Scarlett O`Hara: The Southern Lady as New Woman
Transcription
Scarlett O`Hara: The Southern Lady as New Woman
Scarlett O'Hara: The Southern Lady as New Woman Author(s): Elizabeth Fox-Genovese Source: American Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4 (Autumn, 1981), pp. 391-411 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2712525 . Accessed: 16/08/2011 16:39 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to American Quarterly. http://www.jstor.org SCARLETT O'HARA: THE SOUTHERN LADY AS NEW WOMAN ELIZABETH FOX-GENOVESE State Universityof New York,Binghamton IF GONE WITH THE WIND HAS BECOME SOMETHING OF AN AMERICAN classic,ithas done so as muchbyitspopularappealas byanyaesthetic successincludeall theclasofitsrecord-breaking merit.The components of trappings ofpopularromancewrappedintheirresistible sic ingredients saga of sectionalcatashistoricaladventureand glamour-thehurtling thegreenIrisheyes thenostalgiafora lostcivilization, tropheandrebirth, of a captivatingand unrulyMiss, and the langorous,steel-sprung of her RhettButler.But, if the novel failsto transcendits dynamism it femaletradition, to popularcultureand to a sentimental indebtedness it fromthestandard thatdistinguishes betraysa complexity nonetheless historical melodrama.' mass-market to successofGoneWithTheWindtestifies The extraordinary overnight Critical withwhichitengagedtheAmericanimagination. theimmediacy acclaim,whichlikenedit to VanityFair and Warand Peace, as wellas thesaga ofScarlettO'Hara as a signifipopularsales,rapidlyestablished Scarlettand herworldenteredthe cantadditionto thenationalculture.2 1 The problemof genre meritsparticularattentionwithrespect to Gone WithThe Wind, but transcendsthe scope of this essay. As a novel, Gone WithThe Wind falls somewhere between the great bourgeois novels and recent mass-marketmelodramas or gothics, and at once historicallymoreaccurate and psychologblendsfeaturesof all. Less programmatic, ically more complex thanthe classic melodrama,it nonethelessapproaches the melodrama in that its "universal moral order validates currentsocial attitudes.And, like the social melodrama,it basically affirmsa connectionbetweentraditionalmiddle-classdomesticmoralityand "the operative principles of the cosmos." See John G. Cawelti, Adventure, Mystery,and Romance (Chicago: Univ. ofChicago Press, 1976),on thesequestionsofgenre. Gone WithThe Wind also owes much to the traditionof the historicalnovel analyzed by Georg Lukacs, The Historical Novel (Boston: Beacon Press, 1963). 2 David 0. Selznek's spectacularfilmonlyextendedits impact.Amongmany,see Roland Flamini,Scarlett, Rhett,and a Cast of Thousands: The Filming of Gone WithThe Wind (New York: Collier, 1975); and Jack Temple Kirby,Movie-Made Dixie: The South in the AmericanImagination (Baton Rouge: Louisiana Univ. Press, 1978). 392 American Quarterly mainstreamof American life, therebyincorporatingthe Old South, its beauties and its travails,firmlyinto the prevailingmythof the American past. In thisrespect,Gone WithThe Windcelebrated,even as it contributed to, the restorationof the South to the nation and the nation to the South. Like so many spontaneous culturalmanifestations,the appearance of Gone With The Wind had been carefullyengineered. In the 1930s the Americanpublic was showinga taste forhistoricalfictionand southern fiction.When Harold Latham acquired the manuscriptforMacmillan in 1935,he was on a tripthroughthe South lookingforsouthernmateriallooking,in fact,forGone WithThe Wind,had he only knownit existed.3 So Mitchell's novel fitinto the demand of a popular sensibilitythat,as WarrenSusman has argued,had takena conservativeturn.The American people, in Susman's view, enteredan era of depressionand war somehowawareof a culturein crisis, AmericanWay of Life, alreadyat the outsetin search of a satisfactory fascinated bytheidea ofcultureitself,witha senseofsomeneedfora kindof in a worldsomehowbetweeneras.4 commitment The first World War looms as the critical experience of cultural transformation.There was an element of strain and unrealityin the prosperityand "liberation" of the twenties-a glossingover of problems unresolved. This link between the war and the two postwar decades provided the context for the draftingand receptionof Gone With The Wind. Its compelling dynamism derived as much from its implicit engagementwith the America of the 1920s as fromits outwardconcern with the Civil War and Reconstruction.Never just another historical romanceof magnoliasand moonlight,Gone WithThe Windgrappledwith the natureof the New South, withtwentieth-century problemsof social change and tension, and with the dilemmas of female identityin the modernworld. The storyof Scarlett O'Hara, which opens and closes the novel and organizes the interveningflood of historicalcataclysm, drew countless readers throughthe collapse of one civilizationand the birthof another. fromher readers by simultaneScarlettengaged a special identification and the tensionsof femalebeing and passion ously mobilizing obscuring thatplagued Mitchelland her contemporaries.The appeal of Gone With 3 Finis Farr, Margaret Mitchell of Atlanta (New York: Avon, 1974), 110-13. See also Richard Gray, The Literatureof Memory: Modern Writersof the American South (Baltimore: JohnsHopkins Univ. Press, 1977), 93, 151. 4 Introd., in Susman, ed., Culture and Commitment,1929-1945 (New York: George Brazillier,1973); and his "The Thirties," in Stanley Coben and Lorman Ratner,eds., The Developmentof an American Culture (Englewood Cliffs,N.J.: Prentice-Hall,1970). Scarlett O'Hara: The SouthernLady As New Woman 393 TheWindhasprovedso broadandenduring as todefyanysingleexplanation.Surelyeveryfemalereaderwillalwayscherishherown Scarlett. Andthenovel'sattraction formencan be tracedto Rhett'sspecialqualities,inparticular thattoughandferocious romanticism so reminiscent of Hemingway's heroesor Humphrey Bogart'sroles.Yet anypossibleexplanationofthenovel'sappeal shouldtakeaccountofMitchell'sspecial abilityto renderScarlett'sexperienceat once immediateand distant. Holding a carefulline between mystification and autobiographical realism,Mitchellcasts Scarlett'stale neitheras a gothicfantasynora portrait ofthemodernwoman.Instead,Mitchellchoosesto wed Scarlett to the deathand rebirth of the South,but she also uses thathistorical specificity to veil altogether contemporary concerns.Gone WithThe Wind,inshort,restson a seriesofdisplacements thatbothbindthereader withan illusionofpsychological and masktheimmediacy of immediacy socialissues.Mitchell'sdecisionto weighequallyScarlettandtheagony of social upheaval,the individualand historicalprocess,forcesus to considerboth strandsof the novel together,howevercomplexthe reading. Like anytext,Gone WithTheWindmustbe takenon itsownterms,as a discreteentitywithrules,logic,and meaningof itsown. Yet, also like anytext,it mustbe read in fullhistorical and culturalcontext.We gain nothing frominsisting on a radicalpurity thatseversthetextentirely from itsproduction andreception, fromthemotivations-open andburied-of itsauthororfromthepredispositions ofitsreaders.Thefullcomplexity of MargaretMitchell'spersonalrelationto hernovelexceedsthescope of thisessay, but no readingof the novel shoulddismissthe relationas insignificant. Mitchell,whohad notassumedherownadultfemaleidentitywithoutdetours,wrotea singlenovelthat,whateverits scope and rangeofcompelling characters, focusedupona femaleadolescent'spassage to womanhood. Andheraccountof Scarlett'spassageraisesall the questionsoffemaleidentity, role,and sexualitythatfigured inAmerican consciousnessduringthefirstthreedecadesof thetwentieth century.5 If Mitchelldid not writethe bildungsroman of a twentieth-century southernfemaleadolescenceand youngwomanhood,she nonetheless understood femalebeingas historically specific.6 By displacingScarlett's careerhistorically whilesimultaneously herwithcontemporconfronting 5Among many,see James McGovern, "The AmericanWoman's Pre-WorldWar I Freedom in Manners and Morals," Journal of American History, 55 (1968), 315-33; Estelle Freedman, "The New Woman: Changing Views of Women in the 1920's," Journal of AmericanHistory,61 (1974), 372-93; Gerald E. Critoph,"The Flapper and Her Critics," in Carol V. R. George, ed., RemembertheLadies: Essays in Honor of Nelson ManfredBlake (Syracuse, N.Y.: Univ. of Syracuse Press, 1975). Cf. Dawson Gaillard, "Gone With The Wind as Bildungsroman,or Why Did Rhett ButlerReally Leave ScarlettO'Hara?" Georgia Review, 28 (1974), 9-18. 