FBI-LEEDA Insighter magazine

Transcription

FBI-LEEDA Insighter magazine
April 2013 Issue I
22nd Annual Executive
Training Conference
May 19-22, 2013
Join us in Louisville, Kentucky for excellent training and
networking opportunities for law enforcement executives.
Page 16
2013 Conference Sponsor
IN THIS ISSUE:
2013 Training Schedule Announced
see page 6
New Class!
Advanced Supervisory Liability
see page 8
Sergeant-at-Arms Candidates Announced
see page 22
Free Training
FBI-Law Enforcement Executive Development Association (FBI-LEEDA)
and LifeLock offer one and two day identity theft summits. The summits
are interactive and intensely focused on introducing the newest trends
of the complex crime of identity theft.
The instructor will address a range of identity theft
issues to include:
• Relevant identity theft laws
• High technology theft
• Investigative techniques
• Identity theft awareness and
protection strategies
LAW ENFORCEMENT
EDUCATION
"In my 40 years of law enforcement this is the most
informative one day seminar I have attended."
-Chief Don Dixon
Lake Charles, Louisiana PD
"I am very proud to have been a host of this program.
Our local personnel who attended a ll benefitted in
some way, picking up on new methods for fighting
this insidious crime."
-Chief Glenn Ladd
North Kansas City, Missouri PD
Currently booking 2013 classes
Ask how to host a law enforcement
summit in your area
Contact Paige Hanson
Manager of Educational Programs
Email [email protected] or call 480-457-2108
Visit www.fbileeda.org for upcoming training locations
LifeLock, the LockMan Logo and “Relentlessly Protecting Your Identity” are trademarks or registered trademarks of LifeLock, Inc.
FBI – LEEDA
5 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 125
Malvern, PA 19355
Tel: 877-772-7712 • Fax: 610-644-3193
www.fbileeda.org
FBI – LEEDA Mission Statement
April 2013
n To advance the science and art of Law Enforcement
leadership and management;
n To develop and disseminate improved administrative,
operational and technical practices to meet the needs of
Law Enforcement executives throughout the world;
n To promote the exchange of information and training
for executives of law enforcement;
n To actively seek the expansion of training programs
for Law Enforcement executives and to encourage the
participation of Law Enforcement professionals in
future FBI – LEEDA training.
2013 Executive Board
PRESIDENT
Ozzie Knezovich, Sheriff
Spokane County Sheriff’s Office
1100 W. Mallon, Spokane, WA 99260
Telephone: 509-477-6917 • Facsimile: 509-477-5641
E-mail: [email protected]
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
Greg Hamilton, Sheriff
Travis County Sheriff’s Office
P.O. Box 1748, Austin, TX 78767
Telephone: 512-854-9788 • Facsimile: 512-854-3289
E-mail: [email protected]
SECOND VICE PRESIDENT
Sam Pennica, Director
City County Bureau of Identification
3301 Hammond Road, Raleigh, NC 27603
Telephone: 919-255-7370 • Facsimile: 919-856-6305
Email: [email protected]
SERGEANT-AT-ARMS
David Boggs, Chief
Broken Arrow Police Department
2302 S. First Place, Broken Arrow, OK 74012
Telephone: 918-451-8394
[email protected]
IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT
Richard P. Thomas, Chief (Ret.)
1109 Niesen Road, Port Washington, WI 53074
Telephone: 414-687-7513
Email: [email protected]
PAST PRESIDENT
Donald D. Dixon, Chief of Police
Lake Charles Police Department
830 Enterprise Boulevard, Lake Charles, LA 70602
Telephone: 337-491-1317 • Facsimile: 337-491-1236
E-mail: [email protected]
Issue I
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Mission Statement / Executive Board
President’s Message – by President Ozzie Knezovich
The Reliable Source – Executive Director’s Report
FBI Academy Update
One – Day Summits and Seminars
Identity Theft – LifeLock®
Drug Diversion Summits – Purdue Pharma®
Heavy Equipment Theft – NER and NICB®
6 |
Training Opportunities – Course Schedules
6 Command Institute for Law Enforcement Executives®
6 Supervisor Leadership Institute®
6 Supervisory Liability - Online
7 Executive Leadership®
7 Leadership and Management Seminar
7 Leaders Without Titles
8 Distance Learning Online - Phase II - Advanced Supervisory Liability
10 | General Counsel Update – “ADA - Do You Have a Policy
for That?” — by Eric Daigle
12 | Regional Representative Program Update
FBI – LEEDA Executive Services
13 | FBI – LEEDA / LifeLock Scholarship Program
New Corporate Partnership
14 | Feature Articles
14 Henley-Putnam University: Real-World Impact of Developing
Collaboration Skills
15 Understanding Anonymous’ Roots
— Katherine Sagona-Stophel, Thomson Reuters Special Services
18 The Partnership of Municipal and University Police Departments:
The Galveston Experience
— Chief Thomas Engells, The University of Texas Medical Branch at
Galveston Police Department and Chief Henry Porretto, The
Galveston Police Department, Galveston, Texas
21 Remote Guarding: The State of the Art of Crime Prevention
— Michael Mello, Security Consultant, Elite Interactive Solutions;
Sergeant (Ret.), Huntington Beach Police Department
16 | 22nd Annual Executive Leadership Training Conference
22 | Sergeant-at-Arms Candidacy Submissions
24 | Corporate Partner Directory
28 | Welcome New Members
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Tom Stone
FBI-LEEDA, Inc.
Suite 125, 5 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, PA 19355
Telephone: 1-877-772-7712 • Facsimile: 610-644-3193
E-mail: [email protected]
The FBI–LEEDA Insighter magazine is a publication of FBI–LEEDA, Inc., and is published three times each year by FBI–LEEDA, Inc.
FBI LIAISON
SSA Russell T. Kleber
A-UC, Community Leadership Development Unit
FBI Academy, Quantico, VA 22135
Direct: 703-632-3801 • E-mail: [email protected]
The FBI–Law Enforcement Executive Development Association is a private, non – profit
organization and is not part of the Federal Bureau of Investigation or acting on it’s behalf.
FBI–LEEDA, Inc., is a non – government, non – profit corporation. Neither the Association, its Executive Board, nor its representatives endorse or assure the completeness
or accuracy of information provided by outside sources which is contained in this or
any other FBI–LEEDA publication.
The FBI–LEEDA Insighter magazine is managed and produced by Judith A. Grubb,
Graphics / Publisher, E-mail: [email protected]; Tel: 484–571-4866
www.fbileeda.org
1
President’s Letter
Greetings
It has been my privilege to serve as President of FBI
– LEEDA for the last year. I am proud of the many accomplishments that we have made over the past year,
including the expanding of our leadership programs
which are providing the best training to law enforcement at all levels throughout the United States.
Our conference this year will feature prominent speakers and address up to date situations that have impacted
law enforcement and communities nationwide, such as
dealing with the active shooter, computer crimes, and
surviving a major media event. Please see the program
agenda listed in the center of this magazine for a complete schedule of speakers and events.
Work is in progress to develop the second tier of our
Supervisory Liability Distance Learning class. It will be
available in May 2013.
I expect the Executive Board to make an announcement on the selection of the new Executive Director
by the 15th of April. The high caliber and outstanding
qualifications of the applicants will make the selection
process extremely challenging for the Executive Board.
In recent months I had the chance to teach an ethics class to a Reserve Police Officers Academy. I pose a
question to our FBI – LEEDA members -- when was your
last ethics class? When I asked this question of a group
of experienced law enforcement leaders, most stated
“the academy”. Ethics classes are most often taught as
a result of two events: our academy training or after an
event which has brought negative light to an agency.
In order for ethics to become part of our agency’s and
profession’s core, we need to examine where it really fits
into our core training environment.
We spend countless hours training and preparing our
officers and deputies to deal with use of force issues
so they can make correct split-second decisions during those events. How much time do we spend training
them to make correct split-second decisions when dealing with the ethical dilemmas they face on a daily basis?
When we compare use of force decisions to ethical decisions our personnel are facing, we find that bad ethical
decisions result in more officers and deputies not making it to retirement than use of force situations. As leaders, we owe it to our staff and our profession to ensure
ethics are not just something in a manual but a way of
life.
Thank you for allowing me to serve in this prestigious
position. I look forward to seeing you all in Louisville.
— Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich
2
FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
President FBI – LEEDA
The Reliable Source
Executive Director’s Report
Tom Stone
Executive Director
FBI – LEEDA
The FBI – LEEDA 22nd Annual Executive Training Conference will be one of the premier educational events for
law enforcement leaders nationwide in 2013.
Please make plans to join us in Louisville, Kentucky,
from May 19-22, to hear first-hand from:
• Daniel Oates, Chief of Police, Aurora Police Department, Aurora, Colorado will discuss the tragedy that took
place at the Century Theatre. Chief Oates will be joined
by James Yacone, SAC, FBI Denver Division, and
• Michael Kehoe, Chief of Police, Newtown Police Department, Newtown, Connecticut will discuss the tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
Chief Oates and Chief Kehoe will discuss the events
surrounding these tragedies and the lessons learned. A
question and answer session will follow each presentation.
Additional presenters will be Robert S. Mueller, III,
Director, FBI; John Miller, CBS News Senior Correspondent and former FBI Assistant Director - Critical Issues
Facing Law Enforcement; Ari Fleischer, former White
House Press Secretary to President George W. Bush - National Perspectives Impacting Law Enforcement; Judy
Pal, Chief of Staff, Baltimore Police Department – Social
Media and Public Perception; Robert Boback, Security
Expert and CEO, Tiversa, Inc. – Protecting Your Intellectual Property; and Louis Quijas, Assistant Secretary, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, and Connie Patrick,
Director, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center –
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Partnerships
with Law Enforcement.
The Host Committee has put together exciting events
to showcase their wonderful city, including dinner at the
Kentucky Derby Museum at Churchill Downs on Monday evening.
Excellent training opportunities are available not only
at FBI – LEEDA’s annual conference but also throughout the year via our many training programs. We are
extremely pleased with the overwhelming response to
our first Distance Learning program and will be adding
a Phase II to the program in May dealing with police liability.
As I plan for my retirement later this year, I would be
remiss if I did not thank the exceptional personnel and
faculty members who provide the skill and knowledge
you have come to rely on for education, information,
and assistance. The success of any Association rests with
its staff. FBI – LEEDA is indeed fortunate to have a dedicated, experienced, and professional staff to support the
members, programs, sponsors, and corporate partners
of the Association. I will be on-hand in the months to
come to assist the new Executive Director, when named,
to ensure a smooth transition.
The corporate partners of FBI – LEEDA provide vital
information to our members and keep the law enforcement community informed about the latest technology
and services available to them. Our corporate partnership program is the best in the industry. Please continue
to support the corporate partners of FBI – LEEDA and
their service to law enforcement.
As law enforcement leaders, your single, most important task is to make sure you and the people with whom
you work come home safely at the end of the tour.
Always keep your sense of humor – and remember, it’s
just another day in paradise…
Cheers,
Tom
www.fbileeda.org
3
FBI Academy Update
February 2013
Many changes are still occurring at FBI Academy. The
Madison Dormitory is closed and going through a complete remodel. The dining hall will be moved to a back
parking lot under tents while the entire cafeteria and
kitchen will be renovated. Soon, the Community Leadership Development Unit will be changing its name to
the Law Enforcement Development Unit. We will be responsible for all Leadership Training for Law Enforcement at the FBI Academy.
LEEDS 72 graduated on February 8, 2013 with FBI –
LEEDA President Ozzie Knezovich in attendance. We
had our first attendee from the small island country of
Seychelles. If you are interested in attending a LEEDS
class, contact your local SAC or Training Coordinator for
more information.
— SSA Russell T. Kleber
A/Unit Chief, Community Leadership Development Unit
Tel: 703-632-3801 • E-mail: [email protected]
* Seychelles, officially the
Republic of Seychelles, is
a cluster of 115 islands
spanning in the Indian
Ocean, some 932 miles
east of mainland Africa,
northeast of the island of
Madagascar.
Join the FBI – LEEDA Team
Announce Your Candidacy For
Sergeant-At-Arms
Members who wish to take a more active
role in FBI – LEEDA are encouraged to submit a letter of intent to run for the office of
Sergeant-at-Arms. This is an excellent opportunity to channel the direction of your
organization.
Any active member in good standing who
wishes to run for the office of Sergeant-atArms must submit to the President at the
FBI – LEEDA office a written statement of his
or her intention to seek office at least thirty
days prior to the 2013 Conference.
