The Billiard Records - Chicago Billiard Museum
Transcription
The Billiard Records - Chicago Billiard Museum
The Billiard Records froml859 to 1925 L i s t o f champions at all styles o f play, noteworthy performances, rules covering present day games B y T o m Foley Published by The New Y o r k State Billiard Association 1925 Converted to electronic f o r m by Bob Jewett, 2012 INDEX Page *15 S Conditions governing balkline championship games D e f e a t of H o p p e i n 1925 First Billiard Record . F i r s t e x t e n s i v e v o l u m e on b i l l i a r d s # F i r s t games in west «••• F i r s t great billiard match .- * F i r s t tournament in Illinois F i r s t t o u r n a m e n t a t 18.2 b a l k l i n e F i r s t tragedy in professional billiards H i s t o r y of 18.2 b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d s . . . , ....t H i s t o r y of b i l l i a r d s *j£ h i s t o r y of p o c k e t b i l l i a r d s m ....... Hoppe's victory over V i g n a u x for world's title at b a l k l i n e . . Hoppe's wonderful record . J u n i o r challenge games in balkline J u n i o r p r o f e s s i o n a l 18.2 b a l k l i n e t o u r n a m e n t L i s t of c h a m p i o n s 1&59 to 1 9 2 5 . . . . . . L i s t of I n t e r n a t i o n a l b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d t o u r n a m e n t s 1902 to 1925 , Miscellaneous balkline record \ . Michael P h e l a n first champion billiardist National Championship Pocket Billiard League National Championship Pocket Billiard League standing in 1924-25 t o u r n a m e n t National Championship Interstate Three Cushion L e a g u e . . . National Championship Three Cushion Billiard L e a g u e . . ; . . National Championship Three Cushion Billiard League s t a n d i n g i n 1924-25 t o u r n a m e n t . . Noteworthy billiard performances Noteworthy pocket billiard records Noteworthy three cushion billiard records P a s s i n g o? first J a c o b S c h a e f e r Pocket Billiard World'* R e c o r d . . Prizes in balkline game R u d o l p h - D e e r y m a t c h a c c o m p a n i e d by s e n s a t i o n a l i n c i d e n t . Rules for Pocket B i l l i a r d s Rules governing contestants in National Championship Pocket Billiard League R u l e s g o v e r n i n g 18.2 b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d s R u l e s of T h r e e C u s h i o n c a r o m b i l l i a r d s S c h a e f e r ' s 1925 r e c o r d S e e r e i t e r - P h e l a n , first g r e a t m a t c h .,. S k e t c h e s of g r e a t b a l k l i n e p l a y e r s . fttart of b i l l i a r d s i n A m e r i c a . . The 1922 I n t e r n a t i o n a l b a l k l i n e t o u r n a m e n t . ,. Three Cushion World's Championship r e c o r d s . . . . . Veteran J a k e Schaefer's last game W h e n Y o u n g J a c o b S c h a e f e r defeated H o p p e W o r l d ' s 1925 b a l k l i n e t o u r n a m e n t World's Championship B a l k l i n e record ,. Y o u n g Jacob Schaefer's greatest performance . S I 1 0 : 3 70 8 68 67 52 25 27 17 16 4 18 35 3 46 47 36 38 89 66 58 44 26 51 15 69 69 65 24 44 10 3 12 3 81 „48 26 28 8 85 29 By T O M F O L E Y T h e r e a l s t a r t of b i l l i a r d s i n A m e r i c a m i g h t be d a t e d f r o m 1859 a n d I a m one of t h e f e w a l i v e t o d a y w h o w a s p l a y i n g t h e game then and who have followed and kept in touch w i t h i t u p ' t o t h i s 1925 y e a r . So f r o m a l o n g personal experience and a c t u a l contact w i t h every carve a n d t a n g e n t of t h e progress of the gentleman's game I a m able t o present these a c t u a l figures a n d t h i s l i t t l e book. I a m i n hopes i t w i l l g r o w as the years r o l l by, w i t h a n addenda each year, so t h a t i t may a t last become a n actual B i l l i a r d Guide, one t h a t w i l l keep a close record of t h e w o r k of the g r e a t players o f both t h e past a n d t h e present, records t h a t should prove a real incentive t o a l l hands who come f r o m t h i s f o r w a r d t o excel i n a game t h a t promises better rewards t o those who f o l l o w i t honestly and conscientiously t h a n any other I k n o w of. A t different periods, books g i v i n g a h i s t o r y and record of the game have been published a n d I have t h e m i n m y l i b r a r y . F r o m t h e m a n d figures w h i c h I have saved i n m y l o n g career as a b i l l i a r d r o o m keeper I have culled a l l the d a t a w h i c h appears i n t h i s l i t t l e book. One o f the books t h a t has been of g r e a t value t o me i n this labor of love is " T h e B i l l i a r d Record," a record of i m p o r t a n t b i l l i a r d matches played between 1854 a n d 1870 and w r i t t e n by M i c h a e l Phelan of N e w Y o r k . I n 1909 The Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company published the most extensive volume ever gotten o u t i n the interest of b i l l i a r d s . I t was called " M o d e r n B i l l i a r d s , " was compiled by H . F . D a v e n p o r t , now the vice-president of t h a t company, and contained a record of the game, f r o m 1854 t o 1898. " T h e B i l l i a r d s R e c o r d " a n d " M o d e r n B i l l i a r d s " have been a n a i d t o me i n g e t t i n g out these figures a n d f o r recent data extendi n g f r o m 1909 to this 1925 year I a m also g r e a t l y indebted to M r . Davenport. I took p a r t i n the f i r s t i m p o r t a n t t o u r n a m e n t f o r the c h a m pionship of I l l i n o i s , the game being played i n S m i t h & N i x o n ' s H a l l , Chicago, June 14 t o 2 1 , 1865, s i x t y years ago, b u t I had been p l a y i n g the game as a boy, l o n g before t h a t . The first games of r e a l importance played i n the West did n o t t a k e place u n t i l 1859. There were m a n y matches a t b i l l i a r d s , b o t h E a s t and West, f o r money stakes of a considerable size f r o m 1854 t o 1859 b u t no r e a l championship m a t c h t o o k place u n t i l A p r i l 12, 1859, when J o h n Seereiter of D e t r o i t a n d M i c h a e l P h e l a n o f N e w Y o r k played a m a t c h game i n F i r e m a n ' s H a l l i n t h e f o r m e r c i t y f o r a g r a n d stake of $15,000 and t h e A m e r i c a n Championship. The game consisted of 2,000 p o i n t s , caroms, w i t h f o u r balls a n d a 6x12, 6 pocket t a b l e , p u s h i n g a n d c r o t c h i n g allowed. Phelan w o n , 2,000 t o 1,904 f o r Seereiter. The w i n n e r ' s best r u n was 129, his average 12-32-164. The loser's best r u n was 157 a n d his average 11-111-163. A n d so M i c h a e l Phelan was the f i r s t champion b i l l i a r d i s t of A m e r i c a a n d the records t h a t appear i n this l i t t l e book date f r o m t h a t 1859 year w h e n he proved the best player of the l i t t l e a r m y t h e n i n the field. 8 1859—BILLIARD RECORDS—1925 These are the complete billiard records covering a l l the championships from 1859 up to and including May 1, 1925. T H E FIRST CHAMPIONS Played on a 6x12 four pocket table w i t h four balls, pushing and crotching allowed, 2,000 points caroms: 1859-1860-1861-1862—Michael Phelan. 1863-1864—Dudley Kavanaugh. 1865— Dudley Kavanaugh, Louis Fox, John Deery. 1866—John Deery and Joe Dion. 1867—Joe Dion and John McDevitt. 1868—John McDevitt. CHAMPIONS A T FOUR B A L L CAROM GAME Played on a 5 % x l l pocket table, w i t h four balls, pushing and crotching barred, single caroms counting 3 and double caroms 6, 1,200 points, caroms: 1869—John Deery. 1670—John Deery, A . P. Rudolphe. 1871—Frank Parker, Cyrille Dion. 1872—Cyrille Dion. 1873—Cyrille Dion, Maurice Daly, Albert Gamier. 1874—Maurice Vignaux, Joe Dion. 1 8 7 5 —C y r i l l e Dion. Played on a 5x10 carom table, w i t h three balls, known as straight r a i l : 1876— 1877-1878—William Sexton. 1879-1880-1881—Jacob S c h a e f e r . 1 8 8 2 —Joe Dion. Played on a 5x10 carom table w i t h 8-inch balkline introduced as a preventive of r a i l n u r s i n g : 1883- 1884—Jacob Schaefer. Same conditions as i n 1884, except that balkline was widened from 8 to 14 inches: 1885—George F. Slosson, Jacob Schaefer. 1886- 1887-1888-1889—Jacob Schaefer. 1890—Jacob Schaefer. 1891- 1892-1893-1894-1895-1896—No championship played for. ' 18.1 B A L K L I N E C H A M P I O N S 1897—George Slosson. 1898—Jacob Schaefer, Frank Ives. 1899— 1900—No championship played for. 1906—W. F. Hoppe. 1907—George B. Sutton, W. F . Hoppe, Jacob Schaefer. 1908—George F. Slosson, George B. Sutton. 1910—W. F . Hoppe. 18.2 B A L K L I N E C H A M P I O N S 1901-1902-1903-1904-1905—Jacob Schaefer. 1906—George F. Slosson, George Sutton. 1907—George B. Sutton, W. F. Hoppe, Jacob Schaefer. 1908—George F. Slosson, George B. Sutton. 1909—Ora Morningst a r , Calvin Demarest. 1910—W. F . Hoppe, won the professional championship twice in 1910, first at 18.1 and then a t 18.2. 1911—W. F . Hoppe. 1912—W . F . Hoppe. 1913—W. F . Hoppe 4 1914—W. F. Hoppe. 1915—W. F. Hoppe. 1916—W. F. Hoppe. 1917—W. F. Hoppe. 1918—W. F . Hoppe. 1919—W. F. Hoppe. 1920—W. F. Hoppe. 1921—Young Jake Schaefer. 1922—W. F. Hoppe. 1923—W. F. Hoppe. 1924—W. F. Hoppe. 1925—Young Jake Schaefer. T H R E E CUSHION CHAMPIONS 1912—John Horgan. 1913—Alfredo DeOro. 1914—Alfredo DeOro. 1915—Alfredo DeOro. 1916—George Moore. 1917—Alfredo DeOro. 1918—A. Kieekhefer. 1919—John Layton. 1920—R. L . Cannefax. 1921—John Layton. 1922—John Layton. 1923—Tiff Denton. 1924—R. L . Cannefax. 1925—R. L . Cannefax. POCKET B I L L I A R D CHAMPIONS 1913—Benjamin Allen. 1914—Benjamin Allen. 1915—Benjamin Allen. 1916—Frank Taberski. 1917—Frank Taberski. 1918—Frank Taberski. 1919—Ralph Greenleaf. 1920—Ralph Greenleaf. 1921—Ralph Greenleaf. 1922— Ralph Greenleaf. 1923— Ralph Greenleaf. 1924—Ralph Greenleaf. 1925—Frank Taberski. N A T I O N A L , I N T E R N A T I O N A L A N D WESTERN B A L K L I N E CHAMPIONS 14.2 Champions •1899—Martin Mullen. *1900—Wilson P. F«ss. •1901—C. Fred Conklin. 1901—A r t h u r R. Townsend. • 1902—Chas. Norris. •1902—Wilson P. Foss. 1902— Edward W . Gardner. 1902—Wilson P. Foss. 1904—J. Ferdinand Poggenburg. 6 1 9 0 5 —C. F r e d C o n k l i n . 1906—E d w a r d W . Gardner. 1907—C a l v i n Demarest. 1 9 0 8 —C a l v i n Demarest. 18.2 Champions 1908—I n t e r n a t i o n a l — C a l v i n Demarest. 1909—Chick W r i g h t . 1910—E d w a r d W . Gardner. 1910—International—C. Fred Conklin. 1912—Morris D . B r o w n . 1912—I n t e r n a t i o n a l — J . F e r d i n a n d Poggenburg. 1913— Joseph Mayer. 1914—E d w a r d W . Gardner. 1915—Joseph M a y e r . 1916—Edward W . Gardner. 1917—N a t h a n H a l l . 1918— Cor w i n H u s t o n . 1919— David McAndless. 1920—Percy N . Collins. 1921—Charles H . Heddon. 1922—E d g a r T . Appleby. 1 9 2 2 —E d g a r T . Appleby was also I n t e r n a t i o n a l a t 18.2. 1 9 2 3 —Percy N . C o l l i n s . 1924— E. T . Appleby. 1 9 2 4 — R. W . C a m p b e l l ( W e s t e r n ) . 1925-—Francis Appleby. 1925—P. N . Colling. ( W e s t e r n ) . champion 18.1 Champions 1923—Francis S. Appleby. NATIONAL AMATEUR T H R E E CUSHION CHAMPIONS 1919——Arthur N e w m a n . 1920—W m . B . Huey. 1 9 2 1 — E a r l Lookabaugh. 1 9 2 2 —F r a n k I . F l e m i n g . 1 9 2 3 —Robert M . L o r d . 1 9 2 4 —F r a n k I . F l e m i n g . 1 9 2 5 —D r . A n d r e w J . H a r r i s . •Held under auspices of A m e r i c a n A t h l e t i c U n i o n a n d N a t i o n a l Association o f A m a t e u r B i l l i a r d Players. H I S T O R Y O F T H E 18.2 B A L K - L I N E G A M E O F B I L L I A R D S Complete Record of a l l Games Played i n Championship T o u r n a ments and Championship Matches P r i o r to a n d I n c l u d i n g M a r c h 24, 1925 One m i g h t say t h a t the 18.2 b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d game now followed by the great players l i k e Schaefer, Hoppe, Cochran, Horemans, Hagenlacher a n d others was invented by M . Bensinger, f a t h e r of B. E . Bensinger, now president o f the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company, who is s t i l l the m a i n champion a n d staunch -adherent o f t h a t s t y l e of b i l l i a r d play. The first Jacob Schaefer remained champion a t t h e threeb a l l game f r o m 1879 to 1882, and was so great a t the game t h a t he was p r a c t i c a l l y i m m u n e f r o m challenge. T o get away f r o m a s i t u a t i o n t h a t had become woefully one-sided, M . Bensinger, i n 1883 a n d t h e n a t the head of the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company, set about t o devise a system o f lines t h a t w o u l d handicap Schaefer a n d make several o f t h e t h e n famous players his equal. I n consultation w i t h Charles E . Mussey, T . Z. Cowles a n d Thomas Foley, t h e e i g h t - i n c h b a l k l i n e game was evolved a n d a t o u r n a m e n t a t i t was held under the auspices of t h e B r u n s wick-Balke-Collender Company a t C e n t r a l Music H a l l , C h i cago, M a r c h 26 to A p r i l 6, 1883., L a t e r the lines were changed f r o m eight t o 14 inches, and then to 18.2, t h e style t h a t rules today. F i r s t T o u r n a m e n t a t 18.2 The first t o u r n a m e n t a t 18.2 was held a t Madison Square Garden Concert H a l l , N e w Y o r k , M a r c h 31 t o A p r i l 15, 1896, under t h e auspices o f Ives a n d D a l y . T h e games were 600 points, a l l three contestants p l a y i n g t w i c e a r o u n d . T h e contestants were Schaefer, Ives and Garnier. Schaefer a n d Ives t i e d f o r first place, w i n n i n g 2 a n d losing 1 game each. G a r n i e r f a i l e d t o w i n a game. Best average: Schaefer, 3 0 ; best r u n , 176; Ives, 6 0 ; best r u n , 200. The W o r l d ' s 18.2 B a l k l i n e T o u r n a m e n t o f 1925 T h e names of the w i n n e r s o f these b a l k l i n e championships since t h a t • g a m e first c a m e i n t o b e i n g a p p e a r elsewhere, t h e l a s t of these i n t e r n a t i o n a l c h a m p i o n s h i p s t a k i n g place i n t h e G o l d R o o m of t h e Congress H o t e l i n C h i c a g o f r o m F e b r u a r y 23 t o M a r c h 4, 1926, t h e i n d i v i d u a l games of t h i s t o u r n a m e n t r e s u l t i n g as f o l l o w s : Monday N i g h t , F e b r u a r y 23 Hoppe, 400; Suzuki, 8 1 6 ; fifteen i n n i n g s . H i g h Runs—Hoppe, 121 (unfinished) ; Suzuki, 78. Averages—Hoppe, 20 10-15; Suzuki, 21 1-15. Tuesday A f t e r n o o n , February 24 Hagenlacher—2, 0, 1, 0, 1, 7, 45, 66, 46, 1, 6, 0, 9, 2 1 , 128, 1, 29, 2, 29 400. ' Cochran—2, 4, 22, 6 1 , 2, 36, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2, 3 1 , 43, 17, 9 1 , 1, 0, 43—347. H i g h r u n , 9 1 ; average, 19 5-8. Tuesday N i g h t , February 24 Schaefer—0, 80, 0, 20, 79, 0, 130, 2, 60, 29—400. H i g h r u n , 130; average, 40. * H o r e m a n s — 1 , 67, 28, 2, 2^0, 0, 4, 57—161. B i g h r u n , 6 7 ; average, rr 8-9. 8 Wednesday A f t e r n o o n , F e b r u a r y 25 Horemans—15, 0, 8, 240, 128—400. H i g h run—249 ; average, 8j0. Suzuki—0, 0, 1 , 11—12. H i g h r u n — 1 1 ; average, 3. Wednesday N i g h t , F e b r u a r y 25 Hoppe—0, 0, 52, 109, I i 7 , 12, 2, 4, 24—400. H i g h r u n — 2 4 9 ; average, 80. Cochran—57, 0, 8, 3, 0, 19, 27, 29, 0—143. H i g h r u n — 5 7 ; average, 15 8-8. Thursday N i g h t , F e b r u a r y 26 Jake Schaefer, 400; E r i c h Hagenlacher, 0. H i g h run—Schaefer, 400 (unfinished) ; Hagenlacher, 0. Thursday A f t e r n o o n , F e b r u a r y 26 W e l k e r Cochran—40, 308, 4 1 , 11—400. K a m a k i c h i S u z u k i — 8 1 , 1, 31—112. H i g h r u n — C o c h r a n , 308 ; Suzuki, 81. Average—Cochran, 100; Suzuki, 37 2-3. F r i d a y A f t e r n o o n , F e b r u a r y 27 Edouard Horemans—0, 109, 69, 34, 5, 2 1 , 13, 40, 29, 80— 400. W e l k e r Cochran—0, 3 1 , 42, 4, 0, 110, 0, 2 1 , 56, 2—266. H i g h r u n s — C o c h r a n , 110; Horemans, 109. Averages—Horemans, 40 ; Cochran, 25.6. F r i d a y E v e n i n g , F e b r u a r y 27 Hagenlacher—0, 0, 1, 28, 1 , 18, 228, 2, 4, 7, 1 , 115—400 H o p p e — 1 , 157, 10, 15, 2, 2 1 , 1, 1, 2, 4, 85—299. H i g h runs—Hagenlacher, 228 ; Hoppe, 157. Averages—Hagenlacher, 22 4-12; Hoppe, 27 2-11. Saturday A f t e r n o o n , F e b r u a r y 28 Hagenlacher—34, 3, 0, 8, 1, 33, 85, 26, 0, 0, 4, 5, 0, 3, S3 3, 2, 4 1 , 1, 0, 55, 4, 0, 2, 26, 12, 19—400. • Suzuki—37, 0, 7, 25, 0, 80, 0, 6, 1, 0, 20, 36, 95, 0, 0, 0 1, 1, 1, 36, 11, 0, 0, 0, 9, 1—367. H i g h runs—Hagenlacher, 8 5 ; Suzuki, 95. Averages—Hagenlacher, 14 22-27; S u z u k i , 14 3-26. Saturday N i g h t , F e b r u a r y 28 Jake Schaefer—112, 288—400. W e l k e r Cochran—10, 40—50. H i g h runs—Schaefer, 288 ; Cochran, 40. Averages—Schaefer, 200; Cochran,, 25. Monday A f t e r n o o n , M a r c h 2 Schaefer—3, 8, 49, 2, 5, 1 , 122, 0, 14, 0, 4, 10, 130, 52—400. Suzuki—10, 1, 0, 7, 48, 6, 2, 53, 0, 0, 40, 1 , 1 , 7—175. H i g h runs—Schaefer, 130; Suzuki, 53. Averages—Schaefer, 28 8-14 ; Suzuki, 17 7-14. Monday N i g h t , M a r c h 2 Edouard H o r e m a n s — 6 1 , 4, 0, 121, 1, 1, 212—400. W i l l i e Hoppe—0, 3, 0, 2, 4, 2 1 , 6—86. Averages—Horemans. 55.55; Hoppe, 5.14. H i g h r u n s — H o r e m a n s , 2 1 2 ; Hoppe, 2 1 . Tuesday A f t e r n o o n , M a r c h 3 Edouard Horemans ( B e l g i u m ) — 1 4 4 , 122, 18, 35, 59, 0, 18, 9 —400. E r i c h Hagenlacher ( G e r m a n y ) — 1 2 3 , 4 1 , 0, 40, —254. H i g h r u n s — H o r e m a n s , 1 4 4 ; Hagenlacher. 123. A v e r a g e — H o r e m a n s , 50 ; H a g e n l a c h e r , 31.7. 3, 0, 46, 1 Tuesday N i g h t , M a r c h 3 Jake Schaefer—0, 0, 56, 0, 5, 24, 19, 296—400. W i l l i e H o p p e — 2 , 82, 0, 5, 28, 36, 20—173. Averages—Schaefer, 5 0 ; H o p p e , 24.7. H i g h runs—Schaefer, 2 9 6 ; Hoppe, 82. These w e r e t h e positions o f t h e p l a y e r s a t t h e close o f t h e 1925 t o u r n a m e n t , w h i c h was refereed s p l e n d i d l y b y J . H e r b e r t L e v i s of Chicago. Won Lost Pet. Jake Schaefer, Chicago 0 1.000 Edouard Horemans, B e l g i u m . . . . 4 1 .800 E r i c h Hagenlacher, 4 .600 3 W i l l i e Hoppe, N e w Y o r k ... 2 3 .400 W e l k e r Cochran, H o l l y w o o d . . . . 1 4 .200 Kamekichi Suzuki, Japan. 5 .. .. 0 .000 High High I n - Grand Total Run Avg. Points nings Avg. Schaefer 400 400 2.000 85 57.14 247 80 1,761 45.2 89 Hagenlacher 228 31.7 1,454 22.06 66 197 44.4 1,408 28.75 49 308 100 1,206 44 27.41 95 37.3 982 62 15.84 T h i s 1925 t o u r n a m e n t w h i c h m a r k e d t h e r e t i r e m e n t o f W i l l i e Hoppe as c h a m p i o n a n d t h e c r o w n i n g o f Y o u n g J a k e Schaefer proved t h e greatest ever played, t h e greatest f r o m a r e c o r d b r e a k i n g s t a n d p o i n t as w e l l as i n t h e w o n d e r f u l performances of t h e players. I n t h e seventh game o f t h e t o u r n a m e n t Schaefer defeated Hagenlacher by 400 t o 0, r u n n i n g o u t a f t e r w i n n i n g t h e b a n k " f r o m his opponent, a r e c o r d i n w o r l d t o u r n a m e n t p l a y . B u t i t was i n t h e c l o s i n g game o f t h e t o u r n a m e n t , f a c i n g the t h e n c h a m p i o n Hoppe, t h a t Schaefer played t h e most m a g n i f i c e n t b i l l i a r d s o f his e n t i r e career. O n t h i s occasion i t t o o k e i g h t i n n i n g s f o r Schaefer t o g i v e H o p p e one o f t h e w o r s t defeats he had ever experienced. A s Y o u n g J a k e entered his e i g h t h i n n i n g t w o h u n d r e d a n d n i n e t y - s i x p o i n t s separated h i m f r o m t h e coveted 400. Hoppe, p l a y i n g better t h a n he h a d a t a n y t i m e i n t h i s t o u r n e y , was o u t i n f r o n t , 173 t o 104. A n d then Jake started. For the first t i m e i n t h e n i g h t t h e elusive ivories responded t o t h e t a p of his cue, a n d as f a s t as Referee L e v i s could c a l l off t h e p o i n t s " Y o u n g " J a k e progressed t o v i c t o r y . I t seems a f a r - f e t c h e d s t a t e m e n t t o say t h a t a n y cueist s t a r t i n g off a f t e r 296 p o i n t s could s a t i s f y a n y audience t h a t he could do j u s t t h a t . B u t Schaefer d i d t h a t t h a t n i g h t . F r o m t h e m o m e n t he scored t e n p o i n t s his audience sensed t h a t n o t h i n g else w o u l d stop h i m t h a t n i g h t . And nothing did. Those 296 p o i n t s b r o u g h t Jake's average f o r t h e n i g h t t o 50, b r o u g h t h i s g r a n d average t o 57.14, a new w o r l d ' s r e c o r d , t o add t o t h e h i g h r u n a n d h i g h s i n g l e average records, each o f 400, t h a t he h a d p r e v i o u s l y gained i n t h i s t o u r n e y . 