Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 2010

Transcription

MINUTES
of the
ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY NINTH
SYNOD
of the
REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH
AMERICA
Geneva College
Beaver Falls, Pa.
June 21-25, 2010
CHURCH HEADQUARTERS
Mr. James K. McFarland, Treasurer
7408 Penn Avenue
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15208
(412) 731-1177
REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA
3
Dr. Jerry O’Neill
Moderator, 2010 Synod
Monday, June 21, 2010, 7:00 p.m.
Synod met pursuant to adjournment on the evening of Monday, June 21,
2010 in the John H. White Chapel of Old Main on the campus of Geneva
College, Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania. The Moderator, Bruce Hemphill, called
the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m., greeted the delegates and guests and led in
the opening service.
John McFarland led Synod in the singing of Psalm 133A and the Moderator
led in prayer. He then read Psalm 133 and delivered the keynote address on
the theme “. . . Out of Respect for Christ!” The service was concluded with
the singing of Psalm 133B.
Bruce Backensto led in prayer constituting the Synod.
The roll was called and is as follows for all the sessions of this meeting:
4
MINUTES OF THE 2010 SYNOD OF THE
Backensto, Bruce, First RP Beaver Falls
X
Bailey, Noah, Stillwater
X
Bartel, Dan
X
Baumgardner, Jack, Clarinda
X
Blocki, Martin, North Hills
X
Bower, John, Covenant – Aurora
X
Brace, Paul J., Hazleton Area
X
Bradley, Steve, Trinity
X
Brown, Charles, Rose Point
X
Buck, Richard, Seattle
X
Carr, David, Immanuel – W. Lafayette
X
Carroll, Dave, Stillwater
X
Carson, James D. X
Caskey, Joseph M., Eastvale
X
Chin, Glen, Ridgefield Park
X
Comin, Doug X
Concoby, Bob, Covenant – Aurora X
Coombs, Brian E., Messiah’s Church X
Copeland, Bob, College Hill
X
Cumbee, Greg
X
Curtis, Jim, Southfield
X
Dyck, Matthew H., Almonte Edgar, William J., Broomall
X
England, Mark, San Diego X
Eshelman, Nate, Los Angeles X
Etheridge, Rutledge, Providence
X
Faris, James, Southfield
X
Fawthrop, Arthur, Christian Heritage
X
Filbert, Matt, First RP Beaver Falls
X
Filson, Dean, Second Indianapolis X
Finley, Paul W., Winchester X
Gamble, Rick, RPTS
X
Ganz, Richard L., Ottawa Goerner, Aaron M., Christ Church, NY
X
Goerner, George, Christ Church (NY) X
Gordon, Drew, Covenant Fellowship
X
Graham, Ron, Hebron E
Gray, Tom, Selma E
Grissett, Ron, Covenant - Aurora
E
Hackett, Bob, Shelter (Edmonton) X
Hanna, Lucas, Shawnee
Hanson, David, Grace Presbyterian Church X
Hemphill, Bruce, Covenant Fellowship
X
Hemphill, Robert L., Laramie
X
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XX XXX
XXX
XE XXX
EEX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
EEE
EEE
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX X X
XXX X
XXX X X
XXX X E
XXX X X
EEE E X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XX
X
XXX X X
XXX X X
EEE E E
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XX
X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
X
XXX X X
XXX X
XXX X
XXX X X
EEE E E
EEE E E
XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX X X
XX X
XXX X X
Hemphill, Ryan, Seattle
X
Hindman, Ed, Denison E
Hockenberry, Vernon, Crown & Covenant X
Holdeman, Rich, Bloomington
X
Howe, Daniel M., Christ – East Providence X
Huizing, Howard, Los Angeles
X
Iamaio, Nick, Fulton Jackson, George, Broomall
X
Johovich, Randy, Manchester
Johnston, Brad, Walton
X
Johnston, Richard, Second Indianapolis
X
Joseph, Ralph E. X
Kail, Zachary, Broomall
X
Kanamori, Hiroyuki, Mukonoso
E
Keddie, Gordon, Southside Indianapolis
X
King, Adam, Trinity Ref. Church E
Kingswood, E. Matthew, Russell X
Lanning, Ray, Grand Rapids
X
Leach, Charles W., Coldenham-Newburgh X
Leach, Jonathan
E
LeFebvre, Michael, Christ Church (IN)
X
Long, David W., Lafayette
X
Lowe, G. Duncan X
Magill, Keith, Elkhart
Maginn, Jon M., Phoenix
X
Mann, Max, Quinter
X
Mann, Wade R., Shawnee
Martin, J. Bruce, Ridgefield Park
X
Martin, Titus, College Hill
X
X
McBurney, Kenneth A., 1st RP B.F.
