A consultation with young people about the impact of domestic
Transcription
A consultation with young people about the impact of domestic
A consultation with young people about the impact of domestic violence (abuse) in their families and their formative relationships Ellie McCoy April 2011 Lisa Jones Zara Quigg Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the following people for their assistance with and participation in this research: The staff and young people who participated in the focus groups; Gill Chadwick and the young people at the NSPCC Marie Wallenfang and the young people at the Central Youth Club and the Children’s Centre Paul Huston and the young people at NACRO, The Elms Rachel England, Tony Rigby, Robert Bridge, Donna McAnallen and the young people at the Youth Offending Service Tracy Ramsey and the young people at the Bronte Youth Club Joanne Wormald and the young people at In Training Clair Heaviside, Elaine Kinsella and the young people at Toxteth TV Rosemary Pritchard, Tracy Mathias and the young people at St John Bosco Arts College Julie Smith and the young people at the Unity Youth Club Raichenda Thompson and the young people at Broughton Hall High School The staff at the Centre for Public Health, Liverpool John Moores University: Jim McVeigh, Amanda Atkinson, Geoff Bates, Simon Russell, Layla English, Emma Pemberton, Clare Heraty and Lee Tisdall. Liverpool John Moores University students on placement at Citysafe: Kerryann Lawrence, Andrea Thompson and Corey Edwardson Independent Domestic Violence Advisor (IDVA): Kerry Dowling; IDVA. A special thank you to Michelle Lesbirel-Jones; Citysafe and the Task and Finish Group: Maria Curran; Citysafe, Jason Mather; NSPCC, Carolyn Welsh; NSPCC, Julie Aitchison; Alt Valley Neighbourhood Management Services, Liz Berry; Youth Offending Service, Phil McEwan; Merseyside Police and Paul Ainsworth; Ariel Trust. i Table of Contents Executive Summary................................................................................................................................. 1 1 2 3 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Definitions and prevalence of domestic abuse....................................................................... 4 1.2 Young people .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Policy ....................................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Research aims and objectives ................................................................................................. 9 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 10 2.1 Recruitment strategy ............................................................................................................ 10 2.2 Focus groups ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Questionnaires ...................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Ethical issues ......................................................................................................................... 11 Findings ......................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1 Participant demographics ..................................................................................................... 13 3.2 Focus groups – qualitative findings....................................................................................... 15 3.2.1 What is domestic violence? .......................................................................................... 15 3.2.2 Who does it happen to?................................................................................................ 15 3.2.3 Does it happen to males? ............................................................................................. 17 3.2.4 Do drugs and alcohol make it worse? ........................................................................... 18 3.2.5 The media...................................................................................................................... 18 3.2.6 Control .......................................................................................................................... 20 3.2.7 Is abuse ever acceptable in a relationship? .................................................................. 23 3.2.8 Family ............................................................................................................................ 24 3.2.9 Advice ............................................................................................................................ 25 3.2.10 Have you given advice? ................................................................................................. 28 3.2.11 How have they learnt about domestic abuse so far? ................................................... 28 3.2.12 Domestic abuse programme for young people: what they want ................................. 29 Discussion...................................................................................................................................... 34 4.1 Summary of findings ............................................................................................................. 34 4.2 Research limitations.............................................................................................................. 36 ii 4.3 Further research ................................................................................................................... 37 5 Conclusions and recommendations .............................................................................................. 38 6 References .................................................................................................................................... 40 7 Appendices .................................................................................................................................... 43 Appendices Appendix 1. Carer participant information sheet and consent form ................................................... 43 Appendix 2. Young persons’ participant information sheet and consent form ................................... 47 Appendix 3. Questionnaire ................................................................................................................... 50 Appendix 4. Focus group plan............................................................................................................... 50 List of tables Table 1: Numbers invited and attended by organisation ..................................................................... 13 Table 2: Age of participants by gender ................................................................................................ 14 Table 3: Ethnicity of participants .......................................................................................................... 14 List of boxes Box 1. Summary of recommendations ................................................................................................... 3 Box 2. Definitions of domestic abuse...................................................................................................... 4 List of figures Figure 1: Power and control wheel ......................................................................................................... 5 iii Executive Summary Domestic abuse (often referred to as Intimate Partner Violence) is a recognised global public health concern. It is often defined as behaviour that involves physical, psychological or sexual harm within an intimate relationship and can also include youth violence, child maltreatment, elder abuse and sexual violence. Domestic abuse can also occur within the family; the Department of Health estimates that 750,000 children experience domestic abuse annually. Research examining domestic abuse tends to focus on adult relationships; however it is important to consider young people and their relationships. Adolescence is an important time as this is often when people begin to form intimate and formative relationships. It is therefore an essential stage for initiating domestic abuse prevention work. There is a body of UK research on adult female’s experiences, and a smaller amount on children’s experiences, but little is known about adolescent’s experiences of partner violence and the research that has been conducted tends to originate from the USA. Research suggests that it is essential to include this through detailed examination of young people’s views and experiences in order to recognise young people’s views and actions in their own right. The Coalition Government has recently launched a paper ‘A call to end violence against women and girls’ outlining how they plan to tackle violence against females, with the vision of creating a society in which no female should have to live in fear of violence. Domestic abuse is also a priority locally. In Liverpool, Citysafe (Liverpool’s Community Safety Partnership) prioritises a number of key issues to tackle, one of which is to reduce serious violence, which includes domestic abuse, and to develop an understanding of the issues young people feel affect them in relation to domestic abuse. Citysafe therefore commissioned the Centre for Public, Liverpool John Moores University, to undertake a consultation, to speak with young people around their views and experiences of domestic abuse. The objectives of the research were: • to learn what the issues are for young people in relation to domestic violence (abuse); • to understand how young people view domestic violence (abuse) (in all its forms) in family and intimate partner relationships; and • to use the findings from the project to inform an education programme through ‘It’s Not Okay’. A qualitative study was undertaken to fulfil the research objectives through a series of focus groups with young people. Agencies across Liverpool providing services to young people were contacted and a total of 119 young people aged between 14 and 24 years were invited to attend the focus groups. Each focus group lasted approximately one hour and was conducted by two researchers. Verbal and written consent was obtained to digitally record each focus group session, and the young people were asked to complete a basic demographic questionnaire. 1 In total, 93 young people attended the 14 focus groups. Just over half of participants were male (n=52, 55.9%) with the majority aged 16 and 17 years (n=22 and n=25 respectively). The majority defined their ethnicity as White English (n=72, 77.4%). However minority groups were represented. Ten percent of participants stated that they had a disability. Almost a third (30.1%, n=28) stated they had religious beliefs, 43.0% (n=40) stated that they had no religious beliefs and 26.9% (n=25) preferred not to say. The majority of the young people stated their sexual orientation as Heterosexual (n=70, 75.3%), 17.2% (n=17) preferred not to answer and 7.5% (n=7) stated their sexual orientation as Bisexual, Gay or Lesbian. Overall, the young people involved in the consultation had a good understanding of what domestic abuse is, they could state different types of abuse and who they thought it could happen to. They recognised that it could involve physical, psychological and sexual abuse. In acknowledging these different forms of abuse, the young people felt it should be referred to as domestic abuse rather than domestic violence. At all groups the young people acknowledged that domestic abuse can occur within the family and they placed an emphasis on it being something happening within a house, hence the word domestic. They believed domestic abuse could happen to anyone; however they felt that it is portrayed as happening more often to women. Young people viewed domestic abuse at home as having devastating effects on children; leaving them scared and affected by their experiences into later life. Although participants believed that the effects in adulthood largely depended on the person and how they handled their experiences. It was discussed that children affected by domestic abuse could become perpetrators and victims themselves when in adult relationships, however, the young people also acknowledged that witnessing domestic abuse could make you more determined to not act in this manner yourself. The young people’s knowledge appeared to be gained from what they had seen on TV and from their own personal and friends’ experiences. Not many of the young people had been given any formal training or teaching on the subject, although many of them thought it would be beneficial to have learnt about it. Although there was good knowledge on some areas of domestic abuse, there did appear to be a lack of awareness around the more subtle aspects, such as controlling behaviour. Many of the young people did not see certain controlling behaviours as abusive. The young people also demonstrated a lack of knowledge about where to go for advice; many were not aware of any domestic abuse services and many would not go to a professional for help. Therefore, it appeared that most young people would rather seek support from someone they know or are comfortable with, rather than access a website, ring a help line or speak to a stranger. Learning about domestic abuse was viewed as important and school was thought to be the best setting in which to teach it. The young people expressed preferences on programme content and length; they thought domestic abuse issues should be covered in lessons over a number of weeks and that programmes should incorporate all aspects of domestic abuse, not just the physical violence aspects. Young people expressed mixed views on whether they should be taught about healthy relationships. Some young people thought this was essential whereas others thought you could not teach young people how to have good relationships. Interactive material and activities 2 such as group discussions, DVDs and talks by people affected by domestic abuse were viewed as approaches that would help them learn most effectively and felt that a programme should be realistic and modern in order to hold their attention and allow them to speak freely. Box 1. Summary of recommendations Based on the findings of the consultation the following recommendations have been made: • There is a need for formal training and/or teaching on domestic abuse among young people in Liverpool. A programme addressing domestic abuse issues relevant to young people should be implemented. • In order to provide an evidence base to inform the development of a programme addressing domestic abuse issues, a review of the effects of domestic abuse programmes should be conducted. • The more subtle aspects of abuse, such as controlling behaviour, should be a focus of future programmes and domestic violence materials. • A scoping exercise should be conducted to compile a list of relevant support agencies and advice routes for young people. • Local responses to the Government’s strategy to tackle violence against women and girls should incorporate the findings from this consultation and ensure that young people’s views are considered. • Young people should be given opportunities to speak freely about domestic abuse and to have their views heard. Steps should also be taken to ensure that young people are involved in future work relating to domestic abuse, especially when there are plans to develop or implement programmes and/or materials targeted towards young people. 