes, one for each arm and two for the nave, plus that of the crossing. The lantern was the seventh cube, but the lantern tower was ceiled off in 1887 (some reports mention 1911), on the advice of J Murgatroyd, in response to complaints about downdraughts. It means that the centre was deprived of a flood of light, but also that the sacred dimensions of the building were mutilated. The Design of the Masonic Church Approaching from the south up Clement Royds Street, the building rises up out of the ground. First to appear was the pentagonal bronze star of the weathervane that left no doubt at all that this was an unusual church. Presently, the star has been removed. Noting that for many, a pentagram has Satanist connotations, having a church crowned by one, might have posed some questions. These doubts might not have gone away when people saw how the stone finials on the gables were crowned by even more pentagrams and other enigmatic designs: thefive pointed emblem of the Craft is there; the six pointed star of the Royal Arch; the square crosses of the Christian degrees, etc. All of them leave the casual passer-by with the distinct impression that this church is unlike most – if any other. On the gable end, there is the motto “Semper paratus”, “Always Ready”, a motto that is used by many organisations. It was the slogan of the Royds family, but for Masons might be a reminder of how they are supposed to always be vigilant, in keeping the secrets secret. Around the actual entrance are several depictions of the vesica piscis. The design is linked with divine proportions and architecture and its presence here must be an indication for the visitor that the building he is about to enter, is indeed a sacred design. The tympanum has a pentagram, inside of which are water lilies and the side panels with oak leaves and acorns. For Freemasons, it is seen as an expression of the need to give a password before being able to enter and its presence above the entrance is therefore perfectly chosen. In many so-called “enigmatic churches” (read: Rosslyn Chapel and like), the stained glass windows are often later additions and hence shed little light into the mind of the original builders. Here, because the church is relatively modern, all are original, except for those of the south transept, which are missing. Originally a Te Deum, they were exhibited in Vienna in 1887 – but apparently never returned, or at least never reinstated. The scheme on display in the windows was developed by Lavers, Barraud & Westlake. It is fascinating to know that Henry Holiday (who was behind the frieze at Rochdale Town Hall) also designed for them. In the nave, as one enters to our left, the story that the windows tell appropriately begins with Genesis, and Adam and Eve. In the North Page 12 transept is a Jesse Tree, with Jesse stretched out over two lights. This design, less exposed to direct sunlight, is able to reveal some of the original magnificence of these windows. However, the western rose window does make one wonder whether we might not be in Chartres or some other French medieval cathedral. What theme went into which window was not done haphazardly. Analysis reveals that on the south side, the theme is building – a favourite for Masons, of course – and we find depictions of Noah’s Ark and the Tower of Babel. On the north, the theme is sacrifice, with Abraham and Isaac, and the Last Supper. In the west: creation, fall and redemption. Building has connotations with Freemasonry, but the Masonic interest is openly depicted in the East Window, situated in the Royds Chapel. It is a marvellous example of Masonic symbolism in its architectural design, and is appropriately filled with pictorial representations of the designing, building and decoration of the Temple at Jerusalem. In the centre light the three Grand Masters are shown with the plan of the Temple, or what purports to be the plan. There is also the figure of Hiram Abif, wearing a Master Mason’s cap, preserving the lineaments of Albert Hudson Royds. The right hand light shows the workmen busy with the masonry, while the left hand light shows the priests and populace celebrating the completion of the building. In the central pentagon of each pentalpha are, from left to right, the emblems of the Craft, the Ancient and Accepted Rite and The United Religious, Military and Masonic Orders. Albert Hudson’s Masonic path began on 8 December 1847, when, at the age of 36, he was initiated into the Lodge of Benevolence No. 273 (later No. 226) at the Red Lion Hotel, Littleborough, near Rochdale. It marked the start of a life in which he would join and rise in several – if not most – Masonic rites. He held office in the Provincial Grand Lodge of East Lancashire from 1850 to 1856 as Provincial Grand Junior Warden and from 1856 to 1866 as the Deputy Provincial Grand Master. In 1860, Albert Hudson Royds was one of the petitioners for the foundation of his “own” lodge, The Royds Lodge No. 816, which was consecrated on 3 October 1864, still several years before he would begin the construction of his own Masonic oeuvre. It was not the only lodge that would carry his name. On 30 December 1867 the Provincial Grand Lodge met at Townsend House, Great Malvern, for the consecration of The Royds Lodge No. 1204. At the consecration, Albert Hudson’s son, Edmund Albert Nuttall, was appointed as Junior Warden. He also is known to have joined both Royal Arch and Mark Masonry, as well as being a founder member of the St Dunstan Chapter of the Scottish Rite. On 8 April 1862 he was elected a member of The Supreme Council – also known as the 33rd degree – and appointed Grand Captain General from 1869 to 1872, the time when St Edmund’s was built. The specific spark that initiated St Edmund’s might have come when on 10 August 1869 the Provincial Grand Lodge convened in the Chapter House of Worcester Cathedral to march in procession to the Cathedral where the Provincial Grand Master unveiled the new Masonic window that had been built in the north transept. On this occasion, Royds proclaimed: “I ask you to accept this gift from the brethren of our ancient Craft and sometimes, when you look upon its mellowed light, may you be induced to say, ‘O, wonderful Masons!’” The cost of the windows, nowadays more often referred to as The Twelve Apostles Window, was £530. After the completion of St Edmund’s, Royds, on 24 May 1875 proceeded to lay the foundation stone of St Luke’s Church in Dudley. Alas, in December, he lost the use of his legs which, together with the loss of his daughter, at first made him unable to attend, and then compelled him to resign from office on 7 March 1878. The Church Design… There Is A Plan. Page 13 St Edmund’s is a Temple of Solomon masked as a church. Built roughly at the same time when the enigmatic Bérenger Saunière constructed his enigmatic church in Rennes-le-Château, Saunière’s church supposedly contains “hidden clues” either to the location of a treasure or to the nature of the secret as to how he became so extraordinarily rich. But what detail is significant and might mean what precisely, is a matter of great controversy – and subjectivity. In the case of St Edmund’s, the Masonic references are sometimes underhand, but always clear to the Mason – quite often, they are straight in your face. There is, in short, no doubt that this church is Masonic in design. On the East wall, a reredos by Rev. EW Gilbert is integrated with the stone of the building. At first sight, it appears to be nothing more as if they are cement leaves; on closer inspection, they are meant to grow out of the wall, and are actually vine leaves; inside them, you can read the words “I AM THE”. For those “on the level”, this is supposed to be read as “I am the vine” – the vine not written, but portrayed. It is a reference to John 15:5, “I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit.” It appears to be astraight forward Christian message, but only Masons will know that this is actually a Masonic prayer, and a famous one at that: Buzz Aldrin, the second man on the Moon and a Mason, used it during a private moment on the Moon – leaving non-Mason Neil Armstrong apparently somewhat perplexed as to what his colleague was doing. Looking up, we find the stone bond and the timber close boarding to the roof in enigmatic patterns, almost like a Masonic board. It is indeed accepted that it is to remind of the woodwork of King Solomon’s Temple, which was carved with knops and open flowers, having a variety of geometrical designs. If there is any doubt about this interpretation, the Masonic connection of the lectern is so obvious, it is actually often referred to as the Masonic lectern. Indeed, the lectern has been described as “the symbolic climax of the whole scheme”. On an imperfect block of black marble stands a perfect white cube of ashlar marble. The cube, of course, is already significant within the Craft. Upon that are three columns of brass: Doric, Ionic and Corinthian, representing Wisdom, Strength and Beauty. However, engraved upon their bases are the symbolic tools of the Craft, specifically the jewels of the Master and the Senior and Junior Wardens – the three degrees of Masonry. On top is a horizontal brass tray, fretted with pomegranates, lilies and intertwined snakes (a variation on the ouroboros, but within a Masonic context symbolising unity), with a horizontal design that represents the Blazing Star or glory, and finally, to carry the Volume of Sacred Law, a pyramid formed out of square and compasses – making an obvious – Masonic – statement the congregation was impossible to miss. As mentioned, further straightforward Masonic imagery is present in the Royds Chapel and its stained glass windows. But there are more hidden messages. The chapel – structurally – carries one of the massive buttresses which really carry the tower, which is made out of ashlar stones. The mastery that went into the construction of this buttress – this pillar – is Page 14 extraordinary. The Royds Chapel is divided from the chancel by a screen of granite columns, their overscale capitals representing fig, passion flower and fern – continuing a “leafy theme” that this part of the church shares with Rosslyn Chapel. Direct references to the Craft are also present in the iron gates of Royds Chapel, which have square and compasses and a Seal of Solomon. For Freemasons, there is – again – a secondary level of reading this chapel. First of all, Royds chapel occupies the position in the church where the finished craftsman is placed after his passing. In the windows, of course, Royds has depicted himself as a Master Mason; and if he attended mass, he would hence sit in the position of Master Mason – inside the Royds Chapel. Furthermore, in the opinion of Rod H Baxter, two pillars between the chancel and the chapel are meant to represent Jachin and Boaz, though he admitted that they were placed in an unusual position if they were meant to represent them. He noted that the donor of the church would have had to look out from his sanctuary between these two pillars to contemplate the altar – and hence that they are the best candidates for this honour. Indeed, though the giant pillars near the lantern at first sight seem obvious candidates for the role of Jachin and Boaz, there are four of them – alas, two too many. Whether the church was ever meant to be used as a lodge is open for interpretation. And between intentand execution, is another major chasm. But it is clear that the church could have been used for Masonic rituals – or at least was designed with these rituals in mind. Take, for example, the crypt – even though the Royds never designed or saw it as being used as a burial place. First of all, the crypt runs along the entire length and width of the church. It does not seem to have a real purpose and must have come at an extra cost. Entry to it is by a flight of stairs, as well as two trapdoors. In the third degree of Freemasonry, a crypt is a functional aspect, where the initiate is “raised” after being lowered in a crypt and reborn. In most lodges today, a tarp is laid out in the middle of the lodge temple, but could it be that the Church’s Masonic architects rendered it more spectacularly in St Edmund’s? Even if he intended to use it for Masonic ceremonies, Royds never much could enjoy his Great Work. In December 1875, as mentioned, he lost the use of his legs. He walked again in 1879, but moved to Lytham in 1881, to return to Rochdale six years later. He died on 17 January 1890 and was buried at Christ Church, Healey. The Future of the Building On 12 February 1985, the church became a Grade Two listed building. For a church familiar with Masonic Degrees, it must have been a somewhat familiar step to be raised to the level of Fellowcraft. But Masonic initiations are all about conquering death, and alas, that is currently the challenge the church is facing. In 2006, the Rev. David Finney, vicar at both St Edmund’s and St Mary’s, was informed by the diocese that the church would close. Several services were being held without a congregation. In February 2008, the church was therefore finally closed to the public, but being a Grade Two listed building, it cannot be demolished. Its future is therefore uncertain, though other denominations have expressed a potential interest in securing at least the short to medium-term future of the building. What might therefore