Deadline to
submit your
candidacy:
April 22, 2013
4
FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
FBI-LEEDA
Training Seminars
IDENTITY THEFT
FBI – LEEDA and LifeLock , present
one- and two-day summits on Identify Theft, its economic, personal
and employment impacts. The Summit is open to all law enforcement
personnel and addresses a range of
identity theft issues presented by
distinguished law enforcement personnel with specialized skills and experience in identity theft, high technology crimes and fraud.
®
Check our website for dates, locations and to register for this FREE
law enforcement training, or contact Paige Hanson at 480-457-2108,
e-mail: [email protected] or Chief
Dean Crisp (Ret.), Phone: 803-2403024, e-mail: [email protected]
DRUG DIVERSION
HEAVY EQUIPMENT THEFT
FBI – LEEDA and Purdue Pharma
are expanding the Drug Diversion
Summits. These are FREE interactive
summits covering local area specifics involving drug diversion crime.
Local case studies are presented
along with information on specific
law enforcement resources available
in your area and how to access these
resources. An enhanced RxPATROL®
program is introduced as well. RxPATROL® is a collaborative effort
between industry and law enforcement designed to collect, collate,
analyze and disseminate pharmacy
theft information.
FBI – LEEDA, National Insurance
Crime Bureau (NICB) and National
Equipment Register (NER) cordially
invite you to participate in this informational one-day regional summit designed for law enforcement;
equipment owners, dealers or rental;
insurance adjusters or agents. General sessions and break-out classes
examine theft problems, recovery
challenges, prevention strategies
and solutions.
Visit our website for upcoming
dates and information on the advanced Two Day Summit coming
in 2013. For more information or to
host a summit, please contact Elizabeth Percheson at 203-588-7817 or
email her at Elizabeth.percheson@
pharma.com.
Please check our website for specific
dates and locations for these events
and registration details. Registration
is free for law enforcement, equipment owners and NICB or NER
member insurers.
Commemorative Glock
This special commemorative Glock is available to FBI – LEEDA members only
and is shipped to Federal Firearms licensees only. Standard delivery is 30-45
days after receipt of your order with payment. Purchaser is responsible for cost
of the FFL transfer (if any), shipping, and any applicable taxes. All prices include engraving – can engrave up to three sides of the Glock.
For orders please contact:
Todd R. Ackerman
Chief of Police, Marysville Police Department
207 South Tenth, Marysville, KS 66508
Tel: 785-562-2343 Fax: 785-562-3296
[email protected]
• (.40) 22, 23, 27 – $420.00
• (9mm) 17, 19, 26 – $420.00
• (.357 sig) 31, 32, 33 – $420.00
• (.45) 21, 30, 36 – $485.00
• Shadow Box (engraved) – $100.00
www.fbileeda.org
5
FBI-LEEDA Training Opportunities
Command Institute for Law
Enforcement Executives©
Supervisor Leadership Institute©
The FBI–LEEDA Command Institute for Law Enforcement Executives© is a dynamic, intensive and challenging five day program specifically and uniquely designed
to prepare law enforcement leaders for command level
positions.
The Command Institute focus is to provide real life
contemporary and futuristic strategies and techniques
for those aspiring to command level assignments. Command Institute faculty includes executive level law enforcement experts with extensive leadership experience
who are passionate instructors.
Command Institute students will be engaged in such
topics as preparing and testing for command, leading a
new command, leading change, organizational culture,
surviving and succeeding as a police executive, audits
and controls, vicarious liability and establishing a leadership legacy. The Command Institute is student centered with a high degree of student involvement.
The FBI–LEEDA Supervisor Leadership Institute© is a
cutting edge five day program built especially for firstline supervisors and middle managers with the goal of
enhancing leadership competencies. The Supervisor
Leadership Institute faculty includes senior law enforcement experts on leadership who are committed to
passing on their lessons learned.
Attendees will be engaged in personality diagnostics,
leadership case studies, mentoring, developing your
people, performance management, risk management
and leadership legacy. This Institute is student centered
and rich in facilitated dialogue and group work.
The registration fee for Supervisor Leadership Institute© is $650.
The registration fee for Command Institute for Law
Enforcement Executives© is $650.
Dates and Locations
• March 11-15 . . . . . .
• March 18-22 . . . . . .
• April 8-12 . . . . . . .
• April 29-May 3 . . . . .
• June 10-14 . . . . . . .
• June 24-28 . . . . . . .
• Sept. 9-13 . . . . . . .
• Sept. 16-20 . . . . . .
• Sept. 30-Oct. 4 . . . .
• October 7-11 . . . . .
• November 4-8 . . . . .
• December 9-13 . . . .
Georgetown, TX
Stoughton, MA
Richmond, VA
Framingham, MA
Andover, MN
Boise, ID
Hampton, NH
Austin, TX (TCSO)
Stillwater, MN
Lubbock, TX
Longmont, CO
Spokane, WA
Dates and Locations
• March 4-8 . . . . . . .
• March 18-22 . . . . . .
• April 7-12 . . . . . . .
• April 15-19 . . . . . . .
• April 22-26 . . . . . . .
• May 6-10 . . . . . . .
• June 3-7 . . . . . . . .
• June 10-14 . . . . . . .
• June 24-28 . . . . . . .
• July 22-26 . . . . . . .
• August 19-23 . . . . .
• September 16-20 . . .
Overland Park, KS
Nashville, TN
Andover, MN
Polson, MT
Port Washington, WI
Memphis, TN
Hampton, NH
Spokane, WA
Georgetown, TX
Fort Collins, CO
Stuart, FL
Centreville, MD
Distance Learning Online Training
Supervisory Liability
Supervisory Liability is an online instructor-lead program offered to law
enforcement agencies. The four week course is segmented into four modules that focus on
specific issues facing today’s law enforcement supervisors. Check our website for registration
and course details, or contact the FBI – LEEDA office for more information.
Classes start the first Monday of each month. The registration fee for Supervisory Liability class is $350.
6
FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
FBI-LEEDA
Leadership and Management Seminar
Procedures for Conducting and
Managing Internal Affairs Investigations
Executive Leadership
©
This innovative three and one half day program is designed for senior law enforcement executives focusing
on the emerging challenges facing our profession. This
highly interactive program follows the FBI – LEEDA
“Cops Talking to Cops” model of professional development. The seminar uses a wide range of source material and calls upon the participant’s professional experience to facilitate individual development and enrich the
learning environment.
The three – day seminar is interactive, and attendees participate in various scenarios presented by the instructors.
Procedures for Conducting and Managing
Internal Affairs Investigations focuses on ethics
and integrity, agency policies and procedures,
the complaint process, investigation of personnel complaints, administrative law, and the interview process.
The course first looks inward to identify the forces of
change and emerging trends within the law enforcement community, such as the challenges of merging the
perspectives of Traditionalist, Baby Boomer, and Generation X and Millennia employees and presents leadership strategies to manage and adapt to the future conditions. The program also looks into the future to forecast
several emerging global “Megatrends” that are expected
to shape conditions for the next few decades; discuss
how those trends will affect the global law enforcement
community and how police executives can influence
and shape future conditions.
The registration fee for the Leadership and
Management Seminar is $300.
The registration fee for Executive Leadership© is $550.
Many leaders are placed in positions of power
due to connections, education, personal charisma, experience, and/or socio-economic status. Although these criteria may have a correlation with leadership ability, they often leave
out the fundamental criterion for being a good
leader: a person’s personal make-up, or characteristics, as a human being. A leader’s human
inadequacies can often lead to leadership failure.
Dates and Locations
• April 15-18 . . . . . . .
• April 22-25 . . . . . . .
• April 29-May 2 . . . . .
• May 6-9 . . . . . . . .
• August 19-22 . . . . .
• August 26-30 . . . . .
• September 10-12 . . .
• September 23-26 . . .
• September 23-26 . . .
• October 7-10 . . . . .
• October 21-24 . . . . .
• December 9-12 . . . .
Port Washington, WI
Bellevue, WA
Scottsdale, AZ
North Fargo, ND
Richmond, VA
Spokane, WA
Augusta, ME
Georgetown, TX
Hartford, CT
Myrtle Beach, SC
Hampton, NH
Austin, TX (TCSO)
Dates and Locations
• June 17-19 . . . . . . . Polson, MT
• September 17-19 . . . Orono, ME
Leadership and Leaders Without Titles
How to Influence Others Without Using
Authority / Force
This class will explore the human attributes
leaders should have before given the formal authority. The registration fee for the Leadership
and Leaders Without Titles is $550.
For information to host this class, contact
Donna Carpentier at Tel: 877-772-7712
For additional information concerning any of these training opportunities, or if you would be interested
in hosting any of these programs in your area, please contact Donna Carpentier at 877-772-7712.
SEMINAR REGISTRATION IS OPEN TO ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT – SWORN AND SUPPORT
You do not need to be a member of FBI – LEEDA to attend a seminar.
www.fbileeda.org
7
Distance Learning Online Training
New Class - Phase II
Advanced Supervisory Liability
Ensuring Effective and Constitution Policing
FBI – LEEDA is proud to announce its newest on-line training program, Advanced
Supervisory Liability On-Line Distance Learning Program, to supplement the Supervisory Liability 101 On-Line training program. The goal of this enhanced program is
to ensure effective and constitutional policing through the training of proper supervision standards. The development of these standards includes a review of the current
legal standards, case law interpretation, and Common Police practices.
Module One: Supervision Pursuant to Proper Police Practices
This topic area will review the applicable supervisory standards identified through an
interpretation of Monell Liability and standards pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 14141.
This module includes: failure to supervise standards, as well as span of control and
unity of command standards. This area of training includes a review of topics such as:
performance evaluations, use of early warning systems, and supervisory monitoring/
intervention.
Module Two: Current Trends in Law Enforcement Supervision
This topic area will cover management issues involving the use of technology in daily
operation. This module will also include expectation of privacy issues and the seizing of individual mobile phones to include electronic discovery in criminal and civil
litigation. Specifically, this module will review how the use and seizure of personally
owned and department owned electronic devices affects daily operations. This topic
area will also include the affects of social networking to include Facebook, Twitter,
and much more on the daily operation of the department.
Module Three: Use of Force Investigations
This topic area will review the process required for supervisors to conduct use of force
investigations after an officer uses force, as well as a review of proper police practices
as outlined by various litigation and Department of Justice Consent Decrees. This
module will also review the requirements of interviewing witnesses, documentation
of evidence and injuries, interviewing the subject officer, and reviewing the officer’s
use of force report.
Module Four: Conducting Internal Affairs Investigations
This topic area will review the recommended practice for conducting an effective
internal affairs investigation. This section will review the citizen complaint process,
proper investigation protocols, and the pitfalls found in labor hearings or civil litigation.
We anticipate this training being released to members in May 2013. Supervisors will
be required to take the Supervisory Liability 101 training course to be eligible to take
this program. The registration fee for Advanced Supervisory Liability class is $350.
Check our website for registration and course details, or
contact the FBI – LEEDA office for more information.
877-772-7712
8
FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
January 7, 2013 Command Institute for Law Enforcement Executives Greetings: As the Governor of the State of Delaware, it gives me great pleasure to welcome you to the Command Institute for Law Enforcement Executives. As Law Enforcement Executives you will obtain informative instructions from the FBI Law Enforcement Executive Development Association that will further develop your career and serve as an asset to the state of Delaware that you protect. The knowledge that you possess is a direct asset to the citizens of the First State that you protect and serve. This truly will be a welcome opportunity to share concepts and learn in the law enforcement arena. Here’s to the growth of Law Enforcement Executives in Delaware and all the best in the future! Sincerely, Jack A. Markell Governor Are You Eligible for Life Membership?
Any active member who has been a dues paying member in good standing for a period of not less than ten (10) years
and is retired from public service may request life membership by writing to the FBI – LEEDA President. Life members
are exempt from the payment of annual dues. If you are not sure of your eligibility, contact Lynn Weber of Membership
Services at 877-772-7712 or via email at [email protected].
www.fbileeda.org
9
GENERAL COUNSEL
UPDATE
ADA – Do You Have a Policy for That?
There are certain policies that those who advise law enforcement agencies consider to be “high risk policies.”
Use of Force and Force Related Policies, Pursuit Policy,
Sexual Harassment and the Citizen Complaint Process
are just some of them. Typically, a violation of a “high
risk” policy could make a law enforcement agency more
susceptible to an increased level of liability and a higher damages award. Due to the greater risk of extensive
litigation, an Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)
policy is one that should be included on the list of “high
risk” policies. A violation of the ADA brings with it an
array of causes of action, both on the Federal and State
level, and the ability to create a litigation nightmare for
departments.