394 American Quarterly andsocialconventions to complete arydilemmas, shereliesuponhistory just as she of femaleidentity, thesilencesshe leaves in herexploration thepaina fashion, reliesuponthemto contain,inhowevercontradictory hisfuland confusing desiresofthefemaleself.Indeed,by emphasizing she toryand socialorder,whichshe mergeswiththeidea ofcivilization, female obscuresthemeasureofherpersonalrebellionagainstprescribed a rationalization ofmiddle-class roles.In Gone WithTheWind,sheoffers Yet Americanvalues, especiallywhitemiddle-classsocial domination. a historical pedigreefora natherationalization dependson establishing andperceivedsocial tionalrulingclass in a periodofadvancedcapitalism is lacedwithveiledchallengesto moreover, change.Thisrationalization, theprevailing gendersystem,evenas itproclaimsthatgendersystemas explorathecornerstone of socialorder.At itscore lies a psychological tionof the place of womenwithinthe rulingclass and of the tensions betweentheirsubjectivedesiresand theirassignedobjectiverole. MitchellinvestsScarlettwiththeconsciousand unconsciousconflicts thatinform thetransition fromexplosiveand tensegirlhoodto sociallyinwhichthattransition is open determined womanhoodunderconditions inthe to reinterpretation. By castingthedilemmasofherowngeneration an autobiographical reading contextoftheCivilWar,Mitchellprohibited fromthemostpressingemoofhertext.She intendedto distanceherself tionalconflicts, to protectherselfas well as her privacyfromcurious betweenMitchelland Scarlett,even readers.The one-to-one relationship if it could be established,matterslittle,and is certainly less important thanthekindof femaleidentity thatattractedso manyfemalereaders. the personalcase historyof The point,afterall, is less to understand a fictional its mediationthrough MargaretMitchellthanto understand characterthatrespondedto thefantasiesof so manyAmericanwomen. thatunderliestheCivilWar Onlyinthissensedoes the1920ssubstratum thattheroots becomesignificant. But,inthissense,itmatters foreground andexperienceofa woman ofGone WithThe Windlie intheimagination of who came to maturity insisted,thegeneration with,as she frequently flappers. Mitchelllivedmostofherlifein theAtlantaof Bornin 1900,Margaret materials availableandher theNew South.The preliminary biographical own Gone WithThe WindLetters portraya young woman tornby the claimsoffamily conventional career, behavior,an independent traditions, and a strongstreakof social and sexual rebellion.Her correspondence in her self-perception-or, exudes contradictions better,her preferred misused can onlybe capturedbythatgenerally self-presentation-which so much styleremindsone ofnothing term,ambivalence.Her epistolary as herowndescriptions of Scarlett:"She knewhowto smileso thather so herwidehoopskirtsswayed dimplesleaped,howto walkpigeon-toed Scarlett O'Hara: The SouthernLady As New Woman 395 howtolookup intoa man'sfaceandthendrophereyesand entrancingly, bat the lids rapidlyso thatshe seemeda-tremble withgentleemotion. Most of all she learnedhow to conceal frommen a sharpintelligence beneatha face as sweetand blandas a baby's" (59).7 Or, "At sixteen, thanksto Mammyand Ellen,she lookedsweet,charming andgiddy,but she was, in reality,self-willed, vain and obstinate.She had the easily stirred passionsofherIrishfather andnothing exceptthethinnest veneer ofhermother'sunselfish and forebearing nature"(59).Although Scarlett has nothing butcontempt forthesimpering girlswholiveouttheprescriptionsof southernladyhood,she nevertheless adopts the conventions whenshe wantsto attractmen. Although GoneWithTheWindcannotbe reducedtoa simplereadingof ScarlettO'Hara as MargaretMitchell,bitsofMitchell'sattitudes can be foundscattered amongvariouscharacters, and Scarlettherself does containattributes whichMitchellpossessed.Mitchell'spsychological complexitiesemergefromthe structure of the novel as a whole,fromthe andtheirallottedrewardsor punishments. interactions amongcharacters Mitchell'sown ambivalencebecomesclearestin thegaps thatseparate or admirawithwhichshe investsa character-thesympathy theaffects tionshe makesthecharacterinvite-and thedestinyshe assignsto the Mitchellbothto distance The historical further character. setting permits dramaandto bindthemto it. For she herreadersfromthepsychological as a specificseriesofevents-a dramainitsownright-and uses history as a common,nostalgicmemory of a lostagrarianworld. Herswas thelastgeneration to growup withminimal exposureto the new culturesof radioand film.Her experienceof vicariously livingthe historiesof grandparents, parents,and communities through thetelling "I andretelling oftalesmusthavebeencommonthroughout thecountry. was abouttenyearsold," shewrote,"beforeI learnedthatthewarhadn't and endedshortly beforeI was born."8 In theSouth,thestoriesoffathers with thelullabiesofmothers ensureda widespreadandlivingengagement the eventsof the Civil War and Reconstruction; similarly, elsewhere, historicaleventsand interpretations probablybecameintertwined with thepersonalidentities ofmanyAmericans. But,giventheemergence ofa nationalindustrial and indeedcorporateeconomy,thatfamilialand local identity was becomingmorea privateand less a publicmatter.In this 7 Farr, Margaret Mitchell,is the most comprehensivetreatmentavailable. See also, Atlanta Historical Bulletin: Margaret MitchellMemorial Issue, 9 (1950); Robert L. Grover, "Margaret Mitchell, The Lady From Atlanta," Georgia Historical Quarterly,52 (1968), 53-69; and RichardHarwell, ed., MargaretMitchell's Gone WithThe WindLetters,19361949 (New York: Macmillan,1976). All referencesto Gone WithThe Windwillbe to thefirst edition(New York: Macmillan, 1936). 8 Harwell, ed., Letters, 3. 