3 1 Introduction 1.1 Definitions and prevalence of domestic abuse Domestic abuse (often referred to as Intimate Partner Violence) is a recognised global public health concern (Krug, 2002). It is often defined as behaviour that includes physical, psychological or sexual harm within an intimate relationship (Krug, 2002) and can also include youth violence, child maltreatment, elder abuse and sexual violence (Bellis et al., 2006). However, definitions often refer specifically to intimate partner relationships and females. Violence against women is defined as: ‘Any act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or mental harm or suffering to women (WHO). There are many forms of violence against women, including sexual, physical, or emotional abuse by an intimate partner; physical or sexual abuse by family members or others; sexual harassment and abuse by authority figures (such as teachers, police officers or employers); trafficking for forced labour or sex; and such traditional practices as forced or child marriages, dowry-related violence; and honour killings’ (WHO, 2009b). The World Health Organisation has adopted the following definitions: Box 2. Definitions of domestic abuse ‘Physical violence - a woman has been: slapped, or had something thrown at her; pushed, shoved, or had her hair pulled; hit with a fist or something else that could hurt; choked or burnt; threatened with or had a weapon used against her Sexual violence - a woman has been: physically forced to have sexual intercourse; had sexual intercourse because she was afraid of what her partner might do; or forced to do something sexual she found degrading or humiliating. Though recognized as a serious and pervasive problem Emotional violence - does not yet have a widely accepted definition, but includes, for example, being humiliated or belittled; being scared or intimidated purposefully Intimate-partner violence (domestic violence) - a woman has encountered any of the above types of violence, at the hands of an intimate partner or ex partner; this is one of the most common and universal forms of violence experienced by women’ (WHO, 2005a). 4 Emotional abuse can include control of a partner; the Duluth model’s power and control wheel depicts abuse as controlling the partner’s actions, which is part of a consistent pattern of behaviour. The wheel was developed in 1984 using the experiences of female victims of abuse in Duluth, and is now used world-wide (Duluth power and control wheel, 2011). Figure 1: Power and control wheel Source: Created by the Domestic Abuse Intervention Project, Duluth, Minnesota 5 Domestic abuse can cause severe health and social consequences, including injuries (Wu, 2010) and death (Povey, 2008), and emotional consequences, including anxiety, depression or post traumatic stress disorder. Factors known to be associated with domestic abuse include interpersonal dependency or jealousy, attitudes that excuse violence and lack of empathy (Gilchrist, 2003) and alcohol use, which is known to increase the risk of domestic abuse, as a perpetrator and victim (WHO, 2006). Gender norms within society can create gender inequalities and often inequalities in gender increase the risk of acts of abuse by males against females. Cultural social norms that tolerate abuse and traditional beliefs (WHO, 2009a) are also considered a factor in making females vulnerable to abuse by males, for example, the belief that males have a right to control females, (Ilika, 2005; Mitra, 2007). The World Health Organization conducted a multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women (WHO, 2005b). The study used data from 10 countries to uncover patterns of violence across different countries and cultures to inform national authorities to design policies and programmes to help deal with the problem of domestic abuse. The percentage of women reporting physical or sexual violence by their partners, or both, in their lifetime varied from 15% (in one city in Japan) to 71% (in a province of Ethiopia) (WHO, 2005b). In 2009/10, England had over one million female victims of domestic abuse, and in the UK one in four females experience domestic abuse at some point during their lifetime (Flatley, 2010). The vast majority of these violent acts are perpetrated by males. In 2009/10, females were the victim of over 70% of incidents of domestic abuse (Flatley, 2010). At least one in five females in the UK will experience sexual assault and one in five will experience stalking in their lifetime (Flatley, 2010). The majority of interventions focus on supporting females experiencing violence. Fewer interventions and research focus on support for male victims of partner abuse (Wood, 2010). However one in six of males will experience domestic abuse in their lifetime (Walker, 2009). Domestic abuse can also occur within the family; according to the British Crime Survey 2009/10 (Flatley, 2010), non sexual family domestic abuse, although not as prevalent as partner abuse, does occur, with two percent of females and one percent of males (aged 16 to 59) reporting experiencing this form abuse in the previous year. The Department of Health estimates that 750,000 children experience domestic abuse annually (DH, 2002). An NSPCC prevalence study of children experiencing domestic abuse found that 26% of 18 to 24 years olds had lived with abuse between their parents/carers (Cawson, 2002). Children can be affected in many ways from living with domestic abuse. Although some children may turn to people for support, they are likely to be affected by the fear, disruption and distress in their lives. Children can show distress in various ways, for example, through physical, emotional, learning, behavioural or developmental problems and their educational performance and achievement may also be affected (Mullender, 2004). A meta-analysis of 118 studies of psychosocial outcomes of children exposed to domestic abuse showed that there was a significant association between exposure to domestic abuse and childhood problems (Kitzmann, 2003). Witnessing or experiencing domestic abuse as a child is associated with risk of becoming a victim or perpetrator in later life (Gil-Gonzalez, 2008; Daigneault, 2009), especially among males 6 (Slovak, 2007). There is also some evidence that families in which child abuse occurs are more likely to have a history of domestic abuse (Folsom, 2003). 1.2 Young people Often research examining domestic abuse looks at adult relationships; however it is important to consider young people and their relationships. Adolescence is an important time as this is often when people begin to form intimate and formative relationships. It is therefore an essential stage for initiating domestic abuse prevention work (Schutt, 2006). Partner violence between adolescents is an understudied area of maltreatment in the UK (Hickman et al., 2004). There is a body of UK research on adult females experiences, and a smaller amount on children’s experiences (Mullender et al., 2002; Hester et al., 2006), but little is known about adolescent’s experiences of partner violence (Barter 2009a) and the research that has been conducted tends to originate from the USA. Barter (2009a) argues that it is essential to include this through detailed examination of young people’s views and experiences in order to recognise young people’s views and actions in their own right (James et al., 1998; Mullender et al., 2002). A report from the University of Bristol and the NSPCC was the first UK research to explore the issue of partner abuse in adolescent intimate relationships (Barter 2009b). The research involved a survey of 1,353 young people aged 13 to 17 from eight schools in England, Scotland and Wales, with a further 91 in-depth interviews. The findings revealed that females were more likely to report greater incidence of all forms of abuse, that they experienced abuse more frequently, and that the abuse had more negative impacts on their welfare. A quarter of females and 18% of males reported a form of physical abuse and nearly three quarters of females and half of the males reported experiencing a form of emotional abuse. The research found that younger children, aged 13 to 15, were just as likely to experience abuse as the young people aged 16 and over. When it came to getting advice, the majority of the young people informed a friend or kept it to themselves, only a small amount spoke to an adult. The research also found that young people who had experienced domestic abuse within the family were more likely to have experienced it within a relationship in later life (Barter 2009b). A number of UK studies have examined young people’s views and experiences; one study used interviews and questionnaires to examine views and understandings of domestic abuse with 250 young people aged 14 to 16 from Manchester (Botcherby, 2007). Most of the young people identified that abuse can be physical, emotional and sexual, and they were able to identify different types of abuse including: shouting, put downs, name calling and psychological humiliation. They identified the main perpetrators as male, referring to fathers, stepfathers and boyfriends; however they did believe females could also be perpetrators of domestic abuse. Between 30% and 65% of young people thought that people are violent because of the way they had been brought up. Another study examined awareness and views of abusive behaviour towards women with young people aged 14 to 18 in Scotland. They found that males had a more pro-violent stance than females; however females were more likely to report inflicting verbal emotional abuse than males. Schutt (2006) carried out a study with young people in Southwark, London to examine young people’s 7 experiences with unhealthy relationships and reported that young people had a good knowledge of what a healthy relationship should consist of. However they also reported that the young people lacked knowledge on what to do to help a friend in an abusive relationship. The young people reported experiencing both physical and emotional abuse, but reported that emotional abuse was more common amongst their peers. They were also able to identify different forms of abuse and identify why people remain in unhealthy relationships. 1.3 Policy The Coalition Government has recently launched a strategy ‘A call to end violence against women and girls’ outlining how they plan to tackle violence against females, with the vision to have a society in which no female should have to live in fear of violence (Home Office, 2011). In the strategic vision to end violence against women and girls, the Government has committed to £28m (in total) of stable Home Office funding for specialist services over the next four years to improve the response to rape and provide more training for staff and agencies and early intervention programmes, new powers and better support for victims. 'No level of violence against women and girls is acceptable in modern Britain or anywhere else in the world.' Theresa May, Home Secretary (Home Office, 2011). The paper was launched to mark the International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women; the main aims are to: • Prevent violence by challenging attitudes and behaviours through early intervention • Provide support for victims of violence • Work in partnership to obtain the best outcomes for victims and their families • Take action to reduce risk to women and girls • To ensure that perpetrators are brought to justice Domestic abuse is also a priority locally through Citysafe, Liverpool’s statutory Community Safety Partnership (CSP). Their annual plan for 2010/11 (Liverpool City Council, 2010) prioritises a number of key issues to tackle, one of which is to reduce serious violence, which includes domestic abuse. Actions for 2010/11 include: • To develop an understanding of the issues young people feel affect them in relation to domestic violence (abuse) (through a consultation with young people) • Continued development of the Multi Agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC) • To implement Social marketing campaigns • To develop support services for victims and witnesses of domestic violence (abuse) • To develop a Domestic Violence (Abuse) Reduction Strategy – Action Plan 8 1.4 Research aims and objectives Citysafe commissioned the Centre for Public, Liverpool John Moores University, to undertake a consultation, to speak with young people around their views and experiences of domestic abuse. The objectives of the consultation were to: • Learn what the issues are for young people in relation to domestic violence (abuse), • Understand how young people view domestic violence (abuse) (in all its forms) in family and intimate partner relationships, and • Use the learning from the project to inform an education programme through ‘It’s Not Okay’. 9 2 Methods The methodology was designed to meet the objectives of the consultation by providing a broad understanding of young people’s views on domestic abuse. A qualitative study was undertaken to fulfil the research objectives through a series of focus groups with young people. To facilitate successful completion of the work, the project team worked closely with the Task and Finish group; established by Citysafe to oversee and support the project. 2.1 Recruitment strategy Agencies across Liverpool providing services to young people were contacted. Agencies were identified through contacts already established at Citysafe and the Centre for Public Health, and by conducting a scoping exercise to identify other services. The lead researcher went out to meet with each agency that expressed an interest, to provide more information and set up the focus groups. The researcher liaised with a main contact from each service to recruit the young people. The aim was to ensure that participants represented each of the neighbourhood management areas 1; those in education; those missing from education or home and/or absent from care; teenage parents; those known to the criminal justice services; Black and other Racial Minority Communities; the Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgender Communities; and young people living with families where domestic violence occurs. Parental/carer participant information sheets and consent forms (see Appendix 1) were developed and provided to the agency contact to send out to parents of any young people aged under 16 (however some services requested parental consent for all young people). A participant information sheet (see Appendix 2) was also developed for the young people and given to the services to provide the young people with information on the research before they agreed to take part. 2.2 Focus groups One hundred and nineteen young people aged between 14 and 24 years were invited to attend the focus groups. Fourteen focus groups were held with the capacity of 10-15 young people at each group, a total of 93 young people attended across the 14 groups. Each focus group was attended by two researchers, one to lead the discussion and the other to take notes. At the beginning of each focus group, the researcher gave a verbal description of the aim of the focus group, emphasised the confidentiality policy and discussed some basic protocols that participants should follow (for example, speaking one at a time). Participants were also provided with a participant information sheet and asked to sign a consent form (see Appendix 2). Verbal and written consent was obtained to digitally record each focus group session and parental/care consent forms were collected. The participant information sheet also provided a list of numbers and websites of domestic abuse services/support in case any of the young people wanted any further advice. The young people were also asked to complete a basic demographic questionnaire (see Appendix 3) at the beginning of each 1 The five Neighbourhood Management Areas in Liverpool are: Alt Valley, Liverpool East, South Central, South Liverpool and City and North. 