Appendices - British Army

Transcription

Army Basing Programme: Infrastructure Delivery
Statement of Community Involvement
Appendices
Appendix 1
Terms of Reference and Membership Details of Army Basing Steering Group
Version:
Date:
ARMY RE-BASING STEERING GROUP - TERMS OF REFERENCE
1.8
21 November 2013
Army Re-basing Steering Group Terms of Reference
Purpose of Steering Group:
1. The main purpose of the Group is to ensure that Wiltshire Council can respond to the impact of the
British Army’s rebasing plans announced in March 2013, which will enable effective military integration with
civilian communities throughout Wiltshire. It will limit business to strategic matters, with more detailed issues
being discussed at its subordinate sub-groups.
2. In particular it will:
a. Enable Wiltshire Council to plan and implement its response to the British Army's re-basing plans
b. Ensure that infrastructure as well as health, education, leisure and social services meets the needs of
additional military personnel, their dependents and existing Wiltshire communities
Ensure that the implementation of Army rebasing complies with the principles underpinning Wiltshire’s
c.
Armed Forces Community Covenant
d. Realise the benefits that relocation may deliver in terms of:
• development of surplus MOD estate
• strengthening of the Defence supply chain
• exploitation of MOD skills for economic regeneration
e. Assist development of MOD’s requirements definition
f.
Ensure communication with identified audiences (primarily local communities, both civilian and Armed
Forces, and other key stakeholders) is effective and timely
g. Liaise with other workstream leaders and cooperate with neighbouring local authorities to plan for the
impact of Army rebasing, identifying holistic responses and approaches
h. Oversee key project documentation (PID / Project Plan / Risk Management Plan)
i.
Harness the contribution of partnering organisations, local MPS, education providers, community area
partnerships, national planning authorities, and other stakeholders to aid successful workstream outcomes
j.
Review progress against project milestone plans
k. Review Risk
l.
Task and monitor sub-groups activity required to undertake more detailed activities.
Membership
3. The standing members of the group will include the following:
Alistair Cunningham
John Goodall
Georgina Clampitt-dix
Anne Huggett
Janet O’Brien
Nick Glass
Leanne Sykes
Andrew Guest / Alan
Madge
Kevin Ladner
Stephen Harness
Simon Navas
Martin Herbert
ACu
JG
GCD
AH
JB
NG
LS
Wiltshire Council - Service Director Economy & Regeneration
Wiltshire Council - Associate Director Public Health (CVD)
Wiltshire Council - Hd Spatial Planning Economy & Regeneration
Wiltshire Council - Communications
Wiltshire Council - Hd New Housing
Wiltshire Council - Education Manager
Wiltshire Council - Finance
AG/M
KL
SH
SN
MHe
Wiltshire Council - Development Crtl South : Adam Madge as rep
Wiltshire Council - Programme Manager Economy & Regeneration
MOD – DIO – Town & Country Planning Lead
Mott Macdonald (supporting DIO) - Stakeholder Manager
URS (supporting DIO)
Version:
Date:
ARMY RE-BASING STEERING GROUP - TERMS OF REFERENCE
1.8
21 November 2013
Maj Phil Hill
Lt Col Jon Fox
Mark Harris
Ian Parker
Graham Smith
Peter Jones
4.
PH
JF
MHa
IP
GS
PJ
HQ 43 (Wx) Brigade
MOD Borona Team
NHS Clinical Commissioning Group
Hampshire County Council - xxx
Test Valley Borough Council
HCA
Additional members will be co-opted for specific matters, should they arise. They may include:
Allan Creedy
Ian P Brown
Emma Cooper
Sally Hunter
Jacqueline Chipping
Mark Limbrick
David Underhill
Lt Col Peter Wallace
Colin Bush
Tim Lamacraft
Maj Jon Wort
John Waterhouse
TBA
ACr
IB
EC
SHu
JC
ML
DU
PW
CB
TL
JW
JWa
Wiltshire Council - Hd of Sustainable Transport
Wiltshire Council - Revenues and Benefits
Wiltshire Council - Comm Strategy and Vol Sect
Wiltshire Council - Senior Research Officer
Wiltshire Council - Children’s Services
MOD -DIO
MOD - DIO - Rebasing Programme Manager
MOD - DIO - Army Rebasing
WYG (supporting DIO)
MOD - HQ 43 (Wessex) Brigade
Project Borona
Area Board Rep - if deemed necessary
Reporting
5. The group will report to the MCI Delivery Group, and will assist the programme manager in providing
regular highlight reports to the workstream owner (Corporate Director Carolyn Godfrey).
Review of Terms of Reference
6. These terms reference will be reviewed every six months. Accordingly they should next be reviewed in
December 2013.
Date
7. These terms of reference were reviewed at the Steering Group held on 14 November 2013, and will be
reviewed in May 2014.
Appendix 2
Terms of Reference and Membership Details of Army Basing Environmental
Sub Group
Army Basing Salisbury Plain Environmental Sub Group
Terms of Reference
Purpose
•
•
•
•
•
To support delivery of the Army Basing programme for Salisbury Plain
To monitor progress in production of the Salisbury Plain Masterplan
To provide a forum for feedback on the Salisbury Plain Masterplan for statutory
consultees and others
To provide a forum for feedback on the Outline Environmental Appraisal for statutory
consultees and others
To monitor key environmental risks to the Army Basing programme for Salisbury
Plain
Membership
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
DIO Army Basing Programme Environmental – Giles Rowe & Sue Jordan
DIO Army Basing Programme Town Planning – Stephen Harness
DIO Aquatrine – Chris Boulton
DIO Conservation:
o Richard Brooks
o James Nevitt (Access)
o Richard Osgood (Archaeology)
o Julie Swain (Ecology)
o Chris Daniell (Historic Buildings)
DIO Land Management – Anna Rogers & Michael Russell
DIO SAPT – Jane Hallett
DIO Training – Lt Col Andy Sherburn
Aspire – Mark George & David Keeble
Kelda – Matt McConville
Mott MacDonald – Robert Foord
URS – Colin Bush
WYG – Steve Barrett
•
•
•
•
•
•
Environment Agency - Ellie Challans & Katherine Burt
English Heritage - Phil McMahon & Caroline Power
Forestry Commission – Ian Briscoe
Natural England - Alice Walker & Sarah Grinsted
Wiltshire Council:
o Melanie Pomeroy-Kellinger (Archaeology)
o Helen Garside (Conservation)
o Jon Taylor (Landscape)
o Allan Creedy (Sustainable Transport)
o Kevin Ladner (include in correspondence)
Highways Agency – Richard Ormerod (include in correspondence)
Reporting
•
•
•
DIO Army Basing Programme – Infrastructure Delivery Team
Army Basing Steering Group
Army Basing Planning Sub Group
Review of Terms of Reference
•
Every six months
Appendix 3
Invite Letter and Attendance List for Statutory Consultees Workshop (4th
October 2013)
Dear Sir / Madam,
We write to invite you to a briefing during week commencing 30 September in Trowbridge, jointly
hosted by the Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) and Wiltshire Council, regarding the options
being considered for development in and around the Salisbury Plain Training Area (SPTA) as a result
of the Army Basing Programme. This will form part of the stakeholder engagement that will
ultimately inform a number of planning applications. Your attendance would be greatly appreciated.
Attached at the Annex, is a summary of MOD’s announcement on Army Basing made on 5 March
2013 and its implications for the SPTA.
To support the planning applications, a Master Context Plan is being developed which will establish
the constraints and opportunities for new development, as well as providing an overview of where
development will take place. This will include expansion of current Army bases additional training
facilities and new housing for service families. Proposals for any associated infrastructure that may
be required, such as additional schools, health and leisure facilities provided by Wiltshire Council,
can then be developed. DIO and Wiltshire Council would welcome your early input into the
development of this Master Context Plan at the briefing. In addition we may be seeking specific
information from stakeholders to inform the development proposals to be presented.
Please contact Kevin Ladner on 01225 713220 or via email ([email protected]) by 22
September, to confirm your intention to attend, and when you are available during week
commencing 30 September.
Yours faithfully
David Underhill
Ministry of Defence
Defence Infrastructure Organisation
DIO PPD-Basing Prog Hd
Wiltshire Council
Head of Spatial Planning
Ramillies Building, IDL 416, Marlborough Lines,
Monxton Road, Andover, SP11 8HJ
Mobile: 07768081332
County Hall, Bythesea Road
Trowbridge, Wiltshire. BA14 8JB
01225 713472
Distribution:
English Heritage
Phil Mcmahon | Inspector of Ancient Monuments
English Heritage | 29 Queen Square Bristol BS1 4ND
Tel. 0117 975 0699
Mob. 07900 138612
[email protected]
Environment Agency
Richard Llewellyn-Davies
Environment Officer
Tel01258 483446
[email protected]
Natural England
Sarah Grinsted, Lead Adviser
Wiltshire & Cranborne Chase Land Management Team
Temple Quay House
2 The Square
Bristol BS1 6EB
Tel. 07827 232754
[email protected]
Alice Walker
Land Use Operations
Natural England
0300 060 4923
[email protected]
Highways Agency
Richard Ormerod
Highways Agency | Temple Quay House | 2 The Square, Temple Quay |
Bristol | BS1 6HA
0117 372 8279
E-mail
[email protected]
Annex
A Summary of MOD’s Announcement into the Future Structure of the British Army
The Army Basing Programme is the latest in a series of major announcements by the Government
towards a major reconfiguration of the British Army. Shortly after the Government took office in
2010 it published the Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR) which envisaged a reduction of
personnel in the Army, the redeployment of British forces personnel from Germany to the UK and a
reconfiguration of the Army into five regionally-based multi-role brigades.
The Army Basing Programme announced on 5th March 2013 is based on the new Army 2020 plan
outlined in July 2012. Two key principles guided the Review: that the armoured infantry brigades
should be centred round a single location, and the Army should retain a UK-wide presence. The
Basing Review envisages an Army increasingly consolidated around seven centres in the UK with the
closure of a number of bases, a faster withdrawal from Germany and an end to the culture of
routine rotation in the UK. The Government has committed £1.8 billion to the new basing plan, of
which £1 billion will be spent on new accommodation.
The ministerial announcement on 5th March confirmed Salisbury Plain as a major focus of the
Reaction Force element of Army 2020, with three armoured infantry brigades based around
Salisbury Plain. The SPTA is the only place in the country where the Army can carry out certain
complex training exercises and the concentration of synergistic units around Salisbury Plain is
intended to facilitate these exercises. In total around 4,000 extra personnel will be deployed in the
SPTA.
The key deliverables of the Army Basing Project in the Salisbury Plain Training Area are:
•
extensive new build for single living accommodation (SLA);
•
conversion of existing SLA blocks;
•
additional messing facilities;
•
extensive new build and some conversion of existing technical accommodation, including
workshops, garages, armouries, stores and offices; and
•
over 1,000 new houses for service family accommodation (SFA).
Army Rebasing - Meeting with Statutory Authorities
4 Oct 2013
Trowbridge Wiltshire.
Attendance List:
Wiltshire Council
1. Georgina Clampitt-dix (GCD)
2. Jon Taylor (JT)
3. Melanie Pomeroy-Kellinger (MPK)
4. Allan Creedy (ACr)
5. Helen Garside (HG)
6. Kevin Ladner (KL)
British Army
7. Maj Phil Hill (PHi)
8. Penny Hurst (PHu)
9. Lt Col Jon Fox (JF)
Spatial Planning
Landscape etc.
Archaeologist
Transport
Conservation
Army Rebasing Programme Manager
DCOS
MCI
Project Borona
DIO
10. David Snelgrove (DS)
11. Richard Osgood (ROs)
12. Chris Boulton (CBo)
13. Giles Rowe (GR)
14. Julie Swain (JS)
MOD Consultants
15. Martin Herbert (MHe)
16. Colin Bush (CBu)
17. David Lowin (DL)
18. Steve Barrett (SB)
19. Simon Navas (SN)
Statutory Authorities
20. Alice Walker (AW)
21. Sarah Grinsted (SG)
22. Richard Llewellyn-Davies (RLD)
23. Richard Ormerod (ROm)
24. Phil McMahon (PM)
25. Rohan Torkildsen (RT)
26. Caroline Power (CP)
Apologies
27. Adam Madge (AM)
28. Maj Jon Wort (JW)
29. Lt Col Mark Hiskett (MHi)
Project
Archaeologist
Aquatrine
Environmental Manager
Ecologist
URS
URS
WYG
WYG
Mott MacDonald
Nat England
Nat England
Environment Agency
Highways Agency
English Heritage
Insp Ancient Monuments
English Heritage - Historic Environment Planner
English Heritage - Insp Historic Buildings & Areas
Wiltshire – Planning Officer
HQ 43 (Wx) Brigade
DIO - Training
Appendix 4
Technical Stakeholders Meetings Tracker
Appendix 4 Technical Stakeholders Meetings Tracker
Date
Meeting Type
28 June 2013
Army Basing Steering Group meeting
24 Jul7 2013
22 August 2013
05 September 2013
5 September 2013
4 October 2013
Statutory Consultees initial briefing
10 October 2013
24 October 2013
13 November 2013
Army Basing Environmental Sub Group
14 November 2013
28 November 2013
11 December 2013
12 December 2013
9 January 2014
24 January 2014
Transport meeting (Wiltshire Council, Highways
Agency, Hampshire Council)
30 January 2014
13 February 2014
Army Basing Planning Sub Group meeting
25 February 2014
Statutory Consultees Briefing
26 February 2014
Environmental Sub Group meeting and Presentation
3 March 2014
Briefings to Education and Healthcare providers
10 March 2014
25 March 2014
Environmental Sub Group meeting
27 March 2014
10 April 2014
24 April 2014
7 May 2014
12 May 2014
Environmental Sub Group meeting and Presentation
16 May 2014
Appendix 5
Community Stakeholders Meetings Tracker
Appendix 5 Community Stakeholders Meetings Tracker
Date
Meeting Type
27 Nov 2013
Initial Stakeholder Briefing
2 Dec 2013
Wiltshire Assembly (Wiltshire Council event but with
Army representation)
29 January 2014
Local Stakeholder Briefing
3 March 2014
Special Area Board Briefing- with DIO presentation
29 April 2014
Durrington Town Council Briefing
7 May 2014
Bulford Parish Council Briefing
7 May 2014
Tidworth Town Council Briefing
8 May 2014
Ludgershall Town Council Briefing
28 May 2014
Special Area Board Briefing – with DIO presentation
Appendix 6
Initial Consultation - Press Release
DIO presents Plain proposals in Wiltshire - News stories - GOV.UK
Page 1 of 2
GOV.UK
Menu
News story
DIO presents Plain proposals in Wiltshire
Organisation: Defence Infrastructure Organisation
(https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/defence-infrastructure-organisation)
Page history: Published 6 December 2013
Topics:
Defence and armed forces (https://www.gov.uk/government/topics/defence-and-armedforces) and National security (https://www.gov.uk/government/topics/national-security)
The Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) has presented its early proposals for Army basing in
Wiltshire at a public exhibition.
Some 100 people attended the Army Basing Exhibition in
Trowbridge to review proposals for the relocation of around 4,000
extra service personnel to the Wiltshire area between now and
2020. Attendees included representatives of parish councils and
local businesses.
The moves in Wiltshire form part of the Regular Army Basing Plan
(https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regular-army-basing-plan)
Left to right: Alistair
Cunningham, Wiltshire
Council; Brigadier Piers
Hankinson, 43 (Wessex)
Brigade; David Underhill,
Defence Infrastructure
Organisation
announced by the Defence Secretary, Philip Hammond, in March
2013. This plan set out the where the Army will be located as it
restructures and units move back to the UK from Germany.
The exhibition is part of ongoing engagement with Wiltshire Council
(http://www.wiltshire.gov.uk/index.htm), preparing and planning for
the changes in the area. Changes will include significant new build
and conversion of existing single living accommodation, catering
and technical facilities on existing Ministry of Defence sites.
An extra 1,200 new houses will be provided to accommodate
service families. In total, approximately £800 million will be
invested to provide new and refurbished facilities to support units,
service personnel and their families in the Salisbury Plain area.
David Underhill, Head of Basing Programme Delivery, said:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/dio-presents-plain-proposals-in-wiltshire
15/05/2014
DIO presents Plain proposals in Wiltshire - News stories - GOV.UK
Page 2 of 2
“ DIO’s priority is to support our armed forces by
providing what they need to live, work, train and
deploy on operations. Our aim is to provide fit for
purpose infrastructure, making the most of current
facilities and maintaining integrated and sustainable
communities for both military and civilian families
moving to the Salisbury Plain area by 2019.
Many of the changes will be centered on Tidworth,
Bulford, Perham Down, Larkhill and Upavon; early
engagement with people who live and work in those
areas is vital to the success and acceptance of the
plan. We greatly value the feedback and comments on
the list of potential sites we presented as part of the
exhibition.
The information collated will contribute to the master planning
process, beginning with a formal consultation period in January
2014 for 6 weeks; the master plan setting out the context for the
moves, infrastructure plans and the associated planning
applications that will be required to be submitted to Wiltshire
Council for endorsement in May 2014.
Share this page
• Share on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gov.uk%
2Fgovernment%2Fnews%2Fdio-presents-plain-proposals-in-wiltshire)
• Share on Twitter (https://twitter.com/share?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gov.uk%2Fgovernment%
2Fnews%2Fdio-presents-plain-proposals-in-wiltshire&text=DIO%20presents%20Plain%20proposals%
20in%20Wiltshire)
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/dio-presents-plain-proposals-in-wiltshire
15/05/2014
Appendix 7
Initial Stakeholder Briefing – Presentation Slides
Presentation Outline
Army Rebasing - Involving
Local Communities
Alistair Cunningham
Director Economic
Development and Planning
Plans for Wiltshire
• An increase army personnel (Salisbury Plain) from 10,700 to
14,800) by 2018
• Dependants - a further 6,000 to 8,000 people
• £850 million to be invested on family homes, facilities “within
the wire” (single living accommodation and technical facilities),
and the training estate
• Early moves within UK prior to Germany drawdown
• Employment - Army will need support for dependants and
those made redundant (c. 10,000 nationally)
• Wiltshire welcomes the Army
• Military / Civilian Integration is one of the 10 key actions in
Wiltshire Council’s Business Plan
•
•
•
•
•
MOD Overall (National) Plans - MOD will cover
Plans for Wiltshire
Working Jointly with MOD
What this Means for Wiltshire Communities
Community Engagement
Working Jointly with MOD (1)
• Military Civilian Integration Partnership since 2007
• Army Rebasing Steering Group set up immediately after
March announcement
• MOD has assessed its infrastructure needs and engaged
planning consultants to set out its requirements