Under Title II of the ADA, “no qualified individual with
a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the
services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be
subjected to discrimination by any such entity.1” The
ADA prohibits discrimination based on disability, perceived disability, or association to a person with a disability2. “Discrimination” includes “not making reasonable accommodations to the known physical or mental
limitations of an otherwise qualified individual with a
disability.3” Accordingly, the ADA prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in both state
and local governments, services, programs, and employment.
As state and local government entities, law enforcement agencies are governed by the requirements of the
ADA. Under the ADA law enforcement agencies are required to make reasonable modifications to policies,
police practices, and procedures to accommodate individuals with disabilities4. Proper police practices dictate
that a police department should have a policy identifying ADA guidelines to its officers and should amend specific policies to accommodate individuals with disabilities. Law Enforcement Agencies must also adequately
train their officers on the ADA policy requirements and
applications.
1 See 42 U.S.C. §12132
2 See 42 U.S.C. §§12101(2), 12132, 12182(b)(2)
3 See Id. § 12112(b)(5)(A)
4 See §12182(b)(2)(A)(ii).
10 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
When considering law enforcement procedures, there
are two theories generally recognized by courts in applying the ADA in the context of arrests: first, when police wrongly arrest someone with a disability because
they confuse the signs and symptoms of that disability
as criminal activity; second, when police properly investigate and arrest an individual with a disability for a
crime unrelated to that disability, but fail to reasonably
accommodate the person’s disability in the course of investigation or arrest causing the person to suffer greater
injury or indignity in that process than other arrestees.
In a recent Fourth Circuit case, Seremeth v. Bd. of
County Commissioner Frederick County1, the Appellate
Court held that the ADA applies to police investigation
of criminal conduct. Specifically, the Court stated that
“[a] public entity must ‘make reasonable modifications
in policies, practices, or procedures when the modifications are necessary to avoid discrimination on the basis
of disability, unless the public entity can demonstrate
that making the modifications would fundamentally
alter the nature of the service, program, or activity.5’”.
The Court further stated that when dealing with “communication related disabilities, the ADA requires public
entities to ‘take appropriate steps to ensure that communications with ... members of the public ... with disabilities are as effective as communications with others,’”6 and to “furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and
services where necessary to afford individuals with disabilities ... an equal opportunity to participate in, and
enjoy the benefits of, a service, program, or activity of a
public entity.”7
In Seremeth, the police were called to Seremeth’s home
on a report of a possible domestic violence situation.
The police officers were instructed that the entire Seremeth family was deaf. The officers entered Seremeth’s
home, handcuffed him, and detained him at his home
while they investigated the situation. Ultimately, the officers determined that no domestic violence incident
had occurred and released Seremeth. Seremeth later
brought suit against the department and others claim5 Citing: 28 C.F.R. § 35.130(b)(7)
6 See Id. § 35.160(a)(1)
7 See Id. § 35.160(b)(1).
ing a violation of his rights, including a violation of the
ADA, based in part on the actions of the police officers
during the incident. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The Appellate Court upheld the district court’s decision because it
found that the measures taken by the police department
and officers to accommodate Seremeth were a reasonable pursuant to meet the requirements of ADA given
the exigent circumstances of responding to a domestic
violence call. Some of the measures included: (1) the officers utilized their headlights and flashlights to warn
the family of their arrival; (2) the officers requested that
an officer who was knowledgeable in sign language respond to the scene; (3) upon entering the home, the officers used hand motions to instruct Seremeth to drop
his remote control and turn around; (4) the officers put
their fingers to their lips to instruct the suspect to remain silent; and (5) the officers used Seremeth’s father
to translate.
In an Eighth Circuit case, Barnes v. Gorman,3 an individual confined to a wheelchair brought an action
against the city police department and others under the
ADA for injuries received when being transported in a
police van that was not properly equipped with wheelchair restraints. Gorman was arrested for trespassing
after he failed to leave a night club following an altercation. When the police van arrived, it lacked wheelchair
locks and only contained a narrow bench. Gorman informed the officers that he could not safely ride in the
van. Gorman told the officers that given his disability he
would fall from the bench. Despite Gorman’s statement,
the officers placed Gorman on the bench and used a
seatbelt to strap him in. The seatbelt did not adequately
hold Gorman upright. When Gorman complained the
officers loosened the seatbelt and used Gorman’s own
belt to strap him to the mesh behind the bench to hold
him upright. The officers were unable to fold the wheelchair and place it unfolded in the back of the van with
Gorman. During transportation to the department the
belt came undone and Gorman fell to the van floor, sustaining injury. Gorman’s unsecured wheelchair was also
damaged during transportation. Following a trial the
jury found the defendants liable and awarded Gorman
over $ 1 million in compensatory damages.4
Given the potential for extensive litigation and substantial monetary awards law enforcement agencies
would be wise to protect themselves from potential liability by amending, updating, or drafting a comprehensive ADA policy. One area the policy should address
is police officers’ interaction with the hearing impaired,
including providing a list of available interpreters and
access to a TDD device. Other areas include: procedures
for responding to requests for assistance for disabled
individuals and the transportation of suspects with
wheelchairs or other mobility devices, procedures for
handling custodial interrogations and bookings including the use of a medical screening form to help identify
individuals with emotional, psychological, or medicalbased disabilities, procedures for field enforcement and
investigations including traffic stops and crowd/traffic
control, and accommodations for holding areas and
cells as well as access to bathroom facilities.
The preceding information, however, is by no means
intended to be an all inclusive list of the areas of which
a department’s ADA policy should include. To ensure
that Departments draft proper, comprehensive policies
it would be wise for Departments to seek legal advice
from counsel to avoid potential unnecessary and costly
litigation as a result of claims of discrimination under
the ADA.
Furthermore, it is not enough for departments to
merely have a comprehensive ADA policy. It is equally
important for departments to ensure that their officers
receive regular and thorough training on the policy and
the ADA in general. As we found in Seremeth, it is imperative that officers are knowledgeable with regard to incidents involving persons with disabilities. If the officers
in Seremeth had not been knowledgeable with regard to
the accommodations that they provided the Appellate
Court could have come to a very different conclusion.
The Department of Justice: Civil Rights Division is a
very useful resource for law enforcement agencies that
endeavor to develop, amend, or update appropriate
ADA policies and procedures. For example, the Department of Justice provides a pocket handbook to assist officers when communicating with deaf individuals. The
handbook can be downloaded at http://www.ada.gov/
policeinfo.htm. Other useful information pertaining to
the application of the ADA in law enforcement can be
found at the following Department of Justice website as
well: http://www.ada.gov/publicat.htm.
— Eric Daigle, Esq.
General Counsel for FBI – LEEDA
www.DaigleLawGroup.com
This publication is produced to provide general information on the topic presented. It is distributed with the understanding that the publisher (Daigle Law
Group, LLC.) is not engaged in rendering legal or professional services. Although
this publication is prepared by professionals, it should not be used as a substitute
for professional services. If legal or other professional advice is required, the services of a professional should be sought.
1 Seremeth v. Bd. of County Comm. Frederick County, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 5105
(Mar. 12, 2012.)
2 It is typically not advisable, however, to utilize a family member as an interpreter for reasons that the emotional connection may interfere with the ability
to interpret impartially. Given the exigent circumstances in the Seremeth case,
however, the Appellate Court found the use of Seremeth’s father as an interpreter
reasonable.
3 Barnes v. Gorman,257 F.3d 738 (8th Cir. Mo. 2001.)
4 Although the jury also awarded $1.2 million in punitive damages that portion
of the award was reversed on appeal. The United States Supreme Court held that
an individual cannot recover punitive damages in a private action against a municipality related to discrimination under the ADA. See Barnes v. Gorman, 536
U.S. 181, 122 S.Ct. 2097, 153 L.Ed.2d 230 (2002.)
www.fbileeda.org 11
FBI – LEEDA
Regional Representative
Program Update
12
1
2
8
9
6
11
FBI – LEEDA’s Regional Representatives are preparing
for another busy season with a number of upcoming
Regional Command College and LEEDS programs. Already this season, our Regional Reps have traveled to
programs in Alabama, Connecticut, Washington and
Oregon, and will address hundreds of law enforcement
officers at twenty additional programs this year. Each
year, the Regional Reps promote all of FBI – LEEDA’s
educational opportunities and agencies services to law
enforcement professionals all across the country.
We welcome our newest FBI – LEEDA Representative, Col. Richard Powell, Chief Deputy for the Sedgwick
County Sheriff’s Office in Wichita, KS. Col. Powell is the
new Rep for Region 10, covering Wyoming, Utah, Colorado, Kansas Oklahoma, and New Mexico.
We bid farewell to Chief Randy Szukala, our FBI –
LEEDA Representative for Region 2 (New York, Massachusetts, and Vermont). Chief Szukala retired in March
from the North Tonawanda (NY) Police Department. We
wish him the best, and thank him for his service to the
FBI – LEEDA Regional Representative program.
FBI – LEEDA members in Region 2 who are interested
in serving as a Regional Rep, should contact the FBI –
LEEDA office. Applicants must be an active member of
FBI – LEEDA and a sworn member of a law enforcement
agency with the rank of Lieutenant or above.
If you have any questions about any of the Regional
Representative training programs, contact your FBI –
LEEDA Regional Representative, or the FBI – LEEDA office at (877) 772-7712.
3
7
10
4
5
9
Regional Representative Roster – March 2013
Region 1 – Capt. Matthew Canfield
Laconia Police Department (NH), [email protected]
Region 2 – Vacant position
Region 3 – Capt. Steve Dembowski
Bergen County Prosecutor Office (NJ), [email protected]
Region 4 – Chief Andy Robinson
York Police Department (SC), [email protected]
Region 5 – Lt. Mike Wills
Biloxi Police Department (MS), [email protected]
Region 6 – Chief Joe Monroe
University of Kentucky Police Department (KY), [email protected]
Region 7 – Chief Joel Brumlik
Winthrop Harbor Police Department (IL), [email protected]
Region 8 – Chief Tom Alber
Garden City Police Dept. (MO), [email protected]
Region 9 – Sheriff Mark Pazin
Merced County Sheriff’s Office (CA),[email protected]
Region 10 – Col. Richard Powell
Sedgwick County Sheriff’s Office (KS), [email protected]
Region 11 – Asst. Director Frank Woodall
Texas Dept. of Public Safety (TX), [email protected]
Region 12 – Capt. Eugene Smith
Boise Police Department (ID), [email protected]
Program Coordinator Deputy Chief Mark Sullivan (Ret.)
Mission Police Department (KS), [email protected]
FBI – LEEDA Executive Services
The FBI – LEEDA Executive Board is pleased to offer executive services to
law enforcement agencies nationwide. Services are available for any agency,
although members of FBI – LEEDA will have scheduling preference.
The FBI – LEEDA Executive Services include:
• Operation and management study
• Property room audit
• Provide qualified interim chiefs
• Selection process for chief executive officers and
senior command personnel
12 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
The individuals chosen to provide these services will be FBI – LEEDA members in good standing, with exemplary knowledge, skills and expertise in the
services being offered. The Executive Board realizes the financial constraints
facing many law enforcement agencies at this time and is committed to provide agencies with the best services at reasonable costs.
Please contact the FBI – LEEDA office if you or a colleague has an interest in
the services being offered.
S
P
FBI–LEEDA / LifeLock Scholarship Program
OLARSH
I
CH
FBI-LEEDA
®
FBI – LEEDA is pleased to announce
this year’s FBI – LEEDA / LifeLock
Scholarship Program. During the
Annual Executive Training Conference in Louisville, Kentucky, FBI
– LEEDA / LifeLock will award five
$1,000.00 scholarships. The guidelines for eligibility and procedures
for applying for a scholarship are
listed below.
PROVISIONS
BASICS
ELIGIBILITY
If you’re interested in applying for
the 2013-2014 academic year scholarships, make sure you postmark
your application paperwork by April
22, 2013, in order for your application to be considered. FBI – LEEDA
selects final candidates based on the
following criteria:
To be eligible, you must be the child
of a member of FBI – LEEDA who
has been an active member in good
standing for five or more years or a
Life member. You must be enrolled
in an undergraduate or graduate
degree program at an accredited
college or university or enrolled in a
nationally-recognized trade or vocational school at the time you submit
the application. You must maintain
• Eligibility
• Quality of application
• Commitment to leadership
Did you know?
An individual may receive only one
scholarship award of $1,000.00 per
year from FBI – LEEDA / LIfeLock.
