REPORT TO THE MISSION BAY PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND

REPORT TO THE MISSION BAY PARK IMPROVEMENT
FUND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE
DATE ISSUED:
December 1, 2015
ATTENTION:
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
SUBJECT:
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund (MBPIF) Ten-Year Financial
Outlook
SUMMARY
Issue: Should the Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee recommend
approval of a ten-year allocation schedule for the Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund and
request that multiple priority projects commence work?
Director’s Recommendation: Approve the proposed allocation strategy for the Mission Bay Park
Improvement Fund and request the City Council make necessary findings to allow multiple
projects identified in City Charter Section 55.2 to proceed simultaneously.
BACKGROUND
San Diego voters approved Proposition C on November 4, 2008, which amended the City
Charter by adding Section 55.2 (see Attachment 1). This section designates the use of a portion
of the lease revenue from Mission Bay Park for capital improvements in Mission Bay Park and
for other Regional Parks. This fund is known as the Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund
(MBPIF). The MBPIF is used to complete a series of prioritized projects specifically identified
within City Charter Section 55.2.
Proposition C created the Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
(MBPIFOC) to oversee the prioritized list of projects funded by MBPIF within the Mission Bay
Park Improvement Zone (MBPIZ). City Charter Section 55.2 states that the role of the
MBPIFOC is “to verify that the appropriate funds are collected, segregated, retained and
allocated according to the intent of this Section, and spent as prioritized.” These prioritized
projects are identified and explained further in this report.
Page 2
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
The MBPIZ includes “those areas encompassed within the boundaries of Mission Bay Park,
Oceanfront Walk from the Mission Bay jetty to Crystal Pier and the adjoining seawall, coastal
parks, and ocean beaches contiguous thereto.” It also includes portions of Rose Creek, Tecolote
Creek, and the San Diego River as it passes through the boundaries of Mission Bay Park.
Section 55.2(c)(1)(A-G) lists the capital improvement projects in the priority order in which they
are to be completed. Projects include efforts “to restore wetlands, wildlife habitat, and other
environmental assets within the MBPIZ; to preserve the beneficial uses of the MBPIZ including,
but not limited to, water quality, boating, swimming, fishing, and picnicking by maintaining
navigable waters and eliminating navigational hazards; to restore embankments and other
erosion control features; and to improve the conditions of the MBPIZ for the benefit and
enjoyment of residents and visitors, consistent with the Mission Bay Park Master Plan.”
Section 55.2(c)(2) requires a project on the priority list to be budgeted, approved by the City
Council, and a funding plan adopted for it before work may begin on a subsequent priority
project. Per the Charter, “construction of a subsequent project may proceed concurrently
provided construction of a lesser priority does not unreasonably delay, prolong, or preclude
completion of a greater priority.” However, the City Council must make “findings” that
expending funds on a lower priority project will not unreasonably delay, prolong, or preclude
completion of a higher priority project.
Many of the projects contained on the priority list are such that long lead times will be required
before construction can begin. Considerations regarding precise scopes of work, extensive
environmental analysis, and multiple outside regulatory agency approvals contribute to an
already-complex permitting process required for these types of capital projects.
Certain projects in the MBPIZ are located in areas that are currently the subject of Master Plan
revisions, specifically Fiesta Island and DeAnza Cove. Fiesta Island is the site of three potential
projects that qualify as wetland expansion and/or water quality improvements identified in
Section 55.2(c)(1). These three projects are: (1) wetlands at the north end of Fiesta Island, (2)
wetlands at the mouth of Tecolote Creek, and (3) single-direction culverts beneath the Island’s
connecting causeway. These projects cannot begin until the planning process for Fiesta Island is
complete, which is anticipated in two years.
DeAnza Cove is the subject of a special study that will begin in earnest in January 2016. A major
project that is included within Charter Section 55.2 authority is the creation of a new wetland at
the mouth of Rose Creek where the Campland-by-the-Bay leasehold is currently located. The
current Mission Bay Park Master Plan includes this wetland. Further amendments to the Master
Plan may be forthcoming for the entire DeAnza Cove and Rose Creek area once the DeAnza
Cove planning process is completed over the next three years.
The MBPIF is realizing substantial revenue that is estimated at approximately $7.5 million
annually for the projection period. Staff recommends the MBPIFOC examine the project
priorities and identify projects to initiate given known constraints on several priorities.
Page 3
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
DISCUSSION
In the interest of proceeding with the identified projects as expeditiously as possible, the Park
and Recreation Department proposes a ten-year implementation plan that pursues multiple
projects simultaneously while conforming to the sequencing requirements of the Charter. The
projected fiscal growth of the MBPIF is such that staff believes that multiple projects may
proceed concurrently. As required, each project on the priority list will be budgeted, approved by
the City Council, and have an adopted funding plan in place before a subsequent project is
pursued.
As envisioned by Proposition C and as stated in Charter Section 55.2, “construction of a
subsequent project may proceed concurrently provided construction of a lesser priority does not
unreasonably delay, prolong, or preclude completion of a greater priority.” The City Council
must also formally make this finding. The creation of a ten-year plan for the MBPIFOC’s
consideration is the first step in this process. This report provides the initial guidance to ensure
the available funds are maximally deployed to several projects in keeping with best cash
management practices.
The following table provides the allocations of lease revenue from Mission Bay leaseholds to the
MBPIF since Fiscal Year 2012, the first year in which post-amended Charter Section 55.2
revenue was received. City Charter Section 55.2(b) provides for lowered thresholds at which
additional revenue is received by MBPIF starting in Fiscal Year 2015:
“Twenty-five percent (25%) of the Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues in excess of the threshold
amount, or two million five hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000) whichever is greater, shall be
allocated to the San Diego Regional Parks Improvement Fund that solely benefits the San Diego
Regional Parks and seventy-five percent (75%) of the Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues over the
threshold amount, or the remainder of those revenues if less than 75% is available after the
allocation to the San Diego Regional Parks Improvement Fund, shall be allocated to the Mission
Bay Park Improvement Fund that solely benefits the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone. The
threshold amount shall be $23 million beginning fiscal year 2010 and ending fiscal year 2014.
The threshold amount shall be $20 million beginning fiscal year 2015 and shall remain $20
million thereafter.”
Table 1: Allocation of Mission Bay Lease Revenue to Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund
Fiscal Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Funding
$0
$0
$2.4 million received
$5.4 million received
$4.3 million received
$7.0 million received
$6.6 million
$7.2 million
Fiscal Year
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Funding
$7.7 million
$8.2 million
$8.6 million
$8.5 million
$8.5 million
$8.5 million
$8.5 million
$8.5 million
Page 4
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
Based on the funding received in previous years, the decreased threshold per City Charter
Section 55.2, and future-year lease revenues projected by the Real Estate Assets Department, it
would be reasonable to assume the MBPIF would receive between $7.5 and $8.5 million per
year. Attachment 2 provides a summary of anticipated revenues over the ten-year term of the
plan as well as anticipated fund expenditures based on project priorities, which are detailed later
in this report. Attachment 3 provides the Fiscal Year 2013, 2014, and 2015 Year-End Receipt of
Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues Report, which identifies the amount of lease revenue
generated in the park over a three-year period.
As noted in Attachment 3, actual lease revenues over the past three years have been averaging
around $30 million annually. For example, given the change to the threshold (from $23 million
to $20 million) in Fiscal Year 2015, an allocation of $20 million has been transferred to the
City’s General Fund, and the remaining approximately $10 million has been transferred to the
Regional Park Improvement Fund (RPIF) and MBPIF. Of the $10 million, 25% or $2.5 million is
transferred to RPIF. The remaining 75% or $7.5 million is transferred to MBPIF. Staff projects
that the lease revenue activity of the past three years will abate somewhat in Fiscal Year 2016
then resume growing each year from Fiscal Year 2017 to Fiscal Year 2020 based on information
found in the Mayor’s Five-Year Financial Outlook (page 28). Beyond Fiscal Year 2020, staff
feels an estimate of $8.5 million would be an appropriate allocation to MBPIF annually through
Fiscal Year 2025.
For the purposes of this projection, staff is not assuming any growth in the lease revenues. If
growth occurs, and allocations increase beyond the projection assumptions, then various projects
may receive allocations earlier than currently contemplated and will create a reserve balance
within the fund. In addition to maintaining a reserve balance in the fund, the project scheduling
shown in the ten-year plan would allow for delay in construction of lower priority projects if
necessary to shift more funding to a higher priority project. The funding needed for higher
priority projects must be carefully monitored to prevent a lower priority project from proceeding
too far in its design and permitting process. Environmental determinations and discretionary
permits often have a defined period of time in which they are valid. Exceeding that period of
time may require additional studies or designs to renew a permit, often at some expense.
Specific proposed funding allocations over the ten-year period are summarized in Attachment 2.
The rationale for each of these proposed allocations is provided in the following discussion of
each priority item. Priority 1 has already begun design work. Staff believes sufficient funds will
allow projects to begin within Priorities 2, 3, 4, and 5 in Fiscal Year 2016 and within Priority 6 in
Fiscal Year 2017 with approval of this ten-year plan.
Priority 1: Dredging
The top priority project listed in Charter Section 55.2(c)(1) is the restoration of navigable waters
by dredging those areas deemed to be hazardous. The project is considered fully funded with
$7,849,147 allocated toward the project. It is currently budgeted as Project AGF00004, Sublet
B10163.
Page 5
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
Staff began work on this project in 2012 with a consultant study and a series of planning
meetings. The project will directly impact 30 acres of eelgrass habitat, which must be mitigated
at a 1.2:1 ratio. Overall, the project represents the largest eelgrass habitat impact ever proposed
for a dredging project on the West Coast. Currently the project schedule anticipates completion
of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) permitting in August 2016 with a construction
start in October 2016. Dredging would be completed in May 2017 and completion of eelgrass
mitigation planting in September of 2017. The schedule is contingent on the environmental
document being a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). If an Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) is required, the schedule will be delayed by one year.
Priority 2: Wetland Expansion and Water Quality Improvements
Examinations of the Mission Bay Master Plan for projects that qualify under Priority 2 include at
least four (4) wetland projects and one (1) water quality project. The projects are:
1. Approximately 80 acres of wetland at the mouth of Rose Creek at the current Camplandby-the-Bay location adjacent and contiguous with the existing Kendall-Frost Northern
Wildlife Preserve. Development of this wetland will be contingent on finalizing the plans
for the DeAnza Special Study Area immediately to the east and vacation of the property
by Campland-by-the-Bay, whose lease expires in 2017. Planning for the DeAnza area is
in the earliest stages of scoping and is expected to take three (3) years, with completion in
late 2018 or early 2019.
2. North Fiesta Island is proposed as a controlled habitat area with a new, approximately 15acre wetland as a buffer to the preserve to the south. The wetland is part of the Fiesta
Island plan previously approved by the Mission Bay Park Committee and is now being
incorporated into the Mission Bay Master Plan by a new Fiesta Island General
Development Plan (GDP). The approval process for this GDP is expected to take
approximately two (2) years, with completion anticipated in January 2018. Wetland
improvements would occur after GDP approval.
3. Tecolote Creek wetland is an approximately 12-acre wetland proposed in the existing
Master Plan and further refined in the pending Fiesta Island GDP. It is contiguous with
the causeway to Fiesta Island and would incorporate the proposed one-way tidal culverts
beneath the causeway. In 2002-03, a series of technical studies and engineering drawings
were prepared for this project. At that time, the City Council declined to fund
construction due to perceived high costs of maintenance for the porous weir structure.
Re-examination of the design would seem appropriate with the goal of an acceptable
design that accommodates the one-way tidal culverts beneath the causeway.
4. The previously mentioned one-way tidal culverts beneath the Fiesta Island causeway are
discussed in the current Mission Bay Master Plan and formally proposed as a water
quality feature of the pending Fiesta Island GDP. The function of the culverts is to take
advantage of the time lag between tides on either side of the causeway to provide one-
Page 6
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
way “pulses” of clean water from the south side of the causeway to the north side. The
water quality impaired North Pacific Passage would benefit from the combination of
twice-daily pulses of cleaner water from the south with the beneficial biological action of
the adjacent wetland. This project is also dependent on the pending Fiesta Island GDP.
Since these culverts discharge directly into the south end of North Pacific Passage where
the Tecolote Creek wetland will be located, design and construction of this element
should be conducted together with the creation of the Tecolote wetland.
5. The existing Master Plan proposes a small, approximately five-acre marsh at the outfall
of two large storm drain culverts south of the Former Visitor’s Information Center and
north of Leisure Lagoon. In February of 2003, a technical memorandum was submitted
to the City regarding the proposed marsh. It concluded the water treatment marsh was
infeasible due to the low pipe elevations of the storm drains discharging into the bay at
this location. Construction of a marsh as proposed would lead to blockage of the pipes
and potential flooding upstream on the east side of Interstate 5. From a water quality
standpoint, the study noted that the large culverts were already connected to the Mission
Bay Sewer Interceptor System which is a low-flow storm water diversion system
designed to prevent nuisance water low flows from reaching the waters of Mission Bay.
The low flow system diverts these dry weather flows to the municipal sewer system for
treatment at the Point Loma Treatment Plant. In lieu of a water treatment marsh,
however, a wetland marsh could be constructed allowing the storm drain outlets to bypass
the wetland areas. Conceptual design of such a configuration has not been evaluated and
would require a consultant study to demonstrate feasibility and propose a workable
configuration.
Table 2: Proposed Allocation of Mission Bay Lease Revenue to Priority 2 Projects
Sub-Project
2.1 Rose Creek Wetlands (Campland-by-the-Bay)
2.2 North Fiesta Island Wetlands
2.3 Tecolote Creek Wetlands and
2.4 Fiesta Island Culvert (combined)
2.5 Cudahy Creek Wetlands (near Former
Visitor’s Information Center)
Total Priority 2 Sub-Projects
FY 2016
$1,000,000
FY 2019
FY 2021
TOTAL
$1,000,000 $15,000,000 $16,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$1,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$250,000 $1,000,000
$1,250,000
$2,250,000 $12,000,000 $15,000,000 $29,250,000
The proposed ten-year funding plan proposes to move forward on initial studies and design of
the Tecolote Creek wetland, the Fiesta Island causeway tidal culverts, and the wetland near the
Former Visitor’s Information Center because these projects would not be impacted by ongoing
planning efforts associated with Fiesta Island and DeAnza. The most costly of these projects –
the Rose Creek Wetlands – are directly linked to the DeAnza Special Study, and design could
not begin until the study is completed in Fiscal Year 2019.
Page 7
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
Priority 3: Restoration of Shoreline Treatments
The third priority listed in Charter Section 55.2(c)(1) is “Restoration of shoreline treatments
within the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone including restoration of beach sand and
stabilization of erosion control features.” Areas and scope of work for this priority are not yet
defined. As such, the ten-year plan proposes a $500,000 allocation in Fiscal Year 2016 for
consultant evaluation and project scoping. Construction would be scheduled and funded for
Fiscal Year 2019, assuming the study would require some level of permitting and design. Such a
study should also include cost estimates and phasing proposals.