10 A record b r e a k e r of r e c o r d b r e a k e r s — t h a t w a s Schaefer in this competition. Performances of a l l o t h e r s — H o p p e , the p e r e n n i a l c h a m p i o n ; H o r e m a n s , t h e m a s s e m a r v e l of the old w o r l d , a l l paled into insignificance beside t h i s youthful a r t i s t from Chicago. I t is c u s t o m a r y to greet each n e w c h a m p i o n i n a n y sport w i t h t h e h u r r a h " g r e a t e s t e v e r . " I n S c h a e f e r ' s case i t h a p pens to be t r u e . F o r f u r t h e r evidence, see the figures. S c h a e f e r received $3,000 i n c a s h a n d the diamond medal e m blematic of the championship^ Horemans collected $1,500; H a g e n l a c h e r , $ 1 , 0 0 0 ; Hoppe, $750, a n d C o c h r a n , $250. Kamek i c h i S u z u k i , w h o lost a l l h i s g a m e s , didn't m a k e a n y money, but he h a d a lot of f u n , a n d s a w some good b i l l i a r d s without paying his w a y in. 11 SKETCHES 1925 O F T H EP L A Y E R S WHO TOOK W O R L D ' S C H A M P I O N S H I P 18.2 BILLIARD PART I NT H E BALKLINE TOURNAMENT T h e s e a r e a f e w lines about t h e s i x g r e a t p l a y e r s w h o took p a r t i n t h e r e c e n t 1925 W o r l d ' s C h a m p i o n s h i p 18.2 b a l k l i n e billiard tournament: Y o u n g Jacob Schaefer, who w o n the championship when h e d e f e a t e d W i l l i e H o p p e i n t h e g r e a t 1925 W o r l d ' s C h a m p i o n ship T o u r n a m e n t , is t h e only s o n of t h e first J a c o b Schaefer, f o r m a n y y e a r s t h e g r e a t e s t p l a y e r e v e r k n o w n to t h e g a m e . Y o u n g J a c o b S c h a e f e r w a s b o r n i n C h i c a g o , O c t o b e r 18, 1894. J u s t a t t h i s t i m e a l l t h a t is needed t o p r o v e " Y o u n g J a k e ' s " g r e a t n e s s a s a p l a y e r is a b r i e f r e f e r e n c e t o s o m e o f t h e w o n derful things he h a s accomplished a t billiards without refer- JACOB SCHAEFER r i n g to h i s wonderful performances i n t h e recent w o r l d ' s t o u r n a ment already mentioned. M a y 16, 1921, a t S a n F r a n c i s c o , S c h a e f e r s e t a w o r l d ' s r e c o r d o f 51 1-7 a v e r a g e i n a 4,000 point game against E d o u a r d H o r e m a n s , m a k i n g h i g h r u n s o f 394-278-230 a n d 2 1 4 . I n a w e e k ' s p l a y a t N e w Y o r k w i t h t h e s a m e p l a y e r h e a v e r a g e d 47 54-100, g e t t i n g a h i g h r u n o f 436. O c t o b e r 19, 1921, S c h a e f e r , i n a m a t c h w i t h D a v e M c A n d l e s s a t C h i c a g o a t 18.2 b i l l i a r d s , m a d e a r u n o f 4 8 0 . H e h a d a n u n f i n i s h e d r u n o f 359 t h e n i g h t b e f o r e a n d c o m p l e t e d 121 m o r e p o i n t s . O n J a n u a r y 2 2 , 1922, S c h a e f e r , p l a y i n g against Welker C o c h r a n at Mussey's bill'ard parlor in Chicago, r a n 480 a t 18.2 b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d s , t h e h i g h e s t r u n e v e r m a a e by a p l a y e r i n t h i s c o u n t r y i n a m a t c h , a l t h o u g h t h i s w a s only a n exhibit'on. S c h a e f e r ' s r u n of 394 a g a i n s t C o c h r a n i s exceeded o n l y b y t h e r u n o f 701 m a d e b y E d o u a r d H o r e m a n s o n J a n u a r y 15, 1922, a t T h u m ' s r o o m . N e w Y o r k . O f course, S c h a e f e r ' s greatest p e r f o r m a n c e w a s h i s defeat o f H o p p e in. t h e i r w o r l d ' s c h a m p i o n s h i p m a t c h played i n C h i c a g o i n 1921. t n that t h r e e - n i g h t m a t c h , S c h a e f e r not only defeated H o p p e 12 b y a s c o r e o f 500 t o 346, b u t h e r a n u p a h i g h r e c o r d s i n g l e a v e r a g e of 200 a n d a g r a n d a v e r a g e of 51 10-43 and gave the spectators a view of the most brilliant billiards they had ever witnessed. E d o u a r d H o r e m a n s , w h o finished s e c o n d i n t h e 1925 t o u r n a m e n t , w a s b o r n a t A n t w e r p , B e l g i u m . A p r i L 25. 1889, s o t h a t he i s a t t h e b e g i n n i n g of a c a r e e r t h a t t h i s e a r l y h a s p r o v e n r e m a r k a b l e i n the w o r l d of b i l l i a r d s . W h a t makes him int e r e s t i n g a n d different f r o m other p l a y e r s is t h e f a c t t h a t h e is left h a n d e d a n d no other p l a y e r h a s ever been able to approach him at masse playing. S o m e of his m a s s e shots have brought out generous applause from billiard f a n s . Hore* m a n s , w h o h a s r e p r e s e n t e d B e l g i u m i n t h e I n t e r n a t i o n a l 18.2 b a l k l i n e t o u r n a m e n t s i n A m e r i c a on two different occasions, i s n o w t h e a c k n o w l e d g e d c h a m p i o n of E u r o p e . H e won that t i t l e f a i r l y a n d s q u a r e l y by d e f e a t i n g L o u i s C u r e i n a m a t c h played at Paris, A n t w e r p , Belgium and Amsterdam, Holland. T h a t w a s a m a t c h o f 1,800 p o i n t s p l a y e d i n b l o c k s o f 600, H o r e m a n s w i n n i n g b y t h e o v e r w h e l m i n g s c o r e o f 1,800 to 706. I n t h a t m a t c h H o r e m a n s m a d e a n a v e r a g e of 60, w h i c h h e c l a i m s is t h e best e v e r m a d e i n a c h a m p i o n s h i p m a t c h . E r i c h Hagenlacher, who finished t h i r d i n t h e 1925 t o u r n a m e n t , w a s b o r n a t S t u t t g a r t , G e r m a n y , J u l y 2 5 , 1895. He h a s s p e n t t h e l a s t t h r e e y e a r s i n N e w Y o r k p l a y i n g t h e best balkl iners that happened in there and holding his own with m a n y of t h e m . He has also played exhibitions w i t h the leaders i n Chicago a n d other cities. Willie Hoppe. who finished f o u r t h i n t h e 1925 tournament, was born at Cornwall, N e w Y o r k , O c t . 11, 1887, and although a comparatively young m a n has already earned a fortune at b i l l i a r d s . W i t h the exception of a single i n t e r v a l , 1921, H o p p e h a s b e e n w o r l d ' s c h a m p i o n a t 18.2 b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d s s i n c e 1906, 18 y e a r s i n a l l , a r e c o r d n e v e r b e a t e n by 13 any other b i l l i a r d i s t f o r continuous h o l d i n g of a c h a m p i o n ship. Hoppe has defended h i s championship every year f r o m 1906 t o 1921, when he was defeated by Schaefer. While the first Jacob Schaefer was champion on a n d off f o r 26 years, -or f r o m 1879 t o 1905, he lost t h e c r o w n repeatedly a n d f r o m 1891 t o 1896 did not defend i t a t a l l . So Hoppe's record f o r l o n g h o l d i n g of t h e t i t l e is t h e best. W e l k e r Cochran, w h o finished fifth i n the 1925 tournament^ was b o r n a t Manson, I o w a , Oct. 7, 1896, a n d has been k n o w n f o r several years as one of t h e most capable a n d b r i l l i a n t of a l l t h a t g a l a x y of r o y a l b i l l i a r d players who have contested f o r w o r l d honors i n t h e last f e w years. Cochran has often made marvelous records i n l o n g m a t c h games i n w h i c h such masters of the cue as Schaefer, Horemans a n d M o r n i n g - star have faced h i m . I n D e t r o i t , Cochran took a 3,600-point game f r o m Horemans by a lead of n i n e t y - f i v e . Horemans took the second game of 4,800 p o i n t s by 184. I n Detroit, tod, Cochran led Schaefer over 500 points i n a 3,600-point m a t c h . I n N e w Y o r k , he led Schaefer over 500 points o u t of 2,400 and i n B r o o k l y n he led t h e champion 100 i n a 1,200-point game. I n t w o games w i t h M o r n i n g s t a r , i n San Diego, Cal., Cochran w o n the first by 24 out of 1,200 and the second t w o to one, i n 188 points. Cochran is a dashing, b r i l l i a n t player* liable to w i n i n any k i n d o f company a n d a t a n y t i m e o r place, b u t he has played i n bad l u c k i n t h e last t w o w o r l d tournaments. K a m e k i c h i Suzuki, w h o finished l a s t i n t h e 1925 t o u r n a m e n t , w o n his r i g h t t o compete i n t h i s year's i n t e r n a t i o n a l by w i n n i n g t h e final challenge m a t c h i n t h e j u n i o r professional b a l k l i n e championship f r o m Tadeo Suganuma, another Japanese player. B o r n i n J a p a n about t h i r t y years ago, Suzuki learned the r u d i m e n t s of b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d s f r o m K o d j i Y a m a d a , t h e 14 first of the great players t o come f r o m the flowery k i n g d o m t o take p a r t i n a world's t o u r n a m e n t i n this c o u n t r y . Suzuki a r r i v e d i n N e w Y o r k w i t h letters f r o m Yamada and soon proved himself a w o n d e r f u l player. H i s w i n n i n g of t h e j u n i o r professional championship soon a f t e r his a r r i v a l i n N e w Y o r k proved his great s k i l l and w o n h i m the r i g h t t o a place i n the r e g u l a r world's t o u r n a m e n t of the professionals w h i c h followed i n Chicago. CONDITIONS UNDER W H I C H T H E WORLD'S CHAMPIONS H I P G A M E S A T 18.2 B A L K L I N E B I L L I A R D S W E R E P L A Y E D I N 1925 The t e r m s a n d rules under w h i c h this l a s t of the w o r l d ' s tournaments a t 18.2 b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d s was conducted w e r e : W o r l d ' s championship t o u r n a m e n t a t the 18.2 b a l k l i n e game o f b i l l i a r d s t o be held i n the " G o l d R o o m " of the Congress H o t e l , a t Chicago, I l l i n o i s , b e g i n n i n g F e b r u a r y 23 a n d endi n k M a r c h 4, 1925, under t h e auspices of T h e B r u n s w i c k Balke-Collender Company^ who w i l l c o n t r i b u t e a purse o f $5,000 w h i c h , together w i t h the entrance fees p a i d by the players, w i l l be d i s t r i b u t e d among the contestants according t o t h e i r s t a n d i n g a t t h e close of the T o u r n a m e n t , as f o l l o w s : F i r s t Prize Second Prize T h i r d Prize Fourth Prize F i f t h Prize $3,000 1,500 1,000 750 : 250 , T h e t o u r n a m e n t t o be l i m i t e d t o seven players, subject to a n entrance fee of $250 f r o m each player. The games t o consist of 400 p o i n t s e a c h ; and i n case of a t i e f o r first place, the deciding game t o consist o f 500 points. A l l games t o be played o n a table of The B r u n s w i c k - B a l k e Collender Company make, fitted w i t h the Celebrated " M o n a r c h " Cushions. Contestants f r o m out of t o w n w i l l be allowed t h e i r t r a n s p o r t a t i o n charges t o Chicago a n d r e t u r n . T h e n e t gate receipts, a f t e r deducting a l l expenses incident to the t o u r n a m e n t , i n c l u d i n g t r a n s p o r t a t i o n charges allowed t h e players, w i l l be divided among the contestants i n p r o p o r t i o n t o the a m o u n t o f the p r i z e w o n by each, t o - w i t : Winner Winner Winner Winner Winner of of of of of first prize second prize t h i r d prize f o u r t h prize fifth prize J 46 23 15 12 4 per per per per per cent cent cent cent cent The w i n n e r of first prize w i l l be awarded a t r o p h y emblematic of the W o r l d ' s Championship, w h i c h s h a l l be subject t o challenge under the f o l l o w i n g c o n d i t i o n s : L Players p a r t i c i p a t i n g i n the t o u r n a m e n t shall have the first r i g h t to challenge i n the order of t h e i r s t a n d i n g a t the t e r m i n a t i o n of t h e t o u r n a m e n t , provided they a v a i l t h e m selves of t h a t p r i v i l e g e n o t l a t e r t h a n t e n days a f t e r the closing date o f the t o u r n a m e n t . Should there be more t h a n "One challenge w i t h i n the t i m e specified, the holder of the - 15 t r o p h y must recognize the challenge of the player r a n k i n g highest i n the t o u r n a m e n t . The rules heretofore g o v e r n i n g the w o r l d ' s championship of. the 18.2 b a l k l i n e game of b i l l i a r d s shall p r e v a i l , w i t h the f o l l o w i n g exceptions, t o - w i t : 1. Contests s h a l l involve a money stake of §500. 2. The sum of $250 must accompany a l l challenges. 3. The remainder of the stake money m u s t be deposited fifteen (15) days p r i o r to date of m a t c h . 4. The w i n n e r of the -championship emblem w i l l - n o t be r e quired to defend his t i t l e p r i o r to October 1, 1925, a n d he can name a n y date between October 1 a n d October 15 f o r the m a t c h , t h i s leeway of fifteen (15) days being allowed t o insure the securing of a suitable h a l l f o r t h e , match. 5. The w i n n e r of the first m a t c h , i n case o f any challenge then pending, w i l l be required to play t h e next m a t c h not later t h a n t h i r t y (30) days a f t e r the first m a t cc h h ,, Lk but can select any date between t w e n t y (20) days amdt nd t h i r t y (30) days f o l l o w i n g the first match. The holder of the emblem shall n o t be required t o play any m a t c h games f o r the championship d a r i n g tthe l period of A p r i l 1 to October 1. E n t r i e s f o r the t o u r n a m e n t elose J a n u a r y 24, 1925. A f t e r the closing of the entries, there s h a l l be no match ch games or exhibitions between players who have entered the he t o u r n a m e n t either before or w h i l e the t o u r n a m e n t is i n p r o«g-ress. I n the event of a t i e f o r first place, t h e t i e m u s t be play ed off. Should there be a t i e f o r second a n d t h i r d , t h i r d a n d f o u r t u h, or any succeeding places i n the t o u r n a m e n t , t h e n t h e w i n n e r of the t i e is to be decided by the highest g r a n d average made i n t h e t o u r n a m e n t by the t w o interested players. Should there be a t i e of those t w o i n the g r a n d average, t h e n the he L_ highest i n d i v i d u a l score is to decide the position of the playe?rs involved. The donor o f the emblem has the privilege of selecting t he h contestants f o r the first game to be played i n t h e t o u r n a m emt nt L and a l l succeeding games. A l l entries m u s t be addressed to the Brunswick-Balke-Col lender Company, 623 South Wabash Avenue,. Chicago,- I l l i n o i s J U N I O R P R O F E S S I O N A L 18.2 B A L K L I N E B I L L I A R D T O U R N A M E N T — T H E 1923 R E C O R D e A n o t h e r e n t i r e l y new feature i n the conduct of the game i n 1923 was the introduction of w h a t was termed the J u n i o r 18.2 professional 18.2 b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d t o u r n a m e n t . I t was arranged to give a l l the professional players outside of t h e regular I n t e r n a t i o n a l Tournament a chance to show t h e i r r e a l caliber and to give them an o p p o r t u n i t y to graduate i n t o the higher r a n k . This J u n i o r t o u r n a m e n t gave -the w o r l d a n i n s i g h t i n t o the r i c h field t h e r e is i n b i l l i a r d s for anyone who w o u l d master 16 t h a t game thoroughly, for the w i n n e r t u r n e d up i n Tadeo S u g a n u m a , a little J a p a n e s e boy, who took up b i l l i a r d s i n h i s home i n J a p a n s i x y e a r s ago a n d t h e n set out for this count r y i n s e a r c h .of f a m e i n the b i l l i a r d w o r l d . E n t e r i n g t h i s J u n i o r professional t o u r n a m e n t a t Detroit, S u g a n u m a , a c o m p a r a t i v e s t r a n g e r , won the title a n d for his p a i n s received m o r e t h a n $1,200 i n c a s h a n d a diamond medal w o r t h $1,000. S u g a n u m a w a s b o r n a t N a g a n o K e n , J a p a n , D e c . 12, 1901, so t h a t he is j u s t i n h i s t w e n t y - f o u r t h y e a r a n d w i t h a long a n d p e r h a p s b r i l l i a n t c a r e e r ahead of h i m . I n order to r e t a i n p e r m a n e n t possession of t h e trophy, he m u s t defend i t successfully i n challenge matches for one y e a r . T h e p l a y e r w h o is c h a m p i o n i n these J u n i o r c h a m p i o n s h i p c o n tests a t t h e t i m e n a m e d for the closing of entries to the r e g u l a r professional 18.2 b a l k l i n e world's c h a m p i o n s h i p w i l l also h a v e a good c h a n c e to get i n it, a chance w o r t h over $20,000 a y e a r to t h e m a n w h o c a n excel i n i t a n d a lot, too, to the p l a y e r s i n i t w h o c a n m a k e a good s h o w i n g . T h e s t a n d i n g of the p l a y e r s a t the conclusion of t h i s J u n i o r t o u r n a m e n t w a s : High High Gen. W. L. Run Aver. Aver. Suganuma 5 1 153 42.85 19.91 Bruno 4 2 185 21.42 15.96 Matsuyama 3 3 118 42.85 21.05 Taylor V 3 3 111 27.27 15.37 Cutler 2 4 85 17.64 16.40 Bos 2 4 167 21.42 16.16 McAndless 2 4 77 20.00 14.57 T h e class of p l a y i n g displayed w a s of a higher order t h a n t h a t of the first J u n i o r t o u r n a m e n t of t w e n t y years ago t h a t , introduced Hoppe, the h i g h r u n s a n d general average a l l the w a y t h r o u g h being considerably better. Bos s t a r t e d off as though he w a s going to clean up the field a n d w a l k a w a y w i t h the J u n i o r title. H e defeated T a y l o r in the opening g a m e of the t o u r n a m e n t 300 to 128 i n seventeen i n n i n g s , a n d i n the n e x t game beat C u t l e r 300 to 255 i n fourteen i n n i n g s . B u t S u g a n u m a , the u l t i m a t e w i n n e r , then gave B o s h i s first setback i n h i s t h i r d game, beating the H o l lander 300 to 167 i n t w e n t y i n n i n g s , after w h i c h Bos also lost h i s r e m a i n i n g three games a n d finished in a t r i p l e tie for last place. O n the s a m e day, November 23, the two l i t t l e J a p a n e s e entries gave the most b r i l l i a n t display of b i l l i a r d s s h o w n d u r i n g the s e r i e s . I n the first game d u r i n g the afternoon of t h a t day, S u g a n u m a beat T a y l o r 300 to 100 a n d r a n out i n seven i n n i n g s , a n d in the second g a m e M a t s u y a m a , i n w i n n i n g his first v i c t o r y of the series, tied S u g a n u m a ' s record by beating C u t l e r 300 to 130 i n seven i n n i n g s . Previous to the opening of t h e t o u r n a m e n t , M a t s u y a m a , w h o had been p l a y i n g a w o n d e r f u l g a m e i n exhibitions, w a s looked upon as the probable w i n n e r , but he got a w a y w i t h a poor s t a r t a n d did not accomplish his first victory u n t i l the fifth day of the t o u r n a m e n t . * F o l l o w i n g this first J u n i o r Professional t o u r n a m e n t , several challenge games were played, w h i c h resulted as f o l l o w s : J a n u a r y 23, 1924: S u g a n u m a . .* 1,200 Bruno '. 649 17 January 31, 1924: Suganuxna • , ? ?2 Matsuyama 1 1,146 T a y l o r did not challenge. -fe^p A p r i l 2, 1924: Suganuma 1,09a Cutler "1.200 October 24, 1924: Cutler 1,20© Bos 1,115 December 4, 1924: Cutler 1,150 McAndless 1,200 McAndless surrenders cue title to S u g a n u m a , December 31, 1924. J a n u a r y 18, 1925: Suganuma 1,078 Suzuki 1,209 M a r c h 27, 1925: Suzuki , 1,200 Matsuyama 645 I t was due to the w i n n i n g of his championship m a t c h w i t h Suganuma t h a t K a m e k i c h i S u z u k i w a s given his opportunity to enter the regular professional I n t e r n a t i o n a l 18.2 balkline billiard tournament in Chicago i n 1925 in w h i c h , although finishing i n last place, he made a n excellent showing, especially in the opening game of the tournament, i n w h i c h h e c a m e face to face w i t h the then Champion Hoppe. L I S T O F I N T E R N A T I O N A L 18.2 B A L K L I N E BILLIARD TOURNAMENTS SINCE T H E FIRST TOURNAMENT O F T H A T S O R T I N F E B R U A R Y , 1902 T h e first International 18.2 balkline billiard tournament took place in F e b r u a r y , 1902 a n d the records since then r e a d : 1902-03 1st 18.2 Tournament of F r a n c e — F e b . , 1902, P a r i s Game Single Grand Results High Points Average Average Run Played Won Lost 500 ... Players •Cure •Fournil •Vignaux Gibelin . . . . First World's Championship 18.2 Tournament* Feb. 3, 1903, P a r i s 1 20.83 Cure 19.76 2 ,500 1 tVignaux .. 2 29.48 22.29 1 20.08 Sutton . . . . 2 31.25 8.49 Slosson . . . . 0 11.83 3 *3 players tied. No decision. fDecided by F r e n c h in favor V i g n a u x on grand average. 18 118 138 200 71 . courts 1st Challenge 18.2—Jan 29, 1904, I ' a r i s Game Results Points Single Grand Won Lost Average Played Average 18 23-26 0 1 . .500 Players Sutton vs. •Vignaux 1 * V i g n a u x w o n 500 t o 496. w i t h t h e balls i n close order, a f a v o r a b l e leave, V i g n a u x needed to go o u t . High Run 128 0 19 6-26 146 W i t h 51 to go S u t t o n r a n 47 a n d , made a f a t a l masse effort. From r a p i d l y scored the 23 points he 1906 Second I n t e r n a t i o n a l 18.2 T o u r n a m e n t — A p r i l , 1906, New Y o r k City Game Points Results Single Grand High Players Played Won Lost Average Average Run *Slosson 500 5 1 33.33 18.47 153 Sutton 100. 24.14 234 Schaefer 31.25 22.04 171 Hoppe . 27.78 20.44 177 Cure 20.83 15.14 100 Cutler 24.04 14.46 146 - Morn ingstar 14.39 10.89 82 i—Oct. 18, 1906 tSutton .500 31.25 202 vs. Slosson 25. 75 . 18, 1906, N e w Y o r k %Sutton .500 26.31 107 .' « « ' vs. Hoppe 14.33 78 tSutton won 500 t o 375. I Sutton w o n 500 t o 258. 1907-08 M a t c h — J a n 2 1 , 1907, Chicago Game Results Single Grand Won Lost Average Average 1 0 17.86 3 r d Challenge Points High Players Played Run •Sutton 500 71 vs. Morningstar 0 1 16.86 4 t h Challenge M a t c h — N o v 5, 1907, Chicago t Sutton 500 1 0 33.33 232 vs. Schaefer, Sr. 0 1 16.06 93 5 t h Challenge M a t c h — J a n . 27, 1908, N e w Y o r k {Sutton ....500 93 0 7.46 vs. Morningstar 4.68 26 6th Challenge M a t c h — M a r c h 27th, 1908, New Y o r k f f Hoppe . . . 5 0 0 99 20.83 vs. Sutton 11.83 83 19 * S u t t o n w o n 500 to 477. f S u t t o n w o n 500 to 241. ( S u t t o n w o n 500 t o 309. T h e l o w averages i n t h i s m a t c h w e r e due to u n f a v o r a b l e t e m p e r a t u r e conditions w h i c h c h i l l e d t h e i v o r y . t f H o p p e w o n 500 to 272. H e held t h e t i t l e about a week, t h e n r e t i r e d t e m p o r a r i l y , r e t u r n i n g emblem t o donors. 1909 W o r l d ' s Championship T o u r n a m e n t 1 8 . 2 — M a r c h 22, 1909, New York City Game Points Results Single High Grand Players Played Won Lost Average Average Run * M o r n i n g s t a r 500 6 0 21.74 18.63 114 Sutton .... 5 1 33.33 22.82 148 S loss on 3 3 62.5 20.37 225 Cutler . , 3 3 21.74 14.88 93 2 4 22.73 15.95 181 Cline 1 5 17.66 14.25 118 Demarest . . 1 5 23.81 13.48 116 F o u r t h W o r l d ' s C h a m p i o n s h i p T o u r n a m e n t - —Nov. 22, 1909, New York I D e m a r e s t . . 500 4 1 16.66 15.35 163 tSutton 4 1 31.25 19.76 235 tCline 4 1 20.83 14.66 146 Slosson 2 3 17.58 14.33 123 CasBignol . . 1 4 18.68 125 13.55 Cutler 0 5 15.76 153 11.88 * M o r n i n g s t a r w o n , declined t o defend emblem—hence t h e r e were no challenge matches a n d emblem, reverted t o donors w h o a r r a n g e d f o r another t o u r n a m e n t f Demarest-Sutton-C1 i ne, tied, necessitating " p l a y o f f " games results o f w h i c h are on page 6. 1909-10 T i e " P l a y O f f " 4 t h T o u r n a m e n t 18.2—Dec. 1, 1909, N e w Y o r k Game Points Grand High Results Single Players Played Average Run Won Lost Average •Demarest . .500 108 1 0 25. vs. Cline .. 0 1 20.42 102 Tie " P l a y O f f " 4 t h T o u r n a m e n t 18.2—Dec. 2, 1909 N e w Y o r k t Sutton 1 0 16.66 ...500 78 vs. Cline .. 0 1 16. 78 Tie " P l a y O f f " 4 t h T o u r n a m e n t 18.2—Dec. 3, 1909 N e w Y o r k JDemarest ..500 35.71 117 vs. Sutton 0 21 1st Challenge M a t c h — F e b . 1910, Chicago ••Cline 0 ..1500 3 122 12.93 vs. Demarest . . 0 3 11.95 147 2nd Challenge M a t c h — A p r i l 2, 1910, S t . L o u i s tfCline 500 1 0 129 33.33 vs. Cutler 0 1 Third 20 3rd Challenge M a t c h — M a y 26, 1910, P h i l a d e l p h i a J+Hoppe . . . . 