FBI – LEEDA will make the scholarship award payment to the recipients school on or before August 1.
An applicant may re-apply each year
providing eligibility requirements
are fulfilled.
FBI–LEEDA / LifeLock Scholarship Program
has awarded $20,000 to 20 members’ children
since the program began in 2009.
a 2.5 cumulative grade point average
for three years to be eligible to submit an application. You must have
graduated from high school prior to
disbursement of funds.
HOW TO APPLY:
Applicant must provide the following items:
• Application
• Transcript
• Answers to essay questions
• High School Verification Form
• Documentation of acceptance
to College/University/Trade or
Vocational School
Application, essay questions, and
high school verification forms are
available on the Members Only web
page of the FBI – LEEDA website:
www.fbileeda.org . Send your completed application to:
FBI – LEEDA
Attn: Donna Carpentier
Executive Board Scholarship Program
5 Great Valley Parkway, Suite 125
Malvern, PA 19355
New Corporate Partnership
President Ozzie Knezovich and FBI – LEEDA
are pleased to welcome Elite Interactive Solutions, Inc.
as a new Gold Level Corporate Partner
FBI – LEEDA is pleased to announce our newest private industry partnership with Elite Interactive Solutions,
Inc. This partnership represents an important continuation of our efforts to help promote the leadership
roles of our membership in our respective organizations. With Elite, we are formally introducing and addressing the revolutionary, paradigm shifting, impact that Interactive Remote Guarding is and will be generating in the domestic Law Enforcement and Commercial Security fields. The U.S. Military has recognized the
critical importance the addition of remotely managed activities and assets have become in the formulation
of their strategies and tactics. Our partnership with Elite, who is leading this revolution in domestic Security
and Law Enforcement Industries, will provide our members the education and training opportunities that
will ensure we are leading our respective organizations in the introduction and use of Remote Guarding, including establishing the appropriate roles and boundaries for this truly revolutionary addition to our tactical
capabilities. Please visit www.eliteisi.com to get a headstart on understanding the upcoming Remote Guarding training and development opportunities.
For more information, please contact Louis Hook, EVP and COO at [email protected]
www.fbileeda.org 13
FBI-LEEDA
Henley-Putnam University:
Real-World Impact of Developing
Collaboration Skills
In the aftermath of the Sandy Hook, Connecticut shootings, federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies are devoting time and resources to Active Shooter
response and training techniques, as well as reviewing
response protocols within school systems and emergency management procedures. These efforts are important, and certainly timely considering the recent rise
in school violence.
While the law enforcement community is continually
improving Active Shooter response procedures, innovative techniques should not forgo the detection and prevention lessons learned during the past twenty years.
Before deploying troops to Afghanistan and Iraq, the
federal government’s security officials faced a host of
threats to American bases, embassies, consulates, and
other foreign-based facilities. The lessons learned from
these experiences - some hard, such as the bombings
in Kenya and Tanzania; some successful, such as the
handling of security in countries like Indonesia and the
Philippines - provide a useful template for adaptation to
domestic, community-based prevention and detection
measures. These lessons include:
– Engaging all elements of the community in simple detection and surveillance measures
– Making communication between security specialists and the broader community a regular,
two-way channel of communication
– Explaining the value of information security
within a community, particularly one involving
children, and creating secure and safe spaces to
discuss ideas
– Validating the instincts and observations of all
members of a community
– Shifting a community away from the idea of
hardware as the answer to all threats, and into
the idea that vigilance and awareness is primary
– Moving community members away from perceptions that security measures exist to penalize
them, and towards ownership in the success of
those measures.
14 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
One of the advantages of studying at a university such
as Henley-Putnam—where the focus remains exclusively on strategic security—is the opportunity to bridge
communities and cultures in the security arena. Students and faculty at Henley-Putnam University come
from the special operations community, federal, state,
and local law enforcement, military intelligence, military police, corporate security, government contracting
positions, and throughout the intelligence community.
In many ways, the University is a microcosm of the larger intelligence, counterterrorism, and security fields.
As an alumnae and program adviser to students, I see
one recurring theme in the classroom: unconventional
collaboration across security communities generates
effective and innovative solutions, and minimizes the
chances of repeating past mistakes. I see this occurring
for two reasons. First, the classroom provides a creative
space for students to not only think critically but also
engage in original problem solving. Second, most security professionals are so encumbered by their workload,
they often fail to realize how much their working knowledge can benefit other groups facing similar challenges.
So many of our intelligence and security professionals are tasked with such significant workloads that the
mental space to engage and collaborate is often hard to
find. This challenge is where engagement with universities, particularly those staffed by security operators and
professionals—such as Henley-Putnam University—
can provide a unique opportunity to participate in collaboration in a way that is focused, effective, and well
managed.
FBI-LEEDA
Understanding Anonymous’ Roots
News reports of cyber crimes and intrusions are becoming more prevalent – many of which are being attributed
to Anonymous. In addition to their protests, Anonymous also has been known to infiltrate, deface websites
and shut them down using Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks. Everyone who doesn’t understand
Anonymous assumes each member is a 15 year-old kid
in a basement; however, if there is one thing the Anonymous collective is trying to achieve, it is to demonstrate
that this typical perception is not true.
With their most recent promotion and sympathy for
former LAPD officer-gone-renegade
Chris Dorner, Anonymous continues
to wreak havoc against those who have
been involved in the Dorner investigation. Most people understand Anonymous as a group of hacktivists – a group
of people who hack to promote a certain
cause. They are known by the mass public
as chaotic and unpredictable, without a clear vision for
their group.
Anonymous members associate themselves with an
idea, and do not consider themselves to be a part of
a defined group. This is a key factor in understanding
Anonymous, yet this crucial misunderstanding of their
structure is frequently the crux of mainstream misunderstanding.
The overarching theme of an “Anonymous” ideal is
freedom of the people. This is a pretty vague idea, which
should be taken literally.
Understanding Anonymous as a mindset, and not a
group, would hopefully provide clarity to how DDoS’ers
pillage internet sites. They are not strictly defined by
guidelines, because there are no guidelines to follow.
There is no email you contact, and no website you register for. Any person who believes they are being controlled by society can call themselves part of the Anonymous movement.
Similar to large groups, Anonymous holds many opinions. Their strict belief is the understanding that there
are no strict beliefs, with the exception of internet privacy and limited government regulation. As Encyclopedia
Dramatica (an online source for Anonymous and lulz
ideals) explains:
“This is why the anonymous seems so cruel
and disgusting. But for every grotesque abomination that posts anonymously, there are probably 100 more who are decent human beings that
are just too lazy to post, or are indifferent to the
topic at hand.”
A lot of people believe in the core principles Anonymous stands for, but there are only a portion that protest in public, and a smaller few that take down sites in
protest; however, the sheer numbers of Anonymous allow for a diverse amount of skill sets, which can often
confuse the uninformed into believing that everyone in
Anonymous holds hacking capabilities.
The emergence of criminal activity through Anonymous ideals has created a set of challenges unique to
the online environment. Technological breakthroughs
coupled with crowdsourcing via Anonymous operations
create situations where we cannot predict where or how
fast a criminal threat can emerge.
A fundamental shift in how we look at crime and its
occurrence in cyberspace needs to occur. We need not
only an awareness of this problem but financial and legislative solutions that support law enforcement’s ability
to respond. In the end, knowing the problem and staying current with emerging technologies is a good first
step.
— Katherine Sagona-Stophel
Thomson Reuters Special Services
Katherine Sagona-Stophel
Katherine is employed by Thomson Reuters Special Services as a Government Analyst. Focused on open source collection, Katherine specializes
in understanding the power of crowd sourcing through social media applications, gaming, and mobile technologies in order to solve intelligence
problems.
A graduate of American University in International Studies, Katherine has always focused on technology and gaming as a hobby, from building
computers to designing websites. She has formerly worked for the State Department, Fox News, NBC, and NASA.
www.fbileeda.org 15
Famous for college sports, the Louisville Slugger, and the historic
Churchill Downs, Louisville, Kentucky is home to FBI-LEEDA’s 22nd
Annual Executive Training Conference. FBI – LEEDA invites you to
join us May 19-22, 2013 at the Louisville Marriott Downtown Hotel as
the local host committee prepares
for the best conference to date. The
conference is open to all law enforcement personnel (FBI – LEEDA
members and non-members), as
well as guests and families.
The conference is also fortunate to
have two exceptional sessions reviewing both the Aurora, Colorado
mittee has spent the better part
of a year pulling together a great
line-up of training sessions and
evening networking events that
is sure to please and entertain.
As always, the conference
will be a tremendous value for
attendees. The group hotel rate
Hook elementary school shooting
is a very reasonable $129 per
incidents.
night and the modest conferSome of the sessions will be considered
ence registration fee includes
law enforcement sensitive and open
“all-access” to training, maonly to attendees due to the nature of
terials, breakfast, lunch, and
the information and visuals.
evening networking events. In
addition, attendees will spend
The conference program is packed
quality time with colleagues at
with outstanding training sessions
the Kentucky Derby Museum, located adjacent to
and speakers, including featured topics such as
Churchill Downs.
Critical Issues Facing Law Enforcement, National
Perspectives Impacting Law Enforcement, U.S. De With the reputation as the “best law enforcement
partment of Homeland Security Partnerships with
executive training opportunity in the country”, this
Law Enforcement, and Social Media.
is the one to put at the top of your 2013 conference
list.
The conference is fortunate to have an excellent
host committee comprised of leaders from top law
We invite you to register today for this exceptionenforcement agencies in the State of Kentucky, as
al event. Check out all the details on our website at
well as many conference sponsors and corporate
www.fbileeda2013.com
associates, which support FBI – LEEDA. The com16 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
theatre shooting and the Sandy
Best Value
“The
Law Enforcement Executive Training
Conference in the Country”
Training Sessions and Presenters Planned for Louisville
Breaking News: Critical Issues
Facing Law Enforcement
John Miller, CBS News Senior Correspondent
National Perspectives Impacting
Law Enforcement
Ari Fleischer, Former White House Press Secretary to
President George W. Bush
Social Media and Public Perception
Judy Pal, Chief of Staff, Baltimore Police Department
Protecting Your Intellectual Property
Robert Boback, Security Expert and CEO, Tiversa
U.S. Department of Homeland
Security Partnerships with Law
Enforcement
Louis Quijas, Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security;
and Connie Patrick, Director, Federal Law Enforcement Training Center
The Aurora Colorado Case
Dan Oates, Police Chief, Aurora, Colorado; and
James Yacone, Special Agent in Charge, FBI Denver Division
The Sandy Hook School Case
Michael Kehoe, Police Chief, Newtown, Connecticut
www.fbileeda.org 17
FBI-LEEDA
The Partnership of Municipal and
University Police Departments:
The Galveston Experience
Today, more than ever before, law enforcement leaders
are challenged to provide comprehensive police services to their communities while facing either a no-growth
or declining degree of budgetary support. To fulfill those
important community obligations several creative practices are being implemented across the nation. One
such practice is the Criminal Investigator Enhancement
Program that was implemented in September 2011 in
Galveston, Texas. This article will outline that program
and provide some initial evaluative comments.
crime control can be adjusted to produce greater results. Simply stated, the university and the municipality
have a shared interest in the effective intervention and
interdiction of crime at the earliest point possible for
the safety of the community at large – be it in the neighborhood or on the campus. The modern age requires a
less parochial view of crime and crime control; it is in
the interest of both the city and the campus communities to view crime as a shared concern.
Introduction
In 2010-2011, these two law enforcement agencies Galveston and UTMB - underwent a change in established executive leadership. The Chiefs of Police at both
agencies retired after significant tenures. During this
period of transition, a leadership moment was identified and exploited by the new Chiefs. The university police is led by a career university police executive and the
municipal chief is a career police executive whose roots
in the Galveston community are deep and significant.
Galveston, Texas is located on a barrier island to the
southeast of the Houston-Galveston metropolitan area.
A popular vacation destination, the city of Galveston
was founded in 1839. The city has both an industrial
base and a major ocean port. The municipal police department is the oldest municipal police department in
Texas. Led by Chief Henry Porretto the agency has an
authorized staffing level of 164, with 132 commissioned
as peace officers.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
is an academic health center that includes the regional
Level I Trauma Center (John Sealy Hospital) and hosts
the Galveston National Laboratory. The university is the
oldest medical school west of the Mississippi River and
is the major regional employer. The university police department was established in 1969. Led by Chief Thomas
Engells the agency has an authorized staffing level of
101, with 55 commissioned as peace officers.