396 American Quarterly recognizedrethatincreasingly respectMitchellwrotefora generation strandsin as distinct, yetin somesenseinterchangeable, gionalidentities was becoming a nationalhistory.Even thespeciallegacyof southerners of anddefensiveness undertheinfluence everless a sourceofdivisiveness theproponents oftheNew SouthCreed.9The arrivalofWoodrowWilson of southern in the WhiteHouse openeda new stagein the vindication andhis ofpublicbuildings concerns:withhimcametheracialsegregation of D. W. Griffith's racistfilm,Birthof a Nation. personalendorsement Gone WithThe Windmovesbetweena historiAs socialcommentary, as a aboutcivilization of the 1860sand generalstatements cal treatment universalcategory.But the oscillationbetweenthe particularand the To theextentthatthereadidentification. generalinvitescontemporary thestatements aboutsociers' identification bridgesthepastandpresent, on contemporary as commentaries by the novelfunction etyproffered realism,howevercomplex,ensures problems.Mitchell'spsychological depictionof social theappealofherworkfarmorethandoes herfaithful psychological powerand of contemporary types.It is the combination For Mitchell'saccuthatcommandsattention. historicalverisimilitude ofconflicting, witha number racyandrealismofdetailcan be compatible the precisionin detaildoes not broad patterns.To put it differently, or world commitments, abouttheargument, necessarily tellus anything view whichthe detailis marshalledto serve. Whatdid Mitchellhope a novel to accomplishintellingthetaleofScarlettO'Hara, andinwriting oftheCivilWarand Reconstruction? The historicalsettingof Gone WithThe Windcannotbe reducedto a of Mitchell'sera, forthatera, the 1920s,required simpledisplacement For Mitchell,theNew South,of which foundations.10 specialhistorical she was trying to makesense as a settingforfemalelife,neededto be values in themainstream ofAmericanlife.The middle-class understood whichwerebeingchallenged ofthe1920shadtobe anchored bytheferment InGone With to sectionalidiosyncracies. notlimited ina nationalculture, through a prismofconservahistory The WindMitchellrereadsouthern a certaindisplacement fromthe If sheindeedeffected tiveprogressivism. norto 1920sto theearlierperiod,she did so notto jettisonit entirely, 9 Paul Gaston, The New South Creed: A Study in Southern Mythmaking(New York: Knopf, 1970). See also Michael O'Brien, The Idea of theAmericanSouth, 1920-1941 (Baltimore:JohnsHopkins Univ. Press, 1979); Daniel Aaron, The UnwrittenWar: American Writersand the Civil War (New York: OxfordUniv. Press, 1973); and Gray,Literatureof Memory. 10Mitchell's work may, in this respect, be compared to that of Ulrich Bonnell Phillips, Life and Labor in the Old South (1929; rpt.Boston: Little,Brown, 1963). See also, Eugene D. Genovese, "Ulrich Bonnell Phillips: Two Studies," in his In Red and Black: Marxian History(New York: Pantheon,1968),259-98. Explorationsin Southernand Afro-American Scarlett O'Hara: The SouthernLady As New Woman 397 reduce it to a simplecase studyof the present,but literallyto reconstruct it. She soughtto fashiona historyappropriateto the national concerns and destinyof the New South. Gone WithThe Wind as a whole transformsa particularregionalpast intoa generalizednationalpast. In thisrespect,it contributesto integrating southernhistoryinto national historyeven as it reestablishes the South, with all its idiosyncracies,as an only slightlyspecial case of an inclusivenationaldestiny.Mitchell'santebellumSouth manifestsfeatures characteristicof the nationas a whole. Even priorto the war, the cavalier traditionis shown as infusedwiththe blood of Irishimmigrants.As W. J. Cash does in The Mind of theSouth, Mitchellemphasizes the assimilation of the various gradationsof the white elite-specifically excludingpoor "white trash"-into a ruralprecursorof the industrialmiddleclass.1' Throughoutthe novel, Mitchell explicitlyunderscores her interestin the rise of Atlantaand the emergenceof a business culturein the South. She returnsregularlyto the excitementand importanceof Atlanta as a raw, growing,bustlingcity,the outgrowthof the railroads. She directly points to the similaritiesbetween Atlanta and Scarlett: "Atlanta was of [Scarlett's] own generation,crude with the crudities of youth and as headstrongand impetuous as herself.... The two were roughlythe same age and grew up together.During Scarlett's firstseventeen years, Atlantadeveloped froma stake in thegroundintoa "thrivingsmallcityof ten thousand that was the center of attentionfor the whole state. The older quietercitieswere wontto look upon thebustlingnew townwiththe sensationsof a hen which has hatched a duckling." The maternalreference should be noted. In the eyes of the staid Georgia towns,Atlantahad littleto recommendit save some railroads"and a bunch of mightypushy people . . . Scarlettalways liked Atlantaforthe very same reasons that made Savannah, Augusta,and Macon condemnit. Like herself,the town was a mixtureof the old and the new in Georgia, in which the old often came off second best in its conflictswith the self-willedand vigorous new"(141-43). Atlanta,not the "old days," emerges as the victorin Gone WithThe Wind.Tara, whichinitiallyfiguresas a dynamic,frontierplantation-the locus of vitality-ends as a place of retreat.In the early pages of the novel, Gerald O'Hara confidentlypoints to the land as the only reliable source of wealth. Even duringthe war, Scarlett recalls and echoes his view. But by the war's end, Scarlett must turnto the city to raise the moneyto pay the taxes on Tara. And the section of the novel devoted to II Cash, The Mind of theSouth (New York: Knopf, 1941). Mitchellrecognizedthe similaritybetween her views and those of Cash and warmlypraised his book when it appeared. American Quarterly 398 Reconstructiontakes place in the city. When, at the conclusion, Scarlett thinksof returningto Tara, she thinksonly of a temporaryrefuge.With onlythe slightestexaggeration,it could appear as the typicalhouse in the countryto which busy city-dwellersrepair for rest and refreshment.In this sense, it blends imaginativelywiththose New England farmhouses thathad also once encompassed productivelabor. In Mitchell'srendition, the Civil War becomes a nationalturningpointin the transitionfromrural to urban civilization. And this reading permitsher to incorporatethe South into a shared nationaldrama. This visionof Atlantaas symbolof a generalurbanvitalityconflatesthe destinyof the city with the defense of middle-classvalues. Mitchellreserves her endorsement for an enterprising, indigenous, southern bourgeoisie-for those who can adapt to the timeswithoutsacrificingthe essence of theirvalues. Her mercilessdepictionof the Yankees as rapacious, dishonest,politicalparasitesidentifiesthem as predators,not true capitalists. Yankees are those who manipulateand stirup Negroes and poor whites. She reservesher rage forthose who came South to milkthe victim. She never denies the possibilityof honest Yankee businessmen, comparable to theirsoutherncounterparts.But she does intendto make thecountryas a whole understand"what the Southenduredin thedays of Civil War and Reconstruction."12 Atlantastands forthe dynamismof the New South. At the core of the novel lies Mitchell's fascinationwith the way in which a new world emerges fromthe ashes of the old. Time and again, she returnsto the problem of a dying civilization in confrontationwith one being born. How, she asks, does one make money fromthe collapse of a society? Who makes the money?How does one survive,adapt, and prosperin the wake of a majorsocial upheaval? Historically,economically,and socially, Atlanta provides the lynchpinof Gone WithThe Wind. By the novel's close, all of the major charactershave tied theirdestiniesto thatof the city. Similarly,the characterof Scarlettprovides the novel's identificatorycore. For against the collapse of the Old South and the birthof the New, the novel chroniclesScarlett's comingof age-her painfulassumption of the burdens of southernwomanhood. The