5 0 0 1 0 84 17.85 vs. Cline 0 14.59 66 *Demarest w o n 500 t o 388. f S u t t o n w o n 500 t o 480. m a r e s t w o n 500 t o 78, thereby w i n n i n g t o u r n a m e n t . * * C l i n e w o n t i t l e 1500 t o 1387. t f C l i n e w o n 500 to 42. I^Hoppe w o n t i t l e , 500 t o 394. 1911-12 4 t h Challenge M a t c h 18.2—Nov 28, 1911, N e w Y o r k Game Points Results Single Grand High Played Won Players Lost Averag Average Run . .500 1 0 •Hoppe . 22.72 80 vs. 0 1 Button 12.09 124 ] 5th Challenge! M a t c h 18.2- - F e b . 7, 1912, New York 1 0 29.41 fHoppe . 500 96 vs. 0 1 16.47 Sutton 67 6 t h Challenge M a t c h 18.2— A p r i l 11, 1912, N e w Y o r k 1 0 14.28 (Hoppe ....500 66 vs. 1 0 12.94 Demarest 96 7th Challenge M a t c h 18.2— •June 4, ] Philadelphia 1 20. 0 § Hoppe 500 100 vs. 1 0 15.84 Cline 66 •Hoppe w o n 500 t o 266. f H o p p e w o n 500 to 280. {Hoppe w o n 500 t o 440. §Hoppe w o n 500 t o 396. This m a t c h ended c o m p e t i t i o n . H o p p e successfully d e f e n d i n g t i t l e f o r 2 years became o w n e r of t r o p h y . 1912 F i f t h W o r l d ' s C h a m p i o n s h i p T o u r n a m e n t 18.2—Nov. 11, 1912, New York Game Points Results Single Grand High Players Played W o n Lost Average Average Run •Hoppe 500 6 1 29.41 18.8 122 Slosson . . . . 5 2 31.25 14.82 162 Yamada ... 4 3 25. 13.68 138 Morningstar 4 3 21.74 15.2 167 •Cline 3 4 16.66 10.47 85 Demarest . . 3 4 23.8 14.11 132 Sutton .... 2 6 20.83 12.39 140 Taylor .... 1 6 16.03 12.58 117 * I n t h e one game lost by H o p p e — Y a m a d a , t h e Japanese e x p e r t , defeated h i m i n a t h r i l l i n g f i n i s h by 3 p o i n t s . 1913 1st Challenge M a t c h 18.2—Feb 5, 1913, N e w Y o r k Game Results Single Points High Grand Won Lost Average Run Players Played Average 22.72 117 fHoppe 1 0 . .500 I vs. 14.83 99 Sutton 21 2nd Challenge M a t c h 18.2—May 27, 1913, New Y o r k JHoppe 500 1 0 41.66 115 vs. Yamada . . . 0 1 3. .... 15 yHoppe won 500 to 301. JHoppe w o n 500 to 33. N o other match competition w i t h i n the required 2-year period and Hoppe again became owner of the trophy. 1919 6th World's Championship Tournament 18.2- -Oct. 20-25, 1919, New Y o r k Game Points Results Single Grand High Players Played W o n Lost Average Average Run Hoppe 400 6 0 80 45.28 164 Mornings t a r 4 2 40 26.06 149 Cochran . . . 4 2 44.44 21.44 265 Schaefer .. 3 3 80 22.47 155 Yamada . . . 2 4 24.1 16.03 115 Sutton .... 2 4 59.6 20.38 148 Slosson 0 6 17.25 12.27 95 *Hoppe won. Cochran and M o r n i n g s t a r tied f o r 2nd and 3rd prizes w h i c h were divided equally. Note—Games were reduced to 400 points—challenge matches were eliminated—and a championship of a year's d u r a t i o n , immune f r o m attack, were new rulings applied to this t o u r n a ment. 1920 7th World's Championship Tournament 18.2—Dec 6-8, 1920, New Y o r k Game High Points Results Single Grand Players Run Played Won L o s t Average Average Hoppe . .400 4 0 50 29.62 239 Cochran 1 3 21.05 17.24 92 Schaefer 1 3 22.22 16.3 172 Only 3 contestants entered this meet—each played twice around. 1921 8th World's Championship Tournament 18.2 -Nov. 14-23, 1921, Chicago Game Points Results Single Grand High Players Played Won Average L o s t Average Run •Schaefer . .400 . 5 200 51.23 1 SIS Hoppe 5 66.66 34.33 1 282 fCochran 3 80 34.62 3 384 Conti 8 80 28.6 3 ISO Morningstar 2 50 27.84 4 237 Horemans 2 27.61 4 163 66.66 Sutton 1 28.22 5 156 3ll4 •Schaefer w o n . fCochran set new record h i g h run o f 884, and Schaefer's average of 200 was also a world's record.• 22 Challenge 1922 M a t c h — M a r . 27-29, 1922, Chicago Game Single Grand High Results Average Run Won L o s t Average 252 62 4-8 48.38 2 1 Points Players Played •Schaefer .1500 vs. Hoppe 1 2 69 3-7 48.93 260 2nd Challenge M a t c h — M a y 16-18, 1922, Chicago 3 0 fSchaefer 35 30-42 35.71 202 .1500 vs. Cochran 166 35 8-14 31.73 0 3 9th W o r l d ' s Championship T o u r n a m e n t 18.2—Nov. 13-21, 1922, New York 37.88 0 192 SHoppe 55.55 ,400 30.94 2 195 SSchaefer 55.55 30.06 2 204 Conti 41.66 28.69 2 244 Horemans . 35.71 23.91 4 140 Cochran . . . 33.33 24.26 5 178 Hagenlacher 31.4 •Schaefer w o n 1500 t o 1468. fSchaefer w o n 1500 t o 1333. $Hoppe w o n t o u r n a m e n t . fSchaefer awarded second place on h i g h g r a n d averaf e. T h i r d a n d f o u r t h places decided i n t h e same m a n n e r . 1923 10th W o r l d ' s Championship T o u r n a m e n t 18.2—Oct. 29-Nov. 5, 1923, N e w Y o r k 26.23 1 41.66 170 J :|: Hoppe ....500 62.5 24.70 1 146 JCochran . . . 41.66 27.41 2 169 Schaefer .. 31.25 24.97 3 241 Horemans . 22.72 18.16 3 157 Hagenlacher. 22.56 16.35 5 126 Conti ...... *Schaefer w o n 1500 t o 781 a n d qualified to p l a y Hoppe. f H o p p e w o n 1500 to 1341. $ Hoppe a n d Cochran t i e d f o r first place a n d " p l a y o f f " m a t c h a r r a n g e d t o decide w i n n e r . W i t h C h a m p i o n — J a n . 8-9-10, 1923, Chicago Game Points Results Single Grand High Players Played W o n Lost Average Average Run 'Schaefer . . M 0 0 34.88 209 H vs. Conti oppe Sc VSj 18.59 F i n a l M a t c h - - M a r . 12-13-14, 1923, N e w Y o r k 1500 34.09 115 186 31.18 244 1924 haefer .. - x Championship 10th T o u r n a m e n t — C h i c a g o Game T i e " P l a yP oO i nftfs" Results Single High Grand Players Played Lost Won Average Average Run .* Hoppe .1500 1 44 4-34 2 211 vs. Coc* r a n 84 5-34 107 23 1st Challenge Match—Jan. 10-11-12, 1924, Boston fHoppe 22.8 135 ..1500 3 0 vs. Cochran 18.87 142 2nd Challenge Match—Jan. 21-22-23, 1924, Chicago JHoppe .1500 27.77 182 vs. Schaefer, 2nd 22.14 170 3rd Challenge M a t c h — A p r i l 8-9-10, 1924, Mew Y o r k tfHoppe ...1500 1 0 25.42 276 vs. Horemans.. 0 1 16.23 197 •Hoppe won 1500 to 1161. fHoppe won 1500 to 1189. JHopp« won 1500 to 1196. tfHoppe won 1500 to 958. 1925 11th World's .Championship Tournament 18.2—Feb. 23 to March 4, 1925, Chicago Game Points Results Single Grand High Players Played Won Lost Average Average Run Schaefer 5 0 400 57.14 400 • • a • Horemans 4 1 45.2 247 •• • • Hagenlacher. 3 2 22.06 228 • • • • Hoppe .... 2 3 28.75 197 Cochran . . . 1 4 27.41 308 .... Suzuki . . . . 0 6 15.84 95 .... RULES FOR 18.2 B A L K L I N E B I L L I A R D S The rules under which the world's balkline tournament of 1925 was conducted and under which a l l games at this style of billiards should now be played read: The balk lines should be drawn on a 5x10 table, 18 inches from the edges of the cushions and the eight anchor spaces should also be drawn on the table. The eight spaces at the sides and ends of the table are the balk spaces. The large central space is not a balk, and there is no restriction as to the number of caroms that may be made therein. I n addition to the General Rules of Billiards, the following special rules govern the 18.2 Balk Line Game: SPECIAL B A L K L I N E R U L E S 1 —The object balls are i n balk whenever both have stopped w i t h i n any one of the balk spaced. I n such case the marker shall call " i n , " and when one or both object balls shall be driven out of balk space, the marker shall call " o u t . " 2— A ball on the line is a ball i n balk. A ball is on the lino only when its center or point of contact w i t h the table touches this line. '^fpf 3— When two object balls are on the same line, the striker shall have the option to determine i n which balk they are to be called, and must then govern his play accordingly. P L A Y I N G I N A N D OUT OF B A L K , 4—When both object balls are w i t h i n one of the restricted spaces, only one carom may be scored without d r i v i n g at least one of the object balls out of the space. I f , on the second 24 t •Btroke, a t least one of the object balls is not driven out, the shot is f o u l , the carom cannot be scored and the s t r i k e r loses his i n n i n g . Should an object ball be driven out of the space and r e t u r n , another carom may be scored, but again, on the second stroke, a t least one object b a l l must be driven out, and this may be repeated w i t h o u t l i m i t . Only t w o shots are allowed i n balk or anchor spaces. BALLS " I N ANCHOR" 5—The object balls shall be considered as " I n A n c h o r " when the centres of both balls lie w i t h i n a space 7 inches i n w i d t h and 7 inches i n l e n g t h , defined on one side by the cushion and on the other three sides by lines marked w i t h chalk, and of which space the balk line, wherever i t intersects a cushion, shall be the centre f r o m left to r i g h t . W h e n the balls are so "anchored" the s t r i k e r may have t w o consecutive shots but should he f a i l on the second shot to force one or both of the object balls outside the " a n c h o r " space, the second shot is void, and the incoming s t r i k e r plays on the balls as he finds them. A ball driven out of and r e t u r n i n g inside a n " a n c h o r " space is considered the same as " i n " f o r the first t i m e . I n the last t w e n t y years or r a t h e r since the first great v i c t o r y of W i l l i e Hoppe over Maurice V i g n a u x the champion of France, these 18.2 balk line b i l l i a r d games have been of world-wide interest and many of the happenings i n connection w i t h them are w o r t h y of mention i n this book. HOPPE'S FIRST GREAT VICTORY I t Came at P a r i s , France, i n 1906 When He Defeated Maurice V i g n a u x I t was i n the 1906 year t h a t the name of W i l l i a m F . Hoppe first appeared a t the head of the column. Two years before i n a t o u r n a m e n t of the Y o u n g Masters a t Paris, France, he had w o n his first honors. N o w he appeared as a star of the first flight ready to meet the best of them. M a n y a newspaper the w o r l d over held its final edition the m o r n i n g of J a n u a r y 16, 1906, f o r the result of the w o r l d championship cue match i n P a r i s , France, between W i l l i e Hoppe and Maurice V i g n a u x . I t was k n o w n only before m i d n i g h t t h a t the match was long d r a w n out and had gone f a r into the m o r n i n g . Few conceded the 18-year-old Yankee boy a chance against the 59-year-old Frenchman, who had held the t i t l e of champion f o r t w e n t y years. B u t news is news. A l l the great journals were anxious to chronicle the result of the great m a t c h f o r t h e i r readers. The score had been expected early. W e had six hours difference of t i m e i n our favor. I t was a tedious w a i t . N o t u n t i l long after m i d n i g h t did the cable c a r r y the news to America. Here is how i t r e a d : FLASH**—PARIS: HOPPE W I N S . T h a t was a l l . The score was missing, the h i g h r u n and the average. B u t t h a t brief bulletin proclaimed to the followers of the gentleman's game t h a t the American youngster's t r i p 25 1 across the sea had resulted i n a t r i u m p h . T h a t a Yankee boyheld the world's championship at 18.1 balk line. This match was the most important of W i l l i e Hoppe's phenomenal career. George Butler Sutton, at a preceding date, had tried to w i n the title. Vignaux defeated h i m 600 to 496. A f t e r Sutton lost, Hoppe announced that he would challenge for the 18.1 crown. Many admitted his wonderful ability w i t h the cue. Few believed he had a chance, however, against the wonderful Frenchman. B u t Hoppe went to France. The match was played i n the Grand Hotel, Paris. Count de Dree was the referee. Three thousand spectators watched the cueists. I t was a fashionable gathering of the elite. Beaux and belles were present. One would have to use a copy of Burke's "Peerage" to give the names of those aristocrats and members of the nobility who applauded the great Frenchman and cheered the 18-year-old American boy. The stake was $1,000 a side. A l l the gate receipts went to the winner. Vignaux opened a strong favorite. N a t Goodwin and a party of Americans, who made the t r i p especially f r o m London to see the match, backed the l i t t l e Yankee boy heavily. Still playing at 18.2 balk line billiards George F . Slosson and George Sutton were champions i n t u r n i n the 1906 year while playing at 18.1 W i l l i e Hoppe captured leading honors that season. I n 1907 Sutton, Hoppe and Schaefer held the 18.1 championship i n t u r n and the closing of the latter's championship career came i n the following year. T H E PASSING OF T H E FIRST JACOB SCHAEFER I t Came A f t e r His Defeat of W i l l i e Hoppe at Chicago i n March, 1908 The Schaeferian era of billiards lasted f r o m 1879 when the first Jacob Schaefer lifted the crown f r o m the brow of W i l l i a m Sexton of New York. From that day u n t i l March 11, 1908, or twenty-nine y e a n ia a l l , the first Jacob Schaefer was the bright particular star of the billiard game, his great skill, fleetness and brilliancy outrivaling a l l his would-be rivals. On that day i n March the old wizard closed his wonderful career by defeating W i l l i e Hoppe, who had been one of his pupils i n a game that took place at Orchestra H a l l i n Chicago. That game stands out as a red letter one i n the history of billiards inasmuch as i t was the last Schaefer ever took part i n . A f t e r that game, i n fact Schaefer went to Denver, to t r y to recuperate his shattered health and he diea there on March 10, 1910, a day more than two years after his meeting w i t h Hoppe. I n that last game, Schaefer, to the surprise of a l l defeated Hoppe, defeated h i m at a time when the boy was playing Wonderful billiards, and had been holding the championship for several years. • I n fact, the game resulted i n a b r i l l i a n t victory for the elder Schaefer, and by the long score of 600 to 423. 1 HOPPE'S W O N D E R F U L RECORD I t Came Directly After the Passing of the First Jacob Schaefer Young W i l l i e Hoppe, as he was then called, after the death of the elder Schaefer, went out and beat the world at 18.2 balk line billiards. For 13 years he proved himself invincible, u n t i l the night of November 23, 1921, when he came face to face w i t h Young Jacob Schaefer, son of the man who had beaten h i m 16 years before. The younger Schaefer had previously fallen before Hoppe's s k i l l but now the widow of the old champion and the wife of the younger Schaefer came to see the name of Schaefer placed a t the top of the billiard column again. A n d they were not disappointed. I n this match a change of cue won the championship for Hoppe f r o m the elder Schaefer and a miscue on the part of Hoppe handed i t back to the younger Schaefer. Once more Time had made things even. The younger Schaefer was i n his twenty-seventh year when on the night of November 23, 1921, he defeated W i l l i e Hoppe i n the 18.2 world's balk line billiard tournament of that year and i n which Cochran, Conti, Horemans, Morningstar and Sutton were the other starters and who finished as named. The victory was a popular one w i t h Chicagoans, for the name Schaefer is magic here i n billiards, the first title holder by that name being not only a popular hero for years but beloved by a l l who knew h i m f o r his great heart and kindly ways. The father of Hoppe's conqueror i n fact was for years the recognized genius of the game, caused several drastic innovations i n i t and did much to b r i n g i t to the high standard i t now enjoys. Every advancement that had been made i n carom billiards up to this time was due to the " W i z a r d ' s " startling conceptions and amazing s k i l l . Every restriction excepting the large anchor box, seven inches square, introduced f r o m straight r a i l to balk line, was designed to check the first Schaefer's operations. U n t i l after his father's death, i n 1910, the Schaefer of the present did not take to billiards seriously. The father wished the son to engage i n another pursuit. The young man did not develop rapidly. U p to the 1921 year because of the closing of the academy i n San Francisco, where he was employed, playing three cushions and red ball, he applied himself to balk line and made sensational strides. I n a match of 4,800 points, 18.2, for $500 a side, played at Maurice Daly's just before he defeated Hoppe the younger Schaefer defeated Edouard Horemans and incidentally scored the highest r u n ever made i n competition, 486. I n a subsequent match at San Francisco he again defeated Horemans and made the extraordinary average of 57 1-5. 27 Schaefer i n this 1921 year therefore had a t last reached t h a t p o i n t when even the skeptics who had come to look o n Hoppe as invincible gave h i m a chance to w i n . Hoppe i n this 1921 year before meeting Y o u n g Jacob Schaefer had been champion f r o m 1906 on, fifteen years i n a l l , w i t h o n l y a break i n his w i n n i n g chain of one year, 1908, when Slosson and Sutton captured leading honors a t the 18.1 game. I n 1909 the lines were changed to 18.2 a n d O r a M o r n i n g s t a r a n d C a l v i n Demarest w e n t to the top of the column. I n 1910 Hoppe a g a i n came to the f r o n t , he w i n n i n g the championship t h a t year a t both 18.1 and 18.2 billiards a n d h o l d i n g the w h i p h a n d to t h i s 1921 year so t h a t when he came to face Schaefer i n the I n t e r n a t i o n a l he was looked on as w e l l n i g h invincible. W H E N YOUNG SCHAEFER DEFEATED HOPPE T h a t M a t c h Took Place i n Chicago and Was the Greatest Ever Played U p to t h a t Time Orchestra H a l l , Chicago, was crowded to the doors w i t h b i l l i a r d enthusiasts on the n i g h t of Wednesday, November 23, 1921. I t was a n i g h t l o n g to be remembered i n w o r l d b i l l i a r d annals. I t m a r k e d the dethronement of W i l l i e Hoppe, f o r sixteen years the champion a t the 18.2 balk l i n e game, his c r o w n being taken by Y o u n g Jacob Schaefer, son of the old w i z a r d of t h e game, i n his day champion of a l l champions. The final score was 500 to 346 and t o w i n Schaefer had to break a l l records, his average of 83 2-6 being the best ever scored i n a single game f o r the t i t l e , w h i l e Hoppe's average o f 69 1-5 was the highest ever made by a loser. P r i o r to t h i s deciding game of the 1921 I n t e r n a t i o n a l the score stood: Won Lost B.A. G.A. Hoppe 5 1 66 2/8 51.28 Schaefer 5 1 200 34.33 Cochran 3 3 80 34.62 Conti 8 3 80 28.6 Morningstar 2 4 50 27.84 Horemans 2 4 66 2/3 27.61 Sutton 1 5 37 1/7 28.22 I t w i l l be noticed by the above figures t h a t Schaefer a n d Hoppe were tied f o r the lead when they w e n t i n t o the Wednesday n i g h t contest. On the F r i d a y n i g h t previous Schaefer defeated Hoppe by 400 t o 26 i n the last r e g u l a r 400 p o i n t game of the t o u r n a ment. T h a t brought the t i e , and this game of 500 points was the play-off. The n i g h t before, Schaefer found himself i n a position where he had to w i n t w o s t r a i g h t games t o w i n the championship. I t was • a t r y i n g a n d c r i t i c a l place he found himself i n but he proved easily equal to the occasion. P r i o r to t h i s deciding game Schaefer a n d Hoppe had beaten the other leading players of the w o r l d and the b a t t l e for world's honors, a f t e r Schaefer's v i c t o r y of Tuesday n i g h t , had simmered down t o a contest between the t w o leaders. 28 I t has been often claimed that the early players of this sport and that did not compare w i t h the players of today, but the fact remains that the two greatest players coming out a t the top i n this 1921 world's billiard tournament were both pupils of the old master. Hoppe was then i n his 34th year, while young Schaefer, born i n Chicago, was just turned 26. F r o m 1879 to 1908, or t h i r t y years i n a l l , the elder Schaefer was the master at billiards, the greatest player the world has ever known. I n the declining years of his championship, the elder Schaefer, whose only son was then a little fellow, looked about for someone on whom to place the billiard crown and out of the many he met he singled W i l l i e Hoppe, then a youngster i n short pants. To young Hoppe, the first Schaefer unfolded a l l the mysteries of the game. He taught h i m every curve and tangent of billiards and Hoppe proved so apt a pupil t h a t when old Jake passed on, Hoppe went into the lead and remained there u n t i l this n i g h t i n November, when he came face to face w i t h the son of his old master. Young Schaefer was only 15 years of age when his father passed away i n 1910. He had i n h i m a l l the fine traits of his father, nerves of steel and wonderful eyes, great and liberal heart and a pair of magnificent hands. But unlike Hoppe, he had not the advantage of the teachings of the old master, due to the fact that he had come into the world too late, and though his father showed h i m the game when he was only eight years of age and f r o m that u n t i l he was fourteen, s t i l l Hoppe had the advantage over h i m by at least ten years, years that counted much at that period of the lives of the t w o youngsters. But even a t that, before young Schaefer had reached his fifteenth year, the father had given to the son the methods needed to make h i m a successful balkline player, lessons he never forgot and which really laid the foundation for his wonderfully successful career. B u t when i t came to actual playing, Hoppe, w i t h his ten years' advantage, dashed away in. the lead and remained there f o r sixteen years. I n the meanwhile young Schaefer was learning and improving so rapidly and playing i n such excellent f o r m that there were many who prophesied he would give Hoppe a great battle when they met. The wise men of the game did n o t think so. B u t i n this game young Jacob Schaefer proved t h a t he had the heart and staying quality of his father and he won out in the greatest game ever played at this style of billiards. ; YOUNG SCHAEFER'S GREATEST PERFORMANCE I t Came i n His Crucial Game w i t h Hoppe i n the International Series of 1921 I n this, 1921, one of the most exciting billiard championship games i n the history of the sport Schaefer won the bank and r a n 86 before missing. Hoppe, who had been off his stroke i n this tournament then gave evidence of suddenly regaining his true f o r m by r u n n i n g 140 before missing. 