MAN 6-6-12 - Molokai Advertiser-News

The M.A.N. Online: http://www.MolokaiAdvertiserNews.com
HC01 Box 770 K'Kai
email: [email protected]
Molokai, HI 96748
ph. 808-558-8253
Aloha: it's FREE!
Mail To:
Molokai Advertiser-News
Volume 27 Number 23
The Militia of Molokai's Community Newspaper—Every Wednesday
Planet Venus Transits the Sun
June 6, 2012.. ....
Summer Surfers Start Young
Keiki & Kupuna’s Surfing Beach
Location: Waialua, Molokai
Molokai athletic ocean connected families love to surf big waves at Kaluakoi’s
westend beaches, and at east Molokai’s Rock Point. Every summer after school
lets out, families with little keiki flock to many beaches located on the south shore
between Kaunakakai and Rock Point where small waves roll in to shore to introduce their future surfers to the joy of surfing.
In the photo above, the toddler rides the waves with dad as mom tends to next
keiki
surfer nearby. Location: K & K’s [Keiki & Kupuna’s Beach at Waialua ]
Yes, that little black dot located top left side of sun is planet Venus beginning
===========================================================
its transit across the face of the sun. We could see it on Molokai of and on through
the clouds from about 1pm to 5 pm yesterday.
Hawaii is one of the best spots to see the transit of Venus.
It is a rare planetary phenomenon where those on Earth can view the planet
Venus appear to trek across the face of the sun. Venus, which is extremely hot,
is one of Earth's two planet neighbors and is so close in size to our planet that scientists call them near-twins. During the transit, it appeared as a small dot.
Mike Shanahan from the Bishop Museum explained, "Although Venus goes
The Principal’s Honors List are students who have earned Mark Point Averages
between the earth and the sun more than once a year, it’s usually right above the of 4.000* or above while enrolled in six or more courses, four or more of which
sun or right below the sun. So only roughly every century or so is Venus in the are solid courses. For the fourth quarter of the 2011-12 school year, they are:
right position to be seen crossing the sun’s disk."
GRADE 9:
Historical Significance
Edel Mae Alvarez, Tiera-Lee Bishaw Marquez, Alexandra Gilliland, Olelo
In Hawai‘i, this event has a special historical significance, for it echoes a tranK.P.A
Hamakua Poepoe, Sarah Jenkins, Katalina Santiago, Trevor Takata, Kristin
sit of Venus that occurred during the reign of King David Kalakaua. On December
8, 1874, a British expedition made the first scientific astronomical observations in Tancayo.
Hawaii by observing the transit from a site near the corner of Punchbowl and
GRADE 10:
Queen Streets in Honolulu, as well as from locations in Waimea on Kauai and
Kailua-Kona on Hawaii. They observed the transit to gather data that would be used
Karley Kaulili, Laureano Torres Batara.
to determine the precise distance between Earth and the sun, and thereby, to measure the size of the solar system.
GRADE11:
In India, astrology myths based on astronomic observations like this Venus
Michael Kikukawa, Cara Connolly, Esther Lopez, Francis Ventura.
transit and other planet and stars, is so popular it influences decisions from when
to get married to who should run for office. Hundreds of enthusiasts gathered at
GRADE 12:
New Delhi's planetarium to see Venus cut a path across the Sun.
Charisse Manley, Chelsea Simon, Natalia Levi, Marsha Ah Yee, Moriah
India's Astronomical Observatory in the Himalayan region of Ladakh is the
Jenkins,
Tiffany Tanielu.
world's highest observatory, at 14,800 feet (4,511 meters).
Everybody was looking, then the clouds covered it up.....aaaaah !
*Note: Mark Point Averages reflect inclusion of online course marks.
MOLOKAI HIGH SCHOOL
Principal’s Honors List
Molokai High School Honor Roll
The Honor Roll students who earned Mark Point Averages of 3.500 to 4.000*
for the fourth quarter of the 2011-12 school year are:
GRADE 9:
Kelsie Espiritu-Tanabe, Michaiah Soares, Makana Arce, John Pol Espejo,
Eliana Kalilikane Garces, Tanner Mosher, Kiana Simmons, Desiree Corpuz.
GRADE 10:
Xrystina Bicoy, Monaliza Espejo, Kilo Au Lani Kaawa-Gonzales, Paul Parker,
Taylor Tamanaha, Lucy Wilhelm, Brayden Willing-McCutcheon.
GRADE11:
Ronalyn May Carino, Lesley Escobar, Hokualaka'i Blevins, Faron Kamakana,
Michael Onofrio, Brittanie-Rae Nerveza, Hauoli Falealii, Rachel Steffen.
GRADE 12:
Petrisha Alvarez, Dallin Tancayo, Kailen Inouye, Kate Sandy Espejo, Mikayla
Pico, Kayla Matson.
