August2012Issue - Minnesota Poker Magazine
Transcription
August2012Issue - Minnesota Poker Magazine
Minnesota’s #1 Poker Source august 2012 Minnesota Poker Magazine AUGUST 2012 page 3 Letter from the Publisher PLAYING WITH IVEY By Bryan Mileski P hil Ivey has won eight World Series of Poker bracelets and one World Poker Tour title. He has reached twenty-eight WSOP final tables and nine WPT final tables. Ivey is regarded by most poker players and observers as the best all-around player in the world today. At the most recent WSOP, I was fortunate enough to be able to play with Ivey for almost an entire day. I’m not one to be star-struck, and I wasn’t on this day, but I certainly respect the hell out of someone who can be so consistently good over a ten-year span. I was not going to leave the table without learning something about how he operates. The event was #59—$1,000 NLHE. 4,620 players entered through two Day 1 flights. 726 players advanced to Day 2, 468 places would get paid. I arrived at my table to rip open my bag of 7,975 chips in the six-seat, the tournament was playing nine-handed at this point. The blinds would be 300/600 to start the day. Shortly after my arrival, Phil Ivey strolled in. Ivey was stacked to the tune of 50,000 chips, 25th overall. I was happy to see him settle in on my right in the fourseat. This way I could keep a good eye on him and maybe learn something. I was only carrying thirteen big blinds so I really only had one move, which probably took a little tension off the thought of battling Ivey. Ivey folded for the first hour, rarely played a hand. He saw a couple of flops for cheap and folded after he had missed. That was it, pretty boring. As Event #59 continued to lose players at a rapid pace, Ivey disappeared during the second hour. He had also reached Day 2 of Event #60—$10,000—2-7 Draw Lowball (No-Limit). He was multi-tabling on Day 2 of each event. Ivey busted Event #60 during that second hour and returned back to our table, this time he wasn’t so passive, though definitely not crazy. Before I tell you how he does it, I’ll share with you how the money bubble went down at our table. When you’re dealing with almost 50 tables on the bubble, dealers are required to stand up when the hand at their table is complete. Once all dealers are standing, if nobody has busted, another hand is played. This process can often take 10+ minutes per hand. Grown men turn into 4-year olds at this time. They can’t sit still. One player at our table (table chip leader) asked the dealer to take a picture of him with Ivey. Phil was cool about it and obliged. But then it turned into a photo shoot with three other players at the table (I was not one of them). Ivey handled it well and took every picture request, signed several autographs as well. In a scene out of Happy Gilmore, he was even asked by a gal in the front row of the rail next to our table to sign her breasts, on the shirt though. He agreed. Moving on…what I’m about to tell you isn’t rocket science, but this is how the best poker player in the world plays. Its more fundamental and basic than you would think. Sometimes we need to be reminded of what good poker really is. If it MNPOKERMAG.COM Vol. 3/No. 8 President and Publisher Bryan Mileski [email protected] Art Director Carolyn Borgen [email protected] Contributors Chris “Fox” Wallace Jacob Westlin Jocelyn Bendijo Advertising Information Bryan Mileski 612-743-9847 [email protected] Story Ideas [email protected] Our Mission Minnesota Poker Magazine is a monthly publication dedicated to serving poker players and gaming facilities through industry news, statewide tournament schedules, player profiles and professional tips. Coupled with our website, www.MNPokerMag.com, we are “Minnesota’s #1 Poker Source.” Minnesota Poker Magazine Lakeville, MN 612-743-9847 Minnesota Poker Magazine is published on or near the first of each month. All claims or guarantees are the sole responsibility of the advertiser. All comments and views of contributing writers are their own and do not reflect official policy of Minnesota Poker Magazine which assumes no liability for any advertisement not supplied camera ready by the advertiser. Reproduction or use in whole or in part without written consent from the