29 W i t h the cheers f o r Hoppe r i n g i n g i n his ears, the t a l l , calm youngster took his cue and shot 212 of the most beautiful billiards the thousands of spectators had ever seen. Schaefer's control of the ivories a t t h i s moment was simply perfect. A f t e r t h i s master i n n i n g both players seemed t o relax under the h i g h tension. B u t i n the f i f t h i n n i n g Schaefer again got a s t a r t and r a n 130, missing an easy chance. A t t h i s stage he had only 44 to go and Hoppe, r e a l i z i n g t h a t f o r the first t i m e i n 16 years he stood to lose his coveted championship, deliberately prepared f o r his master effort. H e had the spheres i n beautiful position and was c l i c k i n g the points off a t a dizzy rate when he mis cued. I t was the break of the game, and f o l l o w i n g i t his younger opponent quickly went out w i t h a n unfinished r u n of 44. The final score w a s : Schaefer—86, 212, 16, 12, 130, 44—500. Average 83 2/6. Hoppe—140, 26, 7, 126, 47—346. Average 69 1/5. I t seemed as though the e n t i r e g a t h e r i n g arose a t the finish and i n a volley of cheers, accompanied by s t a m p i n g and hand clapping attested t h e i r j o y a t the v i c t o r y of the son of the old master. I t was sure enough a popular victory and cheers were not only given f o r the victor b u t f o r the loser, a n d three cheers and a t i g e r f o r Referee Levis, who had refereed a l l the games superbly. This tournament of 1921 w h i c h saw the championship pass f r o m Hoppe to the younger Schaefer was the most i m p o r t a n t and best patronized i n the history of the game. I t was held i n the Congress H o t e l , Chicago, and was a success i n every w a y , the h a l l being filled to capacity d u r i n g every n i g h t of the entire week. The t o u r n a m e n t was held under the auspices of the B r u n s wick-Balke-Collender Company and much of its success was due to the w o r k of President B. E . Bensinger of t h a t company, who visited Europe and who, by e n l i s t i n g Roger C o n t i of France and Edouard Horemans of B e l g i u m , added to the t o u r n a m e n t the i n t e r n a t i o n a l t i n g e t h a t made i t so i n t e r e s t i n g and of w o r l d prominence. I n the fine performances of the players t h i s tournament was also the most w o n d e r f u l i n b i l l i a r d history. A l l records were broken and the figures prove how w o n d e r f u l l y the great players have improved i n t h e i r p l a y i n g i n the last f e w years. The tournament was l i m i t e d t o seven players, subject to a n entrance fee of $250 f r o m each player, and the starters were W i l l i e Hoppe, the champion, Jacob Schaefer, Welker Cochran, Ora M o r n i n g s t a r , George Sutton and Edouard Horemans of Belgium and Roger C o n t i of France. The Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company contributed a purse of $5,000, w h i c h , together w i t h the entrance fees p a i d by the players, was distributed among the contestants according t o their standing a t the close of the t o u r n a m e n t , as f o l l o w s : F i r s t prize, Jacob Schaefer $3,000 Second prize, W i l l i a m Hoppe : 1,500 T h i r d prize, Welker Cochran 1,000 F o u r t h prize, Roger C o n t i 750 P A t the t i m e the 1921 t o u r n a m e n t was held the ages of the players t a k i n g p a r t i n i t w e r e : Schaefer, 2 6 ; Hoppe, 8 4 ; C o c h r a n , 23; C o n t i , 20; M o r n i n g s t a r , 40; H o r e m a n s , 36, a n d S u t t o n , 57. A f t e r t h i s t o u r n a m e n t M o r n i n g s t a r a t 40 a n d Sutton a t 57 dropped out of the r u n n i n g . They had u n t i l t h a t 1921 year been considered among the f i r s t f l i g h t of great balk line players. I n the 1912 year S u t t o n a n d M o r n i n g s t a r were a t the crest of t h e i r careers a n d t h a t season each w o n t h e championship a n d divided the leading honors of t h a t year between t h e m . Ten years l a t e r they were s t i l l i n the r u n n i n g , but when t h e f o r e i g n champions Edouard Horemans of B e l g i u m and Roger C o n t i of France came along, Sutton and M o r n i n g s i a r stepped aside so t h a t the t w o newcomers could make up the s i x needed i n the I n t e r n a t i o n a l . B u t even w h e n r e t i r i n g S u t t o n and M o r n i n g s t a r were s t i l l great players. I n t h e year 1921 f o l l o w i n g t h e i r w i t h d r a w a l f r o m t h a t year s I n t e r n a t i o n a l , M o r n i n g s t a r played a remarkable game a t San Diego, C a l i f o r n i a , w i t h E d o u a r d Horemans. Horemans w o n by 2400 t o 2866. I n the last 400-point block, M o r n i n g s t a r f a r ahead, r a n 306. B u t Horemans w o n the games w i t h a n unfinished r u n of 461, made w h e n M o r n i n g s t a r required o n l y 64 points t o w i n . D u r i n g his career M o r n i n g s t a r took p a r t i n m a n y i m p o r t a n t games. I n 1919 i n the professional t o u r n a m e n t a t N e w Y o r k , Hoppe w o n , Cochran was second a n d M o r n i n g s t a r , t h i r d . I n 1919 at San Francisco, M o r n i n g s t a r also finished t h i r d to Cochran and Schaefer. A p r i l 25 to 27, 1918, i n a t o u r n a m e n t i n t h e Recreation B u i l d i n g a t D e t r o i t , M o r n i n g s t a r w o n , leading honors f r o m Cochran, Schaefer and Yamada. L a t e r t h a t year, however, he was beaten i n l o n g games w i t h Cochran a t D e t r o i t and by scores of 3,600 to 1,858. THE 1922 INTERNATIONAL TOURNAMENT I t B r o u g h t i n C o m p e t i t i o n the Three Best A m e r i c a n Three Best European Players and the I t was a f t e r the 1921 I n t e r n a t i o n a l T o u r n a m e n t a t Chicago, t h a t B . E. Bensinger, president of t h e B r u n s w i c k - B a l k e Collender Company, saw t h a t a complete and internat i o n a l t i n g e was needed t o create increased interest i n the g r e a t 18.2 balk l i n e b i l l i a r d contest and t o t h a t end he set o u t f o r Europe w i t h t h e i n t e n t i o n of e n l i s t i n g others of the best players over t h e r e i n t h e w o r l d ' s t o u r n a m e n t w h i c h he had planned t o t a k e place i n the H o t e l Pennsylvania, N e w Y o r k , November 13 t o 2 1 , 1922. A s a r e s u l t of M r . Bensinger's t r i p t o t h e other side, a n e n t i r e l y different color was given t o the I n t e r n a t i o n a l o f t h a t year, no less t h a n three foreigners app e a r i n g a m o n g t h e six s t a r t e r s , included a m o n g them being Roger C o n t i , representing France, and Edouard Horemans, B e l g i u m , who had t a k e n p a r t i n the 1921 t o u r n a m e n t , and 31 E r i c h Hagenlacher of Germany. These three foreigners i n this I n t e r n a t i o n a l faced t h e three great A m e r i c a n players, W i l l i a m Hoppe, young Jacob Schaefer and Welker Cochran. I n this I n t e r n a t i o n a l , according to the conditions, ties f o r other t h a n first position were n o t played off. They were decided by t h e respective g r a n d averages of t h e players i n volved. Schaefer, C o n t i and Horemans each w o n three games and lost t w o . W i t h a g r a n d average of 30.94, Schaefer was awarded second prize. C o n t i , w i t h 30.06-, was placed t h i r d , and Horemans, w i t h 28.69, f o u r t h . The second and t h i r d were privileged to compete i n a game of 1,500 points to determine which would become eligible to challenge Hoppe f o r t h e c h a m pionship. Schaefer defeated C o n t i , and qualified to challenge f o r the championship. Hoppe defeated Schaefer and became absolute champion u n t i l the next t o u r n a m e n t . I f he had lost, he would have had the r i g h t to challenge the v i c t o r t o play another game to finally decide the t i t l e . These were the records made i n this t o u r n a m e n t : High Single Grand Won Lost Run Average Average Hoppe 5 0 192 55.55 37.88 Schaefer, 2nd 3 2 195 55.55 30.94 Conti 3 2 204 41.66 30.06 Horemans 3 2 244 35.71 28.69 Cochran 1 4 140 33.33 28.91 Hagenlacher 0 5 178 31.4 24.26 Results of Games Played Schaefer 500, Hagenlacher 328; C o n t i 500, Cochran 376; Hoppe 500, Horemans 177; Cochran 500, Hagenlacher 4 7 1 ; Schaefer 500, C o n t i 2 5 1 ; Horemans 500, Hagenlacher 301 ; Hoppe 500, Cochran 162; C o n t i 500, Hagenlacher 355; H o r e mans 500, Schaefer 3 2 1 ; Horemans 500, Cochran 405; Hoppe 500, Conti 203; Hoppe 500, Hagenlacher 462; Schaefer 500, Cochran 303; Conti 500, Horemans 303; Hoppe 500, Schaefer 283. The Prizes To W i l l i e Hoppe, the w i n n e r of the 1922 I n t e r n a t i o n a l 18.2 Balkline tournament w e n t the magnificent t r o p h y emblematic of the world's championship a t this game and presented by t h e Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company. To Hoppe too, w e n t the first prize of $3,000 and 46 per cent of the net gate receipts which amounted to $3,680. To Schaefer, who finished second, w e n t $1,500 prize and 23 per cent of the net gate receipts, w h i c h amounted to $1,500. To Conti, who finished t h i r d , w e n t a $1,000 prize and 15 per pent of the net gate receipts, w h i c h amounted to $1,000. To Horemans, who finished f o u r t h , w e n t a $750 prize and 12 per cent of the net gate receipts w h i c h amounted to $960. To Cochran, who finished f i f t h , w e n t a $250 prize and 4 per cent of the net gate receipts or $250. Hagenlacher, who finished s i x t h a n d last, did not figure in the awards. 82 THE 1923 INTERNATIONAL TOURNAMENT I t B r o u g h t A b o u t a Tie Between W i l l i e Hoppe and W e l k e r Cochran The 1923 I n t e r n a t i o n a l T o u r n a m e n t was one of t h e most i n t e r e s t i n g ever held. I t was so w e l l contested t h a t i t resulted i n a t i e between Champion W i l l i e Hoppe a n d W e l k e r Cochran, w h i c h was followed by t h e play-off f o r the world's championship a m o n t h later. The I n t e r n a t i o n a l T o u r n a m e n t of 1923 took place i n the g r a n d b a l l room i n the H o t e l Pennsylvania i n N e w Y o r k , comm e n c i n g on October 29 and e n d i n g November 5. The s t a r t e r s were Champion W i l l i e Hoppe of N e w Y o r k ; W e l k e r Cochran, of H o l l y w o o d , C a l i f o r n i a ; Jacob Schaefer, of Los Angeles, C a l i f o r n i a ; E d o u a r d Horemans, champion of B e l g i u m , H o l l a n d ; E r i c h Hagenlacher, champion of Germany, and Roger C o n t i , champion of France. These contestants f i n ished i n this o r d e r : High • Grand W. L. Run Average Hoppe 4 1 170 26 23—85 Cochran 4 1 146 24 70—94 Schaefer 3 2 169 27 41—72 Horemans 2 3 241 25 8—94 Hagenlacher 2 3 157 18 16—99 Conti 0 5 126 16 35—108 Hoppe Hagenlacher Cochran Conti Schaefer Horemans Hagenlacher Conti Cochran Hoppe . . : Hagenlacher Cochran Schaefer . Conti Hoppe Horemans Horemans Conti Schaefer Hagenlacher Hoppe Conti Horemans Hagenlacher Cochran S U M M A R Y OF GAMES Score 500 424 500 457 500 451 500 131 500 230 500 323 500 342 500 435 500 475 600 173 500 861 500 201 500 83 19 16 20 18 26 23 22 6 31 15 20 13 20 14 33 29 20 20 41 14 29 22 81 12 62 Av. 6—26 24—25 7—25 6—19 14—19 16—22 5—21 4—16 5—15 20—24 11—24 20—24 10—23 5—15 20—24 15—23 8—12 5—12 7—17 9—16 4—16 9—16 4—8 H.R. 106 121 86 72 88 99 114 84 146 58 157 78 169 98 170 241 112 126 104 108 135 97 130 80 141 54 500 472 7 23 23 41 40 5— -7 17-—21 12-- 2 0 8 - -12 7 - -11 21 88 171 152 167 The games were held under the auspices o f The B r u n s w i c k Balke-Collender Company who c o n t r i b u t e d a purse o f $5,000, w h i c h , together w i t h the entrance fees p a i d by t h e players, was d i s t r i b u t e d a m o n g t h e contestants according t o t h e i r s t a n d i n g a t the close of the t o u r n a m e n t , as f o l l o w s : F i r s t prize $3,000 Second p r i z e 1,500 T h i r d prize 1,000 F o u r t h prize 750 F i f t h prize 250 The t o u r n a m e n t was l i m i t e d t o s i x players, subject t o a n entrance fee of $250 f r o m each p l a y e r . The net gate receipts, a f t e r deducting expenses i n c i d e n t t o the t o u r n a m e n t , was divided a m o n g the contestants i n p r o p o r t i o n to the a m o u n t ef t h e p r i z e w o n by each i n t h i s w a y : W i n n e r o f ' f i r s t prize 46% W i n n e r of second prize 23% W i n n e r of t h i r d prize 15% W i n n e r of f o u r t h prize 12 % W i n n e r of f i f t h p r i z e 4% The holder of the t r o p h y was required to defend the same f o r a period of one year, subject t o t h e rules g o v e r n i n g t h e 18.2 balk l i n e championship. I t w i l l be noticed by t h e above t h a t Hoppe a n d Cochran t i e d f o r leading honors a n d f o l l o w i n g the r u l e covering ties they m e t i n Orchestra H a l l , Chicago, on December 17, 18 a n d 19 w i t h J . H e r b e r t Levis officiating as referee. This m a t c h was of 1500 p o i n t s played i n blocks o f 600 a n d the scores on t h e three n i g h t s w e r e : Monday, December 17— Cochran—5 2 33 74 8 9 — T o t a l 203. Average, 40 3—5. Hoppe—150 34 46 211 5 9 — T o t a l 500 Average, 100. Tuesday, December 18— Hoppe—5 2 2 1 1 1 9 0 2 52 162 3 207 5 3 — T o t a l 51 Average, 35 10—14. G r a n d t o t a l , 1,000. G r a n d average, 55 10—18. Cochran—50 2 34 0 2 0 0 4 69 9 20 13 3 0 — T o t a l 233.. Average, 17 12—13. G r a n d t o t a l , 436. G r a n d average, 24 4—18. Wednesday, December 19— The figures o n t h e final block o f t h e championship m a t c h follow: H o p p e — (1,000)—63 0 206 4 144 4 28 4 1 23 0 9 0 7 1 16— T o t a l 500. Average, 29 7—17. G r a n d t o t a l , 1,500. H i g h r u n s , 206 a n d 211. G r a n d average, 44 4—34. C o c h r a n — ( 4 3 6 ) — 1 45 51 40 22 92 107 0 81 79 44 0 66 0 0 97 — T o t a l 725. Average, 45 5—16. G r a n d t o t a l , 1,164. H i g h r u n s , 107, 97. G r a n d average, 84 5—84. 24 Referee—J. H . Levis. Hoppe's first r u n of 53 gave h i m a t o t a l of 106 f o r the r u n , as he had 53 unfinished on Tuesday n i g h t . 18.2 B A L K L I N E W O R L D ' S RECORDS M A D E I N CHAMPIONSHIP P L A Y Highest unfinished r u n i n world's t o u r n a m e n t 400—Young Jake Schaefer p l a y i n g against Hagenlacher a t Chicago on Feb. 26, 1925. H i g h r u n of 400 i n one i n n i n g — Y o u n g J a k e Schaefer, C h i cago, 111., 1925, i n w o r l d ' s t o u r n a m e n t . Highest single average—Young Jacob Schaefer is the holder of t h e w o r l d ' s h i g h r e c o r d single average of 400 m a d e i n t h e 1925 i n t e r n a t i o n a l 18.2 b a l k l i n e t o u r n a m e n t . M I S C E L L A N E O U S 18.2 B A L K L I N E RECORDS Three h i g h r u n record—Young Schaefer, i n 1921, set a world's record, 51 1/7 average i n a 4,000-point game against Horemans a t San Francisco, m a k i n g h i g h runs of 394-278-230 and 214. I n a week's p l a y a t N e w Y o r k fie averaged 47 54/100, g e t t i n g h i g h r u n of 436. H i g h r u n , 18.2 balkline—1,009 single i n n i n g ; W . W . Spink, Los Angeles, Cal., Oct. 12, 1912. 18.2 B a l k l i n e — H i g h e s t single average, 125, W i l l i e Hoppe vs. George Sutton, Chicago, I I I . , Feb. 24, 1914. Hoppe scored 500 i n f o u r i n n i n g s , Hoppe scored 1,500 i n three n i g h t s , 500 each n i g h t , f o r g r a n d average of 55 1 5 / 2 7 ; Hoppe averaged 150 i n 300-point m a t c h , Des Moines, l a . , Nov. 2 1 , 1916. 35 NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP INTERSTATE CUSHION B I L L I A R D LEAGUE THREE A n Organization Established i n 1922 to Look A f t e r the Welfare of This Style of Game I n June, 1922, the N a t i o n a l Championship I n t e r s t a t e Three Cushion B i l l i a r d League of America was organized i n C h i cago. This association was established to look a f t e r the general welfare of this style of b i l l i a r d p l a y i n g , and selected men long famous i n the b i l l i a r d w o r l d and k n o w i n g a l l the curves, tangents and angles of this style of sport, t o handle its affairs. I t s first executives were E . M . H e l m , Cleveland, P r e s i d e n t ; Joseph M o l l , Manager of the Recreation Company, of Detroit* Vice-President; John E. Scanlan, Manager of the F r e d G. S m i t h Recreation Palace, of Milwaukee, Secretary and Treasurer. Executive Committee: L . A . Bensinger, Chicago; Charles E l l i s , P i t t s b u r g h ; Charles M o r i n , Chicago; I r w i n H u s t o n , Detroit. Each player was required to take p a r t i n s i x t y games, p l a y i n g t h i r t y of these a t home and t h i r t y abroad. F i f t y points was decided on as the length of each game, the contests t o be held on afternoons and evenings. I t was also decided t h a t the championship should be established by a post-season series or a " w o r l d ' s series" among the f o u r players who w o n the greatest number of games d u r i n g the season. The Executive Committee picked the best fourteen three cushion players i n the w o r l d to take p a r t i n its first t o u r n a ment. The list included these players representing the rooms and cities n a m e d : John L a y t o n , L a y ton & M c E n i r y , St. Louis. T i f f Denton, K l i n g & A l l e n , Kansas City. Pierre Maupome, L . A . Bensinger & Son, Chicago. Clarence Jackson, P l a n k i n g t o n Arcade, Milwaukee. Augie Kieckhefer, Kieckhefer Recreation Co., Chicago. Bob Cannefax, Recreation Co., D e t r o i t . H u g h H e a l , H e a l & B r i g g s , Toledo. Jess L e a n , E. M . H e l m , Cleveland. Gus Copulos, E u c l i d Arcade, Cleveland. Chas. E l l i s , McCourt & E l l i s , P i t t s b u r g h . H a r r y Wakefield, H a r r y Davis, P i t t s b u r g h . Otto Reiselt, Sol A l l i n g e r , Philadelphia. Geo. Moore, Jos. T h u m , N e w Y o r k C i t y . Byron Gillette, Buffalo, N e w Y o r k . The prizes offered i n t h i s i n i t i a l t o u r n a m e n t a t t h i s stylo of game were w o n d e r f u l l y liberal. To the w i n n e r w e n t w i t h out conditions the b e a u t i f u l t r o p h y emblematic o f the cham36 pionship presented by the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company, together w i t h a yearly salary of $3,000. To the fourteen competitors, including the champion, the prizes were, according to the order i n w h i c h they finished, i n the f o l l o w i n g a m o u n t s : $2,500, $2,000, $1,500, $1,200, $650, $600, $550, $500, $450*, $400, $850, $300, $250 and $200. A p r i z e of $100 was g i v e n f o r t h e best game a n d $200 for t h e highest r u n made d u r i n g the regular season. 1923 Three-Cushion Standing The first regular schedule of games of the N a t i o n a l championship I n t e r s t a t e Three-Cushion B i l l i a r d League came to an end i n A p r i l , 1923, and these figures besides showing how each player stood at the finish also gives t h e i r best runs and the exact amount paid to each p l a y e r : H. B. W. L. R. G. . . . 39 18 11 89 Cannefax, N e w Y o r k , , 37 15 10 32 Denton, Kansas C i t y , . 37 15 14 40 Reiselt, Philadelphia . , 36 16 12 29 . , 32 . 20 10 40 Heal, Toledo.. 26 13 47 25 27 11 36 Wakefield, Milwaukee 22 30 10 82 Moore, N e w Y o r k 22 30 9 89 McCourt, P i t t s b u r g h 20 32 12 51 Lopez, Cleveland ...19 88 13 60 Lookabaugh, P i t t s b u r g h . . 18 34 10 43 Gillette, Buffalo . . . 17 85 8 46 H a h m a n , Cleveland 14" 88 14 48 Reiselt, best game prize, $100. H a h m a n and Denton, tied for h i g h r u n , received Player and C i t y P rize 1st $2,500 2d 1,750 3d 1,760 4th 1,200 6th 900 6th 700 7th 600 8th 275 9th 275 10th 200 11th 176 12th 150 13th 125 14th 100 $50 each. The f o u r players who finished i n f r o n t i n the above t o u r n a ment were to have taken p a r t i n a w o r l d series w h i c h was t o have been held a t St. Louis directly at the close of the r e g u l a r schedule. Due to the illness of Cannefax, this series w a s postponed and i t d i d not take place u n t i l September 16, 1923. The starters were J o h n L a y ton of St. Louis, who was then h o l d i n g the championship; Robert L . Cannefax of New Y o r k , T i f f Denton of Kansas C i t y , and Otto Reiselt of Philadelphia. L a y t o n and Cannefax were looked on as the likely winners, b u t t o the surprise of a l l , T i f f Denton of Kansas City came out victorious. H e started out w i t h victories over L a y t o n , the champion, and Cannefax, who was second choice w i t h t h e experts. N e a r the end and i n the last games of the series, L a y t o n caught up to Denton, b u t i n the crucial series, the one t h a t meant the championship, Denton proved his gameness. When the final games started Denton and L a y t o n found themselves t i e d f o r f i r s t place, each h a v i n g won seven and lost f o u r games. Denton proceeded to w i n easily f r o m Cannefax by t h e wide m a r g i n o f 26 p o i n t s , the score being 60 to 34, 68 innings. Denton was i n splendid f o r m , m a k i n g a r u n of 9, w h i l e his opponent's best effort was a 4. D u r i n g the last game L a y t o n made a final and supreme effort t o beat Reiselt, w h i c h would have placed h i m i n a t i e 37 w i t h Denton f o r first place. This match was indeed a close one, as shown by the score, w h i c h was even a t 45, 67 and 68, Reiselt w i n n i n g : 60 t o 58. The final standing i n this 1928 series r e a d : W. 8 7 Denton Reiselt L. 4 Layton 6 Cannefax W. 7 .2 L. 5 10 N A T I O N A L CHAMPIONSHIP THREE-CUSHION BILLIARD LEAGUE Robert Cannefax W i n s Leading Honors i n 1924, A f t e r a W o n d e r f u l Contest A f t e r the 1923 w o r l d series of the N a t i o n a l Championship Interstate Three-Cushion B i l l i a r d League, t h a t organization changed its name to the N a t i o n a l Championship Three-Cushion B i l l i a r d League and i t s first regular schedule of games came to a n end on May 4, 1924. The standing of the players i n the race on t h a t date, w i t h Robert. Cannefax l a n d i n g w i n n e r after a fierce Struggle, w a s : .... .... .... Heal, Toledo Wakefield, P i t t s b u r g h W. 62 67 66 .... 46 41 48 40 ... 