case study 2: building urban resilience in dong ha, vietnam building
Transcription
case study 2: building urban resilience in dong ha, vietnam building
BUILDING RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY IN MEKONG TOWNS RESOURCE KIT VOLUME 6 CASE STUDY 2: BUILDING URBAN RESILIENCE IN DONG HA, VIETNAM Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management for the Asian Development Bank and the Nordic Development Fund Resource Kit for Building Resilience and Sustainability in Mekong Towns This volume is one in a series of seven volumes that together comprise the Resource Kit for Building Resilience and Sustainability in Mekong Towns. The Resource Kit was developed with the Climate Change Core Groups from each town to promote nature based solutions and integrated green infrastructure approaches for building resilience in Mekong towns. Each volume can be used alone or as an integrated whole. The seven volumes in the Resource Kit are (this volume in bold): 1. Nature Based Solutions for Sustainable and Resilient Mekong Towns; 2. Green Infrastructure for Building Resilient Mekong Towns; 3. Urban Planning for Building Resilient Mekong Towns; 4. Vulnerability Assessment and Adaptation Planning Guide for Building Resilient Mekong Towns; 5. Case Study 1: Building Urban Resilience in Battambang, Cambodia; 6. Case Study 2: Building Urban Resilience in Dong Ha, Vietnam; 7. Case Study 3: Building Urban Resilience in Kaysone Pomvihane, Lao PDR. Citation ICEM, 2015, Building Urban Resilience in Dong Ha, Vietnam, Volume 6 of the Resource Kit for Building Resilience and Sustainability in Mekong Towns, Prepared by ICEM – International Centre for Environmental Management for the Asian Development Bank and Nordic Development Fund, Hanoi, Vietnam ISBN 978-0-9924435-7-3 More information Further information on ICEM: www.icem.com.au ICEM - International Centre for Environmental Management 6A Lane 49 To Ngoc Van St, Tay Ho | HA NOI VIET NAM T: 84 4 3823 9127 | F: 84 4 3719 0367 Images Cover: wikimedia.com i BUILDING RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY IN MEKONG TOWNS CLIMATE CHANGE CORE GROUPS INVOLVED IN PREPARING THE RESOURCE KIT BATTAMBANG, CAMBODIA H.E Vong Piseth, Sieng Eam Wounzy, Ear Kimchheng, Kem Sokuntheary, Khoeu Sophal, Nou Chharvivann, Chea Vong Narith, Mao Sok San, Nou Sean, Iv Ngorn, Ya Sophat, Kea Chhun, Yan Bophay, Seng Sorath, Phok Sinmary, Song Soeung, Sok Kina, Nou Chamroeun, Thuch Vannarath, Chheng Sivutha, Nhek In Rotha, Tuy Rong, Ty Kim Heng, Pich Leakhena, Kun Ratanak, Keo Putchenda, Chhoeung Vuthy, Soeung Bora, Yong Tonghan, Chin Vuthy, El Sales, Kim Chorng, Touch Monyroth, Kok Han, Horm Heng, Samrith Chhorn, Sourn Sokhen, Mao Siny, Lim Ymeng, Carmen Kugele. DONG HA, VIETNAM Hoàng Quân Chính, Nguyễn Quốc Tuấn, Nguyễn Thị Thu, Hoàng Văn Thiền, Hồ Sỹ Hiền, Trần Trọng Cường, Nguyễn Đức Phương, Trần Thị Phong Lan, Nguyễn Xuân Dương, Trần Hữu Thành, Trần Quang Khoa, Lê Thi Quỳnh Sa, Trần Văn Thanh, Khuất Ngọc Minh, Nguyễn Hồng Phong, Nguyễn Thanh Đồng, Lê Chí Hồng, Trần Quang Tĩnh, Nguyễn Thị Thuỳ Nga, Trương Văn Hưng, Trần Thị Thúy Hằng, Hoàng Ngọc Cảnh, Đoàn Thị Minh Hải, Lê Thị Thúy Loan. KAYSONE PHOMVIHANE, LAO PDR Dr. Sengthong Vangkeomany, Ms. Phavanh Bualuanglath, Ms. Phouthalom Saysanavongphet, Mr. Phomma Vongphachith, Mr. Daovanh Phetphansy, Mr. Souvanh Sengchamphone, Mr. Vanthong Xayphavong, Ms. Khamsy Boulom, Ms. Hongkham Xayakhom, Mr. Oukham Phounprakorn, Ms. Bounthalangsy Khammanivong, Mr. Sanchone Dysameu, Ms. Nuanlahong Inthilath, Mr. Ounkham Phiewphachanh, Mr. Thoune Saychandy, Ms. Lamphan Sangboutho, Mr. Vatthana Pongvilay, Mr. Lamkeo Souvannalat, Ms. Orathai Chansity, Mr. Viengkham Sengsoulichanh. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Resource Kit for Building Resilience and Sustainability in Mekong Towns is prepared under TA-8186: (REG): Greater Mekong Sub-Region, Climate Resilience in Cities, funded by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Nordic Development Fund (NDF). The TA 8186 was led by Sonia Chand Sandhu, Senior Environment and Climate Change Specialist with the Urban and Water Division, Southeast Asia Department, (SEUW-SERD) ADB, and Aldrin Plaza, Urban Development Specialist, supported by Tadeo Culla, Associate Social Development Officer and Jake Tio, Environment Impact Assessment Consultant. Special thanks to Florian Steinberg, Senior Urban Development Specialist (retired), SEUW-SERD, for initiating the technical assistance and Sandra Nicoll, Lao PDR Country Director, ADB, for her country level support. ii The Resource Kit was prepared by ICEM — International Centre for Environmental Management, led by Jeremy Carew-Reid, International Climate Change Specialist. The multidisciplinary technical team comprised of Jeremy Sung, Climate Change Specialist and Project Manager; Luke Taylor, Ecosystem Specialist and Project Manager; Penny Beames, Communications Specialist; Julia Winter, Environmental Engineer; Ha Thi Hoang Lan, Administration Officer. The multidisciplinary country team specialists comprised of Virachith Douangchanh, Climate Change Specialist - Lao PDR; Pho Duc Tung, Climate Change Specialist - Viet Nam; Try Thuon, Climate Change Specialist – Cambodia; Redmond Macnamar, Urban Planner (Hansen Partnership); Mai Ky Vinh, GIS Specialist; Luong Thi Quynh Mai, Training / Workshop Coordinator. The Resource Kit benefited greatly from the guidance and inputs of Jeremy Warford, Senior Advisor, Nordic Development Fund; Kriangkrai Thitimakorn, National Programme Officer, Sustainable Communal Services, Embassy of Sweden, Bangkok; and Richard Carlos Worden, Capacity Building Team Leader, ADAPT AsiaPacific Project, USAID/RDMA. MEKONG RESOURCE KIT PARTNER ORGANISATIONS CAMBODIA Department of Public Works, Provincial Department of Environment (PDE), Provincial Department of Public Works and Transport (PDPWT), Provincial Department of Water Resources and Meteorology (PDOWRAM), Provincial Department of Urban Planning, Construction and Cadastral, Provincial Technical Unit of Water Supply, Provincial Department of Health, Provincial Red Cross Provincial Electricity Transmission Line (EDC), Battambang Governors Office, Battambang Municipality Office, Battambang Office of Drainage Systems and Water Pollution Treatment, PDPWT, Battambang Office of Legal Services and EIA, PDE, Battambang Office of Meteorology, PDOWRAM, Battambang Office of Agricultural Extension, PDA, Battambang Office of Municipal Public Works, Battambang Office of Municipal Beauty and Waste Management, Battambang Office of Administration and Finance, Battambang Office of Planning and Commune/Sangkat Support, Battambang Office of Urban Development, Battambang Office of Tourism, Battambang Office of Urban Planning, Construction and Land Management, Battambang Office of Social Affairs and Rehabilitation, Aphivath Srey Commune Office, Sla Ket Commune Office, O Char Commune Office, Prek Preah Sdech Commune Office, Chamkar Samrong Commune Office, Ratanak Sangkat Commune Office, Toul Ta Ek Commune Office, Svay Por Commune Office, Kdol Dountiev Commune Office. iii BUILDING RESILIENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY IN MEKONG TOWNS VIETNAM Agriculture Department - Quang Tri Peoples Committee, Planning and Financial Department - Quang Tri Department of Rural and Agriculture Development, Quang Tri Department of Flood and Storm Damage Prevention, Planning Department - Quang Tri Construction Department, Quang Tri Department of Ocean, Islands and Hydro-meteorology, Quang Tri Department of Environmental Protection, Dong Ha Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Dong Ha Urban Management Department, Dong Ha Peoples Committee, Trieu Phong Department of Finance and Planning, Quang Tri Transportation Consultancy Company, Department of PPMU of Investment and Construction, Dong Ha Urban Environmental Center, Dong Ha Department of Economics and Infrastructure, Trieu Phong Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Dong Ha Department of Planning and Finance, Technical Appraisal Department - Quang Tri Department of Transportation. LAO PDR Urban Development Division(UDD)-Department of Housing and Urban Planning(DHUP)-Ministry of Public Works and Transport(MPWT), Savannakhet Provincial Department of Public Works and Transport(PDWT), Housing Urban Planning and Environment Office – PDPWT, Road-Bridge Office – PDPWT, Kaysone Phomvihane Urban Development and Administration Office (UDAA), Kaysone Phomvihane Cabinet Office, Kaysone Phomvihane Office of Public Works and Transport, Kaysone Phomvihane Natural Resources and Environment Office, Kaysone Phomvihane Women’s Union, Meteorology and Hydrology Division – Savannakhet Natural Resources and Environment Department, Kaysone Phomvihane Agriculture and Forestry Office. INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS Nordic Development Fund (NDF), Asian Development Bank (ADB), ICEM - International Centre for Environmental Management, Swedish International Development Agency (Sida), United States Agency for International Development (USAID), German International Development Agency (GiZ). ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Contents Part 1: Town wide climate change responses ...................................................... 3 1 2 Town wide baseline assessment.......................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Town overview .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Past climatic variability and extreme events and impacts ............................................................ 6 1.3 Projected climate change (climate and hydrology) .................................................................... 12 1.4 Past response to extreme events ............................................................................................... 14 1.5 Town planning context ............................................................................................................... 15 Steps to improve integration of climate change in town wide planning ......................................... 17 2.1 Setting up the Core Group and objectives .................................................................................. 17 2.2 Defining climate change hot spots.............................................................................................. 19 2.3 Identified hot spot development controls .................................................................................. 21 2.4 A permanent Climate Change Core Group ................................................................................. 24 2.5 Revising the town development vision ....................................................................................... 25 2.6 The importance of green infrastructure in Dong Ha’s development ......................................... 26 Part 2: Site specific vulnerability assessment and adaptation planning ............. 29 3 Case study site 1: The box canal and drainage basin of ward 5 ....................................................... 31 3.1 4 Baseline assessment ................................................................................................................... 31 3.1.1 Brief description of the system ........................................................................................ 31 3.1.2 Status and condition of the system and its components ............................................... 33 3.1.3 Past extreme events and impacts on the system ........................................................... 35 3.1.4 Past, current and future land uses ................................................................................... 35 3.1.5 Climate change threat profile........................................................................................... 36 3.2 Impact and vulnerability assessment.......................................................................................... 36 3.3 Adaptation planning ................................................................................................................... 40 3.3.1 Objectives of the adaptation plan .................................................................................... 40 3.3.2 Overall approach of the adaptation plan ........................................................................ 40 3.3.3 Adaptation measures ........................................................................................................ 40 3.3.4 Phasing of adaptation implementation ........................................................................... 41 Case study site 2: The market to port zone ....................................................................................... 47 4.1 Baseline assessment ................................................................................................................... 47 1 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 4.1.1 Brief description of the system ........................................................................................ 47 4.1.2 Status and condition of the system and its components ............................................... 49 4.1.3 Past extreme events and impacts on the system ........................................................... 56 4.1.4 Climate change threat profile........................................................................................... 58 4.2 Impact and vulnerability assessment.......................................................................................... 58 4.3 Adaptation planning ................................................................................................................... 58 4.3.1 Objectives of the adaptation plan .................................................................................... 58 4.3.2 Overall approach of the adaptation plan ........................................................................ 58 4.3.3 Adaptation measures and phasing ................................................................................... 63 5 Impact assessment of adaptation plans ............................................................................................ 73 6 Stakeholder identification and engagement for adaptation plans .................................................. 74 7 8 9 6.1 Stakeholder identification........................................................................................................... 74 6.2 Stakeholder engagement plan .................................................................................................... 76 Monitoring and maintenance of adaptation plans ........................................................................... 76 7.1 Monitoring activities that are needed for effective adaptation plan implementation .............. 76 7.2 Maintenance measures that will be needed for effective adaptation plan implementation .... 77 Supporting policies and programs for adaptation ............................................................................ 77 8.1 Policies and plans ........................................................................................................................ 77 8.2 Regulations and sector design standards ................................................................................... 78 8.3 Economic instruments ................................................................................................................ 78 Lessons Learned ....................................................................................................................... 79 10 References ............................................................................................................................... 82 Appendix 1: Dong Ha Core Group Members .............................................................................................. 86 2 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam PART 1: TOWN WIDE CLIMATE CHANGE RESPONSES 1 TOWN WIDE BASELINE ASSESSMENT 1.1 TOWN OVERVIEW Dong Ha is the political, economic and socio-cultural centre of the Quang Tri Province with 9 wards covering an area of about 7300 ha.1 The city has a strategic location at the intersection of National Road 1 A and the Trans-Asian Road identified by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) as the East West Economic Corridor, one of several development corridors defined for focussed infrastructure and investment support to enhance connectivity and trade between the Mekong countries (Figures 1 to 3). Figure 1: Dong Ha in Quang Tri Province 1 http://dongha.quangtri.gov.vn/ 3 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 2: Dong Ha location on the GMS East West Economic Corridor 4 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 3: Dong Ha with proposed ADB infrastructure projects 5 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam During the American war, Dong Ha was an important base for the South Vietnamese army at the border between the North and South of Vietnam. At that time the town was concentrated in a small area around the bridge and river port. But a large area was cleared and extensively used for the military camp. After the war this military zone was favourable for the city’s further development. Even then, Dong Ha’s strategic location as a transnational crossing point was recognised. After 1975, Dong Ha was classified as “thi xa” – a rural centre belonging to the Binh Tri Thien Province. However, Dong Ha was better known as a trading point on the national road. The Dong Ha market was famous in the North of Vietnam as a centre for consumer goods from the South and from Laos and Thailand. During those hard times of national economic stagnation, Dong Ha was one of few locations in Vietnam which experienced growth. After 2000, with the establishment of the special economic zone Lao Bao on the border with Lao PDR, Dong Ha developed rapidly as a trading hub. Since then, the city has grown in spatial and population terms, with proportional expansion of city infrastructure and services. In December 2005, Dong Ha was approved as a 3rd order city, with a population of about 90,000. Now, Dong Ha is planning to become a 2nd order city, with a projected population of more than 160,000. Purpose of this volume: The Dong Ha Climate Change Core Group – established as part of the ADB TA 8186-REG: Climate Resilience in Cities – worked to identify past and future flood prone areas in the town through participatory mapping and reviewed the zoning arrangements set out in the Dong Ha town master plan to identify what adjustments to boundaries and development controls were required to increase town resilience. The Core Group also assessed climate change impacts and defined adaptation strategies for two key strategic town infrastructure systems - the canal and drainage basin in Ward 5 and the Dong Ha market-to-port zone which is a key economic centre of the town. That town wide and location specific work to build resilience in Dong Ha is summarised in this volume. 1.2 PAST CLIMATIC VARIABILITY AND EXTREME EVENTS AND IMPACTS CLIMATIC AND TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS The most remarkable climate characteristic of Dong Ha is its marked seasonal fluctuations: winter and summer, rainy season and dry season. Average temperature difference between the hottest and coldest months is from 9 to 10 degrees Celsius. The hottest months from May to September are often accompanied by the ‘Laos Wind’ (Southwest wind), which brings dry hot weather, making uncomfortable conditions for the inhabitants and harsh and often drought conditions for agricultural production. The hottest days can reach 40 degrees Celsius and, combined with strong hot wind and drought, bring serious fire risk conditions. The rainfall in region of Quang Tri Province is about 2200-2800 mm/year. About 80% of this relatively high rainfall is concentrated in the 4 months rainy season. The number of rainy days for some months is 17 to 20 days, which can have negative effects on seasonal crop production. Most significant is the 6 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam concentration of rainfall in frequent extreme events. One extreme rainfall event can bring up to 600 mm. Dong Ha is also affected by storms (Figure 4). Hurricanes most frequently occur from September to November. Storms are often accompanied by heavy rain combined with storm surge causing widespread flooding and damage to infrastructure and crops. Figure 4: Quang Tri Province – storm occurrence from 1956-2009 Dong Ha has the typical topography of central Vietnam - high mountains in the west and low deltas in the east (Figure 5) with steep and short watersheds from west to east, and a system of sharply sloping rivers with high velocity water flow. Along a distance of almost one hundred kilometres there is a high coastal sand dune formation, which acts like a dyke with very small openings at river mouths. This topography is the main cause of frequent flooding in the lower deltas with water flow pressure from the mountains being blocked by seaward influences at the narrow river outlets. Every year there are 4-5 floods in Quang Tri between August and November. The deforestation in the western mountains during the war and further unplanned exploitation of the rainforest after the war has made floods in the delta and floodplain more severe and frequent. 