historicalcataclysm, however, transformsScarlett's saga fromthe account of establishinga personal identityas a woman intoan investigationof how to become-or whetherto become-a lady. The terms"woman" and "lady" evoke maturefemaleidentity,but in different forms."Woman" suggestsat once a more inclusive and more privatefemale nature,whereas "lady" evokes the public representation 12 Harwell, ed., Letters, 57. Scarlett O'Hara: The SouthernLady As New Woman 399 of thatnature.To be a lady is to have a publicpresence,to accept a public responsibility.But the essence of that presence and that responsibility consists in recognizingand maintaininga sexual division of labor that relegatesany properwoman to the privatesphere. No lady would admit thatshe, and not herhusband,ran theplantation.No lady would admitto beinghungryin public. No lady would admitto sexual desire or pleasure. In Mitchell's account, the Civil War and Reconstructionforced the issue of how one remainsa lady undernew historicalconditions.Changing times permitand even requirenew modes of behavior. At the same time, no society would survive did not its female membersinternalize certainstandardsand responsibilities.In Gone WithThe Windthe special case of appropriatefemalebehaviorand values in the collapse of a civilization is overdeterminedby the private drama of a girl who grows to womanhood under tumultuousconditions. Mitchellprovides ample evidence thatScarlettwould have had troublewithor withoutthe war. But withoutthe war, social structuresand normswould have provideda corset forher unrulyimpulses. It is Mammywho embodies those shattered structuresand norms,and who strugglesin vain to tightenthe laces of the corset. "Whata youngmisscoulddo and whatshe couldnotdo wereas different as blackandwhitein Mammy'smind;therewas no middlegroundofdeportment between.Suellenand Carreenwereclayin herpowerful handsand harkened respectfully to mostofherwarnings. Butithadalwaysbeena struggle to teach Scarlettthatmostofhernaturalimpulseswereunladylike. Mammy'svictories over Scarlettwerehard-won and represented a guileunknownto thewhite mind"(76-77). Scarlettstandsapartin Gone WithThe Wind,not merelybecause she is the centralcharacter,but because forheralone amongthefemalecharacters do the years of the war and its aftermathrenderproblematicalthe question of appropriategenderrole-the definitionof being, the aspiration to become, a lady. Any understandingof Scarlett's personalitymust take account of the othercharacterswho, by respondingto the pressures of thetimes,relateto her and provideboththe contextand the measuring stick for her responses. Mitchellonce claimed that her novel had been writtenentirely"throughScarlett'seyes. What she understoodwas written down; what she did not understand-and there were many things beyondhercomprehension,theywere leftto the reader's imagination."13 Mitchell's claim will not withstandeven a cursoryreading of her text. Possibly, she believed thatshe had writtenfromScarlett's pointof view. 13 Ibid., 41. 400 American Quarterly But if so, she confusedher own identification withScarlettand had trouble differentiating her functionas presentorof Scarlett's vision fromher functionas commentatoron Scarlett. In any event, whateverthe source of Mitchell's ambivalence about sexuality,gender identity,and gender role, it reaches schizophrenicproportions.Her relationshipwithScarlett, herown creature,exemplifiesherdilemmaof identification andjudgment. ScarlettO'Hara is not beautiful.Neitheris she a lady, althoughin her idiosyncraticway, she sentimentallyaspires to be one, providingthatit does not cost too much. Her adored mother Ellen had been a lady; Melanie Hamilton Wilkes is a lady; Aunt PittypatHamilton,Mrs. Merriwether,Mrs. Meade, India Wilkes,and the otherAtlantaworthiespride themselveson being ladies. Her sisters,Suellen and Carreen, suffering like Scarlett fromEllen's saintlydistance, are pale shadows of ladies. Belle Watling,to be sure, is not a lady, but the classic whore witha heart of gold, a shrewdand successfulbusiness woman in her own right,has a fardeeper sense than Scarlettof the essentialqualities thatinformedtrue ladyhood. But however splendidher personal qualities, the code cannot admit her as a lady. Scarlett, for her part, has no time for irrelevant niceties, and no understandingof the deeper meanings. Raw like the burgeoningcity of Atlanta,determinedand graspinglike her Irish immigrantforebearers,Scarletthas neverbeen nice and, withtheadventof the war, commitsherselfwholeheartedlyto surviving.Scarlett's survivaltactics includemarriagewithoutlove hastilyenteredintoforspitefulreasons, manslaughter,the theftof her sister'sfiance,flagrantdisregardof proper femalebehaviorto the pointof riskingthe lives of her own menfolk,and the mindlesssacrificeof herhusband's life.The same arsenal houses such lesser sins as dancingwhile in mourning,offering herselfforcold cash to pay the taxes on Tara, paradingaround town while pregnant,flauntinga disconcerting talentforbusiness,and otherwiseviolatingall accepted conventionsthatdefinedthe southernlady. In Scarlett'sjudgment,the Yankees, in all other respects so despicable, were right"on this matter.It took moneyto be a lady"(610). The times,the grimdays of the war and Reconstruction,demanded harshstrategemsof those who would survive them.Survivalassured, thetimeswould permittheresumptionofladylike graces. Let others retain,at the risk of destruction,the inner sense of beingladies, or assume the mask,whatevertheirinnerfeelingsof despair. And "she knew she would never feel like a lady again She was different. until her table was weightedwith silver and crystal and smokingwith rich food, untilher own horses and carriages stood in her stables, until black hands and not whitetook the cottonfromTara" (609). Mitchell makes scant effortto redeem Scarlett from the stark selfinterestand greed of her chronicledbehavior. On the contrary,fromthe Scarlett O'Hara: The SouthernLady As New Woman 401 openingpages of the novel in which upland Georgia basks in the glow of antebellumserenity,she establishes the fundamentalcontours of Scarlett's graspingpersonality.The self-consciousmanipulationwith which Scarlett pursues her prey foreshadowsprecisely the resources she will musterin her pursuitof financialsecurityduringReconstruction.Her marriageto RhettButlerand the ensuinghold on materialsecuritydo not sufficeto transform her into a real lady. But then Scarlettlacks any vital understandingof what it is to be one. ThroughScarlett,Mitchellexposes the hypocrisyof being a lady or a gentleman.Time and again, she shows Scarlett chafingunder the constraintsof correct behavior and utterance.No one, in Scarlett's view, could believe the phrases thatgovernpolite interchange.Repeatedly,she mentally dismisses Melanie as "mealy-mouthed." Yet Mitchell also shows Scarlettragingbecause Rhettcannot be counted on to be a gentleman. In the scene of the charitybazaar in Atlanta,Scarlettworriesthat Rhett cannot be trustedto observe the gentleman'scode and keep his mouthshut.A fewpages later,duringthe same scene, Scarlettflaresup at the hypocrisyof required ladylike conduct. Finally, in the name of the Cause, Rhett bids for Scarlett as his partnerto lead the opening reel. Scarlett,aching to dance, furiousat the imprisonment of her mourning, joins him, feet tapping "like castenets," green eyes flashing.This one scene capturesall