publisher and Copyright owners is prohibited. page 4 Minnesota Poker Magazine were somebody else in the four-seat, I likely wouldn’t have paid much attention. Ivey, that day, was the definition of “Position Poker”. Amateurs and beginners often underestimate the importance of position. He rarely played a hand from the first three positions, folded instantly almost every time. Ivey raised my blinds 100% of the time. If it folded to him on the button, he never missed an opportunity to raise. I wasn’t trying to outplay him on this day. It makes no sense for me to try to play against him out of position. I let him have at it. For the record, I held garbage frequently in those positions. I three-bet him once with K♥5♥, he folded. I also called to see a flop with J♠9♠, missed completely and checkfolded. For the most part though, I was trying to pick my battles elsewhere. Ivey also punished limpers. If there were two or more limpers and he was on the button, he popped it. He would also three-bet lighter from late position. Never did I see his cards in these instances, but there was twice where he three-bet from the button and folded to a four-bet shove. You can see the pattern here. He played frequently from late position and rarely from early position. He put pressure on players constantly simply by being Phil Ivey and acting last in every pot. I did see him shove twice on draws where his opponent had to make the decision whether to risk their entire stack by calling. In these two instances Ivey was called, once he hit and the other time he did not. The miss left him short but not out. And even the best get lucky from time-to-time. At one point facing elimination, Ivey rivered a queen holding acequeen versus ace-king. Eventually though Ivey would take a bad beat. He picked up kings on the button and raised, the small blind shoved over the top. I folded ace-jack in the big blind. Ivey called and the small blind showed pocket threes. The turn was a three. Ivey busted 208th for $3,119. What’s important here is that you pick up what I’m putting down. Ivey played aggressive and opened his range from late position. He never played a pot from early position or out of position. This seems basic, but I see players constantly limpcalling a raise while in early to middle position and consistently playing pots out of position. Bad idea if you’d like to be an eight-time WSOP champ. As for me, it was a good run. I grinded a short stack most of the day and into the money. I eventually got hot late on Day 2 and ended the day with 338,000 after starting with only 7,975. 51 players advanced to Day 3 where play would resume until a bracelet was awarded. I entered Day 3—13th of 51 in chips. With blinds at 5,000/10,000, I lost a 200,000 pot with QQ versus AA. With 12-big blinds at a seven-handed table, I shoved Q♣9♣ and was called by pocket eights. The board bricked for me though and I was sent to the rail in 40th place. Oh…and before I forget, Ivey got a TON of walks. 2012 WSOP Event #59 AUGUST 2012 MNPOKERMAG.COM Minnesota Poker Magazine page 6 AUGUST 2012 Tournament News 2012 ANNIVERSARY TOURNAMENT By MNPOKERMAG STAFF R unning Aces Harness Park in Columbus, MN hosted their Anniversary Tournament on Saturday, June 30th. In 2011, Erick Wright bested a 71-entrant field to earn $19,225. In 2010, it was Kuong Yek earning the title for $19,430. This year, the star of the show would be Reg Powell. The Reg Powell $1,000+$100 buy-in event drew 64-runners, Powell was the last person standing and added a cool $23,900 to his bankroll as a result. Powell, from Elk River, has multiple MSPT cashes and a Minnesota State Poker Championship final table on his resume. It took Powell an hour and a half heads up to finally take out “Minneapolis” Jim Meehan. Meehan won a WSOP bracelet in 2003 and has $1.4 Million in lifetime earnings on the felt. The last hand saw Powell’s A♥10♣ defeat Meehan’s 4♥5♥ on a board that read 4♠7♥J♣7♦J♥. Meehan’s runner-up finish earned him $13,855. Running Aces, Columbus, MN Buy-in: $1,000 + $100 ♣ 64 Entrants Place Name 1 Reg Powell $23,900 2 Jim Meehan $13,855 3 Corey Canaday $7,340 4 Erick Eelkema $3,825 5 James Erickson $2,610 6 Dan Stewart $2,350 7 Jeff Petronack $2,110 8 Jason Hartwig $1,890 9 Adam Praught $1,600 10 Ron