7 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 5: Quang Tri’s coastal dunes, flood plain and short steep watersheds Conditions in Dong Ha are influenced by three river basins: Thach Han, Hieu and the Vinh Phuoc River (Figure 6). In recent years, with the construction of nine hydropower dams in the upland of Thach Han and Hieu basins, flooding has become more controlled. However, as the reservoirs are not very large, the flood control only serves to delay the flooding and sometimes makes it more serious when rapid releases become necessary. In addition, the threat of dam break adds risk of catastrophic flooding in the delta. Storm surge, which often comes together with heavy rain and strong winds from the sea, is another factor hindering the discharge of rain water from land to the sea. In extreme events, water can even flow back from sea in-land when high tides combine with storm conditions. In summary, flooding is a natural threat for Dong Ha due to the climatic and topographic conditions of the area. Therefore it becomes a question of how best to live with the flood by minimising its impact on the city and its citizens. 8 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 6: Quang Tri Province catchments and Dong Ha 9 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam PAST EXTREME CLIMATIC EVENTS Because of the relatively young history of the city, there are few local records of extreme events before the 1980s. The hydrologic data in the Thach Han Basin goes back to 1977. Since then, significant flooding occurred in the years 1983, 1990, 1995, 1998, 1999, every year from 2004 to 2010 and in 2013. In the area of Dong Ha city many places were flooded to more than 3 m deep. Two big events in 1999 and 2005 were most extreme. In 1999, in the 10 days from 1-10 November, the rainfall was 1300-1600 mm or 60% of the normal yearly rainfall. In addition, there was a storm surge caused by a tropical low pressure system combined with a high tide. Almost the entire city was under water (Figure 7). Figure 7: Dong Ha City flooded areas during 10 days of heavy rains and storm surge in 1999 IMPACTS OF PAST EXTREME EVENTS ON THE CITY Reports of impacts of past extreme events in Dong Ha are available only from 2006. From then storms, heavy rains and flood levels were recorded as well as the estimated costs of damage. Impacts on dams, riverbanks, electricity lines and some buildings and dwellings could be costed – other forms of damage, to crops for example, were more difficult to estimate. Those historical flood levels can be taken as a reference when considering climate change vulnerability and its potential impacts. In general, some lower parts of the city are frequently affected by river flooding and other parts from local flooding due to heavy rainfall. 10 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam TOPOGRAPHY AND NATURAL SYSTEMS IN AND AROUND THE EXISTING CITY Though situated in a high risk climate and topographic zone, Dong Ha has not been severely damaged by extreme climatic events because it was built on higher ground and has remaining natural systems in urban areas which have helped to buffer the impacts of floods. That situation is changing as the city expands, natural systems are lost and surfaces hardened. The topography of Dong Ha city has three main zones (Figure 8). The hilly zone in the west and south (dark green) is between 20 m-100 m and has many small hills that alternate with depressions and drainage lines. This zone helps to protect the city from the monsoonal south-west wind and, when well vegetated with natural drainage corridors in a natural state, regulates runoff. Figure 8: The three main topographic zones of Dong Ha city The low land in the north and east (light green) is a natural flood plain used for agriculture. It has functioned as a water retention area and reduces flooding in the city. The middle flat land (5-15 m) (cream colour) is favourable for city development. In this zone there are many natural streams, serving as drainage corridors and providing ecological connectivity. Together with the three rivers and many small lakes in the flood plain, they have made up an effective natural water drainage and storage system. 11 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam The existing city largely adheres to this natural setting using the hilly areas for protection and flat areas for flood detention. The city is buffered by the low lying natural systems and damage that does occur is limited to the central area. MANMADE CONDITIONS WHICH INCREASE THE CLIMATE IMPACTS This relative harmony between natural conditions and development is changing rapidly. There are increasing manmade structures and conditions, which are likely to increase the impact of extreme climatic events on the city, including: The town master plan promotes inappropriate development for severe flood risks areas of the city. National road No. 1 runs from north to south at a higher level than the natural topography and acts as a dyke, cutting though the natural water drainage corridor from west to east, causing localised flooding on the western side of the road. Increased hardening of land surfaces through urbanisation, with inadequate artificial drainage system, leading to increased runoff and local flooding. Reduced green space, elimination of many natural drainage systems and poor drainage infrastructure without separation of wastewater and stormwater leads to overloading of the wastewater discharge system during flooding and subsequent disbursal of polluted waters through the city. No overall planning and control of infrastructure and services development, so these elements often conflict and increase the risk of flooding. Roads are under the control of the traffic department, while the pedestrian zones, the street trees, the drainage network, street lighting and underground electricity and communication lines are all under the control of different departments. Street tree and green space planting proceeds without with proper planning and technology, leading to poor survival and growth and little capacity to cope with storms and flooding. When they fall they damage underground facilities as well as the road surface. In summary, Dong Ha is facing a combination of serious flood threats due to its location on the low land between a short and steep catchment in the west and high sand dunes in the east with only one exit to the sea. Several rivers converge on that exit point which means that any increases in volume and speed of runoff met with seaward storm surge can cause extreme flooding in the city. The town plan which encourages development in low lying and flood prone areas as well as clearing and development in the upper catchment aggravates this situation. 1.3 PROJECTED CLIMATE CHANGE (CLIMATE AND HYDROLOGY) With climate change, flood and drought conditions in Dong Ha are expected to become more frequent and extreme. Precipitation in the wet season is projected to increase up to 300 mm by 2050 (Figure 9). 12 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 9: Wet season precipitation - baseline and with climate change (2050), Dong Ha City The average maximum temperature in the dry season is projected to increase by up to 2.4 degrees Celsius (Figure 10). These changes will increase the likelihood of flood and drought. 13 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 10: Average maximum temperature in the dry season - baseline and with climate change (2050), Dong Ha City Another projected climate change threat for Dong Ha is sea level rise. One scenario developed by the government Institute for Meteorology, Hydrology, Environment and Climate Change (IMHEN) has sea level rising by 60 cm over the next 50 years. However more recent analysis by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPPC) has a 1m rise by the end of this Century as a more likely projection. With the 1 m scenario, some areas of Dong Ha would be permanently under water. Extreme events like the flooding of 1999 or 2005 would become more common. There would be more extensive riverine flooding when rainfall coincides with storm surge and high tides and more problems with drainage throughout the city. 1.4 PAST RESPONSE TO EXTREME EVENTS GOVERNMENT RESPONSE The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) and Ministry of Defence (MOD) are responsible for disaster management and flood and storm control including construction of dykes and dams. The Ministry of Construction (MOC) oversees programs with indirect links to disaster management such as drainage systems and land fill for solid wastes which reduce the incidence and severity of local flooding. 14 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam The Quang Tri policy is focused on technologies to build resilience to extreme events. For example measures proposed in the Provincial Climate Change Action Plan include: Raising the level of roads, buildings or developed zones above the flood level. Building of dykes along the rivers, together with hard embankments to prevent erosion and riverine flooding and using the dyke as a main road for development as well as for rescue purposes. Improvement of the drainage system through construction of covered box channels and retention lakes. Collection and processing of solid waste. These technical solutions are supported and funded by the World Bank (WB) and the ADB. The WB is involved in the drainage system such as the Le Loi reservoir rehabilitation in Ward 5, while ADB is focused on embankments, dykes and solid waste processing – although it too has supported drainage infrastructure such as box canals, for example in Ward 5. Those solutions would appear to reduce climatic impacts and increase city resilience. In practice they have many negative side effects which are making drainage and flooding worse. The raising of developed land has not solved flooding only served to shift the problem elsewhere and make the topographic conditions more complex and difficult to manage. The dykes and hard embankment of the rivers may not prevent riverine flooding in extreme events, and act as obstacles to the natural water runoff and cause more local flooding every year. The box canals restrict flow and create more difficult and dangerous conditions for local residents. Even the retention lakes are not connected to adequate drainage and are built with hard, steep and high solid walls which prevent maintenance and multiple uses and create dangerous areas in the heart of the city. These infrastructure investments are designed according to conventional hard engineering approaches often ignoring and eliminating the natural system foundations and opportunities. DONG HA RESPONSE At the city level, there are no exclusive organisations to deal with climate change. Under the CPC, the Division of Economy is in charge of flood and storm control, the Division of Urban Management is in charge of drainage and the Division of Urban Environment is in charge of climate change problems. The Red Cross, Fatherland Front and Women’s Union are very active at the city and ward level in natural disaster emergency response. 1.5 TOWN PLANNING CONTEXT As Dong Ha is a provincial city, its planning documents are mostly made under the responsibilities of the Quang Tri Provincial Peoples Committee and its departments. There are only a few policies and plans at national level relating to the development of Dong Ha. The planning of Dong Ha starts with the general planning of Quang Tri Province. This provincial level planning has a socioeconomic development plan prepared by the Department of Planning and Investment (DPI) and a spatial plan prepared by the Department of Construction (DoC). The provincial 15 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam planning defines the role of Dong Ha in the overall urban and peri-urban settlement system of Quang Tri. The most important central document is the Orientation Plan for Urban Development until 2025 (approved 2010). In this document, the development vision is for Dong Ha City to emerge as an economic and industrial centre and a competitive city for investment in the East West transport corridor. This vision is the legal background for all other provincial planning and projects in Dong Ha. To achieve this vision, the Socio Economic Development Plan (SEDP) of Dong Ha focuses on the following six strategies: 1. Promoting industrialisation and modernisation of the city’s economy for the highest growth and development. 2. Increasing the size of commerce, services, and construction and heavy industries and reduction of agricultural production. 3. Speeding up the urbanisation process through improving the technical infrastructure matching a developed regional scale city. 4. Developing Dong Ha as a river side city, in the midst of three rivers: Thach Han, Hieu and Vinh Phuoc, in which the Hieu River becomes the central axis for the city’s development on both sides. 5. Expanding the City toward the beach and connect with Cua Viet satellite town and other suburban areas. 6. Developing with social and environmental improvements and protections, ecological sustainability and preservation of tangible and intangible heritage and other traditional cultural customs. The DoC prepares the construction master plan within the overall policy context of the SEDP. The last construction plan for Dong Ha was approved in 2006 and extends to 2020. ADB has a subproject to help DoC with a new construction master plan in 2016. Based on the SEDP and construction master plan, the Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DONRE) prepares a land use plan and the Department of Transport (DoT) prepares a transport master plan. This land use plan and transport master plan differ little from the details in the construction master plan. Based on the transport plan and construction master plan, DPI will finish an infrastructure investment plan with a list of priority projects. Following approval, the list of priority projects is the most binding document for realisation of all projects. Under the current spatial master plan of Dong Ha (Figure 11) and associated infrastructure plan the following impacts are likely: Deforestation in the west and south to make way for city expansion. Expansion of the city in low lying lands. Hardening of the river embankments and construction along the rivers. Hardening and filling of water channels and loss of natural drainage corridors. 16 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 11: Dong Ha spatial master plan showing land use zones The new development plans are likely to significantly reduce the extent and buffering capacity of the natural systems in Dong Ha (Figure 12). 2 STEPS TO IMPROVE INTEGRATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE IN TOWN WIDE PLANNING 2.1 SETTING UP THE CORE GROUP AND OBJECTIVES A Climate Change Core Group of twenty-six technical experts was assembled in Dong Ha as the driving force for implementing TA – 8186 (Figure 13). Members were from various provincial and municipal government agencies, including DPI, DONRE and DOC. Other members came from local private sector construction companies. A full list of Core Group members and their affiliation appears as Appendix 1. 17 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 12: Future changes to natural systems in Dong Ha with implementation of the spatial master plan Figure 13: Dong Ha Climate Change Core Group 18 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam The purpose of the Core Group is to build capacity in key experts from relevant agencies to use analytical tools for assessing climate change threats and vulnerability and plan for adaptation with green infrastructure. Through the Core Group, climate change adaptation knowledge will penetrate into their host organisations. Climate change adaptation requires integrative solutions with inputs and coordination from several sectors and strong networks between key decision-makers. Therefore, a second function of the Core Group will be to build strong personal and institutional relationships between key agencies responsible for city planning and infrastructure development. 2.2 DEFINING CLIMATE CHANGE HOT SPOTS As a first step, the Core Group analysed and documented the natural and extent of climate and hydrological threats and opportunities facing the City. That analysis involved: Mapping of past extreme events and regular climate effects; Defining a climate change profile for the city. Combining information on past extremes with the climate change projections to identify hot spots in the City which require special development controls and management. The Core Group found that there were no historical flood maps of Dong Ha. The only existing flood maps were at the provincial scale and were based on flood modelling rather than actual records of past extremes. Though most of the Core Group members did agree on the general zones within the City which are more frequently flooded, initially there was no consensus about the exact boundaries, intensity or frequency of the flooding in these zones, especially in the smaller zones which experienced frequent localised flooding. Even so the Core Group agreed that they had the collective past knowledge and experience to draw together a preliminary map of flood prone areas based on past extreme events and on IMHEN’s projections for climate change. It was understood that map would need to be updated and improved as more information became available. Following an intensive process of participatory mapping, the Core Group produced a Dong Ha flood map defining climate change hot spots and describing the profile of each hot spot. The result was sufficiently accurate and detailed to provide the best available town planning tool on flooding. In general, there were two kinds of hot spots. The larger areas in the north and east of the city which are exposed to riverine flooding in extreme events and the smaller areas scattered throughout the city which experienced frequent local flooding due to intensive rainfall and poor drainage. The digitized results of the participatory mapping exercise were reviewed by the Core Group to identify and resolve differences between the two sub-group interpretations of past extreme flood areas and risks. The sub-groups outputs were fairly similar although group 1 had provided more detail on localised flooding areas in the town centre. These minor differences were resolved quickly though facilitated working sessions and a final flood risk map agreed based on past events. As a next step, the Core Group analysed information and maps on climate change projections included possible overtopping of the Hieu River, and projections of increased rainfall and run-off in the town and its catchments. The Group overlaid that information on their map in determining the severity of climate 19 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam change threats on flood risk areas. From this exercise, a Dong Ha climate change hot spot map was developed (Figure 14). The map shows areas where climate change impacts may be “highly severe” to the east and north of the town. The Group found that those hot spots have been identified for significant future expansion under to the town master plan, which envisions the Hieu River as a central axis along which a modern metropolis will be built. Figure 14: Climate change hotspots in Dong Ha The riverine flooded hot spots can be flooded 3 to 4 times a year, with duration lasting hours up to one week with maximum depth of up to 2 to 3 m. The locally inundated hotspots are flooded regularly with heavy rains up to 50 cm lasting hours to a day or 2. After defining these two kinds of hot spots, the Core Group decided to have a closer look at the bigger riverine hotspots to understand the issues better and identify development controls and safeguards. For the smaller hot spots, they identified two extreme sites that became the focus of the detailed case studies described later in this volume. 20 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 2.3 IDENTIFIED HOT SPOT DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS Overlaying the climate change hot spot map on the town zoning plan (Figure 15) showed that for the most part, the extreme flooding risk has not been taken into account in the zoning scheme, or at least it has not been considered as a key factor influencing the direction and form of town development. In particular, the zoning plan is not accompanied by comprehensive development controls which guide the location and design of infrastructure and buildings. While the low-lying areas to the north and east have not yet undergone full-scale development according to the land-use plan, they have been designated as areas for intensive urban expansion. The potential problems from climate change associated with developing these areas are evident in Figure 16. However the planners did recognise the existing flooding threat in these zones. They argued that the development was safe enough with the application of technical solutions such as raising of the ground level above the projected flood level for new developments and roads; hard embankments for the Hieu and Thach Han Rivers to avoid erosion and protect the land; dykes as riverside roads and a new national road along the Thach Han River to prevent riverine flooding and to stimulate the direction of urban development. Figure 15: Overlaying climate change hot spots on land-use zoning maps In discussing whether there should be changes to the town zoning plan (Figure 17), there was a general consensus that given central and local government had already approved the master plan the current zoning system would remain until the next planning period. As was the case in both Kaysone Phomvihane and Battambang, this partly reflects a willingness to ‘live with’ rather than ‘avoid’ the floods. However, some Core Group members found it difficult to imagine how to change a plan that had already been agreed at the highest levels; and many assumed that the zone designations must have considered extreme flooding. 