thecontradictionsof Mitchell'sattitudes.For thecodes against which Scarlettrebels also provide her protection:she festersat theirdemands,but fearsa worldthatwill not provideher the respectthe codes are designed to ensure. If she does not always wish to meet the requirementsof being a lady, she should not wish to be treatedas one. Mitchellthusremainsambivalentabout Scarlett'sdifficulties. She regularlycalls attentionto Scarlett's naturalvibrancy."There was no one to tell Scarlett that her own personality,frighteningly vital thoughit was, was moreattractivethanany masquerade she mightadopt. Had she been told, she would have been pleased but unbelieving.And thecivilizationof which she was a part would have been unbelievingtoo, for at no time before or since, had so low a premiumbeen placed on female naturalness"(80). Here, Mitchell seems to hold civilizationresponsible for repressinghealthyand attractivefemalevitality,but hernovel as a whole offersa morecomplex readingof the relationbetweenfemalevitalityand civilization. Vitalityserves as a code word for sexuality,and Mitchell harboredconflicting attitudestowardstheproperrelationbetweensexuality,genderidentity,and genderrole. Her confusionon this matterendows the novel witha complexitythat transcends Scarlett's stereotypicalfeatures. For indisputably,if in an occasionally perverse way, Scarlettinvitesidentification.The dynamics 402 American Quarterly turnupon Scarlett's proximityto young bourgeois of that identification women of the twentiesand thirties.Her career raises questions of appropriatefemalebehaviorin a changingworld. Her internallifereverberates crisis in the bourgeoisfamwithovertonesof the earlytwentieth-century Much oftheforce behavior.14 female ilyand thereceivednotionsoffitting social attitudes middle-class of acceptable, of the novel as an affirmation depends upon Scarlett's psychological plausibility. Scarlett herself is caught in a war between the socially ordained role into which she is expected to fitand her own natural impulses. The war in Scarlett, as perhaps in Mitchellherself,is fierce,for she lacks that solid bridgebetweenthetwo-a strongidentityas a woman-which mightpermitherto weatherthe stormsof social change. But the acceptance of herselfas a woman, Mitchell implies, would have required a resilientidentification withanotherwoman, presumablyher mother,thatwould have nurtured her initiationinto female sexualityand generativity. As Scarlettherselfcomes to understandat the close of the novel, the only women she has ever loved and respected are her mother and Melanie. Tellingly,Scarlett omits Mammy fromthis company despite compellingclaims. As Rhett(who along withAshley representsthe voice bothEllen and Melanie were of objectivejudgment)categoricallyaffirms, genuinelygreatladies. Scarlett's tragedylies in herinabilityto understand the meaningof being a lady. Scarlett is correctin her criticismsof the hypocrisiesof the pseudo-ladies, althougheven here, she underestimates theirstrengths.Survivingthe war and its aftermathcalls for more than formsof gentility.Scarlett fails to realize that the prevailingetiquette representsa social effortto codify,institutionalize,and reproduce the deeper qualities of the lady and the fabricof an entiresociety. Having spirit,she confuses nevergraspedthedepthand meaningof the informing that untilthe moment point, it withits forms.So deeply does she miss the that Melanie believes in the of Melanie's death she remains unaware words she uses and the standardsshe observes,and thatthose words and standardsderive fromstrengthratherthan weakness. Only at Melanie's deathbeddoes she recognizethatMelanie too would have killedthe Yankee who threatenedthem-or would have died in the attempt. Ellen and Melanie are presented as attractiveand admirable, albeit adopted and possiblyrepressed.The interpretation highlyself-disciplined depends upon one's angle of vision and the relativeweightaccorded to 14 See, interalia, JohnC. Burnham,"The ProgressiveEra Revolutionin AmericanAttitudestoward Sex," Journalof American History,59 (1973), 885-908; and referencesin note 5 above. For changingsouthernattitudes,see John Ruoff,Southern Womanhood, 1865-1920: An Intellectualand CulturalStudy (Ann Arbor: Univ. Microfilms,1980); Anne Firor Scott, "The 'New Woman' in the New South," South AtlanticQuarterly,65 (1962), 473-83. Cf. Ellen Glasgow, In This Our Life (New York: Grosset and Dunlap, 1941). Scarlett O'Hara: The SouthernLady As New Woman 403 Scarlett'sperceptions,as againstan independentreadingthatderivesfrom the actions and words of the charactersthemselves. Thus, Scarlett reveres Ellen even thoughthe reader has ample evidence that Ellen may have faileddecisivelyas a mother.Ellen's mostdirectaddress to Scarlett comes in the formof a letter,writtenas soon as Ellen receives word of Scarlett's shameless dancing at the Atlanta charitybazaar. That letter, withits cold feelings,could have been writtenby any one of the Atlanta worthies.Melanie, on the same occasion, insistson believingthe best of Scarlettand defendsher. Yet Scarlettpersistsin seeing Melanie as pale, fragile,and lackingin womanlywarmthand charm-in a word, asexual. The reader, however, having seen Melanie's plain face flareinto beauty withthepassion of herlove forAshley,has everyreason to appreciateher special strength.Both Melanie and Ellen lack thatraw undisciplinedsexualitythatpulsates in Scarlettherself,but Mitchellmakes less thanclear whethershe regardssexualityas a male or femaletrait.Time and again, she links Scarlett's exuberance to her paternal inheritance.She establishes Scarlett's early preferenceforthe activitiesof boys over those of girls.She proclaimsScarlett's repugnanceforand failureat motherhood. Althoughshe leaves no doubt about Scarlett's attractivenessto men, she links Scarlett's success as a belle to her unseemlyambition. Mitchellremainspreoccupied withthose featuresof being a lady that survive social upheaval. If the role of lady is constructedand carries serious responsibilities,how much of that role can be taken to persist does being a lady possess an throughchange? Or, to put it differently, essence that remains constantas mannerschange? The sections of the novel that describe Scarlett's early forays into the world of business as a strongfeministapprovalof the selfbetraywhat could be interpreted reliance, business skills, and survivalabilitiesof the heroine. By Mitchell's day, the South had a traditionof resilientwomen who, withor withpostbellum out theirmenfolk,had seen theirfamiliesthroughthe difficult decades and had reestablishedfamilyfortunes.Scarlett's economic success need not have contravenedher standingas a lady. Scarlettrunsinto troublenot foradaptingto new times,nor fordisplayinga vigorousindithose boundariesat which individualism vidualism,but fortransgressing becomes greed and adaptation a threatto any viable social order. For Mitchell,those limitsseem to have come withthe employmentof convicts,the systematicbetrayalof business's own standardsof probity,and femaleintrusion-however inadvertent-intothe politicaldomain. But if Mitchell shows Scarlett's irresponsibleactions as bearingheavy consequences, she does not show Scarlettexperiencingpain or guiltas a result of them.The social dimensionsof superego sanctionsare delineated,but Scarletthas not internalizedthem.Her own responses remaindetermined by whethershe getswhat she