The USGA Handicap System
Transcription
The USGA Handicap System
The USGA Handicap System Women’s Southern California Golf Association Handicap Certification Seminar Seminar Introduction: • Welcome! •USGA Handicap System • Questions at the end of each Section •Lunch Break • Wrap up and Quiz | “Introduction” Handicap Publications “The USGA Handicap System” The USGA Handicap System Reference Guide The Handicap Chairman Information Kit To order, visit: www.usga.org > Shop | “Introduction” USGA Handicap System Licensing Program for Clubs Handicapping & Course Rating license agreements are with authorized golf associations (WSCGA). Ensures that USGA Handicap System policies are uniformly and correctly followed. Golf associations must renew all member club license agreements by 12/31/15, which includes each member club’s club representative attending a Handicap Seminar and demonstrating knowledge regarding the System. Associations may conduct their own Handicap Seminars. | “Introduction” USGA Handicap System Licensing Program For Clubs The program started January 1, 2005. All licensed clubs have until Dec. 31, 2015 to renew their license agreements. If golf club is a member club of the authorized golf association in its area, then it must sign a license agreement with the authorized golf association. Any independent golf club that is not part of an authorized golf association and wishes to utilize any aspect of the USGA Handicap System method must be licensed directly through the USGA. See Club Compliance Checklist. | “Introduction” CLUB COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST • Meet definition of golf club • Have a Handicap Committee • Insist that the principles of the Rules of Golf be followed • Ensure all acceptable scores are posted and adjusted correctly • 13 other items, page 50, USGA Handicap Manual Section 1 COVER HEADLINE GOES HERE and Requirements Purpose TYPE SIZE 36 Presenter’s name: type size 18 Date: type size 18 SECTION 1-1 PURPOSE Purpose The purpose of the USGA Handicap System is to make the game of golf more enjoyable by enabling golfers of differing abilities to compete on an equitable basis. | “Section 1-1” Basic Premises Two basic premises underlie the USGA Handicap System, namely that every player will try to make the best score at every hole in every round, regardless of where the round is played, and that the player will post every acceptable round for peer review. | “Section 1-1” Handicap Myths • The USGA issues handicap indexes • Always post your gross score, especially Tournament scores • If you cannot remember your current index, guess. • Play to your current index, not your course handicap • If there’s no women’s rating, post to the men’s rating • You cannot play to a course handicap > 40.4 Handicap Index A Handicap Index, issued by a golf club or authorized golf association (through its member clubs), indicates a player’s skill and is a number taken to one decimal place, e.g., 9.2. A Handicap Index is issued only to individuals who are members of a golf club. | “Section 1-1” Handicap Index A Handicap Index compares a player’s scoring ability to the scoring ability of a scratch golfer on a course of standard difficulty. | “Section 1-1” It reflects the player’s potential because it is based upon the best scores posted for a given number of rounds, ideally the best 10 of the last 20 rounds. SECTION 1-2 AUTHORIZATION AND LICENSING Authorization and Licensing Policies of golf clubs and golf associations issuing a Handicap Index must be consistent with “The Rules of Golf” and “The USGA Handicap System.” An essential element is the requirement that each golf club must have a Handicap Committee to ensure the integrity of the USGA Handicap System. If a golf club or golf association does not follow all of the procedures of “The USGA Handicap System,” it is not permitted to use any part of the System or to refer to any handicap that it issues or certifies as a “Handicap Index,” “Short Course Handicap,” or a handicap authorized by the USGA. | “Section 1-2” Section 2 Definitions Section 2 Definitions Section 2 Definitions Presenter’s name: USGA Handicap Department Date: 10-5-2011 U.S. Amateur August 22-28, 2011 Erin Hills Erin, Wisconsin Authorized Golf Association An “authorized golf association” is a not-for-profit entity that is recognized as having exempt status under Section 501 (c) of the United States Internal Revenue Code and has been licensed by the USGA to utilize the USGA Handicap System and/or the USGA Course Rating System within a certain state or region. It is an organization comprised of golf clubs or golfers, operated under bylaws, and in existence for the purpose of supporting USGA core programs and services for amateur golfers, and otherwise promoting the best interests and preserving the true spirit of the game of golf. See minimum requirements to be licensed by the USGA in the United States as an authorized golf association, which can be viewed on the USGA website at www.usga.org. | “Section 2” Golf Club • Organization of at least ten individual members* • Operates under bylaws with committees (e.g., Handicap Committee) • Supervise golf activities • Provide peer review • Maintain the integrity of the USGA Handicap System Note: Within the context of the USGA Handicap System, a member is defined as one who is affiliated with a licensed golf club for the purposes of obtaining a Handicap Index. | “Section 2” Golf Club • Must be licensed to utilize the USGA Handicap System Obtain a license agreement directly from the USGA Through its membership in an authorized golf association that is already licensed by the USGA • Must have a reasonable and regular opportunity to golf with each other • Must be able to return scores personally • Scores must be readily available for inspection by others | “Section 2” TYPE 1 GOLF CLUB It is located at a single specific golf course with a valid USGA Course Rating™ and Slope Rating® where a majority of the club’s events are played and the club’s scoring records reside. | “Section 2” TYPE 2 GOLF CLUB Its members are affiliated or known to one another via a business, fraternal, ethnic, or social organization. The majority of the club members had an affiliation prior to organizing the club. | “Section 2” TYPE 3 GOLF CLUB The members had no prior affiliation and a majority of the recruiting and sign-up of the membership is done by solicitation to the general public (e.g., Internet, newspaper). | “Section 2” GROSS SCORE A gross score is the number of actual strokes plus any penalty strokes taken by a player. (See adjusted gross score.) | “Section 2” HANDICAP COMMITTEE A Handicap Committee is the committee of a golf club that ensures compliance with the USGA Handicap System, including peer review. A majority of the Handicap Committee, including the Handicap Chairperson, must be members of the club; club employees may serve on the Handicap Committee, but an employee may not serve as Handicap Chairperson. | “Section 2” HANDICAP TYPE Throughout this manual, different types of handicaps are identified by letter designations. Each "handicap type" is identified as follows: L= M= N= NL = R= Local handicap Modified Handicap Index Nine-hole Handicap Index Local nine-hole handicap Automatically reduced Handicap Index for exceptional tournament performance WD = Handicap Index withdrawn by the Handicap Committee SL = Short Course Handicap | “Section 2” e.g., 38.3L e.g., 10.2M e.g., 6.7N e.g., 21.5NL e.g., 21.2R PEER REVIEW “Peer review” is the ability of golfers to gain an understanding of a player’s potential ability and to form a reasonable basis for supporting or disputing a score that has been posted. There are two essential elements of peer review: 1. Members of a golf club must have a reasonable and regular opportunity to play together (see Decision 2/8). 