Chastain Skillman

CITY OF HAINES CITY
Wastewater Treatment Plant Filtration System
(Sand Filters) Replacement and Upgrade
RFQ #2014-03
March 2014
CITY OF HAINES CITY
[Introduction]
Introduction]
SECTION 1.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TAB
TITLE
1.0
Introduction
> Cover Letter
> Table of Contents
2.0
Firm Information
> Organization and Structure
> Subconsultants
3.0
Project Approach
4.0
Assigned Personnel and Experience
> Organizational Chart
> Resumes
5.0
Firm References, Previous | Similar Work Completed
6.0
Current and Near Future Workload, Project Budget, and Schedule
7.0
Firm Location
8.0
Attachments and Required Documentation
A. Addendum Acknowledgement
B. Certificates of Insurance
C. Acceptance of Proposal Terms and Conditions
D. Drug-Free Workplace Certification
E. Conflict of Interest Statement
F. Public Entity Crimes Disclosure
G. Statement of “No Proposal” (Not Applicable)
H. Firm Location
I. Supplier Survey
Financial Disclosure
Litigation Disclosure
CITY OF HAINES CITY
[Firm Information]
Information]
SECTION 2.0
2.0 CSI FIRM INFORMATION
CHASTAINCHASTAIN-SKILLMAN, INC. (CSI) (PRIME CONSULTANT)
Website: www.chastainskillman.com
STATE OF FLORIDA CORPORATION
COR PORATION
OFFICES
OFFICES
QU
QUICK
ICK FACTS
ORGANIZATION
ORGANIZATION AND YEAR ESTABLISHED
ESTABLISHED
CSI operates as a Corporation in the State of Florida established
in 1950 and is a business licensed to perform:
> Engineering
> Geology
> Surveying
> Asbestos Consulting
> Radon Measurement and Mitigation
PERSONSS
CONTACT PERSON
YEARS
YEARS IN BUSINESS
> 64
CORPORATE LICENSES
>
>
>
>
>
PROJECT OFFICE
Chastain-Skillman, Inc.
4705 Old Highway 37
Lakeland, Florida 33813
[863] 646-1402
JAMES R. CHASTAIN, JR.,
JR., PhD, P.E.
Principal-In-Charge
[email protected]
> Lakeland
> Winter Haven
> Tampa
Engineering Business
Business
Geology Business
Business
Surveying Business
Business
Asbestos Consultant
Radon Consultant
STAFF
STEVEN A. DUTCH, PE
Project Manager
[email protected]
FIRM BACKGROUND
Founded in 1950, CSI began as an engineering firm focused on serving the
phosphate industry, expanding to include surveying and land development and
municipal public works engineering. In the 1970s, services expanded further to
include water, wastewater and solid waste engineering. In the 1980s, CSI added
environmental scientists, hydrogeologists, and public health professionals to address
issues of natural systems, groundwater, hazardous waste assessment, industrial
hygiene, and occupational health and safety.
Environmental engineering is a core aspect of CSI’s history and capabilities. CSI has
provided water and wastewater engineering services to more municipalities in the
Polk County for a longer period of time than any other firm in existence. Further, CSI
prepared the original designs or upgrades to some of the largest wastewater
treatment plants in the region including Lakeland Glendale WWRF, Auburndale
Regional WWRF, TOHO Sand Hill WWRF and Bartow WWRF. CSI is organized and
committed to provide innovative, cost effective solutions to its municipal clients and
their water and wastewater infrastructure needs.
CSI is a leader in providing innovative solutions to the challenges faced by
local governments.
Our engineers were among the first to embrace trenchless methods for pipeline
installation, designed the first municipal SBR WWTP in the state, and designed one of
the first UV disinfection systems for reuse,,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
55 Employees
11 Engineers
3 Geologists
13 Surveyors
1 Wetlands Scientist
3 Industrial
Industrial Hygienists
2 Environmental Scientists
SERVICE DISCIPLINES
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Municipal Engineering
Water/Wastewater Systems
Water Resources
Civil Land Development
Surveying
Geology | Hydrogeology
Environmental Risk
Management
Environmental
Environmental Services
Industrial Hygiene |
Occupational Health
Licensed Asbestos and Radon
Consultants
GIS Mapping
2.0 CSI FIRM INFORMATION
SUBCONSULTANTS EXPERIENCE
EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS
QUALIFICATIONS
To provide Haines City with the best service possible, CSI has assembled for your team a group of highly qualified, experienced
subconsultants to assist with the design provide services that we do not provide in-house. These sub consultants will provide the
highest quality and responsive service that Haines City requires.
These Consultants include:
J.H. Ham Engineering, Inc..
Electrical, Instrumentation & HVAC
J.H. Ham Engineering, Inc. (Ham) is a full-service engineering and construction company covering
both electrical and instrumentation for all types of projects including water, wastewater, reclaimed
water and projects from light commercial to heavy industrial. Based in Lakeland, Florida, Ham has
been in business since 1974.
KEY STAFF
Jim Ham, III
Robert Garcia
Wes Lahey
John Patrick
Ham and CSI have teamed on several projects over the years, and Ham brings a breadth of knowledge to the team. Ham has completed
over 270 water, wastewater and reclaimed water projects in Florida over the past 16 years.
Winslow Engineering Group, Inc.
Structural Engineering
KEY STAFF
Tom Winslow, PE
Winslow Engineering Group, Inc. (Winslow) is an engineering company located in Lakeland, Florida
providing structural engineering and design utilizing structural steel, masonry, and concrete for the private and public sector for the
past 26 years. The firm performs analysis, design, and construction inspection of both new and existing structures.
Committed to high quality structural engineering, consulting, and professional design services, Winslow has been involved in
thousands of projects. Working with owners, architects, design-builders, and contractors, Winslow provides innovative, practical, and
affordable engineering solutions and buildable designs aimed at meeting schedule and budget requirements. Winslow has provided
services for Polk County, Lakeland, Lake Wales, Avon Park, McIntosh Power Plant, Larsen Power Plant, Walt Disney World, and
Progress Energy. CSI and Winslow have teamed on more than a dozen projects in the past two years.
Madrid Engineering Group, Inc.
Geotechnical & Construction
Construction Management
KEY STAFF
Larry Madrid,PE
John Delashaw, PE
James E. Spoon
Keith Ellis, PE
Robert Stach, PG
Madrid Engineering Group, Inc. (MEG) headquartered in Bartow, started out as a geotechnical
engineering firm in 1992 and has expanded its areas of expertise to include civil and structural
engineering, construction materials testing and construction engineering inspection, as well as
environmental site assessment. MEG has completed thousands of projects covering a wide range of diverse applications and
challenging situations. CSI and MEG have teamed on several projects recently.