Priority 4: Expansion of Endangered or Threatened Species Preserves
The fourth priority addresses “expansion of endangered or threatened species preserves and
upland habitats on North Fiesta Island and along the levee of the San Diego River floodway as
identified in the Mission Bay Park Master Plan.” The pending Master Plan Amendment and
GDP for Fiesta Island shows specific areas of the island indicated as “Habitat Preserve.” These
include the existing fenced Least Tern Preserves at the southwest tip of the island and the large
semicircular area at the most northerly end of the island. In addition, new upland habitat areas
are proposed in the area south of the existing sand management area and in the mid-part of the
island in the area of the new proposed sand management area and youth campground. The total
acreage proposed for these habitats on Fiesta Island alone is approximately 89 acres.
The Master Plan also identifies various discontinuous areas in the vicinity of Sea World Drive
and the San Diego River floodway labeled either Upland Preserve or Coastal Landscape that
total approximately 32 acres that may be included in this category. Further refinement of the
precise scope of work for these areas is needed to arrive at a focused project description and cost
estimate. This refinement would also include development of cost estimates and regulatory
agency requirements.
The ten-year plan proposes a $200,000 allocation in Fiscal Year 2016 for consultant evaluation
and project scoping, perhaps in coordination with the GDP effort. Construction would be
scheduled and funded for Fiscal Year 2019, assuming the study would require some level of
permitting and design. Such a study should also include cost estimates and phasing proposals.
Priority 5: Completion of Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths and Bridges
The description of the fifth priority in Charter Section 55.2 (1)(E) reads as follows:
“Completion of bicycle and pedestrian paths and bridges as identified in the Mission Bay Park
Master Plan, installation of sustainable lighting in the MBPIZ, installation of signage and
landscaping at points of entry to MBP and South Shores, and the repair, resurfacing and
restriping of parking lots within the MBPIZ.”
Page 8
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
As the fifth priority contains several unique projects within it, below is the current status and
needs identified for each:
1. Bicycle and pedestrian paths can be identified as elements of the complete perimeter
walkway that is a goal of the Master Plan. Missing segments from this loop include
pathways adjacent to the existing and future expanded Northern Wildlife Preserve and in
the area of the DeAnza peninsula. These together are estimated at approximately 4,500
linear feet.
2. Sustainable lighting is not specifically identified in the Master Plan. Therefore, a study of
suitable locations and costs will be required prior to final design and construction. The
Environmental Services Department has actively converted street lights and other Cityowned lighting to low-energy using devices including light-emitting diode (LED)
technology. Environmental Services will likely convert additional lighting fixtures to
LED within Mission Bay Park during the ten-year period utilizing alternate funding
sources. New lighting may required in conjunction with the proposed new pathways
described in the first sub-project under Priority 5.
3. Signage and associated landscaping will also need further study as the existing signage
theme for Mission Bay Park is several decades old and needs a comprehensive review
and updating.
4. Parking lot repair and resurfacing has had recent efforts but there remain several areas of
needed resurfacing. Because this is a lower priority, staff believes that the majority of
existing parking in the park will need some level of repair (i.e., slurry sealing) and/or
resurfacing with commensurate accessibility improvements. The current public parking
lots in Mission Bay Park that are not within leaseholds is estimated at approximately 3.8
million square feet.
The following table identifies proposed allocations toward each of the sub-projects within the
fifth priority of MBPIF.
Table 3: Proposed Allocation of Mission Bay Lease Revenue to Priority 5 Projects
Sub-Project
5.1 Bicycle and
Pedestrian Paths
5.2 Sustainable Lighting
5.3 Signage and
Landscaping
5.4 Parking Lot Repair
and Resurfacing
Total Priority 2 SubProjects
FY 2016
FY 2018
$100,000
$100,000
$250,000
$450,000
FY 2019
FY 2020
FY 20222025
$2,000,000
$1,000,000
$2,100,000
$1,100,000
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
TOTAL
$1,750,000
$3,000,000
$500,000
$7,800,000
$8,300,000
$500,000
$7,800,000
$13,250,000
Page 9
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
Priority 6: Restoration of the Seawall Bulkhead on Oceanfront Walk
The sixth priority project is to restore the seawall bulkhead located along Oceanfront Walk
within the MBPIZ, generally between the Mission Bay Jetty and Crystal Pier as defined by
Charter Section 55.2. Preliminary measurements indicate as much as 10,500 linear feet of
seawall bulkhead may be included in the priority. The recent construction bid on the bulkhead in
front of Belmont Park gives an approximate construction cost of $2,500 per linear foot.
Including design, project management, and permitting brings the total estimate to $29,500,000.
Not all of this can be funded within the ten-year period of the projection, but a substantial portion
could begin if lease revenues continue at the same pace as the past three years. This estimate
assumes total replacement of those parts of the seawall not previously repaired either in 1988 as
referenced in the Charter or with the current project at Belmont Park. Consultant studies and/or
additional research may be required to confirm or modify this assumption.
Design for this project is proposed to begin in Fiscal Year 2017 with an initial allocation of
$500,000, with construction being phased over multiple fiscal years starting in Fiscal Year 2020.
Priority 7: Deferred Maintenance
The final priority listed in the Charter includes unspecified deferred maintenance projects on
existing assets within the MBPIZ as may be recommended by the MBPIFOC and approved by
the City Council. As these projects are undefined, scopes of work and cost estimates are not yet
available. Staff has tentatively identified areas where this priority could apply:
1. Playgrounds throughout Mission Bay have previously had condition assessments
performed which recommended all existing playground equipment be replaced. This
includes 14 playgrounds.
2. There are 31 comfort stations throughout the park. Some date back to the 1950’s in age.
Most are in various stages of obsolescence or disrepair. A rough estimate of 10 full
replacements has been estimated. Additional locations needing upgrades will also most
likely be required.
3. Site furnishings such as picnic tables, benches, kiosks and shade structures, BBQ’s, hot
coal bins, etc. would also qualify under this priority.
Deferred maintenance projects such as those described above can begin by Fiscal Year 2019 as
shown in Attachment 2. Staff has provided projections for the playgrounds (14) at a total of $15
million and restrooms (31) at a total of $10 million. Only a portion of this is currently proposed
for funding via the ten-year plan ($6 million for playgrounds and $9 million for restrooms).
Other possible items may include a fitness course at DeAnza ($250,000) and site furnishings ($2
million), but these would not be funded within the ten-year projection period.
Page 10
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
Conclusion
Allocation of funds from the MBPIF is dictated by City Charter Section 55.2. The Charter
identifies a list of priority improvement projects for the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone.
Those priority projects must be completed in order unless a funding plan is developed and
approved by the City Council which allows for a lower priority project to be initiated before a
higher priority project is completed. The nature of the top three priority projects listed in the
Charter will require significant environmental studies and permits prior to construction.
Completion of the designs and securing the necessary permits will take two to three years for
each project or sub-project. In the meantime, the MBPIF will continue to receive funding.
To address the long project timelines for the top three priority projects and to properly manage
the funds being deposited into the MBPIF, the Park and Recreation Department developed a tenyear funding strategy in order to meet the requirements of the Charter while keeping the top
priority projects moving forward.
Priority 1, dredging within Mission Bay, is fully funded and is anticipated to begin construction
late 2016.