*Note: Mark Point Averages reflect inclusion of online course marks.
The M.A.N. June 6, 2012...Page 2
Obama Supports Property Tax
Exemptions Only For Hawaiians
Obama, like Linda Lingle, is supporting race based tax exemptions on land in
Hawaii. He has filed his opposition brief in Corboy v. Louie, No. 11-336, asking the U.S. Supreme Court of Appeals to refuse to review the Hawaii Supreme
Court's dismissal of a challenge to the property tax exemptions conferred on lessees
of DHHL by former governor Linda Lingle.
The appeal petition draws into question the constitutionality of a part of the
Hawaii Admission Act. The Appellants’ petition argues that the RPTax refund
claimants have standing, and that the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution
for the United States of America, the supreme Law of the Land, prohibits state and
local tax exemptions that are "available only to members of a certain race." The
appeal petition draws into question the constitutionality of a part of the Hawaii
Admission Act.
Race-based Hawaii State laws says that only "native Hawaiians" are eligible to
lease homestead land, and thus only those possessing the appropriate blood quantum are entitled to the tax exemptions. The petitioners are not "native Hawaiians",
and paid their property taxes under protest, then sought refunds in the Hawaii Tax
Appeals Court and argued that they should also be exempt. Inexplicably, the
Hawaii judges concluded that "native Hawaiian" was not a racial classification and
did not review the tax exemption with strict scrutiny as they should have.
The Hawaii Supreme Court vacated the Tax Court decision and dismissed for
lack of jurisdiction, holding the bogus view that petitioners lacked standing to challenge the exemption since they had not sought DHHL homestead leases even
though they are not native Hawaiians; and, that in order to bring a lawsuit challenging their ineligibility for tax exemption, they needed to have applied for a lease
and been denied.
The Obama brief strongly supported the State in arguing that the standing
questions are matters purely of Hawaii law, and the Hawaii Supreme Court's dismissal is grounded in "independent and adequate" state law, meaning that it is
immune from Supreme Court review. Furthermore, Obama supports Hawaii's
recent legislation instituting a "process for the indigenous native people of Hawaii
to reorganize as a sovereign government", i.e., the Akaka Bill with Lingle.
Romney is GREAT ?
With a win in the Texas Republican primary election Tuesday, Mitt Romney
might have clinched a spot in the November championship round, unless Ron
Paul’s delegates oust Romney at the RNC convention. Romney needs friends now.
Guess who are his new friends? Romney's recent opponents now gathering around
to tell us how wonderful a leader he will be.
Have voters forgotten that Newt Gingrich's labeled Romney "Obama light",
and a "liar," and a "fundamentally dishonest" tool of Wall Street? But now Gingrich
reports that Romney is "a lot like Eisenhower," and "a solid conservative."
Santorum criticized Romney, too. But now its "Governor Romney is the candidate who will stand up for the conservative principles that we hold dear" ?
They told us he was a candidate most foul only weeks ago, why we should rely
on their fawning enthusiasm for Romney today?
It does no good to tell me "that's just politics." It's all intellectually fraudulent and morally loathsome. We should be looking for integrity and principals.
But, that's how it's done, its “just politics." And so it is.
They are just Etch-A-Sketch men who consider Voters stupid.
I am voting for Ron Paul, the only honest candidate for President.
Tree Trimming-recyclechips eastend
call 558 8253 for appointment/ estimate.
The Moloka'i Advertiser-News
S us an
G eo rg e
G & S Enterprises.....Publisher............George Peabody....Editor
email to [email protected]
Patriot-guerrilla journalism
web page: http://www.MolokaiAdvertiserNews.com
Phone: 558-8253.....Call The M.A.N. online
Published Every Wednesday Made on Molokai for theWorld
Subscriptions....FREE Online MolokaiAdvertiserNews.com
Published Weekly. Founded in 1984...Contents © 2012 All Rights Reserved
Akaka Bill SCAM: CATO
Pushes Back on Akaka Bill
by Ilya Shapiro, CATO Institute
The Akaka Bill, which I’ve covered extensively, would create a race-based governing entity that would negotiate with the federal and state governments over all
sorts of issues—effectively carving out an unconstitutional system of racial spoils.
Rep. Cole, as quoted in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser:
“Hawaii has told us again and again, on a bipartisan basis, this is what we
want to do,” Cole said. “I’d have to tell you, I think it’s incredibly arrogant,
whether it’s a Republican or a Democrat that opposes tribal sovereignty — in this
case sovereignty for Native Hawaiians—when the people of Hawaii have told us
we’d like it. Who are we to impose our opinions?”
