Göçmen uyumu için belediye diyaloğu İstanbul`da hemşehri

Transcription

Göçmen uyumu için belediye diyaloğu İstanbul`da hemşehri
STRENGTHENING LOCAL CAPACITY FOR
INTEGRATION OF IMMIGRANTS
Partners : Bozat Municipalitiy, Eminönü Municipalitiy, Göç-Der, İRFAM,
İstanbul Bilgi Üniversity,
Piraziz Municipalitiy, Union of Municipalities of Turkey, Viyana Municipalitiy
Bu yayının içeriği yalnızca Zeytinburnu Belediyesi sorumluluğundadır
ve herhangi bir şekilde Avrupa Birliği’nin görüşlerini yansıtmaz.
Objectives

Exchange information about policies that support integration
of immigrants

Strengthening local capacity in Turkey

Preparation for Integration Center on domestic and external
immigration
Steps

Theoratical Training

Implementing Program by IRFAM

International Relations

Evaluation
Steps for field survey







Problematic is becoming stable
Review the literature
Introduce of interview methods
Planning of field survey
Research
Evaluation of symptoms
Publishing the result
Program





Seminar on preparation of field survey (3 days)
Field survey
Telecommunication access and examination of European
Municipalities
Seminar on evaluation of symptoms (3 days)
Report and publishment
Index



Produce an idea and presentations
“Common report”
“How ?”
 Cooperation with immigrants?
 Methods for communication with associations?
 Evaluation of results?
 Adopting of objectives?
Hypothesis 1
“The objective of Integration Center is; coordinate to
institutions which are supporting to migrants. “
* Integration Center(IC) will connect to public directly
(first line),
* Cooperation with associations and mutual-aid
associations (second line)
* So IC will solve problems.
> IC should coordinate between institutions and
enterprises, make researches and determine the state.
> Should organise vocational training course
So…
We should identify institutions on immigration.







Local/regional?
Private/public?
Foundation/association?
What is the service field?
Permanent/temporary?
Where?
Which cooparate strategies?
Hypothesis 2
“We have to know fellow countryman associations
for communication with domestic and external
immigration associations.”
Exp:





Municipality can support to associations
Encourage to integration
Participation to all activities on the field of migrants
services.
Investing to source country.
…
Fellow Countryman Associations






Members are coming from same homeland
Cooperation/socialisation
Fees, grant, aid system, voluntary basis
Services: courses, seminars, cultural and social activities,
cooperation, advisor, peace maker…
Relations with public and private sector.
…
Mutual aid-associations



Including food, drink, clothing, harboring, heating, training aid
Source: public or grant. It can be public, association or
foundation..
Not including only “ fellow countrymen”

Objectives of associations: Cooperation and integration

Activities:
 Picnics,weddings..
 Folklore, integration nights
 Funeral ceramony
 Dispense rations
 Student grants
 Advisor for employment
 Service to source of immigration (school, festival..) and
trade
 Awareness of urbanity



Problems:
 Disconnection on activities
 Financial difficulties
 Participation of acitivities are restricted
 New generation are insensitive to activities
 Needs on branch (women, young, sport..)
The difference of domestic/external immigration: External
immigration is more experienced, equipped, has more sources, has
more activities (supporting to scientific research, participation to
culteral projects, art courses, conferances, e-letters, web sites..)
The differance of old/new immigration: New migrant’s life is more
difficult because there is financial and spiritual difficulties because
of war, also adaptation to Istanbul and relations with their own
homeland is difficult.

Contribution to Integration Center?






Voluntary participation
Participation to IC’s pratic activities.
Forward the immigrant to IC
Contribute to integration between migrant and center.
Introduce the social and culteral activities to migrants.
Communication and knowledge sharing between immigrant and
center.
Expectations from center:
 Trustability: information security about families.
 Integration without assimilated, respect to migrant
 Evaluation of culteral sources of migrants for social adaptation
 Participation of local policies
STAFF:
 Staff which can speak more than one language
 Professional advisor
 Board of trustess that respect to local politicial balance and
democratic and participator union.
AIMS:

Monetary fund for remigration

Support to improve new activity

Seminars to municipalities, police offices,NGO’s and public

Training on EU and international funds

Scientific researches

Coordination about learning Turkish

Advisor on social aids

….
Social Integration:
Increasing awereness about multiculturalism and common points
of different groups
Increasing communication platforms
Fighting to racisim, discrimination and exclusion
Evaluation the diversity for common aims
Organisational Integration:
Integration of different operation and function by public service
Determination on institution and groups
Cooperation in accordance with common aims
What are the functions of “Integration Center”
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Research and social savings
Inform to public and administrator
Respond to 1st line
Organising to vocational training
Support to institutions and associations
Cooperation between services and associations
Creating some democratic platform as “sector assembly”
Searching new sources for sector
Facilitate to foreign relations, international relations..
Thank you for your attention