Spain $1,500 Running Aces will be hosting a $2,350+$150 buy-in Tournament of Champions August 11-12. The first place prize is guaranteed at $75,000. Visit www.mnpokermag.com or www.runningacesharness.com for further details. Final Table Prize MNPOKERMAG.COM page 8 Minnesota Poker Magazine AUGUST 2012 Tournament News MORGAN GETS MONEY’S WORTH AT ONE DROP By MNPOKERMAG STAFF J ohn Morgan’s run in the $1 Million Big One for One Drop may have come up short but he will certainly be remembered from what many poker pros are calling the craziest hand they’ve ever seen! Morgan’s Day ended when he ran a semi bluff on Richard Yong. Yong was not going anywhere with his trips. The flop read 10♠10♣8♣ . When Yong bet 300,000, Morgan decided to raise it up to 900,000, but that wasn’t enough for Yong who made it 1.9 million. Morgan didn’t seem impressed, he moved all in, and Yong called his remaining chips off. John Morgan K♣9♣ Richard Yong 10♦5♠ Morgan was looking for a club or running straight cards in order to stay alive, and the turn was the J♥. Morgan could still win this big pot with a seven, queen or a club, but the river was the J♦ giving Yong a full house. On the next hand Yong raised it up to 130,000, and Morgan moved all in for 650,000 from the hijack. Ilya Bulychev was in the cutoff and he moved all in as well. Yong folded and we got see another heads-up showdown. John Morgan A♦8♥ Ilya Bulychev 7♦7♣ The board ran out 5♦Q♣2♥J♠Q♠, and Bulychev’s pair held up. Morgan was knocked out in 29th place. Though Morgan was unable to reach the final table, he won a hand that will likely be the most memorable throughout the entire event and one that even pros are calling unbelievable. On Day 1, Morgan got Mikhail Smirnov to fold Quad 8′s! Tom Dwan opened for 32,000 and received a call from Smirnov and Morgan. The flop landed J♠8♣7♠. Dwan checked and Smirnov bet. Morgan called and Dwan folded. The turn was the 8♠ and Smirnov bet 200,000. Morgan called quickly. The river was the K♠. Smirnov bet 700,000 and Morgan raised all-in for 3.4 Million. Smirnov tank-folded 8♦8♥ face up. Phil Galfond tweeted: Just saw the craziest hand I’ve ever seen. Guy folded 88 face up on Js87s8sKs. “I’ve never seen a fold like that, absolutely not,” the cash game pro said. The twitter universe and chat rooms all over the world have been blowing up with discussion about this hand. Morgan has remained tight-lipped about whether he had the goods or not. John Morgan “For me, it was a very easy fold,” Smirnov said. “If he had two kings before the flop he would have re-raised Dwan, because he’s been active and raising a lot. So, two kings was impossible. Two jacks, in theory, was possible.” Smirnov said that he thought jacks full of eights wouldn’t have been such a confident shove on the river. “He was like all-in, no problem. Before he had been playing very carefully and tight.” According to his logic, Morgan would have the 10♠9♠. The size of the buy-in was not a factor in the decision, Smirnov said. He added that Morgan seemed visibly upset after the hand, giving more validity to the fold. “I personally couldn’t have done it,” Galfond said. “I’d lose sleep. But, I think it was a reasonable fold actually. There are definitely very few hands John could have had that weren’t a straight flush. Jacks full was probably the one that made the most sense, other than a straight flush.” According to Galfond, the table erupted once the quads were shown. Dwan left the table in disbelief. Smirnov, who has a Ph.D in economics, is a regular in huge cash games in Russia. Professional poker player Antonio Esfandiari was the eventual One Drop champion, taking home $18.3 Million. MNPOKERMAG.COM Minnesota Poker Magazine page 12 AUGUST 2012 World Series of Poker 43RD ANNUAL WSOP UPDATE BY MNPOKERMAG STAFF As only the Octobernine remain, the 2012 World Series of Poker is pretty much a wrap. 6,598 players entered the Main Event, down slightly from 2011 when 6,865 players took their shot at immortality. The prize pool for the Main was slightly over $62 Million, first place will be $8,527,982. All told, the 61 bracelet events for this year's John Hayes WSOP drew a total of 74,766 entries, with the overall prize pool for all 61 events adding up to a record $222,035,192. A total