Cole’s attack is not only a calumny on those who oppose the Akaka Bill in
good faith—including all but six of his House Republicans who voted against it
in 2010 after years of deliberation, public vetting, and a 2006 Department of Justice
conclusion that the bill was unwise as a policy matter and presented serious constitutional difficulties—but itself displays a dangerous misunderstanding of the
issues involved.
It’s easy to think of the Akaka Bill as being “merely” another request for selfgovernance by native peoples as was extended to Aleuts upon Alaskan statehood,
but that’s simply not what’s going on in Hawaii. Hawaiians, “Native” and otherwise, have a different history and political sociology from the tribes that are accommodated in our (dubious and counterproductive) Indian law, which itself is a unique
compromise with pre-constitutional reality. Congress can’t simply define
Hawaiians as an “Indian tribe” because that term has a fixed meaning, limited to
preexisting North American tribes that were “dependent nations” at the time of the
Founding. Such tribes, to benefit from the protections of Indian law, must have an
independent existence and “community” apart from the rest of American society,
and their separate government structure must have a continuous history for at least
the past century. By these standards, Hawaiians don’t qualify as a tribe.
Moreover, it’s false to say that Hawaiians support the Akaka Bill or
ethnic/racial preferences more broadly. There has never been a public referendum—
Akaka Bill supporters resist such a move—but a November 2009 Zogby poll
revealed that 51% of Hawaiians oppose the bill, 60% opposed if you remove the
undecideds. In addition, 76% would oppose tax increases to pay for the Akaka
nation-tribe (which would be inevitable), only 7% favor separate laws and regulations for a new native government, and only 28% say the bill is fair with respect
to racial discrimination. Perhaps most importantly, 58% would want a chance to
vote before the Akaka Bill could become law, with only 28% saying that would be
unnecessary.
Finally, and quite apart from the policy and political considerations, the Akaka
Bill has serious constitutional defects. As mentioned above, the Constitution’s
anamolous Indian law exception was created by the document itself and Congress
still retains a great amount of oversight. Once the Constitution was ratified, no
government organized under it could create another government that can exempt
itself from the Bill of Rights. Even setting these structural issues aside, the Akaka
Bill is facially disallowed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments’ explicit proscription against any state action that treats people differently based on their race
or ethnicity. The Supreme Court has found Native Hawaiians to be an ethnic group,
so Congress cannot pass a law giving them rights denied other Americans.
I respect Rep. Cole’s right to hold a different view of the Akaka Bill’s merits
than mine, in which case he could have said something like, “Some folks have
principled objections to this. I think they’re wrong. I think they misread the
Constitution and don’t appreciate Hawaii’s unique history. We need to show them
why they should come over to our side, and Linda Lingle can help me do that.”
Instead, he accuses us critics of arrogance, ignorance, and willfully thwarting
Hawaiians’ dreams of self-determination.
With all due respect, Rep. Cole (and Gov. Lingle to the extent she associates
herself with his remarks), if you want to pass the Akaka Bill, you need to do a better job of answering some very valid concerns rather than engaging in base demagoguery. And these concerns aren’t limited to parochial issues relevant only to
Hawaiians. So long as Hawaii remains part of the United States, all Americans
have a stake in the future of the state and how it treats its citizens. We all must
fight for our rights against Constitution violating crooked politicians.
The M.A.N. June 6, 2012...Page 3
Obama Ex.Order Anti-gun
Rights in USA, to be enforced
by foreign troops!
Barack Hussein Obama has signed YET ANOTHER Executive Order... declar-
Molokai's Forum For Freedom
Individual’s Sovereignty vs Slavery
by George Peabody ph. 558-8253 email:
"We have staked the whole of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern
ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves ing INTERNATIONAL LAW for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA!
"On May 1, 2012, our Glorious Leader, Premier Barack Obama AKA Barry
according to the Ten Commandments of God."—
Bill of Rights 2nd Amendment:
“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and
bear arms shall not be infringed.”
Wake up militia! Use it , or lose it ! Got your gun, yet?
"...with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, or fortunes and our sacred honor."
(Unanimous Declaration.of Independence)
If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, and, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds
against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse
case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than live as slaves.
“The people cannot delegate to government the power to do anything which
would be unlawful for them to do themselves.”- John Locke
"Those who make peaceful change impossible,
make violent change inevitable." -- Robert F. Kennedy
"Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God." T.J.
Enforce the Bill of Rights !
————————————
"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have
been like if every Security operative [insert your favorite alphabet Gang DEA,
BATFE, H.S., TSA, FBI, IRS, NSA, CIA, LEOs etc. here], when he went out
at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and
had to say goodbye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for
example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people hadnot simply sat there in their lairs, paling in terror at every bang of the downstairs
door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left
to lose [neither do you now] and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an
ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was
at hand. The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and
transports and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst; the cursed machine would
have ground to a halt!" -- The Gulag Archipelago, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Soetoro AKA Barry the Rat, signed yet another Executive Order - Promoting
International Regulatory Cooperation. This dictate is designed to standardize regulations between the United States and its so-called trading partners.
