QD Diffucaps® Drug Delivery Systems for Weakly Basic
Transcription
QD Diffucaps® Drug Delivery Systems for Weakly Basic
QD Diffucaps® Drug Delivery Systems for Weakly Basic Pharmaceutical Actives G. Venkatesh1, J. Lai1, N.H. Vyas1, P.J. Stevens1, M. Gosselin1, J. Clevenger1, P. Percel1, P. Gatti2, C. Strollberg2, F. Fabiani2, L. Boltri2, L. Mapelli2, and I. Colombo2 1. Eurand Inc., Vandalia, OH 45377 (USA); 2. Eurand S.p.A., Pessano con Bornago, Milan (Italy) Aptalis Pharmaceutical Technologies, formerly Eurand Pharmaceutical Technologies For more information about our portfolio of proprietary pharmaceutical technologies, please visit www.AptalisPharmaceuticalTechnologies.com. Abstract stomach: pH 1.2–3.5, duodenum: pH 4.6–6.0, small intestine: pH 4.7–6.5, large intestine: pH 7.5–8.0); varying fluid volumes (for example, 45 mL vs. 686 mL in the stomach, 105 mL vs. 54 mL in the small intestine, and 13 mL vs. 11 mL in the large intestine in the fasted vs. fed states); surface area (stomach: 0.1–0.2 square meter (sq-m), small intestine: 4,500 sq-m, large intestine: 0.5–1 sq-m); and transit times (stomach: 0.25–3 hrs, duodenum: 1–2 hrs, small intestine: 1–10 hrs, large intestine: 4–20 hrs) that depend on factors such as dosage form and fasted/fed conditions1–4. The drug must be released from the dosage form in solution form; otherwise, it is generally not absorbed. Consequently, the ability to apply enhanced absorption systems to develop controlled-release (CR) products has been limited. Lack of compliance to dosing regimens is widespread largely due to complicated regimens (e.g., too many medications, too frequent dosing) and swallowing difficulties. Eurand’s Diffucaps® technology enables the development of once-daily controlled-release (CR) capsules or patient-compliant orally disintegrating tablet formulations (ODT – CR) comprising immediate-release (IR), sustained-release (SR), timed pulsatile-release (TPR) or timed sustained-release (TSR) bead populations multicoated with a weakly basic drug, an organic acid or an alkaline buffer, and a solid-solution and then further coated with one or more functional polymers. Introduction • Complicated regimens (too many medications, too frequent dosing) and physical difficulties in complying (e.g., handling small tablets, swallowing difficulties, timely accessibility to drinks) are often cited as factors responsible for non-compliance or lack of adherence to dosing regimens, which has become a major medical problem in America costing billions of dollars. • Eurand’s Diffucaps® technology allows development and commercialization of weakly basic drugs with varying pHdependent solubility profiles (e.g., ondansetron, carvedilol, EUR-1057, nifedipine) based on lag-time coating and (1) use of solubility-enhancing organic acids, (2) solubility-retarding alkaline buffers, and/or (3) use of crystallization-inhibiting polymers (solid-solution approach). • Drug delivery systems such as sustained-release (SR) multiparticulate capsule or matrix tablet formulations, amorphous/ nanocrystalline or solid solution formulations, and organic acid- or effervescent-containing formulations have been developed to enhance absorption of the drug throughout the human digestive tract to reduce the frequency of dosing. • Eurand’s Diffucaps® technology allows development and commercialization of drug delivery systems of weakly basic drugs with varying but pH-independent solubility profiles (e.g., methylphenidate, propranolol, cyclobenzaprine) for customized delivery as needed, i.e., to deliver drugs in quantities when needed to mimic circadian rhythm variations of disease states. • Many pharmaceutical actives are weakly basic and exhibit pH-dependent solubility profiles. Further, in the human digestive track, a drug will experience varying pHs (for example, 1 Fig. 1: Diffucaps® CR beads in capsules or in ODT - CR Drug + Binder Inert Core Functional Polymer Coating Seal Coat CR Capsules ODT - CR Diffucaps® Experimental Methods • Eurand’s