be seen by some as the end of this church, might, of course, only be a sleep, or rebirth. Rosslyn Chapel too had numerous episodes when it was unused, derelict and even close to collapse. Equally so, the Temple of Jerusalem had – and continues to have – a controversial history. In the end, it will be a question of whether the Great Architect of the Universe is willing… I would like to thank Andy Marshall for his extraordinary efforts in photographing the church, as well as guiding me to and through it. I would also like to thank Charlie Watson and the Royds Page 15 Lodges for cataloguing their history and the history of their founder, as well as Andrew Gough, for providing me with several Masonic insights, or confirmations. www.fotofacade.com Philip Coppens Is Homosexuality UnUn-masonic? Editor’s Note; I realize homosexuality is a very sensitive subject for many Masonic Brothers, because in the USA ninety something percent of us are Christians and homosexuality is recognized as a sin. BUT, Freemasonry is neither a Christian nor a religious organization. It is a NonReligious organization with mostly Christian members. But, we also have many Jews, Arabs, Indians and other religions as members. And, Grand Lodge law forbids us to even discuss religion in the Lodge. And, Grand Lodge has no rules against sin. But now, in our fast changing world, homosexual men is a subject that faces us. According to current reports, two percent of the population is homosexual. That doesn’t sound too bad… Huh? Well there are currently 6.18 million people in the Houston area. Two percent or 123,600 of them, are Gay. Homosexuality has been legalized by the U.S. Supreme Court. We no longer have the old hodge podge of local laws that for hundreds of years criminalized Homosexuality and kept it hidden. Now we have an elected official sitting in jail as I write because she refused to obey the new laws, for religious reasons, requiring her to do business with homosexuals in her job. The President of the U.S even congratulates sports figures for admitting they are Gay. All Freemasonry maintains that it is not a religion, so homosexuality being a religious sin for Christian Masons could hardly be called a Masonic offence or a legitimate Masonic reason to reject a homosexual just because he is homosexual. Freemasonry will be forced to deal with it in the very near future. We can no longer just say, “That ain’t the way we did it in my year,” and hope it to go away. Corky Well it started quicker than I thought, read “Grand Lodge of Georgia Bans Gay Men” on Page 23, below. By Midnight Freemason Contributor Bro: Jason Richards & Guest Contributor WB: Jon Ruark On Friday, 26 June, 2015, the United States Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in support of homosexual marriage equality. This nationwide declaration of equality and the changing societal norms it represents necessitates taking a hard look at Freemasonry--long having been recognized as an organization that celebrates all men as equals--and its attitude toward homosexuality in order to ask the question: “If all men are equal, and now have equal rights to marriage across the United States, is the practice of homosexuality in and of itself ‘un-masonic’?” Before delving into such a discussion, it is necessary to define the term “unmasonic” for the purposes of our discussion here. Un-masonic Page 16 conduct is often referenced--even by Albert Mackey on numerous occasions--but has seldom been defined. Most often, it is utilized either as a synonym for “immorality” or described as “conduct unbecoming of a Mason.” However, both of these uses are deeply subjective, and interpretation could vary widely depending on a given culture or circumstance as moral laws differ greatly from culture to culture. For the purposes of our discussion here, we would pose a more objective and measurable definition of un-masonic conduct: “an action that causes serious harm within the fraternity or its public image outside of the fraternity.” As a society of good men who strive to make each other into better men, it is important to retain harmony within the organization so it doesn’t crumble from within, but also just as important to retain a positive public image so that the organization can persist and attract membership. (Left to Right) Bros. Robert Johnson, Jason Richards & Jon Ruark broadcasting TMR Masonic laws concerning homosexuality vary widely from Jason's house in VA from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Many jurisdictions have no stated policy on the matter, but some Grand Jurisdictions (who will remain nameless) list transvestitism, homosexual behavior, or even the sheer promotion of homosexuality as Masonic offenses punishable by suspension or expulsion. Many of Masonry’s rules and Landmarks originated in time immemorial; however, the laws, rules, and edicts of each sovereign Grand Lodge comprise a governing framework established by men in authority at a given period of time, based on personal--and therefore subjective--worldviews influenced by societal norms. We would posit that as societal norms change and evolve, regulations at the Grand Lodge level should be revalidated and updated to reflect the greater society within which Masonry operates. As such, the Supreme Court decision on Friday gives leaders of the Masonic fraternity a distinct opportunity to reevaluate existing policies on homosexuality. But back to the original question of this article. If we look at unmasonic conduct from the objective lens postulated earlier, we find it difficult to reconcile calling homosexuality “unmasonic.” Homosexuality causes no inherent harm within the lodge. Regardless of race, age, or sexual orientation, brethren are expected to treat each other with the utmost respect. Furthermore, as societal norms have changed and homosexuality is no longer the social taboo it happened to be several decades ago, the presence of homosexuals in the lodge does not harm the fraternity’s public image. Quite to the contrary--as we have seen in recent times with organizations accused of anti-gay sentiment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chick-fil-A_samesex_marriage_controversy), even a perceived lack of toleration can do harm to an organization’s public image. If we care about public perception--and we should given the past 50 years’ worth of membership trends--then a reexamination of our rules and perceptions toward homosexuality is prudent. If homosexuality is now accepted as a societal norm (much like minorities were increasingly accepted as equal members of society after the Civil Rights movement of the 1970’s), and causes no inherent harm within the fraternity or to the fraternity’s public image, then where are these regulations rooted? Arguably, much of the resistance to homosexuality in Masonry has roots in Christianity, the principles and dogma of which have long been interpreted as condemning the practice of homosexuality. But whether or not a given brother or grand officer subscribes to those interpretations is irrelevant where Masonry is concerned as religion Page 17 has no place inside the walls of the lodge. The fraternity’s most recent addition to the landmarks of Freemasonry (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masonic_Landmarks) is that religion and politics (and sometimes nationalities/borders) are not to be discussed in lodge as those topics only serve to divide, rather than unite, brethren. For the sake of the fraternity, brethren are exhorted to celebrate the common belief of a Supreme Being within lodge while, at the same time, respecting each brother’s right to subscribe to his own religious dogma. As a result, a brother’s religious-inspired belief that homosexuality is immoral (and therefore “unmasonic”) has no place within the confines of the lodge room. Likewise, a man’s sexual orientation should have no bearing on his being accepted or rejected as a candidate to receive the degrees in Freemasonry. After all, candidates are balloted upon within the lodge room during a tiled meeting. As such, religious and political biases should have no bearing on a candidate’s internal qualifications for Masonic membership. Friday’s Supreme Court decision has presented our brotherhood with a distinct opportunity to move forward in line with the ideals upon which our great fraternity was founded: tolerance, harmony, and unity. By embracing toleration for all men under the fatherhood of God regardless of race or sexual orientation, we can set ourselves above today’s polarized society. That toleration, in turn, will promote harmony and build unity within our lodges. By celebrating our diversity rather than condemning it, our fraternity will grow stronger and attract innovative, exceptional young men to join our ranks as Left to Right) Bro. Jon Ruark, men and Masons for years to come. Bro. Jason Richards Bro. Jason Richards is the Junior Warden of Acacia Lodge No. 16 in Clifton, Virginia, and a member of both The Patriot Lodge No. 1957 and Fauquier Royal Arch Chapter No. 25 in Fairfax, Virginia. He is also Chaplain of Perfect Ashlar Council No. 349, Allied Masonic Degrees. He is the sole author of the Masonic weblog The 2-Foot Ruler: Masonry in Plain Language, and is a co-host on the weekly YouTube show and podcast The Masonic Roundtable. He lives in Virginia with his wife, cats, and ever-expanding collection of bow ties. W. Bro. Jon Ruark is a Past Master of The Patriot Lodge No. 1957 in Fairfax, VA. His love of technology and gadgets led him to start The Masonic Roundtable as a Hangout on Air. His Masonic interests lean toward the esoteric and philosophical aspect. He lives in Virginia with his wife, 2.5 children, a dog named Copernicus, and a cat named Tesla who’s a jerk. (Editor’s Note;I did include this one comment from the BLOG because he makes sense. Corky) DrSketch said... Same-sex marriage presents some difficulties within the lodge. Difficulties that, as an organization, we will need to face if we hope to remain relevant. My obligation, for example, gave certain protections to the wife of a brother. Does that same protection extend to a husband? In spirit, of course it does, but not in letter, and unfortunately we all know brothers who subscribe more to the letter of the law than the spirit. Another possible concern of disharmony comes from two men who are married sitting in lodge together. No matter how great the marriage is, there will always be the occasional fight, which could bleed over into lodge if they both attend the same one. An even bigger concern, which every Grand Lodge is struggling to figure out, is how Page 18 do you deal with trans-gender people. If you were born a man, but had a sex change, are you still able to be a Mason? Conversely, if you were born a woman, but are now a man, do you qualify to become a Mason? These aren't issues that should stop the craft from accepting and loving brothers, regardless of their orientation, however they are issues that we will have to face and solve at some point. Until very recently, most Grand Lodges have taken the stance of putting their fingers in their ears, closing their eyes, and pretending this doesn't exist. We have the opportunity to be proactive in our acceptance, but only if we have the bravery to face these issues head on, and set the example the rest of the world should follow. Thank you brothers for this excellent article; there is much food for thought here, and we need to come together as a society of friends and brothers to tackle equal rights. The Irish Connection By R.W. Bro. Michae! W. Walker Grand Secretary, Grand Lodge of Ireland This Short Talk Bulletin has been adapted from remarks given at the 200th Anniversary of Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania. We thank R.W. Bro. Walker for permitting us to share them with his American Brethren. The Grand Lodge of Ireland was five years old, at least, when the first record exists of a Time Immemorial Lodge—St. John’s Lodge-in Philadelphia. This was, of course, followed by the first Regular Warranted Lodge in America, three years later, in Boston. I say the Grand Lodge of Ireland was at least five years old in 1730, because we date our Constitution from the first record, in 1725, of a Grand Lodge Meeting “June 26th, St. John’s Day: More than ‘100 gentlemen ‘ met in the ‘Yellow Lion in Warbrough Street’ and later went to King’s Arms. The procession included ‘the Masters and Wardens of the Six Lodges of Centlemen Freemasons, who are under the jurisdiction of the Crand Master, and the Private Brothers, all in coaches’ (it being a very rainy day). A new Grand Master, Rt. Hon. the Earl of Ross was elected. After a meal they went to a play. “Clearly, therefore, Grand Lodge was in earlier existence though we cannot say exactly when, or challenge the claim of our much larger Sister Grand Lodge that she is the Mother Grand Lodge. There are, of course, records of Time Immemorial Lodges going back much earlier in Ireland. The first definite clue we have is that when Ball’s Bridge was being rebuilt in Limerick in 1830, a brass square was recovered from the foundations on which is engraved “I will strive to live with Love and Care, Upon Ye Level By Ye Square, 1507”. We are, therefore, within sight of a 500th Anniversary of Speculative Masonry. In Ireland we have evidence of skilled Operative Masons very far back in time. We can state