What is a regulation? A law. So what is actually being attempted here is a
standardization of international law. It is an absolute violation of the Constitution
for the United States to legislate our law outside of our borders."
And what exactly can this latest unconstitutional Executive Order lead to? As
Shivley states, "Considering the many international security agreements the traitors occupying our highest seats of power have entered into, this latest executive
order can absolutely be used to institute gun confiscation laws/regulations, without any consent by our Congress or our Judicial. And once these foreign laws are
brought to the United States under the various security agreements, foreign troops
will be brought in to enforce the foreign laws upon the people of the United
States." And, it gets WORSE !
Barack Hussein Obama has signed a Presidential Executive Order, which
would give him the powers of a DICTATOR -- whenever HE thinks it's "necessary" to institute MARTIAL LAW! And, leaves the door open for Obama to give
himself control over all resources during both times of peace, and national crisis.
It is a sweeping power grab that should worry every American.
And you do not have a gun, yet? Get one NOW !
Obama’s "National Defense Resources Preparedness" order is stunning in its
audacity and a flagrant violation of the Constitution. It states that, in case of a
war or national emergency, Obama has the authority to take over almost every
aspect of American society. Food, livestock, farming equipment, personal fire
arms and ammo, manufacturing, industry, energy, transportation, hospitals, health
care facilities, water resources, defense and construction -- all of it could fall under
the full control of Mr. Obama. The order empowers Obama or any President to
dispense these vast resources as he sees fit during a War with Iran or emergency.
But why this -- and why now? Obama is provoking a confrontation with
IRAN, which could give him the excuse to implement martial law in America:
"If that should happen, Iranian President Ahmadinejad has promised massive
retaliation. American troops will be targeted in Iraq and Afghanistan. American
embassies will be struck across the Middle East. Iranian-backed Hezbollah cells
could launch devastating terrorist attacks in major U.S. cities, killing numerous
citizens. The war may well come home, triggering domestic chaos.
Got your guns yet? Vote Ron Paul for President at GOP Convention!
"Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God." T.J.
Guns Preserve YOUR Sovereignty !
Gun Rights Refresher
1. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.
2. A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone.
3. If guns cause crime, then pencils cause misspelled words.
4. "Free" men do not ask permission to bear arms.
5. If you don't know your rights you don't have any.
6. Those who trade liberty for security have neither.
7. What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?
8. The Second Amendment is to enforce the other 9 Amendments.
9. 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.
10. Guns only have two enemies; rust and politicians.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
Know guns, know peace, know safety.
No guns, no peace, no safety.
You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.
911 - government sponsored Dial-a-Prayer.
Assault is a behavior, not a gun device.
Criminals love gun control -- it makes their jobs safer.
If guns cause crime, then matches cause arson.
Only a government that is afraid of citizens prohibits guns.
You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.
Remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves.
The American Revolution was about gun control.
Crimes of Politicians Must Be Stopped by The People (You are The Militia)
The crime on our streets is a tiny fraction of the crime in the offices of our politicians and bureaucrats - the massive majority of crime is committeed by the criminal classes in power. Just look at the constant abuse of power in our State government offices and you will realize the extent of crime in Government. Just consider just how many BILLIONS of dollars a day Government extorts from the people and how little WE get in return; and just how comfortable the politicians make themselves at the expense of the
peoples they extort!
The goal of the founders of America was to restrict government within severe limits and to protect the rights of soverign individuals. Government has NO rights!
Judges are impeachable. Furthermore, judges may be removed immediately for violating oaths of office, involvement in conspiracies, extortion, and failing to uphold their
duty to the common law. Judges can also be arrested, they are not exempt from this nor are any other officials, including the President of the United States.
Do the people have the power to do this? Yes, the people have the power to do everything to defend our country against all enemies foreign or domestic politician, and
government has no power to say otherwise. Fascist bureaucrats might send out its armed marauders, but a huge group of The People (Militia) armed with guns as guaranteed
their Right to keep and bear arms by the 2nd Amendment is likely to stop them unless the governments decide that it is time to begin mass killings of all people who believe
in the rights of Man. Wake up ! Enforce the Bi l l of Ri ghts !
S
A
F
E
T
Y
!
Private
Lessons;
Livefire
Practice
Call 558-8253
Bill of Rights
2nd Amendment:
“A well regulated
Militia, being necessary to the security
of a free State, the
right of the people
to keep and bear
arms, shall not be
infringed.”
Use it or lose it !
F
R
E
E
D
O
M
The M.A.N. June 6, 2012...Page 4
Ron Paul for President Event
Blocked by GOP !!
