R EPO RT - EPA Victoria
Transcription
R EPO RT - EPA Victoria
August 2010 SITA ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL, 890 TAYLORS ROAD, DANDENONG SOUTH Application for Works Approval: Proposed Soil Processing Facility REPORT Submitted to: SITA Australia Pty. Ltd. 274 Hallam Road Hampton Park, 3975 Report Number: 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Executive Summary SITA Australia Pty. Ltd. (trading as SITA Environmental Solutions (SITA)) propose to develop a soil processing facility at the Taylors Road Landfill. The proposed development will be an ancillary activity to existing landfill operations, such that soil processing required prior to the disposal or reuse of prescribed industrial waste can be undertaken at the disposal facility. The proposed development will consist of two stages: Stage One encompasses soil stabilisation and direct fired thermal desorption (DFTD) processing technologies whilst Stage Two will include soil treatment by bioremediation. Proposed works Stage One will consist of installation and operation of soil stabilisation and DFTD equipment for processing of Categories A, B and C contaminated soils. The equipment will be supplied by Enviropacific Services Pty. Ltd. The DFTD principle of operation is to heat and dry contaminated soil causing contaminants to move from the liquid or solid phase to the gaseous phase. Vaporised contaminants are then managed by an exhaust gas treatment system. This process involves soil delivery to a feed hopper, transport to the rotary drier via screw feeder and then discharge of soil to a pugmill for cooling and moisture addition. Exhaust gas treatment involves particulate matter removal via a cyclone, volatile organic compounds (VOC) and semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOC) removal via thermal oxidiser, water quenching for temperature reduction, particulate matter removal by fabric filtration, acid gas removal by wet chemical scrubbing and VOC, SVOC and mercury removal by activated carbon adsorption. The soil stabilisation process limits the solubility or mobility of contaminants, even though the physical characteristics of the soil may not be changed or improved. The process involves mixing of contaminated soil with appropriate liquid or solid additives in a track mounted soil recycler. The soil recycler consists of a screen, hoppers for untreated soil and solid additives, a two shaft paddle mixer and a discharge belt conveyor. Additive feed rates are regulated by a screw feeder or dosing pump for solid and liquid additives respectively. The soil stabilisation process renders the hazardous components in their least mobile, soluble or toxic form. Site Location The facility will be located in the north eastern corner of the landfill site in the area currently occupied by Cells 12A and 12B. The proposed development will occupy an area of approximately 3 ha, bordered by Cells 12C and 14 to the west and Cell 11 to the south. The location of the soil processing facility is designed to minimise potential noise and visual impacts associated with the development. Choice of Equipment and Technology SITA reviewed a number of direct fired thermal treatment technologies for the proposed soil processing facility. The factors assessed in determining the most suitable equipment for the Taylors Road application were: Ability of the equipment to adequately treat contaminated soils; Environmental emissions from the processing equipment; Size of Victorian contaminated soil market; Equipment cost to justify replacement/upgrading as new or improved technologies become available; Initial capital outlay and set-up; Ongoing operation; Equipment size (dimensions); Equipment portability: August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Easily transportable for use interstate/intrastate, when volumes do not justify operation or are unavailable; Proven operation within Australia - both equipment & equipment operator/supplier; Equipment’s ability to be easily shut-down for maintenance or during times of low demand. The DFTD plant, supplied and operated by Enviropacific Services, met these criteria and was consequently selected as the preferred equipment. Key Environmental Considerations The key environmental considerations for the proposed development relate to process emissions to air. Other environmental considerations such as carbon management, waste generation, land and groundwater management and noise are discussed in the extended document. The atmospheric contaminants and proposed emissions rates from the proposed facility are presented in the following table: Atmospheric contaminant Emission rate (g/s) Total solid particulate matter 0.049 PM10 0.049 PM2.5 0.049 Carbon monoxide 0.081 Nitrogen dioxide 0.16 Sulphur dioxide 0.0032 Sulphur trioxide (as H2SO4) 0.00055 Hydrogen chloride 0.046 Hydrogen fluoride 0.0015 Benzene 7.2 x 10-5 Polychlorinated biphenyls 0.00072 Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons 7.2 x 10-5 Organochlorine pesticides 0.00036 Dioxins/furans (I-TEQ) Mercury 1.1 x 10-10 0.0036 Environmental Best Practice Best practice is defined as the best combination of eco-efficient techniques, methods, processes or technology used in an industry sector or activity that demonstrably minimises the environmental impact of a generator of emissions in that industry sector or activity. Further to best practice, proposals including emissions of Class 3 indicators are required to demonstrate that emissions are controlled to the maximum extent achievable The best practice and maximum extent achievable elements of the proposed facility, with respect to air emissions, are as follows: Reduction of fugitive emission through delivery of soil by tarped truck or with soil contained in skips or bins equipped with lids; August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Reduction of fugitive emissions through enclosing delivery, storage and processing equipment within a ventilated building equipped with a dust and VOC control system; Reduction of dust emissions within the building by dampening down of the soil recycler and DFTD feed hoppers with water mist; Reduction of nitrogen oxides formation from the DFTD process through the use of low NOx burners; Reduction of emissions to air from the DFTD process through operation of the thermal oxidiser at a temperature of 1,100°C, and a minimum residence time of 2 seconds; Reduction of particulate matter emissions to air from the DFTD process through inclusion of a baghouse; Reduction of acid gas emissions to air from the DFTD process through inclusion of a wet chemical scrubber; Reduction of dioxin/furan emissions from the DFTD process through primary and secondary control techniques. Primary controls are efficient combustion practices whilst secondary controls are rapid flue gas quenching followed by fabric filtration and wet chemical scrubbing; and Final polishing of emissions to air through inclusion of an activated carbon adsorption system. Best practice environmental management has also been applied to other components of the proposed facility, in particular carbon and water management are highlighted. Carbon management is the management of energy use and greenhouse gas generation. SITA propose to reduce energy use and greenhouse gas emissions through installation of thermal insulation on the thermal oxidiser to reduce heat loss. Other initiatives to be investigated include a thermal oxidiser temperature reduction study and development of an energy focused Environmental Management Plan. Best practice management of water use has been achieved through reuse of stormwater currently collected on the landfill site. It is anticipated that the DFTD process will require 13 ML of water per year for the evaporative cooler and wet chemical scrubber. SITA propose to pipe collected stormwater from the Duck Pond to holding tanks within the facility for use in the DFTD process. Further, water collected from the operational areas of the processing facility will be batched, tested and used to supplement water from the Duck Pond. Currently water collected in the Duck Pond is discharged to Eumemmering Creek in batches of approximately 5 ML (average discharge volume 2007 – 2009). Air Impact Assessment The proposed process emissions to air were assessed against the design criteria contained within the State Environment Protection Policy (Air Quality Management) (SEPP (AQM)) using the AUSPLUME mathematical plume dispersion model. Design criteria were derived for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) as the Policy does not contain criteria for these contaminants. Overall the modelling assessment demonstrated compliance with the design criteria at all points in the modelling domain. Additionally, the maximum predicted ground level concentrations were calculated as a percentage of the SEPP (AQM) design criteria and derived design criteria to demonstrate the safety margin between the criteria and model predictions. The results of this analysis illustrated that SEPP (AQM) designated Class 1 and Class 2 substances with background concentrations included in the model, such as PM10, PM2.5 and nitrogen dioxide, showed the smallest safety margins between the maximum predicted ground level concentrations (GLCs) and the design criteria for both the gridded and discrete receptor results. The OCPs and mercury results also showed a relatively reduced safety margin with 36% of the design criteria made up by the predicted GLCs for the gridded results and 12% of the criteria made up by the predicted GLCs at the discrete receptors. The remaining atmospheric contaminants, including the Class 3 compound benzene, demonstrated GLC results less than 20% of the design criteria for gridded results and less than 5% at the discrete receptors. A summary of the air impact assessment results is presented in the following table. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Atmospheric Contaminant Averaging Period Gridded Results Discrete Receptor Results Safety Margin Safety Margin (GLC as a percentage of the design criteria) (GLC as a percentage of the design criteria) TSP 3 minute 4.8% 1.7% PM10 1 hour 44% 28% PM2.5 1 hour 50% 24% Carbon monoxide 1 hour 1.7% 1.6% Nitrogen dioxide 1 hour 42% 19% Sulphur dioxide 1 hour 0.22% 0.036% Sulphur trioxide (as H2SO4) 3 minute 0.55% 0.19% Hydrogen chloride 3 minute 6.0% 2.0% Hydrogen fluoride 24 hour 7.9% 0.45% Hydrogen fluoride 7 day 6.5% 0.28% Hydrogen fluoride 90 day 19% 0.90% Benzene 3 minute 0.45% 0.15% PCBs 3 minute 14% 4.8% PAHs (as BaP) 3 minute 3.3% 1.1% OCPs 3 minute 36% 12% Dioxins/furans 3 minute 0.97% 0.32% Mercury 3 minute 36% 12% Separation Distances The distances between the proposed SITA soil processing facility and the nearest residential properties are as follows: South-south-east 590 m; South-west 870 m; and West 720 m. The environmental impact assessment prepared for this works approval application demonstrates that these distances are appropriate for the amelioration of possible community amenity and health impacts. Non-Routine Operations Non-routine operations are events where normal process conditions are suspended due to an unforeseen problem or incident. In the context of the proposed Soil Processing Facility, non routine operations fall into four categories; utility failure, equipment failure, process triggered shutdown and chemical/water/soil spill. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The proposed development contains equipment with sufficient safety and environment protection features, implemented with well designed infrastructure including bunding, chemical designated areas, storage buildings and designated transport routes. These physical elements will be coupled with management strategies that enable non-routine operating conditions to be handled appropriately to minimise any potential environmental impact. The relevant management strategies for non-routine operations are: Comprehensive operator training; Induction programme, which includes environmental aspects; Provision of adequate system documentation, including creation of Standard Operating Procedures and operator checklists; Plant and equipment maintenance programme; Audit programme; and Documentation of non-conformances and follow up. An overview of non-routine operations is presented in the following table. Event Likelihood1 Potential Environmental Impact Outcome Risk Management Utility failure: electricity Low Emissions to air Shut down of all systems Emergency backup generator on site at all times Manual opening of baghouse dilution valve and ID fan damper Preventative maintenance programme Qualified electricians used to install and commission equipment Utility failure: natural gas Low Emissions to air Staged shut down of all systems Preventative maintenance programme Conduct of full commissioning programme prior to soil processing Installation in accordance with Australian Standards by qualified electricians and gas fitters. Utility failure: water Low Emissions to air Pollution of land Cessation of soil feed Preventative maintenance programme Opening of baghouse dilution valve Baghouse dilution valve Cessation of soil conditioning system, potential for conveyor damage and soil spill. Preventative maintenance programme Process interlocks Bunding of soil processing area Emergency Procedures Guide, Action Plan: Spills. Equipment failure: ID fan Very low Emissions to air Loss of negative pressure Preventative maintenance programme Dryer inlet hatch Process interlocks August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Event Likelihood1 Potential Environmental Impact Outcome Risk Management Equipment failure: dryer shutdown Very low Pollution of land Dryer shutdown Preventative maintenance programme Thermocouple calibration programme Management of soil feed (calorific value) Process interlocks Equipment failure: thermal oxidiser Low Equipment failure: evaporative cooler Low Equipment failure: baghouse Low Equipment failure: wet chemical scrubber Low Process triggered shut down Low Emissions to air Thermal oxidiser shut down Preventative maintenance programme Process interlocks Commissioning of fuel train in accordance with standard operating procedure Emissions to air Emissions to air Emissions to air Shut down of all systems Preventative maintenance programme Opening of baghouse dilution valve Adequate water supply on site Shut down of all systems Preventative maintenance programme Opening of baghouse dilution valve Baghouse leak detection programme Shut down of all systems Preventative maintenance programme Process interlocks Process interlocks CEMS Emissions to air Shut down of all systems Manual opening of baghouse dilution valve Commissioning of each equipment item in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications Preventative maintenance programme Operator training Soil spill Low Pollution of land and surface waters Immediate clean up Soil spilt within the processing facility will be contained within the bunded area, All soil spills will be managed in accordance with SITA’s existing Emergency Procedures Guide, Action Plan: Spills. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Event Likelihood1 Potential Environmental Impact Outcome Risk Management Chemical spill Low Pollution of surface waters Immediate clean up Chemicals used in the soil processing facility will be stored in a distinct area equipped with bunding installed in accordance with EPA Publication, No. 347, Bunding Guidelines. The storage area will be equipped with appropriate spill kits, including absorbent materials and neutralizing agents. Site personnel will be trained in the appropriate use of spill kits and disposal of materials. Stormwater overflow Low Pollution of surface waters Overflow to Duck Pond The soil processing facility will be bunded in accordance with EPA Publication No. 347, Bunding Guidelines. The operational area will include provision for drainage and collection of stormwater in the holding pond. Where a severe rain event causes overflow from the processing facility, stormwater may flow to the surrounding landfill and be collected in the Duck Pond. Notes 1 Likelihood Scale: Very low, low, moderate, high, very high August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table of Contents 1.0 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Company Details ........................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Contact Details .............................................................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Premises Details ........................................................................................................................................... 8 PROPOSAL ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 3.0 4.0 5.0 Project Description ........................................................................................................................................ 8 2.1.1 Background Information .......................................................................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Site Location.......................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.3 Proposed Works .................................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Cost of Works and Application Fee ............................................................................................................. 18 2.3 Proposed Dates .......................................................................................................................................... 18 APPROVALS ........................................................................................................................................................... 18 3.1 Need for Works Approval ............................................................................................................................ 18 3.2 Planning and Other Approvals .................................................................................................................... 19 3.3 Other Approvals .......................................................................................................................................... 19 3.4 Existing EPA Approvals .............................................................................................................................. 20 ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY ....................................................................................................................... 20 4.1 Track Record............................................................................................................................................... 20 4.2 Key Environmental Considerations ............................................................................................................. 22 4.3 Community Engagement............................................................................................................................. 22 PROCESS AND BEST PRACTICE ......................................................................................................................... 23 5.1 Process and Technology............................................................................................................................. 23 5.1.1 DFTD ..................................................................................................................................................... 23 5.1.2 Soil Stabilisation .................................................................................................................................... 26 5.2 Environmental Best Practice ....................................................................................................................... 26 5.2.1 Fugitive Dust and VOC Emissions ....................................................................................................... 26 5.2.2 DFTD Process ....................................................................................................................................... 27 5.2.3 Soil Stabilisation .................................................................................................................................... 37 5.2.4 Building Ventilation System Exhausts ................................................................................................... 37 5.3 Integrated Environmental Assessment........................................................................................................ 39 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 i APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5.4 5.4.1 DFTD Process Design Case ................................................................................................................. 41 5.4.2 Air Pollution Control Equipment ............................................................................................................. 44 5.5 6.0 7.0 Choice of Locations and Layout .................................................................................................................. 45 RESOURCES ........................................................................................................................................................... 45 6.1 Carbon ........................................................................................................................................................ 46 6.2 Water Use ................................................................................................................................................... 51 6.3 Solid Waste ................................................................................................................................................. 53 6.4 Prescribed Industrial Waste ........................................................................................................................ 53 EMISSION IMPACTS ............................................................................................................................................... 54 7.1 Air Emissions .............................................................................................................................................. 54 7.1.1 Existing Air Emissions ........................................................................................................................... 54 7.1.2 Proposed Air Emissions ........................................................................................................................ 58 7.1.3 Impact on Air Quality ............................................................................................................................. 64 7.2 8.0 Choice of Process and Technology............................................................................................................. 39 Discharges to Surface Water ...................................................................................................................... 94 7.2.1 Leachate Management .......................................................................................................................... 94 7.2.2 Stormwater Management ...................................................................................................................... 95 7.3 Discharges to Land and Groundwater......................................................................................................... 98 7.4 Noise Emissions.......................................................................................................................................... 98 7.4.1 Legislative Requirements ...................................................................................................................... 98 7.4.2 Noise Limits ........................................................................................................................................... 99 7.4.3 Measured Noise Levels ....................................................................................................................... 100 7.4.4 Compliance Assessment ..................................................................................................................... 100 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ..................................................................................................................... 101 8.1 Non-Routine Operations ........................................................................................................................... 102 8.1.1 Utility Failure ........................................................................................................................................ 103 8.1.2 Equipment Failure ............................................................................................................................... 104 8.1.3 Process Triggered Shutdown .............................................................................................................. 106 8.1.4 Spills .................................................................................................................................................... 106 8.1.5 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 106 8.2 Separation Distances ................................................................................................................................ 109 8.3 Management System ................................................................................................................................ 111 8.4 Construction .............................................................................................................................................. 111 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 ii APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 8.5 9.0 Environmental Monitoring ......................................................................................................................... 114 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................................... 120 10.0 ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 122 TABLES Table 1: Volume of Contaminated Soil Received at the Landfill .......................................................................................... 8 Table 2: Contaminated Soil Receipt: Maximum Concentrations - DFTD Process ............................................................. 13 Table 3: Hazard Characteristics: Definitions ...................................................................................................................... 14 Table 4: Processing Options Decision Matrix .................................................................................................................... 15 Table 5: Taylors Road Landfill: SITA Complaint Log 2004 - 2009 ..................................................................................... 21 Table 6: Taylors Road Landfill: EPA Complaint History 2004 - 2009................................................................................. 22 Table 7: DFTD Equipment Specifications .......................................................................................................................... 24 Table 8: Baghouse Specifications ..................................................................................................................................... 24 Table 9: Wet Chemical Scrubber Specifications ................................................................................................................ 25 Table 10: Activated Carbon Bed Specifications ................................................................................................................. 25 Table 11: Soil Recycler Specifications ............................................................................................................................... 26 Table 12: Thermal Treatment Operating Criteria ............................................................................................................... 29 Table 13: Acid Gas Removal Efficiencies .......................................................................................................................... 31 Table 14: Process Controls ............................................................................................................................................... 33 Table 15: Ventilation System Design Basis ....................................................................................................................... 38 Table 16: Exemption Limits Comparison ........................................................................................................................... 39 Table 17: DFTD Process Design Case Calculations ......................................................................................................... 43 Table 18: Acid Gas Removal Efficiencies .......................................................................................................................... 45 Table 19: Greenhouse Gases Global Warming Potentials ................................................................................................ 46 Table 20: Existing Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................................................. 47 Table 21: Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Front End Loader ............................................................................... 48 Table 22: Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emissions – DFTD – Natural Gas Usage .............................................................. 49 Table 23: Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emissions - DFTD - Electricity Usage ................................................................... 49 Table 24: Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Soil Stabilisation................................................................................ 49 Table 25: VOCs Design Criteria ........................................................................................................................................ 62 Table 26: DFTD Emission Rates ....................................................................................................................................... 64 Table 27: Model Input Data: Point Source Characteristics ................................................................................................ 67 Table 28: Model Input Data: Background Concentrations ................................................................................................. 68 Table 29: Model Input Data: Discrete Receptors ............................................................................................................... 69 Table 30: Modelling Assessment Summary....................................................................................................................... 71 Table 31: Organochlorine Pesticides List .......................................................................................................................... 73 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 iii APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 32: Air Quality Impact Assessment Results ............................................................................................................. 75 Table 33: Model Output – GLC Percentage....................................................................................................................... 93 Table 34: Schedule E Compliance: Emission Limits for New Stationary Sources in Air Quality Control Regions ............. 94 Table 35: Stormwater Monitoring Results .......................................................................................................................... 96 Table 36: Duck Pond: Water Quality Parameters .............................................................................................................. 97 Table 37: Noise Limits ..................................................................................................................................................... 100 Table 38: Sound Pressure Levels DFTD and Soil Stabilisation Equipment ..................................................................... 100 Table 39: Predicted Sound Pressure Levels.................................................................................................................... 101 Table 40: Non-Routine Operations: Environmental Impacts and Controls ...................................................................... 107 Table 41: Environmental Monitoring: Stormwater Quality Criteria ................................................................................... 115 Table 42: Environmental Monitoring: Activated Carbon Bed Exhaust - POP Tests ......................................................... 116 Table 43: Soil, Baghouse Dust and Scrubbing Liquor Sampling Programme - POP Tests ............................................. 117 Table 44: EPA Victoria IWRG 621 Table 2 Screen.......................................................................................................... 119 FIGURES Figure 1: Site Locality ........................................................................................................................... Refer figures section Figure 5: Site Layout ............................................................................................................................ Refer figures section Figure 6: DFTD P&ID ........................................................................................................................... Refer figures section Figure 7: Wet Chemical Scrubber Equipment Configuration ................................................................ Refer figures section Figure 2: Waste Management Hierarchy ............................................................................................................................. 9 Figure 3: Overview of Soil Processing Activities ................................................................................................................ 12 Figure 4: Soil Receipt Flow Diagram ................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 8: Combustion Temperature/Residence Time Relationship ................................................................................... 29 Figure 9: Existing Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................................. 47 Figure 10: Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary ............................................................................................ 50 Figure 11: Eumemmering Creek Discharge Volumes 2007 - 2009.................................................................................... 52 Figure 12: Directional Dust Monitoring Results 2004 - 2009.............................................................................................. 55 Figure 13: Directional Dust Gauge Locations and Results Overlay ................................................................................... 56 Figure 14: PM10 Sampling Locations ................................................................................................................................. 57 Figure 15: PM10 Monitoring Programme Results January - April 2003 .............................................................................. 57 Figure 16: Odour Monitoring Results January 2004 – January 2009................................................................................. 58 Figure 17: Dandenong 2002 EPA Meteorological File: Wind Rose ................................................................................... 66 Figure 18: Taylors Road Landfill Meteorological Data - 2005 ............................................................................................ 66 Figure 19: Model Input Data: Terrain Map ......................................................................................................................... 69 Figure 20: Model Input Data: Gridded and Discrete Receptors ......................................................................................... 70 Figure 21: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for TSP .......................................................................................... 76 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 iv APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Figure 22: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for PM10 ......................................................................................... 77 Figure 23: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for PM2.5 ........................................................................................ 78 Figure 24: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Carbon Monoxide ..................................................................... 79 Figure 25: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Nitrogen Dioxide....................................................................... 80 Figure 26: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Sulphur Dioxide ........................................................................ 81 Figure 27: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Sulphur Trioxide (as H2SO4) .................................................... 82 Figure 28: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Hydrogen Chloride ................................................................... 83 Figure 29: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Hydrogen Fluoride – 24 Hour Averaging Period ...................... 84 Figure 30: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Hydrogen Fluoride - 7 Day Averaging Period ........................... 85 Figure 31: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Hydrogen Fluoride - 90 Day Averaging Period ......................... 86 Figure 32: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Benzene ................................................................................... 87 Figure 33: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for PCBs ........................................................................................ 88 Figure 34: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for OCPs ....................................................................................... 89 Figure 35: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Dioxins/Furans ......................................................................... 90 Figure 36: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Mercury .................................................................................... 91 Figure 37: Taylors Road Landfill: Leachate Sump Locations............................................................................................. 96 APPENDICES APPENDIX A Limitations APPENDIX B SITA Australia Certificate of Incorporation APPENDIX C Waste Discharge Licence ES511 APPENDIX D CESC Terms of Reference APPENDIX E Community Engagement Plan APPENDIX F Performance Guarantee APPENDIX G COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE Emission Testing and Soil Analysis Report Mobile Treatment Solutions, Kurnell Site February 2009 APPENDIX H Model Output Files APPENDIX I COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE Hazards and Operability Study August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 v APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 vi APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared at the request of SITA Australia Pty Ltd. {trading as SITA Environmental Solutions (SITA)}. SITA propose to develop a soil processing facility at the Taylors Road Landfill. The proposed development will be an ancillary activity to existing landfill operations, such that soil processing required prior to the disposal or reuse of prescribed industrial waste can be undertaken at the disposal facility. The proposed development will consist of two stages: Stage One encompasses soil stabilisation and direct fired thermal desorption (DFTD) processing technologies whilst Stage Two will include soil treatment by bioremediation. This report forms the Application for Works Approval for the construction and commissioning of Stage One of the soil processing facility at the Taylors Road Landfill. The report outlines the proposal and assesses the development against the requirements of the Environment Protection Act, 1970, the relevant State Environment Protection Policies and associated regulations. Your attention is drawn to the document - “Limitations”, which is included in Appendix A of this report. The statements presented in this document are intended to advise you of what your realistic expectations of this letter should be. The document is not intended to reduce the level of responsibility accepted by Golder, but rather to ensure that all parties who may rely on this report are aware of the responsibilities each assumes in so doing. 1.1 Company Details The Works Approval applicant is SITA Environmental Solutions: Registered Address: Level 3, 3 Rider Boulevard Rhodes, NSW, 2138 ACN: 002902650 SITA’s Certificate of Incorporation is presented in Appendix B. SITA is one of Australia's leading recycling and waste management companies providing clients with integrated 'cradle to grave' environmental and sustainable waste management solutions. SITA is committed to the reduction of waste streams currently going to landfill and is experienced in the processing options proposed to treat and recover contaminated soil. The company recognises that determining the best way to minimise waste and maximise the potential value of residual products requires specialist skills, dedicated resources and facilities, and leading edge systems. More information on SITA’s experience and capabilities can be found at www.sita.com.au. 1.2 Contact Details Works Approval contact details are as follows: SITA Environmental Solutions: Daniel Fyfe State General Manager Tel: 03 8795 2001 Email: [email protected] Golder Associates: Frank Fleer Principal Tel: 03 8862 3500 Email: [email protected] August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 7 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 1.3 Premises Details The Taylors Road facility is located at 890 Taylors Road, Dandenong South, Victoria 3175, within the municipality of the City of Greater Dandenong. The site began landfill operations in October 1990. At present, there are twenty four landfill cells (including closed cells) at the site, currently accepting an average of approximately 163,000 tonnes of waste per year (2008). Three cells have received 100% prescribed industrial waste, whilst the remaining cells received either 100% general waste or a combination of general waste and prescribed industrial waste in varying proportions. Total prescribed industrial waste received at the site in 2008 was approximately 87,000 tonnes. SITA currently accepts approximately 17,000 to 18,000 tonnes Category B and 980 to 3,900 tonnes Category C soils per annum (based on 2007 / 2008 data). The site is roughly rectangular in shape with a total area of approximately 56.34 hectares (ha), much of which is occupied by the Taylors Road Landfill. The site occupies a former sand quarry. The site weighbridge, car parking, offices, laboratories and vehicle wheel wash facilities are located in the northern portion of the site. Clay, sand and concrete stockpiles are located towards the centre of the landfill and soil or dry slimes are stockpiled in the south-western portion. A leachate treatment plant is located in the south-eastern portion of the site, with a landfill gas management compound adjacent to the south and west of the leachate treatment area. The Taylors Road Landfill currently operates a commercial gas extraction system at the site whereby landfill gas is extracted from the site and pumped to a 4 Megawatt power generation plant at Berwick (former Narre Warren landfill). An aerial photograph of the Taylors Road facility is provided in Figure 1 (refer Figures section). 2.0 2.1 PROPOSAL Project Description SITA propose to install and operate a soil processing facility equipped with soil stabilisation and DFTD equipment for processing of Categories A, B and C contaminated soils. The proposal details, including background information, location description and proposed works are presented in the following sections. 2.1.1 Background Information Since start up the landfill has received contaminated soils, which have been placed in the appropriate landfill cells as ‘high level’ contaminated soil or ‘low level’ contaminated soil under the provision of existing EPA Waste Discharge Licence No. ES511 and two planning permits. Table 1 summarises the volume of contaminated soils received at the site since 2002. Table 1: Volume of Contaminated Soil Received at the Landfill Year High Level Contaminated Soil (tonnes) Low Level Contaminated Soil (tonnes) Total Contaminated Soil Received (tonnes) 2002 11,274 4,221 15,495 2003 18,570 81 18,651 2004 – 2005 23,413 142 23,555 2005 – 2006 73,425 2,611 76,036 2006 – 2007 48,971 2,334 51,305 2007 – 2008 17,7181 3,9072 21,625 2008 – 2009 1 18,041 979 Notes 1: Classified as Category B. 2: Classified as Category C. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 8 2 19,020 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The change in waste classification in July 2007 and the subsequent changes to the Prescribed Industrial Waste Regulations in July 2009 introduced new definitions and classifications leading to the need to introduce processing facilities at the site. In accordance with current Victorian regulations and guidelines contaminated soil that exceeds the “Fill Material” (more commonly known as “Clean Fill”) criteria will be classified as Categories A, B or C waste in accordance with allowable concentrations for these categories of "Prescribed Waste (Contaminated Soil)" defined by EPA’s Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines 621 (IWRG621) 2009. Current regulations preclude Category A waste from being disposed to landfill without prior treatment. Categories B and C contaminated soil can be disposed at a facility licenced to specifically accept this waste. The Taylors Road Landfill is the only landfill in Victoria that accepts Category B contaminated soil. Category C contaminated soil can be disposed at a number of sites throughout Victoria as well as at Taylors Road Landfill. The proposed development would provide a dedicated, centralised soil processing facility. In addition to the current volumes of Categories B and C soils received at the site, SITA wishes to provide facilities capable of processing up to 20,000 tonnes/year of Category A soils. Following processing, the soils would either be disposed as Categories B or C soils or Fill Material. Soil classified as Fill Material could be used as daily landfill cover or final capping material, and could potentially be reused at an off-site location. The approach adopted for the facility takes into account the principles of the waste management hierarchy as presented by EPA in Figure 2: Most Preferable Least Preferable Figure 2: Waste Management Hierarchy In accordance with the waste hierarchy, the proposed development would offer the following: A soil processing facility that would contribute to Victoria’s strategic waste minimisation goals; Improved logistics and security for contaminated soil, through processing at the location where it will ultimately be disposed; Storage capacity for soils awaiting processing prior to disposal (i.e. stockpiled contaminated soils would be removed from the community at large); and A practical and sustainable use for closed portions of the landfill. Added management and control through transportation of contaminated soil to a central location (versus multiple sites throughout Victoria); August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 9 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 2.1.2 Site Location The proposed development and operation of the soil processing facility will comprise an ancillary activity within the currently permitted and active landfill boundary and will provide processing capacity for contaminated soils imported to the site. The facility will be located in the north eastern corner of the site in the area currently occupied by Cells 12A and 12B. The proposed development will occupy an area of approximately 3 ha, bordered by Cells 12C and 14 to the west and Cell 11 to the south. The location of the soil processing facility is designed to minimise potential noise and visual impacts associated with the development. The site topography would provide natural screening of the plant and the location of the facility maximises the distance to the nearest residential properties. More specifically, the factors promoting the suitability of Cells 12A and 12B for the proposed soil processing facility are discussed below. Surrounding Land Uses The location is the furthest portion of landfill from residential use. Currently the nearest sensitive land uses to the site (irrespective of the Local Planning Scheme zoning) are the residential properties located approximately 200 m west of the landfill along Taylors Road and Colemans Road, and 250 m south-east of the landfill along Bayliss Road. Landfill Gas As methane gas is produced through decomposition of organic wastes under anaerobic conditions, it is considered unlikely that the landfill cells containing 100% prescribed industrial wastes, such as Cells 12A and 12B will generate methane gas. Settlement and Final Surface Profile Landfills are subject to long-term settlement as waste decomposes and consolidates. This settlement has significant impacts on the final surface profile, the landfill cap and subsequent uses for the site. The degree of settlement in a landfill site varies considerably depending on different factors such as waste composition, level of compaction of the waste during placement and thickness of the waste mass, amongst others. The soil processing facility will be located within the area of Cells 12A and 12B. These cells have received non-putrescible waste. It is considered that due to the nature of the waste, the settlement will be significantly lower than landfill cells receiving predominantly putrescible waste, as changes in volume due to degradation of the waste are expected to be minimal. It is also expected that Cells 12A and 12B will have a low settlement given that compaction levels applied during placement of the waste were maximized, in order to optimize the waste volume in the cell, due to the high cost of the airspace. Settlement is anticipated to be small and would be considered in the design of the building foundations. Settlement and Building Design Similar to the above, as the waste has been placed in layers and intensely compacted, it is expected that limited differential settlement may occur. The buildings will be designed as flexible structures to accommodate the expected limited differential settlement of the waste in Cells 12A and 12B. Cell Lining Design Both Cells 12A and 12B have double composite liners (compacted clay plus high density polyethylene layer plus a second high density polyethylene layer and geotextile overlay with a geosynthetic clay layer in between) providing a significant barrier between the landfill and the surrounding soil and groundwater. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 10 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Leachate Collection System The separation difference between the leachate collection system of Cells 12A and 12B and the foundations of the soil processing facility is in excess of 15 m. The weight of the structure is considered negligible compared to the existing weight of the waste mass over the leachate collection system. Therefore, it is expected that the waste treatment facility buildings and works will have no significant impact on the short or long term performance of the leachate collection systems of Cell 12A and 12B. Infrastructure The proposed location can easily link to existing infrastructure within the site, i.e. access to the leachate treatment plant to the south, site offices and laboratory, weighbridge and existing haul roads. Landfill Cap Cells 12 A and 12 B will be capped once filled. The cap design comprises: Compacted clay; Linear low density polyethylene layer; and A cushion geotextile with a 500 mm select fill overlay. The soil processing facility will be designed to maintain the integrity of the landfill cap and avoid damage to its protective properties. 2.1.3 Proposed Works The following section provides an overview of the soil processing activities from off-site source location through disposition, as shown in Figure 3. Off-site Source Location The volumes of soil for processing will be driven by land development, remediation of contaminated land in the marketplace, requirements to treat Category A soils prior to disposal and economic incentives to reduce landfill levies on disposal of Categories B and C soils. It is envisaged that off-site sources of soil would be identified where: It is not feasible or practical to undertake on-site processing of soils due to available space and/or operational and time constraints; An economic benefit for the site owner/operator would be realised by reduction in contaminant loading of soils from Category A to Category B (required), Category B to Category C or Fill Material (depending on contaminant concentrations and processing required), or Category C to Fill Material prior to disposal or re-use; and The contaminant type and loading are suitable for treatment by stabilisation or DFTD techniques. The contaminated land industry is largely driven by land development cycles such that volumes of soil waste in the marketplace vary from year to year depending on development site availability and the economy. Contaminated soil will only be brought to site if it is adequately characterised in accordance with the Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines (IWRG) and feasibility of treatment has been demonstrated. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 11 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Soil Source Identified Characterisation of soil: Soil type and volume Range of waste Soil classification (Category A, B or C) Feasibility of soil processing Pre-Processing and Transport Soil Processing Receipt and Storage Thermal Desorption Stabilisation Category A, B, C Category A, B, C Cat B TRL Cat C TRL Fill TRL cover or Cat B Cat C TRL TRL off-site use Figure 3: Overview of Soil Processing Activities Transport Soil will be delivered to the Taylors Road Landfill from Taylors Road via Abbotts Road which is an unclassified road that runs adjacent to the northern boundary of the landfill. The soil processing area will be accessed using internal haul roads. The main haul road is surfaced from the site entrance to the wheel wash which is located adjacent to the northern landfill boundary. From the wheel wash the haul road is unsurfaced. A new haul road may be constructed from the current haul route in an easterly direction for approximately 150 m to the proposed development area. All soil transported to the site must be accompanied by a Waste Transport Certificate and transported in a vehicle that holds a current EPA Permit for Prescribed Industrial Waste Transport. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 12 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Receipt Wastes to be accepted to the soil processing facility will be limited to Categories A, B and C contaminated soils. The facility is not equipped to process prescribed solid waste (other than soil), liquids or slurries. Moreover, the facility will be limited to accepting soil which can be effectively treated by either DFTD or soil stabilisation and then only following characterisation and demonstration of treatment feasibility. The maximum contaminant concentrations for soil accepted by the facility for DFTD treatment are detailed in Table 2. Section 7.1.2 outlines the efficiency of the proposed equipment for the listed maximum soil contaminant concentrations. Table 2: Contaminated Soil Receipt: Maximum Concentrations - DFTD Process Contaminant Concentration Semi-volatile organics: Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) 5,000 mg/kg Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 10,000 mg/kg Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP)1 1,000 mg/kg Volatile Organic Compounds: Benzene2 1,000 mg/kg Total petroleum hydrocarbons 40,000 ppm Metals: Mercury 15 mg/kg Notes 1. Representing worst case for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated soil. 2. Representing worst case for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) contaminated soil. In addition to excluding soils containing contaminants exceeding the concentrations listed in Table 2, contaminated soils will be also be rejected if they are classified as Category A Prescribed Industrial Waste due to their displaying one or more of the hazard characteristics shown in Table 3. Hazard characteristics are defined in the Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines (IWRG). Receipt of soils deemed suitable for processing will be conducted in accordance with a modified version of the existing MAN009 Waste Acceptance Manual, Taylors Road. This manual outlines both the criteria and procedures for acceptance of waste streams. The first step of the process occurs prior to transport, with the waste generator required to establish a documented relationship with SITA. In summary this requires: Completion, review and approval of the Disposal Service Agreement; Client demonstration of the feasibility of treatment to the satisfaction of SITA; Completion, review and approval of the Nominated Vehicle Form; Completion, review and approval of the Waste Acceptance Form; Client classification of the contaminated soil by a NATA accredited laboratory, tested in accordance with the Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines (IWRG); Provision of a representative reference sample to SITA; and Issue of the Waste Approval Form. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 13 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 3: Hazard Characteristics: Definitions Explosive wastes An explosive waste is a solid waste (or mixture of wastes) which is in itself capable, by chemical reaction, of producing gas at such a temperature, pressure and speed, as to cause damage to the surroundings. Note: These are wastes classified as ‘Class 1’ under the provisions of the Road Transport (Dangerous Goods) Act 1995 and/or classified as ‘goods too dangerous to be transported’ under the Australian Dangerous Goods Code. Flammable solid wastes Waste solids, other than those classified as explosives, which, under conditions encountered in transport or containment, are readily combustible, or may cause or contribute to fire through friction. Note: These are wastes classified as ‘Class 4.1’ under the provisions of the Road Transport (Dangerous Goods) Act 1995. Wastes liable to spontaneous combustion Wastes which are liable to spontaneous heating under normal conditions encountered in transport, or to heating up in contact with air, and liable to catch fire. Note: These are wastes classified as ‘Class 4.2’ under the provisions of the Road Transport (Dangerous Goods) Act 1995. Wastes which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Wastes which, by interaction with water, are liable to become spontaneously flammable or to give off flammable gases in dangerous quantities. Oxidizing wastes Wastes which, while in themselves are not necessarily combustible, may, generally by yielding oxygen, cause or contribute to the combustion of other materials. Note: These are wastes classified as ‘Class 4.3’ under the provisions of the Road Transport (Dangerous Goods) Act 1995. Note: These are wastes classified as ‘Class 5.1’ under the provisions of the Road Transport (Dangerous Goods) Act 1995. Organic peroxide wastes Organic wastes which contain the bivalent-O-O-structure and which are thermally unstable and may undergo exothermic self-accelerating decomposition. Note: These are wastes classified as ‘Class 5.2’ under the provisions of the Road Transport (Dangerous Goods) Act 1995. Infectious wastes Wastes containing viable microorganisms or their toxins which are known or suspected to cause disease in animals or humans. Note: These include clinical and related wastes as prescribed in the Environment Protection (Prescribed Waste) Regulations 1998 and is waste classified as ‘Class 6.2’ under the provisions of the Road Transport (Dangerous Goods) Act 1995. Corrosive wastes Wastes which, by chemical action, will cause severe damage when in contact with living tissue, or in the case of leakage, will materially damage, or even destroy, other goods or the means of transport or containment. They may also cause other hazards. Where corrosivity testing data is not available, pH may be used to determine if the material is Category A. • pH value of 2 or less • pH value of 12.5 or more Note: This includes wastes classified as ‘Class 8’ under the provisions of the Road Transport (Dangerous Goods) Act 1995. Wastes that liberate toxic gases in contact with air or water Wastes which, by liberation with air or water, are liable to give off toxic gases in dangerous quantities. Note: These are wastes liable to give off toxic gases that are classified as ‘Class 2.3’ under the provisions of the Road Transport (Dangerous Goods) Act 1995. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 14 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The second step of the receipt process occurs when the load is transported to site. The weighbridge operator is responsible for ensuring the load is accompanied by a correctly completed Environment Protection Authority (EPA) transport certificate and the Waste Approval Form. A sample of waste is then collected from the load and supplied to the weighbridge operator for testing, which includes pH, flashpoint and visual appearance. The load is then accepted or rejected based on the outcome of the tests. Storage Once accepted to site, loads will be segregated and stored in the soil processing facility. Loads that have been designated by the waste producer as Category A or loads that are highly odorous will be unloaded and stockpiled within the processing building. Loads classified as Categories B or C will be segregated within the Nissen Hut. SITA may conduct laboratory tests to confirm the soil category and the level and type of contamination. The SITA waste stream monitoring procedure for verification sampling is presented in Section 8.5 “Environmental Monitoring”. The volume of contaminated soil stockpiled for processing will not exceed 10,000 tonnes of soil at any given time, with a maximum storage time of six months. The total volume of soil to be processed annually is approximately 60,000 tonnes; however, this is entirely dependent on the marketplace. No limit on throughput is proposed. A summary of soil acceptance and storage procedures is presented as a flow diagram in Figure 4. Soil Processing Processing of waste will be by direct fired thermal desorption (DFTD) and/or soil stabilisation. The input to each technology will be limited to soil containing contaminants that can be appropriately treated by each process. A matrix of input material suitable for each processing option is presented in Table 4. Table 4: Processing Options Decision Matrix Contaminant Soil Stabilisation DFTD Heavy metals Volatile organic compounds (VOC) Semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOC) Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) Contaminated soils containing both heavy metals and any of the other classes of contaminant listed in Table 4, are not precluded from treatment, instead the soil may first be treated by DFTD followed by soil stabilisation. The DFTD principle of operation is to heat and dry contaminated soil causing contaminants to move from the liquid or solid phase to the gaseous phase. Vaporised contaminants are then managed by an exhaust gas treatment system. This process involves soil delivery to a feed hopper, transport to the rotary dryer via a screw feeder and then discharge of processed soil to a pugmill for cooling and moisture addition. Exhaust gas treatment involves particulate matter removal via a cyclone, VOC and SVOC removal via thermal oxidiser, water quenching for temperature reduction followed by a baghouse for removal of fine particulate matter and acid gas removal by wet chemical scrubbing. The final component of the gas clean up stage is an activated carbon bed for removal of residual VOC/SVOC and mercury. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 15 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL IWRG: Soil Hazard Categorisation and Management IWRG: Soil Sampling IWRG: Sampling and Analysis of Waters, Wastewaters, Soils and Wastes Soil classification, characterisation and demonstration of treatment feasibility Complete Disposal Service Agreement Complete Nominated Vehicle Form Complete Waste Approval Form Compliance Personnel Review and Approve Send Reference Sample IWRG: Permit to Transport Prescribed Industrial Waste IWRG: Waste Transport Certificates Transport with completed EPA Approved Transport Certificate in an EPA Permitted Vehicle Receipt MAN009: Waste Acceptance Manual Taylors Road Load sample compared with reference sample Paperwork review Accept or reject load Processing Building Nissen Hut Segregated storage Segregated storage Category A & odorous Categories B and C IWRG: Soil Hazard Categorisation and Management IWRG: Soil Sampling IWRG: Sampling and Analysis of Verification sampling (as required) Compliance Personnel Review and Approve Waters, Wastewaters, Soils and Wastes DFTD Processing Soil Stabilisation Processing Conducted by SITA Conducted by the Client Figure 4: Soil Receipt Flow Diagram August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 16 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The soil stabilisation process limits the solubility or mobility of contaminants, even though the physical characteristics of the soil may not be changed or improved. The process involves mixing of contaminated soil with appropriate liquid or solid additives in a track mounted soil recycler. The soil recycler consists of a screen, hoppers for untreated soil and solid additives, a two shaft paddle mixer and a discharge belt conveyor. Additive feed rates are regulated by a screw feeder or dosing pump for solid and liquid additives respectively. The soil stabilisation process renders the hazardous components in their least mobile, soluble or toxic form. Processed Soil Processed soil will be stockpiled in batches and segregated from untreated soil. Category A processed soil will be batch stockpiled inside the Processing Building, whilst Category B and C processed soil will be batch stockpiled within the Nissen Hut. Following segregation, samples will be collected from each stockpile and tested to determine the success of the treatment. Once the testing is completed and soils are reclassified as either Category B, C or fill material, SITA may mix soil batches of the same Category and move stockpiles of Category C and fill material to outside storage areas within the Processing Facility. Tested soil that is not deemed to be appropriately processed will be stockpiled with unprocessed soil for further treatment. No Category A soil will be accepted to the site unless there is a high level of confidence, based on the feasibility assessment, that the treatment will be successful in removing contamination or reducing the hazard classification. The final destination of processed soils will depend on the level of treatment undertaken and the residual contaminant levels. Hours of Operation The soil processing facility will accept soil deliveries only during the standard operating hours outlined in planning permit 920213. These are: Monday to Friday: 6.00 am to 6.00 pm Saturday: 6.00 am to 3.00 pm Sunday: 9.00 am to 4.00 pm It is anticipated that the soil processing equipment would operate for up to 24 hours per day 7 days per week. Infrastructure To achieve the desired outcomes, the soil processing facility will consist of the following infrastructure. STAGE ONE: A hardstand area of approximately 162 m x 130 m, equipped with bund walls sized in accordance with EPA Victoria Publication 347, Bunding Guidelines; A pre-processing area enclosed within a shed. This area will be used for minimal processing, including breaking of large rocks using a grinder attachment on a front end loader. The facility will not be equipped with a stand alone screen, crusher or grinder. The shed will be constructed on a concrete pad approximately 35 m x 25 m; A processing building enclosing the feed hoppers for the DFTD and soil stabilisation equipment. The processing building will also be sufficiently sized to enable storage of all Category A and odorous soils prior to processing. The processing building will be constructed on a concrete pad approximately 60 m x 40 m and the building will be approximately 10 m tall. The building will be equipped with a ventilation system that will create a negative pressure within the building to reduce fugitive dust and VOC emissions. The building will be equipped with a fabric filter extraction system for removal of particulate matter and an activated carbon bed system for control of fugitive VOC emissions. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 17 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL DFTD equipment (further detailed in Section 5.1.1) This equipment will be positioned such that the feed hopper and conveyor belt for contaminated soil is located within the processing building and the remainder is located outside the building via an opening; Soil stabilisation equipment (further detailed in Section 5.1.2) This equipment will be positioned such that the feed hopper and processing portion of the equipment is within the processing building and the processed soil discharge conveyor belt is located outside the building; Nissen shed for Categories B and C soils; In order to facilitate construction of the soil processing facility, a minimum of 1.0 m compacted engineered fill will be placed over the existing cap. Processed soil storage pads; Stormwater management infrastructure; Dangerous goods area for storage of bulk chemicals. This area will be bunded in accordance with EPA Victoria Publication 347, Bunding Guidelines; STAGE TWO: Additional Category A and odorous soils storage; Additional thermal desorption processed soil storage pad; and Areas for processing of soils using bioremediation. Development of Stage Two could be undertaken once sufficient filling of Cell 12 C has been completed. The Stage Two development is, however, not the subject of this application for Works Approval and is consequently not discussed further. The layout for Stage One of the proposed soil processing facility is presented in Figure 5 (refer Figures section). 2.2 Cost of Works and Application Fee The cost of constructing the proposed soil processing facility at Taylors Road, Dandenong South is in the range $1 million to $5 million. The corresponding works approval application fee is eight thousand six hundred and sixteen dollars ($8,616.00). 2.3 Proposed Dates Construction of the SITA soil processing facility is scheduled to commence after October 2010. 3.0 3.1 APPROVALS Need for Works Approval The Environment Protection (Scheduled Premises and Exemptions) Regulations 2007 describe premises which are scheduled, and are consequently required to comply with the licencing and works approval provisions of the Environment Protection Act, 1970. Scheduled premise type A01 refers to the storage, treatment, reprocessing, containment or disposal facilities handling any prescribed industrial waste not generated at the premises. Scheduled premise type A02 refers to waste treatment works engaged in the immobilisation, thermal degradation, incineration or other treatment of waste. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 18 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL In both instances a category specific exemption from works approval under section 19A of the Environment Protection Act 1970, or licencing under section 20(1), does not apply. A financial assurance is however required for scheduled premise type A01, in accordance with the requirements of Clause 71(1)(ada) of the Environment Protection Act 1970. SITA currently holds EPA Waste Discharge Licence No. ES511 for the premises at 890 Taylors Road, Dandenong South. The licence applies to a premise where municipal and prescribed industrial waste and solid inert wastes are deposited to land. The proposed soil processing facility includes aspects of both scheduled premise types A01 and A02, consequently works approval is required under section 19A(1)(a)-(c) of the Environment Protection Act 1970. Section 19A(1) notes that the occupier of a scheduled premises must not commence any construction, installation or modification of plant, equipment or a process which is likely to cause: a) an increase or alteration in the waste discharged or emitted from, deposited to, or produced at, the premises; or b) an increase or alteration in the waste which is, or substances which are a danger or potential danger to the quality of the environment or any segment of the environment which are, reprocessed, treated, stored, contained, disposed of or handled at the premises; or c) a change in any method or equipment used at the premises for the reprocessing, treatment, storage, containment, disposal or handling of waste, or of substances which are a danger or potential danger to the quality of the environment or any segment of the environment; d) except in accordance with a works approval, licence or notice issued by EPA. SITA has previously provided a $12.3 million financial assurance for existing operations at the Taylors Road landfill in a form acceptable to EPA under Section 67B(1) of the Environment Protection Act 1970. An alternative financial assurance, or an increase to the current level of financial assurance provided, is consequently not considered justified for the proposed soil processing facility. 3.2 Planning and Other Approvals The existing permits that apply to the operation are: Planning Permit No. 890471 (issued January 24, 1990 by Cranbourne Shire Council and amended by the Minister for Planning, April 2, 2008), which allows the site to be used for “Establishment of a private rubbish tip”; and Planning Permit No. 920213 (issued July 22, 1992 by Cranbourne Shire Council and amended by the Minister for Planning, April 5, 2007), which allows the site to be used for “Use and development of the land for the purpose of a private rubbish tip”. An application has been made to the Minister for Planning (under Section 96 A of the Planning and Environment Act 1987) to rezone the land to Industrial 1 Zone (IN1Z) and to issue a permit to allow the proposed soils processing facility and the development of the associated buildings and works to proceed. The application was presented in Golder Associates Report Number: 107613045-001-RRev0 and was submitted in May 2010. 3.3 Other Approvals The Variation of an Order Relating to Notifiable Chemicals was gazetted under the Environment Protection Act 1970 in February 2000. (No. S5, Gazette 1/02/2000) Within this Order, material or waste with a PCBs concentration greater than 2 mg/kg is designated as a notifiable chemical with August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 19 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL conditions applicable to the sale, storage, handling and use of the material. As detailed above the proposed facility is designed to store and handle PCBs contaminated soil and hence the conditions of the Order are applicable. In particular, SITA will be required to develop an Environmental Improvement Plan (EIP) for approval by the Authority. Storage and handling of PCB contaminated soil will not occur at the Taylors Road facility until an EPA approved PCBs Environmental Improvement Plan is in place. 3.4 Existing EPA Approvals The Taylors Road Facility operates in accordance with EPA Waste Discharge Licence ES511. A copy of this document is presented in Appendix C. SITA also operates the Hallam Road landfill in accordance with EPA Discharge Licence ES33144. 4.0 ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITY The community in which Works Approval applicants operate is a crucial element in the management and operation of any business. One of the key principles of the Environment Protection Act 1970 is to integrate economic, social and environmental considerations, recognising that community well-being is a direct result of social consideration in the decision making process. SITA appreciates this dynamic and works hard to ensure that an open dialogue is maintained with the community in which the business operates. This application for Works Approval explores three elements of environment and community; track record (Section 4.1), key environmental considerations (Section 4.2) and community engagement (Section 4.3). 4.1 Track Record SITA maintains an excellent environmental and community engagement track record. During the period SITA has operated the landfill there have been no enforcement actions or any offences committed as defined by Section 20C of the Environment Protection Act 1970. With regard to operations at Taylors Road, only one EPA infringement notice has been issued, which related to a leachate spill in 2001. Similarly, only one Minor Works Pollution Abatement Notice has been issued to SITA in this period which was a result of two subsurface fires in February 2008. Evidence of SITA’s track record is also provided by the issues log maintained at the landfill site. An excerpt from the log is reproduced in Table 5 for the period 2004 – 2009. As Table 5 shows, only eleven complaints were registered in this period, with no complaints made in the period since July 2007. As the log demonstrates, all records related to odour with follow up action undertaken within 0.5 hour of the complaint being made. The complainant history obtained from EPA shows a similar trend with only five complaints made in the period 2004 – 2009 and only two complaints during the last two years. The database output from EPA for this period is reproduced in Table 6. As Table 6 indicates four of the five complaints related to odour with the remaining complaint relating to waste content. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 20 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 5: Taylors Road Landfill: SITA Complaint Log 2004 - 2009 Time/Date Received July 2007 10:45 20 July 2006 11:15 21 December 2005 12:00 7 December 2005 14:50 25 July 2005 14:30 19 July 2005 14:30 5 October 2004 11:15 1 October 2004 09:00 9 March 2004 9:00 24 February 2004 Time/Date of Response Complaint Type Complaint Source Wind Direction Not recorded Odour Colemans Road Not recorded 10:45 20 July 2006 Odour – prescribed industrial waste character 11:15 Odour Colemans Road, Not recorded Bayliss Road North westerly 21 December 2005 12:08 Odour Bayliss Road Westerly 7 December 2005 14:50 Odour Bayliss Road Westerly 25 July 2005 14:30 Odour Bayliss Road Westerly 19 July 2005 Action Monitoring rounds were conducted, no odour was detected. Odourcide unit in place. Monitoring rounds were conducted, no odour was detected. Odourcide unit in place. Odourcide unit in place. Monitoring round conducted. Visual inspection of the face. Monitoring of the area. Final load of possible source received – odour eliminated. Final load of possible source received – odour eliminated. Additional cover placed. Monitoring rounds completed throughout the day. Waste covered immediately. Loads monitored for vapour OH&S parameters. Odourcide unit in place. Waste covered immediately. Prescribed industrial waste thought to be responsible was restricted to a 2 pm deadline. Odourcide unit in place. Prescribed industrial waste job likely to be responsible – scheduled to finish 20 – 21/07/2005. Odour – prescribed industrial waste character Bayliss Road Westerly 5 October 2004 Cover immediately placed over the prescribed industrial waste. 11:30 Odour Colemans Road Easterly Work ceased and the area was covered immediately. Odourcide unit in place. Odourcide unit in place. Odour monitoring follow up. An additional cover was applied to the burial sites. Odour was monitored throughout the day. 14:50 1 October 2004 09:00 Odour Bayliss Road Westerly 9 March 2004 9:30 24 February 2004 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 Odour Colemans Road Northerly 21 Odour monitoring following odourcide, not odour detected. Cover checked at the prescribed waste face. Two deep burial loads were received at the time of complaint. APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 6: Taylors Road Landfill: EPA Complaint History 2004 - 2009 Report ID Date/Time Received Complainant Location Type Description 106231 5/11/2009 18:46 Lyndhurst Air Strong manure / rotting odour detected outside and around factory work area. 99447 15/12/2008 15:54 Dandenong South Air A smell making people feel nauseous. It is a different smell to usual. 89424 12/10/2007 9:25 Lyndhurst Air Strong odour like from a tip. 82745 12/01/2007 14:43 Dandenong Air Observed a large plume of smoke from Lyndhurst landfill. 80588 12/10/2006 8:57 Dandenong South Waste Large number of trucks going to Lyndhurst landfill today. He spoke with a truck driver who told him it was "chemical dirt". He is concerned that there is a large volume of this material and would like to know what it is. In summary, SITA’s environmental track record indicates no enforcement actions, with a total of sixteen complaints received over a six year period. The key environmental issue behind complaint generation was off site odours, with SITA acting promptly in all instances to address the cause. 4.2 Key Environmental Considerations The proposed soil processing facility has a number of key environmental considerations. Air quality impacts are, however, the primary environmental consideration. These will be explored further in Section 7, together with other environmental aspects such as carbon, water, waste and noise. 4.3 Community Engagement SITA has established a relationship with its stakeholders through the Community Engagement Steering Community (CESC). The committee of 20 people, chaired by an independent facilitator, consists of representatives from the following organisations: Colemans Road Ratepayers Association; R.A.T.W.I.S.E. – Residents Against Toxic Waste in the South East; Hampton Park Progress Association; Lynbrook Residents Association; Dandenong Ratepayers Association; Department of Human Services; Department of Planning & Community Development; City of Greater Dandenong (Councillor and Officer); City Of Casey (Councillor and Officer); EPA; SITA; Victorian Waste Management Association; and Fresh Start Bakeries (from neighbouring industrial estate). August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 22 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The purpose of the committee is to provide a vehicle for community engagement, with the membership representing the diversity and interests of the broader community. As the Terms of Reference state ”the CESC is expected to play an important advisory role to ensure the fair, transparent and accountable inclusion of broader community views in decisions about the landfill.” A copy of the CESC Terms of Reference is provided in Appendix D. Minutes of recent meetings are available on the EPA website. The CESC process is also providing a mechanism for community consultation regarding the proposed soil processing facility. SITA has developed a Community Engagement Plan, which describes the processes, responsibilities and communication channels for community engagement in the proposed development. This initiative aims to provide CESC members and stakeholders with the background information to the development, as well as detailing the proposal itself. It is hoped that increased understanding and awareness of the development will minimise community concern. Further to this, the plan creates an avenue for SITA to address and discuss any concerns raised through the process. A copy of the Community Engagement Plan is provided in Appendix E. Lastly, SITA has a long standing relationship with the Colemans Road Ratepayers Association. This relationship consists of informal phone or face to face meetings every two to three weeks. Meetings may be initiated by SITA or Colemans Road residents. This connection provides an additional forum for community feedback and engagement. 5.0 PROCESS AND BEST PRACTICE The DFTD and soil stabilisation processes are described in the following sections. Best practice elements are presented in Section 5.2. 5.1 Process and Technology 5.1.1 DFTD In summary, the proposed DFTD process consists of the following soil processing stages: Within the building: Front end loader delivery of contaminated soil to a grizzly screen and feed hopper with weigh conveyor delivery to the screw feeder and subsequently to the natural gas fired refractory lined rotary dryer (dryer); Outside the building: Retention of soil in the dryer to enable vaporisation of VOCs and SVOCs with a series of lifters for mixing to ensure that all soil is exposed to the hot exhaust gases; Discharge of processed soil from the rotary dryer through an air lock to a pugmill for soil cooling and moisture addition (soil conditioning system); and Stockpiling of processed soil utilising a radial stacking discharge conveyor. The DFTD process consists of the following exhaust gas treatment stages: Contaminant laden air from the rotary dryer passes through a cyclone, for particulate matter removal, followed by a natural gas fired refractory lined thermal oxidiser (oxidiser), to achieve destruction of VOCs and SVOCs; Exhaust gases then pass through an evaporative cooler consisting of a water quench tower to rapidly reduce the exhaust gas temperature; Removal of particulate matter contained in the exhaust gases by fabric filtration (baghouse), with collected material mixed with processed soil at the entry to the pugmill; Removal of hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride resulting from halogenated compound destruction, and hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride and sulphur dioxide from soil mineral decomposition, by wet chemical scrubbing; and August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 23 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Removal of residual VOCs, SVOCs and mercury by an activated carbon bed system. The process and instrumentation diagram for the Enviropacific Services DFTD unit is shown in Figure 6 (refer Figures section). The equipment specifications are shown in Table 7: Table 7: DFTD Equipment Specifications Manufacturer Meco Environmental LLC Soil throughput (tonnes/h) 2.5 – 3 Dryer: Burner rating (MJ/h) 3,690 Exit temperature (oC) 510 Thermal oxidiser (oxidiser): Burner rating (MJ/h) 3,160 Exit temperature (oC) 1,100 Soil Conditioning System: Pugmill water consumption (L/min) 19 Evaporative Cooler: Quench tower water consumption (L/min) 23 - 30 Indicative baghouse specifications are provided in Table 8. Table 8: Baghouse Specifications Chapman Services Manufacturer B481X9 Model 3 Design flowrate (m /min) 164 Operating flowrate (m3/min) 143 No. bags 81 Bag length (m) 2.769 Bag diameter (m) 0.159 2 Filter area (m ) 112 Filter material Aramid Air to cloth ratio (cm/s) 3.7 For filtration applications, Aramid is principally in the form of needle felted fabric. It is used in high o temperature applications, with a reported continuous operating temperature of 204 C, and a peak limit o 1 o of 218 C . The design baghouse inlet gas temperature of 190 C is therefore appropriately conservative. The equipment configuration for the wet chemical scrubber is shown in Figure 7 (refer Figures section). The indicative specifications for the wet chemical scrubber are provided in Table 9. 1 W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. & U.S. Air Filtration, Inc. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 24 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 9: Wet Chemical Scrubber Specifications Chapman Services, LLC Manufacturer Omni-5-5000 Model 3 Design flowrate (m /min) 143 Operating flowrate (m3/min) 143 Material of construction PVC Mass transfer packing High efficiency polypropylene 89 Packing size (mm) 2 3 Mass transfer surface area (m /m ) 144 Bed depth (m) 1.5 Bed diameter (m) 1.2 Face velocity (m/s) 2.0 Mist eliminator Chevron blades & polypropylene mesh pad Scrubbing liquor Aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide Scrubbing liquor rate (lpm) 30 Scrubbing liquor bleed (lpm) 0.3 – 1.5 Control system pH Acid gas emissions result from halogenated hydrocarbon combustion (HCl, HF) natural gas combustion (NO, NO2) and the decomposition of soil minerals (HCl, HF, SO2). Sulphur trioxide (SO3) is anticipated, but at low concentrations. Removal of the major acid gas emissions will occur to varying degrees through the wet scrubber, utilising an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide as the scrubbing liquor. Scrubbing liquor bleed will be utilised in the pugmill to reduce water requirements. Sodium hydroxide addition to the scrubbing liquor sump will be controlled by a pH control loop. The activated carbon bed forms the final component of exhaust gas cleanup. The bed will consist of two parallel sections, with exhaust gas ducted to one or the other or direct to atmosphere. One section of the bed will consist of activated carbon for VOCs and SVOCs adsorption, whilst the second section will contain activated carbon impregnated with sulphur for VOCs, SVOCs and mercury adsorption. The soil feed inlet concentration and contaminant type will be used to inform the plant operator regarding which carbon bed should be used. DFTD exhaust gas will bypass the bed system during start up and in periods where no soil is being processed. This function will enable SITA to extend the life of the carbon and reduce waste from the facility. The decision matrix for use of the carbon beds is presented in Table 10. Table 10: Activated Carbon Bed Specifications Soil Contaminant Inlet Concentration Carbon Bed All soil contaminants excluding mercury Not applicable Activated carbon Mercury 0 – 2.5 mg/kg Activated carbon Mercury 2.5 – 15 mg/kg Sulphur impregnated activated carbon August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 25 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL It is anticipated that each bed will consist of one tonne of carbon in a bed sized to achieve a face velocity of 2 m/s. Each bed will have a 2 second residence time. 5.1.2 Soil Stabilisation Soil stabilisation will involve mixing of contaminated soil with appropriate liquid or solid additives in a track mounted soil recycler. The soil recycler consists of a screen, hoppers for untreated soil and solid additives, a two shaft paddle mixer and a discharge belt conveyor. Additive feed rates are regulated by a screw feeder or dosing pump for solid and liquid additives, respectively. Indicative specifications for the equipment are provided in Table 11. Table 11: Soil Recycler Specifications Manufacturer Hitachi Construction Machinery Co. Ltd. Model SR2000G Soil hopper capacity (m3) 1.8 Additive hopper capacity (m3) 3.0 Mixer type 2 shaft paddle mixer Soil feed rate (m3/h) 20 - 170 Additive feed rate (m3/h) 0.8 – 13.3 Alternative equipment may be specified, depending on process requirements. 5.2 Environmental Best Practice Clause 19(1) of SEPP (AQM) requires a generator of a new or substantially modified source of emissions to apply best practice to the management of those emissions. “Best practice” is defined as the best combination of eco-efficient techniques, methods, processes or technology used in an industry sector or activity that demonstrably minimises the environmental impact of a generator of emissions in that industry sector or activity. Clause 20(1) of SEPP(AQM) requires emissions of Class 3 indicators to be reduced to the maximum extent achievable (MEA). EPA may also prohibit the emission of a Class 3 indicator if it is considered to constitute a significant threat to public health, either in the ambient air environment or in the vicinity of a particular source. MEA is defined in SEPP(AQM) as a degree of reduction in the emission of wastes from a particular source that uses the most effective, practicable means to minimise the risk to human health from those emissions and is at least equivalent to or greater than that which can be achieved through the application of best practice. Best practice and MEA aspects of the proposed soil processing technologies are discussed in the following sections. 5.2.1 Fugitive Dust and VOC Emissions There are a number of fugitive dust and VOC emission sources that can result from contaminated soil handling and treatment. These include: Truck dumping of soil deliveries; Stockpile formation and maintenance; Filling of soil feed hopper by front end loader; Conveyor drop points; and Entrainment of stockpiled material by wind action. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 26 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Best practice measures proposed by SITA to address fugitive dust and VOC emissions are described below: Deliveries of contaminated soil to the SITA facility by tarped truck or with the soil contained in skips or bins equipped with lids; Soil deliveries, storage and processing equipment loading will occur inside a ventilated building equipped with a dust and vapour control system, eliminating these sources of fugitive dust and VOC 2 emissions. The ventilation system will be designed in accordance with Australian Standard AS 1668.2 ; and Dust emissions resulting from the filling of soil recycler and DFTD process feed hoppers will be minimised through the use of water mist sprays at the feed hopper entry point. 5.2.2 DFTD Process Thermal treatment of soils contaminated with VOCs and SVOCs is recognised internationally as best practice, with the majority of contaminated soil being processed in this manner. It is estimated that over 20 3 million tonnes of soil have been processed using thermal desorption technology in the USA alone . The major concern with thermal desorption processes, especially in the treatment of soil contaminated with PCBs, chlorinated hydrocarbons or organochlorine pesticides, is the potential for formation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (dioxins/furans). 4 The European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Bureau (IPPC) notes that; for dioxins/furans control, both primary (e.g. good combustion practices) and secondary measures are applicable. Secondary dioxins/furans control techniques include rapid gas quenching, oxidation catalysts, powdered activated carbon injection, combination activated carbon and lime sorbent injection, fixed bed carbon filter in the flue gas, and high efficiency dust collectors. The USEPA National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from hazardous waste 5 combustors apply to hazardous waste incinerators, hazardous waste burning cement kilns, and hazardous waste burning lightweight aggregate kilns. Best Available Technology (BAT) for dioxins/furans control is rapid flue gas quenching, activated carbon injection (also for mercury control), temperature control at the inlet to the air pollution control device and high efficiency dust collectors. The combination of DFTD with rapid gas quenching, fabric filtration and wet chemical scrubbing has been demonstrated as best practice and MEA for the treatment of PCBs contaminated soil at Springvale, Victoria and Kurnell, New South Wales, with the concentration of dioxins/furans in the exhaust gases complying with 3 the criterion of 0.1 ng/Nm International Toxic Equivalents (ITEQ) in both instances. Dryer The dryer is equipped with a low NOx burner to minimise the formation of oxides of nitrogen in the combustion gases. Heat Recovery SITA propose the installation of heat recovery equipment in the ductwork from the cyclone to the thermal oxidiser to enable preheating of burner combustion air. 2 “The Use of Ventilation and Air Conditioning in Buildings Part 2: Ventilation Design for Indoor Air Contaminant Control”, Standards Australia, AS 1668.2, 2002 3 “Direct Thermal Desorption Treatment of PCB Contaminated Soil/Sands at Villawood and Kurnell, NSW”, Mobile Treatment Solutions Technology Application, National Protocol for Approval/Licensing of Trials of Technologies for the Treatment of Schedule X Wastes, July 2008 4 “Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Waste Incineration”, European Commission IPPC, May 2003 (draft) 5 “National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Standards for Hazardous Waste Combustors”, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register October 25, 2006, Volume 71, Number 206 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 27 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Thermal Oxidiser The thermal oxidiser is equipped with a natural gas burner (low NOx), enabling a combustion chamber o operating temperature of 1,100 C to be achieved. The minimum residence time of exhaust gases in the o thermal oxidiser combustion chamber is 2 s at 1,100 C. 6 The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment recommends the following for efficient thermal destruction of PCBs in mobile plant: 99.9999% destruction/removal efficiency; Residence time of 2 s at 1,200°C and 3% excess oxygen; and Average carbon monoxide concentration of 50 ppm. The minimum operating conditions specified by Environment Canada for the efficient thermal destruction of PCBs (99.9999% destruction efficiency) are: Residence time of 2 s at 1,200°C and 3% excess oxygen; or Residence time of 1.5 s at 1,600°C and 2% excess oxygen. 7 For the thermal destruction of halogenated VOC streams, USEPA recommends the following operating conditions: o Residence time of 1 second at 1,100 C, with a scrubber installed for the control of acid gases. The degree to which any organic compound is incinerated is dependent on a number of factors. These include residence time in the combustion chamber, combustion chamber temperature, turbulence, oxygen content of the exhaust gases, combustion limit, flame combustion and heat. o o Thermal destruction of most organic compounds occurs between 590 C and 650 C, with most incinerators o o operating at 700 C to 820 C to oxidise the carbon monoxide that occurs at these higher temperatures to 8 carbon dioxide . o o Most hazardous waste incinerators are however operated at 980 C to 1,200 C to ensure nearly complete 9 destruction of the organic compounds in the waste . Residence time and temperature both affect combustion efficiency, however when one variable is increased the other may be decreased with the same end result. The relationship between temperature and residence time is readily demonstrated in Figure 8. The incineration of biomedical waste has similar issues to those associated with the treatment of PCBs and OCPs contaminated soils; a high chlorine content waste stream and the resultant potential for dioxins/furans 10 formation. The European Environment Agency Emission Inventory Guidebook notes that, in general, incinerators used in Europe for hospital waste incineration consist of a pyrolysis furnace and a secondary o combustion chamber that operates at a temperature above 1,000 C, with a gas residence time of 2 seconds. 6 Guidelines for Mobile Polychlorinated Biphenyl Destruction Systems, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 1990 7 Air Pollution Technology Fact Sheet – Thermal Incineration, United States Environmental Protection Agency 8 Environmental Engineer’s Mathematics Handbook, Spellman, F.R. & Whiting, N.E., CRC Press, 2004 9 Air Pollution Engineering Manual, Buonicore, A.J. & Davis, W.T., Air & Waste Management Association, 1992 10 EMEP/EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook, European Environment Agency, Technical Report No. 9, 2009 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 28 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 11 Figure 8: Combustion Temperature/Residence Time Relationship 12 The European Parliament directive on the incineration of waste requires all plants to maintain incineration o gases at a temperature of at least 850 C, with a minimum residence time of 2 seconds, in order to guarantee complete waste combustion. If hazardous waste containing more than 1% of halogenated organic o substances, expressed as chlorine, is to be incinerated, the temperature must be raised to 1,100 C, with a minimum residence time of 2 seconds. The development proposed by SITA allows for the treatment of soil contaminated with a maximum chlorine content of 0.6% (10,000 mg/kg PCBs; 60%w/w chlorine). Consequently the maximum concentration of halogenated organic substances will be less than the European Parliament 1% criterion. The SITA proposal o for thermal oxidiser operation at 1,100 C and a minimum residence time of 2 seconds therefore readily complies with European requirements. On the basis of the above assessment the SITA thermal oxidiser design is considered to comply with best practice and MEA requirements required for the treatment of VOCs and SVOCs contaminated soil. The range of recommended thermal oxidiser combustion temperatures and residence times are summarised in Table 12 in comparison with those applicable to the SITA DFTD equipment. Table 12: Thermal Treatment Operating Criteria Parameter Temperature (oC) Residence time (s) 1a 1b 2 3 4 SITA 1,200 1,600 1,100 1,000 850 1,100 2.0 1.5 1.0 2.0 2.0 >2 Notes: 1a 1b 2 3 4 Canadian Council of Ministers for the Environment & Environment Canada Environment Canada United States Environment Protection Agency European Environment Agency (typical hospital waste incinerator) European Parliament 11 Buonicore, A.J., Op Cit 12 Directive 2000/76/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 December 2000 on the incineration of waste August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 29 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Evaporative Cooler (Quench Tower) 13 Environment Australia note that there are three generally accepted theories on the methods of dioxins/furans formation in incineration systems: contaminated feedstock, thermal breakdown of precursor compounds and de novo synthesis (formation from macromolecular carbon). Precursor compounds are chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons, including PCBs. The formation of dioxins/furans in this instance is believed to occur after the precursor molecule has adsorbed onto the surface of the fly ash in the exhaust gases, the combination of which promotes dioxins/furans formation. The o optimum temperature window for formation will be different for each precursor and can be well above 500 C. De novo synthesis involves the reaction of different molecules to form precursors and subsequently dioxins/furans. For both the precursor and de novo synthesis mechanisms a temperature range of between o o 250 C and 400 C is required for dioxins/furans formation to occur. o o The optimum temperature range for dioxins/furans formation from de novo synthesis is 250 C to 450 C, with o the maximum formation rate at approximately 300 C. Dioxins/furans formation by this mechanism occurs only in the low temperature zone of an incinerator and only where particulate matter (fly ash) is present. De novo synthesis requires the presence of oxygen, metal ions, organic carbon and chlorine sources. Chlorine may be incorporated into dioxins/furans through molecular chlorine or hydrogen chloride. De novo and precursor formation of dioxins/furans are considered to be different processes, however they may operate separately or simultaneously. Metals present within the gas stream or in the materials of construction may act as a catalyst to dioxins/furans formation, whereas sulphur dioxide present in the exhaust gases may inhibit dioxins/furans formation. The Enviropacific Services DFTD process allows for rapid cooling of the thermal oxidiser exhaust gases from o o o 1,100 C to 150 C - 200 C by spray injection of water into a water quench tower, in order to both minimise dioxins/furans formation and to cool the exhaust gases sufficiently to enable fabric filtration. The impact of quench time on dioxins/furans formation cannot be predicted, however previous operating experience with this and other thermal soil treatment systems would suggest that dioxins/furans emission standards can be readily achieved. Baghouse Following cooling in the water quench tower, exhaust gases pass through a reverse pulse (pulse jet) baghouse to remove entrained particulate matter. The collected particulate matter will be returned by screw auger to the pugmill (soil conditioning system). o 2 Based on an exhaust gas temperature of 190 C and a total fabric filter area of 112 m , the air to cloth ratio (filtration velocity) is estimated to be 3.7 cm/s. 14 The UK Institution of Chemical Engineers recommend average air to cloth ratios for baghouses utilising felted media for sand, clay and fly ash applications, of 4.6 cm/s, 3.6 cm/s and 3.0 cm/s respectively. 15 The Air & Waste Management Association suggests typical air to cloth ratios for a range of industries, filter arrangements and filter types. For sand, clay, fly ash, silica and bauxite the generally safe design values are 5.1 cm/s, 4.6 cm/s, 2.5 cm/s, 3.6 cm/s and 4.1 cm/s respectively. Actual design values require consideration of particle size and particulate matter concentration. On the above basis the air to cloth ratio selected for the baghouse serving the DFTD process is considered appropriate. In addition, fabric filtration is considered best available control technology for particulate matter emission control applications. 13 “Characterisation and Estimation of Dioxin and Furan Emissions from Waste Incineration Facilities”, Environment Australia 14 “A User Guide to Dust and Fume Control”, Engineering Practice Committee Working Party on Dust and Fume Control, The Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1981 15 “Air Pollution Engineering Manual”, Buonicore, A.J. and Davis, W.T (Eds), Air & Waste Management Association, 1992 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 30 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The United States Environmental Protection Agency notes that baghouses provide high collection efficiencies for both coarse and fine (submicron) particles, with removal efficiencies typically 99% to 99.9% for pulse jet cleaned units. For a given combination of filter design and dust, the baghouse exhaust gas particulate matter concentration is nearly constant, whereas the overall efficiency is more likely to vary with particulate matter loading. Baghouses can therefore be considered constant outlet devices rather than 16 constant efficiency devices . Dust collected from the cyclone and baghouse will be returned to the pugmill and blended with treated soil. Samples of the baghouse stream will be analysed to confirm that the dioxins/furans content is acceptable. This is considered appropriate given the extended residence time of the collected dust in the baghouse and the operating temperatures in this region. The proposed baghouse is not designed as a control mechanism for dioxins/furans. Alternative baghouse systems for dioxin/furans control include powdered activated carbon or lime coating on baghouse filters or the use of Remedia filter bags which provide catalytic destruction of dioxins/furans. However, available evidence for the proposed DFTD system suggests compliance with the exhaust gas concentration limit of 0.1 3 ng/Nm for dioxins/furans. If proof of performance tests demonstrate that the proposed equipment is not adequately controlling dioxin/furan formation, additional controls such as Remedia filter bags will be investigated. Wet Chemical Scrubber A wet chemical scrubber is proposed to control hydrogen chloride emissions to air resulting from chlorinated organic compound destruction; however the removal of other acid gases present in the exhaust gases will also occur. Typical acid gas removal efficiencies for wet scrubbing systems are listed in Table 13. Table 13: Acid Gas Removal Efficiencies Atmospheric Contaminant Removal Efficiency (%) Hydrogen chloride >99 Hydrogen fluoride >99 Sulphur dioxide >99 Nitric oxide <10% Nitrogen dioxide <30% The absorption of carbon dioxide in the scrubbing liquor, and the resultant sodium hydroxide consumption, will be minimised by operation in the neutral pH range. Mist elimination is an essential component of a packed bed scrubbing system. The DFTD process wet chemical scrubber will have both a chevron blade mist eliminator and a polypropylene mesh pad mist eliminator installed. Most wet scrubbing systems would have one or the other installed, consequently the combination of both is considered industry best practice. Wet chemical scrubbing for hydrogen chloride and sulphur dioxide control applications is also considered best available control technology. 16 “Fabric Filter – Pulse-Jet Cleaned Type”, United States Environmental Protection Agency Center on Air Pollution, Air Pollution Technology Fact Sheet August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 31 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Activated Carbon Bed The final stage of exhaust gas clean up is the activated carbon bed system consisting of an activated carbon bed and a parallel sulphur impregnated activated carbon bed. Activated carbon is a porous solid which has been treated to remove impurities so that a large surface area is available for contaminant adsorption. Adsorption refers to the process where gaseous contaminants are attracted and retained by a solid sorbent, thereby removing them from the gas stream. The proposed carbon bed system will be used to remove residual VOCs and SVOCs not destroyed by thermal oxidization; similarly any SVOCs formed following the destruction of chlorinated compounds will also be removed. Exhaust gas from the treatment of mercury contaminated soil feed will be ducted to the sulphur impregnated activated carbon bed. Volatilised mercury in the gas stream will adsorb to active carbon sites where it is then converted to mercuric sulphide through reaction with the impregnated sulphur. Sulphur chemisorption increases the adsorbent capacity of the activated carbon. The installation of the activated carbon bed system as the final stage of exhaust gas clean up represents a custom modification to the Meco DFTD equipment. Continuous Emission Monitoring System A continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) will be installed on the activated carbon bed system outlet. The monitoring system will consist of analysers for the determination of the following contaminants: Oxygen; Carbon monoxide; Particulate matter; Hydrogen fluoride; Hydrogen chloride; Sulphur dioxide; and Oxides of nitrogen. The oxygen content will be measured to confirm that there is sufficient excess oxygen present in the exhaust gases to enable efficient combustion. Carbon monoxide will be measured to confirm the efficiency of combustion, whilst other analytes will enable the plant operator to confirm the performance of the baghouse and wet chemical scrubber. Process Controls and Interlocks DFTD process controls and interlocks enable optimal operation of the equipment to achieve the following key objectives: Safe equipment operation; Treatment of contaminated soil to an adequate level; and Control of emissions to air to ensure that the principles of best practice and MEA are fulfilled. Process controls refer to procedures and physical systems that enable DFTD operation to be managed such that the three key objectives are met. A summary of the DFTD process controls is presented in Table 14. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 32 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 14: Process Controls Process Control Description Outcome Exhaust fan damper The air damper for the exhaust fan will remain in the closed position unless the induced draft fan is on. The air damper will not open unless the fan is operating and the system is under vacuum, preventing the egress of untreated air. Burner flame safety controller - oxidiser The oxidiser will not start up unless a timed purge cycle is completed and the flame safety controller LED has been activated, followed by activation of the pilot light followed by the main flame. It is not possible to commence operation of the oxidiser without adequate fuel delivery and pressure and correct start up sequences. Burner flame safety controller - dryer The dryer will not start up unless a timed purge cycle is completed and the flame safety controller LED has been activated, followed by activation of the pilot light followed by the main flame. It is not possible to commence operation of the dryer without adequate fuel delivery and pressure and correct start up sequences. Oxidiser burner thermocouple The oxidiser burner is equipped with an automatic control mode, which enables a thermocouple feedback loop to monitor and adjust the burner, ensuring that the oxidiser temperature is constant. Temperature fluctuations resulting from oxidation of organic contaminants will be minimised. Operating temperature ranges Operating temperature ranges are specified as follows: Equipment temperatures are maintained at optimal temperatures, ensuring adequate soil treatment and emission control. Soil discharge from the rotary dryer: 425 – 500°C. Soil conditioning system discharge 65 – 95°C. Oxidiser outlet: 1,100°C. Soil processing rates Soil processing rates are specified as 2.5 – 3 tonnes per hour. DFTD throughput is a function of contaminant type and level and soil moisture content. Specification of an optimal range ensures that the throughput determined for each batch is within the operating parameters of the equipment. Dryer unit – suction draught The burner suction draught must be maintained at 0.2 – 0.25 in. wg (inches water gauge) Maintenance of the burner suction draught enables correct operation of the dryer unit. If the draught is too low, the dryer drum shell will overheat and warp, if the draught is too high excess air will be pulled through the system leading to process inefficiencies. Soil conditioning system – water addition The water injection system for the pugmill consists of thirteen water inlet ports with individual cut off valves and four isolation valves. Manual adjustment of cooling water addition is conducted to ensure that dust generation is minimised. This is particularly important at the fines entry point. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 33 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Process Control Description Outcome Soil conditioning system - mixing paddles Pugmill mixing paddles within the soil conditioning system are used for even moisture addition and blending of fines from the cyclone and baghouse. Mixing paddles can be accessed via the knock out box and access doors, enabling inspection and replacement of tips as well as reversal of direction if necessary. Access to the pugmill mixing paddles will be controlled by a permit system. Soil conditioning system – dust control Dust generated by the pugmill is controlled by a scavenge duct system connecting the pugmill to the baghouse. Fugitive emissions to air from the pugmill are minimised. A manual damper valve is used to ensure that suction at the pugmill is within the range 0.2 – 0.4 in. wg. Equipment start up Commissioning of the DFTD requires a series of steps to be undertaken by the plant operator which are detailed in the Enviropacific SOP. In general the process includes sufficient warm up time for the dryer and thermal oxidiser with specific instructions relating to temperature ramping on both equipment items. The plant operator is responsible for ensuring equipment is properly commissioned and operating at optimal temperatures before introduction of contaminated soil for processing. Oxygen concentration – thermal oxidiser Oxidation of contaminants in the exhaust gas stream requires the presence of oxygen in the thermal oxidiser. The plant operator is responsible for ensuring oxygen exiting the thermal oxidiser is in the range 4 – 6%v/v through adjustment of the burner blower damper or proportional adjustment. The thermal oxidiser is maintained to ensure sufficient oxygen for oxidation of exhaust gas contaminants. Baghouse temperatures The baghouse inlet must not exceed 200°C to protect the filtration fabric. The plant operator will be responsible for maintaining the outlet of the evaporative cooler (quench tower) at 150°C. Filtration fabric will be protected from high temperature, corrosion and physical damage through constant monitoring and maintenance of inlet/outlet temperatures and pressures. The baghouse outlet temperature must not fall below 130°C, as entrained acid gases will condense from the gas stream, causing corrosive damage to the filtration fabric. The baghouse inlet/outlet pressure differential as displayed on the magnahelic gauge must not exceed 3 – 6 in. wg, as the fabric filter may burst. Inlet/outlet pressure is a function of the efficiency of baghouse pulsations to remove captured dust. The plant operator will be responsible for adjusting pulsation frequency and ensuring that the baghouse air pressure is maintained between 40 – 60 psi. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 34 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Process Control Description Outcome Evaporative cooler nozzles The evaporative cooler/quench tower contains nozzles for introduction of water and air to the tower. The plant operator must maintain the water delivery pressure at 75 – 80 psi and the air pressure at 85 – 90 psi. Operation of the water and air nozzles within the specified ranges ensures that water is atomized as it mixes with the incoming exhaust gas, thus reducing gas temperature prior to the baghouse and limiting the potential for dioxins/furans formation. Regular nozzle maintenance and quench tower cleaning will be conducted to remove debris and deposits. Wet chemical scrubber – pH The plant operator is responsible for ensuring that fresh water is available in the scrubber/quench sump. Once operating, water level is controlled by an automatic float valve. Maintenance of scrubber pH is achieved through addition of 46% w/w sodium hydroxide. Minimisation of acid gas emissions to air. Equipment shut down The plant operator is responsible for planning shutdowns such that the DFTD process is maintained at normal operating conditions until all soil has moved through the system. This involves halting the soil feeder and empting conveyors, controlling the dryer burners for reduced soil volumes, and shutting down the soil conditioning system water pumps. Once all soil has moved through the dryer, the 30 – 40 minute dryer cool down commences as does the oxidiser cool down. The other elements of the process are progressively turned off as the temperatures through the system allow. Induced draught (ID) fan operation is continuous throughout shutdown to ensure even temperature reduction. At the completion of shut down, the equipment is electrically isolated and components decommissioned as required. A staged approach ensures shut down occurs following removal of all processed soils and exhaust gas. Process interlocks refer to physical systems that prevent unsafe operation of the DFTD. Process interlocks are either controlled mechanically, electrically or by the device controller (UDC). The UDC interlocks are programmed as alarms in the main control panel. The following conditions result in the cessation of soil feed to the dryer: Low soil temperature (set point determined based on treatment requirements); Low thermal oxidiser temperature; Low or high pH in the recirculating scrubbing liquor for a period greater than 15 minutes; Low baghouse inlet temperature; Negative pressure in the dryer; and Contaminant levels exceeding set points on the CEMS system. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 35 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Equipment specification parameters are set to ensure that temperatures recommended by the component manufacturer are not exceeded. In most cases this is based on the grade of steel used in construction, but can also be based on bearings, gaskets or, in the case of the baghouse, the fabric material selected. The following temperature conditions result in an alarm: o High dryer temperature (590 C); o High thermal oxidiser temperature (1,140 C); and o High baghouse inlet temperature (230 C). When individual alarms are activated it triggers a timing mechanism, allowing the plant operator time to rectify the reason behind the increased temperature. If the operator does not respond in the allocated time: Soil feed to the dryer is shut down; The dryer and thermal oxidiser burners are reduced to low fire; The centrifugal fan (ID fan) speed is reduced, reducing the exhaust gas flowrate; High temperature at the baghouse inlet also causes a damper to open, allowing the ingress of ambient air. Soil feed shut down is usually triggered by electrical relay mechanisms. Safety interlocks associated with the thermal oxidiser and dryer burner trains include: Low and high gas pressure; Pilot light not activated; Purge cycle not completed; and Low fire not exuberant. In summary, DFTD process interlocks are designed to enable safe operation of equipment when non routine operations occur. The entire system is maintained under negative pressure, with the induced draught fan drawing air through each of the emission control stages. Where a process interlock triggers the cessation of soil feed, exhaust air in the dryer will continue to be drawn through the cyclone, thermal oxidiser, evaporative cooler (quench tower), baghouse, wet chemical scrubber and activated carbon bed. In the scenario where soil feed ceases and the thermal oxidiser burners are reduced to low fire, the internal temperature of the oxidation chamber will slowly reduce with the time taken to reach ambient temperatures expected to be greater than one hour. The thermal oxidiser is equipped with internal insulation causing it to respond slowly to changes in operating conditions. This property ensures that contaminant laden air, present in the dryer when process interlocks are triggered, will be treated by thermal oxidation even if the burners have been reduced to low fire. The installed continuous emission monitoring system represents both a process interlock and process control. As noted above, the system will inform the plant operator concerning combustion efficiency and hence operation of the thermal oxidiser as well as provide information relating to operation of the baghouse and wet chemical scrubber. In this manner, feedback provided by the CEMS unit forms a process control; when any of the contaminant concentrations exceed nominated set points, the CEMS unit will act as a process interlock with soil feed shut down. The interlock set points will include an adequate safety buffer such that the plant operator will have the opportunity to investigate and implement corrective actions prior to potential excursion of licence limits. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 36 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5.2.3 Soil Stabilisation Soil stabilisation is considered best practice environmental management for treatment of soil contaminated with heavy metals. The soil stabilisation process has the potential to result in particulate matter emissions to air when soil is added to the feed hopper. However the proposed equipment contains a number of best practice emission reduction strategies to minimise air emissions. These are as follows: Location of the feed hopper within the processing building; Mist sprays located on the feed hopper entry point; Additives principally used in liquid form; and Processed soil has a high moisture content. The inclusion of these best practice measures for soil stabilisation will ensure that air emissions from this process are minimal and consequently are not considered further in this application. 5.2.4 Building Ventilation System Exhausts Detailed design of the soil processing building ventilation system is yet to be commenced, however the following forms the basis of preliminary design: six mechanically ventilated exhausts will be installed, each equipped with a filter and activated carbon bed to remove entrained particulate matter, gaseous VOCs and volatilised mercury; building dimensions 60 m (l) x 40 m (w) x 10 m (h); and the building ventilation system will achieve a minimum of 2 air exchanges per hour. The Golder Air Quality Group has previously conducted area source emission tests on gasworks soil during a site remediation. VOCs and odour flux emission rates were determined on a stockpile utilising a USEPA emission isolation flux chamber, 48 hours and 14 days respectively following stockpile formation. Sampling was conducted in accordance with Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 4323.4 “Stationary Source Emissions - Method 4: Area Source Sampling - Flux Chamber Technique”. The stockpile was heavily contaminated, containing 31,000 mg/kg of total petroleum hydrocarbons, 7,500 mg/kg of PAHs and 455 mg/kg benzene. Gasworks soils are also considered to represent the worst case with respect to odour emissions. The resultant soil flux emission data is therefore considered appropriate for use in evaluating worst case emissions from the soil processing building ventilation exhausts. The building ventilation system preliminary design calculations are summarised in Table 15. Soil will be principally stored in bunkers to aid in segregation and recovery, thereby restricting the soil surface area. Therefore the assumption that soil would cover approximately 50% of the soil processing building floor area is considered to be extremely conservative. The assumed particulate matter concentration is also considered to be conservatively high, given that the 3 concentration of dust inside the building is likely to be less than 20 mg/m and the ventilation system exhausts will be filtered. The calculated odour concentration in the ventilation system exhausts is low and would consequently not represent a source of amenity impact for the local community. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 37 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 15: Ventilation System Design Basis Parameter Result Ventilation rate: Building volume (m3) 24,000 Total ventilation rate (m3/h) 48,000 Exhaust gas temperature (oC) 20 No. of building ventilation system discharges 6 Exhaust gas flowrate/discharge (Nm3/min) 124 Soil surface area: Building floor area (m2) Soil surface coverage (%) Soil surface area (m2) 2,400 50 1,200 VOCs emission rate: Soil flux emission rate (µg/m2/min) 460 Emission rate per discharge (g/min) 0.092 Emission rate per discharge (kg/d) 0.13 Concentration (mg/Nm3) 0.74 Benzene emission rate: Soil flux emission rate (µg/m2/min) 110 Emission rate per discharge (g/min) 0.021 Emission rate per discharge (kg/d) 0.031 Concentration (mg/Nm3) 0.17 Particulate matter emission rate: Concentration (mg/Nm3) 2 Emission rate per discharge (g/min) 0.25 Emission rate per discharge (kg/d) 0.36 Odour concentration: Soil flux emission rate (ou.m3/m2/min) Emission rate per discharge (ou.m3/min) Concentration (ou) August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 25 5,000 40 38 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Under the Environment Protection Act 1970, premises which have the potential for significant environmental impact are subject to works approvals (for construction or modification of facilities or processes) and/or licences (for operating conditions, discharge limits, monitoring and reporting requirements). The Environment Protection (Scheduled Premises and Exemptions) Regulations 2007 prescribe premises that are subject to works approval and/or licensing by EPA, and provide for exemptions in certain circumstances. A works approval under section 19A(1) or 19A(2) of the Environment Protection Act 1970 or a licence under section 20(1) of the Act is not required with respect to discharges or emissions to air from a source, other than an incinerator or an afterburner, discharging or emitting less than: 10 kg per day particles (except asbestos and heavy metals); or 0·1 grams per minute of any substance classified as a Class 3 indicator in the SEPP(AQM). 5 kg per day VOCs except for the emissions of odorous compounds or those substances referred to below; and The scheduled premises exemption limits are compared with the emission estimates for each of the ventilation system exhausts in Table 16. Table 16: Exemption Limits Comparison Atmospheric Contaminant Emission Estimate Exemption Limit Particles (kg/d) 0.36 10 VOCs (kg/d) 0.13 5 Benzene (g/min) 0.021 0.1 On the basis of this assessment the building ventilation system exhausts are exempt from works approval and consequently are not considered further in this application. 5.3 Integrated Environmental Assessment The principal area where there is considered to be competing environmental demands is the thermal processing of contaminated soils. Options for the processing of soil contaminated with high level VOCs and SVOCs are restricted and in most instances will results in incineration or thermal oxidation of a waste stream. Under the current proposal, greenhouse gas generation will result from natural gas combustion in the rotary dryer and thermal oxidiser. Failure to process the soil may result in the soil remaining in-situ, with the associated issues of long-term environmental management, restrictions on development and potential for groundwater and air quality impacts. Alternatively a long term containment facility would be required, with the associated cost to the community. It is consequently considered that a net environmental benefit analysis favours the thermal processing of soil contaminated with VOCs and SVOCs. For the soil stabilisation process, the net environmental benefit relates to the opportunity to treat Category A waste to achieve Category B, C or clean fill criteria, enabling landfill disposal or reuse options which would otherwise not be available. 5.4 Choice of Process and Technology Options for the thermal processing of soil contaminated with VOCs and SVOCs include incineration and low and high temperature thermal desorption (LTTD and HTTD). August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 39 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Incineration has been used previously, however the major disadvantage is the adverse effect on the physical properties of the soil. The principal options therefore relate to thermal desorption. o In LTTD, soil is heated to between 90 C and 320°C, physically separating VOCs and SVOCs from soils. LTTD is typically used for remediating petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. In this process, decontaminated soil generally retains its physical properties, and unless heated to the higher end of the LTTD temperature range, organic components in the soil are not damaged, enabling processed soil to retain the ability to support future biological activity. o In HTTD, soil is heated to 320 C to 560°C. Contaminants such as SVOCs (PAHs, PCBs and pesticides) may be removed by HTTD systems. The process is also applicable to the separation of organics from refinery wastes, coal tar wastes, wood treating wastes, creosote contaminated soils, hydrocarbon contaminated soils, synthetic rubber processing waste, pesticides and paint wastes. Factors that may limit the applicability and effectiveness of thermal desorption of contaminated soils include: Dewatering may be necessary to achieve acceptable soil moisture content levels; Heavy metals in the input soil may produce a processed solid residue that requires stabilisation; Processing temperature (this factor is a function of the moisture content, heat capacity and the particle size of the soil, together with the heat transfer and mixing characteristics of the unit); Clay and silty soils increase reaction time as a result of binding of contaminants; and Contaminant characteristics - vapour pressure and the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Vapour pressure influences the rate at which a contaminant is thermally desorbed, and the maximum concentration of contaminant in the soil that can be processed by thermal desorption depends on the gas flow through the unit, the oxygen content of the purge gas and the type of contaminant present. The United States Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable (FRTR) notes that HTTD has proven that it can produce a final contaminant concentration below 5 mg/kg for the target contaminants identified. On this basis HTTD is the preferred technology option and is considered to represent both best practice and MEA. Thermal desorption processes include both indirect and direct firing. Of the 205 mobile thermal desorber projects conducted in the USA or USA territories during the period 1987 to 2009 on hazardous waste applications (excluding applications on petroleum contaminated soils), the following is the reported 17 breakdown of the technologies utilised : Indirect firing with subsequent destruction 3; Indirect firing with subsequent recovery 68; Direct firing with subsequent destruction 121; and Direct firing with subsequent recovery 13. Direct firing with subsequent destruction of the desorbed compounds has therefore historically been the preferred technology option and represents the technology preferred by SITA in this instance. SITA reviewed a number of direct fired thermal treatment technologies for the proposed soil processing facility. The factors assessed in determining the most suitable equipment for the Taylors Road application were: 17 Ability of the equipment to adequately treat contaminated soils; Environmental emissions from the processing equipment; Size of Victorian contaminated soil market; Personal communication, W. Troxler, Focus Environmental, Inc. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 40 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Equipment cost to justify replacement/upgrading as new or improved technologies become available; Proven operation within Australia - both equipment & equipment operator/supplier; Initial capital outlay and set-up; Ongoing operation; Equipment size (dimensions); Equipment portability: Easily transportable for use interstate/intrastate, when volumes do not justify operation or are unavailable; Equipment’s ability to be easily shut-down for maintenance or during times of low demand. The DFTD plant, supplied and operated by Enviropacific Services, met these criteria and was consequently selected as the preferred equipment. The roles of each of the companies associated with the supply of equipment for this project are as follows: MECO LLC is a US based company that procures thermal equipment from Chapman Services LLC for operation in the US and other parts of the world. Chapman Services LLC is a US based company that designs and fabricates thermal treatment equipment for MECO LLC. Combustion Technology provide burner and gas train advice to Chapman Services, specifically in relation to compliance with Australian Standards. Enviropacific Services is a privately owned Australian company offering a diverse range of environmental services across all states. Enviropacific has purchased the exclusive rights to MECO equipment within Australia (excluding Queensland). Enviropacific will own and operate the equipment at the proposed facility and draws on the thermal processing experience of both Chapman Services and MECO. A supplier performance guarantee for the proposed DFTD soil processing equipment is presented in Appendix F. 5.4.1 DFTD Process Design Case The DFTD process design case represents a quantitative assessment of DFTD operation. The design case is based on actual emission test data for the Enviropacific DFTD equipment operating at Kurnell in NSW. The Kurnell equipment is the same as that proposed for SITA, with the exception that the thermal oxidiser operated at 1,000°C and there were no activated carbon beds installed. Operation of the thermal oxidiser at 1,100°C and inclusion of activated carbon are considered to be process modifications which will enhance the emission control capabilities of the proposed equipment. Presentation of the process design case without these enhancements is considered a worst case operating conditions approach. The DFTD process design case was based on a soil throughput of 3 tonnes per hour, a soil moisture content 3 of 14% w/w, a dry exhaust gas flowrate of 97 Nm /min and maximum concentrations for a range of soil contaminants. The exhaust gas flowrate is based on actual emission test data. The design case calculations are summarised in Table 17, showing the maximum soil contaminant concentration and the following data for each stage of the DFTD process: Equipment item removal/destruction efficiencies for each atmospheric contaminant; and Calculated atmospheric contaminant concentrations and rates of emission from the equipment item exhaust. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 41 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The efficiency of volatilising target soil contaminants (SVOCs, benzene and mercury) has been assumed to be 100%. Operating experience with a similar DFTD soil treatment installation would suggest that this is a 18 realistic expectation, with a measured PCBs removal efficiency of 99.96% . In this instance the treated soil readily achieved the Environment Protection and Heritage Council Polychlorinated Biphenyls Management Plan definition of “PCBs free” material (less than or equal to 2 mg/kg). The assumptions of: 20% of soil being entrained in the rotary dryer exhaust gases; and A minimum cyclone removal efficiency of 95%; are based on supplier information. As noted in Section 5.2.2, baghouses do not have a specific particulate matter removal efficiency, instead they tend to operate as a constant emission rate device. Consequently the removal efficiency noted in Table 3 17 has been calculated based on the assumed baghouse exhaust gas concentration of 30 mg/Nm . This concentration is considered conservatively high based on previous experience with baghouse emission testing. A number of other emission estimates are also considered to be conservatively high as a result of the following design case assumptions: The thermal oxidiser destruction efficiency for VOCs and SVOCs has been assumed to be 99.99%, in comparison with the PCBs destruction efficiency of 99.9997% measured at a similar installation, corresponding to an overestimation of approximately 30,000 times. PCBs are considered to represent the worst case in terms of DFTD equipment performance; The removal efficiencies for SVOCs and mercury for both the baghouse and the packed bed scrubber have been assumed to be zero. It is likely that both equipment items would remove these atmospheric contaminants to some degree; The particulate matter removal efficiency for the packed bed scrubber has been assumed to be zero. Packed bed scrubbing systems are known to remove particulate matter from gas streams; The 99% removal efficiency for hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride and sulphur dioxide assumed for the packed bed scrubber is considered to be the minimum achievable; and The activated carbon bed system is not included as this is a process modification for the Taylors Road Landfill installation and consequently operational data does not exist. 18 PCBs Soil Remediation – Air Quality Impact Assessment, Fleer, F.E., 19th International Clean Air & Environment Conference, September 2009 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 42 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 17: DFTD Process Design Case Calculations Contaminant Soil Rotary Dryer Exhaust Cyclone Exhaust Thermal Oxidiser Exhaust Baghouse Exhaust Evaporative Cooler Exhaust Wet Chemical Scrubber Exhaust Activated Carbon Bed Exhaust mg/Nm3 g/s % mg/Nm3 g/s % mg/Nm3 g/s % mg/Nm3 g/s % mg/Nm3 g/s % mg/Nm3 g/s % mg/Nm3 g/s 100 2,210 3.6 0 2,210 3.6 99.99 0.22 0.00036 0 0.22 0.00036 0 0.22 0.00036 0 0.22 0.00036 0 0.22 0.00036 10,000 100 4,420 7.2 0 4,420 7.2 99.99 0.44 0.00072 0 0.44 0.00072 0 0.44 0.00072 0 0.44 0.00072 0 0.44 0.00072 1,000 100 442 0.72 0 442 0.72 99.99 0.044 0.000072 0 0.044 0.000072 0 0.044 0.000072 0 0.044 0.000072 0 0.044 0.000072 1,000 100 442 0.72 0 442 0.72 99.99 0.044 0.000072 0 0.044 0.000072 0 0.044 0.000072 0 0.044 0.000072 0 0.044 0.000072 15 100 6.6 0.0108 0 6.6 0.0108 0 6.6 0.0108 0 6.6 0.0108 0 6.6 0.0108 0 6.6 0.108 66.7 2.2 0.0036 1,000,000 20 TSP 88,392 143 95 4,420 7.2 0 4,420 7.2 0 4,420 7.2 99.32 30 0.049 0 30 0.049 0 30 0.049 PM10 88,392 143 95 4,420 7.2 0 4,420 7.2 0 4,420 7.2 99.32 30 0.049 0 30 0.049 0 30 0.049 Sulphur dioxide (90% S emitted) 199 0.32 0 199 0.32 0 199 0.32 0 199 0.32 0 199 0.32 99 2.0 0.0032 0 2.0 0.0032 Sulphur trioxide (as H2SO4)(10% S emitted) 34 0.055 0 34 0.055 0 34 0.055 0 34 0.055 0 34 0.055 99 0.34 0.00055 0 0.34 0.00055 2,840 4.6 2,840 4.6 0 2,840 4.6 0 2,840 4.6 0 2,840 4.6 99 28 0.046 0 28 0.046 93 0.15 93 0.15 0 93 0.15 0 93 0.15 0 93 0.15 99 0.93 0.0015 0 0.93 0.0015 Units mg/kg % Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) 5,000 Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) Semi-volatile organics: Volatile organic compounds: Benzene Metals: Mercury Particulate matter (soil): Sulphur (soil): Chloride (soil): Chloride (PCBs) (60% w/w of 10,000 mg/kg PCBs): 500 50 500 50 6,000 100 Total chloride (as HCl) Fluoride (soil): 1,000 0 20 Hydrogen fluoride (as HF) 0 Notes % Percentage removal or destruction efficiency mg/Nm3 Atmospheric contaminant concentration in units of milligrams per cubic meter at 0oC and 101.3 kPa g/s Atmospheric contaminant rate of emission from the equipment item August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 43 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5.4.2 Air Pollution Control Equipment Acid Gas Scrubbing Options for the control of acid gas (hydrogen chloride, hydrogen fluoride, sulphur dioxide and sulphur trioxide) emissions to air include dry and wet scrubbing. Dry scrubbing systems typically utilise spray dryer absorption and/or dry injection adsorption for acid gas control and either gravity settling chambers, fabric filters or electrostatic precipitators for particulate matter removal. In a dry scrubber the acid gas stream is brought into contact with an alkaline reagent. The reagent either absorbs or adsorbs the acid gases in the gas stream. The droplets are then dried and collected in the particulate matter control device. The adsorbents normally used for acid gas control are quicklime (calcium oxide), hydrated lime (calcium hydroxide) or limestone (calcium carbonate). Wet scrubbing systems include spray tower scrubbers, packed bed scrubbers, venturi scrubbers, moving bed scrubbers and tray scrubbers. Packed bed scrubbers are however the principal method used to remove gaseous atmospheric contaminants. Due to issues associated with plugging, they are not used when particulate matter removal is the only concern, or when a high concentration of particulate matter is present in the exhaust gases. In a packed bed scrubber, scrubbing liquor is sprayed or poured over mass transfer packing contained in a column above a support tray. The liquid film coats the packing through which the exhaust gas stream passes, providing a large contact area between the gas and the liquid phases to achieve efficient gas absorption. The absorbent normally used for acid gas control is an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide. 19 Buonicore notes that dry scrubbing system removal efficiencies for hydrogen chloride and sulphur oxides are only “adequate” and that wet scrubbing systems are capable of achieving the highest acid gas removal efficiencies. Buonicore reported acid gas removal efficiencies for a dry hydrated lime scrubber installed on a hospital waste incinerator exhaust are: Hydrogen fluoride 87.2% - 97%; and Hydrogen chloride 57% - 99%. Further data for a dry sodium bicarbonate scrubber serving a municipal waste/biomedical waste incinerator suggests an acid gas removal efficiency of 96%. Design data provided by a dry limestone scrubbing system supplier for a hydrogen fluoride control application in Australia suggests the following removal efficiencies: Hydrogen fluoride 82%; Sulphur dioxide 20%; and Hydrogen chloride 12%. The above removal efficiencies are consistent with those measured by Golder Air Quality Group on a dry limestone scrubbing system with a similar duty: 19 Hydrogen fluoride 72%; Total sulphur oxides 31%; and Buonicore, A.J., Op Cit p. 282 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 44 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Hydrogen chloride 0%. The USEPA notes that spray dryer adsorbers are capable of achieving acid gas removal efficiencies of 80% or greater, whereas packed bed scrubbers are preferred when atmospheric contaminants are only slightly 20 soluble or when the gaseous atmospheric contaminant removal efficiency must be greater than 99% . Typical acid gas removal efficiencies for packed bed scrubbers 21 are listed in Table 18. Table 18: Acid Gas Removal Efficiencies Atmospheric Contaminant Removal Efficiency (%) Hydrogen chloride >99 Hydrogen fluoride >99 Sulphur dioxide >99 On the basis of the above assessment, a packed bed scrubber is considered to represent both best practice and MEA for the control of acid gas emissions, as proposed by SITA for the control of emissions to air from the DFTD process. The absorption of carbon dioxide in the scrubbing liquor, and the resultant sodium hydroxide consumption, will be minimised by operation in the neutral pH range. Mist elimination is an essential component of a packed bed scrubbing system. The DFTD process wet chemical scrubber will have both a chevron blade mist eliminator and a polypropylene mesh pad mist eliminator installed. Most wet scrubbing systems would have one or the other installed, consequently the combination of both is also considered industry best practice. 5.5 Choice of Locations and Layout It is proposed that the soil processing facility be located in the north-east corner of the SITA Taylors Road landfill site, as shown in Figure 1 (refer Figures section). This area was selected as it provides the maximum separation distance from the facility to the residential properties located to the east in Colemans Road and to the south-south-east in Bayliss Road, Dandenong South. The site layout was based on consultation between SITA and Enviropacific Services and is considered to represent best practice. Category A and odorous soil will be stored in a building to minimise fugitive emissions to air. Categories B and C soils will also be located within a Nissen type hut to the east of the Category A facility, providing appropriate separation from Category A material, reducing the possibility of incorrect material placement. Allowance has been made for areas suitable for bioremediation of soils in the future, although this is not the subject of the current application for works approval. 6.0 RESOURCES The purpose of an application for Works Approval is to discuss and quantify how a proposed development will impact on the environment. In this section, the environmental impact of the soil processing facility will be discussed in terms of energy and water consumption and waste generation. In January 2008, EPA introduced an Environment and Resource Efficiency Plan (EREP) program which “requires the largest commercial users of energy and water to identify and implement actions that reduce energy and water use 22 and minimise waste” . The Taylors Road landfill does not meet the trigger requirements for entry into the 20 21 22 Scrubber Systems Operation Review, USEPA, APTI Course SI:412C, 1998 Personal communication, Dr. J. Higgs, The Environmental Group Ltd. EREP Guidelines. Publication 1198.1, August 2008. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 45 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL programme; however the works approval process requires SITA to demonstrate that the proposal is environmentally sustainable. Sustainability is demonstrated through the conduct of one part of the EREP program: preparation of a Resource Efficiency Site Assessment (RESA) as defined by the EREP toolkit, Module 3. In its entirety this module includes, identification of an assessment team, delegation of responsibilities, establishment of resource use and waste generating activities on site and assessment of these, identification of resource efficiency actions, development of a plan and monitoring of the plan. Development of a complete RESA is beyond the scope of this application; however the key RESA elements, such as identification of resource use and waste generating activities and quantification of those will be presented in Sections 6.1 through 6.4. 6.1 Carbon Carbon management is the management of energy use and greenhouse gas generation. As an existing scheduled premise, the Taylors Road Landfill must comply with the requirements stipulated in the Protocol for Environmental Management “Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Efficiency in Industry”. (Greenhouse PEM). The purpose of the Greenhouse PEM is to provide a mechanism for scheduled premises to meet the greenhouse gas management requirements stated in Clause 33 of the SEPP(AQM), and, unlike the EREP programme, the jurisdiction of the Greenhouse PEM is not limited to facilities with energy consumption or waste generation exceeding specified trigger levels. Greenhouse gases are those compounds that have the potential to accumulate in the atmosphere and contribute to global climate change. In the context of the Taylors Road Landfill, the greenhouse gases of relevance are carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide. The climate change contribution of these gases can be expressed as a global warming potential (GWP). This is a measure used to describe the global warming potential of gases relative to the reference gas, carbon dioxide. The GWP of the three greenhouse gases relevant to this application are reproduced in Table 19. Table 19: Greenhouse Gases Global Warming Potentials Greenhouse Gas 23 Global Warming Potential (GWP) Carbon dioxide (CO2) 1.0 Methane (CH4) 21 Nitrous oxide (N2O) 310 The Greenhouse PEM categorises greenhouse gas emissions as either energy or non-energy based. Energy based emissions are primarily carbon dioxide emissions resulting from the burning of fuel. Nonenergy based emissions are greenhouse gas emissions resulting from on-site processes other than fuel consumption. The emission estimates for energy and non-energy based greenhouse gas emissions are presented as carbon dioxide equivalents. Carbon dioxide equivalency is used to represent emissions from different greenhouse gases as the amount of carbon dioxide that would be required over a specified time scale to achieve the same GWP. The calculation of carbon dioxide equivalents for Taylors Road landfill was based on conversion factors published by the Department of Climate Change for the application of the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (NGER) Act. Specifically, the NGER 2008 v1.1 Technical Guidelines were applied. The final assumption applied in the calculation of greenhouse gas emissions was that the impact of the Taylors Road Landfill is limited to direct emissions (Scope 1) resulting from landfill operation and maintenance and indirect emissions (Scope 2) resulting from energy use. In other words, the emission assessment was limited to the site boundary with emissions resulting from transport or extraction and production of products used on site excluded. 23 Department of Climate Change, National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) Factors, June 2009. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 46 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Existing greenhouse gas emission sources at the Taylors Road Landfill consist of: Energy based: Petrol consumed on site; Diesel consumed on site; and Electricity consumed on site. Non-energy based: Landfill gas generation. Landfill gas emissions are controlled at the Taylors Road Landfill by an extraction system which enables methane to be recovered and used for power generation at the Berwick Power Station. The calculated 2008/2009 financial year greenhouse gas emission represented as carbon dioxide equivalents are presented in Table 20 and Figure 9. Table 20: Existing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source Description CO2-e tonnes/year Petrol1 Petrol consumption on-site (administration) Diesel1 Diesel consumption on-site (administration and contractors) Electricity2 Waste decomposition 18 Total electricity consumption 1,122 577 Non-recovered methane 3 31,823 Total 33,541 Notes 1 Estimated using Method 1 Calculations as described in National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Technical Guidelines 2008 v1.1. 2 Indirect emissions resulting from energy consumption at the site was calculated using the method described in the National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) Factors, June 2009 3 Non-recovered methane is the difference between the estimated total methane generated on site, minus the measured amount of methane recovered. The total methane estimate was calculated by Hyder Consulting using the NGER 75% rule. (“Carbon Footprint 2008/2009 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Development for Operational and Waste Management Activities” (November 2009)). Petrol 0% Electricity 2% Diesel 3% Landfill gas 95% Figure 9: Existing Greenhouse Gas Emissions August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 47 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The proposed soil processing facility will result in additional greenhouse gas emissions. The processes generating additional emissions are as follows: Front end loader – diesel fuel combustion; DFTD – Dryer – natural gas combustion; DFTD – Thermal Oxidiser – natural gas combustion; DFTD – Operating panel – electricity consumption; and Soil Stabilisation – Hitachi Soil Recycler – diesel fuel combustion Greenhouse gas emissions due to landfilling of processed materials and electricity consumption associated with the building housing the soil processing facilities are considered to be negligible and have not been considered further. The estimated greenhouse gas emissions from the proposed soil processing facility have been calculated using the equipment specifications and the estimated fuel usage based on 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, 6 months of the year operation. The calculation for the DFTD natural gas consumption contains a comparative carbon dioxide emission estimate, which was derived from emission test results at an equivalent installation (Kurnell 2009). Carbon dioxide estimated using emission test results may include the contribution from carbonates in the soil and has been included as a sensitivity check on calculated emissions. The calculated greenhouse gas emissions are presented with the equipment specifications and calculation factors for each activity in Tables 21 - 24. A summary of proposed greenhouse gas emissions and sources is presented in Figure 10. Table 21: Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emissions - Front End Loader Fuel Diesel1 Description Fuel Use 2 Front end loader fuel combustion (L/year) Energy Content Factor3 (GJ/kL) Energy Use (TJ) Emission Factor3 (kg CO2-e/GJ) (tonnes/year) 60,715 38.6 2.3 69.2 CO2 162 0.2 CH4 0.47 0.5 N2O 1.2 Total CO2-e 164 Notes 1 Method 1 calculation as described in National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Technical Guidelines 2008 v1.1 for Emissions Released from the Combustion of Liquid Fuels. 2 Fuel use was derived from the typical fuel use for a 200 hp wheel loader working on a high load application 100% of the time. It was assumed that the front end loader would be in constant use for 24 hours per day, 7 days per week and 6 months of the year. 3 The energy content factor and emission factors were based on those listed in Table 2.4.2 B “Emission and energy content factors – fuels for transport energy purposes” (National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Technical Guidelines 2008). August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 48 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 22: Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emissions – DFTD – Natural Gas Usage Fuel Description Fuel Use (MJ/hour) Hours of operation (year) Energy Use (TJ) Emission Factor2 CO2-e (tonnes/year) (kg CO2-e/GJ) Natural gas1 Dryer and thermal oxidiser 6850 4368 30 51.2 CO2 1,532 0.1 CH4 3 0.3 N2O 1 Total 1,536 Measured CO2 emissions at an equivalent installation 2,461 Notes 1 Method 1 calculation as described in National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Technical Guidelines 2008 v1.1 for Emissions Released from the Combustion of Gaseous Fuels. 2 The energy content factor and emission factors were based on those listed in Table 2.3.2 “Emission and energy content factors – gaseous fuels” (National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Technical Guidelines 2008). Table 23: Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emissions - DFTD - Electricity Usage Energy Description Energy Rating (kW) Energy Usage (kWh) Energy Use (TJ) Emission Factor2 (kg CO2-e/kWh) CO2-e (tonnes/year) Electricity1 DFTD Energy use 140 611,520 2.2 1.22 746 Notes 1 Calculated using the method described in the National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) Factors, June 2009 2 The emission factor is reproduced from Table 5 “Indirect (Scope 2) emission factors for consumption of purchased electricity from the Grid”, National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) Factors, June 2009 Table 24: Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Soil Stabilisation Fuel Description Fuel Use (L/year) Energy Content Factor2 Energy Use (TJ) (GJ/kL) Diesel1 Track mounted soil recycler fuel combustion 61,152 Emission Factor2 CO2-e (tonnes/year) (kg CO2-e/GJ) 38.6 2.4 69.2 CO2 164 0.1 CH4 0.2 N2O Total 164 Notes 1 Method 1 calculation as described in National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Technical Guidelines 2008 v1.1 for Emissions Released from the Combustion of Liquid Fuels. 2 The energy content factor and emission factors were based on those listed in Table 2.4.2 A “Emission and energy content factors – liquid fuels and certain petroleum-based products for stationary energy purposes” (National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Technical Guidelines 2008). August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 49 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL DFTD - Electricty 29% Soil Stabilisation Diesel 6% Front End Loader Diesel 6% DFTD - Natural Gas 59% Figure 10: Proposed Greenhouse Gas Emissions Summary Overall, it has been shown that existing site emissions principally comprise landfill gas resulting from decomposing waste. By contrast, potential emissions from the soil processing facility are dominated by those arising from natural gas combustion associated with operation of the DFTD system. The results of the carbon assessment also indicate that the proposed energy use for all equipment items is 37 TJ which is less than the trigger level for completion of an EREP Plan. The energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission estimation process is also a requirement of the Greenhouse PEM. This document contains three categories of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission for classification of licence holders and works approval applicants. The proposed facility will generate 2,610 tonnes CO2-e per year, which is greater than the threshold value of 1,400 tonnes of CO2-e emissions per year for the highest category. Once this trigger is reached “the applicant will be required to 24 identify and implement best practice with respect to the activities that are the subject of the application”. Best practice is defined in the PEM as “the best combination of eco-efficient techniques, methods, process or technology used in an industry sector or activity that demonstrably minimises the environmental impact of 25 a generator of emissions in that industry sector or activity”. The proposed soil processing facility is considered to be best practice for the treatment of Categories A, B and C soils. As noted in Section 5.2, the DFTD technology and soil stabilisation equipment has been designed to reduce the environmental impact of Categories A, B and C soils through treatment and disposal. The concept of best practice has also been applied to greenhouse gas emissions. As Figure 10 indicates, all proposed greenhouse gas emissions are the result of energy consumption, therefore best practice initiatives are based on energy saving measures. The results of the carbon assessment indicate that natural gas consumption associated with the DFTD unit is the major energy consumer within the proposed soil processing facility. It is not possible to eliminate this equipment from the proposal as it enables best practice processing of Categories A, B and C soils. Nor is it possible to substitute the fuel for a more efficient fuel as natural gas is already considered to be an efficient, clean burning fuel. Therefore energy saving initiatives must take the form of engineering and administrative controls. 24 Protocol for Environmental Management, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Efficiency in Industry, Environment Protection Authority, Publication 824, January 2002 25 Protocol for Environmental Management, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Efficiency in Industry , Environment Protection Authority, Publication 824 January 2002 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 50 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Firstly, SITA propose to modify the DFTD unit prior to installation in order to increase the energy efficiency of the thermal oxidiser. Heat scavengers will be installed on the ductwork between the cyclone and thermal oxidiser to preheat the thermal oxidiser combustion air. SITA will also install thermal insulation on the thermal oxidiser to reduce heat loss during operation. These engineering controls are custom modifications to the proposed equipment and hence there are no projected energy saving figures or payback period calculations associated with this initiative. It is, however, expected that the installation of insulation and heat scavenging equipment will reduce heat loss to the environment thereby reducing natural gas consumption. The second initiative to be investigated by SITA is a thermal oxidiser desorption temperature study. The study will involve an input/output monitoring programme, whereby the inputs remain steady, outputs are sampled and the operating temperature is varied to determine the minimum operating temperature required to maintain performance. The results of the study will be used to determine if it is possible to run the process at lower operating temperatures for different contaminants/contaminant concentrations in order to reduce natural gas consumption. SITA also intends to minimise electricity consumption at the proposed facility will be through ensuring newly installed infrastructure is equipped with energy saving lights, sensor lights where appropriate and skylights. The final energy saving initiative to be implemented at the proposed soil processing facility will be administrative controls associated with operation of the facility. SITA will develop an Environmental Management Plan as described in the EREP Toolkit, Module 2. The plan will provide a management strategy for efficient use of the soil processing facility. Initiatives to be explored and implemented in the plan, if appropriate, are as follows: Batching versus continuous operation. If it is demonstrated that batch processing followed by equipment shutdown is more efficient than continuous operation a batch processing management system will be implemented which includes a minimum batch size and allowance for energy consumed during start up/cool down phases; Electricity management; and Diesel consumption. The plan will investigate opportunities for reducing diesel consumption. Lastly, in a commitment to continual improvement, the management plan will be reviewed and revised on an annual basis. The review will include an assessment of “current best practice” as best practice is not a static concept. 