with pride that Irish Freemasons were involved before “Warranted Masonry”, and subsequently, in promoting and developing the Craft in, what were then styled, “The Colonies”. Irish Lodges were warranted in many “British” Regiments, though often mainly manned by Irishmen. The 1st Irish or Blue Horse, later the 4th Royal Irish Dragoon Guards had its Warrant issued by Grand Lodge on 24th June, 1758. This Warrant is still held in the 4th/7th Royal Dragoon Guards and the Lodge is working in West Germany, where the Regiment is stationed as part of the NATO Defense Forces. This is our last truly Travelling Warrant which remains of 185 Warrants issued in Artillery, Cavalry and Foot Regiments of the Line, as well as 43 Warrants in Irish Militia and Fencible Regiments. Our only other survivor, Glittering Star Lodge No. 322 originally warranted in the 29th Foot in the following year, 1759, was working in Boston in 1765 where on St. John’s Day, December 27th, 1769, it helped form the “Ancient” Grand Lodge of that State, and some years later it was in Quebec. These contacts, no doubt later on when the Regiments moved away, led to applications for Regular Warrants from the local Freemasons, made in those Lodges, who were left behind; and so the Craft spread. In the years between the early 1730’s and the eventual, and inevitable, War of Independence, many of the leading and influential Colonists became Members of the Page 19 Order so that the history of the gaining of Independence and the Craft is inextricably entwined. We must not, however, fall into the trap of imputing a revolutionary or political aspect to Freemasonry because of this. So many of our detractors make the basic and elementary mistake of correlating a man’s, or a group’s, actions to membership of the Order, when that is coincidental and the same things would have been done or said in, or out of, the Order. A focal point of the early part of that period must be the granting by Henry Price, in Boston, of the Deputation or Charter applied for on November 28th, 1734, by Benjamin Franklin, when he was appointed Provincial Grand Master for Pennsylvania on February 24th, 1735, barely three months later. So many great names are remembered by us from that period, to which distance lends enchantment: Henry Price; George Washington—elected Master in 1788, if my information is correct, in a Lodge at Alexandria in Virginia, though still under a warrant from Pennsylvania; Benjamin Franklin, who probably did more than any other to establish Freemasonry in America and whose reprint of Anderson’s Constitutions was the first, and is the rarest, Masonic book in America; Paul Revere, the silversmith, whose romantic ride from Boston to Lexington warned of the approach of Crown Forces—this has been immortalized by Longfellow; and the gallant and romantic action of Major General Joseph Warren of the Colonial Forces, and Grand Master of Massachusetts, who, having declined to assume command, picked up a musket and tragically fell at Bunker Hill; John Paul Jones, father of Continental Navy; the Marquis de Lafayette; not to mention the Brethren who signed the Declaration of Independence, and many more. A famous Brother and Commander in Chief, George Washington, was initiated in Fredericksburg on November 4th, 1752. Another famous Brother and Soldier, Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington was initiated 38 years later in our Lodge No. 494 at Trim, in the Royal County of Meath. Some 25 years later, at Waterloo, he finally routed his old enemy Napoleon, himself not a Freemason, to the best of our knowledge, though a promoter of the Craft and whose brothers and most of his Marshals were. Wellington’s elder Brother, Richard, 2nd Earl of Mornington, later Marquess of Wellesley, was our Grand Master in 1782 as his father Garrett, the Ist Earl of Mornington, had been in 1776. We Freemasons of the Old World were with you in those days to help kindle a flame which has spread throughout America in the intervening years to become the great institution it is to-day. I know that many Grand Lodges are suffering a reduction in numbers, but we must never be seduced into an acceptance of the attitude “never mind the quality, feel the width!” In the first half of this century there were few competitors for the membership of those whose minds and spirits felt the need for some philosophical inspiration—now they are legion. We have come back now after the seed, which we may have helped to plant some 250 years ago, germinated, grew, became mature and branched out on its own 200 years ago like all sons and daughters to take control of their own destiny. We had our links with you then—the First Volume of the History of Grand Lodge of Ireland says, in the section on Irish Masons Abroad, “Fortunately we have learnt from many other sources, that the issue of Warrants was the very least of the services rendered by Irish Masons in spreading the Craft in the New World, and, we can claim with justice, that these Brethren bore a considerable share in founding some of the greatest and most highly reputed Grand Lodges in the United States. Page 20 The Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania we may almost claim as a child. Leaving aside the obscure early Masonic History of this State, when it would appear that English and Irish Masons held meetings by Time Immemorial right, the foundation, in 1759, of the Provincial Grand Lodge after the Antient forms, which subsequently budded into the Independent Grand Lodge, “was primarily due to an Irish Mason who had been made in a Belfast Lodge. “ I regret the author does not elucidate further and I am not sure to whom he refers, or the Lodge in question, but I bow to his erudition. You may or may not agree according to your point of view, but ties there certainly were. Springett Penn, great grandson of Admiral Penn, and grandson of the Founder of your State, apart from owning an extensive property in Pennsylvania also had an estate at Shanagarry in County Cork; his father, grandfather and great grandfather having been landlords before him. He was an ardent Freemason and was Deputy Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Munster in 1726/27 before its amalgamation with the Grand Lodge of Ireland in 1731. It is not improbable that he encouraged Brethren from Cork to colonize on his Pennsylvania estates. For instance, in 1734, in Benjamin Franklin’s Account Book which he began on July 4th, 1730, appears an entry “Mr. Newinham Dr. for Bindg. of a Mason Book gilt 4/= “. The old and distinguished Newenham family still thrives a bare 10 miles from Shanagarry as the crow flies, and several of whose members are Brethren of our Lodge No. 1, the “First Lodge of Ireland”, which had been a Time Immemorial Lodge before Grand Lodge was constituted. I wonder is there a link there? It does seem likely. Incidentally, on October 9th, 1735, the Pennsylvania Gazette had a notice of a meeting of the Grand Lodge of Ireland, and previously on May 13th, 1731, referred to a Masonic meeting in Dublin; and similarly again on May IIth, 1732, a year later. Freemasonry has waxed and waned, been popular and unpopular, been promoted and persecuted, but it has survived. Freemasonry made errors such as the political intrigues and anticlerical activities of some European Grand Lodges in the 18th and 19th centuries, but today I believe that Regular Freemasonry is back on its correct course worldwide, endeavoring to create in Anderson’s words “a bond of union amongst those who would otherwise have remained at a perpetual distance”—a brotherhood of man under the fatherhood of God. I leave you with a few words of Irish: “Co m’beannaigh Dhia dibh, go n’eiri an t-adh is an bothar libh, agus go m’beirimidh beo ar an am seo aris”—which translates as “God bless you, may your good fortune increase and your way be made easy, and may we all be alive this time next year”. A Brief History of the Grand Lodge of Ireland From the Grand Lodge of Ireland website at http://www.irish-freemasons.org/index.html The Grand Lodge of Ireland is the second oldest in the world and the first evidence for its existence comes from the Dublin Weekly Journal of June 26th 1725. The paper describes an event which took place two days previously on June 24th - a meeting of the Grand Lodge of Ireland to install the new Grand Master, the 1st Earl of Rosse. Unfortunately the exact date of the foundation of the Grand Lodge is not known, but the installation of a new Grand Master would suggest it was already in existence a couple of years. 1725 is the year celebrated in Grand Lodge anniversaries. There is considerable evidence that there were Masonic Lodges meeting in Ireland prior to the eighteenth century, for example the manuscript known as "the Trinity Tripos" dating to the 1680s, and the Baal's Bridge Square, discovered in Limerick in the mid nineteenth Page 21 century, which purportedly dates to the early sixteenth century. The story of the "Lady Freemason", Elizabeth St. Leger, also dates to a time prior to the existence of the Grand Lodge. During the eighteenth century hundreds of Lodges were founded in every part of Ireland, and most of these would have met at inns, taverns and coffee houses. In Dublin, Lodges were known to have met in the Yellow Lion on Werburgh Street, the Centaur Tavern on Fishamble Street, and the Eagle Tavern on Cork Hill, amongst others, and in Belfast meetings were held in the Sailor on Mill Street and the Donegall Anna. The meetings of the Grand Lodge however, generally took place in civic and guild buildings such as the Tailors' Hall in Back Lane, the Cutlers' Hall in Capel Street, and the Assembly Rooms on South William Street. Towards the end of the eighteenth century the number of new Lodges being founded increased dramatically at the same time as the popularity of the Volunteer Movement expanded. Several Lodges were associated with Volunteer Regiments, and in Dublin, the First Volunteer Lodge of Ireland No. 620 was founded by the Officers of the Independent Dublin Volunteers in 1783. The Ballymascanlon Rangers were associated with Lodge No. 222, Dundalk, and in Fermanagh there was a regiment known as the Lowtherstown Masonick Volunteers, The political influence of the Volunteers combined with the success of the American War of Independence and the French Revolution created new ideals of democracy in Ireland. Following the founding of the Society of United Irishmen several Lodges, particularly in the north of Ireland, made public proclamations in the press about the need for reform of the Constitution. Whilst the vast majority of Lodges that did this disavowed violence as the means to an end, some were quite rebellious in their proclamations. Other Lodges, it must be said, publicly dissociated themselves from their more revolutionary Brethren. Government pressure was brought to bear on Grand Lodge and notices were sent out reminding Lodges of the Grand Lodge Law forbidding quarrels of a religious or political nature to be brought within the doors of the Lodge. However, several well-known United Irishmen including Henry Joy McCracken, Henry Monroe, and Archibald Hamilton Rowan were also Freemasons. In 1826 the papal Bull of Leo XII against secret societies was widely promulgated in Ireland unlike the previous bulls issued against Freemasonry in the eighteenth century. Catholic members of the Order were threatened with excommunication if they failed to resign from their Lodges. One of the most prominent figures in Irish history to have been a Freemason, Daniel O'Connell, resigned after pressure was put on him by Archbishop Troy of Dublin. The nineteenth century saw the expansion of Irish Freemasonry to all four corners of the globe with Lodges established in Australia, New Zealand, the West Indies, India and the Far East. Prominent during the century was the 3rd Duke of Leinster who presided over the Order as Grand Master for an impressive sixty one years. The nineteenth century also saw the expansion of the Masonic Female Orphan School, founded in 1792 to educate the daughters of deceased Freemasons. In 1881 a brand new school building was opened on the Merrion Road in Dublin while in 1867 the Masonic Orphan Boys School was founded. By the 1820s the Grand Lodge of Ireland had arranged to lease No, 19 Dawson Street, Dublin, for use as the headquarters of Irish Freemasonry. From there, following a brief sojourn in the Freemasons Coffee House in D'Olier Street, the Order moved to another rented premises, Commercial Buildings on Dame Street, which became the Masonic Hall until 1869 when the present Freemasons' Hall opened for meetings. The new building was designed and purpose built as a Masonic Hall and it remains the headquarters of Irish Freemasonry, housing Page 22 dramatically decorated Lodge rooms, a library. a museum, offices and dining areas. Grand Lodge of Georgia Bans Gay Men From Freemason Information Fred Milliken posted: "Here we go again in Georgia. Remember Victor Marshall who the Grand Lodge of Georgia tried to expel for being a Non-White? If not refresh your memory with the Freemason Information article My Brother's Keeper - Open Racism In Georgia Freemasonry. Grand Lodge of Georgia Bans Gay Men by Fred Milliken Here we go again in Georgia. Remember Victor Marshall who the Grand Lodge of Georgia tried to expel for being a Non-White? If not refresh your memory with the