McClain, Tim, 1st RP Beaver Falls, ALT. McCracken, Andy, Columbus
X
McCracken, Robert B., Columbus
X
McCracken, Timothy, Fresno
X
McFarland, Bill, Topeka
X
McFarland, Jim, Providence
X
McFarland, John M., Christ Covenant
X
McFarland, M.L.
E
McFarland, Robert
X
McGrath, John, Oswego
E
McKissick, Bob, Sycamore
X
McMahon, Jim
X
McMillan, John M. Merkel, David J., Trinity
X
5
XXX XXX X X
EEE EEE E E
XXX XXX X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XX
X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X E
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX
EXX EE X X X
EEE EEE EE
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
X
X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X
XXX XXX X X
XXX XX X X
XXX XXX X X
EEE EEE E E
XXX XXX X
EEE EEE E E
XXX XXX X X
XXX XXX X X
X X
X X
XXX XXX X X
6
Metzger, Harry, North Hills
X XXX
Miller, Courtney, Hudson – St. Lazare
X XXX
Milligan, Harold, Hebron E XXX
Milroy, Craig, Springs Reformed X XXX
Milroy, Jerrold
X XXX
Mitchell, John, Rose Point
X XXX
Monger, John, Washington
X XXX
Morrow, Robert W., Sparta
X XXE
Morton, Raymond E., Sparta
X XXX
Olivetti, Jared P., Immanuel – W. Lafayette X XXX
O’Neill, Jerry F., RPTS
X XXX
Parnell, Jonathan, Fin. Comm., Midwest
Parnell, R. Bruce, Stillwater X XXX
Pihl, William H. E EEX
Piper, Donald X XXX
Pockras, Philip, Belle Center
X XXX
Porter, Jerry, Southside Indianapolis
X XXX
Pulliam, Russ, Second Indianapolis XXX
Ramsey, Micah, Eastvale
X XXX
Reese, David, Springs Reformed Church X XXX
Reid, Tom X XXX
Rhoda, Jack, Lafayette
X XXX
Roberts, William, Bloomington
X X X
Rockhill, Steve, Lisbon X XXX
Sakai, Sumito, Higashisuma
X XXX
Sapp, Shane, Westminster (CO) X XXX
Scavo, Vince, Manchester
X XXX
Schep, Andrew, Syracuse
XXX
Schisler, Ed, Columbus
X XXX
Shapiro, Bob, Northminster (GA) X XXX
Smith, Dean R., Geneva College
X XXX
Smith, Frank, Northminster (GA) X XXX
Smith, John W., Sharon
X XXX
Smith, Kenneth G. X XXX
Spear, Wayne, Grace - Gibsonia X XXX
Stegall, Ronald
X
Stewart, Bruce C. X X X
Stiner, Greg, Shawnee
X XXX
Stivason, Jeff, Grace - Gibsonia
X XXX
Stivason, Robert, Covenant – Meadville E EEE
Sturm, Steve, Southside Indianapolis
X XXX
Swartz, Walter “Kit,” Oswego
X XXX
Tweed, James, Winchester X XXX
Tweed, John H. E EEE
XXX
XXX
XXX
EEX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XEX
XXX
XXX
XX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XX XXX
XXX
XXX
EEX
XXX
XXX
XXX
X
XXX
XXX
XX
XXX
X X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X E
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X E
X X
X
XX XXX
XXX
EEE
XXX
XXX
XXX
EEE
X
X
X
E
X
X
X
E
X
X
X
E
X
E
X
E
Van Timmeren, Kent, Grand Rapids
Webb, Dan, Lafayette
Weir, William, North Hills
Whitla, David, Southside Indianapolis
Wilkinson, J. Scott, New Creation Williams, C.J., RPTS
Wilsey, Martin J., Salt & Light - Longmont
Wing, Keith, College Hill
Wise, Ian, First RPC Durham, NC
Wood, Joel Enoch, Sterling
Work, Steven, Quinter
Wright, Christopher, Cambridge
York, Barry, Sycamore
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
7
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X
X X
X X
X X
X X
X X
Those present without certification were seated as delegates of the court.
