NCUA Ltr 1991-03-29 FCU Investment in Investment Companies
Transcription
NCUA Ltr 1991-03-29 FCU Investment in Investment Companies
NATIONAl CREDIT UNION AOMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, O,C. March 29, 1991 Murray L. Simpson Thelen, Martin, Johnson & Bridges Two Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-3995 Re: FCU Investment In Investment Companies (Your February 25, 1991, Letter) Dear Mr. Simpson: You state that the FranRlin Adjustable U.S. Government Securities Fund (the Fund) currently invests in securities that federal credit unions (FCUs) may invest in directly. You propose to restructure the Fund into a so-called "Hub and Spoke" arrangement, in which 100% of the assets of the Fund will be invested in shares of the Franklin Institutional U.S. Government ARM Fund (the Hub), a newly formed open-end management investment company. The "Spokes" of the Hub will be the Fund and other institutional investors. You state that the Hub will invest in securities that FCUs may invest in directly. You ask whether the Fund will be a permissible investment for FCUs after the restructuring, when the Fund will invest in securities through the Hub rather than directly. As you know, the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) has taken the position that mutual funds are permissible investments for FCUs provided that all-of the securities in which the mutual fund invests are permissible investments for FCUs. Sections 107(7), (8), and (15) of the FCU Act, 12 U.SoC. SS1757(7), (8), and (15), and Part 703 of NCUA’s Rules and Regulations, 12 C.F.R. Part 703, set forth the securities, deposits, and other obligations in which an FCU may invest. Prior to 1987, NCUA issued opinions regarding Murray L. Simpson March 29, 1991 Page 2 the legality of particular mutual funds as FCU investments. For the reasons discussed in the enclosed Letter to Credit Unions No. 92 (August 13, 1987), NCUA no longer issues such opinions. Accordingly, we will not evaluate whether the current Fund or proposed Hub are permissible investments for FCUs. Considering just the Hub and Spoke arrangement, however, it is our opinion that if the Hub is a permissible investment for FCUs, and the Fund invests 100% of its assets in the Hub, then the Fund is a permissible investment for FCUs. As a final matter, although we stated that we would not determine whether the Fund or Hub are permissible investments for FCUs, let us point out that NCUA has recently issued proposed revisions to Part 703 of its Rules and Regulations (see 56 Fed. Reg. 11944, March 21, 1991) which may affect that determination. A copy of the proposed regulation is enclosed. We note that among the Fund’s possible investments, you list stripped mortgage securities. Please be advised that NCUA has proposed to prohibit FCUs from purchasing such securities. If the proposed prohibition becomes final, FCUs would not be permitted to invest in a mutual fund which invests in stripped mortgage securities. Sincerely, Hattie M. Ulan Associate General Counsel Enclosures GC/LH:sg SSIC 4660 91-0234 11944 Proposed Rules ,"h~ ~ of’1~ FEDER/d. OF~C~ OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT S CFR Pm’t 300 U.S. O~c~ of Per~ol~eJ M,.ni~m~t Coa~ta~ ~ N~w’mao‘ 12 CFR Pwt ~ As explained morn hdly below, the prol~Mi would prohilm3 lnvw~nents that expose credit unions to tn inordinate d~.d intent rate RIN 3204-A641 AOe~’~.Nettmml Credit Union Administr~ttoa Employment (General): S~o~ Prac’Jce~ smI~en A~ part of its sstsblidsd policy of ~ AolJ~:y: Office o[ Pe.’sor~el Management. AC’nO~: Notice of w~hdrawa/of proposeJ U~on ~~ ~A) ~Q ~CVA h~ gove~ fe~ ~t mves~en~ ~ ~posi~ ~ p~ immean~ts for the ~ mjorW of St~tl~. The OtT, ce of Pe~ozu~l Manaae=ent ( OP,~ p~o~ to ~end ~e ~p~si p~:ed~es set Federal Ke~Matio~ ~ R~ct tO job analysis, r~ievance, and emplo~e=t oppo~J~ c~n~y aFplicable to ~eder~ Gove~ent emp[o~e~t p~ed~es. issued on J~e wo~d have Rmoved ce~am nonsta~to~ appe~ j~s~c~on of ~e Merit S~m ~o~ec~on ~questJ for ex~mation ra~ be ~ ~ O~ or ~ emp!~ent p~c~ app~pHate ~ses. ~e men~t would have also avoided duplicative cr&orcement of equal empl~Fment opportunity requirements ~t ~ ~t~ ~he juds~ction of ~d c~e~d by ~aceda~s e~o~ad ~y ~e ~al E=plo~ent OF~i~y Co~i~ CP~..~ ~s wi~awi~ ~ ~r=~csal due to ~a~ ~h~k ~v~ ~t ~ve been ~ Interpretive R~liq msdPolic£ I~-1:Poti~7 ea,Sebcttmtof Secn~ss DeaJers and Unsuitable ~:~se~ han~ed by OPM aRd because :here few case~ may ~ ~an~ed ~der ~e Equal ~plc~ent ~po~ty C~ission ~OC} pmced~es. de~vattw~ peoducta, ~,J~ ss St~Lpped pin,bit f~e~ ~t and mq~ ~et ~cb f~ ~t ~on estabfish po~es mnm~nt ~t U~ A~ N~A R~m and ~a~o~ nsk ~vee~amnt~ to dispose af the investment within 1 ye~ born the effective date of the re~J81ion ~tle,J~ ¯ longer period o~ tiara is approved writlr~ by the appropHam re~onal n feder~ ~t to ~ ~e ~t q~ The proh/bitlon ouceru/nS o,porte c~dit urJon lw,,eslm~uts i~ Intended to pro~dbit federal ¢red/t un/ons h’om txe.~actL~ l:mMnell with coqx~te c~edit u~iona that do not ope~te compliance with pmq ~q)4 d the NCUA wo~d ~ ~ ex.sm/n~i ~ NCUA. ~ p~nsio~ of ~e Refo~ R~ve~ and of co~ents on "~e p~pos~d ~a~ to pa~ ~ of ~e N~A ~CUA ~ m =ot ,ee~ co--eats c= ~ose ~o~ or r~a~oa w~cb wo~d ~ot ~ e~ted by ~s pm~l oA~ Co~en~ or be/o~ May ~. AOOnZS~ Send comments to ~y FOR IroRTHL"R INFORMA’J’ION ~s Mor’,~e Ob~att0I (CMOs) ~ Peel Estate Morta~ ~,~sla~ax Cond~ta A~is~s~on ~. 1776 G SL~t ~.. Was~:o~ DC ~. inv~t in an7 comte =~dit ~mlon irmep~t/v~ o~ its d~ o! ~nplianc~ with par~ ~4 end without m~ard whether oz not it is ex, m~i~.~d by NCUA. Although r.learly m~ndat~d b~ sound busi.nese pra~d~, ~edera| ~--edit unions are not prelentty required to have written invest~nent policies. As previously mentioned, the proposal would require each tre~lerel c~ed~t to have written ~vestmen! policies consietent wi..l’, the Pedzrsl Credit Un~on Act. NCUA Rulee and Res~dation~. end other applicable laws and r~gu]aticns. In addison, the rule wouJd req’~ire that those policies address certain minim’~m investment consideratlon~. fedor~J cz~Llt ,~do~ ~ylo dial ¢s~dSt quality or ¯ when m~d~ ms ia~mmat tirol t~ ~ot fu/ly cov~.