Freemason Information article My Brother's Keeper - Open Racism In Georgia Freemasonry. Now it's open war on homosexuals. Where will it all end? Do you think that Georgia can mimic Florida and ban all Pagan religions also? Chris Hodapp on his Masonic Blog Freemasons For Dummies reports: Last week in Georgia, the Grand Master, Douglas McDonald, issued an edict with the endeavor to change their Georgia Map adultery provision to additionally read, "Homosexual activity with anyone subjects the offender to discipline." I'm afraid there will be more of this. Brethren should consider that they have all probably been sitting in lodge with homosexuals since the day they became an EA. I strongly encourage Masons to check their state's code and take steps to remove these provisions. I'm no gay activist, but we live in different times now, and the Supreme Court has spoken on the subject. Like it or no t, such rules may subject us to lawsuits, and I humbly beseech Grand Masters not to act rashly because homosexuality conflicts with their own personal views of morality. We have had thousands of gay members since our beginnings, almost entirely without incident or without bringing disgrace upon the Craft. What someone does in the privacy of their own bedrooms is none of our business, as long as they don't bring their politics into the lodge room. Hodapp also reports on the Grand Lodge of Tennessee attempting to expel a Gay member. Author Brother Michael Karpovage has this to say: Michael Karpovage What an utterly embarrassing day it is for Freemasonry in the state of Georgia. An angry day. We are a non-religious educational institution based on Brotherly Love for our fellow man. Tolerance is a key tenet of the organization. A man's character is all that matters. Not his race, his personal religion, his wealth or social status. And certainly NOT his sexuality. Yet, our deeply religious Grand Master just shoved down our throats (pun intended) an edict that bans a homosexual from becoming a Mason on the basis that it's moral sin under God. His version of God. There was no debate, no unanimous decision. There wasn't a statewide call for this action by the brethren. It was issued like an executive order in the very last month of his term. He opened Pandora's Box and I certainly gave him an earful of which I'll probably be reprimanded for or worse. But I will not sit idly by without raising my voice. This is what scares me about these Ralph Reed-type religious far-right wingers in our country. I believe in separation of church and state. I joined this institution specifically because religion and politics (two of the most divisive subjects of mankind) are strictly prohibited from being discussed within a lodge. And with one man's actions, now all GA Masons will be painted as backward ass bigots. Brotherly Love. Oh, the irony. Don’t Look Behind the Curtain and the Generational Divide By Midnight Freemason Guest Contributor Bro. Robert Patrick Lewis 32° Waking up this morning I was pleasantly amused to read an article by Brothers Robert Johnson and Brian Schimian that I’ve been hearing about and eagerly waiting for. I’ve been lucky enough to share some fellowship with Brother Brian during his “California dreaming” time here with us in La La Land, and over a few conversations I’ve had with him leading up to that article and reading it myself this morning, I felt inspired to pen this article based on some feelings and events in my own Masonic career of late. Brothers Robert and Brian didn’t go so far as to name the specific event that led to the creation of that great article, and it seems as if it wasn’t necessary. From conversations and communications I’ve had with other Brethren around the country of my generation, and from events that I’ve personally witnessed it seems as if the onus for their article isn’t needed, because the same story is being repeated in Lodges, Valleys and Bodies around the country. The problem became apparent to me at a reception dinner my Valley hosted for the Grand Master of California last month (January). It was a pleasant event and dinner, my first function as the general secretary of my Valley (we’ll get to that later). After dinner and some entertainment the Grand Master and several other members of my Valley took the time to speak a few words. What resonated most in my mind was one very small part of the Grand Masters speech that left me, well, speechless. About halfway into his speech about the various charities he’s associated with and things he’s seen in his career, he took a moment to mention the generational divide occurring in Masonry, citing a statistic that the largest numbers of new Masons by far are coming from my generation (I believe the age range he gave was something like 20-35 year olds). As my education is primarily in marketing I love statistics and metrics, as they can tell us so much about trends and what we are doing right or wrong, so when he followed it with a “we don’t know why they’ve come, what they’re looking for, or how to keep them” I was floored. It’s not so much that technology and popular culture have allowed Masonic discussion to be found anywhere that an iPod, phone or laptop can reach, with such outlets as The Midnight Freemasons Blog, Page 24 From Whence Came You podcast, The Masonic Roundtable, etc, which are primarily hosted by Masons of the very generation he seems to have no understanding of. It’s not even so much that those of my generation have started countless discussions in our Lodges about why we came to Masonry and what we were searching for. Moreover, it amazes me that with all of the minutiae Grand Lodges around the country have the time and resources to dedicate to things which seem utterly pointless to men of my generation, it doesn’t seem they’ve taken the time to do the most elementary function an organization can undertake when trying to discern information from a particular demographic: to ask us. I spent the first month of this year in the general secretary seat for my Valley, and after my time in that seat I [Type the document title] can safely say that I’ve seen more than I ever wanted to concerning one of the largest generational disconnects I’ve ever encountered; specifically for me in the Scottish Rite, but after talking with Brothers who’ve held positions in Grand Lodges before, it’s one that seems to be a common theme: politics. There are several recurring themes I’ve encountered in conversations with other Masons of my generation and during my short stint in the secretary’s seat for my Valley that I’d like to address here, concerning and attempting to explain this generational gap and what it is that my generation came to Masonry in search of. I know that a large part of the very generations who don’t understand younger Mason’s don’t really understand this media and means of communication, so hopefully someone reading this can use it as a way to begin the conversation within their Lodge, if you are in agreement with the points I’d like to address. We don’t care about the politics. This “look behind the curtain” dealt a nearly deadly blow to my view of the Scottish Rite, in seeing Brethren treating each other extremely un-Masonically, concerning themselves more with alliances and future positions than what was going on in their Lodge/Valley. The men of my generation are absolutely sick of politicians that have done their best to ruin our country, and fully appreciate why Brother Pike spent so much of his writings in Morals and Dogma talking of the repugnancy and pestilence that are self-serving politicians. Politics should have no place in Masonry, and when a Brother of my generation sees someone playing politics in the Lodge, all respect is immediately lost. We don’t care about titles. That’s great that you have an “Illustrious” or “Honorable” or “Sir” in front of your name. While it does show that you’ve logged some serious hours in a Lodge room or Valley Temple, that’s not what we came here searching for. Many of my generation have spent time across the ocean on battlefields, and much like those who returned from WWII or Vietnam to find solace in the Lodge, we believe that respect is something earned, not given as easily as a large donation or time spent in a certain chair. For those of us who truly came seeking “further Light in Masonry,” no matter what title comes before your name, you are still a man. Just as the skull is used to remind us of our own mortality, it should also remind you that no matter what your title, we are all meant to meet on the Level when in Lodge. We don’t care about the minutes. Seriously. Both my Blue Lodge and Valley have the same group of people who regularly attend stated and special meetings. We were present when it opened last month and heard what happened. No need to repeat it. That valuable oxygen and energy could be used doing what the men of my generation came to Masonry for: spreading further Light through Masonic education. We value our time. Please don’t take this the wrong way. I’m not sure why or how this occurred, but I’ve noticed (even within my own family, friends and friends families) that the men of my generation just seem to value time at home with the family Page 25 differently than those who came before us. Maybe it’s because we were raised by fathers who spent long hours toiling away at work or taking part in other social activities, but my close friends and I value our time with family above all else. Please go back and read #3 again. We work smarter, not harder. I can’t tell you how many times I tried to explain just how efficient, easy and profitable the use of technology can be these days to our Personal Representative (I created a Facebook, Twitter and Google Drive for our Valley to try and get us into the technology age). I get it, we’ve sent out brochures, flyers and put trestle boards out in the Lodge for time immemorial, and that’s what you’re comfortable with. The men of my generation fully embrace technology, and have an understanding that there are a finite amount of trees on our planet, and not everyone can be at every stated meeting (please re-read 3&4). Websites, Email, Facebook and Twitter are just plain smarter, faster, easier and more widespread than their paper predecessors, and give us access from wherever we are, whenever we want to figure out what’s going on in our Lodges/Valleys. Please put some effort into understanding this, as it is at the core of my generation’s culture. We don’t care about the pomp and circumstance. At the beginning of this article I spoke of a reception for the Grand Master that my Valley hosted. This was another “look behind the curtain” for me, and watching the dizzy fervor that this event whipped our PR into made me take a step back and wonder why in the world we were even doing it. Yes, it’s fun to dress up in tuxedos and wear our regalia every once in awhile. But please go back and read 1,2,3&4 before you schedule one of these events for your Lodge or Valley. From the conversations I’ve had with Brethren of my generation, all would be much better served to bring a Masonic scholar like Arturo de Hoyos or Rex Hutchens to shed some further Light to your younger Brethren. We want to learn from you. We didn’t come to Masonry for the institution; we came for the education, the Light, and the community. For us a meeting could be in a Lodge room just as well as a chat room or a dimly lit tavern, as were our forefathers. We know that there are numerous lessons and experiences to be taught, but the resounding narrative I hear echoed from the Brethren of my generation is that those experiences just aren’t being passed on from “mouth to ear” between generations. Sure, we have degrees a few times a month. How about taking some time to impart your thoughts on those degrees. Yes, we can read any number of works to explain the esoteric to us in black and white text. But as we’ve been taught through our developing careers, the best lessons in Masonry aren’t written down. We yearn for our elders to show us the Light, teach us the ways and impart us with knowledge, not just have dinner, read the minutes and go home. If any of the above has been taken as argumentative, disrespectful or out of place, I truly apologize. It is not meant to be so, but I have to admit I feel flabbergasted to hear an officer of my Grand Lodge state that he doesn’t know what the men of my generation are looking for, when we’ve tried so hard to express that very knowledge. We feel that society has done us wrong and taught us lessons that were untrue; we can’t believe our media, our politicians, most of our textbooks from school, or most of what we hear or read in the news. We came to the Order seeking others who, like us, know that there is more to life than what we’ve been told and taught, and were directed that the path to the answers we sought began by walking up the steps into our local Lodge. We love you, we respect you, and we need you, as Brethren, elders, and educators. When we came seeking knowledge and further Light in Masonry, we came to Masonry seeking you. Please don’t let another new Master Mason’s first experience after his raising be a reading of the minutes, because if that is all we have to offer, there won’t be too many more raisings to be had. Page 26 ~RPL Bro. Robert Patrick Lewis 32° is a member of Los Angeles Lodge #42, and the Los Angeles Valley of the Scottish