MEG’s house fleet of up to seven drill rigs and a staff of 15 drill crew chiefs, licensed well drillers and technicians are capable of
drilling test holes in excess of 100 feet below ground surface. MEG’s geotechnical and CMT laboratories and tests performed are
certified under AASHTO R18 and accredited by the Construction Materials Engineering Council (CMEC). MEG’s lab performs
compressive strength tests of cementitious materials, and soils and aggregate testing. MEG is pre-qualified with the FDOT in Group
3 Highway Design/Roadway, Group 9 Soil Exploration, Material Testing and Foundations, and Group 10 Construction Engineering
Inspection.
CITY OF HAINES CITY
[Project Approach]
Approach]
SECTION 3.0
3.0 PROJECT APPROACH
GENERAL
DESIGN SERVICES
Each project and associated site has unique characteristics
and constraints; however, there is a general process
applicable to all such projects as it pertains to achieving
technically effective solutions within the required schedule
and time requirements. The general approach involves seven
key steps performed in sequence, as follows:
The scope of services is designed to develop construction
documents for properly-sized facilities that will allow bidding and
construction with the fewest conflicts and change orders. After
the award of the contract, we will meet with City staff at a
project kick-off meeting to discuss the project and key issues
that need to be addressed.
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
♦
Preliminary design,
Detailed design,
Construction document preparation,
Permitting,
Bidding assistance, and
Construction services.
The ChastainChastain-Skillman Team is a perfect match for this
design project. As a firm located in Polk County, we have local
knowledge of the area, we know the City staff, and the
regulatory agencies; and have the experience to provide the
best project for the City.
SCOPE OF THE PROJECT
The City of Haines City operates a 2.97 MGD Kruger oxidation
ditch wastewater treatment plant with head-works and biosolids facilities capacity up to 6.0 MGD, and effluent filters are
designed for 3.0 MGD. The effluent filters are Parkson Dynasand upflow sand filters that are not performing to standards.
The goal of the project is to evaluate existing sand filters
versus other filtering options to determine the most
technically effective and cost-effective method of filtering 6.0
MGD of effluent. The City has expressed an interest in disktype membrane micro filters.
The project is projected to include the following elements:
♦ Replacement filter evaluation, selection and sizing.
♦ Structural elements for the new filters and
appurtenances.
♦ Hydraulic connections between the clarifiers and the new
filters including backwash discharge.
♦ Hydraulic connections to downstream treatment units.
♦ Instrumentation and control modifications to support the
new filters.
♦ Electrical power connections and upgrades to support the
new filters.
♦ Decommissioning of existing filters.
Based on our review of the project requirements, we propose to
perform the following tasks:
Preliminary
Preliminary Engineering Phase
The Preliminary Engineering Phase of the project is initiated
at the Notice to Proceed. The key to the success of this
project are the decisions made during the preliminary phases
of the project. The purpose of the preliminary design phase is
to:
♦ Define of objectives and constraints.
♦ Collect data to develop design criteria.
♦ Develop of alternative filter systems.
♦ Pilot test various systems, if desired.
♦ Prepare a comparative evaluation of alternatives.
♦ Recommend an alternative solution.
♦ Conceptual design of the selected alternative.
It is anticipated that several meetings and site visits will be held
to review the existing facilities and determine the City’s
preferences for the new facilities. Meetings with filter suppliers
and, perhaps even site visits to installations, may be
recommended to assist in making an informed equipment
selection.
A preliminary evaluation of plant hydraulics will be conducted to
determine if any existing conditions preclude any of the systems
being evaluated. A preliminary sequence for decommissioning
the existing filters will be developed.
The Preliminary Design Report (PDR) will be prepared to
document the preliminary engineering work on the project.. The
PDR will be the basis for the preparation of plans and
specifications and the permit application to FDEP for the
construction of the facility. The PDR will be prepared in
accordance with FDEP guidelines identifying flows and loadings;
all the altered unit treatment processes including the design
criteria; preliminary site layout; the design computations for plant
hydraulics and unit processes; and preliminary opinions of
probable cost.
3.0 PROJECT APPROACH
During the preliminary engineering phase, surveys of the
proposed site would be completed to verify the as-built drawings
and identify any additional site improvements.
Upon completion, CSI will submit the report to the City for review
and discussion. A meeting will be scheduled to review and
finalize the modifications that will be made to the contract
documents. The submission of the PDR will be considered the
30% submittal.
A final report will include a summary of the exploration
including a discussion of subsurface conditions, boring
profiles, laboratory test results including soil permeability
results, and general geotechnical evaluation and
recommendations relative to the structural and foundation
requirements. The final report will be provided at the
completion of the geotechnical investigation, signed and
sealed by a registered Geotechnical engineer
Design Phase Services
Permitting
As soon as the PDR is approved, permit applications will be
prepared and submitted for modifications to the FDEP for the
WWTP to allow construction of the modifications. The permit
application will include the PDR, a site plan, process schematic,
and hydraulic profile modifications.
If storm water runoff is altered, an Environmental Resource
Permit (ERP) modification will be required.
Communication with regulatory and permitting agencies is also
essential for a successful project. Over the years, CSI has
developed excellent working relationships with regulatory
agencies governing central and south Florida.
We would not anticipate any particular permitting concerns
for the various tasks of this contract. A strategy that CSI
typically employs to expedite the project schedule is to
perform the permitting phase of the project concurrently with
design phase. Complete construction plans are not be required
to modify the WWTP permit. Using this technique, we are often
able to compress the overall schedule by a month or more.
Regarding “typical” project time frames, we are widely known
for bringing projects of all types to completion within planned
budget and timelines, and fully capable of fast-tracking a
project when appropriate.
Geotechnical Investigation
MEG has extensive experience completing geotechnical
explorations and engineering evaluations for the structural
aspects of the project. Based on the preliminary information
provided, previous geotechnical investigations and review of
soil survey information, a plan will be prepared for the design
geotechnical study.
Standard drilling equipment and lower contact pressure
(small track mounted) equipment are available for completing
the subsurface exploration program and will be utilized by
MEG as appropriate for the conditions.
Upon agreement by all parties on the scope of the design presented
in the PDR, CSI will prepare the construction documents consisting
of plans and specifications. Plan sheets will be prepared with
AutoCAD in order to develop a complete digital document set for
the project. Based on CSI’s review of the project scope and
experience on similar projects, the plans will consist of
approximately 28 sheets, including:
♦ Cover Sheet and General Information (3 Sheets)
♦ Sitework (3 Sheets)
♦ Instrumentation (4 sheets)
♦ Process (6 sheets)
♦ Structural (3 sheets)
♦ Electrical (6 sheets)
♦ Construction Details (3 sheets)
The project manual, which will include bidding requirements,
contract requirements and technical specifications, will be
prepared. Specifications will be prepared using CSI format. The
contract portions of the documents will use the EJCDC Standard
General Conditions or other documents provided by the City. A
final opinion of probable cost will be prepared based on
estimated quantities developed from the construction
documents.