All other elders present were made consultative members of the court.
The following elders were introduced as delegates for the first time:
Teaching Elders: David Whitla, Southside Indianapolis; Frank Smith,
Northminster RPC, Alpharetta, Georgia; Joel Wood, Sterling, Kansas; Ryan
Hemphill, Seattle; Noah Bailey, Stillwater, Oklahoma, for church planting in
Enid, Oklahoma.
Ruling Elders: Robert Shapiro, Northminster RPC, Alpharetta, Georgia;
James Tweed, Winchester, Kansas; John Bower and John Concoby,
Covenant, Aurora, Ohio; Kent VanTimmeran, First RPC Grand Rapids,
Michigan; Bob Hackett, Shelter in Edmonton, Alberta; Keith Wing, College
Hill in Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania; Roger Cornejo, First RPC in Durham,
North Carolina.
Heather Pinkerton was introduced to the court as the new controller for
the denomination working in the Trustees Office.
The following pages were introduced to the court: Scott Doherty, Gregory
George, Adam Neiss, Luke Finley.
The following were elected to serve as officers of the court: Jerry O’Neill,
Moderator; J. Bruce Martin, Clerk; Ray Morton, Assistant Clerk.
Synod remembered the following servants of the church who have passed
on to their heavenly home since the last meeting of Synod:
Pastors –
J. Renwick Wright
October 8, 2009
Robert B. Tweed
October 19, 2009
Ronald V. Good
June 3, 2010
Paul Faris
June 5, 2010
Ruling Elders –
Waldo McBurney
July 8, 2009
Quinter
Robert McCrory
October 16, 2009 Sterling
Paul D. McElhinney
March 15, 2010 Sharon
8
Charles W. Shafer
April 30, 2010
Coldenham
Pastors’ wife –
Mrs. Robert (Barbara Jean Miles) Fullerton April 25, 2010
Memorials were read for Renwick Wright by Ken Smith, for Robert
Tweed by Matthew Filbert, for Ronald Good by Robert McFarland, and for
Paul Faris by Barry York. These memorials appear in the appendix to the
minutes. Martin Wilsey led in the memorial prayer.
The time for adjournment was delayed to take up the report of the
Business of Synod Committee on Communications. The reports of the clerk
and corresponding clerk are to be taken up Tuesday morning.
James Faris presented the report of the Business of Synod Committee on
Communications for information only.
Synod adjourned at 9:13 p.m. singing Psalm 84B and being led in prayer
of adjournment by Duncan Lowe.
9
Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 8:30 a.m.
Synod met pursuant to adjournment on the morning of Tuesday, June 22,
2010 in Skye Lounge of the Student Center on the campus of Geneva College,
Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania. The Moderator called the meeting to order at
8:30 a.m. John McFarland led Synod in singing Psalm 127A, and Bill Weir
led in prayer constituting the court.