Rite, SJ. The Profound Pontifications of Brother John Deacon Editor’s Note; I think that Chris Williams’ “The Profound Pontifications of Brother John Deacon” stories are the best modern replacement for Brother Carl Claudy’s “Old Tiler” that I have found for Masonic education. And, they have earned a permanent Place in this magazine. I hope you readers are enjoying them as well as I am. By PM Chris Williams The noise was so loud that it felt like my head was going to explode. I couldn’t figure out where it was coming from. Suddenly something hit me in the back… hard… that’s when I woke up from a sound sleep. It was the phone ringing and the blow to the middle of my back came from Pam followed by an order to “ANSWER THE PHONE”!!! There wasn’t time enough to focus and read the caller ID so I when my hand finally found the hand set I just pressed the button. That was my first mistake of the day. The second was that I didn’t just hang it up right then. I still wasn’t awake all the way and the voice sounded familiar. He was talking way too loud and way too fast, “Helloooo Brother Chris, I thought I would catch you on your way to work and see if we could have breakfast.” By the time he finished the first sentence my mind had cleared, I had glanced at the clock and had realized it was John Deacon. “What the heck are you calling me at… I looked again at the clock……oh my God John it’s 4:30 in the morning,” I yelled into the phone causing another blow to my back and a different order. “Are you crazy? It’s too early to even have breakfast.” “Awwww quit whining, my Brother,” he said. “I need some direction. I am hungry and I need to know where to go.” By this time having been rudely awaken, sarcasm and anger were starting to kick and I flatly said, “I’ll tell you where you can go.” And before I could relay that special destination to him, one more blow landed to my back with an admonition, “be nice”. Grrrr, in my then condition being nice was not my first choice. I realized that I was not going to win this with the enemy on both sides, so I took a deep breath and told him to meet me at Bill Millers in 30 minutes. I heard him whining about not wanting BBQ for breakfast as I hung up. He would find out in a few minutes that Bill Millers has pretty darn good breakfast tacos. I know because I have almost every morning of the year. I hurried through my shower and when I got to the restaurant, John was already inside. They had just opened up and were heating the food up as he stood there looking at the menu smacking his lips. As I walked up next to him, I smiled at Sarah who knows me as “potato, egg and cheese taco with an unsweet iced tea refill” cause that’s what I get every day. She already had my taco and drink ready and nodded to John and got a questioning expression on her face. I told her that he was becoming “one” with the menu and he would speak at some point. “He has been staring at the menu for several minutes,” she said. “I thought he had fallen asleep.” “Nope, he’s not Page 27 asleep,” I answered. He is just coming up with a plan.” Without taking his eyes off the menu he growled, “You know, I can hear you both. And neither of you are funny.” And then looking down at Sarah he began to order. “Since my Brother Chris is buying breakfast, I think I will have three of those potato, egg, and cheese tacos. Also I want three carne guisada with cheese. I just have to try a couple of sausage and egg and a couple of bacon and egg and add about four bean and cheese for later and I will be in good shape…..and I will have some tea also.” I don’t think that good shape is something you ought to worry about Brother John unless you consider watermelon a good shape.” As he glared at me, I silently calculated in my mind and as best as I could figure, he was getting ready to consume along with generous portions of sausage, bacon, potatoes, beans, and carne guisada at least a dozen eggs and a dozen tortillas. Heck, that wasn’t breakfast, it was a whole week’s worth of groceries. Sarah handed us our drinks and called out the cavalry to get busy on making tacos. When they were done it took two trays to haul it all out to our table. One for the tacos and one for all the hot sauce and pico de gallo to put on everything. I looked across the table at the mountain of breakfast tacos and heard John ooohing and aaahing over how good it all tasted and realized he was going to be a while and called Leonard to tell him I was going to be a little late. I was not going to be dragged out of bed this early by John and not get something to put in the newsletter, even if I had to force it out of him. The morning crowd was filing in to get their tacos and John’s pile attracted a lot of attention. I just kept my head down and avoided eye contact and waited. Soon he was done and I informed him that it was rude to wake someone up as early as he did me without a day’s prior warning. He told me that he had a big meeting early this morning and had gotten to town the night before and spent the night and woke up hungry. I listened closely but never got anything that remotely resembled an apology so I just shook my head and moved on. “I hope you have something really good for me this month,” I said evenly. “And you need to start talking because I have to get to work.” “Well,” he said. I don’t have much but it has been making me think since it happened.” I groaned… the day looked like it was going to get worse. I leaned back and motioned for him to bring it on. He took a deep breath and began, “On our way out of Lodge after our last Stated Meeting several Brothers had congregated just inside the front door. Among them were a newly passed Fellowcraft and his instructor. The instructor was sharing with the group that the new Fellowcraft had been trying to assign a meaning or symbolism to every word and phrase in the degrees and laughingly made everyone think that the Brother was wearing him out with all the questions. The new Brother was enjoying the joke and as I walked up he turned to me and asked what could possibly be the meaning behind one of the questions asked in the esoteric work of his first degree. The question concerns how he knew there was a door blocking his path. And the answer verifies the fact by reminding that at first he could not proceed and later on he could. In true amateur shrink form I asked him what he thought it meant. Due to his short time as a Mason he could come up with nothing that told him why this particular part of his degree and the question and answer pertaining to it was important. After a few moments of the group waiting for my answer, and none of the others offering an opinion, I told him, “I believe that, because you were in the dark at the time, that it was to impress upon you that entrance into a Lodge was not something automatic or easy. That there were tests to pass, promises to be made, and passwords to be given before you would be trusted with the knowledge and beauty to be found on the other side of that door.” I waited a couple of seconds for a response but nothing was offered, just a few nods and a far off look in the Page 28 eyes of the student. I left them contemplating my answer, and as I drove home I got to thinking about the Brother attempting to make sense out of all that had happened to him. I acknowledged sadly that way too many Brothers new and old have no desire to, and have never even make the attempt to understand or make sense out of the lessons they are given. Many others take a literal view of all that was taught them and with only a basic understanding of their working tools, are perfectly content with working at just a basic level of Masonry and many times reject the deeper philosophical study and discovery. This rejection is not necessarily because they aren’t interested in the deeper meanings. It is many times because of something that I read a few years ago. In a book that was explaining some of the deeper meanings, there was a phrase that stuck in my mind and it is the reason, I think, that many Masons don’t dig into the deeper meanings and mysteries of the Craft. The phrase was… “Always in new knowledge we meet new intellectual frustrations because, every answer searched for and found, creates new questions”. “Oh wow, “I blurted out without realizing it. “That’s absolutely true … and it is frustrating sometimes. But still it’s all good.” “Like I said, he snarled at me, obviously irritated that I threw my own opinion in there, “it’s not that they aren’t interested in the deeper meanings and philosophy… in many cases they don’t have the time to continue searching for more and more answers.” I nodded vigorously but didn’t interrupt as he rolled on, “This old world has changed so much in just one generation, from a time when people actually had time for reflection, and time to read and study, to a world that is moving so fast, it is all but impossible to keep up. The men of this generation, and women, are growing their families in a time where their children are involved in sometimes two and three or more activities outside the school and church. Both husband and wife are being pulled in many many different directions every minute of every day. We are asking men… good men… our Brothers… to spend time… time that most of them don’t have, in thoughtful reflection… in study of their lessons … and in search of new meanings and truths within themselves. And we are disappointed in them because they don’t seem to be spending enough of that time. Well I assure you that they are more disappointed than we are, because they can’t. If there ever was a case for a strong Masonic Education program in our Lodges, this is it. I am not sure that this will explain it properly so it can be understood but Masonry is like a motor in a car. It has many different parts and systems and if the motor is to run the way it is supposed to, all the parts have to do what they are supposed to, when they are supposed to.” I must have looked like I was not getting what he was saying because he frowned and said with an exasperated voice, “Brother Chris, I used the motor analogy to make sure you understood it. You run an Auto shop, for God’s sake. It ought to be easy for you.” “You need to climb about two steps down off my rear end, there Brother,” I shot back at him. “I was getting it just fine, just waiting for you to make your point.” He shook his head slightly like I was full of it, and continued, “Like I was saying, I see Masonry as an intricate combination of words, symbols, emotions, AND timing. All the different parts are equal in importance to the “motor” running properly, including the timing. When a man petitions a Lodge for the degrees, the motor starts. As the process works its way through the reading and investigation and then to the ballot, the motor gains RPM’s. You understand RPM’s don’t you,” he grinned a sarcastic grin? As I fought the urge to reach across the table and beat him vigorously about his head and shoulders, he continued, “Then he is initiated into the Lodge, and with the motor RPM’s getting higher he learns his work and becomes a Fellowcraft, learns that work, and finally is raised to the sublime degree of a Master Mason, and then learns his Masters work. Our new Brother has now learned all the fundamentals and is now ready to begin his personal journey of self-improvement and self-discovery. And that motor is really cruising now and running perfectly, just the way it was meant to. But, right about now is where things start breaking down. That valuable part of that motor called timing, malfunctions. More often than not, the new Master Mason comes to the distressing realization that he is on his own from this point forward. He probably was never given a learned Brother to be his mentor. His instructor who may have mentored him to a certain extent, has other students to teach or may only Page29 have the questions and answers to give and not the meanings and now seems to not have any time for him. He attends meetings in hopes of finding that light he was told would be available to him. Instead he has to listen to the usual motions and reports and a word by word reading of minutes of the last meeting which he sees as redundant since he was at that previous meeting and heard all of it then. He understands that business is part of the meeting but continues to hope for more knowledge of the Craft. He sits through other degrees hoping for things to become clearer all the while wishing he had the time to read and study, knowing that with his obligations to his job and his family that attending Lodge meetings is all his schedule will allow. While he enjoys the fellowship of his Brethren, the reasons why he became a Mason, the promise of deeper moral and spiritual truths and finding an understanding of his inner self does not seem to be a possibility. The RPM’s of his motor have dropped significantly, and soon, feeling unfulfilled and maybe a bit taken advantage of, he allows himself to be drawn into other things and stops coming to Lodge. He may continue to pay his dues out of a feeling of duty or obligation to something once believed in, but his growth as a Mason ultimately stopped as soon as he was raised. What I am trying to make you understand, Brother Chris, and what all of our Brethren need to understand, is that timing is very very important and that a Brothers journey must proceed immediately after his being made a Master