of 41 of this summer's events featured prize pools exceeding $1,000,000. After a slow start, Minnesota players came on strong the second half of the WSOP series. John “johnnyGStaks” Hayes of St. Paul did the most damage and was close to capturing his first bracelet. GStaks finished third in Event #49—$1,500 Ante Only NLHE—earning $99,409. Hayes cashed a MN-best three times during the series for $104,108. Ryan LaPlante of Burnsville also cashed twice in the series for $63,150. His largest was a 7th place finish in Event #33—$1,000 NLHE—for $56,372. In 2011, Minnesota players tallied 55 cashes, 2 final tables and $585,046 in WSOP earnings. $585K was 0.3% of the total prize pool. In 2012, we accumulated more cashes with 59 and the same number of final tables with 2. Total prize money was less but still very respectable at $533,602. As for the Main Event, four Minnesota reps found pay-dirt. Todd Breyfogle of Hopkins and Eric Brix of Little Canada both earned $32,871, placing 328th and 346th respectively. Larry Barbetta of Wayzata and Everett Carlton of St. Paul also faired well bringing home $28,530 and $24,808. In addition to Hayes and LaPlante, players with multiple cashes include Eric Brix–$36,915, Everett Carlton–$29,403, Jason Senti–$17,233, Bryan Mileski–$16,769, Jarod Ludemann–$9,935 and John Reading–$8,062. Matt Kirby of Bemidji won a $235 Daily Rio event for $52,085 by outlasting 1,368 entrants. Kirby also placed 78th in Event #43—$1,500 NLHE—for $6,208. WSOP Event #49 Final 5 (John Hayes in 8-seat wearing black hat) 43rd Annual World Series of Poker ♣ World Series of Poker Rio All-Suite Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, NV Event # Name City Buy-in Event Place Entrants 5 8 9 9 9 14 19 20 Matt Alexander Tyler Schwecke Everett Carlton Eric Worre Jared Michelizzi John Reading Thomas Ogara Mike Schneider Minneapolis St. Paul St. Paul Eden Prairie Blaine Rochester Mendota Heights Minneapolis $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $5,000 Pot-Limit Hold em Omaha Hi-Low Split 8 or Better NLHE Re-entry NLHE Re-entry NLHE Re-entry NLHE Shootout NLHE LHE 40 13 122 157 181 108 158 16 639 967 3404 3404 3404 1138 2302 166 MNPOKERMAG.COM Earnings $4,011 $11,957 $4,595 $4,043 $4,043 $5,295 $3,356 $11,071 Minnesota Poker Magazine AUGUST 2012 page 13 World Series of Poker 43rd Annual World Series of Poker ♣ World Series of Poker Rio All-Suite Hotel & Casino, Las Vegas, NV Event # Name City Buy-in Event Place Entrants 21 21 23 27 29 31 33 33 33 33 38 38 38 40 41 43 43 43 43 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 47 49 49 49 49 49 49 52 53 54 54 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 58 59 61 61 61 61 Robby Westrom Marc Lome Jason Senti Greg Dyer Jonathan Goetze Tom Hammers Ryan LaPlante Paul Dominski John Reading James Wadzinski Jason Senti Jarrod Blackwell Kou Vang Richard Alsup Dan Hendrickson Matt Kirby Jarod Ludemann Chad Boehnke Alan Jeevanathan Ryan Hartmann David Carlson Tucker Hummel Eric Anderson Jeff Schnettler Paul Janssen Darin Minkel John McDonald Alan Dejesus John Hayes Jeff Dobrin Jeremy Dresch Eric Brix Terrance Eischens Theodore Simonson Chris Wallace Bryan Mileski Todd Barrett John Hayes Kevin McClurg Jarod Ludemann Andrew Johnson Rob Wazwaz Wade Woelfel Brad Friestad John Hayes Ryan LaPlante Bryan Mileski Todd Breyfogle Eric Brix Larry Barbetta Everett Carlton St. Paul Eden Prairie St. Louis Park Minneapolis Minneapolis Shakopee Brainerd Minnetonka Rochester Hastings St. Louis Park Milaca Maplewood Plymouth Faribault Bemidji Wells Marietta Blaine Minneapolis Minneapolis New Hope Bemidji Cold Spring Side Lake Morton Marshall Crystal St. Paul Minnetonka Fridley Little Canada Shakopee Minneapolis St. Paul Lakeville Redlake St. Paul Eagan Wells Minneapolis Brooklyn Park Mankato Crystal St. Paul Brainerd Lakeville Hopkins Little Canada Wayzata St. Paul $1,500 $1,500 $3,000 $1,500 $1,000 $1,500 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $2,500 $3,000 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,000 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $2,500 $1,500 $1,000 $1,000 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $1,500 $3,000 $1,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 NLHE NLHE NLHE 6-handed