2. Access must be provided to scoring records, as well as to a Handicap Index list, for inspection by others, including, but not limited to, fellow club members. There are two (2) forms of scoring record display: | “Section 2” PEER REVIEW 1) General – A General scoring record must provide the six most recent revisions of the player’s Handicap Index, along with scores, score types, ratings, differentials, and dates (month and year only) relating to the most recent handicap revision. This must be made available to those involved in peer review. | “Section 2” PEER REVIEW 2) Complete – A Complete scoring record must display the six most recent revisions of the player’s Handicap Index, along with scores*, score types, ratings, differentials, and dates (month, day, and year) relating to the most recent handicap revision. This must be made available to fellow club members, the club Handicap Committee, and competition officials of any competition in which the player is going to participate. *The course name for each score should appear in any "Complete" scoring record display, and must be included for a Type 3 club. | “Section 2” SCORE TYPE The score type indicates specific aspects of a score within a player’s scoring record and should be designated in the following manner: The designated letter must follow the score if the score type is an Internet or tournament score. | “Section 2” I = Internet P = Penalty T = Tournament TI = Tournament Internet C = Combined Nines AI = Away Internet A = Away MEMBERSHIP TYPES vs. INDEX TYPES Membership Types • • • • R - Regular J - Junior H - Handicap M - Multi (System Generated) Index Type • 18-Hole Index • 9-Hole Index Tournament Score • Made in a competition organized & conducted by a Committee • Played under the principles of the Rules of Golf • Winners identified based on a stipulated round(s) USGA COURSE RATING USGA Course Rating is the USGA’s mark that indicates the evaluation of the playing difficulty of a course for scratch golfers under normal course and weather conditions. It is expressed as strokes taken to one decimal place, and is based on yardage and other obstacles to the extent that they affect the scoring ability of a scratch golfer. Example: 71.6 | “Section 2” BOGEY RATING Bogey Rating is the evaluation of the playing difficulty of a course for the bogey golfer under normal course and weather conditions. It is based on yardage, effective playing length and other obstacles to the extent that they affect the scoring ability of the bogey golfer. Example: 103.9 | “Section 2” SLOPE RATING Slope Rating is defined as the USGA’s mark that indicates the measurement of the relative difficulty of a course for players who are not scratch golfers compared to the Course Rating (i.e. compared to the difficulty of a course for scratch golfers). | “Section 2” Slope Rating is computed from the difference between the Bogey Rating and the Course Rating. The lowest Slope Rating is 55 and the highest is 155. A golf course of standard playing difficulty has a Slope Rating of 113 TREND HANDICAP A “trend handicap” is an estimate of a handicap. It may include un-reviewed scores posted since the previous revision. The trend is not a Handicap Index. (See local handicap.) A Trend Handicap must be identified by the letter “L” to indicate it is a local handicap. | “Section 2” Page # Section 3 “THE USGA The HANDICAP PlayerSYSTEM” “SECTION 3-3 AND 3-5” Tee it Forward ! USGA Handicap Department SECTION 3-1 OBTAINING A HANDICAP INDEX Obtaining a Handicap Index In order to obtain a Handicap Index, a player must join a licensed golf club and post adjusted gross scores. These scores are subject to peer review. After at least five scores have been posted, the club will issue a Handicap Index to the player in accordance with the USGA Handicap System. | “Section 3-1” SECTION 3-2 USING A HANDICAP INDEX Using a Handicap Index A player is responsible for knowing the Handicap Index issued to the player at the most recent revision. A player must convert a Handicap Index to a Course Handicap. | “Section 3-2” SECTION 3-3 COURSE HANDICAP COURSE HANDICAP A Course Handicap is the (rounded) number of handicap strokes in relation to the USGA Course Rating (i.e. scratch golfer) of the tees being played. EXAMPLE: The Course Handicap is determined by using some simple math: 15.2 x 147 = 2234.4 2234.4 / 113 = 19.77 19.7 rounds to 20 CH = HI X Slope Rating / 113; (Round to the nearest whole number) | “Section 3-3” Handicap Index 15.2 Slope Rating 147 TARGET SCORE A player who has a net score that is equal to the USGA Course Rating for the tees played "has played to their handicap." Players will only play to their handicap about 25% of the time. This is called a target score. | “Section 3-3” Target Score = CR + CH EXAMPLE: Target Score = 72.8 + 20 Target Score = 93 Average Score = 95-97 COURSE HANDICAP Slope Rating= 125 Index Range For example, a Handicap Index Of 15.2 would convert to a Course Handicap of 17 at a course with a Slope Rating of 125. EXAMPLE: Target Score = CR + CH Target Score = 70.1 + 17 Target Score = 87 Average Score = 89-91 | “Section 3-3” Course Handicap COURSE HANDICAP Slope Rating= 147 The same Handicap Index of 15.2 converts to a Course Handicap of 20 at a course with a Slope Rating of147. EXAMPLE: Target Score = CR + CH Target Score = 72.8 + 20 Target Score = 93 Average Score = 95-97 | “Section 3-3” Index Range Course Handicap SECTION 3-4 MAXIMUM HANDICAP INDEX Maximum Handicap Index The maximum Handicap Index is 36.4 for men and 40.4 men. | “Section 3-4” Using a Handicap Index Note: A maximum Handicap Index will convert to a Course Handicap that exceeds these numbers on golf courses with a Slope Rating greater than 113. Example: A woman player with a Handicap Index of 38.1 will have a Course Handicap of 49 on a course with a Slope Rating of 146. | “Section 3-4” Maximum Handicap Index A player may have a local handicap above these limits, but it must be identified as a local handicap by the letter "L" following the number on a handicap card or report (e.g., 37.5L). When such a local handicap is used for inter-club play, the USGA recommends that it be reduced to the maximum Handicap Index specified previously. | “Section 3-4” 1/1/2012 SECTION 3-5 PLAYERS COMPETING FROM A DIFFERENT USGA COURSE RATING COMPETING FROM A DIFFERENT USGA COURSE RATING (TEES) When players compete from different tees an adjustment has to be made to equalize the “courses.” This doesn’t seem fair! | “Section 3-5” I’m sticking with my gold tees SECTION 3-5 EXAMPLE Warren White and Gary Gold each have a Handicap Index of 15.2. Warren plays from the White Tees which have a Course/Slope Rating of 72.8/147. Warren’s Course Handicap is 20. Gary plays the Gold Tees which have a Course/Slope Rating of 70.1/125. Gary’s Course Handicap is 17. | “Section 3-5” What do they need