Bruce Stewart led in the morning worship. Synod sang Psalm 84A then
Dr. Stewart read 2 Timothy 2:1-15 and preached God’s Word on the theme
“Motivated in Ministry by Commitment to Christ.” He then led in prayer
and Synod concluded the service singing Psalm 84B.
The roll was passed.
The minutes of the Monday evening session were read, corrected and
approved.
The Moderator announced the following committees:
Nominating Committee: 1-year members – Ian Wise, Aaron Goerner,
Howard Huizing, David Carr; 2-year members – Rutledge
Etheridge, Jared Olivetti.
Resolution of Thanks: Glen Chin, Ralph Joseph, Jack Rhoda.
Judicial Committee: Michael LeFebvre, Keith Wing, David Hanson.
State of the Church: John McFarland, Sumito Sakai, Bob Copeland.
Committee to Canvass the Overture: Andy McCracken, Nathan
Eshelman, Jim Curtis.
Committees to Review Presbytery Records:
Alleghenies: Mark England, Dean Filson, Zach Kail
Atlantic: Micah Ramsey, Max Mann, Bob McKissick
Great Lakes/Gulf: Paul Brace, Craig Milroy, Daniel Howe
Japan: Charles Leach, Ed Schisler, Chris Wright
Midwest: David Whitla, Richard Buck, Vince Scavo
Pacific Coast: Jeff Stivason, George Goerner, Scott Wilkinson
St. Lawrence: Drew Gordon, Bill McFarland, Shane Sapp
Sudan Commission: Martin Blocki, George Jackson, Tom Reid
Bruce Martin presented the report of the Clerk. Item 1 was amended and
adopted. Item 2 was adopted. Item 3 had already been accomplished. The
report as a whole was approved and is as follows:
Report of the Clerk of the 2009 Synod
Dear Fathers and Brothers,
The Clerk of the 2009 Synod reports that to the best of my knowledge, I have
carried out the duties assigned to me. The 2009 Minutes of Synod and Yearbook
was edited by Heidi Filbert and proofread by the Clerk. The managing editors of
Crown and Covenant Publications secured the printer and handled the sale and
distribution of the books.
Please note the following corrections to the 2009 Minutes of Synod. On Page
10
20 as part of the Stated Clerk’s Report, Christ Reformed Presbyterian Church
in Providence, Rhode Island, is listed as a congregation that was organized. It
should have been listed as a mission church that was organized. Although not
actually a part of the Minutes, it should be noted that the headings in membership
and financial statistics, pages 264-283 have incorrect dates; the beginning dates
should be 12/31/07 and the ending dates should be 12/31/08.
The Clerk has also prepared the 2010 Docket and Digest and it has been copied
both in electronic and hardcopy formats, and distributed by Crown and Covenant
Publications.
If the time of the meeting of the 2011 Synod as recommended by the Business
of Synod Committee is adopted, notice is here given that reports should be sent to
the Clerk for inclusion in the 2011 Digest by Tuesday, May 17, 2011, and no later
than May 24, 2011.
A page has been assigned in the Docket for all reports. Although some reports
were not ready to be included in the Digest, a page number is assigned for
inclusion of these reports at Synod. It is intended that a time be set in the agenda
for each report. The Clerk should be informed if no place has been assigned for a
particular report.
Recommendations:
1. That the order of business and hours of meeting stated in the Docket be
accepted as the agenda for this meeting of Synod.
2. That those to be elected to fill vacancies on Synod’s boards and permanent
committees be referred to the Nominating Committee.
3. That the Moderator appoint a Committee to Canvass the Overture.
Respectfully submitted,
J. Bruce Martin, Clerk
Bruce Stewart presented the report of the Corresponding Clerk which
was approved and is as follows:
Report of the Corresponding Clerk of Synod
As the Corresponding Clerk of Synod, I have responded to correspondence
referred to me by the Clerk of Synod and the Stated Clerk of Synod. There were
only a few items this year.