10 group. Discussion topics were guided by the lead researcher who utilised a discussion guide. Food was provided at each focus group and each group lasted approximately one hour and each participant received a £5 high street shopping voucher in recompense for their participation. The two groups at the Youth Offending Service (YOS) did not receive vouchers due to YOS policies. All participants were given the opportunity to speak to the researchers privately and given the opportunity to record private comments after the group sessions have been completed. Support measures were also provided at each focus group. Young people attending the groups could utilise the expertise of an Independent Domestic Violence Advisor (young people; IDVA), who either attended the groups or her contact details were made available, should anyone wish to speak to her. Focus groups were digitally transcribed, allowing for the session to be transcribed and analysed. Demographic data were input into the statistical package SPSS which allowed a quantitative analysis to be undertaken. Thematic analysis (Krippendoff, 1980; Braun and Clarke, 2006) of the discussions allowed the identification of twelve themes. 2.3 Questionnaires A questionnaire was developed using the Liverpool John Moores University Equality and Diversity form. The questionnaire was anonymous and collected data on age, sex, ethnicity, disability, religion and sexual orientation. The young people were asked to complete the questionnaire at the beginning of each focus group. Age, sex and ethnicity were included as essential fields, however the young people were given the option ‘prefer not to say’ for other fields. 2.4 Ethical issues Ethical approval from Liverpool John Moores University Research and Ethics Committee was sought and granted. All data was held in accordance with Liverpool John Moores University Data Protection Policy (LJMU, 2008). All participants received a participant information sheet and had the research explained to them verbally and written informed consent was obtained. All participants were 14 years or older, parental consent was sought for those under 16 years of age and the principle of Gillick/Fraser competence was adhered to, i.e. young people aged 16 and 17 years old were able to consent for themselves providing they fully understand what was being asked of them (Department of Health, 2001). Furthermore, the Centre for Public Health’s Child Protection Policy was strictly adhered to (Woolfall et al., 2009). The Centre for Public Health also complies with Liverpool John Moores University’s ‘Child Protection protocol’ (April 2007). This protocol was written in accordance with the document ‘Safeguarding Children and Safer Recruitment in Education (DfES, 2006). All work complied with the British Psychological Society’s Ethical Guidelines (2006), and proceeded according to Fraser and Department of Health (Seeking consent: working with children, 2001) guidelines. All research staff involved in the focus groups had Criminal Records Bureau clearance for working with young people. This project included questions about sensitive topics to groups of vulnerable young people and therefore the protection of the participants was of great importance. Members of the research team met with staff from each organisation prior to commencement of fieldwork to discuss appropriate 11 protection and support for participants and utilised the support of the Independent Domestic Violence Advisor (IDVA) and specialist advice provided by the NSPCC. It was also made clear that the research team could not offer absolute guarantees of confidentiality where a young person’s welfare was concerned. 12 3 Findings 3.1 Participant demographics In total, 14 focus group sessions were conducted. The participation in the focus groups is detailed below: Table 1: Numbers invited and attended by organisation No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 - Organisation NSPCC Central Youth Club NACRO Youth Offending Service 1 Bronte Youth Club Children’s Centre In Training 1 Toxteth TV St John Bosco In Training 2 Unity Youth Club 1 Unity Youth Club 2 Broughton Hall Youth Offending Service 2 Total No. Invited 4 6 6 10 10 5 10 10 12 5 11 13 10 7 119 No. Attended 2 2 5 5 2 3 11 9 11 9 4 10 13 7 93 Reasons for non involvement included: no replies; agencies that were interested but didn't have any young people within the age range; agencies interested but replied after the recruitment period; and agencies interested but could not take part due to prior commitments. Two groups scheduled to take part had to be cancelled due to other commitments. One agency wanted to take part, however the agency was NHS funded and the ethical approval sought for the consultation did not extend to patients and users of the NHS, for which ethical approval from the NHS is required. Another reason given when recruiting was the concern that the subject may be too sensitive. In total, 93 young people attended the 14 focus groups and just over half were male (n=52, 55.9%) (females, n=41, 44.1%).The young people were aged between 14 and 23, with the majority aged 16 and 17 (n=22 and n=25 respectively). 13 Table 2: Age of participants by gender Age 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Total Male No. 1 1 14 17 7 4 1 4 2 1 52 % 14.3 14.3 63.6 68.0 41.9 80.0 50.0 100.0 66.7 100.0 55.9 Female No. % 6 85.7 6 85.7 8 36.4 8 32.0 10 58.8 1 20.0 1 50.0 0 0.0 1 33.3 0 0.0 41 44.1 Total No. 7 7 22 25 17 5 2 4 3 1 93 % 7.5 7.5 23.7 26.9 18.3 5.4 2.2 4.3 3.2 1.1 100.0 2 The majority defined their ethnicity as White English (n=72, 77.4%). However BME groups were represented, other ethnicities stated included Black and White British, Irish Egyptian and Yemeni. Table 3: Ethnicity of participants Ethnicity Bangladeshi African Black British White and Asian White and Black African White and Black Caribbean English Welsh Other White Other Total Frequency 1 1 4 1 5 3 72 2 1 3 93 Percentage 1.1 1.1 4.3 1.1 5.4 3.2 77.4 2.2 1.1 3.2 100.0 3 Of the 93 young people, 9.7% (n=9) stated that they had a disability, including asthma, autism, cerebral palsy and a stammer. Almost a third (30.1%, n=28) stated they had religious beliefs, whereas, 43.0% (n=40) stated that they had no religious beliefs and 26.9% (n=25) preferred not to say. Religions included Christian (Catholic and Protestant), Muslim and Sikh. The majority of the young people stated their sexual orientation as Heterosexual (n=70, 75.3%); 17.2% (n=17) preferred not to answer and 7.5% (n=7) stated their sexual orientation as Bisexual, Gay or Lesbian 4. 2 Total percentage does not equal 100%, due to rounding. Total percentage does not equal 100%, due to rounding. 4 It was noted that when completing the demographic questionnaire, homophobic language was used during a number of groups. 3 14 3.2 Focus groups – qualitative findings 3.2.1 What is domestic violence? The first question at each group asked the young people to define what they thought domestic abuse was. They were asked to name different types of domestic abuse and who they thought it could happen to. Overall, the young people provided a broad definition of domestic abuse. The young people defined domestic abuse as couples arguing, something that happens within a relationship, child abuse and family related: ‘When one member of a household is violent towards another member’. Physical violence was always listed first; types included assaults, aggression, hitting someone, pushing someone and punching. All groups of young people thought that domestic abuse could be both physical and psychological. When it was referred to as domestic violence, the young people discussed that it should be referred to as abuse rather than violence as this only includes the physical aspects. In one case psychological abuse was considered worse: ‘That’s domestic abuse, not domestic violence. It's a different thing to domestic violence and it’s probably worse, because you can hurt somebody in the head worse than you can hurt them on the outside, if you know what you are saying or doing, to make them feel bad’. All groups listed bullying as the main form of psychological abuse, this included bullying partners, bullying within the household, emotional bullying, cyber bullying and bullying within the local community. Other types listed included; mental abuse, patronising people, mind control, making people feel useless, playing with people’s minds, using guilt, not allowing people to leave the house, undermining confidence and emotional abuse. The majority of the groups also listed sexual abuse, in particular rape by a partner, or child abuse. All groups listed verbal abuse, insults and name calling; racism was also listed on a number of occasions. Other forms of abuse included: financially stealing from a partner; destroying the house or personal objects; intimidating a partner; pressurising a partner to use drugs; using homophobic language; using things that they know their partner is afraid of; abuse and threats via social networking/mobile phones; and stalking. 3.2.2 Who does it happen to? The young people thought that domestic abuse often occurred at home, whether it was in a relationship or family: ‘Something that happens inside the house, if they live in the same house, domestic means home, anything that happens in your house is domestic’. 15 The young people mostly listed domestic abuse as something occurring within relationships, between a male and female; the term ‘wife beater’ was mentioned on several occasions. Quite a few participants also believed that it happened between families. Forced marriages were also given as an example by one female. When asked who domestic abuse could happen to, they listed: husbands and wives; couples; children; pets; mums and dads; and brothers and sisters. They discussed parents abusing their children, and children abusing their parents. All of the young people thought it was wrong to hit a parent, in particular their mother: ‘It’s wrong, my mate battered her own mother, it was sick. I literally had to get her, and batter her and say “don’t do that to your mum you’re a coward” I think that’s just disgusting’. The examples given for children being abusive to parents were mostly all physical examples, verbal examples of abuse were only mentioned once, and seen as acceptable: ‘…known people to call their mum names like “shut up you little sl*g” you know what I mean that’s your mum, calling names that's just the way it is now, we argue and then we are alright about half an hour later’. Parents’ physically hurting their children was also discussed; however it was not believed to always be a form of abuse, they noted that it could depend on whether the parents were strict and it was a form of punishment. They also gave examples of witnessing violence between their parents; they noted that this could be something witnessed, or parents fighting and taking it out on their children. There were mixed views on whether domestic abuse could occur between brothers and sisters. Most thought it was not abuse and saw it as day to day arguing and bickering, they believed that everyone fights with their siblings and that it was a way of life rather than abuse. A small amount of the young people did think that fighting between siblings was a form of domestic abuse, an example given involved violence occurring between half siblings living in one household when families came together. Some saw it as usual sibling arguments going too far. One female commented that siblings can cause psychological abuse due to mind control. One young person provided an example of their brother being aggressive and breaking objects within the house. The parents had called the police on one occasion because they felt they didn’t have another option, it was recalled that this had given the brother a fright, leading to an end in his violent behaviour. The majority of the young people didn't have any examples of friends who had experienced domestic abuse within the family when asked, however examples did come up throughout the sessions. One male recalled fighting with his stepdad, another male had a friend who’s dad used to hit his mum, one male reported that he had witnessed his father physically hurt his mother and a female had a friend who was experiencing violence from her father, but would not report it due to a fear of her parents divorcing and splitting the family up. A small number of females provided examples of experiencing domestic abuse 16 themselves in previous relationships; they all had children from the relationships and during the relationship had blamed themselves for the violence: ‘…they only start on you because they have done something wrong and they are just blaming you, I was thinking is it my fault because of the mind games, after all that with him, that changed me, it changed who I was’. 3.2.3 Does it happen to males? All of the young people said that they believed domestic abuse could happen to both males and females. However they thought it was less common for males to experience it. Quite a few males laughed at the idea of their girlfriend abusing them; however a few did acknowledge that it is a form of abuse. All of the young people thought domestic abuse was perceived as worse for females by others, because they hear mostly about female victims. They also believed it was because males are seen as stronger than females, often due to the media portraying it that way. All of the young people believed that males were less likely to report domestic abuse that had happened to them: ‘It doesn’t happen to all men, they are too proud to say it is happening to them, It’s not reported enough, they have got too much pride, they feel like ashamed don’t they? That they’re letting a woman do that to them, that’s why they don’t tend to say anything about it because of ego’. All of the young people, male and female, agreed that it was harder for males to talk about and get advice, especially from their male friends due to ‘ego’ and feeling embarrassed. Conversely, it was believed that females were able to speak to friends because females are more sensitive to the issue. A large amount of males and a smaller amount of females thought it was more acceptable for a female to hit a male, and worse for a male to hit a female. The males were asked that if they acted in self defence who would be blamed. Males thought they would be blamed; this opinion was noted at all groups: ‘We always get the blame even if you we are just pushing them off we get the blame for it, people would blame the lad, you’d instantly think it was the lad’s fault’. Some of the males said they would act out in self defence, whereas the majority of males said they would not retaliate. A couple of males provided examples of their male friends experiencing physical violence from their female partners. One male stated that his friend tolerates it because he is scared of his female partner, they have children together and he is scared of losing his family. Another had 17 a friend who experiences violence once his girlfriend has been drinking alcohol. Another had a friend who received violence over trivial events: ‘…he came back with the wrong biscuits, she started banging his head against the wall, she was very controlling’. 