21 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam This is an institutional barrier to change i.e. the limited real influence local line department technical staff have in fundamental planning decisions relating to their town. This barrier will need to be addressed in the next master planning cycle. Given the continuing strong decentralisation process in Vietnam, it is important that local and provincial officials are empowered to modify their town plan as the need arises, especially as they have deep on-the-ground knowledge and experience in implementation. With respect to climate change, this will involve ensuring local authorities have ready access to up to date climate change projections and related hydrological modeling for their town. Figure 16: Dong Ha - climate change hot spots overlaid on land-use zones Throughout presentations and plenary discussions, a key message conveyed was how in international planning practice, private sector developers are required to make a contribution to community welfare and in overall strengthening of town resilience – either financially to an adaptation fund, for example, or with designs that directly improve resilience through improved amenity, drainage effectiveness and environmental quality. 22 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 17: Members of the Dong Ha Core Group defining climate change safeguards for land-use zones The requirement that the private sector must ‘give back’ to the public in exchange for being granted a private development approval was a new concept for the Core Group. The important role of the private sector in climate change adaptation stood out as a key gap in the existing planning processes and development, and something which would benefit from legislative reform and additional training and capacity building. The Core Group came to the conclusion that the planned functions of urban development and high class urban centres in the flood prone zones along the river are not appropriate and should be changed to another type of function - what they call an ecotourism zone. The safeguard principles for this zone should be: In principle living with flood with no large hard infrastructure solutions. Minimising development in this zone with no critical and strategic facilities such as hospitals, power plants and major roads and intersections. Encouraging green space expansion and urban farming in combination with ecotourism and recreation. Eco architecture, natural materials, energy saving, low density. Define the zone as a water retention area, with regulations for protection of landscape and ecologic infrastructure. Green infrastructure for river embankments, canals, ponds, lakes and reservoirs and all slopes. 23 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Facilitation of community participation in monitoring, maintenance and management of public assets and conservation of nature through communal agreements. The Core Group also agreed that residential development that is currently allowed in flood prone areas in the city should have appropriate development controls in place to reduce flood risk and the vulnerability of urban poor. 2.4 A PERMANENT CLIMATE CHANGE CORE GROUP The Core Group members decided that the progress they have already made in strengthening town resilience to climate change will only be sustained and continued if the Core Group is formally established as a permanent body. This body will provide technical advice for building climate resilience in new infrastructure proposals and in the town plan, oversee and advise on government spending on climate change resilience, coordinate internally with other departments in Dong Ha on issues of climate resilience and convene regularly to review and exchange experiences within Dong Ha and with Core Groups from other towns. COMPETENCE OF THE CORE GROUP The Core Group defined the following competences, which will be the basis for their service and existence: The Group will produce accurate flood and heat maps of the city with grass roots methods and have the capacity to maintain and upgrade them annually. With these products, they will help decision makers and other stakeholders in developing their strategies and in planning. It will have contacts with national and international networks on climate change and have access to different programs and funding. With this competence they will act as a special governmental department for climate change at city level. It will have knowledge of technical safeguards and solutions and can act as consultants in this field. With Group member background in different governmental departments they will provide information and consulting services for their home department as well as sharing the information and strategies from their department with other sector departments for common goals. The budget for the Group’s work should be partly from the government, as a special department, and partly from their own activities such as consulting or fund raising. LEGAL STATUS OF THE CORE GROUP In the existing governmental structure, there is no example of such an organisation. However the Core Group members identified at least two main possibilities for the establishment of a permanent body: (i) Internal advisor: The Group will be a technical staff group in the steering committee for upgrading the town to a 2nd order city. The advantage of this arrangement would be that the 24 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Group would be internal to each future development decision of the city and can provide their recommendations. The negative side is that as internal technical staff, they will not have an independent voice. (ii) External advisor: The second option is to establish the Group as a scientific association under the Association for Science and Technology. With this status they are not insiders to the decision making process but they would be invited to each hearing and decision making process as a third party. 2.5 REVISING THE TOWN DEVELOPMENT VISION The Core Group recognised that the first step for any urban planning process is the definition of the town vision. All the planning opportunities and challenges of Dong Ha have their roots in the vision. Therefore a necessary starting point for integrating climate change into urban planning should be the revision of the town development vision. DONG HA EXISTING TOWN VISION The current town visions as expressed in the socio-economic development plans is: “Over the next decades, the People’s Committee of Quang Tri Province envision Dong Ha City to be a dynamic and vibrant city serving as the regional economic growth centre for trade and investment in the southern economic corridor while optimizing its resource potentials for sustained economic development.” The Core Group considered that the existing vision focuses too much on economic development while ignoring the social and ecological values and sustainability. The Core Group is fully aware that it cannot change the ambition to establish Dong Ha as a regional growth centre. So the question is how to compromise and integrate climate change resilience and ecological sustainability into a vision which is intent on rapid economic growth. REVISING THE TOWN VISION The Core Group conducted an extensive working exercise to define a new vision statement as follows: “Dong Ha is green, prosperous, happy, fair, equitable, dynamic and enjoys the benefits of sustainable development.” With the use of the word “green”, the Core Group means “green infrastructure”, which they explained in this way: Infrastructure assets serve as the technical foundation for the effective functioning of the city. Green infrastructure can be natural or manmade but replicates or mimics nature and functions in a natural way. 25 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 2.6 THE IMPORTANCE OF GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE IN DONG HA’S DEVELOPMENT At the regional workshop which brought the three town core groups together, the head of Dong Ha’s Core Group Mr. Nguyễn Quốc Tuấn, Vice Director of the Quang Tri DPI, made the following statement on the importance and interpretation of green infrastructure for his town2: By green are we referring to development or climate change adaptation? The Dong Ha Core Group views green development as the necessary foundation for climate change adaptation – for that reason it has included green as a fundamental concept in Dong Ha’s development vision. Green infrastructure provides the foundation for a city to function effectively and efficiently. It is critical to city resilience and adaptive capacity. Green infrastructure can be defined as infrastructure which has in-built natural features and elements ensuring its durability and effective functioning. Those features can be natural or manmade in a ways that mimics nature. Such infrastructure has the highest resilience to climate change. If we progressively green the infrastructure of a city as the primary adaptation strategy then we will build higher resilience to climate change. The green infrastructure objectives identified for Dong Ha include three points: water management, reduction of urban temperature; and reduction of pollution These benefits of climate adaptation through green infrastructure are the most fundamental amongst all other benefits discussed. The Core Group broke these objectives down into smaller objectives. For example, managing water through green infrastructure can also serve the purpose of water purification or erosion prevention. Part of it is to collect water, storm water, and recycle it to be used at different stages by different components. For reduction of heat island effect in urban centres, there are different options that could be used such as increased vegetation, water as a cooling source, or a reduction in the use of fossil fuels. For water pollution control, we can separate stormwater run-off from wastewater and biologically treat the wastewater. We can also reduce air pollution, noise pollution and deal with solid waste; all of these can be biological measures, not just conventional engineering; so these biological treatments would be classified as green technology. Those objectives can be met through additional green infrastructure measures, such as collecting stormwater run-off, using permeable surfaces or green roofs, building and maintaining regulatory reservoirs and floodplains, and natural or constructed wetlands. We need to conserve arable land as 2 ICEM, 2014, TA-8186: GMS: Climate Resilient Cities in the Mekong Region - Regional Knowledge Sharing Workshop Report, http://icem.com.au/portfolio-items/resilient-cities-regional-workshop-report/ 26 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam potential for flood retention and ground water recharge, use rain gardens, ponds for drainage, and natural canals and streams combined with landscaping. We can bioengineer embankments. We can use recycled stormwater for many purposes. More importantly, as the Core Group we need to mainstream these measures into day-to-day work. What exactly are we going to do? How are we going to use this Core Group as a force for resilience building? We will continue working to deliver these objectives – the systematic use of soft infrastructure, of green infrastructure in order to turn Dong Ha into a green, sustainable city that meets all the criteria we have identified. All of these measures are ingredients, the raw materials, the building blocks for a sustainable city. In order to build a beautiful house of these building blocks, you need time, you need a very good architect and other experts involved. When we design the house based on these building blocks, we may imagine a system, or a house as a system, there are lots of factors that we need to consider - climate, of course, more severe weather, more severe storms, more extreme events – and other influences on the house over time. The city is our home and it continues to grow bringing new challenges. Today we can do this, but tomorrow, other issues may arise, and we have to address those issues as they arise. But underlying all those changes, green infrastructure will increase in strength with time and place our home in a better position to adjust and adapt. Topography and the terrain - we need to consider these as key factors influencing our vulnerability to climate change. Where can water flow? Which area can be for urban development and which retained as green space? We need to make our development harmonious with the distinctive topography. For example, considering Dong Ha’s steep and short catchment area, how can we formulate a system for the town’s canals’ and natural drainage corridors? We need to improve all of these regulatory reservoirs and canals. Some residents in the low lying areas could be relocated, and we could turn those areas into parkland, and upstream we may try to plant more forests rather than continue to harden surfaces with development. We can build more reservoirs like Dia Han. So I think there are lots of solutions and we have to base those solutions on the characteristics of each catchment. As in other cities of this region, flooding is serious and common for Dong Ha. Like in Hanoi or Ho Chi Min City, a few hours of rain can inundate the city. So the issue of flood control is very critical. And we need to anticipate that with climate change and development the problem may continue to get worse. And the issue of money: Green infrastructure may be more affordable than conventional engineered structures but still we always need to consider our budget. As developing cities, we do not have much money to hand. Whatever structural engineering or biological measures, they all require money, so we need to take cost and funding availability into consideration. Another issue we need to consider is where the money goes. There are lots of proposals, but we need to have good planning and priority setting to choose between them. We need to make the various projects into a complete and integrated system, and detailed planning is required to do that. 27 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam The way we have been planning now in Dong Ha is not appropriate. We often build roads first before we think about drainage requirements or linked infrastructure. We build a road before we build a market or other facility. We need to give priority to what should be done first. The hard infrastructure must come after we have already planned for the green infrastructure. Green infrastructure must receive more priority. It must come first before the structurally engineered roads and bridges are designed. We must first ask questions like: what natural systems and corridors do we need to keep or introduce to keep our city resilient? What natural drainage patterns do we need to keep open? How can we meet our objectives through use of natural approaches and bioengineering, for example water purification through constructed wetlands? What canopy cover and green spaces must we conserve? All those questions must be answered first in a systematic way - the roads and bridges must follow and be harmoniously integrated with the green infrastructure approaches. Another issue is that reservoirs and creeks within the town used to be natural, but they’ve been progressively blocked by waste and filled in for development. That is a problem. Many developers in our city neglect the drainage considerations. They care more about getting water in but they don’t care much about removing it. We need to change their minds. In the Core Group’s view, we need to transform and rehabilitate the former natural reservoirs and natural drainage networks and areas to make them more eco-friendly - to turn those areas into parkland, for instance, or landscaped areas together with some services for exercise, tourism and sports use. Public–private partnerships (PPP) also need to be promoted. We can involve the private sector with support from the government, because PPPs are important in the development and maintenance of green infrastructure facilities. Some can be provided by government, but others can be assigned to the private sector for monitoring and maintenance. Government can build the facilities, and the private sector can maintain them, which may be a more sustainable solution. The community can contribute by way of labour, doing the maintenance work. When they contribute labour, they get other benefits as well. If possible, it would be valuable to have further technical assistance, to put these systems and underlying policies in place so we can do the planning more carefully, in a way which promotes green infrastructure before other hard infrastructure options as a foundation for resilience. 28 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam PART 2: SITE SPECIFIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT AND ADAPTATION PLANNING The broad framework of master plans, land use zones and development controls provides the foundation for integrating climate change in town development. The Dong Ha Core Group contributed at that level with tools such as the climate change hot spot maps, an analysis of the current zoning scheme and guidance on necessary approaches to controls and safeguards relating to all development in the town. That guidance relates to town wide strategies such as rehabilitating and maintaining a network of natural drainage corridors through to specific requirements on how buildings should be designed and located. The Core Group spelt out an overall approach to a Dong Ha adaptation plan promoting green infrastructure as the key ingredient in building resilience. Equally important are local area plans which look in greater detail at how infrastructure assets relate to their natural and social system contexts. In any year a town would have the resources to prepare only a few of these local plans for strategic or sensitive assets and locations. The plans should provide direction on how an area and its infrastructure should be developed to build resilience and service multiple uses in response to climate change. The Core Group and local authorities applied a set of scoping criteria to identify strategic and sensitive areas and infrastructure which might be the focus of demonstration vulnerability assessments and local adaptation planning. Those criteria covered, for example, areas subject to past extreme flooding, scheduled for focussed ADB infrastructure investment, of strategic importance to town economic activity, affecting significant numbers of Dong Ha residents and providing good opportunities for demonstration and testing of green infrastructure approaches. The scoping process led to the selected two infrastructure systems as priorities for detailed vulnerability assessments and adaptation planning – both linked to ADB investments past and future: (i) a box canal and bridge culvert at Le Loi Street in Ward 5 (taking in an upstream reservoir and natural waterway); and (ii) a strategic development zone, from the central market to the new port along the Hieu River. The locations of the sites are shown in Figure 18. Core Group members applied the vulnerability assessment and adaptation planning methodology described in Volume 4 of this resource kit and involving a combination of technical presentations and intensive group working sessions and field activities at the case study sites. The process involved (i) a baseline assessment, (ii) impact and vulnerability assessment, and (iii) definition and assessment of adaptation options (Figure 19). It also involved drawing together priority adaptation measures into an integrated adaptation plan for each site. 29 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 18: Dong Ha demonstration case study sites – the Le Loi drainage system and the central market to port zone Figure 19: Key steps in the vulnerability assessment and adaptation planning process. Both sites span large geographic areas and incorporate a range of infrastructure and natural components each responding differently to climate change. This diversity allows for a variety of adaptation measures to be demonstrated within integrated area-wide adaptation plans for each location. In both cases, the Core Group referred to the area as a system with interrelated components 30 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam to emphasise the importance of taking area wide and integrated approaches to infrastructure and site design and development. 