An important part of the design process is CSI’s collaborative
team approach to project design. In weekly meetings, all
projects are reviewed at a departmental level. Any significant
issues or design challenges are discussed by the design
professionals in order to obtain different perspectives on how
a resolution might be reached. In addition, design projects
are given milestone peer reviews by a professional who is not
on the design team. In this way, an independent assessment
is provided to the design manager. This allows for project
issues and continuity to be understood by the entire team.
3.0 PROJECT APPROACH
CSI has Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) staff
review the plans for field relevance. CSI’s CEI staff is well
versed in construction methods and, by virtue of their daily
interaction with contractors and construction methods can
provide practical, cost-saving recommendations for
consideration by the design engineers. This in-house value
engineering is a key factor in developing cost-effective and
constructible designs.
Review submittals, including opinions of probable cost, will be
made at 60%, 90% and 100% completion levels. The content of
these submittals will be determined as the final scope of the
project is negotiated.
During the preparation of the 60% completion, base plans for all
drawings would be prepared, underground piping, conduits, and
structures would be located and elevations of all structures would
be verified. Typically, the 60% submittal would include:
♦ final process and hydraulic calculations,
♦ complete drawing index,
♦ final site layout,
♦ process and instrumentation diagrams,
♦ partial process drawings,
♦ partial structural drawings,
♦ partial electrical drawings,
♦ specification index, and
♦ draft specification sections.
A revised opinion of preliminary probable cost will also be
submitted.
The 90% submittal would include:
♦ final review set of all drawings,
♦ final review set of technical specifications,
♦ draft of the bidding and contract Requirements for review,
and
♦ all required permits.
A final opinion of preliminary probable cost will be submitted.
The 100% documents will provide be bid ready documents with
all permits ready for advertising..
It is important to mention our commitment to technical
excellence in our work. Quality Assurance & Quality Control is a
critical element of CSI’s design process. CSI’s quality control
process is based on the collaborative effort of understanding
the client’s expectations and relaying that information to our
project team. Every project receives quality reviews at various
milestones by a senior staff member who is not involved in the
project design. CSI has worked diligently to be a leader in our
technical disciplines. It is important to us that our clients
receive not just adequate, but exceptional, value for the fees CSI
is paid. As an additional aspect of our QA/QC, if a project is
beyond normal complexity, CSI hires an outside expert
consultant (at our expense) to review our work and to provide
design input. This is done to make sure that CSI is providing the
client with an exceptionally thorough and advanced design. By
hiring highly qualified staff, implementing careful management
processes, and participating in various professional development
opportunities, CSI has enjoyed a long legacy of client
satisfaction.
3.0 PROJECT APPROACH
BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
Bidding Phase Services
During the bidding phase, CSI will:
♦ Assist in advertising the project.
♦ Attend a pre-bid meeting.
♦ Respond to bidders’ questions and prepare addenda.
♦ Attend bid opening.
♦ Review bids and qualifications of bidders, prepare bid
tabulation, and recommend an award.
♦ Assist in award of the contract.
The bidding phase requires a minimum of 30 days of advertising
followed by 4 to 6 weeks for award and contract execution.
Construction Phase Services:
During the construction phase, the project manager and
members of the design team will:
♦ Conduct the pre-construction meeting.
♦ Make periodic site visits to review progress.
♦ Attend contractor progress meetings.
♦ Review shop drawings and other contractor submittals.
♦ Review contractor pay requests.
♦ Review change order requests.
♦ Perform an inspection to determine substantial completion
in accordance with the contract documents.
♦ Prepare punch lists of incomplete and unacceptable work.
♦ Provide a Resident Project Representative (RPR) to monitor
construction for compliance with the construction
documents.
Post Construction Services:
Services: At the conclusion of the project,
CSI will:
♦ Conduct a final inspection.
♦ Provide certification of the completion of construction to the
City and FDEP.
♦ Prepare record drawings.
♦ Prepare an update to the Operations and Maintenance
Manual.
Final certification should be received from FDEP within 3 to 4
weeks after final inspection.
CITY OF HAINES CITY
[Assigned Personnel and Experience]
Experience]
SECTION 4.0
4.0 ASSIGNED PERSONNEL AND EXPERIENCE
WWTP Filtration System Replacement and Upgrade
ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
Jim Chastain, PhD, PE, MPH
[Principal-in-Charge]
Steve Dutch, PE
[Project Manager–
Sr. Project Engineer]
Steve McConn, PE
[Quality Assurance|Control]
Mike Leffler, PE
[Lead Project Engineer]
Doug Jones, PE
[Tank and Pumping
Design]
Lisa Lassi, PE
[Permitting and
Specifications]
Wendy Contner, PE
[Project Engineer–
Stormwater Design]
David Buyens, PE
[Sr. Project Engineer–
Site Design]
Subconsultants
Ham Engineering
[Electrical,
Instrumentation & HVAC]
www.chastainSKILLMAN.com
Winslow Engineering
[Structural]
Madrid Engineering
[Geotechnical Engineering|
Testing]
4.0 ASSIGNED PERSONNEL AND EXPERIENCE
PROJECT TEAM RESUMES
A team of seasoned professionals has been selected to assist the City of Haines City (City) with this important contract.
The Chastain-Skillman, Inc. (CSI) Team has both the experience and the personnel to develop, manage, and implement the projects
included in this continuing services contract. Each has performed on similar projects and has the technical knowledge and
experience to efficiently implement the City’s directives. Listed below are the key staff who will be working on the City’s projects
throughout the life of the contract. Each one of these individuals has been chosen because they are the best match for the City’s
priorities and requirements.
JAMES R. CHASTAIN,
CHASTAIN, JR., PHD, PE, MPH
Principal in Charge
>
>
>
>
>
PhD, University of South Florida
Master of Public Health, University of South Florida
Master of Engineering, University of Florida
BSCE (Cum Laude), University of Florida
Registered Professional Engineer (Florida #16277,
Georgia #12080)
Jim has a unique background in environmental engineering, municipal and public health engineering, and project management.
Over his 40 year career he has sought to apply these skills to produce innovative designs for his clients. With respect to reuse
water, he developed the design concept and was Principal-In-Charge of the City of Bartow’s wastewater treatment and reuse
system. The design was one of the first of its kind in Florida and won the state engineering design award that year. He is pastchairman of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) national committee on Public Health Engineering which deals with
reuse systems and other engineering topics that impact public health.