Diffucaps® technology involves (1) the preparation of drug-containing cores such as immediate-release (IR) beads, pellets or microtablets (e.g., typically 2 mm or less in diameter) obtained by (1) layering drug on inert cores, extrusion-spheronization, controlled spheronization, or granulation-compression, (2) applying one or more coatings with proprietary functional polymers, and (3) combining one or more coated, spherical, multi-layered bead populations (Fig. 1) into hard gelatin or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) capsules2 or blending with rapidly dispersing granules and compressing into orally disintegrating tablets (ODTs)5 (Fig. 1). • In case of weakly basic drugs requiring an organic acid to solubilize the drug prior to its release into the intestine, a drug-containing core (e.g., an acid crystal or an inert core layered with the acid) is coated with a water-insoluble polymer to sustain the acid release and to prevent the acid from coming into contact with the weakly basic drug. The SR acid-cores are coated with the drug as well as one or more polymer membranes to produce CR capsules containing IR and/or timed pulsatile-release (TPR) bead populations6. • A weakly basic drug and a crystallization-inhibiting/solubility-enhancing polymer are dissolved in a solvent mixture and coated onto inert cores. The polymer inhibits the drug from returning to crystalline form while maintaining it in the thermodynamically activated (i.e., amorphous) state7. • IR beads containing extremely soluble drugs, such as EUR-1057, are coated with an alkaline buffer prior to coating with functional polymers to create an alkaline pH microenvironment that retards drug release. The polymer-coated beads are further coated with a compressible coating to eliminate/minimize membrane fracture during compression8. Results and Discussion • Cyclobenzaprine, freely water-soluble, is a novel centrally acting drug administered to relieve skeletal muscle spasm of local origin. Cyclobenzaprine is well absorbed after oral administration with a relatively long half-life, but with a suspected short pharmacological activity. Amrix® is the first and only FDA-approved, once-daily skeletal muscle relaxant (Fig. 2) providing significant reduction in patient-rated daytime drowsiness9–11. 2 Plasma concentration (ng/mL) 20 15 Fig. 2: Plasma Profiles of cyclobenzaprine from Flexeril® (10 mg IR) dosed 3 times daily vs. Amrix® (ER capsule) dosed once daily 10 20 Plasma concentration (ng/mL) 5 15 0 = Amrix® 30 mg = Cyclobenzaprine 10 mg TID = Therapeutic cyclobenzaprine level 10 0 8 16 5 0 24 Time (hours) 32 = Amrix® 30 mg = Cyclobenzaprine 10 mg TID = Therapeutic cyclobenzaprine level 0 8 16 24 Time (hours) 32 • Stimulant therapy of school-going– children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder to (ADHD) Amrix® with reduced sedation is better tolerated compared Flexeril® with a scheduled drug such as methylphenidate requires the development of a modified-release dosage form to avoid dispensing the drug during the school Metadate CD®, a capsule formulation containing 30% of the dose as IR for rapid onset of action upon dosing at breakfast and • Stimulant of school-going children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with ®a, scheduled drug such as remaining 70% of therapy the dose for continued action until bedtime, is compared with Concerta an expensive osmotic device that methylphenidate requires the development of a modified-release dosage form to avoid dispensing the drug during the school hours. ® 12,13 the OROS technology, in Fig. 3 . ® Metadate CD , a capsule formulation containing 30% of the dose as IR for rapid onset of action upon dosing at breakfast and the remaining 70% of the dose for continued action until bedtime, is compared with Concerta®, an expensive osmotic device that uses the OROS® technology, in Fig. 312,13. Fig. 3: Plasma Profiles of Metadate CD® compared to expensive Concerta® 4.0 3.0 Concentration (ng/mL) Concentration (ng/mL) 4.0 3.0 18 mg Concerta® 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 18 mg Concerta® 25 mg Metadate 25 mg Metadate 0 0 4 4 8 12 8 Time (hours)12 16 20 16 24 20 24 Time (hours) – Metadate CD® containing a scheduled CNS stimulant was initially developed to avoid medication of children with ADHD during school hours as it allows medicating just once daily at breakfast – The extended-release capsules comprise 30% of the dose as immediate-release (IR) beads for rapid onset of action and 70% of the dose as extended-release (ER) beads for extended effect during the day until bedtime • InnoPran XL®, a chronotherapeutic dosage form designed to be dosed at bedtime, provides therapeutically effective concentrations in the morning hours to prevent or minimize target organ damage from morning cardiovascular events (Fig. 4)14,15. • InnoPran XL®, a chronotherapeutic dosage form designed to be dosed at bedtime, provides therapeutically effective concentra 3 the morning hours to prevent or minimize target organ damage from morning cardiovascular events (Fig. 4)14,15. Concentration (ng/mL) 200 Fig. 4: Plasma Profiles of InnoPran XL vs. Inderal LA 150 Fig. 4: Plasma Profiles of InnoPran XL vs. Inderal LA 100 Fig. 4:200Plasma Profiles of InnoPran XL vs. Inderal LA 0 150 10:00 12:00 PM 100AM 250 200 200 Concentration (ng/mL) Concentration Concentration (ng/mL) (ng/mL) 50 Concentration (ng/mL) 250 250 Fig. 4: Plasma Profiles of InnoPran XL vs. Inderal LA 250 InnoPran XL® 200 150 150 150 100 100 100 2:00 AM 4:00 AM 6:00 AM 8:00 AM 10:00 AM 12:00 PM 2:00 PM 4:00 PM 6:00 PM 0 PM 12:00 AM 2:00 AM ® 10:00 12:00 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 ® InnoPran XL ® InnoPran XL4:00 AM 6:00 PM AM PM PMXLPM InnoPran AM AM me catecholamine levels Clock Time (hr) 50 50 0 10:00 PM XL® Clock TimeInnoPran (hr) 50 • Chronot 10:00 50 8:00 PM cifically designed to coincide with 8:00 10:00 PM PM • Ad 4:00 6:00 8:00 10:00 12:00 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 10:00 AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM 4 hour delayed release to achieve C 6:00 incifically the early morning hours with • 10:00 12:00 2:00 4:00 6:00 8:00 10:00 12:00 2:00 4:00 8:00 • designed to coincide 10:00 12:00 Chronot 2:00 4:00 Clock6:00 4:00max 6:00 8:00 10:00 10:00 Time (hr)8:00 10:00 12:00 2:00 PM AM AM AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM AM AM catecholamine AM AM AM levels PM PM PM thePMnight PM when PM less is needed during • AM me ®. Clock Time (hr) • Ad bioavailability • Chronot • Superior to Inderal LA cifically designed to coincide with Clock Time (hr) 10:00 00PM 12:00 AM 2:00 AM delayed release to achieve Cmax in the early morning hours • 4 hourlevels me catecholamine – Chronotherapeutic release formulation specifically coincide • Ad duringdesigned the nightto when less is needed • • Chronot cifically with daytime catecholamine levels • Chronot release to bioavailability achieve Cmax in the early morning • 4 hour delayed cifically designed designed to to coincide coincide with with • Superior to Inderal LA®. hours • –Administration at bedtime during the night when less is needed me catecholamine levels me bioavailability catecholamine levels • –4 hour delayed release to achieve Superior to Inderal LA®. Cmax in the early morning hours Ad • • Ad plasma concentration during the night when less is needed –Lower serotoninreceptor antagonist, is to freely soluble <C pHin3.0 and is morning practically insoluble > pH 6.0, delayed to • –Superior Inderal LA® 4 hour hourbioavailability delayed release release to achieve achieve Cmax in the the early early morning hours hours •4 • Ondansetron, a max to develop once-daily (q.d.) • formulations. By creating an acidic pH microenvironment within the polymer-coa during the night less needed during the3.0 night when less is isinsoluble needed • • Ondansetron, a serotonin receptor antagonist, is freely soluble < pH and when is practically > pH 6.0, thereby m ® ®.. drug prior to