H.O.R.S.E. Senior's NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE LHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE PLO Hi-Low Split 8 or Better Ante Only NLHE Ante Only NLHE Ante Only NLHE Ante Only NLHE Ante Only NLHE Ante Only NLHE 10-Game Mix / 6-Handed NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE PLO Hi-Low Split 8 or Better NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE 181 230 35 34 164 205 7 110 129 242 74 77 229 17 124 78 162 239 247 45 50 81 86 93 135 239 290 42 3 39 55 59 65 97 21 206 135 315 39 81 127 148 160 231 293 37 40 328 346 426 503 2799 2799 924 889 4128 2811 2795 2795 2795 2795 2534 2534 2534 302 1394 2770 2770 2770 2770 2949 2949 2949 2949 2949 2949 2949 2949 978 939 939 939 939 939 939 421 3166 3221 3221 2798 2798 2798 2798 2798 2798 2798 526 4620 6598 6598 6598 6598 MNPOKERMAG.COM Earnings $2,217 $2,015 $11,452 $5,088 $2,786 $3,339 $56,372 $2,767 $2,767 $2,012 $5,781 $5,781 $2,771 $7,495 $5,937 $6,208 $3,665 $2,992 $2,992 $8,812 $7,299 $4,406 $3,795 $3,318 $2,920 $2,123 $1,937 $5,704 $99,409 $5,476 $4,044 $4,044 $3,549 $2,611 $7,614 $3,505 $3,015 $1,942 $12,541 $6,270 $4,155 $3,702 $3,702 $3,022 $2,757 $6,778 $13,264 $32,871 $32,871 $28,530 $24,808 Minnesota Poker Magazine page 14 AUGUST 2012 Venetian Deep Stack DEEP STACK EXTRAVAGANZA III BY MNPOKERMAG STAFF By now everyone is familiar with The Venetian Deep Stack Extravaganza. The series of events was held from May 24th–July 15th simultaneously with the World Series of Poker. Like the WSOP, the series boasted a large number of events—this year fifty-five—and included a variety of games with an emphasis on No-Limit Hold’em. The tournaments themselves were actually hosted at the Venetian’s sister casino, The Palazzo. Robby Westrom of St. Paul had the largest win of all Minnesota players when he placed 3rd in Event #8—$600 NLHE. Westrom’s deep run earned him $34,327. Kou Vang of Maplewood and James Wadzinski of Hastings each grinded a series-high four cashes. Vang’s four cashes earned him $25,796. His largest came in Event #18—$400 NLHE—a 3rd place finish for $13,083. Wadzinski brought home $19,755 as a result of his four scores, the largest coming in Event #4—$400 NLHE. He won that event for $16,712 by defeating a 206-player field. Chris “Fox” Wallace was the only other player to record The Venetian Deep Stack Extravaganza III ♣ World Series of Poker Kou Vang Robby Westrom multiple cashes (2) during the Deep Stack series. In total, Minnesota players cashed twenty-three times for $135,592. The Palazzo, Las Vegas, NV Event # Name City Buy-in Event Place Entrants 4 6 8 8 13 16 18 20 21 25 28 29 29 31 37 40 41 42 42 43 44 46 54 James Wadzinski Derek Palmer Robby Westrom Kou Vang James Wadzinski Adam Mingo Kou Vang Wade Woelfel Kou Vang Dan Kraft Bennett Wadekamper James Wadzinski Chris Wallace Kou Vang Dan Anderson Ryan Hartmann Pat Ryan David Cooper Shane Crelly Andrew Redleaf Chris Wallace James Wadzinski John Reading Hastings Glencoe St. Paul Maplewood Hastings Faribault Maplewood Mankato Maplewood Zimmerman Lonsdale Hastings St. Paul Maplewood New Ulm Minneapolis Apple Valley St. Louis Park Minneapolis Minneapolis St. Paul Hastings Rochester $400 $600 $600 $600 $400 $600 $400 $600 $2,200 $400 $600 $600 $600 $1,100 $400 $600 $1,100 $600 $600 $600 $600 $400 $600 NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE Big Bounty NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE PLO NLHE NLHE NLHE NLHE HORSE NLHE NLHE 1 34 3 59 45 11 3 28 18 80 30 21 24 8 4 10 21 18 46 16 10 48 3 206 401 739 739 531 553 397 572 195 1093 489 301 301 218 264 362 391 1046 1046 313 167 661 421 MNPOKERMAG.COM Earnings $16,712 $1,270 $34,327 $1,304 $844 $4,650 $13,083 $1,722 $4,686 $997 $1,548 $1,328 $1,328 $6,723 $6,373 $3,570 $3,254 $4,017 $2,117 $1,771 $2,340 $871 $20,757 AUGUST 2012 Minnesota Poker Magazine MNPOKERMAG.COM page 17 Minnesota Poker Magazine page 20 AUGUST 2012 Grinder Chronicles 49 DAYS IN VEGAS by Chris "fox" Wallace I spent forty-nine days in Vegas this summer. Yep. Forty-nine. That's a damn long time in the summer heat in the desert and a damn long time to be away from my wife, my dogs, my friends, and my own bed. I did it, like I do every year, because of all the soft players playing way too