3 CASE STUDY SITE 1: THE BOX CANAL AND DRAINAGE BASIN OF WARD 5 3.1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT 3.1.1 Brief description of the system The Le Loi drainage system has a core zone - the drainage channel and a surrounding zone of residential and commercial buildings, road and services infrastructure (Figure 20). The main components of the core zone are: 1. 2. 3. 4. Đại An reservoir Box culvert Le Loi Street bridge culvert Box culvert outlet gate The components of the surrounding area are: 5. 6. 7. 8. Public facilities like schools, bus station and sport centre. Residential and shop buildings Natural and rural landscape Roads Figure 20: Dong Ha, Le Loi Street box culvert and canal in Ward 5 drainage basin This case study includes a box canal system constructed with ADB support during 2003-2009 linked to an upstream former reservoir (Figure 21). The box canal has constricted increasing run off and flow in this major drainage corridor and now causes more 31 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam severe and frequent flooding of surrounding residences, shops and roads and is a dangerous area for children and animals living close by. Figure 21: Box Canal and upstream reservoir in Ward 5 Dong Ha The canal passes under Le Loi Street and feeds into a covered box canal of concrete construction (Figure 22). Upstream of the box culvert is the Dai An reservoir which is now being rehabilitated with World Bank support (Figure 23). Figure 22: Case study site 1 - Loi Loi Street box canal entry point, Dong Ha 32 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 23: Case study site 1 - Reservoir area upstream of the Le Loi Street canal The function of this infrastructure system is to discharge runoff water from a large basin of about 285 ha in Ward 5. This drainage corridor is a natural depression in the middle of Ward 5. The runoff water from both sides (north and south) of the drainage are collected in this area and discharged to the irrigation channel of Ward Dong Le in the east of the national road 1A from where it flows to the rivers. The original natural system had two main components: the stream in the middle of the depression and the wetlands around it, which served as a retention area and ecological buffer zone (Figure 24). Over the years those natural components have been greatly altered. Figure 24: The Le Loi drainage system, Dong Ha The channel in the middle can be divided again into three main components: The Dai An reservoir at the western end, the natural creek in the middle and the ADB box canal in the eastern end. 3.1.2 Status and condition of the system and its components The current structure of the Le Loi box canal is inadequate to cope with minor frequent flood events (i.e. two or three times each year) and certainly not conditions equivalent to past extremes and projected with climate change. It has made flooding in the surrounding residential and agricultural area substantially worse – during discussions with the Core Group which was the first time they had been consulted on the flood issue, some residents said they had become “flood refugees” because of the new 33 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam drainage infrastructure. On a positive note, some appreciated that box canal has reduced foul odours coming from the polluted waters which pass through it. As it stands it has created a serious threat to life and property, being suspended up to 2m above surrounding buildings in most sections (Figure 25). Figure 25: Case study site 1 - Box canal. The top of the canal is higher than the footings of the adjacent housing According to local authorities, as well as residents and businesses in the area, during annual heavy rains, neither the culvert nor covered canal is able to cope with the flow of water resulting in serious flooding of the roads, shops and houses in the area. Many roads were built crossing or near the stream, leading to increased inundation and disruption of traffic. The Core Group analysis indicates that the Le Loi Street infrastructure planning was flawed in terms of (i) capacity - the flood waters overtop the box canal every time it rains heavily which is several times each year, (ii) the original decision to limit the design to a two year flood return period – already more severe flood events have damaged the structure, (iii) the conclusion that it was the best technical option providing for drainage and flood protection – the box canal has been shown to be ineffective for drainage and flood protection – the Core Group has defined a mix of engineering and other adaptation measures which would likely be a more effective technical option, (iv) that there were no engineering alternatives – the Core Group have shown that there are engineering and non engineering alternatives, and (v) that the system was the least cost option – the Core Group measures include an emphasis on bioengineering mixed with engineering measures which, it is estimated would have been less costly than the box canal. 34 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam This case raises concerns about the process of definition and design of town and donor funded projects and the guidance they follow. It reinforces the potential for climate change response to facilitate a review and strengthening of that system – so it is more creative and consultative in settling on solutions to flooding and drainage problems which work with climate change and have strong community backing. Disparities between the town master plan and the box canal development show it has led to reduced drainage and flood mitigation capacity and the removal of green space and buffers. 3.1.3 Past extreme events and impacts on the system The box canal was intended to improve on the natural creek functions. However, it has created many flood and drainage problems for the basin. Its total capacity is much smaller than the natural water flow upstream to downstream. The flooding time in the box canal area can fluctuate between a few hours to a day in some places. In general, flooding now occurs 3-4 times a year. Zone 9 of ward 5 floods to a depth of 0.3 – 0.5 m and Zone 4 can experience floods of up to 1.5 m. Even the Le Loi Street, which passes over and close to the canal entry point, is now flooded seriously for the first time up to 1.5 m, 4-5 times a year. Also, the canal does not allow water to enter into the channel along its length so that runoff water from both sides of the canal cause flooding and forms stagnant polluted water pools along the base of the canal’s concrete walls. The solid box shape has increased encroachment on the natural water channel with infilling and construction up to the canal walls. The box canal entry point and along either side have become sites for solid waste dumping. Importantly, it is not an aesthetically pleasing structure branded as “ugly” and an “eyesore” by some residents. 3.1.4 Past, current and future land uses In the past, this area was peri-urban and not intensively settled. Most of the area was wetland, some parts with seasonal cultivation of vegetables or rice. Under these land uses, the natural systems could function effectively for water retention and drainage of the 285 ha basin without any problems and damage. Over the past 15 years, many public facilities and private buildings have been built on the flood prone land. Some have problems with flooding. Some are raised above the flood level but they have change the topography and shifted the problem to neighbouring areas. As a result the flood and hydrological characteristics of the area has become more complex and difficult to manage. In the general master plan for Dong Ha, almost all the green space will disappear for the city expansion with natural drainage corridors greatly restricted and hardened or filled. A project is now being implemented with World Bank support to harden high walls surrounding the Đại An reservoir and excavate the internal wetland creating a dangerous and inaccessible area with little amenity values. In this project, only the maximum water surface and retention capacity was considered with no recreational and touristic uses, green area and amenity facilities around the lake envisioned or 35 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam continuing multiple uses including provision of wetland plants and aquatic animals as food. Even with maximum surface water, the efficiency of the rehabilitated lake is limited. The new structure cannot replace the natural channel as much lateral runoff will no-longer be able to flow into it. The lake as designed will be very deep, with hard and steep embankments. If the lake is not well managed, it will have little water in it for most of the year and become a dangerous and unhealthy area collecting solid waste and concentrating effluents especially during the dry season. Similar problems are being experienced with other water reservoirs with the same design in cities like Ha Tinh and Quang Ngai. In the detailed plan for Ward 5, the lake becomes an isolated retention pond with reduced drainage management capacity and no longer a well integrated component of the basin wide catchment and drainage system. On the positive side the Ward does had planned to establish a green area around the lake as park for recreation uses. The planning experience with this reservoir reflects the challenges in Dong Ha of ensuring that higher level plans are effectively implemented on the ground when expressed through specific infrastructure and project design. 3.1.5 Climate change threat profile As presented in the town overview (Section 1.2), Dong Ha is projected to become wetter in the wet season and hotter in the dry season. This will lead to increased incidence and severity of flooding at the site in the wet season and more intensive drought and soil drying periods in the dry season. 3.2 IMPACT AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT As a first step in the climate change impact assessment process, the Core Group walked the drainage system from the former reservoir area upstream to the exit point to agricultural fields downstream, including conducting a series of discussions with local residents and shop owners. They conducted a baseline assessment of the site and later used this evidence base to inform a climate change impact and vulnerability assessment. The Core Group’s vulnerability assessment found the system as a whole to be highly vulnerable to the threat of flooding caused by increased rainfall with climate change (Table 1). The main climate impact on the site is flooding, caused by heavy rain, concentrated in a short time. With climate change, the expected rainfall in an extreme event could increase by 20%. All impacts will be increased significantly. In addition, the process of urbanization will continue and exacerbate the impacts. Some main impacts are: Destruction of infrastructure and inhibition of functions: for example, roads and culvert bridges, water supply piping, drainage structures, electricity lines and sub-stations, communication lines; Damage to agricultural fields and irrigation structures and reduced production in hamlets 4 and 9; Water pollution and effluent disbursement, especially by flooding and overflow of septic tanks leading to health threats; 36 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Traffic obstruction with road overtopping and damage to bridge culverts; Damage and destruction of residential properties and reduced real estate values; and Reduced commercial activity with flooding of shops and access to businesses The area is a central residential and public service zone of the city. With the existing land uses and planning and technical design challenges, the Core Group considered adaptation capacity to be low and therefore the general vulnerability of the zone as high. As the zone is strategically located in the middle of the city, its high vulnerability will influence the vulnerability of the city overall. 37 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Table 1: Impact and vulnerability assessment results of case study 1 - the main drainage system of Ward 5 and Dong Le Ward System/ component Overall system: Đại An reservoir Đại An sewer gate Upstream canal Sewer and bridge culvert at Le Loi road ADB box canal downstream, outlets at Duong Sat, Thien Nhien bridge and residents within the basin Threat Heavy rain during short period Threat description Flooding with short duration Land slide Increased temperature and long dry season Long drought period Exposure Sensitivity High Direct exposure to increased flow velocity, and flood duration and height 2-4 h duration 3-4 times/year KH9: flooded from 0.3-0.5 m KP4 flooded from 1-1.5 m widespread runoff Medium Effects the natural canal upstream of Le Loi bridge and residential properties High Isolated infrastructure components sensitive to damage and destruction impact on the entire system after heavy rain Medium Every 2-3 years. Each time lasts for 5 months. Medium Most infrastructure reinforced concrete. But residential properties liable to collapse Low Less affect to capacity of the drainage system Impact level High Impact summary Causes damage to infrastructure (bridge, roads, sewers, canals), Partly flooded in KP4, KH9 and destroys crops and assets of local people. Pollutes water sources and impacts on local community health and amenity Impacts on transportation and trade of local people. Medium Sewer blockage. Land slide of residential properties and collapse of buildings along the canal banks. Medium Plants development affects the runoff. Encroachment of the reservoir bed. Have impact on water regulation capacity. Drying of soils can increase erosion and sedimentation during Adaptation capacity Low Technology, financial resources, human resources, management, policy, material sources have not yet met practical demands Low Technology, financial resources, human resources, management, policy, material sources have not yet met practical demands High Easy to fix, make the line functional by removing vegetation and trees that have blocked the water flow Vulnerability High Medium Low 38 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam System/ component Threat Threat description Exposure Sensitivity Impact level Impact summary Adaptation capacity Vulnerability the wet season with onset of heavy rains Component A Đại An Reservoir Component B ADB box canal Maximum rainfall. Water level in the drainage system increases in height and flow velocity High 5-7 years/time Low In most cases the water level does not exceed safe level and overtop new lake banks Medium Increased temperature and long dry season Long drought period without rain High Every 2-3 years, each time lasts 5 months. High There is no underground water source Medium Intensive heavy rain during short season Flood in short period High Direct exposure to flood 2-4h 3-4 times/year Low Structure reinforced concrete Medium Potential collapse of hardened lake sides Impact on the surrounding area and downstream. Creates dangerous conditions for residents and users of the lake area Vegetation growth in empty reservoir affects runoff and flow. Concentration of effluents leading to health and amenity impacts. High biomass has impact on water retention and regulation capacity. The reservoir could fulfil 1/3 of set objectives: flood reduction; but not ensure proper landscape protection and water regulation function Reduce longevity and quality of sewer Undermining of box structure Cause subsidence, potential breaks in box canal High There exists management and operational mechanism of flood drainage Medium Low Low water storage and supply, low technology High Medium Local authorities and community could repair possible damages Medium 39 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 3.3 ADAPTATION PLANNING Following the vulnerability assessment, the Dong Ha Core Group worked through all steps of the adaptation planning process including identifying a range of options to address each of the most significant impacts, setting priorities among the measures and then defining ways to implement them in an integrated and systematic way in a local area adaptation plan. 3.3.1 Objectives of the adaptation plan The main objective of the adaptation plan for this system is to rehabilitate and optimise its drainage and flood protection functions so that it effectively serves the 285 ha basin under climate change conditions. Subsidiary objectives are to develop the system in a way which brings back as much of its natural features and functions as possible for multiple-uses, and enhanced amenity and quality of life for local communities. 3.3.2 Overall approach of the adaptation plan The Core Group’s overall approach to adaptation is to redesign the whole 285 ha basin as a new urban development centre, which has an attractive green core zone with multiple functions: as drainage corridor, water retention facility, landscaped recreation area and water and air purifier. The development of a green and modern urban renewal area will increase the total value of the basin and a part of this added value can be investment in improvement of the green infrastructure system. The Core Group formulated a range of adaptation options for the site: from rehabilitating the upstream reservoir as a recreational and stormwater retention area, to redesigning the box canal corridor to be more appropriate for the volumes of water during the wet season, now and with climate change. The Core Group’s adaptation plan is to turn the box canal corridor into parkland and natural drainage area with a network of walkways and bicycle paths linked with the reservoir upstream and downstream with a constructed wetland and agricultural fields. The entire corridor and adjoining areas will become an attractive green zone and recreational area for town residents. 3.3.3 Adaptation measures The integrated adaptation measures relate to rehabilitation, improvement and maintenance of the reservoir, creek, box canal and downstream area to approximate and mimic natural drainage corridor conditions. The rehabilitated system should provide the necessary drainage and retention capacity for the 285 ha basin under climate change. The water channel GI Guide 3.2 will need to have greater capacity than existing structures to absorb and manage runoff without causing floods because it will be greater with climate change and increased urbanization. 40 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam The Core Group’s measures for the upstream reservoir were particularly important for the overall system functions. They proposed terraced embankment treatments GI Guide and access points, building setback safeguards, and extensive planting and facilities 4.4, 4.6, 4.7 such as boardwalks to turn the area into a major recreational and touristic asset for the town – in addition to building climate change resilience. That plan was made before the World Bank supported work began on the reservoir including dredging and construction of hard vertical banks. That work now greatly constrains what might be possible in taking a green infrastructure and bioengineering approach to the reservoir as part of a corridor wide adaptation initiative. The feasibility of the Core Group measures will need to be assessed against this recent construction. The results of the Core Group’s adaptation planning assessment are summarised in Table 2. 