• Working closely with Wiltshire Council to align with
Wiltshire policies and needs
• We are both committed to stakeholder engagement
Working Jointly with MOD (2)
• Exploring nature of planning applications with council
• Looking for “Win/Win/Win”
¾ Army gets right facilities in the right place on time
¾ MOD (Defence Infrastructure Organisation) delivers on
time within budget and achieves Value for Money
¾ Wiltshire benefits from shared facilities, boost to
economy, benefit of skills from leavers and spouses
• Essential to cooperate and involve statutory authorities,
members, town and parish councillors and community
What this Means for Wiltshire Communities
• Economy – increased opportunities
• Housing – Up to 1,400 homes for Service personnel
• Training Area – slight increase but no higher than
recent historical levels
• Schools - more classrooms arising from additional
children
• Health – providing for health needs of military families
• Leisure and Recreation facilities – potential for sharing
• Pressure on Social services
Community Engagement
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Community views welcomed
Initial briefing through Area Board structure
Monthly Newsletter since October
Stakeholder Briefing – today
Three local exhibitions
Public Consultation early 2014
Involvement in Masterplan in Spring 2014
Planning Applications Summer 2014
Army Basing Plan
and the Salisbury Plain Area
David Underhill
DIO Basing Delivery Head
• Requirement:
– March 2013 Defence Secretary of State announced Army Regular Basing Plan
– Need to relocate British Troops from Germany back to the UK, and
– To reconfigure units in the UK for their future role under the Army 2020 strategy
•
Scope:
– Involving circa 19,000 military personnel returning from Germany from 120 units across
70 UK sites moving between 2014 and 2019
SCOTLAND DEVELOPMENT
Two units into Leuchars from Germany. One unit
moves to Belfast allowing 3 RIFLES into Dreghorn
with a re-role to a Light Protected Mobility Unit.
• A2020 Manpower Total: 3,560
• Potential Disposals: Redford, Edinburgh (part);
Craigiehall, Edinburgh; and Forthside, Stirling (part)
NORTH WEST
Chester and Preston.
– Including sites in Wiltshire: Tidworth, Bulford, Perham Down, Larkhill and Upavon
NORTHERN IRELAND
Retain two Infantry Battalions.
• A2020 Manpower Total : 1,840
• Current Process:
Major Centres of Gravity (7)
Includes: Deployable Force (Combat HQ and Units including a combination of Reaction, Adaptable and Force Troops Brigades)
Excludes: Non-Deployable Force (training, recruiting and personnel support) and Reserves
Enduring Army headcount in UK is 79,000, no net reduction from SDSR
– Approximately 4,000 additional military personnel for the Salisbury Plain Area raising
the total number to 14,800 by 2018.
– 1600 new homes nationally to accommodate service families, with up to 1400 in the
Salisbury Plain Area.
Key:
A2020 Regular Army Basing Plan
– Undertaking Studies to assess the development options, review the costs and
timescales
– Master planning the development across all the sites within the Salisbury Plain Area
– The boards contain information that outlines the sites, areas and facilities affected.
.
NORTH EAST DEVELOPMENT
Catterick will remain approximately the
same size but with significant changes in
roles and new Units. Additional new Units
at York, Albemarle and Dishforth.
• Potential Disposal: Claro, Ripon
4
EAST MIDLANDS DEVELOPMENT
Cottesmore, North Luffenham, Grantham and
Wyton.
WALES BASING
One Regiment will move within Wales to
a new development at St Athan by 2020.
• Potential Disposal: Cawdor, Brawdy
3
EASTERN ENGLAND
Colchester and Swanton Morley
– Managed jointly between DIO and the Army
– Liaison with Wiltshire and other councils
Other Areas
WEST MIDLANDS DEVELOPMENT
Stafford (BORONA).
• Potential Disposal: Copthorne, Shrewsbury
7
5
LONDON & SOUTH EAST
Various sites.
• Potential Disposal: Howe,
Canterbury
6
SALISBURY PLAIN
Three AI Brigades to be based at Salisbury Plain. Two
existing Mechanised Bdes convert in situ.
1
SOUTH WEST & SOUTHERN
Various sites including Thorney Island and Hermitage (excludes
Salisbury Plan and Aldershot).
2
ALDERSHOT DEVELOPMENT
Addition of two Protected Mobility Heavy Infantry
Battalions.
10
Army Basing Plan
and the Salisbury Plain Area
Stephen Harness
DIO Senior Town & Country Planner
• Initial information gathering process - Completed
– Constraints & Opportunities Mapping & Initial Infrastructure
Assessment.
• The Consultation process
– NOW: Seeking your views on the approach being followed and key
issues we should be considering
– Comment forms to be returned today or by 6th December
– THEN: Analysis of feedback & input to the sifting process
– FORMAL CONSULTATION: 6 Weeks Commencing Mid January 2014
on location and scale of development & preferred sites.
– THEN: Analysis & input to Master Plan issued May 2013
• The Master Plan
– will set the context for any applications to Wiltshire Council. Detailed
work on these applications will then commence.
Appendix 8
Invite and Attendance Lists for Initial Stakeholder Briefing
Salisbury Plain - Consulting for a Master Plan
ATTENDANCE RECORD FOR PRESENTATION & EXHIBITION 27TH NOVEMBER 2013
AT WELLINGTON ACADEMY, TIDWORTH
Note: Attendance sheet totals 99.
9 Total headcount in auditorium 110 – discrepancy due to
late arrivals after commencement
ATTENDANCE RECORD – GUESTS
(Total 71 No.)
Name
Organisation
Chris Williams
FdR-P
Mark Connolly
Jerry Kunkler
Mike Hewitt
John Smale
Charles Howard
Graham Wright
Jacqui Abbott
Caroline Brailey
Mary Cullen
Wendy Higginson
Chris Franklin
Wiltshire Councillor (Ludg & PD)
Wiltshire Councillor (Wrmnstr W'out)
Wiltshire Councillor (Tidworth)
Wiltshire Councillor (Pewsey)
Wiltshire Councillor (Brn & Wdfd Vlly)
Wiltshire Councillor (Bulf, Allgtn & Fighldn)
Wiltshire Councillor (Cllngbrns & Nvravon)
Durrington & Larkhill
CAM Warminster
CAM Pewsey
CAM Tidworth
Development Centres for Young People
Mayor Tidworth / Chair Tidworth TC
Cholderton Parish Council & Ldr S Wilts Advocacy Ntwk
to mltry in Wilts
W'mnstr & Villages Comity P'hip (WVCP)
Nat Trust
S Wilts Defence Industries UTC Proj Man
Late Night Economy group in Salisbury
Principal Sarum Academy
Deputy Principal Sarum Academy
Director of Business and Finance
Figheldean School – Head
Figheldean School-Parent Governor
S Wilts Grammar - Parent Governor
Stonehenge School - Headteacher
Stonehenge School - Parent Governor
Clarendon Infants School
Shrewton NdhPl coord
Netheravon Vice Chairman
Winterbourne Stoke PC – Clerk
Bulford Parish Clerk
Bulford Parish Chair
Cholderton Parish Chair
Myra Orr
Shona Holt
Nicola Snashall
Gordon Aitken
Amanda Newbery
Mrs Ruth Johnson
Bruce Burley
Ms Dawn Higgins
Jill Adams
Olivia Davies
Edward Richards
Nigel Roper
AN Other
Jane Spandswick
Patrick Curry
Cllr Burke
Jim Carr
Nichola Grove
Ms Jackie Clark
Crawford Stoddart
1
ATTENDANCE RECORD – GUESTS (Page 2)
Name
Organisation
Graham Reeves
Cllr John Swindlehurst
Cholderton Parish Clerk
Amesbury TC
Jim Carr
Winterbourne Stoke PC Clerk
Winterbourne Stoke Parish Council
Cllr Tony Zacks-McGoldrick
Scott Carruthers
The Castle Practice
Dr Steve Comber
The Castle Practice
David Waspe
S'bury & S Wilts Scouts - Dist Commissioner
Paul Cowen
Upavon Parish Chair
Julie Tremlin
Extended Services Coordinator Tidworth
Adele Lake
NSPCC Tidworth
Sharon Skelly
NSPCC Tidworth
Jim Johnson
Chair Stonehenge Chamber of Trade
Shirley Hollis
Vice Chair Stonehenge Chamber of Trade
Paul Lefever
Chair Healthwatch Wiltshire
Godfrey Tilney
Tidworth Chamber of Commerce
Rebecca Thompson
Ramona Mc
4Cildren, Children’s Centre
Andrew Williams
Amesbury Town Council
R A Haywood
Netheravon Parish Council
Joan Beaullea
Wilts CC
Fred Westmoreland
Wilts CC Amesbury
Rev Mark Zammit
Stonehenge Deanery
Ian Cawbrook
WCC Manager
Lisa Burgess
4Cjhildren, Windmill Hill Children’s Centre
Roger Ashill
Carol Slater
Shrewton PC
Ann Larsen Bennett
Upavon Support Group
Tony Pickerwell
Tidworth Community Area Partnership
Fred Galvin
Tidworth resident
Donna Proctor
St Leonards Primary, Bulford
Patrick Wilson
Pewsey & District Chamber of Commerce
Mike Tillyer
Durrington Town Council
John Todd
ATTENDANCE RECORD – GUESTS (Page 3)
2
Name
Mark Avoth
Humphrey Jones
Reia Jones
Richard Holden
Martyn Kemp
Mike Milner
Sandra Richardson
Ivor Noyce
Stuart Watson
Dr Barbara Igney
Louis Hoareal
Colin Beagley
David Winter
Ruth Freeman
C Kemp
Organisation
Avon Valley College
Tidworth Town Council
Chair TCAP H&S Care GP
Hants CC
Salisbury Diocese Board of Education
TWA (?)
TWA (?)
Durrington Junior School
Avondale Prep School
The Castle Practice
Codford Parish Council
Figheldean Primary School
Bourne valley Practice
TTC
ATTENDANCE RECORD – DIO & MILITARY
(Total 17 No.)
Name
Organisation
David Underhill
Brig Piers Hankinson
Stephen Harness
Robert Shopland-Reed
Martin Herbert
Simon Navas
Colin Bush
Maj Phil Hill
Sue Harper
Lt Col Jon Fox
Giles Rowe
Padre Chighen (?)
Lt Col Gosling
Mrs Tammy Dixon
James Denny
Lt Col Bennington
Barbara Sealy
DIO
CO HQ 43 (Wx) Brigade
DIO - DIO Senior Town & Country Planner
DIO - SAPT SAM-Strat1 (part)
MM (supp DIO) - Stakeholder Manager
HQ 43 (Wx) Brigade
HQ 43 (Wx) Brigade
MOD Borona Team
DIO Environmental
HQ 43 (Wx) Brigade
Upavon Station
Army press office HQ 43 (Wx) Brigade
MoD Garrison Cmd Tid/Bul
HQ 43 (Wx) Brigade
Tid/Bul garrison Early Years
3
ATTENDANCE RECORD – DIO & MILITARY (Page 2)
Name
Organisation
Michael Russell
Charlene Stevens
Henry Mtonga
DIO SEA PAC
DIO Press Office
ARTD-RG-NRC Upavon
ATTENDANCE RECORD – Wilts CC Officers
Name
Organisation
Alistair Cunningham
Kevin Ladner
Ann Huggett
ATTENDANCE RECORD – WYG (Supporting DIO)(Total 6 No.)
Name
Organisation
Steve Barrett
Jennifer Lui
Alice Broomfield
Tim Lamacraft
Paul Labbett
Rob Pearson
PM –Team Lead
T & C Planner
T & C Planner
T & C Planner
Architect
T & C Planner
4
Appendix 9
Initial Consultation - Display Boards
Appendix 10
Wiltshire Assembly Attendance List
Wiltshire Assembly - Attendance List
02 December 2013
Ref
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
Surname
Firstname
Company/Organisation
Addington
Peter
Highway Farm
Alberry
Nicky
Deputy Lieutenant
Position
Alecock
Maj John
3 Regt Royal Military Police
Allan
Lance
Trowbridge Town Council
Town Clerk
Allen
Ben
Wiltshire College
VP Business Development
Ashby
Laura
Tidworth Mums
Ashton
Tracey
Sovereign Global UK
Training Co-ordinator
Ayliffe
Greg
Chippenham Rugby Club
Community Rugby Liaison Officer
Barras
John
FSB
Baxter
Peter
Wiltshire Compact
Chairman
Beale
Carolyn
Children and Families Voluntary Sector Forum
Coordinator
Bealing
Michael
The Red House Hotel
Bebb
Richard
Goughs Solicitors
Bedford
Mike
Splutz
Beech-Allend
Peter
The Enterprise Network
Bell
Laurie
Wiltshire Council
Service Director - Policy, Research and Comms
Bellamy
Captain Ian
Personnel Recovery Centre (South)
Welfare Officer,
Bertuello
Roy
Procol Ltd
Director
Blackmore
Michael
Planning Manager
Electrit
Blakemore
Charlotte
Tidworth Mums
Bond
Richard
Hills Waste Solutions
Contract Manager
Bourne
Jonathan
Wootton Bassett Town Council
Town Clerk
Brand
Carlton
Wiltshire Council
Corporate Director
Brice
Bob
Trowbridge Town Council
Leader
Bridges
Teresa
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust
Broadhead
Richard
Wiltshire Soldiers
Broom
Rachel
Aster Group
Head of Learning and Development
Brown
Sam
SSAFA Wiltshire Branch
Assistant Secretary & Training Organiser
Brown
WO1 (RSM) Steve
21 Signal Regiment
Bucknell
Allison
Royal Wootton Bassett and Cricklade Area Board
Burdis
Shaunne
Military Police
Burke
David
RGV Engineering (Netheravon) Ltd
Managing Director
Burt
Katherine
Environment Agency
Planning Specialist
Chairman
Bush
John
Wiltshire Assembly
Chair
Cambrook
Ian
MCI Programme
Programme Manager - Consultant
02 December 2013
Ref
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
Surname
Firstname
Position
Canning
Spencer
Asset Pkus One Ltd
Carman
Lt Col (Retd) Richard
Tidworth and Bulford Garrison
Deputy Chief of Staff
Carter
Tracy
Wiltshire Council
Associate Director
Chappell
Richard
Richard Chappell Interiors/Richard Chappell Photography Proprietor
Charman
Frances
Holiday Inn Express Swindon West
Chase
Adrian
FBS
Regional Sales Manager
Child
Annie
Salisbury City Council
Services manager - Civic and Community Engagement
Clifford
Duncan
Electrit
MD
Clifford
Janet
Company Secretary
Marketing enablers
Cooper
Emma
Wiltshire Council
Partnership Development Manager (Resilient Communities)
Couzens
Air Vice-Marshal David
SSAFA
Chairman Wiltshire Branch
Cox
Emma
Action on Addiction
Business Development Manager
Credido
Rachel
Aster Group
Change Director
Crompton
Bel
Home-Start Kennet
Scheme Manager
Cullen
Mary
Wiltshire Council
Tidworth Community Area Manager
Cunningham
Alistair
Wiltshire Council
Service Director - Economy and Enterprise
Dalby-Walsh
Brig (Retd) Tony
RFCA/SaBRE
Daniel
John
Mabey Hire Ltd.
Regional Director
Davis
Stephen
Wiltshire Wildlife Trust
Head of Conservation Policy
de Rhe Philipe
Fleur
Wiltshire Council
Cabinet Member
Deeley
Brian
Age UK Wiltshire
CEO
Denning
Nick
Procol Ltd
Director
Denny MBE
Col James
Tidworth and Bulford Garrison
Commander
Dicker
Sarah
Wiltshire Council
Voluntary and community services
Douglas
Andrew
Awdry, Bailey and Douglas Solicitors
Drew
Matthew
Goughs Solicitors
Dunstan
Quetin
Faslane Results
Dymond
Karen
The Shaw Trust
Farnworth
Claire
Spurgeons Bulford Childrens Centre
Administrator
Ferries
Ian
Councillor
Finlay
Rachel
Salisbury & District Chamber of Commerce
Executive Officer
Firth
Sharon
Inspire Away
Flynn
Lisa
Wiltshire Probation Trust
Forrest
Kate
Fortune
Janice
Develop
Team Leader - Wiltshire Supported Employment
Probation Local Delivery Unit Manager
Chief Officer
02 December 2013
Ref
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
Surname
Firstname
Position
Foster
Amanda
Salisbury & District Chamber of Commerce
Board Director
Fox
Frances
Tedworth House
Volunteering Project Manager
Franklin
Mike
Wiltshire Fire & Rescue Service
Partnership & Community Engagement Manager
Freman
Natasha
Merriman Waine
Leading property executive
Gamble
Richard
Wiltshire Council
Councillor
Gard
Derek
Volunteer Coordinator
Gascoigne
Jay
Wiltshire Council
National Management Trainee
Gearney
Debs
43 (Wx) Brigade Personnel Recovery Unit
2IC
Gelleburn
Andy
Holiday Inn Express Swindon West
General Manager
Gibbons
Ian
Wiltshire Council
Asscoiate Director
Gillett
William
Blesma
Gittins
Major Dickie
Officer Commanding
Glass
Nick
Wiltshire Council
manager for school strategic planning
Godfrey
Carolyn
Wiltshire Council
Corporate Director
Goodall
John
Wiltshire Council
``
Goodall
John
Chippenham Rugby Club
Chairman Chippenham Mini Rugby
Gosling MBE
Lt Col Chris
Upavon
Station Commander
Graham
Captain PJ
Army
Second in Command and Quartermaster
Graham
Capt. Phil
2ic 10 Signal Regiment
Gray
Barbara
Wiltshire Council
Communications
Green
Doug
DEG Signal Ltd
Chief Executive
Greene
Paul
British Limbless Ex-Service Men’s Association
Support Officer (South West)
Gregory
James
Alder King
Gullis
Sandy
Wincanton
General Manager
Hamersley
Gerry
Natural England
Area Manager, Gloucestershire, Wiltshire & Oxfordshire
Hankinson
Bdgr Piers
43 Wessex Brigade
Commander
Harford
Rob
Harford's 4 x 4 Ltd
Compnay Director
Harford
Judith
Harford's 4 x 4 Ltd
Compnay Director
Harley
Keith
Tidworth Garrison Golf Club
Business Development Officer
Harper
Sue
43 Wessex Brigade
Engagement
Managing Director
Harrison
Elaine
Poppies Daycare Nurseries
Hawley
Lady Ruth
Deputy Lieutenant
Hecquet
Meryl
GROW
Community Development Manager
Helps
Hew
Home Farm
Owner
Hill
Peter
Salisbury Health Centre
Chief Executive
02 December 2013
Ref
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
Surname
Firstname
Position
Hills
Hodges
Nigel
Wiltshire Council
Senior Commissioning and Performance Officer (Substance misuse)
Michael
Deputy Lieutenant
Hodges
Micahel
Merriman Waine
Principal
Hodgkins
Michael
Chairman
Hodgkins
Mike
Wiltshire Wildlife TRust
Hopkinson
Ruth
Corsham Town Council
councillor
Huggett
Anne
Wiltshire Council
Communications
Hughes
Stephen
SWAN Advocacy Network
Armed Forces Advocacy Service Volunteer
Hughes
Barry
Selwood Housing Association
Chief Executive
Hurford
Catharine
Carer Support Wiltshire
Head of Operations
Hurst
Penny
43 Wessex Brigade
Civil Engament
Ingleton
Colonel Grant
Commanding Officer
Ingleton
Lt Col Grant
Jellalabad Barracks, Tidworth
Jackson
Tony
Army Welfare Service
Jackson
Tony
43 Wessex Brigade
BWSO
Jacobs
Simon
Devizes Area Board
Chairman
James
Lucy
Wiltshire Council
Public Health Intelligence
John
Suzanna
Career Transition Partnership
Employment Consultant
President
Johnson
Wing Commander Jeremy
Jones
Eliot
Salisbury Chamber of Commerce
Jones
Claire
Nationwide
Joyce
Rev Penny
Old Sarum
Community enabler
Kelly
Jan
1st Lyneham Brownies
Fundraising co-ordinator
Kirby
Jenny
NHS England
Head of Armed Forces Health (south)
Kitching
Jo
Recruit for Spouces
Director
Ladner
Kevin
Wiltshire Council
Development Officer
Le Feuvre MBE
Lt Col John
Larkhill Garrison
Deputy Garrison Commander
Levy
Paul
NCE computer group
Services Sales Manager
Llloyd
Andrew
Alabaré Christian Care & Support
Chief Executive
Loades
Wendy
Stop Loan Sharks Team - Trading Standards
Lead in Awareness, Intelligence, Support & Education
Lofthouse
Simon
Awdry, Bailey and Douglas Solicitors
Long
George
Chairman
Lyndene
Dawn
43 Wessex Brigade
Civil Engament
MacPherson
Angus
Police and Crime Commissioner
Police and Crime Commissioner
Mallon
Colette
Wiltshire Council
Economic Development
02 December 2013
Ref
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
Surname
Firstname
Position
Manby
Stuart
Ark Data Centres
Client Sales Director
Manley
Peter
Wiltshire Council
Economy and regeneration
Mantle
Gary
Director
Martin
David
Corsham Town Council
Town Clerk
Martin
Alison
Warminster School
Bursar
Mason
Tim
Wiltshire Community Safety Partnership
Partnership Manager
Matthews
Phil
Wilton Town Council
Wilton Mayor
Maunder
Yvonne
Wiltshire Probation Trust
Business Support Manager
McQuaid
Kevin
Wiltshire Heavy Building Materials
Director
Cpmmander
Merriman
Col Peter
Warminster Garrison
Merton
Peter
9 Regiment Royal Logistics Core
Miller
Cdre Andrew
COS & SO1 Recruiting
Morris
Simon
Salisbury Arts Centre
Engagement Manager
Morrison
Graeme
Wiltshire Council
Communications
Mounde
Michael
Warminster and Villages Community Partnership
Mullard
Professor Chris
Deputy Lieutenant
Murley
David
Wiltshire College
Director of Enterprise
Nicholls
Julia
Regional Resettlement Centre
Regional Employment and Training Manager
Nichols
Ross
Federation of Small Businesses
Oatley
Kate
Trowbridge Community Area Future
Project Officer
Odams
Sue
Wiltshire Council
Reservist
O'Keeffe
Sean
The Training Wing
Managing Director
O'Malley
Kate
Creative Ecology Wiltshire
Creative Producer for Theatre
Orr
Myra
SWAN Advocacy Network
Armed Forces Advocacy Service Project Lead Volunteer
Owen
Gareth
SCISYS UK Ltd
Business Development Manager (Govt & Defence)
Paine
Julian
Aster Group
Regional Director
Parnham
Raymond
Raymond John Parnham
Managing Director
Parnham
David
Operational Director
Parnham
Micheal
Operational Director
Paton
Roz
People Issues HR services
Direcor
Patten
Roz
People Issues HR Services