Priority 2 is to create wetlands as identified in the Mission Bay Park Master Plan. Some of the
wetland areas identified in the Master Plan occur on Fiesta Island and near the De Anza area of
the Park. Wetland development within these two areas must be delayed until the Master Plan
update process is complete and the wetland areas are more precisely identified. However, the
wetlands at Tecolote Creek and near the Former Visitor’s Information Center can be initiated
because they will not be addressed in a Master Plan update. Therefore, the ten-year plan
identifies funding for the Tecolote Creek and Former Visitor’s Information Center wetlands
immediately, with future funding for the wetland development at Fiesta Island and De Anza.
Priority 3 is shoreline treatments within the MBPIZ. The Charter language is rather vague on the
requirements of this project which makes it difficult to project what the costs may be. Therefore,
the ten-year plan identifies $500,000 of funding in Fiscal Year 2016 to initiate a study to help
determine what the scope of work should be and what the approximate costs may be.
Completion of this study will ensure funding allocations for lower priority projects will comply
with the Charter requirements.
Priority 4 would provide endangered and threatened species preserves at Fiesta Island and the
San Diego River. Additional study is necessary to ensure compliance with this priority.
Priority 5 would involve four major sub-projects: bicycle and pedestrian paths (primarily around
the DeAnza Cove area), sustainable lighting, signage and landscaping, and parking lot repairs
and resurfacing. Each of these sub-projects are allocated funds, with some beginning pre-design
in Fiscal Year 2016.
Priority 6 would replace and repair substantial segments of bulkhead along the beach within the
MBPIZ. This would take several years to study, design, and implement, most likely in phases.
Page 11
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
Priority 7 consists of deferred maintenance, which would include upgrades and improvements to
restrooms, playgrounds, fitness courses, and site furnishings. The projection plan provides some
funds to initiate but not complete sub-projects within this priority.
Attachment 2 shows the funding recommendations for each priority project and the year the
funding is anticipated to be added to the project. Due to the nature of the top three priority
projects and the environmental studies and permits that will most likely be required, along with
the life span of those environmental determinations and permits, this ten-year plan will be a
living document providing flexibility to meet changing project needs. The City Council will be
asked to approve the plan each time it is adjusted to ensure compliance with the Charter. It is
anticipated the plan will need to be adjusted annually as project scopes and costs are more clearly
defined.
Staff requests that the MBPIFOC approve the proposed allocation strategy for the Mission Bay
Park Improvement Fund and request that the City Council make necessary findings to allow
multiple projects identified in City Charter Section 55.2 to proceed simultaneously.
Respectfully Submitted,
Herman D. Parker
Park and Recreation Director
Attachments:
1. City Charter Section 55.2
2. Proposed Ten-Year Funding Recommendations for Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund
3. Fiscal Year 2013 through 2015 Year-End Receipt of Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues
Report
Page 12
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY CHARTER SECTION 55.2
Section 55.2: Mission Bay Park and Regional Parks Improvement Funds
(a) For the purpose of this Section, the following definitions shall apply and the words shall
appear in italics:
(1) Capital Improvement means physical assets, constructed or purchased, or the restoration of
some aspect of a physical or natural asset that will increase its useful life by one year or more or
which constitutes an environmental improvement of a natural asset.
(2) Mission Bay Baseline Chart shall be defined as the Mission Bay dredging plans on file with
the City Clerk as Document No. OO-19776. It shall serve as the baseline for depths for navigable
waters within Mission Bay. Depths may be increased or decreased for specific areas within
Mission Bay only if, after review of these areas by the San Diego Fire Department or the Mission
Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee, it is found that either the original depth no
longer supports or ensures safe navigation, is inconsistent with the Mission Bay Park Master
Plan, or needs to be modified in order to create sustainable shorelines. Any changes must be
adopted by ordinance of the City Council and shall act as amendments to the original dredging
plans.
(3) Mission Bay Park means the area described in the Mission Bay Park Record of Survey
16891, filed on February 28, 2001, in the Office of the County Recorder as File No. 20010113422.
(4) Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone means those areas encompassed within the boundaries
of Mission Bay Park, Oceanfront Walk from the Mission Bay jetty to Crystal Pier and the
adjoining seawall, coastal parks and ocean beaches contiguous thereto, Rose Creek from its
terminus in Mission Bay to the southern end of the Santa Fe Road flood control channel,
Tecolote Creek from its terminus in Mission Bay to the western end of the Tecolote Creek flood
control channel and the San Diego River as it passes through the boundaries of Mission Bay Park
as described herein. The boundaries of the San Diego River, Rose Creek and Tecolote Creek
shall be the width of those waterways to the nearest property line.
(5) Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund means a separate interest bearing monetary fund
maintained by the City of San Diego to receive and spend the Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues
identified herein for the benefit of the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone.
(6) Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee means the committee determined
by ordinance of the City Council to carry out the oversight responsibilities described herein.
(7) Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues means all revenues collected by the City of San Diego
from commercial and non-profit sources within Mission Bay Park, including but not limited to
all monetary consideration received under leases of city owned property within Mission Bay
Park, as well as revenue collected from contracts for concessions or any other revenues collected
for the use of city owned property within Mission Bay Park. The term does not include revenue
from the Mission Bay Golf Course, unless privately leased; mooring fees; any revenues from
taxes including but not limited to Transient Occupancy Taxes, sales taxes, possessory interest
taxes, property taxes; or permit fees such as park and recreation fees or special event fees to the
extent those fees are levied to recover actual costs incurred by the City of San Diego.
(8) Mission Bay Park Master Plan means the Master Plan adopted by the City Council for
Mission Bay Park in 1994, the Natural Resources Management Plan, and any amendments or
Page 13
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
updates that are subsequently adopted by the City Council or any such similar replacement plan
that may be subsequently adopted by the City Council. For purposes of this Section, the
definition shall also include adopted plans for areas located within the Mission Bay Park
Improvement Zone.
(9) San Diego Regional Parks means those parks that serve regional residents and/or visitor
populations as determined by ordinance of the City Council. San Diego Regional Parks shall
initially include Chollas Lake Park, Balboa Park, Mission Trails Regional Park, Otay River
Valley Park, Presidio Park, San Diego River Park, open space parks, and coastal beaches along
with coastal parks contiguous thereto. For the purposes of this Section, this definition shall
specifically exclude the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone.
(10) San Diego Regional Parks Improvement Fund means a separate interest bearing monetary
fund maintained by the City of San Diego to receive and spend the Mission Bay Park Lease
Revenues identified herein for the benefit of the San Diego Regional Parks.
(11) San Diego Regional Parks Improvement Fund Oversight Committee means the committee
determined by ordinance of the City Council to carry out the oversight responsibilities described
herein.
(b) Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues up to the threshold amount in each fiscal year shall be
deposited into the San Diego General Fund and may be used for any municipal purpose,
including but not limited to, police, fire, streets, sewers, water delivery, roads, bridges, and
operation of parks. All Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues in excess of the threshold amount shall
be allocated in the City of San Diego budget to two distinct funds. Twenty-five percent (25%) of
the Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues in excess of the threshold amount, or two million five
hundred thousand dollars ($2,500,000) whichever is greater, shall be allocated to the San Diego
Regional Parks Improvement Fund that solely benefits the San Diego Regional Parks and
seventy-five percent (75%) of the Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues over the threshold amount,
or the remainder of those revenues if less than 75% is available after the allocation to the San
Diego Regional Parks Improvement Fund, shall be allocated to the Mission Bay Park
Improvement Fund that solely benefits the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone. The threshold
amount shall be $23 million beginning fiscal year 2010 and ending fiscal year 2014. The
threshold amount shall be $20 million beginning fiscal year 2015 and shall remain $20 million
thereafter.