to shoot to “play to their handicap?” Hint: Target Score Target Score (Warren) = 72.8 + 20 = 93 Target Score (Gary) = 70.1 + 17 = 87 SECTION 3-5 EXAMPLE 3 20 17 Warren Gary 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 Target Score (Warren) = 72.8 + 20 = 93 Target Score (Gary) = 70.1 + 17= 87 | “Section 3-5” SECTION 3-5 EXAMPLE: SUMMARY Now Warren has a Course Handicap of 23 (20 + 3). Warren Gross Score Course Handicap Net Score | “Section 3-5” 93 -23 70 Gary 87 -17 70 We have reached our desired goal, where both players have scored to their Course Handicap and their net scores result in a tie. (See Decision 3-5/1.) DECISION 3-5/1 Warren has a Course Handicap of 20. But Gary now has a Course Handicap of 14 (17 - 3). Warren Gross Score Course Handicap Net Score | “Section 3-5” 93 -20 73 Gary 87 -14 73 We have reached our desired goal, where both players have scored to their Course Handicap and their net scores result in a tie. DECISION 3-5/2 May a Golf Club Choose Not to Follow Section 3-5 of the USGA Handicap System? Q: May golf clubs’ choose not to follow Section 3-5 of �”The USGA Handicap System”� manual if the clubs groups are competing from different tees? A: No, ignoring Section 3-5 of “The �USGA Handicap System”� when players are competing from different tees would be waiving a Rule of Golf. The Committee in charge of a competition does not have the authority to waive a Rule of Golf (see “The Rules of Golf,” Decision 6-2/1). | “Section 3-5” Section 4 COVER HEADLINE Adjusting Hole Scores GOES HERE TYPE SIZE 36 Presenter’s name: type size 18 Date: type size 18 SECTION 4-1 UNFINISHED HOLES AND CONCEDED STROKES MOST LIKELY SCORE A "most likely score" is the score a player must post for handicap purposes if a hole is started but not completed or if the player is conceded a stroke. | “Section 4-1” The most likely score consists of the number of strokes already taken plus, in the player's best judgment, the number of strokes the player would take to complete the hole from that position more than half the time. MOST LIKELY SCORE This most likely score should be preceded by an "X.” There is no limit to the number of unfinished holes a player may have in a round, provided that failure to finish is not for the purpose of handicap manipulation. | “Section 4-1” SECTION 4-2 HOLES NOT PLAYED OR NOT PLAYED UNDER THE PRINCIPLES OF THE RULES OF GOLF HOLES NOT PLAYED OR NOT PLAYED UNDER THE PRINCIPLES OF THE RULES OF GOLF My ball is out of bounds, but I’ll just drop another and play from here! If a player does not play a hole or plays it other than under the principles of the Rules of Golf, the score recorded for that hole for handicap purposes must be par plus any handicap strokes the player is entitled to receive on that hole. This hole score, when recorded, should be preceded by an "X." | “Section 4-2” HOLES NOT PLAYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRINCIPLES OF THE RULES OF GOLF Example: A player with a Course Handicap of 18 receives a handicap stroke on every hole. If the player takes a mulligan on the first tee, which is a par 4, the player must record a score of par plus one for handicap purposes, or X-5. | “Section 4-1” SECTION 4-3 EQUTIABLE STROKE CONTROL EQUITABLE STROKE CONTROL Equitable Stroke Control (ESC) is the downward adjustment of individual hole scores for handicap purposes in order to make handicaps more representative of a player’s potential ability. ESC sets a maximum number that a player can post on any hole depending on the player’s Course Handicap. Course Handicap=21 ESC would be 8 | “Section 4-3” Course Handicap = 21 ESC Max = 8 EQUITABLE STROKE CONTROL ESC is used only when a player's actual or most likely score exceeds the player's maximum number based on the table below. All scores for handicap purposes, including tournament scores, are subject to the application of Equitable Stroke Control (ESC). | “Section 4-3” EQUITABLE STROKE CONTROL A handicap determined from scores to which ESC has not been applied may not be termed a Handicap Index. Under no circumstances must the procedures of this section be used by a player to manipulate his Handicap Index. If a player uses this section for such purposes, their Handicap Index must be adjusted or revoked by the Handicap Committee under Section 8-4. | “Section 4-3” Section 5 COVER HEADLINE Posting Scores GOES HERE TYPE SIZE 36 Presenter’s name: type size 18 Date: type size 18 SECTION 5-1 ACCEPTABILITY OF SCORES SCORES TO POST Number of Holes Played Score to Post 1–6 Cannot Post 7 – 12 Nine-Hole Score 13 - 18 Eighteen-Hole Score | “Section 5-1” ACCEPTABILITY OF SCORES Scores on all courses with a USGA Course Rating and Slope Rating made during an active season, both at home and away. Scores in both match play and stroke play. This includes scores made in match play, in multi-ball, or in team competitions in which players have not completed one or more holes or in which players are requested to pick up when out of contention on a hole. | “Section 5-1” ACCEPTABILITY OF SCORES A player who is disqualified from a competition, but has an acceptable score, must record an adjusted gross score for handicap purposes. For example, a player who is disqualified from a competition for failure to sign a scorecard has an acceptable score for handicap purposes. | “Section 5-1” UNACCEPTABLE SCORES When made on a golf course in an area observing an inactive season; When, as a condition of the competition, the maximum number of clubs allowed is less than 14, or types of clubs are limited as, for example, in a competition that allows only 2 clubs and a putter; When scores are made on a course without a USGA Course Rating and Slope Rating. | “Section 5-1” UNACCEPTABLE SCORES -When a player uses nonconforming clubs, nonconforming balls, or tees; -With respect to Rule 14-3 (Rules of Golf), when an artificial device or piece of unusual equipment is used during the execution of a stroke or when equipment is used in an unusual manner during the execution of a stroke. | “Section 5-1” SECTION 5-2 POSTING SCORES POSTING SCORES Posting scores in person immediately following the round at the course where the round is played is the preferred way to expose scores to peer review. This method of posting must be used whenever possible. The posted scores for the day must be immediately available to all members for peer review. | “Section 5-2” POSTING SCORES • Identification number • Date (when the round was played) • USGA Course Rating and Slope Rating of the gender and the tees played • Adjusted gross score • Tournament designation, if applicable Course Name* *Type 1 and Type 2 golf club recommendation. Type 3 requirement. | “Section 5-2” POSTING SCORES The Handicap Committee may adopt a policy to accept scores returned by email, fax, Internet, or surface mail. Scores may not be returned verbally by the telephone. | “Section 5-2” POSTING SCORES Total scores may be returned and need not be recorded hole-by-hole. The Handicap Committee may require the returning or attesting of scorecards periodically in order to assist in its responsibilities, but this requirement must not be used to affect the acceptability of a score. A score is acceptable for handicap posting purposes regardless of whether a scorecard accompanies it. (See Decisions 5-2a/3 and 5-2a/4.) | “Section 5-2” POSTING NINE-HOLE