wants: at thecenterof Scarlett,theapparent 404 American Quarterly woman, lingersa demandingand frightened child. In presentingScarlett as emotionallyimmatureand willful,Mitchellvalidates the legitimacyof social constraintson femalelives. In presentingScarlettas so personally immuneto the normalemotionalresponsibilitiesforher socially inappropriatebehavior,Mitchellquestions the psychologicalfoundationsforsocially prescribedroles. She remains,in short,deadlocked on the social possibilitiesforand the social legitimacyof the freeexpressionof female nature. Mitchell's strategyhighlightsa gap between the desire and its object, betweenthe act and its emotionalresonance. The formalaccount of Scarlett's actions and behavioris shadowed by unstatedpsychologicalconsiderations. The central flaw in Scarlett's character, the source of her egoism, derives fromthe relationshipwith her motherthat purportedly furnishesher standardsof beinga lady. All explicitreferencesto Ellen in the novel, includingScarlett's own, are positive. Yet all indirectevidence with suggeststhatScarlettneverattainedthatpsychologicalidentification her mother that would have provided the bedrock for becoming her mother'ssuccessor. At the centerof the novel, at the end of thedevastating road back fromthe destructionof Atlanta, falls Ellen's death. For Scarlett,thatroad "that was to end in Ellen's arms" ended in a "blank wall," in "a dead end." Scarletthad believed thatshe was fleeingto "the protectionof her mother's love wrapped about her like an eiderdown quilt." With Ellen dead, the hope of that love had vanished. From her despair and abandonment,Scarlettwrests the determinationto survive. Somewhere "along the road to Tara, she had left her girlhoodbehind her." The scene thatmarksher assumptionof womanhoodends withher vow: "as God is my witness,I'm never goingto be hungryagain"(418). That night,she firstdreamswhatis to become herrecurrentnightmare, of being lost in the fog. On this occasion, Melanie comes to her bedside. Later in the novel, Rhettwould comforther, promisingto feed and spoil herlike a treasuredchild. But she stillpasses on to Bonnie, herdaughter, a fear of the dark. The firstappearance of the dream underscoresthe psychological dimensionof her fightagainsthunger.The scene in the fieldsof Tara conflates, in a mannerthat persists throughoutthe novel, the elements of ladyhood that derive fromsocial structureand those that derive from intrapsychicidentification-especially from the mother-daughter relationship. Scarlett's willfulness, graspingness, and jealousy of other women, includingher own sisters,have been presentfromthe opening pages. Her admirationof and love forher motherhave also been there. But her motheremerges as distant and preoccupied, as having never recovered froman early passion, as having littleof her emotional substance to give to those she so dutifullycares for. Scarlettgerminatedthe Scarlett O'Hara: The SouthernLady As New Woman 405 need forlove and nurturefromher childhood.The crisisof her adulthood consolidates a persistingneed. The social and historicalcircumstancesof thatcrisis merelydeterminethe formand intensityof her adult behavior. The underlyinglongingremainsto be wrappedin thequiltof her mother's love. The hungershe determinesto appease harksback to a longstanding unconscious feelingof deprivation. RichardKing has recentlyargued,inA SouthernRenaissance, thatthe southernfamilyromance,which"placed the father-sonrelationshipat its center," leftonlythe role of motherto thewhitewoman who, as mistress of the plantation,was to care forthe "wants and needs of herfamilyboth whiteand black." In King's view, this "queen of the home" was denied erotic appeal and, in "extreme form," was "stripped of any emotional nurturing attributesat all. Eventually,she came to assume a quasi-Virgin Mary role...." Interestingly, Mitchelldoes statethatScarlettperceives her motheras the VirginMary. But she also provides the reader with information that supportsa more complex interpretation.15 Ellen RobillardO'Hara had, as an adolescent, experiencedan intense passion fora youngcousin whomherfamilypreventedherfrommarrying. Afterhis death, in a bar room brawl in New Orleans, the young Ellen cried all nightand thendriedhertears and closed her heart.Her marriage to Gerald O'Hara is presentedsimplyas an alternativeto enteringa convent forthe rest of her life. This renunciationof her own passionate self crippledEllen's abilityto provide nurtureto her own daughtersand bequeathed, at least to Scarlett,contradictoryattitudestowardmen as objects of sexual and emotional desire. On the surface, Mitchell affirms Ellen's goodness and Scarlett'slove forher. But Mitchellalso shows that Scarlett managed to hide much of her impetuous,passionate self from Ellen, thatin crucial ways Ellen did not know-perhaps did not want to know-Scarlett. Mitchellalso informsus thatEllen had never told Scarlett that "desire and attainmentwere two different matters"(73). These clues and others invite the reader to criticize Ellen from Scarlett's perspective,much in the mannerthat Lillian Smith would criticizeher own mother.Yet theydo not commitMitchellto an open critiqueof the mother's(her own mother's)failurevis 'a vis the daughter.16 If Ellen's deathforcesScarlettto assume a womanhoodforwhichshe is not emotionallyprepared,Melanie's death, at the novel's close, provides her withan opportunityto relive and reworkthatearlierloss. The parallels between Ellen and Melanie are deep and numerous.Most important, however,in psychologicalterms,is Melanie's marriageto Ashley, whom Scarlettloves. Scarlett's failureto understandthe natureof Ashley and 15 King, A Southern Renaissance: The Cultural Awakening of the American South, 1930-1955 (New York: OxfordUniv. Press, 1980), 35. 16 Lillian Smith,Killers of the Dream, rev. ed. (New York: Norton, 1961). 406 American Quarterly Melanie's love foreach other,her attemptto fathomthe secrets of that love throughreading Melanie's lettersfromAshley, her resentmentof Melanie in the face of Melanie's maternallyunselfishlove for her, all evoke the attitudesof a female Oedipal crisis, of an adolescent girlwho loves her fatherand hates her mother.Melanie and Ashley permitMitchell to explore thatcrisis because theyare not Scarlett's parents. Yet the emotionallogic of the situationforcesthe readerto take it as evidence of Mitchell's using Melanie as a double forEllen. And whateverScarlett's conscious feelings,her relationshipwithMelanie permitsher to come to termswithher ambivalentfeelingsabout her mother.Only at Melanie's deathbed does Scarlettbegin to see clearly,to arriveat some measure of Only at Melanie's death does she recognize the true self-understanding. object of longingin her recurringnightmareof cold and hunger.Throughout the novel we are told that Scarlett loves Ellen; as the novel progresses, we come to know that Melanie loves Scarlett. That love, as Rhettasserts, may indeed be Scarlett's cross, but it may also be her salvation. For at the end, the loss of Rhett may have to be weighted against her recognizingRhettas the object of her desire. Ellen had endowed Scarlett,the child,witha hungerforherself,a longing formaternallove. That longingcolors Scarlett'schoice of men. Both consciously and unconsciously,Scarlett perceives Ashley Wilkes to be cut fromthe same cloth as Ellen. Aristocraticand self-controlled,he and acts