3.3.4 Phasing of adaptation implementation The adaptation plan will need to be implemented in phases. Some measures need be set in place before others are possible. Other measures can are needed as high priority while others can be left until later when further information and experience is gained on flooding and green infrastructure performance. Adjustments will be needed over time. Funding might not be available to embark on all measures in the plan. The key is to ensure that each measure is set in place according to the overall integrated plan which should be progressively implemented so its full benefits are realised. Phase 1 (1-2 years): Raise awareness and involvement of the community. The most urgent adaptation measure is to raise awareness of stakeholders – government, private sector and the affected community – about the challenge and potential for the site and make arrangements for community involvement in adaptation plan implementation. In order to do that, research and documentation of existing land uses is needed, with details on each lot: proprietor, legal status, land use efficiency, real estate price, and vulnerability. Hydrologic modelling of the basin with climate change in order to confirm and detail the need for improved drainage and its parameters. Development controls on further encroachment, hardening of ground surfaces and land filling in the corridor area to prohibit all construction works, until the new planning is complete and approved. Defining the minimum core zone for effective drainage of the overall catchment. This zone should be protected in the master plan. Legally, the whole basin of 285 ha should be defined as a special unit and subject to new detailed planning (Figure 26). Better solid waste management, especially in and along the ADB box culvert. Small solutions should be applied like frequently cleaning of the box canal, controlling and preventing disposal of waste in the canal and clarifying responsibility for the management of the system. GI Guide 6.2 41 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Organisation of community agreements to protect the green space prior to and following the detailed planning – and arrangements for communities to activity participate in establishing, monitoring and maintaining the green infrastructure components. Formalise the Dong Ha Core Group – Continue the current institutional analysis work summarised in this report to establish the Core Group and engage it the adaptation plan implementation process. Detailed design and approval for the adaptation plan bioengineering measures – the measures have been sketched out in this report and now need to be designed in detail by an interdisciplinary team with international technical input from a bioengineering and landscaping specialist – especially for components such as the constructed wetland and rehabilitation of the box canal section of the corridor. If at all possible, the bioengineering works GI Guide 3.1 can begin in Phase 1, but the regulatory and institutional arrangements for its implementation and management need to be put in place first. Regulate to protect the green core zone: Obtain a decision for protection of the corridor core zone for green infrastructure and strict development control (Figure 26). Set up arrangements for funding and fund management. Establish the area as pilot project in the next revision of the master plan and begin the process of identifying it as a priority investment project for Dong Ha, with but not necessary requiring ODA funding. Also set in place a system of payment for recreational and service facilities within the corridor to partly cover green infrastructure maintenance costs. Phase 2 (2-5 years) (Figure 27): Commence construction of the bioengineering and green infrastructure measures along the corridor with special focus on the reservoir, box canal section and downstream constructed wetlands. International expert support in implementing the green infrastructure solutions and in providing capacity building will be needed in establishing and maintaining measures such as the green embankments, constructed wetlands and biodiversity improvement. Integrate bioengineering measures with existing hard engineering structures: The box canal is a special challenge because, like the World Bank reservoir work, this structure was costly to build and only recently completed. The Core Keeping the ADB box culvert but establishing better management and integration with environment. Strictly enforce the development controls for the green corridor zone. Sharp responsibilities for development control enforcement need to be defined so that pipeline projects are effectively reviewed and required to meet all the necessary safeguards. Development should be prohibited in severe flood prone areas within the corridor. Phase 4 (over 5 years) (Figure 27): Zoning and guiding green development around the corridor parkland. The areas abutting the corridor protected core zone should be reserved for developments which demonstrate the idea of green architecture and eco design. Green infrastructure building standards, canopy and green cover GI Guide 6.342 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam ratios for all land allotments, on site storm water management and other key aspects of eco design should apply to all residential, commercial and government buildings and development in the area. On-going monitoring and maintenance of the corridor with community involvement: Community management and action groups should be given a key role in maintaining and strengthening the green infrastructure along the corridor. Local community groups would need to be involved in other functions such as solid waste management and site beautification. A government technical field team will need to take overall responsibility for corridor maintenance and management. Bioengineering measure grow in strengthen over time but they do require adjustment and enrichment as vegetation becomes well established. Figure 26: Schematic of the drainage basin with a connected water channel and green space 43 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam This green infrastructure should be designed so that it becomes a beautiful landscape and recreation place in the middle of the city. It will become more than drainage infrastructure and will create recreational, aesthetic and real estate value for the whole surrounding area. Figure 27: Schematic of areas adjacent to corridor (blue) for demonstration eco design and critical urban facilities and residential areas (brown) and green streets (yellow) 44 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Table 2: Adaptation planning results for the main Drainage system of Ward 5 and Dong Le Ward System/Component 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Đại An reservoir Sewer gate of Đại An reservoir Upstream canal Sewer in Le Loi road ADB sewer at the bridge downstream Outlet gate of Duong Sat bridge Nature and residents in the catchment A component - Đại An reservoir Impacts Description of Impacts Flooding of short duration Land slides Long term drought Causes damage to infrastructure (bridge, roads, sewers, canals). Partly flooded in KP4, KH9 destroying crops and assets of local people. Pollution of water sources and impact on local community health. Impact on transportation and trade of local people. Negative impact on the city landscape. Land slide along the canal embankments. Land erosion along 2 sides of the ADB sewers resulting in sewer blockage. Plant development has impacts on the flow direction. Encroachment of the corridor area. Impact on water regulation capacity. Water pooling and pollution. 1. Impact on the surrounding area and downstream. Plant development affects the flow. Lake encroachment. Effects on water regulation capacity. 1. Exceeds the safety of the reservoir storage capacity Adaptation options 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 2. 3. 4. 5. Improve drainage capacity of the entire system through rehabilitation and expansion of corridor and green infrastructure treatments. Create landscaped green corridor as central recreational area in city. Regulate water volume into the system by upstream reforestation and bioengineering. Develop a green plan for the entire basin plan. Develop a wastewater and solid waste treatment plan. Awareness raising for local people and relevant stakeholders. Develop a managerial and operational mechanism for the system. Develop a financial mechanism and commitment. Identify boundary & mechanism to protect the reservoir and corridor core zone. Improve the reservoir to meet objectives: Landscaped recreation and tourism; flood regulation and drainage. Develop urban agriculture and fishery proposals. Set in place corridor managerial and operational mechanisms. Design parks and walkway network from Prioritization of adaptation options Feasibility 1. Medium Efficiency 1. Very high Priority 1. Very High 2. High 2. Very high 2. Very High 3. Medium 3. Medium 3. Medium 4. High 4. High 4. High 5. Medium 5. High 5. High 6. Very high 6. Medium 6. High 7. High 7. Medium 7. Medium 8. Medium 8. Very high 8. Very high 1. Very high 1. High 1. 2. Very high 2. High 2. 3. High 3. Medium 3. Medium 4. High 4. Medium 4. Medium 5. Medium 5. High 5. High 45 Very high Very high ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam System/Component Impacts Description of Impacts Adaptation options 6. B Component - ADB sewer Not enough aperture culvert drainage leads to flooding in downstream areas of Le Loi bridge Reduces the longevity and quality of the box canal. Causing subsidence, box canal breakage. No water collection drains causing flooding sections between. Facilitate encroached land drains either side. Water stagnant at the both sides so as to pollute environment. 1. reservoir to downstream constructed wetland. Develop infrastructure and urban plan design surrounding the reservoir. Prioritization of adaptation options Feasibility 6. Medium Efficiency 6. High Improve drainage of Le Loi bridge 1. Medium 1. Very downstream segment with expansion of high corridor either side of the box canal and bioengineering measures: 2. Option 1: Retain ADB box canal and design 2. High 2. Medium broader corridor consistent with the drainage requirements. 2. Option 2: remove ADB box canal and renew water canal to ensure flood drainage while creating natural landscape. 3. Re-plan residents at two sides (prevention 3. Medium 3. High of encroachment and flood). 4. Solid waste management along the sewer and conduct regular dredging. 4. High 4. Medium 1 - Determine the catchment area of 285 ha in the urban centre and the ecological landscape of Dong Ha in Dong Ha upgrade project to City 2 2 – Propose this area as a key urban development project in the project implementation action plan. 3 – Include this project into the overall Dong Ha construction plan 4 – Propose to consider the entire area as a project under a unified management and interdisciplinary projects identified in the key investment portfolio of the province 5 – Adjust Dai a reservoir project design 6 – Adjust design of the prolonged Le Thanh Tong Street - ADB project Priority 6. High 1. Very high 2. Medium 3. High 4. Medium 46 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 4 CASE STUDY SITE 2: THE MARKET TO PORT ZONE 4.1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT 4.1.1 Brief description of the system Located in the centre of Dong Ha, this area which the Core Group has designated a strategic development zone covering the central market to the new port area (Figure 28). The port is just downstream of the market with the main Dong Ha bridge spanning the Hieu River between them. The port is one of the areas slated for ADB investment, which also includes the riverbanks of the Hieu River, just upstream of the market and port zone. The Core Group gathered baseline information through field site visits which included investigating the drainage system in the park on Le Duan Street, walking through the market and along the riverbank and examining the site of the port redevelopment. Discussions were conducted with vendors and customers and with local authorities - Government technical staff provided on site briefings. Information from the site visit was synthesized into a baseline assessment. Figure 28: Market to Port Development Zone Dong Ha city 47 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam The Core Group identified this as an urban renewal area of strategic importance for Dong Ha in terms of climate change resilience and overall development as a dynamic and beautiful river side city. The objective the Group defined for area is to provide Dong Ha with a resilient commercial and service centre which is intensively used for tourism, recreation and business because of its beauty and amenity values. This zone consists of the most important facilities in Dong Ha, which are components of the target system for this assessment: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Peoples committee compound Đông Hà Bridge Đông Hà market Lê Duẩn park Sài Gòn Đông Hà Hotel Đông Hà Port Hiếu river embankment Other urban services (post office, supermarket, night life street) The Core Group conceived of the market to port area as an important development and demonstration zone for climate change adaptation for the town (Figure 19 and Figure 30). First, the zone contains a potential natural drainage point in Le Duan Park, which could play an important role in helping to alleviate pluvial flooding in the area by linking it to the river. Second, given its location and economic resources, this zone could become an important centre of trade, tourism and commercial activity, from which economic resources could be drawn to strengthen the town’s adaptive capacity. Third, its strategic and prominent location at the centre of town and along the Hieu River would make it an accessible and highly visible demonstration site for good adaptation. Figure 19: Dong Ha Market on the Hieu riverbank 48 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 30: View from the market to the port in the background, including the Dong Ha bridge crossing the Hieu River and the hotel buildings to the right The area has a favourable location with many important facilities critical to a future trade and service centre enabling Dong Ha to realise its vision as a prominent economic corridor and riverside city. Yet, currently there is almost no integrated planning of this zone and despite its obvious importance the serious development problems it faces including climate change are not properly recognised. The main components do not follow any systematic plan and their operations often conflict and impede each other’s functions. For example, intensive heavy traffic next to the five star hotel and market prevents connectivity and creates a hostile environment for commerce, tourism and recreation. The various developments are ideas of different periods and do not integrate with each other to form a whole. 4.1.2 Status and condition of the system and its components 1. City Peoples Committee compound The city peoples committee compound (Figure 31), together with a number of other administrative facilities, occupies a large area in the zone. It is a significant presence in the area as the administrative centre of the city. Figure 31: City peoples committee However most of compound buildings are old and degraded with no design connection between them or to the surrounding area. City authorities are now discussing whether to move the CPP or to rebuild a new complex on the site. If they are removed a large quantity of valuable land in the centre will be available for the development of the commercial centre. This is a common tendency in many cities of Vietnam administrative facilities are removed to make way for development of expensive commercial areas. But if the administration remains, which is a more probable alternative, then if properly developed it can present an important function in the area and 49 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam contribute to a more resilient city. Importantly, the new complex should follow development controls and eco design so that it demonstrates effective on-site water and flood management. 2. Dong Ha Bridge The Dong Ha Bridge was first built in 1969 by the American army. Between 1969 and 1972, the bridge was destroyed many times. In 1972 with the liberation of Dong Ha, the bridge was rebuilt. The current bridge was built in 2000 (Figure 32). The first problem the new bridge created is that it separates the two sides of the south river bank. There is almost no safe connection between the market and park area to the west and the hotel and river port to the east of the national road. The second problem is that this bridge was designed solely for interregional traffic. There is no functional relationship between the immediate surrounding areas and the bridge. When national road 1A is relocated to the east, along the Thach Han River, to avoid the city, the bridge will then serve as inner city infrastructure and it should be made to fit within its inner city context. A third problem is that the bridge and national road disturb the natural flow of water from west to east and increase the local flooding on the western side. Figure 32: Dong Ha Bridge with market in background 3. Đông Hà Market Dong Ha market (Figure 33) is one of the most important facilities of the city. It can be defined as a commercial facility, architectural monument or cultural and tourism attraction. It is the most intensively used facility in Dong Ha, by local residents as well as visitors. 50 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam The market was built on relatively high ground on the river bank but it is surrounded by lower streets, which are often flooded in the wet season, restricting access to the facility. In addition, during flooding, all drainage and underground sewage from the market becomes blocked and backs up. Figure 33: Dông Hà market on the banks of the Hieu River The river dyke and the drainage pipes are much lower than the river water level. The main drainage pipes for the streets Huyen Tran Cong Chua and Tran Hung Dao in front of the market are too small to effectively drain the volumes of water received. They run partly under the market to the river so that it will be very costly to renovate and improve them without disturbing the function of the market. Water pollution and solid waste are also persistent problems, which increase flooding, sanitation and health issues in the market areas. During the regular floods, both access points to the market from Huyen Tran Cong Chua Street and Phan Boi Chau Street are under water. During the dry season there are problems with heat, odour and effluent concentrations in drains. The market has many large concrete and roof surfaces and is very hot in summer, which increases the use of fans and other cooling facilities. There is no roof drainage, water collection or storage for cooling or use during the dry season. 4. Lê Duan Park Le Duan Park (Figure 34) was built in 2007, celebrating the 100th birthday of the former party leader Le Duan. At this time Dong Ha already had a vision of becoming a trans-Asian corridor city. The park was one of the main projects demonstrating that vision. In front of the statue of Mr. Le Duan is a large space, which consists mainly of a grass lawn and a lake bordered by vertical masonry walls. Originally this and adjoining areas were low lying natural wetlands, intensively used by local communities, and with critical flood retention and water management functions. All that has gone. Following construction of the park and lake, stormwater from adjoining areas cannot follow the earlier natural drainage pattern. The park land and lake banks are now higher than the surrounding areas and not connected by an underground drainage system. Since the construction of the lake, the area in front of the market is more frequently inundated. 51 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Functionally, the park is seldom used. It is a large empty area without shade trees, with little gathering space for recreation or entertainment. Once or twice a year, the park is used for ceremonies. There is no functional and visual link between the park and other facilities in the area, especially the market, hotel and nearby river with all its natural beauty and potential as a recreational and touristic attraction. Most important from a climate change resilience perspective, the lake does not function as a key drainage and flood protection facility connected to the river. Figure 34: Lê Duẩn Park 5. Sài Gòn – Đông Hà Hotel The Sai Gon Dong Ha Hotel is the first large 4 star hotel in Quang Tri Province. It has 8 stories and close to 100 rooms including president suites (Figure 35). It is the sign of the new age in Dong Ha - the beginning of new service and enterprise thinking. 