Ron Paul has stopped actively campaigning in primary states that have not
yet voted, but his Revolution collecting delegates to vote for him in the big GOP
convention where the Official choice for Presidential Nominee is made shows no
sign of slowing down. Ron Paul may indeed win the GOP Nomination.
But the GOP elite are obstructing Ron Paul/s progress.
Just a few days after the media erroneously reported that Ron Paul had dropped
out of the presidential race, he won 80% of the delegates going to the Republican
National Convention (RNC) from Minnesota. Romney got only 20%.
Ron Paul supporters are now organizing a massive event on the eve of the
RNC to celebrate their ideas and Paul’s 77th birthday. Not just a political rally,
Paul Festival will be three days of music, entertainment and activism featuring
nationally-known musicians, comedians and other entertainers.
It will also feature plenty of the ideas shared by those who make up what
Paul’s supporters call “the liberty movement.”
Reminiscent of Paul’s Rally for the Republic during the RNC in 2008, the
event may have the Republican Party concerned about being upstaged again. The
2008 event sold out the Target Center in Minneapolis.
This time, Paul’s supporters are attempting to secure the Florida State
Fairgrounds, where they expect an estimated 40,000 people per day to attend. The
Republican Party is trying to block them.
The RNC has first dibs on virtually every venue in Tampa during the week
of the convention. Liberty Unleashed, the nonprofit group incorporated in Florida
by Paul supporters, can only sign a contract for the fairgrounds with the agreement of the RNC Committee on Arrangements (COA).
It was reported locally in Tampa on May 23rd that both Paul Festival organizer Deborah Robinet and fairgrounds director of sales and marketing Terry Parnell
expected to sign a contract that week. However, Robinet told supporters in an email last night that the RNC “had blocked our attempt.”
According to the e-mail, Liberty Unleashed was told that the RNC has “other
requests for the fairgrounds that we need to evaluate’ and ‘no, this isn't first-comefirst-served. Your event is not approved and it may take two more weeks."
The Republican Party’s apprehension over such an event is understandable.
The RNC is supposed to be a three-day infomercial for the party that unites
Republicans around their nominee for president. Yet, despite the media narrative
that Mitt Romney secured the nomination after his Texas primary win, NPR
reports that he still doesn’t have enough delegates bound to vote for him on the
Tree Trimming-recyclechips eastend
call 558 8253 for appointment/ estimate
l Da Kine Ads l
SERVICES OFFERED
Architectural Drafting Office
Ph. 553-9045
email: [email protected]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LICENSED ARCHITECT
Rich Young - Custom homes
Portfolio available online at
www.richyoungarchitect.com
553-5992 [email protected]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2012 ELECTION IS
APPROACHING
You can now purchase your
Presi denti al T-shi rt onl i ne.
Vi si t www. votenow2012. org
Free S hi ppi ng. Al l ow 7-14 days
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
House for Rent
2-bdrm house, newl y renovated, fully furnished. Carport, storage,
laundry $1250/mo. min. 6 mos.
Lease. Non-smokers only. No pets.
Last house Seaside Place
Koheo Wetland
[email protected] or
phone 1-808-553-5992.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
COLORADO 5 acres, $7, 500!
$100 down, $100 monthl y. Hi gh
mountai n val l ey, l evel l and near
mountai ns, ri vers and streams.
S urveyed, good road access.
Owner anyti me 806-376-8690.
Di ane. steed@att. net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pono Tree Triming /remove
and chips: ph 558 8253
Every
Wednesday
Your Company is in good company with The M.A.N.
first ballot at the convention.
Worse for Romney, there are an undetermined number of delegates that are
bound to him that are actually Paul supporters – and who will abandon him and
vote for Ron Paul if Romney failed to get 1,144 votes on the first ballot.
None of this is in the RNC script. Neither is a massive rally for the antiestablishment candidate going on at the same time. The party can’t even appeal to
Paul to call it off. While Paul’s campaign organized the Rally in 2008 in an act
of defiance against a party that had snubbed Paul and his supporters, neither he nor
the campaign have anything to do with this one.
“Paul Festival is different,” says Robinet. “It is being organized by the grassroots with no help from the campaign. As unpaid volunteers, we are solely
responsible for raising the money to make this happen.”
"Our goal is to honor the man, whom we feel is the Founding Father of our
movement, his message, and all that his message encompasses. Dr. Paul's 77th
birthday is August 20th, just 4 days before the festival. We intend to have a birthday celebration the likes of which he's never seen. People from all over the political spectrum will be there because he unites us all in his message of freedom for
everyone.”
This is the kind of enthusiasm that the party’s nominee is supposed to generate, but it’s non-existent for Romney. Despite his primary successes, he’s hasn’t even been able to get his delegates seated in many states where he won the primary by a wide margin. It’s no secret that there is a strong anti-Romney undercurrent among traditional conservatives.