81 81 21 L. 26 27 80 84 40 89 48 46 60 68 56 66 H . R. 14 10 11 12 17 12 10 9 9 10 18 9 B. G. 23 26 88 82 82 80 85 27 42 44 40 49 Pet. .718 .684 .651 .596 .585 .612 .500 .464 .875 .369 .361 .244 Cannefax also topped the league i n t o t a l points, best game, least opponent score, and best grand average on t o t a l i n n i n g s . As i n the 1923 tournament of the N a t i o n a l Championship Interstate Three-Cushion B i l l i a r d League, a w o r l d series was played by the four leaders of its successor at the close of its regular 1924 schedule, i n which Robert L . Cannefax came, out victorious, the final standing reading as f o l l o w s : Cannefax, D e t r o i t L a y t o n , St. Louis Reiselt, Philadelphia Denton, Kansas C i t y : W. 8 7 6 3 L. 4 5 6 9 H . R. 9 8 5-11 13 B . G. 61 55 44 65 NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP THREE-CUSHION B I L L I A R D L E A G U E 1924-25 F I N A L S T A N D I N G PLAYER CITY W. R. L . Cannefax, N e w Y o r k 94 * J . M . L a y t o n , Minneapolis . . . . 89 * f G . L . Copulos, D e t r o i t ....89 Otto Reiselt, Philadelphia 86 T . S. Denton, Kansas City 75 C. L . Jackson, D e t r o i t A . H . Kieckhefer, Chicago 61 A . K . H a l l , Chicago . . . ,58 H a r r y Wakefield, Cleveland . ,48 A . J . T h u r n b l a d , Milwaukee , 47 C. R. E l l i s , P i t t s b u r g h E. W . Lookabaugh, B o s t o n . . . . . . . ,41 PLAYER CITY PRIZE R. L . Cannefax, N e w Y o r k .$2,500 * J . M . L a y t o n , M i n n e a p o l i s . . .. 1,750 * t G . L . Copulos, D e t r o i t . 1,750 Otto Reiselt, Philadelphia 1,200 T . S. Denton, Kansas City . 800 C. L . Jackson, D e t r o i t . 700 A . H . Kieckhefer, Chicago 600 A . K . H a l l , Chicago 450 H a r r y Wakefield, Cleveland .. 350 A . J . Thurnblad, Milwaukee.. . 250 C. R. E l l i s , P i t t s b u r g h .. 175 E. W . Lookabaugh, Boston .. 175 L. 38 43 43 46 57 69 71 74 84 85 91 91 PTS. 6159 6156 6104 6190 6064 5872 5726 5819 5552 5454 5343 5514 H.R. 13 14 14 11 12 11 10 11 9 12 9 12 INS. 6862 6786 6947 6620 7453 7342 6689 7489 7854 7289 7298 7644 B.G. 29 25 22 26 35 35 23 27 33 39 42 37 AV. .899 .908 .862 .937 .813 .799 .857 .778 .707 .748 .732 .721 OPS. 5399 5958 5466 5475 5540 5943 5890 6021 6082 6147 6238 6183 P.C. .712 .674 .674 .652 .568 .477 .462 .432 .364 .356 .311 .311 AV. .786 .878 .783 .824 .743 .809 .881 .812 .773 .844 .856 .808 •Share H i g h R u n Prize, $50 each. t W i n s best Game Prize, $100. Copulos established world's record of 22 innings f o r 50 points. Reiselt bettered world's record w i t h 17 consecutive victories. N o t e w o r t h y performances of 100 points i n 57 innings and 150 points i n 104 innings recorded by Reiselt. H a l l allowed opponent fewest points, T h u r n b l a d 9, i n a 50p o i n t game. Ties f o r second a n d n i n t h places, prize money s p l i t . Cannefax draws $3,000 salary added to prize. I n this 1924-25 b i l l i a r d race f o r the second season i n a r o w Robert Cannefax of N e w Y o r k sticks his fingers i n the prize pie of the N a t i o n a l Championship Three Cushion B i l l i a r d League and pulls out the b i g plums. K i n g s of balkline and 89 I R. L . C A N N E F A X W i n n e r of the 1925 Tournament I pocket billiards were turned out into the cold, cruel world to shift for themselves, but the triangle dictator faces another year of fat and plenty. F o r winning 94 games and losing only 38 Cannefax collects $2,500 in one bunch and $3,000 more i n installments. He played winning billiards most of the time, but L a d y L u c k smiled upon the Gotham boy in his struggles. A t the crisis of the campaign he was aided materially by Otto Reiselt of Philadelphia, who scored four straight victories over G. L . Copulos of Detroit, throwing the latter out of the first place he held for months and giving Cannefax * t h e lead. This turn of events followed the failure of Cannefax to check Copulos. H e divided his last series with the Detroiter, but lost seven out of 12 to h i m for the season. On total points and averages two . p l a y e r s .outranked the champion. There were Reiselt w i t h the highest total, 6190 points, amd t h e f e w e s t innings, 6620, f o r t h e best .937, a n d J . M . L a y t o n o f M i n n e a p o l i s . average T h e latter-scored p o i n t s i n 6786 i n n i n g s f o r a n a v e r a g e o f .908 p o i n t s Reiselt He set also i n 104 taking record by m a k i n g of consecutive i n 57 $1,200. victories. innings and split second records of Copulos tied Layton and third prizes, taking 89 g a m e s w o n a n d 43 lost. a l s o t a k e s t h e $100 p r i z e f o r b e s t g a m e w i t h h i s w o r l d ' s of 2 2 i n n i n g s m a d e a g a i n s t L a y t o n . prize fourth frames. They on their 17 100 p o i n t s 14 o f h i s l a s t 16 g a m e s , second place. each 86 a n d 4 6 , c l a i m i n g a p r i z e o f new world's earned fame 150 p o i n t s By a 6156 a n inning. Though he gained the most points, Reiselt placed only i n g a m e s w o n a n d lost, of the $100 for high 14. T h e y also counted standard set for the season $1,750 Copulos record Copulos shares w i t h L a y t o n r u n , each strings for having made a cluster of o f 13 w h i c h e q u a l l e d t h e e a r l i e r by Cannefax. J. M. L A Y T O N T i e d f o r S e c o n d i n t h e 1925 41 Tournament G. L . COPULOS Tied f o r Second i n the 1925 Tournament Copulos is the newcomer among the " B i g F o u r " , w h i c h last year and the year previous included T. S. Denton of Kansas City. The latter placed f i f t h f o r $800 w i t h a count of 75 games won and 57 lost. Despite the fact t h a t he lost his last eight games to Copulos, C. L . Jackson of D e t r o i t placed s i x t h f o r $700 w i t h 63 w o n , 69 lost. Two Chicago players, A . H . Kieckhefer and A . K . H a l l , placed seventh and eighth, respectively. The season's record was even between them, but Kieckhefer won more outside, t a k i n g 61 games and losing 71. Though Cannefax required 242 more innings t h a n Reiselt to complete the season, he 'allowed fewer points to r i v a l s t h a n any other player. His opponents averaged .786 of a p o i n t a n i n n i n g , w h i l e Reiselt's averaged .824, Layton's .878 and those of Copulos, .783. More innings were used by H a r r y Wakefield of Cleveland, w i t h 7854, t h a n any other player! Wakefield's improvement i n the second round was a n outstanding feature 42 I of the season. H e won 11 and lost 33 in the first series, averaging .250, but i n the second round he averaged .450 with 87 victories against 51 defeats. H e numbered a clean sweep of four games against Copulos among his achievements. •!••••. v . . v . - . v ' - v . v . •.•>!<• OTTO R E I S E L T Fourth in the 1925 Tournament Tenth place and $250 is claimed by A . J . Thurnblad of Milwaukee, while G. R . E l l i s of Pittsburgh and E . W . Lookabaugh of Boston divide eleventh and twelfth, taking $175 each. E l l i s had the better average. THREE CUSHION WORLD'S RECORDS MADE I N M •flf C H A M P I O N S H I P P L A Y | Best Game 50 Points Innings Place and Date 31 Tiff Denton vs. Byron Gillette Cleveland, 1919 29 Otto Reiselt vs. Maupome Chicago, Nov. 1, 1922 26 John L a y t o n vs. Kieckhefer Chicago, J a n , 29, 1924 23 Robert Cannefax vs. M a u p o m e . . . . Detroit, F e b . 21, 1924 22 Gus Copulos vs. Layton Minneapolis, Mar. 30, 1925 43 K 57 104 132 338 Caroms 17 Games 15 ' 17 Innings 17 Low O t t o Reiselt vs. Low O t t o Reiselt vs. I n n i n g s , 100 P o i n t s Kieckhefer Chicago, M a r . 13, I n n i n g s , 150 P o i n t s Copulos (3 games) ...Philadelphia, A u g i e Kieckhefer vs. M c C o u r t (3 blocks) Chicago, L o w I n n i n g s , 450 P o i n t s Robert Cannefax Detroit, High Run Gus Copulos vs George Moore Consecutive V i c t o r i e s 1025 1925 1918 1923 N e w Y o r k , 1924 Robert Cannefax » D e t r o i t , 1923-24 O t t o Reiselt . . P h i l a d e l p h i a , 1924-25 Consecutive S c o r i n g Robert Cannefax Detroit, 1924 N O T E W O R T H Y T H R E E - C U S H I O N B I L L I A R D RECORDS Three-cushion C a r o m s — H i g h r u n t o u r n e y , 18, Charles M o r i n , St. L o u i s , Mo., M a y 20, 1915; h i g h r u n i n e x h i b i t i o n , 25, W i l l i e Hoppe, San Francisco, J a n . 8, 1918. Three cushion w o r l d ' s record r u n . The best w o r l d ' s record r u n i n a r e g u l a r three cushion t o u r n a m e n t is 18, made by Charles M o r i n a t St. L o u i s i n 1915. RULES OF THREE-CUSHION CAROM BILLIARDS A s Adopted B y the N a t i o n a l Championship Three-Cushion B i l l i a r d League October 10, 1922 1. The game of Three-Cushion Caroms is governed by t h e general rules of b i l l i a r d s w h e n n o t c o n f l i c t i n g w i t h t h e f o l lowing rules: 2. A v a l i d three-cushion carom is effected by m a k i n g t h e cue b a l l touch three cushions before s t r i k i n g t h e second object ball. 3. Three cushions means t h r e e impacts. 4. T h e number o f cushions r e q u i r e d does n o t mean t h r e e different. 5. A count m a y be executed on one cushion. 6. E a c h carom counts one. 7. W h e n t h e cue b a l l rests a g a i n s t a cushion t h e s t r i k e r can p l a y d i r e c t l y a t t h a t cushion b u t t h a t shall n o t count as an i m p a c t . 8. I n case of a freeze t h e s t r i k e r has t h e o p t i o n of p l a y i n g a w a y f r o m t h e b a l l w i t h w h i c h ' t h e cue b a l l is i n contact o r h a v i n g t h e balls spotted as a t the opening of t h e game. P l a y i n g f o r Deliberate Safety 9. P l a y i n g deliberately f o r safety a s t r i k e r m u s t m a k e t h e e b a l l s t r i k e a n object b a l l and t h e n touch a cushion, or 44 force the object ball against a cushion. F a i l u r e to do so w i l l cause one p o i n t to be deducted f r o m his score. 10. O n l y one deliberate safety play allowed w i t h o u t penalty. 11. A f t e r h a v i n g once played f o r safety, the s t r i k e r must play to count, or f o r f e i t one p o i n t off his score f o r each additional consecutive safety. * 12. F o r a deliberate safety miss a s t r i k e r shall f o r f e i t one p o i n t off his score. This too w i l l count as safety play number one, m e a n i n g t h a t subsequent consecutive safety shots must be penalized as provided f o r i n r u l e eleven. 13. I n case an object ball is frozen to a cushion, t h i s cushion does not count except f o r the cue b a l l . 14. The cue ball may be d r i v e n f r o m said object b a l l to the cushion upon w h i c h the object b a l l rests. Or t h e object ball t o create a legal safety m u s t be driven to another, a different cushion. T h a t is, i n this case a second impact of the object ball on the cushion to w h i c h i t is frozen w i l l not be v a l i d , 15. There shall be no penalties f o r misses; p r o v i d i n g , however, the strokes are made w i t h apparent honest i n t e n t . 16. Each and every penalty i n v o l v i n g a f o r f e i t u r e is to be deducted f r o m the player's score i f and when a score is made. Shooting W i t h the W r o n g B a l l 17. I f a player shoots w i t h the w r o n g b a l l , the stroke is f o u l a n d such f o u l can be called a t any t i m e d u r i n g a r u n , b u t t h e s t r i k e r shall be e n t i t l e d to a l l points made previous to the stroke i n w h i c h he is detected and shall be penalized a safety. 18. The i n c o m i n g player shall have the option of p l a y i n g w i t h the balls as he finds them or of h a v i n g the positions of t h e cue balls reversed. H e must, however, begin his i n n i n g w i t h his own ball. Instructions f o r Referee 19. The referee shall call a l l fouls and safeties. 20. The referee must be f a m i l i a r w i t h the intricacies of the three-cushion game. 21. H e must n o t tolerate d i l a t o r y tactics. 22. The referee shall have absolute control of a l l games over w h i c h he presides. H e must call a l l counts, fouls, penalties, freezes and decide a l l points w i t h o u t a w a i t i n g any appeal, except t h a t i n r u l e 17 he shall n o t call fouls or n o t i f y player or give decisions u n t i l appealed t o . H e is to protect the i n terests of both players. T h i s , however, does not disbar a player f r o m c a l l i n g his a t t e n t i o n t o a palpable mistake or apparent oversight. H i s decisions when rendered shall be final i n a l l cases a n d there shall be no appeal t h e r e f r o m . I n the event of t h e balls becoming manifestly imperfect, out of t r u e , cracked or damaged, or i f the cloth, table or equipment become defective, w h i l e i n use d u r i n g a game, the referee s h a l l , upon his a t t e n t i o n being called to such defect, stop the game and exchange balls f o r another set, or have any other defects i n the equipment made good. 45 1923 N A T I O N A L P O C K E T B I L L I A R D CHAMPIONSHIP LEAGUE On Tuesday, J u l y 10, 1923, the N a t i o n a l Championship Pocket B i l l i a r d League w e n t i n t o its first a n n u a l meeting i n Chicago and elected officers and transacted a l o t o f other business of importance. The f o l l o w i n g were chosen as its first l i s t of officers: President, F . A . D w y e r , B r o o k l y n , N . Y . Vice-President, John K l i n g , Kansas C i t y . Secretary and Treasurer, L . K i l p a t r i c k , 1002 A r c h street, Philadelphia. Executive Committee—Chairman, L . A . Bensinger, C h i c a g o ; Joseph Mayer, P h i l a d e l p h i a ; John Klein,. B a l t i m o r e ; C. H e r b e r t L e w i s , Rockford, 111.; I r w i n Hueston, D e t r o i t ; L . W . Y o u n g , Cleveland. A m o n g the rooms represented a t the i n i t i a l meeting a l l of w h i c h signed applications f o r franchises were the f o l l o w i n g : R a t i o n a l R e c r e a t i o n , I n c . , F . A . D w y e r , 398 F u l t o n s t r e e t , Brooklyn. Hudson Recreation Company, Joseph Mayer, 128-140 N o r t h Broad street, Philadelphia. Regent B i l l i a r d Room, J . A . Rampanellis, A k r o n , Ohio. F l a t I r o n Recreation Room, M a x B . Grossman, Cleveland, Ohio. Davis B i l l i a r d P a r l o r , D. G. B a l m a n , M i l l i o n D o l l a r Grand Building, Pittsburgh. Fred G. S m i t h Recreation Company, J o h n E. Scanlan, Cleveland, Ohio. Harvey's Recreation, F r a n k C l i f f o r d , Kansas C i t y . C. H e r b e r t Lewis (the Lewis b r a n c h ) , Rockford, I1L Recreation Company, W . S. Sweeney, D e t r o i t . Weston B i l l i a r d Club, Chas. (Cowboy) Weston, L o r a i n , Ohio. Klein's B i l l i a r d Academy, Baltimore. Jerome R. Keogh, Rochester. Sol A l l i n g e r , Philadelphia. The Bensinger Rooms, L . A . Bensinger, Chicago. There were some changes i n i t s line-up as the season progressed, but at the close of its 1923 championship schedule the record f o r the first year's p l a y s t o o d : Greenleaf, Philadelphia Rudolph, N e w Y o r k St. Jean. Minneapolis Hueston, Chicago Taberski, D e t r o i t A l l e n , Kansas C i t y N a t a l i e , St. Louis Maturo, Brooklyn Woods, P i t t s b u r g h F r a n k l i n , Kansas C i t y Stoutenburg, Cleveland Westonv L o r a i n Keogh, Rochester Church, B a l t i m o r e McCoy, Richmond W. 31 32 22 29 22 38 18 81 9 17 14 14 13 12 9 4 46 L. 6 16 19 16 28 14 26 11 19 20 22 36 39 H . R. 77 63 62 40 71 74 88 41 55 49 55 48 48 49 37 B . G. 6 8 10 10 16 10 8 12 12 19 14 1924-25 N A T I O N A L C H A M P I O N S H I P P O C K E T BILLIARD CHAMPIONSHIP I n A u g u s t , 1924, members of the N a t i o n a l Championship Pocket B i l l i a r d League assembled at Chicago, l a i d plans f o r t h e i r 1924-25 season and elected these officers: Frank A . Dwyer, New F r a n k A r a t a , St. Louis, Leander L. A. Kilpatrick, Bensinger, York, President Vice-President. Philadelphia, Secretary-Treasurer. Chicago, C h a i r m a n . I r v i n H u s t o n , D e t r o i t ; John K l e i n , B a l t i m o r e ; Joseph Mayer, Philadelphia, and B e n j a m i n A l l e n , Kansas C i t y , Executive Committee. F o l l o w i n g the above meeting, the N a t i o n a l Championship Pocket B i l l i a r d League got down to business f o r its 1924-25 campaign and cut its l i s t of starters down to 10. I t s second schedule of games extended f r o m October 27, 1924, t o A p r i l 23, 1925, on w h i c h day F r a n k Taberski, at the close of a t h r i l l i n g series of games w i t h the apparently invincible and long-time-champion Ralph Greenleaf as his opponent, captured the c r o w n f o r the f o u r t h t i m e i n his career, the same c r o w n t h a t Greenleaf wore w i t h o u t intermission since c a p t u r i n g i t f r o m Taberski i n 1919. Taberski once held a l l the world's records a t pocket billiards. T h a t was when he was champion i n 1916, 1917 and 1918. Just t o show how the game has improved since t h e n , Tabers k i says t h a t his world's record h i g h r u n was t h e n 71. Many runs of over 80, some over 90, and one of 100 have been made i n the last year or t w o , he points out. Taberski n o t only held the t i t l e f o r three years, but he w o n t e n s t r a i g h t challenge matches, defeating R a l p h Greenleaf, t h e present champion, twice. H e w o n the crown f r o m Johnny L a y t o n a n d defeated A l l e n , M a t u r o , Stoutenburg, Concannon, E. I . R a l p h and K r e u t e r , the l a t t e r twice. Taberski before the to go to a the c r o w n then. He toured the country t w i c e , defeating everybody, but tourney of 1919, held i n Chicago, he was forced hospital f o r a n operation. H i s campaigns to regain have been i n t e r r u p t e d by illness each year since had t o postpone a number of games this season. Taberski owns a b i l l i a r d room a t Schenectady, N . Y . , when n o t engaged i n championship play. H e has been i n business o f some k i n d ever since he l e f t h i g h school. H e had a m i l k a n d grocery business and sold out f o r $10,000 when only 22 years o l d . H e took a flier i n t o m o v i n g p i c t u r e e x h i b i t i n g a t Holyoke, Mass., but had a fire and the panic of 1907 wiped h i m o u t financially. H e is h a p p i l y m a r r i e d and has three boys. 47 NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP POCKET BILLIARD 1924-25 F I N A L S T A N D I N G LEAGUE T h e final s t a n d i n g i n the N a t i o n a l C h a m p i o n s h i p P o c k e t B i l l i a r d L e a g u e a t t h e close of i t s 1924-25 schedule w i t h t h e a m o u n t s w o n b y t h e p l a y e r s w h o t o o k p a r t i n i t w a s as f o l l o w s : Player W. L . H r . Bg. Pc. Prize Pts. Ins. Ave. Ops. Are. F. J . Taberski, New York . . 8 1 27 70 4 .750 $2,500 9623 2443 3.979 7423 3.078 *E. R. Greenleaf, Phila. 74 34 84 3 .685 1,800 9665 1866 5.179 7033 S.760 • Andrew St. Jean, Minn 59 49 88 3 .546 1,200 8939 2145 4.167 8119 3.785 Benjamin Allen, Kansas C. ..57 51 81 5 .528 1,00.0 8969 1965 4.590 8653 4.40S t A . A. Woods, Syracuse . . . 55 53 85 7 .509 800 8145 2311 3.528 8563 3.705 E r w i n Rudolph, Chicago . . . . 54 54 71 4 .500 650 8740 2189 3.992 8470 3.874 J. M . Concannon, Brooklyn . . . 52 56 75 5 .481 550 8331 2511 3.318 8891 3.541 Pasquale Natalie, Baltimore . . . 49 59 86 6 .461 450 8553 2771 3.089 9049 3.266 C E. Seaback, Boston 35 73 74 8 .324 300 7444 2322 8.206 9499 4.091 Charles Harmon, New York ..24 84 58 7 .222 150 7449 2766 2.701 10184 8.682 • Share best game prize, $50 each, t w i n s high r u n prize $100. Rudolph recorded fastest game 100 points i n 22 minutes. Greenleaf scored only shut out, 100 to 0 i n 5 innings against St. Jean. Won 19 games i n 10 innings or less. Greenleaf; 12 games, St. Jean. I n addition to his prize, champion receives $3,000 a year salary. 48 I t will be noticed by the above figures that Taberski won the championship by winning 81 games and losing only 27. E . R. G R E E N L E A F Second in the 1925 Tournament By doing this he captured the $2,600 first prize and the l>.J00 annual salary which goes with the title. He regained tne 49 A N D R E W ST. J E A N T h i r d i n t h e 1925 T o u r n a m e n t title w h i c h he held for three years a n d released i n 1918. T a b e r s k i d e p o s e d R a l p h G r e e n l e a f of P h i l a d e l p h i a , o n whose handsome head reposed the c r o w n for six y e a r s . T a b e r s k i accomplished the t a s k despite the f a c t t h a t G r e e n leaf took s i x s t r a i g h t g a m e s i n t h e i r final series a n d showed a season superiority over the w i n n e r by t a k i n g 9 of t h e i r 12 e n g a g e m e n t s . I t w a s against the other r i v a l s t h a t T a b e r s k i built up bis big advantage. A t one s t a g e he w a s g o i n g so good h e e s t a b l i s h e d a w o r l d ' s r e c o r d o f 35 c o n s e c u t i v e v i c t o r i e s . W h a t w o u l d h a v e h a p p e n e d to t h a t r e c o r d i f h e h a d m e t G r e e n l e a f i n t h e middle of it? T h a t performance was recorded while the Philadelphia contender w a s temporarily retired a n d postponing his games. Greenleaf encountered more trouble w i t h other rivals, howe v e r , f i n i s h i n g t h e s e a s o n w i t h a r e c o r d of 74 g a m e s w o n a n d 84 l o s t . Outside of g a m e s w o n a n d lost, G r e e n l e a f ' s record is m o r e b r i l l i a n t t h a n t h a t of T a b e r s k i . H e scored the second best h i g h r u n , 84, a n d s h a r e d t h e s e a s o n ' s b e s t g a m e m a r k o f 8 innings. G r e e n l e a f collects $1,800 for second p l a c e a n d $50 for h a l f of the best g a m e p r i z e . H e c a r r i e d a w a y a l l t h e top prizes last year. I n addition, Greenleaf's record shows that while w i n n i n g s e v e n f e w e r g a m e s , h e s c o r e d a t o t a l o f 42 m o r e p o i n t s t h a n 50 Taberski. H e compiled i n 108 games a score of 9,665 points against 9,623 f o r the w i n n e r . The most impressive difference comes i n the .number of innings he used to compile t h a t t o t a l . He needed 577 fewer innings t h a n Taberski. Greenleaf's record of 1,866 innings was the lowest i n the league. H e averaged 5,174 points an i n n i n g , another standard. Taberski's best r u n was 70, his best game 4 innings, and only four limes did he go out i n ten innings or less. Greenleaf went out 19 times i n ten or under. On the other hand, Taberski's defensive play was superior. H i s opponents averaged only 8.078 points a n i n n i n g , w h i l e Greenleaf's averaged 3.760. Other interesting comparisons may be d r a w n f r o m the table of statistics. T h i r d place prize of $1,200 was claimed by A n d r e w St. Jean of Minneapolis, who won 59 and lost 49 games. He drew $50 more f o r h a l f of the best game prize, shared by Greenleaf. B e n j a m i n A l l e n of Kansas C i t y , who lost t w o more games t h a n St. Jean but averaged better on t o t a l points, took f o u r t h money of $1,000. Close f i f t h is A . A . Woods of Syracuse, w i n n e r of $800 on a record of 55 games won and 53 lost. H e takes $100 f o r the h i g h r u n prize on his m a r k of 85 made i n the very first engagement of the season and never equalled. H e finished ahead of E r w i n Rudolph of Chicago, who averaged better on total points. Rudolph collected $650. H e recorded the fastest game, 22 minutes f o r 100 points, w h i c h received praise and suggested the idea of a prize f o r such performances next year. Seventh prize of $550 is claimed by J . M . Goncannon of B r o o k l y n ; Pasquale N a t a l i e of B a l t i m o r e , who was second f o r the first h a l f of the season, claims $450 f o r e i g h t h ; C. E. Seaback of Boston, gets $300 f o r n i n t h and Charles H a r m o n of New Y o r k , collects $150 f o r last. Greenleaf scored the only shutout, defeating St. Jean i n 5 i n n i n g s , 100 to 0, w h i l e Rudolph gave Greenleaf his worst defeat, a l l o w i n g h i m only 8 points. POCKET B I L L I A R D W O R L D ' S RECORDS M A D E I N CHAMPIONSHIP PLAY Best Game, 100 Points Innings Place and Date 5 Bennie A l l e n vs. E. I . R a l p h . . H i g h t s t o w n , N . J . , Dec. 4, '19 2 A n d r e w S t . J e a n vs. "Walter F r a n k l i n '. Kansas City, J a n . 