~d by F~l~/dropout mm~=~nc~. The centares ¯ vurio~ NOJA 1,m~mm ~ Ce~lit Uulmm develop w~lttmm.lmmmuumt $mBciem. In ~mne canto. ~e boen£e f~lu~e m ~e ham been p~btted fnves~en~ cont~ ~e ~q~eat eff~Uve date lo~er ~I~ d~c~. ~o~8~ d~ioa p~ ~j~ Secu’on ~ De~u’tJonB Tlds section ham been apanded to L~Je the followL~ key tem~ Ave~qa Lifo CotlatemL~d MortsaSe ObLija~ion (CMO} Corporate ~-’~Jtt u~ou *Reel F~tate Mortp~ lnv~ansnt Section RSA Amt/~Ac~"~ List of the kex tm.m s~d d~hdUms ~ in the reguld~ion. ~ reaction ~ the propose/bu been expanded to the ad~o~ ~ tm a~ ~U~ necess~ to ~p~t ~e. ~e ~( ~cn (~ ~) w~d co~ta~ ~e new ~=ent ~ves~e~t ~es consis:~t ~veo~nt ~ ~ o~ ~s~bh for ~t~ ~t ~ves~en~ ~mpiy ~t U~ou Re~ta~onm. rand a~ mvemted m m ~.e ~d p~t It ~ b~n N~A’5 !on3mt~ posi~on ~8t ea~ (ede~ ~t ~’I boa~ of ~cto~ mho~d devdop min~um ~aves~t c:=~ide~t~cr~ ~at ~tte~ ~vem~e~t :)::~e ~olic~es wo~d nee~ t~ ad~s~ out i~ ~spou~b~em The fo~ sec~on (] :~.4) se~ out of ~e Fede~ casein au~o~ed 5ut ~vesh~en( activates. ~s sec~on been w)u]d cont~ ~e c~w :sq~ment ~at ,~nionl on n,~e~uJ o~Jio~ re~Jla~c~s. ~d c~r app~Ie unions, and o( state-chartered, federally insured corporate ~’ed/t ~o~ been ~e ~e as ~o~ of f~e~ ~ons ~d s~te-~e~ f~er~y ~v~en= ~at we~ not for £ede~ ~o~te ~t ~o~ but ¯ 8( were ~itted by ~e laws state ~ w~ e state-~e~ f~dersgy ~d ~orate ~t was ~. ~q~ ~tt t acco~t ~ ~=b~shed ~d ~d~ to ¯ e extent ~ ~e ~e~= ~ b~k ~d ~et v~ of ~ mves~enL N~A has no morte~S~lmd .e~m~ (MBB} mertSqas ~het ee~vas to mn-tem~ ~nd has b~ able ~ ~te "pas..d ~hmqk to end, an, mats’ m a in’o mm lain. ~ach MM Ires s rated ~S~ ~ ~t of ~ ~ doll~ ~ ~d ~ ~t de~ M ~ ~ ~t f~d~y ~ ~t ~ 8ub8~ ~pU~ ~ averase knph ef ~ne that each d,da~ N~A R~as ~d ~~ m~ff~ ~ffo~ ~e ~t N~A ~as ~t ~ ~m new inves~nent proldb/tlo~s as de~td below. detonn/aed by the appropriate mSlmml Corporate credit um’o~ It has bern director. If the regioe~l dimcto~ N.CUA’s {o~tincLt~ Ix~itioa not to ~e ex~pflon to a f~ ~ ~e~t ~on’s con~~ l~ restless of ~e ~t ~vclv~ ~8 posi~on has =pp~ed to ~ feder~y ~d etate~e~d ~te ~t ~ons. whaler or not ~e ~on ~ e~ed by N~ or o~te= = ~mp~= ~ p~ ~ of ~e N~A Rules ~d Re~8~o~ ~e ~ves~ent ~we~ ~d au~o~en of fede~ ~te ~e~t de~ ~t = ~omte ~t ~ b not ~ ~bs~U~ ~mpU~= ~ p~ ~ ~ as eu~ l= not ~t~ ~ m~ of ~at ~omte ~t uoncomp~ A =~rtte ~t ~ ~ ~ deemed to ~ = ¯ e o~o~ ~t ~on b not ~sten~ Vur~ a pe/od of d~Jnlne JntJ~m rateS, it may become ~ ~ a~ o~ app~ a~ ~ ~ o~er w~ It ~ ~ MBS will preps}, at ¯ time when investors most desire 8 fixed rate r~tr~==t ~ ¯ per/ed of iaterest ratas. Bxed rate s~ase bon.owm will Im less ind/ned to raflnancs their mortgage loans, while market price of ¯ Dxed rate MBS w,,ll Imowu u prlvat~ Ixues and may be backed by poo~ tnmsrmsce, lettm~ o~ cred/t or ot~r ~dit s~c=ment~ ia ~kb fluc~m wtd~ u the martp~= ~ mad ~ Mo~ov~. at 8ove___n~ment-spouaored MBS pro~ ~vu=~s not isned or gum~nteed by GNMA. FNM~ o~ the R-fl~tC ~m I~1~ ms t~ prepa.vmmst pettm~ of the Because SM~.% a~ mJaUvely new to the markemlace {the f~t SMB~ was issued by FNMA i~ eaHy ~ the supply in existence i= Umited. As a consequen~ca, holders of Sl~ may also be su~Sjected to e ~ de~ of marketab~ty risk. M~’ketabiUty r/sk is the risk that a =ecu~t~ may not be reacLLly ~onvertibla to cash (or cashed or..’y at ¯ siLa~L~cant loss}, ff it suddenJy needs to be =oicL Due to the 8t~culat~ve natu~ of these ~e:zu~t~e~, their extreme price voJa~lty. and L,~e lindted m~rket that may e3djt for the sale of los a~.d POe. the NCUA Board has d~ie,-mm~d ’.