heifer international tanzania organizational
Transcription
heifer international tanzania organizational
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL TANZANIA ORGANIZATIONAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PRESENTATION AT INTERACTION EVALUATIVE THINKING WORKSHOP HELD IN ACCRA, GHANA, DECEMBER 10- 12, 2013 By Msangya Msangya Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation Manager Heifer International Tanzania Presentation Outline Brief on Heifer International Tanzania What it does Livestock enterprise portfolios Livestock enterprises benefits Strategies and Action Plan Theory of Change/categories of Impact Measures • How Heifer assesses it impacts • Categories of Impact Measures in Heifer • • • • • • Brief on Heifer International Tanzania • • HITz is a registered INGO in Tanzania affiliated with Heifer Project International in the United States of America (USA). • Vision: Communities living together in peace and equitably sharing the resources of a healthy planet. • Mission: To work with communities to end hunger and poverty and care for the earth. • Purpose: Works with vulnerable families and communities in partnership with relevant stakeholders to improve food and nutrition security, increase income and assets by sharing knowledge, livestock and other resources, empowering women and ensuring environmental sustainability. • Therefore, HITz, enables resource-poor farm families to build resilience and sustainable livelihoods to overcome abject poverty. What Heifer Tanzania does • Implements programs/projects using a sustainable livelihoods approach in supporting diverse, socially appropriate and economically viable, integrated, livestock farming enterprises portfolios that enable resource-poor farm families to build resilience and sustainable livelihoods to overcome abject poverty. Livestock enterprises portfolios Sample Direct benefits to smallholder farmers • Benefits Direct benefits Cont… Camel milking: Halima Jumanne, one the Kipashe & Ruvu Camel Groups members milking a camel. The groups collect a total of 100 liters per day from the 10 camels they are milking. 7 Heifer’s Strategy and Action Plan Ends – Define What results Heifer will achieve Heifer’s Strategy & Action Plan for Impact – Defines How Heifer works Key Results Growth, Mobilization and Stewardship – a growing and diverse financial portfolio with engaged donors and financiers Measured by: 1. Increase in funds 2. Donor acquisition retention 3. Deepening donor experience and engagement 4. Percent change in components of funding portfolio 1. Scale-up Program Impact PROJECT 2. Growth and Diversification of Support and Revenue 3. Strengthen Core Global Operating Systems Key Results Hunger and poverty ended for millions of smallholder farmers. Measured by: 1. Number of families above the poverty line+ 2. Deeper impact in dimensions of theory of change 3. Smallholders engaged in value chains significant enough to lift smallholders out of poverty 4. Systemic change and impact beyond household level Key Results Quality, performance excellence, accountability. Measured by: 1. Program quality 2. Donor satisfaction 3. Employee engagement 4. Negative overhead growth 8 Theory of Change- Categories of Impact Measures From Vulnerability to Sustainability. Heifer believes that it significantly contributes to feeding the world and securing sustainable livelihoods, by enhancing the capacity of vulnerable and smallholder farmers especially women. These accompanied by strong social capital and women’s empowerment will have multiplier effects and result in a sustainable reduction in world hunger and poverty Factors contributing to poverty and hunger: Marginalization, gender discrimination, lack of access to resources and services, lack of diversified livelihood opportunities, vulnerability, low income, and environmental degradation Core Indicators: Dimensions: Categories of Impact Goal: Improved global sustainable livelihoods Food Security and Nutrition Increase in Income and Assets • • • Income Assets Expenditures • Percent change of families' monthly average gross income • Percent change of families owning basic productive assets • Percent change of families owning basic nonproductive assets • • • Availability Accessibility Utilization • Percent change in project related livestock productivity • Percent change in project related crop productivity • Average Number of Meals per day • Percent change in Household Dietary Diversity Score • Percent change in Months of Adequate Household Food Provisioning Women Empowerment Environment • Agro-ecological Production practices • Natural Resources Management • Waste Management Social Capital • Agency • Structure • Relations • Structural • Cognitive • • • Percent change of families implementing agroecological practices • • • Percent change of participants reporting women control of productive assets, own education, own labor and freedom of movement Percent change of participants reporting women decision making power over household expenditures, children education, fertility and group participation Percent change of participants reporting women having an enabling environment Percent change of participants reporting women active participation at community level • • • • • • • Percent change of families reporting participation in community organizations Percent change of families reporting participation in informal community networks Percent change of families reporting equal participation in the community of society’s diverse groups Percent change of families reporting community members equality of access to utilities and services Percent change of families reporting trust among community members Percent change of families reporting solidarity and cooperation among community members Percent change of families reporting positive perception of PoG's Percent of families reporting commitment to participate in PoG 9 How Heifer assesses overall organizational impacts Organizational level (annual): • Finance audits (internal & external) • Staff performance appraisal • Identified programs/project evaluations • Leadership performance management assessment How HITz assess overall organizational impacts cont.. Project level: • Annual Implementation Plans • Sustainable livelihoods assessments • Baseline surveys • Outcome mapping • Impact project’s monitoring during implementation, NOT at the end • Success stories for learning • Participatory self-review and planning • Joint stakeholder review meetings Why HITz decided to assess organizational impact? • Need for triple accountability • Need to get informed and transform • Need to document lesson learned for replicating and/or scaling up • Need to be a fundamental lead in reducing hunger and poverty through integrated livestock enterprises Note: Inform is getting relevant, reliable and accurate information . Transform is using the information to facilitate positive changes. Who are involved in collecting/analyzing data? • Project staff at field levels • Monitoring and Evaluation Project Officers • Clusters’ (Regional) Managers • Project Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation & Learning Manager at country Office • Identified consultants (periodically) How results can be achieved -Through intensive integrated livestock husbandry improvement theoretical and practical training -Through placement of genetic potential livestock spices suiting specific environment - Adequate extension services to farmers by either government or Private Public Partnership - Through readiness (able and willingness) of smallholder farmers to attitudinal change for adopting new skills and technologies How information is shared -Shared at country Senior Management Team level then with staff to inform and or transform - Shared with partners including donors in joint review meeting or special report - Documented for lesson learned that are used for new intervention replication or scaling up Note: Partners are implementing stakeholders (i.e., state and non-state actors), while donors are funders. Process put in place to ensure use of information • There is a strong M&E system in place from project level to headquarters to ensure the use of the following information Field visit reporting system Quarterly joint meetings to update on the progress and challenges Project reporting (financial and narrative ) systems, Web-based program information (PPMIS) Web-based financial systems (AGRESSO) Web-based project success story systems How results can be improved in the future • More friendly information system for local partner level to access is needed. • Country specific information server is needed. • More public reporting to inform and enable their attitudinal change (to transform) is fundamental. • More sharing what Heifer is doing with other organizations is critical for improvement. The use of information -Helps in planning new interventions, based on experience and lesson learned -Helps in designing interventions and operationalizing the scaling up of interventions -Helps to improve daily ways of doing things, and NOT taking work as usual -Leads to improved funding opportunities from institutional donors -Creates more trust and transparency of the organization for outsiders (donors) Challenges being encountered in doing assessment - Time consuming Very costly Qualified personnel needed all the time Need appropriate technology for data base (collation, analysis and storage) Broader lessons learned from the experience - Planning for impact monitoring during implementation, and not waiting to do it at the end of the intervention, is informative, educative and helps to transform. -Doing monitoring based on donor requirements alone does not have benefits for the organization and beneficiaries. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING