Sport Aviation - Belite Aircraft
Transcription
Sport Aviation - Belite Aircraft
Birth of the Belite BY TIM KERN JAMES WIEBE, EAA 859932, worked at Cessna as an intern in 1978, joined a flying club, and earned his private pilot certificate. Since then, he has logged some 1,800 flight hours in general aviation aircraft while developing a reputation as an entrepreneur in the computer industry. As founder and president/CEO of Newer Technology, he led that company to annual sales of more than $60 million; later he founded WiebeTech, a significant provider of storage devices for personal computers. 54 Sport Aviation July 2010 PHOTOGRAPHY BY CRAIG SOOTER www.eaa.org 55 A fter selling WiebeTech, James turned his entrepreneurial enthusiasm toward his passion for aviation. In early 2009 he bought the tooling for the Kitfox Lite and, following an extensive weight-reduction program, relaunched the aircraft as the Belite series of legal FAR Part 103 ultralights. WHY ULTRALIGHTS? As James notes, “When light-sport opened up, people expected ‘cheap’ two-seat airplanes. That’s not happening….” With more than 100 light-sport aircraft designs covering the higher end of the price bracket, James sensed an opportunity for those on a restricted budget who don’t want to fly anywhere in particular; they just want to experience the joy of flight. He came to the conclusion that FAR Part 103 ultralighting is still the best answer to the question of low-cost flying, and also holds great appeal to the free spirit in aviation. Here, under minimal restrictions and with virtually no supervision, nearly anyone can fly. You can build your own ultralight, power it with your own engines (as many as you want), and fly it with no medical restrictions. You don’t have to build 51 percent; manufacturers don’t need to conform to federal aviation regulations (FARs) or ASTM standards. But James did figure that a modern ultralight must exhibit handling similar to a “real” airplane, particularly as the new sport-pilot rules had effectively killed traditional methods of ultralight training. This would make one’s first solo a less foreign experience after receiving training in a small two-place airplane. KITFOX ON A DIET When James purchased the Kitfox Lite tooling, he also acquired a well-used Kitfox Lite airframe to use as the test bed for an aggressive weight-reduction program. His goal was to drop at least 40 pounds from the used “fat ultralight.” PART 103 ALIVE AND KICKING STILL THE BEST OPTION FOR AFFORDABLE FLYING Industry gurus are sensing an upturn in interest in ultralights following the upheaval precipitated by the introduction of the new sport pilot rules in 2004. The market has been preserved through some lean years by dedicated trike and powered parachute manufacturers, plus a few fixed-wing stalwarts: Challenger, CGS, Hummel, Quicksilver, Fisher, and Kolb, among others. New players such as Belite are helping create a sense of positive momentum in the ultralight segment, Randy Schlitter of RANS is said to be working on a new design, and the emergence of electric powerplants seems to hold significant prospects for future growth. Following pioneering work by Randall Fishman with his ElectraFlyer, Tom Peghiny flew his electricpowered Flightstar e-Spyder just about every day at Oshkosh last year. If the FAA allows equivalent “fuel” weight for additional batteries (the 5-gallon rule effectively allows for 30 pounds in Part 103, why not allow 30 pounds more of batteries?) then—even using current battery technology—potential flight times of an hour or more would become realistic. 56 Sport Aviation July 2010 James Wiebe compares the carbon fiber rib with the original wood wing rib Big chunks of weight reduction were found by changing the powerplant; the original weighed some 90 pounds and was so heavy that more weight had been added to the tail to keep the center of gravity in range. Other weight reduction came incrementally. James attacked the steel lift struts, wheels and brakes, and especially the wings, which weighed some 62 pounds total with their aluminum spars and plywood ribs. Even the fabric on the old machine was heavy. After a redesign of the wing, including carbon-fiber spars and ribs, a total of 12 pounds was gone. The steel lift struts gave way to carbon fiber—3 pounds saved. The steel tail wheel spring, too, became composite; though a larger tail wheel used up the weight saved there. Grove 4-inch wheels and hydraulic (but still heel-operated) brakes replaced the larger mechanical units. The new fabric, from Stewart Systems, weighs 3 to 5 pounds less than the original and is used sparingly. The original aluminum firewall is now carbon fiber, as is the seat