EXHIBIT 6 Declaration of Leesburg Police Detective
Transcription
EXHIBIT 6 Declaration of Leesburg Police Detective
Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 1 of 59 EXHIBIT 6 Declaration of Leesburg Police Detective Richard Giles Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 2 of 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION ESTATE OF MELINDA DUCKETT, et al. Plaintiffs, v. CASE NO.: 5:06-cv-444-WTH-GRJ CABLE NEWS NETWORK LLLP (CNN), et al. Defendants. / DECLARATION OF DETECTIVE RICHARD GILES (RET.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746,1 declare the following under the penalty of perjury: 1. My name is Richard Giles, I am over the age of 18 and am fully competent to make this Declaration. The statements made herein are based upon personal knowledge and my review of the records of the Leesburg Police Department in Leesburg, Florida (the "Department"). 2. From February 1991 until my retirement in July 2008 I was in law enforcement with the Department. From July 2005 until my retirement, I served as a detective. Before I retired, I served as the Department's lead detective on the Trenton Duckett missing person investigation. Also participating in the Department's investigation were agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement ("FDLE"). 3. On August 27, 2006, the Department began an investigation precipitated by a 911 telephone call reporting that Melinda Duckett's son had been abducted from her home in Leesburg, Florida Melinda reported that someone had cut a screen on Trenton's bedroom window and abducted him from the home through the window. Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 3 of 59 Documents Recovered from Melinda Duckett's Laptop Computer 4. After Melinda's September 8, 2006, suicide at the home of her grandparents at 638 Rainbow Blvd., law enforcement officers secured that scene. I participated in the investigation of the scene. 5. On September 8, 2006, the FDLE recovered a laptop computer from the vehicle belonging to Melinda Duckett, which was parked outside of her grandparents' home. Melinda Duckett is the only known user of that computer. The FDLE provided to the Department the chain of custody and report regarding Melinda's laptop, an Averatec 3200 Series Silver Laptop Computer Model: AV3250HX-01, with an internal Travelstar/Hitachi 80GB hard drive Model 1C25N080ATMR04-0, P/N 08K0635, S/N K4J23RAH. That record is attached to this Declaration as Exhibit A. 6. I and other investigators obtained a document from the grandparents' home and recovered documents from the hard drive of Melinda's laptop computer demonstrating that she had prepared for her appearance on the Nancy Grace television program. Among these documents were: a. A script of Melinda's talking points for the Nancy Grace program, in both hard copy (attached as Exhibit B) and in text fragments (attached as Exhibit C). In her script, Melinda had prepared responses to questions ranging from her interaction with local law enforcement and refusal to take a polygraph examination, to her child custody and marital problems, as well as her thoughts on who might be a suspect, b. A letter she wrote to a friend, attached as Exhibit D, while she was on the Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 4 of 59 telephone awaiting the start of the taping of Nancy Grace. In the letter, she told her friend that "right now I'm fixing to be on an interview with Nancy Grace from CNN and it's over the phone so I've got the phone in one ear, headset to my cell in another, and then I'm on my computer, but not hooked up to the internet. Confusing as hell, but I'm doing fine so far." 7. The text fragments contained in attached Exhibits C and D were recovered from the hard drive (listed by FDLE as "Exhibit MA3" on attached Exhibit D) following a search of all text fragments recovered on the hard drive using a number of search terms. That search produced 262 pages of information, in the form of text fragments like those contained in Exhibits C and D, that had been deleted from Melinda's laptop computer before law enforcement recovered the computer from her car. 8. After FDLE completed its forensic analysis, on or about October 12, 2006, the laptop computer, its hard drive, and all reports and tests performed by FDLE were transferred to the Leesburg Police Department. I therefore am familiar with the contents, and these are the types of records detectives in the Department routinely keep and rely upon in conducting investigations like this one. My Interviews With Melinda Duckett 9. During investigations like this one, detectives routinely interview the parents for any information that may help find their missing child. I therefore interviewed Melinda Duckett two times in investigating Trenton's disappearance. 10. During the early morning of August 28, 2006, I, along with FDLE Special Agent Denise Nevers, interviewed Melinda at the Leesburg Police Department's offices. This Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 5 of 59 interview was recorded. During this interview, we asked Melinda to provide details regarding her whereabouts for the two days prior to Trenton's reported abduction. Melinda refused to provide anything beyond a generalized and repetitive story. 11. As part of any interview, it is important to test the accuracy of the information being given. During the course of the interview, Melinda was consensually administered a Voice Stress Analysis ("VSA"), an investigative tool commonly used to detect deception in witnesses during criminal investigations. The VSA examiner asked Melinda a series of Yes/No questions, including: • Did you take Trenton to a safe place? • Did you make up the story about Trenton being taken? • Are you being truthful about Trenton? • Did you lie during this investigation? • Have you ensured Trenton's safety? The Department's written report of the session, finding possible deception by Melinda, is attached as Exhibit E. 12. FDLE Special Agent Nevers and I informed Melinda of the results shortly after she concluded the test. Melinda became defensive. We asked her whether she left Trenton somewhere other than his bedroom, and we told her we thought it would be impossible for someone to take Trenton out of the bedroom through the cut screen on the window. Melinda became more argumentative and accused us of not trying to help find her child. I then asked her to write a statement for me to summarize her story. Melinda resisted and terminated the interview by abruptly walking out of the room and leaving the station. Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 13. Filed 05/07/10 Page 6 of 59 Later on the morning of August 28, 2006, after Melinda returned to the station, I interviewed her with Detective Dunagan. We questioned her on inconsistencies in her story. Melinda's answers were evasive and incomplete. I informed Melinda that her story wasn't adding up, and I asked her if it was possible that she had arranged to place Trenton somewhere. Melinda acknowledged that it was a reasonable question, but then asked us to not bring it up again. After further questioning, Melinda also terminated this interview by walking out of the room and leaving the station. Melinda Duckett Was the Prime Suspect, and Continues to Be the Only Suspect 14. After interviewing Melinda, speaking with a large number of witnesses, reviewing all available documents, and discussions with investigators, I, in consensus with the other investigators, concluded that Melinda Duckett was the prime suspect in Trenton's disappearance. 15. In addition, prior to her suicide, the Department had been prepared to charge Melinda Duckett with the crimes of Offense Against Intellectual Property and Perjury in an Official Proceeding. The charges stem from Melinda's false report that she had received a message from her husband Joshua Duckett on her MySpace.com email account, threatening to hunt her and Trenton down and kill them. Melinda reported this email to the Department, and later swore in a state court custody proceeding that Joshua sent the email. On the basis of that sworn testimony, Melinda received a temporary restraining order against Joshua. Upon further investigation, the Department found that Melinda had in fact unlawfully entered Joshua's MySpace.com account and sent the fictitious email to herself, giving the appearance that it was generated by Joshua The Department did not arrest Melinda on these charges, Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 7 of 59 however, as we believed the best option for finding Trenton was to not take her into custody. 16. The FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit, which developed a profile of the person who took Trenton, similarly concluded in the December 15, 2006 report that it provided to the Department (attached hereto as Exhibit F) that "Melinda Duckett falsely alleged that her child was abducted in an effort to cover up a homicide." The Department received this document from the FBI, our trusted partner in the Trenton Duckett investigation, which contained factual findings resulting from the investigation. 17. When I retired from the Department in July 2008, Melinda remained the prime suspect in the disappearance of Trenton Duckett. No Discussions with CNN and Nancy Grace Prior to Melinda Duckett's Suicide 18. From the time Trenton was reported missing on August 27, 2006, to the time Melinda Duckett committed suicide on September 8, 2006, I did not speak or have any communication with anyone from Cable News Network or the Nancy Grace television program, and I provided no input at all in the Nancy Grace program in which Melinda participated. No Interference with Law Enforcement Investigation 19. At no time did CNN, Nancy Grace, or any other media interfere with the Department's investigation and efforts to locate Trenton Duckett. Instead, the Department welcomed media coverage to publicize the search for Trenton. Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 8 of 59 FURTHER DECLARANT SAYETH NAUGHT I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct on this \-SL£ day of March ,2010. Richard Giles Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 9 of 59 EXHIBIT A to Giles Decl. Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 10 of 59 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIVE REPORT This report was written in reference to investigative activities related to the kidnapping of Trenton Duckett from his residence in the City of Leesburg. On September 8, 2006, FDLE Special Agent (SA) Molly Akin performed computer forensic imaging and analysis on tw^. laptop computers at the request of Special Agent Supervisor (SAS) John King. United States Secret Service (USSS) Special Agents Ramin Sawal, Edward Hughes, and Thomas Campbell of the Orlando Field Office assisted SA Akin with forensic imaging and analysis of these computers. These computers were forensically analyzed to determine the location of Trenton Duckett, who has been missing from Leesburg, Florida, since August 27, 2006. These computers were searched, due to exigent circumstances which exist in this case. SA Akin received an Averatec 3200 Series laptop, silver in color, from FDLE SA Tom Davis on September 8, 2006, at approximately 1845 hours. SA Davis obtained this laptop from Melinda Duckett's vehicle. The details obtained from the computer and hard drive are as follows: Averatec 3200 Series Silver Laptop Model: AV3250HX-01 HDD: Travelstar/Hitachi Capacity: 80 GB Model: IC25N080ATMR04-0 P/N: 08K0635 S/N: K4J23RAH Comments: No Jumpers On September 8, 2006, USSS SA Hughes created a forensic image of this computer using a write blocker and the forensic software, Encase. USSS SA Sawal utilized the forensic software, Forensic Toolkit (FTK) to analyze the contents of the image. Relevant documents retrieved from this computer are maintained in the related items section of this case file. On September 8, 2006, at approximately 2330 hours, Special Agent (SA) Akin received a black Compaq Presario computer from FDLE SA Denise Nevers. This computer was seized pursuant to a search warrant executed at Melinda Duckett's residence. The specifications for this Serial #: 13 Case Number:OR-20-0062 Office:Orlando AuthonAkin, Mary (Molly) Emily Activity End Date:09/08/2006 Activity Start Date:09/08/2006 Approved By:King, John L. Description Two Laptop Computers: Digital Evidence Imaging & Analysis THIS REPORT IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE AGENCY TO WHICH IT WAS DISSEMINATED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS EITHER PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. ITS CONTENTS ARE NOT TO BE DISTRIBUTED OUTSIDE YOUR AGENCY. Pagel 85420071126165611 NPP-3747 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 11 of 59 Case Number: OR-20-0062 IR Number: 13 computer were recorded as follows: Compaq Presario Black Laptop Model: 1456VQLIN HDD: Fujitsu Model: MHH2064AT Capacity: 6 GB S/N;01052793 Jumper: Cable Select SA Hughes used Encase to create a forensic image of this hard drive. Because there was little data on the hard drive, it was not forensically analyzed. The Compaq Presario and the hard drive retrieved from the Averatec 3200 laptop shall be sent to the FDLE/Tampa Crime Laboratory for a complete forensic examination. SA Akin entered these items into evidence on September 12, 2006. The exhibits were labeled as follows: MA1 MA2 MA3 Averatec Laptop Computers Compaq Presario Hitachi/Travelstar Harddrive (Hard Drive from Exhibit MA1) "Note: This case was submitted under the Leesburg Police Department's case number, #06083735. Therefore, the evidence will not appear in the AIMS systems under the FDLE Case Number OR-20-0052, The lab case number associated with this evidence is: 20060309114.** The documents retrieved from the Averatec Laptop and the evidence submission form are maintained in a related items section within this case file. Page 2 NPP-3748 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 12 of 59 FDLE Florida Department of Law Enforcement Tampa Bay Regional Operations Center Gerald M. Bailey Commissioner 4211 North Lois Avenue Tampa, Florida 33614 (800)226-1140 www.fdle.state.fl.us October 12, 2006 Chief William J. Chrisman Leesburg Police Department 115 East Magnolia Leesburg, FL 34748 FDLE NUMBER: SUBMISSION: AGENCY NUMBER: ATTN; EVID CUSTODIAN SUBPOENAS PERTA: O THIS CASE SHQyfcQ REFER TO HE FDLfc NUMBER VICTIM(S): OFFENSE(S): TRENTON, DUCKETT Kidnapping Lake County 08/27/2006 TO: 20060309114 004 06083735 Barbar-a Ramos-Mendez Crime laboratory Analyst Digital Evidence Section REFERENCE: This report has reference to item(s) submitted to FDLE on September 12, 2006 by Molly Akin referenced to a missing child. This report cross references case number 20060511306 from the Town of Lady Lake Police Department in reference to a death investigation case. EXHIBIT(S): Container Exhibit Description 02.000.000.00 Exhibit MA2 One (1) Compaq Presario 1830 model laptop computer with serial number 1V9BCTV520E0 with one (l)Fujitsu MHH2064AT model hard drive with serial number 01052793. 03.000.000.00 Exhibit MA3 One (1) Hitachi Travelstar model hard drive with serial number K4J23RAH. RESULT fS): Exhibit MA2 was analyzed for the presence of active and deleted data of potential evidentiary value. All data of potential evidentiary value was recorded on the DVD-R under the directory titled "\20060309114 SUB4\ExhMA2\Active Files ". A search for data in the unallocated space (where deleted data of potential value may be found) was performed and the data recovered was recorded on the DVD-R under the directory titled "\20060309114 SUB4\Exh-MA2\Unallocated Data Files ". A keyword search was performed. No keywords of value were found. Exhibit MA3 was analyzed for the presence of active and deleted data of potential evidentiary value. All data of potential evidentiary value was recorded on the DVD-R under the directory titled "\200603091J4 SUB4\ExhMA3\Active Files ". A search for data in the unallocated space was performed and the data recovered was recorded on the DVD-R under the directory titled "\20060309U4 SUB4\Exh-MA3\UnallocatedData Files ", A keyword search was performed. A listing of the keywords andfrequencyof occurrence was saved to the directory referenced above as "Keyword Search Report far Exh-MA3.rtf" In addition, text fragments of potential evidentiary value were saved to the file titled "Text Fragments from Exh-MA3.rtf" m this directory. Committed to Service • Integrity • Respect • Quality EMS Report 1200603091U S4 - Printed On : Friday, October 13, 2006 - Page 1 of 2 NPP-3229 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 13 of 59 Qief William J. Chrisman PAGE 2 of 2 FDLE NUMBER : 20060309114 004 REMARKS ; A complete listing of all active and deleted files recovered during this analysis was saved in the "Active Files" directory under the corresponding exhibit number. All data files and reports generated from the exhibits in this case were recorded on two (2) DVD-Rs in container number 01.002.000.00. In addition, a forensic backup was saved on seven (7) DVD-Rs in container 01.001.000.00. Please be advised that all data of potential evidentiary value is still present on the media that you submitted for analysis. The DVD-Rs mentioned in this report have been returned with your evidence. Additionally, analytical case file notes for this case are available upon request. EMS Report: 20060309114 S4 . Printed On ; Friday, October 11, 2006 - Page 2 of 2 NPP-3230 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 14 of 59 Encase report Exh-MA3 Exh-MA3 report\File Report\Exh-MA3\Encase report Exh-MA3 Device Name: Actual Date: Target Date: File Path: Case Number: Evidence Number: Examiner Name: Notes: Drive Type: File Integrity: Acquisition Hash: Verify Hash: EnCase Version: System Version: Is Physical: Raid Stripe Size: Error Granularity: Read Errors: CRC Errors: Compression: Total Size: Total Sectors: Exh-MA3 09/14/06 12:51:12PM 09/14/06 12:52:54PM F:\20060309114 S4\Exh-MA3.E01 20060309114 Exh-MA3 Barbara Mendez Hitachi HDD s/n K4J23RAH Fixed Completely Verified, 0 Errors ade27b8883101ace5ed0d 4d38a4b168 ade27b8883101ace5ed0d 4d38a4b168 3.22g Windows 2000 • 0 0 0 0 None 80,026,361,856 bytes (74.5GB) 156,301,488 Partitions Code Type NTFS 07 Volume File System: Sectors per cluster: Total Sectors: Total Clusters: Free Clusters: Volume Name: Driver Information: Page 1 Start Sector 0 NTFS 8 156,296,322 19,537,040 17,200,271 NTFS 3.1 ChkdskO L-C (—$Extend |—AOL Instant Messenger |—Config.Msi -Documents and Settings (-All Users |—Application Data Adobe i—Acrobat 1-6.0 l—Replicate 1—Security AOL •AOL Spyware Protection [-AOLDiag L-AOL L-ACSD j L_win32 I |-3.2.9.1 | 1—4.1.35.3 j-ACSDialer | L_Win32 j 1-3.2.9.1 Total Sectors 156,296,385 Size 74.5GB Drive Type: Bytes per sector: Total Capacity: Unallocated: Allocated: Volume Offset: Fixed 512 80,023,715,840 bytes (74.5GB) 70,452,310,016 bytes (65.6GB) 9,571,405,824 bytes (8.9GB) 63 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 15 of 59 EXHIBIT B to Giles Decl. Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 16 of 59 //AA/^-v/ &£**&?- Froip the M«frfT,» WW vUfcf? Main Topic; • My soo i* the main topic in this scared and nekhcr the awba nor any ochcr partia* involvement Wx>u)d sanyfromh>». Thm nave b c « so inaiiyaUM avenue* OurtpoopfehmwaM oNos<!hc«Koe«<rfwiiiii»goio*oobtt*. Tbhwiu^orttoJstawkJfixujooKifnm^riMtmjjvir old, th* toddler Pctog my son end temmintpcrtam aspect of my lift. iifrustratesmc to no end wbenaarve people wW» op aspect of how ifee!personally are trying to jwtge sny family and I. Husband: • 1 he event*, between my husband and 1 are DM for public itfastretioa, Ow chemistry was j«st not compatible and ye*, we had our differences and f ba>« <3cdft*divorce. Now I have botn waiting months for blm to sign the paperv Bui again, the focus... • Thcmcdia has divulged onto mc dying rny hair, my »motipn»l sutt wbik oo c*tD«r», and fo on . Emotions: emotions: I am not» publicly atwtionilpcnooai^ woes lorvakdowa Mis is tte privacy of my own home. 1 feci tan ke«pingrrrytmK} screwed csiatiiiijbisrt for my sun. Sitting in one spot and bawling or ghia? vr/selftote poHco srtalions lobby u surrendering m> '4>ntowhoever has him. My love tor Urn is too strong and defiant to fait into that pit Polygraphs 1 M far at any tavestipa^ tetiuuo^ m cot^ searches or awervirwa: say ftmliy and I have funy cooperated wWi tfaa local law enforcement aod now tbef«deraL Locally, tfacy do ac* have tbt necessary espciiewe and tm is why the FBI was called p. I have been instructed to only speak to an iadJvidttal FBI unit and afrythJng that tbay release to the roedu or public is vp to tfcem. They are * e professional* andl do not wad to sspade on amy of tbcu involvement so any other questions pertaining to the tacnnkal try**, pkwe direct free TO them. Suspects: ' Personally 1 do not want lo point thefingerend publicly bnnUia» anyone, I am too onxmooaUy "iNoh-c^iudmy »sumingc^cye«i3vrooJdc*Wa«M)dwnip8. Everyone H • suspect in diis tnanrr, no one has been excluded and since! m the taotber, tbc FBI would personally «>ina«4 taefirstif toy wild leads came op. Coping with...: • Honestly there ts no actual coping b» this matter. My ion i» my life «nd with him g^r t^ ^fy ,hm^ | canoo is exist. Nc^Vw^JnfrByseJflwsyirWidxscart3iarKjhelpmgni whatever ways I can does help with (he stress and aggravation. What does not help is when you walk in a store to buy something as soap!* as taltk and a demen peopls can't t*k«t»e* eyes off of yw. And I'm is* tafctsf stotf * r wpportrcorxsOistsjTtryuij tomaUstirc your mil alive, I n*an th« cold banks* ones thai are rxrtnttngfioaimknteadof focA^cwfind^rny >on. Speak lo a b d u c t o r « lfIcouldipe4*lowbo*vwli»TntMwo«^ did not care atxxd finding them, only to five my son bac* i? he cmiMte safe K feme with tnc again, where be ngntftiliybtteBjs Nowlainl*anftj»«ridtrtaJiibjai*]*^ can literally fwMife sinking. All I can say now b us* yew reap what you sow and somehow in the end of all this, you wfU get what's coma* *> yon ify w * » ' t (Jo wtui't risit He u » BIWO i»J aawent, there was no reason to take ban awayfrc*nd»osewl»really cared for him. Please give bbi back to the security and warmdi that ae know*. Baker Act: • FirstofaflJm going u> go fcrc^ this and u w H w ^ froaimyson. For two years actually tobo* and aij mother had bean trying to take my soo sway froro me b>using Buslw* poUc*, Sumto County, and the DejpartmeTnofChildren and Families DCF came into the piowe and did ownerow mmtifyHiow because of Josbmi Utxrcpom of chiWibu^ and neglect on my part. Myfamily laidljiaispsdthKHigballof ia«fr boci>s.fitn^yooiopletiog the cJu*planMithnyi»»w>prs, ^cbua on the other bandramraJBadpnrjory and was b noncoropliance MISC00127 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 17 of 59 ro his custody * w ttkcn tvttj completely. DCF closed aH ewes being unfounded tod if Joshua or his neffcr mAv *ny other folic rpporo, ihcy wjH be t*cn •>criminrt charges That Is all on Uutl matter •Ml now we'w done with h. Summary: That night approximately wound 6 we came home from a long day out and I'm oot going to go into STMJI details about the entire day or weekend for that nrntter. Anywaylfed him dinner he went to bed, 1 checked on him b<jfore myfriendscame and he WM E«k«p, My friend* arrived, we watohed one movie, got ready for another when I checked on Trent and found him missing, 1 searched the premise, but with him unfound, my friend called the police, I went to a deputy1! apartment in my complex, called family and friends and then everyone showed up and It was a mad bouse. Investigators scrambled around, tape was put up, my family was in distress and there I we* a bawling fool in the mist of it oil, not helping with anything. That is part of the reason why I am so determined to stay on track now. I nave had a few distraught and overly emotional moments in public, but if my eyes are shut with tears, they're not open lo look for him. That is the way 1 see it. MISC00128 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 18 of 59 EXHIBIT C to Giles Decl. Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 19 of 59 68) Exh-MA3\C\Documents and Settings\FOX\Local Settings\Temp\~Qil3782.tmp p i t f a l l that A s o n c o p e t n t h e F B I t h e c a 1 a n e a s t h e d o m e n i n 9 t h o a f f a r e r n e d r a t e a t n o w e z X n e c c w a s r t h e y s e a r c i n d i V i t e t o m t h e n o t w a a t s o t h t o t h e m P e r s o n r a n I d 0 n o o f t h i r y o e n n n o o n e m t t h e con t a c r a s I i w t h e e s s a 1 1 b e h e r d u a h e y n t n y e t a n any i n v e s t i a g a I f m y f a m i 1 y a w i t h t t h e 1 o h f e d e r a 1 L o c a a r y e X P e r i c n e e e d i n I I h a P o 1 y g r a P h s , s o r i n t e r n V i e F B I u n i t a n d 1 I I c 0 n 1 m e d i a T h e y a r e t h e t o i m p e g e o d e q u e s q u e s 0 t h e r a s P e c e c h n i c a 1 d a l y 1 y I d p u b 1 i c a a m t o o em n g s e v e n t s e is a s u b e e n has mo o t e h r firs t me c o p e H o n e s t l y ma t t e r . t h is one t h e 1 1 y k e e P i n g my s e l f 1 p i n g in m w h a t w s t r e s s an h t h e T 0 i n n e W h a s t 0 d k o f a 1 k try e c n s e t r e a y o i n i n o 1 t e W h a t to b n d a u . T g a b o g to d h e a ad of d o e s u y so d o z e n h o s e u t h t m a k e r t 1 e s f u s 0 I c3 o not 1 y pub 1 i o t i 0 n a 1 1 y w o u 1 d b e s u p a top e c e x 1 c c 1 c 1 t h e r t h e t i f a n y t n c 1 n i v d k a 1 y c e V e s t r s w s a n a o p r 0 o n i t 0 t , wan c 1 y i n b i P o e u d e F B s 0 1 t h e r e s i i s y son i s m h i n g I c i i u s y i w t h w a t e V e r w a y s a g r g r a V a t e M t b h d not m e h P e a r e e s u r s o X c u hel t i n g o pie the t h e s e y o n e s s i n g p s c a o n u P P u r t h a o n i s o m n e e r 0 s t t f e I a 1 , b e t y r f a n P a e s o t e n s 1 t e c 1l n l g q u I h a V f u e 1 a w e n f o t h e y d o n n d t h a t i e n i n s t r u s t e e s t s t 0 n 1 y s P e h i n g t h a t P u c l b 1 i c s s i o n s a 1 s 0 f t h e i y q u e s t i o e a s e d i r e t 0 t h u m i 1 V 0 1 v e a s c e c t d n d a I w o u i d 1 e p o i n i a t e d an and in t n d s Id p ads t d h i e c a n m w r i s n c r o a m e s f u r c e o t s w c t e s , a k t h i s a n r i n s P c t the y o y o n m e s n e are 1 1 y m n e h a V h y d P h y t 0 e y u P d i n V o e r t t h 0 n k a i a P n you gas e t h t A n d v e o live o i n t g my w a n t I k i n s i m p 1 e a s e i r e y e s o I I m n n o n e s t h a t a I m e a n , I i n g f i n g e r s o n . I c o u l d M y n t o p i t h I f son m a n e m e d i m e d i a n e i t h e r the r c h and t he s t r a y i n v o l v e m e n t s h o u l d r v p a r t i e s f b e e n so many o t h e r a v e n u e s ere h a v e t w e I on t o tt oo , t h i n s g s ave w a n d e r e d I CE S% lost the ese s e n c e t w o f 2 o « o s 6 f f i 6 s U 6 0 o U o U s E * 66 7 7 07 '7 ®7 07 U7 R8 t e t w s t r t 0 I 1 v e a i n s e i i n g e t I n e a s s u m i n g A E v e g • t a t t e r , I I a m n s o n a 1 i y u p n o a c t u a 1 1 c 0 c o p i n 1 i f e an d wit h h i m y a n d o i s e s x i s t . N i t h t h e s e a r c h a n a h I I can d 0 e s h e 1 P i o n w h e n e t h i t t a s t h t 0 r t i 1 1 a r e i n d i c c o n t h e h e i a h e e 1 g g 0 o w e 1 i w i t a m i f f t r e t s 1 t h i this sea any o t h e nor him. T h rom p e o p l e h hat some of f e e 1 '6 X6 E6 66 69) Exh-MA3\C\Documents and Settings\FOX\Local Settings\Temp\~Qil3782,tmp i. p s » " PS cs " PS hat is g o i n g on h e r e . This o w h o l e o r d e a l fo s h o u l d f o x u s c u s on an i n n o c e n t two t y e a r old, c Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 that t o l l d d l e r r t n a t a n t a s p e c t b e i n g my son of my l i f e . Filed 05/07/10 Page 20 of 59 n a d a n d m t h e It f u r i a t e d s s m e f r u s t r a t e s me to enno aive n a i v e p e o p l e with not a s p e c t ofl s 8 < > @ B " $ & « « ! " ' 51 a a D- F- H- J- L- N- P- R- T- E6 E6 66 7 '7 V7 ®7 07 U7 U7 8 alAAaeaelAAAaeiAAAae m o s t end V a « impo w h e n n X S a 0 e CE% B- 70) Exh-MA3\C\Documents and Settings\FOX\Local Settings\Temp\~Qil3782.tmp "0| ege "Y my " /tty how I f a m i l y I f e e l p e r s o n a l l y an ddl I. I are t r y i n g t to jud The e v e t n s nts b e t e w w e e n my h u s g b a n d and I Iare not for p u b l i c i l l u s t r a t e i o n . Y e s , we had our di f f e r e n c e s and I Ihav e f i l e d for d i v o r c e . We ar e c u r r e n t l y I I h a v e b e e n w a i t i n g m o n t h s for him to s i g h n the p a p e r s , but t h a t s . a n d e . Now I W O u r c o m e m h e m i s t y ry was j u s t j u s t not o m c o m p a t a b l e and y c o m p a t i b l e But a g i a n a i n , the f o x c u s . . . & the Teh ir, ... my & . T h e m e d i a has d e i v u l g e d e m o t i o n a l s t a t e w h i l e H i a E m o t i o n : e r s 0 n o V a c y i m y p i n g c r a o i n g o r m e y y c r y a n d c e s t a t i h a s e V e r n y 1 o V e t a 1 1 i n h a V e 0 r o t c a r e h a c k s o I I N o w e n s n o t f a r t h n k i n d t h e b a y s o n m i m ra e d i a p w h a r e e i n h w 0 o w i n g t 0 y o n d P 1 e a d e 1 1 y b e 1 o n a 1 l a 1 1 & I I 1 a n h i m t a k e h i m r o o r y a n d w a r m t h e W i t h h i s m o n d g o t h r o u g b e c a u e s e s o n y u s u i n g y 1 v e g f t i o M f d n b n i i f m i e P i s; I w h a n d m y 0 w e a d s c e h h e y n s s 0 a w 1 i n g l s n n s a n h i m a d f o r s P e a k i g a i n 1 i a b o u t f e c o u 1 d f a c a m s o u g h a n e r a n d i V i d i u a c k t 0 w t e 1 Y t h w h a t P t h e e n d u i f y o d ,1 e 1 l i c a n g s o H e i s d i n n o c a w a y s f G i V e P 1 e a e s b a k F o r t h e r h a h t h i s i t t a k b t r y i n g i n g B u s a f h z o b o e lam n I not I b P a r e a u b 1 d s o a t i n u s i s u r I a m o o 0 e V 1 d h e m a t c 0 1 a c h a n h a V r ig I y 0 , y d O h 0 m e n r e w e d o n 1 P s m e t E S i t n o r c 1 g 1 i s 0 b b y I d h i m i s t t h e o w h n a 1 1 y t o t i n d i n g s a f e b e t h e i n g d w i t h e f r a r t h e r 1 s t h a t h e h e r e I e n A 1 1 w h a t y a P t h i s o f t u d o n n g , r i g h t 1 i t e r a l 1 y n 1 y s so p i e t n e n t , r 0 m t h o s e h i m t b a c k e t h a g i t h t w o e y a r y e d b e e n F i r s a n d t h e n I t h e t h h e s t o t a k e m h n e 1 1 P 1 i k on on p u b l i c a l l y k d i c 1 s t r i d i g i n g r en t o s t r er t h e , 0 h d e h c u o w w h f m t h o t a t to me d y i n g c a m e r a , and e a h o r o t d a a w in t f a n s u h e 1 1 e s t h s 0 I 1 a r 1 1 r e h e f w i g i c y y o 1 i c 0 w n I y a i d g h i n t h t t i n g m y s e d e r in 0 s t r o n g a h a s T m t h a n 1 y t m e w i r u t h d y p a s a y f r c h i y u l 1 y s a y 0 e a n w i 1 1 t s r e w h e 1 1 i a n d e w a s w h o e s e c k n o w a c t u a a 1 1 a n t t g h 1 i g s o n e , L s i ha on e m t o t i o n a in I f e e 1 t n d n a e t h e s i n o n 1 f t o t s 0 g m y o n g w i 1 n d d i e f r e n t , I t I d i o g i V e t h m e a h a t t s i n g d a o m r e a 1 1 d d o n b e 1 o n g s i s t h a t d i n w a g e t w h a i g h t b e r e h e f e s i n k i n n o c e t n o r e a r e a 1 1 y u r t i y s l l y J o s I I m g i i s t s q h t a w a y a w a y f r u m t e r C i t my so s t h e t h a t n d n e a c r e e h e P t 0 n 1 e d i a n t I w I d i d s m y g a i n t t h I y i t y o t g b e f y 0 u n d s t s e g g e r i g h i n g n n t s o n c a r e s e c u o c s o p k t h P 1 r e o e w h a n d t o o u 1 n o n e a t I s I i V e 0 r e w e o m e c o m d a t f u n o w t 0 d t r i t h u a a o i n g t o u a s h e d f r o m m o m m e b o u n t y Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 a i n r P e n c c c 1 m d s m e r r w 0 m n o o m 1 0 t t ( s a i h e u e a i T h a e g e t 0 y d f e d o n c a m , w i h h s i n m b o 1 i c 0 m n e u s e P u t t h e a 1 1 i s e r m a d s i e P r e I s e e t D C F r o u s r e P e r M y h o 0 P e f 1 t h i t t e d c o m p 1 c 0 m P a s e s m h r w i e y 1 o n t n e t i m n y c e h 1 t h h e c i n 0 o f s y i P i a 1 e b e 0 t 1 1 t h n i g 1I t h o m e f r o i n t o 0 0 w e e k e r h i m n d 0 n h d a n d e a t w a t e e n w e I g u t w i t h i I c e , c P 1 e X , V e r y o e n i n V e u P , m y i i r e 1 , n o t 0 f P a r t t o i n G d f e w a U P u b 1 n m y e y e s o P e n 0 t i t e s u t m n d i h c I I a s h d i n m D a m V e r t a m s n g u r n c t e i n h e b a t P e P a r i n t e s t i g a s 0 f i 1 y a f i n , c o 1 0 g e r y e s o 1 y u n f g r m a k e t a k e m a t t a p p r a 1 s m a 1 d f o i n n e f b m w w e h e d I c s e a r h i m I w e n 1 1 e d e V e t i g a f a m i I w a e 1 P i t h e s t a y e i s t u c , i f m t o m a r y o o 1 r r e a o h c n t r 0 1 s n r 0 r b y 1 x i n g d h h o I s n e h u t m o t c n a r a h T i h d 1 s n i a 0 u a e n e r m a d e t t a e r e a s m k e d f 0 e c e n t 0 f a m i y o n e t 0 r s w a y a b h e e a s y n o a u 9 h b u t e y e o o k H u h s e n t t h e 0 n s i 1 d I 1 y c d s t h n d n y a a t a i t w 1 o d t u a 1 s n a 1 o n t t s f b e ! y a 1 t h n e b e e V i o h e n d d y h 0 s c s w 1 P i n o t a t a o r a rt M e i n l a i u n n T o p c i i c : E m o t i o n s : Polygraphia!,: S u s p e c t : s : C o p i n g with d u c k t o r : B a k e r e r A c t : N a n y c CNN 0 P b a I o J e r g c u s h a t e d 0 t s c n d f C h i c t e e c a u b u s e Ju mP m P 1 e o s h u u y r y t o d y i s a n d h e r r i m i n o w Filed 05/07/10 Page 21 of 59 i r r u s e a e d t e a w i f n w w h f a a e 1 d 1 e a o f n d t h 1 = i o n P e r s a y e r e J 0 1 s e 1 c e r a r o u n ci L y o u t a n d I a b s a i 1 s a t m e a t a t e n t b e t 0 e f o r e m b f w M y P e , r e g 0 t T r e n t o n P r e m i S i s f r i n , my e t P u t y s a n d f r i e n w e d u P a n r a b m m b 1 e d i n s d X s t r i n g t o 0 1 n g w i t h a n r e a s o n n r a c k h o w n n d 0 V e r 1 y h e y h a V e r e s u h u t h i m T h d f 0 t d e r a a s e a d d e i y w o n w a i w t h w i t h . . . d r n d n r J 0 s n e d 1 r o u g n g t t h e Ju r y a s t D C F s h u a r e P h a r g w e G U w e I m U t t e r i I , f 0 r e i e n d d y f n d f e c s e n d P P a r s n a i t a r o u s d n t h t h i n h y I 1 w e m o t 0 t h i t h t i s a n a u a 1 e a e t h n d k e c 1 a n r 0 s e s r e e h g h h o a a c a m e n O t e h e A n y I m y a r s 0 r a o u n d e P r c a 1 1 e t m e d t h w a s n d , i s t r e in i i s g I a d f F n d d s c t 0 1 1 o c a s e e r h w a s n a w o e s s d o r t o r s T h d o n e g n W c f r n e e n e a t e s m I i o n a 1 e 1 P i e y t e a r t h e a m i 1 i d n f a 1 s n m y f t h P 1 a a n d i n a y s e d a h i s t z t s i a t w i t o n h o j m i n g t 0 t i r e d a a y i I h e k c k e r i e n d s i V e d a n 0 t h e r w h i m m i s m i s e , m d t h e P t i n m y a n d t h e m a d h o a p e w a s s s s n a n d t o f i t T h a t s o d e t I h a V e h m o m e n t d m e k e s , t h e y w a y i I 0 & : S o p e a k to ab I n e t e r v i e w S e p t e m b e r 7 t h , 2006 from F r o m t h e M o t h e r s p o i n t of v i e w 01 72) Exh-MA3\C\Documents and Settings\FOX\My Documents\News on TrentVNancy Graves, wps e f i n g e r mber 7 t h , and p u b l i c l y 2006 h u m i l i C N N I n t e r v i e w - S e p t e Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 22 of 59 o f v i e w s p o i n t t.. h e M cI t: h e r F r• o m T o p i . c : M ai i. n