One request came from an individual who had questions about the position
of the RPCNA on the place of the ten commandments in our lives today. In
addition to stressing our commitment to the authority of Scripture, and the
keeping of the commandments to be a response to God’s grace, not a means of
salvation, I referred him to relevant citations in our Constitution, particularly
WLC, Q95.
To a Seminary student in the Presbyterian Church of Canada who wrote that
“he is considering a jump to the RPCNA,” I spelled out the requirements necessary
11
for a student from another denomination to be a candidate for ordination in the
RPCNA, and referred him to our Constitution which is available from Crown and
Covenant Publications, 7408 Penn Ave. Pittsburgh, Pa., 15208.
Two letters came from people who were upset about NAE’s approval of
amnesty for illegal aliens. I acknowledged their concern, but informed them that
we were no longer members of NAE.
Bruce C. Stewart
Corresponding Clerk of Synod
James Faris presented the report of the Business of Synod Committee on
Communications. The recommendation on Paper 09-2 was adopted. Harry
Metzger presented the committee’s recommendations on Communications
10-1 and 10-2 and these recommendations were adopted. Communication
10-3 was voted on without reference. Item 1 was adopted as follows: That
the members of Synod likewise encourage their deacons to register and
participate on the website (See page 262). Item 2 was lost. The Committee
recommendations on Communications 10-4 and 10-5 were adopted. The
Committee report is as follows:
Report of the Business of Synod Committee on Communications
Your committee has received five communications for the consideration of
the 2010 Synod. The communications and our recommendations for them are as
follows:
Communication #09-2 comes from Paul McCracken regarding informal
worship. This communication was referred to your committee by Synod at the
end of the 2009 Synod meeting after the judicial commission had determined that
the communication came in an orderly manner.
Recommendation:
That this communication be referred to a Special Committee of the Day comprised
of five members appointed by the moderator to report back to this meeting of
Synod.
Communication #10-1 comes from the Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery. It
requests changes to future printings of The Book of Psalms for Worship and
guidelines for future Psalter revision work.
Recommendation:
That Communication #10-1 be referred to a special 3-member committee of the
day to be appointed by the Moderator.
Communication #10-2 comes from the Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery and
requests the Synod to produce a position paper on ‘sexual orientation’ using
modern terminology. It comes with a forty-page study paper to serve as a
resource.
12
Recommendation:
That Communication #10-2 be referred to a 5-member study committee appointed
by the Nominating Committee to report back to the Synod of 2011.
Communication #10-3 comes from the Presbytery of the Alleghenies and
requests Synod’s approval and oversight of an information-sharing network for
deacons in the RPCNA.
Recommendation:
That Synod vote on the recommendations of Communication #10-3 without
reference. The Business of Synod Committee recommends that the first
recommendation of the communication be voted up since the sharing of diaconal
ministry ideas could be of benefit to the denomination; and that the second
recommendation be voted down since diaconal ministry should not be under the
direct jurisdiction of Synod.
Communication #10-4 comes from the Atlantic Presbytery and requests a
change to the Book of Discipline regarding the second summons of the accused
in the case of a trial.
Recommendation:
That Communication #10-4 be referred to the Judicial Committee.
Communication #10-5 comes from the Presbytery of the Alleghenies
and asks that the Synod cover the Synod conference fees of retired ministers.
The communication came in a timely manner, and your Committee failed to
appropriately address the request. When receiving the same or similar requests in
the past, your Committee has determined that as a matter of policy the Synod ought
not to cover these expenses but that individual presbyteries should determine how
best to care for these men. Some presbyteries and congregations already cover
Synod expenses for retired ministers.
Recommendation:
That Synod return the communication to its authors.
Rationale: the local churches who hold their membership and the presbyteries
who hold their credentials benefit from the ministry of these men and ought to
provide for their expenses.