Context
Crime is simply an aspect of modern urban life and it
exists in this community. The nature of crime varies
by location across the island. The city’s crime situation
mirrors that expected of a city that is both a recreational
destination and a port city. As found across the nation
there has been a general decline in crime over the last
two years.
However, it is important to note that crime is not necessarily an independent variable but can be a dependent variable. The criminals who engage in crime in the
city will also engage in crime at the university and vice
versa. The traditional approach to crime prevention and
18 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
A Leadership Moment
A new functional relationship between these two
agencies was established based upon the actions taken by the Chiefs. The past relationship between these
agencies was marked by a mutual suspicion built upon
a foundation of misunderstanding. The Chiefs grappled
with a means to open a new chapter in that relationship
and designed the Criminal Investigator Enhancement
Program as a visible marker of an actual partnership
and a tool for such change.
Criminal Investigator Enhancement Program Some Principles and Program Design
This program is built upon several principles:
• Crime does not respect political borders or agency
boundaries
• The city and the university have shared and mutual
interest in effective crime prevention and crime control
• Rapid and effective investigation of serious crime directly contributes to a perception of community safety
• Experience gained from investigating complex criminal acts contributes to the professional development of
practitioners.
FBI-LEEDA
The program’s core concept was to enhance the training and experience of the participating university police officer by assigning that officer to duties with the
Galveston Police Department’s Criminal Investigation
component. This core concept was not without risk.
Those risks were acknowledged during the design phase
of this program. Risks that could be mitigated were
while other risks were acknowledged, accepted and the
program partners forged ahead. Some of those identified risks included:
• Assignment – The specific job tasks to be assigned
to the participating university officer were notionally outlined. However, it was understood
that if the assignment failed to be professionally challenging, e.g. a simple desk assignment
completing paperwork, the university police officer would disengage, the development opportunity would be lost and the program would fail.
• Selection – The selection of the participant officer would be critical to the success of this
program. The officer had to be mature and
adaptive (able to work effectively in teams
within a fluid and changing environment).
The selection process was designed as a joint
effort; the municipal Criminal Investigations
Supervisor actively participated with university Criminal Investigations Supervisor in the
ranking and selection of the candidate officers.
• Communication – The university police officer
would be embedded into the municipal police unit. The nature of this assignment would
limit communication on several issues due to
operational security concerns of the active investigation of evolving and complex criminal
cases. A routine briefing protocol was established between the municipal and university
Criminal Investigation supervisors. The participant officer retained administrative reporting requirements as a university employee, but
the university police supervisor ensured these
university obligations did not create conflict
with operations of the municipal Criminal Investigations unit. It became a matter of trust.
• Supervision – The key to program success was
the supervisory skills of the Galveston and university Criminal Investigations supervisors,
for each supervisor would face unique challenges. The Galveston Police Department’s
Criminal Investigations supervisor was as-
signed a new investigator who was simultaneously a part of and apart from the municipal
criminal investigations unit. Some municipal
police officers expressed the view that this university police officer was depriving them of an
assignment to Criminal Investigations. That
challenge was addressed in an effective and
transparent manner by the Galveston Police
Department’s Criminal Investigations supervisor and senior commanders. In contrast, The
University Police supervisor had a subordinate
police officer, for whom he was responsible,
assigned to a unit whose tasks he did not control. A focus on the differences would doom
the project to failure, but a shared commitment to success could contribute to the resolution of the inevitable conflicts that would arise
over time as the program was implemented.
• Liability – This partnership would not alter or
discharge the liability that may arise from operations by either agency. The legal staffs at
both the municipality and university ensured
that neither principal was harmed by this proposed partnership and then vetted the Memorandum of Agreement as legally sufficient.
The initial assignment was envisioned to be sixty days
in length with weekly conferences between Criminal
Investigations Supervisors to discuss accomplishments
and challenges as they arose. The Chiefs would be apprised immediately of any issues of significance as they
arose. Both Chiefs have the ability to withdraw from the
program at any time with notice to the other principal.
Evaluative Comments
The success of this program to date has far exceeded our
expectations. The first officer assigned, September 2011,
had his assignment extended to be seven months in duration. Within the first five days of his assignment the
university officer was involved in the identification and
seizure of a marihuana grow house, the reputed largest
such seizure in the history of both agencies. As important, during his tenure at the Galveston Police Department this officer conducted follow-up investigations
of violent crimes, participated in surveillance activities
and performed the duties and responsibilities as a Detective.
Upon his rotation, another university officer was assigned to the program in March 2012, that initial program participant resumed his duties at Criminal In-
www.fbileeda.org 19
FBI-LEEDA
vestigations at the university. The effective working
relationships, established during his tenure at the program, have markedly enhanced his productivity as a
criminal investigator. The frequency of the exchange of
formal and informal operational information, the sharing of resources and the degree of demonstrated cooperation between these agencies in the area of criminal
investigations has markedly improved.
Summary
It is our considered opinion that this small program has
yielded substantive results that far out-weigh the risks
and costs of the program. The university police have
gained a uniquely trained and experienced criminal
investigator, while the city has had the benefit of the
work of a qualified police officer at no direct cost. The
agencies remain committed to this specific program
and continue to seek other ways to span the boundaries
between these agencies to contribute to effective crime
control and progressive crime prevention in the Galveston community. The traditional relationship between
20 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
campus and municipal law enforcement agencies is
often marked by a high degree of insularity, with few
common touch-points. The change in that relationship
is not without risk. A clear understanding of scope, role
and responsibilities must be established early to facilitate success. Ongoing and open communication at all
levels has ensured that the inevitable misunderstandings do not morph into actual problems of significance.
In closing, the Public University Police Departments
are an integral part of the larger community in which
they are located. Coordinated crime control and crime
prevention efforts involving campus, city and county
law enforcement agencies benefits the community as a
whole and is simply - the right thing to do.
— Chief Thomas Engells
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston Police Department, and
— Chief Henry Porretto
The Galveston Police Department, Galveston, Texas
FBI-LEEDA
Remote Guarding: The State of the Art of Crime Prevention
It’s 3 a.m. on a winter night and an officer is responding
to the second alarm activation at a location that he or
she knows is a frequent location for false alarms. This
false alarm scenario and countless others are played out
on a daily basis, requiring unnecessary police response.
With the rapid shrinking of law enforcement budgets, police chiefs, sheriffs and other public officials are
caught between the pressure from the public to continue the same standard of service, versus reducing or
eliminating the response to alarms completely by units
in the field.
Is a physical security guard the answer? It might be,
if you have the impossible good fortune of having well
trained, experienced, incorruptible guards, who can
cover every aspect of a guarded location at once, not
fall asleep, not leave their post, not create liabilities by
inappropriate action, and … the list goes on and on
in an effort to define a human guard that can provide
truly effective security. Sadly, such a guard does not exist. In fact, the businesses you deal with using security
agent/guard firms certainly face some, if not all, of these
commonly known negative issues with using security
guards, and are paying a significant cost to do so.
Remote Guarding is the solution that leverages leading edge technologies with forensics based processes
and highly trained staff to dramatically impact all of the
following: reduce false alarms, prevent crime and losses, and reduce the need for law enforcement resources,
thereby dramatically lowering costs across the board.
Remote Guarding principles were developed by Aria
Kozak, a former member of the Israeli military forces
and one of the leading experts on the development of
new innovations to the security industry, to address the
complete security failure of security guards and current
uses of security technologies, like burglar alarms. With
over 40 years of security industry experience, Aria has
been directly involved in leading the planning, development, provision and use of alarm and camera systems,
as well as physical guarding services. Dissatisfied with
Stone Age methods and uses of technology, Aria developed a unique approach to integrating current technologies, staffing and processes to generate security results
far beyond what the current security industry had ever
imagined.
Remote Guarding is comprised of: 1) A camera system, integrated with military quality software designed
to automate identification and notice to agents of potential security problems; 2) Well trained security agents
in a remote command center receive the notices and
immediately address problems by using software and
an audio speaker system to speak to intruders and tell
them they are being observed and recorded and should
leave immediately; 3) If and only if needed because an
incident rises to the level of a crime in progress, agents
contact law enforcement directly to report crime, continue monitoring the event, and assist with the response
as needed.
To illustrate, consider the Acme Auto Dealership,
which has Remote Guarding in place. False alarm calls
to the police are reduced to zero due to agent assessment of every potential intrusion/event in real time
by live video, including raccoon, wind or other typical false alarms. Security threats involving actual individuals and/or vehicles are quickly assessed, where the
transient who is searching for cans in the dumpster, or
the potential criminal who is identified before he actually begins a crime, is spoken to by the security agent
and told to go away. However, if the individual(s) is actively breaking into vehicles, they are monitored as law
enforcement is called. The communications operators
and responding units have the best possible information, a trained first person witness to a crime in progress, constant updates to the suspects’ activity, location
and whether any weapons were seen. Additionally, this
information is recorded on video by cameras controlled
by the agent to specifically track the event, resulting in
the best evidence available for later prosecution.
As we all move forward in ways to better serve our
communities, with less resources and finances that ever
before, we face the need to find viable, cost effective alternatives to traditional methods of handling crime. Remote Guarding presents community members the opportunity for levels of crime and loss prevention never
before seen, and does so with dramatic cost savings to
both public and private entities. Elite Interactive Solutions has established the benchmark for these Remote
Guarding service levels.
— Michael Mello
Security Consultant
Elite Interactive Solutions
Sergeant (Ret.), Huntington Beach Police Department
www.fbileeda.org 21
FBI-LEEDA
Sergeant-at-Arms Candidacy
Chief Paul Shastany
FBI – LEEDA Candidate for Sergeant-At-Arms
My name is Paul Shastany and I am the Chief of Police
of the Stoughton, Massachusetts Police Department. I
write to you today to ask for your consideration for the
position and your vote for FBI – LEEDA Executive Board
as Sergeant-At-Arms.
I was appointed to Chief in 2010 to lead the turnaround of my department. We have attained “Accreditation” status within three years.
I have a Master of Science Degree in Criminal Justice
Administration from Western New England College. I am
a Graduate of the FBI National Academy Session #248. I
attended PERF’s Senior Management Institute for Police
Class #48. I attended several FBI – LEEDA trainings as
well as FBI-LEEDS New England. We are hosts for FBI –
LEEDA trainings as well.
I formerly served as a high ranking member of the
Framingham Police Department for 28 years and was
a driving force behind the development of many innovative programs that involve caring for children who
have witnessed violence, a jail diversion program, that
improved our response to calls dealing with those with
mental illness. I am well known for handling diverse
communities and my ability to bring many different
groups of people together for a common goal. I have
had the opportunity to work at every level of law enforcement from operations to administration.
I insist that all officers will be empowered to reach
their potential. As a 36-year veteran of policing, I am
passionately committed to continuous professional development. As a transformational leader, I have a proactive management style and “servant model” approach
mindset.
I can say without hesitation that FBI – LEEDA has
the greatest positive effect upon my organization. FBI
– LEEDA is simply the best leadership training available.
22 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
At this time, 9 of our 12 supervisors are Trilogy Award recipients and I expect to have four
more next year. I have also sent
seven patrol officers to the Supervisor Leadership Institute.
My goal is to have every member of our department attend.
The Stoughton Police Department was recognized in
FBI – LEEDA Insighter magazine
for “setting a new standard of excellence in terms of enhancing fellowship as well as tying in leadership lessons
with the outside the classroom practical reality.”
In March 2012, We hosted a “Supervisory Leadership Institute” training class. The importance of lessons
taught by FBI – LEEDA instructors, Larry Horak and
Tim Plotts, were reinforced during a “behind the scenes
leadership tour” at Gillette Stadium, home of the New
England Patriots. We are pleased that they recognize the
Stoughton Police Department as “fostering positive organizational development akin to the blueprint used by
the Patriots.”
With that said, I have found leadership training begins
when you pin on your badge and swear your oath. I am
committed to continuous improvement and advancement in our chosen profession.
Undoubtedly this position will be highly sought after
by many qualified candidates, but none will bring the
unique qualities, level of experience, work ethic, effective leadership style and genuine interest than I presently offer to you.
I would be honored if I received your support in this
election.
– Paul J. Shastany
FBI-LEEDA
Sergeant-at-Arms Candidacy
Chief Joe Monroe
FBI – LEEDA Candidate for Sergeant-At-Arms
It is with great pleasure that I have formally announced my
candidacy to run for Sergeant-At-Arms for the FBI – LEEDA
Executive Board in the 2013 election. I have been fortunate to
have already begun to travel around and meet with many of
you at training conferences and business meetings. Through
these opportunities I have been able to listen to your concerns
and ideas on how to improve our association.
These are five of my top priorities
• Work to enhance the benefits for the membership through
new innovative partnerships and programs that benefit both
active and retired members
• Work to increase our membership enrollments by giving
back more to our members and reaching out to other associations to create shared partnerships
• Continue to improve the communication and relationships
• Focus on using modern technology to improve the business
operations of the Association
• Continue to develop and maintain partnerships to increase
outside revenue
I will ensure the members of this association that by electing me to represent you on the Board you will find me as a
dedicated member of the Executive Board that possesses the
character, integrity and the leadership skills that are necessary
for doing what is right for FBI – LEEDA. You have my word that
I am always readily available to assist any member in developing and preparing our organization for the future. It is my belief that we must develop positive working relationships and
creating lasting partnerships of cooperation. I will build upon
the foundation that has been established by our previous leaders on the Executive Board and I look forward to serving the
organization for years to come.
Again, thank you for your consideration, support, and the
trust you will give me as your candidate for the Sergeant-AtArms position on the Executive Board. It will be my extreme
honor to serve as your representative to ensure that FBI –
LEEDA continues to grow and develop to higher levels of service to all of our members.
Biography
Joe Monroe was named University of Kentucky Chief of Police in November of 2009 following three-year tenure as the
department’s Interim Chief of Police. His police career began
at Transylvania Department of Public Safety in 1991. On April
4, 1994, Monroe became an officer with the UK Police Department and has advanced through
the ranks, serving as a detective,
sergeant, lieutenant and major.
During Monroe’s leadership
tenure, the department has experienced many advancements: an
increase in the number of officers;
developed a task force to address
underage drinking to reduce student deaths related to alcohol; enhanced technology by outfitting each police officer with mobile data terminals to improve
communication and response times; updated communications and 911 equipment; moved to fully electronic report
taking procedures; implemented “green” sustainability initiative for the department including procurement of two electric
motorcycles for patrol; increased training and preparedness;
improved relationships with the campus and Lexington communities, which included establishing the Citizen’s Police
Academy.
Chief Monroe also developed the first Protestor Device Extraction Team by a university police agency in the country. He
was one of the founding members of the UK Police Special
Response Team. He serves as a developer and trainer for the
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office for Domestic
Preparedness training programs and has been a consultant
since 2000. He also serves as an adjunct instructor for Texas
A & M University. Monroe has a passionate interest and focus
on leadership development of his staff. While at UK he has
been able to re-energize the police department and advance
its reputation as a respected police department through training, discipline, accountability, and stimulating creativity and
growth.
Chief Monroe holds a bachelor’s degree in medical management from Carson-Newman College and is a graduate of
the Criminal Justice Executive Development Program (CJED),
School of Strategic Leadership (SSL), International Association of Campus Law Enforcement Administrators Executive
Development Institute, and the FBI National Academy Session
# 220, FBI LEEDS # 71 and is completing his Master’s degree in
Criminal Justice from Eastern Kentucky University. Feel free to
contact Joe at [email protected]
– Joe Monroe
www.fbileeda.org 23
Support Our
Corporate
Partners
DIAMOND LEVEL
LifeLock
CORPORATE PARTNER
Contact: Paige Hanson, Manager of Educational Programs
60 East Rio Salado Parkway, Suite 400
Tempe, Arizona 85281
Telephone: 480-457-2108
Facsimile: 480-907-2946
E-mail: [email protected]
PREMIER LEVEL CORPORATE PARTNERS
Purdue Pharma, LP
Contact: John Gilbride, Director of Law Enforcement
Liaison and Education
One Stamford Forum
Stamford, Connecticut 06901
Telephone: 203-588-7220
Facsimile: 203-588-6035
E-mail: [email protected]
Overwatch Textron Systems
Contact: Carl Holshouser, Director of Business Development
P.O. Box 91269
Austin, Texas 78709-1269
Telephone: 202-538-9216
E-mail:
[email protected]
PLATINUM LEVEL CORPORATE PARTNERS
V.H. Blackinton & Co., Inc.
Contact: David Long, Chief Operating Officer
221 John L. Dietsch Blvd.
Attleboro Falls, Massachusetts 02763
Telephone: 508-699-4436 x111 • Toll-free: 800-699-4436
E-mail: [email protected]
DuPont Advanced Fiber Systems - Life Protection
Contact: Marcio Manique
24 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
Spruance Plant, 5401 Jefferson Davis Highway
Richmond, Virginia 23234
Telephone: 804-383-4401 • Facsimile: 804-383-4131
E-mail: [email protected]
FBI-LEEDA
PLATINUM LEVEL CORPORATE PARTNERS
Tiversa, Inc.
Contact: Scott Harrer, Brand Director
144 Emeryville Drive, Suite 300
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania 16066
Telephone: 724-940-9030 • Facsimile: 724-940-9033
E-mail: [email protected]
Verizon Wireless Communications
Contact: John G. Monroe, Program Manager, Corporate Security
3949 Pender Avenue, Suite 140
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Telephone: 202-589-3747
E-mail: [email protected]
GOLD LEVEL CORPORATE PARTNERS
American Military University
Contact: Timothy J. Hardiman, Manager, Law Enforcement Programs, APUS
10110 Battleview Parkway, Suite 200
Manassas, Virginia 20109
Telephone: 304-919-9051
E-mail: [email protected] www.amu.apus.edu/
Elite Interactive Solutions, Inc.
Contact: Louis C. Hook, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
1200 W. Seventh Street, Suite L1-180
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: 877-435-4832 • Mobile: 310-753-5327
E-mail: [email protected]
Target Corporation
Contact: Ms. Mahogany Eller, Government & Community Partnerships - Asset Protection
1000 Nicollet Mall, TPS-2087
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
Telephone: 612-696-2664 • Facsimile: 612-696-5163
E-mail: [email protected]
TARGET CORPORATION
SILVER LEVEL CORPORATE PARTNERS
CargoNet
Contact: Anthony Canale, Vice President, Operations
FBINAA 195th, 545 Washington Boulevard
Jersey City, New Jersey 07310
Telephone: 201-469-3256
E-mail: [email protected]
www.fbileeda.org 25
Support Our
Corporate
Partners
SILVER LEVEL CORPORATE PARTNERS
Henley-Putnam University
Contact: Nancy A. Reggio, Director of Admissions
2804 Mission College Blvd, Suite 240
Santa Clara, California 95054
Telephone: 408-453-9900 • Facsimile: 775-522-4643
Toll-free: 888-852-8746, ext. 9928 E-mail: [email protected]
National Equipment Register
Contact: David Shillingford
545 Washington Blvd., 22-19, Jersey City, New Jersey 07310
Telephone: 212-297-1805 • Facsimile: 212-354-9039
• Toll-free: 866-663-7872 E-mail: [email protected]
Shell Oil Company
Contact: Robert Ream
One Shell Plaza (OSP) Suite 4584A, 910 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: 713-241-1870 • Facsimile: 713-241-0078
E-mail: [email protected]
Thomson Reuters - Clear
Contact: Daniel DeSimone, Sr. Director, Investigative Resources
1410 Springhill Road, Suite 450, McLean, VA 22102
Telephone: 703-219-2511 • Cell: 571-422-6548
E-mail: [email protected]
www.clear.thomsonreuters.com
BRONZE LEVEL CORPORATE PARTNERS
Fechheimer Brothers Company
Contact: Eric Miller, Sales Representative
4545 Malsbary Road
Cincinnati, Ohio 45242
Telephone: 513-793-5400 • Fascimilie: 513-793-7819
Customer Service: 800-543-1939
E-mail: [email protected] www.wearvertx.com
Glock, Inc.
Contact: Bob Schanen
P.O. Box 1444, Brookfield, Wisconsin 53045
Telephone: 262-790-6823
E-mail: [email protected]
HAIX North America
Contact: Sallie Kenney
26 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
2320 Fortune Drive, Suite 120
Lexington, KY 40509
Telephone: 866-344-HAIX (4249)
E-mail: [email protected]
FBI-LEEDA
Justice Federal Credit Union
Contact: Joan Kayne
5175 Parkstone Drive, Suite 200
Chantilly, Virginia 20151
Telephone: 703-480-5300 Ext. 3130 • Facsimile: 703-480-5444
E-mail: [email protected]
Lexis Nexis
Contact: Susan Crandall, Director of Marketing
125 Park Avenue, Suite 2200
New York, New York 10017
Telephone: 434-205-4328 • Facsimile: 206-238-2826
E-mail: [email protected]
National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB)
Contact: Ivan Blackman, Director of Vehicular Investigations
1111 E. Touhy Ave., Suite 400
Des Plaines, Illinois 60018
Telephone: 847-544-7042
Facsimile: 847-544-7101
E-mail: [email protected]
CORPORATE LEVEL CORPORATE PARTNERS
Business Innovations
Police & Sheriffs Press
Contact: Scott Terrell
Contact: Carol Conaway
6579-B Peachtree Industrial Blvd.
Norcross, GA 30092
Telephone: 770-242-8002
Facsimile: 770-242-8088
E-mail: [email protected]
Laser Shot
Contact: Steve White
25 Highlands Creek Way
Oxford, GA 30054
Telephone: 678-625-1821
Facsimile: 281-240-8241
E-mail: [email protected]
P. O. Box 1489, Lyons, GA 30474
Telephone: 912-537-0780
Facsimile: 912-537-4894
E-mail: [email protected]
Raytheon
Contact: Roman Kaluta
5800 Departure Drive
Raleigh, NC 27616
Telephone: 919-790-1011
Facsimile: 919-790-1456
E-mail: [email protected]
Security Industry Alarm Coalition
Contact: Stan Martin, Executive Director
13541 Stanmere Drive
Frisco, TX 75035
Telephone: 972-377-9401
Facsimile: 972-377-9285
E-mail: [email protected]
Membership Renewal Info Attention Members:
Your 2013 dues renewal was due March 1. Please log into the Members Only section
of our website (www.fbileeda.org) to renew your membership and to ensure your contact information is up to date. Please contact Lynn Weber ([email protected]) if you
have any membership questions.