i e a r c h m a i. n t o p i c i. n t h i s a n d n e! i t s o n is t. h e M y i n v o 1 V e m e n t n o r 0 t h e r a n y m e d i a s t h e h e r P a r t i e s h i m . h a V e b e e n s o m a n y f r o m T h e r e s t r a y o t h o u 1 d h a V e w a n d e r e d o n t o , t h a t I a V e n u e s f e e h e r P e o p 1 e e s s e n c e o f w h a t i s t h e o f 1 o s t g o i n g 0 n h e 1 S 0 m e f o c u s o n a n i n n 0 c e n 0 r d e a 1 s h 0 u 1 d T h i s w h o 1 e r e m y s o n t h a t b e i n g a n d 0 1 d , t 0 d d 1 e r t h e t t w o y e a r m y 1 i f e a s p e c t o f i m P o r t a n t m o s t w h e n e n d n a i v e p e o p l e f r u s t r a t e s m e to no w i t I t o f h 0 w I f e e 1 a r e t r y i n g a s P e c t t h n 0 p e r s 0 n a l 1 y o Ju d g e m y f a m i 1 y a n d i H u s b a n d : b e t w e e n m y h u s b a n d a n d I a r e n o t f o r e v e n t s T h e 0 u r c h e m i s t r y w a s i 1 1 u s t r a t i 0 n n 0 t j u s t P u b 1 i c h a d o u r d i f f e r e n c e s a n d a n d I c o m P a t i to 1 e y e s , w e h a V e f o r d i V 0 r c e N o w I b e e n w a i t i n g f i 1 e d h a V e s i g n p a P e r s B u t h i m t o t h e a g a i n , f o r t h m o n t h s f o c u s & e o n t o me d y i n g m y d i v u l g e d h a i r , m e d i a h a s m y T h e c a m e r a , a n d s o o n 0 n & s t a t e w h i 1 e e m o t i 0 n a 1 E m o t i o n s : a p u b l i c l y am n o t e m o t i o n a l I E m o t i o n s : p e r s o n a i t i s i n t h e d o w n I b r e a k 0 f m y n d w h e n 0 P r i v a c y t h a t k e e P i n g m y h e a d f e e 1 s c r e w e d I h 0 m e 0 n w n n o t h e l P s c r a z y t 0 a i d a n d m e i n s t r a i g h t t g 0 i n g i n m y o n e f o r s 0 n . S i t t i n g s p o t a n d s e a r c h b a h e m y s e l f t o t h e s t a t i o n s o r 1 o b w 1 i n g P o 1 i c e g i u i n g t o m y s o n w h 0 e V e r h a s h i m s u r r e n d e r i n g i s M y b y d e f i a n t i s t 0 0 s t r 0 n g a n d t o f a 1 1 f 0 r h i m 1 o V e i n t h a t t o P i t P o l y g r a p h : i n v e s t i g a t i v e t e c h n i q u e s a r e f a r as a n y A s c o n c e s t r e s s t h e y b e w h e t h e r t e s t s , P h p 0 1 y g r a p h s , r n e d m y o r i n t e r V i e w s f a m i 1 y a n d i s e a r c h e s h a y s i c a 1 1 o c a 1 w i t h t h e 1 a w e n f 0 r c e m e n c o o P e r a t e d v e f u 1 1 y t h e f e d e r a 1 . L 0 c a 1 1 y , t h e y d o n o w n o t a n d h a v e t e x p e r i e n c e a n d t h a t i s w h y t h e n e c e s s a r y F B I t h e a v e n s r i n I b e e i n t u c t e c a 1 1 e d h d t 0 0 n 1 y s p w a s a n d F B I u n i t t o a n i n d i v i d u a 1 a n y t h i n g t h a t e a k t o r r e 1 e a s e t 0 t h e m e d i a i s u I m h e y P u b 1 i c g o i n g I t h i s a n d t h e n w a n t s q u a s h e d t h r o u g h i t t 0 b e g 0 t h e h i g h 1 i g h t a w a y f r o m m y i t t a k e s s o n c a u s e F a c t u a 1 i y h i s J o s h u a a n d m o t h e r o r h a d t w 0 b y e a r s m y s 0 n a w a y f r 0 m t 0 t a k e m e b y t r y i n g u s i n g e e n B a n d C 0 u n t y , S u m t e r t h e D e P a r t m e n t u s h n e 1 l P o 1 i c e , a n d F a m i 1 i e s D c F c a m e i n t o o f t h e C h i l d r e n P i c t n u m e r o u s i n V e s t i g a t i o n s a n d d i d b e c a u s e o f u r e J o r e p 0 r t s c h i l d a b u s e o f a n d n e g 1 e c t s f a 1 s e s h u a 0 f a m i l y a n d I M y t h r o u g h n m y a 1 1 j u m p e d o f P a r t f i n a 1 1 y t h e h o o P s , c a s e t h e i r c 0 m P 1 e t i n g w i t P I a n t h e o t h e r J o s h u a 0 n h a n d c o 1 o r s . c o m m i t h f 1 y i n g a n d w a s i n n o n c o m P 1 i a n c e s 0 h i s t e d c u s t 0 P e r j u r y a w a y t a k e n c o m p 1 e t e 1 y • D C F c 1 o s e d d y w a s a 1 1 c a s u n f o u n d e d a n d i f J o s h u a o r h i s m o t h e r e s b e i n g m a f a 1 s e r e p o r t s , o t h e r t h e y w i 1 1 b e t a k e n k e a n y a s i s T h a t a 1 1 0 n t h a t m a t t e r c h a r g e s c r i m i n a l a n d d o n e w i t h i t r e n o w w e S u m m i3 r y : n .i g h t T h ia t a 1 o n g r o m d e t a i 1 m a 1 1 m a t t e r t h a t c h e c b e d , I a s 1 e h e w a s e m o V i e , g o a n d f T r e n t b u t i s e , w i o 1 i c e I w e a p p r 0i X i m a t e i y d a y 0 u t a n d i s a b o u t t h e e n A n y w a y f e I k e d 0 n h i m b e f e P f r i e n d M y t r e a d y f o r a n o u n d h i m m i s s i t h h i m u n f o u n d n t t o a d e p u t y a :r o 'a n d n o t g i r e d a h i m d r e m y a r r i V t h e r w i g , m y f r s a P a r m t d o s o n i6 W 1a 0 i n g y i f e h s i t n r d e e e m o r n e r i e n , w n I a r c n d e n t c a m t 0 w e e h e d s e w c h h e d c a 1 i n e h i3 m e i n t 0 g 0 k e n d f o w e n t t c a m e a n a t c h e d e c k e d 0 t h e P r 1 e d t h e m y c 0 m f s r 0 d o n n e m p P 1 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 f a m i l y a n d c a 1 1 e d e x , i t w a s a u p a n d h o w e d t a P e a r 0 u n d , c r a m b 1 e a n m i t n e k i s t r 0 f i s t s P a r t 0 n a y o V e r d a r y e s f 0 r h a a n d e s s a 1 1 i t t h e 0 f n t r a c k e m 0 t 1 y e s h u t i m T h , o i w a t h n r e w 0 n i t t e r e o t a s o I a 1 h t i s I h e n h m o e a t h f r i m a d w a s w a 1 P i w h y a V e m e n r s , e w I g o i n F i r s t o f a l l I m t i 1 s t s <3 u I I w a n t t h e n a w a y t h h g i 1 i g h 1 i g h t h e m c y s o n a w a y f r o t a k e y 1 F P 1 i k o l z t ' i c e t ~ n g e n h P s n g i h t s t a y d s a n d o u s e u t u P , a b a w 1 w i t h a m s o a d a i n P u h e y r e I s e e t 0 g o a s h e d b e f r 0 m m y m m e b y o u n t y , a n 1 € P P L s u m t e r c ' N b a, <? 0a6O66uu666u6u6u66tiou666 , Filed 05/07/10 Page 23 of 59 i a f b t I m n n d e 1 n i h n y g y e w i 0 t e n e f f t h t e d V c t , e t m o n m s b 0 P s a o i r i V e i i 1 g i t u e r y t g a l y 0 n 0 r w a t T h n e d t r a u g h i f t n t 0 i n e s s h a o t m 1 s s i e t s a y o o ~ t h r o u g h t h i s c a u e s e i t t a k e s 0 n b t r y i n g u s u i n g i n g B u s h d t h e D P e p a t h e ~ ® D « i $ n$ €$ a n d s t t 0 n e 1 r t m , Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 24 of 59 EXHIBIT D to Giles Decl. Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 25 of 59 189) Exh-MA3\C\Documents and SettingsVFOXVMy Documents\Personal\letters\stevl.wps H e y b e s t e g 0 s t l y w i t h I s 0 e 1 I n o t , b u h a d I g o P r e c a f o t m 0 t e b w d m e n r n c o o d g i t S e p t e m b e r t h o u g I c w a y t 0 S o r i n g , r i g h t n N a n c y G r V e t g 0 t i n a n o t h e u P h 0 0 k e d I m t d 0 i t o t a 1 k e d t P i y 0 u r i t i a t e , L a t e 1 1 , m e w a w n c a o i n h 0 r h i n g m I u t s i t h t o n 1 e y c a u s g o g t h e T h e I o t e T r s t a t g 0 i c X h e s t i s t r e a h e wkswp w i t d b e 0 n t h s n d i n s 1 1 h o m n o w , d f u s e s m o t 0 i n n o t a y i n g I a n d e V e n a s e a t e t h a t o f e 0 w n e o t h e r w a n t e n t o n i n L y i n g t O e a d a n o n s ? s s w i t r e a , b l y I h 7 t h h t t h a 0 n t a c t I r y m I 0 w m a c e f r h e P h 0 r , a n d t o t h n g f i n o y 0 u c t u r e s t h e s u r P a 1 a t i d e 0 I e 0 y 0 u r e o r i n V e I w t h e r m a 1 0 k n o w W i n d s a T h e q r s 0 f t h i n g s t t 0 g e t s a k e c b e c d h i s I w e n h a I u t 2 0 0 6 t t h i y 0 u n 0 t f i X i o m C N i n n e t h e n i n t e e s 0 t h e n a n d w a y r i s e d 1 L U t 1 i w a n t k n o w n t , c t o 0 n 1 o V e e i s n e w h i f t h e m e r e 1 o t 0 u e s t i m y a i m a y i n h 0 m e o u n t y a u g h t b a c k t u P 1 i t t 1 w a s t s w o u a n d t h a n d w n g t 0 N a n d 0 n 6 I m e r n e t I a r c o m P 1 e t t e t h i n g i f I i f e h t e r a 1 t o m a n y o h e a p •? e , b u t h e Ju s t i c h d e y 1 1 V i 1 1 f m 0 n I o n P a r t m l o o k i t h e n i c e a t a d e a d w a r d s M a t o e d r i h i n k i s l d 0 r i b i e a o n L u t r b e t h e s e e h o w t i n g t h e o n a n o V e t s h e a d r , m y c o m C o n f u s i k e I s e r t h e i n t h e h a v e m a d e a s b e e 1 y a n d o V e o u n e t h a s I t t t o m 1 a n d 1 0 t 0 o m u 0 e s n t h 0 1 d a s , wh e y t h a s u P P 0 s e n t c 0 n g i n t a r e a 0 a n d s a 1 1 a n d i n S u f a m i 1 r i o n t V e a n d n 3 a b b e e n i t o V n t u r I h a t o f t 0 w n n 0 t o V e o r d a n f o c h h e 1 P m e t 0 e r e I t t h e e i s , m P 1 e X o i s r n 0 t I i e I d a m t e r 1 i V y h e o t a 1 1 L d a b s o l u t h i n g s i s b u t i n t e r V r t h e P s e t t 0 P u t e r , i n g a s a i d w h e o t h e r d m a i 1 g o i n e r t h n e d u V e n o t h e p s a p a a n i m u t o f d w h a r m e a t a t h e m a t d b y H o w 7 w h e t h I d 0 n t m n s u C o u n t e s h e r d a n d I \m ry g e P s P 1 a r t m e t t t o 1 1 e n n e n t e w h o i e h 0 m y b u h e n a y I a n n e i d 1 a c e m e d i h e n o d e r n e w n e c t 1 1 I , a P d t e d c e I n t s a t e 0 n t , e a 1 I d o f o w , b 1 e t t i i c e a e r k n 0 w a r e w y A n y a y 1 i X o r w 0 n t a m h e r s u t o k e d n t n e g d Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 26 of 59 EXHIBIT E to Giles Decl. Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 27 of 59 Gary L. Barrett, Jr, Detective Sergeant Leesburg Police Department Truth Verification Examiner 115 East Magnolia Street Leesburg. Florida. 34748 (352)728-9862 CONFIDENTIAL TRUTH VERIFICATION REPORT August 28th, 2006 ARRANGEMENTS On this date, the subject, Melinda M. Duckett, SSN: 109-74-3358, having a date of birth of August 14,1985, was interviewed and submitted to a detection of deception examination. Standardized Voice Stress Analysis techniques with a self calibrating Digital Voice Stress Analyzer was utilized. A Dell Desktop Computer, serial number CN-0Y0919-70821-36M3GVC was used. EXAMINER'S CREDENTIALS This examiner has practiced voice stress analysis and detection of deception since April 11th, 2003. The Baker Group, E. Gary Baker, Ph.D. awarded the title of Law Enforcement Examiner by examination. The examiner is a sworn law enforcement officer of the Leesburg Police Department and has been employed Since November, 1992. The examiner has been assigned to the Criminal Investigations Division since June 1996. PURPOSE The subject was interviewed and examined for the purpose of determining their knowledge and/or possible involvement in the disappearance of Trenton J. Duckett, white male, 2 years of age, the subject's son. CASE INFORMATION This was an on-going investigation, being conducted by members of the Leesburg Police Department and members of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, relative to the child being reported missing and possibly abducted from his residence on August 27th, 2006, between the hours of 1900 and 2100 hrs. NPP-2250 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 28 of 59 PROCEDURE International Society of Stress Analysts standardized truth verification procedures were exercised throughout the examination. The subject signed a release and acknowledged that the examination was taken freely and that he was in good health. Questions were reviewed with the subject to protect against outside issues and to insure that only the issues in question were relevant to the examination. There were four test administered, consisting of relevant, irrelevant, control and outside issue questions regarding the subject and the issues in question. Test number one (1): Irrelevant/Relevant Primary Test Is your first name Melinda? Do you live in Leesburg, Florida? Are you a citizen of the United States? Do you know who broke into your apartment? Is today Monday? Did you allow anyone other than Chris and David into your apartment? Is your last name Duckett? Is this the month of August? YES YES YES NO YES NO YES YES Test number two (2): Irrelevant/Relevant Primary Test Is your first name Sarah? Do you live in Orlando, Florida? Are you a citizen of the United States? Do you know who took Trenton from your apartment? Is today Saturday? Did you take Trenton to a safe place? Is your last name Jefferson? Is this the month of December? NO NO YES NO NO NO NO NO NPP-2251 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 29 of 59 Test number three (3): Irrelevant/Relevant Primary Test Is your first name Melinda? YES Do you live in Leesburg, Florida? YES Are you a citizen of the United States? YES Do you know who abducted Trenton? NO Is today Monday? YES Did you make up the story about Trenton being taken?NO Is your last name Duckett? YES Is this the month of August? YES Test number four (4): Irrelevant/Relevant Primary Test Is your first name Melinda? Do you live in Leesburg, Florida? Are you a citizen of the United States? Are you being truthful about Trenton? Is today Monday? Did you lie during this investigation? Is your last name Duckett? Is this the month of August? YES YES YES YES YES NO YES YES Test number five (5): Irrelevant/Relevant Primary Test Is your first name Melinda? Do you live in Leesburg, Florida? Are you a citizen of the United States? Is Trenton in Orlando? Is today Monday? Have you ensured Trenton's safety? Is your last name Duckett? Is this the month of August? YES YES YES NO YES NO YES YES CONCLUSION Based upon the case details provided by the subject, upon standardized chart reading criteria and the stress present in the answers of the subject, to the NPP-2252 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 30 of 59 relevant questions, it is the professional opinion of this examiner that there is deception indicated concerning the relevant questions regarding the disappearance of Trenton J. Duckett, 2 years of age. Lk"> • $<WT . C=j5ty»y^ Gary L, Barrett, Jr., Delta 3 Detective Sergeant Leesburg Police Department Criminal Investigations Division NPP-2253 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 File Name Filed 05/07/10 Page 31 of 59 File No. T. V. INTERVIEW DATA SHEET SUBJECT: L, Mi, F. i- U U t Q v ^ l u c ^ ^ fVAgJtPATE: B A f t ) 6<c ; SSAN ^ - " T H Tfrsrfe DOB fi^-frS^ M fFfcAcQ J^ACE A r a £ ~ ADDRESS >M/b U 6 4 ^ ^ ^fe / * f S ^ 4 ^ ^ ^ ^ j f Ph &g&g57 - 7 5 5 ^ ID: HEIGHT M ft /Q> in,"^66 lbs fo/lHAIR /?>^Q EYES STATE/=^C EXPIRES DRIVER'S LIC NO./ID Background Information , Education, High School 1, 2, 3, 4, Grad.^lVJ College Z/S GSchool Military,® N, AF, M, CG Yrs total Disch. type ^fe*fl£AltjLDate Specialized training, S-2.N 5c\-PPij SPGCZAUZJ*^P to£j*iu I. Q. Score if known UW&Qi General physical condition? Good f*fair Poor Hospitalized past two years? S t s - CnZu> &z25i-< /<*i& -S^ec^y Trouble with nerves? ^ S Any prescribed medication now? i > C ~£x c c Ever under care of Psychiatrist or Psychologist? i^L Ever a patient in a mental hospital? JO "O Any heart trouble or high blood pressure? Mz^ j&t^i* j&Zd».< Any pills or medicine taken in past 8 hours? S&, e*//*?u*"g J£ J^ics. Number of hours of sleep last night? *ft Soundly oJS »yg>£t-<i Ever taken a lie detector test before? ?Q c> Ever been arrested, convicted, or taken to jail? O £• O&Lx-^Q Marital Status >A*iftE» tx J<6}#2Q?*A No. Children & Ages NPP-2254 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 32 of 59 EXAMINER'S OBSERVATION ^ • Basic current health: Alert, Well appearing, no apparent distress. Q>l N • Mental Status: Alert and oriented to person, place and time. Q)I N • Mental Status: Memory, speech and thought intadAY/V N • Mental Status: Affect and mood are apjajppiiateJ^1/ N • Mental Ability: Dull Low Average (Above Average Superior Occupation: 3 T U ^ ^ T " Employer ftOfr^>/ ^CTn'ZV Length of Employment .From To Present. Prior Employers, (if necessary) From To From To '.^Procedure and instrumentation explained? 5^5 m _Polygraph ^Vbice ^Release signed? m. Client Information Journal Client Co. or Agency Address Client representative Case Details provided by: Purpose of examination: Phone_ Title_ Title IS EPA REQUIRED TO BE FOLLOWED REGARDING THIS EXAMINATION? Y/ N IF SO, then: EPA documents reviewed/ attached? Request date Time 48hrs EPA read to employee _, Reason for suspicion explained? _ Copy to emp, EPA documents signed? Act Release Time Log Appointment m. Arrived m. Pre-test Start m. Exam end m. Subject left exam room m. Client verbally advised of opinion at m. Report mailed / / Examination location Observer' name SIGNED: Title Examiner, License No. Financial Information FEE: ( )Cash ( ) Invoice date NPP-2255 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 33 of 59 TRUTH VERIFICATION EXAMINATION AUTHORIZATION AND RELEASE I, frMl^M M.^uccgnr SSAN \V\~-H'35S$ DQB 9 7 ? " & S " do hereby request voluntarily, without duress, coercion, threats, promise of reward or immunity, agree to submit to an interview, and to be examined by the VOICE STRESS ANALYZER, a detection of deception technique, regarding the truthfulness of my statements concerning: T^<-"kSA^-^W^tg, Csf "?Cc^T^yo jXtOtx^TT -2.Hf44> O ^ A&& . I understand that this intei^iew and examination is being requested by myself and by: I do hereby declare that I am, to the best of my knowledge, in good health, and not undergoing treatment for any illness, mental or emotional disease. I have had the nature and procedure of this examination explained to me, and I have also been advised that I have an absolute right to refuse to submit to an examination. I have been told that I can stop talking and end the interview and examination at any time, without prejudice. I hereby authorize the examiner to tape record my statements, to place the necessary apparatus on my person, and to use any electronic hearing or recording devices operated contemporaneously with this examination. I do release, absolve, and forever hold harmless, the Examiner, Monitor, and Witness shown below, the Examiner's clients, agents, agency, firm, interviewers, employees, and anyone acting on their behalf, from any liability flowing from any matter, act, or thing arising out of the aforementioned interview and examination, including, but not limited to the results or opinions therefrom. I further hereby agree and authorize the disclosure, both orally and in writing the results and opinions of the interview, and examination, including but not limited to any conversation, comments, admissions or statements made by me during the interview and examination to: S4*\>4.}. Circa a. .g&iJr STrfs/6 J4-7T6&V&S *?, <?**<.£*£. — r" " y : *" Having been made clearly aware that statements I may make will be used, that I have an absolute right to refuse to submit to an examination, and that I may discontinue the interview and examination at any time, I am willing to submit to an interview and truth verification examination freely without promise of reward, without force, threat, or duress being exerted on me. I have carefully read this Authorization and Release and agree fully to the conditions herein. SIGNED: V VTY(\^X^d^~ DATE: p f f t A f t - a c TIMEx*^*? EXAMINER"vfrv-Sc • j j y w & j ^ i MONITOR & Examinee. WITNESS: 'm. Lie. NoJ-fQ LOCATION xfrb C3&. NPP-2256 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 34 of 59 IRRELEVANT / RELEVANT PRIMARY TEST TEST NO. SUBJECT «NiUV\Wjl£frr I -DATE &)3&/Cfc TIMEp5% QUESTION 1. 2. 3. 4. ANSWER Is your first name K.\fi y -x>^ & A Do you live in ^<L&5 &\tl<» t Fi Are you a citizen ofthe United States? Do you know who o£oafc. X>JTS S Q,_VC>_ A 5. Is today ^ x ^ i ^ A n ? fir- ? ? 6. Did vou Apa>»o;»t.. &»ugg- T U A ^ Cg/ZzS 4d>*<sz±y -xcirk % K 7. is your last name ^>wr M3*TT? ^ 8. Is this the month of y£W>ivS>? ANALYSIS: Dl NDI L_ O ~i~ Q «-V» NO NPP-2257 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 35 of 59 t-orensic voice nuaiysis v,uimuviiuai Examiner Det Sgt Gary Barrett Date: 8/28/2006 12:00:00AM Location: LPD CID Case* 06083735 I>»I— . 1 . - n > V Selection*: Subject: Test: Charge: Case: 8/28/2006 Melinda Duckett GQT None Felony Recording*; 1 in-. Time Begin: End: Total 1 6.927 7.766 0.839 Selection*: Time Begin: End: Total 2 » I'll. ! > » * / • " » ^ » 11 » III " * 10.915 11.859 0.944 ' ^/\**W*A Selection*: * / Time Begin: End: Total 3 Time Begin: End: Total 7 Selection*: 4 Time Begin: End: Total 20.045 21.199 1.154 Time Begin: End: Total 53.103 53.943 0.84 A ^ * < - Selection*: Selection*: 15.532 16.687 1.155 Time Begin: End: Total 26.342 27.181 0.839 57.196 58.246 1.05 Selection*: Selection*: 6 8 Time Begin: End: Total 60.87 61.919 1.049 NPP-2258 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 36 of 59 IRRELEVANT / RELEVANT PRIMARY TEST TEST NO. SUBJECT V*.\>*Q(jgfr- ^ -DATE ? J ^ s / ^ TIME C g ^ l QUESTION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ANSWER Is your first name S>y2,AH ? Do you live in QYl^/wsfr ^ ( p c ? Are you a citizen of the United States? Do you know who " - T ^ A L *Ttt.>lCffo3» ffe^*i >Uc A^~ Is today S ^ T U J U ^ S ? Did v o u T w . ^ " T g i / f r - c ^ T O # ^»f (- rb? (.re. Is your last name J tjcgfcg^ovi ? Is this the month of '^XJJLVJ&SZ. . """"? ANALYSIS: Dl NDI O Q , -4? ? Q <^ f> C^ O NO NPP-2259 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 37 of 59 <cuuiiueiiuai Examiner: Date: Location: Case#: f-orensic voice «naiysis Subject: Test: Charge: Case: Det Sgt Gary Barrett 8/28/2006 12:00:00AM LPD CID 06083735 Melinda Duckett GQT None Felony 8/28/2006 Recordings ^mmjf^^K^^^ Selection*: Time Begin: End: Total 1 / ^"K IWM»Wt»l|P«|i . j I • r »>i/T T ^ ^ ^ M 15.742 16.435 0.693 Selection*: 24.747 25.691 0.944 Selection*: " * > W » H ( / <•*•' Selection*: I III Time Begin: End: Total 11.082 12.09 Time Begin: End: Total 20.024 20.78 0.756 Time Begin: End: Total 29.91 30.792 0.882 1.008 Aw xwn'umi Time Begin: End: Total Selection*: Selection*: )» Time Begin: End: Total Selection*: 7.808 8.753 0.945 . . I . » ^ ^ * < M . Hlfcl^liilll'* lllli^iMUll »••»» Time Begin: End: Total 33.877 34.696 0.819 Selection*: 8 Time Begin: End: Total 36,774 37.655 0.881 NPP-2260 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 38 of 59 IRRELEVANT / RELEVANT PRIMARY TEST TEST NO. SUBJECT lM/WtfF5r 3 -DATE ^fog/Ofr TIME C > 5 % QUESTION 1, 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ANSWER Is your first name t ^ . e x ^ s A Do you live in C J ^ S A O . ^ , -Pc Are you a citizen of the United States? Do you know who AfcDvxOLCs Tfi4a?7*>a> ? Is today \NXfe^5A^ ? Didvou AAftH?. uft TUL 5ftcfey o* T ^ t - S ^ f ^ ^ 7 Is your last name £>UCttjfrr ? T^JOJ-J Is this the month of A-*w\flUST~. ~? ANALYSIS: Dl NDI ± —H (^) O -«^~V- NO NPP-2261 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 39 of 59 V.UU11UCU Urtl Examiner: Date: Location: Case* t-orensic voice nuaiysig Det Sgt Gary Barrett 8/28/2006 12:00:00AM LPD CID 06083735 Subject: Test: Charge: Case: Melinda Duckett GQT None Felony ^jT Selection*: 1 JVVA Time Begin: End: Total 9.04 Selection*: 8/28/2006 Recording*: \m*«~ | » >H.ilHMi<<"»"Hl» 2 Time Begin: End: Total 9.985 0.945 12.211 13.021 0.81 MM^imM^NWM* ,> ,,••*•**** *n^*Trr m i 11 a J H . JI n- i-| jr Selection*: 3 Time Begin: End: Total 16.394 17.406 1.012 Selection*: 4 Time Begin: End: Total 20.645 21.657 1.012 Selection*: 5 Time Begin; End: Total 25.097 26.042 0.945 Selection*: 6 Time Begin: End: Total 33.126 34.003 0.877 Selection*: 7 Time Begin: End: Total 36.904 37.579 0.675 Selection*: 8 Time Begin: End: Total 39.873 40.682 0.809 NPP-2262 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 40 of 59 IRRELEVANT / RELEVANT PRIMARY TEST TEST NO. SUBJECT frVvhyi/jHr- 1 -DATE ^ U ^ ) Off TIME C 5 5 Q QUESTION ANSWER 1. Is your first name M C ^ X r ^ b A 2. Do you live in Ig.jg >£<•*&(;,, F t , 3. Are you a citizen of the United States? ? -fr* •+" 4. -P0~7oTJkllOWWlTO Aft*, Spy* 3*fcxaC TfcW7aP*U / ^ C g r ? fr?f-47£^ -f- 5. 6. 7. 