SCORES To be acceptable for handicap purposes nine-hole scores must meet the following conditions: • The course must have a nine-hole USGA Course Rating and Slope Rating • At least seven holes must be played Score = 46 USGA Course Rating / Slope Rating: 35.1/134 | “Section 5-2c” NINE-HOLE SCORES Nine-hole scores must not be designated as T-scores; When two nine-hole scores are combined, the USGA Course Rating is the sum of each 9-hole USGA Course Rating and the Slope Rating is the average of the Slope Rating of the two nines; Two nine-hole scores combined to create an 18-hole score should be designated with the letter C (e.g., 85C). If either of the two nine-hole scores was posted via Internet (see Section 5-2a(vi)), the score should be designated CI; | “Section 5-2d” TREATMENT OF NINE-HOLE SCORES Nine-hole scores are combined in the order that they are received into the player's scoring record from any club or from any combination of nines, regardless of score type. An 18-hole score created by the combination of two nine-hole scores will display the date and course name (if applicable) of the latest nine hole score (e.g., April 29 and May 4 = May 4). A nine-hole score is eligible to be combined until 20 new (18-hole) rounds have been posted. | “Section 5-2d” TREATMENT OF NINE-HOLE SCORES A nine-hole score will be retained for combination with another ninehole score until it is older than the twentieth oldest eighteen-hole score in the scoring record, and nine-hole scores will be combined in the order they are received in the player’s record, and “not necessarily by date.” | “Section 5-2d” COMMITTEE POSTING A SCORE If a player fails to post a score, the Handicap Committee may post the score without the player's authorization. (See Section 8-4b.) | “Section 5-2f” COMMITTEE POSTING A SCORE The Committee is authorized (and encouraged) to post the scores for all competitors. This can be for normal play days as well as the major events at the club. Be sure to notify players in advance to avoid a duplicate posting scenario. | “Section 5-2f” POSTING A SCORE FROM AN UNRATED SET OF TEES ON A RATED COURSE If a USGA Course Rating and Slope Rating from a selected set of tees are not available for the appropriate gender, the player may apply Section 5-2g procedure on a temporary basis. This procedure is NOT a substitute for a formal USGA Course Rating and Slope Rating. If the Committee in charge of a competition has used a combination of tees for a competition course, this procedure may be used. It may also be used if a player employs Tee It Forward and the forward tee is not rated for that gender. | “Section 5-2g” EXAMPLE A junior boy plays from the forward tees, which are not rated for men. The men's USGA Course Rating from the middle tees is 71.0, with a Slope Rating of 117. The forward tees are 800 yards shorter than the middle tees. He enters the 781 to 802 yard range to subtract 3.6 from the USGA Course Rating and 9 from the Slope Rating of the middle tees. He will post his score with a USGA Course Rating of 67.4 (71.0 – 3.6) and a Slope Rating of 108(117 - 9). He will also calculate his Course Handicap based on the 108 Slope Rating. | “Section 5-2g” Section 6 COVER HEADLINE Scoring GOES HERE Records TYPE SIZE 36 Presenter’s name: type size 18 Date: type size 18 SECTION 6-1 CONTINUOUS RECORDS CONTINUOUS RECORDS Scores made in a new playing season (or calendar year) must be added to those of the preceding playing seasons (or calendar years) to make up a scoring record, which is continuous from year to year. | “Section 6-1” SECTION 6-2 INACTIVE SEASON INACTIVE SEASON The authorized golf association having jurisdiction in an area is responsible for declaring the duration of any inactive season. A golf club located within the area covered by an authorized golf association must observe any inactive season established by the golf association, even if the club is not a member of the association. | “Section 6-2” INACTIVE SEASON Scores made at a golf course in an area observing an active season MUST be posted for handicap purposes. Scores made at any golf course observing an inactive season are not acceptable for handicap purposes. | “Section 6-2” SECTION 6-3 SCORING LISTS AND RECORDS HANDICAP LISTS AND SCORING RECORDS The accessibility of scoring records is an important component of peer review. Accordingly, the club must display a Handicap Index listing as well as current scoring records of all players as of the most recent revision date. | “Section 6-3” HANDICAP LISTS AND SCORING RECORDS If a computer with handicap information is directly accessible to members, scoring records may be displayed in this manner. However, for the purpose of peer review, the club should print out a Handicap Index list, the current scoring record, as well as a report of Internet-posted scores (if allowed), as of the most recent revision date. | “Section 6-3” SECTION 6-5 PLAYER BELONGING TO MORE THAN ONE CLUB PLAYER BELONGING TO MORE THAN ONE CLUB A player who belongs to more than one golf club must do either of the following: (a) Register as a multi-member with the authorized golf association or computation service, if such service is provided, so that all scores at every club will enter into the player's scoring record for computation; or (b) Return all scores to all clubs in person, or, if the club allows, by email, fax, Internet, or surface mail (See Section 5-2), together with the USGA Course Rating and Slope Rating, and date. | “Section 6-5” PLAYER BELONGING TO MORE THAN ONE CLUB Failure to post all scores at all clubs produces a Handicap Index that is not based on the best 10 out of the last 20 Differentials and subsequently may not be termed a Handicap Index. If a player has a different Handicap Index at different clubs, despite posting all scores at all clubs, the committee in charge of the competition may require the player to use the lowest Handicap Index when competing with players from more than one club. | “Section 6-5” SECTION 6-6 PLAYER CHANGING GOLF CLUBS PLAYER CHANGING GOLF CLUBS When changing golf clubs, a player should give the new club a record of the player’s last 20 scores in chronological order plus any eligible tournament scores recorded together with the appropriate USGA Course Rating and Slope Rating. This information will become part of the player’s scoring record at the new club and will NOT result in a Handicap Index until after the next handicap revision. | “Section 6-6” Section 6-7 Records of Resigned Members • The Handicap Index of a resigned member remains valid only until the next revision date. • When the player joins a new golf club, a new Handicap Index is issued at the first revision date, based on the scoring record from the prior club and any scores recorded in the interim. Section 7 COVER HEADLINE Preferred Lies (Winter Rules) and GOES HERE Adverse Course Conditions TYPE SIZE 36 Presenter’s name: type size 18 Date: type size 18 SECTION 7-1 ACCEPTABILITY OF SCORES WHEN PLAYING PREFERRED LIES ACCEPTABILITY OF SCORES WHEN PLAYING PREFERRED LIES Scores made when a Local Rule for preferred lies and/or winter rules is in effect must be posted for handicap purposes unless the Committee (preferably the Handicap Committee) determines that conditions are so poor that such scores should not be posted. The Local Rule should be withdrawn as