(c) Funds in the Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund may be expended only in the Mission Bay
Park Improvement Zone, to restore wetlands, wildlife habitat, and other environmental assets
within the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone; to preserve the beneficial uses of the Mission
Bay Park Improvement Zone including, but not limited to, water quality, boating, swimming,
fishing, and picnicking by maintaining navigable waters and eliminating navigational hazards; to
restore embankments and other erosion control features; and to improve the conditions of the
Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone for the benefit and enjoyment of residents and visitors,
consistent with the Mission Bay Park Master Plan.
(1) To achieve these goals, all of the following identified priorities are intended to be authorized,
funded, and completed in the order provided below:
(A) Restoration of navigable waters within Mission Bay Park and elimination of navigational
hazards. When depth conditions no longer support and ensure safe navigation, those areas that
pose a danger or impede the passage of watercraft shall be dredged in accordance with
the Mission Bay Baseline Chart.
Page 14
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
(B) Wetland expansion and water quality improvements and the protection and expansion of
eelgrass beds as identified in the Mission Bay Park Master Plan.
(C) Restoration of shoreline treatments within the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone
including restoration of beach sand and stabilization of erosion control features.
(D) Expansion of endangered or threatened species preserves and upland habitats on North Fiesta
Island and along the levee of the San Diego River floodway as identified in the Mission Bay
Park Master Plan.
(E) Completion of bicycle and pedestrian paths and bridges as identified in the Mission Bay Park
Master Plan, installation of sustainable lighting in the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone,
installation of signage and landscaping at points of entry to Mission Bay Park and the South
Shores, and the repair, resurfacing and restriping of parking lots within the Mission Bay Park
Improvement Zone.
(F) Restoration of the seawall bulkhead on Oceanfront Walk to a condition no less than the
quality of restoration previously performed in 1998 from Thomas Street to Pacific Beach Drive
or to conditions as may be required by historic standards.
(G) Deferred maintenance that are also Capital Improvements hereunder on existing assets
within the Mission Bay Improvement Zone as may be recommended by the Mission Bay Park
Improvement Fund Oversight Committee and approved by the City Council.
(2) After each priority project identified in (c)(1)(A-G) above has been budgeted and approved
by the City Council and a funding plan adopted for it, construction of a subsequent project may
proceed concurrently provided construction of a lesser priority does not unreasonably delay,
prolong, or preclude completion of a greater priority. To the extent funds become available from
grants or other sources for a lower priority before a higher priority has been completed, or in the
event of substantial delay in proceeding with a higher priority, funds may be committed to the
next lower priority in the order set forth in (c)(1)(A-G), provided such expenditure of a lesser
priority does not unreasonably delay, prolong, or preclude completion of a greater priority. The
City Council shall be required to make findings that completion of a higher priority project will
not be unreasonably delayed, prolonged, or precluded by expending funds on a lower priority
project before approving said expenditure.
(3) Once the projects identified in (c)(1)(A-G) have been fully budgeted or completed, additional
projects shall be prioritized and funded only for Capital Improvements as identified in the
Mission Bay Park Master Plan, recommended by the Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund
Oversight Committee, and approved by the City Council.
(4) To the extent items (c)(1)(A-G) that have been completed herein are later in need of
additional Capital Improvements, then those items shall again have priority over other Capital
Improvements only if approved by the City Council.
(5) Except as may be specifically authorized above in this subsection, funds in the Mission Bay
Park Improvement Fund may not be expended for commercial enterprises or improvements of
leasehold interests; for any costs associated with utilities, including, but not limited to, water and
sewage; or for roads, vehicle bridges, or vehicular ramps; or on costs that cannot be capitalized;
or on daily, weekly, monthly, or annual upkeep of the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone and
there shall be no expenditure for contracted labor or services or for city employee salaries,
pensions or benefits unless those expenses can be capitalized, and only then at the then standard
rates used by the City of San Diego for all other capital improvement projects.
Page 15
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
(d) Funds in the San Diego Regional Parks Improvement Fund may be expended only for noncommercial public Capital Improvements for the San Diego Regional Parks and only for park
uses. Funds in the San Diego Regional Parks Improvement Fund may not be expended for
commercial enterprises or improvements of leasehold interests; for any costs associated with
utilities, including, but not limited to, water and sewage; or for roads, vehicle bridges, or
vehicular ramps; or on daily, weekly, monthly, or annual upkeep of the San Diego Regional
Parks. Priority for Capital Improvements hereunder shall be recommended by the San Diego
Regional Parks Improvement Fund Oversight Committee, in accordance with the master plans
for each of the San Diego Regional Parks, and approved by the City Council.
(e) The Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee and the San Diego Regional
Parks Improvement Fund Oversight Committee shall meet at least quarterly to audit and review
the implementation of this Charter Section, to recommend priorities for expenditures and Capital
Improvements hereunder in accordance with the master plans for each of the San Diego Regional
Parks or with the Mission Bay Master Plan or within the priorities identified in (c)(1)(AG), as
applicable; and to verify that the appropriate funds are collected, segregated, retained and
allocated according to the intent of this Section, and spent as prioritized in this Section and
consistent herewith. The San Diego City Auditor, in cooperation with each committee, shall
establish and oversee a mechanism to ensure public accountability by effectively reporting and
communicating the extent and nature of revenues, expenses and improvements generated
hereunder and compliance with the requirements outlined herein. This shall include, at a
minimum, an annual audit report to the Mayor, City Council and public. Each report shall, at a
minimum, contain a complete accounting of all revenues received, the amount and nature of all
expenditures, a report as to whether in each committee’s view the expenditures have been
consistent with the priorities and provisions hereof, whether the City of San Diego has complied
with sections (c)(2), (f), (g) and (h). In the event that either committee finds that there has been a
violation of this Charter Section by the City of San Diego, it should set forth the alleged violation
in a written communication to the City Manager and members of the San Diego City Council. If
the alleged violation is not resolved to the satisfaction of the aggrieved committee within 30
days, the San Diego City Council shall docket an action item for a public meeting of the San
Diego City Council within 60 days. If evidence presented to the San Diego City Council by the
aggrieved committee establishes a violation of this Section, the San Diego City Council shall
forthwith cure the violation including but not limited to the restoration of inappropriately
expended funds.
(f) The City of San Diego shall take all steps necessary to ensure the collection and retention of
all Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues for purposes described herein and to utilize those revenues
only for the purposes described herein and consistent with the priorities and intentions described
herein. The City of San Diego may issue bonds, notes or other obligations to expedite the Capital
Improvements contemplated herein, utilizing the revenue stream from Mission Bay Park Lease
Revenues designated herein.
(g) The annual budgets allocated for park operations and maintenance in the Mission Bay Park
Improvement Zone and the San Diego Regional Parks shall not be reduced at a greater rate or
increased at a lesser rate relative to the overall annual budget of park and recreation as a result of
monies available hereunder.
(h) The City of San Diego is encouraged to seek other sources of funding for the purposes of
improving the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone and the San Diego Regional Parks,
Page 16
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund Oversight Committee
December 1, 2015
including but not limited to grant funding from other governmental agencies, private individuals,
or foundations. In the event the City of San Diego receives any such additional funds, they shall
be in addition to, and shall not offset or reduce funds dedicated to the Mission Bay Park
Improvement Fund or San Diego Regional Parks Fund under this Section.
