UDAF Resources - Utah Farm Bureau
Transcription
UDAF Resources - Utah Farm Bureau
Utah Department of Agriculture and Food UDAF Resources Feb. 18, 2016 Brand Inspection Utah Wildlife Services Invasive Species Mitigation Leafy Spurge Squarrose Knapweed Utah Department of Agriculture and Food Utah Grazing Improvement Program Troy Forest Program Manager Created when the Rangeland Improvement Act (HB-145 B. Johnson) was signed by Gov. Huntsman, March 2006 Program Overview Mission: “Improving the productivity and sustainability of our rangelands and watersheds for the benefit of all” State Grazing Advisory Board Jay Tanner – Chairman Paul McCoy Butch Jensen Andrew Taft Darrell Johnson Steve Osguthorpe Director Mike Styler Ruland Gill Rex Sacco 97 Enable the UDAF to help ranchers communicate their concerns regarding grazing policies to land management agencies Northeast Southeast Central Southwest Northwest 6 Regional Grazing Boards (Formerly Taylor Grazing Act Districts) State Grazing Advisory Board Commissioner of Agriculture and Food 1 member from each Regional Board 2 at large appointed by UDAF Representative of UACD Representative of USU Extension and Research Ex-Officio Members Wasatch Create a grassroots board system where ranchers’ concerns and needs are consolidated into a strong unified voice 6 Regional Grazing Boards (Formerly Taylor Grazing Act Districts) Northeast Southeast Central Paul McCoy David Robinson Doak Chew Sandy Johnson Stephen Osguthorpe Mitch Hacking Charles Redd Todd Moon Charley Tracy Bill Jasperson Jack Madsen Southwest Northwest Wasatch Tom Williams Jr, Goring Rowdy Fitzgerald Raymond Heaton Mike Spencer Dennis Iverson Bill Kennedy Wayne Smith Jay Tanner Calvin Crandal l Jason Morgan Dell LeFevre Brent Rose Ren Provost Burt DeLambert Dee Taylor Paul Frischknecht Bill Robinson Butch Jensen Stanly Wood Dean Eyre Kelly Kunzler Gawain Snow Vic Sacco Earle Hobby Calvin Yardley Tracy Hatch Gordon Moon Don Holyoak Mark Monroe Arlin Hughes Peggy Briggs Wade Jensen Bliss Brinkerhoff Tom Hatch Ross Hinkins Andrew Taft John Hanna John Nielson Earl Gordon Verl Bagley William Dalton Bart Parker Jim Gowans UGIP Technical Advisory Committee Dr. Eric Thacker, USU Ext. Ron Torgerson, SITLA Terry Padilla, USFS Larry Lichthardt, BLM Shane Green, NRCS Troy Forrest, UGIP Carl Adams, DEQ Bracken Henderson, UACD UGIP Technical Committee Key Principles of Grazing Management Most rangeland isn’t overstocked, but grazing is often under-managed. •! Grazing impacts are managed by controlling the time (duration), timing (season), frequency, and intensity of grazing. •! Managing plant succession through grazing, mechanical, fire, chemical, and other means can enhance diversity and production (diversity = sustainability). •! You can’t manage what you can’t measure (adaptivemanagement). 13 Goal: To improve and enhance the benefits of healthy public and private rangeland Benefits: Healthy rangeland for livestock and wildlife Program: 1.! Range improvement projects: Project grants (money for rangeland projects) 2.! Improve water quality and quantity. 3.! Invasive plant species control. 4.! Control encroaching pinyon-juniper and overgrown or decadent sagebrush, add high quality grasses, forbs and shrubs to increase health and diversity of rangeland. 5.! Maintain health by proper monitoring and management. UGIP Projects FY06-16 ! Fiscal Year Total Projects 2006 21 $1,081,903 $148,934 50,416 7.26 2007 21 $1,042,294 $371,907 141,413 2.80 2008 63 $4,079,489 $1,645,837 411,118 2.48 2009 62 $3,213,705 $1,043,406 375,850 3.08 2010 63 $2,901,114 $1,379,851 309,514 2.10 2011 70 $2,878,402 $1,173,574 354,579 2.45 2012 58 $2,405,100 $1,054,571 399,751 2.28 2013 67 $2,531,442 $1,341,491 500,569 1.89 2014 62 $2,794,476 $1,549,766 146,735 1.80 2015 71 $3,513,498 $1,295,636 134,130 2.71 2016 77 $2,964,715 $1,550,561 420,575 1.91 Total 425 $29,406,138 $12,555,534 2,543,210 2.80 Total Cost UGIP Cost Acres Affected Total Cost/UGIP Cost 15 Improvement Practices Disk and Imprinter Fire Aerator Spike Improvement Practices Improvement Practices Improvement Practices Improvement Practices Improvement Practices Project Application Procedure •! •! •! •! •! •! •! •! •! •! •! •! Visit with Technical Service Provider and agency personnel about project idea. Get together with UGIP Regional Coordinator. Plan project. Submit project grant application and all supporting information. Regional Board reviews, ranks and approves project. State Board Reviews Regional recommendations. Project gets approved and letter comes out. Arch, NEPA and RDCC processes can begin. Once hoops are jumped through, the project can be carried out. Take before and after pictures of project. After project completion, Regional Coordinator can inspect project. Submit request for payment to UDAF/UGIP. Monitor project, pre and post treatment. This is to determine effects of the treatment on rangelands. Monitoring will show benefits of how money was spent. Before After Utah Department of Agriculture and Food Utah’s Agricultural Mediation Program EST. 1988 Melissa Ure Program Mediator Participating Agencies •! Farm Service Agency •! Natural Resource and Conservation Service •! Forest Service •! Rural Development What is Mediation? •! Tool used to resolve disputes •! Mediation is not a court proceeding •! Purposes is to come to a mutually agreed upon resolution to the issues –! Mutual Respect –! Confidential –! Voluntary Who Participates? •! Mediator •! Representative from the agency •! Party requesting mediation –! Attorneys are not required, but are authorized to participate Why should I mediate? •! •! •! •! •! Open communication Mutual understanding and respect New ideas and solutions Confidentiality Cost When can I request Mediation? •! Generally, mediation is available when an adverse decision has been reached by an agency within USDA. –! Some decisions are not open to mediation •! Once a decision has been made the party has 30 days to appeal and/or request mediation –! Forest Service requires that the request for mediation be included in the appeal. Termination •! Mediation concludes when: –! The parties reach a mutually agreed upon resolution –! When one party withdraws from the process –! If there has been zero movement on the issues for more then 15 days •! Forest Service has a time frame of 45-60 days •! Timing for appeal or other actions is tolled or stayed How do I initiate Mediation •! Complete Request For Mediation Form –! http://ag.utah.gov/legal-mediation.html –! Send to Melissa Ure •! [email protected] •! (801)538-7126 fax •! 350 North Redwood Road PO Box 146500 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-6500 –! UDAF will contact the parties, gather information, and set up an agreeable time to mediate Utah Department of Agriculture and Food UDAF Resources Feb. 18, 2016