todevelop its release into • the hostile pH soluble environment, the formulation has> demonstrated its suitability for a Superior bioavailability LA • Ondansetron, a serotonin receptor antagonist, is freely < pHto 3.0Inderal and is practically insoluble pH 6.0,within thereby making it difficult bead • Superior bioavailability to Inderal LA once-daily (q.d.) formulations. By creating an acidic pH microenvironment the polymer-coated 8,16,17 to develop (q.d.) pH microenvironment within has the polymer-coated to solubilize .once-daily (Fig. 5) drug pHacidic environment, the formulation demonstrated bead its suitability for the a q.d. dosin prior to its formulations. release into By thecreating hostile an drug prior(Fig. to its 5) release 8,16,17. into the hostile pH environment, the formulation has demonstrated its suitability for a q.d. dosing regimen (Fig. 5)8,16,17. 20 Concentration (ng/mL) 30 25 40 40 35 Concentration (ng/mL) Concentration (ng/mL) • Ondansetron, aa serotonin receptor antagonist, is soluble < 3.0 and practically insoluble > pH 6.0, ther • Ondansetron, serotonin receptor antagonist, isoffreely freely soluble QD < pH pH 3.0 andvs.is isvs. practically 6.0, BID ther Fig. 5: Plasma Profiles Ondansetron (EUR-1025) Reference (Zofran® Dosed ®(Zofran® Fig. 5: Profiles of Ondansetron (EUR-1025) Reference IR) Dosed BID Fig. 5: Plasma Profiles ofPlasma Ondansetron QD (EUR-1025) vs. Reference (Zofran IR) insoluble Dosed BID>IR)pH Fig. 5: Plasma Profiles of Ondansetron QD (EUR-1025) vs. QD Reference (Zofran® IR) Dosed BID to to develop develop once-daily once-daily (q.d.) (q.d.) formulations. formulations. By By creating creating an an acidic acidic pH pH microenvironment microenvironment within within the the polymer-coated polymer-coated drug drug prior prior to to its its release release into into the the hostile hostile pH pH environment, environment, the the formulation formulation has has demonstrated demonstrated its its suitability suitability for for aa q.d q.d 45 8,16,17 45 8,16,17 . (Fig. 5) (Fig. 5) . 45 40 TEST 1 35 30 Ondansetron TEST QD 1 Ondansetron QD TEST Test Formulations TEST 21 Ondansetron QD Test Formulations EUR-1025 provides Ratios) TEST TEST 32 REFERENCE Zofran® IR, BID consistent therapy Test Formulations Ratios) REFERENCE Zofran TEST 3® IR, BID by eli Ratios) REFERENCE Zofran® IR, BIDtrough in PK curve (hours ~5–10) of bbetween dosesthe IR Zofran t TEST 2 35 TEST 3 30 25 20Profiles of Ondansetron QD (EUR-1025) vs. Reference Fig. 25 Fig.155: 5: Plasma Plasma Profiles of Ondansetron QD (EUR-1025) vs. Reference 10 5 0 0 45 450 Concentration Concentration(ng/mL) (ng/mL) 40 40 35 35 20 15 5 10 15 10 5 10 15 20 Time (hours) 0 0 5 0 5 25 10 15 0 0 5 10 he 30 15 35 20 Time (hours) of bbetween dosesthe IR Zofran t 40 25 30 35 40 TEST TEST 1 1 Ondansetron QD TEST 2 2 Ondansetron QD TEST Formulations 20 25 Test 35 Test 30 Formulations TEST TEST 3 3 Time (hours) Ratios) ® Ratios) REFERENCE Zofran REFERENCE Zofran® IR, IR, BID BID EUR-1025 provides consistent therapy provides EUR-1025 by eli consistent therapy (Zofran® IR) Dosed BID trough in PK curve (Zofran® IR) Dosed BID by eli (hours ~5–10) dosesthe ofin PK curve bbetweentrough IR Zofran t (hours ~5–10) 40 EUR-1025 EUR-1025 provides provides consistent therapy consistent therapy 0 25 he 25 by eli – EUR-1025 achieved similar plasma concentration at 24 hours post dosing by eli 20 trough 20 v. BID dosing of IR product • N = 12 healthy subjects trough in in PK PK curve curve (hours 15 (hours ~5–10) ~5–10) 15 doses of b he • Maximizing the surface area and optimizing the drug load and polymer-coating composition while maintaining the drug in the amorphous between dosesthe of bbetween the 10 10 IR Zofran t IR Zofran state dramatically shifts the poorly soluble drug’s solubility/absorption kinetics, enabling the development of q.d. dosage of poorly t forms 30 30 5 5 soluble drugs (e.g., nifedipine)7. • Maximizing the surface area and optimizing the drug load and polymer-coating composition while maintaining the drug in 0 0 0 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 state dramatically kinetics, enabling the development of q.d. dosage fo 0 shifts 5 5the poorly 10 soluble 15 drug’s 20 solubility/absorption 25 30 35 40 Time (hours) Time (hours) soluble drugs (e.g., nifedipine)7. 