James Faris - Chairman, Harry Metzger,
Class of 2010
Jon Maginn, Kit Swartz, Class of 2011
Jerry Porter, David Willson, Class of 2012
Bruce Hemphill, Bruce Martin, Ex officio
The Moderator announced the following committees:
Committee to respond to Communication 09-2: Wade Mann, Matt
Kingswood, Dave Carroll, Barry York, Bill Roberts.
Committee to respond to Communication 10-1: Kit Swartz, Greg Stiner,
Bill Edgar.
The report of the Psalter Revision Committee was taken up. Item 1 was
13
adopted. Item 2 was laid on the table until the completion of the report of the
committee to respond to Communication 10-1.
Titus Martin presented the report of the Committee on the Contents of
the Communion Cup. Item 1 was laid on the table to entertain the following
substitute: a) That Synod affirm that, as stated in the Committee report,
the Biblical language used for elements of the supper are generic items, not
specifically defined; b) that the scriptural requirements for the sacramental
elements may be satisfied by bread that is either leavened or unleavened,
and by the “fruit of the vine” that is either fermented or unfermented. The
substitute motion in its two parts was adopted.
Following announcements, Synod took a break from 10:36 to 10:57 a.m.
Synod continued its consideration of the report of the Committee on the
Contents of the Communion Cup. Item 3 was lost. Item 4 was adopted. The
report as a whole was received rather than approved and is as follows:
The Committee to Study the Contents of the Cup
in the Lord’s Supper
During the Synod of 2008 this study committee was assigned to answer the
following questions:
“1.) How broadly or how narrowly should the church understand
Scripture’s requirements for ‘bread’ and ‘fruit of the vine’? Must the church
serve unleavened bread only or is ‘bread’ in a generic sense acceptable? Must the
church serve fermented ‘fruit of the vine’ only or is ‘fruit of the vine’ in a generic
sense acceptable?
“2.) Must all who commune share the same elements? In light of
1 Corinthians 10:16-17, if (theoretically) there were an issue of conscience
concerning the bread, would it be permissible for the church to offer both leavened
and unleavened bread at the same time to satisfy differing consciences? Similarly,
is it permissible for the church to offer both fermented and unfermented ‘fruit of
the vine’ at the same time (the “split cup” issue)? (1 Corinthians 10:16, 17; Luke
22:17.) “3.) Does Scripture enjoin strict conformity of practice regarding the
elements among the congregations of our denomination?” 1
A Brief History of the Committee
The committee submitted a report for the 2009 Synod but the court returned it
to the committee to bring a more thorough report for the Synod of 2010.
The committee discussed over e-mail and met two times in person. We
sought and received some feedback from other members of the Synod outside the
committee. This is a difficult topic and we trust that the Holy Spirit will guide the
Synod with wisdom to make a Christ-honoring decision.
1
Minutes of Synod, 2008, 127
14
The Report:
The following is our response to the three questions assigned to the committee.
“1.) How broadly or how narrowly should the church understand
Scripture’s requirements for ‘bread’ and ‘fruit of the vine’? Must the church
serve unleavened bread only or is ‘bread’ in a generic sense acceptable? Must the
church serve fermented ‘fruit of the vine’ only or is ‘fruit of the vine’ in a generic
sense acceptable?”
The Supper’s relationship to the Passover
Jesus, the night before his death, instituted the Lord’s Supper during the
celebration of Passover (Matthew 26). He instituted this new sacrament as
the replacement of the old sacrament. What kind of continuity are we to draw
between the elements of the Passover and the elements of the Lord’s Supper?
With regard to the cup, there is no precedence from the Passover that dictates
the specific kind of ‘fruit of the vine’ that is to be used in the Lord’s Supper. The
two elements used in the Passover are the lamb and unleavened bread. There
was no drink that was prescribed for the Passover. (There are Jewish traditions
that speak to the kind of drink used in the Passover celebration, but no Scriptural
prescription.) Therefore, there is no specific precedent for what was in the cup
when Jesus instituted the Supper besides the generic term ‘fruit of the vine’.