Peden
Jo
Health Protection Agency
Peters
Sgt Beverley
Military Police
Pictor
Laura
Wiltshire Forum of Community Area Partnerships
Pirie
Barry
Wiltshire Council
02 December 2013
Ref
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
Surname
Firstname
Position
Plain
Pointon
Matt
Aster Group
Head of Marketing Services
Diana
Wiltshire Council
Senior Researcher
Popowicz
John
Head of Community Safety and Partnerships
Powell
Matthew
Fundraising Officer
Pratt
Andrew
Poppies Daycare Nurseries
Finance Manager
Preston
Michael
The Training Wing
UK Training Manager
Pullen
Sally
Wiltshire Police
Youth and Community Officer
Rahman
Wali
Wiltshire Council
Economy and Enterprise
Randolph
David
Deputy Lieutenant
Read
Philippa
Community First
Reay
Tamara
Office of Claire Perry MP
Reed
Lee
Gemini Property Services/KMAK Ltd.
Rendle
Louise
Wiltshire and Swindon Users' Network
Head of Network Services
Richards
Susie
Recruit for Spouces
Talent Acquisition Director
Chief Executive
Richardson
Sandra
Wellington Academy
Ricketts
Carole
Direct Cleaning Services Ltd
Ridout
Pip
Warminster Town Council
Ritson
Keith
Audience Systems Ltd.
Roberts
Mat
Landmarc
Robinson
Kate
Wiltshire and Swindon Community Foundation
Rogers
Dan
Landscape Group
Routh-Jones
Simon
Interim Chief Fire Officer
Ryan
Julie
Wiltshire Council
Elections
Sanders
Jeremy
Hartham Park plc, Corsham
Scott
Jane
Wiltshire Council
Leader
Sellers
Samantha
Danlers Ltd.
Sales and Customer Services Manager
Shoesmith
Claire
Wiltshire Council
Elections team
Simms
Lucy
Wiltshire Council
Communications
Simpson
Chris
FSB
Smale
John
Amesbury Area Board
Chairman
Smith
Pete
Devizes Town Council
Mayor
Smith
Pete
Remploy Ltd.
Head of Uniformed Services - Commercial
Smith
Mike
The Rifles Regimental Casualty Officer
Smyth
Col Aidan
43 Wessex Brigade
Spaven
Nick
Gastro Nicks Ltd.
Development Director
Deputy Commander
02 December 2013
Ref
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
Surname
Firstname
Position
Spiller
Squadron Leader Andy
MOD Boscombe Down
Squadron Leader
Stenner
Matt
AVAYA
Sales Manager
Stone
Steve
Swindon and Wiltshire Local Enterprise Partnership
Chair
Stone
Tamsin
Wiltshire Council
Lead Commissioner and Childrens Trust
Strange
Margaret
South Wilts Mencap
Swabey
Mike
Royal British Legion
Chairman Wiltshire Branch
Swindlehurst
John
Councillor
Swindlehurst
John
councillor
Symonds
Hannah
Merriman Waine
Family Matters
Tatlock
Adam
1st Choice Stairlifts
Sales and Business Development Manager
Tatlock
Adam
1st Choice Stairlifts
Sales and Business Development Manager
Teal
Ken
FSB
Temple
Michelle
Temple-Multon
Dee
Wiltshire Business Support Services
Business Manager
Thatcher
Tony
Wiltshire Citizen Advice Bureau
Head of Finance and ICT
Thomas
Rev Dr Robert
Rector, Trowbridge St James' with Keevil
Chaplain
Thomas
Karina
Hayne and Smith Optician
Thomas
Victoria
Tidworth Mums
Thompson
Roger
Action of Hearing Loss
Tilney
Godfrey
Wiltshire Council
Timms
Kevan
The Edington Group
Group Managing Director
Tomes
Linnet
Wiltshire Council
Communications
Troughton
Sarah
Lieutenancy office
HM Lord Lieutenant of Wiltshire.
Truscott
Alan
Community First
Tuckett
Jackie
Jobcentre Plus
Childcare Partnerships Manager
Tyas
Peter
Wiltshire Council
Heritage and Arts
Vaughan
Darren
Direct Cleaning Services Ltd
Waites
Dennis
Walker
Craig
Lyons Seafoods Ltd
Warnock
Jenny
Forever Living Products (FLP).
Watt
Chris
Bath ASU
Weston
Mike
Age UK Wiltshire
Chair of Trustees
Director or HR
White
Steven
Vectura Ltd.
Wildman
David
Castledown Steering Group
Wilk
Mischi
Homes and Communities Agency
House Director
Distributor
02 December 2013
Ref
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
Surname
Firstname
Position
Wilkinson
Adrian
Westbury Town Council
Councillor
Wilkinson
Maj Howard
43 Wessex Brigade
Chief of Staff
Williams
Christopher
Tidworth and Ludgershall Area Board
Chairman
Williams
Reg
Salisbury City Council
Town Clerk
Williams
Amanda
Aster Group
Group Development Director
Willmont
Sean
Willmont Building Services Ltd
Willmot
Jerry
SW Veterans Advisory & Pensions Committee
Winchester
Col Dickie
Larkhill Garrison
Commander
Winchster
Maj Adrienne
43 Wessex Brigade
Transition
Windess
David
Westbury Town Council
Mayor
Wintour
Patrick
Healthwatch Wiltshire
Board member
Woodhouse
Thomas
Wootton Bassett Shadow Community Operations Board
Vicar of Wootton Bassett and Rural Dean of Calne
Woodhouse
Giles
Tedworth House
Centre Manager
Woolnough
Lt Col Paul
Commander 1 Mech Bde
Wragg
Peter
Visit Wiltshire / LEP
Wylam
Jo
Audience Systems Ltd.
Wyldbore-Smith
William
High Sheriff
Wylie
Jordon
The Training Wing
Wyse
Martin
Chippenham Chamber of Commerce
Yates
Jon
Wiltshire & Swindon Community Foundation
Yorke
Heidi
Wiltshire & Swindon Community Foundation
Chairman
Operations Director
Development Director
Appendix 11
Initial Consultation - Comments Form
Army Basing - Salisbury Plain
Consulting for a Master Plan
The ministerial announcement on 5th March confirmed Salisbury Plain as a major focus of the Reaction
Force element of Army 2020. In total around 4,000 service personnel will be rebased in and around
Salisbury Plain as part of the Army Basing Programme. This exhibition is the first part of the MOD
community engagement strategy, which will continue throughout the delivery of the project.
For the purposes of recording and collating responses we would like your contact details, however these
can be left blank if you prefer:
Name
Email address
Address
The consultation boards show a number of issues and propose questions about where the SFA should be
sited. Please can we have your comments. For Example:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
What do you feel we should be considering as part of the community engagement process?
Are there any issues that make the Salisbury Plain Area special to you?
Are there any special issues that we need to consider on the Plain itself where training takes
place?
Are there any issues that may affect you when we make changes on the existing bases to
accommodate future needs?
Do you have any views on where you think the new Service Families Accommodation dwellings
should or should not be sited? Please provide your reasons.
What new or improved local services are needed to provide for the expansion of the number of
military personnel and their families in the area?
How can the proposed Service Family Accommodation be integrated into the existing communities?
Date:
Post:
FREEPOST RTGX-TXYU-AXSL
Army Basing Salisbury Plain
Ropemaker Court
11 Lower Park Row
BRISTOL
BS1 5BN
Please continue overleaf should you need to
Email:
[email protected]
Space for further comments
Appendix 12
Initial Consultation - Tri-Fold Leaflet
Appendix 13
Initial Consultation - Schedule of Responses
ARMY BASING PROGRAMME - Salisbury Plain Masterplanning Consultation
Initial Public Consultation - 27th November to 6th December 2013
SCHEDULE OF RESPONSES
Date: 15/01/2014
1
2
Schedule represents all comments received up to date of schedule
version
Hand written response forms received have been transcribed - [word]
indicates transcriber could not read/interpret the word on the form
Ref
Name
Address
Organisation
Date
received
Comments
Response/Action required
RECEIVED VIA EMAIL/RESPONSE FORMS
1
Julia Eager (Head of
Leaden Hall School)
Leaden Hall
School, 15B The
Close, Salisbury,
SP1 2EP
Leaden Hall School 27-Nov-13
Educational provision is vital for both the families coming into the area and those already here. We need to ensure that there are enough school places available of the best quality possible, not just scrabbled
DIO is working closely with Wiltshire Council to determine the education requirements of the incoming population, this includes identifying the demand for private/grammar
together. Our children are the future and we need to make sure that they leave their schools as confident, resourceful and well trained individuals ready to contribute to the wider community as a main feeder for the schools. An element of the Masterplan is to identify the likely impact of the proposed incoming personnel and their families on current services and infrastructure. The
Masterplan will inform greatly on this and is intended to be used as a planning tool to accurately target resources to where we believe additional services will be required i.e.
grammar school, at Leaden Hall we provide that quality of education - over the last few years all of our girls who have committed themselves to the 11+ have gained places and have done very well there.
additional school places.
MOD will also be consulting directly with local schools as part of our formal consultation whcih is due to take place between February and April 2014.
2
Becky Thompson
23 Burlington
Walk, Tidworth,
SP9 7GE
Chair of Governors, 27-Nov-13
Clarendon Infant
School
The sites around Corunna barracks and Ludgershall make sense for extra SFA with regard to the extra regiment in Pernham Down. This would also make it easier for children to access the secondary school safely as Comment regarding Corunna Barracks, Ludgershall noted.
well as using the extra capacity of Castle Primary School. I am very concerned as to the impact on current infrastructure i.e.roads. Something needs to be done to ensure that soldiers are housed as close as possible
to their place of work to minimise road use or to encourage things like cycle use for commuting. Currently government employees can access schemes to purchase bikes tax free but the military are not able to!
Traffic studies and assessments are being carried out as part of the overall plan to identify pinch points and areas of concern. Plans to mitigate problem areas will be
developed. Mitigation may include agreeing access routes for heavy transport.
It is preferential to both Wiltshire and the Army to site their personnel close to their place of work with the intent to maximise sustainable forms of transport wherever
practical or feasible.
MOD are exploring sustainable travel options, this includes introducing cycleways linking the settlements around Salisbury Plain. Any plans for cycleways will be developed
and presented to the public to accompany planning applications, but where possible these will be incorporated into the emerging Masterplan process.
3
Trudy Austreng
Wick Barn,
Solicitor and
27-Nov-13
Tisbury, SP3 6NW Governor of Leaden
Hall School
6. Education is key to the success of this relocation. Most families aspire to the grammar schools in Salisbury and special consideration should be given to promote pre school teaching to achieve success at 11 +
level. I am writing to support Leaden Hall as the main feeder to South Wilts Grammar School. We are a day and boarding school for girls of 3-11 years. the existing school provision is nothing like coping with the
number of families moving here - the private sector can help and must be given a chance to assist here. No reasonable army personnel will stay without this chance to give their children the education that they
themselves didn't have.
DIO is working closely with Wiltshire Council to determine the education requirements of the incoming population, this includes identifying demand for private/grammar
schools. An element of the Masterplan is to identify the likely impact of the proposed incoming personnel and their families on current services and infrastructure. The
Masterplan will inform greatly on this and is intended to be used as a planning tool to accurately target resources to where we believe additional services will be required i.e.
additional school places.
We will also be consulting directly with local schools as part of our formal consultation whcih is due to take place between February and April 2014.
4
Susan Raeburn
c/o Kiwi School,
Hubert Hamilton
Road, Bulford
Camp, SP4 9JY
Headteacher of Kiwi 27-Nov-13
Primary School
I would welcome further SFA on Bulford camp. As the headteacher of the school there, it would allow the expansion/development now needed by the school. I am currently in discussions with Wiltshire Council
regarding this, although many proposals would be dependent on further SFA in the area. We have "oodles" of space for school expansion. In addition to the obvious benefits to the forces children already in
attendance (98%). As the units based in Bulford increase, it would be very helpful for the families to live close to the place of work to minimise the amount of car journeys needed along the range road and in and
out of Bulford. Win win! I hope you choose Bulford for some of the proposed builds. This may also encourage development of current facilities for current families (we no longer even have a post office!) I will take
this to my governors for discussion at their meeting on Monday 2nd December.
Comment regarding new development at Bulford noted.
DIO is working closely with Wiltshire Council to determine the education requirements of the incoming population. An element of the Masterplan is to identify the likely
impact of the proposed incoming personnel and their families on current services and infrastructure. The Masterplan will inform greatly on this and is intended to be used as
a planning tool to accurately target resources to where we believe additional services will be required i.e. additional school places.
5
Karen Lineker
Wiltshire Council, Wiltshire Council
Bourne Hill,
Salisbury, SP1
3UZ.
27-Nov-13
A. Roads need to be close to the top of the list - rightly or wrongly they are a top concern of the Amesbury area and other community areas.Either improved communication is needed to clarify what the real issues Traffic studies and assessments are being carried out as part of the overall plan to identify pinch points and areas of concern. Plans to mitigate problem areas will be
are, where they can/cannot be addressed to reassure communities, or transparency is needed as to the investment programme for new road infrastructure. B) This is an opportunity to further and enhance efforts to developed and presented in the consultation for the final masterplan (post May 2014). Mitigation may include agreeing access routes for heavy transport.
truly integrate military and civilian families - more time, resources and "communications-pr" is needed.
It is preferential to both Wiltshire Council and the Army to site their personnel close to their place of work with the intent to maximise sustainable forms of transport
wherever practical or feasible.
6
Mike Bealing
Red House,
Cholderton, SD4
0EG.
27-Nov-13
Shockingly bad exhibition. No staff to explain boards or ask questions. No name badges on various people wandering about. No help for those with hearing/vision impairment. A case study in how not to consult typical of Wiltshire Council!
DIO replied directly to the consultee due to the nature of the response (18 December 2013). Email response set out below:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dear Mr Bealing
I refer to your response to the exhibition at Wellington Academy and although we are not generally replying individually to responses received, I feel that your comments
require one:
‘Shockingly bad exhibition’ – your comment is noted but was the only adverse one on the exhibition itself, rather than content, that we received.
‘No staff to explain boards’ – there were two identical sets of exhibition banners in place, one adjacent to the wall and the other opposite facing into the foyer. Two sets
were provided to avoid a crush of viewers around each banner, the one against the wall was unstaffed whilst the other was fully staffed with one or more member of the
team alongside each banner after the auditorium event.
‘No name badges on various people wandering about’ - there were approximately 107 people attending the auditorium event who then decanted to the exhibition. There
was no requirement for attendees to wear identification and the exhibition was open to the general public from 730pm so, yes, there were a lot of people in the area with no
name badges. For the team members on the staffed exhibition banner set all of them had some form of identification around their neck, identifying them as representing
either Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) or WYG (consultants to DIO). In total there were 10 staff on the banners. In some cases the identification was not the
person’s name but identified the party that they were representing.
‘No help for those with vision/hearing impairment’ – thank you for your pertinent comment. The exhibition as a means of communication was a preliminary event and not
part of a formal public consultation (6 week period starting in Feb 14). As such it was, to a degree, a trial run. We have had and are continuing discussions within the team
on the issue of avoiding discrimination with respect to communications and will have measures in place for the formal series of events to ensure that we have done
everything possible to avoid any perceived, or actual discrimination. In case you yourself are visually impaired I attach a copy of the exhibition banners that were on display
on 27 th – these can be blown up electronically to whatever scale you require.
7
The Castle Practice
Central Street,
Ludgershall, SP11
9RA
27-Nov-13
We need an increase in primary care facilities - both building room and additional clinical personnel. The current NHS GP facilities cannot cope with an increase in demand and a clear consultation process with local
healthcare providers need to take place - not just area team and NHS England who do not deal with the day to day care of patients.
An element of the Masterplan is to assess the needs of incoming personnel and their families and how these can be accommodated given current services and infrastructure.
The Masterplan is intended to be used as a planning tool to accurately target resources to where it is believed additional services will be required i.e., additional school
places, health & community provision, transportation, environmental and ecological matters.
MOD have collated information on the incoming population from which we will base our calculations for the infrastructure that is required to meet the needs of the new
population. MOD is working closely with Wiltshire Council to plan for and provide the required additional infrastructure.
Military personnel are provided with medical and dental services on base. Their families are able to use MOD GP medical facilities but may opt to use civilian services. The
precise number using which service won’t be known for some time however, to prepare for this MOD/ Wiltshire Council & Health Authorities are working closely together.
MOD will also be consulting directly with healthcare providers as part of our formal consultation whcih is due to take place between February and April 2014.
Page 1 of 8
Date: 15/01/2014
1
2
version
Ref
Name
8
Amanda Newbury
9
Amanda Newbury
The Chapel, 34
Milford Street,
Salisbury, SP1
2AP
10
Mark Connolly
Wiltshire Council, Wiltshire Councillor 29-Nov-13
Tidworth
Address
Organisation
Date
received
Chair of Salisbury 28-Nov-13
BID (Business
Improvement
District) c/o Robin
McGowan (Business
Manager)
28-Nov-13
Comments