8. Is today ?Ate>^As ? Didvou VC** Wa,3>X I I V L S tc^ofcsy-rG/t r a i ^ Is vour last name b a vufh? Is this the month of * W 6 a s r ? ANALYSIS: Dl NDI ? -j— Q -j- j - NO NPP-2263 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 41 of 59 Forensic Voice Analysis ^onnaentiai Examiner: Date: Location: Case*: Subject: Test: Charge: Case: Det Sgt Gary Barrett 8/28/2006 12:00:00AM LPD CID 06083735 8/28/2006 Melinda Duckett GQT None Felony Recording*: A.. Selection*: Time Begin. End: Total 1 l mmmam0mJf ^V^nm Selection*: » . ••,- Time Begin: End: Total 3 4.438 5.037 0.599 Selection*: »««J™ 11.814 12714 0.9 Selection*: Time Begin: End: Total 2 ^WwJH,,,^ Time Begin: End: Total 4 ^y*Vv Selection*: 5 jT Selection*: Time Begin: End: Total 19,49 20.27 0.78 Selection*: 8.336 8.936 0.6 6 15.892 16.552 0.66 iMMWlWni* i»»ni'M«i»" Time Begin: End: Total 23.808 24.648 0.84 ^4K^ ^^•(•f^^n*., 7 Time Begin: End: Total 27.466 28.186 0.72 Selection*: 8 Time Begin. End: Total 35.202 35.802 0.6 NPP-2264 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 42 of 59 IRRELEVANT / RELEVANT PRIMARY TEST TEST NO. SUBJECT i K V ^ W y f t C 3 -DATE ffi^/ft TIME 0 ^ ^ QUESTION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ANSWER Is vour first name 'M£ia.-^£>o ? -\~ Do you live in , L f c f f s f r ^ g y , £\ ? -fr" Are you a citizen of the United States? -fDa yoy know who ^ s a r ^ i | in i f : 3 J : 7Xg^r"oi> x ^ <fr&t3^<K \3" Is today M ^ h ^ ? 4" 6. Didvou U<vs*_ S ^ 7. Is your last name 8. Is this the month of ANALYSIS: Dl £*£ t Kfe£j> ^ x s . ^ - ^ a>^g~v ? OIMLK <&rb<r m\G, u , s r . NDI D ? -f-~ ? -\^ NO NPP-2265 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 43 of 59 v^ v u J i i w c i i u a i Examiner. Date: Location: Case*: ruiensic vuicc miaiysis Subject: Test: Charge: Case: Det Sgt Gary Barrett 8/28/2006 12:00:00AM LPD CID 06083735 Melinda Duckett GQT None Felony 8/28/2006 Recording*. A- im»«H«l«M|iii»miii - i n win Selection*: ^ 1 Time Begin: End: Total * ^ ^ » » i > | . » ~ Selection*: / Selection*: 3 5.037 5.637 0.6 11.754 12.534 0.78 Vw*w**w_~ 5 Time Begin: End: Total 7 Time Begin: End: Total Selection*: Time Begin: End: Total 23.388 24.288 0.9 Selection*: 8.096 8.636 0.54 Selection*: 19.61 20.63 1.02 ^~——6 Time Begin: End: Total 29.085 29.865 0.78 Time Begin: End: Total 35.982 36.642 0.66 ^K*M J 33.103 33,763 0.66 Time Begin: End: Total 4 —<* _A_ Selection*: 2 JV__ „H»<'iH"'"»»l Time Begin: End: Total Selection*: 8 NPP-2266 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 44 of 59 EXHIBIT F to Giles Decl. Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 45 of 59 (Rev. 01-31-200.3) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Precedence! To: From: ROUTINE Date: Jacksonville Attn: Criminal Investigative Attn: Tampa Attn: Knoxville Columbia Attn: Attn: Squad 9 - Ocala, RA SA Jeffrey S. Bolin CACU UC Alan Nanavaty Ft. Myers RA SA John Kuchta SSA Mike McLean SSA Phil Coughlin CIRG NCAVC/BAU-3 Contact: SSA Kathleen E. Canning Approved By: Hess John «£^ A, Kosky Robert H Jr fi#v- Drafted By: Canning Kathleen E Case ID #: t* 12/22/2006 (703) 632-4264 C^ 7C-JK~50l72y?3 (Pending) Title: UNSUB; TRENTON DUCKETT - VICTIM CHILD ABDUCTION - NO RANSOM Synopsis: To document BAU's assistance and analysis with regard to captioned matter. Enclosure(s) Copies of General Assessment Questionnaires (GAQs) completed by Josh Duckett, Carla Massero, and Ruth Harvey Gilligan Details: On 8/29/06, S SAs Kathleen E. Canning and James 0. Beasley, II, Critical I ncident Response Group, National Center for the Analysis of Vio lent Crime (NCAVC), Behavioral Analygis Unit (BAU-3), deployed to Leesburg, Forida (FL) to assist members of the Child Abduction Rapid Deployment(CARD)Team who had responded to the allege d child kidnaping investigation concerning Trenton Duckett (age 2) The purpose of the BAU's assistance was to conduct a comprehens ive behavioral assessment of Trenton's mother, Melinda Duckett , focusing specifically on her personality and behavior, as well a s to evaluate the interpersonal dynamics associated with the ext ended circle of family and acquaintances and their possible rela tionship to the victim's disappearance. NPP-3749 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 46 of 59 (Rev. 01-31-2003) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION The following case analysis was conducted by SSAs Kathleen Canning, James Beasley, and Craig Ackley, in consultation with other members of the NCAVC: CASE SUMMARY Melinda Duckett told investigators that her biological son, Trenton Duckett, had been abducted from their apartment at 1416 West Griffin Rd, Apartment 48, Leesburg, Florida on the evening of Sunday, 8/27/06. She put Trenton to bed at approximately 6:45 p.m. that evening, prior to the arrival of two male friends whom she had invited earlier that day to watch movies. At approximately 9:00 p.m., during a break between movies, she went into Trenton's room to check on him and noticed he was not in his bedroom. Melinda discovered that the screen of Trenton's window had been cut. The only other disturbance to the room was a small picture frame, containing a picture of her and Trenton, which was found on the floor underneath the window. Upon discovering Trenton missing, Melinda went into the living room and alerted her two friends that Trenton had been abducted. She told one of her friends to make the call to 911 while she searched outside for her son. The Leesburg Police arrived shortly after the 911 call and searched the inside of Melinda's apartment and the immediate area outside. A command post was established at the Leesburg Police Station to begin the investigation of Trenton's disappearance. Melinda Duckett committed suicide by shooting herself with a shotgun inside her grandparents' home on 9/8/06, the morning after she appeared on a nationally televised Nancy Grace program about her son's disappearance. To date, Trenton Duckett has not been recovered. VICTIMOLOGY Typically, two-year-olds are considered at low risk to become victims of abduction, largely because they are not making lifestyle choices that put them at risk and they are usually closely supervised. Accordingly, the risks for a victim of this age are largely driven by the custodial parent's lifestyle. Trenton Duckett, white male (mixed Korean/Caucasian), date of birth 8/10/04, was the only biological child of Melinda and Joshua Duckett. According to a child custody evaluator, Trenton was a typical, healthy 2-year-old child who was on target developmentally. At the time of his reported diaappearance, he was living with his mother at 1416 Griffin Rd., Apt. 48, in NPP-3750 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 To: Re: Filed 05/07/10 Page 47 of 59 Jacksonville From: CIRG 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 Leesburg, FL. Joshua shared custody of Trenton with Melinda. His maternal great-grandparents, Bill and Nancy Eubank of Lady Lake, FL often babysat for Trenton while his mother worked or attended school. Outside of Melinda, Bill and Nancy Eubank were the last people to see Trenton alive. Melinda and Trenton left the Eubank's home on Saturday, 8/26/06, at approximately 5:00 p.m. after spending the day visiting. According to the Eubanks, Trenton appeared in good health the day before he was reported missing. Melinda Duckett (nee Eubank) was born in Korea and adopted by Beth and William Eubank of Rockport, NY. She lived with the Eubanks until 2 002, when her adoptive parents signed over guardianship.to the paternal adoptive grandparents, Bill and Nancy Eubank when, according to the Eubanks, Melinda became too difficult to control. Melinda and Joshua Duckett met in January of 2003, when they were both seventeen years old. Melinda graduated from high school and became pregnant. Trenton was born on 8/10/2004. Trenton was placed with his father in accordance with a Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF) Shelter order in on 4/30/05, due to allegations of irrational and dangerous behavior exhibited by Melinda. Trenton lived with Joshua until 6/11/05, when Joshua, in defiance of the DCF Shelter order, reunited with Melinda, Josh and Melinda were married in July of 2005, and were immediately placed into marital counseling. After a history of marital discord, and mutual allegations of misconduct, they separated on 12/25/05 and were allowed shared custody of Trenton. These arrangements remained in effect until July of 2006, when Melinda alleged that Josh had sent her an email threatening to harm her and Trenton. On the basis of this email threat, Melinda sought and received a court ordered injunction preventing Josh from seeing Trenton until an investigation of the email was conducted. The police later discovered that Melinda had emailed the threat to herself. Previous Allegations of Abusive/Assaultive Behavior By Melinda Against Trenton, Herself, and Others: 1. In early 2002, while living in New York with her NPP-3751 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 48 of 59 To: Jacksonville From: CIRG Re:' 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 adoptive parents, William and Bethann Eubank, Melinda threatened to cut her adoptive mother with a knife. During this time period Melinda received psychological counseling for the attack, as well as self-mutilating behavior. After a series of other incidents involving harm to herself and threats to harm family members, the decision was made to transfer guardianship of Melinda to Nancy and Billy Eubank of Florida. 2. On 10/31/04, the Okeechobee Sheriff's Office responded to an incident at a BMX Motocross race involving Melinda and her mother-in-law, Carla Massero. Massero reported that Melinda attacked Massero while she attempted to bathe Trenton. Massero reported that Melinda slapped her, pulled her hair, and bit her on the arm. 3. On 11/2/04, Melinda was evaluated by Dr. Catherine L. Waltz upon the request of her family after the incident at the BMX Motocross race. Melinda reported that she sometimes cuts herself, and that she had continued this behavior after Trenton was born. This self-mutilating behavior was also corroborated by Josh as well as the child custody evaluator. 4. According to records, on 4/6/05, Joshua Duckett contacted the DCF hotline alleging that Melinda Duckett had threatened to harm Trenton that night. He further stated that Melinda Eubank said that Trenton "will be gone" if Joshua Duckett would not go to her house and talk with her. When Joshua asked what she meant by this remark, she told him, "If you don't get it by now, you'll read it in the paper and everyone will be sad." 5. According to DCF records, on 4/29/05, the Police Chief for the City of Bushnell, Florida reported that she overheard a telephone conversation between Melinda and Joshua Duckett, wherein Melinda said that she was going to "end it" because she "couldn't take it anymore." During this conversation, Melinda threatened the safety of Trenton, accused Josh of being with other women and stated, "You will be sorry." Melinda then counted down from three to zero, and at the count of zero, Trenton was heard screaming on the other end of the line. Josh made a recording of this telephone call, which was heard by several different individuals, including Melinda's child custody evaluator. (The tape was turned over to the DCF, however NPP-3752 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 To: Re: Filed 05/07/10 Page 49 of 59 Jacksonville From: CIRG 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 investigators were unable to locate it at the time of this report.) At the time, Melinda and Joshua were separated and engaging in a custody battle. This incident resulted in Melinda's arrest for domestic violence. She.was "Baker Acted" on 4/30/05, causing the temporary removal of Trenton from her custody, and the referral of Melinda for a mental health evaluation. 