With regard to the bread, Jesus does not prescribe a specific kind of bread that
is to be used in the supper. Although Jesus likely used unleavened bread for the
supper, since that was the kind of bread used in the Passover celebration, it does
not appear that Jesus is prescribing unleavened bread as the only kind of bread to
be used in the Lord’s Supper.
Clearly there is discontinuity between the Passover and the Supper. One
element was added (a cup) and one element was taken away (the lamb). This
discontinuity applies to the bread as well. By using unleavened bread Jesus
was not prescribing unleavened bread as the only kind of bread to be used in the
supper. The connection between the Passover and the Lord’s Supper does not
require the continuation of unleavened bread as the only kind of bread to be used
in the Lord’s Supper.
The Generic Language of the ‘bread’, ‘cup’, and ‘fruit of the vine’
The Biblical language used for the elements of the supper are generic terms,
not specifically defined.
With regard to the drink, Jesus used the generic terms ‘cup’ and ‘fruit of
the vine.’ From this usage we deduce that Jesus indicated to us that the precise
nature of the ‘fruit of the vine’ is not the point. Both wine and grape juice fit the
description of ‘cup’ and ‘fruit of the vine.’
In the same fashion, Jesus used the generic term for bread. Jesus certainly
used a particular kind of bread, likely unleavened because it was the bread used in
the celebration of the Passover. But there is no indication that Jesus specifically
prescribes the use of unleavened bread to be the only kind of bread used in the
15
supper.
The scriptures do not require that the bread be made of wheat, or that it be
leavened or unleavened, but simply requires that it be ‘bread’.
Conclusion#1: The Word of God does not narrowly define or prescribe the
kind of ‘bread’ or the kind of ‘cup’ or the ‘fruit of the vine’ that are to be
used in the supper, but rather provides generic terms. The church can use
any kind of ‘bread’ or any kind of fruit of the vine for the celebration of the
supper.
“2.) Must all who commune share the same elements? In light of
1 Corinthians 10:16-17, if (theoretically) there were an issue of conscience
concerning the bread, would it be permissible for the church to offer both leavened
and unleavened bread at the same time to satisfy differing consciences? Similarly,
is it permissible for the church to offer both fermented and unfermented ‘fruit of
the vine’ at the same time (the “split cup” issue)? (1 Corinthians 10:16, 17; Luke
22:17)” Young’s Literal Translation 1 Corinthians 10:16-17 The cup of the blessing
that we bless—is it not the fellowship (koinonia) of the blood of the Christ? the
bread that we break—is it not the fellowship (koinonia) of the body of the Christ?
17
because one bread, one body, are we the many -- for we all of the one bread do
partake.
This is one of two passages in First Corinthians where the apostle Paul refers
to the Lord’s Supper. He is comparing the celebration of the supper to sacred
pagan meals. By understanding the significance and implications of participating
in the Lord’s Supper we see how incompatible it would be then to participate in
a pagan celebration.2
Inherent to the supper is what Paul refers to as koinonia. The Greek word
Koinonia is an expression of peaceful unity or fellowship or enjoyment of
a relationship.3 To what relationship is Paul referring when he uses the term
koinonia?4
There are three facets to the significance of koinonia in this passage:
(1) Koinonia points us to the peaceful unity and fellowship that each individual
Christian has with Christ. Each individual personally enjoys fellowship and
relationship with Christ, eating and drinking with Him, spiritually feeding upon
Him.
(2) Koinonia also points us to the peaceful unity and fellowship that we have
with one another. We enjoy fellowship and relationship with other believers. Paul
2
Gordon D. Fee, New Testament International Commentary on the New Testament, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans), 465.