soon as the conditions warrant. | “Section 7-1” ACCEPTABILITY OF SCORES WHEN PLAYING PREFERRED LIES Ground under repair is provided in Rule 25 (“The Rules of Golf”), and occasional local abnormal conditions that might interfere with fair play and are not widespread should be defined as ground under repair. Adverse conditions, such as heavy snows, spring thaws, prolonged rains or extreme heat can make fairways unsatisfactory and sometimes prevent use of heavy mowing equipment. When these conditions are so general throughout a course that the Committee believes “preferred lies” or “winter rules” would promote fair play or help protect the course, the following Local Rule is recommended: | “Section 7-1” LOCAL RULE A ball lying on a closely mown area through the green [or specify a more restricted area, e.g., at the 6th hole] may be lifted without penalty and cleaned. Before lifting the ball, the player must mark its position. Having lifted the ball, he must place it on a spot within (specify area, e.g., six inches, one club-length, etc.) of and not nearer the hole than where it originally lay, that is not in a hazard and not on a putting green. | “Section 7-1” LOCAL RULE A player may place his ball only once, and it is in play when it has been placed (Rule 20-4). If the ball fails to come to rest on the spot on which it is placed, Rule 20-3d applies. If the ball when placed comes to rest on the spot on which it is placed and it subsequently moves, there is no penalty and the ball must be played as it lies, unless the provisions of any other Rule apply. If the player fails to mark the position of the ball before lifting it or moves the ball in any other manner, such as rolling it with a club, he incurs a penalty of one stroke. | “Section 7-1” SECTION 7-2 PITFALLS IN ADOPTING PREFERRED LIES PITFALLS IN ADOPTING PREFERRED LIES • Conflicts with the fundamental principle of playing the ball as it lies. • Does not protect the course-just the opposite. • "Preferred lies" generally tends to lower scores and each player’s Handicap Index. • Extended use or indiscriminate use of "preferred lies" will place players at a disadvantage when competing at a course where the ball must be played as it lies. | “Section 7-2” COVER HEADLINE GOES HERE TYPE SIZE 36 Section 8 The Handicap Committee Presenter’s name: type size 18 Date: type size 18 SECTION 8-1 HANDICAP COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON HANDICAP COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON The position of Handicap Chairperson requires a substantial amount of time and a basic knowledge of the USGA Handicap System. The more information the Handicap Chairperson provides to members, the more cooperation the Handicap Chairperson is likely to receive. | “Section 8-1” Attributes of a Handicap Chairperson From the 1989 USGA Handicap System and Golf Committee Manual: • Must be a discerning person who can meet unforeseen situations and solve with fairness • Patient with players who present grievances based on lack of knowledge • Is an educator as the more information provided to players, the more cooperation received SECTION 8-2 DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES • The Handicap Committee within the golf club is responsible for all aspects of the USGA Handicap System, including: • Verify all acceptable scores are reported for handicap purposes, and that recorded scores are available for peer review • Examining Results of Competitions • Maintaining Players' Records • Cooperation With Other Committees | “Section 8-2” NOTICE TO MEMBERS • How and where scores are returned; • How handicap cards or labels are issued; • How each Handicap Index is verified at each revision; • The handicap revision schedule; • The duration of any inactive season; | “Section 8-2a” NOTICE TO MEMBERS • How away scores are posted prior to the start of the active season • Handicap Index adjustment powers of the Handicap Committee; • Penalties for players failing to return scores; • Which rounds will be designated as tournament scores. | “Section 8-2a” SECTION 8-3 HANDICAP REVISIONS HANDICAP REVISIONS • A golf club must follow the National Revision Schedule. Under the National Revision Schedule, each Handicap Index must be revised on the 1st and the 15th of each month. • Each authorized golf association may establish an inactive season for its region. If so, it must establish the dates on which the inactive season starts and ends. These dates, along with the National Revision Schedule for Handicap Index revisions, are to be distributed to all member clubs and non-member clubs in the region. • Any non-member club of an authorized golf association must observe the National Revision Schedule and any inactive season established by the authorized golf association that has jurisdiction in its area. | “Section 8-3” SECTION 8-4 PENALTY SCORES, HANDICAP INDEX ADJUSTMENT, AND WITHDRAWAL GENERAL No player has an inherent right to a Handicap Index without providing full evidence of the player’s ability to the Handicap Committee at their golf club. A Handicap Index must normally be changed only as warranted by the USGA Handicap System. Only the Handicap Committee where a player maintains a handicap can adjust or withdraw that player’s Handicap Index. | “Section 8-4a” PENALTY SCORES If a player fails to post an acceptable score as soon as practicable after completion of the round, the Handicap Committee should post the score and/or a penalty score and ratings equal to the lowest Handicap Differential in the player’s scoring record. If the score not returned is unusually high, the Handicap Committee should enter the score and/or a penalty score and ratings equal to the highest Handicap Differential in the player’s scoring record. | “Section 8-4b” HANDICAP INDEX ADJUSTMENT Before an adjustment becomes effective, the Handicap Committee must give the player an opportunity to explain the circumstances surrounding the proposed adjustment, either in writing or by appearing before the Committee. | “Section 8-4c” HANDICAP INDEX ADJUSTMENT • Improving faster than the System can react • Numerous away or Internet scores change Handicap Index • Temporary disability • Continued violations of Section 5-1e • Player manipulates round | “Section 8-4c” PLAYER MANIPULATES SCORES If a player manipulates scores to influence that player’s Handicap Index, the Handicap Committee must adjust or withdraw the Handicap Index, depending on the severity of the offense. | “Section 8-4c” PLAYER MANIPULATES SCORES • Posting erroneous information to scoring record • Stopping play after 6 holes to avoid posting scores; • Repeatedly playing more than one ball to avoid posting scores; • Not adjusting hole scores under Section 4; • Deliberately reporting more or fewer strokes than actually scored; • Deliberately taking extra strokes to inflate a score. | “Section 8-4c” •Not observing either or both premises that underlie the USGA Handicap System. DURATION OF ADJUSTMENT The Handicap Committee must determine how long a player’s Handicap Index is to remain modified or withdrawn. At each handicap revision date, the Handicap Committee should compare the modified Handicap Index to the value determined by normal computation methods. | “Section 8-4d” Section 9 COVER HEADLINE Competitions GOESHandicap HERE TYPE SIZE 36 Presenter’s name: type