Mason and that the lack of Masonic education being given in the Lodges and especially at stated meetings effectively stops Brothers from growing within our Craft system and renders all of Masonry ignorant of its true mission and purpose. Men do not become better men just because of the three degrees. Those teach the fundamentals, introduce them to the tools of their new trade, and provide a few basic examples of how to use them. They provide a basic education for a lifetime course of study and discovery and to deny all Brothers the higher education we promised them is to make Masonry nothing more than a social supper club with a rather dramatic and interesting entrance requirement, instead of a rite of passage and transformation leading to a lifelong journey of building his inner being for the service of God, Family, Self, and all of mankind. This is why so many believe that Masonry has become irrelevant this day and age, because we say that we do all these great things for men … but we don’t. Maybe that is one of the reasons why many of our Brethren are afraid to talk about the Fraternity, maybe deep down they see the contradiction between what we are supposed to be doing and what we really do. I see more and more Brothers whose motors have broken down from lack of maintenance and neglect, disillusioned by finding out that what they were promised in Masonry and what they hoped for by becoming a Mason, was instead a fraternity that had forgotten its purpose… had forsaken it’s duty… and had lost its way, and was now wandering in the wilderness possibly towards that undiscovered country from whose bourne, no traveler returns.” He stopped and I was still writing on my napkin. I had forgotten my recorder and figured if I got the high points I could fill in the middle later. My hand was shaking as I wrote… dang, they were all high points and this was really good stuff. I looked up at John and I said, “I know you don’t use bad language Brother John, but I have to say… DAMN, that was good. I didn’t know you had that in you.” He had been looking off in the distance and that word brought him back. He smiled and said, “I will allow you that one, my Brother because I know how you are.” I wondered what the heck he meant by that as he slid out of his chair and announced that he had to get on down the road to his appointment. I was ready to go too. I waved at Sarah and the crew who were still in shock from all John had eaten. I followed him out to his truck and realized that the extra tacos he had ordered for the road he had already eaten. Page 30 He shrugged and said that he would just have to get a snack later. I just laughed and shook my head and told him thanks for the material for the newsletter, shook his giant hand, and watched him roar out of the parking lot in a cloud of dust. On my way to work I got to thinking about that new Fellowcraft who was trying to figure it all out and I hoped that he continued to search for meaning in all that he experienced, but also that he wouldn’t stop at just the most obvious meanings. To do that would be to miss the real reward and beauties waiting for only those who are determined to find the most profound truths and the answers to life’s most hidden mysteries. Until next month….I wish you all well Page 31 Phoenix St. John, A New Super Masonic Website Editor’s Note; We have a new Super Masonic Website, “Phoenix St. John” on the internet. I hope to be reprinting some of the more interesting articles like, “The Virgin of the Rocks, by Da Vinci: the controversy”, “Albert Pike on trials and triumph” and “” in The Small Town Texas Masons E-magazine. From the tabs across the top of the banner it seems like the site will have something for everyone. However, if you can’t wait, you can always visit the site on your own at http://www.phoenixstjohn.com/. The following was an interview with Phoenix St. John by Fred Milliken of Freemason Information I had the honor and privilege to sit down and interview Phoenix St. John and this new website owner explained what you will be seeing on this new website: I am pleased to introduce to Freemasons and non-Masons alike the opening of a new website, Phoenix St. John – http://www.phoenixstjohn.com/ The author will remain anonymous using the pen name of Phoenix St. John. Page 31 But let that not dissuade you. This is a site written by a multitalented author who is proficient in a number of different fields of study. The breadth and scope of what this author writes about is truly quite amazing. And that is precisely what it is going to take to be successful in today’s Masonic Internet market. Masonic Blogs are really out. So many have disappeared that one can find only a handful of worthy ones still publishing. One of the reasons is that Masonic blogs tend to be one dimensional. They concentrate on one person’s opinion on one subject matter at a time. Sometimes they are more emotional than factual. They do not take in a blending of Masonic, philosophical, religious, historical, artistic, architectural, musical and archeological thought. Few Freemasons are that talented or knowledgeable across many different fields of study. That takes a truly multitalented person to accomplish that feat. And Phoenix St. John is one of those people. In the previous article I wrote for Freemason Information and Phoenixmasonry, “The Craft Unmasked,” I can distinctly remember the words of Coach Nagy. Nagy claims, “Without a foundation in classical literature, scripture and related materials, there is little likelihood of any man truly appreciating anything other than superficial aspects of what the Society offers him. What’s more, when they don’t appreciate what is offered, they do not stick around much.” Those Masonic websites that are more than just a blog and offer many aspects of life and Masonic expression are the Masonic Websites still alive and thriving. There is: 1. David Lettelier’s Phoenixmasonry 2. Greg Stewart’s Freemason Information 3. Blake Bowden’s My Freemasonry And now we add to this prestigious list: 4. Phoenix St. John’s Phoenix St. John I had the honor and privilege to sit down and interview Phoenix St. John and this new website owner explained what you will be seeing on this new website: The Phoenix St. John site has two purposes. One is to present my thoughts on Masonic topics and literature and the other is to provide a place for Masons to explore various disciplines within Masonry and related to Masonry through the Liberal Arts and Sciences. The site has galleries of Masonic and world artifacts, history, and architecture. It has a gallery of Masonic art by the best Masonic artists of today, such as Bro. Ryan Flynn, Bro. Greg Stewart, and Bro. Chad Mesteller. It also has a gallery of inspiring artwork from non-Masonic artists. It has a music history timeline with samples of music from around the world and numerous educational videos on all kinds of subjects such as Knight Templar history and music, biographies of notable philosophers, Freemasons, and scientists. I have provided links to many research and study sites for the more dedicated Masons. You will also find poetry, both old and current, Masonic (including some of yours, Bro. Frederic) and from different philosophical traditions such as Zen and Sufi, as well as my own. I will be updating the Masonic News section of the site with interesting occurrences from the Masonic world. I am a huge fan of quotes and I make memes so you will find galleries with my original memes and thoughts, as well as Masonic memes and thoughts and the same by non-Masons. Page 31 I will be posting bi-monthly studies on Masonic literature. I will begin with The Meaning of Masonry by W.L. Wilmshurst. The idea is to study the book, cover to cover, adding my own insights and research. I am not sure which book I will study and post about after The Meaning of Masonry. Since the site is very multidimensional you will see posts on Masonic art, architecture, literature, history, museum pieces, and more. People can subscribe to the site’s posts to get them by email. As the “about me” section on the Phoenix St. John site states, I am a lifelong student of numerous religious and esoteric traditions. My interest began as a kid, when a few documentaries on mysterious ancient civilizations sparked my interest. I was drawn to old religious and philosophical beliefs from civilizations such as Ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, and South America. When I was about 14 years old, my father bought me a rather cheap but heavily researched encyclopedia of religions. It was heavy reading, one book per religion. I did my best to process what I could from them. I grew up around Jesuits, with whom my parents had a close academic relationship. I was a spoiled teen because I was invited to religious and philosophical discussion groups they organized for adults only and even a poetry group they put together for college students. I became interested in the history of Christianity and the Bible after being re-baptized by a Jesuit friend of the family in my mother’s garden fountain in a simple yet profound ceremony. I read the Bible in its entirety pausing to research terms and reflect on its ideas. From there, I studied Judaism and its history, as well as the history of the Temple of Jerusalem. I studied the history of the Catholic Church and various heretical philosophes it has fought. Once I learned that the Temple of Jerusalem is such a prominent feature in Freemasonry, I just had to research Freemasonry and I was hooked. I studied Knight Templar and Freemasonic history for many years prior to becoming a Mason in 2008. Religion and philosophy remain strong interests of mine and this is reflected on the Phoenix St. John site. I have studied ancient Greek philosophy on my own time and in college and law school. I have endeavored to understand the gnostic currents of Christianity, such as Cathar history, from the middle ages back to its known origins. I was lucky enough to visit Carcassonne and Toulouse in France, two Cathar sites where much fighting took place between Cathars and the Catholic Church. Seeing the Languedoc region in France, the places where Cathar massacres occurred, and such controversial ideas flourished was incredibly stimulating for me. I developed an interest in the history of the Prophet Muhammad in Junior High School when I had a fantastic history teacher so the history of Islam and the Crusades is also a favorite subject of mine and this is reflected on the site. Finally, I have also studied modern religious cults and movements such as FLDS and the history of Jonestown, where residents ended up committing suicide and were poisoned, but the site is focused on non-recent history. In short, I am interested in all things religious and historic. I could go on and on as this subject has truly captured me for life, which is one reason I love Freemasonry so much: Freemasonry is inclusive as far as religion goes. I believe my sincerity and long years of study on these subjects qualifies me to produce Masonic and philosophical insights Brethren will hopefully find worth reading. I am an attorney by trade. International Law is my forte but, of course, I also love historic topics within law such as how the U.S. Constitution came to be and the Page 33 numerous Freemasons involved in constituting this great nation. I also appreciate just how many Masons have done the same in countries such as France, Mexico, Argentina, England, you name it! Our fraternity is incredibly rich in history and has produced so many movers and shakers throughout the world, it is an honor to participate in the preservation of our traditions and history, even if in such a small way as having informative galleries on Masonic history online. I am also a musician, which is why you will find a lot of music included on the site. I am a singer/songwriter, I play the guitar, and have done a lot of theatre. I have played in many bands over the years and have toured with various music and theatre groups. I did three years of intensive Theatre training at a performing arts school. I have studied and performed classical music, choir, and opera. Of course, music history has been a favorite interest of mine as well. I love traditional world music and that always has been my contribution to groups I have played with. I love to add native flutes, chants, and elements to electronic and acoustic music alike. The site contains all these interests of mine with an eye to providing valuable education. The only other time I felt I could bring these elements together was during my last trimester in law school, when I wrote and performed a musical which had an esoteric theme based on Michelangelo’s work. It had music, theatre, esoteric undertones, art, and law. I was in Heaven! That is exactly how I feel about the site now. It is truly a pleasure for me to offer a varied and hopefully stimulating website. To me, as I state on the site, Freemasonry is a stable philosophical system that, nevertheless, allows each Mason to interpret its tenants and contribute original work and thinking. Therefore, I support today’s Masonic writers, artists, and promoters. Each Masonic piece of art, each original article or paper, each lecture a Mason prepares and shares with the Brethren contributes to the philosophical system that is Masonry, both originality and newness and an appreciation for our history