We are keen to engage at any level we can ensure the military personnel and their families are made as welcome as possible into the Salisbury commercial sector: shopping, leisure and services. Also to work with
other Wiltshire towns e.g. Amesbury, Devizes, to ensure no leakage into Hampshire.
Comment noted
Response from Salisbury Pubwatch/late Night Economy: We have between 1-2000 army personnel (estimated) every week in the evening/late night venues. We welcome them and want to work with the Army to
ensure their safety and wellbeing. Issues around intoxication and return transport late at night with lack of infrastructure. We have ideas that have funding and sponsorship solutions but also need basic public
transport put in.
MOD are exploring sustainable travel options. An increase in the local population would help to bolster services such as public transport (bus services e.g.) as they could
make certain bus routes more viable. New sustainable travel options will be presented in the consultation material for the final Masterplan.
1. Any development in Tidworth and Perham Down would need to see improvements to infrastructure, such as schools, health/social care, leisure and foot/cycle paths. These improvements should be for the whole community, not just
the military community. 2. Any Service Family Accommodation built must be built in the areas where the soldiers will be working, not soldiers living in Tidworth travelling across the Plain to Larkhill or Bulford for example. It must be
sustainable so that personnel do not have to drive to work (that is why improving the foot and cycle networks should be important). The Community Area Partnership has for 20 years been trying to rebalance the Tidworth community
but Army Basing will threaten this work as DIO has already bought 10% of the North East Quadrant from Persimmon – this being on land that was sold by DIO to provide civilian housing and help rebalance the community. The North
West Quadrant (land that wraps around the Hill Top and Zouch estate) has been identified by the recently adopted Community Area Plan for civilian housing from 2026 (end of Wiltshire Core Strategy) – please see link
http://www.tidworthcommunityarea.info/community-plan and should not be lost for the provision of SFA.
Comment noted.
An element of the Masterplan is to assess the needs of incoming personnel and their families and how these can be accommodated given current services and infrastructure. The Masterplan
is intended to be used as a planning tool to accurately target resources to where it is believed additional services will be required i.e., additional school places, health & community
provision, transportation, environmental and ecological matters. MOD have collated information on the incoming population from which we will base our calculations for the infrastructure
that is required to meet the needs of the new population. MOD is working closely with Wiltshire Council to plan for and provide the required additional infrastructure.
As hundreds of SFA are to be built in Tidworth and Perham Down to accommodate the net increase of three units as a result of Army Basing, Wiltshire Council and Tidworth Town Council will want further land released by DIO for civilian Military personnel are provided with medical and dental services on base. Their families are able to use MOD GP medical facilities but may opt to use civilian services. The precise number
housing, especially if the North West Quadrant is used for SFA.
using which service won’t be known for some time however, to prepare for this MOD/ Wiltshire Council & Health Authorities are working closely together.
The development of the Masterplan is being carried out in accordance with statutory guidelines and in close liaison with Wiltshire Council so local strategic aims of sustainable and integrated
I oppose all land identified for possible SFA that is next to the A338/A3026. These are not suitable for the large numbers of housing that is required and will significantly detract from the green lung appearance of the Town along these
communities can be met.
routes. The land next to St Michaels Church should remain a green site and the thin strips of land next to Bulford Road should not be used as they will spoil the views of the historic military buildings behind the wire.
Traffic studies and assessments are being carried out as part of the overall plan to identify pinch points and areas of concern. Plans to mitigate problem areas will be developed. Mitigation
The only sites that are suitable for housing will be the two next to Site 19/Church Lane, which will be next to existing SFA, the site between Humber Lane and Bulford Road and the North West Quadrant (though as stated previously, I
may include agreeing access routes for heavy transport. It is preferential to both Wiltshire Council and the Army to site their personnel close to their place of work with the intent to
would prefer the latter was used for civilian housing). If these sites are used for SFA, then I propose that the field between the North West Quadrant and the military cemetery should be released for civilian housing, along with another maximise sustainable forms of transport wherever practical or feasible.
site.
The provision and siting for military housing are the subject of a specific housing study and the emerging Masterplan to identify the most appropriate and beneficial locations to support
With regard to Perham Down, the vehicle depot site should be mixed use with business use being next to the A3026 to compliment Castledown Business Park. The Brimstone Bottom site next to the Academy on the A3026 should not
Wiltshire Councils housing strategy and the military requirements. SFA is in addition to the housing numbers specified in the emerging Wiltshire Core Strategy. Where it may not be possible
be used for SFA as it is on a steep gradient and may be liable to flooding at the bottom. The other sites around Drummond Park (the old medical depot) are possible sites but I would prefer that these sites were not used, especially as
provide agreed new build SFA in time for their arrival alternative sources, either short term lease or capital purchase, may be considered but only after consultation with Wiltshire Council
MOD will not allow access on its road from the A342 to the A3026.
and for it to be in compliance with their strategic plans. At the time of writing, the total number of military housing required is 1,380 and the proposal for the supply of these houses is to
purchase 199 units of commercial stock to de-risk the Army Basing Programme supply, as this number of SFA are required by April 2015 and cannot be procured for construction in time
I support the sites to the East of the Australian estate and to the West of Swinton Barracks for SFA. Another site for consideration could be to the South of the civilian estate, which is poor quality arable land.
available. The purchase of commercial stock has been agreed with Wiltshire Council. The remaining requirement will be delivered by DIO.
I do not support the land next to Wood Park, Ludgershall, as this will increase the traffic pressures at the Memorial junction (A342/A3026) and the bridge traffic lights on the A3026. As stated above, personnel should live where they
work.
Within the North West Quadrant, sites T15 and T16 in Tidworth have been identified as preferred sites for military housing as part of the formal consultation (February to April 2014) on the
masterplan, with Site T19 identified as a potential site option. DIO understand that the North West Quadrant has been identified for civilian housing from 2026 in the latest Tidworth
Community Area Plan. We will work with local stakeholders with regard to the next steps.
If the sites I support are built on for SFA, then there should be a footpath provided on Somme Road from the Wellington Academy to Perham Down and the existing path from Perham to Tidworth should be improved into a dual foot
and cycle path with lighting so that people are encouraged to walk and cycle to work and for leisure.
11
Kirsten Rangecroft
4 Meadow View,
Larkhill, SP4 8FD
03-Dec-13
I object to any proposed development on land at site 6. 1. I paid a premium for my property and do not want to live on a housing estate. 2. I like the unique ambience of the place. 3. Shouldn't this land be
preserved? 4. Would the terrain be suitable for new build? 5. Will have a detrimental value on my property. 6. It may be of some relevance that aspects of the proposed property such as street lighting affecting
Stonehenge, poor infrastructure would make building inadvisable.
The site in question (L14a and L14b) did not progress to the next stage of the SFA site selection exercise as it lies within the World Heritage Site and Concordat and
considered unsuitable for development.
The precise means to provide SFA required has yet to be determined however, by working closely with Wiltshire Council and complying with their strategic development
plans we aim to have a minimal effect on civilian housing stock. The principle being followed is that the SFA provided will be over and above the requirements for housing in
Wiltshire Council's emerging Development Plans and therefore there should be no reduction in the market availability of civilian housing.
12
Chris Franklin
13
Joy Peatman
Mayor of Tidworth
2 Meadow View,
The Packway,
Larkhill, SP4 8FD
03-Dec-13
I thought the plans/maps shown outside on the boards were rather small and not great to see the coloured outlines, not saying this was on purpose but I have seen far better ! Requested plans/maps/photos for the Comment on presentation/format of consultation material noted.
areas concerning Tidworth & Perham for a meeting.
04-Dec-13
I have just seen the building plans proposed for Larkhill. I am devastated to see that the meadow directly outside my apartment is outlined for development. The map only indicates the row of
shops, these apartments built last year seem to have been overlooked. I bought this apartment just over a year ago to spend my retirement in, the outlook was the deciding factor to buy in
Larkhill, for which i paid a premium. I was assured by the developer that the meadow would never be built on. As you can see from the attached pictures, taken from my lounge window, the
outlook down to the church and towards the Officers Mess is truly lovely, as I am retired I spend most of my time at home and enjoy this view.
The site in question (L16) did not progress to the next stage of the SFA site selection exercise. The site is within the Concordat, noted as major risk by Wiltshire Council and
DIO. Further local objections were raised regarding setting of nearby church.
3 out of the 5 apartments own dogs,we obviously don't have our own gardens so the meadow and surrounding walks are very important to us, these are main leisure areas for walkers, dog
Walkers and horse riders. If the meadow was to be built on, the value of our property would be adversely affected and possibly very difficult to sell in the future, although my plan was to stay here
forever. This is obviously on a very personal level as a civilian living in Larkhill, and we are probably a high percentage of the civilian population !
Larkhill would obviously need additional facilities for the extra families..such as schools doctors and dentists. Nearby Amesbury is already at capacity. Retail outlets in Larkhill are inadequate.
Traffic is already heavy and fast along the Packway, since the road past Stonehenge was closed Larkhill is now a rat run to avoid the heavily congested A303...an accident waiting to happen. I
absolutely understand the need for development, but surely there is enough open space without the need to cram houses into this small plot right on our doorstep. The thought of living on a
building site does not inspire me! Please give this serious consideration I don't want to sell up even I could with this hanging over us.
14
Jenny Holmes
05-Dec-13
We live in Watergate Lane, Bulford Village and have to pay a heavy household insurance because the fields at the back of our properties are subject to flooding, in fact, on the old maps that area is shown as Flood
Plain, so why would houses be built there? Maybe Carter Barracks could be filled with houses, why do people have to live on top of one another these days? I know now why Wessex Water were so busy with the
pipe work and the electricity company before them, what a shame the local people aren't informed in the correct manner about what is happening.
Page 2 of 8
The site in question (B15) did not progress to the next stage of the SFA site selection exercise due to flood risk.
Date: 15/01/2014
1
2
version
Ref
Name
Address
15
John le Feuvre
23 Strangeways,
Larkhill, SP4 8LN
Organisation
Date
received
Comments
05-Dec-13
1. The information boards showing SFA sites were extremely poor quality and difficult to understand. 2. Wherever SFA sites are situated, they need to be in or near a sustainable community. The Larkhill site(s) will
require community services, especially as Durrington does not have these in abundance. 3. SFA sites south of the Packway in WHO site/area is preferred option. Such sites would be close to centre of gravity of the
existing support services, as limited as they may be. Do not allow WHO/EH to override any suggestion that SFA sites in existing should not be allowed. 4. One area shown far too close to Durrington, Durrington
Town Council will not like this in the time span being proposed. Formally request that this site is avoided as it will create a military ghetto on the close edge of Durrington. 5. Timescales WC/MOD are presented with
make integration into existing communites in the future impossible.
Comment regarding presentation/format of consultation material noted. MOD and Wiltshire Council are working closely to identify impacts on retail and leisure and to plan
for addressing any shortfalls as part of the emerging Masterplan.
Support for development South of the Packway noted. Whilst sites south of the Packway were excluded early on in the subsequent site selection exercise due to the World
Heritage Site designation, some of these sites were re-introduced as potential SFA sites due to support from residents and the army.
Comment regarding coalescence between Larkhill and Durrington noted. Any forthcoming proposals for SFA development in that location will maintain a large green buffer
so that SFA will not serve to conjoin the two settlements. They will remain distinct and separate from one another.
16
Mary Towle
We were surprised that areas such as Netheravon and Upavon were not part of the overall plan, bearing in mind that there are link roads. The opportunity to have smaller groups of houses in villages in need of investment we believe
is an opportunity missed. This led the meeting and responses to suggest that you are looking for larger site so you can build maximum quantity at minimum cost. Area 1 - a green space needs to be kept between our existing building
line (Wiltshire Core Strategy) and any future development west of Durrington. New houses were welcomed but residents want to clearly retain the existing village identity of Durrington and services houses built in close proximity could
result in Durrington becoming a Garrison Town. by setting a precedent and opening the way for future development near to the existing building line. Area 3 - Golf Range which may or may not be part of your plan (map not clear) came
next as least popular. Loss of local amenity. Areas 2, 4, 5 and 6 - There were seen as ideal sites because they are adjacent to the local facilities and existing SFA housing. Please note that 4,5,6 are brown field sites and any objections
from English Heritage are seen as irrelevant in current circumstances because these areas are fully screened by mature trees and with the need for the housing EH need to compromise. Area 7 - The most popular was site 7 although we
appreciate the fact that due to the close proximately to Fargo Ammunition Compound it may be discounted. Summary - Apart from site numbers 1 and 3, it was agreed that a general spread of SFA accommodation near to existing
facilities is the way forward
Durrington Town
The Council
Office, The
Council
Village Hall, High
Street,
Durrington,
Salisbury,
Wiltshire, SP4
8AD
06-Dec-13
06-Dec-13
As you may be aware, the National Trust looks after various parcels of land around Stonehenge – see attached map. We therefore have an interest in proposals affecting Larkhill and the wider Amesbury area,
Comment noted, the National Trust have been added to the distribution list for future consultation events.
particularly from a landscape and heritage perspective, but also as regards local infrastructure (including highways). Going forwards, we would very much appreciate the opportunity to meet with DIO early next year,
primarily to discuss the Army Basing proposals.
08-Dec-13
The need for additional Service Families Accommodation (SFA) on Salisbury Plain is clear but this development cannot be considered in isolation. The potential locations for SFA are all in close proximity to the A303 Traffic studies and assessments are being carried out as part of the overall plan to identify pinch points and areas of concern. Plans to mitigate problem areas will be
– one of the busiest East/West routes in Southern England. Furthermore, they are all close to the major congestion point at Amesbury – the stretch covering the Countess Roundabout, Stonehenge and the
developed. Mitigation may include agreeing access routes for heavy transport. It is preferential to both Wiltshire Council and the Army to site their personnel close to their
Longbarrow Roundabout.
place of work with the intent to maximise sustainable forms of transport wherever practical or feasible.
The additional traffic generated both by new housing development, and military traffic, in the area will exacerbate the problem causing even greater delays on the A303 as traffic attempts to join the A303 or cross
it heading to Salisbury at Countess Road or the Amesbury East A303 Junction. It should be noted that traffic on Countess Road is already excessive as motorists attempt to avoid delays on the A303; to add to this An element of the Masterplan is to assess the needs of incoming personnel and their families and how these can be accommodated given current services and infrastructure.
would be intolerable for Countess Road residents.
The current proposals therefore make it imperative that the various Government Departments and heritage agencies take urgent concerted action to widen the A303 in this area, various proposals for which have places, health & community provision, transportation, environmental and ecological matters.
been under discussion for many years.
Housing development has continued apace during the past decade placing ever greater strain on local infrastructure. The new SFA sites will require local retail and recreational in addition to schools and medical
facilities if the development is not to place undue strain on existing resources and impact unfavourably on the present population.
population. MOD is working closely with Wiltshire Council to plan for and provide the required additional infrastructure. Military personnel are provided with medical and
