iI 35 1 UN OF TNc. U 1`! uF LUk-n\1N, ILX,~S, nECU

Comments

Transcription

iI 35 1 UN OF TNc. U 1`! uF LUk-n\1N, ILX,~S, nECU
~vjINUThS OF- ;~LGUL~~~c
NELl I NO OF U I IV FLI%nN I P4G t-iNU hun I NO
~iI
35 1 UN OF TN c. U 1’! uF LUk-n\1 N, ILX,~S, n ECU uI 5~
00 Ph
0th
963,
N ThE COb NC L LOON Al Ci TV hALL
10th day of October, 1963, the City Planning and t~i~-~9Commis—
Cc Cit1 oh
ur<in ~
r
~‘cgt Ian ~
in c e a1.
Nooni at C it>’ Hal I with fol owl no members tnerecf,
to—wit;
On the
5101
0
~aitcr
LtweH
E Lynn u.etteauer
Carl Lively
N arol H
N aemnerl I ng
:inn-D-urham
Oavid IL Lawson
being
present,
ano the
to!
C;lairman
kent er
Lender
Lender
S ecretary
C ity Engineer
~w in; no in;
3c1-~~GB fareing
a
Leet In;
2B
I mites
C.
aoscnt:
Vice—Chairman
opencc?wt th prayer
byC1c
roe.;
alter
of prey i ous meet ng were aoproveo
atwef 1
as written.
cecretary
~.ynn Durham presentee no 50C chanpe appl I cati on of Chas
N utn, Attorney,
who was pros cr5 :t meet n;, from o—i ii I str I ct
to No District
on Lots 12, 13—;;, 13—t and 13—C, wap 3 of the Na
a
onton
ea;ue, I ocateo between a ranici n 300 o ancol ph zscreats
on i~ortn 51cc of
i iS r~\’enue~
hr a
uth so;ze in tavor ot his a;opl cao ion ane urgent I y sol ic rceci
favorabi e cons i beret ion by the City Planning ane honing Coon Is—
s ion
Ne stated that I n order Co rea Inc vch ue from th is wrup—
erty,
it was necessary to get tne zone change passed; aI so Chat
severa I coctors were i nteresteo
i n construct i ng an orr cc ano
clinic for ccy use on!>’ if orop~erty could be util inch mr this
o5~r~~ose
B ;:r B ouCh further stcteotn crc were restrictive
covenants in the deeds to two of the 1 ots~
Secretary
stateci t:;at not ice em tn is nearing nac ceen maii cc; to
a1 I eroperty owners wrcn in zoO’ or tn is croperty on wn icn change
is requesteo,
I ist of such owners having been furnished oy Lr~
huth, and had received tel egram and letter from iCrsB Helen hynum
Stuart and Dra Granvil Ic fright,
resoectivel y, protesting
this
c: ~ange B
After aI I information deal red had been received by too City
Planning and Zoning Commission, hr
:<uth was excusao iron the
hearing in order that cons i derat ion cod d be gi von and recommen—
dat ion made to the City Commission on the ace! icc.~ionB
B
Dy vote of three for and one a;ai nst, after
second, recommendation of tne C ity LI ann in;
si on is tnat C ~ty Commission not aeprove tne
the existence of deec~ restriction
on port ion
rocer not i on and
and toning Comm is—
appl I cat i on cue to
o toe eroperty
B
4~ Some discussion was had; on status of revised Sue—division Ordin—
ance~ City Er;gi neer stated he had not compi eted ‘n is study of
the Ordinance but toat same woul d be coop! etaci cy meeting of
November 14th B ~Jh¼~.i roan wi 1 1 contact hr B Nobert N N L I in, Con—
sifi tant,
ano reguest
~s presence at tn is meeting in oro.er moat
toe Crc. inence may cc p1 aceo in ci nai to rm mor presentat wn to
City Commission for passacea
5~
There being
asjournec a
no further
bus mess
for
cuns iderat i on,
;ualter~~cwell
A
~
ES I
meet in; was
—~nairoan