and tradition. Not all Brethren are engaged in creating new Masonic works or celebrating our old, but for those who are and for those who benefit from what other Masons create and contribute, I believe it is important to support each other’s work. That is why you find poems by Masons and artwork by Masons on the Phoenix St. John site. I try my hand at poetry myself, as you will find if you visit the site but I have yet to produce presentable art. I do make my own memes though. Phoenix St. John is a pen name. I do not wish to make my real name known at this point because I am writing a book in which the creation of this site is included. Once I finish the book and, hopefully, publish it, I can reveal my name but I want to keep Phoenix St. John as my pen name for life. Did you know Voltaire is a pen name? Most people know or have heard of Voltaire but how many can tell you his real name? François-Marie Arouet. My real name isn’t as exciting as Phoenix’s. I can write under a name that means much in its symbology so I will. I understand you have also used a pen name, Bro. Frederic? ( yes, Squire Bentley). Manly P. Hall tells us that the Phoenix is one sign of the secret orders of the ancient world and of the initiate of those orders, for it was common to refer to one who had been accepted into the temples as a man twice-born, or re-born. St. John refers to St. John the Baptist. The theme is that of the Baptism of St. John and the initiates of secret orders, many of which had Baptism rituals. You see a Templar Cross on the chest of the Phoenix and also two red roses, symbolizing the blooming of human consciousness. The undulating line with two dots is my secret signature. I have used that symbol since I was 17 years old. I just had to include it. Another fun secret, or used to be secret, is that I use two periods instead of three as can be seen in this meme. So as you can see we are all in for quite a treat. If the Craft is to move forward, if it is to grow, if it is to flap its philosophical wings then websites such as Phoenix St. John must be on the scene. If Freemasonry slides into a social club or a service organization everywhere Page 34 and neglects its philosophical roots and its intellectual capabilities it is doomed to wither and die on the vine. The rise of the Super Masonic Website is quelling the tide of superficiality in Freemasonry and sparking the interest of Millennials. This is what will be Freemasonry’s Savior. And one of those Super Masonic Sites is now Phoenix St. John. Cheap Brotherhood Brotherhood A rebuttal to "Have We Cheapened Our Fraternity?" By: R.W Mohamad Yatim; Living Stones Magazine, October 2014. By Midnight Freemason Contributor Bro. Aaron Gardner, 32°, MPS There was an article in Living Stones magazine this past October that asked a very interesting question. Have we cheapened our Fraternity? The article goes through an entire spiel of what initiation fees and dues cost in various lodges during different time periods. Right Worshipful Brother Yatim insists his article is not a call to increase dues. However, it is a call to brothers who are able to reach into their pockets and help provide more than what the dues are capable. I am in agreement with RW Brother Yatim that the Fraternity is much more than showing up and paying yearly dues at an ultra low price. It is a requirement for a lodge to effectively manage their budget. I have even written about a lodge budget myself for the Midnight Freemasons. I however, cannot get over the fact that he seemingly attacked lodges that typically cater toward the Blue Collar workers. Most of these men show up to their lodges without suit and tie. They have a suit and tie ready for the one instance they may use them in the year, however, the usual attire for a brother in these lodges are jeans and a button up. Honestly, some of these brothers show up in work clothes. He further asks if we are supposed to portray the “Cream of the Crop”, the first class citizens of our society are within this Fraternity, how would visitors or a potential candidate see our Fraternity with these individuals in the lodge? I believe the real question is: Are we making judgments on a brother who works hard all day, comes to lodge before seeing his family and dedicates the only time he has to the Craft; to better his community, his friends, family and himself? Have we really cheapened the Fraternity to the point of worrying more about the money than the cause? My brothers, Freemasonry is having a hard time finding the funds to support our many programs. It could be because our retention is low, our dues are lower than what our ancestors paid based of their salary, or, it could be because we continue to live in the glory days. Honestly, I believe it is a combination of it all. What should we do in order to fix it? Brothers, there are books upon books, articles and podcasts dedicated to fixing our problems as a Fraternity. Our problem is not JUST that we don’t charge enough, it’s not JUST our retention numbers, and it’s not JUST that we are living in the old days. Brothers, it is that we won’t do anything about it. Our Grand Lodges have pushed out plan after plan, strangling some jurisdictions control. Some Grand Lodges have issued a “Big Government” ideology that tells the lodge verbatim what they will and will not do. Page 35 Is it a control thing? Is possible, but I don’t think it started out as such. I believe the Grand Lodges that are issuing out these laws, originally had no choice because our subordinate lodges failed to do what they were supposed to. Some were too lazy to keep up with their own bylaws, adopting the “Grand Lodge Basic”. I have even seen lodges give up their individual rights to vote in Grand Lodge to the Worshipful Master of the Lodge. It wasn’t because the Worshipful Master was the only vote that mattered in Grand Lodge, it was simply because the members of the Lodge didn’t want to stay in session to hear the issues being brought forth to Grand Lodge. It is not “at the will of the Worshipful Master”. The Worshipful Master’s vote represents the majority of his Lodge. Brothers, we can point the finger and say what and who is to blame, but that will never solve the issue. It has been expressed and debated multiple times in various forums the reasons we are in this predicament of decline. It is time to stop talking about it, and do something about it. In my presentation “Man in the Mirror” I ask the commonly referred joke “How many Master Masons does it take to change a light bulb?” Usually you hear the answers from the crowd, “Three” or “I don’t know…” It’s not a trick question. The answer is One. All it takes is a Master Mason to see the problem, address it and fix it. It all starts with that man in the mirror, The Change you want to see. Allow the individual Lodges to determine what is best for their lodge and community. If it means the lodge turns to Tuxedos and higher dues, as long as it works for that lodge to stay alive. If the lodge is mostly blue collar, there is nothing wrong with a brother wearing jeans and a polo to regular scheduled meetings. We are the cream of the crop, brethren. It isn’t about how we look on the outside, but how we conduct business on the inside. From the inside we can change our image, which will change the world. We, my brethren, are the ones that must step up and say what is right for our lodge. With our participation and discussion with each other inside lodge, we can determine what is right, what is wrong, what works and what doesn’t. Once we do that, retention will not be the issue, appearance will not be the issue, the dues will not be the issue and we will soon realize the glory days are not behind us, but, right in front. ~AG Bro. Aaron Gardner, an American Soldier who just recently transitioned into the Reserves after 8 years serving the Active Duty Army. He dedicates the majority of his free time to Freemasonry with his constant studies, writing and traveling from lodge to lodge to learn as much as he can regarding Freemasonry. He likes to relate his everyday life to the Craft and anything he finds he wants to spread to the world. It is his passion to study people, religion, history and Freemasonry. When he isn't working as a Soldier he is dedicating his time to the amazing and supportive Emily, writing about Freemasonry and writing his very own novel. His blog page is Celestial Brotherhood. Masonic Family Park, Granite Falls, Washington A Masonic Did You Know From W. Bro. Dwight D. Seals The Masonic Park is the property of the Master Masons Club of Snohomish and Island Counties. It consists of 245 acres of beautifully wooded land on rushing Canyon Creek and is located in the foothills of the majestic Cascade Mountains. This beautiful park was donated by Jacob Anthes, Mathias and Johanna Quist, the Soundview Pulp Company, and the Des Moines Timber Company in four separate bequests between 1922 and 1948. It was donated for the purpose of constructing a park for Master Masons and their Page 36 families. The Park has been developed entirely by donations of time, effort, money, and materials from many devoted brethren and many of the surrounding lodges. Membership in the Master Masons Club is maintained by an annual fee to all Master Masons belonging to a lodge in Snohomish and Island Counties and is the primary source of revenue for maintenance of the Park. In recent years, the use of the Park has been extended to other Master Masons belonging to lodges outside of Snohomish and island Counties, who wish to maintain an annual associate membership for the same fee per year. This beautiful park is open to all Master Masons, their family members and guests. In addition, members of Eastern Stat, Amaranth or majority members of Rainbow and Job's Daughters along with family and guests are welcome. Planned development of the Park, inaugurated several years ago to protect this tremendous resource, has made possible the development of timbered portions and the expansion and beautification of picnic and camping areas. Provisions for future development of the Park have been made by the adoption of a Memorial Trust Fund from life memberships that will one day provide income for the perpetual maintenance of the Park. Donations to this fund can be made directly to the Master Masons Club or at the entry gate. Washington state Masons hold an annual ‘Outdoor Degree’ on the first Saturday of August every summer in an amphitheater area of the park. May We Meet Upon The _|_ Act By The ! And Part Upon The |_ W. Bro. Dwight D. Seals - Camden Lodge #159 - Camden, Ohio ++++++++++++++++++++++++ Why Old People Still Need Newspapers I was visiting my DAUGHTER last night when I asked if I could borrow a newspaper. "This is the 21st century" she said. "We don't waste money on newspapers. Here, use my iPad." I can tell you one thing ... that damn fly never knew what hit him... ++++++++++++++++++++++++ The Obligation and the Oath: The obligation is a promise made by the candidate to the members of his Lodge and to the Fraternity. The oath is the "So help me God!" that follows the obligation. Masonic TriviaTrivia- A Lodge Saved From the book Masonic Trivia: Amusements and Curiosities by Peter Champion The year 1828 was the height of the anti-Masonic fervor arising out of a controversy called “The Morgan Affair.” During this period, local anti-Masonic authorities resorted to unlawfully seizing Lodges and Lodge possessions. Morgan Park Lodge #999 of Chicago, Illinois, found itself in such a pickle when their Lodge was sealed by county officials. As the years passed, the anti-Masonic fanaticism quelled. Brethren of the Lodge wished to reopen, but lacked their Charter, lights, officer regalia, and tools of the craft. They called a meeting to brainstorm a solution for their dilemma. Much to their astonishment, the Lodge Tiler, Past Master Charles M. Gray, walked into the meeting with all of the above items. Needless to say, the brethren were surprised, but not dumbfounded enough that they failed to ask how the Page 37 possessions had escaped impoundment. Gray explained that he had foreseen the possible seizure. As Tiler, he had the keys to the Lodge and storage areas and was able to secure the items in advance of the approaching authorities. Thereupon, he’d entrusted the items to the care of “a maiden friend.” Gray went on to state, “She deposited them between the straw and feather ticks of her bed, where they remained unmolested.” +++++++++++++++++++++ An Irishman moves into a tiny hamlet in County Kerry, walks into the pub and promptly orders three beers. The bartender raises his eyebrows, but serves the man three beers, which he drinks quietly at a table, alone. An hour later, the man has finished the three beers and orders three more. This happens yet again.The next evening the man again orders and drinks three beers at a time, several times. Soon the entire town is whispering about the Man Who Orders Three Beers. Finally, a week later, the bartender broaches the subject on behalf of the town. “I don’t mean to pry, but folks around here are wondering why you always order three beers?” ‘Tis odd, isn’t it?” the man replies, “You see, I have two brothers, and one went to America, and the other to Australia. We promised each other that we would always order an extra two beers whenever we drank as a way of keeping up the family bond.” The bartender and