C. N. Abadie , B. W. Byrne and S. Levy
Transcription
C. N. Abadie , B. W. Byrne and S. Levy
Model pile response to multi-amplitude cyclic lateral loading in cohesionless soils C. N. Abadie (1), B. W. Byrne (1) and S. Levy-Paing (2) (1) Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford (2) Département THEMIS, EDF R&D 1. BACKGROUND › Limited guidance on how to address effect of cyclic loading over lifetime of foundation Recent research shows that constant amplitude cyclic loading causes significant increases in pile displacement and rotation over time OWT foundation are subjected to a range of amplitudes of many different cycles › › Load type ULS SLS FLS Relevant Cycle No. 1 100 107 › › › Investigate pile response to multi-amplitude cyclic lateral loading relevant to offshore wind turbines › Considerations of scaling for model testing › Analysis of 1-g small scale model test results covering realistic multi-amplitude testing › Interpretation of the results using a linear superposition method Load Magnitude 74% MR 47% MR 27% MR 3. EXPERIMENTAL EQUIPMENT › › 2. OBJECTIVES Relevant design loads for a 2MW turbine in terms of ultimate capacity MR (Leblanc et al. (2010a)) 4. SCALING METHODOLOGY › Dimensionless framework ensures small-scale laboratory tests capture field conditions Further consideration to bending stiffness and aspect ratio: Motor frequency = 0.106Hz Combined cyclic moment and horizontal loading on pile at soil surface Displacement transducers (LVDTs) and load cell 600 mm x 600 mm x 527 mm tank; loose Yellow Leighton Buzzard sand (Rd ≃ 4%) Stiff copper pile (D=77mm, L=360mm, h=430mm) 5. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS › Multi-amplitude tests: (1) Aims at understanding the influence of increasing load events on continuous cyclic FLS loading (2) Mimic the applications of 2 storms on a continuous FLS loading condition Test 1 Test 2 6. LINEAR SUPERPOSITION METHOD › › Decomposition of load history into equivalent set of uniform load reversals (rain-flow counting) Prediction of the final pile rotation based on linear accumulation of rotation from each individual load sequences: a (TbTc s ) a ( N a ) N eq ab a (TbTc s ) b 0.31 0.31 tot (TbTc s ) b ( N b N ) max , b tot 0 , a 0 , b eq 0.31 ab 7. CONCLUSIONS 1) Series of laboratory floor model tests exploring pile response under multi amplitude cyclic loading, representing storm loading on a monopile 2) Pile rotation appears to reach a limiting value following a series of maximum storm type loads Contact Details Christelle ABADIE [email protected] 3) Pile response to multi amplitude cyclic loading involves significant non-linearity, particularly when large plastic deformations occur 4) A linear superposition method provides a reasonable but conservative approximation to final pile rotation