size 18 Date: type size 18 SECTION 9-1 HANDICAP REQUIRED FOR COMPETITION ENTRY INTO A COMPETITION When a Handicap Index is a requirement for entering a competition, a player must submit the Handicap Index in effect on the date of entry. A Handicap Index adjusted by the Handicap Committee must be the player’s Handicap Index. | “Section 9-1” SECTION 9-2 HANDICAP INDEX TO USE HANDICAP INDEX TO USE …must be determined by the Committee in charge of the competition. The USGA recommends that the Committee require use of a Handicap Index in effect on the date the competition commences. … in an exceptional case, the Committee may modify a player’s Course Handicap before or between rounds of the competition. …if a competition spans a handicap revision date, the revised Handicap Index should be used in rounds following that date. …if a player has more than one Handicap Index, the Committee in charge of a competition must require the player to use his lowest Handicap Index. | “Section 9-2” SECTION 9-3 ASSIGNMENT OF STROKES ASSIGNMENT OF STROKES A player receiving handicap strokes generally takes them in the order assigned on the scorecard. For example, a player receiving three strokes takes them on the first, second, and third stroke holes. In mixed competitions where players play their own ball and where allocations are different for men and women, the players receive strokes based on their respective stroke allocations. In mixed foursome and selected drive match-play competitions, strokes are received based on the men’s allocation. | “Section 9-3” ASSIGNMENT OF STROKES For formats in which handicap strokes are used on specific holes during the course of play, a player generally takes them in the order assigned on the scorecard. In mixed competitions where players play their own ball and where allocations are different for men and women, the players receive strokes based on their respective stroke allocations. | “Section 9-3” SECTION 9-4 HANDICAP ALLOWANCES HANDICAP ALLOWANCES Step 1) Players must first determine Course Handicap (from tees played). Step 2) Player should the apply the handicap allowances for the appropriate format. Step 3) It is recommended that in four-ball stroke play competitions, if the Course Handicaps of the side differ by more than 8 strokes, each is reduced by 10 percent. Step 4) If players are competing from different tees or men and women are competing from the same tees, players must apply the adjustment for the difference in the USGA Course Rating from the tees played. | “Section 9-4” HANDICAP ALLOWANCES Singles Match Play Allowance: The higher-handicapped player receives the full difference between the Course Handicap of the two players; the lower-handicapped player must play from scratch. (See Decision 9-4a (i)/1.) Example: A player with a Course Handicap of 17 must receive four strokes from a player with a Course Handicap of 13. The player receives them on the holes allocated as the first four handicap-stroke holes. | “Section 9-4” HANDICAP ALLOWANCES: WHY DO WE NEED THEM? An inequity arises in some multi-ball team events when a full Course Handicap is used. Higher- handicapped sides would have an unfair advantage over lowerhandicapped sides. Thus in some events, less than full Course Handicaps are used. | “Section 9-4” HANDICAP ALLOWANCES Net Skins- No official recommendation Scramble- No official recommendation, however USGA research indicates the following allowances should be equitable 4-Person Scramble 2-Person Scramble 20% of A (low hdcp) 35% of A 15% of B 15% of B 10% of C 5% of D (high hdcp) | “Section 9-4” SECTION 9-5 HOW TO DECIDE TIES HOW TO DECIDE TIES Committee determines how and when a halved match or stroke play tie must be decided. The procedure should be published in advance. | “Section 9-5” USGA RECOMMENDATIONS Match play: A match which ends all square should be played off hole-by-hole until one side wins a hole. Should start where the match began. Should allocate strokes as in stipulated round. | “Section 9-5” USGA RECOMMENDATIONS Stroke Play: A Playoff with handicaps is recommended. It may be over 18 holes or a smaller number of holes as specified by the Committee. Stroke hole allocation not relevant (e.g. individual stroke play): The percentage of 18 holes to be played should be applied to the players’ handicaps to determine their playoff handicaps. Fractions of ½ stroke or more should count as a full stroke. Stroke hole allocation is relevant (e.g., 4-ball stroke play): Handicap strokes should be taken as they were assigned for the competition. | “Section 9-5” SCORECARD PLAYOFFS • Play-off not feasible for stroke play; • Matching of the cards is recommended. • Method of matching should be announced in advance. USGA Recommendation: Best score for the last nine holes, if tying players have the same score for the last nine holes, determine the winner on the basis of the last six holes, last three holes, and finally the 18th hole. | “Section 9-5” SCORECARD PLAYOFFS If such a method is used then 1/2, 1/3, 1/6, etc. of the Course Handicap should be deducted from the score for those holes. (If stroke hole allocations are relevant, strokes are taken as they were assigned on the score card). Hole 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3 5 11 9 7 15 17 Handicap 17 18 1 13 HDCP Player A (5) A-net Player B (10) B-net * =one stroke received | “Section 9-5” 5* 4* 5 3 5 4 4 4* 5 4 3 5 3 5 4 4 3 5 6* 4* 6 3* 5* 6 3 6* 5 5 3 6 2 4 6 3 5 5 36 39 Section 10 COVER HEADLINE USGA Handicap Formula GOES HERE TYPE SIZE 36 Presenter’s name: type size 18 Date: type size 18 SECTION 10-1 HOW TO DETERMINE A HANDICAP DIFFERENTIAL HANDICAP DIFFERENTIAL FORMULA Handicap Differential = (Adjusted Gross Score – USGA Course Rating) x 113 / Slope Rating Adjusted Gross Score - USGA Course Rating: x Standard Slope Rating: Result / Slope Rating: Handicap Differential (rounded): | “Section 10-1” 95 - 71.5 = 23.5 x 113 = 2655.5 / 125 = 23.5 2655.5 21.24 21.2 HANDICAP DIFFERENTIAL FORMULA A lower score may not always produce a lower Differential. Examples: (95 – 71.5) x 113/125 = 21.2 (97 – 73.8) x 113/140 = 18.7 (90 – 66.1) x 113/105 = 25.7 | “Section 10-1” SECTION 10-2 HANDICAP INDEX FORMULA HANDICAP INDEX FORMULA Once the Handicap Differentials are calculated for all 20 scores, the best 10 Differentials are averaged. Multiply average by 96% (Bonus for Excellence*) Delete digits after tenths digit Result = Handicap Index | “Section 10-2” BONUS FOR EXCELLENCE • Bonus for Excellence is the incentive that is built into the USGA Handicap System for players to improve their golf games. It is the term used to describe the small percentage below perfect equity that is used to calculate a Handicap Index (96%). As a player’s Handicap Index improves (gets lower), the player has a slightly better chance of placing high or winning a handicap event. | “Section 10-2” EXAMPLE Total of 10 lowest Differentials*: 154.8 Average (154.8 divided by 10): 15.48 Multiply average by .96: 14.861 Delete all digits after tenths: 14.8 Handicap Index: 14.8 | “Section 10-2” HANDICAP INDEX FORMULA Ideally the Handicap Index is based on the 10 lowest Differentials of the most recent 20. The average of the 10 best is multiplied by .96 then truncated to the tenth. If less than 20 scores are available, less than 10 Differentials are used to calculate the