dental services on base. Their families are able to use MOD GP medical facilities but may opt to use civilian services. The precise number using which service won’t be
known for some time however, to prepare for this MOD/ Wiltshire Council & Health Authorities are working closely together.
17
Mark Funnell
Eastleigh Court,
Wiltshire
18
Guy Lawrence
60 Countess
Road, Amesbury,
SP4 7AT
National Trust
The intention is for new homes to be located close to existing bases to minimise travel time for personnel. The key unit locations for incoming units as set out in the
Regular Army Basing Plan are Perham Down, Larkhill, Bulford and Tidworth. Consequently the areas of search for potential housing sites have been centred around these 4
bases. Comment regarding coalescence between Larkhill and Durrington noted. Any forthcoming proposals for SFA development in that location will maintain a large green
buffer so that SFA will not serve to conjoin the 2 settlements. They will remain distinct and separate from one another.
The Golf Range (L19) did not progress to the next stage of the SFA site selection exercise due to lease issues and public opposition. The large site within the Larkhill Camp
(L13a and L13b) did not progress to the next stage of the SFA site selection exercise as it is required for new technical development.
The development of the Masterplan is being carried out in accordance with statutory guidelines and in close liaison with Wiltshire Council so local strategic aims of
sustainable and integrated communities can be met.
19
David Potts
Bulford Camp
11-Dec-13 I live in my own house within the curtilage of Bulford Camp. GR 1800 1994. The possibility of building on the ‘ blue’ area to the SW of the property has already had a disastrous effect on its value - a drop of at least The site in question (B24) did not progress to the next stage of the site selection exercise as there were more favourable sites available within this settlement.
40%. I am 75 years old and need to plan for the future.
How soon will a decision be taken on the SFA building sites so that I will know how much of my estate remains ?
Wiltshire Council's emerging Development Plans and therefore there should be no reduction in the market availability of civilian housing.
20
Jason Miller
Building 20 Glover Army
Road, Royal
Artillery Barracks,
Larkhill, Salisbury,
Wiltshire, SP4 8QT.
17-Dec-13 I understand that the Army Basing plan for Salisbury Plain will of course involve new building works in the Larkhill area. I do not have any preference about the location of the new buildings but would like to
propose a way to raise money for the Larkhill Community welfare fund.
My proposal is to host a metal detecting Rally on the area of ground to be built upon prior to the start of any construction work. Having attended a number of these rallies in the past, all of which have been for a
charitable cause, I expect we would raise funds in the region of £2000 for a one day event. This may spread into a 2 day event depending on the size of the available ground.
The event would be done in accordance with the portable antiquities scheme and the number of detectorists would be limited to a manageable number. The close proximity to Durrington wall would ensure a great
deal of interest from the detecting community.
I have already approached the deputy garrison commander, Lt Col John Le Feuvre, with the idea, and on principle he is on side with the concept.
I have also approached local business about sponsorship interest with positive results.
Page 3 of 8
Comment noted
Date: 15/01/2014
1
2
version
Ref
Name
21
Nichola Grove
Address
Organisation
Clerk to Bulford
Parish Council
Date
received
Comments
17-Dec-13 The Parish Council has provided a detailed response. Section of response set out below:
Sites B6, B 16, B23 are included as preferred sites within the formal consultation (February to April 2014), site B30 was included as a potential site for military housing.
a. Bulford Parish Council understands on good authority that the number of SFA dwellings required in this Parish is 250 - with, perhaps, an eventual small amount of adjustment resulting from circumstances in
neighbouring Parishes.
b. On this basis, Council considers that this number of dwellings should be accommodated in one estate without mixing its composition with civilian content.
Reasons :
(1) Ease of administration including the resolution of neighbour disputes.
(2) A mixed estate would result in unnecessarily large increases in the green land area required (outside established Development Boundaries).
c. Council considers that the 250 dwelling estate in this Parish should be established as one estate within the following designated areas :(1) B6 - northern portion.
(2) B16 - northern portion.
(3) B23
(4) B30
places, health & community provision, transportation, environmental and ecological matters.
population. MOD is working closely with Wiltshire Council to plan for and provide the required additional infrastructure.
Reasons :
As part of the plans we are looking at all the existing recreational facilities within the areas and we are working with MOD to ensure the right services are in place. MOD is
(1) Ease of administration - this general area lies opposite to the established SFA Canadian Estate and alongside (for part of its length) the military Married Quarters lying to the north east of the Parish Housing
aware of the benefits of sharing its facilities with local communities and aims to accommodate this wherever feasible.
Estate (marked in green on the Consultation Map); a solid military administrative framework already exists in this area.
(2) Road Access - this area would allow for exit & entry on to two roads, the Bulford Road and Double Hedges, thereby easing vehicular congestion.
(3) This area would allow for a sensible and logical extension of the Parish Development Boundary.
(4) SFA dwellings in this area would facilitate social inter-action between the military families and those in the Parish civilian housing estate; it could also provide direct (largely internal) road access to the Parish
Village Hall and recreational facilities.
(5) SFA households in this area would readily connect with the combined footpath and cycleway (that is in the last stages of planning) over Aerial Hill, Folly Bottom, and Amesbury; moreover, entry to an established
Bridleway, leading directly to Amesbury, lies adjacent to this route.
(6) Electrical, water, and sewage infra-structure have already been enlarged and improved to the recently re-built Canadian Estate and it is thought that an extension would be comparatively easy.
The Council suggests that improvements to local facilities including buses, roads, schools, medical and child care facilities will be necessary. Shared recreational facilities is suggested to promote integration.
22
The site in question has been identifed as a potential option for military housing in the formal consultation on the Masterplan (sites L2, L13b and L18). Potential sites are
18-Dec-13 At the meeting held in Durrington the other night there appears to be a outright objection building along the A345! Also to keep houses as central as possible to the camp itself. My only objection would be site 4,
which is on the base of the First World war (some years previous to this actually) Army flying site. This is the oldest Military Flying site still in existence in the WORLD. The only sign that it was here, is a simple
those which are more constrained and require further studies to be undertaken, and would be back up options. These sites are within the World Heritage Site and noted as
base plate cast in iron on the corner of the road. A certain Norman Parker is a military Historian who lives in Amesbury and already runs a small museum based in the ‘George Hotel’ Amesbury! He also writes in the major risk by Wiltshire Council and DIO.
Local Stonehenge Trader. I have spoken to Norman and he would have loved his Museum to have been based on this site in one of the Old Aircraft buildings. This would be a good thing for the Military and the
Locals to be involved in wouldn’t it?
Before submitting planning applications for SFA, the County Archaeologist has noted that unless sites can be shown at desk-based assessment stage to have low potential
I have signed into the Local committee that will oversee peoples comments! We would love to hear from you too! It is noted that most agree and support this plan in principle it is just a case of tying all the details for archaeological deposits, whether because of earlier ground disturbance or previous archaeoligical investigations or the scale of prior development, assessment works will
in regards to services etc.
be undertaken to inform the baseline data. Such field evaluation can include geophysical surveys and evaluation trial trenching.
John D Wigglesworth
Where possible, English Heritage thematic studies on military heritage, including airfields and barracks will be employed to inform assessment of assets. In other cases a
more iterative approach based on the experience and expertise of DIO heritage staff will be essential to ascribe signficance and value to historic buildings and training
remains.
23
Jonathan Banham
34 Windsor Road
Durrington
Salisbury
Wilts
SP4 8HG
18-Dec-13 An extensive letter sent to Claire Perry MP which has been summarised below:
Personally I welcome these proposals, however the right location must be found and the right community benefits secured. Many of the locations identified around Larkhill are clearly unsuitable. Sites 1-4 should in
my opinion be classified as sited in open countryside, furthermore sites 1,3 &4 would impact on the setting of Durrington Walls which is an important historic site.
Aside from three sites (L2, L13b and L18), none of the sites south of the Packway progressed to the next stage of the SFA site selection exercise due to the World Heritage
Site designation. Sites L2, L13b and L18 have been identified as potential sites, potential sites are those which are more constrained and require further studies to be
undertaken, and would be back up options. These sites were included following support from the general public and MOD, although it is acknowledged that they are within
the World Heritage Site and noted as a major risk by Wiltshire Council and DIO.
Clearly the best site for sustainable development is site 7. This site is within what should be classified as a “brown field” development site as it sits within the existing boundary of the garrison. Careful consideration Before submitting planning applications for, the County Archaeologist has noted that unless sites can be shown at desk-based assessment stage to have low potential for
will need to be given as to how access to and from The Packway. If this site is found unsuitable site 6 offers the best opportunity to integrate the development within the garrison's facilities being within easy
archaeological deposits, whether because of earlier ground disturbance or previous archaeoligical investigations or the scale of prior development, assessment works will be
walking distance of the school, play area, Church, local shops and services. Sequentially a case can be made for this being the most sequentially preferable site.
undertaken to inform the baseline data. Such field evaluation can include geophysical surveys and evaluation trial trenching.
If these two sites are discounted, and only on this basis site 5 would be the least worst option. This site is opposite a large existing housing estate and within the natural boundary (albeit not defined in the core
Where possible, English Heritage thematic studies on military heritage, including airfields and barracks will be employed to inform assessment of assets. In other cases a
strategy) of the settlement. The proposals around Bulford look even harder. The sites to the North of the camp should be investigated first as these offer the best opportunity to access services within the camp and more iterative approach based on the experience and expertise of DIO heritage staff will be essential to ascribe signficance and value to historic buildings and training
avoid building in the open countryside. I believe that the overwhelming majority accept the need for the new houses there are concerns being raised about the creaking local infrastructure.
remains.
The large site within Larkhill Camp (L13a and L13b) did not progress to the next stage of the SFA site selection exercise as it is required for technical development.
The site selection process indicating the reasons for the inclusion and/or exclusion of specific sites can be found in Appendix 9 of the Planning Context Report (Phase 3
report - Consultation Draft).
24
Mrs Taylor Cox
25, Newman’s
Way Bulford
Whiltshire SP4
9HT
17-Dec-13 I am very concerned about the sites actually surrounding the village of Bulford. I believe any new building that attach to the village itself will not only ruin its character but also put a strain on the amenities available. A number of residents have objected to SFA development on potential sites adjacent to the Conservation Area. These sites did not make it through the site selection
I also anticipate that this will significantly increase traffic on what is already a busy network due to overflow from the A303. In particular, I am concerned about the noise disturbance and loss of privacy to my own exercise and have been omitted.
property on Newman’s Way
25
Sheryll Jerred
West hedges,
Church Lane,
Bulford, Salisbury
SP4 9DD
17-Dec-13 Existing local communities – Bulford village in part is a conservation area and I feel strongly the land designated around the village will destroy the environment, the village has already seen a huge development with A number of residents have objected to SFA development on potential sites adjacent to the Conservation Area. These sites did not make it through the site selection
the council estate which has been successful and sited appropriately. I feel further development should be concentrated in the Bulford camp area not the village.
exercise and have been omitted.
I accept S.P.A is for military use and feel need to respect this – it is a known quantity when moving in to such an area (The huge housing development is a very different issue) enjoy the free day to walk here.
As above – I do feel the MOD is very good at notifying the public of their expenses – thank you!
Yes we have recently purchased west hedges and are doing a self-build – we have to keep our build ‘Agriculture’ It look due to it's sensitive site & location so I am somewhat shocked that schedule 1 land has been
marked for housing development.
Obviously not in the farming area I have highlight above feel new housing is necessary but it should be in a area where new roads do not have to be built – farming land is precious – the area I’m talking about is
also SSSI!!! The M.A.Hoppe farming land is mainly around the Bulford village area and this should be used to protect the area and continue farming.
Schools, Dr’s etc etc, entertainment need to be in areas which can take this development along with the proposed dwellings ‘Bulford village is not the place’
Very difficult but small developments would be better than large as like minded people stick together - better chance of interaction in smaller numbers.
Page 4 of 8
Date: 15/01/2014
1
2
version
Ref
Name
Address
26
Garland
9 Milston View,
Durrington
Organisation
Date
received
Comments
Sainsbury Plain is beautiful with its SSSI sites and archaeology – so please don’t make great conglomerates around its base – allow green spaces between the villages. The new houses should be have a pleasing
Candidate sites within SSSIs have been been omitted as part of our site selection exercise.
outlook and not built in to the “rabbit house” style. Perhaps outlaying villages would benefit from a dozen or so houses in their communities to keep the local amenities going, like the village shop, post office, school
to survive. I hope there will be some excavation of the areas chosen even the ‘brown field’ site below the 30 mph sign (packway) to determine that our heritage will not be lost. Exercises on the plain have always
MOD maintains strong commitment to the conservation of the historic environment within its estate, with its stated aim of sustainable development and role as steward of
respected the special sites and with the possible greater use I hope this will continue.
the historic assets within its holdings.
Before submitting planning applications for SFA, the County Archaeologist has noted that unless sites can be shown at desk-based assessment stage to have low potential
for archaeological deposits, whether because of earlier ground disturbance or previous archaeoligical investigations or the scale of prior development, assessment works will
be undertaken to inform the baseline data. Such field evaluation can include geophysical surveys and evaluation trial trenching.
27
Amber Goodchild
20 Watergrate
Lane, Bulford,
SP4 9D4
The first point to make is the lack of engagement with the local communities that this exhibition was even taking place. We heard of it by chance. Leaflets should be put through the door of those communities likely Comment about advertisement of consultation events noted. The exhibitions as a means of communication were preliminary events and not part of a formal public
to be affected by the plans.
consultation (6 week period starting in Feb 14). Press releases were issued to local papers publicising the start of the consultation period.
We bought our property in Bulford village as a place to retire from the military, whilst we don’t mind living near the camp, Bulford village is completely separate from the camp and should remain so. To suggest
A number of residents have objected to SFA development on potential sites adjacent to the Conservation Area. These sites did not make it through the site selection
building quarters in the centre of Bulford village in the area between Watergate lane and Bulford High Street is concerning us and other residents is an understatement.
We paid a lot of money for our property and there is no doubt that building on our area will drastically devalue the property.
Bulford village would turn from a village into a town, not what we bought in the village for.
Building on the village boundary will also increase the size of the village drastically and change the whole feel of the village. There is plenty of MOD land surrounding all the garrison areas why encroach on the local
scullion population?
A very worried resident of Bulford village!
MORE NEEDS TO BE DONE TO LET RESIDENTS KNOW THESE EVENTS ARE TAKING PLACE!
28
No Name provided
29
Sarum Academy
Has consideration been given to building houses at Netheravon/Upavon on army land? They both have easy access to all centres such as Tidworth, Larkhill and Bulford by the army tracks across the plain therefore Comment about advertisement of consultation events noted. The exhibitions as a means of communication were preliminary events and not part of a formal public