3.2.4 Do drugs and alcohol make it worse? All of the young people stated that they thought alcohol and drugs could make domestic abuse worse, they believed drugs could make paranoia worse and alcohol could make someone more aggressive: ‘…he changes into a completely different person and you can see when he is going to change so you have got to distance yourself’. They believed that people could use this as an excuse for violent behaviour, and in some cases the young people believed it could be an excuse, for example you can be ‘heavy handed’ when you are drunk and do more damage than intended, or act out because of the drink because you are not in full control of your actions. However, other young people expressed the belief that drug and alcohol use was no excuse for violence: ‘It’s not a virtual reality when you have had a drink, it’s still you, If they can’t control themselves when they drink then they shouldn’t get into that state in the first place, it’s an excuse to not take responsibility for their actions’. 3.2.5 The media Portrayal of domestic abuse in the media When asked about examples of domestic abuse in the media, soap operas were the most commonly identified source. Particular soaps named were Hollyoaks, Emmerdale, Eastenders and Coronation Street. The most frequently recalled storyline related to physical domestic violence occurring between a homosexual couple on Hollyoaks. The young people commented that the victim had himself once been a perpetrator of domestic abuse in a previous heterosexual relationship. Another frequently mentioned storyline, from Eastenders, was based on a young female, Whitney, being encouraged into prostitution by her boyfriend, the character had also been abused by her step dad in a previous storyline. Other storylines mentioned involved self defence in violent relationships, harassment, rape (of male and female characters), animal cruelty and domestic abuse against males. It was also noted that the soaps often have a helpline number at the end if domestic abuse is shown; 18 in particular, Eastenders. Other TV programmes noted for covering domestic abuse included Shameless, the Bill and Casualty. An American animated TV series, Family Guy was also noted as frequently depicting violent incidents within the family: ‘They are always beating their heads in, it’s a comedy, but it’s still violent isn’t it’. A TV drama called Secret Smile was recalled as showing the psychological side of domestic abuse. Talk shows, including Jeremy Kyle, Trisha and Jerry Springer were also mentioned as examples of domestic abuse covered by the media. Jeremy Kyle was mentioned on a number of occasions; some people recalled the programme as a method for learning about domestic abuse and another used it as an example of domestic abuse within the family: ’I was watching Jeremy Kyle the other day and there was this woman who had battered her mum, battered her own mum over money’. The recent TV programme about the travelling community ‘My Big Fat Gypsy wedding’ was recalled at a number of groups. In particular, the practice of ‘grabbing’ females by males. A lot of the young people believed it was a form of domestic abuse and it was also discussed that the females were not entitled to an education. Some of the young people felt this was not a form of domestic abuse, because it is part of the travelling communities’ culture: ‘That’s like a tradition though isn’t it, we don’t judge other traditions but when it comes to gypsies we judge them, but it’s the way they’ve done it for years and they’re going to continue it for years. I don't think its violence’. Other forms of media reported as examples in relation to domestic abuse included music, for example, a song by Mary J Blige was discussed: ‘It’s proper sick, it’s a 9 year old girl and she is getting battered by her dad and she’s telling her mum but her mum is taking crack. Then she is going to school and the teachers are asking her “where are you getting these bruises from?" He says that all in the rap and she ends up trying to run away’. The domestic violence case against the singer Rihanna by her partner, another singer, Chris Brown, was also discussed at numerous groups. Support adverts Whilst discussing representations of domestic abuse in the media, the young people discussed any adverts they had seen providing awareness or advice about domestic abuse. When asked about adverts for support service, not all of the young people could recall having seen any. The main 19 advert recalled was from a recent Government advertising campaign involving a boyfriend and girlfriend with a phone. Some of the young people recalled this advert without prompting, and in a lot of cases the young people could remember this particular advert when prompted. The young people felt this advert was particularly useful, as it didn't show violence and showed the control aspect of domestic abuse. It was also noted that the male character looked drunk in the advert: ‘Yes isn’t there one where they are in the bedroom and the girl is texting and he throws the phone away and smashes it, he is watching himself through the window, watching himself do it and banging on the window, it shows emotional abuse, it shows his aggressive and controlling behaviour’. Another advert recalled by the young people was shown during the World Cup with the headline ‘after the final whistle it all kicks off’. This was a Citysafe campaign which was timed to coincide with the 2010 World Cup and featured billboard posters showing the impact of drink-fuelled domestic violence; showing a father assaulting his wife and their daughter witnessing it. Other adverts discussed included the NSPCC adverts around child abuse, in particular one where a dad hits his daughter; this adverts was discussed in numerous groups. Other adverts included other child abuse adverts and RSPCA adverts. Most of the young people felt that such adverts worked as it made them take notice, however, others found the adverts too upsetting and found themselves switching off the TV: ‘Yeah they do, makes you think, makes you think about other people, it shocks you and makes you watch it and think what’s going on, you can’t ignore a child’s cry on an advert ’. 3.2.6 Control Social networking and mobile phones During the focus groups, more subtle acts of abuse were discussed, rather than focusing on violence, to identify whether the young people saw control as domestic abuse. The young people were asked whether it was ok to check social networking accounts, whether they themselves would do it, and whether they saw it as a form of domestic abuse. The majority of young people felt social networking caused trouble in general, and within relationships. Reasons for this included people arguing via social networking sites. Scenarios given were arguments arising from a male commenting on a female’s photo or wall, or a male accepting a female’s ‘friend request’: ‘She thinks I’m chatting up girls, it causes big arguments’. 20 It was also discussed that social networking provided young people with an easier method of bullying and making threats and gave people the confidence to do things they might not say face to face. Other young people thought that Facebook in particular was problematic because it could give people the wrong impression: ‘She’s mates with 10,000 friends so she must be a sl*g, or she or he has got a topless picture on Facebook so she must be a sl*g’. Others thought social networking was problematic because people could easily access your personal information. The young people were divided on whether they thought it was okay to check their partner’s social networking account. A lot of young people concluded that this was controlling behaviour but believed this was because it was an invasion of privacy rather than abuse; they saw it as a partner being overprotective and not trusting them. Most of the young people said they would not allow their partner to check up on them, their accounts are private, but some did say it was okay, they believed if they had nothing to hide then there wasn't a problem with the other person checking up on them. However the majority did say they would check their partner’s account, whether this is by looking at their ‘public profile’ or by accessing their private account. They thought of it as being ‘nosey’ rather than a form of abuse against their partner. Some, however, did believe this was abuse. One young person considered it could be abuse because it could lead to an argument; hence the actual argument being a form of abuse. Another young person thought it could cause emotional damage, and others thought it was problematic as people may get addicted to checking their Facebook account. The young people viewed checking mobiles in a similar way to checking their social networking accounts. Again some expressed the belief that it was okay if you had nothing to hide; others found it intrusive and an invasion of privacy. Many viewed it as more intrusive than checking a social networking site; they believed it was an invasion of privacy and personal space. The young people were asked about receiving constant phone calls; they believed this was harassment and a warning sign of an abusive relationship, others referred to it as ‘lockdown’, which they described as being told what to do by your partner. ‘…obsessive and possessive, they are trying to control what you’re doing, like checking on you all the time’. Other young people expressed the view that you can get ‘clingy’ people (i.e. an insecure partner), and that they in themselves are not abusive, they just get attached and it’s acceptable that some people are like that and therefore did not see it as a form of abuse. Friends All of the young people said they wouldn’t tolerate being told who they could be friends with. Many said that if their partner tried to stop them seeing their friends, they would ignore them and see them anyway. Some believed it was a form of abuse: ‘It’s like mental abuse isn’t it then they’re trying to make you think you’re doing wrong, if they have just seen you talking to a mate, its control’. 21 Some saw it as form of distrust, jealousy and being overprotective. It was recognised that both males and females are guilty of this, many referred to it as ‘lockdown’ rather than abuse. However, some young people felt it was acceptable in certain circumstances, for example, if their partner was friends with someone who was seen as a bad influence: ‘If you have got good reasons yes, you can’t have a relationship if you can’t voice your opinions’. A few participants, both male and female, said they had experience of their partner’s stopping them seeing their friends: ‘Yeah myself, I got stopped from seeing my mates before by my ex, I wasn't even allowed to see my family, I was on a 24 hour lockdown, 24/7’. Another female reported that her friend had experienced abuse from her older boyfriend, but her friend saw it as him being over protective due to him being older rather than as a form of control. Appearance When it came to telling your partner what to wear or being told what you could or couldn’t wear, there was a definite gender divide in the views expressed. The females said they wouldn’t be told what to wear, or tell their partner what to wear, and thought it was a form of abuse. A few males said the same; however the majority said they would tell a female what to wear. They expressed reasoning for telling their partner what to wear and believed it wasn't abuse. However, these males were quite derogatory in their description of females. Most males said they wouldn't want their girlfriend going out in a short skirt as it produced the wrong attention from other males and often resulted in fights between them and males looking at their girlfriends: ‘If I had a nice bird [girlfriend] I would be overprotective, you wouldn’t want them going out in short skirts because all the lads would be steaming and looking at her, they would be speaking to her and trying to touch her and it would cause trouble, I wouldn’t want them to dress like a sl*g, if she walked in the living room in a dead short skirt I would say what the f*** are you doing with that on, I would be like get that off’. Some males defended this opinion by saying that they would like their girlfriend to look presentable, respectable and nice. A small minority of males said it didn’t matter what their girlfriend wore, because they trusted them. The males thought the responsibility for the consequences of this behaviour lay with the females themselves rather than with the males, as it gave the wrong impression and to a certain extent some of the females agreed with this. However, the majority of females expressed annoyance at these opinions. Females classed it as control and a form of abuse 22 with one male calling it ‘social abuse’ through limiting someone’s social abilities by not letting them wear what they want or see their friends. ‘If the girl feels comfortable, and feels nice about herself, why not? Why should that be a problem? At the end of the day, he’s with her, you should be able to wear what you want it’s not their life is it, you should be free to wear what you want, we wouldn’t say that if a lad wears no shirt then he’s asking for it’. 3.2.7 Is abuse ever acceptable in a relationship? The majority of young people, both male and females, said that violence or abuse was never acceptable, not in any circumstances: ‘No you can sort it out with words can’t you, there’s different ways of dealing with things, you don’t have to be aggressive, do you?’ However some did say it would be acceptable in certain situations, the most common reason being if your partner had cheated. However, the young people saw this act of violence as a ‘one off’; they didn't see it as abuse as it wasn't a recurring act. Other young people were very matter of fact, expressing the view that if there was cheating within the relationship they would just end it because there was no trust. Males had an expectation of violence from their partner if they had cheated, whereas females didn't expect to receive violence. Males said they would be violent towards the third party rather than their partner. Other reasons for violence being acceptable in a relationship included self defence and some thought if the other person needed their help, for example, if the perpetrator needed support. ‘Because they might need help, because it might not be their fault that they’re doing it, I wouldn’t leave him and wouldn't want to let him hit me, I would try and help him out’. Why do people stay in abusive relationships? Although a lot of the young people said they wouldn't tolerate abuse in any circumstances, they gave a variety of reasons for why they believed people stay in abusive relationships. Quite a few of the young people, both male and female, said they believed people stay because of love; females reported that you might think you can change them: ‘They think they can change them, like “he only hit me but he says he loves me so he’ll like change and won’t do it again” and then they just keep on giving them chances’. 23 However, others questioned how you could love someone that abused you. All young people mentioned fear as a reason for tolerating abuse, which was fear of leaving and also fear of being alone: ‘I was scared of being on my own’ and ‘you might be scared if you leave, then they’ll come and find you and then do something worse’. A few young people expressed the belief that people stay because they have low confidence, because they feel like they are not good enough for anyone else and blame themselves. Others said some people may get so used to it, that they don't know any different. A couple of the young people touched on the fact that they might have nowhere else to go: ‘Some people stay because they need them, they’ve got no money or nowhere else to live’ and ‘because of the control they might not have any friends or family, they are isolated’. Other reasons included having children; one male reported that his mother stayed with her partner because she didn't want to split the family up, whilst another believed his mother stayed due to fear of her partner hurting her children if she left. It was also discussed that people might leave because of the children; one female reported that the main reason for leaving the violent relationship was because her child might have been taken into care due to the potential risk to her child. Can abuse continue once a relationship has ended? The young people felt that domestic abuse could continue once you are no longer in the relationship, through spreading rumours about ex partners. A few of the males also said that with new girlfriends they now expected harassment and threats from their ex boyfriends. One person recalled a news story about a sales assistant from Harvey Nicholls being murdered by her ex boyfriend. Another person said that abuse could continue especially if there are other factors involved such as having children or a house together: ‘My mum broke up wither ex husband five years ago and it still goes on now, he uses the kids to get to my mum’. 3.2.8 Family The young people felt that having a form of domestic abuse within the family could affect family functioning through changing the atmosphere of the household. They believed it could affect everyone within the household, but especially the children: ‘…it changes the kids doesn't it, kids learn it, they are scared, crying all the time, it will f*** them up for later life, it sticks in their mind, the memories of stuff going over again and again in their mind, that can have a really big effect, a big effect’. 24 During the focus groups, the young people were asked whether they thought growing up in a family affected by domestic abuse could have an effect on whether you went onto an abusive relationship. The majority thought this could have an effect, but that it depended on the person and how they handled their experiences. Some young people thought you could go on to become a perpetrator, because of witnessing violence in the family and growing up believing it was normal. One young person recalled knowing a perpetrator who had witnessed violence between his parents. The domestic violence that happened to the singer Rihanna was recalled in the context that the perpetrator had blamed it on witnessing his dad abuse his mother. It was also noted that witnessing parental domestic abuse may not impact on future relationships, but may impact on your violent behaviour as a child, through bad behaviour at school to seek attention. Others thought that witnessing abuse would make you more likely to not become a perpetrator: ‘All my life I’ve grown up to see my dad hit my mum. That’s why I would never hit a girl. I’ve seen the effect it has on a woman, because my mum is f***ed up in the head, it f***s girls up you know, I will never hit a girl in my life because I have witnessed it’. A number of the young people thought that witnessing abuse could make you more likely to become a victim yourself: ‘Yes because I did that, ended up with someone violent, because that's the way you are brought up and that's what you think life is going to be, you've seen it, you think it’s normal so you think “oh I should be doing that when I am in a relationship” oh well this is how it’s supposed to be’. 3.2.9 Advice The young people were asked if they had ever sought advice before, or if they were concerned that they were in an abusive relationship or if there was domestic abuse at home, where they would go for advice and support. There was very limited knowledge on agencies that provided support and advice, the young people could not name specific services. A lot of the males said they would try to deal with the issue themselves rather than seeking advice or by leaving the relationship, although it was pointed out by other participants that some people can’t walk away. There was a mixed response as to whether the young people would seek help at school. Quite a lot of participants said they wouldn’t seek support from a teacher, because they didn’t feel it would be confidential: ‘…because it’s like personal and your teachers will know all your business, its proper horrible if you say it to one teacher “I don't want anyone to know”, and then they all know, you go you into your next lesson and the teacher is flapping around you, can’t trust them not to repeat it’. 25 Others wouldn't seek help from school due to fears that social services would be contacted. A small amount said they would seek advice from a teacher that they get on well with and felt comfortable speaking to; however this would be a last resort if they didn't have friends or family to talk to. A few young people said they would prefer to go to a mentor, with a specialised role in providing advice and support rather than teaching staff. A couple of the young people said they would seek support at the service in which the focus groups were held, however this was the agencies that young people attended voluntary, compared to the mandatory services. Although a few people did say they would go to the police for help, a large number wouldn’t. This was mostly due to negative views of the police; some participants had previously had bad experiences with the police. A lot of young people expressed distrust in the police, for example, they thought the police didn’t take domestic abuse seriously enough: ‘My step dad was hitting mum, but it was my mum who was arrested for being drunk, the police just saw someone drunk and didn’t look below the surface’. Some of the females felt that because victims will often go back to violent partners, the police may not take domestic abuse seriously in such cases. One female discussed that her partner was found not guilty of domestic abuse, and believed this could due to her dropping charges on numerous occasions in the past. Quite a few of the young people didn’t want to be associated with seeking help from the police, due to the stigma attached to being labelled a ‘snitch’: ‘…just makes it ten times worse for young people, if you go to the plod [police]. Get called a grass and then your family gets called a grass, then your family have to move away because you get battered more for being a grass, there is a saying: snitches get stitches’. Some feared that going to the police would make the violence worse, by aggravating the perpetrator. Those who said they would go to the police said they would go because they knew something would be done. However some young people thought that they would only go to the police if they believed the violence to be particularly serious as they were concerned that the perpetrator could be punished severely, when in some cases the victim may not want this. There was a lack of knowledge around what services were available for support and advice on domestic abuse. Only one person, who had themselves sought advice at a service, recalled a particular group: ‘A group goes round every week and they discuss it, they are just for domestic abuse, its good because then you know someone else is going through it themselves so you can talk to some else about it’. 26 A couple of participants were aware of the types of support available at specialist services such as counselling and group work. However some young people said that they would not attend such services due to concerns around confidentiality: ‘I wouldn’t go to anyone professional, everyone professional is connected to the police, they say it’s confidential but then go to social services’. A small minority suggested that you could go to the church for help. Nearly all of the young people said they would go to a family member for help. Family members named included mum, dad, nan, granddad, brother, sister, girlfriend, a cousin or an auntie. They wouldn’t always go to a parent, for example, if the violence involved a parent, but they would speak to the rest of the family. Others said they wouldn’t go to their parents because they might feel intimidated, or because they didn't believe their parents would be able to do anything about it. Most young people also said they would seek advice from their friends. The young people expressed the view that seeking advice from a friend was often better than from an adult as they know you better and are easier to talk to. However it was noted by most of the males that they would feel foolish seeking advice from another male friend, and would not do this. A few groups discussed that if you are in an abusive relationship, you may not see your friends anymore. Considering a large amount of young people used social networking sites on the internet, the majority of the young people said they would not use the internet for advice. The main reasons given being that they didn’t know who they would be speaking to or that it may be discovered if you were in an abusive relationship: ‘If you have an intrusive boyfriend and girlfriend they can go through your internet history’. A small number of young people said they would use the internet, including a recognised website such as the NHS or council as they believed these sites would ‘probably’ have a support page. Forums were also discussed as useful as they are anonymous. Others said they might use the internet if they knew of a specific site, but that they wouldn’t just ‘google it’. The young people were put off using a helpline service for similar reasons, i.e. not knowing who they are speaking to. However, another young person said that the fact that they are strangers is a good thing: ‘Strangers are better they’re not going to know who you are, don’t need to give your name and address in, it might be easier for different people to tell someone that they’re not as close to because if their going through it, they might feel like a failure to people close to them and they know the relationship so they wouldn’t open up as much’. One participant thought that a helpline service could be useful for younger people who may not feel like they could go to someone they knew. Other reasons for not using a helpline service again 27 included a partner checking up on your phone bill, but also due to the fear of social services becoming involved. Leaflets and posters were not believed to be very useful as a source of help and advice. A number of young people commented that a lot of people may not be able to read. Others thought that they didn’t get your attention, however again it was noted that young people who did not want to speak to someone they knew, may find posters helpful. ‘You sort of just pass by them, you don't see them or you don’t you take interest, it doesn't make you think’. The young people discussed whether an adult or someone of a similar age would be best to speak to. Most people said either, and that it wouldn’t really matter. Some young people felt that it would be good to speak to someone their own age as they have more of an understanding and would respond in a calmer way than an adult. Some young people expressed the view that if the adult was older they might not pay attention or take them seriously or they may not want to speak to an authority figure. However, other participants said that adults would be better because they would know more about domestic abuse. Again, a fear of social services involvement was a factor that would put young people off speaking to an adult. 3.2.10 Have you given advice? The young people were asked what they would do if a friend came to them for advice. Most said they would listen to them, but that they would not seek advice on their friend’s behalf. Males said that it was unlikely that a friend would come to them, but if they did they would advise them to end the relationship. One young person said that she would provide a safe place for her friend by letting her move in with her. A few of the female participants said they had offered advice to their friends in the past but had become frustrated when their friends returned to violent relationships. Not many females said that they would intervene in their friend’s relationship, due to a fear that they might make the situation worse if the perpetrator found out. Some of the male participants stated that they would respond with violence if they found out that a female friend or family member was experiencing domestic violence. 3.2.11 How have they learnt about domestic abuse so far? The majority of young people reported that they had not been taught about domestic abuse at school and that this consultation was the first opportunity they had had to discuss domestic abuse. Some participants thought that they may have learnt about domestic abuse at school but couldn't recall it and just presumed that they had, stating that it wasn’t memorable. The young people who did vaguely remember learning about domestic abuse at school reported that it was most likely to have been taught during a PSHE (Personal, Social and Health Education) lesson. However, they couldn’t recall the details of these lessons but thought it was likely that domestic abuse was touched on when covering other topics such as alcohol awareness, bullying and sex education. Two groups also reported that relationship issues were touched on during religious education classes when they learnt about the family and divorce: 28 ‘In religion you learn about it because you have to talk about how you would get a divorce and stuff because obviously in the Catholic Church you would need to get an annulment first and the only real way to get one is if it’s a violent relationship or something, or if one of them has cheated or something, so you sort of learn about a bit of it’. There were a few young people who could recall the details of lessons they had received on domestic violence and relationships, such as watching a video in PSHE and through acting out a play in a drama class. One young person recalled being given a leaflet at school that they could remember the content of: ‘There were leaflets in our school and they said does he call you pretty? Pretty ugly, ring this number for domestic violence’. A small number of young people recalled learning about domestic abuse outside of school. However, these examples were among specific groups. Young females affected by domestic abuse recalled a domestic abuse support group they had attended, and a number of young offenders reported that it had been covered in prison on numerous occasions, and included learning about awareness and anger management. 3.2.12 Domestic abuse programme for young people: what they want At the end of each group, the young people were asked what activities they would benefit from in a domestic abuse programme, what they thought might work best for them and what they would like to see implemented. The vast majority of participants thought that young people should be taught about domestic abuse at school. The reason given for this was that as most young people attend school it would be the best place to capture your audience: ‘You would have no choice but to go because you are already at school, you would have to listen, because people wouldn't go otherwise’. Some young people thought domestic abuse should be covered during PSHE lessons. A few suggested having a mentor or pastoral teacher with a specialist role, someone in a different capacity to a teaching role; a mentor scheme was also suggested. However others thought that with teacher training on the subject matter provided, a teacher could deliver the lesson. Quite a few young people thought domestic abuse should be a compulsory part of the curriculum. However, others believed that making it voluntary would be better and that young people should have a choice. Related to this it was acknowledged that if sessions on domestic abuse were voluntary it would need to be handled sensitively, as it was noted that other school children would know a young person was experiencing abuse if they saw them attending voluntary sessions. Areas to be covered in domestic abuse lessons were suggested by the participants. They wanted all aspects covered such as 29 awareness, including violence and control aspects. A few groups suggested having a one off lesson, but the majority thought it should be covered over a longer period of time, six weeks was suggested. The young people also suggested the need for refresher lessons as they progressed through school as many of them couldn't recall if they had learnt about domestic abuse. In particular, they thought they would learn more effectively if they were taught about domestic abuse issues in short bursts over a period of time. They expressed the view that short sessions would keep their attention longer than one long lesson. One group suggested that school was not the right place to learn about domestic violence: ‘If you have it as a lesson for kids, they’re just going to switch off because they are going to think “oh it’s another lesson” and you do switch off in lessons’. Another group thought that it was more important to concentrate on core subjects, for example, some were doing their GCSEs and saw this as their priority. A suggestion was made for an after school club to implement a programme. A lot of the young people also suggested holding a programme at the youth services they attended, such as youth clubs. The Youth Offending Service was also suggested by the young people as a good venue for learning because of the links between domestic abuse and crime. Counselling services were also recommended. The young people were asked whether they thought you should be taught about healthy relationships and there were mixed views on this. Some young people wanted to learn about healthy relationships in school; they thought it was a good idea so that they could recognise early on if their relationship wasn’t healthy: ‘Make it more obvious and to recognise it when it’s on the build up, to get it before it gets nasty, you don't realise straight away do you, it happens over a period of time’. One male participant said it was important to cover relationships and that young people would benefit from learning more about relationships and social skills. He suggested that this was because this doesn't always come naturally to everyone, for example shy people, or people with low confidence. Whilst some young people thought it would be good to learn about relationship break ups, one group suggested that this could be damaging: ‘Because it doesn't happen the same for everyone and if they teach you about a way of breaking up and it doesn't happen that way for someone they might think they are not normal’. Others expressed the view that healthy relationships couldn't be ‘taught’: ‘No I don't think you should learn that, no you need to learn it yourself and learn from your mistakes’ and ‘I don't think you can really teach how to have a good relationship, you can’t teach how to fall in love, I would find it really cheesy, I wouldn’t take it seriously’. 30 At one group, a female participant discussed whether forming healthy relationships was based on ‘common sense’, acknowledging that young females who are being controlled by their partners may not recognise this. During the groups the young people discussed at what age they thought young people should learn about domestic abuse. Whilst a couple of participants expressed the view that young people should learn early on, for example, as young as primary school, the majority thought that children should only be taught when they were older. Most young people thought secondary school age was the optimum age to be taught about domestic violence issues, and that any younger was not a good idea, as they thought they were too young to learn about violence. The young people also suggested that who younger children are spoken to about domestic violence would have to be very carefully thought out; the young people suggested that particularly young children could be scared or that ‘ideas could but put in their head’. The young people were asked what materials and activities they would find useful to help them learn about domestic abuse, or would encourage them to go and get advice about it. The majority of participants said that handouts and posters wouldn't work: ‘People don't pick up leaflets and take the time to read them, you can’t be bothered to read it and most people will just chuck them away, it's a waste of time’. Other participants acknowledged that not everyone had good levels of literacy, and so posters and handouts would not be of any use for them. The majority of young people didn't think a helpline was a good idea; many stated that they did not like the idea of not knowing who they were talking to. In addition, the majority also said that they would not use the internet, again as they would not know who they were speaking to. However, a small number of participants did say that materials and activities available on the internet would be useful if there was a confidential site available to them. A participant also said the internet would be useful for anonymously reporting incidences of domestic abuse. The young people said they wanted interactive materials, expressing the view that they learn better if they can talk about issues as it ‘sinks in’. Group work and role playing were suggested as other effective methods for learning by the young people. One young person thought that teaching should be more interactive and include different styles; he acknowledged that different people learn in different ways: ‘VARK, four learning styles – visual, auditory, reading, kinesthetic, we need other ways of learning, we need more communication’. All of the young people suggested that a DVD would be useful, as they thought it was important to learn through visual, interactive resources. They thought materials showing the early stages of abuse would be helpful, so they could be helped to recognise the signs straight away. They wanted the content of the DVDs to be current and modern. The young people noted that it was important not to glamorise violence in a film too much as it could encourage people to commit violence. They thought 31 stories conveyed through film were particularly useful, because it enabled them to ‘sit back and watch’ and to think about the issues from a number of perspectives. The importance of having realistic storylines was discussed; the young people wanted them to show the seriousness of domestic abuse and they wanted to see examples of female perpetrators of domestic abuse. Other participants suggested that watching a play about domestic abuse would be helpful; one particular group discussed going to see a play about drugs which they had found very useful and could recall a lot of details from. Adverts were also recommended. Involving young people in producing music was also seen as a good way to learn. The majority of the young people said that having someone in to give a talk would be useful. However, one young person commented that it would depend on the content of the talk and personality of the speaker. Nearly all of the young people said that a programme would benefit from the addition of a speaker who had experienced domestic abuse themselves. The young people suggested that this would be useful because the speaker would ‘know what they were talking about’ and would give them a more personal and realistic account of domestic abuse issues. For example, they thought it would be inspirational to learn how victims had moved on with their lives. Other methods of learning and ideas for materials suggested by the young people included: • The legal side – a female participant suggested that there should be legal advice available for those affected by domestic abuse, for example, advice on what happens if you continue to go back to the perpetrator, and how will this affect the chances of prosecution at a later date? • An advocacy service – run by young people for other young people to have someone of a similar age to speak to. • An enterprise day – for specialists to attend and present their services at an open day for the public to attend. • Support for perpetrators of domestic abuse: ‘because otherwise they will continue to do it, If you show your willing to listen to their side they might be more reluctant to do it in the future because they know people are willing to help them. If it wasn't just punishment, if you were willing to help’. • A programme that provides awareness and support for not only direct victims, but also for those who witness domestic abuse. • Games to play – ‘a game where kids have to pay attention and you earn money and stuff, so they are sort of win something. So kids sort of want to win this so they pay more attention, so if you did it like a game they’d be more into it’. • Fundraising: ‘give the parents money for the kid’s clothes who are going through it’. 32 • Activities for families: ‘like activities where you go somewhere with your kids and bond with them properly, for example going to Blackpool or Southport for the day, a day out instead of stuck in the house and make it free for them’. • A youth centre: ‘for people who need to escape from the house at times of violence’. • Project work at school: ‘like the homeless project we did with the homeless people, it as useful and helped us learn more, it would be good to do work around domestic violence’. • Support for parents Overall the views and opinions voiced by the young people suggested that they wanted something that was ‘realistic’; they expressed that the consultation had been useful and that they wanted similar opportunities to be able to talk openly and get involved in discussions about domestic abuse: ‘People like you who can talk openly about it, people shouldn’t be ashamed to talk about it, people need to find their voice, you shouldn’t be scared to say anything’. 33 4 Discussion A series of focus groups were conducted with young people to gain a greater understanding of how young people view domestic abuse and to learn more about the issues affecting them in relation to domestic abuse. 4.1 Summary of findings How do young people view domestic abuse? The young people involved in the focus groups had a clear understanding of domestic abuse and recognised that it could involve physical, psychological and sexual abuse. In acknowledging these different forms of abuse, the young people felt it should be referred to as domestic abuse rather than domestic violence. At all groups the young people acknowledged that domestic abuse can occur within the family and they put an emphasis on it being something happening within a house, hence the word domestic. They believed domestic abuse could happen to anyone; however it is portrayed that it happens more often to females. There was stereotyping of male behaviour in response to domestic abuse from a female partner, especially from the males themselves. Some females also thought it was more acceptable for a female to hit a male. Often the males laughed at the thought of being the victims themselves, but following more in-depth discussion they acknowledged that these perceptions were unfair and expressed the view that it was harder for males to speak to someone about domestic abuse or get advice. The young people themselves brought up the influence of drugs and alcohol on violence; they concluded that although people may use drug and alcohol use as an excuse for their violent behaviour, in their view it was not an excuse. Media influences The media, particularly TV, was frequently cited by participants as a source of information about domestic abuse; the young people could name various programmes that had shown storylines involving domestic abuse. It appeared that they had learnt the majority of their knowledge about domestic abuse through the media. The young people could recall advice adverts when prompted, they felt that adverts had a shock value which made them take notice, however a few of them said they found some of them too upsetting, especially ones involving children, and this would make them switch off. Exploring the more subtle aspects of domestic abuse An aim of the research was to try and gauge what the young people thought about other aspects of domestic abuse, in particular whether they thought being in a controlling relationship was a form of abuse. The young people expressed mixed views, particularly with regard to the more subtle aspects of controlling behaviour, such as checking your partner’s social networking account or mobile phone. 