0 0 4 • Maximizing the surface area and optimizing the drug load and polymer-coating composition while maintaining t • EUR-1057, an atypical antipsychotic agent, is extremely soluble in the physiological pH range (e.g., > 700 mg/mL), thereby insufficiently extending drug release/absorption from coated beads under 500 µm to provide patient-compliant, once-daily, orally disintegrating tablet formulations. By creating an alkaline pH microenvironment at the drug-alkaline buffer interface within the polymer-coated bead, thereby retarding drug’s solubility/release, Eurand could develop alternate bioequivalent dosage forms – CR capsules and ODT CR (Fig. 6 & 7)8,18. Fig. 6: Release Profiles for EUR-1057 Once-daily ODT-CR and CR Capsules % Drug Released 100 80 60 40 ODT - CR1 (Test 1) ODT - CR2 (Test 2) 20 CR Capsules 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 Time (Hrs) – Patient-friendly once-daily ODT CR also developed to improve patient compliance – EUR-1057 CR beads are provided with a compressible coating to minimize membrane fracture during tableting 5 Fig. Profiles forfor EUR-1057 QD, 5050 mg vs. 25 mg Syrup Fig. 7:Plasma Plasma Profiles EUR-1057 QD, 50 mg vs. 25 mg Syrup Fig. 7:7:Plasma Profiles EUR-1057 QD, mg vs. 25 mg Syrup Plasma Concentration(ng/mL) (ng/mL) Plasma Concentration 20 20 Ref.: Ref.: Syrup, 25 mg25 mg Syrup, Test 1: ODT CR1 - CR1 Test 1: -ODT Test 2: ODT - CR2 Test 2: ODT - CR2 Test 3: CR Capsules 16 16 Test 3: CR Capsules 12 12 8 8 4 4 0 00 0 • 4 8 4 12 8 Time (hour)12 16 20 16 24 20 24 Time (hour) ndly once-daily ODT-CR1 and CR capsules are bioequivalent ••Patient-friendly Cmax of 50 mgndly ODT-CR1 and CRODT-CR1 capsules comparable thatare of 25 mg once-daily andand CR capsules bioequivalent – once-daily ODT-CR1 CRtocapsules areSyrup bioequivalent • C of 50 mg ODT-CR1 and CR capsules comparable to that of 25 –Cmaxmaxof 50 mg ODT-CR1 and CR capsules comparable to thatmg ofSyrup 25 mg Syrup • For a CR ODT, the most critical parameter is being able to develop a product with reproducible dissolution profiles. Coated beads are typically rigid and encounter breakage issues upon compression into ODTs. The Diffucaps® beads are coated with a compressible • For a CR to ODT, the most critical parameter is being abletabletting to develop product with reproducible dissolution profiles. Coated beads are coating eliminate/minimize membrane fracture during (Fig.a7). typically rigid and encounter breakage issues upon compression into ODTs. The Diffucaps® beads are coated with a compressible coating to eliminate/minimize membrane fracture during tabletting (Fig. 7). Conclusion • Combining one or more Diffucaps® bead populations into CR dosage forms provides therapeutically effective plasma concentration Conclusion profiles suitable for q.d. dosing regimens. • Combining one or more Diffucaps® bead populations into CR dosage forms provides therapeutically effective plasma concentration profiles suitable for q.d. dosing regimens. RE FE RE N CE S: 1. Davis SS, Hardy JG, Fara JW. Transit of pharmaceutical dosage forms through the small intestine. Gut. 1986 Aug; 27(8): 886–92. 2. FE Chawla et al.S:Gastroretention: A means to address regional variability in intestinal drug absorption. Pharm Technol. 2003; July: 50–68. RE RE G, N CE Schiller et al. JG, Intestinal fluidTransit volumes transit of dosage as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Pharmacol 1.3.Davis SS,C,Hardy Fara JW. of and pharmaceutical dosage forms through the small intestine. Gut.Aliment 1986 Aug; 27(8): Ther. 886–92. 2005; 22: 971–979. 2. Chawla G, et al. Gastroretention: A means to address regional variability in intestinal drug absorption. Pharm Technol. 