(i) Nothing contained herein shall prevent the City of San Diego from spending funds in excess
of the Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund or San Diego Regional Parks Fund for the purposes
of improving the Mission Bay Park Improvement Zone or the San Diego Regional Parks.
(j) This Section shall take effect and be in force on July 1, 2009, and will expire on June 30,
2039. Before the expiration of this Section, the City Council shall place on the ballot no later
than the last regularly scheduled election prior to June 30, 2039 a measure to amend the Charter
to extend the effect of this Section for an additional 30 years.
(k) In the event of a conflict between any provision of Section 55.2 and any other provision of
this Charter or the Municipal Code, Section 55.2 shall govern.
(Addition voted 11-04-2008; effective 12-16-2008.)
Attachment 2
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund
Proposed Ten-Year Plan
Park and Recreation Department
December 1, 2015
Mission Bay Park Improvement Fund (MBPIF)
Fund 200386
Total Anticipated FY12 - FY25:
Revenues Received by Fiscal Year
$99,854,436
Cumulative Anticpated Unallocated MB Park Fund
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Priority Order Per Charter 55.2
Restoration of navigable waters within
Mission Bay Park (MBP) and
elimination of navigational hazards.
When depth conditions no longer
support and ensure safe navigation,
those areas that pose a danger or
impede the passage of watercraft shall
be dredged in accordance with the
Mission Bay Baseline Chart.
Wetland expansion and water quality
improvements and protection and
expansion of eelgrass beds as
identified in the Mission Bay Park
Master Plan (MBPMP). ($250-350k/ac)
Restoration of shoreline treatments
within Mission Bay Park Improvement
Zone (MBPIZ) including restoration of
beach sand and stabilization of
erosion control features.
Expansion of endangered or
threatened species preserves and
upland habitats on North Fiesta Island
and along the levee of the San Diego
River floodway as identified in the
Completion of bicycle and pedestrian
paths and bridges as identified in the
MBPMP, installation of sustainable
lighting in the MBPIZ, installation of
signage and landscaping at points of
entry to MBP and South Shores, and
the repair, resurfacing and restriping
Restoration of the seawall bulkhead
on Oceanfront Walk to a condition no
less than the quality of restoration
previously performed in 1998 from
Thomas Street to Pacific Beach Drive
or to conditions as may be required by
historic standards.
Deferred maintenance that are also
Capital Improvements on existing
assets within MBPIZ as may be
recommended by the MBPIF Oversight
Committee and approved by the City
Council.
FY12
$2,449,147
$2,449,147
FY13
$5,400,000
$0
Est. Cost FY12FY25
Project in design phase. Currently fully
funded.
B10163
FY14
$4,260,441
$4,260,441
FY15
$7,025,879
$11,286,320
FY16
Anticipated
$6,587,589
$14,473,909
FY17
Anticipated
$7,169,341
$21,143,250
FY18
Anticipated
$7,697,045
$27,340,295
FY19
Anticipated
$8,150,987
$14,191,282
FY20
Anticipated
$8,614,007
$17,305,289
FY21
Anticipated
$8,500,000
$2,805,289
FY22
Anticipated
$8,500,000
$1,805,289
FY23
Anticipated
$8,500,000
$805,289
FY24
Anticipated
$8,500,000
$5,289
FY25
Anticipated
$8,500,000
$5,289
FY 17
Funding
FY 18
Funding
FY 19
Funding
FY 20
Funding
FY 21
Funding
FY 22
Funding
FY 23
Funding
FY 24
Funding
FY 25
Funding
$ 2,000,000
$ 2,000,000
$ 2,300,000
$ 1,500,000
FY 15 Funding FY 16 Funding
$7,849,147 $7,849,147
$16,000,000
2.1 Rose Creek (80 ac +/-)
$5,000,000
2.2 North Fiesta Island (15 ac +/-)
$ 1,000,000
$
1,000,000
2.3 & 2.4 Tecolote Creek (14 ac +/-)
$7,000,000
$
1,000,000
$ 6,000,000
2.5 Cudahay Creek (5 ac +/-)
$1,250,000
$
250,000
$ 1,000,000
$3,000,000
$
500,000
$ 2,500,000
$2,000,000
$
200,000
$ 1,800,000
$ 2,000,000
Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths
$2,100,000
$
100,000
Sustainable Lighting
$1,100,000
$
100,000
Signage and Landscaping
$1,750,000
$
250,000
Parking Lot Repair/Resurfacing
4450 LF
3.8M SF
Approx 10,500 LF @
$2,500/lf (x1.3)
Playgrounds
14 ea
Fitness Course (De Anza)
Restrooms (31 total)
Site Furnishings
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$8,300,000
$29,500,000
$6,000,000
$ 15,000,000
$ 4,000,000
$
$
500,000
500,000
$ 5,000,000
$
5,000,000
$ 5,000,000
$ 5,000,000
$ 4,500,000
$ 4,500,000
$ 1,000,000
$
1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
$
2,000,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$ 1,500,000
$0
10 ea
$9,000,000
$0
ATTACHMENT 3 - FY 2013-2014-2015
ACTUAL MISSION BAY PARK REVENUES
Schedule of Mission Bay Park Lease Revenue
Prepared by: The Office of the City Comptroller
Ken Whitfield, City Comptroller
Account Title: Mission Bay Park Lease Revenue
Revenue Account Number: 418108
Fiscal Year 2013
Audit/Other
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Unaudited Revenue
Invoiced
YTD Cummulative
1,533,574 $
1,533,574
4,634,736 $
6,168,311
3,901,806 $
10,070,116
2,151,970 $
12,222,087
2,106,716 $
14,328,803
1,532,331 $
15,861,134
1,730,694 $
17,591,829
1,437,349 $
19,029,178
1,494,890 $
20,524,068
2,385,773 $
22,909,841
2,274,398 $
25,184,239
2,362,793 $
27,547,031
3,363,797 $
30,910,828 *
YTD Revenue Totals
$30,000,000
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000
$5,000,000
$YTD Total
* Revenues are based on customer invoices subject to year-end audit adjustments
Minimum
PY Actual
Invoiced
FY2013 Actual
$22,403,960
$27,928,632
$30,910,828
City Charter Article V, Section 55.2 (a)7
Mission Bay Park Lease Revenues means all revenues collected by the City of San Diego from commercial and non-profit sources within Mission Bay Park,
including but not limited to all monetary consideration received under leases of city owned property within Mission Bay Park, as well as revenue collected
from contracts for concessions or any other revenues collected for the use of city owned property within Mission Bay Park. The term does not include
revenue from the Mission Bay Golf Course, unless privately leased; mooring fees; any revenues from taxes including but not limited to Transient
Occupancy Taxes, sales taxes, possessory interest taxes, property taxes; or
permit fees such as park and recreation fees or special event fees to the extent those fees are levied to recover actual costs incurred by the City of San
Diego.