6.2 Water Use The water objectives of the Environment Protection Act, 1970 are detailed in the State Environment Protection Policy (Waters of Victoria). (SEPP(WoV)). This policy defines the parameters around water use and quality in order to “protect the specified beneficial users of the surface waters”. In terms of water usage, the policy stipulates in Clause 23 that “industrial and trade processes shall be undertaken in such a manner that the generation of wastes is minimised.” Further to this, the Environment Protection Policy (Environment and Resource Efficiency Plans) Regulations 2007, require that “water saving practices are implemented to ensure a sustainable water supply”. Mains water is used in the existing operations at Taylors Road for amenities located in the main office and contractor facilities. Other water uses on site such as dust suppression and wheel washing make use of stormwater captured and contained on site. The average volume of mains water used for existing operations is 2,854 L/day. (average of 2008 - 2009). Water will be used in the DFTD process evaporative cooler, soil conditioning system and wet chemical scrubber. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 51 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The projected water usage was calculated by the equipment supplier as 23 – 30 L/min for the evaporative cooler, 19 L/min for the soil conditioning system and 0.3 – 1.5 L/min for the wet scrubber. Assuming the maximum water usage for each item, the projected water usage for the proposed development will be 50.5 L/min, equating to 13 ML per year. This figure assumes a plant operating time of 24 hours per day and 7 days per week for six months of the year. Given the quantity of water consumed by the DFTD process, SITA intends to implement best practice water management strategies. Currently stormwater collected on site is stored, used where required and then discharged to Eumemmering Creek. Section 7.2 details this process. It is proposed that accumulated stormwater be used as process water for the DFTD. In the past three years a total of 131 ML of water has been discharged to Eumemmering Creek, despite the recent drought conditions. An overview of discharges in this period is provided in Figure 11. 70,000 16,000 60,000 14,000 50,000 12,000 10,000 40,000 8,000 30,000 6,000 20,000 4,000 10,000 2,000 - Water discharged per year (kL) Water discharged per event (kL) 18,000 - 2007 2008 2009 Figure 11: Eumemmering Creek Discharge Volumes 2007 - 2009 As the figure demonstrates, the discharge volume is relatively constant with at least eight discharge events per year releasing an average of 5 ML per event. The overview for the three years indicates that at least 34 ML was discharged each year, far in excess of the 13 ML required for DFTD process equipment operation. It is proposed that the soil processing facility be equipped with sufficient water tank storage for two days operation. Additionally the tanks will be connected to the roof of the soil storage buildings to enable capture of rainwater. The storage tanks will be filled on an as needs basis using water piped from the Duck Pond. Where the Duck Pond does not have sufficient water to meet the requirements of the DFTD, mains water will be used to supplement the supply. The use of stormwater as process water is a significant best practice innovation. This initiative makes use of existing infrastructure and resources to reduce the impact of the proposed development and, in accordance with the requirements of the SEPP(WoV), ensures a sustainable water supply. The proposed works do not trigger the water use threshold requirements for completion of an EREP. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 52 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 6.3 Solid Waste Solid wastes that are not classified as prescribed industrial wastes consist of non-contaminated waste items. The proposed soil processing facility will not generate significant volumes of solid waste. The facility will be located within an existing premise and therefore current solid waste streams such as general refuse will not increase significantly with this development. Where possible, any solid waste generated from the proposed facility will be recycled, otherwise solid waste will be disposed to landfill. The volume of solid waste generated will not exceed the 100 tonne/year trigger level. 6.4 Prescribed Industrial Waste Prescribed industrial waste is defined in the Environment Protection (Industrial Waste Resource) Regulations as “any industrial waste or mixture containing industrial waste other than industrial waste or a mixture containing industrial waste that: is a Schedule 1 industrial waste; has a direct beneficial reuse and has been consigned for use; or is an exempt material or is not a Category A waste, Category B waste or Category C waste.” The purpose of the Environment Protection (Industrial Waste Resource) Regulations is to provide a mechanism for industry to achieve the objectives of the Environment Protection Act 1970, which in essence requires industry to implement the principles of the waste hierarchy. The proposed soil processing facility adopts this principle. The soil processing facility will enable SITA to process Categories A, B and C soils which, by definition, are regarded as contaminated, with management options limited to on or off site remediation and storage prior to treatment. Disposal to landfill for Category A soils is not an option. This facility will enable waste producers to meet Clause 9(1) of the regulations and treat/process waste which cannot be avoided, reduced, reused or recycled. The end product of the process may still be classified as a prescribed industrial waste, Categories B or C, or as non-prescribed industrial waste, and be classified as Fill Material. Management options for these solid wastes are significantly greater than for Category A soil. As previously described the proposed soil processing facility has two components; stabilisation and DFTD. The output from each process will be dependent on the input material and type and duration of processing. Overall three types of solid waste will be generated. These are Category B soil, Category C soil and Fill Material. Category B soils are those which, according to the EPA guidelines “Soil Hazard Categorisation and Management“, are contaminated with any contaminant level greater than TC1, but below TC2 or greater than ASLP1 but below ASLP2. Similarly Category C soils are those which have contaminant levels greater than TC0, but below the TC1 and ASLP1 thresholds. Lastly, soils with all contaminant levels less than the TC0 threshold are classified as clean fill. SITA propose to deposit Category B and C soils from the soil processing facility directly into the existing prescribed waste Cell 12C at the Taylors Road Landfill. Alternatively, clean fill that is generated will be used for cell capping on-site or off-site at rehabilitation projects conducted by SITA. The volume of prescribed industrial waste processed by DFTD and soil stabilisation is 60,000 tonnes per year, based on the expected throughput of the facility. Additionally, the soil processing facility will generate prescribed industrial waste from the activated carbon bed adsorption system attached to the DFTD. Spent carbon may contain VOCs, SVOCs and mercury. The volume of waste generated from this process will be dependent on the level of soil contamination, type of contaminants, DFTD equipment destruction efficiency and facility throughput. For example, predictive modelling suggests that continuous treatment of 5 mg/kg mercury contaminated soil will generate one tonne of spent carbon per month. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 53 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 7.0 7.1 EMISSION IMPACTS Air Emissions Air quality impacts are governed by the requirements stipulated in the State Environment Protection Policy (Air Quality Management) (SEPP(AQM)). The objectives of the SEPP(AQM) are to manage emissions to the air environment such that beneficial uses are protected. Relevant to this application, the policy seeks to achieve these objectives through requiring proponents of new sources to minimise their operational impact through appropriate design. The air quality impact of the proposed soil processing facility is assessed in the following sections with an examination of existing emissions in Section 7.1.1 and proposed emissions in Section 7.1.2. The best practice management aspects of air emissions are presented in Section 7.1.3. Finally, assessment of the proposed emissions is presented as a plume dispersion modelling assessment in Section 7.1.4. 7.1.1 Existing Air Emissions Emissions to air from the existing Taylors Road Landfill primarily consist of odour and particulate matter. Odour has the potential to be emitted from a number of sources at the landfill facility with the largest potential source being decomposing putrescible waste. Odour may be emitted from the waste delivered to site and when it is applied to the active cell; when old burial sites are reopened; when waste cells are joined or when daily cover is removed. Fugitive odour emissions may also arise from cells with insufficient or damaged cover. Further fugitive emissions may result from gas wells or the methane extraction system. It is expected that odorous gas may contain atmospheric contaminants such as methane, hydrogen sulphide, mercaptans and VOCs. Other potential odour sources include the waste water treatment plant, in particular emissions to air due to aeration of the pre-treatment ponds, operation of the anoxic tank and sludge removal. Particulate matter emission sources at the landfill consist of dust generated from the application of daily cover to active cells and as a result of excavation and earthworks associated with landfill management. Particulate matter fractions generated from these activities include total suspended particulate matter (TSP) and deposited dust (insoluble solids fraction), as well as the finer fractions, PM10 and PM2.5. Odour and particulate matter emissions resulting from existing site operations have been quantified based on results of historical monitoring programmes conducted at the landfill site. Particulate matter sampling has been conducted in two forms at Taylors Road. Firstly, directional dust (total solids) monitoring has been conducted at the site boundaries since July 2001. The monitoring programme consists of six directional dust gauges located on site to passively collect dust from a particular quadrant. Directional dust gauges consist of four cylinders each with an opening oriented to one of the four cardinal points (north, east, south and west). Particulate matter from the air column is collected in the cylinders with any rain water from the monthly exposure period. Collected particulate matter is analysed in accordance with Australian Standard AS3580.10.1 “Determination of Particulate Matter—Deposited Matter”. The purpose of directional dust gauges is to provide an indication of the direction from which dust is originating, with results typically expressed in terms of % dust for each quadrant. Directional dust gauges do not provide a dust deposition rate for the exposure period. Therefore the results from the on-going monitoring programme can be used to assess the sources of dust around the landfill site. The results for the period December 2003 to September 2009 have been compiled for each monitoring location and presented as a pie chart, indicating the percentage mass over the study period for each quadrant (north, south east and west)(Figure 12). August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 54 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL DM7: w estern boundary DM3: eastern boundary 22% 25% 36% 36% 26% 22% 17% 16% DM4: southern boundary DM1: north w est corner 17% 21% 40% 29% 13% 23% 27% 30% DM6: w estern boundary DM2: northern boundary 19% 20% 34% 38% 18% 26% 17% 28% North East South West Figure 12: Directional Dust Monitoring Results 2004 - 2009 The results of this analysis were overlayed on an aerial photograph of the site presenting the directional dust gauge locations together with the pie chart results. (Figure 13). August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 55 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL DM2 DM1 DM7 DM6 DM3 DM4 ± Figure 13: Directional Dust Gauge Locations and Results Overlay Overall the directional dust results indicate that there is no cardinal point on any of the boundaries that significantly dominates. The north cylinder located on the southern boundary collected 40% of the deposited matter over the 6 year study period, indicating that dust generated from the landfill may be impacting at this location, however the east canister also collected a significant portion of dust during this period (30%). The three samplers on the western boundary indicated similar results, with the east cylinders, facing the landfill, collecting a comparable amount of dust to the west cylinders facing away from the landfill. The second component of particulate matter sampling at Taylors Road was PM10 sampling conducted during th th the period 24 January - 10 April 2003. The sampling programme consisted of two high volume samplers (HVS) equipped with PM10 size selective inlets located upwind and downwind of the active tipping face. The high volume samplers were also equipped with an anemometer and interface system, enabling the samplers to be activated when ambient wind conditions triggered predefined sampling conditions. In this programme, the trigger wind conditions were: 10 minute rolling average wind direction between ≥125°and ≤190°. The trigger wind conditions and sample locations were based on an analysis of the predominant wind direction during the sample months. The sample locations for this monitoring programme are displayed in Figure 14, with the results displayed in Figure 15. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 56 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Downwind Upwind ± Figure 14: PM10 Sampling Locations 90 PM10 concentration (ug/m3) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 January - April 2003 Upwind Downwind Figure 15: PM10 Monitoring Programme Results January - April 2003 Overall results of the programme demonstrate that measured downwind PM10 concentrations were less than upwind results for ten of the sixteen sampling events. Further to this, the reporting of results was qualified by the report authors noting that during the sample period regional ambient air quality had been compromised by events such as bushfires and a severe dust storm. In summary the PM10 results indicate that downwind impacts from the active tipping face were limited, with off site sources and events having a significantly greater effect on air quality. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 57 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Odour emissions from the proposed site have also been quantified using the results of historical monitoring programmes. EPA Waste Discharge Licence No. ES511 conditions 3.20, 3.21, 3.22, 3.23 and 3.24 stipulate routine sampling of gas monitoring bores for a number of contaminants including odour. Gas monitoring bores are capped and sealed to prevent fugitive emissions, however the wells are vented during monitoring to enable sample collection. Hence odour results are used as an indicator of odour concentration inside the wells, but not to determine a rate of discharge from the source. Additionally, ambient odour sampling is conducted at the landfill on a routine basis. This involves collection of an ambient air sample downwind of an odour generating activity. The air sample is analysed for odour concentration in accordance with Australian/New Zealand Standard AS4323.3, “Determination of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry”. All ambient odour sampling undertaken at Taylors Road Landfill since 2004 has occurred downwind of the leachate holding lagoons and landfill Cell 1. The results of the monitoring programme for the period January 2004 to January 2009 are presented in Figure 16. Odour concentration (ou) 200 150 100 50 Oct-08 Jan-09 Jul-08 Apr-08 Oct-07 Jan-08 Jul-07 Apr-07 Jan-07 Jul-06 Oct-06 Apr-06 Jan-06 Oct-05 Jul-05 Apr-05 Jan-05 Oct-04 Jul-04 Apr-04 Jan-04 0 Monitoring Date Downwind of leachate holding lagoons Downwind of Cell 1 Figure 16: Odour Monitoring Results January 2004 – January 2009 As Figure 16 demonstrates, odour concentrations downwind of the leachate holding lagoons and Cell 1 are variable, with a number of sample results below the method limit of detection (30 ou). When detected, the average odour concentration for the study period was 64 ou. 7.1.2 Proposed Air Emissions Emissions to air from the proposed DFTD process will result from thermal destruction of the contaminant VOCs and SVOCs, soil entrainment, soil mineral decomposition, natural gas products of combustion and products of incomplete combustion. Quantification of proposed emissions to air has been conducted using the results from a soil remediation project conducted in Kurnell, New South Wales, utilising the Enviropacific Services DFTD equipment. As previously noted, the Kurnell thermal oxidiser operated at 1,000°C and the DFTD process was not equipped with an activated carbon bed following the wet chemical scrubber. Operation at 1,100°C and installation of an activated carbon bed control system represent process enhancements that are proposed for the SITA Soil Processing Facility to achieve MEA control of Class Three indicators. Estimation of emissions without these enhancements is considered a worst case assessment, conducted for the purpose of assessing the proposal against the criteria contained within SEPP (AQM) Schedule A. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 58 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Results of the emission tests and soil analyses conducted in February 2009 at Kurnell, New South Wales are contained in the ENSR Australia Pty. Ltd. report reproduced in Appendix G of this application. This document is provided on a commercial in-confidence basis. Contaminants that may be present in the soil feed to the proposed Soil Processing Facility are as follows: VOCs may include, but will not be limited to: Benzene; Toluene; Ethyl benzene; Xylene isomers; Methyl ethyl ketone; Methyl isobutyl ketone; Acetone; Trichloroethylene; 1,1,1 & 1,1,2 trichloroethane; and Tetrachloroethylene. SVOCs may include, but will not be limited to: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans (dioxins/furans); and Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs). Heavy metals may also be present in the feed soil, normally at low concentrations. Atmospheric contaminants emitted from the DFTD process will therefore principally include: Total solid particulate matter (including PM10 and PM2.5); Carbon dioxide (CO2); Carbon monoxide (CO); Nitric oxide (NO); Nitrogen dioxide (NO2); Sulphur dioxide (SO2); Sulphur trioxide/sulphuric acid (SO3/H2SO4); Hydrogen chloride (HCl); Hydrogen fluoride (HF); VOCs; PCBs; PAHs; OCPs; August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 59 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Dioxins/furans; and Heavy metals. Methods used to estimate emission rates for each of the atmospheric contaminants are described below. Particulate Matter The reported concentration of total solid particulate matter in the exhaust gases measured at Kurnell in 3 February 2009 was less than the test method limit of detection (<0.02 mg/Nm ). (refer Appendix G) This is considered a low result in comparison with typical data for fabric filtration applications. Available DFTD emission test data from an equivalent installation would suggest concentrations in the range 3 2.7 – 12 mg/Nm , consistent with typical baghouse data. To enable a conservative assessment a total solid 3 particulate matter concentration of 30 mg/Nm has been assumed. Based on a dry exhaust gas flow rate of 3 97 Nm /min (refer Appendix G), the corresponding total solid particulate matter mass rate of emission would therefore be 0.049 g/s. Given that the exhaust gases will be treated by fabric filtration and wet chemical scrubbing prior to discharge to atmosphere, total solid particulate matter, PM10 and PM2.5 mass emission rates should be similar. Consequently the PM10 and PM2.5 emission rates have been conservatively assumed to be equal to the total solid particulate matter emission rate. Carbon Monoxide The Kurnell emission test results (refer Appendix G) indicate that carbon monoxide was not detected in the DFTD treatment exhaust gases. Available DFTD emission test data from an equivalent installation would also suggest very low 3 concentrations up to a maximum of 4 mg/Nm , due to the high combustion temperature and extended 3 residence time in the thermal oxidiser chamber. A concentration of 50 mg/Nm has therefore been conservatively assumed, corresponding to a mass emission rate of 0.081 g/s. Oxides of Nitrogen The Kurnell emission test results (refer Appendix G) indicate a total oxides of nitrogen (NOx) concentration of 3 105 mg/Nm (as NO2 equivalents). Available DFTD emission test data from an equivalent installation would suggest NOx concentrations in the 3 3 range 250 – 340 mg/Nm . A concentration of 500 mg/Nm has therefore been conservatively assumed, corresponding to a mass emission rate of 0.81 g/s. The NO2 emission rate was assumed to be 20% of the NOx emission rate. For most natural gas combustion sources NO2 would typically represent only 5% or less of NOx (Kurnell data would suggest 0.1%). Allowing for some transformation of NO to NO2 in the near field would still suggest that this is an extremely conservative assumption. Sulphur Dioxide/Sulphur Trioxide The worst case sulphur dioxide and sulphur trioxide/sulphuric acid emission rates can be calculated by mass balance based on the following: Soil feed rate of 3 tph; Soil moisture content of 14%w/w; Soil sulphur content of 500 mg/kg; Soil sulphur loss of 50%; Wet chemical scrubber removal efficiency of 99%; and August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 60 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Sulphur trioxide as 10% of sulphur emitted. On this basis the emission rates are 0.0032 g/s SO2 and 0.00055 g/s SO3 (as H2SO4). Hydrogen Chloride The worst case hydrogen chloride emission rate can be calculated by mass balance based on the following assumptions: Soil feed rate of 3 tph; Soil moisture content of 14%w/w; Soil chloride content of 500 mg/kg; Soil chloride loss of 50%; Maximum PCBs concentration of 10,000 mg/kg; PCBs chlorine content of 60%w/w; 100% PCBs destruction; and Wet chemical scrubber removal efficiency of 99%. On this basis the hydrogen chloride emission rate is 0.046 g/s. The soil chloride content and percentage loss resulting from soil heating to approximately 550°C in the rotary dryer are not known. However, Golder Air Quality Group data for clay mineral decomposition over a range of firing temperatures would suggest that the assumed values are conservatively high. Hydrogen Fluoride The worst case hydrogen fluoride emission rate can be calculated by mass balance based on the following: Soil feed rate of 3 tph; Soil moisture content of 14%w/w; Soil fluoride content of 1,000 mg/kg; Soil fluoride loss of 20%; and Wet chemical scrubber removal efficiency of 99%. On this basis the hydrogen fluoride emission rate is 0.0015 g/s. Golder Air Quality Group data for clay mineral decomposition over a range of firing temperatures would suggest that a soil fluoride loss of 20% is conservatively high. Fluorine containing minerals typically do not commence thermal decomposition until soil temperatures exceed 600°C. VOCs 3 The Kurnell emission test results (refer Appendix G) indicate a total VOCs concentration of 0.89 mg/Nm (as n-hexane equivalents) when expressed at 7%O2, however this was during treatment of SVOCs contaminated soil, not VOCs. Design criteria for air quality modelling purposes are contained in Schedule A of the SEPP(AQM). As indicated by the 3 minute average design criteria contained in Table 25, benzene represents the worst case scenario with respect to the range of VOCs typically present in contaminated soils. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 61 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 25: VOCs Design Criteria VOC Design Criteria (mg/m3) Benzene 0.053 Toluene 0.65 Ethyl benzene 14.5 Xylene isomers 0.35 Methyl ethyl ketone 5.9 Methyl isobutyl ketone 0.41 Acetone 40 Trichloroethylene 0.9 1,1,1 Trichloroethane 22.7 1,1,2 Trichloroethane 1.8 Tetrachloroethylene 6.3 The worst case benzene emission rate can be calculated by mass balance based on the following: Soil feed rate of 3 tph; Soil moisture content of 14%w/w; Soil benzene content of 1,000 mg/kg; Thermal oxidiser destruction efficiency of 99.99%; and Activated carbon removal efficiency of 0%.. -5 On this basis the benzene emission rate is 7.2 x 10 g/s. PCBs Environment Canada suggests that thermal destruction of PCBs at a high temperature and with an extended residence time results in a 99.9999% destruction efficiency. Available DFTD soil and emission test data from an equivalent PCB soil remediation installation suggests a destruction efficiency of 99.9997%. The Kurnell PCBs congener emission test data and soil test data (refer Appendix G) suggest that: The feed soil PCBs concentration was approximately 170 mg/kg during the period corresponding to the emission tests; The processed soil concentration was below the test method limit of detection, 0.1 mg/kg; and -8 The PCBs emission rate was 2.1 x 10 g/s. Based on a 3 tph throughput the calculated PCBs destruction efficiency is greater than 99.99998%, however in this instance the total congener result may not reflect the total PCBs value, therefore overestimating the efficiency. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 62 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Based on a maximum PCBs concentration of 10,000 mg/kg in contaminated soil and a conservative destruction efficiency of 99.99%, the calculated PCBs emission rate is 0.00072 g/s. This approach conservatively assumes zero removal efficiency due to activated carbon adsorption. PAHs As noted for PCBs, the destruction efficiency for PAHs would be expected to be greater than 99.9999%. EPA has previously clarified that the SEPP(AQM) Schedule A Class 3 design criterion for PAH (as BaP) of 3 0.00073 mg/m refers to benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) only. Based on a maximum BaP concentration of 1,000 mg/kg for contaminated soil and a conservative -5 destruction efficiency of 99.99%, the calculated BaP emission rate is 7.2 x 10 g/s. This approach conservatively assumes zero removal efficiency due to activated carbon adsorption. Organochlorine Pesticides Again, as noted for both PCBs and PAHs, the destruction efficiency for organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) would be expected to be greater than 99.9999%. Based on a maximum OCPs concentration of 5,000 mg/kg for contaminated soil and a conservative destruction efficiency of 99.99%, the calculated OCPs emission rate is 0.00036 g/s. This approach conservatively assumes zero removal efficiency due to activated carbon adsorption. Dioxins/Furans Worst case dioxin/furan emissions to air from the DFTD process can not be estimated based on mass balance techniques or destruction efficiency calculations. 3 Compliance with a dioxins/furans emission concentration of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm at 11% O2 is considered best practice both in Australia and internationally. Expression as I-TEQ provides a single value relative to the most toxic congener, 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8 TCDD). Kurnell emission test data (refer Appendix G) indicates a lower bound (excludes limit of detection values) 3 concentration of 0.00051 ng/Nm and a middle bound (includes half limit of detection values) concentration 3 3 of 0.0031 ng/Nm , both expressed at 11%O2. Compliance with a concentration limit of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm is therefore readily indicated. 3 For the SITA air quality impact assessment a dioxins/furans concentration of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm at 11% O2, 3 an exhaust gas flow rate of 97 Nm /min (dry) at 14.3% O2 and an exhaust gas moisture content of 33%v/v have been assumed. -10 On this basis the dioxins/furans emission rate is 1.1 x 10 g I-TEQ/s. This approach conservatively assumes zero removal efficiency due to activated carbon adsorption. Heavy Metals Soils contaminated with heavy metals have the potential to contain organotin compounds, cadmium, chromium VI and mercury. However the majority of heavy metals present in contaminated soil have high boiling points and consequently will not be volatilized in the desorber to any significant degree. Elemental mercury however has a boiling point of 357°C and is therefore likely to be completely volatilized if present in the soil. Mercury and mercury compound emissions to air will be controlled to a degree by fabric filtration, wet 2+ chemical scrubbing and activated carbon, however tests conducted at coal fired utilities suggest that Hg 0 captured by a wet scrubber can be chemically reduced and re-emitted as Hg . Consequently SITA has determined that soils contaminated with mercury will not be processed by thermal desorption. A maximum acceptance concentration of 15 mg/kg has been set. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 63 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The worst case mercury emission rate was calculated based on the following: Soil feed rate of 3 tph; Soil moisture content of 14%w/w; Soil mercury content of 15 mg/kg; Soil mercury loss of 100%; Fabric filter and wet chemical scrubber removal efficiency of 0%; and A conservatively low activated carbon removal efficiency of 67%, in the absence of operational data for this process enhancement. On this basis the mercury emission rate is 0.0036 g/s. Previous experience with DFTD equipment has shown that other heavy metals are unlikely to be detected at concentrations in the exhaust gases above the test method limit of detection, being present in the entrained particulate matter nominally at the same concentrations as in the feed soil. The air quality impact assessment has consequently been restricted to mercury. The outcomes of the atmospheric contaminant emission estimation process are summarized in Table 26: Table 26: DFTD Emission Rates Atmospheric contaminant Emission rate (g/s) Total solid particulate matter 0.049 PM10 0.049 PM2.5 0.049 Carbon monoxide 0.081 Nitrogen dioxide 0.16 Sulphur dioxide 0.0032 Sulphur trioxide (as H2SO4) 0.00055 Hydrogen chloride 0.046 Hydrogen fluoride 0.0015 Benzene 7.2 x 10-5 PCBs 0.00072 PAHs 7.2 x 10-5 OCPs 0.00036 Dioxins/furans (I-TEQ) Mercury 7.1.3 1.1 x 10-10 0.0036 Impact on Air Quality The SEPP(AQM) contains a framework and criteria for the assessment of emissions to air from new or modified emission sources using a plume dispersion model. Emissions to air from the DFTD exhaust stack August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 64 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL located at the proposed soil processing facility were assessed in accordance with this framework, with the details presented in the following sections. The Model The AUSPLUME mathematical model is a regulatory model used in assessing the dispersal of industrial source emissions to air. The SEPP(AQM) requires the prediction of maximum concentrations for an individual source, or group of sources, to be undertaken using either a currently approved version of AUSPLUME, or an alternative model approved in writing by EPA. AUSPLUME Version 6.0 was the model used in this assessment. Assumptions made in the application of the model included the following: Roughness height of 0.4 m was assumed; Plume buoyancy effects were considered; Pasquill-Gifford formulae were adjusted for roughness height; Building wake effects were assessed using the Prime building wake algorithm; and Terrain effects were considered using the Egan half height method. Meteorological data The model requires the following hourly meteorological data for a one year period: Atmospheric stability (Pasquill class); Mixing depth; Wind speed; Wind direction; and Temperature. The SEPP(AQM) requires that the meteorological data be representative of meteorological conditions within the vicinity of the site, as approved by EPA. The 2002 meteorological file for Dandenong was utilised in this assessment. It should be noted that this file is incomplete with only 8,088 observations of the possible 8,760 observations. The suitability of this file was assessed through comparison with meteorological data collected at the Taylors Road Landfill from a cup and vane anemometer located on a 10 m mast near to the A-ACAP test cell, between Cells 10 and 11. The on-site anemometer is located approximately 200 m south of the proposed Soil Processing Facility. An analysis of the dominant wind directions at the proposed site was conducted by creating a frequency distribution of wind speed and wind direction for the Dandenong 2002 meteorological file and historical 2005 data from the on-site anemometer. Wind roses were then generated for both frequency distributions. The Dandenong 2002 meteorological file wind rose is presented in Figure 17 and the on-site meteorological station wind rose in Figure 18. Results demonstrate that both data sets consist of similar wind patterns, with predominant northerly winds. Therefore use of the EPA meteorological file is considered appropriate for the air quality impact assessment. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 65 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Figure 17: Dandenong 2002 EPA Meteorological File: Wind Rose Figure 18: Taylors Road Landfill Meteorological Data - 2005 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 66 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Model Input Data The required model input data for the DFTD exhaust stack includes the following: Source co-ordinates; Exhaust gas velocity; Exhaust gas temperature; Source diameter; Discharge height about ground level; Dimensions of influencing buildings; and Atmospheric contaminant emission rate. The model input data for the DFTD exhaust stack is based on the Kurnell equipment which operates without an activated carbon bed. The carbon bed outlet attached to the DFTD system, as proposed for the Taylors Road Landfill, will be equipped with a stack discharge with exhaust gas characteristics similar to those presented in the modelling assessment. The model input data is presented in Table 27. Table 27: Model Input Data: Point Source Characteristics Parameter DFTD Exhaust Location: AMG Co-ordinates (x, y) (m) Elevation above Australian Datum (m) Stack height (above ground level) (m) Stack diameter (m) 345079, 5788030 13 15 0.595 Exhaust Gas Characteristics: Velocity (m/s) 11 Temperature (°C) 72 Building Wake Algorithm: Height of nearest influencing building BPIP Width of nearest influencing building BPIP Atmospheric contaminant emission rate (g/s): Total solid particulate matter 0.049 PM10 0.049 PM2.5 0.049 Carbon monoxide 0.081 Nitrogen dioxide 0.16 Sulphur dioxide 0.0032 Sulphur trioxide (as H2SO4) 0.00055 Hydrogen chloride 0.046 Hydrogen fluoride 0.0015 Benzene 7.2 x 10-5 PCBs 0.00072 PAHs 7.2 x 10-5 OCPs Dioxins/furans (I-TEQ) Mercury August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 0.00036 1.1 x 10-10 0.0036 67 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Background Concentration Background concentrations are used in AUSPLUME to estimate the contribution of other sources in the area, in addition to those being modelled. The main additional source of atmospheric contaminants in the vicinity of the Taylors Road Facility is motor vehicle traffic. A constant background concentration for carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, PM10 and PM2.5 was included in the modelling assessment. th Background concentrations were obtained from EPA and represent the 70 percentile of one year’s observed hourly concentrations, in accordance with SEPP (AQM). The background concentrations used in the modelling assessment are presented in Table 28. Table 28: Model Input Data: Background Concentrations Atmospheric Contaminant 1 Hour Average Concentration (µg/m3) Carbon monoxide 460 Nitrogen dioxide 28 PM10 20 PM2.5 10 Building Downwash Building downwash occurs when aerodynamic turbulence, induced by buildings, causes an atmospheric contaminant emitted from an elevated source to be mixed rapidly toward the ground, resulting in higher ground level concentrations. To evaluate the occurrence of building downwash, the position and dimensions of each structure relative to each source must be identified for each of the possible directions of wind flow. Buildings that are within an area of 5L from the source, where L is the lesser of the building height or projected building width, should be considered for downwash effects. AUSPLUME V6.0 provides the PRIME algorithm which was used to determine building downwash effects. Influencing building dimensions were calculated using site plans and building elevation projections. The PRIME algorithm requires the height and co-ordinates of each building corner. When a building does not have a uniform shape, geometric approximations are used to represent each segment/tier of the structure. The treatment building, Category B and C storage building and the pre-processing shed were the only buildings relevant to the modelling assessment. Model Receptors A Cartesian receptor grid consisting of 60 m spacing was utilised in this assessment. The grid domain extends from Australian Map Grid (AMG) co-ordinate, 343312, 5786414 in the south-west to 346612, 5789354 in the north-east. In practical terms the receptor grid encompasses the industrial park to the north of the landfill, industrial land to the south and west and some of the Hampton Park and Lynbrook residential areas in the east. A terrain file was established for this grid with heights above datum calculated for each receptor. A representation of the terrain file used in this assessment is presented in Figure 19. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 68 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Figure 19: Model Input Data: Terrain Map The model also included a number of discrete receptors to represent the closest residential properties to the proposed development. The details of the discrete receptor locations are presented in Table 29 and Figure 20. This figure also demonstrates the location of the DFTD exhaust stack. Table 29: Model Input Data: Discrete Receptors Description AMG Co-ordinates (x,y) (m) Height above datum (m) Bayliss Road 345405, 5787506 18 Bayliss Road 345618, 5787509 21 Taylors Road 344320, 5787593 18 Taylors Road 344284, 5787617 16 Taylors Road 344285, 5787598 16 Taylors Road 344262, 5787698 15 Colemans Road 344377, 5788095 16 Colemans Road 344280, 5788106 15 Colemans Road 344205, 5788123 14 Colemans Road 344061, 5788138 12 Colemans Road 343984, 5788148 12 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 69 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 346000 346500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor Figure 20: Model Input Data: Gridded and Discrete Receptors Model Output Data For each atmospheric contaminant, the AUSPLUME model predicts the one hour average concentration at each receptor specified for each hour of the year’s meteorological data. The highest ground level concentration is established for each hour and is referred to as the peak hourly concentration. th The maximum predicted ground level concentration (GLC) is defined as the 99.9 percentile value, or the 8 highest of the 8,088 peak hourly concentrations. Two models were prepared for each atmospheric contaminant emitted from the proposed facility. The first model contained gridded and discrete receptors with the model output used to determine the maximum predicted ground level concentration at any location on the grid. The second model only contained discrete receptors, with output used to show the maximum predicted ground level concentration at the nearest sensitive receptor. A summary of models assessed is presented in Table 30. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 70 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 30: Modelling Assessment Summary Atmospheric Contaminant Averaging Period Background Concentrations Receptors TSP 3 minute No Gridded: TSP_3 minute_v1 Discrete only: TSP_3 minute_v2 PM10 1 hour Yes Gridded: PM10_1 hour_v1 Discrete only: PM10_1 hour_v2 PM2.5 1 hour Yes Gridded: PM25_1 hour_v1 Discrete only: PM25_1 hour_v2 Carbon monoxide 1 hour Yes Gridded: CO_1 hour_v1 Discrete only: CO_1 hour_v2 Nitrogen dioxide 1 hour Yes Gridded: NO2_1 hour_v1 Discrete only: NO2_1 hour_v2 Sulphur dioxide 1 hour No Gridded: SO2_1 hour_v1 Discrete only: SO2_1 hour_v2 Sulphur trioxide (as H2SO4) 3 minute Hydrogen chloride 3 minute No Gridded: H2SO4_3 minute_v1 Discrete only: H2SO4_3 minute_v2 No Gridded: HCl_3 minute_v1 Discrete only: HCl_3 minute_v2 Hydrogen fluoride 24 hour No 7 days Gridded: HF_24 hour_7 day_90 day_v1 Discrete only: HF_24 hour_7 day_90 day_v2 90 days Benzene 3 minute No Gridded: Benzene_3 minute_v1 Discrete only: Benzene_3 minute_v2 PCBs 3 minute No Gridded: PCB_3 minute_v1 Discrete only: PCB_3 minute_v2 PAHs 3 minute No Gridded: PAH_3 minute_v1 Discrete only: PAH_3 minute_v2 OCPs 3 minute No Gridded: OCP_3 minute_v1 Discrete only: OCP_3 minute_v2 Dioxins/furans 3 minute No Gridded: TEQ_3 minute_v1 Discrete only: TEQ_3 minute_v2 Mercury 3 minute No Gridded: Mercury_3 minute_v1 Discrete only: Mercury_3 minute_v2 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 71 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The maximum predicted ground level concentration for the gridded and discrete receptor models is compared to the SEPP(AQM) Schedule A design criteria. However the SEPP(AQM) does not list any OCPs or PCBs as Class 2 or Class 3 indicators, consequently an assessment is required to establish appropriate design criteria for modelling applications. OCPs Table 31 lists OCPs together with their USEPA carcinogen classification, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) carcinogen classification and Safe Work Australia (SWA) recommended workplace exposure standard. OCPs examined have been based on: Compounds classified as such by the Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) in their July 1999 publication, "Organochlorine Pesticides Waste Management Plan"; OCP breakdown products DDD, DDE, heptachlor epoxide, endrin aldehyde, endrin ketone and oxychlordane; and OCPs listed for analysis under USEPA Method SW-846 Method 8081, "Organochlorine Pesticides". Carcinogen classifications are defined as follows: USEPA Group A – Human Carcinogen This group is used only when there is sufficient evidence from epidemiological studies to support a causal association between exposure to the agents and cancer. USEPA Group B – Probable Human Carcinogen This group includes agents for which the weight of evidence of human carcinogenicity based on epidemiological studies is "limited" and also includes agents for which the weight of evidence of carcinogenicity based on animal studies is "sufficient". The group is divided into two subgroups. Group B1 is reserved for agents for which there is limited evidence of carcinogenicity from epidemiological studies. Group B2 is used for agents for which there is sufficient: evidence from animal studies and for which there is inadequate evidence or no data from epidemiological studies. USEPA Group C – Possible Human Carcinogen This group is used for agents with limit evidence of carcinogenicity in animals in the absence of human data. USEPA Group D – Not Classifiable as to Human Carcinogenicity This group is generally used for agents with inadequate human and animal evidence of carcinogenicity or for which no data are available. USEPA Group E – Evidence of Non-Carcinogenicity for Humans This group is used for agents that show no evidence for carcinogenicity in at least two adequate animal tests in different species or in both adequate epidemiological and animal studies. IARC Group 1 The agent is carcinogenic to humans. IARC Group 2A The agent is probably carcinogenic to humans. IARC Group 2B The agent is possibly carcinogenic to humans. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 72 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 31: Organochlorine Pesticides List Compound USEPA Carcinogen IARC Carcinogen SWA Exposure Standard (mg/m³) Aldrin B2 3 0.25 α – BHC B2 2B 0.1 β – BHC C 2B 0.1 ε – BHC D 2B 0.1 δ – BHC D 2B 0.1 t - BHC B2 2B 0.1 γ – BHC (Lindane) ND 2B 0.1 Chlordane B2 2B 0.5 Chlorobenzilate 3 ND NA DBCP 2B ND NA DDD (breakdown product) B2 2B NA DDE (breakdown product) B2 2B NA DDT B2 2B 1 Diallate 3 NA NA Dieldrin B2 3 0.25 Endosulfan ND NA 0.1 Endosulfan sulphate NA NA NA Endrin D 3 0.1 Endrin aldehyde (breakdown product) NA NA NA Endrin ketone (breakdown product) NA NA NA Heptachlor B2 2B 0.5 Heptachlor epoxide (breakdown product) B2 2B NA Hexachlorobenzene B2 2B NA Hexachlorocyclopentadiene NA E 0.11 Hexachlorophene ND 3 NA Isodrin NA NA NA Methoxychlor D 3 10 Oxychlordane (breakdown product) NA NA NA Pentachloronitrobenzene ND 3 0.5 Pentachlorophenol B2 2B 0.5 2,4,5-T ND 2B 10 Toxaphene 2B B2 NA Notes NA: Not available. ND: Not done. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 73 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL IARC Group 3 The agent is not classifiable as to carcinogenicity in humans. Class 3 indicators under the SEPP (AQM) are defined as extremely hazardous substances that are carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, highly toxic or highly persistent, and which may threaten the beneficial uses of the air environment. Class 2 indicators are defined as hazardous substances that may threaten the beneficial uses of the air environment by virtue of their toxicity, bioaccumulation or odorous characteristics. In most circumstances, substances are listed as Class 3 indicators because of their classification as USEPA Group A or B1 carcinogens or IARC Group 1 or 2A carcinogens. As indicated in Table 31, the highest carcinogen classifications for the OCP listed are USEPA Group B2 and IARC Group 2B. On this basis, the compounds would be considered Class 2 indicators. A number of OCPs, however, are considered extremely persistent in the environment (e.g. DDT, dieldrin and BHC). On this basis, it has been conservatively assumed that OCPs as a class of compounds are Class 3 indicators. To determine the design criteria, a factor of 300 is applied to the SWA workplace exposure standard. This is based on an allowance for 24 hour exposure, rather than an 8 hour workday, a factor of 10 to protect the more vulnerable members of the community, and a further safety factor of 10. The lowest recommended workplace exposure standard for OCPs is 0.1 mg/m³, consequently the derived design criterion for OCPs is 0.33 µg/m³ (3 minute average). PCBs Schedule A of SEPP(AQM) does not list PCBs as Class 2 or Class 3 indicators, consequently an assessment is again required to establish appropriate design criteria for modelling applications. PCBs are IARC Group 2A carcinogens and USEPA Group B2 carcinogens. On the basis of the IARC classification, PCBs would be considered Class 3 indicators. SWA workplace exposure standards for PCBs are as follows: 3 42% chlorine content: 1 mg/m ; 54% chlorine content: 0.5 mg/m . 3 Applying the factor of 300 noted above to the lowest workplace exposure standard suggests an assessment 3 criterion of 0.0017 mg/m (3 minute average). Model Assessment Results The maximum predicted ground level concentrations (GLCs) for each of the atmospheric contaminants are displayed in Table 32. Model output files are contained in Appendix H. Isopleth plots of the maximum predicted ground level concentrations for each atmospheric contaminant are presented in Figures 21 through 36. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 74 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 32: Air Quality Impact Assessment Results Atmospheric Contaminant Averaging Period Gridded Results Maximum Predicted GLC (mg/m3) Discrete Receptor Results Location of Maximum Predicted GLC Location of Maximum Predicted GLC AMG Co-ordinates Maximum Predicted GLC (mg/m3) Design Criteria (mg/m3) AMG Co-ordinates TSP 3 minute 0.016 345172, 5788034 0.0055 345405, 5787506 0.33 PM10 1 hour 0.035 345112, 5787974 0.022 345405, 5787506 0.080 PM2.5 1 hour 0.025 345112, 5787974 0.012 345405, 5787506 0.050 Carbon monoxide 1 hour 0.49 345112, 5787974 0.46 345405, 5787506 29 Nitrogen dioxide 1 hour 0.079 345112, 5787974 0.036 345405, 5787506 0.19 Sulphur dioxide 1 hour 0.0010 345112, 5787974 0.00016 345405, 5787506 0.45 Sulphur trioxide (as H2SO4) 3 minute 0.00018 345172, 5788034 6.2 × 10-5 345405, 5787506 0.033 Hydrogen chloride 3 minute 0.015 345172, 5788034 0.0051 345405, 5787506 0.25 Hydrogen fluoride 24 hour 0.00023 345112, 5787974 1.3 × 10-5 345405, 5787506 0.0029 7 day 0.00011 345112, 5788094 4.8 × 10-6 345405, 5787506 0.0017 90 day -5 9.4 × 10 345445, 5787974 -6 4.5 × 10 345405, 5787506 0.0005 Benzene 3 minute 2.4 × 10-5 345172, 5488034 8.1 × 10-6 345405, 5787506 0.0053 PCBs 3 minute 0.00024 345172, 5788034 8.1 × 10-5 345405, 5787506 0.0017 PAHs (as BaP) 3 minute 2.4 × 10-5 345172, 5788034 8.1 × 10-6 345405, 5787506 0.00073 OCPs 3 minute 0.00012 345172, 5488034 4.0 × 10-5 345405, 5787506 0.00033 Dioxins/furans 3 minute 3.6 × 10-11 345172, 5488034 1.2 × 10-11 345405, 5787506 3.7 × 10-9 Mercury 3 minute 0.0012 345172, 5788034 0.00040 345405, 5787506 0.0033 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 75 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 21: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for TSP August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 76 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 22: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for PM10 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 77 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 23: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for PM2.5 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 78 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 24: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Carbon Monoxide August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 79 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 25: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Nitrogen Dioxide August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 80 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 26: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Sulphur Dioxide August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 81 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 27: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Sulphur Trioxide (as H2SO4) August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 82 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 28: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Hydrogen Chloride August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 83 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 346000 346500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 29: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Hydrogen Fluoride – 24 Hour Averaging Period August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 84 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 346000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 30: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Hydrogen Fluoride - 7 Day Averaging Period August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 85 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 346000 346500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 31: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Hydrogen Fluoride - 90 Day Averaging Period August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 86 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 32: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Benzene August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 87 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 33: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for PCBs August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 88 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 34: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for OCPs August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 89 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (pg/m3) Figure 35: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Dioxins/Furans August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 90 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 5789000 AMG Co-ordinates (m) 5788500 5788000 5787500 5787000 5786500 343500 344000 344500 345000 345500 AMG Co-ordinates (m) Symbol Map Feature DFTD Exhaust Stack Discrete Receptor ___ Rank 1 isopleth (mg/m3) Figure 36: Isopleth Plot of Maximum Predicted GLCs for Mercury August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 91 346000 346500 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL SEPP (AQM) Compliance The modelling assessment results indicate that all modelled atmospheric contaminants comply with SEPP(AQM) design criteria and derived design criteria at all locations on the grid when modelled using worst case scenario input data. In summary the worst case aspects of the modelling assessment were as follows: A constant emission rate was assumed for all atmospheric contaminants over the full year; The PM10 emission rate was assumed to equal the total solid particulate matter emission rate; A conservative nitrogen dioxide emission rate was assumed, which was greater than the emission rate measured at an equivalent installation. Further, it was conservatively assumed that 20% of the total oxides of nitrogen were emitted as nitrogen dioxide, whereas it is more likely to be 5% or less; The hydrogen chloride emission rate assumed a scrubber removal efficiency of 99%. It is anticipated that the actual scrubber removal efficiency will be greater than 99%; The hydrogen fluoride emission rate assumed a scrubber removal efficiency of 99%. It is anticipated that the actual scrubber removal efficiency will be greater than 99%; The benzene emission rate assumed worst case soil benzene content as well as a conservative thermal oxidiser destruction efficiency of 99.99%. It is anticipated that the actual thermal oxidiser destruction efficiency will be 99.9999%; The PCBs emission rate assumed a worst case soil PCBs content as well as a conservative thermal oxidiser destruction efficiency of 99.99%. It is anticipated that the actual thermal oxidiser destruction efficiency will be 99.9999%; The PAHs emission rate assumed a worst case soil BaP content as well as a conservative thermal oxidiser destruction efficiency of 99.99%. It is anticipated that the actual thermal oxidiser destruction efficiency will be 99.9999%; The OCPs emission rate assumed a worst case soil OCPs content as well as a conservative thermal oxidiser destruction efficiency of 99.99%. It is anticipated that the actual thermal oxidiser destruction efficiency will be 99.9999%; The dioxins/furans emission rate was based on an in-stack concentration equal to the best practice 3 concentration of 0.1 ng/Nm (I-TEQ), rather than the expected in-stack concentrations which are anticipated to be significantly less; The mercury emission rate was based on the maximum soil mercury content to be processed by the DFTD equipment; The derivation of the OCPs design criterion was based on a worst case evaluation; and A conservative estimate for the particulate matter emission rate was assumed, which was greater than the emission rate measured at an equivalent installation; The PM2.5 emission rate was assumed to equal the total solid particulate matter emission rate; A conservative carbon monoxide emission rate was assumed, which was greater than the emission rate measured at an equivalent installation; The modelling assessment did not include provision for process DFTD enhancements proposed for the Soil Processing Facility, eg operation of the thermal oxidiser at 1,100°C and the effectiveness of the activated carbon bed for VOCs/SVOCs control (assumed to be zero). August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 92 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Furthermore, in addition to worst case inputs the modelling was conducted such that maximum predicted ground level concentrations could occur at any location on the modelling domain. Examination of the isopleth plots indicates that the isopleths representing the maximum GLCs fall immediately to the north-east of the DFTD stack within the boundary of the landfill site. Maximum predicted ground level concentrations at the modelled discrete receptors and residential developments of Lyndhurst and Hampton Park are significantly less. Finally, the maximum predicted ground level concentrations were calculated as a percentage of the SEPP(AQM) design criteria and derived design criteria to demonstrate the safety margin between the criteria and model predictions. The results of this analysis are presented in Table 33. The results show that the SEPP(AQM) Class 1 and Class 2 substances with background concentrations included in the model, such as PM10, PM2.5 and nitrogen dioxide, showed the smallest safety margins between the maximum predicted GLCs and the design criteria for both the gridded and discrete receptor results. The OCPs and mercury results also showed a relatively reduced safety margin with 36% of the design criteria for the gridded results and 12% of the criteria at the discrete receptors. The remaining atmospheric contaminants, including the Class 3 compound benzene, demonstrated GLC results less than 20% of the design criteria for gridded results and less than 5% at the discrete receptors. Table 33: Model Output – GLC Percentage Atmospheric Contaminant Averaging Period Gridded Results Discrete Receptor Results Safety Margin Safety Margin (GLC as a percentage of the design criteria) (GLC as a percentage of the design criteria) TSP 3 minute 4.8% 1.7% PM10 1 hour 44% 28% PM2.5 1 hour 50% 24% Carbon monoxide 1 hour 1.7% 1.6% Nitrogen dioxide 1 hour 42% 19% Sulphur dioxide 1 hour 0.22% 0.036% Sulphur trioxide (as H2SO4) 3 minute 0.55% 0.19% Hydrogen chloride 3 minute 6.0% 2.0% Hydrogen fluoride 24 hour 7.9% 0.45% Hydrogen fluoride 7 day 6.5% 0.28% Hydrogen fluoride 90 day 19% 0.90% Benzene 3 minute 0.45% 0.15% PCBs 3 minute 14% 4.8% PAHs (as BaP) 3 minute 3.3% 1.1% OCPs 3 minute 36% 12% Dioxins/furans 3 minute 0.97% 0.32% Mercury 3 minute 36% 12% August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 93 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The final component of SEPP(AQM) compliance relates to the management of emissions from stationary sources. In addition to demonstrating compliance with modelling criteria, proponents of new or modified sources must demonstrate compliance with Schedule E “Emission Limits for New Stationary Sources in Air Quality Control Regions”. The relevant limits are reproduced in Table 34 together with the estimated DFTD process exhaust atmospheric contaminant concentrations. Table 34: Schedule E Compliance: Emission Limits for New Stationary Sources in Air Quality Control Regions Wastes Emission Limit DFTD Process Exhaust Combustion particles/total particulate matter 0.25 g/m3 (gas volume calculated at 12 % CO2 0.074 g/m3 Particulate matter 60 g/min 2.9 g/min Sulphur trioxide 0.2 g/m3 expressed as SO3 0.00028 g/m3 Carbon monoxide 2.5 g/m3 0.05 g/m3 Fluorine compounds 0.05 g/m3 expressed as HF 0.00093 g/m3 Chlorine and chlorine compounds 0.2 g/m3 expressed as chlorine 0.028 g/m3 Total of antimony, arsenic cadmium, lead and mercury 10 mg/m3 2.2 mg/m3 Note Gas volumes expressed dry at 0°C and 101.325 kPa. Overall, the air quality impact assessment demonstrates that emissions from the proposed DFTD exhaust are fully compliant with the SEPP(AQM) Schedule A design criteria and Schedule E emission limits. 7.2 Discharges to Surface Water Surface water discharges are defined as releases of waste water to a water body such as an ocean, river or creek. Surface water discharges must be controlled and discharged in accordance with the objectives of the State Environment Protection Policy (Waters of Victoria) (SEPP(WoV)). Wastewater at the Taylors Road landfill is defined as either leachate or stormwater. Leachate is collected, treated and discharged to sewer in accordance with Trade Waste Agreement 1899, Reference 8 held with South East Water Limited (SEWL) whilst stormwater/groundwater is collected, used on site and, where required, discharged to Eumemmerring Creek in accordance with EPA Licence ES511. Details concerning the management of both leachate and stormwater at the facility are presented in the following sections. 7.2.1 Leachate Management Leachate is collected in seventeen sumps located across the landfill site, servicing each of the waste cells. Two of these sumps, 12A and 12B, are located in the prescribed waste Cells 12A and 12B which are the subject of the proposed development. Leachate sump locations are presented in Figure 37. Leachate from all sumps, including those located in the proposed soil processing facility, will continue to be managed in accordance with the requirements of the SITA Environmental Monitoring Manual (MAN010). This process involves transfer of leachate from collection sumps to the 50kL balance tanks for storage prior to Sequencing August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 94 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Batch Reactor (SBR) treatment or to Ponds C and D for ammonia stripping. Ponds C and D are each equipped with 22kW aerators which are used to air strip ammonia from the leachate. For SBR treatment, leachate is transferred from the balance tanks via underground piping to the anaerobic tank, with surplus flowing on to the aerobic tank. Leachate is recycled between these vessels throughout the process until treatment is completed. The first stage of SBR treatment is the aeration cycle where leachate in the aerobic tank is subject to aeration and biological nitrification. The Nitrosomonas spp bacteria converts ammonia to nitrite which is then converted to nitrate by the Nitrobacter spp bacteria. The overall reaction describing nitrification is as follows: + - NH4 + 2O2 → NO3 + H2O + 2H + The next stage is the denitrification cycle in the anoxic tank, where nitrate is reduced to nitrogen gas, with continual mixing and the addition of a carbon supplement. The final SBR stage is settling, where quiescence in the tanks allows sludge to settle and enables treated effluent to be decanted from the aerobic tank into the wet well, and subsequently pumped into Ponds A and B for testing and discharge. Ponds A and B may also be used as treatment ponds, if leachate volumes are sufficient. Aeration in this scenario is achieved by an aerator located in each pond. Once treatment is completed the inlet/outlet valves on Ponds A and B are locked out, with samples collected by SEWL. Initially a sample is analysed and compared against the trade waste criteria. If the sample indicates compliance, the historical sample is then analysed. Non compliance of the first sample means that the batch requires further treatment. Once the batch has compliant samples, the valves are unlocked and the batch discharged to sewer. The monitoring requirements for the leachate plant are stipulated in the SITA Environmental Monitoring Manual (MAN010). 7.2.2 Stormwater Management Stormwater is regulated at Taylors Road Landfill by EPA Waste Discharge Licence ES511, Conditions 2.24 – 2.27. These conditions stipulate controls around the process of stormwater collection and discharge. Initially, water falling onto the landfill is diverted from active waste cells, in order prevent unnecessary contamination. Further to this, stormwater contacting completed caps and site areas free from waste may be directly discharged to off-site perimeter drains. The suitability of this approach is assured by Licence Condition 2.25(c), which requires stormwater samples to be collected from one of the let-down structures on the northern, western, and southern boundary during at least one storm event in every six month period. Samples collected must be analysed for TDS, EC, pH, total iron, total nitrogen as nitrogen, ammonia and PCBs. In the 2008/2009 reporting period samples were collected from the let-down structures on two th rd occasions (25 August 2008 and 3 April 2009). The time between let-down structure sampling events was greater than 6 months due to the lack of significant storm events. The results from these sampling events are presented in Table 35. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 95 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Figure 37: Taylors Road Landfill: Leachate Sump Locations Table 35: Stormwater Monitoring Results Sample Date/Location pH (units) South Let Down Structure West Let Down Structure South Let Down Structure West Let Down Structure 25/08/2008 25/08/2008 03/04/2009 03/04/2009 7.6 7.9 9.0 9.7 TDS (mg/L) 1400 870 240 160 EC (uS/cm) 930 940 350 210 Total iron (mg/L) 8.8 7.9 1.3 0.45 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N (mg/L) 1.8 3.6 3.3 4.9 Total N as N (mg/L) 2.2 5 4.1 5.5 Ammonia as N (mg N/L) <0.1 0.4 0.24 0.27 PCB Arochlor 1016 (mg/L) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 PCB Arochlor 1221 (mg/L) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 PCB Arochlor 1232 (mg/L) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 PCB Arochlor 1242 (mg/L) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 PCB Arochlor 1248 (mg/L) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 PCB Arochlor 1254 (mg/L) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 PCB Arochlor 1260 (mg/L) <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 Total PCBs (mg/L) <0.001 <0.001 <0.01 <0.01 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 96 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Licence Condition 2.25 (b) relates to all other stormwater impacting the site, where water contacting intermediate capped areas is directed to the Duck Pond. Collected water is discharged from the Duck Pond to Eumemmerring Creek in accordance with Licence Conditions 2.26, 2.27, 3.12, 3.13, 3.14, 3.15 and 3.16. In summary, this requires a sample to be collected from the pond prior to discharge, analysed and deemed compliant with the parameters listed in Table 36. Table 36: Duck Pond: Water Quality Parameters Parameter Units Quality Requirement NA 6.0 – 9.0 Suspended soils mg/L <40 Ammonia as Nitrogen mg/L <1 Total organic carbon mg/L <20 Zinc mg/L <0.5 Lead mg/L <0.1 Cadmium mg/L <0.1 Mercury mg/L <0.005 Total iron mg/L <5 Copper mg/L <0.2 Total chromium mg/L <0.3 Phenol mg/L <2.0 Number of organisms per 100 mL <1,000 Chlorinated hydrocarbons (once every six months only) µg/L <0.01 PCBs (once every six months only) µg/L <0.01 pH E.coli Additionally, a visual examination of the pond must ensure that the Duck Pond waters contain no oil, grease, scum, foam, litter or other objectionable matter. At this stage, SITA regards the pond contents as a batch and water cannot be transferred to the pond. Once the pre-discharge analytical requirements are completed the water may be discharged to the Creek. This involves sampling the upstream, downstream and Duck Pond waters for pH and EC. The results are used to calculate an appropriate discharge rate that does not exceed 40 L/s. Further downstream samples are collected 30 minutes following the start of pumping to ensure that the maximum EC does not exceed 1600 µS/cm. The volume of water discharged to Eumemmerring Creek ranges between 319 kL and 15,843 kL per discharge event, with an average of nine discharges per year. The entire discharge process is governed by EPA Waste Discharge Licence conditions with the specific steps required to meet licence conditions detailed in the SITA Environmental Monitoring Manual (MAN010). Stormwater from the proposed soil processing facility will be managed in accordance with this existing system. SITA does not propose any changes to the process for discharging stormwater to Eumemmering August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 97 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Creek, nor is it expected that the proposed development will result in exceedences of the EPA Waste Discharge Licence and SEPP (WoV) emission limits. Stormwater from the proposed facility will be handled in two ways. Firstly, water collected from the roof of the processing building will be regarded as non-contaminated and directed into the process water storage tanks, for subsequent use in the DFTD system. Stormwater collected from the hardstand area will be drained to a collection pond within the proposed facility where it will be stored. Once a sufficient volume has been collected, the water will be regarded as a batch and tested for the parameters contained in the EPA Waste Discharge Licence for the Duck Pond. However, chlorinated hydrocarbons and PCBs will be tested for every batch, not at the 6 monthly frequency currently required for the Duck Pond. Once the collected water is tested and deemed to meet the Duck Pond licence requirements, the water will be transferred to the Duck Pond or to the process water storage tanks within the facility. 7.3 Discharges to Land and Groundwater Discharges to land and groundwater are currently managed at the Taylors Road landfill, in accordance with the requirements stipulated in EPA Waste Discharge Licence ES511. In terms of land, the licence sets out criteria for the placement of waste, types of waste received, disposal procedures, receipt requirements and operational controls. Treated soil discharged to land from the proposed soil processing facility will be managed within this existing system. In terms of groundwater, SITA maintains a groundwater monitoring network and undertakes three monthly sampling for the parameters stipulated in the licence. The proposed development does not include any provision for discharges to groundwater. 7.4 7.4.1 Noise Emissions Legislative Requirements The State Environment Protection Policy (Control of Noise from Commerce, Industry and Trade) No. N-1 (SEPP N-1) specifies compliance noise limits for commercial, industrial and trade premises within the Melbourne metropolitan area. The noise limit, or permissible level, is the maximum effective level allowed at a point in a noise sensitive area. SEPP N-1 prescribes noise limits which are to be met outdoors at noise sensitive areas. Noise sensitive areas include segments of land associated with residential buildings, caretaker houses, hospitals, hotels, institutional homes, motels, reformative institutions, tourist establishments and work release hostels. The noise limit varies with the land use zoning of the area, the time of day, and sometimes with the existing background noise level, if this is either exceptionally high or exceptionally low. The effective noise level produced by the industry must not exceed the noise limit. Where two or more industries emit noise, the combined noise level must not exceed the noise limit. The implications are that under some circumstances individual industries must attenuate noise emissions to significantly below SEPP N-1 limits. The effective noise level is the A-weighted energy averaged noise level (LAeq) over a time period (nominally 30 minutes), adjusted if necessary for various aspects of noise character such as duration, intermittency, impulsiveness or tonality. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 98 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Three time periods are specified in SEPP N-1 for which different noise limits apply. These time periods are as follows: Day: Evening: Night: 7.4.2 Monday – Friday 7.00 a.m. – 6.00 p.m. Saturday 7.00 a.m. – 1.00 p.m; Saturday 1.00 p.m. – 6.00 p.m. Sunday, Public Holidays 7.00 a.m. – 6.00 p.m. All days 6.00 p.m. – 10.00 p.m; and All days 10.00 p.m. – 7.00 a.m. Noise Limits The permissible level is obtained by taking into consideration the noise level expected by the surrounding area, time of day (zoning level) and background noise level. The zoning levels at each sample location for the selected time periods are calculated by the following formulae: Day period (0700-1800 hours) 18 x IF + 50; Evening period (1800-2200 hours) 17 x IF + 44; and Night period (2200-0700 hours) 17 x IF + 39 where; The influencing factor (IF) is a measure of the proportion of land zoned for industrial or commercial use around the measurement point. The influencing factor is assessed by drawing two concentric circles around the measurement point, at 400 metres and 140 metres. The areas contained in each circle of Type 1, Type 2 or Type 3 zones (as described in the Policy) are then calculated, and the influencing factor calculated from the following equation: IF = 1 (Area Type 3) + ½ (Area Type 2) 2 Circle Area 140 metre circle + 1 (Area Type 3) + ½ (Area Type 2) 2 Circle Area 400 metre circle The SITA site is zoned Farming Zone (FZ) and is consequently Type 1. The nearest residential properties are located in Industrial 1 Zone (IN1Z) land (Type 3), to the south-south-east, west and south-west of the site. Based on the zoning at the nearest sensitive receptors, the influencing factors will be 0.95, 1.0 and 0.70 for properties to the south-west, south-south-east, and west respectively. An application to amend the Greater Dandenong Planning Scheme has been made to rezone the land occupied by the Taylors Road Landfill from FZ to IN1Z, to better reflect the ongoing use of the land. Should this application be successful, the influencing factor will increase to 1.0 for the nearest sensitive receptors to the south-west and 0.8 for the property to the west, thereby increasing the applicable noise limits. As the existing property zonings have been utilized in the noise impact assessment provided below, it represents a conservative evaluation in the event that the proposed zoning change occurs. Background noise data is not available, however it is likely to be neutral; at least 6 dB and not more than 12 dB below the zoning level for the day period, and at least 3 dB and not more than 9 dB below for the August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 99 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL remaining periods. For a neutral background the noise limit is equal to the zoning level. The noise limits for each property are presented in Table 37. Table 37: Noise Limits Noise Limits dB(A) Location of Residence SSE W SW Day period (0700-1800 hours) 68 63 67 Evening period (1800-2200 hours) 61 56 60 Night period (2200-0700 hours) 56 51 55 7.4.3 Measured Noise Levels SITA propose that soil pre-treatment, where required, is conducted off site, at the source of the contamination. Consequently there will be no grinding or crushing equipment installed as part of the proposed works. Truck deliveries of contaminated soil will only occur during the day period, therefore the only noise sources of significance during the evening and night periods are the DFTD process equipment and the soil recycler. Enviropacific Services estimate that the fan and blower components of the DFTD equipment run at 88 dB(A). Sound pressure levels measurements conducted on similar DFTD equipment located at BCD Technologies in Narangba, Queensland and the Hitachi SR2000G soil mixer located at Spotswood, Victoria are presented in Table 38. Sound pressure level measurements were conducted at a distance of approximately 1 metre from the equipment. These numbers are considered to be conservatively high for each individual equipment item, as the measurements would have been affected by noise associated with operation of other plant and equipment. Where a range is indicated the highest values have been subsequently assumed in the calculations. Table 38: Sound Pressure Levels DFTD and Soil Stabilisation Equipment Equipment SPL at approximately 1 m dB(A) DFTD Baghouse 90 - 96 Compressor 89 Thermal oxidiser 92 Fan and blower 88 Soil Stabilisation Hitachi SR200G 7.4.4 79 - 84 Compliance Assessment As sound propagates from its source to the receiver location, interactions with the atmosphere, reflective and absorptive surfaces occur to attenuate the sound. In addition geometrical divergence or spreading of the sound energy means that the sound energy will decrease with increasing distance from the source. For a point source exhibiting spherical divergence this equates to approximately 6 dB for each doubling of distance. The total attenuation, in decibels, can be approximated as the sum of three independent terms as follows: August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 100 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Attenuation Atotal= Adiv+ A air + A other Where Adiv is the attenuation due to geometrical divergence, Aair is the attenuation due to air absorption, and Aother is the attenuation due to all other effects and includes the effects of the ground, refraction by a nonhomogeneous atmosphere, scattering effects due to turbulence and attenuation by barriers. Attenuation due to divergence is the same for all acoustic frequencies, while the attenuation due to the other two terms in the equation depends on frequency and therefore changes the spectral characteristics of the sound. International Standard ISO 9613 "Attenuation of Sound During Propagation Outdoors" details the calculations to determine the attenuation due to atmospheric absorption (Aair). Atmospheric conditions such as temperature, pressure and humidity have a significant effect on the level of absorption. Over larger distances (>100 m), the overall sound level and character of the noise can be significantly altered. As there is no spectral data available for the measured sound pressure levels, atmospheric absorption will not be considered further. Attenuation due to divergence can be calculated assuming spherical divergence from the following equation: Adiv = 20 log(D2/D1) Where; D1 and D2 represent a distance in metres from a point source. The nearest residential properties to the proposed SITA soil processing facility are located at the following approximate separation distances and directions from the proposed soil processing equipment: South-south-east 590 m; West 720 m; and South-west 870 m. For a receiver at a distance of 590 m from the source the attenuation due to spherical divergence equates to 55 dB(A). The predicted sound pressure levels at each of the nearest residential properties due to operation of the DFTD and soil stabilisation equipment, together with the night period noise limit, are presented in Table 39. Predicted sound pressure levels were calculated based on measured and estimated equipment noise levels, allowing for attenuation by spherical divergence only. Attenuation due to atmospheric absorption and other effects such as barriers, vegetation and ground absorption have not been considered. Table 39: Predicted Sound Pressure Levels Receiver Location Distance (m) SPL at Receiver dB(A) Night Period Noise Limit dB(A) South-south-east 590 44 56 West 720 42 51 South-west 870 40 55 The predicted sound pressure levels at each of the nearest residential properties readily comply with the derived night period noise limits and SEPP N-1 requirements, despite the conservative nature of the assessment. 8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SITA is committed to rigorous environmental management to ensure all segments of the environment are protected and preserved where possible. This is best demonstrated by the company’s Environment Policy, which states: “SITA is committed to: August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 101 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Complying with relevant Federal and State environmental laws, and other legislation and requirements; Adopting responsible environmental protection practices; Seeking excellence in waste handling procedures; and Striving for the prevention of pollution and continual improvements in environmental performance. To achieve these goals, we: Provide resources to meet our environmental obligations; Implement the principles of waste reduction, reuse and recycling; Integrate responsible environmental targets with the corporate planning process; Continuously monitor and review our environmental performance and report to regulators as required; Audit our major sites’ environmental management systems; Respond promptly and appropriately to any adverse environmental impacts that may result from our activities; Consult with the local community in response to any concerns about our operations; Educate our employees and contractors in environment protection techniques; and Work with public sector and industry groups to encourage sustainable environmental practice.” The proposed soil processing facility is positioned firmly within this management framework. The facility will enable SITA to further implement the principles of waste reduction and create a mechanism for the prevention of pollution (through treatment of Category A wastes), which is a key objective of State policy. The policy principles are also at the core of the proposed development, with SITA committed to the installation of best practice technology to meet environmental obligations (Section 5.0) and integration of the facility into the existing environmental management systems (Sections 8.3 and 8.5). Lastly the proposed development includes consulting with the local community and stakeholders through the process outlined in the community engagement plan (Section 4.3). The specific environmental management requirements relating to non routine operations, separation distances, management systems, construction phase and environmental monitoring relating to the proposed soil processing facility are presented in Sections 8.1 to 8.5. 8.1 Non-Routine Operations Non-routine operations are events where normal process conditions are suspended due to an unforeseen problem or incident. In the context of the proposed Soil Processing Facility, non routine operations fall into four categories; utility failure, equipment failure, process triggered shutdown and chemical/water/soil spill. The proposed development contains equipment with sufficient safety and environment protection features, implemented with well designed infrastructure including bunding, chemical designated areas, storage buildings and designated transport routes. These physical elements will be coupled with management strategies that enable non-routine operating conditions to be handled appropriately to minimise any potential environmental impact. The relevant management strategies for non-routine operations are: Comprehensive operator training; Induction programme, which includes environmental aspects; Provision of adequate system documentation, including creation of Standard Operating Procedures and operator checklists; Plant and equipment maintenance programme; August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 102 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Audit programme; and Documentation of non-conformances and follow up. The outcomes of a hazards and operability study (HAZOP) conducted on the proposed DFTD equipment, which assesses actions to address non-routine operations, is reproduced in Appendix I. This document is provided on a commercial in confidence basis. Each category of non-routine operation is discussed in the following sections. 8.1.1 Utility Failure Electricity Electricity will be used by the Soil Processing Facility for lighting, operation of the processing building ventillation system and operation of the DFTD control panel, induced draught fan, pumps, compressors and motors. Mains electricity will be used as the primary power supply with a back up emergency generator available on site to facilitate equipment shutdown in the event of mains power interruption. The generator will not be used as a power source to continue processing; rather it will be used to enable a safe and controlled shut down during a non-routine operating event. In this instance, the generator will be used for the DFTD equipment, processing building ventilation system and lights if the power interruption occurs at night. The procedure will be the same as that employed for normal shut down, eg. a staged approach, following removal of processed soil and exhaust gases. It is not anticipated that mains electricity failure will result in non-routine emissions to air, land or water. A more extreme circumstance is the total interruption of mains and generator power whilst processing contaminated soil. In this scenario, the plant operator will be required to perform manual adjustments to reduce the potential for an unsafe working environment, equipment damage and emissions to air. The following steps will be undertaken: All equipment and controls will be switched off and isolated from power, to prevent damage in the event that power returns; An audible signal will notify all plant operators of emergency conditions; Battery operated lights will be activated if the event occurs at night; Account for all personnel and activate the site emergency plan; The dilution valve will be manually opened to enable the ingress of air to the baghouse and wet chemical scrubber, protecting the equipment from high temperature exhaust gases; The ID fan damper will be opened enabling convective flow of air through the system; The dryer will be turned every thirty minutes to prevent hot soil from warping the drum; A handheld infrared gun will be used to check equipment for hot spots. An emergency water tank with cylinder air pressure will be available on site to cool down hot spots as required; When power returns, soil will be removed from the drum and returned to the untreated stockpile; and A comprehensive system check will be conducted to ensure that equipment damage did not occur. Once power interruption has occurred, the rotary dryer and thermal oxidiser will slowly cool down to ambient temperature over a period of approximately 60 minutes. Soil contaminants will continue to be driven off, however the ID fan will no longer be operating to draw the exhaust gas through the system. Ventilation will however be achieved to a limited extent through manual release of the ID fan damper. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 103 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Emissions to air during the emergency may occur from the dryer inlet, with the contaminant concentration expected to slowly decrease as the soil and dryer cool from desorbing temperatures to ambient. Exhaust gas that is naturally ventilated will be treated by the thermal oxidiser as it cools, however the evaporative cooler will not be operational and air travelling through the system may leak from the dilution valve prior to the baghouse and system damper prior to the wet chemical scrubber. The contaminant concentration at each location can be estimated from the process design case presented in Table 17, however the emission rate cannot be calculated as it will be a dynamic process, with no mechanical ventilation, subject to the interactions between equipment pressures and temperatures and ambient pressures and temperatures. Overall, the likelihood of total power failure is very low as contingency measures will be in place if mains power supply is interrupted. The focus of actions undertaken in this emergency scenario will be prevention of harm to personnel and equipment. Natural Gas Natural gas is used to fuel the dryer and thermal oxidiser. Start up procedures for both fuel trains require a comprehensive staged approach to ensure that the system can achieve the flows and pressures required for operation of the DFTD. Once operating, an interruption to dryer burner natural gas supply will cause the dryer, soil feed and screening unit to shut down. Similarly, cessation of natural gas supply to the thermal oxidiser burner will also cause the dryer, soil feed and screening unit to shut down. Shut down of the dryer and soil feed, halts processing and enables the plant operator to investigate and implement a staged shutdown. The ID fan will continue to operate, drawing exhaust air from the dryer through the thermal oxidiser and subsequent control equipment. It is not anticipated that thermal oxidiser burner shut down will result in elevated emissions to air as temperature reduction within the oxidation chamber is a gradual process with the internal temperature reducing to ambient conditions over a 60 minute period. The plant operator will also be in a position to control exhaust gas flow and manage emissions to air using the output from the CEMS. Partially treated soil will be removed from the dryer and returned to the untreated soil stockpile. The likelihood of natural gas supply failure is low. Risk control measures will be implemented to reduce the likelihood of supply failure including installation of gas supply in accordance with Australian Standards and equipment startup and commissioning checks conducted in accordance with standard operating procedures. Water Water is incorporated in the DFTD process in the soil conditioning system/pugmill, evaporative cooler and wet chemical scrubber. Loss of water supply to the pugmill will result in hot soil exiting the system, with the potential for conveyor belt damage, personnel burns and fugitive dust emissions. In this instance the soil feed will be shut down, with the plant operator responsible for ensuring sufficient water is available to continue soil processing. Loss of water supply to the evaporative cooler will cause an increase in gas temperature entering the baghouse, triggering the high temperature alarm which in turn shuts down the soil feed to the dryer, reduces the dryer and thermal oxidiser burners to low fire and reduces the ID fan speed, lowering the exhaust gas flowrate. These interlocks also trigger the release of the baghouse damper, allowing the ingress of ambient air to cool the system and reduce the potential for baghouse damage. System shut down will enable the operator to ensure that sufficient water supply is available to continue processing or investigate causes of water failure such as quench pump failure. 8.1.2 Equipment Failure Induced Draught Fan The induced draught (ID) fan works to draw exhaust gas through the system, maintaining a negative pressure throughout the processing equipment. The loss of negative pressure will cause the dryer, soil feed and screening unit to shut down. A pressure switch located in the dryer will trigger a hatch on the dryer August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 104 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL opening, preventing dryer exhaust gas from leaking from the system without treatment. Shut down of the dryer, soil feed and screening unit will enable the plant operator to rectify the situation, or commence a staged shut down. It is unlikely that induced draught fan failure will result in non-routine emissions to air due to incorporated process interlocks. Dryer Dryer operation is dependent on adequate soil feed, operation of the ID fan to maintain negative pressure and temperature maintenance. Risks of dryer failure are managed through a preventative maintenance programme and correct operation of the induced draught fan and burner fuel trains as described above. Dryer temperature is a function of the calorific value of the contaminated soil been processed and operation of the dryer burner. If the dryer temperature exceeds 590°C as measured on thermocouple TC2, the soil feed will shut down, the dryer and thermal oxidiser burners are reduced to low fire and the ID fan is reduced to low speed, lowering the exhaust gas flowrate. The purpose of this interlock is to prevent temperature damage to the dryer, with the enforced shut down enabling the plant operator to investigate and rectify the situation. Emissions to air will continue to be discharged through the process emission control system. SITA will control risks to dryer operation through ensuring that the soil feed calorific value is within limits recommended by the equipment manufacturer and that thermocouple cross checks and calibrations are conducted as part of the preventative maintenance programme. Thermal Oxidiser Failure of the thermal oxidiser will occur if insufficient fuel is supplied to the burner and if internal temperatures exceed the manufacturer’s recommendation for safe operation of the equipment (1,140°C). Exceedence of 1,140°C as measured by thermocouple TC3, will result in an alarm, with process interlocks triggered. Soil feed will be shut down, burners (dryer and thermal oxidiser) reduced to low fire and the ID fan reduced to low flow, enabling the plant operator to investigate, instigate corrective actions or commence a staged shut down. Fuel train failure is discussed above, however it is important to note that inefficient operation of the fuel train will result in elevated concentrations of oxides of nitrogen and carbon monoxide in the exhaust gas. Where exhaust gas concentrations exceed the CEMS trigger level, the process interlock system will be activated. The CEMS trigger level will be set below the facility licence requirements to provide a safety buffer between elevated exhaust gas concentrations and licence condition exceedences. Evaporative Cooler Evaporative cooler operation is dependent on an adequate water supply and the integrity of the components delivering the water supply. Risks to this control equipment will be minimized by the preventative maintenance programme whilst the outcomes of water supply failure are addressed above. Baghouse Operation of the baghouse is dependent on the inlet temperature, which is a function of the effectiveness of the evaporative cooler, and the pressure differential measured across the filter fabric. Outcomes associated with a high inlet temperature are discussed above under water utility failure. As noted in the Process Controls and Interlocks Section, filter fabric pressure differential enables the plant operator to monitor the baghouse pulse cleaning system. It is the responsibility of the plant operator to ensure that baghouse operation is within the manufacturer’s guidelines as the pressure differential is not linked to process interlocks. However if exhaust gas particulate matter concentrations exceed the CEMS trigger level, the process interlock system will be activated. As noted above, the trigger level will be set below the facility licence requirements to provide a safety buffer between elevated exhaust gas concentrations and licence condition exceedences. A baghouse leak detection programme will also be instigated to guard against baghouse failure during operation. The procedure will enable SITA to identify leaking bags, improperly seated bags, and/or leaks in the side walls. Wet Chemical Scrubber Operation of the wet chemical scrubber is dependent on adequate water supply and operation of the equipment components delivering the water supply and pH neutralising chemicals. Equipment components such as the recirculating water pump, water valve, water nozzles, water lines, blowdown valves and float August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 105 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL valve arm are subject to wear and tear which has the potential to cause under delivery or over delivery of water and neutralising chemicals during operation of the DFTD. Diligent conduct of the preventative maintenance programme will ensure that equipment wear and tear is monitored and components cleaned and replaced where necessary. However if component failure occurs during DFTD operation exhaust gas acid gas emissions will increase until the CEMS trigger is breeched, activating the process interlocks system. Hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride and sulphur dioxide trigger levels will be set below the facility licence limits to enable an adequate safety margin. 8.1.3 Process Triggered Shutdown Process triggered shutdown refers to an emergency stop triggered by the plant operator. In this scenario, the operator will hit the emergency mushroom button which will shut down power to the entire plant and sound the emergency air horn to alert all personnel to the emergency. Following this, the operator will be responsible for shutting down burners and opening the baghouse dilution damper. Where possible, the operator will shutdown the plant in accordance with the standard operating procedures. Emergency shutdown may be triggered by equipment failure as described above or other process related emergencies. 8.1.4 Spills Soil Soil spilt within the processing facility will be contained within the bunded area. All soil spills will be managed in accordance with SITA’s existing Emergency Procedures Guide, Action Plan: Spills. Chemicals Chemicals used in the soil processing facility will be stored in a bunded area, in accordance with EPA Publication No. 347, Bunding Guidelines. The storage area will be equipped with appropriate spill kits, including absorbent materials and neutralizing agents. Site personnel will be trained in the appropriate use of spill kits and disposal of materials. Stormwater Overflow The soil processing facility will be bunded in accordance with EPA Publication No. 347, Bunding Guidelines. The operational area will include provision for drainage and collection of stormwater in the holding pond. Where a severe rain event causes overflow from the processing facility, stormwater may flow to the surrounding landfill and be collected in the Duck Pond. 8.1.5 Overview An overview of non-routine operations is presented in Table 40. The table summarises the information provided above, providing an indication of the risk, risk control measures, likelihood and consequence. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 106 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 40: Non-Routine Operations: Environmental Impacts and Controls Event Likelihood1 Potential Environmental Impact Outcome Risk Management Utility failure: electricity Low Emissions to air Shut down of all systems Emergency backup generator on site at all times Manual opening of baghouse dilution valve and ID fan damper Preventative maintenance programme Qualified electricians used to install and commission equipment Utility failure: natural gas Low Emissions to air Staged shut down of all systems Preventative maintenance programme Conduct of full commissioning programme prior to soil processing Installation in accordance with Australian Standards by qualified electricians and gas fitters. Utility failure: water Low Emissions to air Pollution of land Cessation of soil feed Preventative maintenance programme Opening of baghouse dilution valve Baghouse dilution valve Cessation of soil conditioning system, potential for conveyor damage and soil spill. Process interlocks Preventative maintenance programme Bunding of soil processing area Emergency Procedures Guide, Action Plan: Spills. Equipment failure: ID fan Very low Emissions to air Loss of negative pressure Preventative maintenance programme Dryer inlet hatch Process interlocks Equipment failure: dryer shutdown Very low Pollution of land Dryer shutdown Preventative maintenance programme Thermocouple calibration programme Management of soil feed (calorific value) Process interlocks Equipment failure: thermal oxidiser Low Emissions to air Thermal oxidiser shut down Preventative maintenance programme Process interlocks Commissioning of fuel train in accordance with standard operating procedure Equipment failure: evaporative cooler Low Equipment failure: baghouse Low Emissions to air Emissions to air August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 Shut down of all systems Preventative maintenance programme Opening of baghouse dilution valve Adequate water supply on site Shut down of all systems Preventative maintenance programme Opening of baghouse dilution valve Baghouse leak detection programme 107 Process interlocks APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Event Likelihood1 Potential Environmental Impact Outcome Risk Management Equipment failure: wet chemical scrubber Low Emissions to air Shut down of all systems Preventative maintenance programme Process triggered shut down Low Process interlocks CEMS Emissions to air Shut down of all systems Manual opening of baghouse dilution valve Commissioning of each equipment item in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications Preventative maintenance programme Operator training Soil spill Low Pollution of land and surface waters Immediate clean up Soil spilt within the processing facility will be contained within the bunded area, All soil spills will be managed in accordance with SITA’s existing Emergency Procedures Guide, Action Plan: Spills. Chemical spill Low Pollution of surface waters Immediate clean up Chemicals used in the soil processing facility will be stored in a distinct area equipped with bunding installed in accordance with EPA Publication, No. 347, Bunding Guidelines. The storage area will be equipped with appropriate spill kits, including absorbent materials and neutralizing agents. Site personnel will be trained in the appropriate use of spill kits and disposal of materials. Stormwater overflow Low Pollution of surface waters Overflow to Duck Pond The soil processing facility will be bunded in accordance with EPA Publication No. 347, Bunding Guidelines. The operational area will include provision for drainage and collection of stormwater in the holding pond. Where a severe rain event causes overflow from the processing facility, stormwater may flow to the surrounding landfill and be collected in the Duck Pond. Notes 1 Likelihood Scale: Very low, low, moderate, high, very high August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 108 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 8.2 Separation Distances 26 EPA Publication No. AQ2/86 contains recommended buffer distances associated with residual air emissions from a range of industrial processes. Equipment failure, accidents and abnormal weather conditions are among the causes that can lead to amenity reducing emissions affecting properties beyond the boundary of the source premise. Residual air emissions are often intermittent or episodic in occurrence and may originate at or near ground level. Provision of an adequate buffer distance allows the emissions to dissipate without adverse impacts on sensitive land uses. The buffer distance is defined as the distance between all plant, buildings or other structures and features (e.g. stockpiles) from which residual air emissions may be anticipated and the property boundary of any sensitive use nearest to the emission source, except in the case of an isolated house in a non-residential zone where the house itself would be the measuring point. If land is zoned for a sensitive use, it is treated as sensitive regardless of its current use, and the zone boundary is the measuring point. Given the proposed thermal treatment of VOCs and SVOCs contaminated soils at the proposed facility, the recommended buffer distance of 500 m for premises undertaking the treatment of organic waste could be considered applicable. EPA has however determined that treatment of organic waste is not an appropriate classification, consequently there is no EPA endorsed buffer distance for the proposed SITA facility. In March 2001, the Minister for Major Projects established the Hazardous Waste Siting Advisory Committee (HWSAC), to advise on all aspects of the siting process for new waste recycling, treatment and storage 27 28 facilities . HWSAC adopted the HWCC buffer recommendation as the default for the siting of soil recycling and treatment facilities and accepted the following concentric buffer zones around such facilities: A core of 200 m radius within which only compatible land uses (i.e. compatible hazardous waste facilities) will be permitted and which must be owned (or controlled) by the operator; and An outer zone between 200 m and 2 km radius within which there will be no sensitive uses unless permitted in accordance with the planning overlay. Buffer zones were accepted by HWSAC for soil recycling and treatment facilities to: Provide an additional margin of safety for the community during normal operating conditions where emissions may occur; Provide an additional margin of protection of amenity (from things such as odours, aesthetic impacts or noise); Provide safety and protection of amenity (e.g. against loss due to odours, aesthetic impacts or noise) in the event of abnormal conditions (such as spillages, fires, machinery breakdown); Address community concerns and expectations or anxieties about such facilities; and Provide industry, government and community with a clear and sustainable basis for planning. HWSAC does however note that buffer distances for soil recycling and treatment facilities, set on the basis of risk calculations alone, would probably be of the order of a few hundred metres or less and that the HWCC outcome represented a precautionary approach to the setting of buffer distances. The distances between the proposed SITA soil processing facility and the nearest residential properties (refer Figure 20) are as follows: South-south-east 590 m; 26 “Recommended Buffer Distances for Industrial Residual Emissions”, Environment Protection Authority, Publication No. AQ2/86, July 1990 27 “Siting of Soil Recycling and Treatment Facilities”, Hazardous Waste Siting Advisory Committee, Department of Infrastructure, May 2002 28 “Final Report”, Hazardous Waste Consultative Committee, April 2000 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 109 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL South-west 870 m; and West 720 m. Theses distances are less than the precautionary approach recommended by HWSAC and more than those suggested by a risk based approach (a few hundred meters). The air quality impact assessment presented in Section 7.1.3, demonstrates that the proposed buffer distance is more than adequate to establish compliance with the SEPP (AQM) design criteria during normal operation; with custom enhancements expected to provide even better emission control. However, the primary purpose of industrial buffers is to provide adequate protection to beneficial users from “industrial residual air emissions” (IRAEs). IRAEs are non-typical air emissions which may be episodic or intermittent. The proposed soil processing facility has two levels of control to reduce the risk of IRAEs, these are physical and managerial. Physical controls proposed to reduce the risk of IRAEs are: Intermittent uncontrolled emissions are not possible, as process controls and interlocks will not enable the DFTU to operate unless pollution control equipment is engaged; The DFTU unit operates under negative pressure; loss of draught and hence vacuum causes immediate shut down and closure of the hatch on the dryer. Moreover the process between the dryer and pollution control equipment is sealed, physically preventing the egress of untreated residual emissions to air; The risk of non routine emissions to air resulting from power failure has been minimised through the inclusion of a back-up generator on-site. In the event of mains power failure, the plant operator will implement a controlled shutdown using emergency power. Pollution control equipment will be shut down in stages, ensuring all emissions to air are within the operating parameters for the site. The plant operator will use CEMs output during this process to ensure compliance; Utility failure including water and natural gas will trigger process interlocks and equipment shutdown, reducing the risk of uncontrolled emission to air; and CEMs equipment will trigger process shutdown if emissions to air breach a predefined trigger level. Managerial controls proposed to reduce the risk of IRAEs are: Comprehensive operator training; Installation and commissioning in accordance with standards and regulations; Rigorous preventative maintenance programme; and Development of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for routine and non-routine operations. Additionally, similar soil processing facilities have been installed in Australia and overseas at distances less than those advocated by HWSAC. Notably the Kurnell installation is located within 1 km of residential properties and approximately 100 m from commercial premises. The primary soil contaminant treated at Kurnell was PCBs. Enviropacific Services also operates a DFTD processing facility in the Narangba Industrial Estate, north of Brisbane. The DFTD unit is located at BCD Technologies which is positioned in the vicinity of other industrial manufacturers such as fish food and fertilizer producers. The nearest residential property is located approximately 670 m to the north-east. The facility has been operating the DFTD unit for six months processing contaminated soil with no complaints received to date. The facility has been inspected by members of the local residents action group and no issues or additional concerns have been raised following inspection of the plant and operations. Moreover a new housing development is proposed to the south of BCD Technologies, potentially reducing the buffer distance to 400 m. Precedence can also be demonstrated by the locations of other soil processing facilities with similar technology to that proposed for the Taylors Road Landfill. For example Thiess Services operated a thermal desorption technology in Rhodes NSW, to clean up the Former Allied Feeds Site. This facility was located within 100 m of the nearest residential properties. Similarly Thiess is working to thermally treat chlorinated August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 110 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL and non-chlorinated organics at the former Lednez/Union Carbide Site in Homebush Bay NSW. This site is located approximately 120 m from the nearest residential properties. To provide a global perspective, MECO Services has operated many thermal treatment installations where distances to sensitive receptors were varied. Many projects have undergone strict supervision by the USEPA and local government bodies, and where required met and exceeded the legislated requirements. Proximity to residential dwellings, sensitive natural environments and ecologically sensitive areas were considered and managed successfully. The buffer distance in one project in Boise, Idaho was only a few hundred meters. This project was fast tracked by the state and federal regulatory authorities and implemented technology similar to the proposed equipment. Overall the proposed DFTD equipment incorporates the best available technology for exhaust gas cleanup and goes and above and beyond what has been used historically in any thermal treatment project in Australia. The addition of activated carbon adsorption post wet chemical scrubbing places a further treatment stage on to what has been considered to be acceptable air pollution control practice in similar projects in the past. The level of control with CEMS and the ability to manage mercury within the waste stream places the Enviropacific Services equipment in a class above any previous or currently operating thermal desorption project. These measures and the risk management strategies adopted for control of nonroutine emissions, coupled with experience in operation of similar installations, demonstrates that the proposed buffer distances are appropriate for the amelioration of possible community amenity and health impacts. 