14, 1924 2 R a l p h Greenleaf vs. A r t h u r Woods Philadelphia, Feb. 23, 1924 Balls High Run 71 Bennie A l l e n vs. Kansas C i t y , June 4, 1914 71 F r a n k Taberski vs. 1918 81 Bennie A l l e n vs. E. I . R a l p h . . H i g h t s t o w n , N . J . , Dec. 4, '19 101 Ralph Greenleaf vs. Jerome K e o g h . . N e w Y o r k , J a n . 19, '24 Consecutive Victories Games 20 Ralph Greenleaf Philadelphia, 1923 85 F r a n k Taberski N e w Y o r k , 1925 Fastest Time, 100 Points Minutes 19 E r w i n Rudolph vs. A r t h u r Church B a l t i m o r e , 1924 51 POCKET B I L L I A R D S I n sizing u p t h e different games o f billiards t h e pocket b i l l i a r d game must n o t be forgotten. T h e first' great billiarovists l i k e John Deery, Joe a n d C y r i l l e D i o n , John M c D e v i t t and others played i t i n t h e early days b u t i t was a n entirely different game t o t h e pocket b i l l i a r d s o f today. The r e a l beginning o f t h e present style o f pocket b i l l i a r d s , w h i c h was o f course improved a n d made better w i t h the years, should perhaps be dated f r o m A p r i l 18, 1878, when the first N a t i o n a l Tournament a t pocket billiards was played i n the U n i o n Square Rooms i n N e w Y o r k , t h e play c o n t i n u i n g f r o m A p r i l 8 t o 20. A m o n g t h e contestants were a l l t h e recognized first-class A m e r i c a n caromers o f t h a t period w i t h M h e exception of A l b e r t G a m i e r , Maurice D a l y a n d Jacob Schaefer. I n addition were t h e pocket b i l l i a r d players Samuel F . K n i g h t , C l a r k E . W i l s o n , George Frey, J . McWarble a n d Gottlieb W a h l s t r o m . The w i n n e r t u r n e d u p i n C y r i l l e D i o n , K n i g h t , W a h l s t r o m , and J . D i o n , finished i n t h e order named. McWarble a n d G. s F . Slosson t i e d f o r fifth a n d s i x t h place, W i l s o n was seventh, W i l l i a m Sexton, eighth a n d A . P. Rudolphe, t i e d w i t h Frey for n i n t h . This medal of 1878 was held successively up t o 1881 by C. D i o n , K n i g h t , Alonzo M o r r i s , W a h l s t r o m a n d then by K n i g h t a g a i n . T h e names of t h e pocket b i l l i a r d c h a m pions f r o m t h a t d a y t o t h i s are as f o l l o w s : 1 8 8 1 —Gottlieb W a h l s t r o m . 1 9 0 8 — F r a n k Sherman. 1882—A l b e r t Frey. 1909—Charles Weston. 1883—A l b e r t Frey. 1910—Jerome Keogh. 1884—J. L . Malone. 1 9 1 1 — A l f r e d De O r o . 1885—Peter Rodgers. 1912—E. I . R a l p h . 1886—Albert Frey. 1918—Ben A l l e n . 1887—A l b e r t F r e y a n d 1914—Ben A l l e n . A l f r e d De Oro. 1915—Ben A l l e n . 1 8 8 8 — A l f r e d Frey a n d 1916—W. E . Blankenship A l f r e d De O r o . F r a n k Taberski and 1 8 8 9 — A l b e r t F r e y 'and ,o,-, £ ^ J ? ? ; A l f r e d De O r o . J?}J~? t ^ ^ 1890 t o 1 9 0 0 — A l f r e d De Oro. } ? ™ — £ » J Taberski 1 9 0 1 — F r a n k Sherman. }2Jn~5 £ S J J1902—W i l l i a m Clearwater. la??~5 £ £ J| 1903—K. Stofft. ??o~? , ? . f 1-904—Alfred De Oro. J ^ — J * Ph Greenleaf. 1905—Thomas Hueston. 1923—Ralph Greenleaf. 1906—J o h n H o r g a n . 1924—Ralph Greenleaf. 1907—John H o r g a n . 1 9 2 5 — F r a n k Taberski. The first N a t i o n a l Championship Pocket B i l l i a r d T o u r n a ment was played i n N e w Y o r k C i t y , A p r i l 8 t o 20, 1878. «C. Dion was t h e w i n n e r . A t New Y o r k C i t y i n Tammany H a l l , June 2. 1881, a match, best i n 41 games, was played f o r $250 a side and t h e score was W a h l s t r o m 21, Frey 18. The first p y r a m i d (eight balls') t o u r n a m e n t took place i n New Y o r k C i t y , M a y 3, 1882. F r e y was t h e w i n n e r . The t h i r d N a t i o n a l Championship Pocket B i l l i a r d T o u r n a ment, c a l l t h e balls b u t no pocket, was played i n N e w Y o r k City, J a n u a r y 10, 1884. J . L . Malone was t h e w i n n e r . The first tournament i n w h i c h t h e b a l l and pocket was called J o n r a n e T S n 1 7 R 1 a P a P a 9 r e e n r P G e r e e e a n e e a n l e a saw F r e y t h e w i n n e r , a t Syracuse, N . Y . , J a n u a r y 28 to F e b r u a r y 15, 1884. J a n u a r y 30 to F e b r u a r y 9. 1887, a t B r o o k l y n , N . Y . , the first, t o u r n a m e n t a t continuous pocket b i l l i a r d s took place, games of 150 balls. F r e y was the w i n n e r . The f o u r t h N a t i o n a l Pocket B i l l i a r d T o u r n a m e n t took place i n N e w Y o r k C i t y , F e b r u a r y 14-20, 1887. I n this A l f r e d De Oro made his first public appearance. F r e y was the w i n ner. De Oro losing the play off f o r first. F e b r u a r y 20 to M a r c h 3, 1887, a prize t o u r n a m e n t was held at Syracuse, N . Y . This was Clearwater's first appearance i n a t o u r n a m e n t and he proved the w i n n e r . F e b r u a r y 25 t o M a r c h 2, 1889, the f i f t h championship t o u r n a m e n t took place a t N e w Y o r k C i t y . I t was a t continuous^, pocket b i l l i a r d s , one hundred balls u p , and was w o n b y F r e y . M a r c h , 1893, a championship of A m e r i c a t o u r n a m e n t was played i n Syracuse, N . Y . ; and was w o n by De Oro. October 16-21, 1893, De Oro met Roberts, of L o n d o n , at N e w Y o r k C i t y f o r $2,000. The terms were one thousand points. E n g l i s h and A m e r i c a n tables, c h a n g i n g tables every s i x t y balls. De Oro w o n , 1,000 to 924. F e b i u a r y a n d M a r c h , 1901, i n a t o u r n a m e n t f o r the championship of t h e w o r l d , F r a n k Sherman was t h e w i n n e r a t Boston. M a r c h . 10-25, 1902, f o r t h e championship of the w o r l d , a continuous pocket b i l l i a r d t o u r n a m e n t was played i n Brookl y n , N . Y . , w i t h Clearwater the w i n n e r . F e b r u a r y 6, 1903, i n a t o u r n a m e n t f o r money prizes, at B r o o k l y n , N . Y . , Stofft w o n . October 12 to November 2, 1904, i n a game f o r the championship of t h e w o r l d a t St. Louis, De Oro was the w i n n e r . J a n u a r y 20, 1905, Keogh challenged De Oro, and i n M a r c h , Keogh was awarded the championship by default, De Oro f a i l i n g to comply w i t h the rules a t San Francisco. M a y 18, 1905, De Oro w o n f r o m Keogh, 600 to 563 at Buffalo f o r the championship. A p r i l , 1908, F r a n k Sherman w o n first i n Chicago c h a m pionship t o u r n a m e n t . *ip£ F e b r u a r y 2-4, 1912, De Oro, champion, defeated W . Douglaa 600 to 498 i n a m a t c h f o r the professional championship at Philadelphia. F e b r u a r y 25-27, 1912, A l f r e d De Oro defeated Thomas Hueston i n championship m a t c h a t N e w Y o r k , 600 to 36. 2 3 M a r c h 7-9, 1912, De Oro, champion, defeated Hueston, 600 to 495. M a r c h 2 5 - A p r i l 26, 1912, the last series h a v i n g been awarded to De Oro, a new series was i n s t i t u t e d a t H o r t i c u l t u r a l H a l l , P h i l a d e l p h i a , and they finished i n the order n a m e d : Games 6 Won Edward I . Ralph, Hightstown, N . J 7 James M a t u r o , Hoboken, N . J 6 A l f r e d De Oro, N e w Y o r k 5 F r a n k Sherman, W a s h i n g t o n 4 C. W . Weston, P i t t s b u r g h 3 Ed. Wilson, Philadelphia 2 W . W . K i n g , Milwaukee 1 W . F . De L a n g h , Philadelphia 0 58 r A p r i l 8, 1912, Bennie A l l e n defeated A l f r e d De Oro in a championship m a t c h a t New Y o r k , 600 t o 516. A p r i l 13-14, 1912, De Oro scored 400 to Alexander Smith's 250 a t Doyle's Academy, N e w Y o r k . M a y 29-31, 1912, first challenge m a t c h , R a l p h , c h a m p i o n , defeated De Oro, challenger, 600 t o 583. A t this stage i t was m i d n i g h t Saturday. I t being illegal t o play i n N e w Jersey on Sunday, the game had to be abandoned and an arrangement was made t o play i t i n the same h a l l June 11 t o 13, 1912, De Oro w i n n i n g by 600- t o 408. J a n u a r y 6-8, 1913, i n a game f o r the professional c h a m p i o n ship, De Oro, champion, beat James M a t u r o , challenger, 600 to 563 a t N e w Y o r k . F e b r u a r y 25-27, 1913, De O r o , champion, beat Hueston, challenger, 600 t o 386 a t N e w Y o r k . October 1-3, 1913, Ben A l l e n , challenger, beat De Oro, champ i o n , 600 t o 514 a t N e w Y o r k . T h i s was the last game De Oro played a t pocket b i l l i a r d s . A f t e r losing t h i s game he announced t h a t he w o u l d t u r n his a t t e n t i o n thereafter p r i m a r i l y t o three-cushion caroms. The score by blocks of this game was: Total Allen 200—200—200 600 De Oro ,.148—164—202 514 I t w i l l be noticed by the above t h a t i n the last block of championship pocket b i l l i a r d s De Oro ever played, although losing the m a t c h as a whole, he was t r i u m p h a n t i n t h e final session by 202 t o 200. December 3-5, 1913, Ben A l l e n , champion, beat Charles Weston, challenger, 600 t o 411 a t Kansas C i t y . September 29 to October 5, 1913, i n a m a t c h f o r the E a s t e r n Championship a t P h i l a d e l p h i a , E d w a r d I . R a l p h , J . E. McCoy and Charles L e v y tied f o r first, each w i n n i n g 5 and losing 2. R a l p h won i n the play off, w i t h McCoy second, L e v y t h i r d , C l a r k f o u r t h , Reade fifth, Reiselt s i x t h , F i n k seventh, a n d Kelly e i g h t h . December 16, 1913, J o h n K l i n g defeated Charles Weston, 600 t o 505, a t Kansas C i t y . September, 1913, A l l e n , p l a y i n g 600 t o J o h n L a y t o n ' s 500, w o n 600 t o 490 a t K l i n g ' s Academy, Kansas C i t y . June 5, 1914, A l l e n 600, P r a t t 149, a t Kansas C i t y , Mo. I n this game A l l e n made a h i g h r u n of 7 1 , a w o r l d ' s record f o r championship p l a y a t this style of game. B y w i n n i n g this contest A l l e n gained permanent possession of t h e B r u n s w i c k Balke-Collender championship t r o p h y , h a v i n g w o n the t i t l e three years hand r u n n i n g — 1 9 1 8 , 1914 and 1915. This took the championship out of open p l a y . F e b r u a r y , 1915, R a l p h Greenleaf, a f t e r w a r d s a famous and champion player, played his first public game a t Savannah, 111., w h e n he scored 200 t o W . G. M a k i n ' s 185. A p r i l and M a y , 1915, a special t o u r n a m e n t was played at Kansas C i t y . I t was won by Ben A l l e n , who w o n 7 and lost 1 ; John K l i n g , second, w o n 6, lost 2 ; John L a y t o n , t h i r d , wop 5, lost 8 ; Greenleaf, F r a n k l i n , W h i t f o r d and B u n n e l l finished i n t h e order named. M a y 4-6, 1916, first challenge m a t c h f o r new emblem, L a y t o n . challenger, defeated Blankenship, champion, 450 to 341 at Detroit. 54 September 16, 1916, T a b e r s k i , c h a l l e n g e r , defeated L a y t o n , c h a m p i o n , 450 to 437 a t S e d a l i a , Mo. October 18-20, 1916, T a b e r s k i , c h a m p i o n , defeated G r e e n leaf, c h a l l e n g e r , 450 to 407 a t N e w Y o r k . November 30 to December 2, 1916, T a b e r s k i , c h a m p i o n , defeated R a l p h , c h a l l e n g e r , 450 to 342 a t Schenectady, N . Y . T o decide a n e w c h a m p i o n s h i p a t o u r n a m e n t w a s played in G h ieago, F e b r u a r y 26 to M a r c h 20, 1916. I t w a s w o n by W . E . B l a n k e n s h i p , of D e t r o i t , w i t h a record of 10 games w o n a n d 2 lost. J o h n L a y t o n , of S e d a l i a , Mo., finished second, a n d F r a n k T a b e r s k i , of Schenectady, N . Y . , t h i r d . T h e scores were: W. 10 9 8 7 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 4 1 Blankenship Layton Taberski Greenleaf Clark Ralph Petrie Maturo Concannon Weston Allen Fink Chapman H . R, 45 31 33 40 43 32 29 34 38 28 58 32 19 L a t e r i n t h e y e a r T a b e r s k i , w h o h a d finished t h i r d i n the previous t o u r n a m e n t , c a p t u r e d l e a d i n g honors a n d held the championship t h r o u g h 1916, 1917 a n d 1918. A m o n g t h e i m p o r t a n t games played i n 1917 w e r e : J a n u a r y 10-12, 1917, T a b e r s k i , c h a m p i o n , beat M a t u r o , c h a l lenger, '450 to 420 a t P i t t s b u r g h . F e b r u a r y 22-24, 1917, T a b e r s k i , c h a m p i o n , beat L o u i s K r e u t e r , c h a l l e n g e r , 450 to 399 a t Y o u n g s t o w n , O h i o . M a r c h 24-25, 1917, T a b e r s k i , beat A u g i e K i e c k h e f e r , 500 to 235 a t C h i c a g o . A p r i l 12-14, 1917, T a b e r s k i , c h a m p i o n , beat A l l e n , c h a l lenger, 450 to 448 a t A k r o n , Ohio. M a y 22-24, 1917, T a b e r s k i , c h a m p i o n , beat L a r r y Stoughtenb u r g h , c h a l l e n g e r , 450 to 367 a t Buffalo. October 1-8, 1917, T a b e r s k i , c h a m p i o n , beat Concannon, c h a l l e n g e r , 450 to 392 a t Buffalo. N o v e m b e r 13-15, 1917, T a b e r s k i , c h a m p i o n , beat K r e u t e r , c h a l l e n g e r , 460 to 276. November, 1919, t h e first I l l i n o i s State A m a t e u r C h a m p i o n s h i p P o c k e t B i l l i a r d T o u r n a m e n t w a s held under the auspices of t h e I l l i n o i s B i l l i a r d A s s o c i a t i o n . O n e hundred contestants began p l a y i n n i n e d i s t r i c t s , the respective w i n n e r s coming together i n finals, w h i c h w e r e decided on a basis of total points. W o n by M o r i a r i t y , w h o w o n 8, lost 0, 600 p o i n t s ; second, W o o d y a t , w o n 6, lost 2, 585 p o i n t s ; t h i r d , K a v a n a u g h , won 5, lost 3, 535 points. A t P h i l a d e l p h i a o n December 13, 1919, t h e Pocket B i l l i a r d C h a m p i o n s h i p T o u r n a m e n t , w h i c h h a d been in progress for two w e e k s , closed w i t h another victory for R a l p h Greenleaf, of Wilmington, Del., the national champion, who won his ninth s t r a i g h t m a t c h by defeating J o h n M . L a y t o n , C o l u m b i a , Mo., 55 125 to 49 in eighteen i n n i n g s . Greenleaf's h i g h and Lay-ton's 14. A l l e n Bfeaks W o r l d ' s Record Beside w i n n i n g second place, A l l e n broke t h e record r u n , g a t h e r i n g 81 balls i n one i n n i n g , and new record f o r the shortest game, w i n n i n g t h e in five i n n i n g s . The final s t a n d i n g f o l l o w s : R a l p h Greenleaf, W i l m i n g t o n , Del Bennie A l l e n , Kansas C i t y Jerome Keogh, Rochester, N . Y Joseph Concannon, N e w Y o r k Louis D . K r e u t e r , N e w Y o r k Chas. Seeback, H a r t f o r d , Conn. John M . L a y t o n , Columbia, M o James M a t u r o , Denver, Colo M o r r i s D. F i n k , Philadelphia Ed. I . R a l p h , H i g h t s t o w n , N . J Won 9 7 6 5 5 5 3 3 1 1 r u n was 27 w o r l d ' s high established a same match Lost 0 2 3 4 4 4 6 6 8 H . R. 70 81 41 68 58 I n 1920 the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company announced a P r e l i m i n a r y Pocket B i l l i a r d T o u r n a m e n t , t h e players q u a l i f y i n g i n i t to compete i n the finals f o r t h e n a t i o n a l championship o f the U n i t e d States. A t t h i s t i m e R a l p h Greenleaf, of New Y o r k , was champion a t t h i s game. T h i s t o u r n a m e n t took place i n the Strauss A u d i t o r i u m i n Chicago a n d t h e players who took p a r t i n i t w e r e : C. Seaback, T o r r i n g t o n , C o n n . ; J . M a t u r o , Denver, Colo.; W . D . Ricketts, F l i n t , M i c h . ; J . E. McCoy, Richmond. V a . ; Charles Weston, Chicago, 111.; C. E . Safford, Minneapolis, M i n n . ; M . A . L o n g , Los Angeles, C a l . ; A r t h u r Woods, Minneapolis, M i n n . , E r w i n Rudolph, Sayre, P a . ; B. E. Rhines, A k r o n , O h i o ; O r v i l l e Nelson, Rochester, N . Y., «nd W a l t e r F r a n k l i n , Kansas C i t y , Mo. *n the p r e l i m i n a r y the final s t a n d i n g w a s : Woods Franklin Ricketts Maturo Rhines Safford W. 10 8 8 8 6 6 L. 1 2 8 8 6 6 Seaback Nelson Weston Rudolph McCoy Long W. 5 5 4 3 2 0 L. 6 6 7 8 9 11 I n the final r o u n d , w i t h Greenleaf defending his t i t l e , the standing w a s : W. L. H . R. P. C. Greenleaf 8 0 48 1000 1 35 .667 2 31 .339 A N a t i o n a l Pocket B i l l ' a r d T o u r n a m e n t took place a t the Hotel C o n t i n e n t a l , Philadelphia, October 17 t o 29, 1921. The t o u r n a m e n t ended w i t h t h i s r e s u l t : Player Won Lost R. Greenleaf. New Y o r k 9 0 A r t h u r Woods, Minneapolis, M i n n 7 2 T . A . Hueston, Los Angeles, Cal 6 3 Ben A l l e n , Kansas C i t y , Mo 5 4 A r t h u r Church, Yonkers, N . Y 5 4 56 W a i t e r F r a n k l i n , Kansas C i t y , Mo. 5 4 James M a t u r o , New Y o r k '. 4 5 Michael Korach, Trenton, N . J 2 7 Jerome Keogh, Rochester, N . Y 2 7 W . F . De L a n g h , Philadelphia, Pa 0 9 December 2 1 , 22 and 23, 1921, R a l p h Greenleaf met A r t h u i Woods f o r the championship. The m a t c h took place a t the A s t o r H o t e l , N e w Y o r k , December 2 1 , 22 a n d 23, 1921. F e b r u a r y 22, 23 a n d 24, 1922, Greenleaf met Hueston for t h e championship. The m a t c h took place a t t h e Strand Academy i n N e w Y o r k a n d r e s u l t e d : IstG. 2d G. 3dG. Total Greenleaf 158 149 158 450 Hueston 89 29 15 133 H i g h e s t run—Greenleaf, 100; Hueston, 23. May 4, 5 and 6, 1922, Greenleaf played F r a n k l i n f o r the championship. The m a t c h took place i n K l i n e ' s S t r a n d B i l l i a r d Academy i n N e w Y o r k a n d r e s u l t e d : 1st G. 2d G. 3d G. Total Greenleaf 156 152 142 450 Franklin 64 24 128 216 Highest run—Greenleaf, 3 5 ; F r a n k l i n , 20. 57 NOTEWORTHY POCKET BILLIARD RECORDS 1859, 1860, 1861 and 1862, first champion p l a y i n g on a 6x12 four-pocket table, Michael Phelan o f N e w Y o r k . A p r i l 8 t o 20, 1878, f i r s t n a t i o n a l pocket b i l l i a r d t o u r n a m e n t , played i n N e w Y o r k , C y r i l l e D i o n the w i n n e r . J a n . 6, 1881, second n a t i o n a l pocket b i l l i a r d tournament, played i n N e w Y o r k . W a h l s t r o m the w i n n e r . May 3, 1882, first p y r a m i d , 8 b a l l t o u r n a m e n t , played i n New Y o r k . F r e y the w i n n e r . J a n . 10, 1884, t h i r d n a t i o n a l championship pocket b i l l i a r d ? t o u r n a m e n t , eight balls, c a l l the balls but no pocket, a t N e w 1 Y o r k . J . L . Malone, w i n n e r . J a n . 28 t o Feb. 15, 1884, first tournament i n w h i c h the b a l l and pocket was called, a t Syracuse, N . Y . F r e y the w i n n e r . J a n . 30 to Feb. 9, 1887, the first tournament a t continuous pocket b i l l i a r d s took place, games of 150 balls, a t N e w Y o r k . B Frey w i n n e r . Feb. 14-20, 1887, f o u r t h n a t i o n a l pocket b i l l i a r d t o u r n a m e n t took place i n N e w Y o r k . Frey w i n n e r . M a r c h 2, 1889, fifth championship tournament a t continuous pocket b i l l i a r d s , 100 balls u p , a t N e w Y o r k . Frey w i n n e r . M a r c h , 1893, a championship of A m e r i c a tournament was held i n New Y o r k . De Oro w i n n e r . Oct. 16-21, 1893, De Oro met Roberts of London, E n g l a n d , f o r $2,000 a t N e w Y o r k . The terms were 1,000 points, E n g l i s h and A m e r i c a n tables, changing tables every 60 balls. De Oro won 1,000 to 924. Feb. and M a r c h , 1901, i n a t o u r n a m e n t f o r the championship . of the w o r l d at Boston, F r a n k Sherman was the w i n n e r . M a r c h 10-15, 1902, i n a continuous tournament a t B r o o k l y n , Clearwater was the w i n n e r . J a n . 20, 1905, Keogh challenged De Oro and i n M a r c h he was awarded the championship by default. J a n . 8, 1913, A l f r e d De Oro r a n 59 i n professional m a t c h w i t h James M a t u r o a t N e w Y o r k . ' J a n . 20, 1914, A l f r e d De Oro r a n 74 balls i n pocket b i l l i a r d ! match a t T a m p a , F l o r i d a . M a r c h 15, 1918, R a l p h Greenleaf established a new h i g h r u n record o f 137, unfinished, a t pocket b i l l i a r d s , a t Camden, N . J . Dec. 4, 1919, Ben A l l e n r a n 81 a n d shattered his f o r m e r record o f 74, held j o i n t l y by himself and A l f r e d De Oro. This was done i n t h e A m e r i c a n pocket b i l l i a r d t o u r n a m e n t a t H i g h t s town, N . J . M a r c h 8 1 , 1921, R a l p h Greenleaf pocketed 169 balls before missing i n a n e x h i b i t i o n at Y o r k , Pa., beating his o w n previous h i g h record of 156 made a t D a n b u r y , Conn. A p r i l 2 1 , 1921, F r a n k Taberski, of Schenectady, N . Y . , w o n his 300th v i c t o r y at pocket b i l l i a r d s , beating A . H o w a r d , 126 to 0 at Tampa, F l o r i d a . I n t h e year 1923, R a l p h Greenleaf m a d e a n e x h i b i t i o n r u n of 263 a t Sacramento, C a l i f . 