Certainly, no one will be organizing a “Romney Festival” anytime soon.
This puts the party in a difficult position. If they strong arm the Paul supporters by blocking their event, they risk losing their votes. If they acquiesce to
allowing the event, their spin doctors will have to work to keep the Romney RNC
from looking frivilous following a festival for Ron Paul ten times as large.
=====================================================
Was Momi Kong
Victim of an illegal
Bailbond Scam?
Momi Kong was put in jail April
14, 2012 for alleged Contempt of Court
failure to Appear to a hearing she was
not served notice to attend in April 2010.
No writ of HABEAS CORPUS, a
legal action against unlawful detainment
that commands the court to order the person released if the reason for detention is
deemed insufficient or unjustifiable, was
advised to her by police, and none filed.
Are Molokai District Court clerks
and Judge Rhonda Lai-Loo et al attempting to collect a debt NOT owed, 2-years after the judge issued an Arrest Warrant
charging Contempt? [That would be criminal racketeering by court officers!]
Compounding these injustices, Momi was held in the Molokai jail until she
was led by police to hire the services of All Maui Bail Bonds to buy her release
upon payment of $500 bail extortion demanded by MPD police who arrested her.
By law, bailbonds are allowed to charge up to 15% of the $500 bail demanded by police: maxim $75. But Momi was charged $225 by All Maui Bail Bonds.
No one told Momi that Hawaii statutes: §804-11.5 Cash, credit and debit card
authorization... for bail. (a) Any person who is permitted to give bail in accordance with section 804-7.4 may secure the bail bond by a deposit, with the clerk
of the appropriate court...Momi could have bailed herself if advised.
Was Bail Bond service law violated? §804-62 Limit of compensation; penalty. (a) The amount of compensation which may be collected on any bail bond or
bond to keep the peace by one or more persons acting as sureties thereon shall not
exceed a one time only fee from five to fifteen per cent of the amount thereof, but
need not be less than $50 in any event... (c) Every person holding a license to
act as surety on any bail bond or bond to keep the peace who violates this section
shall be fined not more than $250 and shall forfeit the license and shall not be entitled to receive a similar license for a period of one year thereafter.
Looks like criminal racketeering by court officers and police and bail bond
service provider, to me. What do you think? Momi wants justice done.
The M.A.N. June 6, 2012...Page 5
Obama’s Secret Kill List
by Andrew Napolitano
The leader of the government regularly sits down with his senior generals and
spies and advisers and reviews a list of the people they want him to authorize their
agents to kill. They do this every Tuesday morning when the leader is in town.
The leader once condemned any practice even close to this, but now relishes the
killing because he has convinced himself that it is a sane and sterile way to keep
his country safe and himself in power. The leader, who is running for re-election,
even invited his campaign manager to join the group that decides whom to kill.
This is not from a work of fiction, and it is not describing a series of events
in the Kremlin or Beijing or Pyongyang. It is a fair summary of a 6,000-word
investigative report in The New York Times earlier this week about the White
House of Barack Obama. Two Times journalists, Jo Becker and Scott Shane,
painstakingly and chillingly reported that the former lecturer in constitutional law
and liberal senator who railed against torture and Gitmo now weekly reviews a
secret kill list, personally decides who should be killed and then dispatches killers
all over the world – and some of his killers have killed Americans.
We have known for some time that President Obama is waging a private war.
By that I mean he is using the CIA on his own – and not the military after congressional authorization – to fire drones at thousands of persons in foreign lands,
usually while they are riding in a car or a truck. He has done this both with the
consent and over the objection of the governments of the countries in which he
has killed. He doesn’t want to talk about this, but he doesn’t deny it. How chilling is it that David Axelrod – the president’s campaign manager – has periodically seen the secret kill list? Might this be to keep the killings politically correct?
Can the president legally do this? In a word: No.
The president cannot lawfully order the killing of anyone, except according to
the Constitution and federal law. Under the Constitution, he can only order killing
using the military when the U.S. has been attacked, or when an attack is so imminent and certain that delay would cost innocent American lives, or in pursuit of a
congressional declaration of war. Under federal law, he can only order killing using
civilians when a person has been sentenced lawfully to death by a federal court and
the jury verdict and the death sentence have been upheld on appeal. If he uses the
military to kill, federal law requires public reports of its use to Congress and congressional approval after 180 days.
The U.S. has not declared war since World War II. If the president knows that
an attack on our shores is imminent, he’d be hard-pressed to argue convincingly
that a guy in a truck in a desert 10,000 miles from here – no matter his intentions
– poses a threat to the U.S. so imminent and certain that he needs to be killed on
the spot in order to save the lives of Americans who would surely die during the
time it would take to declare war on the country that harbors him, or during the
time it would take to arrest him. Under no circumstances may he use civilian
agents for non-judicial killing. Surely, CIA agents can use deadly force to protect
themselves, but they may not use it offensively. Federal laws against murder apply
to the president and to all federal agents and personnel, wherever they go on the
planet.