Jim will provide overall corporate oversight and direction to the project team and client contact. During the duration of the project,
he is expected to spend 1percent of his time on the project.
> BSCE, University of Maine
> Registered Professional Engineer (Florida #39118,
STEVEN A. DUTCH, PE
P roject Manager
Maine #3612)
> FDOT Advanced MOT Certification
Principal design engineer for 15 wastewater treatment facilities ranging in capacity from 25,000 GPD to 8.0 MGD and five water
plants and supply wells with capacities up to 6,000 gpm. Responsible for the design of over 50 miles of gravity sewer over 100
miles of water main, force main, and reclaimed water main; and over 150 pump stations with capacities up to 9,000 gpm. Project
Manager for design and permitting of reclaimed water projects and treatment upgrades to allow public access reuse. Provided
construction engineering on over 100 water, wastewater, linear utility, and solid waste projects. Services included submittal review,
review and preparation of change orders, review of contractor payment requests, enforcement of schedule and quality requirements,
and final certification of projects.
As project manager, Steve will be the primary client contact and will be responsible for the overall direction of the project design and
project team. He is expected to spend 10 to 15 percent of his time during the duration of the project.
4.0 ASSIGNED PERSONNEL AND EXPERIENCE
MICHAEL R. LEFFLER, PE, DEE
Lead Wastewater Process Design
> MSCE, Cleveland State University
> BSEE, Purdue University
> Registered Professional Engineer (Florida #61130,
Ohio #E-41889)
> Certified Wastewater Works operator (Ohio #3-81-53)
Project Manager for design of numerous Winter Haven projects at wastewater plant 2 and 3 and at the 3Rd Street water plant.
Project Manager and lead designer for expansion of an 4.0 MGD SBR wastewater treatment plant to 8.0 MGD in Bartow. Lead
designer on a thermophilic egg-shaped digester and two phase anaerobic digestion to meet Class AA requirements for a 13.7 MGD
wastewater treatment plant for Lakeland; for upgrade to existing 7.5 MGD wastewater treatment plant to thicken waste activated
sludge using disk thickeners and to provide new belt filter presses for dewatering of aerobically digested sludge;. Served as licensed
wastewater operator for small activated sludge plant. Responsible for operation, monitoring, and monthly EPA reports. Supervised
operation of a 22.5 MGD wastewater treatment plant with fixed film biological reactors under a 10-year operations contract.
Developed computerized data management system for a 22.5 MGD municipal wastewater treatment facility. Supervised start-up,
provided operations assistance, developed operator training program, and implemented maintenance schedules and records
management system for a 50 MGD physical/chemical wastewater treatment plant and 300 MGD CSO treatment facility
As lead project Engineer, Mike will be responsible for the overall project design and coordination of design with the project team. He is
expected to spend up to 40 percent of his time during the evaluation and the design phases of the project.
DOUGLAS E. JONES, PE
Wastewater Process Design
>
>
>
>
>
>
MSE, Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida
MS, Microbiology, University of South Florida
BS, Biology, Valdosta State University
Professional Engineer (Florida #58077)
Microbiologist (Florida #22602)
LEED Green Associate
Provided design, construction and/or permitting services for six public water and wastewater treatment facilities ranging in size
and complexity from 25,000 GPD Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR) plants units to 13.7 MGD systems. Innovative experience
includes high-level ultraviolet disinfection systems, filtration, effluent storage and pumping for public access reuse of up to 9.6
MGD. Conventional design experience includes the design of efficient storage ponds, oxidation ditches, secondary clarifiers, filters,
Class AA residuals treatment processes, chlorine contact chambers, and ground storage tanks. Designs have been for new
construction, retrofits and expansions. Project Manager and Engineer for planning, design and permitting of reclaimed water projects
and treatment upgrades to allow public access reuse. Designs included filtration systems; high level disinfection systems including
chlorination, and ultraviolet disinfection; ground storage tanks up to 3 million gallons; and pumping systems.
Managed or served as technical lead for transient analysis, modeling, design, permitting, and construction services associated with
more than 350,000 linear feet of utility system infrastructure projects including piping, pumps, valves, and other components,
including sewer systems. These designs have included pipes up to 24 inches in diameter, as well as associated pump stations up to
8 MGD.
Doug will assist with the process design and may spend up to 20 percent of his time during the duration of the design.
4.0 ASSIGNED PERSONNEL AND EXPERIENCE
> MS, Engineering, Environmental Concentration, University of
South Florida
DAVID J. BUYENS, PE
Site and Infrastructure
> Registered Professional Engineer (Florida #51316)
> LEED Green Associate (ID #10618918)
Designed numerous designs for municipal and private clients, including the City of Lakeland, the Drummond Company, Ruthven
Investments, and many others. Performed hydraulic analysis of force mains for multiple municipal and private clients. Provided
planning services based on modeling of the water distribution system for multiple municipal clients. Water system modeling of the
Lakeland system identified improvements that saved over $3.0 million in planned major construction. Provided site, infrastructure
and stormwater designs for numerous clients.
David will spend the time necessary to complete assigned tasks as required by the project scope.
LISA STRINE LASSI, PE,
P E, CDT
Permitting and Specifications
>
>
>
>
ME, University of South Florida
BSCE, University of South Florida
Professional Engineer (Florida #44157)
Certified Construction Documents Technologist
Managed preparation of Operation and Maintenance Manual for regional wastewater treatment facilities. Developed wastewater
residuals land application management plans. Managed design and construction of pump stations and sanitary sewer
rehabilitation. Provided a wide variety of permitting services. Prepared project manuals for construction projects including
bidding and contractual requirements, general requirements, and technical specifications. Assisted clients with project
administration. Winter Haven native with extensive knowledge of local issues.
Lisa will spend the time necessary to prepare specifications and permits required by the project scope.
> Professional Land Surveyor (Florida #5293)
ROBERT F. DUBOIS, PLS
PLS
Surveying
Oversees design surveys of major pipeline and roadway projects up to 20 miles in length. Provide topographic, right-of-way, and
aerial control surveys in support of design surveys. Provide construction stake out and progress surveys for land development and
roadway construction projects. Also provide “as-built” record surveys of finished construction for land development, utility, and
roadway projects. Provide record surveys for compliance permitting on major mining sites. Oversee surveys to assist in the
delineation of wetlands and habitats, determine groundwater elevations, and delineate the extent of environmental
contamination.
Bobby will spend the time necessary to complete assigned tasks as required by the project scope.