www.fbileeda.org 27
FBI-LEEDA
Welcome
New
Members
We continue
to celebrate
our growing
family of law
enforcement
executives
Chief Troy L. Abney – Nevada Highway Patrol, Carson City, NV
Captain David K. Aldridge – Colorado State Patrol, Lakewood, CO
Sergeant Wade A. Alexander – Delmar Police Department, Delmar, DE
Chief Lydia Alvarado – Bellmead Police Department, Bellmead, TX
Sergeant Dennis J. Aniuanas – Newark Police Department, Newark, DE
Chief David L. Arbogast – Medina Township Police, Medina, OH
Lieutenant James K. Atkinson – Homewood Police Department, Homewood, AL
Chief C. Jeff Augram – Asheville Regional Airport Department of Public Safety, Fletcher, NC
Officer E. R. Balinton – San Francisco Police Department, Oakland, CA
Captain Jon W. Barba – Colorado State Patrol, Lakewood, CO
Lieutenant Steven H. Barnes – Wilmington Police Department, Wilmington, DE
Assistant Chief Brandon L. Barnhill – Paducah Police Department, Paducah, KY
Deputy Chief U.S. Probation Officer Steve Beasley – United States Probation Office, Riverview, FL
Sergeant Bob Bedsaul – Frederick Police Department, Frederick, CO
Lieutenant. Will Benny – Dothan Police Department, Dothan, AL
Major Paul M. Bernat – Dover Police Department, Dover, DE
Lieutenant Jason Berthon-Koch – CWU Police Department, Ellensburg, WA
Chief John M. Beshara – Youngstown State University Campus Police, Youngstown, OH
Deputy Chief Mike Bestul – Brainerd Police Department, Brainerd, MN
Chief Deputy Steven Blackwell – Pine County Sheriff’s Office, Pine City, MN
Captain Joseph M. Bobak – Parma Police Department, Parma, OH
Staff Sergeant Chris E. Boddy – Toronto Police Service, Toronto, ON
Master Sergeant Bob Bohl – Des Moines Police Department, Des Moines, WA
Sergeant Mark Boone – Medford Police Department, Medford, OR
Sergeant Alan Booth – Polson City Police Department, Polson, MT
Chief Fred E. Bordallo – Guam Police Department, Tiyan, Barrigada
Chief Michael Boswell – PBPN, Mayetta, KS
Chief of Police (Ret.) John Bouthillette – South River Police Department, East Brunswick, NJ
Sergeant Joseph W. Bowen – Seaford Police Department, Seaford, DE
Lieutenant Adam P. Brams – New Castle City Police Department, New Castle, DE
Lieutenant Jeffrey S. Braun – Delhi Township Police Department, Cincinnati, OH
Lieutenant Ryan Brosterhous – Klamath Falls Police Department, Klamath Falls, OR
Lieutenant Michael Broughton – Ross Township Police, Hamilton, OH
Captain Charles Nathan Brown – University of Kentucky Police, Lexington, KY
Sergeant Richard S. Brown, Jr. – Whitefield Police Department, Whitefield, NH
Captain Shawn F. Bukovinsky – Cecil Township Police Department, Cecil, PA
Lieutenant Brian K. Calloway – Millsboro Police Department, Millsboro, DE
Chief W. Todd Caltagarone – City of St. Marys Police Department, St. Marys, PA
Sheriff William F. Cameron – Charlotte County Sheriff’s Office, Punta Gorda, FL
Sergeant Randall A. Campana – Mill Creek Metro Parks Police, Youngstown, OH
Chief Timothy M. Carney – College of Mount St. Joseph Police Department, Cincinnati, OH
Captain Reymundo Casarez – San Juan, TX
Lavetra Castles – U.S. Probation Office - District of Idaho, Boise, ID
Lieutenant Charles D. Catholdi – Town of Brighton Police Department, Rochester, NY
Sergeant Chris L. Caulk – Isanti County Sheriff’s Office, Cambridge, MN
Asst. State Fire Marshall Michael G. Chionchio – Office of The State Fire Marshal, Dover, DE
Inspector Christopher F. Cincio – Niagara Regional Police Service, Niagara Falls, ON
Sheriff Robin Cole – Pine County Sheriff’s Office, Pine City, MN
Lieutenant Tim D. Coley – WA State Patrol, Olympia, WA
Chief Ward S. Collins – Selbyville Police Department, Selbyville, DE
Deputy Chief Joey Comstock – Muscogee Creek Nation Lighthorse, Okmulgee, OK
Lieutenant Charles C. Condon – Delaware State Police, Dover, DE
Captain John G. Cornwell – Milton Police Department, Milton, DE
Chief of Police Michael J. Crowley – Town of Groton Police Department, Groton, CT
Special Agent Craig Cruz – Coast Guard Investigative Service, Arlington, VA
Commander Jerry Cusick – Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Stillwater, MN
Captain Lennis Darby – Enterprise Police Department, Enterprise, AL
Lieutenant Patricia A. Davies – New Castle County Police Department, New Castle, DE
Paul D. Delacourt – Federal Bureau of Investigation, Honolulu, HI
Master Corporal Edward A. Dempsey – New Castle City Police Department, New Castle, DE
FBI (Ret.) Daniel J. Desimone – FBI (Ret.) 1988-2011, (FBIA 1988), Arlington, VA
Lieutenant Douglas P. Deveney – Delaware State Police, Wilmington, DE
28 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
Det. Chief Inspector Piers A. Dingemans – Counter Terrorism Command Metropolitan Police Service, The Broadway, London
Captain George A. Dingfelder – Colorado State Patrol, Alamosa, CO
Chief Richard L. Dolbow – Bratenahl Police Department, Bratenahl, OH
Chief Christopher D. Domagalski – Sheboygan Police Department, Sheboygan, WI
Deputy Chief Tim Doney – Medford Police Department, Medford, OR
Detective Tom Dowd – Boulder Police Department, Boulder, CO
Sergeant Michael J. Downs – Delaware Capital Police, Wilmington, DE
Colonel Thomas E. Doyle – Greenhills Police Department, Cincinnati, OH
Chief Mark W. Dubois – Maynard Police Department, Maynard, MA
Captain Michael P. Dunn – Niagara County Sheriff’s Office, Lockport, NY
Sheriff Ira Edwards – Clarke County Sheriff’s Office, Athens, GA
Sergeant Andrew Ellickson – Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Stillwater, MN
Detective Sergeant Scott Emerson – Lafayette Police Department, Lafayette, CO
Sergeant Tony Erickson – Colorado Springs Police Department, Simla, CO
Lieutenant Wendi S. Feeser – New Castle County Police Department, New Castle, DE
Chief Phillip A. Ferguson – Town of Duck Police Department, Duck, NC
Chief Ronald D. Fierst – Butler City Police Department, Butler, PA
Lieutenant Edmond Finizie – North Las Vegas Police Department, North Las Vegas, NV
Chief Dwayne S. Flournoy – Hallandale Beach Police Department, Hallandale Beach, FL
Chief (Ret.) Kelly Fogg – Groton Town Police Department, Mesa, AZ
Chief Deputy Robert L. Fox – Delaware State Fire Marshal, New Castle, DE
Executive Director Maceo B. Franks – Marine Corps Police Academy East / United States Marine Corps, Alexandria, VA
Staff Sergeant Richard R. Frayne – Niagara Regional Police Service, St. Catharines, ON
Lieutenant Art Lee Fredericks – Bloomfield Police Department, Bloomfield, CT
Lieutenant Bryon Fuerst – Anoka County Sheriff’s Office, Andover, MN
Captain Walter Fumich – Monongalia County Sheriff Department, Morgantown, WV
Captain Frank Genova – Virginia Beach Police Department, Virginia Beach, VA
Lieutenant James P. Gilbride – University of Akron Police Department, Akron, OH
Chief Jon R. Godfrey – U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Police, Syracuse, NY
Chief Tracey G. Gove – West Hartford Police Department, West Hartford, CT
Deputy Chief Keith Grabarek – Woodridge Police Department, Woodridge, IL
Major Paul Grant – University of Kentucky Police, Lexington, KY
Chief Deputy Richard E. Grau – Gallia County Sheriff’s Office, Gallipolis, OH
Sergeant James Gribble – Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Stillwater, MN
Assistant Director Tina Griffin – WA State Gambling Commission, Olympia, WA
Lieutenant Lawrence A. Grose – Georgetown Police Department, Georgetown, DE
Detective William Hugh Grundy – Western Shoshone DPS, Elko, NV
Sergeant Darrel Guadnola – Greenwood Village Police Department, Greenwood Village, CO
Captain William J. Hamilton – Kirkland Police Department, Kirkland, WA
Sergeant Eric L. Hamm – Delaware State Police, Odessa, DE
Lieutenant Alan Hardcastle – Brentwood Police Department, Brentwood, TN
Captain Charles D. Hardman – Wayne County Sheriff’s Office, Wooster, OH
Sergeant II Michael Hardt – AZ DPS, Prescott, AZ
Sergeant Timothy Harris – Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Stillwater, MN
Chief Christopher J. Hartung – Vermillion Police Department, Vermilion, OH
Lieutenant Dempsey Harvey – Navajo Police Department, Chinle, AZ
Lieutenant Derrick L. Harvey – Milton Police Department, Milton, DE
Deputy Chief Thomas Hathaway – Roanoke Rapids Police Department, Roanoke Rapids, NC
Staff Sergeant Jody M. Hauck – Delaware River & Bay Authority, New Castle, DE
Assistant Jail Administrator Roger Heinen – Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Stillwater, MN
Lieutenant Jason Helfer – Town of Greece Police Department, Rochester, NY
Colonel Henry E. Henderson, Jr. – Georgia Department of Natural Resources Law Enforcement, Social Circle, GA
Lieutenant Barry J. Hendricks – Hunting Valley Police Department, Hunting Valley, OH
Supervisory Special Agent Matthew Heron – Keyport, NJ
Commander Daniel P. Hickson – Washing Metropolitan Police Department, Washington, D.C.
Commander Henry Hix – Colville Confederated Tribes Police Department, Nespelem, WA
Lieutenant Danny R. Holmes – Pell City Police Department, Pell City, AL
Major Keith P. Horton – United States Park Police, Washington, D.C.
Records Supervisor Rosemary Horton – Boulder County Sheriff’s Office, Boulder, CO
Chief Jeffrey Horvath – Lewes Police Department, Lewes, DE
Captain Roger Lee Hosey, II – Landis Police Department, Landis, NC
Chief James E. Hosfelt – Dover Police Department, Dover, DE
www.fbileeda.org 29
Welcome
New
Members
We continue
to celebrate
our growing
family of law
enforcement
executives
Deputy Chief Stephen L. Hrytzik – Powell Police Department, Powell, OH
Captain David Hunt – Delaware Capital Police, P.O. Box 1401, DE
Lieutenant Carl E. Hutson – Clayton Police Department, Clayton, DE
Lieutenant. Adamjohn Riley Inman – Gibsonville Police Department, Gibsonville, NC
Lieutenant Matt Johnson – Prairie Band Potawatomi Police, Mayetta, KS
Sergeant Wayne Johnson – Washington County Sheriff’s Office, St, WA
Aisha U. Johnson – Federal Bureau of Investigation, Quantico, VA
Chief Charles N. Jones – Beaver Falls Police Department, Beaver Falls, PA
Lieutenant Kevin L. Jones – Division of Alcohol & Tobacco Enforcement, Dover, DE
Senior Deputy Sheriff Tracy T. Jones – Travis County Sheriff’s Office, Elgin, TX
Chief Kevin R. Jowitt – Noblesville Police Department, Noblesville, IN
Lieutenant Philip J. Karaszewski – NFTA Transit Police, Buffalo, NY
Assistant Deputy Chief Trina Kenon – United States Probation, Tampa, FL
Chief Michael R. Kent – Burlington Police Department, Burlington, MA
Deputy Chief John P. Kerr – Marine Corps Base Hawaii/ PMO, Kaneohe, HI
Deputy Chief (Ret.) William Patrick Kiley – Suffolk County Police Department, East Northport, NY
Sergeant Michael Kittilstved – Spokane County Sheriff’s Office, Spokane, WA
Sergeant Tim Knutson – Lakeville Police Department, Lakeville, MN
Lieutenant Joanne Lake – Spokane County Sheriff’s Department, Spokane, WA
Major Jack Gordon Lane – Arizona Department of Public Safety, Phoenix, AZ
Lieutenant Todd Larson – Scottsdale Police, Scottsdale, AZ
Chief William R. Latchford – Seminole Police Department, Hollywood, FL
Sergeant Jim Lawler – Goodhue County Sheriff’s Office, Red Wing, MN
Chief Wayne Patrick Le Roux – City of Cape Town Metropolitan Police Department, Cape Town
Sergeant Chris E. Leatherman – Mineral County Sheriff’s Department, Keyster, WV
Lieutenant Gerry Lehew – Pasadena, TX
Chief Robert M. Lemons – City of Washington Police, Washington, PA
Gary Leonard – Lincoln, CA
Chief Michael Levine – Morongo Reservation Patrol Department, Banning, CA
Sergeant Harry E. Litten – Dagsboro Police Department, Dagsboro, DE
Deputy Sheriff Thomas Loew – Stevens County Sheriff’s Office, Morris, MN
Sergeant Otis Tyrone Luke, Sr. – Birmingham Police Department, Birmingham, AL
Lieutenant Steven K. Mackay – Assumption College Police Department, Worcester, MA
Assistant Chief Sue A. Madsen – Miami Township Police Department, Milford, OH
Agent James Matthew Mancil – Alabama Criminal Justice Information Center, Montgomery, AL
Sergeant Brad Marquardt – Washington County Sheriff, Stillwater, MN
Lieutenant Ruben Martinez – New Castle County Police Department, New Castle, DE
Master Corporal Andrel Martinez – Delaware State Police, Dover, DE
Sergeant John M. Mccarty, III – Delaware State Parks Enforcement, Rehoboth, DE
Captain John Mcgrath – Spokane County Sheriff’s Office, Spokane, WA
Al. Inspector Barbara Mclean – Toronto Police Service, Toronto, ON
Sergeant Jay Mcnall – Spokane County Sheriff’s Office, Spokane, WA
Lieutenant Ron Mead – Washington State Patrol, Olympia, WA
Chief Daniel P. Meloy – Colerain Police Department, Cincinnati, OH
Lieutenant Kevin Meyer – Cranberry Township Police Department, Cranberry, PA
Sergeant Aaron J. Mick – Dover Police Department, Dover, MA
Chief Robert C. Miller – Parma Ohio Police Department, Parma, OH
Commander John P. Miller – Pacific Grove Police Department, Pacific Grove, CA
Deputy Associate Director Michael C. Miller – BIA/OJS/Division of Operations, Washington, D.C.