bottom. The seat cushion is dropped in per pilot preference and not a permanent part of the aircraft or its official weight. The elevator and its pushrod are made of carbon fiber as well. With all those modifications, the Belite 254 was born. OPTIONS With the basic Belite design in place, James started giving people options. Although ultralight pilots don’t need a tailwheel endorsement, many pilots are more comfortable with a nose wheel. For these folks, James developed a tri-gear version he calls the Belite Trike. Its full-castering nose wheel allows a remarkable turning radius through differential braking when taxiing or when parking. PHOTOGRAPHY BY GENE STRATTON AIRCRAFT DATA HOW PART 103 IS LESS RESTRICTIVE THAN LSA: ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● ●● Owners can make any modifications (within the overall rule) to their machines. There are no airworthiness certificates, equipment lists, operating or maintenance handbooks, or annual inspections. There are no pilot or mechanic requirements, restrictions, or certificates. There are no restrictions on the number or type of engines; number or type of wings; type of fuel or endurance; type of landing gear; propeller(s) and their operation; or maximum altitudes flown (while respecting airspace rules). There is no pilot or flight-training requirement, though training is highly recommended. There is no medical requirement whatsoever. (A denied or lost medical does not ground the Part 103 pilot.) The responsibility for operating under Part 103 rests solely with the operator of the vehicle (not the manufacturer, the flight instructor, or anyone else), and such responsibility does not end with the completion of the flight. (In other words, if you get caught later, you’re still in trouble!) Then for the “high performance” crowd there’s the Superlite, a short takeoff and landing (STOL) machine with the Hirth two-cylinder engine; on average it leaves the ground at the 100-foot mark and climbs at (a claimed) 1,000 feet per minute. The Superlite uses the same fuselage and wing as the Belite 254 but sports about 2 square feet more wing area to accommodate larger flaperons, and it features more carbon fiber to keep it light. Depending on the weight of the pilot, the Superlite has a power-to-weight ratio somewhere between a P-51 Mustang and a P-55 Baron! With Part 103 limiting an ultralight to a top speed of 55 knots (63 mph) the 50-hp Hirth could cause the machine to exceed the limit, so James restricts its ultra-light output to 38 hp. Owners who choose to build the Superlite as an experimental amateur-built aircraft and fly it with a pilot certificate can avail themselves of all the power, run the empty weight up to 300 pounds, and turn a 60-by-36 prop. All three versions of the Belite are offered in factory-new and kit form. In all of the models he offers, James left some weight for avionics, and then made sure they were ultra light, too, by developing his own line. With a nod back to his technology roots, James recently began offering an ingenious and innovative range of solid state avionics under the name Patch Flyer that weigh just 1/2 ounce each. In less than two years since entering the marketplace, James has accomplished a great deal toward his quest for a light-weight and low-cost ultralight—and his Belite range may just be the answer that many pilots are looking for. AIRCRAFT MAKE & MODEL: Belite 254, Belite Trike, or Superlite CERTIFICATION: FAR Part 103; also amateur-built experimental LENGTH: 16 feet, 5 inches (all models) WINGSPAN: 25 feet, 2 inches (all models) HEIGHT: 5 feet, 2 inches (all models) MAXIMUM GROSS WEIGHT: 550 pounds (all models) EMPTY WEIGHT: varies from 225 pounds to 278 pounds, depending on engine selection and optional equipment. Maximum empty weight is 278 pounds. FUEL CAPACITY: 5 gallons SEATS: 1 POWERPLANT OPTIONS (ALL USE REDRIVES): HIRTH F23 50HP PROPELLER: 60 x 38 CRUISE: 62 mph HIRTH F33 28HP PROPELLER: 60 x 27 CRUISE: 52 mph COMPACT RADIAL ENGINES MZ-201 45HP PROPELLER: 60 x 34 CRUISE: 62 mph POWER LOADING: 11 pounds per HP WING LOADING: 5.5 pounds per square foot (at max gross weight) EQUIPPED FOR: VFR Day VNE 80 MPH VSO 28 MPH VX 45 MPH VY 50 MPH PRICE: BELITE 254: starting at $24,995 BELITE TRIKE: starting at $26,995 SUPERLITE: starting at $28,655 Quick-build kits start at less than $12,000 FOR MORE INFORMATION: BELITE AIRCRAFT 3450 N. Rock Road #210 Wichita, KS 67226 www.BeliteAircraft.com 316-253-6746 To read more about James Wiebe’s Kitfox Lite weight-reduction program visit www.SportAviation.org. James also maintains an informative and entertaining blog “We Be James” at jameswiebe.blogspot.com. PHOTOGRAPHY BY JIM KOEPNICK www.eaa.org 57