58 R U L E S G O V E R N I N G T H E G A M E OF F I F T E E N - B A L L C O N T I N U O U S POCKET B I L L I A R D S Approved and Adopted October 17, 1921, and Revised i n 1925 Continuous Pocketings, so-called f r o m the system of scoring the game, differ f r o m any other game previously i n vogue. U n l i k e 61 or 8 ball Pyramid, scoring is continued u n t i l a l l the balls but one i n each frame have been pocketed, and the game may consist of any number of balls or points which may be agreed upon. Each ball pocketed scores one point for the striker and the game is usually scored upon the s t r i n g of buttons over the table. Penalties are paid through deducting points from the offendi n g striker's score or string of buttons, instead of f o r f e i t i n g a ball as i n regular pyramid games. I f when penalized, a striker has no points to his credit, such penalty or penalties shall be charged against h i m and deducted f r o m any score he may make. I n p l a y i n g a match of more than one night's duration, when one striker shall have scored the agreed upon quota for the night, play must be continued u n t i l fourteen balls of the final frame have been pocketed and each striker must be credited w i t h the balls which each shall pocket in the aforesaid final frame. The position of the cue ball and the 15th (unpocketed) object ball shall be marked by the referee, and upon resumption of - play the following day the cue ' ball and the 15th (unpocketed) ball shall be returned to their marked position on the table, the fourteen balls are framed and the player continues his i n n i n g f r o m the previous day's game. On the final n i g h t of a match, playing shall cease as soon as one striker shall have scored or pocketed a sufficient number of balls to w i n the match. Continuous Pocket-Billiards is played w i t h fifteen numbered balls and one white ball, not numbered. The white is the cue hall. The numbered balls are object balls, to be directly or indirectly driven into pockets by the cue ball. A line across the head of the table, at the r i g h t angle f r o m the second diamond on each long r a i l is termed "the s t r i n g . " This line is necessary for the regulation of the cue ball " i n hand" and for determining whether or net object balls are w i t h i n or beyond " t h e s t r i n g . " A spot is placed at the center of this line and designated the " H e a d " spot. A spot is also placed at the center of a line across the foot of the table at a r i g h t angle from the second diamond a t t h a t end, and is designated as the "Foot" spot. A spot is also placed i n the center of the table and is designated as the "Center" spot. A light pencil, m a r k must be drawn from the foot spot directly back to the center diamond on the end r a i l . This line is necessary for absolute accuracy i n spotting object balls. The outline of the triangle should be drawn w i t h lead pencil 59 on the bed cloth when set in the proper position for racking: the balls on the foot spot. Beginning the game, or when the cue ball is " i n h a n d , " a striker must play from within "the s t r i n g " line. ^ A ball, the perpendicular center of which is on "the s t r i n g " line, must be regarded within it. The cue ball is " i n h a n d " at the beginning of a game, also when forced off the table or pocketed and when, for any reason, fifteen balls are framed, excepting as provided in rule eleven. It remains " i n hand** and is not in play until forced from behind "the s t r i n g " line by a stroke made with the point of a cue. When not " i n h a n d " the cue ball is at all times i n play. I f during the progress of a game, when a l l the object balls on the table are within "the s t r i n g , " the cue ball becomes " i n hand," the object ball that is nearest to "the s t r i n g " must be moved to the Foot spot. The cue ball can then be played from within "the s t r i n g " on the object ball so spotted. Opening the game the striker plays with the cue ball from within "the s t r i n g " at any of the object balls and afterwards as he finds the cue ball on the table. The object balls are numbered one to fifteen respectively, and are usually colored. The numbers on the balls are simply used for specifying each ball which a striker aims to pocket and do not in any way affect the score of the player. Before commencing the game these .fifteen balls are placed in the form of a triangle upon the table, a triangular frame being employed to insure correctness. The highest ball must be placed near the apex of the triangle, and the lowest number at its base; the 15-ball must be placed at the apex and must rest on the spot known as the Foot spot, and the 1 and 5 balls at either corner of the base of the triangle. E a c h and every ball counts one point, and the game shall consist of any given number of points, to be mutually agreed upon. RULES FOR P L A T R U L E 1.—All strokes must be made with the point of the cue, otherwise they are foul. R U L E 2.—In match or tournament contests, the game is begun by banking from within "the s t r i n g " to the foot rail and return. The striker whose ball comes to a rest the nearer to the head rail wins the lead. F o r convenience, two white balls of the same size as the object balls may be provided for banking. The winner of the lead has the option of playing first or compelling his opponent to play first. « R U L E 3.—The striker Who makes the opening stroke must drive two or more object balls to a cushion, or cause at least one object ball to go into a pocket. Should he fail to do either, the stroke is fool, he forfeits two points and at the option of his opponent, may lose his inning, or, with* the balls reframed, may be compelled to play again from "the string** and continue to play until he drives two or 60 more object balls to a c u s h i o n , or a t least one object b a l l into a pocket. E a c h f a i l u r e causes h i m to forfeit t w o points. R U L E 4 . — I n m a k i n g a n opening stroke, a s t r i k e r must play directly a t the object balls or m a k e the cue b a l l touch one or more c u s h i o n s before c o n t a c t w i t h the f r a m e . R U L E 5 . — B e f o r e m a k i n g a stroke, the referee m u s t d i s t i n c t l y c a l l t h e n u m b e r of the b a l l the s t r i k e r intends to pocket. When i t i s not obvious as to w h i c h b a l l a p l a y e r is e n d e a v o r i n g to pocket a n d t h e referee is i n doubt, t h e n h e m u s t a s k the p l a y e r to i n d i c a t e the b a l l before shooting, o t h e r w i s e , w h e r e t h e shot is obvious, t h e referee is to c a l l the b a l l w i t h o u t questioning the p l a y e r . S h o u l d a s t r i k e r , by one s t r o k e , pocket more balls t h a n the one c a l l e d , h e is entitled to a l l the balls pocketed by the stroke. R U L E 6 . — W h e n the pocket for w h i c h a called ball be aimed is obvious, the referee need not c a l l the pocket. W h e n there is a possibility Of doubt as to w h i c h is t h e objective, a definite c a l l of b a l l a n d pocket m u s t be made. R U L E 7 . — A Btriker is not required to pay a p e n a l t y for f a i l u r e to m a k e the cue b a l l h i t a called b a l l provided it hits a n y other object b a l l or balls on the table, a f t e r w a r d t o u c h i n g a cushion or d r i v i n g a n object b a l l to a c u s h i o n . R U L E 8 . — A f t e r the opening stroke, p l a y i n g for safety or to count, e a c h contestant m u s t either pocket a b a l l or m a k e a t least one object b a l l o r the cue b a l l , after contact w i t h an object b a l l , s t r i k e a c u s h i o n , under p e n a l t y of forfeiture of one point. P l a y i n g d i r e c t l y a t a n object b a l l r e s t i n g a g a i n s t a cushion a n d s t o p p i n g the cue b a l l i n f r o n t of s u c h object b a l l without m o v i n g i t does not comply w i t h t h e requirements of t h i s r u l e . I n a l l s u c h cases, the cue b a l l , after contact w i t h the object b a l l , m u s t touch a c u s h i o n , or the object b a l l m u s t be d r i v e n to a n o t h e r ( a different) cushion. D i s r e g a r d of t h i s requirement w i l l s u b j e c t a p l a y e r to the p e n a l t y of a forfeiture of one point. R U L E 9 . — O n l y fourteen balls a r e to be pocketed i n the first f r a m e , a f t e r w h i c h these fourteen balls a r e to be replaced o n the table i n t r i a n g u l a r f o r m as a t the b e g i n n i n g of the game, w i t h o u t i n t e r f e r i n g w i t h the fifteenth (unpocketed) ball or the cue b a l l , both of w h i c h m u s t r e m a i n i n the position occupied a f t e r the fourteenth b a l l w a s pocketed a n d the s t r i k e r continues. W h e n e v e r fourteen balls a r e f r a m e d , the apex of the t r i a n g l e m u s t be v a c a n t . F o r a c c u r a c y , a w h i t e b a l l corresponding i n size to the others m a y be f r a m e d i n the apex a n d removed before p l a y is resumed. R U L E 1 0 . — S h o u l d either the cue b a l l or object b a l l left on the table i n t e r f e r e w i t h the f r a m i n g of the fourteen (14) balls i n t r i a n g u l a r f o r m , the b a l l thus i n t e r f e r i n g m u s t be placed on the H e a d spot located m i d w a y of " t h e s t r i n g " l i n e . I f t h a t spot should be occupied the b a l l m u s t be placed on the C e n t e r spot. Should- the cue ball a n d object ball interfere at the same time* the fifteen (15) balls a r e t h e n f r a m e d on the table as at the commencement of the game, the cue b a l l is " i n h a n d " and the s t r i k e r continues his r u n . R U L E 1 1 . — W h e n e v e r by accident or design, a p l a y e r , by on« stroke, pockets the fourteenth a n d fifteenth balls of a f r a m e , he is entitled to both b a l l s , the fifteen object balls s h a l l be 61 f r a m e d a n d t h e s t r i k e r c o n t i n u e s to p l a y f r o m w h e r e t h e c u e b a l l c o m e s to r e s t . R U L E 1 2 . — W i t h the cue ball " i n h a n d " a striker m a y change t h e p o s i t i o n of t h e c u e b a l l a t p l e a s u r e , b u t n o t o c c u p y a n u n r e a s o n a b l e l e n g t h o f t i m e i n so d o i n g . H e c a n m o v e t h e b a l l w i t h h i s h a n d o r t h e body o f h i s c u e w i t h o u t r e s t r i c t i o n . When w i t h the point of the cue he delivers a stroke upon it, o r w h e n , i n t h e a c t o f t a k i n g a i m , h e c a u s e s t h e c u e t i p to l i g h t l y touch it, the rules a n d penalties o f the game apply. R U L E 1 3 . — W h e n t h e cue b a l l i s " i n h a n d " a s t r i k e r m a y play from any place w i t h i n " t h e s t r i n g " a t a n y object ball outside of " t h e s t r i n g . " S h o u l d he p l a y f r o m a n y p o s i t i o n not w i t h i n " t h e s t r i n g " l i n e w i t h o u t b e i n g checked p r e v i o u s to the s t r o k e b y h i m , h e i s e n t i t l e d to a n y s c o r e h e m a y m a k e f r o m s u c h s t r o k e , b u t i f h e is c h e c k e d b e f o r e m a k i n g t h e s t r o k e a n d t h e n m a k e s i t f r o m o u t s i d e o f " t h e s t r i n g , " i t does n o t c o u n t f o r h i m ; h i s h a n d is o u t , h e f o r f e i t s o n e p o i n t a n d a l l b a l l s d i s t u r b e d b y t h e s t r o k e m u s t be r e p l a c e d o r l e f t a s t h e y a r e , a t the option of t h e opposing s t r i k e r . R U L E 1 4 . — A b a l l g o i n g into a pocket a n d r e b o u n d i n g on the t a b l e is n o t to be c o u n t e d a s a p o c k e t e d b a l l . I t r e t a i n s its p l a c e w h e r e i t c o m e s to r e s t u p o n t h e t a b l e . A n object ball f o r c e d off t h e t a b l e , o r f o r c e d off a n d r e b o u n d i n g f r o m s o m e o b j e c t f o r e i g n to t h e t a b l e , m u s t be r e p l a c e d u p o n t h e F o o t s p o t ; o r , i f t h a t be o c c u p i e d , o n a l i n e b e t w e e n t h e s p o t a n d t h e foot r a i l a n d a s n e a r a s p o s s i b l e to t h e s p o t . T h e p l a y e r loses h i s h a n d , b u t does n o t s u f f e r a n y f o r f e i t u r e . I f in like m a n n e r , t h e c u e b a l l be f o r c e d off t h e t a b l e , t h e s t r i k e r loses h i s h a n d a n d forfeits one point, a n d t h e n e x t s t r i k e r p l a y s . I f , w h e n p o c k e t i n g a c a l l e d b a l l , a n o t h e r o b j e c t b a l l is d r i v e n off t h e t a b l e , t h e l a t t e r i s to be s p o t t e d , t h e p l a y e r i s c r e d i t e d with the called ball a n d continues his hand. R U L E 1 5 . — I f a s t r i k e r pockets one or m o r e of the object b a l l s a n d t h e c u e b a l l goes i n t o a p o c k e t , h e c a n n o t s c o r e a n d f o r f e i t s o n e p o i n t . I f o n e o b j e c t b a l l be p o c k e t e d b y t h e s t r o k e , i t m u s t be p l a c e d o n t h e s p o t k n o w n a s t h e F o o t s p o t ; o r , i f t h a t be o c c u p i e d , a s n e a r l y b e l o w i t a s p o s s i b l e , a n d o n a l i n e w i t h t h a t s p o t — i f t w o o r m o r e o b j e c t b a l l s be p o c k e t e d , one m u s t be p l a c e d o n t h e F o o t Spot, t h e o t h e r o r o t h e r s o n t h e line below it. I n e i t h e r c a s e t h e b a l l m u s t be " f r o z e n , " i n other words touch one another. R U L E 1 6 . — T h e gas fixture or other a p p a r a t u s for lighting w h e n p l a c e d d i r e c t l y o v e r t h e t a b l e s h a l l n o t be c o n s i d e r e d a f o r e i g n o b j e c t , a n d s h o u l d a b a l l s t r i k i n g a fixture r e b o u n d to t h e t a b l e , i t m u s t r e t a i n i t s p o s i t i o n w h e r e i t c o m e s to r e s t . R U L E 1 7 . — A b a l l r e s t i n g o n top o f t h e c u s h i o n o r r a i l m u s t be r e g a r d e d a s off t h e t a b l e . R U L E 1 8 . — P u s h shots are allowed only w i t h a f a i r stroke of the cue. R U L E 1 9 . — W h e n t h e c u e b a l l is i n c o n t a c t w i t h a n o t h e r b a l l , a s t r i k e r m a y p l a y d i r e c t l y a t t h e b a l l w i t h w h i c h i t is i n c o n tact* p r o v i d e d t h e o b j e c t b a l l i s m o v e d , a n d t h e c u e b a l l s t r i k e a c u s h i o n o r d r i v e a b a l l w h i c h is i n c o n t a c t w i t h t h e c u e b a l l to a c u s h i o n . F a i l u r e to do e i t h e r , t h e s t r i k e r s h a l l be p e n a l i z e d o n e p o i n t , a s i n R u l e N o . 8. R U L E 2 0 . — I t is f o u l , a n d t h e s t r i k e r f o r f e i t s one p o i n t , if, 62 w h i l e i n the a c t of s t r i k i n g , he h a s n o t a t l e a s t one foot on the floor. R U L E 2 1 . — A forfeit of one p o i n t is deducted f r o m a s t r i k e r ' s s c o r e for p o c k e t i n g the cue b a l l ; f a i l i n g to either m a k e a n object b a l l s t r i k e a c u s h i o n or go into a pocket, or the cue b a l l to s t r i k e a c u s h i o n as provided i n R u l e 8, for s t r i k i n g his o w n b a l l t w i c e ; a n d f o r , a f t e r a s u c c e s s f u l or u n s u c c e s s f u l s t r o k e , i n a n y m a n n e r o b s t r u c t i n g the cue b a l l . R U L E 2 2 . — F o r o b s t r u c t i n g , d i s t u r b i n g or t o u c h i n g i n a n y m a n n e r , w i t h clothes, or a n y t h i n g else, the cue b a l l or a n object b a l l , a s t r i k e r loses his i n n i n g , forfeits one point a n d a n y b a l l he m a y h a v e pocketed on the f i n a l s t r o k e of s u c h inning. R U L E 2 3 . — S h o u l d the s t r i k e r m a k e t h r e e consecutive forf e i t u r e s , he forfeits fifteen points ( r e g a r d l e s s of the n u m b e r of balls on the table) w h i c h a r e deducted f r o m his score. The table s h a l l t h e n be c l e a r e d , the fifteen object balls f r a m e d a n d the cue b a l l w i l l be " i n h a n d " for the n e x t s t r i k e r . T h e g a m e b e i n g c o n t i n u o u s , a n i n c o m i n g s t r i k e r is not by r e a s o n of f o r f e i t u r e of points a n d the r e f r a i n i n g of the fifteen bails relieved of p e n a l t i e s w h i c h h a v e a c c r u e d . L i a b i l i t y for consecutive s c r a t c h e s extends f r o m one f r a m e to a n o t h e r , as i f t h e r e w e r e no r e f r a m i n g of the b a l l s . R U L E 2 4 . — S h o u l d a b a l l , after h a v i n g come to a s t a n d s t i l l r e s t i n g on the edge of a pocket, f a l l into t h a t pocket without being h i t by a n o t h e r b a l l , it m u s t be r e p l a c e d o n the table, at the edge of s u c h pocket, by the referee. S h o u l d s u c h b a l l f a l l into a pocket w h i l e the s t r i k e r is i n the act of t a k i n g a i m , or a f t e r the s t r i k e r h a s delivered his stroke a n d before the cue b a l l or a n y object b a l l , set i n motion by the s t r o k e , h i t s s u c h b a l l , it a n d a l l other balls set i n motion by the s t r o k e m u s t be r e p l a c e d by the referee, a s n e a r a s possible to t h e i r o r i g i n a l p o s i t i o n , a n d the s t r i k e r is e n t i t l e d to p l a y a g a i n . R U L E 25.-—A c o u n t i n g s t r o k e c a n n o t be regarded as being complete u n t i l a l l balls set i n motion by the s t r o k e h a v e come to r e s t . A s t r o k e m a d e w h e n a n y of t h e b a l l s a r e i n motion is foul, a n d the s t r i k e r loses h i s i n n i n g a n d forfeits one point. Should s u c h a s t r o k e be made, balls disturbed m u s t be replaced, or left as they come to r e s t , a t the option of the n e x t s t r i k e r . R U L E 2 6 . — B a l l s a c c i d e n t a l l y disturbed by a n y other person or cause t h a n a s t r i k e r , m u s t be replaced as n e a r l y as possible in t h e i r o r i g i n a l position a n d the s t r i k e r m a y continue his inning. R U L E 2 7 . — I n case of cause for a forfeiture being overlooked by a referee, a n o n - s t r i k e r who demands a p e n a l t y m u s t do so before a n o t h e r s t r o k e is m a d e ; i f delayed, it c a n n o t be enforced. R U L E 2 8 . — A t no time a f t e r the opening of the game s h a l l a p l a y e r be obliged to force two balls to the c u s h i o n . R U L E 2 9 . — D e l i b e r a t e j u m p shots, t h a t is m a k i n g the cue b a l l j u m p over a n object b a l l , a r e prohibited. O b j e c t balls pocketed by deliberate j u m p shots s h a l l be replaced upon the table as provided i n R u l e 15, a n d the p l a y e r s h a l l lose his inning. RULE 30.-—If a p l a y e r w i l f u l l y moves the cue b a l l for 63 safety play other t h a n w i t h the t i p of the cue, he shall f o r f e i t fifteen points, which are deducted f r o m his score and play shall continue as i n Rule 23. R U L E 3 1 . — I f a player scratches on a pocketed ball, that ball must be spotted on the table. We, the undersigned, agree to abide by the foregoing rules governing play i n the tournament f o r the N a t i o n a l Championship a t Pocket B i l l i a r d s to be held in Philadelphia, commencing October 17, 1921, under the auspices of The Brunswick-BalkeCollender Co. E. Ralph Greenleaf A r t h u r Woods Thomas A . Hueston Walter Franklin A r t h u r Church Bennie A l l e n Michael Kovach Jerome Keogh James Maturo W m . F . DeLangh Philadelphia, October 17, 1921. NOTES TO T H E FOREGOING R U L E S The decision of the referee is final. The referee shall have sole authority to call a l l fouls, scratches, misplays, errors and penalties of any k i n d whatsoever provided f o r i n the rules. The privilege, however, is to be retained by each player to call the referee's a t t e n t i o n to any oversight on his p a r t , and to appeal f r o m his decisions as heretofore, i f there are justifiable grounds. The General Rules of B i l l i a r d s , when not conflicting w i t h any of the foregoing rules, govern this game. There shall be no unnecessary delay on the p a r t of a striker and i n case of such delays an opponent may appeal to the referee, who shall place a reasonable t i m e l i m i t on die striker. This rule is p a r t i c u l a r l y favorable to spectators, who dislike a tedious game. A n opponent, i f standing, must remain at least four feet f r o m the player and the table. Protests may be made i f a non-striker stand i n f r o n t of or i n any manner annoy another whose t u r n i t is to play, or i n such p r o x i m i t y as to disconcert his p l a y i n g ; also against loud t a l k i n g or advice f r o m either spectator or opponent. The referee must take cognisance of a l l such protests and i f he deems them w e l l founded must act t o support them. Players who w i t h d r a w f r o m a game before i t is finished shall be declared to have forfeited. (Additional) RULES A N D REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE TOURNAM E N T OF T H E N A T I O N A L C H A M P I O N S H I P POCKET B I L L I A R D LEAGUE Season of 1923-1924 R U L E 1.—Each contestant must play f o u r games w i t h every other contestant i n his home t o w n , t w o on the first day and t w o on the second. R U L E 2 . — A l l games shall be played w i t h 2 5-16 E m p i r e Compo-Ivory balls upon a 5x10 Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company table, w i t h pocket openings 4 % inehes a t corners and 4 % inches a t sides. Same shall be furnished w i t h 1845 m a t c h cushions and B r u n s w i c k special i m p o r t e d t o u r n a m e n t c l o t h . The roomkeeper must f u r n i s h 2 5-16 I v o r y cue b a l l f o r each contest. R U L E 3.—Each game to consist of 100 balls. R U L E 4.—The referee shall be appointed by the p r o p r i e t o r or manager of the b i l l i a r d room i n w h i c h the contest takes place. R U L E 5 . — A l l games shall be played under the rules adopted by the Executive Committee. R U L E 6 . — A l l ties to be played off subject to the rules governi n g same, as specified i n said rules. This refers only to players finishing 1-2-3-4. R U L E 7 . — A l l parties to this contract f u r t h e r agree not t o p e r m i t public g a m b l i n g i n any w a y i n connection w i t h these League games. R U L E 8 . — I t is agreed between the parties to this contract, t h a t a n y roomkeeper p e r m i t t i n g a contestant t o play w h i l e under the influence of l i q u o r , subjects himself t o f o r f e i t u r e of his franchise. C o m p l a i n t to take the same course as t h a t of a player. R U L E 9.