high for their skill level. That's what we look for in a good game right? And many of the games were fantastic. I played around $50,000 in tournaments, winning back only about $35,000, but in such a small sample size you aren't always going to come home a winner. Luckily, I made enough in cash games and sit-and-go tournaments that I was able to pay the bills and come home with a small profit, but this trip was definitely not what I had hoped for. As I'm headed back to Minnesota, I find myself tempted to repeat my least favorite quote of the summer. "And if I win that hand..." That was all I heard this year. From donkeys to experienced pros, they were all focused on the one hand that they thought would have propelled them to stardom. My favorite was a player who busted a $1,000 buy-in event as a short stack with 200 players left and lost his Ace-King against a pair of tens. I actually laughed out loud when he told the story to his friend standing in line for a burrito at the Rio's Poker Kitchen. "And if I win that hand, I've got 25-bigs, almost average with 200 left for a bracelet. I'm the best player at my table by far, and if I win that hand I probably make the final table." I was annoyed throughout the series at players expressing a similar sentiment, but now I'm flying home thinking the same way. Seven weeks of missed draws, second best hands, and hitting it to the warning track instead of the home run that I envisioned. Poker can be a harsh mistress indeed. Along with a number of min-cashes, I had a 10th, 17th, 21st, and 30th place finishes. I have cashed in the razz and the ten-game mixed events twice now, with a shot at a bracelet both times, but that and $14 will get me a burrito at the poker kitchen. I think what bothered me the most this year was how badly they run things at the Rio for the WSOP. While we show up to get our asses kicked day after day, the only people that are guaranteed to make money, the house, treat players like they couldn't care less if we show up again next year so they can make another $150,000,000 from us. After your first $4 bottle of water in the poker kitchen you have a taste of what is to come, but it gets much worse. After you finish your meal, you can head down to the tournament registration area where you can wait in line for an hour, fuming the whole time that half the cashier windows are empty. Then you get registered for your event and head to your table, where everything seems to be running smoothly until you need a floor decision. Some of the floor people are excellent, but for the kind of money we are paying they should ALL be good at their jobs, have a player's best interests in mind, and know the TDA rules. If the bad floor decision busts you, you can head up to your room, which you overpaid for, or go play a sit-and-go which may also require a significant amount of standing in line. Once you bust the sit-and-go, you can stand in line some more to play another one, or you can register for a daily event. And you guessed it, stand in line for that too, sometimes for half an hour or more. So why do we do it? Why do we endure the Rio when there are so many other tournaments happening all over Vegas? The answer depends on why you play the game. Most people play it for fun, pride, competition, respect, the action, and money, with money actually being the least important. Those people play at the Rio because there is a bracelet at the end of the rainbow and they'll keep chasing it as long as they can afford it. They think that bracelet will make them famous (not true unless it's the main event), rich (generally not true either, $300k after taxes is not rich), respected (not likely since Jamie Gold has one and they have given out over a thousand of them now) and proud. Those of us who primarily play the game for money, and make our living at the tables, play at the Rio because that's where the fish are. I played a $1,000 event at the Venetian this year toward the beginning of the series, and the field was drastically tougher than the $2,500 event I played later at the Rio. The fish want those bracelets because they believe the hype, and the sharks may know the water isn't warm but we have to go where the fish go. Year-after-year we go to the Rio and chase the