~.at SMBS= a~ 8eneraJ]7 unsuP.aS!e for aH fedeTsJ cre~t u~cns. AcccrdAn~ly. the proposed re~fz~on pm~bi= the put-..Sase of S~-~c. This prohibi~on is re~ec:ecf L~ § 70:.3(t~ o£ the 1~roposed =’,de. mslxm~ to iavester coacams ~ the uacamJat~ of cash flows assno/atsd w~th the ability of the ~ borrowe~ to prepay the mort~ nots. A ~’~dO can be cobb,tara "Lized. d~y by who~ lo~n mor~e=, but morn often coUa=r~ by ~Sm-ism~ ~ ~a~d by G~ ~ ~ ~IC ~d held ~ ~ for ~0 flows ~ ~tved p~ mm ~ ~ mo~e, ~d~ a ~0 ~ ae~ente~ ~d ~d = a~~ ~ funclion of the present value of ~he anUdptted cash flows undm’ usumm/ prepayment speeds end rates of mtm.n associated w/th reinvested8 paymente h’om the tmdeflying collateral befm~ ¯ s~lmtlon to bondholdm~. This cash flow is exl~naly ssn~ve to ~a~eetin8 the maflcet value of residuals dude a lack of Uqu/dit~ end tm~erl deaJe~ p~L Certain C~O residuab misht be emplcyed to offset dsciir.es in ~he value of fixed rate merriness or an portfoUo in a period cf risin~ interest rates. However, Like an I0 SMBS. the ur, certainty re~ardi~ prepayments on ¯ e underly~g coUch.era] mzkes it axe’an:ely ~cu]t to u~e these L~U-~mente as ~n effecUve interest rate ~sk reduction tool. ~n ~n env’lrcnment of rapidly ful]ln~ ~t.orest rates, the market value of a restduel can completely d.~sappe~. Moreover. a ~omplex C~O su’uct~re (e.8., multiple numbers or types of u’anches) or u~usual ~llatera] as 8~ck. are u~uiteble holdinss for all federtl cmiit un/ans, l"aerefo~. rune c~ed~t amahs. Section federsl credit ~mlo~s ~ ~b~ mves~ent polices. ~on ~q~s feder~ ~t ~ ¯ e ~t qu~ of ~y ~ ¯ e ~ves~ents. ~ese ~qu~menu ~ ~ subbed O~ce of Msnasemont ~d Ac~ Written ~en~ ~ ~r ~t~ ~1~ ~t ~ New ~ ~ le~ W~ E.xecutJve Order 72812 Federal ~edit animus may eater ~ to couuection wtth the pmd~ end Jab ExecutJve Ord~ 12812 requires NCUA to co~side~ the effect of it~ actimm m state LnteJestJ. It states that: "Podm~ aC~OU timl~ the policymaktnl discretion of the States should be takan onJy where constitutions] authodff for the actiou is cle~ ~d ¢m’t~a ~ad I~ nat~ou-l activity presence of a problem of scope." Cur~atly, pert 7~ ct~,cdy applies on]y to fed~ che~etmmd ~t ~ s~te ~ ~t ~ ~ 741~a)(3) ~d ~3~ ~ ~ ~ dete~ed ~t ~e p~ ~e ~ not have ~ ~he~ ~ eff~ ~ ~bo~ ~~t ~ ~ S~ m on ~e ~.~on of ~ ~ ~spo~ib~es m~ ~e v~ ~eb not p~t pm~i~ of Jta~ ~w ~ Adjusted tract/a# means .,,y umbod or tr~n~cltoa used to def~ a lees whereby ¯ Fedm~l credit union lib securlff to ¯ vendm st e pHc~ above curmat madmt price end the veadm’ another security at a lace above Jt8 ~rt, ent maxa~ot pric~. averse time to Wtodpsl peydowus (both sched~ded end Sec~m~ of ~e ~ Acco~ly, it Js pm~d ~t 12 C~R ps~ "03 be ~ended to ~ed as ~t fo~ beiow: ~n~ whem~ a ~ p~. ~ or o~er ~d~ ~U~Uo~ for a f~ prote~ ~e ~ held m safeke~ for its ~tome~. B~’A~p~ce me~ 8 ~e PART 703,--(AMENDF.DI ~ ~at ~ ~ ~ ~d t~d by a 1-Z. Tt:e su~or~ty citatto,~ for ~ 7~ b~ ~d ~t ~nu ~ ~ble conl~nues to reed as follows: 1757(15). 1~5~a), 1781~11). 