4.0 ASSIGNED PERSONNEL AND EXPERIENCE
WENDY G. CONTNER,
CONTNER, PE
Stormwater and Drainage
> BSCE, University of South Florida
> Professional Engineer (Florida #70604)
> LEED Green Associate (ID # 10626154)
Performed stormwater management design services for commercial, residential, institutional and industrial land development
projects. This has included stormwater master planning, multi-phase designs, multiple interconnected pond systems, hydrologic
and hydraulic modeling and nutrient loading calculations. Design software familiarity includes Ponds, ICPR, Hydraflow, StormCAD
and AutoCAD. Performed hydrological analysis and floodplain modeling for land development projects ranging from one (1) acre
to 2,000 acres. This has included pre- and post- development modeling, floodplain encroachment and compensation calculations
and establishment of Base Flood Elevations for FEMA map amendments. Extensive, successful experience in obtaining
Environmental Resource Permits for storm water systems for large development projects.
Wendy will spend the time necessary to complete assigned tasks as required by the project scope.
> BCE, The Georgia Institute of Technology
> Professional Engineer (Florida #67840, Georgia #25186,
STEPHEN D. MCCONN, PE
PE
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Alabama #26661-E, Ohio #61834)
Managed all aspects of civil site design and permitting for more than 150 commercial, residential, mixed-use, and educational
facility development projects. This has included the management of multi-disciplinary teams of engineers, scientists, and support
personnel, development of construction drawings and permit applications, preparation and evaluation of bid packages, and
construction support services. Managed or performed stormwater master planning and design for commercial and residential land
development projects ranging from one (1) acre to 3,000 acres. This has included stormwater modeling, permitting, construction
observation, and certification. Project Manager for site design at the new Florida Polytechnic campus, major commercial
developments in Lakeland and off-site improvements for a large industrial project in southern Polk County.
Steve will spend the time necessary to complete provide QA/QC required by the project scope.
.
CITY OF HAINES CITY
[Firm References, Previous | Similar Work Completed]
Completed]
SECTION 5.0
5.0 FIRM REFERENCES, PREVIOUS SIMILAR WORK
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY EXPANSION
Bartow, FL
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
The original SBR process, designed by CSI in 1994, provided a flexible process
that allowed the facility to meet treatment criteria without large auxiliary basins
or internal recycle flows. The process provided for biological removal of both
phosphorus and nitrogen. As a result of the success of this system, the City
elected to continue with the SBR process, but to add additional reactor basins to
permit treatment of flows up to 8.0 MGD. In addition to the expanded SBR
system, the proposed construction included ugraded headworks, traveling bridge
filters, and an Autothermal Thermophilic Aerobic Digestion (ATAD) system to
produce Class AA biosolids.
The combination of technologies was designed to produce an expanded 8.0 MGD facility that meets the effluent requirements of
Florida Power (user of effluent for cooling), while producing exceptional quality biosolids for reuse. The new headworks receives and
meters the flow from two 24-inch force mains and consists of a new elevated concrete structure with a mechanically cleaned fine
screen and two centrifugal grit removal units. The headworks is designed for an average daily flow of 8.0 MGD to serve the future
expansion of the remainder of the facility.
The design of the facilities was completed in 2008. Due to funding issues and the dramatic slowdown in population growth, the City
elected to go forward with construction of only the much needed headworks expansion. The new headworks receives and meters the
flow from two 24-inch force mains and consists of a new elevated concrete structure with a mechanically cleaned fine screen and
two centrifugal grit removal units. The headworks is designed for an average daily flow of 8.0 MGD to serve the future expansion of
the remainder of the facility.
PROJECT OWNER: City of Bartow | 2505 East Wabash Avenue | Bartow, Florida 33830
POINT OF CONTACT: Connie Adcock, Plant Supervisor [863] 534-0147
PROFESSIONAL FEE: ~$3 Million | CONSTRUCTION COST: ~$22 million
YEAR COMPLETED: Ongoing in phases – Headworks phase completed in 2011
PROJECT TEAM: Mike Leffler, PE, Lisa Lassi, PE
REGIONAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
Auburndale, FL
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
In January 1997, construction was completed for this $6.5 million facility which
is designed to treat 2 million gallons of wastewater per day. The wastewater
facilities include headworks, secondary treatment, filtration, UV disinfection, and
effluent storage. The facility has been designed to meet public access reuse
requirements. The project includes development of a 20-acre site, including
extensive landscaping. All structural and architectural professional services, as
well as surveying, were provided in-house, along with all engineering design. The
overall project is a key part of the City’s commitment to serving an extended
service area with wastewater and water utilities. This Regional Wastewater
Treatment Plant allows the City to provide reliable wastewater treatment for its extended service area.
5.0 FIRM REFERENCES, PREVIOUS SIMILAR WORK
This facility utilized state-of-the-art technology to provide a compact, flexible wastewater plant at a reasonable cost. In 2010, the
expansion of this facility to double its capacity to 4.0 MGD was completed. The expansion upgraded the treatment level to allow
public access reuse.
PROJECT OWNER: City of Auburndale | 215 Main Street | Auburndale, Florida 33830
POINT OF CONTACT: John Dickson, Public Works Director [863] 965-5511
PROFESSIONAL FEE: ~$ 0.8 Million | CONSTRUCTION COST: ~$6.5 million
YEAR COMPLETED: Ongoing in phases – Headworks phase completed in 2011
PROJECT TEAM: Doug Jones, PE; Steve Dutch, PE; Lisa Lassi, PE
SAND HILL ROAD WATER RECLAMATION FACILITY EXPANSION
Kissimmee, FL
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
In 2003, Chastain-Skillman, Inc. (CSI) was retained by the TOHO Water Authority
(TWA) to provide multi-phased design and construction management services for
the expansion of the Sand Hill Wastewater Treatment Facility. TWA had been
operating a dual train oxidation ditch type treatment system since 1999. The Sand
Hill Road Water Reclamation Facility (Sand Hill) was rated at about 4.8 mgd (AADF),
but because of roadway construction, about one-half of the capacity had to be
demolished. To accommodate anticipated area growth, the lost capacity had to be
replaced as well as additional capacity provided. Based on planning information
from TWA, the new treatment capacity was to be 6.0 mgd (AADF).
CSI performed a two-part function. Part I was to prepare a “Conceptual Process
Design and Equipment Evaluation Report”. This task included investigation of
various Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR) processes to determine the best fit with the influent parameters and flow rates. A
treatment process able to operate as either an AOAO or MLE was selected. The second element of this task was to evaluate various
pieces of processing equipment including filters, UV disinfection, and preliminary treatment equipment. The final element was to
develop construction cost estimates in cooperation with the construction manager.