accordingto principlesthatshe cannot possesses self-knowledge fathom.Until the finalscenes of the novel, Scarlettmisunderstandsand misevaluatesAshley: she understandsneitherhis strengthnor his weakness, least of all does she understandhis love forMelanie, or thathis love love forherself.In comparable could coexist withan altogetherdifferent fashion,ScarlettmisperceivesRhett:only in the finalpages of the novel does she recognize her love for him (althoughthe reader has known of thatlove since the earlysectionsofthenovel on thewar years in Atlanta), but by then she has (apparently)lost him. Scarlett's woeful inabilityto fathomher own desires or those of the men in her lifehas its roots in her inabilityto arriveat a maturefemaleidentity-tobecome a woman. Or so Mitchellwould seem to be suggesting.Scarlettfailsto integrateherneeds and her desires, her understandingof love-the longing of romantic 17 This reading suggests that the years between the death of Ellen and that of Melanie constitute,in part, an extended period of mourningfor Scarlett. See Sigmund Freud, "Mourning and Melancholia," in James Strachey,ed., The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Worksof SigmundFreud, 1914-1916 (London: HogarthPress, 1957), XIV, 243-58. For the general problems of female psychological development, see J. Chasseguet-Smirgel,et al., Female Sexuality (Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press, 1970); Harold P. Blum, ed., Female Psychology:ContemporaryPsychoanalyticViews (New York: InternationalUniversitiesPress, 1977). Scarlett O'Hara: The SouthernLady As New Woman 407 love-with her sexual feelings.There are persistinghintsthat Scarlett, the erstwhiletomboy,would, on some level, preferto be a man. Mitchell never fullyresolves these tensions. For althoughshe allows Scarlett a clearer perception of herselfand her desires, she deprives her of the objects of thatdesire. In theend, Scarletthas onlyherself.Even Tara will provide only a temporaryretreat,not a fulllife. Mitchell's ambivalentattitudestowardsfemale sexuality,genderidentity,and genderrole-desire, womanhood,and ladyhood-informed her own life,as well as thelifeof herheroine.The discretecomponentsof this ambivalence include uncertaintyas to whethersexuality is compatible withwomanhood, mixed feelingsabout motherhoodand its relationship to sexuality,and thepossibilityforweddingfemaleindividualismto ladyhood. The core of Scarlett's dilemmaremainswhethershe can transform her need forher motherinto love fora man and children.And thisbasic psychodynamic pattern is faithfulto an increasingly typical early twentieth-century pattern.Ellen could be read as a positive renditionof Philip Wylie's "Momism." Gerald O'Hara could qualify as the absent father. Scarlett herselfcould be recast as a 1920s flapper.'8 Mitchell mediates, ratherthan invites, these transpositions.But the compelling popularityof her novel may have turnedon her readers' effectingthe identifications forthemselves.Even the resonances thatbind contemporary identificationsto the historicalplot do not clarifyMitchell's own attitudestowardthe appropriatemeaningand responsibilitiesof womanhood and ladyhood, especially toward female destinyrelativeto thatof men. Historians such as Anne Firor Scott and A. Elizabeth Taylor have demonstratedthe interdependenceof thepositionof southernwomenand the southernsocial system as a whole, and have argued that southern Mitchellunderstands women themselvescriticizedsouthernpatriarchy.19 these arguments,but on the surface,her own critiqueis more narrowly focusedon menas menand is moreindirectin itsexpression.For Mitchell does notso muchcriticizemenas displaytheirweaknesses and, too often, kill themoff.At the same time,she endows men withthe objective view of historyand the natureof civilization.Despite the constantjuxtapositionof Rhettand Ashleyin Scarlett'smind,Mitchellpresentsthemas one in theirgrasp of historicalprocess. Thus, even as individualmen fall by thewayside, men as a groupemergeas the custodiansof objectiveknowledge. The problemis to identifyMitchell's own ultimateattitudetoward Philip Wylie,A Generationof Vipers (New York: Reinhart,1942). 19Scott, "Women's Perspectiveon the Patriarchyin the 1850's," Journalof American History,61 (1974); Taylor, "The Last Phase of theWoman SuffrageMovementin Georgia," Georgia Historical Quarterly,43 (1959), 11-28. 18 408 American Quarterly theclaimsoffemaleindependence. Thatproblemis complicatedby her play withtranssexualidentifications: "But Scarlett,child of Gerald, foundtheroadto ladyhoodhard"(58).Ellen's earlypassionsuggeststhat sexualitycannotsimplybe classifiedas masculine.Mitchellnonetheless underscores Scarlett'sinheritance fromherunrulyIrishfatherand portraysrawsexuality as masculineandinherently dominating-towhit,the famoussceneinwhicha drunken RhettcarriesScarlettofftobed. Mitchell also considerstherelationsbetweensexualityand generativity problematical:Scarlettmiscarriesthe baby conceivedin her and Rhett's mutualpassion;Ellen,reproducing without passion,lostall ofhersons; Melaniedies in childbirth; Bonnie,belovedof bothScarlettand Rhett, dies perhapsas a resultofherinherited Irishrecklessness, perhapsas a resultof herfather'sdelightin herunladylike highspirits,perhapsas a resultoftheOedipalconfusions thatinform Scarlett'sownlife,perhapsin testimony to Scarlett'sandRhett'sfailedcommunication-their inability to reproduce. Anyofthesereadingsis compatible withone or anotherfemalecritique ofpatriarchy andthetollitexactedfromwomen.Anyis compatible witha severejudgment on womenwhorebelagainsttheirordainedrole.Mitchell,likeScottandTaylor,stressestheinterdependence offemaleroleand socialsystem.Ifshe,consciously ornot,resentedtheconstraints thatthe roleofladyimposedon women,sheremained attached totheclassbasisof thesocialsystem-totheclassandracerelations within whichthatrolewas is complicated in social her interest essential.But Mitchell'sstrategy by a the South as and her commitment to Old change establishing special case ofa generalnationalpast.Her treatment oftheOld Southbrilliantly blendsa nostalgiafora lost social order,a morestableagrarianworld, witha specificevocationofsouthern culture.She eschewsanydefenseof in slaveryas a coherent socialsystem favorofevokinga harmonious agriculturalorderreminiscent of thatevokedin I'll Take My Stand.20Her earlydiscussionofTara,resting upona detailedrendition ofuplandGeorgia,establishesthespecificity oftimeandplace,butnoneofthedescriptionbearsanyrelationto theslavesystem.Mitchellbringsherreadersto accepta particular worldwithout including anyofthesocialfeatures that structure it. By thismarveloussleightof hand,she invitesa national audienceto accepttheold Southas a directantecedent ofitsownAmerican civilization. The lostantebellum is validatedfortheSouth civilization evenas it is absorbedintotheloss ofan earlierAmericanorder. Similarly, Mitchellrecastsouthernslaveryto conformto a national class system.Her attitudestowardblacks resemblethose of Howard 20 Twelve Southerners,I'll Take My Stand: The South and the Agrarian Tradition (New York: Harper and Brothers,1930). Scarlett O'Hara: The SouthernLady As New Woman 409 andin"theracisttransformation ofsocial OdumintheirsocialDarwinism 'facts'intonaturalgivens."Yet, as Odumdidinhislaterworks,Mitchell also allowsforthedevelopment of a blackleadershipunderwhiteguidall themorebecauseshedraws ance. Her attitudes