3. Section 703.1 ts republished fo~ the conve,~:er.ce of the reader. ~ de~v~ ~ a~p~ ~ man~to~ ~ at a ~ ~te m the credit union s chief executive entit~ formed for the soi, Imrlxm of’ holdin~ a fixed pool of ~ in the underlTin~mortp~s. ~qepu~.hnae £wn~n~tion meonm 8 NCUA’s mpdi~m~, end othe~ eppUcab& hw~ end n~dattom, md ~d ~ ottl~ (Comptndler). Settlement do~e means the date ~lly asreed to by e Fedml croat union and1 vendor for at~lemmt d the pu.,~l~ or ~le of a ~ec-arlty. Short s~/e me~uJ the ~ of a ~ not o~ by ~e ~. S~dby comment m~ ~ ~ent to eider buy ~ ~ a ~, on or Eo~o~ t ~ ~ at 8 p~det~ed pn=. ~e ~g~ ~ ~ ~ent ~ ~e p~ ~i’~ associated w~h cosum.ia8 either to purcha~ a security in the futm.e ¯t ¯ predeterm~ed price, or to ~erl ¯ mmutlly in the future at m predetermined pr!~. The selle~ of the omm/t=ent is required [~] Securiti~ de~/ers/brokerelp ~ apprmmd for ue by th~ boe~d of dincton ~ with -,,y linutatm~ re’~f’ect to the amount o( Funds thal may be placed or Inve~ted with any o( ~ .r~mved broker/dealers (~m applicable: (h) Sa(ekeep~ o( securities. ~c(udin( list of approved safekeepi~ facilities. 6. Section 7034 is ~v~s~ ~o ~sd em quaht’y~n~ is either an mvntmeat.~pe or ~nan,’,al In-U~ufloa-t~pe ~p~ ~ansactson ~ ~ ~i~d ¯ t~e rep~ese ~i~on ~b~ to section I~ of ~ F~e~ ~t .~ct (12 U.S.~ I~7). w~ ~nerifiy ~:~sts Federal ~t ~o~ to m~8 loans only to member. (e) ~e ~ e ~ e ~pu~o~e ~moc~on~. ~ Fede~ ~dit ~ou ~y en~r ~to I revere rep~8~ ~acU~ {U A Fede~tl cr~lit ~mon puz~.hale a S~ Se~ty (S~ [8) A Fedet~ ~t ~on ~ not invest in any ~0 whole lver~ shorten by ~ ~ ~ yem ~r ~i~ent m~ ~steiy ~ or fall ~ barn ~ contm~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~0/~ ~v~mn~ at ~ ~ ~ p~ ~d on ~y ~ settlement date fm ~ ~ mp~m ~~ A (i} A F~ ~t ~C~ penni of i~ ~ ~ ~ ~on ~y ~U F~ ~ ~ s ¯ 8 ~te~mt or ~m~~ received ~m ~ ~ ~~ b ~pe~ent st ~ ~ deposits m * ~on 1~8) ~ion may ~v~t ~ £~o~ ~i~ ~ a br~ ots ~on I~(8) ~s~o~ c~e~t ~oa ~y ~t ~ ~’ accep~n~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 1~8) ~. A new i 7~ ~ i~ ~ ~md am (oUowm: ~t ~ to ~y empl~ ff ~e emplo~ ~ of ~ de~es emplo~’s ~t pratt a ~ ~ ~te~st (m} ~ ~ all.dates ~ of ~ ~ m~ ~ ~du~ at ~t~ (a} Except am lmr~ided in I ~1..~(1| o/ 8. A n~ ~ this chupter, m Yedert] credit mtio~ my foll~: not pm’~ase or m~ I st~ (b) A Federal ~t ~ ~y ~t buy or se~ a ~es con~ (c~ A Federal ~t ~ may not engage (e) A Fbde~ ~l ~ ~y not purchase o~e~e co~c~te operate net exammed Any federal credit un~ov, bo:~ lecurities that sr~ ~ot in ccmplianc~ 700.~,j) sh~ ll~,m I year ~’o: ~e e~e~e ~m of ~ ~al ~ ~:a~on to NCUA LETTER NO. 92 TO’-cRED UNi-olxiS TO DATE: August 13, 1987 FHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE FEDE~,AL CREDIT UNION ADDRESSED: the past, NCU.% has responded to requests from broker/dealers, ~nutual f’~nds, Fe-~er~l credit unlons (FCU’s), and others for a determination as to she legality of particular mutual funds (F~Jnds) as FCU investments. For the reasons discussed below, NCUA w~!! no longer ~ssue such opinions. .As you are aware, NCUA has taken the position that mutual funds are permissible ~nves~ments for FCU’s provided that all of the investments and inves.