52 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam The Hotel is located on the east side of Le Duan Street, between the bridge and the river port. Though the location is suitable, the hotel stands alone and isolated in the area. There are no easily accessible facilities for guests in the surrounding area. To get to the market, visitors also have to cross the national road. It has no landscaping, shade trees or walkways within its compound. Visually and functionally it does not have any relationship with the river or with other elements in the area. In front of the Hotel, between the Mac Dinh Chi and Ngo Sy Lien streets, is the only place in Dong Ha with food in the late evening. With better planning and development of the surrounding area, this zone around the hotel could become quite attractive and a popular area for residents and visitors alike. An important consideration is access across the national road as most of the visitors to this evening service will come from the other side of the national road. Most important is that this major facility and its grounds could become a demonstration for private sector contributions to building city resilience. Initiatives are needed for more effective on-site management of storm and waste water using green infrastructure approaches, landscaping and actions to link the site in with overall flood management in this strategic area. Figure 35: Sài Gòn Đông Hà hotel with national road and bridge approach in foreground 6. Đông Hà Port The river port of Dong Ha (Figure 36 and 37) was built by the American army 50 years ago. It was the most important transport facility in Dong Ha. It consisted of a storage area in the current location of the Sai Gon – Dong Ha Hotel and an embankment with a horizontal quay. Historical pictures revealed that the storage facilities were very important and connected the port with the bridge and the national road. With the construction of the Sai Gon Dong Ha Hotel, the port was detached from the associated storage area, bridge and road. For almost 10 years, the port has had very little use. It has mostly functioned as a small storage facility for some imported woods from Laos. 53 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam The city has a plan to renovate and improve the capacity of the port, perhaps with ADB funding. Questions of function, purpose and integration with the city should be addressed as part of this process. The Core Group questions whether the function of the port as a goods transport facility is viable or necessary. They envision that the port should be integrated with its surroundings as a multi-purpose light transport facility serving city residents and tourists and well integrated with the market and other facilities and tourist attractions along the river. Its location requires that the design should be particularly sensitive to climate change including implications of hard and high embankments for the low lying residential and agricultural area on the opposite bank. Figure 36: Đông Hà port looking upstream with hotel, bridge and market in background Figure 37: Dong Ha port looking downstream 54 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 8. Hieu River Embankment Originally the market of Dong Ha was connected to the river and included floating market stalls and boats. The riverbank was once a frequently used area and the main face of the market. The city has invested a lot to improve the condition of this area, including construction of a solid concrete staircase on the river side of the market more than 100m long (Figure 38). The idea was to protect the bank from erosion and establish a tourist river port with delivery access for the market. Unfortunately, the waterway became inactive and lost connection with the market, partly because of road alternatives, but also because of the design of the bank. To protect the bank, the concrete staircase was built too high and steep without adequate landing and access points. Only the back side of some shops still sell fish and other products. Their activities further pollute the river with solid waste and wastewater. The main drainage pipes from the market also discharge directly onto the staircase further limiting intended use. Now the whole area is more or less abandoned. The facility will face serious decay problems – especially with projected climate changes – because it lacks regular maintenance leading to more severe consequences for the bank and the market. Figure 38: Hieu River embankment and staircase at the rear of the market 55 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 7. Other Urban Services Other urban services in the zone include the night life area opposite the hotel and around the market, supermarket, post office, the historical zone, commercial area and road and drainage network. The main problem with these facilities is that there is still no real concept to develop an integrated city commercial centre. All existing activities are more or less informal and disconnected one from the other. The road network would require adjustment to effectively serve a city centre. The Dong Ha market is normally accessed through two points: Tran Hung Dao and Huyen Tran Cong Chua Streets in front and the Phan Boi Chau and Dinh Tien Hoang Streets in the west. From Le Duan Street in the east, the market is almost inaccessible. Tran Hung Dao Street is one of the main streets in Dong Ha and therefore very intensively used. In contrast, the other three streets are little used. There is no real connection to the riverbank in the north of the market and to the bridge, as well as to the east side of Le Duan Street. Some areas experience regular local flooding. The drainage is too small and is often blocked with waste. During heavy rains, both junctions in the front and rear of the market are flooded. At those times, the market is inaccessible. In addition, the drainage for runoff and wastewater are not separated. Wastewater discharges directly to the river, causing pollution, especially during flooding. 4.1.3 Past extreme events and impacts on the system The market to port zone has serious flooding problems: both localised pooling linked to poor drainage during heavy rains, and river backing up through the drains and overtopping banks (Figure 39). The frequent flooding has implications for trade, tourism development and commercial activities. Also, it has serious impacts on hygiene and safety in the market. Although the zone is not situated in the lowest area of Dong Ha, it is still threatened by flooding in extreme events. In the extreme event of 1999, much of the area was under water. The area around the hotel is the highest point in the zone and was less affected by flooding, but local flooding can occur in the western side of the hotel, next to the national road 1A. Under normal conditions, some components, like the access roads to the market are locally flooded for 1-3 hours with every heavy rain due to malfunction of the drainage system. Bank erosion is a hazard occurring in the area of the market and near the port. With the construction of the Ba Trieu riverside street with support from ADB, local flooding has increased significantly in the neighbourhood. The new hard embankment project of ADB could diminish the threat of flooding from the river, but will increase the possibility of local flooding, especially for the poorer neighbourhoods. Waste, wastewater and urban heat, fire and other hazards are also present, especially in market area. 56 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 39: Flooding level of Dong Ha in 1999 and 2005 57 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 4.1.4 Climate change threat profile As presented in the town overview (Section 1.2), Dong Ha is projected to become wetter in the wet season and hotter in the dry season. This will lead to increased incidence and severity of flooding at the site in the wet season and more intensive drought and heat effects in the dry season. 4.2 IMPACT AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT The Core Group’s detailed vulnerability assessment was focussed on the market and its drainage system. The Group found the system as a whole to be moderately vulnerable to the threat of flooding caused by increased rainfall with climate change. One component of the system – the sewer at the junction of Trần Hưng Đạo and Huyền Trân Công Chúa was found to be highly vulnerable (Table 3). With climate change, flooding events are expected to become more severe and occur more frequently. 4.3 ADAPTATION PLANNING 4.3.1 Objectives of the adaptation plan The new vision set out in the Core Group’s adaptation plan includes an integrated redesign of the area and its drainage system with use of the existing park and lake as a flood retention facility all flowing to the river. The objective is to create a new and resilient city centre. The plan connects the components in an overall area wide urban renewal initiative through expanded green space, foot paths and river side recreational facilities. It increases permeable surfaces, rehabilitates the port as a recreational and touristic centre and retrofits the market to recycle stormwater and manage solid and liquid wastes on site. ADB is committed to supporting Dong Ha in redevelopment of the old port so there is an important opportunity to take an area wide approach and to embrace the urban renewal adaptation plan prepared by the Core Group. 4.3.2 Overall approach of the adaptation plan The overall approach of this adaptation plan is to create a vibrant, attractive and resilient urban centre through application of green infrastructure integrated with conventional measures. The plan should be implemented as a pilot and demonstration project in building climate change resilience and solving the problems of flooding in an ecologically sustainable way. The project should emphasise the involvement of all stakeholders in Dong Ha to work toward a better quality of life that is harmonious with nature. There are many planning, technological, management and cultural considerations in reaching the goal requiring the input and viewpoints of many different groups at all levels in the city. 58 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Table 3: Impact and vulnerability assessment summary for the market and drainage system, Dong Ha System/ component - Dong Ha market - Drainage system at the junction between Tran Hung Dao and Huyền Trân Công Chúa streets - Outlet sluice gate at market Threat description Exposure Sensitivity Rain with precipitation of over 100 mm that occurs from 15 – 20 times in a year - Flood - Short duration flooding from 1-3 hours Medium Low Impact level Medium Flood occurs 3-4 times/year and lasts from 1-2 days - Slow water drainage from market to river through the market internal drainage system. - Low flood at some locations Low Low Low Threat Impact summary - Difficult transportation for road users including damage to vehicles - Limited access to market, reduced sales and damage to / loss of property - Local environmental pollution (effluents and solid wastes) - After rain (health, odour and waste problems) - Low impact on business and trade - Low impact on infrastructure in the area - Reduction of business and trade - Difficult transportation at some locations - Low impacts on the market drainage system - Low impact on infrastructure, business and trade as well as transportation in the area Adaptation capacity Medium High Vulnerability Medium Low 59 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam System/ component Component A Market area and outlet sluices of the market Threat description Exposure Sensitivity Storms, tropical low pressure occurs 1-3 times / year. Especially when there are storms with gust at level 10 - Extensive local flooding - High winds Medium Medium Impact level Medium Rain with precipitation of over 100 mm that occurs from 15 – 20 times in a year due to extreme climate Localise flooding Low Low Low Threat Impact summary - Damaged infrastructure (lost roofs, advertisement boards and electric cables cut) - Damage to assets, commodities in the market - Fallen trees - Local environmental pollution - Business and trade ceases. - Fallen trees - Local environmental pollution -Difficult transportation - Reduction of commerce and trade in the market - Rainwater overflows the waste collection pipe polluting the river - Low impact on transportation - Insignificant environmental pollution - Low impact on trade and business - Low impact on infrastructure in the area Adaptation capacity Medium Low Vulnerability Medium Low 60 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam System/ component Component B - Drainage system at the junction between Tran Hung Dao and Huyền Trân Công Chúa streets Threat description Exposure Sensitivity Flood occurs 3-4 times/year and lasts from 1-2 days/flood -Slow water drainage from market to river through the market internal drainage system. - Low flood at some locations Low Low Impact level Low Storms, tropical low pressure occurs 1-3 times / year. Especially when there are storm gust over level 10 - Extensive local flooding - High winds Medium Medium Medium Rain with precipitation of over 100 mm that occurs from 15 – 20 times in a year - local flooding - Short duration from 1-3 hours High High High Threat Impact summary - Reduction of commerce and trade - Difficult transportation at some locations - Low impact on the market’s drainage. - Low impact on trade, business and infrastructure in the area -Damaged infrastructures (flow away of roof, advertisement board, electric cable cut) -Damage to assets, commodities in the market - Fallen trees - Local environmental pollution - Business and trade cease operation. -Fallen trees - Local environmental pollution - Difficult transportation with high number of road users including damage to vehicles - After rain pollution problems from solid waste and effluents Adaptation capacity High Vulnerability Low Medium Medium Low High 61 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam System/ component Threat Threat description Exposure Sensitivity Impact level Flood occurs 3-4 times/year and lasts from 1-2 days - Flood - Short duration from 2-5 hours Low Low Low Storms, tropical low pressure occurs 1-3 times / year. Especially when there are storm gusts over level 10 - Flood - Short duration from 2-5 hours/event - High winds Low Low Low Impact summary - Difficult transportation for high number of road users, damages of vehicle’s parts/items, engine stops working - Local environment pollution - Destroys urban beauty - Difficult transportation for high number of road users, damages of vehicle’s parts/items, engine stop working - Local environmental pollution Adaptation capacity Vulnerability High Low High Low 62 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 4.3.3 Adaptation measures and phasing Phase 1 (1-2 years) – short term solutions: In the next two years, there are many immediate steps, which could be taken to improve the condition of local flooding and reduce the risk of urban heat and fire. The solutions are divided into three main groups: (i) to improve the existing drainage system; (ii) to minimise water runoff to the town drainage system; and (iii) to reduce urban heat and risks of fire. Group 1 - Improve the existing drainage system (Figure 40) with the following measures: Add more drainage channels, especially to the river. Enlarge the existing water collection points. Expand the capacity of existing drainage pipes Create additional water collection points. Install more manholes with improved access design. GI Guide 6.2 Improved the waste collection system so it is regular and effective. Improve the control and maintenance of the existing drainage system with more community involvement in monitoring and management. Such measurements can reduce local flooding around the market under normal conditions but not under extreme events, climate change or further urbanization. Figure 40: Improving the existing drainage system – arrows show routes of new or improved drainage channels to the river Group 2 - Reducing the contribution of each component to the storm water drainage system: 63 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Parallel to the improvement of the drainage system, there should be a number of measures aimed at minimising runoff into the drainage system. The key point is to retain and retard the water as long as possible in separate locations before it enters the drainage system. There are many places where water can be stored, flow velocity reduced and where infiltration to ground water can be improved, such as gardens, ponds and lakes, green roofs, water tanks and other green infrastructure measures such as bio-swales. One GI Guide important principle is that each new development or building should manage 3.1, 3.4, 5.1, 5.2, 6.1 its own runoff and minimise its contribution to the drainage system during peak times. This requirement can be realised through a range of technical solutions, design standards and development controls. Such solutions can be costly and therefore cannot be made mandatory for existing facilities. However for new or renewal projects, such standards can be applied, especially for larger public and private investments which must be used as demonstrations for best practice. Solutions are proposed for each component of the urban development zone: Administration complex: new safeguard regulations on minimising runoff and maximising infiltration through methods such as rain gardens, green roofs, GI Guide 3.3, 5.2, 5.4, 6.1 bio-swales and permeable paving. Market: green roof, roof water collection and rainwater tanks. Ground surface water collection and pre-treating before discharge to river. Use of permeable GI Guide 3.3, 3.4, 5.2, 5.4 paving, bio-swales and rain gardens. GI Guide 3.3, 3.5, 5.2, 5.4 Roads: permeable paving, street planting and nature strips, rain gardens, and bio-swales. Le Duan Park: changing the overall design of the lake and park to collect water through bioengineering and terracing of banks (to allows for uses any time of the year), GI Guide connecting it to the river, creating constructed wetlands and gardens to filter 3.1, 4.4 – 4.6, 5.4 and retard storm water, improving the landscape and creating a facility for recreation. River embankments: bioengineering for bank stabilisation (combined with conventional methods where needed) with terracing to facilitate access and GI Guide 4.1 – 4.12 multiple uses throughout the year. Residential areas: collection of roof water and installing rainwater tanks, green roofs, separating wastewater from stormwater, rain gardens, regulation of density and ground cover, use of permeable surfaces. GI Guide 3.1, 4.4 – 4.6, 5.4 64 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Group 3 - solutions to reduce urban heat stress and fire risk: Integrated urban greening: creation of green streets with rain gardens, bioswales and major expansion of canopy cover through tree planting and maintenance (linked to overall canopy cover targets for Dong Ha), on the walls, on roofs and balconies. GI Guide 5.2, 5.4, 6.3 Mapping of heat stress areas and sources to identify priorities for action linked to specific land allotments and buildings. Use of rainwater roof collection and storage systems for cooling and fire protection. GI Guide 3.4 Phase 2 (2-5 years) – medium term solutions: In the medium term, the objective is to have approved and commence implementation of an integrated urban development and adaptation plan for the market and port zone as the city centre. To meet this objective requires a wide range of solutions: institutional, management and technology including: 1. Institutional - defining the whole area as one project, with special regulations and decisions about new detailed planning including a multi-sectoral project management board. 2. Finance – obtaining the budget for implementing the solutions including investment contributions from government, the private sector and communities to realise the project. 3. Threat assessment – conducting detailed hydrological modelling for area under climate change and ensuring that information feeds into the plan preparation and linked decision making. Disseminate the information to stakeholders. 4. Greening of infrastructure - protection and improvement of main infrastructure: drainage, embankments, roads, port and bridge through carefully designed bioengineers measures including creating a network of safe and dedicated green walkways and bicycle paths throughout the site and connected to a river bank walkway that could run all the way to the coast. 5. Stakeholder participation: awareness raising and training of stakeholders to effectively participate in the implementation and management of this new urban renewal area. 6. Rehabilitating, expanding and enhancing natural systems: conserving natural assets and ecosystem services. 65 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Phase 4 (over 5 years) – long term solutions: In the long term, the vision for this zone is a pilot project to demonstrate the idea of a green and resilient economic corridor city. There are several strategies to achieve this goal and each strategy will require a range of solutions. Overall Strategy- Green and resilient city using nature as the connecting theme Meeting this objective relies on the foundation of the existing large park area near the river. The strategy is to multiply the green space at many levels, over roads, streets, along the river, in each building land allotment and over buildings throughout the zone. The project should function as a pilot of new ideas to build resilience, beauty and functionality which can be expanded to the whole city. The overall vision has three components (Figure 41): 1. Use the park to connect the market, administrative and commercial, service centre (bottom) 2. River and riverside park as green connectors (top right) 3. Greening at multiple levels (top left) Figure 41: Green and resilient city vision 66 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam By maximising and expanding the use of the existing park, it will become a green core connecting and integrating all components of the system such as the market, administrative complex, commercial and service facilities. The park area will also become a core for flood management and drainage, for heat reduction and storm water purification. The river and riverside is another natural landscape element, which should be developed to connect all components from the east side with those on the west side. It should be a new green backbone of the city. This strategy will help to realise the vision of a riverside city defined in the socioeconomic plan but one which is resilient and accessible for multiple uses through appropriate recreational and entertainment facilities. The long term strategy can be realised through a range of sub-strategies for each component as follows: Sub-strategy 1: Green and integrate the market within the zone The market is a defining element of Dong Ha. As part of the new city vision, this facility needs to be upgraded to fulfil multiple functions in a modern city in the next century. Four measures are proposed: 1. The market connecting the city to the river The most important quality of the new market is that it should connect the city to the river and to other key facilities within the special city centre zone. The commercial function of the market should complement its function as a key access corridor to the river through pathways, corridors, vistas and other design elements. 