remaincontradictory, revealingdoublesof upon black charactersto providepsychologically Her class and racialattitudes. whites,butsheis weddedto conservative attitudestowardcontemporary issues shape her depictionof slavery which,in hertreatment, disappearsas a coherentsocial system.21 Mitchelldistinguishes betweenhouseand fieldslaves. In an authorial intervention, she explainsthat"the house negroesand yardnegroes" despised"theselowlyblacks." Forthepositionofthehouseslavesrested upon meritand effort."Justas Ellen had done, otherplantationmisthrough coursesof tressesthroughout theSouthhadputthepickanninies training and elimination to selectthe best of themforthe positionsof greaterresponsibility. Those consignedto thefieldsweretheones least theleasthonestandtrustworwillingor able to learn,theleastenergetic, thy,themostviciousand brutish.And nowthisclass, thelowestin the blacksocialorder,was makinglifea miseryfortheSouth"(654).Mitchell ideologyofwork,schooling, and the hereechoestheprevailing capitalist promotion ofmerit,tempered by a harshattitudetowardcrime. Mitchellalso describeseven the good, deservingblacks as "monfieldhands, whomtheYankees keyfaced"and "child-like."The former "conducted had so irresponsibly promoted to positionsofresponsibility, as creaturesofsmallintelligence mightnaturally be expected themselves to do. Like monkeysor smallchildrenturnedloose amongtreasured theyran wildobjects whose value is beyondtheircomprehension, or simplybecause of their eitherfromperversepleasurein destruction ignorance."Not naturally malicious,theywere,"as a class, childlikein mentality. . . "(654). Mitchellthus combines racism as a justificationfor to individual betterment through blacksubordination witha commitment theworkethic.Blacks,she believes,can risein thesocialladderto the extentthattheyacceptandprofit fromthetutelageoftheirwhitebetters. Mitchellcannotresistsomenostalgic pronouncements on thetiesbindin thiscategorybutherstarcharacters ingtheblackand whitefamily, Prissy-all Mammy,Uncle Peter,Sanm, and, withspecialreservations, rather thanas members offamilies relatetothewhitefamily as individuals of theirown. And thepersonalloyaltiesthattranscendclass and racial lines all have rootsin the lost agrariancivilization.Whenthe blacks they remaintrueto thoserootsand rejecttheirchanceforindependence to chastisetheirmasters.The mofarewell,and evenhave thefreedom 21 Odum, The Social and Mental Traitsof theNegro (New York: Columbia Univ. Press, 1910), 52 ff.;and King, SouthernRenaissance, 41. 410 American Quarterly menttheycutloose fromtherestraining bonds,theirinferiority becomes a crippling disadvantage.By thussubstituting racismforslaveryas the basis fordomination, Mitchellendorsespreciselythe processthathistoricallyestablishedthegroundsfora reconciliation betweentheNorth and theSouth. Mitchell'sharshattitude towardsblackscollectively does notprevent herfromvaluingindividual blacksonthebasisoftheirpersonalattributes. Mammyespecially,butalso UnclePeter,Sam,andevenPrissyareshown as genuinecharactersin theirown right.Mitchellin factuses themas psychological doublesforimportant whitecharacters.Uncle Peterfunctionsas a doubleforAshleyand,beyondhim,forthewhitegentlemen of theantebellum South.UnclePeterembodiesall themanners, and bearing, respectforconvention thatpurportedly arischaracterized theantebellum UnclePeter'sfinicky reflects on tocracy.Fromthisperspective, timidity Ashleyand alertsthereaderto thoseweaknesswhichScarlettrefusesto throwsintorelief see, or at leastto interpret correctly. Sam, in contrast, thatunderliesRhett'sunconventional and thesolidityand dependability surfacebehavior.Prissyilluminates Scarlett'sown failureto disturbing achievean internalsenseoffemalegenerativity: "Laws, Mis Scarlett,I 'boutbirthin babies." And,in thiscase, sincePrissy doan knownothing has claimedtohavepreciselythatknowledge, the herfailureunderscores gap betweenScarlett'sexternalappearanceas a grownwomanand her as a needychild. internal identity In thiscontext, Mammy playsthemostcomplexroleofall.Thelifeofthe character almostescapesMitchell's and assuredly control, escapesMitchell's racistconvictions.For Mammy,the compelling doubleforEllen, comes close to providing Scarlettwitheverything thatEllen could not. Mammy'sknowledgeof Scarlettand heracceptanceof hercould have providedthefoundations forScarlett'sgenderidentity. Mammyneither sees norexperiencesanycontradictions betweenunderstanding Scarlett andlovingor forgiving her.LacingScarlettintohercorset,forcing herto eat beforea barbecueso shewillnotdisgraceherself byeatingat it,areto Mammytheunavoidablerequirements ofcorrectbehavior.Scarlett'srecalcitranceelicitsdisciplinary action but not condemnation. Mammy couldhavemoldedScarlettintoa lady,preciselybecauseMammywould have feltno need to repudiateScarletttheneedychildand thesensual woman.Ellen, havingrepudiatedthose qualitiesin herself,could not afford torecognizetheminScarlettand,therefore, couldnothelpherdeal withthem.Mammy,swishing proudly inherredpetticoat, knowsas much aboutsexualityas BelleWatling.Mammyalso knowsthatyouwearyour redsatinwhereitdoes notshow.ButifMitchellcould,consciously, allow Mammyto lay bear Ellen's failuresas a womanand as a mother,she Scarlett O'Hara: The SouthernLady As New Woman 411 in orderto allowMamherclass and racialattitudes couldnotsurmount Heto provideScarlett'smaternalidentification. my'sknowingnurture of condemnation ifunintended, rein,perhaps,lies hermostdevastating, thevalues she soughtto support. in moment inand spoketo a particular Gone WithTheWindoriginated theworldsofelite Americanculture.Its verystatusas a novel,straddling andmassculture,capturedthedilemmaofa bourgeoissocietythatstrugrebellion andtoengagethe gledtopreserveitsownvaluesagainstinternal popularbase. Notunlikethenew allegianceofa broadandheterogeneous it appearedto offerAmericans languagesofradio,film,and advertising, and an imageofthemselves at oncespecificenoughtoinviteidentification Mitchell'sre-creation generalenoughto encompassnationaldiversity.22 ofan initshistorical detail,boundthedestruction ofthe1860s,so faithful equatedas the orderedworldtothebirthofmedernAmerica.Structurally two great opportunitiesfor makinga fortune,the building-upand in humanafemergeas cyclicalrecurrences of civilizations breaking-up distancein no waydetractsfromthepoignancy fairs.Thatphilosophical documentedtale. Nor does it ever soar to and dramaof the carefully encompassthefullrangeofhumandestinies.Rather,it subsumesa purtraditional societyundertheaegisofbourgeoisnorms.Andthis portedly ofthosenormsina worldthatis fusion,inturn,promisesthepersistence itsoriginalsocial base. outstripping portrayed therelationbetweenthepast and No one morecompelling thefutureof the nationand the SouththanMitchell.But, forher,the bindingup of woundsrequireda sharedbourgeoisethic,and could ill a "feudal" past. Underthebourgeoisruafford theluxuryof mourning as thedestinyoftheSouth,and the bric,thenationcouldbe understood Southas a generalized,rural,nationalpast. Perhapsit is a final,fitting bourgeois coreofMitchell'svisionofa revitalized ironythatthemagnetic orderlay in theunconsciouslifeof a mostdisorderly girl.* 22 For example, see Lary May, Screening Out the Past (New York: OxfordUniv. Press, 1980). * I would like to thankThomas Africa,HerbertAptheker,Sarah Elbert, Duncan Rice, Lewis Rubin, SterlingStuckey,and, as always, Eugene D. Genovese.