Part II of the project included the preparation of design documents and performing services during construction. The final design
to take the treatment plant capacity to 6.0 mgd included the following:
Expansion and renovations to the headworks with new bar screen and grit removal, and odor control;
New secondary treatment with tankage, mixing, aeration, aeration blowers, and flow diversion;
Renovation and improvements to the existing circular secondary clarifiers;
The addition of tertiary disk filters to increase filtering capacity;
Waste activated sludge storage and pumping;
New UV disinfection and effluent pumping; and
Other associated tasks included stormwater handling and site design.
PROJECT OWNER: Tohopekaliga Water Authority (TWA) |951 MLK Jr. Boulevard|Kissimmee, Florida 34741
POINT OF CONTACT: Quyen Newell, PE, [407] 518-2261
PROFESSIONAL FEE: ~$ 1.7 Million | CONSTRUCTION COST: ~$18.0 million
YEAR COMPLETED: 2008
PROJECT TEAM: Mike Leffler, PE; Doug Jones, PE; Lisa Lassi, PE
5.0 FIRM REFERENCES, PREVIOUS SIMILAR WORK
As a testament to our reputation and service, one only needs to observe the number of years that we have continually served the
clients referenced below. We value long-term relationships with our clients.
CITY OF AUBURNDALE
Provided Services for 30 years
Mr. John Dickson, Public Works Director
Post Office Box 186
Auburndale, Florida 33880
(863) 965-5511
email: [email protected]
CITY OF BARTOW
Provided Services for 24 years
Ms. Connie Adcock, Wastewater Superintendent
450 North Wilson Avenue
Bartow, Florida 33831
(863) 543-0100
email: [email protected]
HIGHLANDS
HIGHLANDS COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPT.
Provided Services for 27 years
Ramon Gavarrette, PE
505 South Commerce Avenue
Sebring, Florida 33870
(863) 402-6877
[email protected]
HARDEE
HA RDEE COUNTY
Provided Services for 27 years
Mr. Ken Wheeler, PE, Public Works Director
205 Hanchey Road
Wauchula, Florida 33873
(863) 773-3272
[email protected]
POLK COUNTY UTILITIES DIVISION
Provided Services for 13 years
Mr. Mark Addison, PE, CIP Manager
1011 Jim Keene Boulevard
Winter Haven, Florida 33880
(863) 298-4100
email: [email protected]
CITY OF LAKELAND
Provided Services for 41 years
Mr. Tom Mattiacci, Engineering Manager
501 East Lemon Street – A32
Lakeland, Florida 33801
(863) 834-8316
email: [email protected]
CITY OF HAINES CITY
[Current and Near Future Workload, Project Budget, and Schedule]
Schedule]
SECTION 6.0
6.0 CURRENT WORKLOAD, BUDGET & SCHEDULE
CURRENT AND PROJECTED WORKLOAD
Company
CSI uses a project-focused team approach to assure continuity
throughout the project. The ChastainChastain-Skillman Team
provides Wastewater design and construction experience
which will result in reducing the time and costs associated
with this project.
The project manager is a Registered Professional Engineer
who has primary responsibility from project initiation through
final close-out. The project manager assembles the team and
directs the professionals and support staff needed to develop
all aspects of the project. These team members follow the
project through to completion.
The Team has full capacity and capability to staff the project
in order to meet the schedule. The Team exceeds the
quantity of manpower required to successfully complete the
Haines City Filter Replacement Project. The Team’s
Tea m’s
professional and technical staff is experienced in the
roadway design process. Key personnel assigned to this
project have been selected based on their extensive,
combined experience on similar projects. The Team has
carefully assessed manpower and resource availability for
this project. The table below indicates the actual manpower
commitments to this project and additional reserve
manpower available.
Based on the current workload of CSI’s key team members,
we are available immediately upon contract award to begin
project discussions and planning. As for continuity and
experience of staff, our record of tenure and experience
speaks volumes. At CSI, our goal is to select key personnel
who will be here for the City, from start to finish. In
support of this selection process, the following table
represents key staff who will be assigned to the City’s
projects, their years with CSI, and their availability to work
on City projects.
Key Project Staff
Hours
ours per Month
Available for City
Jim Chastain, PE
41 yrs w/CSI
4
Steve Dutch, PE
19 yrs w/CSI
24
6 yrs w/CSI
4
Mike Leffler, PE
10 yrs w/CSI
40
Doug Jones, PE
17 yrs w/CSI
16
Lisa Lassi, PE
34 yrs w/CSI
16
David Buyens, PE
21 yrs w/CSI
12
9 yrs w/CSI
32
Steve McConn, PE
Wendy Contner, PE
Staff in local
offices
Staff
assigned to
Project
Additional
staff
Chastain-Skillman
55
8
10
JH Ham Engineering
12
2
2
Winslow Engineering
5
1
1
Madrid Engineering
42
5
9
Furthermore, CSI does not pursue new contracts unless our
future workload projections demonstrate sufficient available
man-hours to perform the services required within the time
constraints of the Client. A review of current and future
contract obligations indicates that we can devote a full
complement of experienced staff to support the City’s
engineering needs. In addition to the key personnel listed
above, several junior level professionals are available to
perform tasks with oversight of a senior-level staff member.
PROJECT BUDGET AND SCHEDULE
We understand that maintaining project cost and schedule are
all inter-related and that experienced project planning is
essential for executing a successful project. Client surveys show
that the most important issues to the client are schedule and
budget, with the budget being controlled largely by project
coordination and time management. Our goal is to deliver
high quality projects ahead of schedule and under
budget.
CSI believes the essential indicators of a successful project will:
Satisfy client objectives and expectations.
Exceed industry quality standards.
Technically feasible.
Constructible.
Permittable.
Cost-effective.
Considers innovative solutions.
CSI’s experience regarding the cost and time required to
design and build a project has taught us that initial
projections depend primarily on the available base data, such
as soils and survey information; the time required for the
Client's public participation and review processes; and the
required permits for the project
Our general project strategy begins with a clear definition of
the project objectives. Meetings with the Client
Representative and the users clarify needs and goals.
6.0 CURRENT WORKLOAD, BUDGET & SCHEDULE
Original project goals and objectives are reviewed
throughout the work to assure that the final outcome will be
successful.
During our first meeting for any project, a Work Plan,
Plan
addressing the approach to the success factors including
budgets and schedules shall be presented to the City for
concurrence. The Work Plan is then reviewed with the Client
and adjusted if necessary before continuing with design
development and construction documents. Once accepted, we
will proceed with the design tasks and deliverables to
completion of the project.
Key components of the work plan are:
• Develop a complete, detailed schedule with associated
costs prior to project kick-off that accurately reflects the
needs and deadlines of the City;
• Target interim "milestones" to complete subsequent
phases of the project with presentations and submittals to
City staff, to present and review the project design and
cost estimates; and
• Review written comments from the City and other
applicable parties and authorization to proceed with the
next phase of work.