6. According to DCF records, on 10/30/05, Melinda scratched Joshua with her hands during an argument while driving, Joshua sustained scratch marks to his left arm. During the argument,, Melinda threatened to kill Trenton by breaking his neck and held a pocket knife against his leg. Joshua got out of the vehicle and Melinda drove away. She. then called Joshua on her cell phone and threatened to harm Trenton. Trenton was later evaluated and found to have no physical marks indicative of an assault. Melinda denied the incident, although she and Josh admitted to having an altercation in the vehicle in Trenton's presence. 7. On 12/27/05, DCF was notified report to the police, alleging that Melinda hurt Trenton "and make him cry" if Josh did wanted him to do (return her keys). Melinda separated at the time. that Josh had made a told Josh she would not do what she and Josh were NCAVC Research and Anecdotal Experience of Cases Involving the Disappearances of Two-Year-old Children: The two most common outcomes when two-year-old disappear are the following: children 1. Lost/Accident.- This may include incidents in which the toddler becomes separated from the caregiver. Most often the child survives the experience and is found and returned unharmed or with minor injuries; however, there are accounts of toddlers who have wandered into some type of natural hazard, resulting in the child's accidental death. In the case of Trenton Duckett, his mother claims to have put him in his bed at 6:45 p.m. on 8/27/06, and was watching movies in an adjacent room with two individuals when she discovered Trenton missing from his bedroom. Therefore, given the facts and circumstances of this case, this scenario is eliminated as a possible outcome. NPP-3753 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 To: Re: Filed 05/07/10 Page 50 of 59 Jacksonville From: CIRG 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 2. Domestic-Related Incident: This may include abduction and/or homicide. Typically, toddlers are the victims of an emotion-based event, i.e., anger or revenge. Since their exposure is limited to family or close associates of the family, the greatest risk to their health and safety is likely to come from that same small universe of people. The vast majority of child abductions/homicides of toddlers are committed by family members, followed by acquaintances, and the primary motivation is again, emotion-based, For-those incidents that end in the child's homicide, body disposal plans are usually not developed prior to the homicide, and offenders tend to dispose of the victims close to home in familiar areas. (Child Abduction: AgedBased Analysis of Offender, Victim, and Offense Characteristics in 550 Cases of Alleged Child Disappearance, Boudreau, Lord, Dutra, 1998). One type of domestic-related incident are false allegations of child abduction. The NCAVC is presently involved in a research project studying these crimes, wherein a parent or caregiver claims a child has been abducted or has "gone missing" in an attempt to cover up a homicide. The research has shown that there are two primary categories of victims in false allegation of child abduction cases: 1) children who have had a history of being physically abused, and 2) children who are "unwanted". Typically those that have been a victim of chronic child abuse die as a result of a fatal child abuse incident. Children who are "unwanted" are usually killed because the offender views them as a liability, or as an obstacle to a relationship with the offender's partner. The following are some relevant findings from this study of false allegation 45 cases: 1. The biological mother was most often the offender. 2. In more than 1/3 of the cases, the victim had been a target of previous physical abuse. 3. In more than M of cases, there had been a period of separation between the victim and the offender. 4. There had been a change in the victim's family within six months of the offense in more than half of the cases. NPP-3754 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 To: Re: Filed 05/07/10 Page 51 of 59 Jacksonville From: CIRG 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 5. Domestic problems around the time of the offense were noted in over 90% of the cases. 6. The vast majority of the victims would not have be been located if not for the offender's disclosure to police. Two-year-old children present unique behavioral challenges that sometimes overwhelm young and/or inexperienced parents or care givers. "The terrible twos" often come with temper tantrums and other behaviors that require a great deal of patience and parental self-control. Potty training is an activity that is associated with any two-year-old child's natural development. Unfortunately, depending on the level of maturity of the child, the training process can be prolonged. Pottytraining accidents can be frustrating and vexing, particularly for a parent prone to angry outbursts. During an interview with Melinda Duckett, SSA Canning, asked Melinda the status of Trenton's potty training. Melinda responded, "We tried it, but it went very badly." Stranger abductions of two-year-olds are extremely rare. When they do occur, it is often in the context of a car jacking. On the rare events when children are abducted from their residence, they are most often abducted by male offenders with a sexual motivation, and the victims are usually pre-teen or teenaged females. Case Analysis Analysis of Melinda's Free Narrative-. Within days following her son's disappearance, Melinda was asked to provide a written narrative, explaining her whereabouts on Sunday, 8/27/06. Investigators had hoped, with Melinda's cooperation, to develop a time-line of her and Trenton's activities in an effort to develop potential leads. In the four-page handwritten document, Melinda recounted that she and Trenton slept in her bedroom on Saturday night. On Sunday, they went through their "normal routine" and drove to Melinda1s grandparents' home in Lady Lake. Melinda wrote that she had forgotten it was Sunday, and didn't realize NPP-3755 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 To: Re: Filed 05/07/10 Page 52 of 59 Jacksonville From: CIRG 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 what day of the week it was until she arrived at her grandparents' home and noticed their car was not in the driveway. Melinda recounted that she. and Trenton went to the Suntrust Bank in Leesburg and then to the Altamonte Mall. After spending time window shopping, Melinda left the mall and became lost in Orlando. She ended up in the "TD Waterhouse" area before finding her way back home. Upon arriving at her complex, Melinda stated that she parked in a different area so as to avoid a "confrontational neighbor." • She recounted that she carried Trenton into the apartment through the front door and fed him leftover Chinese food before tucking him into bed 6:45 p.m. She stated that she checked on him once and "verified his breathing." Melinda further wrote she had previously made plans to have friends over to watch movies. Chris Pierce and Danny Bass arrived sometime around 7:00 p.m., and the three of them watched the first movie. Melinda recounted that after watching the first movie, she went to check on Trenton discovered that he was not in his room. After checking the closet and interior of the house, she had Danny Bass call the police while she dialed her grandparents. (It was later determined through an analysis of phone records, that during this time, Melinda called an acquaintance who was a police officer to report Trenton's disappearance. This police officer advised Melinda to call 911.) Melinda then left her residence and walked to a local deputy's apartment to see if he had seen Trenton. When she arrived back at her apartment, Danny Bass handed her the telephone to speak with the dispatcher, and the police arrived a short time later. In her statement, Melinda told investigators that upon returning to her apartment Sunday at approximately 6:00 p.m., she parked in a different area of the apartment complex, rather than in front of her apartment, in order to avoid a "confrontational neighbor." She specifically stated that she carried Trenton through the front door. A neighbor, however, was interviewed as part of the initial canvass; that neighbor reported having seen Melinda towards the rear of her apartment without Trenton earlier Sunday afternoon. Chris Pierce stated that when he arrived to watch movies at about 7:00 p.m., Melinda asked him to move her vehicle from a rear parking lot and park it in the lot in front of her apartment. An analysis of the hand-written statement revealed NPP-3756 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 53 of 59 To: Jacksonville Prom: CIRG Re:' 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 ambiguity with respect to the times of her travel, as well as the locations reportedly visited by her and Trenton on Sunday. Also of note was a significant lack of detail and emotion regarding Trenton's activities during this period of time. When investigators asked Melinda to accompany them in order to retrace her travels on Sunday, Melinda refused. Investigators reviewed videotape from the Altamonte Mall in an effort to assist with the development of a time-line; however, Melinda and Trenton were not seen on the tapes. When asked to take a polygraph examination with regard to Trenton's disappearance, Melinda declined. Analysis of Crime Scene: The NCAVC defines "staging" as "the purposeful alteration of a crime scene by an offender to redirect the investigation." The following analysis of the crime scene indicates elements of staging, perpetrated by Melinda Duckett: Melinda reported that her son was abducted from his bedroom on the evening of 8/27/06. Trenton's bedroom window faces the front of the apartment. If one were facing the front door, Trenton's bedroom window is approximately five feet to the right of the unit's front door. The bedroom is located next the kitchen area, which abuts the family room (where Melinda claimed to have been watching movies with her friends). The approximate distance between the family room and Trenton's room is less than 20 feet. Melinda claimed that when she discovered her son missing from his bedroom at about 9:00 p.m., she saw that a picture frame had fallen on the floor and a cut had been made in the window screen. The cut was not large enough for an adult to squeeze through, which would infer that the offender managed to pull Trenton outside through the screen. The distance from the cut in the screen to the top of Trenton's mattress is approximately three feet. In order to have successfully accomplished the abduction, the offender would have to have coaxed Trenton into standing next to the window with his arms extended, or convinced him to stand on his bed so that he could be close enough to the cut in the screen to be pulled through. (Melinda commented in a posting to her Myspace account the following day that Trenton "was kidnapped last night from our home. Someone broke into his room and grabbed him throught (sic) NPP-3757 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 54 of 59 To: Jacksonville From: CIRG Re:' 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 window.") Given the relatively early hour, it would have been extremely unlikely for someone to have abducted Trenton through his bedroom window, and to have escaped without being detected by a neighbor. Further, someone unfamiliar with the apartment's layout would not have known that the front bedroom of the apartment belonged to Trenton, or that Trenton was alone in his bedroom at that time. Chances are a stranger would have made some audible noise, either by gaining entry, or by convincing a two-year-old child