8.3 Management System Existing operations at the Taylors Road Landfill are managed in accordance with two SAI Global certified management systems. These are: ISO 14002 Certified Environmental Management System Licence No. C10260 ; and AS 4801, Certified Occupational Health and Safety System Licence No. 00160. The proposed soil processing facility will operate within these existing systems. 8.4 Construction SITA is committed to ensuring a high standard of responsible environmental management during construction and operational activities. SITA is committed to: Reducing the risk of adverse environmental impacts through an ongoing process of hazard identification, risk assessment, control measures implementation, monitoring and review; Minimising the potential for disturbance and disruption to surrounding stakeholders, including residents, businesses and the public; and Striving for continual improvement. The following section provides a summary of the key management solutions for potential environmental impacts arising from the construction activities. It is further anticipated that prior to construction commencing, the appointed construction contractors/subcontractors will be tasked with preparing a site specific construction environmental management plan in accordance with guidance provided in EPA Publication No. 480 “Environmental Guidelines for Major Construction Sites”, dated February 1996. As a minimum the construction environmental management plan will: Address the potential environmental risks associated with construction activities; Identify control measures to minimise the potential for adverse environmental impacts arising from construction activities; August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 111 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Outline the mitigation measures to ensure environmental risks are adequately managed during construction; Ensure all activities comply with relevant regulatory requirements; Ensure all activities comply with any Works Approval and Permit Conditions; and Ensure all activities comply with SITA’s environmental criteria. The following key potential environmental risks have been identified for the construction phase: Excavation on the landfill/additional weight on the landfill; Noise and vibration including operating hours, vehicles, equipment and traffic; Air quality and dust; Surface water quality control (stormwater); Erosion and sediment control; Waste management; Public roads; and Public safety. Likely mitigation measures considered in the design of the proposed facility are summarised below. Excavation on the Landfill/Additional Weight on the Landfill The cap of the cells comprise a flexible geomembrane liner overlying a clay layer with 500 mm of cover soil over the geomembrane liner. The materials for the lining system have a load capacity well in excess of the load from the capping system. It is expected that the load capacity of the materials of the cap liner system will be able to withstand the additional weight from the construction of the waste treatment facility as well as the weight of the structures. Additional fill will also be placed over the completed capping system to construct and shape the subgrade for the waste treatment facility. The existing surface will be proof rolled to identify any softer area in the capping cover material which will be replaced with compacted fill. The placement of additional fill over the cap will provide additional protection and separation between the building footings, buried services and the lining system. Before placement of any additional fill, a layer of warning geotextile will be installed to ensure that the lining system of the cap is not damaged during the waste treatment facility construction works. The warning layer will be at least 300 mm above the liner system. The foundations of the waste treatment facility buildings are proposed to be of low to moderate bearing pressure to spread building loads to limit the stress transfer on the lining system of the cap. The surface grade of the cap is gradual so lateral movement is not likely to occur due to the additional load. Methane gas in landfills is produced through decomposition of organic wastes under anaerobic conditions and it is considered unlikely that the cells containing 100% Prescribed Industrial Waste such as Cells 12A and B will generate significant methane gas. Thus, impacts relating to worker safety due to the risk of methane gas during the construction phase are low. Further, it is expected that construction worker safety will be addressed in the site construction management plan, and prior to site works, all contractors/ subcontractors will be required to undertake site induction training. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 112 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Noise and Vibration Construction operating hours will be limited to the standard working day, i.e. 07:00 to 18:00 Monday to Friday, and 08:00 to 15:00 Saturday and Sunday. Further, no construction activities involving heavy equipment such as earth moving equipment and excavators will be undertaken on Sundays. It is anticipated that construction activities will not result in excessive vibration impacts. Air Quality and Dust Protection The main source of air pollutants associated with construction activities are likely to be dust and exhaust emissions associated with the movement and operation of construction vehicles. Measures to reduce the impacts of dust will include, wetting of bare earth surfaces and internal roads as appropriate. Vehicle speeds will be restricted on the site to 15 kph on unsealed roads. Where possible, work schedules will be arranged such that exposed areas are only stripped as construction progresses. Given the scale of the construction activities, it is unlikely that exhaust emissions from construction vehicles and equipment will result in significant impacts. Furthermore, site vehicles will be maintained in operable condition in accordance with manufacturers’ specifications. Surface Water Quality, Erosion and Sediment Control A suite of measures are available to minimise on-site erosion, reduce and limit sediment discharged from the site and limit any adverse off-site impacts to receiving waters. These include: Stockpiles and large areas of bare soil will have sediment controls placed on the down slope side; Sediment barriers (maybe gravel or cloth filter with sandbags) will be placed around stormwater inlets. The barriers function by temporarily ponding runoff allowing suspended sediment to settle before entering the stormwater drainage system; Divert water exposed to disturbed land into the existing stormwater management system at the landfill; Temporary sediment ponds will be established at the site to collect run-off from construction activities prior to discharge to the landfill stormwater management system. Stockpiling of excavated soils during construction will be limited to designated location(s); ‘No Go Areas’ will be established for construction vehicles; Sediment fences and low flow diversion bunds will be installed on contours, where practicable, to control sheet erosion; Where practical work schedules will be arranged such that exposed areas are only stripped as construction progresses; and Waste Management In line with SITA’s current practice at the landfill, the site will be secured to ensure no illegal dumping of waste occurs. Contractors/ subcontractors will be expected to comply with SITA’s internal policies and procedures for management of chemicals and fuels on site, including safe storage, handling and use to prevent spillage. In the event of spillage of fuels or chemicals during construction, SITA will respond in accordance with emergency procedures for the landfill. Concrete mixing and refuelling will be conducted in designated areas to prevent washings/spills/leaks entering the stormwater drainage systems. Public Roads A vehicle wash down area or wheel wash facility will be located at the site exit to remove any soil, mud or debris from vehicles leaving the site. Public roads abutting the site will be swept and inspected weekly during August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 113 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL the construction phase. Appropriate signage making road users aware of construction vehicles entering or exiting the site will be displayed. Public Safety The external boundaries of the site (namely, the northern and eastern boundaries) will be secured with a minimum 1.8 m fence to prevent unauthorised entry onto the site. Construction warning signage will be displayed as appropriate to inform the public of the potential hazards involved. Chemicals and machinery will be stored such that they do not pose a risk of vandalism, theft or damage. SITA will develop a contingency response plan which identifies all potential environmental construction scenarios and contains appropriate contingency plans and procedures to manage each possible scenario and minimise associated impacts, with provision of adequate notice to the public regarding timing and progress of the works associated with the development. SITA will also develop a monitoring and inspection programme to assess impacts of construction activities. Some of the key areas for inspection and monitoring include the following: 8.5 Visually monitor the effects of dust and emissions generated during construction; Visually monitor the effects of generated waste (e.g., spills) and clean work areas; Monitor noise from plant and equipment; Record and respond to complaints from local residents; Record and monitor the storage of dangerous goods and hazardous substances; and Monitor stormwater and sediment control devices and discharges from the site. Environmental Monitoring Environmental monitoring conducted at the Taylors Road Landfill is currently managed by the procedures outlined in SITA’s “Environmental Monitoring Manual”. This document details the monitoring requirements for groundwater, leachate, gas, stormwater, dust, occupational health and safety and miscellaneous monitoring in order to comply with the conditions of EPA Waste Discharge Licence ES511. Monitoring conducted in accordance with this document may be undertaken in-house or by a NATA accredited laboratory. All analytical results must be reported on NATA endorsed test reports. Similarly, the procedures used must be in accordance with the following EPA publications: Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines, Sampling and Analysis of Water, Wastewater, Soil or Waste, IWRG701, June 2009; Groundwater Sampling Guidelines, Publication No. 669, April 2000; and A Guide to the Sampling and Analysis of Air Emissions, Publication No. 440.1, December 2002. Environmental monitoring at the proposed soil processing facility will also be managed by the “Environmental Monitoring Manual” with the requirements for NATA accreditation and the use of validated EPA sampling methods applicable to the proposed facility. Additional monitoring that will be required as part of the proposed soil processing facility development is as follows: Dust Deposition Monitoring The existing network of directional dust gauges on the landfill boundaries provide an indication of percentage dust per compass quadrant. This network does not measure the deposition rate of insoluble solids, hence 2 compliance with the EPA guideline of 4 g/m /month cannot be assessed. Consequently SITA will co-locate August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 114 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL an additional dust deposit gauge with each existing directional dust deposit gauge. The gauges will be located in accordance with AS/NZS 3580.1.1 Guide to Siting Air Monitoring Equipment. Samples will be collected on a monthly basis and analysed for insoluble solids in accordance with AS3580.10.1 Determination of Particulate Matter – Deposited Dust. Stormwater Monitoring The proposed soil processing facility will include a mechanism for catchment of stormwater from the operational areas of the facility. As noted in Section 7.2, this water may be discharged to the Duck Pond or the process water tanks following batching, sampling and analysis. The sampling programme for batch stormwater will include measurement and assessment of the water quality indicators and criteria presented in Table 41: Table 41: Environmental Monitoring: Stormwater Quality Criteria Parameter Frequency Units Quality Requirement pH Every batch NA 6.0 – 9.0 Suspended solids Every batch mg/L <40 Ammonia as nitrogen Every batch mg/L <1 Total organic carbon Every batch mg/L <20 Zinc Every batch mg/L <0.5 Lead Every batch mg/L <0.1 Cadmium Every batch mg/L <0.1 Mercury Every batch mg/L <0.005 Total iron Every batch mg/L <5 Copper Every batch mg/L <0.2 Total chromium Every batch mg/L <0.3 Phenol Every batch mg/L <2.0 E.coli Every batch Number of organisms per 100 mL <1,000 Chlorinated hydrocarbons Every batch µg/L <0.01 PCBs Every batch µg/L <0.01 Proof of Performance Tests Proof of performance tests (POP) tests will be conducted to demonstrate that the DFTD equipment performance specifications are being met and to verify estimated emission rates presented in Section 7.1.2. In particular, POP tests are required to demonstrate acceptable destruction and removal efficiencies, and 3 compliance with the dioxins/furans emission limit of 0.1 ng/Nm (I-TEQ) when treating higher PCBs content soils. Reported results for the equivalent installation in Kurnell, NSW are available for PCBs soil feed concentrations of 170 mg/kg. SITA propose POP tests to demonstrate satisfactory equipment performance for PCBs soil feed concentrations up to 10,000 mg/kg. One round of air emission tests, consisting of single samples, will be conducted during the POP test for each soil input. The activated carbon bed exhaust stack will be fitted with the appropriate sockets at a sampling plane location consistent with the requirements of Australian Standard AS 4323.1, Stationary Source Emissions: Method 1: Selection of Sampling Planes. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 115 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL The air emission monitoring requirements for the POP tests are presented in Table 42. Table 42: Environmental Monitoring: Activated Carbon Bed Exhaust - POP Tests Soil Input POP Test Monitoring Programme OCPs contaminated soil not exceeding 5,000 mg/kg exhaust gas velocity, temperature, flowrate and moisture content; exhaust gas velocity, temperature, flowrate and moisture content; exhaust gas velocity, temperature, flowrate and moisture content; exhaust gas velocity, temperature, flowrate and moisture content; PCBs contaminated soil not exceeding 10,000 mg/kg PAHs contaminated soil not exceeding 1,000 mg BaP/kg Mercury contaminated soil not exceeding 15 mg/kg concentration of oxygen and carbon dioxide; concentration and mass rate of emission of TSP, PM10, CO, total oxides of nitrogen (as NO2 equivalents), SO2, SO3, HCl, total fluorine compounds (as HF equivalents), VOCs (GC/MS scan), OCPs, dioxins/furans and heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead and mercury). concentration of oxygen and carbon dioxide; concentration and mass rate of emission of TSP, PM10, CO, total oxides of nitrogen (as NO2 equivalents), SO2, SO3, HCl, total fluorine compounds (as HF equivalents), VOCs (GC/MS scan), PCBs (as Aroclor groups), dioxins/furans and heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead and mercury). concentration of oxygen and carbon dioxide; concentration and mass rate of emission of TSP, PM10, CO, total oxides of nitrogen (as NO2 equivalents), SO2, SO3, HCl, total fluorine compounds (as HF equivalents), VOCs (GC/MS scan), PAHs, dioxins/furans and heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead and mercury). concentration of oxygen and carbon dioxide; concentration and mass rate of emission of TSP, PM10, CO, total oxides of nitrogen (as NO2 equivalents), SO2, SO3, HCl, total fluorine compounds (as HF equivalents), VOCs (GC/MS scan), dioxins/furans and heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead and mercury). The actual soil contaminant concentrations that will be treated during the POP tests will be dependent on soil availability. SITA acknowledge that the actual concentrations of soil treated during the OCPs and PCBs trials will form the basis for contaminated soil acceptance criteria for the proposed facility. The emission monitoring programme will be conducted by a laboratory accredited by NATA for the specified emission tests. All samples will be analysed by a laboratory accredited by NATA for the specified analytes, unless prior agreement to do otherwise has been obtained from EPA. During the POP tests, soil samples will be collected from the rotary dryer feed conveyor and pugmill discharge. Additionally samples will be collected from the baghouse and scrubbing liquor bleed. The proposed soil, baghouse dust and scrubbing liquor sampling programme during the POP tests is presented in Table 43. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 116 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 43: Soil, Baghouse Dust and Scrubbing Liquor Sampling Programme - POP Tests Sample Type Sample Location Sample Frequency Sample Analysis Reference Sample Feed soil Rotary dryer feed conveyor Duplicate samples will be collected when the drier has received 3 tonnes of input soil, and at 10 tonne intervals thereafter. One sample of each pair analysed One sample of each pair retained for at least six months Treated soil Pugmill discharge Two samples will be collected at the same frequency as for the feed soil, at a time shift based on the rotary dryer residence time One sample of each pair analysed One sample of each pair retained for at least six months Baghouse dust Collected baghouse dust One composite sample will be collected, consisting of discrete samples obtained at a frequency matching rotary dryer feed sample collection. One composite sample analysed None Scrubbing liquor Scrubbing liquor bleed One composite sample will be collected, consisting of discrete samples obtained at a frequency matching rotary dryer feed sample collection. One composite sample analysed None All samples collected from the soil feed, pugmill discharge, baghouse and scrubbing liquor bleed will be analysed by a laboratory accredited by NATA for the analyte of interest. For OCPs contaminated soil the analyte of interest is OCPs, whilst samples collected from PAHs contaminated soil will be analysed for PAHs. Finally samples collected during processing of PCBs contaminated soil will be analysed for PCBs (Aroclor groups). The results will enable calculation of both soil removal efficiency and contaminant destruction efficiency. In addition, for the OCPs and PCBs trials, the baghouse and scrubbing liquor bleed samples will be analysed for dioxins/furans (I-TEQ) content. The final component of the POP testing regime is the conduct of a noise survey at community based sensitive receptors to demonstrate that the noise impacts associated with the development comply with the requirements of the State Environment Protection Policy (Control of Noise from Commerce, Industry and trade) No. N1. SITA will provide EPA with at least 7 days prior written notice of the commencement of each POP test, and the quantity of soil to be treated. The soil quantity will be to a maximum of 250 tonnes for each trial. An assessment report, including POP soil and emission test results, will be provided to EPA within 30 days of the completion of each round of the POP test programme. The report, to be prepared by an environmental auditor appointed pursuant to the Environment Protection Act 1970, will state whether the POP test has been undertaken in accordance with works approval requirements, and whether the specified emission limits have been met. Following completion of the POP test, no further treatment of contaminated soil of that type will occur on-site until a copy of the assessment report has been submitted to EPA. Point Source Monitoring The SEPP(AQM) contains provisions for the ongoing monitoring of emissions from point source discharges. Clause 21(1) stages that “The Authority may require a generator of emissions to measure and report on its emissions to enable the Authority to determine whether the emissions are being managed in accordance with the policy and any other statutory requirements”. A point source monitoring programme will be established for the proposed DFTD exhaust in accordance with this clause and any licence requirements imposed by the EPA. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 117 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Process Input Monitoring Particulate matter collected in the fabric filter and bleed water from the wet chemical scrubber will be returned to the pugmill for mixing with the processed soil. A monitoring programme for dioxins and furans from both these inputs will be instigated to ensure the suitability of this waste minimisation measure. Dioxins/furans will be sampled from collected particulate matter and wet chemical scrubber liquor bleed once per batch until compliance is demonstrated. Activated Carbon Monitoring Activated carbon used for DFTD process exhaust gas clean up requires a routine monitoring programme to ensure that the carbon is not spent. SITA propose to conduct a thirty day routine inspection programme to establish carbon activity. When 75% bed breakthrough is observed, activated carbon changeover will occur. Waste Stream Monitoring Waste stream monitoring refers to the verification of contaminated soil loads prior to stockpiling and processing. As described in Section 2.1.3, receipt of contaminated soils to the processing facility involves client characterisation of waste and demonstration of treatment feasibility to SITA’s satisfaction, followed by transport to site, where a sample from the load is compared to a previously forwarded reference sample. Once admitted to site, the load is segregated in either the processing building or Nissen Hut. At this stage, SITA may undertake verification testing to confirm the level and type of contamination. 3 Verification testing involves collection of one sample per 1,000 m of load. This frequency is considered appropriate as the soil must be appropriately characterised by the client before entry to site. The purpose of the verification test is to confirm the initial assessment through collection of an independent sample. Overall sampling and analysis must be conducted in accordance with the IWRG “Sampling and Analysis of Waters, Wastewaters Soils and Wastes”, Australian Standard AS 1141.3.1 – 1996 Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates – Method 3.1 – Sampling – Aggregates and NEPC Schedule 3(B) “Guideline on Laboratory Analysis of Potentially Contaminated Soils”. In summary this involves ensuring that the sample is collected with the “utmost care and integrity by properly trained personnel” so that the “sample represents, as far as practicable, the true nature of the main body of 29 material”. The composite sample will consist of at least five discrete samples, as described in Australian Standard AS 1141.3.1, Tables 1 and 2, with the discrete samples mixed to form a homogenous composite sample (unless the contaminants(s) of concern include volatile chemicals and then individual samples will be tested). The discrete samples shall be collected from random locations throughout the pile, ensuring the procedure used for collection is in accordance with Australian Standard AS 1141.3.1, Section 6.9, Sampling from Stockpiles. The sample container, holding time and sample preservation techniques will be in accordance with IWRG “Sampling and Analysis of Waters, Wastewaters, Soils and Wastes”. Sample analysis will consist of a soil screen for all contaminants listed in Table 44 and the contaminant of concern, if not already included. All laboratory analyses will be conducted by a laboratory with NATA accreditation for the tests to be performed. 29 Australian Standard AS 1141.3.1 – 1996, Methods for Sampling and Testing Aggregates – Method 3.1 – Sampling – Aggregates August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 118 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Table 44: EPA Victoria IWRG 621 Table 2 Screen Total Metals (As, Cd, Cu, Pb, Hg, Mo, Ni, Sn, Se, Ag, Zn) Total Cr (VI) Total cyanide Total fluoride Speciated phenols (halogenated plus non-halogenated) MAHs PAHs TPH (C6-C9, C10-C15, C16-C28, C29-C36) PCBs Chlorinated hydrocarbons (volatile plus semi-volatile) OCPs Once sample results have been received by SITA the segregated loads will either be accepted as meeting the licence limits for the facility or rejected. Rejected loads will be immediately returned to the client. Any equipment contacting the rejected load will be decontaminated following removal. This process will be documented by SITA with a system established for: Materials inspection and tracking; Materials ownership; Handling of unacceptable materials and associated paperwork; and Operator training. End Product Monitoring Soils processed by DFTD or soil stabilisation will be sampled to ascertain the success of treatment, and to establish the appropriate disposal options. End product monitoring involves collection of samples, analysis and categorisation using either the highest th result or the 95 percentile value. The number of samples to be collected from each batch is dependent on the volume of the batch and the method used to categorise the treated soil. SITA will determine the number of samples to be collected and the method for collection using the sampling guidelines presented in the IWRG “Soil Sampling”. Samples will be analysed for all contaminants listed in Table 44 and the contaminants of concern, if not already included. Samples will also be tested for leachable concentrations in accordance with the Industrial Waste Resource Guideline “Soil Hazard Categorization”. All laboratory analyses will be conducted by a laboratory with NATA accreditation for the tests to be performed. August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 119 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 9.0 REFERENCES A.J. & Davis (eds). Air Pollution Engineering Manual. Air and Waste Management Association, 1992. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. Guidelines for Mobile Polychlorinated Biphenyl Destruction Systems. 1990. Department of Climate Change. National Greenhouse Accounts (NGA) Factors. June 2009. Department of Climate Change. National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting (Measurement) Technical Guidelines. Version 1.1, 2008. Department of Infrastructure, Hazardous Waste Siting Advisory Committee. Siting of Soil Recycling and Treatment Facilities. May 2002 Direct Thermal Desorption Treatment of PCB Contaminated Soil/Sands at Villawood and Kurnell, NSW. Mobile Treatment Solutions Technology Application, National Protocol for Approval Licensing of Trials of Technologies for the Treatment of Schedule X Wastes. July 2008. Environment Australia. Characterisation and Estimation of Dioxin and Furan Emissions from Waste Incineration Facilities. Environment Protection Act, 1970. Version 170, Act No. 8056/1970. (incorporating amendments as at 1 May 2009) Environment Protection (Scheduled Premises and Exemptions) Regulations, 2007 Environment Protection Authority of Victoria. A Guide to the Sampling and Analysis of Air Emissions. Publication 440.1, December 2002. Environment Protection Authority of Victoria. Bunding Guidelines. Publication 347, December 1992. Environment Protection Authority of Victoria. Environmental Guidelines for Major Construction Sites, Publication 480, February 1996. Environment Protection Authority of Victoria. EREP Guidelines. Environment Resource Efficiency Plans, Publication 1198.1, August 2008. Environment Protection Authority of Victoria. EREP Toolkit Module 3 of 5: A Resource Efficiency Site Assessment Procedure. Publication 1223.1, April 2008. Environment Protection Authority of Victoria. Groundwater Sampling Guidelines, Publication 669, April 2000 Environment Protection Authority of Victoria. Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines, Soil Hazard Categorisation and Management, Publication IWRG631, June 2009. Environment Protection Authority of Victoria. Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines, Solid Industrial Waste Hazard Categorisation and Management, Publication IWRG631, June 2009. Environment Protection Authority of Victoria. Industrial Waste Resource Guidelines, Sampling and Analysis of Water, Wastewater, Soil or Waste, IWRG701, June 2009 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 120 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Environment Protection Authority of Victoria. Protocol for Environmental Management, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Energy Efficiency in Industry, Publication 824, January 2002. Environment Protection Authority of Victoria. Recommended Buffer Distances for Industrial Residual Emissions, Publication AQ2/86 July 1990. Environment Protection (Industrial Waste Resource) Regulations 2009, S.R. No. 77/2009 European Commission IPCC. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for Waste Incineration (Draft), May 2003 GHD. Monitoring for Fine Particulates at Taylors Road Landfill, Lyndhurst, 31/13015/56306, August 2003. Hazardous Waste Consultative Committee. Final Report, April 2000 Hyder Consulting Pty. Ltd. SITA Environmental Solutions Carbon Footprint 2008/2009 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Development for Operational and Waste Management Activities Financial Year 2008/2009, AA001640-02-04, November 2009. SITA Environmental Solutions Post Collection Victoria. Environmental Monitoring Manual,. MAN010, July 2009. Standards Australia. AS1668.2, The Use of Ventilation and Air Conditioning in Buildings Part 2: Ventilation design for Indoor Air Contaminant Control”, 2002. Standards Australia. AS 4323.1, Stationary Source Emissions: Method 1: Selection of Sampling Planes, 1995. Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand. ASNZS 3580.1.1 Method for Sampling and Analysis of Ambient Air – Part 1.1 – Guide to Siting Air Monitoring Equipment. 2007 Standards Australia. AS3580.10.1 Method for Sampling and Analysis of Ambient Air – Method 10.1 – Determination of Particulate Matter – Deposited Dust, 2003 State Environment Protection Policy (Waters of Victoria), S 13, February 1988. State Environment Protection Policy (Air Quality Management), S 240, December 2001. The Institute of Chemical Engineers. A User Guide to Dust and Fume Control, Engineering Practice Committee Working Party on Dust and Fume Control, 1981 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Centre on Air Pollution, Fabric Filter – Pulse-Jet Cleaned Type, Air Pollution Fact Sheet. United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Standards for Hazardous Waste Combustors, Federal Register, Volume 71, Number 206, October 2006. Variation of an Order Relating to Notifiable Chemicals, S5, 1 February 2000. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc & U.S. Air Filtration, Inc. W. Troxler, Focus Environmental, Inc., Personal communication. www.sita.com.au August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 121 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL 10.0 ABBREVIATIONS AMG Australian Map Grid BAT Best available technology CEMS Continuous emission monitoring system CESC Community Engagement Steering Committee DFTD Direct fired thermal desorption EC Electrical conductivity EIP Environmental Improvement Plan EPA Environment Protection Authority of Victoria EREP Environment Resource Efficiency Plan FRTR United States Federal Remediation Technology Roundtable IRAQs Industrial Residual Air Emissions ITEQ International Toxic Equivalents LTTD Low temperature thermal desorption GWP Global warming potential HTTD High temperature thermal desorption MEA Maximum extent achievable NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants NGER National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act 2007 PAHs Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PCBs Polychlorinated biphenyls PEM Protocol for Environmental Management PM10 Particulate matter with an equivalent aerodynamic diameter less than 10 microns PM2.5 Particulate matter with an equivalent aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 microns psi Pounds per square inch (unit of pressure) RESA Resource Efficiency Site Assessment SBR Sequenced batch reactor August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 122 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL SEPP (AQM) State Environment Protection Policy (Air Quality Management) SEPP (WoV) State Environment Protection Policy (Waters of Victoria) SEWL South East Water Limited SVOCs Semi-volatile organic compounds TDS Total dissolved solids TOC Total organic carbon TSP Total suspended particulate matter USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency VOCs Volatile organic compounds in.wg Inches water gauge (unit of pressure) August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 123 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL Report Signature Page Frank Fleer Principal Jacinda Shen Senior Environmental Scientist FF/JSHEN/sh A.B.N. 64 006 107 857 Golder, Golder Associates and the GA globe design are trademarks of Golder Associates Corporation. j:\air\2010\107613081_sita waa\correspondance out\107613081-001-r-rev0-application for works approval.doc August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL FIGURES August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 SOUTH GIPPSLAND FWY SLA S ROAD Y HW ND / EXISTIN G ENTR ANCE/E XIT APPRO EXISTING GATE X. NATIO NAL DR IVE EXISTING WEIGH BRIDGE GIP V DRI TH H NAS U SO MO AN PSL E ATION . EASEM ENT LOC PROPOSED SITE ACCESS WAY APPROX TAYLOR S ROAD WESTER N PORT TAYLOR HWY S ROAD WY DH C GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY. LTD. INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS DRAWING IS THE COPYRIGHT OF GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY. LTD. UNAUTHORISED USE OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS PLAN EITHER WHOLLY OR IN PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION INFRINGES COPYRIGHT. IPP HG UT SO ABBOTT SITE LOCATION (SEE INSET) BAYLIS S ROAD BAYLIS S RO AD KEY MAP INSET APPROX. 1:7,500 0 150 300 450m 0 200 400 600m APPROX. 1:7,500 APPROX. 1:10,000 CLIENT SITE LOCALITY APPROX. 1:10,000 www.golder.com GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD Plot Date: 23 August 2010 Time:9:57:20 AM By: McKeown, Peter Path: J:\Env\2010\107613081\Technical Doc\CADD\FIGURES - File Name:107613081-001-R-F001-REV0.dwg Xref: J:\Env\2010\107613081\\Technical ########### Doc\CADD\IMAGES\107613081_XIMG_LYNDHURST 1046_56 hl lr.jpg PROJECT SITA ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS DRAWN BY DATE PDM 13.08.10 CHECKED BY DATE MG 23.08.10 SCALE SITE LOCALITY AND KEY MAP SHEET SIZE AS SHOWN PROPOSED SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL DRAWING TITLE A3 PROJECT No 107613081 DOC No 001 DOC TYPE R FIGURE No F001 REVISION 0 FIGURE 1 LEGEND BUILDING CONCRETE PAD TITLE BOUNDARY EXISTING CELL LIMITS PROPOSED SITE LEVEL (mAHD) NOTES 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Xref: Plot Date: 23 August 2010 Time:9:55:44 AM By: McKeown, Peter Path: J:\Env\2010\107613081\Technical Doc\CADD\FIGURES - File Name:107613081-001-R-F002-REV0.dwg 6. TITLE INFORMATION IS SHOWN FROM SURVEY MAP PREPARED BY JCA LAND CONSULTANTS, PLAN NUMBER: PS 607356 B, SHEET 2 OF 2 (LAST DATED 04.02.08). TITLE INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATE ONLY. SITE GRID BASED ON ARBITRARY DATUM PER LANDAIR SURVEYS MAP VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCED TO (mAHD) UTILITIES TO SUPPLY FACILITY TO ENTER SITE FROM THE EAST. RELATIVE LEVELS SHOWN ALLOW FOR 1m MINIMUM FILL MATERIAL TO BE PLACED ON APPROVED CAP. SITE ACCESS AND FINISHING SURFACE TO CONSIST OF COMPACTED CRUSHED ROCK OR CONCRETE HARDSTAND. 0 25 50 75m 1:1,250 CLIENT PROJECT SITA ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS www.golder.com GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY LTD DRAWN BY DATE PDM 13.08.10 CHECKED BY DATE MG 23.08.10 SCALE DRAWING TITLE PRELIMINARY SITE LAYOUT STAGE 1 SHEET SIZE 1:1,250 PROPOSED SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL A3 PROJECT No 107613081 DOC No 001 DOC TYPE R FIGURE No F002 C GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY. LTD. INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS DRAWING IS THE COPYRIGHT OF GOLDER ASSOCIATES PTY. LTD. UNAUTHORISED USE OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS PLAN EITHER WHOLLY OR IN PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION INFRINGES COPYRIGHT. REVISION 0 FIGURE 5 CHAPMAN SERVICES, LLC APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL APPENDIX A Limitations August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL LIMITATIONS This Document has been provided by Golder Associates Pty Ltd (“Golder”) subject to the following limitations: This Document has been prepared for the particular purpose outlined in Golder’s proposal and no responsibility is accepted for the use of this Document, in whole or in part, in other contexts or for any other purpose. The scope and the period of Golder’s Services are as described in Golder’s proposal, and are subject to restrictions and limitations. Golder did not perform a complete assessment of all possible conditions or circumstances that may exist at the site referenced in the Document. If a service is not expressly indicated, do not assume it has been provided. If a matter is not addressed, do not assume that any determination has been made by Golder in regards to it. Conditions may exist which were not detected given the limited nature of the enquiry Golder was retained to undertake with respect to the site. Variations in conditions may occur between assessment locations, and there may be special conditions pertaining to the site which have not been revealed by the investigation and which have not therefore been taken into account in the Document. Accordingly, additional studies and actions may be required. In addition, it is recognised that the passage of time affects the information and assessment provided in this Document. Golder’s opinions are based upon information that existed at the time the information is collected. It is understood that the Services provided allowed Golder to form no more than an opinion of the actual conditions of the site at the time the site was visited and cannot be used to assess the effect of any subsequent changes in the quality of the site, or its surroundings, or any laws or regulations. Any assessments, designs, and advice provided in this Document are based on the conditions indicated from published sources and the investigation described. No warranty is included, either express or implied, that the actual conditions will conform exactly to the assessments contained in this Document. Where data supplied by the client or other external sources, including previous site investigation data, have been used, it has been assumed that the information is correct unless otherwise stated. No responsibility is accepted by Golder for incomplete or inaccurate data supplied by others. Golder may have retained subconsultants affiliated with Golder to provide Services for the benefit of Golder. To the maximum extent allowed by law, the Client acknowledges and agrees it will not have any direct legal recourse to, and waives any claim, demand, or cause of action against, Golder’s affiliated companies, and their employees, officers and directors. This Document is provided for sole use by the Client and is confidential to it and its professional advisers. No responsibility whatsoever for the contents of this Document will be accepted to any person other than the Client. Any use which a third party makes of this Document, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, is the responsibility of such third parties. Golder accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this Document. Golder Associates Pty Ltd GAP Form No. LEG04 RL1 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL APPENDIX B SITA Australia Certificate of Incorporation August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL APPENDIX C Waste Discharge Licence ES511 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL APPENDIX D CESC Terms of Reference August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 Taylors Rd Landfill Community Engagement Steering Committee TERMS OF REFERENCE 1. Background The State Government has indicated its intention to rely on the Taylors Road landfill at Dandenong South (formerly Lyndhurst) for “safe management and disposal of industrial waste until 2020”. As a result, EPA, in collaboration with the cities of Greater Dandenong and Casey and the landfill operator, SITA, is initiating a community engagement process to be guided by a Community Engagement Steering Committee (CESC). This process complements a long-standing and continuing dialogue between SITA and the closest residents to the landfill in Colemans Road. It is not intended to be a substitute for that long standing relationship with the residents of Colemans Road, as they are the people most directly affected by how the landfill operates. Nor is it intended that matters directly affecting only the residents of Colemans Road are matters for consideration by the CESC. 2. Purpose The overall aims of broadening the community engagement process for the Taylors Road landfill are to: Build community understanding of, and confidence in, how the landfill works and its performance is reviewed Provide open, accessible and ongoing avenues for community involvement in decisions affecting the landfill operations Provide a model for community involvement in the management of these types of facilities Ensure the facility is an example of best practice waste management for Victoria. 3. Role and level of influence The overall role of the Community Engagement Steering Committee (CESC) is to ensure the fair, transparent and accountable inclusion of broader community (which includes all stakeholders) views in decisions about the Taylors Road landfill. The CESC will also ensure opportunities are maximised for the broader community to: build a greater understanding about waste management have their views included in decision-making deliberate over, and influence, key decisions affecting the monitoring/assessment and implementation of best practice waste management at the site review performance of the site. The CESC is not a decision-making body. Final management decisions regarding the facility will rest with SITA and the relevant State and local government regulators. It is expected that the CESC will provide advice and recommendations on the best ways to maximise the input and involvement of the broader community as outlined above. The CESC’s advice on these matters will as far as possible form the basis of plans and actions for ongoing community involvement. In keeping with this role, the focus of the group’s discussions will be on matters directly relating to the operation and monitoring of the landfill itself, rather than on broader matters such as the merits of State policies, standards and classifications in relation to Prescribed Industrial Waste. Taylors Road Landfill CESC 1 of 6 Terms of Reference, May 2009 4. Specific tasks and activities Some of the Community Engagement Steering Committee’s specific tasks will include: Contributing to discussion of various issues surrounding the management of the Taylors Road site such as monitoring and safety, operational issues or future plans Identifying varying viewpoints that will need to be presented to the broader community Contributing to the plan for engaging with the broader community in the south east Melbourne metropolitan area Reviewing the content of information distributed to the public to ensure it is fair and balanced. Commenting and reviewing any community surveys (or the like) to ensure the design and distribution is appropriate Commenting on advertising, media and potential PR related to community engagement at the landfill to ensure it is balanced and appropriate Agreeing on the participant representation at any events, e.g. including: the stakeholder groups to be invited, the regional area from which participants will be elicited, the advertising process to elicit broad and inclusive participation, the selection process if needed (i.e. if there are too many nominations) Contributing to any engagement events as agreed by the group (e.g. as ‘experts’, observers, table facilitators or scribes, participants) Overseeing the outcomes of the process and feedback to participants, and back to SITA and relevant regulators Requesting information from relevant stakeholders including EPA, to assist in clarifying process and policy regarding waste management in Victoria. 5. Membership and the role of members The members of the CESC are: Member Interest Organisation Tony O'Hara Hampton Park residents and local environmental and community interests Treasurer, Hampton Park Progress Association Casey Conservation Advisory Committee Friends of River Gum Creek Friends of Hampton Park Library Jason Wood Lynbrook residents Lynbrook Residents Association Ian Jensz (substitute Helen Russo) Residents of Colemans Road President, Colemans Road Ratepayers Association (Secretary, CRRA) Jim Houlahan Dandenong residents and ratepayers Dandenong Residents and Ratepayers Association Thelma Wakelam Resident and broader interests in the SE region Secretary, RATWISE Geraldine Gonsalvez Residents and other community interests in the SE region Australian Indian Innovations Inc Chairperson, RATWISE Rowan Park Preservation House Southern Women's Australian Network Andrew Tytherleigh Waste producers and treaters Executive Director, Victorian Waste Management Association Laurence Halvy Adjacent/local industry General Manager, Fresh Start Bakeries, Lyndhurst Malcolm Baker Regulation of the landfill operations and broader community interests in CGD Director Development Services, City of Greater Dandenong Yvonne Herring Regulation of the landfill operations and broader community interests in CGD Councillor, City of Greater Dandenong David Richardson Regulation of the landfill operations and broader community interests in Casey Manager Engineering and Environmental Services, City of Casey Taylors Road Landfill CESC 2 of 6 Terms of Reference, May 2009 Lynette Keleher Regulation of the landfill operations and broader community interests in Casey Councillor, City of Casey Susan Carter Community engagement Community Relations Officer, EPA Colin McIntosh Regulation of the landfill operations Landfill Unit, EPA Mark D'Agostino Health impacts Environmental Health Officer, Dept of Human Services Marc Boxer Land use planning Dept of Planning and Community Development Evan Kyriakopoulos Landfill operations Landfill Operations Manager, SITA Environmental Solutions Michael O'Keeffe Landfill operations Post Collection Manager, SITA Environmental Solutions Bruce Turner Community involvement CESC independent facilitator Phoenix Facilitation The membership and these Terms of Reference will be reviewed after the first 12 months of operation by the independent facilitator in consultation with the CESC members and CESC selection panel (comprising EPA, Greater Dandenong and Casey Councils and SITA). The frequency of ongoing reviews will be considered at that time. (NB This is not meant to preclude evaluations of the group’s process and progress during the first 12 months). Additions or changes to the membership of the group may occur at the discretion of the independent facilitator in discussion with the CESC if it becomes apparent that the collective membership of the Community Engagement Steering Committee does not adequately capture the diversity of backgrounds and views of the landfill’s broad set of stakeholders. Maximum numbers for the Steering Committee are around 20. Participation on the CESC: is voluntary does not preclude members from being involved in other forums and avenues for input to State policy considerations on industrial waste does not affect participants’ rights to participate in any statutory decision-making processes concerning the operation of the landfill (i.e. members are not required to endorse any particular decisions or outcome/s of the engagement process, and any differences of view arising in CESC meetings will be recorded in the minutes). In joining the CESC, members are both expected and encouraged to: value the opportunity to help ensure the Taylors Road landfill site is accountable, wellmanaged and an example of best practice waste management for the state make themselves available to groups and individuals in the wider community (apart from the media, as addressed in the section on media contact below) as a contact for information about, and input to, the process pass on CESC-endorsed information about the process to the community (and input to the process from the community) whatever their personal views may be [NB information acquired at CESC meetings may only be circulated if specifically agreed by the CESC] commit the time to attend meetings as outlined under ‘Meetings’ below. CESC members will not be assumed to speak for the whole of the broader community; rather they represent a selection of views and are charged with ensuring that all sectors of the community have an opportunity to provide their own thoughts and opinions. Taylors Road Landfill CESC 3 of 6 Terms of Reference, May 2009 6. Independent facilitator Bruce Turner of Phoenix Facilitation Pty Ltd has been appointed by EPA Victoria to chair CESC meetings. His role is to act in the interests of a fair and constructive process. In that role he will endeavour to be independent and impartial. He will not be providing advice on the merits of anyone’s view or ideas, or deciding between different options that may be discussed. The facilitator will review and edit ‘raw’ notes of CESC meetings, prior to their circulation as a draft to members, to ensure they reflect a balanced record of key points of agreement, actions and conclusions. If the facilitator or any other participant becomes aware of any circumstances that might reasonably be considered to affect the facilitator’s capacity to act impartially, the CESC will be informed of those circumstances and the Committee will advise whether to continue the process with the current facilitator. 