Tulare Lake Basin Storage Facility Concept Proposal to
Transcription
Tulare Lake Basin Storage Facility Concept Proposal to
TULARE LAKE BASIN Surface / Groundwater Storage Concept Proposal July 21, 2008 Water Quality and Reliability for the San Joaquin Valley A Cost Effective Approach to managing the long term effects of drought Submitted by Steve Haze Gary Temple Chris Acree Richard Sloan Grace Napolitano, Chair House Subcommittee on Water and Power – Drought Hearing Fresno, California Contact Information Steve Haze (559) 970-3656 - [email protected] Gary Temple (559) 855-5653 - [email protected] Technical Advisors Dr. John Suen, California State University – Fresno Sargeant Green Consultant to California Water Institute – CSUF (Former GM Tranquility Irrigation District; Former Chair – FCWA) Presentations Fresno Bee Editorial Board and Staff Reporters – July 7, 2008 Honorable Jim Costa, U.S. House of Representatives - 20th Congressional District, CA - November 29, 2007 Honorable Mike Villines, Republican Leader California State Assembly and 31st District - November 19, 2007 Fresno County Water Advisory Committee - October 25, 2007 Don Perrata, President Pro Tem California State Senate - October 8, 2007 Darrell Steinberg, Chair - California Senate Natural Resources and Water Committee and all members of the Committee - October 8, 2007 Statement for today’s Congressional Hearing on the Drought in California Dear Chairwoman Napolitano, Congressman Costa and Members of the Subcommittee, It is a pleasure and indeed an honor to contribute to this important Congressional hearing regarding the significance of the drought that is now afflicting not only the San Joaquin Valley in which we live in – but the entire state of California. We applaud you for all of your hard work and commitment to securing and improving the quality and reliability of a finite and indeed precious natural resource. Without water – our valley communities and agriculture will indeed wither away. We all need to pull together, farmers, businesses, environmentalists and all citizens – as a partnership to build a secure and better future here in our valley. As you have so wisely stated, “All of California must work together as we endure drought conditions through a hot summer”. And, I must add without hesitation. With that in mind, we offer solutions for securing our precious and finite water resources for the future. We must plan well. All constituencies and leaders of any and all political persuasions must be willing to reach across to each other – in a positive and constructive way. It is with this spirit of cooperation and willingness to sit down across the table, that we have hereby submit a comprehensive surface storage and enhancement proposal – that can become a catalyst to move from paralysis and unwillingness to compromise. All constituencies must be welcomed to the table – and be willing to roll up their sleeves and begin to do the necessary heavy lifting. We cannot rely solely on Washington DC and Sacramento to dig us out of this hole. We, here in this wonderful valley must take the initiative and work in partnership for long term solutions. The San Joaquin Valley Water Leadership Forum today stands unequivocally in support of a partnership that truly represents the common and best interests of all of the people. Respectfully, Steve Haze San Joaquin Valley Water Leadership Forum CREATING FEASIBLE SURFACE STORAGE OPPORTUNITIES IN CALIFORNIA The Challenges: 1). Save money 2). Leverage finances for best return on investment for taxpayers 3). Assure flexibility of new infrastructure 4). No direct or indirect impact to the environment 5). Minimize or reduce the impact of greenhouse gases and global warming 6). Complete projects on time, to cost and to specification 7). Work toward minimizing deficit spending or raising taxes 8). Pay as you go 9). Long term capital improvement with low cost maintenance 10). Multiple benefits to all Californians 11). Leverage off of existing infrastructure Tulare Basin Background and Overall CVP/SWP System Benefits Background: Historic Tulare Lake was once the largest freshwater lake west of the Mississippi River Historic Tulare Lake was 50 miles by 100 miles or 5,000 square miles Historic Tulare Lake covered over 3,200,000 acres with a depth ranging from 6 to 25 feet The Historic Tulare Lake stored approximately 25,600,000 acre feet of water - or 8.345 Trillion Gallons of water The storage capacity of the historic lake would serve the water needs of 26 to 40 million people in California -- and nearly all of agriculture's need At just 10% of its potential capacity - Tulare Lake could store over 2.56 Million acre feet of water This equates to the water needs of 26 to 40 million people This equates to nearly twice the storage capability of the largest dam being built at Temperance Flat Temperance Flat is now estimated to cost $3.9 Billion Dollars for a 1.3 million acre foot storage or $3,000 an acre foot Tulare lake as managed storage and 10% increment would be 2.56 million acre feet or 2 times greater than Temperance Flat for only $195 an acre foot or @ 6.5% of the cost The capital outlay for the total system enhancements would be $313 an acre foot or 10.4% of the cost of a Temperance Flat Capital Outlays would not only systematically benefit the San Joaquin River - but also the Kings River, Kaweah, Tule and the California Aqueduct - thus allowing for greater flexibility in moving water around in a timely, reliable, cost effective and efficient way CALSIM II and/or CALSIM III could be enhanced to simulate system enhancements and performance Imagine if the Salton sea could store fresh water - and then imagine that Tulare Lake at one time was the largest freshwater lake in California - and can again be serving a thriving and growing California TULARE LAKE BASIN Surface / Groundwater Storage Conveyance Hub with River and Canal Interties San Joaquin / Kings Intertie Friant-Kern Canal Kings River Intertie CA Aqueduct Intertie Tule River Cross Valley Canal TULARE LAKE BASIN Surface / Groundwater Storage Conveyance Hub with River and Canal Interties Schematic Tule River Kaweah River Kings River Friant-Kern Kings Intertie Surface San Joaquin / Kings Intertie Groundwater Cross Valley Canal CA Aqueduct Intertie CA Department of Water Resources – CALSIM-II Comparison of Temperance versus Millerton Enlargement and Tulare Lake Basin Surface Storage Facility Benefit or Impact Temperance Cost >$4 Billion Maximum Storage 1.3M acre Ft Flexibility of Conveyance Use of existing infrastructure Flood Control - Rivers Link to California Aqueduct Loss of Clean Hydroelectricity Groundwater storage / recharging Bi-Directional movement of water Environmental Impacts Environmental Improvements None Tulare < $1 Billion 2.5M acre Ft or greater 4 Rivers 3 Canals 1 Maximum Leverage 4 None Yes Yes – 216 Mega Watts / year No Loss None Yes None Yes 2 Significant Minimal None Significant Minimal