Index. | “Section 10-2” SECTION 10-3 REDUCTION OF HANDICAP INDEX BASED ON EXCEPTIONAL TOURNAMENT SCORES TOURNAMENT SCORE DESIGNATION A tournament score is a score made in a competition organized and conducted by a Committee in charge of the competition. The competition must identify a winner(s) based on a stipulated round(s), and must be played under the principles of the Rules of Golf. Routine events such as regular play days are not normally to be designated as T-Scores because they are not significant in the traditions, schedules, formats, and membership of the club. | “Section 10-3” ELIGIBLE TOURNAMENT SCORE An eligible tournament score is any tournament score made either within the last 12 months or within the player’s current 20-score history. | “Section 10-3” HANDICAP INDEX REDUCTION This process is an automatic function of the USGA Handicap System and performed by the club’s handicap computation service or program. This procedure occurs at every revision period. | “Section 10-3” HANDICAP INDEX REDUCTION The Handicap Committee’s job is: to check the player’s reduced Handicap Index and see if any further action needs to occur; and to review the tournament schedule and determine the scores (in conjunction with the Committee in charge of the competition) that should be designated as tournaments and inform the members when posting, so that they post with a “T.” | “Section 10-3” EXAMPLE: HANDICAP INDEX REDUCTION Sandy’s calculated 10-2 value is 24.2 and has two exceptional T-Score Differentials that average 18.2 and six total eligible tournament scores. Using the two best T-Score Differentials the difference between the 10-2 calculation and the T-Scores is 6.0 strokes. Based on the Handicap Reduction Table, what would be the Handicap Index? | “Section 10-3” HANDICAP REDUCTION TABLE Number of Eligible T-Scores 24.2 – 18.2 = 6.0 6 eligible T-Scores (5-9 column) Table Value= 1.9 24.2 – 1.9 = 22.3 Average of lowest 2 T-Scores below calculated Handicap Index Sandy’s new Handicap Index 22.3R | “Section 10-3” DURATION AND VARIATION OF REDUCTION Handicap Index reduction for exceptional tournament scores is calculated at each handicap revision and may vary from revision to revision. The Handicap Committee must review all reductions and may increase, reduce, or override a 10-3 reduction. | “Section 10-3” DURATION AND VARIATION OF REDUCTION If a player has Tournament Scores which were not exceptional at the time they were posted, but subsequently become exceptional due to an increase in the player’s 10-2 calculated Index, the reduction is still warranted. Handicap T-Scores Index 10 11 | “Section 10-3” 12 13 14 15 16 17 SECTION 10-5 NINE HOLE HANDICAP INDEX (N) NINE HOLE HANDICAP INDEX (N) A Handicap Index followed by an “N” signifies a 9-hole Handicap Index. If a competition requires a Handicap Index, a Handicap Index (N) may be doubled for 18-hole play (a Handicap Index can be halved for a 9-hole competition). A player with a Handicap Index (N) who plays an 18-hole round must post two nine-hole scores to his scoring record (N). Maximum Handicap Index (N) 18.2N for men and 20.2N for women | “Section 10-5” NINE HOLE HANDICAP INDEX (N) Handicap Differential = (9-hole adjusted gross score – 9-hole USGA Course Rating) x 113 / 9-hole Slope Rating (45-36.2) x 113 / 121 = 8.2 Avg. the best 10 Differentials of last 20 Multiply average by 96% Delete digits after tenths Result = Handicap Index (N) | “Section 10-5” Section 12: Measurements Begins the portion of the manual that addresses the Golf Course and includes Sections 12 through 17 MEASUREMENTS Section 12 Each teeing ground should have permanent yardage markers. Could be: concrete slab metal plate pipe - set flush to the ground - middle of teeing ground - hole yardage should be visible in marker This is the start point for measuring hole length. Permanent Markers/Moveable Markers MEASUREMENTS – con’t • Measuring done by air line (not ground) • Along line at play to center of green • Dog-legs straight line measurements to turn point, then to center of green • Accurate measurements are to nearest yard Measuring By Air Line Section 13 Course Rating What Is the Course Rating? (The first number as in rating/slope ex. 72.4/135) The playing difficulty of a course for a scratch golfer under normal course conditions. Expressed as strokes taken to one decimal place Who is Scratch? • Plays to a Course Handicap of 0 • Hits drive 210 yards • Hits second shot 190 yards What Is Slope? The difficulty of a course for everyone else (non-scratch golfer = 99.36% of women golfers with handicaps) relative to the difficulty of a course for scratch golfers under normal course and weather conditions. Who is Bogey? • Course Handicap of approximately 24 on a course of standard difficulty • Hits her drive 150 yards • Hits her second shot 130 yards Who Does the Course Rating? Course Rating Teams Course Rating Captain and 3-7 other course raters. When Are The Courses Rated? Every 7 - 8 years New Courses – Every 5years (Ratings are valid for 10 years, absent changes.) Effective Length Correction Factors • • • • • ELEVATION ROLL DOGLEG WIND ALTITUDE Effective Playing length is the measured playing length adjusted by above factors Elevation ROLL DOGLEG/FORCED LAY-UP PREVAILING WIND What Obstacles Are Measured? • • • • TOPOGRAPHY FAIRWAY GREEN TARGET ROUGH AND RECOVERABLILITY (Trouble) • BUNKERS What Obstacles Are Measured? Con’t • • • • OUT OF BOUNDS WATER TREES GREEN SURFACE (speed & contour) • PSYCHOLOGICAL (ADDITION OF ALL OBSTACLES OVER 5) (PLUS X) TOPOGRAPHY FAIRWAY GREEN TARGET Rough & Recoverability BUNKERS FAIRWAY BUNKERS GREENSIDE BUNKERS Out of Bounds and Extreme Rough WATER HAZARDS Obstacle: Water Hazards • Water hazard with both lateral and water carry. • Water surrounds the green and is close to the edge of the green TREES GREEN SURFACE PYSCHOLOGICAL How Changes In Course Maintenance Affect The Course Rating? FAIRWAY – DECREASING FAIRWAY WIDTHS BY 10 YDS ON THE PAR 4’S AND 5’S ADDS TO C/R AND TO SLOPE R&R – INCREASE ROUGH HEIGHT BY 1” ON ALL 18 HOLES ADDS TO C/R AND INCREASES THE SLOPE OB – MOVING WHITE STAKES 10 YARDS CLOSER How Changes In Course Maintenance Affect The Course Rating? Con’t BUNKERS – DEPENDS ON HOW MANY AND HOW DEEP. ADDING 13 AVERAGE BUNKERS WILL INCREASE THE SLOPE BY 1 GREEN TARGET – DECREASE WATERING TO CHANGE FROM SOFT TO MEDIUM OR HARD, CHANGES THE HOLDING PROPERTIES OF THE GREENS. GREEN SURFACE – SPEEDING UP GREENS Course Rating Resort courses have a tendency to move the ladies tees up, and players should be aware of this. It is a good idea to pay attention to where the permanent markers are. If after playing a few holes you find all the tees are placed more than 10 yards forward, you would be wise to play from the permanent markers. You will be posting your score to a truer course rating! How Does Course Rating and Slope Affect Your Handicap? How Are Differentials Figured? Gross Score – Course Rating x 113/Slope Rating (rounded) COURSE RATINGS, SLOPES & DIFFERENTIALS Example: Two Courses with the same slope but different ratings – Score 94 Course A Course B 74.2/127 70.5/127 94-74.2=19.8 94-70.5=23.5 19.8x113=2237.4 23.5x113=2655.5 2237.4/127=17.61 2655.5/127=20.90 17.6 20.9 Course Rating Temporary Ratings Section 14 Yes: 5 holes are altered for more than 4 weeks. Yardage is altered more than 30 