consultation (6 week period starting in Feb 14). Press releases were issued to local papers publicising the start of the consultation period.
keeping military traffic off the main roads. It would also be good for the local communities.
I hope this consultation is not just a box ticking exercise but you will listen to local residents. Most of us will welcome the increased military presence as long as it is done sensitively and due regards given to those of
us who already love the area, its rural aspect and archaeology. In future please advertise any exhibition I only saw it as I am a library user. Not all of us look online – we need info in local papers, on local radio,
No military housing is proposed at Upavon or Netheravon. The intention is for new homes to be located close to existing bases to minimise travel time for personnel. The
posters etc. Thank you.
key unit locations for incoming units as set out in the Regular Army Basing Plan are Perham Down, Larkhill, Bulford and Tidworth. Consequently the areas of search for
potential housing sites have been centred around these 4 bases.
Westwood Road, Sarum Academy
Sailsbury,
Wiltshire SP2 9HS
Sarum Academy is very keen for accommodation to be close to Salisbury. Our new purpose built facilities are state of the art. A key strength of the academy is the strong pastoral care we provide which will support DIO is working closely with Wiltshire Council to determine the education requirements of the incoming population. An element of the Masterplan is to identify the likely
the young people of service families integrate into their education community. We are very willing to support in any way to enable to potential transition to our institution to be as smooth as possible.
impact of the proposed incoming personnel and their families on current services and infrastructure. The Masterplan will inform greatly on this and is intended to be used as
We currently have surplus places which mean that pupils who may already know each other could be placed together.
a planning tool to accurately target resources to where we believe additional services will be required i.e. additional school places.
30
A B Taylor-Roberts
The cottage, 38
old coach road,
Bulford village,
SP4 9DA
I am writing specifically about the proposal (or potential) to build SFA in the area to the north of Old Coach Road, Bulford. The area to the south of the road is both a conservation area and a building restraint area. A number of residents have objected to SFA development on potential sites adjacent to the Conservation Area. These sites did not make it through the site selection
Both north and south of the road is an area of special archaeological interest. There are plenty of brown field site to build on which would not destroy the character of the surrounding countryside. The effect on the exercise and have been omitted.
value of the houses (and the quality of life to the inhabitants) in the conservation area is also something you should give serious attention to. I trust you will resolve this matter soon as I am in the middle of a
conservation programme concerning my house and garden and will now cancel all future works until this matter is resolved.
31
D H Potts
Owl house, 203
the penning,
Bulford camp,
Salisbury, Wilts
SP4 9BT
This consultation for a master plan for the new SFA in the area has come as a complete bombshell. It has a spread widespread concern. It not clear how much thought has into the selection of the ‘blue’ area. Even The blue areas on the plans indicate the 'long list' of sites which are being considered for SFA. The majority of the land parcels will not be developed for SFA.
as a first stab some areas seem pretty unlikely.
We are liasing with a number of local stakeholder groups including parish councils, and local business groups.
Our primary concern is – when will the decision on the areas selected be made public?
Following the initial consultation, sites were assessed against a number of factors including environmental constraints, access to existing facilities, proximity to duty stations.
Comments on your points –
report - Consultation Draft). One of the weightings under the 'environment' category was 'agricultural land' e.g. land which is not in agricultural use would score higher than
1) You should ensure the Regimental Welfare/Family Officers HIVES etc are fully briefed on the new quartering area and what they have to offer. They should be talking to Town Councils, Parish Councils, Chambers a site which comprised Grade 1 Agricultural Land. Consequently, brownfield land would therefore score higher than greenfield land.
of Trade, Parochial Church Councils, working Men’s clubs etc, etc.
2) I am retired soldier 1960 – 1994, well acquainted with the Garrisons, Camps and SPTA. I live in Bulford camp GR 1800 4340
3) As long as training is well controlled as in the past there should be no problem. Increased unauthorised civilian 4x4 and motorbike activity may be cause for concern.
the Wiltshire Council's development plans and therefore there should be no reduction in the market availability of civilian housing.
4) The drop value of my property
5) Clearly ‘brown field’ sites should be considered first. Of the three areas Larkhill has the most. Where agricultural (schedule 1) land is considered care should be taken to avoid close overlook by existing private
properties
The provision of further school places, retailing, community facilities and public open space will become part of the proposal for each location, and will take account of the
level of facilities currently available at each location. Opportunities to further military-civilian integration will be a key determining factor in the selection of final SFA sites.
6) Bus services, additional retail outlets (good shops) in Larkhill, Tidworth and Bulford (talk to local councils/chambers of trade – make them aware, real opportunities here).
7) Service families integrate well into existing communities (always assuming attention has been paid to Para 1. Above)/ the general view is that if there has to be new housing alongside existing stock better military
then civil (and horror, housing association)
Page 5 of 8
Date: 15/01/2014
1
2
version
Ref
Name
Address
32
David Nicholls
4GA High Street
Bulford Salisbury
Wiltshire SP4 9DS
Organisation
Date
received
Comments
INTRODUCTION
It has been proposed that the plan to base 4,000 additional service personnel "around Salisbury Plain" will involve the building of a huge number of married quarters around current areas of population. The figure of 4,000 only tells part of the story as along
with these 4,000 service personnel will come wives and children which will greatly increase the population influx. The phrase "around Salisbury Plain" is also misleading as it suggests that the 4,000 military personnel and their families will be spread over a
wide area . In fact , the plans are to base these families into concentrated areas around villages that have no infrastructure to support them. In addition, the amount of building proposed around these small villages is out of all proportion to that which could
be carried out while still maintaining the identity of the villages. While much of Salisbury Plain's 94,000 acres (147 square miles) is required for military training it is hard to believe that so little of the area is available for relocation of forces personnel and that
so much building must be centered around the villages. The MOD rightly make much of their stance on conservation but it seems that this does not apply to the conservation of Village life.
The blue areas on the plans indicate the 'long list' of sites which are being considered for SFA. The majority of the land parcels will not be developed for SFA.
I live in Bulford Village so my comments relate only to this area since that is what I am most familiar with. Below are my main objections to the proposed building around Bulford Village itself. It should be noted that I am not suggesting that no building
takes place in the Bulford area. That would be naive and would take no account of the undisputed fact that our armed forces need a comfortable base location for the soldiers and their families. I am an ex-soldier who has served 22 years (1984 to 2006)
with 16 of those years as both a married enlisted soldier and officer. I clearly understand the need for additional families housing but even I would look upon the encroachment of the Army in such vast numbers as a threat to my quality of life. Salisbury
Plain is a huge area of MOD land that is more than capable of supporting the number of married quarters proposed without having such a large impact on the village itself.
COMMENTS ON ARMY BASING PLANS
The maps provided in the small exhibitions set up in Amesbury and Durrington libraries show areas being considered for building of military quarters. These areas include fields to the North and West of Bulford Village. Bulford Village itself is a rural
community and has been for 900 years. The village has a 121 century church and many thatched cottages. With this in mind conservation areas have been established to preserve the village character. The proposed areas to the West of High Street (A3028)
and North of Old Coach Road, while not actually inside the conservation areas, will surround the church and thatched cottages with a large modern development. This is unacceptable as it will completely destroy the identity of the old Bulford Village. These
fields should most definitely not be considered for building. With the inevitable encroachment from the camp area, land around Bulford Village should be left intact on the West and North sides to maintain at least some semblance of the rural community that
village residents currently enjoy.
A number of residents have objected to SFA development on potential sites adjacent to the Conservation Area. These sites did not progress to the next stage of the SFA site
selection exercise and have been omitted.
The intention is for new homes to be located close to existing bases to minimise travel time for personnel. The key unit locations for incoming units as set out in the
Regular Army Basing Plan are Perham Down, Larkhill, Bulford and Tidworth. Consequently the areas of search for potential housing sites have been centred around these 4
bases.
There is a great deal of building proposed to the South of Bulford Road. When all the proposed areas are taken together they would appear to more than double the size of Bulford Village. No village could withstand such a huge influx of building and families
and retain any of its character. The impact of this, quite apart from killing the rural feel the area currently enjoys, would create animosity between the local population and the military personnel and families. I believe that building an estate along the South
side of Bulford Road is reasonable as it abuts onto the current Bulford camp area. However, no building should be carried out any further South West than a line extending through Duke's Way. It should be noted that Bulford Village was recently subjected
to weeks of disruption to install a water ring main which, it now appears, is to supply building to the South East of the Churchill Avenue estate. It seems that either the cart is being put before the horse or the decision to build in this area has already been
taken in advance of the public consultation.
Traffic- Bulford Village has in recent years suffered from a large increase in traffic. A significant proportion of this traffic is civilian cars driven by forces personnel in uniform, particularly at rush hour times. An increase in the numbers of military personnel
and their families will serve only to exacerbate the situation. I live at the end of Watergate Lane and it can take a great deal of time just to be able to turn out of the lane at peak times. In addition, it would appear that Bulford Village is now considered an
acceptable place for tracked vehicle training. The poor vision available to the drivers of these vehicles makes them unsuitable for operations where children are walking to and from schools. When army basing plans are drafted I believe consideration should
be given to imposing a weight limit along certain roads in the village. This would go some way towards relieving at least some of the traffic by ensuring that we are not considered a training area for unsuitable vehicles.
Local infrastructure- Bulford Village and Amesbury are just able to support local residents with schools, doctors, dentists etc. Some people already have trouble finding places with NHS dentists. The huge amount of additional residents being added to the
local population by the army basing plans will overwhelm local facilities. It must be assumed that the MOD will include a plan to bolster local services or to provide facilities within the current bases to ensure incoming military families do not take up valuable
resources at the expense of local residents.
33
No name provided
34
No name provided
What about re-opening Netheravon which has most facilities already available.
This would also be outside Heritage site.
No SFA development is planned at Netheravon. The intention is for new homes to be located close to existing bases to minimise travel time for personnel. The key unit
locations for incoming units as set out in the Regular Army Basing Plan are Perham Down, Larkhill, Bulford and Tidworth. Consequently the areas of search for potential
housing sites have been centred around these 4 bases.
29-Nov-13 1. Road , and infrastructure
Traffic studies and assessments were carried out as part of the overall plan to identify pinch points and areas of concern. Plans to mitigate problem areas can then be
developed. Further details are set out in the Outline Transport Assessment.
2. Parking – please do not repeat the Mathew Estate by throwing up cheap houses with inefficient parking
35
36
Jill Adams
Mr ME Rommily OBE
St Michael’s
primary school.
High St
,Figheldean
Salisbury, SP4
8JT
Comment noted, we will continue to work closely with Wiltshire Council's education team to gain a better understanding of the impact of army basing on school provision,
As a school with a 63% military families and a member of the Durrington Chester of schools we have a very real awareness of the impact military families have on the schools and wider communities already.
Military families come with their own unique set of needs both educational, emotional and social. Already within the Durrington area these needs are placing a real strain on Devizes. As a Chester we have formed a including special needs provision. We will also be consulting directly with local schools as part of our formal consultation whcih is due to take place between February and
partnership to enable us to bid for agents which can finance estate permission of services to meet these specific needs.
April 2014.
Little Orchard,
Orchard End,
Bulford Village,
Salisbury, SP4
GEA
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to comment on your plans for village SFA. We live in the village of Bulford; my wife is disabled and we have great interest in your Masterplan and how it develops. Please
keep us informed. Our comments are centred on questions 5-7 above.
As at present the support services are not able to meet the needs of those already here, they will continuously be unable to meet the much increased demands in the future. So high priority is to ensure that the
support services in this area are robust enough in the future to deal with the increase in demand and understand the possible needs of the military families.
Bulford Village is a village and showed keep it’s open field sites. Additional SFA would change the character of the village, which struggles to cope with the existing population. You should be aware of the following Site B22 (Carter Barracks) did not make it through the subsequent site selection stage and was omitted as it needs to be retained as a major trianing featrue for driver
Nature, Environmental and Highway points:
training, and logistics headquarters. Likewise, site B10 (triangle of land bounded by Sheepbridge Road, [CEnf] Road and Tidworth Road) did not make it through the
subsequent site selection stage and was omitted as there are major cultural heritage constraints and lies immediately adjacent to Salsibury Plain SSSI/SAC/SPA.
1. The River Avon causes flooding in the village
2. The village roads do not cope with the existing traffic, any increase would be dangerous
3. The village facilities and amenities are not good and would be swamped by SFA
Bulford Village should not be the site for SFA
wherever practical or feasible.
The following sites are recommended:
1. Extent and average the CANADA Estate
2. Use the extensive MOD land that was CARTER Barracks on Bulford Drive Way
3. Use the extensive MOD land in the triangle of Sheepbridge Road, [CEnf] Road and Tidworth Road
4. Invest in the Boscombe Down Housing Estate which is being built in South Amesbury
I hope that you find my comments and my recommendations helpful.
37
Cllr R W Fisher
A number of residents have objected to SFA development on potential sites adjacent to the Conservation Area. These sites did not make it through the site selection
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Consider Retail Facilities in the area for SFA
World Heritage site and building on it (Larkhill only)
Proximity to Residential Areas
Traffic Problems including A303 and A345
Difficult to show preferred locations given the number of houses expected the areas shown are too large and very wide spread
There will be a refurbishment for greater retail shops. Possibly youth provisions and thoughts given to the signer element of the arm and their retirement
With careful preparation and consultation at a local level I believe this integration can be achieved very successfully.
Support noted. Whilst sites south of the Packway were excluded early on in the subsequent site selection exercise due to the World Heritage Site designation, some of these
sites were re-introduced as potential SFA sites due to support from residents and the army.
The blue areas on the plans indicate the 'long list' of sites which are being considered for SFA. The majority of the land parcels will not be developed for SFA.
Traffic studies and assessments were carried out as part of the overall plan to identify pinch points and areas of concern. Plans to mitigate problem areas could then be
developed.
It is preferential to the Army to site their personnel close to their place of work with the intent to maximise sustainable forms of transport wherever practical or feasible.
38
Mrs J Burt
04-Dec-13 There is a need to ensure that any service family accommodation is readily accessible is the basis in which the military personnel will be employed. This will reduce travel time and fuel consumption.
Parcels of land in MOD ownership within villages is the proposed sites should be retailed as agricultural/green spaces.
Need to ensure that rural access and travel for military tracked vehicles is restricted to designated routes and does not go through villages.