2. Green roof for the market The second technical measure for the market is to re-design it with a green roof (Figure 42) as a demonstration for developing green space at multiple levels GI Guide 6.1 across the zone. Commerce and market activities should be organised in harmony with the overall green vision. The green roof will reduce runoff, reduce heat within the market building and create an attractive enjoyable space. 67 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Figure 42: Green roof for the market 3. Extend the market into the park The market structure and activities can be extended into the open space of the park and riverside through green walkways and covered paths (Figure 43). The design of the market building could be adjusted to extend those green arms into the park and river green spaces. There are many kinds of market activities which could be encouraged to use those extended spaces such as weekend markets, open air exhibitions and concerts and food stalls. Figure 43: An open market space and green pathways connected to the park 4. Collection and filtration of water within the market area The new market area should consider new safeguard regulations concerning climate resilience. The water management should be one key technical requirement for the new design, so that from the market area, there will be minimal runoff contribution to the drainage system during peak times and onsite management and treatment of solid and liquid wastes. Sub-strategy 2: Create connectivity underneath and along the bridge 1. Raise the bridge to connect both sides: natural connection and commercial connection 68 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam The biggest problem with the existing bridge is that it is too low cutting through the landscape and separating the western and eastern side of the zone and connectivity with the city. In order to solve this problem, one approach is to raise the bridge so that it can function as a roof in the landscape and give shelter for public activities and transit underneath (Figure 44). Figure 44: Concept to raise the bridge to create natural and commercial connectivity through the zone 2. Create levels for the bridge: low for pedestrians, high for vehicles. The current bridge is hostile to pedestrians and cyclists. In order to make the bridge an inner city facility and urban connector, a second or adjacent level for pedestrians and bicycles should be added (Figure 44). This will make the bridge a landscape element and a viewing point for tourists above the river. The renovated bridge and walkways could include vegetation and specially designed vantage points. The bridge needs to become a tourist attraction and facility in its own right. Sub-strategy 3: Greening and multi-use space for the administration area 1. Open the administrative complex to the park and extend the park into the existing administrative land. The existing administration areas are strictly separated from the surrounding areas by fences. Each facility has its own relatively large open and green area but these areas are not effectively used. If all these open space were joined together creating an open park there will be much more potential to create a mixed use space for recreation and water management (Figure 45). The administration will also become more open to the people adding to the diverse urban life of the city centre. Figure 45: Public green space for the administration compounds 69 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 2. Local collection and filtration of water within the administrative complex. Once the green space within the administration area has been interconnected with the green network throughout the zone it can be modified to include green infrastructure to collect, store and filter rainfall and local runoff. Measures such as rainwater collection and storage, rain gardens, bio-swales and permeable paving could be implemented to increase infiltration GI Guide and help to alleviate flooding problems in the area. In any redevelopment of the 3.3, 3.4, 5.2, 5.4 administration complex safeguards and regulations like minimum ratio of green space and maximum allowable runoff could be set. The government areas should be demonstrations of best practice in green infrastructure and resilience. Sub-strategy 4: Bioengineering for river embankments and riverside (Figures 46 and 47) 1. Soft embankments and terracing in new areas for walkways and multiple uses. 2. Create a recreation space for existing hard embankment areas. Figure 46: Redeveloping the river embankments into a multiple use recreational space using bioengineering Figure 47: Terracing of river banks for multiple use and resilience 70 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Sub-strategy 5: Connecting the river port to the city The Core Group members agreed that in long term the city does not need a port for wood, building materials and other goods at the current location. These types of goods can transferred via the new Cua Viet port. The current ADB project of renewing and revitalizing this port as a transport port should be revised. Instead, this port should be developed as a tourist port catering to river tourism and activities on the quay like fish markets, shops, riverside promenade and other services (Figure 48). The port will be a focal point on the riverside promenade linking the wetland in the east with the hotel complex, bridge and the market area. Figure 48: The port as a tourist facility and landscape element integrated with the market and city Sub-strategy 6: Connection over Le Duan Road 1. Pedestrian bridge over Le Duan Road The construction of a covered foot bridge over the national road to provide safe connection between east and west side is needed (Figure 49). This bridge should provide for connecting layers, giving direct access to the second layer of the market area and providing a view over the park area. This infrastructure will facilitate the use of the valuable open space in the park and provide a connection between the park and the river. Figure 49: Bridge for pedestrians over the national road connecting to market and park 71 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Sub-strategy 7: Riverside commercial and entertainment district Incentives should be provided to develop a commercial and entertainment district along the east side of the south bank of the Hieu River (Figure 50). This area needs to increase the connectivity between the city and the river by providing more activities and services along its length instead of reserving the river bank area for private use. For Dong Ha to become a river city with the city centre and its activities coming together along the river banks a river corridor development plan is needed before large scale individual investments proceed such as hardening sections of the banks or port redevelopment. This plan and special development controls and incentives are particularly important with climate change and the need to accommodate rising and falling of the river level and intensity of flow. Integrated design of the river corridor could be part of the city centre development plan proposed in this volume. Dong Ha could conduct a master planning competition with an international invitation for design companies to compete for the most beautiful and appropriate plan. Any master planning undertaken must be framed by the overarching issue of climate change. Figure 50: Riverside commercial and entertainment district and master plan Dong Ha city centre and river master plan competition 72 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 5 IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF ADAPTATION PLANS Both case studies are complex and involve multiple measures conducted as an integrated development initiative. They are strategic steps on the way to realising the vision of a green economic corridor and river city. All important fields of city life and space will be affected. Potential environmental impacts The environmental impacts of the plans should be positive and are the main motivation for their implementation. The natural systems of the town will be enhanced to form sustainable green infrastructure for the city. The case study areas will provide a backbone of further city development by allowing flexible urban expansion and functions around it but following the same themes and principles. There will be enhanced ecological connectivity from the west to the east of the city along the Ward 5 drainage line and from the market to port zone. The micro climate at both sites should be improved with greater green space and the local flooding problems with all their negative impacts should be resolved. Potential community / livelihood impacts In terms of social impacts, both adaptation plans should proceed very carefully. In general, both adaptation plans should help to alleviate existing impacts of flooding on the surrounding community and livelihoods. They should also have positive impacts for recreation, amenity and commercial activity. However it is important to ensure that there is close community engagement and participation from the beginning through the planning, construction and management phases. The forming of the multidisciplinary Climate Change Core Group with broad membership and the active contribution of this group to the project is the first step in that direction supported by Ward or local community management groups. 73 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Potential impacts on traffic and infrastructure The market to port zone adaptation plan will have significant impacts on the road system through modifications to the Dong Ha Bridge, Le Duan Road, National Road 1A and inner city streets with a focus on increasing green space, water management and connectivity. The riverbank will also become a new important promenade increasing pedestrian traffic, tourist transport and commerce. With the structural changes to roads all other infrastructure such as water, drainage, electricity and communication will require modification. The drainage site in Ward 5 will have less radical impacts on traffic and infrastructure; however some new connection and access points will be needed to make optimal use of the new corridor area. Potential impacts on other sectors As both adaptation plans are not individual projects but a complex rethinking and reorientation of the city development strategy, they will have widespread positive impacts on other sectors if they are fully realised. First, the implementation of the adaptation plans requires new administrative procedures and strategies in urban planning and management. Up to now city management has only dealt with isolated projects. Although there is a general master plan for the city, there are no complex integrated projects and the kind proposed here, which require concerted and coordinated action from multiple departments and stakeholders. It is a very challenging task for the city and provincial governments but one which must be embraced given the very significant projected climate changes affecting the city. From an economic point of view, the adaptation plans will create a movement toward green engineering, green architecture and environmental technology. They will also provide a large area of high value real estate in the middle of the city, which will totally change the landscape of urban services and commerce. These two urban centres, especially the market to port zone, will become a fertile ground for modern city services and activity. 6 STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION AND ENGAGEMENT FOR ADAPTATION PLANS 6.1 STAKEHOLDER IDENTIFICATION The stakeholders in the Ward 5 drainage area include the inhabitants of the 285 ha basin such as small shop keepers along the roads, farmers in the middle areas, labourers, civil servants and teachers in the schools. In general, they are low to middle income people with no strong social or economic influence. If the adaptation plan is realised, there may be a need for some resettlement to improved low cost housing. The question is therefore how to engage them from the beginning in the planning and implementation process so that they are aware of their responsibilities and rights. The involvement of the community is extremely important in the first phase of the adaptation plan as the critical issue is to 74 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam protect the existing natural assets before physical measures are implemented. Following implementation, some local residents should profit from the increased value of their land. Besides the local residents, there are a number of other stakeholders occupying corridor land, such as the sports centre, the school and the bus station. These are government institutions and therefore could be relatively easily moved away from the flood prone corridor to other locations. At present, they are situated directly on the wetland and will need relocating. If they do remain their land area and any structures on it should be reduced and reorganized because it is currently very extensive and limits the space for flood retention and recreational purposes. The stakeholders in the market to port zone are: The residents. Many of market to port zone residents are shop keepers. In general, this group is more coherent than the inhabitants of the Ward 5 drainage site and therefore more readily mobilized. They are also relatively wealthier. They would be key players in the implementation and management of the adaptation measures. The market vendors are mostly not local residents but are from nearby Wards. Therefore they would need to be engaged in a more focussed way. Their awareness will need to be raised so that they understand and support the new market design. The City peoples committee and other administrative institutions. These stakeholders control a large proportion of land in the zone and the question is whether they stay and have a key role in shaping the zone or relocate. Often in riverside cities the administration prefers to move from the city centre leaving it to commercial and entertainment uses. They can effectively fulfil their administrative functions in less commercial areas. They will need to be engaged and involved from the outset both as zone land holders and planning and management decision makers. The Sai Gon Dong Ha Hotel. It is in the natural interest of the hotel to restrict access to the riverside for other private uses. It will be important for the hotel management to recognise that opening the way to a combined commercial and entertainment riverside centre would be beneficial for the hotel in the long run. It is also important to assist the management to understand the commercial and resilience benefits of green infrastructure landscaping and design modifications on the hotel land allotment. Other stakeholders. There will be many other stakeholders who need to be involved in the adaptation process including government departments, investors, private sector actors, NGOs and local community groups and associations. The ADB would be an important partner because the idea of an economic corridor city has its origin with the Bank and the embankments and river port development are ADB projects in the pipeline. It would be desirable and efficient if the city could commit to influencing and shaping the design of these two projects towards achieving the adaptation goals using green infrastructure. 75 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 6.2 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT PLAN In Vietnam, the process of urban planning and development is largely top down involving preparation of a blue print or master plan with little consultation outside government. So the steps to mobilise different stakeholders for the two complex adaptation plans set out here are as follows: (i) The interdisciplinary Core Group should be officially established and consult the city and provincial governments on ecologically sustainable development with consideration of climate change. (ii) The Core Group should persuade the provincial and city governments about the need for a new city vision and agree on a project base for urban development commencing with the two demonstration and pilot plans proposed for the case study areas. (iii) The Core Group should then develop a detailed proposal for the two adaptation plans in the form of a consultation paper. During the preparation of the proposal, community inputs should be facilitated to ensure engagement from the outset and realistic plans. (iv) The proposal should be submitted and presented to the Provincial Government to be included in the TOR of the next revision of the Master Plan (2017). (v) If the proposal is considered in the Master Plan some institutions will be charged with developing detailed planning at 1/500 scale for the two sites. Normally, it will be a planning institution, like the Vietnam Institute of Architecture, Urban and Rural Planning, which is responsible for detailed urban planning. However, in this case, the Core Group should involve all important stakeholders in a steering committee for designing and implementing each adaptation plan. The committee should control the process of planning and decide who will be involved including the option of conducting an international competition to ensure the highest quality and most innovative options. (vi) The Core Group should facilitate the development of community agreements, which describe in detail the rights and responsibilities of each community group. In particular, development control and safeguard regulations should first be agreed at the local level, as it will take time to establish them as official regulations. In addition to the public consultation sessions, community groups should be involved in project implementation by contributing labour and fulfilling well defined monitoring and management functions. 7 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE OF ADAPTATION PLANS 7.1 MONITORING ACTIVITIES THAT ARE NEEDED FOR EFFECTIVE ADAPTATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Multi-sectoral monitoring is especially important for these complex adaptation plans because many stakeholders are involved and affected. A steering committee should be responsible for overall monitoring but community groups should be encouraged to become involved. This kind of community engagement is very unusual in Vietnam. If it can be organized in Dong Ha, it will be a pilot concept. The content and timeframe for monitoring and maintenance should be defined in the community group agreements. Some social organisations such as the Women’s Union, Fatherland Font and Red Cross have a network of volunteers and can be involved in monitoring procedures. 76 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam One important point is to organize a process of ongoing cross sectoral inputs to the monitoring and maintenance program during implementation. Currently, multi-sectoral consultation exists only at the concept phase. Once the project is approved one department will be in charge of the project and it is difficult for others to have any ongoing influence and impact on it. Effective adaptation will require continuing multi sector involvement with well defined roles to be reviewed at regular intervals. 7.2 MAINTENANCE MEASURES THAT WILL BE NEEDED FOR EFFECTIVE ADAPTATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION One important advantage of the adaptation plans is that they utilise natural systems and processes, become stronger over time and require less maintenance and upfront costs than hard engineering solutions. Large projects will need to have their own very detailed maintenance program. In addition, simple maintenance measures like waste removal, weed control and awareness-raising on flood and water management and environment quality will be important. Currently such activities are the responsibility of the Department for Urban Environment. Community groups and other government sectors should also become involved. 