34 Although this behaviour was not seen as acceptable, it was viewed by most as an invasion of privacy rather than a form abuse. A lot of participants said they themselves would check up on their partners in this way. Your partner stopping you from seeing friends was considered a form of abuse and some participants gave examples of their partners having exhibited this behaviour. Males and females differed in their opinions of whether it was acceptable to tell a partner what to wear; female participants thought this was not acceptable whereas nearly all of the male participants stated that they would and did stop their partners from wearing short skirts. The male participants expressed the view that females were to blame for receiving the wrong type of attention when wearing short skirts and they did not perceive their behaviour as a form of abuse. Is abuse acceptable? The majority of the young people said that abuse was not acceptable in any circumstances. Some participants suggested that violence would be acceptable if a partner had cheated; in their view this was seen as a one off act of violence rather than abuse because it wasn't sustained. The young people suggested that it was more likely for females to physically hit a male partner for cheating. Other circumstances in which abuse was viewed as acceptable included self defence and if the perpetrator needed help for an anger-related or mental health problem. Although a lot of the young people expressed the view that abuse was not acceptable in relationships, they all gave reasons as to why they thought people stayed in abusive relationships. Quite a few believed that people stayed because of love and in the hope that they could change their partner. However, others questioned how you could love someone who was violent towards you. Fear in particular was mentioned as a reason for tolerating abuse, but also because of people having children or a home together. The Family Young people viewed domestic abuse at home as having devastating effects on children; leaving them scared and affected by their experiences into later life. Although participants believed that the effects in adulthood largely depended on the person and how they handled their experiences. It was discussed that children affected by domestic abuse could become perpetrators and victims themselves when in adult relationships, however, the young people also acknowledged that witnessing domestic abuse could make you more determined to never do that yourself. Seeking advice Although some young people said they would seek advice from a teacher quite a few participants expressed the belief that teachers would not maintain confidentiality. Family members were frequently cited as a source for advice and support. Female participants were particularly likely to say they would speak to a friend, whereas males were more likely to go to a family member or keep it to themselves rather than speak to a friend. Young people rarely said they would go to the police. Some of the reasons given were due to bad experiences, but the majority of opinions were based on stereotypical views of the police. Considering the majority of the young people said they used the internet for activities such as social networking, not many of them would access the internet for 35 advice. In addition, not many of them would use helpline services or take notice of posters and handouts. Giving advice A number of the young people gave examples of friends who had experienced domestic abuse either at home, or in a relationship. Female participants had given advice to their friends in abusive relationships, but expressed frustration with their friends, particularly when they went back to their violent partner. Males said that friends were unlikely to come to them, but if they did they would advise them to end the relationship. Learning about domestic abuse Young people had generally not learnt about domestic abuse prior to the consultation; expressing that it was the first opportunity they had had to discuss it. Recall of lesson content was low among the young people who thought they had covered it at school; only a small minority had covered domestic abuse at school, usually in a one off lesson. A few others had learnt about it, but in a specialist setting, one had attended a specific support group for victims of domestic abuse, and a couple of males had been taught about it in prison. Learning about domestic abuse was viewed as important and school was thought to be the best setting. The young people expressed preferences on programme content and length, for example they thought domestic abuse issues should be covered in lessons over a number of weeks and that programmes should incorporate all aspects of domestic abuse, not just the physical violence aspects. Young people expressed mixed views on whether they should be taught about healthy relationships. Some young people thought this was essential whereas others thought you could not teach young people how to have good relationships. Interactive material and activities such as group discussions, DVDs and talks by people affected by domestic abuse were viewed as the approaches that would help them learn most effectively. Handouts, leaflets, the internet and helpline services were not thought to be a useful source of learning. 4.2 Research limitations The consultation ran over a short period of time and this hindered recruitment in the early stages of the work. Early on in the consultation it was apparent that a low number of young people were attending the focus groups, because some groups were held at voluntary agencies it was always likely that people may not turn up to the groups. However this was overcome by increasing the number of focus groups. There was poor representation of young people from agencies in the South of Liverpool, however, it is unknown how this may have affected the results and it is likely that the sample would have included young people from across Liverpool (e.g. such as those attending Central services). Another problem encountered during the recruitment phase was that discussion of domestic abuse is still seen as a taboo topic and some of those invited to participate in the research felt it would be too risky to discuss. A small number of disclosures of abuse were made during the 36 consultation, the disclosures were about past experiences and the young people were not believed to be at present risk. They were referred to the Independent Domestic Violence Advisor (IDVA) for advice and support and received onward referrals. 4.3 Further research A lack of awareness of services was noted among the young people who participated in the focus groups. Therefore, it is recommended that a scoping exercise is undertaken to identify what support is available for young people in relation to domestic abuse and to provide a directory of domestic abuse services. There also appeared to be a lack of formal training and teaching, with many reporting that domestic abuse awareness is not taught at school. It is recommended that a review of current and previous domestic abuse programmes is conducted, to determine the evidence base for what works with young people and the most effective way to deliver such interventions. 37 5 Conclusions and recommendations Overall, the young people involved in the consultation had a good understanding of what domestic abuse is, they could state different types of abuse and who they thought it could happen to. However this knowledge appeared to be from what they had seen on TV and from their own personal and friends’ experiences. Not many of the young people had been given any formal training or teaching on the subject, although many of them thought it would be beneficial to have learnt about it. Although there was good knowledge on some areas of domestic abuse, there did appear to be a lack of awareness around the more subtle aspects, such as controlling behaviour and many of the young people did not see certain controlling behaviours as abusive. The young people also demonstrated a lack of knowledge about where to go for advice; many were not aware of any domestic abuse services and many would not go to a professional for help. Therefore it appeared that most young people would rather seek support from someone they know and someone they felt comfortable talking to, rather than access a website, ring a help line or speak to a stranger. The young people had not had the opportunity to learn about domestic abuse previously and stated that this consultation was their first opportunity to discuss the topic. All focus groups were well received, and the young people wanted to discuss abuse and believed they should be taught about domestic abuse. They expressed the desire for a programme that is realistic and modern that will hold their attention and where they can speak freely. Recommendations: • There is a need for formal training and/or teaching on domestic abuse among young people in Liverpool. A programme addressing domestic abuse issues relevant to young people should be implemented. Examples of what young people would like to see from a programme include: - A programme taught at school with age appropriate material - A series of lessons over a set course of time, including refresher lessons - A programme that covers all aspects of abuse, including awareness, violence and control aspects • - Interactive tools that are both modern and realistic, such as a DVD - Talks from agencies, including people who have experienced domestic abuse themselves - Group work, to give the young people the opportunity to talk about domestic abuse. In order to provide an evidence base to inform the development of a programme addressing domestic abuse issues, a review of the effects of domestic abuse programmes should be conducted. 38 • The more subtle aspects of abuse, such as controlling behaviour, should be a focus of future programmes and domestic violence materials. For example: - An interactive DVD, with material showing the early stages of abuse to help young people recognise the signs straight away. • Awareness of domestic abuse services and the types of support available needs to be improved among young people in Liverpool, to prevent stereotypical views and to encourage engagement. A scoping exercise should be conducted to compile a list of relevant support agencies and advice routes for young people. • Local responses to the Government’s strategy to tackle violence against women and girls should incorporate the findings from this consultation and ensure that young people’s views are considered. • Young people should be given opportunities to speak freely about domestic abuse and to have their views heard. Steps should also be taken to ensure that young people are involved in future work relating to domestic abuse, especially when there are plans to develop or implement programmes and/or materials targeted towards young people. 39 6 References Barter C (2009a). In the Name of Love: Partner Abuse and Violence in Teenage Relationships. British Journal of Social Work. 39, 211–233 doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcm127. Barter C, McCarry M, Berridge D and Evans K (2009b). Partner exploitation and violence in teenage intimate relationships. Executive summary. NSPCC. www.nspcc.org.uk/inform. [accessed March 2011]. Bellis MA, Hughes S and Hughes K (2006). WHO Policy Briefing: Interpersonal Violence and Alcohol. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University. Botcherby S and Pendergast Y (2007).Young People’s Experiences and Understandings of Violence and Domestic Violence. Manchester. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. Burman M and Cartmel F (2005). Young people’s attitudes towards gendered violence. Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Applied Social Science, University of Glasgow. NHS health Scotland. Cawson P (2002). Child Maltreatment in the Family: The Experience of a National Sample of Young People, London: NSPCC. Liverpool City Council (2010). Citysafe Liverpool’s Community Safety Partnership Annual Plan 2010/11. Liverpool. Daigneault I, Hébert M, McDuff P(2009). Men and women’s childhood sexual abuse and victimization in adult partner relationships: a study of risk factors. Child Abuse and Neglect. 33:638647. Department of Health. (2001). Seeking Consent: Working with Children. London: Department of Health. Department of Health (2002). Women’s Mental Health: Into the mainstream. London: Department of Health. Department of Health (2006). Safeguarding Children and Safer Recruitment in Education. Department for Education and Skills. London: Department of Health. Duluth Power and Control Wheel (2011). The Duluth Model. The Domestic Abuse Intervention Project. Minnesota. Available from: http://www.theduluthmodel.org/duluthmodel.php [accessed March 2011]. 40 Flatley J, Kershaw C, Smith K, Chaplin R and Moon D (2010). Crime in England and Wales 2009/10 Findings from the British Crime Survey. London: Home office. Folsom WS, Christensen ML, Avery L and Moore C (2003). ‘The co-occurrence of child abuse and domestic violence: an issue of service delivery for social service professionals’. Child and adolescent social work journal. 20 (5), p 375. Gilchrist E et al (2003). Domestic violence offenders: characteristics and offending related needs. Findings No. 217. London: Home Office. Gil-Gonzalez D et al (2008). Childhood experiences of violence in perpetrators as a risk factor of intimate partner violence: a systematic review. Journal of Public Health, 2008, 30(1):14-22. Hester M, Pearson C and Harwin N with Abrahams H (2006). Making an Impact: Children and Domestic Violence, London, Jessica Kingsley. Hickman L, Jaycox L and Aronoff J (2004). ‘Dating violence among adolescents: Prevalence, gender distribution and prevention program effectiveness’. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 5(2), pp. 123–42. Home Office (2011). Call to end violence against women and girls. HM Government. Home Office: London. Hughes S, Bellis MA, Hughes K and World Health Organization (2009). Promoting gender equality to prevent violence against women. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University. Ilika AL (2005). Women’s perception of partner violence in a rural Igbo community. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 9:77–88. James A, Jenks C and Prout A (1998). Theorizing Childhood, Cambridge, Polity. Kitzmann KM, Gaylord NK, Holt AR and Kenny ED (2003). ‘Child witnesses to domestic violence: a meta-analytic review.’ Journal of Consultative Clinical Psychology, 71(2): 339-52. Krug EG et al (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization. Krippendoff K (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Liverpool John Moores University (2008). Liverpool John Moores University Data Protection Policy. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University. Mitra A and Singh P (2007). Human capital attainment and gender empowerment: the Kerala paradox. Social Science Quarterly, 2007, 88:1227–1242. Mullender A, Hague GM, Imam I, Kelly L, Malos EM and Regan L (2002). Children’s Perspectives on Domestic Violence. London: Sage. Mullender A (2004). Tackling Domestic Violence: providing support for children who have witnessed domestic violence Home Office Development and Practice Reports are produced by the 41 Research, Development and Statistics Directorate. Development and Practice Report 33. University of Warwick. London: Home Office. Povey D et al (2008). Homicides, firearm offences and intimate violence 2007/08. Available from: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs09/hosb0209.pdf [accessed March 2011]. Schütt N (2006). Domestic violence in adolescent relationships. Young people in Southwark and their experiences with unhealthy relationship. Research project carried out for Safer Southwark Partnership. Slovak K, Carlson K and Helm L (2007). ‘The influence of family violence on youth attitudes’. Child and adolescent social work 24 (1), pp 77-99. Walker A, Flatley J, Kershaw C and Moon D (2009). Crime in England and Wales 2008/09. Volume 1 Findings from the British Crime Survey and police recorded crime. London: Home office. WHO (2005a). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva, World Health Organization. WHO (2005b). Addressing violence against women and achieving the Millennium Development Goals Department of Gender, Women and Health Family and Community Health. Geneva, World Health Organization. WHO (2006). Intimate partner violence and alcohol. Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO (2009a). Changing cultural and social norms that support violence. Violence prevention, the evidence. Geneva: World Health Organization. WHO (2009b). Violence against women. Fact sheet N0.239 November 2009. [Accessed March 2011]. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/ Wood S, Bellis MA and Watts C (2010). Intimate Partner Violence. A review of evidence for prevention from the UK focal point for violence and injury prevention. UK focal point for violence and injury prevention. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University. Woolfall K, Wareing M and Stredder K (2009). Researcher Child Protection Protocol. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University. Wu V, Huff H, Bhandari M (2010). Pattern of physical injury associated with intimate partner violence in women presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review and meta analysis. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 11(2):71-82. 42 7 Appendices Appendix 1. Carer participant information sheet and consent form A consultation with young people about the impact of domestic violence (abuse) in their families and their formative relationships Ellie McCoy, Centre for Public Health, LJMU and Citysafe Please ask if there is anything you do not understand or if you would like more information. Take time to decide whether or not you wish to take part. About the research This research is being carried out to look at the impact that domestic violence has on young people and their families/relationships. You are invited to take part in a group discussion with other young people. Participation is entirely voluntary. It is up to you to decide whether or not to take part. If you decide to participate you will be given this information sheet and asked to sign a consent form. You can decide not to be involved in the research at any time and without giving a reason. If you decide to withdraw it will not affect any services you currently receive or may receive in the future. What will happen to me if I take part? You will be asked to take part in a group discussion with other young people. No staff from the agency you attend will be present during the discussion (unless you wish for them to be present). The group discussion will involve a small number of people having a confidential and open discussion. Discussion topics will include: • Domestic violence and family • Domestic violence and relationships 43 • Domestic violence in the media/social network sites It will take between one and two hours of your time. You will get a £5 shopping voucher as a thank you for taking part. What would my involvement mean to me? There are no foreseen risks to taking part in the group discussion. The information we get during the research will help increase understanding of the needs of young people and help to improve services, where it is needed. Will my taking part in the study be kept confidential? All the information you give us will be strictly confidential. This means that your answers are private between you, us and other young people who attend the group discussion. Young people who attend the group discussion will be asked to keep the conversations private. However, should you suggest, imply or state that you will act in a manner that will cause harm to yourself or others, that someone else is harming you/others or that you or someone you know is involved in specific serious criminal activities (i.e. acts of terrorism, offences against children) then the researcher will have to let the necessary people know. If it is okay with you, we will tape record the focus group. Once the recording has been written up, it will be wiped clean. Only the research team will have access to the recording and the written transcript. Contact Details of Researcher If you have any questions about this research then please contact, Ellie McCoy by email [email protected] or telephone 0151 231 4442 (office hours). Thank you for reading this. 44 For advice and more information: • ChildLine Freephone - 0800 1111 http://www.childline.org.uk/Pages/Home.aspx Need to talk? Calls are free and confidential. You can contact ChildLine about anything. No problem is too big or too small. Whatever your worry it's better out than in. • The Hideout http://www.thehideout.org.uk/default.aspa Women's Aid have created this space to help children and young people to understand domestic abuse, and how to take positive action if it's happening to you. • IDVA Service (Independent Domestic Violence Advisory Service) Kerry - 0151 482 2496, Email: [email protected] Aim is to provide a short/ medium term service to reduce the risk of further domestic violence and the emotional effects it causes. • Mankind National helpline: 01823 334244 http://www.mankind.org.uk/ The ManKind Initiative is a national Men’s Charity which is largely devoted to helping male victims of domestic violence and domestic abuse. • Women’s Aid 0808 2000 247 http://www.womensaid.org.uk/ Women's Aid is the key national charity working to end domestic violence against women and children. • Worst Kept Secret Free phone confidential helpline 0800 028 3398 http://www.worstkeptsecret.co.uk/ 'Worst Kept Secret' is a Merseyside project established to reduce domestic violence and enhance support for survivors. 'Worst Kept Secret' provides a listening ear to those who are affected by domestic violence. • Young Person’s Advisory Service YPAS, 36 Bolton Street, Liverpool L3 5LX, 0151 707 1025 [email protected] YPAS supports young people from 13 to 25 with a range of issues. Services at YPAS include advice, support and group work. 45 A consultation with young people about the impact of domestic violence (abuse) in their families and their formative relationships: Consent form Please tick 1. I understand the information sheet about the research called: A consultation with young people about the impact of domestic violence (abuse) in their families and their formative relationships. 2. I have had the chance to ask questions. 3. I understand that I don’t have to take part if I don’t want to. 4. I agree for the focus group to be audio recorded. 5. I understand that parts of our conversation may be used verbatim in future publications or presentations but that such quotes will be anonymised. 6. I agree to take part in the above research. Initials of young person Date Signature Initials of researcher Date Signature 1 copy for participant, 1 for researcher 46 Appendix 2. Young persons’ participant information sheet and consent form A consultation with young people about the impact of domestic violence (abuse) in their families and their formative relationships Ellie McCoy, Centre for Public Health, LJMU and Citysafe Please ask if there is anything you do not understand or if you would like more information. Take time to decide whether or not to give consent for your child to take part. About the research This research is being carried out to look at the impact that domestic violence has on young people and their families/relationships. We have invited your child to take part in a group discussion with other young people. Participation is entirely voluntary. It is up to you to decide whether s/he should take part. If you decide to give consent for your child to participate you will be given this information sheet and asked to sign a consent form. You may withdraw your consent at any time without giving a reason. If you decide to withdraw it will not affect any services your child currently receives or may receive in the future. What will happen to my child if they take part? Your child will be asked to take part in a group discussion with other young people. No staff from the agency they attend will be present during the discussion (unless the young people ask for them to be present). The group discussion will involve a small number of people having a confidential and open discussion. Discussion topics will include: 47 • Domestic violence and family • Domestic violence and relationships • Domestic violence in the media/social network sites It will take between one and two hours Your child will receive a £5 shopping voucher as a thank you for taking part. What would their involvement mean? There are no foreseen risks to taking part in the group discussion. The information we get during the research will help increase understanding of the needs of young people and help to improve services, where it is needed. Will my child’s participation in the study be kept confidential? All the information your child gives us will be strictly confidential. This means that their answers are private between them, us and the other young people who attend the group discussion. Young people who attend the group discussion will be asked to keep the conversations private. However, should they suggest, imply or state that they will act in a manner that will cause harm to themselves or others, that someone else is harming them/others or that they or someone they know is involved in specific serious criminal activities (i.e. acts of terrorism, offences against children) then the researcher will have to let the necessary people know. If it is okay with you, we will tape record the focus group. Once the recording has been written up, it will be wiped clean. Only the research team will have access to the recording and the written transcript. Contact Details of Researcher If you have any questions about this research then please contact, Ellie McCoy by email [email protected] or telephone 0151 231 4442 (office hours). Thank you for reading this. 48 A consultation with young people about the impact of domestic violence (abuse) in their families and their formative relationships: Consent form Please tick 1. I understand the information sheet about the research called: A consultation with young people about the impact of domestic violence (abuse) in their families and their formative relationships. 2. I have had the chance to ask questions (by telephone or email). 3. I understand that my child does not have to take part if I don’t want them to. 4. I agree for the focus group to be audio recorded. 5. I understand that parts of the group discussion may be used verbatim in future publications or presentations but that such quotes will be anonymised. 6. I give permission for my child to take part in the above research. Initials of parent/guardian Date Signature Initials of researcher (prior to Date Signature focus group) Initials of researcher (at focus group) 1 copy for participant, 1 for researcher 49 Appendix 3. Questionnaire Questionnaire Today’s date: 1. Age My age is: 2. Gender (please tick) My gender is: □Male □ Female 3. Ethnic background (please tick the box that you feel most appropriately defines your ethnicity) Asian □Bangladeshi □Indian □Pakistani □other Black □African □British □Caribbean □other Chinese □Chinese □other Dual Heritage □White & Asian □White & Black African □White & Black Caribbean □other White □English □Irish □Scottish □Welsh □other Other – please specify: 4. Disability (please tick) Do you have a disability: If yes please state: □yes □ No 5. Religion (please tick) I would describe my religion as: □I have no religious beliefs □I prefer not to say 6. Sexual orientation (please tick the box that you feel most appropriately describes your sexuality) □Bi-sexual □Gay/lesbian □Heterosexual □Prefer not to say Thank you for taking the time to complete this form All information provided will be kept confidential. Appendix 4. Focus group plan 50 Focus Group - Discussion Guide Proposal to undertake a consultation with young people about the impact of domestic violence (abuse) in their families and their formative relationships - Introduce self Explain research and participants involvement Opportunities for questions about research Gain written consent (ethical approval gained and requires consent) Explain safeguarding (when confidentiality will be broken) Discuss opportunity to speak with the domestic violence specialist Opportunities for questions about consent/confidentiality Ask participants to complete demographics questionnaire Introduction - Ask young people to introduce themselves (ice breaker) What is domestic violence? - Do you know what domestic violence is? What do you think domestic violence means/is? - What types of violence are you aware of? (e.g. emotional/physical abuse?) - What is acceptable? - Can men and women experience domestic violence? - Why does it happen? - How do the media portray it? Relationships - Control – does social networking affect relationships? - Do you think partners can control you via your social networking, does it create jealousy? /Checking each other’s accounts is this ok? - Mobile phones – checking phones/monitoring texts and calls? Is this ok? - Being told what to wear? - Have ever been ‘put down’ by a boyfriend/girlfriend (sworn at, insulted) - Attitudes towards aggression within dating relationships – is it ok for someone you are going out with to be aggressive? Would you consider forgiving violent behaviour from someone you are going out with? - Is violent behaviour ok in response to cheating? 51 - Knowledge of friends that had experienced emotional, physical and mental abuse (or pressured into sex?) from a boyfriend/girlfriend that they were going out with? Examples? Why do you think people stay in these relationships? (Blinded by love, scared, think it’s ok, lack confidence, emotionally dependent?) What about when you split up? Trouble from an ex? Spreading rumours? Telling confidential secrets? Family experiences - Anyone know of anyone with domestic violence in the family, examples? - If you saw your parents/carers being threatening, violent or abusive towards each other, what do you think you would do? - How do you think this affects families? - Do you think coming from a family where domestic violence is present – would make you more likely to accept it from a partner? (see it as normal, difficult to recognise an unhealthy relationship) Or more likely to not put up with it? - Do you think lack of support at home could push you into a relationship? Who to tell - Who would you get advice from? Friends? Parents? Teachers? Agencies? - Why would you not speak to certain people? (e.g. parents?) (Do adults know enough about what goes on in young people’s lives today?) - Do friends take it seriously? Is it different for girls and boys confiding in friends? - Ever had a friend confide in you, what did you do? - If someone did confide in you, would you intervene? - Where would you go for information, support and guidance? Education/Programme? - Do you think you know enough about healthy relationships? - Have you ever learnt about domestic violence and health relationships in school (PSHE) or through other activities (youth clubs, agencies etc) - If yes? What was covered? Did it cover emotional aspects of relationships? Promote healthy relationships? - If no, would you like to have access to this? What would you like to see? - What would you like to learn from a domestic violence project? (healthy relationships/anger management? etc) - What activities would you like to participate in? (a talk at school, counselling, group work etc) The end - Is there anything else you would like to add? - Thank young people for taking part - Reiterate that the domestic violence specialist is available - Provide shopping vouchers 52 Liverpool John Moores University Centre for Public Health Research Directorate Henry Cotton Campus 2nd Floor, Room 2.23 15-21 Webster Street Liverpool L3 2ET e: [email protected] t: 0151 231 4442 f: 0151 231 4552 www.cph.org.uk ISBN: 978-1-908029-62-1