Since 9/11, the United States government has set up national security systems that function not under the Constitution, not under the Geneva Conventions,
not under the rule of law, not under the rules of war, not under federal law, but
under a new secret system crafted by the Bush administration and personally directed by Obama, the same Obama who condemned these rules as senator and then
extended them as president. In the name of fighting demons in pick-up trucks and
wars that Congress has never declared, the government shreds our rights, taps our
cellphones, reads our emails, kills innocents abroad, strip searches 87-year-old
grandmothers in wheelchairs and 3-year-old babies in their mothers’ arms, and
offers secrecy when the law requires accountability.
Obama has argued that his careful consideration of each person he orders killed
and the narrow use of deadly force are an adequate and constitutional substitute for
due process. The Constitution provides for no such thing. He has also argued that
the use of drones to do his killing is humane since they are “surgical” and only
kill their targets. We know that is incorrect. And he has argued that these killings
are consistent with our values. What is he talking about? The essence of our values is the rule of law, not the rule of dictator tyrants. OMG: Obama must go!
AGENDA 21 AND The U.N. World
Agenda 21 in the United States today. Using radical environmentalism, a
complicit leftist media, and Marxist principles, the UN has been able to get a
foothold in the United States and is in a cultural battle for your rights, liberty and
property!!
Agenda 21 is an initiative created by the United Nations (UN) in 1992 and
brought to the United States by way of President Clinton’s Executive Order
#12858. Neither the American people nor Congress has EVER voted on this resolution, yet it continually finds its way into Federal, state and local government
programs. Agenda 21 is the enemy of private property, capitalism and individual
choice; according to Agenda 21 supporters, ENVIRONMENTAL concerns trump
your constitutional freedoms and our nation’s sovereignty!!
We must PROTECT our national SOVEREIGNTY and DEMAND that
Agenda 21, and any other UN initiative, br reject, or be ratified by CONGRESS
prior to implementation in the UNITED STATES!!
The UN attempts to sell Agenda 21 as a resolution that simply seeks to promote “sustainable development” throughout the world using environmental policy rules on the international, national, state, and local levels. The text of the UN
resolution states:“Human beings are at the center of concerns for sustainable development. They are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature.”
Sounds great, doesn’t it? It almost makes you want to hold hands with the
rest of the world and sing “Kum bay ya”. The phrase “sustainable development”
sounds innocuous enough and might even be beneficial. Don’t be fooled.
“Sustainable development” is simply a code phrase for “top down governance of
resources” which is just another way of defining COMMUNISM.
As you can see, the UN’s stated goal is simply the cover story for a scheme
that envisions the UN governance of sovereign nations, the destruction of capitalism and the complete evisceration of private property; all without a single citizen casting a single vote!
Agenda 21 is the brainchild of radical environmental and socialist movements
and is the enemy of private property and capitalism. In 1976, the UN laid out its
view on private property by stating: “Land…cannot be treated as an ordinary
asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of
the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation
and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if
unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation
of development schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions
for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a
whole. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable….”
Agenda 21 furthered this communist approach to land ownership with this
statement: “Land is normally defined as a physical entity in terms of its topography and spatial nature; a broader integrative view also includes natural resources:
the solid, minerals, water and biota that the land comprises. Expanding human
requirements and economic activities are placing ever increasing pressures on land
resources, creating competition and conflicts and resulting in suboptimal use of
both land and land resources. It is now essential to resolve these conflicts and
move towards more effective and efficient use of land and its natural resources…”
To be certain, Agenda 21 uses environmental scare tactics to destroy the idea
of private land ownership. Indeed, for their plan to work the UN must convince
American citizens that environmental concerns are so acute that the age old principles of land ownership must be thrown out to preserve the planet. Once they
have taken our land, do you think we will ever get it back?
You can quickly see how democracy and capitalism in the United States is a
major stumbling block for the UN in accomplishing its goal. The GOAL is very
clear: top down governance of the world by the UN using environmental issues as
the excuse to exercise power. Don’t believe me? Here is a quote from UN
Commission on Global Governance:
“The concept of national sovereignty has been immutable, indeed a sacred
principle of international relations. It is a principle which will yield only slowly
and reluctantly to the new imperatives of global environmental
cooperation….Regionalism must precede globalism. We foresee a seamless system of governance from local communities, individual states, regional unions and
up through to the United Nations itself….”
Thanks to Bill Clinton and his constitutionally-questionable executive order,
the UN has already infiltrated the United States! The UN’s International Council
of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) claims that Agenda 21 has already been
implemented by 600 local governments in 49 states including Hawaii!! Have you
identified the pungent politicians of Hawaii who sold out your freedom yet?