fish, dealing with the terrible customer service because it's where the money is. And the Rio itself has very little incentive to change. The fish will keep coming as long as they keep waving a shiny trinket in front of them and telling them that this could be their year and they could be rich and famous if they just play one more tournament. There are other nice prizes in poker, MSPT bracelets, WSOP circuit rings, but in the eyes of a fish, nothing compares to a WSOP bracelet. And it would be laughable if I said that I didn't want one myself. Next year the bracelets will be there, the fish will be there, and if you're there we'll get a drink at the hooker bar, because I'll be there too, chasing bracelets through mine fields of clueless donkeys chasing the same bracelets. Until then, it's good to be heading home. MNPOKERMAG.COM Minnesota Poker Magazine AUGUST 2012 page 21 Grinder Chronicles EXPLAINING POKER by Jacob Westlin My wedding is three weeks away. I’m getting married on August 4th at the Sculpture Garden in Minneapolis. I’m very much looking forward to it, as luckily my fiance and I have had little extended family interference in our planning. The wedding should be a nice reflection of us: casual, fun, and full of booze. What I am somewhat trepidatious about, however, is the many obligatory awkward conversations with extended family about my poker-playing. To be clear, none of these conversations will be instigated with malice; these delicate talks always arise because of simple ignorance on the topic of poker, and attempting to explain the role of poker in my life can be tricky. The discussions I have with my own aunts and uncles are uncomfortable enough, let alone talking to a protective elder relative of the woman I’m about to marry. I can see it now. A half-drunk uncle I’ve met once in my life stumbles up to me and says, “So, I hear you’re a big poker player!” I know he means no harm. He’s simply trying to have a discussion with his new nephew-in-law about whom he only knows one thing. The problem for me is determining exactly what type of conversation this man wants to have. To me, there are only four types of strangers who strike up a conversation about poker with me. I’ve categorized them as such: #1 Guy who thinks you’re a degenerate gambler who loses all of his money This guy is the harshest of the people I encounter. He doesn’t believe poker is a skill; he thinks I’m lying to my fiance, convincing her I make money playing this “game,” while in fact, I really just lose thousands and thousands of dollars. He’s skeptical, protective and accusatory. He once saw a 20/20 special about addicted online poker players, and now not only is he an expert, but he views all poker players exactly the same way: losers. I can attempt to explain to him the reality of my poker-playing, but people don’t like to be confused with facts once they’ve made up their mind. #2 Guy who doesn’t believe you are successful since he hasn’t seen you on ESPN This person will acknowledge that there are indeed successful poker players in the world. He simply doesn’t think I’m one of them. Again, I can try to tell him that I’m not a tournament player and that I play in mid-level cash games. It doesn’t matter. He’s not as unwavering as the first guy, but he’s at best skeptical. If I’m so good, why hasn’t he seen me on TV holding up a trophy and millions of dollars? #3 Guy who saw Rounders and thinks I can spot physical tells like a madman This guy is tolerable. He’s completely wrong in the way he views poker, but he recognizes it as a skill and is enthusiastic to discuss it. He thinks that poker is like he saw in Rounders: everybody plays with their cookies when they have the nuts, and you need only to spot this one massively ridiculous flaw to become successful. Sorry dude, it doesn’t work like that. Like, not at all. But I appreciate the enthusiasm, even if it is completely misguided. #4 Guy who legitimately wants to hear what you have to say This is the rarest of all breeds, and this applies not simply to poker discussion but to life. It’s hard to find somebody who hasn’t yet made up their mind, and is willing to discuss something with an expert before jumping to conclusions. Talking with this man is an absolute delight! He wants