—A player shall not play a t b i l l i a r d s i n any room, club, or place other t h a n t h a t i n w h i c h a N a t i o n a l Championship Pocket League game is t o be played t h i r t y days p r i o r to opening of t o u r n a m e n t , October, 1923, w i t h o u t the consent ( i n w r i t i n g ) f r o m Secretary, approved by owner of the franchise. R U L E 1 0 . — A l l contestants shall appear i n Jersey Jackets i n the a f t e r n o o n a n d Tuxedo Coats i n evening. R U L E 1 1 . — V i s i t i n g players shall be allowed fifteen m i n u t e s ' practice p r i o r t o t i m e set f o r games. R U L E 12.—The Treasurer shall give a bond sufficient t o cover a l l moneys received by h i m and i n his custody. NOTEWORTHY BILLIARD PERFORMANCES 18-in. balkline—Best Average, 50, F r a n k Ives, New Y o r k . 18-in. balkline (no shot i n ) — B e s t r u n , 111, Jake Schaefer, Chicago, 111. 18-in. b a l k l i n e — ( n o shot i n ) Best average, 19 8-13, F r a n k Ives, Chicago, 111. 18-in. balkline (1 shot i n ) — H i g h r u n , 157 average, 36 4-11, W i l l i e Hoppe, Chicago, 111., M a r c h 5. 1908. 18-in. b a l k l i n e — ( 1 shot in)—500 p o i n t game, highest average, 331-3 W i l l i e Hoppe, N e w Y o r k , D e c 1, 1910; ( c h a m pionship match) W i l l i e Hoppe averaged 23 11-21 against George Sutton, 500 to 228, New Y o r k , March 20, 1914. 18-in. balk line (2 shots i n ) — H i g h e s t single average, W i l l i e Hoppe, 135%, vs. George S u t t o n , Chicago, I I I . , Feb. 24, 1914. Hoppe scored 500 i n f o u r innings. Hoppe scored 1,500 i n three nights, 500 each n i g h t , f o r g r a n d average of 55-15-27; Hoppe averaged 150 i n 800 p o i n t m a t c h , Des Moines, l a . , N o v . 21, 1916. 18-in. balk l i n e (2 shots i n ) — H i g h e s t r u n , i n m a t c h , 818—» Edouard Horemans, New Y o r k , A p r i l 25, 1922. 4,000 points, 67 innings—Roger C^ ^ P a r s . An gr J 922. ( A m a t e u r ) 27 3/11 av.—Percy N . Collins, B r o o k l y n , Feb. 3, 1922. 18-in. b a l k l i n e (2 shots i n ) , 6 2 2 — W i l l i e Hoppe, P a r i s , France, M a r c h , 1911; George Sutton ( E x h . ) , 500 i n f o u r i n n * ings, Chicago, Nov. 7, 1911. H i g h r u n , 18.2 balk line—1.009 single i n n i n g , W . W . S p i n k , Los Angeles, Cal., Oct. 12, 1912. 18.2 b a l k l i n e — r u n o f 384 i n one i n n i n g (championship game) Welker Cochran, Chicago, Nov. 18, 1921. Three Cushion caroms—Best average, 10, Jake Schaefer, Chicago, 111., h i g h r u n tourney, 18, Charles M o r i n , St. Louis, Mo., May 20, 1915; h i g h r u n i n e x h i b i t i o n , 25, W i l l i e Hoppe, San Francisco, J a n . 8, 1918. R u n o f 153 i n 114 innings—• H e n r y Solomon, Spokane, Wash., June 22, 1922. Robert Cannefax beat Pierre Maupome, 60 to 18 i n 23 innings, Detroit, M i c h . , Feb. 2 1 , 1924. J a n . 28, 1924, J o h n L a y t o n r a n 50 points i n m a t c h w i t h A u g i e Kieckhefer i n 26 i n n i n g s a t Chicago. S t r a i g h t r a i l , 5x10 table—Best average, 333%, Jake Schaefer, Chicago, 111. 14 2-in balk line (amateur)—Best average, 67 1-7. 400 p o i n t s , Calvin Demarest, Chicago, 111., M a r c h 17, 1908; h i g h r u n , 170, Calvin Demarest, Chicago, 111., M a r c h 17, 1908. 3-cushion caroms—Best r u n , Joe Carney, 50 points, 31 i n n ings, Denver, Colo., J a n . 5, 1912; W i l l i e Hoppe, Cleveland, O., Feb. 15, 1917; A u g i e Kieckhefer made h i g h r u n of 19 a t Chicago, 111., A u g . 22, 1917. Off red b a l l — W i l l i e Hoppe, H o l l a n d , 1907, r u n o f 5 3 ; Charles Peterson, St. Louis, Mo., June 5, 1996; e x h i b i t i o n m a t c h , r u n of 54. A t London, E n g . , M a r c h 18, 1911—George Gray r a n 2.196 at E n g l i s h style. Sydney, N . S. W., May, 1922—Walter L i n d r u m made r u n of 1,417 a n d averaged 77.33 f o r 16,009 points under new rules. Best r u n , close cannon p l a y , E n g l i s h b i l l i a r d s — 3 8 8 by Claude Falkiner, London, E n g . , June 16, 1918. H i g h r u n , pocket billiards, 137 (unfinished)—Ralph Greenleaf, C a m d e n , N . J . , M a r c h 15, 1918. Greenleaf also r a n 101 i n championship game w i t h Jerome Keogh a t Rochester, N . Y . , J a n . 19, 1924. 66 ; i : 18.2 Amateur Record average 37 4 / 8 — J o h n A . Clinton, Brookl y n , N . Y . , March, 1923. National amateur championship, 18-27 grand average—' J o s e p h M a y e r , P h i l a d e l p h i a , Pa., A p r i l 14, 1913, 132-162. B I L L I A R D S . FROM T H E GAME'S BEGINNING U P TO ITS PRESENT TIME OF WIDE-SPREAD POPULARITY • " W h i c h is the oldest of the present day sport g a m e s ? " is often asked, and the question is not an easy one. But billiards is one of the oldest and perhaps leads all i n age when it comes to indoor sports. " H o w old is the billiard g a m e ? " Well, that, too, is a hard question to answer. Various authorities have given it different ages and the real question as to its longevity has never been actually settled by the sport writers of the present age. Some say the game was born I r i s h , and perhaps it was. for like the I r i s h it has lived thru many a hard battle and stands out today stronger and better and with a wider circle of friends than ever. I t was played in Ireland hundreds of years ago, according to MacGeoghegan's " H i s t o r y of I r e l a n d , " which relates that Cathire Moore, one of "those original k i n g s , " indulged in billiard balls of brass, with the pools and cues of the same material. Archbishop Hughes very recently, while discussing the game, said that he had read in " T h e Confessions of St. Augustine," who lived in the fourth and fifth centuries, an allusion to billiards. So the game must at some old time or other have been I r i s h , or nearly I r i s h . The people of F r a n c e , too, claim the game. They claim i t was really played first of a l l in F r a n c e , and then imported to E n g l a n d . T h e French cla'm the word billiards comes from the two F r e n c h words, " b i l l i a r d , " a staff, or stick, and " b i l l o , " a bubble or ball. Other authorities in F r a n c e say the game was born in that country and first played and named there, and they point to the fact that its name resembles " b i l l o , " which in that tongue signifies " b a l l , " and we are assured that Henrique de Vigne invented the sport there in 1571. While the game was perhaps born in F r a n c e , it is well known that it was not until the spring of 1823 that one Mons. Minguad. a professional billiard player of Paris, invented the leather tip, and even then no theoretical deduction suggested to him the wonderful phenomena that would result from the apparently unimportant change, but he is entitled to credit for the boldness with which he pursued his chance discovery to its ultimate conclusion. I n the autumn of 1823 these tips were imported into the United States, and they have been improved on, added to the effectiveness of the cue'ever since, and what the game would be without this small and useful invention is entirely problematical. The English, the first to claim the establishment of thorobred •horse racing, also claim to be the real inventors Of'billiards. 67 They base t h e i r c l a i m because Shakespeare, born i n 1564, m e n tions b i l l i a r d s i n Scene 5, A c t 2 o f his " A n t o n y and Cleopatra." I n t h a t scene, too, he r e a l l y pays t h e game a c o m p l i m e n t , his subject, Cleopatra, declaring her choice o f i t over music w h e n t o C h a r m i a n , her companion, she s a y s : " L e t music a l o n e : L e t ' s go to b i l l i a r d s ! Come, C h a r m i a n ! " A n d so, according t o Shakespeare, t h e game of b i l l i a r d s was n o t a new pastime i n E n g l a n d i n t h e fifteenth a n d s i x t e e n t h centuries, f o r he even t h e n made h i s people believe t h a t t h e game o f b i l l i a r d s was k n o w n i n the days when A n t o n y reveled i n the l u x u r i o u s love of the E g y p t i a n queen a n d t h a t Cleopatra i n v i t e d C h a r m i a n t o the game i n the year SO B.C. Opposed t o the c l a i m o f F r a n c e , too, is s t i l l another c l a i m by the E n g l i s h t o the effect t h a t the N o r m a n s were t h e p r i m i t i v e b i l l i a r d i s t s , because the w o r d sounds v e r y m u c h l i k e " b i l l a r t , " N o r m a n f o r " s t i c k . " F u r t h e r we l e a r n t h a t the E n g l i s h " b a l l y a r d s , " is w o n d e r f u l l y l i k e b i l l i a r d s . T h e n , too, the game o f b i l l i a r d s has been claimed b y Greece as w e l l as by I r e l a n d , E n g l a n d , France a n d I t a l y a n d i n t h e travels of A n a r c h a r s i s t h r u Greece, 400 B . C , we are t o l d t h a t he noticed a game w h i c h f r o m his description w e should consider a f a i r sample o f w h a t the early b i l l i a r d s m i g h t have been. I n no other c o u n t r y , however, has b i l l i a r d s had a more r a p i d g r o w t h i n t h e last 100 years t h a n i n A m e r i c a . One w h o has given i t a close study and gathered t h e statistics claims t h a t i t is now played d a i l y by n e a r l y 6,000,000 men a n d women i n t h i s c o u n t r y . T H E GAME'S FIRST TRAGEDY It Came W h e n Louis Fox A f t e r L o s i n g the Championship J o h n Deery Ends H i s O w n L i f e to I n 1865 J o h n D e e r y became c h a m p i o n . His crown came t h r o u g h illness of D u d l e y K a v a n a g h w h o f o r f e i t e d t o L o u i s Fox. I n 1865 F o x challenged K a v a n a g h , b u t t h e l a t t e r was i n H I health a t the t i m e of his receipt of the challenge, a n d he requested t i m e t o get w e l l a n d i n shape. F o x refused to accede t'o this request and insisted on the immediate p l a y i n g o f t h e game. T h e n K a v a n a g h w i t h d r e w f r o m the field a n d the gage of b a t t l e was t a k e n up f o r the old champion by handsome J o h n Deery. T h i s g a m e t o o k place on Sept. 7, 1865, i n W a s h i n g t o n H a l l , Rochester, N . Y . , t h e b i r t h p l a c e of F o x , w h e r e he w a s s u r rounded by friends. Beside t h e c h a m p i o n s h i p $1,000 w a s involved. The rules were the same as i n t h e games i n w h i c h P h e l a n a n d K a v a n a g h had t r i u m p h e d except t h a t the number o f p o i n t s were cut f r o m 2,000 t o 1,500. Those were the days when gas instead o f electric l i g h t s were used over the b i l l i a r d tables. The n i g h t was s u l t r y a n d w a r m , a n d w h e n Deery a n d F o x s t a r t e d p l a y there were m a n y flies fluttering over the tables. N e a r t h e e n d of t h e g a m e , w h e n F o x h a d b u t 35 t o go, a fly f e l l a n d a l i g h t e d on one of the balls w h i c h F o x was a i m i n g a t 68 in his effort to run out his last 35. The balls were close together and it seemed as. though F o x was destined to win easily, for runs of over 1,000 were often made in those days. But the fly deflected the course of the ball, F o x missed, and in the next few moments Deery r a n the 90 points needed to win the game, the total score being 1,500 to 1,465 points in his favor. Fox, disappointed and nearly demented at losing a game which had seemed almost in his possession, and losing it by a strange and unprecedented accident, r a n from Washington Hall and plunged into the Geneseo river, which runs through Rochester. T h e next day some of the newspapers attributed his tragic ending, to his uncharitable treatment of Kavanagh, for whom he had had no consideration when the latter was really seriously i l l . After that game, Deery retained the championship in 1866 in a game w i t h Joe Dion. I n 1867 Dion turned the tables on him and Deery did not win the honor back until 1868, when he defeated John McDevitt of Chicago. Deery was also champion in 1869 and 1870. A SENSATION AT SAN FRANCISCO I t Came When a Spectator Interfered with Progress of Deery-Rudolphe Match Beside the sad ending of his match with Fox at Rochester, strange to say, too, other peculiar incidents occurred in other matches in w h i c h John Deery, one of the first of the great billiard players, took part. One of these happened in San Francisco on March 5, 1870, when Deery and A . P . Rudolphe, another great player of that time, were contending for the championship. Deery was then the champion and Rudolphe won the match by a score of 1,500 to 1,327. Deery a t this time was a wonderful favorite in S a n Francisco and the crowd at several stages showed marked partiality. A s a result of this when it came near to the finish of the contest there happened a n extraordinary incident. As Rudolphe was about to make the winning carom one of Deery's backers, a man who had the reputation of a desperado, picked up one of the balls and threw it into the gallery. Deery, a man of splendid physique, fearless and straight and honest, a t once interfered, took hold of the disturber and made him take his seat. . T h e n Deery sent.for the ball that was thrown, put it back i n position, and standing close by saw that Rudolphe, made the shot that was needed to win the game and title. • I n 1870 great rivalry existed in New Y o r k between J o h n Deery and A . P. Rudolphe, and that year those great players alternated as champions. Deery, a wonderfully handsome man, and a n American, had an immense following and Rudolphe, a dashing Frenchman, also had a large coterie of friends and admirers. A t that time New Y o r k , as now, had a large F r e n c h colony, and to a man its people followed the fortunes of Rudolphe. 69 I n a game for the championship between the Frenchman and the t a l l a n d handsome American, there was intense rivalry and the followers of Rudolphe grew surly and cross when they saw their m a n was getting beaten. Rudolphe, too, became angry, and seeing that his chance to w i n had vanished long before Deery had completed his winning run, he slipped his hat and coat from under the table a n d tiptoed out of the hall. When Deery had scored his winning point he turned to look for Rudolphe, intending to extend his hand and sympathy to him. But the Frenchman was not in sight. T h e crowd, divining Deery's intention, called for Rudolphe, but he still remained in the background and Deery had to leave the hall without apologizing to his opponent for having defeated him. The new champion retained his title by defeating John McDevitt at Cooper Union, March 13, 1866, but on May 23 of the same year, a t the same hall, Deery was vanquished by Joseph Dion, then a resident of Montreal. THE FIRST GREAT BILLIARD MATCH It Was Played at Detroit, A p r i l 16, 1859, with Phelan and Seereiter the Principals The real beginning of billiards should be dated and its branching out i n this country to the match i n F i r e m a n ' s H a l l , Detroit, on A p r i l 16. 1859, or 66 years ago, in which Michael Phelan of New York and John Seereiter of Detroit were the competitors a s the real s t a r t i n g point of billiards in this country from a public exhibition and amusement standpoint. Phelan was at that time the champion and the acknowledged leader of billiards i n this country a n d Seereiter was looked on as a remarkable player. This match between Phelan and Seereiter was the first ever played for a great stake. No less than $15,000 and the championship was involved. T h e game was witnessed by a magnificent crowd of men and women. T h e leading people of Detroit came to cheer their fellow citizen on to what to them appeared certain victory. And they were greatly surprised when Phelan triumphed by a score of 2,000 to 1,904. The admission fee was placed at $5, a lot of money at that time and the price was made high rather to keep the wrong persons out than to profit by letting the wrong persons i n . The Old Fireman's H a l l is still standing at Detroit, is one of the show places of that city and is often visited by old timers alive today and who remember seeing the first great game or of hearing about it. Mr. Phelan remained champion from 1859 to 1862 and then retired. I n 1863 and 1864 Dudley Kavanagh of New York held the championship but in 1865 two new stars appeared in the billiard horizon, Louis F o x of Rochester, N e w Y o r k , and John Deery of Cincinnati, and they held the championship that year i n turn but i n the following year John Deery and Joe Dion of Montreal, Canada, divided championship honors. 70 Deery, the champion of this 1867 year, became a marked figure i n the b i l l i a r d w o r l d , due to his fine appearance and physique. He was a six-footer w i t h black eyes and c u r l y h a i r and dressed handsomely. He presented a fine appearance a t the b i l l i a r d table. On November 21, 1861, at C i n c i n n a t i , when 19 years old, Deery played his first match. H i s opponent was P h i l l i p Tieman of C i n c i n n a t i , who was one of the first class players of the time. The game was 1,000 points, pushing and j a w i n g allowed, on a 6 by 12 six pocket table. Tieman won by 317. Shortly a f t e r w a r d Deery a r r i v e d i n New Y o r k and A p r i l 4, 1862, at I r v i n g H a l l he made his first public appearance i n the East. H e then tackled Michael Foley, a n aspirant for championship honors, and was beaten 1,000 to 502. A m o n g the spectators was the distinguished p u l p i t and p l a t f o r m orator H e n r y W a r d Beecher, who was given an ovation as he advanced to occupy a seat t h a t had been reserved f o r h i m . The f o l l o w i n g year, June 1 to 9, a t I r v i n g H a l l , Deery competed i n the first championship b i l l i a r d tournament ever h e l d in any country. The games were played on a 6 by 12, four pocket table. H e finished t h i r d t o Dudley Kavanagh a n d Louis Fox. Behind h i m were P h i l i p Tieman, John Seereiter, Michael Foley, W i l l i a m Goldthwait and V i c t o r Estephe. 71 Page^ C o n d i t i o n s g o v e r n i n g b a l k l i n e c h a m p i o n s h i p ganfes 1* D e f e a t o f H o p p e i n 1925 f. • M First Billiard Record \^ tffi m F i r s t extensive volume on billiards >JB • F i r s t games in west «\|« F i r s t great billiard match \W'9F i r s t tournament in Illinois F i r s t t o u r n a m e n t a t 18.2 b a l k l i n e 8 F i r s t tragedy i n professional billiards 68 H i s t o r y o f 18.2 b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d s 8, History of billiards 671 H i s t o r y of pocket billiards 521 Hoppe's victory over V i g n a u x for world's title a t b a l k l i n e . . 25 < Hoppe's wonderful record 271 J u n i o r challenge games i n balkline 17. J u n i o r p r o f e s s i o n a l 18.2 b a l k l i n e t o u r n a m e n t 60 L i s t o f c h a m p i o n s 1859 to 1925 L i s t o f I n t e r n a t i o n a l b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d t o u r n a m e n t s 1902 to 1925 13 Miscellaneous balkline record 35 Michael P h e l a n first champion billiardist National Championship Pocket Billiard League 46 National Championship Pocket Billiard League standing i n 1924-25 t o u r n a m e n t * 47 National Championship Interstate Three Cushion L e a g u e . . . 36 National Championship Three Cushion Billiard League 381 National Championship Three Cushion Billiard League s t a n d i n g i n 1924-25 t o u r n a m e n t 39 Noteworthy billiard performances , 66 Noteworthy pocket b i l l i a r d records 53" Noteworthy three cushion billiard records 45 Origin of billiards 731 P a s s i n g o f first J a c o b S c h a e f e r 26 Pocket Billiard World's Record 51 Prizes i n balkline game. 15 R u d o l p h - D e e r y - m a t c h a c c o m p a n i e d by s e n s a t i o n a l i n c i d e n t . 69 Rules for Pocket Billiards 59 Rules governing contestants in National Championship Pocket Billiard League 65 R u l e s g o v e r n i n g 18.2 b a l k l i n e b i l l i a r d s 24 R u l e s of T h r e e C u s h i o n c a r o m billiards 44 S c h a e f e r ' s 1925 r e c o r d , 10 S e e r e i t e r - P h e l a n , first g r e a t m a t c h 3 Sketches of great balkline players . 4 . 10 Start of billiards 3 T h e 1922 I n t e r n a t i o n a l b a l k l i n e t o u r n a m e n t ML. . . 81 T h r e e Cushion W o r l d ' s Championship records J . . . . 43 Veteran J a k e Schaefer's last game .. 26 W h e n Y o u n g J a c o b S c h a e f e r defeated H o p p e 2. W o r l d ' s 1926 b a l k l i n e t o u r n a m e n t , .. World's Championship B a l k l i n e record S Y o u n g J a c o b Schaefer's greatest performance 2J| ILLUSTRATIONS W o r l d ' s balkline emblem Jacob S c h a e f e r Edouard Horemans . . . Eric Hagenlacher William F . Hoppe Welker Cochran Kamatare Suzuki ...... R. L . C a n n e f a x J . M. L a y t o n G . L . Copulos Otto Reiselt F. J . Taberski E . R. G r e e n l e a f A n d r e w St. J e a n 72 THE Of Spain, the origin of ORIGIN the Italy, F r a n c e and fiF BILLIARDS game of billiards little ^ J c i ^ ^ i a — Germany and even a n c i e n t EJfeypt being regarded as its original home by various authorities. B i l l i a r d s w a s brought into this country by the Spaniards who settled in S t . Augustine, F l o r i d a , in 1565, and since then has numbered many of our leading men and women as its patrons. O u r Presidents from George W a s h i n g t o n to the present time have played the game i n the B i l l i a r d P a r l o r of the E x e c u t i v e Mansion. H e n r y W a r d Beecher and numerous other eminent Divines and E d u c a t o r s have i n strong terms of praise, advocated the game of billiards. Judge B e n B . L i n d s e y of J u v e n i l e C o u r t fame, s a y s , " I believe the plan of h a v i n g a billiard room in the home would do more to abolish evil among boys, t h a n a l l the laws and police departments in e x i s t e n c e . " J a m e s E . West, C h i e f Scout E x e c u t i v e of the Boy Scouts of A m e r i c a , says, " I have no hesitation whatever in endorsing the billiard table in private homes. I heartily approve of these games in Y . M. C . A / a and a l l boys* clubs w h i c h provide proper supervision/ 9 Mark T w a i n was a devotee, never missing a match in the later years of his life. championship