10/7/2013 1:26 PM
Page 1 of 1
FY13 Mission Bay Lease Revenue Statistics 6_30_13.xlsx
Mission Bay Lease Revenue - FY2013
Prepared by: Office of the City Comptroller
FY2012 Recorded Revenue
SAP #
R00270
R09896
R00061
R00091
R00184
R00002
R00354
R00052
R00139
R00253
R00104
Business Name
Legal Lessee Name
Revenue Type
SD Mission Bay Boat & Ski Club
SD Mission Bay Boat & Ski Club
Invoiced
Ending: 04/30/1988
Beginning: 5/1/1981
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Power Boat Club
Minimum
Mission Bay Yacht Club
Mission Bay Yacht Club
Invoiced
Ending: 7/31/2037
Beginning: 8/1/2012
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Yacht Club
Minimum
Dana Inn and Marina
Bartell Hotels
Invoiced
Ending: 11/30/2050
Beginning: 12/1/2000
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Hotel, Coffee Shop, Marina
Minimum
Bahia Resort Hotel
Bh Partnership
Invoiced
Ending: 3/31/2031
Beginning: 3/17/1966
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Hotel, Restaurant, Marina
Minimum
Hilton San Diego Resort
LHO Mission Bay Rosie Hotel, LP
Invoiced
Ending: 12/31/2045
Beginning: 1/1/1996
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Hotel, Restaurant, Dock
Minimum
Driscoll Mission Bay LLC
Driscoll Mission Bay LLC
Invoiced
Ending: 3/4/2029
Beginning: 3/5/1979
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Boat Repair, Storage, Marina
Minimum
Dana Landing Marina
Wesco Sales Corp
Invoiced
Ending: 7/31/2020
Beginning: 8/1/1995
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Marina & Related Uses
Minimum
Sea World
Sea World, Inc.
Invoiced
Ending: 6/30/2048
Beginning: 7/1/1998
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Marine Park
Minimum
Everingham Bros Bait Co
Everingham Bros Bait Co
Invoiced
Ending: 5/30/2029
Beginning: 5/20/2009
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Retail & Wholesale Live Bait
Minimum
Mission Bay Aquatic Center
Associated Students SDSU/Regents OfInvoiced
UCSD
Ending: 8/31/2023
Beginning: 8/20/2008
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Aquatic Sports Programming
Minimum
Campland On The Bay
Campland, LLC
Invoiced
Ending: 11/7/2017
Beginning: 11/8/1967
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Campground
Minimum
10/9/2013 10:46 AM
Jul-12
8,339
8,339
23,170
22,740
23,170
160,093
153,267
73,450
193,004
173,947
81,052
255,217
255,674
135,281
41,279
40,269
24,503
22,343
32,028
21,165
2,610,400
2,407,871
799,514
4,000
4,000
4,000
325,811
314,780
74,315
Aug-12
8,339
8,184
8,339
23,170
22,740
23,170
143,419
126,341
73,450
163,231
141,488
81,052
237,334
229,474
135,281
39,626
35,375
24,503
32,115
29,727
21,165
1,980,653
1,942,853
799,514
4,000
3,600
4,000
32,507
31,814
249,150
223,971
74,315
Sep-12
8,339
8,184
8,339
23,170
22,740
23,170
91,748
91,858
73,450
8,715
98,964
81,052
283,769
172,822
135,281
30,342
30,387
24,503
23,710
24,829
21,165
923,013
854,939
799,514
4,000
4,000
4,000
131,992
132,040
74,315
Oct-12
8,339
8,184
8,339
24,024
22,740
23,170
92,945
90,712
73,450
99,310
90,561
81,052
215,196
179,410
135,281
27,166
29,171
24,503
21,165
21,165
21,165
846,436
759,187
799,514
4,000
4,000
4,000
81,241
81,266
74,315
Nov-12
8,339
8,184
8,339
24,024
22,740
23,170
64,476
60,425
73,450
79,488
65,682
81,052
135,281
128,433
135,281
26,447
27,193
24,503
21,165
21,165
21,165
609,788
500,463
799,514
4,000
4,000
4,000
80,121
76,021
74,315
Page 1 of 2
Dec-12
8,648
8,339
8,339
24,024
23,170
23,170
73,450
73,450
73,450
84,241
66,750
81,052
135,281
127,761
135,281
22,107
25,251
24,503
21,165
21,165
21,165
857,247
846,173
799,514
4,000
4,000
4,000
74,515
72,184
74,315
Jan-13
8,648
8,339
8,339
24,024
23,170
23,170
73,450
73,450
73,450
87,968
72,075
81,052
150,040
135,281
135,281
26,882
24,970
24,503
21,165
21,165
21,165
463,934
402,012
799,514
4,000
4,000
4,000
70,358
74,236
74,315
Journal Entries
Feb-13
8,648
8,339
8,339
24,024
23,170
23,170
73,450
48,624
73,450
72,235
81,544
81,052
146,569
151,867
135,281
26,444
28,252
24,503
21,165
21,165
21,165
514,353
487,609
799,514
4,000
4,000
4,000
73,616
75,414
74,315
Mar-13
8,648
8,339
8,339
24,024
23,170
23,170
73,450
73,450
73,450
113,217
112,777
81,052
175,971
185,844
135,281
26,276
27,170
24,503
21,165
21,165
21,165
1,169,984
812,205
799,514
4,000
4,000
4,000
112,425
89,869
74,315
Apr-13
8,648
8,339
8,340
24,024
23,170
23,171
73,450
73,450
73,451
116,024
105,551
81,053
182,357
183,751
135,282
27,770
27,985
24,504
21,165
21,165
21,166
1,083,151
1,156,792
799,515
4,000
4,000
4,001
1
96,323
102,382
74,316
May-13
8,648
8,340
8,341
24,024
23,170
23,172
96,860
77,023
73,452
114,891
106,342
81,054
186,669
171,270
135,283
33,572
31,573
24,505
21,478
21,167
1,107,983
1,090,882
799,516
4,000
4,000
4,002
2
122,554
118,927
74,317
Jun-13
8,648
8,340
8,342
24,024
23,170
23,173
130,029
120,511
73,453
158,238
134,211
81,055
205,670
228,161
135,284
32,955
35,396
24,506
23,627
21,168
1,797,989
1,814,548
799,517
4,000
4,000
4,003
3
185,915
172,973
74,318
Audit/Other
618
21,172
-
80,341
1,784
-
-
-
-
4,735
-
Amount
Total
Ref
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
102,844
91,110
100,070
306,893
275,889
278,041
1,146,820
1,062,561
881,406
1,370,903
1,249,893
972,635
2,311,138
2,149,748
1,623,380
360,864
362,994
294,037
271,428
234,740
253,986
13,964,931
13,075,533
9,594,174
48,000
47,600
48,006
37,242
31,814
6
1,604,021
1,534,063
891,786
10_7_13 version FY13 Mission Bay Lease Revenue Statistics 6_30_13.xlsx
FY2012 Recorded Revenue
Business Name
Revenue Type
Jul-12
Aug-12
Sep-12
Oct-12
Nov-12
Dec-12
Jan-13
Feb-13
Mar-13
Apr-13
May-13
Jun-13
Audit/Other
R00297
Sportsmen'S Seafood Co Inc
Joseph Busalacchi
Invoiced
Ending: 4/30/2012
Beginning: 5/1/1987
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Park Related Restaurant, Etc.
Minimum
Mission Bay Sportcenter
Gleason, Richard & Debra
Invoiced
Ending: 07/20/2031
Beginning: 07/21/2011
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Aquatics, Sailing Center
Minimum
Catamaran Pier
Braemar Partnership/9th & A LP
Invoiced
Ending: 11/30/2014
Beginning: 12/1/2004
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Dock Facility, Boat Berthing
Minimum
SD Paradise Point Resort
LHO Mission Bay Hotel, L.P.