Need to ensure that sufficient school places (nursery, primary and secondary are available for the increase in service personnel families together with adequate medical/dental services, retail facilities, bus routes to nearby towns/cities
and social activities for a mix of interest and age groups (nor just the young).
Consideration should be given to building the SFA in the Bulford area on the Carter Barracks site. This is a brownfield site which had a military camp on it for many years. The site would have good access to both Bulford Garrison and
Tidworth Garrison. It would be on the edge of Bulford Village which would facilitate social interaction between the civilian and military population which is lacking at present.
Other sites for SFA in the Bulford area could be opposite the newly build Canadian Estate or on the parcels of land either side of the B3023 at ‘Double Hedges’ by the Army sports field which appears to be currently under minded for any
Military Sporting activities.
The above sites suggested would minimise disruption to the daily lives of residents and businesses whilst they are being constructed as they would not require the closure of roads and services to any great degrees. Any development
undertaken should try to integrate both the civilian and military communities so that there is no Percival divide between them partially in view of the fact that there was an intention to keep troops and regiments in one place for longer
tours.
In the event that the Manor in Bulford Village is released from MOD use consideration should be given to redeveloping it as a dementia centre or care home.
This would go some way towards showing the commitment of the present Goverment to care and compassion to the elderly in our community and would reflect well on the military community as well.
There is a need to ensure that all sites for the proposed SFA do not require unjustifiably high levels of expenditure to manage flooding, containment and constraining issues.
Any meeting dates and their locations, together with any locations shortlisted for the SFA development should be widely and clearly communicated to the residents and Parish Council of the areas affected in sufficient time to allow
people to consider any issues in advance of the meetings.
The taxpayer should not be committed to any PFI funding for the construction of the SFA.
Page 6 of 8
A number of residents have objected to SFA development on potential sites adjacent to Bulford Village Conservation Area. These sites did not make it through the site selection exercise and
have been omitted.
Comment regarding developing close to Candian Estate noted. This reflects the army’s preference. It is preferential for new military families to be located in proximity to existing military
families so as to foster integration. The preferred/potential sites identified as part of the site selection exercise is centred on land close to the Canadian Estate.
Site B22 (Carter Barracks) did not make it through the subsequent site selection stage and was omitted as it needs to be retained as a major trianing featrue for driver training, and logistics
headquarters.
The provision of further school places, retailing, community facilities and public open space will become part of the proposal for each location, and will take account of the level of facilities
currently available at each location. Opportunities to further military-civilian integration will be a key determining factor in the selection of final SFA sites.
Traffic studies and assessments are being carried out as part of the overall plan to identify pinch points and areas of concern. Plans to mitigate problem areas will be developed. Mitigation
may include agreeing access routes for heavy transport. It is preferential to both Wiltshire Council and the army to site their personnel close to their place of work with the intent to
maximise sustainable forms of transport wherever practical or feasible.
The MOD is subject to the same planning conditions as any other developers and is in discussion with Wiltshire Council as the Planning Authority to agree appropriate financial contributions
as other developers would. Wiltshire Council is discussing with Government Departments and local MPs, the source of capital funds to provide non-military infrastructure required to support
the additional population that will result from Army Rebasing. Also the MOD makes a “contribution in lieu of council tax” which funds ongoing running costs of new facilities and services for
accommodation that lies within the wire.
Date: 15/01/2014
1
2
version
Ref
Name
Address
39
Cllr Mark Connolly
34 Manor Bridge
Court, Tidworth,
SP7 7NY
Organisation
Date
received
Comments
29-Nov-13 1. Houses should be built where units are located i.e no travelling across the plain from one location to another
2. Improved infrastructure for the whole community, not just the military i.e schools, foot/cycle ways/roads, leisure, medical/social care
Perham Down Comments
1. The vehicle depot site should be used for both businesses and housing. It should compliment castle down business park and be the business unit of the Castledown Business Area
2. The sites to the east of the Australian Estate and West of the Barracks (Swinton) are acceptable for SFA
3. Why not use field to South of Civilian Estate (Poor Quality Arable Land)?
4. No to field west of Wellington Academy due to topography
5. No to land next to Wood Park, Ludgershall
Tidworth
1. ‘North West Quadrant’ that wraps around hill top and Zouch Estates has not been identified in the TCAP as future civil housing.
2. Sites of A338 and A3026 not suitable, will detract append able of the down with its MCE ‘Green Lung’
3. Yes to sites near Church Lane (Deone’s Close etc) p.s Next to site 19
4. Yes to the site on [space] of Bulford Road but not those on North of the plans
5. If North West Quadrant to be built on and lots of SFA built in Tidworth, land will need to be more available for civilian housing to help maintain a better balance – flield before military cemetery?
places, health & community provision, transportation, environmental and ecological matters. MOD have collated information on the incoming population from which we will
base our calculations for the infrastructure that is required to meet the needs of the new population. MOD is working closely with Wiltshire Council to plan for and provide
the required additional infrastructure.
developed. Mitigation may include agreeing access routes for heavy transport. It is preferential to both Wiltshire Council and the Army to site their personnel close to their
place of work with the intent to maximise sustainable forms of transport wherever practical or feasible.
The provision and siting for military housing are the subject of a specific housing study and the emerging Masterplan to identify the most appropriate and beneficial locations
to support Wiltshire Councils housing strategy and the military requirements. SFA is in addition to the housing numbers specified in the emerging Wiltshire Core Strategy.
Where it may not be possible provide agreed new build SFA in time for their arrival alternative sources, either short term lease or capital purchase, may be considered but
only after consultation with Wiltshire Council and for it to be in compliance with their strategic plans. At the time of writing, the total number of military housing required is
1,380 and the proposal for the supply of these houses is to purchase 100 units of commercial stock to de-risk the Army Basing Programme supply, as this number of SFA
are required by April 2015 and cannot be procured for construction in time available. The purchase of commercial stock has been agreed with Wiltshire Council. The
remaining requirement will be delivered by DIO.
Within the North West Quadrant, sites T15 and T16 in Tidworth have been identified as preferred sites for military housing as part of the formal consultation (February to
April 2014) on the masterplan, with Site T19 identified as a potential site option. DIO understand that the North West Quadrant has been identified for civilian housing from
2026 in the latest Tidworth Community Area Plan. We will work with local stakeholders with regard to the next steps.
40
Nigel de Foubert
Church Cottage,
35 Church Street,
Amesbury, SP4
9FU
06-Dec-13 1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
No reduction to training area size, or additional restrictions to training
Access to public should not be restricted than currently exists.
SFA should predomintently be sites on brown fields sites and close to military bases
Wilts Council must bid for additional infrastructure facilities, fire, ambulance, police, schools, clinics and transport
Archaeology and conservation must remain and high profile be preserved.
The SPTA area will not be reduced as a result of army basing. Traffic studies and assessments are being carried out as part of the overall plan to identify pinch points and
areas of concern. Plans to mitigate problem areas will be developed. Mitigation may include agreeing access routes for heavy transport. It is preferential to both Wiltshire
Council and the Army to site their personnel close to their place of work with the intent to maximise sustainable forms of transport wherever practical or feasible.
In the context of the Armby Basing Programme, proposed development will be sensitive to designated and undesignated heritage assets, including their settings.
41
Richard Miller
28-Dec-13 In response to your consultation questionnaire I would like to make the following comments;
Q3. Living on the edge of a military training area can be noisy and subject to disruptions. A fact that is often not appreciated by civilian populations and can lead to complaints. Therefore if the intention is to
produce mixed military/civilian housing this should be sited towards the extremity of the training area. In view of archaeological, conservation and scientific issues (particularly bat habitats) priority consideration
should be given to brownfield sites (i.e. former barrack areas).
Q4. In the main this will be the increased traffic load on an already busy infrastructure.
Q5. New SFA should be sited so as to enable ease of access by military personnel to barrack areas where they are likely to work. Whilst it is inevitable that some families will be accommodated away from the actual wherever practical or feasible.
barracks where their unit is located the aim should be to reduce reliance on the use of cars where possible and, where unavoidable, not to overstress the limited existing road infrastructure.
Given that both the Avon and Nine Mile Rivers have been subject to flooding in recent years, very careful consideration should be given to the effect of any new built up areas placed close to these rivers affecting theFollowing the initial consultation, sites were assessed against a number of factors including environmental constraints, access to existing facilities, proximity to duty stations.
ability of the ground to absorb water, thereby causing additional problems to existing properties from increased run off.
One of the weightings under the 'environment' category was 'agricultural land' e.g. land which is not in agricultural use would score higher than a site which comprised
Q6. Provision of medical facilities to support the increased population is critical, there being no civilian surgery in Bulford and Amesbury appearing to have reached capacity as a result of recent expansion. Equally Grade 1 Agricultural Land. Brownfield land would therefore score higher than greenfield land.
important will be the provision of adequate schooling facilities (with safe pedestrian routes).
Q7. The solution to integration of service families into the wider community should be sought mainly through the provision of shared facilities, i.e shopping parades, library, coffee shop, gym etc - for example the
It is anticipated that training activity will return to levels prior to commencement of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. This resulted in specific operational training
Tidworth Leisure Centre. However, colocated military/civilian housing could be detrimental to family welfare. Those a long way from their home area, in stressful times need the support of neighbours who
requirements dissimilar to those previously carried out. With the return to training for ‘contingency’ (potential for as yet unseen operational deployment) the Reaction Force
understand their position and circumstances rather than being isolated in a civilian community.
brigades will be required to train in their primary role.
The agreed capacity limits for the training impact on SPTA are agreed via a unilateral undertaking between the Secretary of State for Defence, relevant Statutory Bodies and
Local Authorities.
42
43
Sandra Drysdale
John Mills
A number of residents have objected to SFA development on potential sites adjacent to Bulford Village Conservation Area. These sites did not make it through the site
Horseshoe
Cottage, 34 Old
Coach Road,
Bulford Village
SP9 9DA
18-Dec-13 I most sincerely hope that the field opposite our house will not be developed for accommodation for the undernoted reasons.
Elmers
Hackthorne
Corner,
Hackthorne Road,
Durrington,
Salisbury SP4 8AS
29-Nov-13 In my opinion the whole issue of army basing is being very well handled and organised. My only comment is that I wonder if consideration has been given to expanding Netheravon and Upavon camps, which already No development is planned at Netheravon. No SFA development is planned at Upavon, although there will be some behind the wire development. The intention is for new
have some infrastructure and housing. It would also regenerate these villages.
homes to be located close to existing bases to minimise travel time for personnel. The key unit locations for incoming units as set out in the Regular Army Basing Plan are
Perham Down, Larkhill, Bulford and Tidworth. Consequently the areas of search for potential housing sites have been centred around these 4 bases.
We live in a conservation area, and to build on these fields would completely undermine the character. We moved into our little cottage 17 years ago for the express reasons of the surrounding area, both immediate
and further afield. Ours is a small, low lying building on a narrow country lane and to build here would potentially adversely affect our light levels in daytime, and certainly be a cause of light pollution at night. The
result, overall, would be claustrophobic and noisy. The new demands placed on local shops, takeaways and garages etc, would have a catastrophic effect on an area whose roads are already badly congested,
especially at peak times. Moreover, and of utmost improtance, I am concerned for the resident and visiting animal life. The area is a haven for foxes, bats and hedgehogs (already under threat of local extinction),
owls and other avian life such as woodpeckers, blackbirds and egrets, frogs, toads and reptiles such as grass snakes. There are surely other more appropriate areas, for example, land adjacent the recently built
Canada Estate, or up near the Kiwi perhaps.
Page 7 of 8
Date: 15/01/2014
1
2
version
Ref
Name
Address
44
G R Burt
18 Watergate
Lane, Bulford,
Salisbury SP4 9DY
Organisation
Date
received
Comments
04-Dec-14 1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
The houses required for Bulford garrison should be built opposite the Canadian Estate. This woule be convenient for the camp. Economic for travel.
That the footpath/cycle way to Solstice Park be completed and extended to where required for the estate
That pedestrian crossings be made in Bulford Village for schoolchildren and use of the village hall and play area
That the manor in Bulford Village be considered for a Dementia Care Centre to help dementia sufferers, showing that this government takes this problem seriously
That military veterans be restricted in Bulford Village
Comment regarding developing close to Candian Estate noted. This reflects the army’s preference. It is preferential for new military families to be located in proximity to
existing military families so as to foster integration. The preferred/potential sites identified as part of the site selection exercise is centred on land close to the Canadian
Estate.
developed. Mitigation may include agreeing access routes for heavy transport. It is preferential to both Wiltshire Council and the army to site their personnel close to their
place of work with the intent to maximise sustainable forms of transport (including cycle paths) wherever practical or feasible.
45
R G Rowe
Orchard End
Bulford Village
SP4 9EA
46
Dr Kenneth A Horne
Horseshoe
Cottage, 34 Old
Coach Road,
Bulford Village
SP9 9DA
I write as a resident of Bulford village and a retired army officer. I have lived at the above address for 10 years. I am asumming you will only consider additional SFA wihtin the garrison areas which does not include A number of residents have objected to SFA development on potential sites adjacent to Bulford Village Conservation Area. These sites did not make it through the site
Bulford Village. However, if Bulford village is included, I would advise that this is totally unsuitable as there are no appropriate facilities for any major increase in the population. We do not know what is proposed
and so fear the worst case! I assume you will engage us in the dialogue process.
It is preferential to both Wiltshire Council and the army to site their personnel close to their place of work with the intent to maximise sustainable forms of transport
Re Question 5, from a practical point of view most SFA has tended to be close to barracks. There are reasonably large areas on the edges of Salisbury Plain, close to the intended enlarged garrisons which would be (including cycle paths) wherever practical or feasible.
utilised.
16-Dec-13 The fields directly in front of our house have been identified, for the purposes of an initial public consultation, as a possible Service Families Accommodation housing area. It is to be hoped, however, that SFA will
recognise and respect the need, not to encroach on the space and chosen lifestyles of pre-existing people, and understnad that, by and large, such people have selected their places of residence for particular
reasons.
Comment regarding developing close to Candian Estate noted. This reflects the army’s preference. It is preferential for new military families to be located in proximity to
existing military families so as to foster integration. The preferred/potential sites identified as part of the site selection exercise is centred on land close to the Canadian
Estate.
Our personal decision to move here - 17 years ago - was guided by:
-
A number of residents have objected to SFA development on potential sites adjacent to Bulford Village Conservation Area. These sites did not make it through the site
the fields and open spaces, offering peace and natural beauty
our admiration, respect and support for the Armed Forces (we both boast past connections with the RN and RAF)
the freedom to roam the splendour of SPTA
the presence, as neighbour, of the Army and Boscombe Down etc, whose frequent intrusions we welcome (artillery, small arms fire, aircraft etc).