8 SUPPORTING POLICIES AND PROGRAMS FOR ADAPTATION 8.1 POLICIES AND PLANS The most important policy change is to set out special conditions from the central level for Dong Ha to achieve the goal of becoming a prominent economic corridor green city - this goal is a national one and not determined by the Province. With this as a national policy commitment, Dong Ha will have access more funding support than it could at the city or provincial level. The next important step is to revise the city vision and focus on green infrastructure and ecologically sustainable development. The new vision should then be spelt out in the revised Master Plan. Then the Core Group needs to be formally established to organise multi-sectoral projects for climate change adaptation. The multi-sector Core Group will be a response the existing scattered structure of responsibilities spread over many departments and to integrate sectoral engagement toward a common goal. For effective adaptation, urban planning for Dong Ha needs to shift away from the current rigid blue print master planning process for the entire city to one which provides an overall urban structure plan which incorporates a number of regional and city wide design layers and dimensions, including hydrological conditions, microclimate, water drainage systems, green space systems, street networks, building blocks and parcels, and public support amenities. Then more detailed master plans would pertain to special areas, development zones, waterfront areas, town centre precincts and others. 77 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Dong Ha’s development and specific plans would concentrate on some key projects that help to achieve the structural vision. This change will be very difficult in Vietnam. However due to the general policy of enhancing decentralization, the province and city will increasingly gain more autonomy in the planning process. Dong Ha should take the opportunity to demonstrate and pilot innovative approaches to city planning for climate change resilience. 8.2 REGULATIONS AND SECTOR DESIGN STANDARDS There are existing design standards applied in urban planning, especially in technical fields such as infrastructure. They ensure the minimal security of the assets but do not consider climate change impacts. So the first thing to do is to adjust individual design standards to accommodate climate change projections. Probably more important, there needs to be an overall shift from a focus on hard engineering solutions to incorporating green infrastructure and natural system solutions. Vietnam has too little experience with green solutions to dictate them in revised standards. However the Dong Ha Core Group proposed that all development projects should be required to first consider green infrastructure options before committing to conventional engineering approaches. Every development proposal submitted for government approval should demonstrate that green infrastructure and nature based solutions have been considered and integrated into project design. In addition to updating standards for infrastructure projects, there are many safeguard regulations needed to make sure that the land use plan promotes climate resilient development. For example, regulations are needed for special protection zones, for building density and set-backs, on building and paving materials, on street tree planting, green space to development ratios and for park greening. All changes and additions to regulations are based on the principle that every developed zone should be climate resilient and that all citizens should have sufficient level of security from the impacts of climate change. On that basis, all safeguard regulations and existing zones and development controls should be improved to support the goals climate change resilience and ecological sustainability. 8.3 ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS The use of economic instructions such as fines, tax incentives and subsidies is usual in supporting adaptation measures in a planned economic system like Vietnam. Normally, the city can offer the ground or tax incentive to support private and international investors. Direct subsidies are less common because the city does not have an adequate budget to support them. In general the city and provincial governments are experienced in the use of such economic instruments. Subsidies may increase the risk of corruption and inefficiency and undermine the effectiveness of adaptation projects because their use may be influenced by other than technical considerations. For the foreseeable future it may be better not to use government subsidies for adaptation plans. Performance related tax incentives of various kinds may work better. It will be useful to improve the flow of appropriate investments by market driven financial solutions where feasible. 78 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam In general it will be more realistic if the adaptation projects are broken down into many small steps and subprojects so that the risk and benefits can be shared by a large number of stakeholders. Currently, the government often prefers to give whole projects to one big partner, which is easy for the government to control but is very risky for the realisation of the project. 9 LESSONS LEARNED Over one year, the work by the Dong Ha Core Group on town wide climate change resilience and on the two strategic areas has led to a number of lessons learned which can guide further adaptation planning and implementation in the city: (i) Green infrastructure is a critical component of ecologically sustainable urban development. Green infrastructure is implemented in integrated systems of natural components and manmade components which in ways that mimic nature. They reinforce the link between urban life and the natural environment and normally work with least energy and maintenance for the same result as conventional measures and are most sustainable. Dong Ha is situated in a risky topographical and climatic region. However green infrastructure can help to limited damage from natural disasters and climatic change impacts. (ii) Loss of natural systems has reduced natural resilience: The destruction of Dong Ha’s natural system foundations through urbanisation that replaces natural functioning systems with hard engineering solutions has considerably increased the vulnerability of the city. (iii) Promoting natural systems as the foundation for wise development in Dong Ha: The protection of Dong Ha’s remaining natural systems and their enhancement with green infrastructure should be the as highest priority in the overall city vision. (iv) Reorientation to green infrastructure in donor partners needed: Local government as well as the World Bank and ADB seem to prefer hard engineering solutions because they are standardised and relatively easy to deliver. However, with the serious problems associated with and caused by these hard measures, a shift toward softer and bioengineering solutions is needed. (v) The Group Core as a window to stakeholder participation: The process of planning and management in Vietnam is top down. It is challenging to introduce broader stakeholder or community participation. However the interdisciplinary Core Group can act as a mediator between the decision makers and the community and demonstrate methods for wider community engagement. (vi) A climate change threat and impact data base to support adaptation planning: Climate change is recognised by the Provincial and Dong Ha Governments but there is lack of detailed data on the nature and extent of threats and their impacts. Existing data is mostly based on theoretical modelling and even past extreme events have not been documented or impacts thoroughly assessed. There are annual reports on climatic extreme events but no mapping or formal impact assessment. One important task for the future is to develop an accurate data base and GIS products on specific threats and impacts on different areas of the town. The data base should be detailed and regularly updated. One way of building the data base on past extremes is through community involvement via Red Cross, Women’s Union or as a task of the climate change Core Group. 79 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam (vii) Urban heat and its consequences need further study. They were not covered in this study which focussed mainly on flood protection and drainage. Given the projections for increasing incidence of higher temperatures and severity of drought in Dong Ha, an important task for the future will be to investigate this issue more thoroughly. (viii) Current urban planning in Dong Ha does not consider climate change. Even past extreme events and existing risks are not sufficiently included in the plan. In particular, safeguards and standards are only applied to planning new urban zones. Existing zones and unplanned development are not covered by the same safeguards and standards. It is mostly poor social groups that live in these risky areas. Currently, there is a view within government that development with safeguards is more expensive and therefore it is not feasible in cheaper zones - the priority should be to allow development to precede at lower cost so that the poor can afford land and housing. Yet, the poor and the areas they settle are the most vulnerable with far reaching consequences for the resilience of whole the city. (ix) Poor performance in internationally support infrastructure projects: The box canal case study made it clear that even on higher ground severe local flooding can happen when poorly planned development leads to destruction of natural infrastructure. An internationally financed project does not guarantee the appropriateness and success of the project even though a sophisticated chain of evaluation and approval is in place. A system of credible and thorough post construction monitoring is crucial but is often lacking. That evaluation system should include interdisciplinary cross check procedures and channels for community feedback. (x) Unifying area wide planning: Both Dong Ha case studies show that there is a need for the integration of multiple components into a complex project. Urban development is continuing on an isolated project by project basis without a unifying area specific plan. The usual rigid separation of line agency responsibilities and lack of coordination mechanisms means that each sector plans and develops without contributing to integrated area wide approaches. For example, the management of roads and other infrastructure along roads is broken down into unrelated functions – roads are controlled by the traffic department, while the pedestrian zones, the street trees, the drainage, street lighting and underground electricity and communication lines are all under the control and planning of different departments. There is no overall planning and management, so that these elements often conflict in use of land and their functions. (xi) Line agency influence on planning decisions: Some Core Group members found it difficult to imagine how to change a master plan that had already been agreed at the highest levels; and many assumed that the land-use designations must have considered extreme flooding. This is an institutional barrier to change and reflects the limited real influence line department technical staff have in fundamental planning decisions relating to their town. This obstacle will need to be overcome in the next master planning cycle. (xii) Private sector contributions to building resilience: The requirement that the private sector must ‘give back’ to the public in exchange for being granted a private development approval was a new concept for the Core Group. The important role of the private sector in climate change adaptation stood out as a key gap in the existing planning process and something which would benefit from legislative reform and additional training/capacity building. 80 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam (xiii) Participatory mapping and expert knowledge enabled the Core Group to overcome a lack of data for undertaking vulnerability assessment and developing adaptation plans. The Core Group found that there were no historical flood maps of Dong Ha. The only existing flood maps were at the provincial scale and were based on flood modelling rather than actual records of past extremes. Following an intensive process of participatory mapping, the Core Group produced a Dong Ha flood map defining climate change hot spots and describing the profile of each hot spot. The result was sufficiently accurate and detailed to provide the best available town planning tool on flooding. 81 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam 10 REFERENCES I- GENERAL BASELINE AND PLANNING TO 2020 CPC Dong Ha (2011) General social economic planning of Dong Ha to 2020 – quy hoạch chung kinh tế xã hội Đông Hà tới 2020, Dong Ha PPC (2011) Approvement of the social economic planning of Dong Ha to 2020. Quyết định phê duyệt Quy Hoạch phát triển KT-XH Đông Hà tới năm 2020. Quang Tri PPC (2013), Decision 06/2013 from provincial PPC about developing of Dong Ha to 2nd order city. Nghị quyết 06/2013/NQ-HĐND tỉnh về phát triển Đông Hà đạt đô thị loại II, Quang Tri PPC (2013), Decision about implementing of the decision nr. 06/2013. Quyết định phê duyệt kế hoạch triển khai Nghị quyết 06/2013/NQ-HĐND, Quang tri PPC (2005) Spatial planning of the city Dong Ha to 2020. Quy hoạch chung xây dựng thành phố Đông Hà tới 2020, Quang Tri PPC Website of the city Dong Ha and Province Quang Tri PPC (2011) General spatial planning of the provincial Region Quang Tri. Thuyết minh tổng hợp quy hoạch xây dựng vùng tỉnh Quảng Trị. Quang Tri Publishing house for statistic, Annual statistics of Dong Ha 2000-2008 Niên giám thống kê thị xã đông Hà từ năm 2000-2008, Ha Noi CPC of Dong Ha, (2011) Report on the realization of the social economic planning in the period 20062010 of Dong Ha - Planning orientation for the 5 years period 20 -20 . o c o nh h nh thực hiện ế hoạch inh tế x hội năm 2006-2010 ế hoạch ph t tri n kinh tế xã h i 5 năm 2011-2015 ii- CLIMATE, PAST EVENTS AND CLIMATE CHANGE CPC Dong Ha, (2009-2013) Reports on storms and flooding 2009-2013 and measures of response- Các báo cáo về phfng chống lụt bão 2009-2013 CPC Dong Ha (2013) Climate change scenarios for Dong Ha– Kịch bản biến đổi khí hậu Đông Hà Nguyen Van Hơp et al. (2011) Existing environment condition of the province Quang Tri in the last 5 years - Hiện trạng môi trường tỉnh Quảng Trị năm gần nhất CPC Dong Ha (2012) Report on environment observation year 2011 Báo cáo tổng hợp quan trắc môi trường năm 20 1 82 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam CPC Dong Ha (2013) Report on environment observation year 2012 Báo cáo tổng hợp quan trắc môi trường năm 20 2 University for natural science and consulting firm Duc Viet (2010): eport of the Pro ect aseline assessment and h drologic modeling of Thach Han and en Hai asin. o c o tổng ết dự n Tiến hành hảo s t thực địa và lập mô h nh th lực lưu vực sông Thạch H n và ến hải tỉnh Quảng Trị - Đại h c hoa h c tự nhi n và ct tư vấn tr tuệ Đ c iệt. Ha Noi Tran Ngoc Anh et al. (2010) Evaluation of Erosion in Thach Han river an s. Đ nh gi hiện trạng xói lở bờ sông Thạch Hãn. MONRE (2009) National Target program on climate change –- Chư ng tr nh mục với iến đổi h hậu - ộ tài ngu n và môi trường. Ha Noi u uốc gia ng ph PPC (2013) Decision on developing of an action plan for climate change response of the province Quang tri 2013-2015 - Quyết định về ế hoạch hành động thực hiện chư ng tr nh mục u uốc gia ng ph với iến đổi h hậu tỉnh uảng trị giai đoạn 2013-2015. Quang Tri Nguyễn Tiền Giang, Trần Ng c Anh, Nguyễn Thanh Sơn et.al.(2007). Water Environment pollution caused by raising of sea foods and salination problems in the province Quang Tri and especially Thach Han River – o c o đ nh gi hiện trạng ô nhiễm nguồn nước do nuôi trồng th y sản, vấn đề xâm nhập mặn tại tỉnh Quảng Trị. (Trong đ c t nh h nh nhiễm mặn sông Thạch Hãn) MONRE (2010). Bộ Tài ngu n Môi trường, 2010, Thông báo Quốc gia lần th hai c a Việt Nam cho Công ước khung Liên Hợp Quốc về Biến đổi khí hậu. MONRE (2010). Bộ Tài ngu n và Môi trường, 2009, Kịch bản biến đổi khí hậu, nước biển dâng cho Việt Nam. MONRE (2009). Bộ Tài ngu n và Môi trường, Công văn số 3815/BTNMT- TT Đ H ngà 3/ 0/2009 về hung hướng dẫn xây dựng kế hoạch hành động ng phó với biến đổi khí hậu c a các bộ, ngành, địa phư ng. IMHEN (2011) Viện Khoa h c h tượng Th văn và Môi trường, 2011, Sổ tay biến đổi khí hậu. Ha noi IMHEN (2011) Viện Khoa h c h tượng Th văn và Môi trường, 2010, Các kịch bản nước biển dâng và khả năng giảm thiểu r i ro ở Việt Nam, Báo cáo tổng kết dự án hợp tác với Đan Mạch. Ha Noi IMHEN (2010) Viện Khoa h c Kh tượng Th văn và Môi trường, 20 0, T c động c a biến đổi khí hậu l n tài ngu n nước và các biện pháp thích ng, Báo cáo tổng kết dự án hợp tác với Đan Mạch. Trần Thục, Nguyễn Văn Thắng, Dương Hồng Sơn, Hoàng Đức Cường, (2011), Biến đổi khí hậu và ng phó với biến đổi khí hậu ở Việt Nam - Nghiên c u chi tiết cho tỉnh Thừa Thiên - Huế. UNDP, (2005), Khung chính sách thích ng với biến đổi khí hậu - Xây dựng chiến lược, chính sách và giải pháp. Ha noi 83 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam Nguyễn Văn Thắng và nnk, (2010), Nghiên c u ảnh hưởng c a biến đổi khí hậu đến c c điều kiện tự nhi n, tài ngu n thi n nhi n và đề xuất các giải pháp chiến lược phòng tránh, giảm nhẹ và thích nghi, phục vụ phát triển bền vững kinh tế xã hội ở Việt Nam, Đề tài KC08.13/06-10. Ha Noi Trần Thục, Lê Nguyên Tường, (2008) Những t c động c a biến đổi khí hậu đối với nước ta, Tạp chí Tài ngu n Môi trường, 4/2008. Trần Thục, Lê Nguyên Tường, (2008) Bàn về một số biện pháp mới để thích ng với biến đổi khí hậu, Tạp ch Tài ngu n Môi trường, 2/2008. Trương uang H c, (2007). Nghi n c u những vấn đề inh tế - xã hội – môi trường v ng sinh th i đặc th Quảng nh - Quảng Trị. KC.08.07. Phạm uang Sơn, (2001). Đ nh gi nh h nh iến động l ng dẫn sông Thạch H n ua c c tư liệu viễn th m (giai đoạn 9 2 - 999 . Trung t m iễn th m và eoma c - Viện Địa chất, TT KHTN & CNQG. Hà N i. Nguyễn Thanh, Nguyễn Viễn Th et al., (2002). ề ết uả nghi n c u dự o, ph ng chống sạt lở ờ hệ thống sông miền Trung . ếu Hội nghị hoa h c lần th nhất Đại h c Huế. Nguyễn Viễn Th et al., (2001). Nghi n c u dự o, ph ng chống sạt lở ờ sông hệ thống sông miền Trung (hệ thống sông từ Quảng Trị đến Quảng Ng i . o c o tổng hợp đề tài cấp Nhà nước. Nguyễn H u Thông, Nguyễn u n Hãn et.al, (2001). Nghi n c u, đ nh gi c c sự cố và t c động ềm n c a môi trường tự nhi n hu vực Đông Hà, Quảng Trị, C a iệt. o c o tổng ết đề tài, ưu trữ ở H CN Quảng Trị. Trần Thanh u n, (2002). Đặc điểm th văn tỉnh Quảng Trị. Đề tài nh nh thuộc thề tài X dựng c sở dữ liệu và đ nh gi đặc điểm h tượng th văn phục vụ ph t triển inh tế x hội tỉnh Quảng Trị , ở HCN MT tỉnh Quảng Trị, ND tỉnh Quảng Trị. Trần Văn , (2001.) Dự ưu trữ tại iện Địa l . o ngập lụt tỉnh Quảng Trị và giải ph p ph ng tr nh. o c o tổng ết đề tài. Minístry for Agriculture and rural development (1999) Bộ Nông nghiệp và Ph t triển Nông thôn, 1999. Dự n u hoạch ph ng chống o l và l u t tỉnh u ng Trị PPC, DONRE (2002) ở hoa h c Công nghệ và Môi trường tỉnh Quảng Trị, 2002. Đặc điểm thu văn tỉnh u ng Trị. PPC, DARD, (2006) ở NN PTNT tỉnh Quảng Trị, Chi cục PC sông ở địa àn tỉnh Quảng Trị. Đông Hà. Q ĐĐ, 2006. Tổng hợp sạt lở đất c c 84 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam III- TECHNICAL INFRASTRUCTURES PPC- Projects on attracting of ODA funds for the Period 2010 -2015 of the Province Quang Tri - Đề án thu hút ODA giai đoạn 2010-2015 tỉnh Quảng Trị. Quang Tri PPC Priority list of infrastructures for ODA Projects in the period 2012-2016 - Danh mục dự n ưu ti n vận động ODA tr n địa bàn tỉnh giai đoạn 2012-2016. Quang Tri PPC- List of all existing ODA projects in the City of Dong Ha - Danh mục dự n ODA trên địa bàn thành phố Đông Hà trừ trước đến nay ADB- Reports on ADB Infrastructure Projects 85 ADB & NDF | Volume 6 of the Mekong Resilience Resource Kit | ICEM Building Climate Resilience in Dong Ha, Quang Tri Province, Vietnam APPENDIX 1: DONG HA CORE GROUP MEMBERS Core Group Member Affiliation Nguyễn Thị Thu Deputy Chief of Agriculture Department - Quang Tri People Committee Hoàng Văn Thiền Deputy Chief of Planning and Financial Deparment - Quang Tri Department of Rural and Agriculture Development Hồ Sỹ Hiền Officer of Quang Tri Department of Flood and Storming Prevention Trần Tr ng Cường Deputy Chief of Planning Deparment - Quang Tri Construction Department Nguyễn Đức Phương Officer of Quang Tri Department of Ocean, Island and Hydro-meteorological (Chi Cuc Bien, Hai Dao va Khi tuong Thuy van) Trần Thị Phong Lan Officer of Quang Tri Department of Environment Protection Nguyễn u n Dương Officer of Dong Ha Department of Natural Resources and Environment Trần H u Thành Chief of Dong Ha Urban Management Department (Truong Phong Quan Ly Do Thi - Dong Ha) Trần Quang Khoa Officer of Dong Ha Department of Natural Resources and Environment Lê Thi Quỳnh Sa Officer of Dong Ha People Committee Trần Văn Thanh Officer of Trieu Phong Department of Finance and Planning Khuất Ng c Minh Technical Officer - Quang Tri Transportation Consultancy Company Công ty Tư vấn Giao thông Qu ng Trị Nguyễn Hồng Phong Gio Linh Department of PPMU of Investment and Construction Nguyễn Thanh Đồng Gio Linh Urban Environmental Center (Trung Tam Moi Truong Do Thi) Lê Chí Hồng Deputy Chief of Dong Ha Department of Economics and Infrastructure (Phong Kinh te Ha Tang) Trần uang Tĩnh Officer of Trieu Phong Department of Natural Resources and Environment Nguyễn Thị Thuỳ Nga Deputy Chief of Dong Ha Department of Planning and Finance Trương Văn Hưng Officer of Technical Appraisal Department - Quang Tri Department of Transportation 86