yards for more than 4 weeks Temporary greens are used for more than 4 weeks Course Rating Temporary Ratings NO: When temporary greens are in use for a short period of time When a tee box is moved laterally but the yardage remains the same Post net par for hole (par plus handicap stroke(s) for that hole If in doubt, call the Course Rating Manager at the WSCGA Office! COURSE SET-UP Section 15 • IMPORTANT to keep course difficulty constant • Balance placement of tees so effective playing length same day to day • Place holes for fairness of playing – no tricks! Appendix A , B & C • Appendix A – Short Course Handicap Procedure for courses under 3000 yards for 18 holes or under 1500 yards for 9 holes • Appendix B – Sample Letter Applying Section 8-4 (Committee notice of adjustment to handicap index to player) • Appendix C – Junior Par computation Appendix D • Sample letter explaining Section 3-5 & 93c where players compete from different tees. Adds language that if Committee does not apply section 3-5 when players are competing from different tees it would be waiving a Rule of Golf and that the Committee in charge of a competition does not have the authority to waive a Rule of Golf. Appendix E –Exceptional ‘T’ Scores To help Handicap Committees at the club and association level, the USGA Handicap Manual, provides a statistical analysis of the odds of shooting a net differential EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN the number in the left column. •This table shows, at different handicap levels, the probability of a golfer shooting 1 to 10 or more strokes below their handicap. Appendix F – Club Licensing • Appendix F – USGA Handicap System Licensing Program for Clubs – Outlines procedure for club licensing – See Compliance Check List on page 54 – Club must be able to answer affirmatively to 17 questions, “Does the club….?” in order to satisfy club licensing requirements Appendix G – Golf Club Audit Procedure • Golf Club Audit Procedure: USGA contacts golf association (WSCGA); WSCGA contacts club, reviews compliance and makes recommendation. Worse case scenario for non-compliance, club looses ability to issue handicap indices to members; Appeal process described Appendix H - Most Improved Calculation • Method for Determining Most Improved Player at End of Season or Year – Step by step computation COVER HEADLINE GOES HERE TYPE SIZE 36 Section 16 Par Computation Presenter’s name: type size 18 Date: type size 18 SECTION 16 PAR COMPUTATION PAR COMPUTATION Par is the score that an expert golfer would be expected to make for a given hole. Par means errorless play under ordinary playing conditions, allowing two strokes on the putting green. The effective playing length of a hole for the scratch golfer determines par. The configuration of the ground and the severity of the obstacles should be taken into consideration. Authorized golf associations are empowered to adjudicate questions of hole par. | “Section 16” PAR COMPUTATION Par has little importance in the USGA Handicap System and little impact on a player’s Handicap Index. Par Men Women 3 up to 250 up to 210 4 251 to 470 211 to 400 5 471 to 690 401 to 590 6 691 and over 591 and over | “Section 16” DECISION 9-4a/3 9-4a/3. Result of a Hole If Men’s and Women’s Par Is Different Q: In a match-play competition, one hole is par four for men and par five for women. In a match between a man and a woman, if both score par, what is the result of the hole? | “Section 16” DECISION 9-4a/3 9-4a/3. Result of a Hole If Men’s and Women’s Par Is Different A: Par is irrelevant. The player who completes the hole in fewer strokes wins the hole. | “Section 16” EXAMPLE Mike and Sarah are playing a match. The 15th hole is a 450-yard par 4 for men and a 420-yard par 5 for women. There are no handicap strokes given to either player. Both Mike and Sarah score their respective par for the hole. Who wins the hole? Mike - because his score is better than Sarah’s. Par is irrelevant. | “Section 16” Section 17 COVER HEADLINE Allocation of Handicap Strokes GOES HERE TYPE SIZE 36 Presenter’s name: type size 18 Date: type size 18 SECTION 17-1 DISCRETION OF THE COMMITTEE ALLOCATION OF HANDICAP STROKES A handicap stroke should be an equalizer and should be available on a hole where it most likely will be needed by the higher-handicapped player to obtain a half in singles or four-ball match play. Difficulty in making par on a hole is not an effective indicator of the need for a stroke. | “Section 17-1” ALLOCATION OF HANDICAP STROKES The basic principle is to equalize the abilities of golfers at different handicap levels. Men’s and women’s stroke allocations will usually be different because their needs to equalize holes will come on different holes. | “Section 17-1” ALLOCATION OF HANDICAP STROKES Odd strokes should be allocated to the front nine and even strokes should be allocated to the back nine. This helps equalize the distribution of handicap strokes over the entire 18 holes. Allocating low-numbered strokes to the holes near the beginning and end of each nine should be avoided. | “Section 17-1” SECTION 17-2a ALLOCATION BASED ON SCORES: COMPARISON METHOD COMPARISON METHOD 1. Collect 200 scores from each group. Group A – low handicapped players 0-8 for men and 0-14 for women or 25% of the low handicapped players Group B – middle to higher handicapped players 20-28 for men and 26 -40 for women Average Course Handicap of Group B should be 15-20 strokes higher than Group A. 2. Average the hole scores for each group and determine the difference between groups. | “Section 17-2a” | “Section 17-2a” SECTION 17-2b ALLOCATION BASED ON SCORES: REGRESSION METHOD REGRESSION METHOD Linear regression is applied to all data points. • • • Use a minimum of 400 hole-by-hole scorecards representing any Course Handicap. Similar to 17-2a method, but instead of comparing the average of two groups, the Regression Method uses all scores covering the whole Course Handicap range to allocate handicap strokes. See “Section 17-2b” in the manual for additional information and the formulas involved in this method. | “Section 17-2b” REGRESSION METHOD Linear regression is applied using all data points. | “Section 17-2b” SECTION 17-5 FOUR-BALL AND BEST-BALL STROKE PLAY; STABLEFORD FOUR-BALL AND BEST-BALL STROKE PLAY; STABLEFORD It may be appropriate to develop a separate table based on difficulty relative to par. If a club decides to use this method the procedures are as follows: Sum the Group A and B average score for each hole; Subtract from this sum two times the par of each hole; Rank holes from the largest hole result to the smallest. | “Section 17-5” EXAMPLE OF ALLOCATION METHOD BASED ON DIFFICULTY RELATIVE TO PAR Example for Men Hole Par Group A Average Score Group B Average Score Group A + B Score Group A + B Score Minus 2 Par Rank 1 5 5.25 6.52 11.77 1.77 10 2 3 3.46 3.96 7.42 1.42 14/15 3 4 4.76 5.57 10.33 2.33 4 4 4 4.69 5.89 10.58 2.58 2 5 4 4.50 5.56 10.06 2.06 6 6 5 5.28 6.61 11.89 1.89 7 7 4 3.96 4.74 8.70 0.70 18 8 3 3.38 4.04 7.42 1.42 14/15 9 4 4.22 5.06 9.28 1.28 16 10 5 5.21 6.53 11.74 1.74 11 11 3 3.50 4.13 7.63 1.63 12 12 4 4.70 5.84 10.54 2.54 3 13 4 4.77 6.24 11.01 3.01 1 14 4 4.62 5.51 10.13 2.13 5 15 5 5.34 6.46 11.80 1.80 9 16 4 4.33 4.93 9.26 1.26 17 3 3.54 4.30 7.84 1.84 8 4 4.37 5.11 9.48 1.48 13 17 | “Section 17-5” 18