6.1. Appointment of a new facilitator If for any reason a new independent facilitator is required to be appointed, the selection of the new facilitator will be made by a subcommittee of the CESC that is broadly reflective of the CESC’s membership at the time (including EPA, SITA, Council and community representatives) in consultation with the CESC. 7. Attendance by non-members Attendance by non-members at particular meetings may be helpful to the CESC in a variety of ways, such as providing additional expert knowledge and experience, or strengthening links to interests not fully represented on the CESC. The independent facilitator has discretion as to how many visitors can attend a meeting. Depending on the constraints of the meeting room or process, visitors may be asked to sit separately from CESC members at meetings. 8. Meetings The Community Engagement Steering Committee is expected to meet every 4-6 weeks (approximately). 8.1 Venue The CESC will determine the location and time of day suitable to the majority of members. Forums involving the wider community will be held at a variety of other local venues. 8.2 Minutes of meetings Points of discussion, actions and recommendations from meetings will be recorded as minutes. The initial draft minutes will be reviewed by the independent facilitator prior to being distributed as a draft to the Committee (generally at least one week prior to the next meeting). The minutes will be made publicly available once they have been confirmed by the Committee. 8.3 Conduct The collective membership of the Community Engagement Steering Committee will, as far as possible, capture the diversity of backgrounds and views of the facility’s broad set of stakeholders. Therefore, diversity of opinion within the group is expected. Members are required to respect the views of others at all times and to contribute to discussion in a manner that provides members with an equal voice. The members will also actively seek to engage with, and learn from, others. Since the CESC is not democratically constituted and has no formal decision-making powers, every effort will be made to develop recommendations and reach conclusions by consensus. Taylors Road Landfill CESC 4 of 6 Terms of Reference, May 2009 9. Communication with the wider community In the interests of an open process and two-way communication between the community and CESC (as indicated in section 5), members will allow their names and contact numbers to be publicised in the local community. In order to ensure balanced reporting of the CESC’s discussions, the minutes of meetings will be reviewed by the whole group as outlined under ‘Meetings’ above. Once meeting minutes are confirmed by the CESC, they will be made available on (or via a link from) the websites of the Councils involved and EPA, and members are encouraged to make them available through their networks. 9.1 Contact with the media In order to ensure clear and consistent communication about/from the CESC process, members are not permitted to speak individually as spokespersons for the CESC or to circulate information acquired at CESC meetings unless specifically agreed to by the CESC. Once information is legitimately in the public domain, members are not constrained from publicly expressing their interest group’s or individual opinions, provided they make it clear that they are not representing the views of others on the CESC, and do not quote other CESC members. If the CESC believes a media statement would be helpful to the engagement process at any point, the CESC will endeavour to agree the content of the statement and delegate the drafting of it, in the first instance, to the independent facilitator. The facilitator will act as the coordinator for media inquiries in relation to these media statements. 10. Breaches of these Terms of Reference If there is a breach of trust in relation to these Terms of Reference, particularly in regard to communication with the wider community, the CESC (and/or independent facilitator) should discuss the matter with the member(s) involved. If the breach is repeated, the facilitator has the discretion to ask the member(s) to leave the CESC. 11. Endorsement In signing this document, the CESC members indicate their understanding of and agreement to these Terms of Reference. Member Signature Date Malcolm Baker Marc Boxer Susan Carter Mark D'Agostino Geraldine Gonsalvez Laurence Halvy Cr Yvonne Herring Jim Houlahan Taylors Road Landfill CESC 5 of 6 Terms of Reference, May 2009 Ian Jensz (substitute – Helen Russo) Cr Lynette Keleher Evan Kyriakopoulos Colin McIntosh Tony O'Hara Michael O'Keeffe David Richardson Andrew Tytherleigh Thelma Wakelam Jason Wood Bruce Turner In signing this statement, non-members who attend CESC meetings indicate their understanding of and agreement to these Terms of Reference. Name (Organisation) Signature Date Daniel Fyfe (SITA) Renee Deverson (SITA) Taylors Road Landfill CESC 6 of 6 Terms of Reference, May 2009 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL APPENDIX E Community Engagement Plan August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 Community Engagement Plan: Proposed Soil Processing Facility at Taylors Road Landfill. Introduction SITA Environmental Solutions has briefed the Taylors Road Landfill (TRL) CESC on its intention to establish a soil treatment facility at TRL. The facility is proposed in order to secure SITA’s presence in the Prescribed Waste market in the future and in response to the recent works approval application (by Renex) for a soil treatment facility at Ordish Road. There is an identified gap in the market, particularly due to restrictions such as space and short timelines to achieve soil remediation. SITA is proposing to provide the necessary infrastructure, time and space for customers to mobilise portable soil treatment equipment. Some the proposed remediation processes include: • • • Thermal treatment, Stabilisation, and Bioremediation (potential future application). Members of the CESC have been asked to provide feedback from their community networks to SITA to indicate likely community concerns and questions so that SITA is able to respond to and address those aspects that are of most interest to the community. The following outlines SITA’s Community Engagement Plan specifically for this proposal. Below is a list of stakeholders identified that are to be involved and or targeted for engagement. Table 1: List of Identified Stakeholders Stakeholder Reason For Engagement Local residents Concerns about health, amenity and safety State Government Departments – (EPA and DPCD) Have regulatory responsibility (EPA) planning responsibility (DPCD) can assist with advise/policy regarding health impacts Surrounding landowners Proximity to the site. Interest in management and operations of the proposal. Local Councils Represents local residents (constituents), have some enforcement powers, long history with the landfill Local Industry Proximity to the site. Interest in management and operations of the proposal. Local MPs Concern for constituents’ interests. SITA Manage and operate the site. TRL Soil Treatment Facility CE Plan 1 Draft 17 August 2009 The following outcomes are sought from this Community Engagement Plan: Proposed Outcomes The CESC Members have confidence in the Proposal reasonably addressing community concerns and feel that their contribution has been validated. Additionally, the members have greater confidence that the group is fulfilling its role as outlined in the terms of reference. Stakeholders Know who they can contact to convey their concerns and or ask questions regarding the proposal. A significant increase in understanding and knowledge about the proposal leading to minimal community concern. SITA Enhanced avenues for communication regarding this proposal allow for community concerns to be addressed in its applications up front (Planning Permit and Works Approval). TRL Soil Treatment Facility CE Plan 2 Draft 17 August 2009 Engagement Type Tool/ Activity Who Is responsible Stakeholder Involved Resources Required Start and Completion Date Feedback Method Stage 1: Initial Information Provided rd Inform SITA to provide initial information to CESC of the proposal. SITA CESC N/A 23 July Inform/Consult CESC to indicate proposal to their respective networks and provide feedback to SITA. CESC SITA CESC time and commitment Before next CESC meeting th (20 August). Collaborate SITA to provide CESC further details of the proposal. SITA CESC SITA Time and Commitment. 20 August Respond to some initial questions raised from July CESC meeting. Provide more details of the proposal. Discuss this CE Plan with the CESC SITA/CESC SITA/Facilitator to prepare information bulletin. CESC to forward to relevant community groups. Printing Letterbox drop to local residents. Copies issued to CESC members to pass on to respective networks. SITA staffing and resources. Draft to be circulated after th 20 August meeting for comment Contact details for CESC members and SITA to be included on Bulletin. SITA/CESC CESC CESC time and commitment. 17 September th Comments to be received to SITA by CESC members. Anecdotal comments, formal emails and requests. Stage 2: Information Gathering and Feedback Inform Information Bulletin/ Newsletter to: • Report on CESC progress • Outline soil treatment proposal • Promote Open Day Consult/ Collaborate CESC Meeting – Focus on the proposal as only topic. TRL Soil Processing Facility CE Plan 3 th Comments to be provided to SITA by CESC members present at meeting and thereafter. December 2009 Inform/Consult Open Day (on-site) SITA All th Advertising (in Information bulletin and possibly local media) Catering Printed material/ Handouts/ Display boards CESC Member time and commitment SITA staffing and resources 24 October Informal drop-in style format as per 2008 Open Day Feedback sheets + CESC and SITA reps keeping notes of comments and discussions Response to all those who submitted questions from website & open day. -One query (from Industry) received re: timing of establishing facility. Consult Reflect back Community Feedback and respond to questions and concerns from Open Day SITA All SITA time and commitment. Early November Consult Provide Copies of Draft WAA & PPA Documents to CESC Reflect back Community Feedback and respond to questions and concerns SITA All SITA time and commitment. CESC members time in reviewing a draft and consulting with their networks 3 &4 December Response to all those who have expressed interest Inform/Consult CESC Meeting – Focus on draft documents and SITA/CESC All SITA time and commitment 9 December Discuss Draft Documents & respond to questions N/A Review & collate CESC Comments SITA SITA SITA time and commitment 16 December Address concerns raised by CESC in draft documents & finalise applicatons rd th Stage 3: Application Process N/A Submit Works Approval to EPA SITA All SITA Resources Late December Legislated Public consultation period for submissions. N/A Submit Application for Revised Planning Permit SITA All SITA Resources Late December Legislated Advertising Period. Consult Community Forum as required by Works Approval/ planning process SITA/ relevant agencies CESC and All Venue Advertising Possible Catering Early 2010. Q&A style forum. Contact details for CESC members and SITA to be provided at meeting if community TRL Soil Processing Facility CE Plan 4 December 2009 Printed material/Handouts Projector Lecturn CESC Member time and commitment Consult/ Collaborate CESC to discuss the outcomes of the forum. TRL Soil Processing Facility CE Plan CESC CESC CESC Time and commitment 5 members have questions afterwards. Directly after Public Meeting or soon thereafter Direct Consultation between CESC members. December 2009 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL APPENDIX F Performance Guarantee August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL APPENDIX G COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE Emission Testing and Soil Analysis Report Mobile Treatment Solutions, Kurnell Site February 2009 August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL APPENDIX H Model Output Files August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 1 ___________________ TSP_3 minute_v1 ___________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ TSP_3 minute_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 4.90E-02 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ TSP_3 minute_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 1.80E-02 1.76E-02 1.72E-02 1.71E-02 1.70E-02 1.65E-02 1.64E-02 1.62E-02 1.62E-02 1.62E-02 1.61E-02 1.59E-02 1.58E-02 1.57E-02 1.57E-02 1.56E-02 1.55E-02 1.55E-02 1.55E-02 1.54E-02 1.54E-02 1.53E-02 1.53E-02 1.53E-02 1.53E-02 1.52E-02 1.52E-02 1.52E-02 1.51E-02 1.51E-02 1.51E-02 1.50E-02 1.50E-02 1.49E-02 1.49E-02 1.48E-02 1.48E-02 1.47E-02 1.47E-02 1.47E-02 1.47E-02 1.47E-02 1.47E-02 1.47E-02 1.47E-02 1.46E-02 1.46E-02 1.46E-02 1.45E-02 1.45E-02 1.45E-02 1.45E-02 1.45E-02 1.45E-02 1.45E-02 1.45E-02 1.45E-02 1.44E-02 1.44E-02 1.44E-02 1.44E-02 1.44E-02 1.44E-02 1.44E-02 1.43E-02 1.43E-02 1.43E-02 1.43E-02 18,20/08/02 19,20/08/02 02,04/05/02 15,01/02/02 02,08/04/02 06,26/12/02 18,21/12/02 04,14/07/02 24,03/08/02 01,04/08/02 03,05/03/02 06,05/03/02 16,21/12/02 03,16/04/02 04,03/10/02 06,02/05/02 20,03/11/02 03,02/05/02 19,30/06/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 01,21/10/02 05,05/03/02 17,15/02/02 20,21/05/02 01,02/03/02 02,02/03/02 01,04/05/02 05,27/09/02 04,20/05/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 23,26/09/02 18,24/03/02 02,22/08/02 24,26/09/02 22,05/06/02 22,30/08/02 22,31/08/02 06,26/04/02 17,23/11/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 17,24/03/02 12,08/04/02 06,08/11/02 06,21/10/02 16,05/03/02 04,09/04/02 03,10/11/02 05,12/10/02 20,10/04/02 17,14/07/02 24,12/05/02 18,17/11/02 05,08/09/02 02,04/07/02 05,21/11/02 23,17/08/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 02,01/11/02 22,01/01/02 19,19/09/02 16,04/06/02 19,17/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (344872, 5787734, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344812, 5787734, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 1.43E-02 1.43E-02 1.42E-02 1.42E-02 1.42E-02 1.42E-02 1.42E-02 1.42E-02 1.42E-02 1.41E-02 1.41E-02 1.41E-02 1.41E-02 1.41E-02 1.41E-02 1.41E-02 1.41E-02 1.40E-02 1.40E-02 1.40E-02 1.40E-02 1.40E-02 1.40E-02 1.40E-02 1.40E-02 1.39E-02 1.39E-02 1.39E-02 1.39E-02 1.39E-02 1.39E-02 1.39E-02 20,31/08/02 22,14/11/02 03,09/10/02 23,15/02/02 16,13/02/02 23,03/08/02 01,30/06/02 03,27/04/02 16,21/08/02 18,23/01/02 21,02/10/02 05,14/07/02 17,14/01/02 07,26/04/02 02,17/03/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 12,20/01/02 23,10/09/02 04,13/03/02 05,24/08/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 22,08/02/02 24,13/08/02 21,20/09/02 07,16/10/02 19,07/07/02 12,01/07/02 09,11/06/02 06,22/08/02 10,09/02/02 (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 __________________ PM10_1 hour_v1 __________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 2.00E-02 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 1 hour _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ PM10_1 hour_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 4.90E-02 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ PM10_1 hour_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 1 hour Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 3.71E-02 3.63E-02 3.62E-02 3.60E-02 3.57E-02 3.54E-02 3.53E-02 3.53E-02 3.52E-02 3.50E-02 3.50E-02 3.50E-02 3.48E-02 3.48E-02 3.48E-02 3.47E-02 3.47E-02 3.47E-02 3.46E-02 3.46E-02 3.46E-02 3.46E-02 3.45E-02 3.45E-02 3.45E-02 3.45E-02 3.45E-02 3.44E-02 3.43E-02 3.43E-02 3.43E-02 3.43E-02 3.43E-02 3.43E-02 3.42E-02 3.42E-02 3.42E-02 3.42E-02 3.42E-02 3.42E-02 3.41E-02 3.41E-02 3.41E-02 3.41E-02 3.40E-02 3.40E-02 3.40E-02 3.40E-02 3.39E-02 3.39E-02 3.39E-02 3.39E-02 3.39E-02 3.39E-02 3.39E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.37E-02 15,01/02/02 18,21/12/02 02,04/05/02 12,17/08/02 16,21/12/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 17,15/02/02 03,05/03/02 05,27/09/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 02,22/08/02 06,05/03/02 18,24/03/02 24,26/09/02 22,30/08/02 06,26/04/02 12,08/04/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 06,08/11/02 17,23/11/02 17,24/03/02 22,05/06/02 23,26/09/02 05,08/09/02 18,17/11/02 02,04/07/02 03,16/04/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 22,01/01/02 16,05/03/02 16,04/06/02 16,13/02/02 19,17/11/02 22,14/11/02 16,21/08/02 17,14/01/02 12,20/01/02 18,23/01/02 07,26/04/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 02,17/03/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 21,20/09/02 10,09/02/02 03,09/10/02 12,01/07/02 24,13/08/02 22,08/02/02 19,07/07/02 09,11/06/02 09,09/06/02 07,16/10/02 16,03/07/02 15,19/02/02 13,12/07/02 19,29/08/02 21,02/10/02 24,08/02/02 (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 3.37E-02 3.37E-02 3.37E-02 3.37E-02 3.36E-02 3.36E-02 3.36E-02 3.36E-02 3.36E-02 3.36E-02 3.36E-02 3.36E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.33E-02 10,02/03/02 06,11/09/02 17,20/06/02 06,08/09/02 16,13/09/02 06,22/08/02 05,26/04/02 09,27/03/02 19,17/03/02 14,20/09/02 12,15/12/02 11,22/08/02 07,09/02/02 07,01/01/02 03,27/04/02 04,14/06/02 20,09/05/02 22,10/12/02 22,20/09/02 08,19/05/02 05,01/07/02 07,06/07/02 12,07/05/02 22,03/04/02 10,19/05/02 02,04/11/02 24,16/09/02 07,11/06/02 10,20/09/02 02,18/05/02 07,04/06/02 22,13/10/02 05,26/09/02 21,24/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ___________________ PM2.5_1 hour_v1 ___________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 1.00E-02 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 1 hour _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ PM2.5_1 hour_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 4.90E-02 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ PM2.5_1 hour_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 1 hour Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 2.71E-02 2.63E-02 2.62E-02 2.60E-02 2.57E-02 2.54E-02 2.53E-02 2.53E-02 2.52E-02 2.50E-02 2.50E-02 2.50E-02 2.48E-02 2.48E-02 2.48E-02 2.47E-02 2.47E-02 2.47E-02 2.46E-02 2.46E-02 2.46E-02 2.46E-02 2.45E-02 2.45E-02 2.45E-02 2.45E-02 2.45E-02 2.44E-02 2.43E-02 2.43E-02 2.43E-02 2.43E-02 2.43E-02 2.43E-02 2.42E-02 2.42E-02 2.42E-02 2.42E-02 2.42E-02 2.42E-02 2.41E-02 2.41E-02 2.41E-02 2.41E-02 2.40E-02 2.40E-02 2.40E-02 2.40E-02 2.39E-02 2.39E-02 2.39E-02 2.39E-02 2.39E-02 2.39E-02 2.39E-02 2.38E-02 2.38E-02 2.38E-02 2.38E-02 2.38E-02 2.38E-02 2.38E-02 2.38E-02 2.38E-02 2.38E-02 2.37E-02 15,01/02/02 18,21/12/02 02,04/05/02 12,17/08/02 16,21/12/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 17,15/02/02 03,05/03/02 05,27/09/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 02,22/08/02 06,05/03/02 18,24/03/02 24,26/09/02 22,30/08/02 06,26/04/02 12,08/04/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 06,08/11/02 17,23/11/02 17,24/03/02 22,05/06/02 23,26/09/02 05,08/09/02 18,17/11/02 02,04/07/02 03,16/04/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 22,01/01/02 16,05/03/02 16,04/06/02 16,13/02/02 19,17/11/02 22,14/11/02 16,21/08/02 17,14/01/02 12,20/01/02 18,23/01/02 07,26/04/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 02,17/03/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 21,20/09/02 10,09/02/02 03,09/10/02 12,01/07/02 24,13/08/02 22,08/02/02 19,07/07/02 09,11/06/02 09,09/06/02 07,16/10/02 16,03/07/02 15,19/02/02 13,12/07/02 19,29/08/02 21,02/10/02 24,08/02/02 (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 2.37E-02 2.37E-02 2.37E-02 2.37E-02 2.36E-02 2.36E-02 2.36E-02 2.36E-02 2.36E-02 2.36E-02 2.36E-02 2.36E-02 2.35E-02 2.35E-02 2.35E-02 2.35E-02 2.35E-02 2.35E-02 2.35E-02 2.35E-02 2.35E-02 2.35E-02 2.35E-02 2.34E-02 2.34E-02 2.34E-02 2.34E-02 2.34E-02 2.34E-02 2.34E-02 2.34E-02 2.34E-02 2.34E-02 2.33E-02 10,02/03/02 06,11/09/02 17,20/06/02 06,08/09/02 16,13/09/02 06,22/08/02 05,26/04/02 09,27/03/02 19,17/03/02 14,20/09/02 12,15/12/02 11,22/08/02 07,09/02/02 07,01/01/02 03,27/04/02 04,14/06/02 20,09/05/02 22,10/12/02 22,20/09/02 08,19/05/02 05,01/07/02 07,06/07/02 12,07/05/02 22,03/04/02 10,19/05/02 02,04/11/02 24,16/09/02 07,11/06/02 10,20/09/02 02,18/05/02 07,04/06/02 22,13/10/02 05,26/09/02 21,24/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ________________ CO_1 hour_v1 ________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 4.60E-01 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 1 hour _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ CO_1 hour_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 8.10E-02 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ CO_1 hour_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 1 hour Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 4.88E-01 4.87E-01 4.87E-01 4.86E-01 4.86E-01 4.85E-01 4.85E-01 4.85E-01 4.85E-01 4.85E-01 4.85E-01 4.85E-01 4.85E-01 4.85E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.84E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 15,01/02/02 18,21/12/02 02,04/05/02 12,17/08/02 16,21/12/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 17,15/02/02 03,05/03/02 05,27/09/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 02,22/08/02 06,05/03/02 18,24/03/02 24,26/09/02 22,30/08/02 06,26/04/02 12,08/04/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 06,08/11/02 17,23/11/02 17,24/03/02 22,05/06/02 23,26/09/02 05,08/09/02 18,17/11/02 02,04/07/02 03,16/04/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 22,01/01/02 16,05/03/02 16,04/06/02 16,13/02/02 19,17/11/02 22,14/11/02 16,21/08/02 17,14/01/02 12,20/01/02 18,23/01/02 07,26/04/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 02,17/03/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 21,20/09/02 10,09/02/02 03,09/10/02 12,01/07/02 24,13/08/02 22,08/02/02 19,07/07/02 09,11/06/02 09,09/06/02 07,16/10/02 16,03/07/02 15,19/02/02 13,12/07/02 19,29/08/02 21,02/10/02 24,08/02/02 (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.83E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 4.82E-01 10,02/03/02 06,11/09/02 17,20/06/02 06,08/09/02 16,13/09/02 06,22/08/02 05,26/04/02 09,27/03/02 19,17/03/02 14,20/09/02 12,15/12/02 11,22/08/02 07,09/02/02 07,01/01/02 03,27/04/02 04,14/06/02 20,09/05/02 22,10/12/02 22,20/09/02 08,19/05/02 05,01/07/02 07,06/07/02 12,07/05/02 22,03/04/02 10,19/05/02 02,04/11/02 24,16/09/02 07,11/06/02 10,20/09/02 02,18/05/02 07,04/06/02 22,13/10/02 05,26/09/02 21,24/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 _________________ NO2_1 hour_v1 _________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 2.80E-02 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 1 hour _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ NO2_1 hour_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 1.62E-01 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ NO2_1 hour_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 1 hour Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 8.45E-02 8.20E-02 8.14E-02 8.08E-02 8.00E-02 7.88E-02 7.85E-02 7.85E-02 7.83E-02 7.77E-02 7.76E-02 7.75E-02 7.71E-02 7.71E-02 7.70E-02 7.67E-02 7.66E-02 7.65E-02 7.63E-02 7.62E-02 7.62E-02 7.61E-02 7.60E-02 7.60E-02 7.60E-02 7.59E-02 7.59E-02 7.55E-02 7.54E-02 7.53E-02 7.53E-02 7.53E-02 7.53E-02 7.51E-02 7.51E-02 7.51E-02 7.50E-02 7.48E-02 7.48E-02 7.48E-02 7.46E-02 7.46E-02 7.46E-02 7.45E-02 7.44E-02 7.43E-02 7.43E-02 7.42E-02 7.40E-02 7.40E-02 7.40E-02 7.39E-02 7.39E-02 7.39E-02 7.38E-02 7.38E-02 7.38E-02 7.38E-02 7.37E-02 7.36E-02 7.36E-02 7.36E-02 7.35E-02 7.35E-02 7.35E-02 7.34E-02 15,01/02/02 18,21/12/02 02,04/05/02 12,17/08/02 16,21/12/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 17,15/02/02 03,05/03/02 05,27/09/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 02,22/08/02 06,05/03/02 18,24/03/02 24,26/09/02 22,30/08/02 06,26/04/02 12,08/04/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 06,08/11/02 17,23/11/02 17,24/03/02 22,05/06/02 23,26/09/02 05,08/09/02 18,17/11/02 02,04/07/02 03,16/04/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 22,01/01/02 16,05/03/02 16,04/06/02 16,13/02/02 19,17/11/02 22,14/11/02 16,21/08/02 17,14/01/02 12,20/01/02 18,23/01/02 07,26/04/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 02,17/03/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 21,20/09/02 10,09/02/02 03,09/10/02 12,01/07/02 24,13/08/02 22,08/02/02 19,07/07/02 09,11/06/02 09,09/06/02 07,16/10/02 16,03/07/02 15,19/02/02 13,12/07/02 19,29/08/02 21,02/10/02 24,08/02/02 (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 7.34E-02 7.33E-02 7.32E-02 7.32E-02 7.31E-02 7.31E-02 7.31E-02 7.30E-02 7.30E-02 7.30E-02 7.29E-02 7.29E-02 7.28E-02 7.28E-02 7.27E-02 7.27E-02 7.27E-02 7.27E-02 7.27E-02 7.26E-02 7.26E-02 7.25E-02 7.25E-02 7.25E-02 7.24E-02 7.23E-02 7.23E-02 7.23E-02 7.23E-02 7.23E-02 7.23E-02 7.23E-02 7.22E-02 7.21E-02 10,02/03/02 06,11/09/02 17,20/06/02 06,08/09/02 16,13/09/02 06,22/08/02 05,26/04/02 09,27/03/02 19,17/03/02 14,20/09/02 12,15/12/02 11,22/08/02 07,09/02/02 07,01/01/02 03,27/04/02 04,14/06/02 20,09/05/02 22,10/12/02 22,20/09/02 08,19/05/02 05,01/07/02 07,06/07/02 12,07/05/02 22,03/04/02 10,19/05/02 02,04/11/02 24,16/09/02 07,11/06/02 10,20/09/02 02,18/05/02 07,04/06/02 22,13/10/02 05,26/09/02 21,24/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 _________________ SO2_1 hour_v1 _________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 1 hour _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ SO2_1 hour_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 3.20E-03 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ SO2_1 hour_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 1 hour Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 1.12E-03 1.07E-03 1.06E-03 1.04E-03 1.03E-03 1.00E-03 9.98E-04 9.97E-04 9.94E-04 9.82E-04 9.81E-04 9.78E-04 9.69E-04 9.69E-04 9.67E-04 9.62E-04 9.61E-04 9.59E-04 9.53E-04 9.53E-04 9.52E-04 9.51E-04 9.49E-04 9.49E-04 9.47E-04 9.47E-04 9.46E-04 9.38E-04 9.36E-04 9.35E-04 9.35E-04 9.35E-04 9.34E-04 9.31E-04 9.30E-04 9.30E-04 9.28E-04 9.25E-04 9.25E-04 9.25E-04 9.21E-04 9.20E-04 9.20E-04 9.19E-04 9.16E-04 9.15E-04 9.14E-04 9.13E-04 9.08E-04 9.08E-04 9.08E-04 9.07E-04 9.07E-04 9.07E-04 9.05E-04 9.04E-04 9.04E-04 9.04E-04 9.04E-04 9.02E-04 9.01E-04 9.01E-04 8.99E-04 8.99E-04 8.98E-04 8.96E-04 15,01/02/02 18,21/12/02 02,04/05/02 12,17/08/02 16,21/12/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 17,15/02/02 03,05/03/02 05,27/09/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 02,22/08/02 06,05/03/02 18,24/03/02 24,26/09/02 22,30/08/02 06,26/04/02 12,08/04/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 06,08/11/02 17,23/11/02 17,24/03/02 22,05/06/02 23,26/09/02 05,08/09/02 18,17/11/02 02,04/07/02 03,16/04/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 22,01/01/02 16,05/03/02 16,04/06/02 16,13/02/02 19,17/11/02 22,14/11/02 16,21/08/02 17,14/01/02 12,20/01/02 18,23/01/02 07,26/04/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 02,17/03/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 21,20/09/02 10,09/02/02 03,09/10/02 12,01/07/02 24,13/08/02 22,08/02/02 19,07/07/02 09,11/06/02 09,09/06/02 07,16/10/02 16,03/07/02 15,19/02/02 13,12/07/02 19,29/08/02 21,02/10/02 24,08/02/02 (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 8.96E-04 8.95E-04 8.94E-04 8.93E-04 8.91E-04 8.90E-04 8.90E-04 8.89E-04 8.89E-04 8.88E-04 8.87E-04 8.86E-04 8.85E-04 8.85E-04 8.83E-04 8.83E-04 8.82E-04 8.82E-04 8.82E-04 8.80E-04 8.80E-04 8.80E-04 8.79E-04 8.78E-04 8.77E-04 8.76E-04 8.76E-04 8.76E-04 8.75E-04 8.74E-04 8.74E-04 8.74E-04 8.72E-04 8.72E-04 10,02/03/02 06,11/09/02 17,20/06/02 06,08/09/02 16,13/09/02 06,22/08/02 05,26/04/02 09,27/03/02 19,17/03/02 14,20/09/02 12,15/12/02 11,22/08/02 07,09/02/02 07,01/01/02 03,27/04/02 04,14/06/02 20,09/05/02 22,10/12/02 22,20/09/02 08,19/05/02 05,01/07/02 07,06/07/02 12,07/05/02 22,03/04/02 10,19/05/02 02,04/11/02 24,16/09/02 07,11/06/02 10,20/09/02 02,18/05/02 07,04/06/02 22,13/10/02 05,26/09/02 21,24/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 _____________________ H2SO4_3 minute_v1 _____________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ H2SO4_3 minute_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 5.50E-04 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ H2SO4_3 minute_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 2.02E-04 1.98E-04 1.93E-04 1.92E-04 1.91E-04 1.85E-04 1.84E-04 1.82E-04 1.82E-04 1.82E-04 1.81E-04 1.78E-04 1.77E-04 1.77E-04 1.76E-04 1.75E-04 1.74E-04 1.74E-04 1.74E-04 1.73E-04 1.72E-04 1.72E-04 1.72E-04 1.72E-04 1.71E-04 1.71E-04 1.71E-04 1.71E-04 1.70E-04 1.69E-04 1.69E-04 1.69E-04 1.68E-04 1.67E-04 1.67E-04 1.66E-04 1.66E-04 1.66E-04 1.66E-04 1.65E-04 1.65E-04 1.65E-04 1.65E-04 1.65E-04 1.65E-04 1.64E-04 1.64E-04 1.63E-04 1.63E-04 1.63E-04 1.63E-04 1.63E-04 1.63E-04 1.63E-04 1.63E-04 1.62E-04 1.62E-04 1.62E-04 1.62E-04 1.61E-04 1.61E-04 1.61E-04 1.61E-04 1.61E-04 1.61E-04 1.61E-04 1.60E-04 1.60E-04 18,20/08/02 19,20/08/02 02,04/05/02 15,01/02/02 02,08/04/02 06,26/12/02 18,21/12/02 04,14/07/02 24,03/08/02 01,04/08/02 03,05/03/02 06,05/03/02 16,21/12/02 03,16/04/02 04,03/10/02 06,02/05/02 20,03/11/02 03,02/05/02 19,30/06/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 01,21/10/02 05,05/03/02 17,15/02/02 20,21/05/02 01,02/03/02 02,02/03/02 01,04/05/02 05,27/09/02 04,20/05/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 23,26/09/02 18,24/03/02 02,22/08/02 24,26/09/02 22,05/06/02 22,30/08/02 22,31/08/02 06,26/04/02 17,23/11/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 17,24/03/02 12,08/04/02 06,08/11/02 06,21/10/02 16,05/03/02 04,09/04/02 03,10/11/02 05,12/10/02 20,10/04/02 17,14/07/02 24,12/05/02 18,17/11/02 05,08/09/02 02,04/07/02 05,21/11/02 23,17/08/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 02,01/11/02 22,01/01/02 19,19/09/02 16,04/06/02 19,17/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (344872, 5787734, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344812, 5787734, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 1.60E-04 1.60E-04 1.60E-04 1.60E-04 1.60E-04 1.60E-04 1.59E-04 1.59E-04 1.59E-04 1.59E-04 1.58E-04 1.58E-04 1.58E-04 1.58E-04 1.58E-04 1.58E-04 1.58E-04 1.58E-04 1.58E-04 1.57E-04 1.57E-04 1.57E-04 1.57E-04 1.57E-04 1.57E-04 1.57E-04 1.56E-04 1.56E-04 1.56E-04 1.56E-04 1.56E-04 1.56E-04 20,31/08/02 22,14/11/02 03,09/10/02 23,15/02/02 16,13/02/02 23,03/08/02 01,30/06/02 03,27/04/02 16,21/08/02 18,23/01/02 21,02/10/02 05,14/07/02 17,14/01/02 07,26/04/02 02,17/03/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 12,20/01/02 23,10/09/02 04,13/03/02 05,24/08/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 22,08/02/02 24,13/08/02 21,20/09/02 07,16/10/02 19,07/07/02 12,01/07/02 09,11/06/02 06,22/08/02 10,09/02/02 (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ___________________ HCl_3 minute_v1 ___________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ HCl_3 minute_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 4.60E-02 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ HCl_3 minute_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 1.69E-02 1.65E-02 1.61E-02 1.61E-02 1.60E-02 1.55E-02 1.54E-02 1.52E-02 1.52E-02 1.52E-02 1.51E-02 1.49E-02 1.48E-02 1.48E-02 1.47E-02 1.46E-02 1.46E-02 1.46E-02 1.46E-02 1.45E-02 1.44E-02 1.44E-02 1.44E-02 1.44E-02 1.43E-02 1.43E-02 1.43E-02 1.43E-02 1.42E-02 1.42E-02 1.41E-02 1.41E-02 1.41E-02 1.40E-02 1.40E-02 1.39E-02 1.39E-02 1.38E-02 1.38E-02 1.38E-02 1.38E-02 1.38E-02 1.38E-02 1.38E-02 1.38E-02 1.37E-02 1.37E-02 1.37E-02 1.37E-02 1.36E-02 1.36E-02 1.36E-02 1.36E-02 1.36E-02 1.36E-02 1.36E-02 1.36E-02 1.35E-02 1.35E-02 1.35E-02 1.35E-02 1.35E-02 1.35E-02 1.35E-02 1.35E-02 1.35E-02 1.34E-02 1.34E-02 18,20/08/02 19,20/08/02 02,04/05/02 15,01/02/02 02,08/04/02 06,26/12/02 18,21/12/02 04,14/07/02 24,03/08/02 01,04/08/02 03,05/03/02 06,05/03/02 16,21/12/02 03,16/04/02 04,03/10/02 06,02/05/02 20,03/11/02 03,02/05/02 19,30/06/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 01,21/10/02 05,05/03/02 17,15/02/02 20,21/05/02 01,02/03/02 02,02/03/02 01,04/05/02 05,27/09/02 04,20/05/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 23,26/09/02 18,24/03/02 02,22/08/02 24,26/09/02 22,05/06/02 22,30/08/02 22,31/08/02 06,26/04/02 17,23/11/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 17,24/03/02 12,08/04/02 06,08/11/02 06,21/10/02 16,05/03/02 04,09/04/02 03,10/11/02 05,12/10/02 20,10/04/02 17,14/07/02 24,12/05/02 18,17/11/02 05,08/09/02 02,04/07/02 05,21/11/02 23,17/08/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 02,01/11/02 22,01/01/02 19,19/09/02 16,04/06/02 19,17/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (344872, 5787734, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344812, 5787734, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 1.34E-02 1.34E-02 1.34E-02 1.33E-02 1.33E-02 1.33E-02 1.33E-02 1.33E-02 1.33E-02 1.33E-02 1.33E-02 1.32E-02 1.32E-02 1.32E-02 1.32E-02 1.32E-02 1.32E-02 1.32E-02 1.32E-02 1.32E-02 1.31E-02 1.31E-02 1.31E-02 1.31E-02 1.31E-02 1.31E-02 1.31E-02 1.31E-02 1.31E-02 1.30E-02 1.30E-02 1.30E-02 20,31/08/02 22,14/11/02 03,09/10/02 23,15/02/02 16,13/02/02 23,03/08/02 01,30/06/02 03,27/04/02 16,21/08/02 18,23/01/02 21,02/10/02 05,14/07/02 17,14/01/02 07,26/04/02 02,17/03/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 12,20/01/02 23,10/09/02 04,13/03/02 05,24/08/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 22,08/02/02 24,13/08/02 21,20/09/02 07,16/10/02 19,07/07/02 12,01/07/02 09,11/06/02 06,22/08/02 10,09/02/02 (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ______________________________ HF_24 hour_7 day_90 day_v1 ______________________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 24 hours 7 days 90 days _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________________ HF_24 hour_7 day_90 day_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS ______________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 1.50E-03 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________________ HF_24 hour_7 day_90 day_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 24 hours Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 3.18E-04 3.02E-04 2.67E-04 2.64E-04 2.56E-04 2.46E-04 2.40E-04 2.29E-04 2.15E-04 2.09E-04 2.06E-04 2.04E-04 2.02E-04 2.02E-04 1.99E-04 1.98E-04 1.95E-04 1.95E-04 1.92E-04 1.92E-04 1.88E-04 1.87E-04 1.86E-04 1.86E-04 1.85E-04 1.85E-04 1.83E-04 1.80E-04 1.79E-04 1.77E-04 1.77E-04 1.76E-04 1.75E-04 1.74E-04 1.73E-04 1.72E-04 1.71E-04 1.70E-04 1.68E-04 1.67E-04 1.67E-04 1.66E-04 1.66E-04 1.64E-04 1.63E-04 1.62E-04 1.57E-04 1.57E-04 1.55E-04 1.54E-04 1.53E-04 1.53E-04 1.53E-04 1.52E-04 1.52E-04 1.51E-04 1.51E-04 1.48E-04 1.47E-04 1.47E-04 1.44E-04 1.43E-04 1.43E-04 1.43E-04 24,11/06/02 24,08/09/02 24,08/06/02 24,18/07/02 24,20/06/02 24,20/09/02 24,09/06/02 24,05/09/02 24,11/08/02 24,15/10/02 24,24/06/02 24,09/02/02 24,12/06/02 24,08/07/02 24,19/07/02 24,23/10/02 24,19/09/02 24,07/06/02 24,23/06/02 24,30/08/02 24,05/11/02 24,03/09/02 24,17/05/02 24,01/01/02 24,04/07/02 24,26/09/02 24,14/06/02 24,21/02/02 24,07/07/02 24,22/02/02 24,10/09/02 24,16/09/02 24,30/09/02 24,13/01/02 24,06/11/02 24,08/11/02 24,19/10/02 24,16/07/02 24,06/08/02 24,04/06/02 24,27/09/02 24,03/01/02 24,04/11/02 24,07/08/02 24,21/06/02 24,21/08/02 24,13/10/02 24,02/03/02 24,14/01/02 24,27/03/02 24,24/10/02 24,02/07/02 24,21/05/02 24,14/07/02 24,11/12/02 24,09/09/02 24,09/11/02 24,12/01/02 24,07/01/02 24,22/05/02 24,31/10/02 24,23/07/02 24,20/10/02 24,13/11/02 (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 1.42E-04 1.42E-04 1.40E-04 1.40E-04 1.39E-04 1.38E-04 1.36E-04 1.36E-04 1.35E-04 1.35E-04 1.34E-04 1.34E-04 1.32E-04 1.32E-04 1.31E-04 1.29E-04 1.29E-04 1.29E-04 1.29E-04 1.29E-04 1.28E-04 1.28E-04 1.28E-04 1.27E-04 1.27E-04 1.27E-04 1.26E-04 1.26E-04 1.25E-04 1.25E-04 1.25E-04 1.24E-04 1.23E-04 1.23E-04 1.21E-04 1.21E-04 24,12/05/02 24,29/09/02 24,20/03/02 24,13/08/02 24,21/10/02 24,24/12/02 24,17/11/02 24,22/08/02 24,20/07/02 24,05/06/02 24,06/10/02 24,15/01/02 24,20/05/02 24,23/02/02 24,08/01/02 24,29/03/02 24,03/07/02 24,25/09/02 24,08/08/02 24,14/10/02 24,02/02/02 24,05/05/02 24,04/09/02 24,31/12/02 24,06/09/02 24,09/05/02 24,10/06/02 24,28/09/02 24,12/08/02 24,04/01/02 24,07/11/02 24,02/01/02 24,08/10/02 24,04/08/02 24,10/11/02 24,19/05/02 (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5787974, (345112, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 7 days Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 2.00E-04 1.62E-04 1.35E-04 1.31E-04 1.31E-04 1.27E-04 1.17E-04 1.06E-04 9.64E-05 9.23E-05 9.07E-05 8.83E-05 8.80E-05 8.76E-05 8.33E-05 8.21E-05 7.99E-05 7.94E-05 7.81E-05 7.65E-05 7.34E-05 7.16E-05 7.10E-05 7.00E-05 6.94E-05 6.79E-05 6.35E-05 6.19E-05 6.15E-05 24,12/06/02 24,26/06/02 24,05/09/02 24,24/07/02 24,10/07/02 24,24/10/02 24,08/11/02 24,16/01/02 24,12/09/02 24,07/01/02 24,19/09/02 24,17/10/02 24,03/07/02 24,26/09/02 24,03/10/02 24,03/03/02 24,24/05/02 24,15/11/02 24,14/08/02 24,16/12/02 24,17/07/02 24,01/11/02 24,07/08/02 24,03/04/02 24,10/10/02 24,10/05/02 24,13/02/02 24,31/07/02 24,05/06/02 (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 6.11E-05 5.94E-05 5.86E-05 5.78E-05 5.74E-05 5.69E-05 5.58E-05 5.30E-05 5.18E-05 4.87E-05 4.84E-05 4.74E-05 3.98E-05 3.87E-05 3.45E-05 3.24E-05 3.17E-05 3.11E-05 2.94E-05 24,17/03/02 24,24/03/02 24,23/12/02 24,10/04/02 24,19/06/02 24,17/05/02 24,23/01/02 24,21/08/02 24,07/12/02 24,30/12/02 24,22/11/02 24,30/01/02 24,06/02/02 24,03/05/02 24,24/04/02 24,17/04/02 24,28/08/02 24,10/03/02 24,20/02/02 (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (344992, 5788094, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (344992, 5788154, (344992, 5787854, (344992, 5788094, (345052, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) 90-day running averages Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 9.62E-05 9.54E-05 9.53E-05 9.52E-05 9.51E-05 9.49E-05 9.43E-05 9.39E-05 9.34E-05 9.32E-05 9.24E-05 9.23E-05 9.19E-05 9.18E-05 9.17E-05 9.17E-05 9.16E-05 9.14E-05 9.14E-05 9.13E-05 9.12E-05 9.11E-05 9.10E-05 9.10E-05 9.10E-05 9.08E-05 9.07E-05 9.07E-05 9.07E-05 9.04E-05 9.02E-05 9.01E-05 9.00E-05 8.99E-05 8.96E-05 8.95E-05 8.95E-05 8.94E-05 8.90E-05 8.90E-05 8.86E-05 8.86E-05 24,05/09/02 24,06/09/02 24,03/09/02 24,31/08/02 24,01/09/02 24,04/09/02 24,30/08/02 24,08/09/02 24,09/09/02 24,07/09/02 24,11/08/02 24,29/08/02 24,12/08/02 24,13/08/02 24,14/08/02 24,28/08/02 24,27/08/02 24,18/09/02 24,26/08/02 24,17/09/02 24,22/08/02 24,25/08/02 24,23/08/02 24,24/08/02 24,21/08/02 24,10/08/02 24,08/08/02 24,07/08/02 24,09/08/02 24,06/08/02 24,15/08/02 24,16/09/02 24,10/09/02 24,20/08/02 24,17/08/02 24,16/08/02 24,20/09/02 24,19/08/02 24,18/08/02 24,21/09/02 24,19/09/02 24,05/08/02 (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 8.85E-05 8.85E-05 8.83E-05 8.81E-05 8.81E-05 8.81E-05 8.78E-05 8.78E-05 8.77E-05 8.76E-05 8.75E-05 8.75E-05 8.75E-05 8.73E-05 8.70E-05 8.68E-05 8.66E-05 8.64E-05 8.57E-05 8.53E-05 8.52E-05 8.50E-05 8.45E-05 8.45E-05 8.41E-05 8.36E-05 8.34E-05 8.34E-05 8.34E-05 8.32E-05 8.24E-05 8.19E-05 8.13E-05 8.05E-05 8.04E-05 7.98E-05 7.93E-05 7.86E-05 7.84E-05 7.82E-05 7.82E-05 7.82E-05 7.73E-05 7.71E-05 7.68E-05 7.67E-05 7.66E-05 7.63E-05 7.61E-05 7.60E-05 7.60E-05 7.57E-05 7.57E-05 7.57E-05 7.56E-05 7.56E-05 7.55E-05 7.55E-05 24,11/09/02 24,28/07/02 24,12/09/02 24,15/09/02 24,14/09/02 24,29/07/02 24,03/08/02 24,31/07/02 24,04/08/02 24,30/07/02 24,13/09/02 24,02/08/02 24,01/08/02 24,27/07/02 24,26/07/02 24,22/09/02 24,28/09/02 24,27/09/02 24,25/07/02 24,29/09/02 24,24/07/02 24,23/07/02 24,23/09/02 24,26/09/02 24,30/09/02 24,25/09/02 24,01/10/02 24,22/07/02 24,24/09/02 24,02/10/02 24,21/07/02 24,20/07/02 24,03/10/02 24,04/10/02 24,19/07/02 24,05/10/02 24,06/10/02 24,09/10/02 24,08/10/02 24,18/07/02 24,07/10/02 24,10/10/02 24,14/10/02 24,11/10/02 24,13/10/02 24,12/10/02 24,11/12/02 24,04/12/02 24,16/10/02 24,15/12/02 24,14/12/02 24,07/12/02 24,17/07/02 24,10/12/02 24,09/12/02 24,15/10/02 24,10/11/02 24,16/07/02 (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 _______________________ Benzene_3 minute_v1 _______________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ Benzene_3 minute_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 7.20E-05 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 _______________________ Benzene_3 minute_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS _______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 2.64E-05 2.59E-05 2.52E-05 2.51E-05 2.50E-05 2.42E-05 2.41E-05 2.39E-05 2.38E-05 2.38E-05 2.37E-05 2.33E-05 2.32E-05 2.31E-05 2.30E-05 2.29E-05 2.28E-05 2.28E-05 2.28E-05 2.27E-05 2.26E-05 2.25E-05 2.25E-05 2.25E-05 2.24E-05 2.24E-05 2.24E-05 2.24E-05 2.22E-05 2.22E-05 2.21E-05 2.21E-05 2.20E-05 2.19E-05 2.19E-05 2.18E-05 2.17E-05 2.17E-05 2.17E-05 2.16E-05 2.16E-05 2.16E-05 2.16E-05 2.15E-05 2.15E-05 2.15E-05 2.14E-05 2.14E-05 2.14E-05 2.14E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.12E-05 2.12E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.10E-05 2.10E-05 18,20/08/02 19,20/08/02 02,04/05/02 15,01/02/02 02,08/04/02 06,26/12/02 18,21/12/02 04,14/07/02 24,03/08/02 01,04/08/02 03,05/03/02 06,05/03/02 16,21/12/02 03,16/04/02 04,03/10/02 06,02/05/02 20,03/11/02 03,02/05/02 19,30/06/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 01,21/10/02 05,05/03/02 17,15/02/02 20,21/05/02 01,02/03/02 02,02/03/02 01,04/05/02 05,27/09/02 04,20/05/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 23,26/09/02 18,24/03/02 02,22/08/02 24,26/09/02 22,05/06/02 22,30/08/02 22,31/08/02 06,26/04/02 17,23/11/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 17,24/03/02 12,08/04/02 06,08/11/02 06,21/10/02 16,05/03/02 04,09/04/02 03,10/11/02 05,12/10/02 20,10/04/02 17,14/07/02 24,12/05/02 18,17/11/02 05,08/09/02 02,04/07/02 05,21/11/02 23,17/08/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 02,01/11/02 22,01/01/02 19,19/09/02 16,04/06/02 19,17/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (344872, 5787734, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344812, 5787734, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 2.10E-05 2.09E-05 2.09E-05 2.09E-05 2.09E-05 2.09E-05 2.09E-05 2.08E-05 2.08E-05 2.08E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.06E-05 2.06E-05 2.06E-05 2.06E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.04E-05 2.04E-05 2.04E-05 2.04E-05 20,31/08/02 22,14/11/02 03,09/10/02 23,15/02/02 16,13/02/02 23,03/08/02 01,30/06/02 03,27/04/02 16,21/08/02 18,23/01/02 21,02/10/02 05,14/07/02 17,14/01/02 07,26/04/02 02,17/03/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 12,20/01/02 23,10/09/02 04,13/03/02 05,24/08/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 22,08/02/02 24,13/08/02 21,20/09/02 07,16/10/02 19,07/07/02 12,01/07/02 09,11/06/02 06,22/08/02 10,09/02/02 (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ____________________ PCBs_3 minute_v1 ____________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ PCBs_3 minute_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 7.20E-04 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ PCBs_3 minute_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 2.64E-04 2.59E-04 2.52E-04 2.51E-04 2.50E-04 2.42E-04 2.41E-04 2.39E-04 2.38E-04 2.38E-04 2.37E-04 2.33E-04 2.32E-04 2.31E-04 2.30E-04 2.29E-04 2.28E-04 2.28E-04 2.28E-04 2.27E-04 2.26E-04 2.25E-04 2.25E-04 2.25E-04 2.24E-04 2.24E-04 2.24E-04 2.24E-04 2.22E-04 2.22E-04 2.21E-04 2.21E-04 2.20E-04 2.19E-04 2.19E-04 2.18E-04 2.17E-04 2.17E-04 2.17E-04 2.16E-04 2.16E-04 2.16E-04 2.16E-04 2.15E-04 2.15E-04 2.15E-04 2.14E-04 2.14E-04 2.14E-04 2.14E-04 2.13E-04 2.13E-04 2.13E-04 2.13E-04 2.13E-04 2.13E-04 2.13E-04 2.12E-04 2.12E-04 2.11E-04 2.11E-04 2.11E-04 2.11E-04 2.11E-04 2.11E-04 2.11E-04 2.10E-04 2.10E-04 18,20/08/02 19,20/08/02 02,04/05/02 15,01/02/02 02,08/04/02 06,26/12/02 18,21/12/02 04,14/07/02 24,03/08/02 01,04/08/02 03,05/03/02 06,05/03/02 16,21/12/02 03,16/04/02 04,03/10/02 06,02/05/02 20,03/11/02 03,02/05/02 19,30/06/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 01,21/10/02 05,05/03/02 17,15/02/02 20,21/05/02 01,02/03/02 02,02/03/02 01,04/05/02 05,27/09/02 04,20/05/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 23,26/09/02 18,24/03/02 02,22/08/02 24,26/09/02 22,05/06/02 22,30/08/02 22,31/08/02 06,26/04/02 17,23/11/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 17,24/03/02 12,08/04/02 06,08/11/02 06,21/10/02 16,05/03/02 04,09/04/02 03,10/11/02 05,12/10/02 20,10/04/02 17,14/07/02 24,12/05/02 18,17/11/02 05,08/09/02 02,04/07/02 05,21/11/02 23,17/08/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 02,01/11/02 22,01/01/02 19,19/09/02 16,04/06/02 19,17/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (344872, 5787734, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344812, 5787734, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 2.10E-04 2.09E-04 2.09E-04 2.09E-04 2.09E-04 2.09E-04 2.09E-04 2.08E-04 2.08E-04 2.08E-04 2.07E-04 2.07E-04 2.07E-04 2.07E-04 2.07E-04 2.07E-04 2.07E-04 2.06E-04 2.06E-04 2.06E-04 2.06E-04 2.05E-04 2.05E-04 2.05E-04 2.05E-04 2.05E-04 2.05E-04 2.05E-04 2.04E-04 2.04E-04 2.04E-04 2.04E-04 20,31/08/02 22,14/11/02 03,09/10/02 23,15/02/02 16,13/02/02 23,03/08/02 01,30/06/02 03,27/04/02 16,21/08/02 18,23/01/02 21,02/10/02 05,14/07/02 17,14/01/02 07,26/04/02 02,17/03/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 12,20/01/02 23,10/09/02 04,13/03/02 05,24/08/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 22,08/02/02 24,13/08/02 21,20/09/02 07,16/10/02 19,07/07/02 12,01/07/02 09,11/06/02 06,22/08/02 10,09/02/02 (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ___________________ PAH_3 minute_v1 ___________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ PAH_3 minute_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 7.20E-05 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ PAH_3 minute_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 2.64E-05 2.59E-05 2.52E-05 2.51E-05 2.50E-05 2.42E-05 2.41E-05 2.39E-05 2.38E-05 2.38E-05 2.37E-05 2.33E-05 2.32E-05 2.31E-05 2.30E-05 2.29E-05 2.28E-05 2.28E-05 2.28E-05 2.27E-05 2.26E-05 2.25E-05 2.25E-05 2.25E-05 2.24E-05 2.24E-05 2.24E-05 2.24E-05 2.22E-05 2.22E-05 2.21E-05 2.21E-05 2.20E-05 2.19E-05 2.19E-05 2.18E-05 2.17E-05 2.17E-05 2.17E-05 2.16E-05 2.16E-05 2.16E-05 2.16E-05 2.15E-05 2.15E-05 2.15E-05 2.14E-05 2.14E-05 2.14E-05 2.14E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.13E-05 2.12E-05 2.12E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.11E-05 2.10E-05 2.10E-05 18,20/08/02 19,20/08/02 02,04/05/02 15,01/02/02 02,08/04/02 06,26/12/02 18,21/12/02 04,14/07/02 24,03/08/02 01,04/08/02 03,05/03/02 06,05/03/02 16,21/12/02 03,16/04/02 04,03/10/02 06,02/05/02 20,03/11/02 03,02/05/02 19,30/06/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 01,21/10/02 05,05/03/02 17,15/02/02 20,21/05/02 01,02/03/02 02,02/03/02 01,04/05/02 05,27/09/02 04,20/05/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 23,26/09/02 18,24/03/02 02,22/08/02 24,26/09/02 22,05/06/02 22,30/08/02 22,31/08/02 06,26/04/02 17,23/11/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 17,24/03/02 12,08/04/02 06,08/11/02 06,21/10/02 16,05/03/02 04,09/04/02 03,10/11/02 05,12/10/02 20,10/04/02 17,14/07/02 24,12/05/02 18,17/11/02 05,08/09/02 02,04/07/02 05,21/11/02 23,17/08/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 02,01/11/02 22,01/01/02 19,19/09/02 16,04/06/02 19,17/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (344872, 5787734, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344812, 5787734, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 2.10E-05 2.09E-05 2.09E-05 2.09E-05 2.09E-05 2.09E-05 2.09E-05 2.08E-05 2.08E-05 2.08E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.07E-05 2.06E-05 2.06E-05 2.06E-05 2.06E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.05E-05 2.04E-05 2.04E-05 2.04E-05 2.04E-05 20,31/08/02 22,14/11/02 03,09/10/02 23,15/02/02 16,13/02/02 23,03/08/02 01,30/06/02 03,27/04/02 16,21/08/02 18,23/01/02 21,02/10/02 05,14/07/02 17,14/01/02 07,26/04/02 02,17/03/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 12,20/01/02 23,10/09/02 04,13/03/02 05,24/08/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 22,08/02/02 24,13/08/02 21,20/09/02 07,16/10/02 19,07/07/02 12,01/07/02 09,11/06/02 06,22/08/02 10,09/02/02 (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ____________________ OCPs_3 minute_v1 ____________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ OCPs_3 minute_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 3.60E-04 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ OCPs_3 minute_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 1.32E-04 1.29E-04 1.26E-04 1.26E-04 1.25E-04 1.21E-04 1.21E-04 1.19E-04 1.19E-04 1.19E-04 1.19E-04 1.17E-04 1.16E-04 1.16E-04 1.15E-04 1.15E-04 1.14E-04 1.14E-04 1.14E-04 1.13E-04 1.13E-04 1.13E-04 1.13E-04 1.12E-04 1.12E-04 1.12E-04 1.12E-04 1.12E-04 1.11E-04 1.11E-04 1.11E-04 1.10E-04 1.10E-04 1.09E-04 1.09E-04 1.09E-04 1.08E-04 1.08E-04 1.08E-04 1.08E-04 1.08E-04 1.08E-04 1.08E-04 1.08E-04 1.08E-04 1.07E-04 1.07E-04 1.07E-04 1.07E-04 1.07E-04 1.07E-04 1.07E-04 1.07E-04 1.06E-04 1.06E-04 1.06E-04 1.06E-04 1.06E-04 1.06E-04 1.06E-04 1.06E-04 1.06E-04 1.06E-04 1.06E-04 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 18,20/08/02 19,20/08/02 02,04/05/02 15,01/02/02 02,08/04/02 06,26/12/02 18,21/12/02 04,14/07/02 24,03/08/02 01,04/08/02 03,05/03/02 06,05/03/02 16,21/12/02 03,16/04/02 04,03/10/02 06,02/05/02 20,03/11/02 03,02/05/02 19,30/06/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 01,21/10/02 05,05/03/02 17,15/02/02 20,21/05/02 01,02/03/02 02,02/03/02 01,04/05/02 05,27/09/02 04,20/05/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 23,26/09/02 18,24/03/02 02,22/08/02 24,26/09/02 22,05/06/02 22,30/08/02 22,31/08/02 06,26/04/02 17,23/11/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 17,24/03/02 12,08/04/02 06,08/11/02 06,21/10/02 16,05/03/02 04,09/04/02 03,10/11/02 05,12/10/02 20,10/04/02 17,14/07/02 24,12/05/02 18,17/11/02 05,08/09/02 02,04/07/02 05,21/11/02 23,17/08/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 02,01/11/02 22,01/01/02 19,19/09/02 16,04/06/02 19,17/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (344872, 5787734, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344812, 5787734, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 1.04E-04 1.03E-04 1.03E-04 1.03E-04 1.03E-04 1.03E-04 1.03E-04 1.03E-04 1.03E-04 1.03E-04 1.03E-04 1.02E-04 1.02E-04 1.02E-04 1.02E-04 1.02E-04 1.02E-04 1.02E-04 20,31/08/02 22,14/11/02 03,09/10/02 23,15/02/02 16,13/02/02 23,03/08/02 01,30/06/02 03,27/04/02 16,21/08/02 18,23/01/02 21,02/10/02 05,14/07/02 17,14/01/02 07,26/04/02 02,17/03/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 12,20/01/02 23,10/09/02 04,13/03/02 05,24/08/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 22,08/02/02 24,13/08/02 21,20/09/02 07,16/10/02 19,07/07/02 12,01/07/02 09,11/06/02 06,22/08/02 10,09/02/02 (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ___________________ TEQ_3 minute_v1 ___________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ TEQ_3 minute_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 1.10E-06 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ TEQ_3 minute_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 4.03E-07 3.96E-07 3.85E-07 3.84E-07 3.82E-07 3.70E-07 3.69E-07 3.64E-07 3.63E-07 3.63E-07 3.62E-07 3.57E-07 3.54E-07 3.53E-07 3.52E-07 3.50E-07 3.49E-07 3.48E-07 3.48E-07 3.47E-07 3.45E-07 3.44E-07 3.44E-07 3.43E-07 3.43E-07 3.42E-07 3.42E-07 3.42E-07 3.39E-07 3.39E-07 3.38E-07 3.38E-07 3.37E-07 3.35E-07 3.34E-07 3.33E-07 3.32E-07 3.31E-07 3.31E-07 3.31E-07 3.30E-07 3.30E-07 3.30E-07 3.29E-07 3.29E-07 3.28E-07 3.28E-07 3.27E-07 3.27E-07 3.26E-07 3.26E-07 3.26E-07 3.25E-07 3.25E-07 3.25E-07 3.25E-07 3.25E-07 3.24E-07 3.23E-07 3.23E-07 3.23E-07 3.23E-07 3.23E-07 3.22E-07 3.22E-07 3.22E-07 3.21E-07 3.21E-07 18,20/08/02 19,20/08/02 02,04/05/02 15,01/02/02 02,08/04/02 06,26/12/02 18,21/12/02 04,14/07/02 24,03/08/02 01,04/08/02 03,05/03/02 06,05/03/02 16,21/12/02 03,16/04/02 04,03/10/02 06,02/05/02 20,03/11/02 03,02/05/02 19,30/06/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 01,21/10/02 05,05/03/02 17,15/02/02 20,21/05/02 01,02/03/02 02,02/03/02 01,04/05/02 05,27/09/02 04,20/05/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 23,26/09/02 18,24/03/02 02,22/08/02 24,26/09/02 22,05/06/02 22,30/08/02 22,31/08/02 06,26/04/02 17,23/11/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 17,24/03/02 12,08/04/02 06,08/11/02 06,21/10/02 16,05/03/02 04,09/04/02 03,10/11/02 05,12/10/02 20,10/04/02 17,14/07/02 24,12/05/02 18,17/11/02 05,08/09/02 02,04/07/02 05,21/11/02 23,17/08/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 02,01/11/02 22,01/01/02 19,19/09/02 16,04/06/02 19,17/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (344872, 5787734, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344812, 5787734, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 3.20E-07 3.20E-07 3.20E-07 3.19E-07 3.19E-07 3.19E-07 3.19E-07 3.18E-07 3.18E-07 3.17E-07 3.17E-07 3.17E-07 3.17E-07 3.17E-07 3.16E-07 3.16E-07 3.16E-07 3.15E-07 3.15E-07 3.15E-07 3.14E-07 3.14E-07 3.14E-07 3.14E-07 3.13E-07 3.13E-07 3.13E-07 3.13E-07 3.12E-07 3.12E-07 3.12E-07 3.12E-07 20,31/08/02 22,14/11/02 03,09/10/02 23,15/02/02 16,13/02/02 23,03/08/02 01,30/06/02 03,27/04/02 16,21/08/02 18,23/01/02 21,02/10/02 05,14/07/02 17,14/01/02 07,26/04/02 02,17/03/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 12,20/01/02 23,10/09/02 04,13/03/02 05,24/08/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 22,08/02/02 24,13/08/02 21,20/09/02 07,16/10/02 19,07/07/02 12,01/07/02 09,11/06/02 06,22/08/02 10,09/02/02 (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 _______________________ Mercury_3 minute_v1 _______________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects Egan method Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ Mercury_3 minute_v1 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 13m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 3.60E-03 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 _______________________ Mercury_3 minute_v1 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS _______________________ The Cartesian receptor grid has the following x-values (or eastings): 343311.m 343372.m 343432.m 343492.m 343552.m 343612.m 343672.m 343732.m 343792.m 343852.m 343912.m 343972.m 344032.m 344092.m 344152.m 344212.m 344272.m 344332.m 344392.m 344452.m 344512.m 344572.m 344632.m 344692.m 344752.m 344812.m 344872.m 344932.m 344992.m 345052.m 345112.m 345172.m 345232.m 345292.m 345352.m 345412.m 345472.m 345532.m 345592.m 345652.m 345712.m 345772.m 345832.m 345892.m 345952.m 346012.m 346072.m 346132.m 346192.m 346252.m 346312.m 346372.m 346432.m 346492.m 346552.m 346612.m and these y-values (or northings): 5786414.m 5786474.m 5786534.m 5786594.m 5786654.m 5786714.m 5786834.m 5786894.m 5786954.m 5787014.m 5787074.m 5787134.m 5787254.m 5787314.m 5787374.m 5787434.m 5787494.m 5787554.m 5787674.m 5787734.m 5787794.m 5787854.m 5787914.m 5787974.m 5788094.m 5788154.m 5788214.m 5788274.m 5788334.m 5788394.m 5788514.m 5788574.m 5788634.m 5788694.m 5788754.m 5788814.m 5788934.m 5788994.m 5789054.m 5789114.m 5789174.m 5789234.m 5789354.m 5786774.m 5787194.m 5787614.m 5788034.m 5788454.m 5788874.m 5789294.m DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 1.32E-03 1.29E-03 1.26E-03 1.26E-03 1.25E-03 1.21E-03 1.21E-03 1.19E-03 1.19E-03 1.19E-03 1.19E-03 1.17E-03 1.16E-03 1.16E-03 1.15E-03 1.15E-03 1.14E-03 1.14E-03 1.14E-03 1.13E-03 1.13E-03 1.13E-03 1.13E-03 1.12E-03 1.12E-03 1.12E-03 1.12E-03 1.12E-03 1.11E-03 1.11E-03 1.11E-03 1.10E-03 1.10E-03 1.09E-03 1.09E-03 1.09E-03 1.08E-03 1.08E-03 1.08E-03 1.08E-03 1.08E-03 1.08E-03 1.08E-03 1.08E-03 1.08E-03 1.07E-03 1.07E-03 1.07E-03 1.07E-03 1.07E-03 1.07E-03 1.07E-03 1.07E-03 1.06E-03 1.06E-03 1.06E-03 1.06E-03 1.06E-03 1.06E-03 1.06E-03 1.06E-03 1.06E-03 1.06E-03 1.06E-03 1.05E-03 1.05E-03 1.05E-03 1.05E-03 18,20/08/02 19,20/08/02 02,04/05/02 15,01/02/02 02,08/04/02 06,26/12/02 18,21/12/02 04,14/07/02 24,03/08/02 01,04/08/02 03,05/03/02 06,05/03/02 16,21/12/02 03,16/04/02 04,03/10/02 06,02/05/02 20,03/11/02 03,02/05/02 19,30/06/02 20,05/09/02 01,05/09/02 01,21/10/02 05,05/03/02 17,15/02/02 20,21/05/02 01,02/03/02 02,02/03/02 01,04/05/02 05,27/09/02 04,20/05/02 04,01/01/02 14,11/04/02 23,26/09/02 18,24/03/02 02,22/08/02 24,26/09/02 22,05/06/02 22,30/08/02 22,31/08/02 06,26/04/02 17,23/11/02 20,28/01/02 17,26/01/02 17,24/09/02 17,04/03/02 17,24/03/02 12,08/04/02 06,08/11/02 06,21/10/02 16,05/03/02 04,09/04/02 03,10/11/02 05,12/10/02 20,10/04/02 17,14/07/02 24,12/05/02 18,17/11/02 05,08/09/02 02,04/07/02 05,21/11/02 23,17/08/02 13,05/05/02 21,28/03/02 02,01/11/02 22,01/01/02 19,19/09/02 16,04/06/02 19,17/11/02 (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (344872, 5787734, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344932, 5787734, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344992, 5787794, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (344812, 5787734, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 1.05E-03 1.05E-03 1.05E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-03 1.03E-03 1.03E-03 1.03E-03 1.03E-03 1.03E-03 1.03E-03 1.03E-03 1.03E-03 1.03E-03 1.03E-03 1.02E-03 1.02E-03 1.02E-03 1.02E-03 1.02E-03 1.02E-03 1.02E-03 20,31/08/02 22,14/11/02 03,09/10/02 23,15/02/02 16,13/02/02 23,03/08/02 01,30/06/02 03,27/04/02 16,21/08/02 18,23/01/02 21,02/10/02 05,14/07/02 17,14/01/02 07,26/04/02 02,17/03/02 14,12/07/02 06,01/01/02 12,20/01/02 23,10/09/02 04,13/03/02 05,24/08/02 18,17/05/02 02,21/06/02 22,08/02/02 24,13/08/02 21,20/09/02 07,16/10/02 19,07/07/02 12,01/07/02 09,11/06/02 06,22/08/02 10,09/02/02 (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345172, 5788034, (344992, 5787794, (344932, 5787794, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5788094, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5787974, (345112, 5788094, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ___________________ TSP_3 minute_v2 ___________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ TSP_3 minute_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 4.90E-02 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ TSP_3 minute_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 6.79E-03 6.56E-03 6.06E-03 5.84E-03 5.73E-03 5.62E-03 5.55E-03 5.48E-03 5.44E-03 5.44E-03 5.40E-03 5.35E-03 5.32E-03 03,17/12/02 03,22/11/02 05,28/08/02 01,25/02/02 03,06/10/02 08,16/06/02 04,04/10/02 05,07/12/02 23,20/02/02 22,27/09/02 20,22/04/02 07,13/05/02 03,15/12/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 5.28E-03 5.27E-03 5.25E-03 5.21E-03 5.08E-03 5.05E-03 5.05E-03 4.95E-03 4.93E-03 4.87E-03 4.76E-03 4.73E-03 4.68E-03 4.68E-03 4.59E-03 4.56E-03 4.48E-03 4.41E-03 4.32E-03 4.29E-03 4.26E-03 4.21E-03 4.20E-03 4.19E-03 4.11E-03 4.08E-03 3.93E-03 3.93E-03 3.92E-03 3.92E-03 3.90E-03 3.90E-03 3.86E-03 3.85E-03 3.85E-03 3.84E-03 3.83E-03 3.82E-03 3.78E-03 3.74E-03 3.71E-03 3.71E-03 3.64E-03 3.63E-03 3.63E-03 3.63E-03 3.62E-03 3.61E-03 3.56E-03 3.54E-03 3.51E-03 3.46E-03 3.46E-03 3.44E-03 3.42E-03 3.42E-03 3.42E-03 3.40E-03 3.38E-03 3.37E-03 3.36E-03 3.34E-03 3.31E-03 3.30E-03 3.29E-03 3.24E-03 3.24E-03 3.24E-03 3.24E-03 3.23E-03 3.20E-03 3.18E-03 3.18E-03 3.17E-03 3.16E-03 24,22/08/02 21,26/09/02 23,31/08/02 18,10/07/02 24,02/10/02 18,14/07/02 06,20/12/02 21,26/05/02 02,06/10/02 06,26/11/02 03,18/08/02 05,08/11/02 24,19/03/02 01,20/03/02 06,01/11/02 07,06/05/02 23,24/08/02 01,09/10/02 05,01/11/02 06,13/05/02 19,17/07/02 02,11/09/02 23,25/04/02 05,18/07/02 23,06/05/02 07,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 18,26/06/02 20,18/06/02 03,08/08/02 24,16/08/02 01,19/06/02 02,07/12/02 02,28/09/02 02,18/10/02 08,17/07/02 01,18/05/02 24,20/04/02 06,06/01/02 02,20/12/02 03,02/04/02 05,10/04/02 23,07/11/02 04,28/01/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,20/12/02 01,01/09/02 04,11/09/02 20,07/05/02 05,13/03/02 04,19/02/02 07,22/08/02 08,18/06/02 05,10/09/02 19,17/05/02 02,03/10/02 24,09/05/02 01,08/10/02 19,22/08/02 07,31/08/02 02,12/08/02 01,10/05/02 19,24/11/02 04,17/04/02 18,07/05/02 04,24/09/02 01,24/08/02 05,11/04/02 21,28/05/02 04,21/03/02 02,26/09/02 24,07/10/02 20,14/08/02 07,17/03/02 (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 3.15E-03 3.15E-03 3.15E-03 3.12E-03 3.12E-03 3.12E-03 3.12E-03 3.11E-03 3.11E-03 3.10E-03 3.09E-03 3.08E-03 23,27/08/02 07,05/06/02 02,15/04/02 01,01/04/02 05,04/05/02 02,24/09/02 23,23/11/02 22,01/09/02 22,08/08/02 24,30/08/02 08,21/12/02 03,29/03/02 (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (344205, 5788123, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (343984, 5788148, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 __________________ PM10_1 hour_v2 __________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 2.00E-02 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 1 hour _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ PM10_1 hour_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 4.90E-02 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ PM10_1 hour_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 1 hour Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 2.34E-02 2.28E-02 2.27E-02 2.25E-02 2.25E-02 2.24E-02 2.24E-02 2.24E-02 2.24E-02 2.23E-02 2.23E-02 05,08/11/02 03,06/10/02 22,25/04/02 20,21/07/02 03,02/04/02 03,17/12/02 07,06/05/02 08,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 08,13/05/02 08,18/06/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 2.23E-02 2.23E-02 2.23E-02 2.22E-02 2.22E-02 2.22E-02 2.21E-02 2.21E-02 2.21E-02 2.21E-02 2.20E-02 2.20E-02 2.20E-02 2.20E-02 2.20E-02 2.20E-02 2.20E-02 2.20E-02 2.20E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.19E-02 2.18E-02 2.18E-02 2.18E-02 2.18E-02 2.18E-02 2.18E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.17E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.16E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 03,22/11/02 04,31/08/02 01,09/10/02 03,08/08/02 06,06/05/02 02,06/10/02 03,29/03/02 23,23/11/02 01,01/09/02 08,06/05/02 07,13/05/02 20,30/07/02 05,24/03/02 03,24/03/02 03,07/03/02 24,20/04/02 04,01/11/02 06,24/09/02 06,13/05/02 05,01/11/02 23,25/04/02 02,06/01/02 06,31/08/02 22,18/06/02 06,28/08/02 23,14/04/02 19,16/09/02 23,07/04/02 07,16/06/02 02,22/11/02 02,30/12/02 18,26/08/02 05,17/04/02 02,17/03/02 04,26/04/02 07,06/02/02 23,08/10/02 06,17/04/02 04,08/08/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,11/03/02 22,19/02/02 24,08/10/02 04,06/01/02 08,16/03/02 07,31/08/02 02,28/09/02 02,20/09/02 03,11/09/02 18,14/07/02 08,17/07/02 02,17/09/02 01,17/09/02 01,25/02/02 01,03/10/02 05,06/05/02 06,17/09/02 22,08/08/02 18,07/07/02 01,20/09/02 01,18/05/02 07,04/01/02 02,11/09/02 02,20/12/02 02,26/09/02 09,30/06/02 02,09/10/02 02,06/05/02 23,03/07/02 21,18/06/02 08,15/12/02 22,19/05/02 01,22/08/02 04,11/09/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344205, 5788123, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (344280, 5788106, (344377, 5788095, (344261, 5787698, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (343984, 5788148, (343984, 5788148, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344205, 5788123, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 2.15E-02 02,04/11/02 08,30/06/02 07,22/08/02 06,05/11/02 03,28/12/02 24,05/10/02 02,01/02/02 07,26/04/02 24,14/02/02 05,26/04/02 20,20/08/02 06,06/10/02 21,03/07/02 07,06/09/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ___________________ PM2.5_1 hour_v2 ___________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 1.00E-02 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 1 hour _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ PM2.5_1 hour_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 4.90E-02 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ PM2.5_1 hour_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 1 hour Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 1.34E-02 1.28E-02 1.27E-02 1.25E-02 1.25E-02 1.24E-02 1.24E-02 1.24E-02 1.24E-02 1.23E-02 1.23E-02 05,08/11/02 03,06/10/02 22,25/04/02 20,21/07/02 03,02/04/02 03,17/12/02 07,06/05/02 08,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 08,13/05/02 08,18/06/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 1.23E-02 1.23E-02 1.23E-02 1.22E-02 1.22E-02 1.22E-02 1.21E-02 1.21E-02 1.21E-02 1.21E-02 1.20E-02 1.20E-02 1.20E-02 1.20E-02 1.20E-02 1.20E-02 1.20E-02 1.20E-02 1.20E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.19E-02 1.18E-02 1.18E-02 1.18E-02 1.18E-02 1.18E-02 1.18E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.17E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.16E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 03,22/11/02 04,31/08/02 01,09/10/02 03,08/08/02 06,06/05/02 02,06/10/02 03,29/03/02 23,23/11/02 01,01/09/02 08,06/05/02 07,13/05/02 20,30/07/02 05,24/03/02 03,24/03/02 03,07/03/02 24,20/04/02 04,01/11/02 06,24/09/02 06,13/05/02 05,01/11/02 23,25/04/02 02,06/01/02 06,31/08/02 22,18/06/02 06,28/08/02 23,14/04/02 19,16/09/02 23,07/04/02 07,16/06/02 02,22/11/02 02,30/12/02 18,26/08/02 05,17/04/02 02,17/03/02 04,26/04/02 07,06/02/02 23,08/10/02 06,17/04/02 04,08/08/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,11/03/02 22,19/02/02 24,08/10/02 04,06/01/02 08,16/03/02 07,31/08/02 02,28/09/02 02,20/09/02 03,11/09/02 18,14/07/02 08,17/07/02 02,17/09/02 01,17/09/02 01,25/02/02 01,03/10/02 05,06/05/02 06,17/09/02 22,08/08/02 18,07/07/02 01,20/09/02 01,18/05/02 07,04/01/02 02,11/09/02 02,20/12/02 02,26/09/02 09,30/06/02 02,09/10/02 02,06/05/02 23,03/07/02 21,18/06/02 08,15/12/02 22,19/05/02 01,22/08/02 04,11/09/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344205, 5788123, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (344280, 5788106, (344377, 5788095, (344261, 5787698, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (343984, 5788148, (343984, 5788148, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344205, 5788123, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 1.15E-02 02,04/11/02 08,30/06/02 07,22/08/02 06,05/11/02 03,28/12/02 24,05/10/02 02,01/02/02 07,26/04/02 24,14/02/02 05,26/04/02 20,20/08/02 06,06/10/02 21,03/07/02 07,06/09/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ________________ CO_1 hour_v2 ________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 4.60E-01 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 1 hour _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ CO_1 hour_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 8.10E-02 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ CO_1 hour_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 1 hour Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 4.66E-01 4.65E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 05,08/11/02 03,06/10/02 22,25/04/02 20,21/07/02 03,02/04/02 03,17/12/02 07,06/05/02 08,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 08,13/05/02 08,18/06/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.64E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 03,22/11/02 04,31/08/02 01,09/10/02 03,08/08/02 06,06/05/02 02,06/10/02 03,29/03/02 23,23/11/02 01,01/09/02 08,06/05/02 07,13/05/02 20,30/07/02 05,24/03/02 03,24/03/02 03,07/03/02 24,20/04/02 04,01/11/02 06,24/09/02 06,13/05/02 05,01/11/02 23,25/04/02 02,06/01/02 06,31/08/02 22,18/06/02 06,28/08/02 23,14/04/02 19,16/09/02 23,07/04/02 07,16/06/02 02,22/11/02 02,30/12/02 18,26/08/02 05,17/04/02 02,17/03/02 04,26/04/02 07,06/02/02 23,08/10/02 06,17/04/02 04,08/08/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,11/03/02 22,19/02/02 24,08/10/02 04,06/01/02 08,16/03/02 07,31/08/02 02,28/09/02 02,20/09/02 18,14/07/02 03,11/09/02 08,17/07/02 02,17/09/02 01,17/09/02 01,25/02/02 01,03/10/02 05,06/05/02 06,17/09/02 22,08/08/02 18,07/07/02 01,20/09/02 01,18/05/02 07,04/01/02 02,11/09/02 02,20/12/02 02,26/09/02 09,30/06/02 02,09/10/02 02,06/05/02 23,03/07/02 21,18/06/02 08,15/12/02 22,19/05/02 01,22/08/02 04,11/09/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344205, 5788123, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (344280, 5788106, (344377, 5788095, (344261, 5787698, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (343984, 5788148, (343984, 5788148, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344205, 5788123, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.63E-01 4.62E-01 4.62E-01 4.62E-01 4.62E-01 4.62E-01 4.62E-01 02,04/11/02 08,30/06/02 07,22/08/02 06,05/11/02 03,28/12/02 24,05/10/02 02,01/02/02 07,26/04/02 24,14/02/02 05,26/04/02 20,20/08/02 06,06/10/02 21,03/07/02 07,06/09/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 _________________ NO2_1 hour_v2 _________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 2.80E-02 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 1 hour _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ NO2_1 hour_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 1.62E-01 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ NO2_1 hour_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 1 hour Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 3.92E-02 3.71E-02 3.69E-02 3.63E-02 3.63E-02 3.61E-02 3.60E-02 3.59E-02 3.59E-02 3.58E-02 3.57E-02 05,08/11/02 03,06/10/02 22,25/04/02 20,21/07/02 03,02/04/02 03,17/12/02 07,06/05/02 08,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 08,13/05/02 08,18/06/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 3.56E-02 3.55E-02 3.54E-02 3.54E-02 3.52E-02 3.52E-02 3.50E-02 3.50E-02 3.49E-02 3.49E-02 3.47E-02 3.47E-02 3.47E-02 3.47E-02 3.46E-02 3.45E-02 3.45E-02 3.45E-02 3.45E-02 3.44E-02 3.44E-02 3.43E-02 3.43E-02 3.43E-02 3.43E-02 3.43E-02 3.43E-02 3.42E-02 3.42E-02 3.42E-02 3.42E-02 3.42E-02 3.40E-02 3.40E-02 3.39E-02 3.39E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.38E-02 3.37E-02 3.37E-02 3.36E-02 3.36E-02 3.36E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.35E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.34E-02 3.33E-02 3.33E-02 3.33E-02 3.33E-02 3.33E-02 3.33E-02 3.33E-02 3.33E-02 3.33E-02 3.32E-02 3.32E-02 3.32E-02 3.32E-02 3.31E-02 3.31E-02 3.31E-02 3.31E-02 3.31E-02 03,22/11/02 04,31/08/02 01,09/10/02 03,08/08/02 06,06/05/02 02,06/10/02 03,29/03/02 23,23/11/02 01,01/09/02 08,06/05/02 07,13/05/02 20,30/07/02 05,24/03/02 03,24/03/02 03,07/03/02 24,20/04/02 04,01/11/02 06,24/09/02 06,13/05/02 05,01/11/02 23,25/04/02 02,06/01/02 06,31/08/02 22,18/06/02 06,28/08/02 23,14/04/02 19,16/09/02 23,07/04/02 07,16/06/02 02,22/11/02 02,30/12/02 18,26/08/02 05,17/04/02 02,17/03/02 04,26/04/02 07,06/02/02 23,08/10/02 06,17/04/02 04,08/08/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,11/03/02 22,19/02/02 24,08/10/02 04,06/01/02 08,16/03/02 07,31/08/02 02,28/09/02 02,20/09/02 03,11/09/02 18,14/07/02 08,17/07/02 02,17/09/02 01,17/09/02 01,25/02/02 01,03/10/02 05,06/05/02 06,17/09/02 22,08/08/02 18,07/07/02 01,20/09/02 01,18/05/02 07,04/01/02 02,11/09/02 02,20/12/02 02,26/09/02 09,30/06/02 02,09/10/02 02,06/05/02 23,03/07/02 21,18/06/02 08,15/12/02 22,19/05/02 01,22/08/02 04,11/09/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344205, 5788123, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (344280, 5788106, (344377, 5788095, (344261, 5787698, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (343984, 5788148, (343984, 5788148, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344205, 5788123, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 3.31E-02 3.31E-02 3.31E-02 3.30E-02 3.30E-02 3.30E-02 3.30E-02 3.30E-02 3.30E-02 3.30E-02 3.30E-02 3.30E-02 3.29E-02 3.29E-02 02,04/11/02 08,30/06/02 07,22/08/02 06,05/11/02 03,28/12/02 24,05/10/02 02,01/02/02 07,26/04/02 24,14/02/02 05,26/04/02 20,20/08/02 06,06/10/02 21,03/07/02 07,06/09/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 _________________ SO2_1 hour_v2 _________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 1 hour _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ SO2_1 hour_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 3.20E-03 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ SO2_1 hour_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 1 hour Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 2.22E-04 1.80E-04 1.77E-04 1.64E-04 1.64E-04 1.59E-04 1.58E-04 1.57E-04 1.55E-04 1.53E-04 1.52E-04 05,08/11/02 03,06/10/02 22,25/04/02 20,21/07/02 03,02/04/02 03,17/12/02 07,06/05/02 08,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 08,13/05/02 08,18/06/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 1.50E-04 1.48E-04 1.47E-04 1.47E-04 1.42E-04 1.42E-04 1.38E-04 1.38E-04 1.36E-04 1.36E-04 1.33E-04 1.32E-04 1.32E-04 1.31E-04 1.30E-04 1.29E-04 1.29E-04 1.28E-04 1.28E-04 1.26E-04 1.26E-04 1.25E-04 1.25E-04 1.24E-04 1.24E-04 1.24E-04 1.24E-04 1.23E-04 1.22E-04 1.22E-04 1.22E-04 1.22E-04 1.19E-04 1.18E-04 1.17E-04 1.16E-04 1.15E-04 1.15E-04 1.14E-04 1.14E-04 1.14E-04 1.13E-04 1.13E-04 1.11E-04 1.11E-04 1.11E-04 1.09E-04 1.09E-04 1.09E-04 1.08E-04 1.08E-04 1.08E-04 1.08E-04 1.07E-04 1.07E-04 1.06E-04 1.06E-04 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 1.05E-04 1.04E-04 1.03E-04 1.03E-04 1.02E-04 1.02E-04 1.01E-04 1.01E-04 1.01E-04 1.01E-04 1.01E-04 03,22/11/02 04,31/08/02 01,09/10/02 03,08/08/02 06,06/05/02 02,06/10/02 03,29/03/02 23,23/11/02 01,01/09/02 08,06/05/02 07,13/05/02 20,30/07/02 05,24/03/02 03,24/03/02 03,07/03/02 24,20/04/02 04,01/11/02 06,24/09/02 06,13/05/02 05,01/11/02 23,25/04/02 02,06/01/02 06,31/08/02 22,18/06/02 06,28/08/02 23,14/04/02 19,16/09/02 23,07/04/02 07,16/06/02 02,22/11/02 02,30/12/02 18,26/08/02 05,17/04/02 02,17/03/02 04,26/04/02 07,06/02/02 23,08/10/02 06,17/04/02 04,08/08/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,11/03/02 22,19/02/02 24,08/10/02 04,06/01/02 08,16/03/02 07,31/08/02 02,28/09/02 02,20/09/02 03,11/09/02 18,14/07/02 08,17/07/02 02,17/09/02 01,17/09/02 01,25/02/02 01,03/10/02 05,06/05/02 06,17/09/02 22,08/08/02 18,07/07/02 01,20/09/02 01,18/05/02 07,04/01/02 02,11/09/02 02,20/12/02 02,26/09/02 09,30/06/02 02,09/10/02 02,06/05/02 23,03/07/02 21,18/06/02 08,15/12/02 22,19/05/02 01,22/08/02 04,11/09/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344205, 5788123, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (344280, 5788106, (344377, 5788095, (344261, 5787698, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (343984, 5788148, (343984, 5788148, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344205, 5788123, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 1.00E-04 1.00E-04 1.00E-04 9.94E-05 9.91E-05 9.91E-05 9.91E-05 9.89E-05 9.86E-05 9.85E-05 9.83E-05 9.79E-05 9.74E-05 9.66E-05 02,04/11/02 08,30/06/02 07,22/08/02 06,05/11/02 03,28/12/02 24,05/10/02 02,01/02/02 07,26/04/02 24,14/02/02 05,26/04/02 20,20/08/02 06,06/10/02 21,03/07/02 07,06/09/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 _____________________ H2SO4_3 minute_v2 _____________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ H2SO4_3 minute_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 5.50E-04 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ H2SO4_3 minute_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 7.62E-05 7.36E-05 6.80E-05 6.56E-05 6.43E-05 6.31E-05 6.23E-05 6.15E-05 6.10E-05 6.10E-05 6.06E-05 6.00E-05 5.97E-05 03,17/12/02 03,22/11/02 05,28/08/02 01,25/02/02 03,06/10/02 08,16/06/02 04,04/10/02 05,07/12/02 23,20/02/02 22,27/09/02 20,22/04/02 07,13/05/02 03,15/12/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 5.93E-05 5.92E-05 5.89E-05 5.84E-05 5.70E-05 5.67E-05 5.67E-05 5.55E-05 5.53E-05 5.46E-05 5.34E-05 5.31E-05 5.25E-05 5.25E-05 5.16E-05 5.12E-05 5.03E-05 4.95E-05 4.85E-05 4.81E-05 4.78E-05 4.73E-05 4.71E-05 4.71E-05 4.61E-05 4.58E-05 4.41E-05 4.41E-05 4.40E-05 4.40E-05 4.38E-05 4.37E-05 4.34E-05 4.33E-05 4.32E-05 4.31E-05 4.30E-05 4.29E-05 4.25E-05 4.20E-05 4.17E-05 4.17E-05 4.08E-05 4.07E-05 4.07E-05 4.07E-05 4.07E-05 4.06E-05 3.99E-05 3.98E-05 3.94E-05 3.89E-05 3.88E-05 3.86E-05 3.84E-05 3.84E-05 3.84E-05 3.82E-05 3.79E-05 3.78E-05 3.77E-05 3.75E-05 3.71E-05 3.70E-05 3.69E-05 3.64E-05 3.63E-05 3.63E-05 3.63E-05 3.62E-05 3.59E-05 3.57E-05 3.56E-05 3.56E-05 3.55E-05 24,22/08/02 21,26/09/02 23,31/08/02 18,10/07/02 24,02/10/02 18,14/07/02 06,20/12/02 21,26/05/02 02,06/10/02 06,26/11/02 03,18/08/02 05,08/11/02 24,19/03/02 01,20/03/02 06,01/11/02 07,06/05/02 23,24/08/02 01,09/10/02 05,01/11/02 06,13/05/02 19,17/07/02 02,11/09/02 23,25/04/02 05,18/07/02 23,06/05/02 07,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 18,26/06/02 20,18/06/02 03,08/08/02 24,16/08/02 01,19/06/02 02,07/12/02 02,28/09/02 02,18/10/02 08,17/07/02 01,18/05/02 24,20/04/02 06,06/01/02 02,20/12/02 03,02/04/02 05,10/04/02 23,07/11/02 04,28/01/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,20/12/02 01,01/09/02 04,11/09/02 20,07/05/02 05,13/03/02 04,19/02/02 07,22/08/02 08,18/06/02 05,10/09/02 19,17/05/02 02,03/10/02 24,09/05/02 01,08/10/02 19,22/08/02 07,31/08/02 02,12/08/02 01,10/05/02 19,24/11/02 04,17/04/02 18,07/05/02 04,24/09/02 01,24/08/02 05,11/04/02 21,28/05/02 04,21/03/02 02,26/09/02 24,07/10/02 20,14/08/02 07,17/03/02 (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 3.54E-05 3.54E-05 3.53E-05 3.50E-05 3.50E-05 3.50E-05 3.50E-05 3.49E-05 3.49E-05 3.48E-05 3.47E-05 3.45E-05 23,27/08/02 07,05/06/02 02,15/04/02 01,01/04/02 05,04/05/02 02,24/09/02 23,23/11/02 22,01/09/02 22,08/08/02 24,30/08/02 08,21/12/02 03,29/03/02 (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (344205, 5788123, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (343984, 5788148, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ___________________ HCl_3 minute_v2 ___________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ HCl_3 minute_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 4.60E-02 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ HCl_3 minute_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 6.38E-03 6.16E-03 5.68E-03 5.48E-03 5.38E-03 5.28E-03 5.21E-03 5.14E-03 5.10E-03 5.10E-03 5.07E-03 5.02E-03 4.99E-03 03,17/12/02 03,22/11/02 05,28/08/02 01,25/02/02 03,06/10/02 08,16/06/02 04,04/10/02 05,07/12/02 23,20/02/02 22,27/09/02 20,22/04/02 07,13/05/02 03,15/12/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 4.96E-03 4.95E-03 4.93E-03 4.89E-03 4.77E-03 4.74E-03 4.74E-03 4.64E-03 4.63E-03 4.57E-03 4.47E-03 4.44E-03 4.39E-03 4.39E-03 4.31E-03 4.28E-03 4.20E-03 4.14E-03 4.06E-03 4.03E-03 4.00E-03 3.95E-03 3.94E-03 3.94E-03 3.86E-03 3.83E-03 3.69E-03 3.69E-03 3.68E-03 3.68E-03 3.66E-03 3.66E-03 3.63E-03 3.62E-03 3.61E-03 3.60E-03 3.60E-03 3.59E-03 3.55E-03 3.51E-03 3.49E-03 3.49E-03 3.42E-03 3.41E-03 3.41E-03 3.41E-03 3.40E-03 3.39E-03 3.34E-03 3.33E-03 3.29E-03 3.25E-03 3.25E-03 3.23E-03 3.21E-03 3.21E-03 3.21E-03 3.19E-03 3.17E-03 3.16E-03 3.16E-03 3.14E-03 3.10E-03 3.10E-03 3.09E-03 3.04E-03 3.04E-03 3.04E-03 3.04E-03 3.03E-03 3.00E-03 2.99E-03 2.98E-03 2.97E-03 2.97E-03 24,22/08/02 21,26/09/02 23,31/08/02 18,10/07/02 24,02/10/02 18,14/07/02 06,20/12/02 21,26/05/02 02,06/10/02 06,26/11/02 03,18/08/02 05,08/11/02 24,19/03/02 01,20/03/02 06,01/11/02 07,06/05/02 23,24/08/02 01,09/10/02 05,01/11/02 06,13/05/02 19,17/07/02 02,11/09/02 23,25/04/02 05,18/07/02 23,06/05/02 07,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 18,26/06/02 20,18/06/02 03,08/08/02 24,16/08/02 01,19/06/02 02,07/12/02 02,28/09/02 02,18/10/02 08,17/07/02 01,18/05/02 24,20/04/02 06,06/01/02 02,20/12/02 03,02/04/02 05,10/04/02 23,07/11/02 04,28/01/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,20/12/02 01,01/09/02 04,11/09/02 20,07/05/02 05,13/03/02 04,19/02/02 07,22/08/02 08,18/06/02 05,10/09/02 19,17/05/02 02,03/10/02 24,09/05/02 01,08/10/02 19,22/08/02 07,31/08/02 02,12/08/02 01,10/05/02 19,24/11/02 04,17/04/02 18,07/05/02 04,24/09/02 01,24/08/02 05,11/04/02 21,28/05/02 04,21/03/02 02,26/09/02 24,07/10/02 20,14/08/02 07,17/03/02 (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 2.96E-03 2.96E-03 2.96E-03 2.93E-03 2.93E-03 2.93E-03 2.92E-03 2.92E-03 2.91E-03 2.91E-03 2.90E-03 2.89E-03 23,27/08/02 07,05/06/02 02,15/04/02 01,01/04/02 05,04/05/02 02,24/09/02 23,23/11/02 22,01/09/02 22,08/08/02 24,30/08/02 08,21/12/02 03,29/03/02 (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (344205, 5788123, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (343984, 5788148, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ______________________________ HF_24 hour_7 day_90 day_v2 ______________________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No Averaging time for sigma-theta values 60 min. DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Sigma-theta Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIMES 24 hours 7 days 90 days _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________________ HF_24 hour_7 day_90 day_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS ______________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 1.50E-03 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________________ HF_24 hour_7 day_90 day_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 24 hours Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 1.89E-05 1.60E-05 1.60E-05 1.58E-05 1.46E-05 1.35E-05 1.34E-05 1.32E-05 1.30E-05 24,11/06/02 24,09/06/02 24,31/08/02 24,08/08/02 24,08/09/02 24,26/09/02 24,17/07/02 24,08/06/02 24,07/07/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 1.25E-05 1.22E-05 1.17E-05 1.15E-05 1.14E-05 1.12E-05 1.11E-05 1.07E-05 1.04E-05 1.03E-05 1.01E-05 1.01E-05 1.01E-05 1.01E-05 1.00E-05 9.93E-06 9.93E-06 9.17E-06 8.68E-06 8.58E-06 8.50E-06 8.48E-06 8.37E-06 8.06E-06 8.01E-06 7.82E-06 7.81E-06 7.70E-06 7.63E-06 7.46E-06 7.40E-06 7.29E-06 7.29E-06 7.20E-06 7.15E-06 7.13E-06 7.12E-06 7.10E-06 7.06E-06 6.91E-06 6.86E-06 6.84E-06 6.80E-06 6.71E-06 6.70E-06 6.60E-06 6.56E-06 6.49E-06 6.43E-06 6.21E-06 5.96E-06 5.95E-06 5.94E-06 5.90E-06 5.89E-06 5.86E-06 5.83E-06 5.78E-06 5.73E-06 5.64E-06 5.55E-06 5.52E-06 5.51E-06 5.40E-06 5.35E-06 5.25E-06 5.22E-06 5.21E-06 5.04E-06 5.00E-06 4.97E-06 4.86E-06 4.75E-06 4.73E-06 4.72E-06 24,30/06/02 24,17/09/02 24,06/05/02 24,22/06/02 24,09/05/02 24,25/04/02 24,06/10/02 24,26/04/02 24,01/01/02 24,16/03/02 24,20/09/02 24,04/07/02 24,22/08/02 24,13/05/02 24,03/07/02 24,16/06/02 24,08/10/02 24,17/03/02 24,22/11/02 24,25/02/02 24,27/09/02 24,30/08/02 24,20/12/02 24,12/08/02 24,14/10/02 24,28/08/02 24,11/09/02 24,05/09/02 24,11/08/02 24,18/07/02 24,14/02/02 24,21/06/02 24,25/09/02 24,06/08/02 24,03/09/02 24,08/11/02 24,20/06/02 24,16/09/02 24,10/06/02 24,09/10/02 24,12/06/02 24,16/07/02 24,07/08/02 24,17/04/02 24,28/07/02 24,20/03/02 24,10/05/02 24,13/06/02 24,21/08/02 24,06/09/02 24,14/06/02 24,24/09/02 24,02/01/02 24,01/11/02 24,26/05/02 24,23/04/02 24,26/06/02 24,05/10/02 24,25/01/02 24,23/07/02 24,19/01/02 24,05/06/02 24,21/07/02 24,26/08/02 24,06/01/02 24,29/10/02 24,20/07/02 24,01/02/02 24,11/04/02 24,12/05/02 24,04/12/02 24,03/11/02 24,16/04/02 24,19/05/02 24,07/11/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (344377, 5788095, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 4.68E-06 4.65E-06 4.61E-06 4.61E-06 4.60E-06 4.56E-06 4.55E-06 4.53E-06 4.52E-06 4.50E-06 4.49E-06 4.46E-06 4.45E-06 4.42E-06 4.42E-06 4.40E-06 24,07/10/02 24,05/11/02 24,06/02/02 24,04/10/02 24,01/09/02 24,18/06/02 24,18/09/02 24,28/09/02 24,16/10/02 24,05/01/02 24,05/03/02 24,02/08/02 24,01/04/02 24,19/08/02 24,16/05/02 24,27/08/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344261, 5787698, (344320, 5787592, (344320, 5787592, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344320, 5787592, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 7 days Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 9.31E-06 7.45E-06 5.97E-06 5.57E-06 5.14E-06 4.99E-06 4.82E-06 4.81E-06 4.75E-06 4.69E-06 4.41E-06 4.18E-06 4.02E-06 3.73E-06 3.65E-06 3.61E-06 3.53E-06 3.50E-06 3.21E-06 3.17E-06 3.07E-06 3.05E-06 2.94E-06 2.76E-06 2.68E-06 2.64E-06 2.56E-06 2.55E-06 2.18E-06 2.05E-06 2.03E-06 1.92E-06 1.91E-06 1.84E-06 1.79E-06 1.68E-06 1.67E-06 1.58E-06 1.54E-06 1.28E-06 1.14E-06 1.14E-06 1.09E-06 9.42E-07 8.93E-07 7.21E-07 3.23E-07 4.14E-08 24,12/06/02 24,05/09/02 24,10/10/02 24,10/07/02 24,14/08/02 24,26/06/02 24,10/05/02 24,12/09/02 24,26/09/02 24,03/07/02 24,03/05/02 24,24/07/02 24,19/09/02 24,19/06/02 24,17/05/02 24,07/08/02 24,08/11/02 24,17/07/02 24,03/10/02 24,17/03/02 24,28/08/02 24,05/06/02 24,07/01/02 24,31/07/02 24,07/12/02 24,21/08/02 24,17/10/02 24,17/04/02 24,23/12/02 24,20/02/02 24,24/03/02 24,06/02/02 24,22/11/02 24,24/04/02 24,30/01/02 24,10/03/02 24,03/03/02 24,10/04/02 24,24/05/02 24,13/02/02 24,03/04/02 24,23/01/02 24,01/11/02 24,30/12/02 24,24/10/02 24,16/12/02 24,15/11/02 24,16/01/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344377, 5788095, (344377, 5788095, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344377, 5788095, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) 90-day running averages Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 4.66E-06 4.63E-06 4.59E-06 4.57E-06 4.55E-06 4.53E-06 4.53E-06 4.52E-06 4.49E-06 4.43E-06 4.40E-06 4.38E-06 4.36E-06 4.36E-06 4.34E-06 4.33E-06 4.32E-06 4.32E-06 4.31E-06 4.31E-06 4.30E-06 4.30E-06 4.30E-06 4.30E-06 4.30E-06 4.30E-06 4.30E-06 4.29E-06 4.29E-06 4.29E-06 4.29E-06 4.29E-06 4.29E-06 4.28E-06 4.28E-06 4.28E-06 4.28E-06 4.27E-06 4.27E-06 4.27E-06 4.26E-06 4.26E-06 4.26E-06 4.26E-06 4.25E-06 4.25E-06 4.25E-06 4.24E-06 4.23E-06 4.23E-06 4.23E-06 4.23E-06 4.23E-06 4.23E-06 4.22E-06 4.22E-06 4.22E-06 4.21E-06 4.21E-06 4.20E-06 4.20E-06 4.19E-06 24,06/09/02 24,05/09/02 24,03/09/02 24,04/09/02 24,01/09/02 24,07/09/02 24,31/08/02 24,08/09/02 24,09/09/02 24,08/08/02 24,28/09/02 24,27/09/02 24,30/08/02 24,11/08/02 24,28/07/02 24,18/09/02 24,30/07/02 24,12/08/02 24,28/08/02 24,09/08/02 24,11/09/02 24,14/08/02 24,13/08/02 24,27/08/02 24,29/07/02 24,26/07/02 24,17/09/02 24,29/08/02 24,10/09/02 24,07/08/02 24,26/08/02 24,27/07/02 24,26/09/02 24,10/08/02 24,20/09/02 24,22/08/02 24,25/07/02 24,25/08/02 24,24/08/02 24,29/09/02 24,24/07/02 24,12/09/02 24,14/10/02 24,23/08/02 24,19/09/02 24,15/08/02 24,31/07/02 24,14/09/02 24,23/07/02 24,06/08/02 24,30/09/02 24,09/10/02 24,13/09/02 24,10/10/02 24,21/08/02 24,01/10/02 24,21/07/02 24,21/09/02 24,03/08/02 24,15/10/02 24,04/08/02 24,08/10/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 4.19E-06 4.19E-06 4.18E-06 4.18E-06 4.18E-06 4.18E-06 4.18E-06 4.17E-06 4.17E-06 4.17E-06 4.17E-06 4.16E-06 4.16E-06 4.16E-06 4.15E-06 4.15E-06 4.15E-06 4.15E-06 4.15E-06 4.14E-06 4.13E-06 4.12E-06 4.11E-06 4.11E-06 4.10E-06 4.10E-06 4.09E-06 4.08E-06 4.07E-06 4.05E-06 4.03E-06 4.02E-06 3.99E-06 3.96E-06 3.96E-06 3.96E-06 3.94E-06 3.94E-06 24,11/10/02 24,16/09/02 24,05/08/02 24,22/09/02 24,20/08/02 24,20/07/02 24,13/10/02 24,19/08/02 24,02/08/02 24,22/07/02 24,12/10/02 24,25/09/02 24,01/08/02 24,23/09/02 24,16/10/02 24,17/08/02 24,18/08/02 24,02/10/02 24,24/09/02 24,16/08/02 24,15/09/02 24,19/07/02 24,07/10/02 24,05/10/02 24,04/10/02 24,18/07/02 24,06/10/02 24,03/10/02 24,17/10/02 24,18/10/02 24,17/07/02 24,19/10/02 24,16/07/02 24,13/07/02 24,20/10/02 24,21/10/02 24,14/07/02 24,15/07/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 _______________________ Benzene_3 minute_v2 _______________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ Benzene_3 minute_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 7.20E-05 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 _______________________ Benzene_3 minute_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS _______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 9.98E-06 9.64E-06 8.90E-06 8.58E-06 8.42E-06 8.26E-06 8.16E-06 8.05E-06 7.99E-06 7.99E-06 7.93E-06 7.86E-06 7.81E-06 03,17/12/02 03,22/11/02 05,28/08/02 01,25/02/02 03,06/10/02 08,16/06/02 04,04/10/02 05,07/12/02 23,20/02/02 22,27/09/02 20,22/04/02 07,13/05/02 03,15/12/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 7.76E-06 7.75E-06 7.71E-06 7.65E-06 7.46E-06 7.42E-06 7.42E-06 7.27E-06 7.24E-06 7.15E-06 7.00E-06 6.95E-06 6.88E-06 6.88E-06 6.75E-06 6.71E-06 6.58E-06 6.48E-06 6.35E-06 6.30E-06 6.26E-06 6.19E-06 6.16E-06 6.16E-06 6.03E-06 5.99E-06 5.78E-06 5.77E-06 5.77E-06 5.76E-06 5.74E-06 5.72E-06 5.68E-06 5.66E-06 5.66E-06 5.64E-06 5.63E-06 5.62E-06 5.56E-06 5.50E-06 5.46E-06 5.46E-06 5.35E-06 5.33E-06 5.33E-06 5.33E-06 5.33E-06 5.31E-06 5.22E-06 5.21E-06 5.16E-06 5.09E-06 5.08E-06 5.05E-06 5.03E-06 5.03E-06 5.03E-06 5.00E-06 4.96E-06 4.95E-06 4.94E-06 4.91E-06 4.86E-06 4.85E-06 4.83E-06 4.76E-06 4.76E-06 4.76E-06 4.75E-06 4.74E-06 4.70E-06 4.68E-06 4.67E-06 4.66E-06 4.65E-06 24,22/08/02 21,26/09/02 23,31/08/02 18,10/07/02 24,02/10/02 18,14/07/02 06,20/12/02 21,26/05/02 02,06/10/02 06,26/11/02 03,18/08/02 05,08/11/02 24,19/03/02 01,20/03/02 06,01/11/02 07,06/05/02 23,24/08/02 01,09/10/02 05,01/11/02 06,13/05/02 19,17/07/02 02,11/09/02 23,25/04/02 05,18/07/02 23,06/05/02 07,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 18,26/06/02 20,18/06/02 03,08/08/02 24,16/08/02 01,19/06/02 02,07/12/02 02,28/09/02 02,18/10/02 08,17/07/02 01,18/05/02 24,20/04/02 06,06/01/02 02,20/12/02 03,02/04/02 05,10/04/02 23,07/11/02 04,28/01/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,20/12/02 01,01/09/02 04,11/09/02 20,07/05/02 05,13/03/02 04,19/02/02 07,22/08/02 08,18/06/02 05,10/09/02 19,17/05/02 02,03/10/02 24,09/05/02 01,08/10/02 19,22/08/02 07,31/08/02 02,12/08/02 01,10/05/02 19,24/11/02 04,17/04/02 18,07/05/02 04,24/09/02 01,24/08/02 05,11/04/02 21,28/05/02 04,21/03/02 02,26/09/02 24,07/10/02 20,14/08/02 07,17/03/02 (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 4.63E-06 4.63E-06 4.63E-06 4.58E-06 4.58E-06 4.58E-06 4.58E-06 4.56E-06 4.56E-06 4.55E-06 4.55E-06 4.52E-06 23,27/08/02 07,05/06/02 02,15/04/02 01,01/04/02 05,04/05/02 02,24/09/02 23,23/11/02 22,01/09/02 22,08/08/02 24,30/08/02 08,21/12/02 03,29/03/02 (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (344205, 5788123, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (343984, 5788148, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ____________________ PCBs_3 minute_v2 ____________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ PCBs_3 minute_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 7.20E-04 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ PCBs_3 minute_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 9.98E-05 9.64E-05 8.90E-05 8.58E-05 8.42E-05 8.26E-05 8.16E-05 8.05E-05 7.99E-05 7.99E-05 7.93E-05 7.86E-05 7.81E-05 03,17/12/02 03,22/11/02 05,28/08/02 01,25/02/02 03,06/10/02 08,16/06/02 04,04/10/02 05,07/12/02 23,20/02/02 22,27/09/02 20,22/04/02 07,13/05/02 03,15/12/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 7.76E-05 7.75E-05 7.71E-05 7.65E-05 7.46E-05 7.42E-05 7.42E-05 7.27E-05 7.24E-05 7.15E-05 7.00E-05 6.95E-05 6.88E-05 6.88E-05 6.75E-05 6.71E-05 6.58E-05 6.48E-05 6.35E-05 6.30E-05 6.26E-05 6.19E-05 6.16E-05 6.16E-05 6.03E-05 5.99E-05 5.78E-05 5.77E-05 5.77E-05 5.76E-05 5.74E-05 5.72E-05 5.68E-05 5.66E-05 5.66E-05 5.64E-05 5.63E-05 5.62E-05 5.56E-05 5.50E-05 5.46E-05 5.46E-05 5.35E-05 5.33E-05 5.33E-05 5.33E-05 5.33E-05 5.31E-05 5.22E-05 5.21E-05 5.16E-05 5.09E-05 5.08E-05 5.05E-05 5.03E-05 5.03E-05 5.03E-05 5.00E-05 4.96E-05 4.95E-05 4.94E-05 4.91E-05 4.86E-05 4.85E-05 4.83E-05 4.76E-05 4.76E-05 4.76E-05 4.75E-05 4.74E-05 4.70E-05 4.68E-05 4.67E-05 4.66E-05 4.65E-05 24,22/08/02 21,26/09/02 23,31/08/02 18,10/07/02 24,02/10/02 18,14/07/02 06,20/12/02 21,26/05/02 02,06/10/02 06,26/11/02 03,18/08/02 05,08/11/02 24,19/03/02 01,20/03/02 06,01/11/02 07,06/05/02 23,24/08/02 01,09/10/02 05,01/11/02 06,13/05/02 19,17/07/02 02,11/09/02 23,25/04/02 05,18/07/02 23,06/05/02 07,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 18,26/06/02 20,18/06/02 03,08/08/02 24,16/08/02 01,19/06/02 02,07/12/02 02,28/09/02 02,18/10/02 08,17/07/02 01,18/05/02 24,20/04/02 06,06/01/02 02,20/12/02 03,02/04/02 05,10/04/02 23,07/11/02 04,28/01/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,20/12/02 01,01/09/02 04,11/09/02 20,07/05/02 05,13/03/02 04,19/02/02 07,22/08/02 08,18/06/02 05,10/09/02 19,17/05/02 02,03/10/02 24,09/05/02 01,08/10/02 19,22/08/02 07,31/08/02 02,12/08/02 01,10/05/02 19,24/11/02 04,17/04/02 18,07/05/02 04,24/09/02 01,24/08/02 05,11/04/02 21,28/05/02 04,21/03/02 02,26/09/02 24,07/10/02 20,14/08/02 07,17/03/02 (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 4.63E-05 4.63E-05 4.63E-05 4.58E-05 4.58E-05 4.58E-05 4.58E-05 4.56E-05 4.56E-05 4.55E-05 4.55E-05 4.52E-05 23,27/08/02 07,05/06/02 02,15/04/02 01,01/04/02 05,04/05/02 02,24/09/02 23,23/11/02 22,01/09/02 22,08/08/02 24,30/08/02 08,21/12/02 03,29/03/02 (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (344205, 5788123, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (343984, 5788148, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ___________________ PAH_3 minute_v2 ___________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ PAH_3 minute_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 7.20E-05 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ PAH_3 minute_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 9.98E-06 9.64E-06 8.90E-06 8.58E-06 8.42E-06 8.26E-06 8.16E-06 8.05E-06 7.99E-06 7.99E-06 7.93E-06 7.86E-06 7.81E-06 03,17/12/02 03,22/11/02 05,28/08/02 01,25/02/02 03,06/10/02 08,16/06/02 04,04/10/02 05,07/12/02 23,20/02/02 22,27/09/02 20,22/04/02 07,13/05/02 03,15/12/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 7.76E-06 7.75E-06 7.71E-06 7.65E-06 7.46E-06 7.42E-06 7.42E-06 7.27E-06 7.24E-06 7.15E-06 7.00E-06 6.95E-06 6.88E-06 6.88E-06 6.75E-06 6.71E-06 6.58E-06 6.48E-06 6.35E-06 6.30E-06 6.26E-06 6.19E-06 6.16E-06 6.16E-06 6.03E-06 5.99E-06 5.78E-06 5.77E-06 5.77E-06 5.76E-06 5.74E-06 5.72E-06 5.68E-06 5.66E-06 5.66E-06 5.64E-06 5.63E-06 5.62E-06 5.56E-06 5.50E-06 5.46E-06 5.46E-06 5.35E-06 5.33E-06 5.33E-06 5.33E-06 5.33E-06 5.31E-06 5.22E-06 5.21E-06 5.16E-06 5.09E-06 5.08E-06 5.05E-06 5.03E-06 5.03E-06 5.03E-06 5.00E-06 4.96E-06 4.95E-06 4.94E-06 4.91E-06 4.86E-06 4.85E-06 4.83E-06 4.76E-06 4.76E-06 4.76E-06 4.75E-06 4.74E-06 4.70E-06 4.68E-06 4.67E-06 4.66E-06 4.65E-06 24,22/08/02 21,26/09/02 23,31/08/02 18,10/07/02 24,02/10/02 18,14/07/02 06,20/12/02 21,26/05/02 02,06/10/02 06,26/11/02 03,18/08/02 05,08/11/02 24,19/03/02 01,20/03/02 06,01/11/02 07,06/05/02 23,24/08/02 01,09/10/02 05,01/11/02 06,13/05/02 19,17/07/02 02,11/09/02 23,25/04/02 05,18/07/02 23,06/05/02 07,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 18,26/06/02 20,18/06/02 03,08/08/02 24,16/08/02 01,19/06/02 02,07/12/02 02,28/09/02 02,18/10/02 08,17/07/02 01,18/05/02 24,20/04/02 06,06/01/02 02,20/12/02 03,02/04/02 05,10/04/02 23,07/11/02 04,28/01/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,20/12/02 01,01/09/02 04,11/09/02 20,07/05/02 05,13/03/02 04,19/02/02 07,22/08/02 08,18/06/02 05,10/09/02 19,17/05/02 02,03/10/02 24,09/05/02 01,08/10/02 19,22/08/02 07,31/08/02 02,12/08/02 01,10/05/02 19,24/11/02 04,17/04/02 18,07/05/02 04,24/09/02 01,24/08/02 05,11/04/02 21,28/05/02 04,21/03/02 02,26/09/02 24,07/10/02 20,14/08/02 07,17/03/02 (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 4.63E-06 4.63E-06 4.63E-06 4.58E-06 4.58E-06 4.58E-06 4.58E-06 4.56E-06 4.56E-06 4.55E-06 4.55E-06 4.52E-06 23,27/08/02 07,05/06/02 02,15/04/02 01,01/04/02 05,04/05/02 02,24/09/02 23,23/11/02 22,01/09/02 22,08/08/02 24,30/08/02 08,21/12/02 03,29/03/02 (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (344205, 5788123, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (343984, 5788148, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ____________________ OCPs_3 minute_v2 ____________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ OCPs_3 minute_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 3.60E-04 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ OCPs_3 minute_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 4.99E-05 4.82E-05 4.45E-05 4.29E-05 4.21E-05 4.13E-05 4.08E-05 4.03E-05 3.99E-05 3.99E-05 3.96E-05 3.93E-05 3.91E-05 03,17/12/02 03,22/11/02 05,28/08/02 01,25/02/02 03,06/10/02 08,16/06/02 04,04/10/02 05,07/12/02 23,20/02/02 22,27/09/02 20,22/04/02 07,13/05/02 03,15/12/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 3.88E-05 3.88E-05 3.86E-05 3.82E-05 3.73E-05 3.71E-05 3.71E-05 3.63E-05 3.62E-05 3.58E-05 3.50E-05 3.47E-05 3.44E-05 3.44E-05 3.37E-05 3.35E-05 3.29E-05 3.24E-05 3.18E-05 3.15E-05 3.13E-05 3.09E-05 3.08E-05 3.08E-05 3.02E-05 3.00E-05 2.89E-05 2.88E-05 2.88E-05 2.88E-05 2.87E-05 2.86E-05 2.84E-05 2.83E-05 2.83E-05 2.82E-05 2.82E-05 2.81E-05 2.78E-05 2.75E-05 2.73E-05 2.73E-05 2.67E-05 2.67E-05 2.67E-05 2.67E-05 2.66E-05 2.66E-05 2.61E-05 2.60E-05 2.58E-05 2.54E-05 2.54E-05 2.53E-05 2.52E-05 2.52E-05 2.51E-05 2.50E-05 2.48E-05 2.48E-05 2.47E-05 2.46E-05 2.43E-05 2.42E-05 2.42E-05 2.38E-05 2.38E-05 2.38E-05 2.38E-05 2.37E-05 2.35E-05 2.34E-05 2.33E-05 2.33E-05 2.32E-05 24,22/08/02 21,26/09/02 23,31/08/02 18,10/07/02 24,02/10/02 18,14/07/02 06,20/12/02 21,26/05/02 02,06/10/02 06,26/11/02 03,18/08/02 05,08/11/02 24,19/03/02 01,20/03/02 06,01/11/02 07,06/05/02 23,24/08/02 01,09/10/02 05,01/11/02 06,13/05/02 19,17/07/02 02,11/09/02 23,25/04/02 05,18/07/02 23,06/05/02 07,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 18,26/06/02 20,18/06/02 03,08/08/02 24,16/08/02 01,19/06/02 02,07/12/02 02,28/09/02 02,18/10/02 08,17/07/02 01,18/05/02 24,20/04/02 06,06/01/02 02,20/12/02 03,02/04/02 05,10/04/02 23,07/11/02 04,28/01/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,20/12/02 01,01/09/02 04,11/09/02 20,07/05/02 05,13/03/02 04,19/02/02 07,22/08/02 08,18/06/02 05,10/09/02 19,17/05/02 02,03/10/02 24,09/05/02 01,08/10/02 19,22/08/02 07,31/08/02 02,12/08/02 01,10/05/02 19,24/11/02 04,17/04/02 18,07/05/02 04,24/09/02 01,24/08/02 05,11/04/02 21,28/05/02 04,21/03/02 02,26/09/02 24,07/10/02 20,14/08/02 07,17/03/02 (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 2.32E-05 2.32E-05 2.31E-05 2.29E-05 2.29E-05 2.29E-05 2.29E-05 2.28E-05 2.28E-05 2.28E-05 2.27E-05 2.26E-05 23,27/08/02 07,05/06/02 02,15/04/02 01,01/04/02 05,04/05/02 02,24/09/02 23,23/11/02 22,01/09/02 22,08/08/02 24,30/08/02 08,21/12/02 03,29/03/02 (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (344205, 5788123, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (343984, 5788148, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 ___________________ TEQ_3 minute_v2 ___________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ TEQ_3 minute_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 1.10E-06 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 ______________________ TEQ_3 minute_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS ______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 1.52E-07 1.47E-07 1.36E-07 1.31E-07 1.29E-07 1.26E-07 1.25E-07 1.23E-07 1.22E-07 1.22E-07 1.21E-07 1.20E-07 1.19E-07 03,17/12/02 03,22/11/02 05,28/08/02 01,25/02/02 03,06/10/02 08,16/06/02 04,04/10/02 05,07/12/02 23,20/02/02 22,27/09/02 20,22/04/02 07,13/05/02 03,15/12/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 1.19E-07 1.18E-07 1.18E-07 1.17E-07 1.14E-07 1.13E-07 1.13E-07 1.11E-07 1.11E-07 1.09E-07 1.07E-07 1.06E-07 1.05E-07 1.05E-07 1.03E-07 1.02E-07 1.01E-07 9.90E-08 9.70E-08 9.63E-08 9.57E-08 9.45E-08 9.42E-08 9.41E-08 9.22E-08 9.15E-08 8.83E-08 8.81E-08 8.81E-08 8.80E-08 8.76E-08 8.75E-08 8.67E-08 8.65E-08 8.64E-08 8.62E-08 8.60E-08 8.58E-08 8.49E-08 8.40E-08 8.34E-08 8.34E-08 8.17E-08 8.15E-08 8.15E-08 8.15E-08 8.14E-08 8.11E-08 7.98E-08 7.96E-08 7.88E-08 7.77E-08 7.76E-08 7.72E-08 7.69E-08 7.69E-08 7.68E-08 7.63E-08 7.58E-08 7.56E-08 7.55E-08 7.51E-08 7.42E-08 7.41E-08 7.38E-08 7.27E-08 7.27E-08 7.27E-08 7.26E-08 7.25E-08 7.17E-08 7.15E-08 7.13E-08 7.11E-08 7.10E-08 24,22/08/02 21,26/09/02 23,31/08/02 18,10/07/02 24,02/10/02 18,14/07/02 06,20/12/02 21,26/05/02 02,06/10/02 06,26/11/02 03,18/08/02 05,08/11/02 24,19/03/02 01,20/03/02 06,01/11/02 07,06/05/02 23,24/08/02 01,09/10/02 05,01/11/02 06,13/05/02 19,17/07/02 02,11/09/02 23,25/04/02 05,18/07/02 23,06/05/02 07,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 18,26/06/02 20,18/06/02 03,08/08/02 24,16/08/02 01,19/06/02 02,07/12/02 02,28/09/02 02,18/10/02 08,17/07/02 01,18/05/02 24,20/04/02 06,06/01/02 02,20/12/02 03,02/04/02 05,10/04/02 23,07/11/02 04,28/01/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,20/12/02 01,01/09/02 04,11/09/02 20,07/05/02 05,13/03/02 04,19/02/02 07,22/08/02 08,18/06/02 05,10/09/02 19,17/05/02 02,03/10/02 24,09/05/02 01,08/10/02 19,22/08/02 07,31/08/02 02,12/08/02 01,10/05/02 19,24/11/02 04,17/04/02 18,07/05/02 04,24/09/02 01,24/08/02 05,11/04/02 21,28/05/02 04,21/03/02 02,26/09/02 24,07/10/02 20,14/08/02 07,17/03/02 (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 7.08E-08 7.08E-08 7.07E-08 7.00E-08 7.00E-08 7.00E-08 6.99E-08 6.97E-08 6.97E-08 6.96E-08 6.94E-08 6.91E-08 23,27/08/02 07,05/06/02 02,15/04/02 01,01/04/02 05,04/05/02 02,24/09/02 23,23/11/02 22,01/09/02 22,08/08/02 24,30/08/02 08,21/12/02 03,29/03/02 (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (344205, 5788123, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (343984, 5788148, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 1 _______________________ Mercury_3 minute_v2 _______________________ Concentration or deposition Concentration Emission rate units grams/second Concentration units milligrams/m3 Units conversion factor 1.00E+03 Constant background concentration 0.00E+00 Terrain effects None Smooth stability class changes? No Other stability class adjustments ("urban modes") None Ignore building wake effects? No Decay coefficient (unless overridden by met. file) 0.000 Anemometer height 10 m Roughness height at the wind vane site 0.300 m Use the convective PDF algorithm? No DISPERSION CURVES Horizontal dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Vertical dispersion curves for sources <100m high Pasquill-Gifford Horizontal dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Vertical dispersion curves for sources >100m high Briggs Rural Enhance horizontal plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Enhance vertical plume spreads for buoyancy? Yes Adjust horizontal P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Adjust vertical P-G formulae for roughness height? Yes Roughness height 0.400m Adjustment for wind directional shear None PLUME RISE OPTIONS Gradual plume rise? Yes Stack-tip downwash included? Yes Building downwash algorithm: PRIME method. Entrainment coeff. for neutral & stable lapse rates 0.60,0.60 Partial penetration of elevated inversions? No Disregard temp. gradients in the hourly met. file? No and in the absence of boundary-layer potential temperature gradients given by the hourly met. file, a value from the following table (in K/m) is used: Wind Speed Stability Class Category A B C D E F ________________________________________________________ 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 3 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 5 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 6 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.020 0.035 WIND SPEED CATEGORIES Boundaries between categories (in m/s) are: 1.54, 3.09, 5.14, 8.23, 10.80 WIND PROFILE EXPONENTS: "Irwin Urban" values (unless overridden by met. file) AVERAGING TIME: 3 minutes. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 __________________________ Mercury_3 minute_v2 SOURCE CHARACTERISTICS __________________________ STACK SOURCE: DFTD X(m) Y(m) Ground Elev. Stack Height Diameter Temperature Speed 345079 5788030 0m 15m 0.60m 72C 11.0m/s ______ Effective building dimensions (in metres) ______ Flow direction 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° 110° 120° Effective building width 0 66 69 70 69 66 60 53 44 42 51 59 Effective building height 0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 0 51 59 64 68 70 70 67 63 61 66 69 Along-flow distance from stack 0 -12 -10 -8 -5 -3 0 3 5 6 1 -4 Across-flow distance from stack 0 -34 -31 -27 -22 -17 -11 -4 2 8 14 20 Flow direction 130° 140° 150° 160° 170° 180° 190° 200° 210° 220° 230° 240° Effective building width 64 68 70 70 68 63 0 66 69 70 68 65 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 69 65 60 53 44 0 51 59 65 68 70 Along-flow distance from stack -8 -12 -16 -19 -22 -24 0 -40 -49 -57 -63 -68 Across-flow distance from stack 25 29 32 35 36 37 0 34 31 27 22 17 Flow direction 250° 260° 270° 280° 290° 300° 310° 320° 330° 340° 350° 360° Effective building width 60 53 44 42 51 58 64 68 70 70 67 63 Effective building height 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Along-flow building length 70 67 63 61 66 69 70 69 65 60 53 44 Along-flow distance from stack -70 -70 -68 -67 -67 -65 -62 -57 -50 -41 -31 -20 Across-flow distance from stack 11 4 -2 -8 -14 -20 -25 -29 -32 -35 -36 -37 (Constant) emission rate = 3.60E-03 grams/second No gravitational settling or scavenging. _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 _______________________ Mercury_3 minute_v2 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS _______________________ DISCRETE RECEPTOR LOCATIONS (in metres) No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 1 345405 5787506 18.0 0.0 2 345618 5787509 21.0 0.0 3 344320 5787592 18.0 0.0 4 344284 5787617 16.0 0.0 5 344285 5787598 16.0 0.0 6 344261 5787698 15.0 0.0 No. X Y ELEVN HEIGHT 7 344377 5788095 16.0 0.0 8 344280 5788106 15.0 0.0 9 344205 5788123 14.0 0.0 10 343984 5788148 12.0 0.0 11 344061 5788138 12.0 0.0 _____________________________________________________________________________ METEOROLOGICAL DATA : EPAV AWS Data BoM MelbourneAP Clouds MelbourneAP Uai r _____________________________________________________________________________ 1 Peak values for the 100 worst cases (in milligrams/m3) Averaging time = 3 minutes Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Value Time Recorded Coordinates hour,date (* denotes polar) 4.99E-04 4.82E-04 4.45E-04 4.29E-04 4.21E-04 4.13E-04 4.08E-04 4.03E-04 3.99E-04 3.99E-04 3.96E-04 3.93E-04 3.91E-04 03,17/12/02 03,22/11/02 05,28/08/02 01,25/02/02 03,06/10/02 08,16/06/02 04,04/10/02 05,07/12/02 23,20/02/02 22,27/09/02 20,22/04/02 07,13/05/02 03,15/12/02 (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 3.88E-04 3.88E-04 3.86E-04 3.82E-04 3.73E-04 3.71E-04 3.71E-04 3.63E-04 3.62E-04 3.58E-04 3.50E-04 3.47E-04 3.44E-04 3.44E-04 3.37E-04 3.35E-04 3.29E-04 3.24E-04 3.18E-04 3.15E-04 3.13E-04 3.09E-04 3.08E-04 3.08E-04 3.02E-04 3.00E-04 2.89E-04 2.88E-04 2.88E-04 2.88E-04 2.87E-04 2.86E-04 2.84E-04 2.83E-04 2.83E-04 2.82E-04 2.82E-04 2.81E-04 2.78E-04 2.75E-04 2.73E-04 2.73E-04 2.67E-04 2.67E-04 2.67E-04 2.67E-04 2.66E-04 2.66E-04 2.61E-04 2.60E-04 2.58E-04 2.54E-04 2.54E-04 2.53E-04 2.52E-04 2.52E-04 2.51E-04 2.50E-04 2.48E-04 2.48E-04 2.47E-04 2.46E-04 2.43E-04 2.42E-04 2.42E-04 2.38E-04 2.38E-04 2.38E-04 2.38E-04 2.37E-04 2.35E-04 2.34E-04 2.33E-04 2.33E-04 2.32E-04 24,22/08/02 21,26/09/02 23,31/08/02 18,10/07/02 24,02/10/02 18,14/07/02 06,20/12/02 21,26/05/02 02,06/10/02 06,26/11/02 03,18/08/02 05,08/11/02 24,19/03/02 01,20/03/02 06,01/11/02 07,06/05/02 23,24/08/02 01,09/10/02 05,01/11/02 06,13/05/02 19,17/07/02 02,11/09/02 23,25/04/02 05,18/07/02 23,06/05/02 07,16/06/02 05,31/08/02 18,26/06/02 20,18/06/02 03,08/08/02 24,16/08/02 01,19/06/02 02,07/12/02 02,28/09/02 02,18/10/02 08,17/07/02 01,18/05/02 24,20/04/02 06,06/01/02 02,20/12/02 03,02/04/02 05,10/04/02 23,07/11/02 04,28/01/02 03,08/09/02 04,08/09/02 03,20/12/02 01,01/09/02 04,11/09/02 20,07/05/02 05,13/03/02 04,19/02/02 07,22/08/02 08,18/06/02 05,10/09/02 19,17/05/02 02,03/10/02 24,09/05/02 01,08/10/02 19,22/08/02 07,31/08/02 02,12/08/02 01,10/05/02 19,24/11/02 04,17/04/02 18,07/05/02 04,24/09/02 01,24/08/02 05,11/04/02 21,28/05/02 04,21/03/02 02,26/09/02 24,07/10/02 20,14/08/02 07,17/03/02 (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, (344261, 5787698, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (345405, 5787506, (344320, 5787592, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (344261, 5787698, (344284, 5787617, (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (344284, 5787617, (345618, 5787509, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 2.32E-04 2.32E-04 2.31E-04 2.29E-04 2.29E-04 2.29E-04 2.29E-04 2.28E-04 2.28E-04 2.28E-04 2.27E-04 2.26E-04 23,27/08/02 07,05/06/02 02,15/04/02 01,01/04/02 05,04/05/02 02,24/09/02 23,23/11/02 22,01/09/02 22,08/08/02 24,30/08/02 08,21/12/02 03,29/03/02 (344261, 5787698, (345405, 5787506, (344284, 5787617, (344285, 5787598, (344320, 5787592, (345618, 5787509, (344205, 5788123, (344284, 5787617, (345405, 5787506, (345405, 5787506, (345618, 5787509, (343984, 5788148, 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) 0.0) APPLICATION FOR WORKS APPROVAL: SOIL PROCESSING FACILITY, TAYLORS ROAD LANDFILL APPENDIX I COMMERCIAL IN CONFIDENCE Hazards and Operability Study August 2010 Report No. 107613081-001-R-Rev0 Golder Associates Pty Ltd Building 7, Botanicca Corporate Park, 570 – 588 Swan Street Richmond Victoria 3121 Australia T: +61 3 8862 3500