to accompany him/her through the cut screen in his bedroom window. This scenario also assumes that Trenton would have quietly acquiesced to leaving the safety of his home for the arms of a stranger. Analysis of the crime scene photos, taken in context with the writers' collective knowledge and experience in child abduction matters, suggests that Melinda staged the break-in to cover up the homicide of Trenton. Witness statements and an analysis of her My Space account indicate that Melinda was home during the afternoon of 8/27/06, prior to the arrival of her two male friends. Her friends told police that they did not see, nor hear Trenton that evening, nor did they enter his bedroom until Melinda checked on her son and told them that he was missing. Post Offense Behavior * Apartment Cleaning: Parents of abducted children exhibit a wide range of behavior, and the NCAVC cautions investigators not to draw conclusions about a parent or care giver's possible involvement in their child's disappearance based on emotional responses alone. Different people deal with crises differently; some remain stoic and in control, while others become hysterical and fall apart. In most cases, despite the emotional drain, parents of abducted children take great care in preserving the memories of their missing children. Missing children's bedrooms are often enshrined and their possessions are lovingly preserved. The parents of missing children rarely change telephone numbers or move residences, especially in the days following their disappearance, in the hope that their child will someday return home. In the case of Melinda Duckett, her emotional response 10 NPP-3758 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 To; Rei Filed 05/07/10 Page 55 of 59 Jacksonville From: CIRG 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 and behavior during the immediate time period following her son's alleged disappearance were so atypical that they deserve consideration in the analysis of this incident. Within hours following the disappearance of her son, Melinda conducted a thorough cleaning of her apartment. Investigators became aware that Melinda was removing items from the apartment and subsequently collected them from the complex's dumpster. Some of Trenton's items included clothing, toys, and dishes. Of particular note were items that usually evoke a sentimental response in a typical distressed parent of an abducted child. Trenton's sonogram picture, greeting cards congratulating Melinda on the birth of Trenton, as well photographs of Trenton and Melinda were found among the garbage. When investigators questioned Melinda about the things she was throwing away, she told them that the items were old or dirty, and that she was preparing to move out of her apartment. Further Evidence of Melinda1s Manipulative Behavior; Melinda invited three friends (one did not show up) over to watch movies on Sunday 8/27/06 so that there would be witnesses when she discovered Trenton missing from his room, and to manipulate these people into contacting the police to make the kidnaping report. This attempt to "distance" oneself from the crime through manipulation of others is also evidenced in another false allegation by Melinda which occurred on 7/5/06, when Melinda notified her family care manager and her attorney that Josh had sent her a threatening email. Police later found that Melinda had sent the threatening email to herself. In July of 2006, Melinda met an individual at a local pawn shop from which she purchased a shotgun. This individual told police that Melinda, after engaging in a brief sexual encounter, asked him to give her money so that she could have her husband killed. (This information was corroborated by police when they discovered the person whom she requested to kill her husband.) Melinda told him that Josh had beaten her and was threatening to harm her and Trenton. In each of these scenarios, Melinda manipulated other to "do her bidding." Furthermore, she engaged in "impression management", painting herself as a loving mother and vulnerable victim. This significant feature of Melinda's personality will 11 NPP-3759 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 Filed 05/07/10 Page 56 of 59 To: Jacksonville From: CIRG Re': 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 be discussed in further detail below. Personality Assessment of Melinda Duckettt • In providing an assessment regarding Duckett, it is important to analyze certain aspects of her personality in order to more fully comprehend her motivations for behaviors that she exhibited during this investigation, to include what the BAU believes to be the false allegation of her son's abduction, and her subsequent suicide. These behaviors were demonstrated on multiple fronts, including several interviews with various law enforcement investigators; information gleaned from General Assessment Questionnaires (GAQs), further described elsewhere; and her responses to questions posed to her during her interview on an episode of the Nancy Grace program, as well other news media interviews with her on prior occasions. • The GAQ was developed by the BAU to obtain, from multiple sources, background information on suspects in criminal investigations. One component of the GAQ is a series of adjective terms that the respondents are encouraged to apply, as they deem appropriate, to the individual in question. These terms are based on the NEO-PR Personality Assessment Instrument, which captures information about individuals based on five' facets of personality. These facets are neuroticism, extraversion, openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness. • Three individuals associated with Duckett completed separate GAQs which were evaluated by BAU personnel and outside consultants. Viewed collectively, the adjective ratings of the respondents indicated the following: o Duckett had a low tolerance for frustration, was insecure, had low self-esteem, and was easily provoked. She appeared to be able to handle herself fairly well in crisis situations, but became emotionally unstable when she perceived the actions of others to be attacks against her self-image. This stress would be manifested in the externalization of blame toward others. 12 NPP-3760 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 To: Re': Filed 05/07/10 Page 57 of 59 Jacksonville From: CIRG 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 Duckett had a low level of warmth and trust, and therefore had great difficulty in developing attachments to others, viewing them as objects to be manipulated. She was forceful and bold in social situations, with little hesitation to speak her mind. She was energetic and had a fast-paced lifestyle. She was generally unemotional and pessimistic. Stimulation and thrills had great appeal to her, and she was prone to engage in excitement-seeking behavior. Duckett exhibited a high level of superiority and entitlement, had little empathy and compassion for others, and had a low level of personal loyalty. In personal relationships, her needs took priority over all others, and she was highly competitive. In her world view, the ends would justify the means. She displayed a high need to achieve, and appeared to be competent and efficient. She was highly disciplined, organized, and methodical in her approaches to achieving her goals of self-interest. However, on the occasions when she felt under attack or a loss of control, she could be extremely impulsive, openly hostile and retaliatory. She exhibited very strong narcissistic traits, wherein she had an inflated view of herself and a diminished view of others. She routinely engaged in impression management, painting herself in the most favorable light possible. She generally appeared to be in control of her emotions and displayed a high degree of self-confidence in most situations. However, threats against her self-confidence would likely be defended against with anger and/or rage. Individuals who exhibit strong narcissistic traits often exhibit features of psychopathy, a personality construct that involves emotional/affective deficiencies such as superficial social charm, inclination toward deceptive and manipulative behavior, and an inability to experience guilt. personality, it appears probable that her 13 NPP-376] Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 To: Re! Filed 05/07/10 Page 58 of 59 Jacksonville From; CIRG 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 motivation for appearing on the Nancy Grace show was to manipulate the panel, and thereby a national audience, into viewing her in a more positive light and siding with her as a "victim." Initially, Nancy Grace and the other participants on the show appeared to be supportive and understanding, sympathizing with Duckett as a victim. The events relating to the abduction as Duckett described them were not initially challenged, and in fact, appeared to be accepted and supported by the participants. At that point, she was confident and in control of the situation. When her statements were challenged, however, she became defensive and began externalizing blame on others, including her exhusband and the case investigators. She then provided false and evasive answers, and misdirected the discussion, in a vain attempt to regain her sense of self-control. When she realized that these efforts were futile, she ended the interview by hanging up the telephone. The next day, Duckett committed suicide by shooting herself with a shotgun, at the home of her grandparents. This act appears to be entirely consistent with the personality, traits, and behaviors described within this report. Regarding the suicide there are two points of interest: First, as stated earlier within this report, Melinda's appearance on the Nancy Grace program appeared to be entirely selfserving, motivated by her need to manipulate the panel, and thereby the American public into viewing her as a sympathetic victim of a crime. This would have been consistent with Melinda's strong need for control and impression management. Second, and perhaps more importantly, appearing on the show potentially represented the worst case scenario for Melinda. By choosing to appear on a nationally televised show, Melinda, in essence, elevated the stakes to the ultimate win or lose proposition. In Melinda's mind, if she failed in her efforts to win over the American public, the blow to her self-image could be intolerable and something from which she could not recover. In that 14 NPP-3762 Case 5:06-cv-00444-WTH-GRJ Document 166-6 TO Re Filed 05/07/10 Page 59 of 59 Jacksonville From: CIRG 7C-JK-50172, 12/15/2006 case, Melinda could perceive suicide as the only viable option. In fact, Melinda's history has shown that she had considered suicide as an option in instances of overwhelming stress. Melinda left behind several notes wherein she attempted to provide an explanation for her suicide. The notes were also consistent with Melinda's personality, in that they were remarkably void, of any emotions indicative of guilt or remorse. While she professed love for her son in these notes, she also blamed the public for the frustration she felt due to the "ridicule and criticism." This demonstrates, as indicated above, her continuing need to externalize blame on others. CONCLUSION Based on a comprehensive review of this investigation to date, and taking into account the BAU's research and experience in child abduction matters, it is the opinion of the BAU that Melinda Duckett falsely alleged that her child was abducted, in an effort to cover up a homicide. Further, the BAU believes that Melinda Duckett committed suicide in part based on her perception that her positive self-image was unrecoverable, but also to further her desire for the public to view her as a victim. 15 NPP-3763