More than anything, we do depend on the unspoilt greenery and the open countryside round our house. The wildlife here is of paramount importace - mammalian, birdlife, insects and reptiles, notably grass snakes.
Building on the land to the N of the original part of Bulford Village would dtract from its designation as a Conservation Area. The residents, including those on the Milston Road and the land to the N and W of these
fields have determined to live as they do for reasons of the peace and calm and the spectable that is provided by this little piece of countryside. I would not know for certain what to suggest as alternative space.
One logical solution, however, would be to utilise land adjacent the most recent, newly-sited housing developments (for example, Canada Estate).
47
48
49
Durrington Town
Council
Durrington Town
Council
Durrington Town
Council
10-Dec-13 What about re opening Netheravon which has most facilities already available. This would also be outside Heritage Site.
Comments noted.
No military housing is proposed at Netheravon. The intention is for new homes to be located close to existing bases to minimise travel time for personnel. The key unit
locations for incoming units as set out in the Regular Army Basing Plan are Perham Down, Larkhill, Bulford and Tidworth. Consequently the areas of search for potential
housing sites have been centred around these 4 bases.
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
(L15a and L15b) - No - Spoil Salisbury Plain recreational and training area
(L17a and L17b)- No -This would spoil Salisbury Plain recreational and training area
(L19)- No - Don't close the golf range- its a local facility
(L2, L10 and L18)- No - loss of birthplace of army flight. Loss of wooded belt and screen. No existing facilities
(L13b)- Yes - Yes, where opposite existing soldier's accommodation
(L14a and L14b)- yes- Close to existing facilities and houses, Packway
(L13a and L13b)- yes - Close to existing facilities, space for further future expansion etc.
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
(L15a and L15b) - Yes - on main route and won't spoil greenbelt too much
(L17a and L17b) - Yes - as set back, won't be too intrusive and still maintain greenbelt
(L19) - Yes - housing more important than golf range. Can use Tidworth cause instead
(L2, L10 and L18) - No - spoil greenbelt and don't want it too built up in this area. Traffic is bad enough!!!
(L13b) - Yes - Will still maintain some greenbelt and also be close to the camp
(L14a and L14b) - Yes - spoil view to the mess and some greenbelt is still needed! don't want it too built up like an estate
(L13a and L13b) - Yes - plenty of space to build and alos clsoe to camp. Won't seem cramped
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
Site
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
(L15a and L15b) - No - Durrington will feel if too close - if no commercial/recreation/social/health to go in then No! Too far from centre of gravity
(L17a and L17b) - Yes - preferred location over 1+2. Appreciate it takes up training area. Space but makes sense < roads
(L19) - No - Good housing site - golf driving ragne will not be happy! Depends on whether S of Packway suitable
(L2, L10 and L18) - Yes - Officers should be located in this area where existing officer SFA is located
(L13b) - No
(L14a and L14b) - Yes - No 1 choice for soldier's SFA - depends on medical/dental centre and social/recreation/commercial plans. Centre of gravity existing
(L13a and L13b) - Who chose Site 7? Inside wire - close to Fargo Ammunition Compound!!!
report - Consultation Draft).
10-Dec-13
Commments noted. The site selection process indicating the reasons for the inclusion and/or exclusion of specific sites can be found in Appendix 9 of the Planning Context
Report (Phase 3 report - Consultation Draft).
10-Dec-13
Page 8 of 8
Comments noted. The site selection process indicating the reasons for the inclusion and/or exclusion of specific sites can be found in Appendix 9 of the Planning Context
Report (Phase 3 report - Consultation Draft).
Appendix 14
Formal Consultation - Distribution List for Notices
SALISBURY PLAIN MASTER PLAN
EXHIBITION NOTICES - SUMMARY
TYPE
Total
No. to Each
Print
SURGERIES
30
1
30
DENTIST
32
1
32
SCHOOLS
52
2
104
COUNCILS
38
3
114
LIBRARIES
6
2
12
SPORTS CENTRES
4
2
8
162
300
EXHIBITION NOTICES - ADDRESSEES - Sheet 1 of 5
SURGERIES
Barcroft Surgery
The Centre
Amesbury
SP4 7DL
Bourne Valley Surgery
10-12 High Street
Ludgershall
Andover
Wiltshire
SP11 9PZ
Avon Valley Surgery
Fairfield
Upavon
Pewsey
Wiltshire
SN9 6DZ
Ann street Surgery
82 St Ann St,
Salisbury,
SP1 2PT
Avon valley Practice
77 Bulford Road,
Durrington,
Salisbury,
SP4 8EU
Date posted (1 copy)
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
bemerton health Surgery
Pembroke Road,
Salisbury,
SP2 9DJ
Castle Street Surgery
67 Castle Street,
Salisbury,
SP1 3SP
Downton Surgery
Moot Lane,
Downton
Salisbury
SP5 3JP
Endless Street Surgery
72 Endless Street,
Salisbury,
SP1 3UH
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
Harcourt medical centre
Crane Bridge Road,
Salisbury,
SP2 7TD
Hindon Surgery
High Street,
Hindon,
Salisbury,
SP3 6DJ
Mere Surgery
Dark Lane,
Mere,
BA12 6DT
New Street Surgery
61 New Street,
Salisbury,
SP1 2PH
The Practice Cross Plain
Durrington
84 Bulford Road,
Durrington,
SP4 8DH
The Practice Cross Plain
Shrewton
The High Street,
Shrewton,
SP3 4JL
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
The Surgery
St Georges Road,
Tidworth,
SP9 7EW
Tisbury Surgery
Park Road,
Tisbury,
SP3 6LF
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
Salisbury Medical Practice
Fisherton House,
Fountain Way,
Salisbury
SP2 7FD
Salisbury Walkin Health
Centre
Avon Approach,
Salisbury,
SP1 3SL
St Ann Street Surgery
82 St Ann Street,
Salisbury,
SP1 2PT
St Melor House Surgery
Edwards Road,
Amesbury,
Salisbury,
SP4 7LT
The Surgery
Winterslow,
Salisbury,
SP5 1PQ
Three Swans Surgery
Rollestone Street,
Salisbury,
SP1 1DX
Whiteparish Surgery
Common Road,
Whiteparish,
Salisbury,
SP5 2SU
Wilton Health Centre
Market Place,
Wilton,
Salisbury,
SP2 0HT
The New Surgery
St Melor House
Edwards Road
Amesbury
SP4 7LT
Castle Practice
Central Street
Ludgershall
Andover
Wiltshire
SP11 9RA
Orchard Partnership
(Till Valley Surgery)
High Street
Shrewton
Salisbury
SP3 4BZ
Cross Plain Surgery
Bulford Road
Durrington
Salisbury
Wiltshire
SP4 8DH
Orchard Partnership
Cherry Orchard
Codford
Warminster
Wiltshire
BA12 0PN
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
COUNCILS
Organisation
Name
Allington Parish Council
Mrs J Tier
Mrs Wendy Brown
Berwick St James Parish Meeting
Helen Riding
Bulford Parish Council
Nicola Grove
Chitterne Parish Council
Virginia Neal
Cholderton Parish Meeting
Graham Reeve
Chute Forest Parish Council Carolyn Wall
Chute Parish Council
Carolyn Wall
Mr L Hoareau
Collingbourne Ducis Parish Council
Mr Philip Gill
Collingbourne Kingston Parish Council
Catherine Vaughan
Durnford Parish Council
Mrs W Rountree
Position
Address 1
Allington Parish Clerk (Acting)
40 Firs Road
Amesbury Town Clerk
The Bowman Centre
Clerk to Berwick St James Parish MeetingThe Barn
Bulford Parish Clerk
C/o The Village Hall
Chitterne Parish Clerk
Clump House
Cholderton Parish Clerk
Poppies
Chute Forest Parish Clerk
Orchard House
Chute Parish Clerk
Orchard House
Codford Parish Clerk
Weavers
Collingbourne Ducis Parish Clerk
Thistle House
Collingbourne Kingston Parish Clerk
The Old Bakery
Durnford Parish Clerk
Meadowbank House
Mrs Mary Towle
Enford Parish Council
Elizabeth Harrison
Everleigh Parish Council
Mr Phillip Gill
Figheldean Parish Council
Mr G Ford
Fittleton Parish Council
Dorothea Georgeson
Great Wishford Parish Council Mrs A Musselwhite
Idmiston Parish Council
Sarah Burden
Ludgershall Town Council
Mrs J White
Manningford Parish Council Jacqui Burgess
Milston Parish Meeting
Mrs Sarah Steggel
Netheravon Parish Council
Mr G Dyer
Newton Tony Parish Council Mrs M Thomas
Orcheston Parish Council
Mr John Badgery
Rushall Parish Council
Claire Ridge
Shrewton Parish Council
Marion Barton
Stapleford Parish Council
Mr John Gibbs
Steeple Langford Parish CouncilMrs J.M MacDougall
Tidcombe and Fosbury Parish Meeting
The Honourable Erskine Guiness
Durrington Town Clerk
Enford Parish Clerk
Clerk to Everleigh Parish Council
Figheldean Parish Clerk
Fittleton Parish Clerk
Clerk to Great Wishford Parish Council
Clerk to Idmiston Parish Council
Ludgershall Town Clerk
Manningford Parish Clerk
Milston Parish Clerk
Netheravon Parish Clerk
Newton Tony Parish Clerk
Orcheston Parish Clerk
Rushall Parish Clerk
Shrewton Parish Clerk
Stapleford Parish Clerk
Steeple Langford Parish Clerk
Tidcombe & Fosbury Parish Clerk
Tidworth Town Council
Ms Carly Lovell
Tilshead Parish Council
Mrs T James
Upavon Parish Council
Mrs P Eyre
Wilsford cum Lake Parish Meeting
Mr Eddie Deighton
Winterbourne Parish Council Mrs Melanie Thomas
Winterbourne Stoke Parish Council
Mr J H Carr
Woodford Parish Council
Mrs W Rountree
Wylye Parish Council
Mrs J M MacDougall
Tidworth Town Clerk
Tilshead parish Clerk
Upavon Parish Clerk
Wilsford Cum Lake Parish Clerk
Winterbourne Parish Clerk
Winterbourne Stoke Parish Clerk
Woodford Parish Clerk
Wylye Parish Clerk
Address 2
Firsdown
Shears Drive
High St
Watergate Lane
Chitterne
Amesbury Road
Lower Chute
Lower Chute
3 Wool House Gardens
10 Foxtail Gardens
61 Collingbourne Kingston
Upper Woodford
The Village Hall, High Street
The Council Office
Pewsey
832 West Chisenbury
10 Foxtail Gardens
Thistle House
Figheldean
7 Hill Top Close
Haxton
The Brook
South Street
Evergreen Cottage
c/o Idmiston Parish Memorial HallIdmiston Rd
Ludgershall
213 Andover Road
Manningford Abbots
Copper Cottage
Milston
5 Brigmerston Cottges
Haxton
2 Downsview Close
Kings Paddock
Windrush
Whatcombe Brow
Auvers
5 The Old Barnyard
The Creamery
Warminster
4 Emwell Street
Over Street
Cuffdale
Steeple langford
Field House
Marlborough
Fosbury Manor
Tidworth Community Centre,
Wylye Road
Town Council Office
Near Salisbury
Chuch House, Tilshead
Upavon
32 High Street
Stable Cottage, Wilsford cum LakeSalisbury
Winterslow
Windrush, Kings Paddock
Salisbury
1 Cleeve View, Winterbourne Stoke
Salisbury
Meadowbank House, Upper Woodford
Salisbury
Field House, Steeple Langford
Town/County
Salisbury, Wiltshire
Archers Gate, Amesbury
Berwick St James
Bulford
Wiltshire
Cholderton, Salisbury
Andover
Andover, Hants
Codford, Warminster
Ludgershall, Andover Hants
Marlborough, Wiltshire
Postcode
SP5 1SL
SP4 7XT
SP3 4TN
SP4 9DY
BA12 0LL
SP4 0ER
SP11 9DU
SP11 9DU
BA12 0PS
SP11 9TB
SN8 3SD
SP4 6PA
Date posted 3 copies
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
Durrington
Wiltshire
Ludgershall, Andover
Salisbury
Salisbury
Great Wishford, Salisbury
Porton, Salisbury
Hants
Pewsey, Wiltshire
Winterslow, Salisbury
Orcheston, Wiltshire
Rushall, Pewsey
Wiltshire
Stapleford, Salisbury
Wiltshire
SP4 8AD
SN9 6BB
SP11 9TB
SP4 8LG
SP4 9PY
SP2 0NN
SP4 0LU
SP11 9NG
SN9 6JA
SP4 8HY
SP4 9PS
SP5 1RZ
SP3 4RJ
SN9 6BF
BA12 8JA
SP3 4LP
SP3 4NF
SN8 3NJ
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
Tidworth
Wiltshire
Wiltshire
Wiltshire
Salisbury
Wiltshire
Wiltshire
Wiltshire
SP9 7QH
SP3 4RZ
SN9 6EA
SP4 7BX
SP5 1RZ
SP3 4SY
SP4 6PA
SP3 4NF
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
SCHOOLS
County
Postcode
Date
posted - 2
copies
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Amesbury
Salisbury
Tidworth
Tidworth
Tidworth
Tidworth
Collingbourne Ducis Marlborough
Durrington
Salisbury
Durrington
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Figheldean
Salisbury
Wilton
Salisbury
Gomeldon
Salisbury
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
SP4 9PJ
SP4 7XX
SP4 7AX
SP3 4HL
SP4 8HH
SP4 9DR
SP2 9NW
SP1 2ED
SP4 9HP
SP1 1LR
SP4 7LX
SP9 7QD
SP9 7QD
SN8 3UH
SP4 8HJ
SP4 8DL
SP1 3BL
SP4 8JT
SP2 0JE
SP4 6JZ
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
Bishpdown
Bulford Barracks
Larkhill
Southampton Road
Salisbury
Ludgershall
Newton Toney
Pewsey
Pewsey
Rushall
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Andover
Salisbury
Pewsey
Pewsey
Pewsey
Salisbury
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Hants
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
SP1 3GZ
SP4 9JY
SP4 8QB
SP1 2EP
SP1 3BQ
SP11 9RB
SP4 0HF
SN9 5EJ
SN9 5EW
SN9 6EN
SP1 2LW
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
1 The Close
Salisbury
Salisbury
Wilts
SP1 2EQ
13.2.14
Salisbury Manor Fields Primary School
Sarum Academy
Wilton Road
Westwood Road
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Wilts
Wilts
SP2 7EJ
SP2 9HS
13.2.14
13.2.14
Sarum St Paul's CofE (VA) Primary School
Shipton Bellinger Primary School
Shrewton CofE Primary School
South Wilts Grammar School for Girls
St Edmund's Girls' School
St Joseph's Catholic School Salisbury
St Mark's Church of England Junior School Salisbury
Westminster Road
3 Parkhouse Road
Tanners Lane
Stratford Road
Church Road
Church Road
Somerset Road
Salisbury
Shipton Bellinger
Shrewton
Salisbury
Laverstock
Laverstock
Salisbury
Salisbury
Tidworth
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Wilts
Hants
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
SP2 7DG
SP9 7TW
SP3 4JT
SP1 3JJ
SP1 1RD
SP1 1QY
SP1 3BL
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
St Nicholas Church of England Primary School, Porton
Idmiston Road
Porton
Salisbury
Wilts
SP4 0LB
13.2.14
St Osmund's Catholic Primary School Salisbury
The Farringdon Centre
The Godolphin School
The Stonehenge School
The Wellington Academy
Winterbourne Earls C of E Primary School
Woodford Valley CE Primary Academy
Wyndham Park Infants' School
Wyvern College
Zouch Primary School
Exeter Street
School Lane
Milford Hill
Antrobus Road
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Amesbury
Ludgershall
Winterbourne Earls
Middle Woodford
Salisbury
Laverstock
Tidworth
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Tidworth
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Salisbury
Tidworth
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
Wilts
SP1 2SG
SP1 3YA
SP1 2RA
SP4 7ND
SP11 9RR
SP4 6HQ
SP4 6NR
SP1 3BL
SP1 1RE
SP9 7JF
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
13.2.14
Name
Address1
Address2
All Saints VA CofE Primary School
Amesbury Archer Primary School
Amesbury Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School
Appleford School
Avon Valley College
Avondale School
Bemerton St John CofE Aided Primary School
Bishop Wordsworth's Grammar School
Bulford St Leonard's CE (VA) Primary School
Chafyn Grove School
Christ The King Catholic School Amesbury
Clarendon Junior School
Collingbourne Church of England Primary School
Durrington All Saints Church of England Voluntary Controlled Infants' School
Durrington Church of England Controlled Junior School
Exeter House Special School
Figheldean St Michael's Church of England Primary School
Focus School - Wilton Primary Campus
Gomeldon Primary School
High Street
Shears Drive
Kitchener Road
Elston
Recreation Road
High Street
Lower Road
The Close
John French Way
33 Bourne Avenue
Earls Court Road
Ordnance Road
Ordnance Road
Chicks Lane
School Road
Bulford Road
Somerset Road
High Street
The Hollows
Netheravon
Amesbury
Amesbury
Shrewton
Durrington
Bulford
Bemerton
Salisbury
Bulford
Greentrees Primary School
Kiwi School
Larkhill Primary School
Leaden Hall School
Leehurst Swan School
Ludgershall Castle Primary School
Newton Tony Church of England Voluntary Controlled School
Pewsey Primary School
Pewsey Vale School
Rushall Church of England Voluntary Aided School
Wiltshire College (Salisbury)
Stcamoe Drive
Hubert Hamilton Road
Wilson Road
70 The Close
19 Campbell Road
Short Street
Salisbury Cathedral School
Wilcot Road
Wilcot Road
Summerlug
Church Road
Wavell Road
Town
OTHERS
LIBRARIES
Date posted
- 2 copies
Ludgershall Library Memorial Hall, Andover
Road, Ludgershall. SP11
12/02/2014
9LZ
Tidworth Library Tidworth Leis Ctr,
Nadder Road, Tidworth.
12/02/2014
SP9 7QA
Amesbury Library Smithfield Street,
12/02/2014
Amesbury, SP4 7AL
Neveravon Library High Street, Netheravon,
Wiltshire, SP4 9PJ
12/02/2014
Durrington Library 75 Bulford Road,
Durrington, Salisbury.
12/02/2014
SP4 8EU
Salisbury Library Market Place
Salisbury
12/02/2014
Wilts SP1 1BL
SPORTS CENTRES
Tidworth Rd,
Ludgershall, Hampshire,
SP11 9RR
Nadder Road, Tidworth.
SP9 7QA
49 Antrobus Rd,
Amesbury Sports Amesbury, Salisbury,
Centre
SP4 7QN .
Recreation Rd,
Durrington Sports Durrington, Salisbury,
Centre
Wiltshire, SP4 8HH
Ludgershall Sports
Centre
Tidworth Sports
Centre
Date posted
- 2 copies
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
12/02/2014
DENTISTS
Date
posted - 1
copy
Pewsey Dental Practice
15 North St,
Pewsey,
SN9 5ES
Amesbury Dental Centre
Unit 1 Stonehenge Walk,
High St,
Salisbury,
SP4 7DB
Dr Abbasi
28 St Clements way,
Bishopdown Farm,
Salisbury,
SP1 3FF
Vale Dental Practice
7c High St,
Pewsey,
SN9 5AF
Chequers Dental Practice
18 Endless St,
Salisbury,
SP1 1DP
Dr Rob Dukes
29 Castle St,
Salisbury,
SP1 1TT
Coombe Dental Care
120 Coombe Road,
Salisbury,
SP2 8BD
Dental Access Centre
Central Health Clinic,
Avon Approach,
Salisbury,
SP1 2SL
Fisherton Dental Care
151 Fisherton St,
Salisbury,
SP2 7RP
Gentle Dental
27A Castle St,
Salisbury,
SP1 1TT
Gibbs
The White House,
Southampton Rd,
Salisbury,
SP5 3EA
Iveydene Dental Practice
5 Salisbury Rd,
Salisbury,
SP4 7HQ
Langdale House Dental Centre
19 Endless St,
Salisbury,
SP1 1DP
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
Martin Thomas
Vale House Dental Practice,
St Ann St,
Salisbury,
SP1 2DX
Mid-Wessex Orthodontics
16 Ashfield Rd Trading Estate,
Salisbury,
SP2 7HL
12.2.14
12.2.14
New Canal Dental Practice
13 New Canal,
Salisbury,
SP1 2AA
Salisbury Orthodontic Practice
32 Chipper Lane,
Salisbury,
SP1 1BG
12.2.14
12.2.14
DENTISTS
Date
posted - 1
copy
Sarum Denatl Practice
208 Castle St,
Salisbury,
SP1 3TE
Southern Smiles Ltd
9a Catherine St,
Salisbury,
SP1 2DF
St Ann Dental Care
18 St Ann St,
Salisbury,
SP1 2DN
The Barn Dental & Cosmetic
Clinic
The Avenue,
Odstock,
Salisbury,
SP5 4JA
The Borough Dental Practice
58 The Borough,
Salisbury,
SP5 3ND
The Cathedral Close Dental
Practice
14 The Close,
Salisbury,
SP1 2EB
The Dental Practice
40 Castle St,
Salisbury,
SP1 3TS
The Dentist
Beckett House,
4 Bridge St,
Salisbury,
SP1 2LX
The Private Treatment Centre
23 New St,
Salisbury,
SP1 2PH
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
The White House
Southampton Road,
Alderbury,
Salisbury,
SP5 3EA
Tisbury Dental Centre
Pump House,
High Street
Tisbury,
Salisbury,
SP3 6HD
V J Reese
2 Malborough Rd,
Salisbury,
SP1 3TH
Wilton Dental Surgery
16 North St,
Salisbury,
SP2 0HE
Tidworth Dental Practice
Beacon House,
Station Road,
Tidworth,
SP9 7NN
Whitecross Dental Practice
The Castle Practice,
Drummer Lane,
Tidworth,
SP7 7FH
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14
12.2.14

Appendices - British Army

Transcription

Similar documents

Made of - Visit Wiltshire

Erb`s Palsy - Home Stretching Programme (1 of 2) - ICID

ERL-0631-GD PR

Crop Circles

May 2013

18 Laineys Close

August 2007

Small Business Development Fund

Newsletter July Issue 47.pub - Wiltshire Rural Housing Association

masses for the week - Our Lady of Peace Lynbrook