2003; July: 50–68. 4. Gupta PK, Robinson JR. Oral controlled release delivery, In: Kydonieus A (ed). Treatise on controlled drug delivery. Marcel Dekker, Inc. 3. Schiller C, et1992; al. Intestinal New York; 255–313. fluid volumes and transit of dosage as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005; 22: 971–979. 5. Venkatesh G. Diffucaps technology for controlled release drug delivery. In: Youan BC (ed). Chronotherapeutics: Science and Technology 4. Gupta PK, Robinson Oral Therapy controlled delivery, In: Kydonieus (ed).Wiley Treatise on controlled drug delivery. Marcel Dekker, Inc. for Biological RhythmJR. Guided andrelease Prevention of Diseases. New York:AJohn & Sons; 2009: 122–142. New York; 1992; 255–313. 6. Ventakesh GM. Drug delivery systems comprising weakly basic drugs and organic acids. United States Patent 20070190145, August 23, 2007. 5. Venkatesh G. Diffucaps technology for controlled release drug delivery. In: Youan BC (ed). Chronotherapeutics: Science and Technology Biological Therapy of Diseases. Newsolid York:solutions John Wiley & Sons; 2009: 122–142. 7.for Ventakesh G,Rhythm Boltri L, Guided Colombo I, et al. and DrugPrevention delivery systems comprising of weakly basic drugs. United States Patent 20080069878. 2008. systems comprising weakly basic drugs and organic acids. United States Patent 20070190145, August 23, 6. Ventakesh GM.March Drug 20, delivery 8.2007. Ventakesh GM, Stevens PJ, Lai JW. Compositions comprising melperone. United States Patent 20100151021. June 17, 2010. VentakeshG, G, Boltri Clevenger JM. Modified forms of skeletal muscle relaxants. Unitedof States Patent 7, 387,793, US 7,544,372, 7.9.Ventakesh L, Colombo I, et release al. Drugdosage delivery systems comprising solid solutions weakly basic drugs. United States Patent US 7,790,199. 20080069878. March 20, 2008. 8. Ventakesh GM, Stevens PJ, Lai JW. Compositions comprising melperone. United States Patent 20100151021. June 17, 2010. 9. Ventakesh G, Clevenger JM. Modified release dosage forms of skeletal muscle relaxants. United States Patent 7, 387,793, US 7,544,372, 6 US 7,790,199. 10. Darwish M, Chang S, Hellriegel ET. A pharmacokinetic comparison of single doses of once-daily cyclobenzaprine extended-release 15 mg and 30 mg: a randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study in healthy volunteers. Clin Ther. 2009; 31(1): 108–14. 11. Malanga GA, et al. Cyclobenzaprine ER for muscle spasm associated with low back and neck pain: two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of identical design. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009; 28: 1179–1196. 12. Battman MJ, Percel PJ, Hensley DL, Vishnupad KS, Ventakesh GM. Methylphenidate modified release formulations. US 6,344,215. 13. Swanson JM. A comparison of once-daily extended-release methylphenidate formulations in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the laboratory school (the Comacs Study). 2004; 113 (3part 1): e206–216. 14. Percel PJ, Vishnupad KS, Ventakesh GM. Timed sustained release systems for propranolol. US 6,500,454. 15. Sica D, Frishman WH, Manowitz N. Pharmacokinetics of propranolol after single and multiple dosing with sustained release propranolol or propranolol CR (innopran XL), a new chronotherapeutic formulation. Heart Dis. 2003 May–Jun; 5(3): 176–81. 16. Ventakesh G, Lai J, Vyas NH, Purohit V. Drug delivery systems comprising weakly basic drugs and organic acids. United States patent 20090232885. September 17, 2009. 17. Ventakesh G, Perrett S, Thieroff-Eherdt R. Methods of treating PDNV and PONV with extended release ondansetron compositions. United States Patent Application Ser. No. 12/688,493 filed on July 6, 2010. 18. Ventakesh GM, Stevens PJ, Lai JW. Compositions comprising melperone. United States Patent 20100151021. June 17, 2010. 7
Similar documents
HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION ------------------------------- CONTRAINDICATIONS -------------------------------
More information