the whole town was pleased with this answer, and soon the “Man Who Orders Three Beers” became a local celebrity and source of pride to the hamlet, even to the extent that out-of-towners would come to watch him drink. Then, one day, the man comes in and orders only two beers. The bartender pours them with a heavy heart. This continues for the rest of the evening – he orders only two beers. The word flies around town. Prayers are offered for the soul of one of the brothers. The next day, the bartender says to the man, “Folks around here, me first of all, want to offer condolences to you for the death of your brother. You know-the two beers and all… ”The man ponders this for a moment, then replies, “You’ll be happy to hear that my two brothers are alive and well… It’s just that I, myself, have decided to give up drinking for Lent.” Finally Finally – After 179 Years Of Doubt Santa Anna’s Masonic Membership Confirmed DAL Thanks to W. Bro. Gary Mosmeyer for submitting this one from the Texas Historical Foundation LAS – The Texas Scottish Rite of Freemasonry has confirmed that Mexican General Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna, Commander at the battle of the Alamo and the Battle of San Jacinto, was a Scottish Rite Mason in Mexico. His original Scottish Rite membership certificate is located in the Livingston Masonic Library of the Masonic Grand Lodge of New York. According to M. Douglas Adkins, the top Scottish Rite official in Texas and a member of the Supreme Council of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in the Southern Jurisdiction, a person must be a Master Mason to be eligible for Scottish Rite membership in Mexico, as in the United States. Today’s announcement resolves arguments by Texas historians who have contended there has been no proof of General Santa Anna’s membership. The significance of this announcement in terms of Texas history stems from numerous reports that General Santa Anna saved himself from execution after being captured at the battle of San Jacinto in 1836 by giving secret Masonic signs to Texas soldiers and later to Page 38 General Sam Houston, a well-known Mason. The Texas critics of these reports have said that General Santa Anna would not have known of such secret signs unless he actually was a Mason, for which no proof had previously been provided. Mr. Adkins explained that this confirmation of Masonic membership does not provide proof of the story that Masonic membership saved General Santa Anna’s life, but rather only refutes the arguments that General Santa Anna was not a Mason. Some Masons have said that General Houston and many other Masons at San Jacinto would have known that General Santa Anna had disowned Masonry and that his offenses in Mexico, the Alamo and Goliad would have forfeited any rights for protection he may have had as a Mason. Sources in Mexico have confirmed that he was kicked out of Masonry. Mr. Adkins emphasized that the Texas Scottish Rite is taking no position in this historical controversy, and is only confirming General Santa Anna’s Masonic membership. Mr. Adkins said Masonry always has celebrated its history and the lives of many of its members, including George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, William B. Travis, James Bowie and Davy Crockett. The Texas Scottish Rite is pleased to provide this information for the use of present and future Texas historians. An enlarged and enhanced graphic image of Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna’s Scottish Rite Masonic Membership certificate, as well as his Masonic Apron, his spurs, items from his tent at San Jacinto, Davy Crockett’s pistol from the Alamo, and other Texas history artifacts will be on display before and after the presentation of the new play, “Leaving San Jacinto,” on April 23, 2013, in Dallas. For more information, please visit http://www.leavingsanjacinto.com. . Surviving The Big Ones Surviving The Big Ones By John “Corky” Daut The big ones for me were that 16 year period between the Great Depression and World War II. Being born in 1928, I grew up during the hard times between the stock market crash of 1929 and the end of World War II in 1945. Some of the readers have told me that they enjoyed reading about the good old days in the country so this is the second of three columns about Pine Island during the late 1800’s and early 1900’s with stories my mother told me. In the late eighteen hundreds and early nineteen hundreds the people, at least in the country, enjoyed a simpler God fearing life that was reflected in their social life and entertainment’s. One of the more popular social events, of the time, was visiting friends and kinfolk. The whole family would load into the wagon or later the car or truck and go to visit Uncle John's or Aunt Kate's family just to talk and enjoy each other’s company. It wasn't at all uncommon, especially in the earlier "horse and wagon" days, to put pallets on the floor for the children and spend a night or two on such a visit. When the farm work was caught up, my great grandfather would load up the wagon with family food and quilts and head for the Fields Store community. There, they would pay a visit with his Page 39 brother and the family for a few days, then load up and make the 12 mile trip back to Pine Island. Now, don’t laugh about a 12 mile trip that would take you 15 minutes. With a team of horses and a wagon on the roads of that day it was at least a half days journey. Visiting was popular enough around the turn of the century that people overcame many obstacles that most current day persons with modern automobiles and highways would not consider trying. Mama talked about going with her friend Lena, Lena's father Joe and the rest of Joe's family to all went to visit Lena’s grandfather. They all loaded into Joe's truck one morning and headed toward Chappell Hill. When they reached the Brazos River the water level was so high that the ferry wasn't running. Not allowing Mother Nature to halt a visit, Joe hired a man with a rowboat to row the whole family across the river in two trips. Once across the river, Joe used the phone at a nearby store to call his father in Chappell Hill. His father drove down to the river, loaded the whole group into his car and they continued the journey. After they spent the day visiting, "grandpa" loaded them all back in the car and drove them to the river. There, they were rowed back across the river and loaded into Joe's truck for the drive home. Most citizens of the area were very religious and their social life often consisted of singings and bible study held at each other’s homes and at the church. Even attending the official church services or prayer meetings was also a semi-social event, although most members would have been very upset to hear it called that. Church services allowed the members to meet before and after the service to exchange the neighborhood news events of the past week. It gave the women a chance to let the other ladies see their new dresses or sunbonnets that came far and few between. It allowed the men a chance to meet with their neighbors and discuss the crops, or the weather, or the new horse that one of them had bought. The church also gave the people a place to join together and share their grief at funerals and after natural disasters as well as their joy at weddings and christenings. Maybe once a month or so, if the young people were lucky, they could talk one of their families into giving a "Play Party" for the teens and young adults. The word “party” had a slightly different definition in those days. It usually meant that the furniture would be moved out of a room and chairs would be placed around the walls for the guests. Sometime cake or cookies were served, but often the only refreshment offered was a cold drink of water, fresh from the well. At the party the young people would play "party games" such as Snap where a boy and girl would hold each other’s hands high up like an arch and name a boy to start the game. He would call a girl's name and she would chase him around the couple. When she caught him, he had to replace the boy holding hands. Then the girl called a boy's name and he chased her around the couple and on and on. Some of the other "Ring Party Games" that were very popular, were actually square dances, but of course no one dared call them dances in those days, so they were party games. Some of the ring games of the day were called "Black Them Boots and Make Them Shine", "Build My House, Wilburn", "Same Old Two and Go Right Through", "Four In The Middle", "Dusty Miller" and "In And Out The Window". Occasionally some of the neighbors would get out the old hand cranked ice cream freezers and have an ice cream supper at the school or someone's home. At these events the young people would play the same games that they did at the play parties. The schools were sometime used for events such as plays or special holiday programs that were presented by the students. The older men would sometime play dominoes, shoot the moon or forty two or even a hot game of checkers. And, of course there was horseshoe pitching. Card games were out of the question for most families however, as they were "Tools of the devil" that were used for gambling and therefore sinful. +++++++++++++++++++ Bubba and Abe met up after their fishing trips and Bubba asked Abe if he had any luck. Abe replied, "Yep, I caught a 65 lb catfish, how about you?" Abe replied, No luck with catching fish but I fished out a lantern I lost about 10 years ago, and the light was still burning." Page 40 Rubbing his chin, old Abe looked at Bubba and said, "Well perhaps that fish wasn't that big after all. Tel ya what, I'll knock off 30 pounds from that fish if you'll blow out the light in that lantern." Thanks to W. Bro. Paul Weathers The Pine Island Pen Works No, this is not a paid advertisement. It is just a story about my other hobby. Really, it’s not an advertisement. But, if you are interested you can always email me. Hi, I'm "Corky" from Pine Island, Texas. I started working with wood in wood shop class at Stonewall Jackson Junior High School in Houston, Texas in 1941 at 14 years old. Now, 73 years later at 87 years old, I'm still working with wood. I saw my first turned wooden ball point pens about 7 or 8 years ago. They were beautiful and I knew that someday I would be making some. After my wife passed away 4 years ago, I started making pens to occupy my mind. Well, you can only give away so many pens as gifts, so I started selling some at the “First Saturday Trades Day” in Bellville, Texas once a month. I don’t make any real money, but it does pay for the hobby. The Bolt Action Bullet pen is the best seller. I’ve sold 22 so far this year at $30.00 each. A metal parts kit cost me $14.95 and a few more dollars for fancy woods, finishes and shipping. So, I make about $10 on one, but the hobby pays for itself. The Masonic pens were in second place with 19, but that is misleading. One Worshipful Master bought 16 Masonic pens as gifts for his officers. The new Lever Action pens just came out and will be introduced to buyers at the October sale. Looking for another hit??? Operating the bolt or the lever advances and retracts the replaceable “Parker” type ink cartridges, I just finished completely overhauling my Pen Shop on the internet. You can visit the site at http://oldcorky.com/PenWorks There are 22 different kind of pens including Masonic, some desk top items and some shaving items all made with wood as a major part. $5.00 off on all prices for Brothers. Page 41 Australian Gun Law Update Editor’s Note; Thanks to Brother May, who is one of my regular contributors, for this one. This is a message I have been supporting for years. CRIMINALS ARE NOT LAW ABIDING CITIZENS, WHO Will TURN IN THEIR GUNS. BUT, THEY WILL THANK YOU FOR MAKING THEIR JOB SITES A MUCH SAFER AREA TO WORK IN. From Lowry May To BCC [email protected] Today at 8:35 AM Australian Gun Law Update Here's a thought to warm some of your hearts.... From: Ed Chenel, A police officer in Australia Hi Yanks, I thought you all would like to see the real figures from Down Under. It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars. The first year results are now in: Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent, Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent; Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)! In the state of Victoria... lone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent.(Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not and criminals still possess their guns!) While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since the criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed. There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly, while the resident is at home. Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in 'successfully ridding Australian society of guns...' You won't see this on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the State Assembly disseminating this information. The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens. Take note Americans, before it's too late! Will you be one of the sheep to turn yours in? WHY? You will need it. FORWARD TO EVERYONE ON YOUR EMAIL LIST. DON'T BE A MEMBER OF THE SILENT MAJORITY. BE ONE OF THE VOCAL MINORITY WHO WON 'T STAND FOR NONSENSE AUSTRALIA: MORE VIOLENT CRIME DESPITE GUN BAN