Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments
Transcription
Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments
Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Soft Landings and environmental assessment methods Can they work together? 02.03.2011 Julie Godefroy Hoare Lea Sustainability Executive Sustainability Consultant HOARE LEA Sustainability Glen House 200 - 208 Tottenham Court Road London W1T 7PL Tel: +44 (0)20 7890 2500 Fax: +44 (0)20 7436 8466 Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments AUDIT SHEET REVISION A DESCRIPTION First issue to Ecobuild organisers DATE ISSUED BY REVIEWED BY 24.02.2011 J. Godefroy A. Bateson PRES-JG-20110223-ECOBUILD-BREEAM and Soft Landings-RevA.ppt This report is provided for the stated purposes and for the sole use of the named Client. It will be confidential to the Client and the client’s professional advisers. Hoare Lea accepts responsibility to the Client alone that the report has been prepared with the skill, care and diligence of a competent engineer, but accepts no responsibility whatsoever to any parties other than the Client. Any such parties rely upon the report at their own risk. Neither the whole nor any part of the report nor reference to it may be included in any published document, circular or statement nor published in any way without Hoare Lea’s written approval of the form and content in which it may appear. Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Contents Why? How BREEAM (2008) can help Soft Landings What about the new BREEAM (2011)? Conclusions Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Why? BREEAM Soft Landings We love to hate it We love it We (mostly) understand it We (mostly) understand it We’d love to do less of it, but we need it and it’s everywhere We’d love to do more of it, but how? Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments How BREEAM can help Provides a Quality Management process and can protect the design intent A facilitator to champion the process (the BREEAM AP?) Credits Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments What do we want? Man6 Man11 Designing for ease of use User consultation Man9 Lessons learnt Man4 Man1 Handover Monitoring Post Construction Review Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Example University Policy BREEAM Higher Education 2008 “Adopt Soft Landings approach to: • Involve users in the design process • Facilitate handover • Encourage post-occupancy evaluation • Introduce a feedback loop “ •Man6, Man9 •Man4, Man1 •Man6, Man9 … and University to adopt BREEAM In-Use in the future? Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Post Construction Review Arguably the most significant change in BREEAM 2008 Helps bridge the gap between design and construction Collaborative design process and regular design reviews Brings forward some topics for early investigation Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Post Construction Review Can help protect the design intent Quality Management Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Man 6 Consultation 1st credit: Extensive consultation from RIBA Stage B (2nd credit: Influence on the design) How can it help? Does it work? • Consultation with users ~ Not in all BREEAM schemes • Topics should include functionality, satisfaction / productivity, maintenance and operation, good and bad examples of buildings In practice, little emphasis on lessons learnt, ease of use, and maintenance Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Man 9 Publication of Building Information Publication of information (energy, costs) and involvement of users in the design and construction How can it help? Does it work? • Users can attend team meetings and site visits ~ Not in all BREEAM schemes • Valorise the project and team – opportunity for team work ~ Too process-based? ~ Should improve with greater take-up Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Man 9 Publication of Building Information Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Man 4 Building User Guide Simple guide on services, ‘advanced natural ventilation’ etc Aimed at Facilities Manager and building users How can it help? Does it work? • Help users understand their building Who produces the guide? • Force the team to think of users When is it produced? ~ Who sees it? Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Man 11 Ease of Maintenance Production of extensive maintenance strategy (CIBSE Guide M), from RIBA Stage B How can it help? Does it work? • Force the team to take account of ease of use ~ Not in all BREEAM schemes • Provide the Client with opportunities to comment on maintenance choices ~ Overly complex and tickbox process? Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Man 1 Commissioning 1st credit: At completion: mandatory for ANY rating 2nd credit: In the 1st year of occupation: optional How can it help? Does it work? • Raises the importance of commissioning ~ Definition of each role • Enshrines it in contractual arrangements • Design input and recommissioning ~ Timing of appointments Generally very beneficial Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments BREEAM 2011 Soft Landings User Group input To be launched at Ecobuild BRE Open Letter (February 2011) Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments BREEAM 2011 NEW - Up to 8 credits: Sustainable procurement Commissioning, building user guide, maintenance, Soft Landings incl. operational after-care and monitoring of performance NEW – Up to 4 credits: Stakeholder participation Combines existing credits on consultation, shared facilities, publication of building information etc Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Conclusions BREEAM isn’t perfect but it’s still the best carrot around Use BREEAM to promote Soft Landings (‘you’ll already have to do a lot of it anyway, so might as well…’) Use BREEAM to defend what we want, not just to tick a box Hope for BREEAM 2011… Soft Landings and Environmental Assessments Thank you, any questions? [email protected] THE LITERARY WORLD IS ABUZZ ABOUT MAPEL SYRUP’S SEQUEL TO ‘’HAMSTER HUEY AND THE GOOEY KABLOOIE WE HAVE TO BUY IT! IT’S CALLED ‘’COMMANDER CORIANDER SALAMANDER AND ‘ER SINGLEHANDER BELLYLANDER’’ ! And clients, engineers, contractors … ARCHITECTS SHOULD BE FORCED TO LIVE IN THE BUILDINGS THEY DESIGN, AND CHILDREN’S BOOK AUTHORS SHOULD BE FORCED TO READ THEIR STORIES ALOUD EVERY SINGLE NIGHT OF THEIR ROTTEN LIVES