To maintain budgets, CSI utilizes BST management software
that provides detailed cost breakdowns by project. Project
managers are required to monitor and control project costs
and approve all charges prior to invoicing. All changes in the
project scope and additional services must be justified and
approved by the Client prior to initiation of work. We have also
recently incorporated PSMJ’s PlanTrax Project Management
software which identifies dependencies and critical paths.
When coupled with costs from BST, budget and scheduled
conformance can be monitored and controlled.
The project manager is responsible for communications with
the Client and users. CSI project managers meet with and report
to Client representatives on a regular basis. The interim
milestones provide opportunities for City feedback. CSI uses
SnapShot Progress Reports to keep the client informed of their
project status. These are submitted weekly or monthly
depending on the project stage and client preferences. This
report depicts completed tasks and work product, actual
start/finish dates, tasks planned or in progress, deviations from
schedule with corrective actions, manpower data, and forecast
schedule. They can be tailored to provide additional
information at the client’s request.
Internally, our engineering departments hold weekly meetings
to monitor the status and progress on each active project.
Resources are assigned and coordinated as required to keep
all projects on task and on schedule. Interim deadlines are
imposed on each sub-task to minimize schedule disruptions.
We avoid unacceptable final work products through
submittal of milestone deliverables and consistent
communication with the Client.
Anticipated Schedule
Below is a possible schedule for implementation of the project. Most durations are variable depending on factors that
are currently unidentified.
Task
Preliminary Design Phase
60% Completion
90% Completion
Final Completion
Bidding Phase
Duration
90 days
45 days
30 days
10 days
185 days
70 days
Construction
Con struction Phase
Post Construction & Closeout
Subtotal
Total
210 days
60 days
340 days
525 days
Subtotal
Comments
May vary depending on site visits or pilot tests
After receipt of review
review comments
After receipt of review comments
After receipt of review comments
30 day bid period mandatory; award schedule dependent
on City policies,
Dependent on equipment delivery schedules
Dependent on delivery of asas-builts and O&M manuals
CITY OF HAINES CITY
[Firm Location]
Location]
SECTION 7.0
7.0 FIRM LOCATION
CSI LAKELAND OFFICE
OFFICE
CSI does not have an office in Haines City; however, we are
less than 30 minutes away. Our proximity to the City provides
advantages: meeting schedules are flexible; travel time is
minimal; and site visits during construction can typically
happen at a moment’s notice.
CSI has a Lakeland corporate headquarters office of 50
professionals and support staff located on Old Highway 37, a
mere 26 miles from Main Street. From this location, we have
successfully performed hundreds of highly successful projects
for area clients such as the School District of Hillsborough
County, Pinellas County Government (Facilities Dept.), Cities of
Lakeland, Bartow, Auburndale and Winter Haven, Sprint
Florida, a major retail chain and others. This office location
provides the opportunity for rapid response times when the
City calls and it facilitates easy face-to-face communication
with City officials as needed. We have found that constant
open communication is one of, if not the most important
factor in successful project delivery and client satisfaction.
We have successfully delivered projects throughout the
southeast for over 60 years.
J.H. Ham Engineering, Inc.
Polk County: Lakeland
Winslow Engineering Group, Inc.
Polk County: Lakeland
Madrid Engineering
Engineering Group, Inc.
Polk County: Bartow
CITY OF HAINES CITY
[Attachments and Required Documentation]
Documentation]
SECTION 8.0
&+$67
23,'50
'$7(00''<<<<
&(57,),&$7(2)/,$%,/,7<,1685$1&(
7+,6 &(57,),&$7( ,6 ,668(' $6 $ 0$77(5 2) ,1)250$7,21 21/< $1' &21)(56 12 5,*+76 8321 7+( &(57,),&$7( +2/'(5 7+,6
&(57,),&$7( '2(6 127 $)),50$7,9(/< 25 1(*$7,9(/< $0(1' (;7(1' 25 $/7(5 7+( &29(5$*( $))25'(' %< 7+( 32/,&,(6
%(/2: 7+,6 &(57,),&$7( 2) ,1685$1&( '2(6 127 &2167,787( $ &2175$&7 %(7:((1 7+( ,668,1* ,1685(56 $87+25,=('
5(35(6(17$7,9(25352'8&(5$1'7+(&(57,),&$7(+2/'(5
,03257$17 ,I WKH FHUWLILFDWH KROGHU LV DQ $'',7,21$/ ,1685(' WKH SROLF\LHV PXVW EH HQGRUVHG ,I 68%52*$7,21 ,6 :$,9(' VXEMHFW WR
WKH WHUPV DQG FRQGLWLRQV RI WKH SROLF\ FHUWDLQ SROLFLHV PD\ UHTXLUH DQ HQGRUVHPHQW $ VWDWHPHQW RQ WKLV FHUWLILFDWH GRHV QRW FRQIHU ULJKWV WR WKH
FHUWLILFDWHKROGHULQOLHXRIVXFKHQGRUVHPHQWV
3KRQH
)D[
352'8&(5
//(ZLQJ%ODFNZHOGHU'XFH
6RXWKIRUN'ULYH
/DNHODQG)/
6WHYHQ1RUWRQ$
&217$&7
1$0(
3+21(
$&1R([W
(0$,/
$''5(66
)$;
$&1R
,1685(56$))25',1*&29(5$*(
1$,&
,1685(5$ $OOLHG3&,QVXUDQFH$,'&2
,1685('
&KDVWDLQ6NLOOPDQ,QF
32%R[
/DNHODQG)/
,1685(5% %ULGJHILHOG(PSOR\HUV,QV&R
,1685(5&
,1685(5'
,1685(5(
,1685(5)
&29(5$*(6
&(57,),&$7(180%(5
5(9,6,21180%(5
7+,6 ,6 72 &(57,)< 7+$7 7+( 32/,&,(6 2) ,1685$1&( /,67(' %(/2: +$9( %((1 ,668(' 72 7+( ,1685(' 1$0(' $%29( )25 7+( 32/,&< 3(5,2'
,1',&$7(' 127:,7+67$1',1* $1< 5(48,5(0(17 7(50 25 &21',7,21 2) $1< &2175$&7 25 27+(5 '2&80(17 :,7+ 5(63(&7 72 :+,&+ 7+,6
&(57,),&$7( 0$< %( ,668(' 25 0$< 3(57$,1 7+( ,1685$1&( $))25'(' %< 7+( 32/,&,(6 '(6&5,%(' +(5(,1 ,6 68%-(&7 72 $// 7+( 7(506