The UN must be stopped!! The United States is one of the few
countries in the world that can still stand up to the UN; but what will
happen once we give away our sovereignty? How long before they
take your land, your money, or your home? How long before
unelected, foreign UN “Peacekeepers” have more control over our
country than we do? How long until Agenda 21 sweeps democracy
and capitalism into the dustbin of history?
We MUST stop the United Nations IMMEDIATELY!!
Obama-light
Freedom Liberty
The M.A.N. June 6, 2012...Page 6
Obama Admits: Born in Kenya; Not
Eligible to be President
PETITION DEMANDING THAT CONGRESS OPEN AN INDEPENDENT
Whereas, , lead investigator Mike Zullo also said his team believes the
PETITION FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF BARACK OBAMA’S CONSTITUTIONAL ELIGIBILITY TO
SERVE AS PRESIDENT, IN LIGHT OF THE FIRST OFFICIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT PROBE INTO
THE MATTER DISCOVERING “PROBABLE CAUSE” THAT BOTH OBAMA’S BIRTH CERTIFICATE
AND SELECTIVE SERVICE REGISTRATION FORM ARE FORGERIES.
To All members of the U.S. Congress:
Whereas, the first official U.S. law enforcement investigation into Barack
Obama’s legal eligibility for the presidency, led by Maricopa County, Ariz.,
Sheriff Joe Arpaio and involving a six-month investigation by three professional criminal investigators and two attorneys, established “probable cause” that the
document released with great fanfare by the White House April 27, 2011, as
Obama’s “long-form birth certificate” is a forgery;
Whereas, specifically, these investigators, after interviewing dozens of witnesses, examining hundreds of documents, and taking numerous sworn statements from witnesses around the world, including multiple document experts,
concluded that said “birth certificate” did not originate in a paper format, but was
created – that is, forged – as an electronic file on a computer;
Whereas, the Arpaio-led law-enforcement investigation cited numerous
experts demonstrating that an additional fraud was allegedly committed in the
forgery of Barack Obama’s Selective Service registration card;
Whereas, the investigation also found that, according to a sworn affidavit
by the longtime mailman for the parents of ex-Weather Underground terrorist
Bill Ayers, Ayers’ mother enthusiastically claimed she had helped pay for the
Harvard Law School education of “foreign student” Barack Obama;
Whereas, Arpaio’s lead investigator Michael Zullo explained at a March 1
press conference that the 1961 Hawaiian newspaper “announcements” of Barack
Obama’s birth confirm nothing, since the investigators “can prove beyond a
doubt” that these newspapers also announced arrivals of foreign babies as well
as native-born; and that the investigators even possess “documented evidence of
two adopted individuals who were breathing three years prior” to their supposed
Hawaii “birth” and subsequent newspaper “birth announcements”;
Whereas, the investigation determined that immigration files in the
National Archives recording overseas arrivals into Hawaii are missing from one
particular week – the week of Obama’s birthday, August 4, 1961;
Hawaii Department of Health has engaged in a systematic effort to hide from
public inspection any original 1961 birth records for Obama it may have in its
possession;
Whereas, investigators have advised Sheriff Arpaio they believe at least two
crimes of fraud were committed: 1) The White House allegedly created a forgery
it claimed was an officially produced governmental birth record; and 2) the
White House allegedly presented to the residents of Maricopa County, Ariz. –
and to the entire American public – a forgery represented as “proof positive” of
President Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaii long-form birth certificate;
Whereas, Sheriff Arpaio said March 1: “The president can put all this to
rest quite easily. All he has to do is demand the Hawaii Department of Health
release to the American public and to a panel of certified court-authorized forensic examiners all original 1961 paper, microfilm and computer birth records the
Hawaii Department of Health has in its possession”;
Whereas, Sheriff Arpaio concluded: “Absent the authentication of Hawaii
Department of Health 1961 birth records for Barack Obama, there is no other
proof he was born anywhere within the United States”;
Whereas, despite a virtual media blackout on the issue, repeated national
polls show that almost half of registered U.S. voters remain unconvinced that
Barack Obama’s birth certificate is authentic:
We, the undersigned, demand that the 112th Congress immediately undertake a full and impartial investigation into the constitutional eligibility of
Barack Hussein Obama to serve as president of the United States. Despite the
fact that anyone expressing concern over this issue is ridiculed as a “conspiracist” and even a “racist” by the major news media, every scientific survey
shows that around half of American voters simply do not believe Barack Obama
is telling the truth about his past – and specifically they remain unconvinced he
is even legally qualified to occupy the presidency. Not to finally resolve this
monumental and unprecedented constitutional issue would be intolerable, and
would constitute the most extreme disrespect and contempt for the U.S.
Constitution which every Congress member has sworn a solemn oath to defend.