-.ment practlces of the mutual fund are legal if made directly by an FCU. Sections 107(7) and 107(8) of the Federal Credit. Unlon A&t set forth the securities, deposits, and other obligations in which an FCU may invest. Part 703 of the NCUA Rules and Regulations places certain limits on the types of transactions tha~ FCU’s may enter into in connection with the purchase and sa!e of authorlzed securities, deposits, and ozl igat ions. NCUA is aware tha~ some FCU’s have ~nvested in mutual funds solely on the basis that NCUA has determined that the Fund is a legal investment. Use of NCUA’s legal opinion as the criterion for making an investment raises several concerns. First, an FCU relying solely cn NCUA’s legal oo~nion is not determining whether the Fund ~s an app~o,oriate investment in light of the FCU’s current ~nvestment portfolio and liability structure. Second, NCUA i~ concerned that the routine issuing of opinions on mutual funds has indirectly encouraged investment in the funds. Such a result was not intended. The decision to invest in mutual funds s~ould be ma-~ based on the individual needs of each FCU. Last, although NCUA has consistently stated that its opinions on the legality of particular mutual funds are not to be interpreted as recommendations or approval of the Funds by NCUA, the opinions have been used by bro<ers and Funds as a marketing tool. The prospectuses or ma~ke~.ing materials of some Funds incorrectly state that they have peon "approved by NCUA", and FCU’s ~ave invested in the F~nds on this basis. According!y, NCUA ha~ decided that it w~ll no longer issue opinions on the legality of particular funds. NCUA believes that th~s decision w~il have a positive ef.~ect on FCU investmen~ policies. Those boards of d~rectors which may in the past have exp~o~e the ~i~[[ ~ange o~ inve~tmen~ oDt~on$ ~v.~i~b[e, ~nd then ¯ ake an ~nvestment ~ec~s~on that ~s ~n ~he best ~nte[es~ o~ ~.= FCU. In so doing, ~hey will become more knowledgeable about FCU ~nvestment author~ty ,~nd ~nvestment rest[ict~ons, as contained ~n the FCU Act and the NCUA Rules and Regulations. Th~s new policy should not be vlewed as NCUA’s "abandonment" of FCU’s ~n th~s area. To the contrary, NCUA’s Office of General Counsel and the NCUA Investment Hotllne will continue to respond to Investment questions requiring an interpretation of the FCU A~ct and the NCUA Rules and Regulations, in particular the legality of specific direct investments and investmen~ practices. However, the FCU will be responsible for establlsh~.ng and supporting the legality of any of its investments. If in doubt about a particular investment, FCU’s are encouraged to obtain the opinion of qualified legal counsel. Finally, NCUA is considering requiring that a Fund’s prospectus or statement of additional information provide that the type of investments the Fund will make and the Fund’s investment practices may only be changed if authorized by majority shareholder vote. Thus, if a Fund changes its investment authority or practices in a manner that wi!l make the Fund impermissible for FCU’s, the FCU will have knowledge of the change and can take appropriate steps to divest itself of the Fund. In the interim, FCU’s investing in mutual funds should either invest only in Funds that feature the shareholder vote notice, or continually monitor the Fund to ensure that it remains a legal investment. If the Fund does invest in securities or engage in activities not authorized for FCU’s, the credit union must immediately divest its interest in the Fund. Sincerely, .FOR THE NCUA BOARD RWJ : s g -2-