Invoiced
Ending: 5/31/2050
Beginning: 6/1/2000
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Hotel & Marina
Minimum
Marina Village
Retirement Fund Trust Of Plumbing Invoiced
Ending: 4/30/2027
Beginning: 5/1/1977
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Marina & Shops
Minimum
Bahia Belle I
Bahia Sternwheelers Inc/01
Invoiced
Ending: 5/31/1996
Beginning: 6/1/1986
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Sightseeing Boat
Minimum
William D. Evans
Bahia Sternwheelers Inc/02
Invoiced
Ending: 9/11/1991
Beginning: 9/12/1986
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Sightseeing Boat
Minimum
SD Rowing Club/Intercollegiate Rowing
SD Rowing Club/Intercollegiate Rowing
Invoiced
Ending: 7/31/2013
Beginning: 8/1/1988
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Rowing & Storage Facility
Minimum
Catamaran Beach Concession
Braemar Partnership/03
Invoiced
Ending: 11/30/2014
Beginning: 12/1/2004
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Chair, Umbrella, Food Concession
Minimum
Hanohano Outrigger Canoe Club
Hanohano Outrigger Canoe Club
Invoiced
Ending: 12/31/2012
Beginning: 04/01/2011
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Outrigger Canoes, Equipment Storage
Minimum
Hyatt Regency Islandia
CHSP Mission Bay LLC
Invoiced
Ending: 1/31/2056
Beginning: 1/9/2006
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Hotel, Restaurant, Marina, Sportfishing
Minimum
Quivera Rd
Verizon Wireless LLC
Invoiced
Ending: 8/31/2022
Beginning: 8/31/2012
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Equipment enclosure and a light standard
Minimum
Seaforth Sportfishing Corp.
Seaforth Sportfishing Corp.
Invoiced
Ending: 11/30/2047
Beginning: 11/8/2007
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Sportfishing Headquarters
Minimum
SD Canoe & Kayak Team
SD Canoe & Kayak Team
Invoiced
Ending: 6/30/2012
Beginning: 12/1/10
PY Actual Inv.
Function: Storage and Access
Minimum
TOTAL
CY Invoiced
TOTAL
PY Actual Inv.
TOTAL
Minimum
6,862
7,307
3,129
20,894
16,516
5,833
10,418
10,944
1,977
419,478
412,572
208,666
59,113
60,418
39,396
4,100
5,878
2,648
5,634
4,203
5,634
1,048
1,048
42
42
42
291
274
360,736
360,772
165,394
#N/A
9,347
6,544
3,129
18,339
5,833
9,751
8,881
1,977
417,847
391,318
208,666
64,909
63,553
39,396
3,417
3,585
2,648
7,947
5,456
5,634
1,048
989
1,048
42
42
42
291
274
274
324,005
308,552
165,394
#N/A
9,352
5,705
3,129
10,228
9,205
5,833
4,437
3,007
1,977
195,176
277,017
208,666
60,107
60,005
39,396
3,937
3,057
2,648
10,155
10,601
5,634
1,048
989
1,048
42
42
42
291
274
274
220,377
218,784
165,394
#N/A
7,367
6,104
3,129
4,347
5,366
5,833
1,546
1,492
1,977
262,242
249,269
208,666
59,762
61,364
39,396
2,826
3,160
2,648
7,718
10,704
5,634
1,086
989
1,048
42
42
42
301
274
274
268,336
221,364
165,394
#N/A
3,129
3,129
3,129
5,902
2,001
5,833
798
555
1,977
187,147
158,252
208,666
53,493
54,636
39,396
2,648
1,190
2,648
5,634
4,033
5,634
1,086
989
1,048
42
42
42
301
274
274
182,312
181,834
165,394
#N/A
3,129
3,129
3,129
4,120
116
5,833
362
474
1,977
152,485
158,095
208,666
55,343
52,688
39,396
2,803
2,350
2,648
9,205
6,975
5,634
1,086
1,048
1,048
42
42
42
301
274
274
165,394
179,097
165,394
#N/A
3,129
3,129
3,129
4,300
1,797
5,833
594
517
1,977
211,202
136,495
208,666
48,828
49,593
39,396
2,648
3,075
2,648
5,634
3,075
5,634
1,086
1,048
1,048
42
42
42
301
291
274
195,967
182,128
165,394
#N/A
3,129
3,129
3,129
4,214
2,612
5,833
709
681
1,977
229,295
192,440
208,666
48,502
49,948
39,396
2,648
1,132
2,648
5,634
4,060
5,634
1,086
1,048
1,048
42
42
42
301
291
274
206,208
221,066
165,394
#N/A
4,132
3,129
3,129
7,821
2,558
5,833
1,616
1,029
1,977
279,834
256,354
208,666
54,565
53,232
39,396
2,648
2,247
2,648
9,530
10,894
5,634
1,086
1,048
1,048
42
42
42
301
291
274
247,259
257,185
165,394
#N/A
4,365
3,129
3,130
7,470
4,969
5,834
1,772
1,625
1,978
255,034
268,551
208,667
51,584
55,557
39,397
1,324
1,998
2,649
2,885
8,693
5,635
1,086
1,048
1,049
42
42
43
301
291
275
264,163
244,301
165,395
#N/A
5,050
3,129
3,131
11,162
7,371
5,835
3,054
1,989
1,979
267,387
266,896
208,668
59,963
60,542
39,398
2,238
2,650
8,626
5,636
1,086
1,048
1,050
42
42
44
301
291
276
240,489
243,852
165,396
#N/A
5,810
7,051
3,132
15,350
12,879
5,836
6,285
4,244
1,980
353,550
345,106
208,669
60,128
60,683
39,399
3,497
2,651
12,025
5,637
1,086
1,048
1,051
42
42
45
301
291
277
275,325
296,761
165,397
#N/A
-
102,229
107,458
44,314
238
225
238
4,634,736
4,390,910
1,723,382
131,082
115,830
44,314
238
225
238
3,901,806
3,700,816
1,723,382
107,788
90,141
44,314
238
225
238
2,151,970
2,119,817
1,723,382
71,075
54,899
44,314
247
225
238
2,106,716
1,901,649
1,723,382
36,463
28,435
44,314
247
225
238
1,532,331
1,349,900
1,723,382
31,498
31,815
44,314
247
225
238
1,730,694
1,704,570
1,723,382
32,902
31,571
44,314
247
238
238
1,437,349
1,251,697
1,723,382
28,371
29,389
44,314
247
238
238
1,494,890
1,436,059
1,723,382
47,532
34,192
44,314
247
238
238
2,385,773
1,980,428
1,723,382
47,213
39,002
44,314
247
238
239
2,274,398
2,336,028
1,723,405
53,334
48,635
44,314
247
238
240
2,362,793
2,276,422
1,723,428
74,580
64,354
44,314
247
238
241
3,363,797
3,349,528
1,723,451
R05898
R00097
R00183
R02096
R00086
R00087
R00271
R00096
R04996
R10296
R11495
R00278
R03495
10/9/2013 10:46 AM
Legal Lessee Name
Journal Entries
SAP #
Page 2 of 2
Amount
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
7,038
-
-
-
569
1,275
14,046
-
23
1,392,661
9,300
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
13
1,524,274
-
Total
Ref
-
-
64,802
54,616
37,558
121,186
65,391
70,006
41,340
35,437
23,724
3,230,677
3,112,365
2,503,998
676,297
682,219
472,756
29,568
33,407
31,781
71,253
89,346
67,617
26,965
11,290
12,576
500
500
510
3,609
3,114
3,294
4,343,232
2,915,696
1,984,738
9,300
#N/A
764,068
675,722
531,768
2,948
2,777
2,862
30,910,828
27,797,824
20,680,717
10_7_13 version FY13 Mission Bay Lease Revenue Statistics 6_30_13.xlsx