Deputy Chief Investigator Danny Miller – Ventura County District Attorney, Ventura, CA
Lieutenant Laurie Miller – Spokane County Sheriff’s Office, Spokane, WA
Sergeant Glenn W. Miller – Lake County Sheriff’s Office, Polson, MT
Investigator David Michael Monk – Erie County Medical Center Police, Buffalo, NY
Chief of Department Robert Anthony Moore – Suffolk County Police Department, Centerport, NY
Lieutenant Charles C. Moore – Homewood Police Department, Homewood, AL
Sergeant Greg Moore – Coeur D’Alene Police, Coeur D’Alene, ID
Captain Sean E. Moriarty – Delaware State Police, Georgetown, DE
Detective Lieutenant Dawud H. Muhammad – Reidsville Police Department, Reidsville, NC
Sergeant David Murphy – Loveland Police Department, Loveland, CO
Lieutenant James A. Murphy, III – Canisius College Department of Public Safety, Buffalo, NY
Lieutenant Mike Murray – Kirkland Police Department, Kirkland, WA
Superintendent Kevin J. Murray – Lothian And Borders Police, Edinburgh
30 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
Deputy Sheriff Kenneth Marion Mzkenzie – Richmond County Sheriff’s Office, Martinez, GA
Captain David M. Nelson – West Virginia State Police, South Charleston, WV
Lieutenant Mark D. Newcomb – City of Whitehall Division of Police, Whitehall, OH
Sergeant Doug Newman – Port of Seattle Police Department, Seattle, WA
Commander Dan Nielsen – USDA-Forest Service, Golden, CO
Captain Dave N. Noahr – North Las Vegas Police Department, North Las Vegas, NV
Section Chief - SES (Ret.) Thomas A. Nunemaker – FBI, Overland Park, KS
Chief Jody A. O’Guinn – Carbondale Police Department, Carbondale, IL
Lieutenant Linda E. O’Malley – South Bethany Police Department, South Bethany, DE
Lieutenant Michelle Orlando – Anoka County Sheriff’s Office, Andover, MN
Lieutenant John T. Ostenson – Shawnee County Sheriff’s Office, Topeka, KS
Sergeant Larry Osterman – Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Stillwater, MN
Chief Brian J. Oxley – Nitro Police Department, Nitro, WV
Section Chief Tracy A. Paige – FBI, Washington, D.C.
Captain Kevin M. Payne – Niagara County Sheriff’s Office, Lockport, NY
Sergeant Bruce Peterson – Forest Lake Police Department, Forest Lake, MN
Chief of Police William Phillips – Milton Police Department, Milton, DE
Superintendent Deborah J. Platz – Queensland Police Department, Brisbane
Sergeant Michael Pollard – Yakima Police Department, Yakima, WA
Sergeant Joel Post – Longmont Police Department, Longmont, CO
Stnd. & Trng. Mgr. Thomas Provost – MNDNR Law Enforcement, Little Falls, MN
Captain Eric Prugh – Loudoun Sheriff’s Department, Chantilly, VA
Chief Daniel S. Racine – Fall River Police Department, Fall River, MA
Lieutenant Mark J. Rankin – City of Norwood Police Department, Norwood, OH
Chief of Police Gregory E. Ratchford – Cramerton Police Department, Cramerton, NC
Lieutenant Scott Rettke – Scott County Sheriff’s Office, Shakopee, MN
Sergeant Mark Richert – Forest Lake Police Department, Forest Lake, MN
Lieutenant Richard K. Riley – Blue Ash Police Department, Cincinnati, OH
Chief of Police Steven C. Rinzel – Brown Deer Police Department, Brown, WI
Special Agent In Charge James T. Rivera – U.S. Naval Criminal Investigative Service, Brunswick, GA
Sergeant Christopher Robertson – Colorado State University Police, Fort Collins, CO
Deputy Chief Roderick A. Robinson – Eustis Police Department, Eustis, FL
Sergeant Brian Rod – Wyoming Police Department, Wyoming, MN
Captain Jim Rogers – Dakota County Sheriff’s Office, Hastings, MN
Special Agent Mark S. Rogers – Federal Bureau of Investigation, Cincinnati, OH
Lieutenant Michael Rombalski – Kenosha Police Department, Kenosha Police Department, WI
Detective Jack Rosenthal – Spokane County Sheriff’s Office, Spokane, WA
Sergeant Andrew S. Rubin – Newark Police Department, Newark, DE
Major Stephen A. Rubino – James City County Police, Williamsburg, VA
Lieutenant Pleadge J. Sanders – Delaware State University Police Department, Dover, DE
Lieutenant Erik Scairpon – City of Redmond Police Department, Redmond, WA
Captain Douglas Schnurr – Scott County Sheriff’s Office, Shakopee, MN
Sergeant Aaron C. Schultz – Niagara County Sheriff’s Office, Lockport, NY
Captain William J. Scott – West Virginia State Police, South Charleston, WV
Chief Deputy Steven P. Scott – Monroe County Sheriff’s Office, Rochester, NY
Captain Gregory M. Seamon – Moon Township Police, Moon, PA
Sergeant Jay Seely – Yakima Police Department, Yakima, WA
Lieutenant Daniel Selekman – Wilmington Police Department, Wilmington, DE
Detective Sergeant Ronald A. Sellon – Mansfield Police Department, Mansfield, MA
Captain David Michael Servie, Jr. – Hope Mils Police Department, Hope Mills, NC
Chief Willie L. Shaw – Shreveport Police Department, Shreveport, LA
Chief Todd C. Shepard – Williston Police Department, Williston, VA
Chief of Police Earl Shirley – Bixby Police Department, Bixby, OK
Lieutenant Leland Silver – Aurora Police Department, Aurora, CO
Sergeant Jack B. Simone – Copley Police Department, Copley, OH
Lieutenant Robert W. Simpson – University of Delaware Police, Newark, DE
Chief Steven Singletary – Plant City Police Department, Plant, FL
Captain Joseph W. Skinner – New Philadelphia Police Department, New Philadelphia, OH
Deputy Chief Carl M. Smith – Franklin, TN
Chief of Police John W. Snodgrass – Gantt Police Department, Gantt, AL
Lieutenant Matthew D. Solomon – Morgantown Police Department, Morgantown, WV
Chief Sandra R. Spagnoli – San Leandro Police Department, San Leandro, CA
www.fbileeda.org 31
Welcome
New
Members
We continue
to celebrate
our growing
family of law
enforcement
executives
Lieutenant Mike Sparber – Spokane County Sheriff’s Office, Spokane, WA
Lieutenant Michael T. Spitzer – Mount Olive Township Police Department, Mount Olive, NJ
Sergeant Thomas Stafford – WCSO, Stillwater, MN
Assistant Chief of Police Windy M. Stafford – Slippery Rock University Police Department, Slippery Rock, PA
Lieutenant Dolmesha L. Stallings-Bolton – Delaware State University Police Department, Dover, DE
Deputy Chief Bryan B. Stanifer – Lynnwood Police Department, Lynnwood, WA
Sergeant Chad Stephens – Yakima Police Department, Yakima, WA
Sergeant Jason A. Sterner – Seaford Police Department, Seaford, DE
Chief Brian A. Stilwell – Clanton Police Department, Clanton, AL
Sergeant Derrick W. Stovall – Cleveland Clinic Police Department, Cleveland, OH
Inspector Reuben Stroble – Toronto Police Service, Toronto, ON
Captain Timothy S. Stump – Dover Police Department, Dover, DE
SAIC Scott D. Sweetow – U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco. And Firearms, Atlanta, GA
Chief Jeffrey A. Swoboda – Elgin Police Department, Elgin, IL
Chief Conservation Officer Michael A. Taylor – Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe DNR Enforcement, Onamia, MN
1st Sergeant William A. Tennant – Monongalia County Sheriff Department, Morgantown, WV
Chief Keith A. Ternes – Fargo Police Department, Fargo, ND
Sergeant William R. Texter – Middletown Police Department, Middletown, DE
Chief J.C. Tolle – Orland Police Department, Orland, CA
Chief William S. Topping – Georgetown Police Department, Georgetown, DE
Lieutenant Daniel Torok – Spokane Police Department, Spokane, WA
Sergeant Jeffrey Treanor – Cohasset Police Department, Cohasset, MA
Patrol Sergeant Robert Troolin – Goodhue County Sheriff’s Office, Red Wing, MN
Special Agent In Charge Perrye K. Turner – Federal Bureau of Investigation, Louisville, KY
Aaron Turner – Colorado State University Police Department, Fort Collins, CO
Lieutenant Eric Twaites – Central Washington University Police Department, Ellensburg, WA
Lieutenant Phil Tyler – Spokane County Sheriff’s Office, Spokane, WA
Sergeant John T. Tyndall – Georgetown Police Department, Georgetown, DE
Lieutenant James G. Unger – New Castle County Police Department, New Castle, DE
Sergeant Lonnie Van Klei – Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Stillwater, MN
Lieutenant Shawn V. Varso – Youngstown State University Campus Police, Youngstown, OH
Lieutenant Daniel Veloski – Spokane County Sheriff’s Office, Spokane, WA
Sergeant Greg J. Vondenbenken – Montgomery Police Department, Montgomery, OH
Sergeant John Wales – Delaware Department of Natural Resources/Parks, Newark, DE
Chief (Ret.) David Lon Walker – Marshalltown Police Department, Marshalltown, IA
Joe Walker – Spokane Police Department, Spokane, WA
Deputy Police Commissioner Hakan Wall – National Bureau of Investigation - Special Operations Division, Stockholm
Chief James Wardwell – New Britain Police Department, New Britain, CT
Administrative Lieutenant Robert D. Weber, Jr. – Flagler County Sheriff’s Office, Bunnell, FL
Special Agent Todd D. Werth – Federal Bureau of Investigation, Cleveland, OH
Chief Leonard J. Wetherbee – Moultonborough Police Department, Moultonborough, NH
Staff Sergeant Cindy J. White – Niagara Regional Police Service, St. Catharines, ON
Sergeant Matt Wieland – Washington County Sheriff’s Office, Stillwater, MN
Acting Chief Richard Wildman – Middlebury Police Department, Middlebury, CT
Sergeant Francisco Wiliams – Jersey City Police Department, Jersey City, NJ
Chief Martin O. Willey – Wyoming Police Department, Wyoming, DE
Constable Shane Williams – Collin County Constable’s Office, Mckinney, TX
Lieutenant Thomas Williams – Cumberland County Sheriff’s Office, Portland, ME
Lieutenant Randall J. Williams – Youngstown State University Campus Police, Youngstown, OH
Sergeant Kyle Wilson – Sherburne County Sheriff’s Office, Elk River, MN
Sergeant Mark D. Windsor – Delaware State Police (Troop 7), Lewes, DE
Sergeant Steven M. Woock – Niagara County Sheriff’s Office, Lockport, NY
Lieutenant Norman Wood – Smyrna Police Department, Smyrna, DE
Chief Michael Jon Woznick – Gibsonville Police, Gibsonville, NC
Lieutenant Alex Yao – UC Berkeley Police Department, Berkeley, CA
Undersheriff Daniel Yonkin – Lake County Sheriff’s Office, Polson, MT
Deputy Chief Ted Young – Marble Falls Police Department, Marble Falls, TX
Sergeant Darin M. Zaremba – Medina Police Department, Medina, OH
Assistant Chief Tom Zenner – Stevens Point Police Department, Stevens Point, WI
32 FBI-LEEDA Insighter | April 2013
SPEND
PROUDLY
GIVE BACK
PROUDLY
The FBI-LEEDA VISA®
Rewards Credit Card Offers
★ 0% APR* six-month
introductory rate
★ 11.90% non-variable APR*
after the first six months
★ No annual fees
★ Rewards
Receive a
$
50 VIS
statemenAt
credit**
The Official Card of the
FBI Law Enforcement Executive
Development Association
8 Visit www.jfcu.org to apply online,
or call
800.550.5328
*Annual Percentage Rate. Information current as of February 1, 2013 and subject to change. Membership with Justice FCU must be established via a share account prior to the approval of the FBILEEDA VISA card application. Subject to credit approval. **FBILEEDA card must be used within the first six months of opening the account or the $50 credit will be revoked.
For current rates, terms, and disclosures visit www.jfcu.org.
Federally Insured by NCUA.
FBI – LEEDA Insighter
Suite 125
5 Great Valley Parkway
Malvern, PA 19355
April 2013 – Issue I
TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES
Command Institute
Supervisor Leadership
Executive Leadership
Internal Affairs Investigations
Leaders Without Titles
Online Supervisory Liability
Online Advanced
Supervisory Liability
See pages 6-8 for details