to know what I do, how it works, and why I continue to be successful at it. He knows nothing about poker and doesn’t pretend to. In that way, I can inform him of the realities without being clouded with 20/20, ESPN, or Rounders. He walks away from the conversation feeling reassured that my poker-playing is a low-risk, skilled, thoughtful pursuit. I have to say, with every one of these men, I keep my discussion strategy simple. I don’t overload them with specific details. People become bored incredibly easily when you start rambling on and on and on about the intimate details of a life they don’t understand. Give them the easy-to-understand facts: I play poker a few times a week at the local card-room, and earn a very nice ancillary income. That’s it. And also, I don’t try to change their minds. I give them a gentle nudge in the right direction of poker understanding, but if they don’t care to know the reality, I don’t care to give it to them. There’s no need getting into an argument with Uncle Billy over whether or not my poker-playing will put us in the poorhouse. ”You win, Uncle Billy! I’m a loser! I’m going to get a drink.” Jacob "Jaymind" Westlin is a semi-professional limit hold'em player with a strong, sarcastic wit. Read his blogs at www.mnpokermag.com. MNPOKERMAG.COM page 22 Minnesota Poker Magazine AUGUST 2012 Grinder Chronicles Nice catch! By Jacob “JayMind” Westlin and Bryan Mileski Poker players have a common language. We seem to speak to one another with phrases only interpretable by people who actually play cards. And these phrases are stunningly universal. You can be in Little Rock, Arkansas, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, or Las Vegas, Nevada, and the reactions to wins and losses at the hold’em table will be strikingly similar. The old farmer in Wisconsin has nothing in common with the young professional in Vegas; yet, both have a seemingly biological urge, upon losing an ugly hand, to sarcastically berate their opponent with the words, “Nice Catch!” What a glorious idiom! “Nice Catch” somehow manages to thinly mask a player’s overwhelming disgust with another player. That’s the brilliance of the phrase! If we strip down the words to their most raw definition, “Nice Catch” sounds positive. It almost sounds like a compliment. If a person who never plays poker heard those words said during a game, he’d probably be impressed with the player’s civility and sportsmanship. To him, it probably sounds the same as, “Hey, nice job.” In the world of the seasoned poker player, however, the term “Nice Catch” is more closely analogous to the term, “Way to get lucky on me, dipshit!” To us, “Nice Catch” is one of the worst fucking things you can say to another player! What it means, essentially, is that the person who beat you did so despite his own horribly shitty play. “Nice Catch” gives credit to the luck of the cards at the expense of the player’s own skills. If somebody with pocket kings flops a king and beats you, you don’t say “Nice Catch.” That seems like a deserving win. The guy had a beast of a hand! If, however, some dickhead with pocket deuces runs down your two-pair to the river, only to catch that miracle deuce, you’ll gladly berate him with the condescending “Nice Catch!” This situation is the very reason “Nice Catch” was invented: for players who want to take their dumbass opponents by the hair and punch them in the teeth, but, unfortunately, live in a society where people are expected to act like civilized humans. Stupid. Again, that’s the genius of “Nice Catch”: you can insult your opponent without actually saying anything insulting. It’s therapeutic to release your tilted emotions, and yet, the words are also perfectly socially acceptable. Poker players are clever! For more entertaining bits like this, go to www.PPNSBook. com TODAY and order your copy of “Poker Players are Narcissistic Sociopaths” written by Jacob “Jaymind” Westlin and Bryan Mileski. Its only $15! Don’t be cheap. MNPOKERMAG.COM
Similar documents
JuneIssue - Minnesota Poker Magazine
place. I feel I have a big advantage once we get to six or seven-handed. Most live tournament players don’t get into short-handed situations often enough with money on the line to be good at it. Th...
More information