Aldi and Lidl - standard bearers of successful internationalisation
Transcription
Aldi and Lidl - standard bearers of successful internationalisation
Aldi and Lidl - standard bearers of successful internationalisation Prepared for Redagricola, Piura, June 22nd 2016 What we will talk about Internationalisation Where have the discounters come from? Understanding their success from a consumer perspective Impact on other retail / 7 strategies What are the discounters’ likely future plans? Successful internationalisation Local differences Customer centricity Multi format, multi channel strategy Retrenching from overreach Shopper insight/data Successful internationalisation Local differences Highly standardized range Customer centricity Product centric, quality first – then price Multi format, multi channel strategy One format: the box with parking / delivery space Retrenching from overreach Internationalizing (Lidl USA, SRB, LTU) Aldi (ITA, AUS, USA) Shopper insight/data Limited shopper insight Global Top 10, $bn sales 2015 Global Top 10, $bn sales 2015 Alibaba 485.0 Walmart 482.1 225.0 Amazon GMV Costco 113.6 Kroger 109.8 Walgreens Boots 103.4 Schwarz 92.2 Tesco 89.3 Home Depot 88.5 Carrefour 85.7 Aldi 78.0 Where have the discounters come from? • German market origins and operational characteristics Similarities - Business principles Austerity (post 1945) & ruthless efficiency, one copycat of the other Price leadership, EDLP, PL, product focus, not customer centric Number of SKUs fits with store size, DCs, n of suppliers-> footprint flexing Operational set up Store details perfected over decades, nothing that could be subtracted DCs, focus on simplicity, standardised approach, OSA, JIT, cost management through bundling supplier trips into the DC Private ownership, DE: training academy for executives as well as customers Differences Lidl is much more vertically integrated (security, speed, costs, NPD) 2 fascia/format retailer (Kaufland), biggest Euro retailer in €, x markets Lidl highly innovative: brands, PL NPDs, promos and store formats Differences - rather in degree than kind Hard – almost exclusively PL Soft (er) – introduction of FMCG A brands Tight SKU range SKU range extension Conservative expansion policy Aggressive expansion policy Higher sales density Faster top line growth Differences - top level view Sales: €56.7bn €64.0bn Stores: 9,995 10,362 Density: €5,976 sq/m €5,806 sq/m Differences - top level view Sales: €63.4bn €74.0bn Stores: 11,086 11,077 Density: €4,389 sq/m €4,939 sq/m Understanding their success… • …from a consumer perspective: marketing, pricing, convenience, quality and brands Private label strategy PL strategy disables price comparison, Aldi product specs (quality/ contents) as price floor for the sector in DE Lidl PL as Pan EU - huge scale benefits. Aldi, more local approach, but difference in magnitude Aldi sales per SKU much bigger than Walmart Quality and brands Premiumisation: shifting quality perceptions, deluxe as Pan EU umbrella range, overstretch A brands added where PL is weak - baby food, h&b etc - but only there Price leadership as defining business principle for Aldi Consumer perspective: drivers Reduced choice (!!!), speed at which shoppers get out of the store Trust, tight range works together with price leadership and EDLP Exclusive product, non food promos, premium food SKUs for holidays Convenience Growth driver: the addition of fresh and bake off Drawing footfall and building baskets, bake off as loss leader Move towards neighbourhood shop - local player Tripple supply, replenishment costs, supply chain Reduces risk, if one supplier is down, others can pick up Reduces transport cost and lead times- different bases around country, Aldi and Lidl pick up, grouping trips Introduces (price) competition between suppliers on same PL Tripple supply, replenishment costs, supply chain usually two deliveries - avoid night shift and double pay replenishment - 20 min per pallet all processes optimised for speed, SRP, pallets etc Impact on other retail • Should other retailers be competing, or co-operating? 7 Strategies - 3 of which are counterproductive 1) Private label proposition relaunch 2) Price wars 3) Discounter launch or acquisition 7 Strategies - 2 are tried and tested 4) Co-location strategy 5) Convenience retailing 7 Strategies - 2 on which the jury is still out 6) Online retailing 7) Raising buying synergies (France) Footfall & loyalty, colocation From competition to cooperation Following consumer expectations and behaviour/use case Aldi dm tie up - defensive against Lidl What are the discounters’ likely future plans? • The discounters have found that investment in-store in fresh and bake off has worked very well. What is next? Problems and potential Problem: finding right locations (perfect: box with ample parking space) Heavy competition, general shift to smaller basket size shopping, more trips etc - real estate costs, new thinking required Potential: DE discount channel ~ 40%. In UK? DE and UK attitudes to food similar (not France) - no natural ceiling, depends on store estate Australia Aldi: 396 stores (end of 2015). AUS$700m investment: 130 stores and two DCs. Sales of AUS$6bn, pre tax earnings: $261m Aldi builds out DC, then stores, takes suppliers with it Australia store visit, Sydney Double Bay 80 new stores within 1 year, most ever in OZ, south and east. More stores than many EU markets 20% + in demand forecasted, 10% share in Eastern markets, benchmark, NZ next? Some flex to the model (alcohol sales, pricing levels, SKU counts) Lidl’s new format Outlook - FMCG A brands Premiumisation: from price to quality/fresh, move away from “hard” discounter image, Lidl’s wine promo attracting different demographics FMCG A brands, Lidl 94% Aldi 96% PL, limited shelf space for Brands Margin dilutive, enables price comparison, control over presentation in store and logistics The Coca Cola case study Oct 2012 - Feb 2013, Coke listing starts, PL suffers, but success overall, moderate pricing level, then Aldi cuts prices (leadership) 2014: Lidl delists Coke after price hike, Coke loses €150m in sales, Rewe and Edeka attack with heavy promotions, Pepsi gets dragged in March 2014: Coke returns to Lidl (no Sprite/Fanta), Aldi lowers price again, deflation of entire category, Verdict: volume growth up, success? Outlook - Lidl Online Deluxe online in Spain DE: Lidl Vorratsbox (Pantry), Kochzauber Opportunity to roll out a click & collect offer - integrate into store Vertical integration in China The Tchibo example - the non food opportunity taking on all the risks but also benefits, supply chain management supporting the online roll out - much more clothing and non food Aldi online - streaming, UK launch 2016 The Napster tie up- copying Prime? non food online, big opportunity with vertical integration, PL branding UK launch 2016 - non food for now Conclusion & recommendations Conclusion Grocers: think about co-location strategies FMCG: Lidl, Pan Euro promotions (wine), scale and premium Discounters: online push, click & collect, home delivery Other retailers: online & service, 3P marketplaces 37