(;&/86,216$1'&21',7,2162)68&+32/,&,(6/,0,766+2:10$<+$9(%((15('8&('%<3$,'&/$,06
,165
/75
7<3(2),1685$1&(
$''/ 68%5
,165 :9'
32/,&<180%(5
32/,&<())
32/,&<(;3
00''<<<< 00''<<<<
$&3*/32
*(1(5$//,$%,/,7<
$
;
&200(5&,$/*(1(5$//,$%,/,7<
&/$,060$'(
$
;
2&&85
$&3*/32
; %ODQNHW
&RQWUDFWXDO
$
/,0,76
($&+2&&855(1&(
'$0$*(725(17('
35(0,6(6(DRFFXUUHQFH
0('(;3$Q\RQHSHUVRQ
3(5621$/$'9,1-85<
*(1(5$/$**5(*$7(
*(1
/$**5(*$7(/,0,7$33/,(63(5
352
32/,&< ; -(&7
/2&
352'8&76&20323$**
$87202%,/(/,$%,/,7<
&20%,1('6,1*/(/,0,7
(DDFFLGHQW
%2',/<,1-85<3HUSHUVRQ
;
;
+,5('$8726
;
80%5(//$/,$%
;
$&3%$3&
$1<$872
$//2:1('
$8726
6&+('8/('
$8726
1212:1('
$8726
%2',/<,1-85<3HUDFFLGHQW 3523(57<'$0$*(
3HUDFFLGHQW
$
%
(;&(66/,$%
;
($&+2&&855(1&(
2&&85
$&3&$3
&/$,060$'(
; 5(7(17,21 '('
:25.(56&203(16$7,21
$1'(03/2<(56
/,$%,/,7<
<1
$1<35235,(7253$571(5(;(&87,9(
1$
2)),&(50(0%(5(;&/8'('"
0DQGDWRU\LQ1+
,I\HVGHVFULEHXQGHU
'(6&5,37,212)23(5$7,216EHORZ
$ 5HQWHG/HDVHG(TX
$**5(*$7(
;
:&67$78
725</,0,76
27+
(5
(/($&+$&&,'(17
(/',6($6(($(03/2<(( (/',6($6(32/,&</,0,7
$&3&,03
/LPLW
'HF
'(6&5,37,212)23(5$7,216/2&$7,2169(+,&/(6$WWDFK$&25'$GGLWLRQDO5HPDUNV6FKHGXOHLIPRUHVSDFHLVUHTXLUHG
(E &(57,),&$7(+2/'(5
&$1&(//$7,21
,165'&3
,QVXUHG&RS\
&KDVWDLQ6NLOOPDQ,QF
32%R[
/DNHODQG)/
$&25'
6+28/' $1< 2) 7+( $%29( '(6&5,%(' 32/,&,(6 %( &$1&(//(' %()25(
7+( (;3,5$7,21 '$7( 7+(5(2) 127,&( :,// %( '(/,9(5(' ,1
$&&25'$1&(:,7+7+(32/,&<3529,6,216
$87+25,=('5(35(6(17$7,9(
‹$&25'&25325$7,21$OOULJKWVUHVHUYHG
7KH$&25'QDPHDQGORJRDUHUHJLVWHUHGPDUNVRI$&25'
Client#: 2183
ACORD
TM
CHASSKI3
DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
05/22/2013
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES
BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED
REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to
the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the
certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
CONTACT
NAME:
PHONE
(A/C, No, Ext): 813
E-MAIL
ADDRESS:
PRODUCER
CUSTOMER ID #:
PRODUCER
SunCoast Insurance, div of USI
1715 N. Westshore Blvd. #700
Tampa, FL 33607
813 321-7500
FAX
(A/C, No):
321-7500
813 321-7525
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURED
INSURER A :
Chastain-Skillman, Inc.
P.O. Box 5710
4705 Old Hwy 37
Lakeland, FL 33807-5710
NAIC #
XL Specialty Insurance Company
37885
INSURER B :
INSURER C :
INSURER D :
INSURER E :
INSURER F :
COVERAGES
CERTIFICATE NUMBER:
REVISION NUMBER:
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR
LTR
ADDL SUBR
INSR WVD
TYPE OF INSURANCE
POLICY NUMBER
POLICY EFF
POLICY EXP
(MM/DD/YYYY) (MM/DD/YYYY)
GENERAL LIABILITY
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CLAIMS-MADE
OCCUR
LIMITS
EACH OCCURRENCE
DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence)
$
$
MED EXP (Any one person)
$
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY
$
GENERAL AGGREGATE
$
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER:
PROPOLICY
LOC
JECT
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG
$
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
(Ea accident)
$
BODILY INJURY (Per person)
$
$
ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $
SCHEDULED AUTOS
PROPERTY DAMAGE
(Per accident)
HIRED AUTOS
$
$
NON-OWNED AUTOS
$
UMBRELLA LIAB
OCCUR
EACH OCCURRENCE
$
EXCESS LIAB
CLAIMS-MADE
AGGREGATE
$
$
DEDUCTIBLE
RETENTION $
WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
Y/N
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH)
If yes, describe under
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
A Professional
Liability
$
WC STATUTORY LIMITS
OTHER
E.L. EACH ACCIDENT
N/A
$
E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
DPR9708525
$
05/24/2013 05/24/2014 $3,000,000 per claim
$5,000,000 annl aggr.
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, if more space is required)
Professional Liability coverage is written on a claims-made and reported basis.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CANCELLATION
For proposal purposes
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
c 1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
O
ACORD 25 (2009/09)
1 of 1
#S475573/M475535
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
KEB
8.0 LITIGATION STATEMENT
LITIGATION
In its 64 years in business, we are proud to state that
Chastain-Skillman, Inc.’s (CSI’s) Professional Liability
insurance company has only paid one claim on the firm’s
behalf or any of its officers or employees. The following
project represents its only paid claim which was settled in
mediation.
Oakwood Golf Course – this was a claim in which the owner of
a golf course sued the developer of subdivision lots
surrounding the golf course and named CSI in that suit as the
consultant to the developer. The golf course flooded in 2005
after experiencing record rainfall. The services performed by
CSI were on behalf of its client and in full compliance with
applicable SWFWMD standards. Additionally, CSI was not
responsible for or involved with the design of the golf course.
Due to numerous hurricanes passing over the area in which
the golf course is located, this area received substantially
more rainfall than normal. This was clearly evidenced by the
city and county work in this area having to deal with
emergency flooding. Additionally, the golf course is located at
the lowest elevations of a closed basin. The amount of rain
and the associated groundwater levels significantly exceeded
the regulatory design assumptions. This case was settled in
mediation in 2011.