3
Colin Brown, Generial Editor, New International Dictionary of New Testament
Theology, (Grand Rapids: Zondervan) 1:639
4
Fee, 466. Fee asks this question and he points to the unity that we share with
fellow believers and the unity that we share with Christ.
16
refers to us as one body, the body of Christ. There is a unity among all believers
as we eat and drink together.
(3) Koinonia then points to the peaceful unity and fellowship that the corporate
body of Christ shares with Christ. As a united body we enjoy fellowship and
relationship with Christ. Participation in the Lord’s Supper is not simply an
inward, spiritual, personal communion with Christ, but it is a corporate celebration
with our Lord. We, the body of Christ, enjoy fellowship with and spiritually feed
upon our Savior.
This koinonia is inherent to the celebration of the Lord’s Supper and it is
symbolized in two ways:
1. First, koinonia is symbolized in the singularity of the elements of one loaf and
one cup. The argument that Paul makes in 1 Corinthians 10 is that because we are
one body we partake of one loaf. This analogy also extends to the cup. Because we
are one body we partake of one visible cup. One cup and one loaf point us to the
one body of Christ that was broken for us and of which we are all members.
The RPCNA Synod of 1912 maintained that the singularity of the cup applies
primarily to the constituent makeup of the cup.5 This allowed for using miniature
cups for communion and, by necessary consequence, using precut bread. It
was the ruling of the Synod of 1912 that our koinonia as the body of Christ is
represented in that we all partake of one constituent loaf and one constituent cup.
2. The second symbol of our unity is the fact that everyone actually participates
in the supper. Everyone who belongs to the body of the Lord and recognizes the
body of the Lord (and welcomed by the session) is to participate in the supper.
Because we eat and drink together it points to the unity that we share with Christ
as the body of Christ.
Our unity and fellowship with Christ, our head, is expressed not only in the
singularity of the elements of the supper, but also in the fact that we all participate
together—we eat and drink together.
Conclusion #2: Because of the precious unity that we share together with
Christ each session should make every effort to maintain
(a)The singularity of the one cup and one loaf. The session MUST
not divide the elements unnecessarily but to make every effort to
maintain the constituent unity of one loaf and one cup.
(b) The participation of all communicant members of the congregation.
We must not quickly or willingly sacrifice one or the other of these
symbolic characteristics of the celebration of the Lord’s Supper.
For our purposes, a key question that must be asked is this: What if there arises
within the church a situation where not everyone, for either health or conviction
reasons, can partake of the same kind of bread or the same kind of drink and
therefore have to refrain from eating and drinking with Christ and his body?
There are some in our congregations who are allergic to various kinds of bread.
5
Minutes of Synod of the RPCNA of 1912, 61.
17
Because of this allergy some are forced to refrain from participating in the supper.
In this case the session ought to find a loaf of bread of which every member could
partake. Alternatives that sessions could consider: gluten free bread, dairy free
bread.
If there are some in our congregation who refrain from participating in the
Supper because of moral, theological conviction, the session should take the
opportunity to teach the congregation about the broad definition of the ‘bread’
and the ‘fruit of the vine’ as explained in the answer to the first question assigned
to this committee.
If this matter of conviction still remains then the session should seek to find an
alternative bread and/or ‘fruit of the vine’ that would satisfy everyone’s conscious.
Alternatives that Sessions could consider: freshly pressed grape juice, nonalcoholic wine.
What should the session do if it proves to be impossible to find a singular cup
or a singular bread that is acceptable for all the members? There are only two
possible options:
1. The session sacrifices the unity of the elements in order to maintain the
participation of all. The session provides an alternative bread or drink
in order to accommodate for the health or conscience of all participants
so that everyone eats and drinks together. Or
2. The session sacrifices the participation of all members in order to
maintain the singularity of the elements. The session maintains a
single bread or cup forcing bread and drink while forcing communicant
members of the congregation to refrain from eating and drinking
together with Christ and his body.
Conclusion #3: The first option is the preferred option. It is better to sacrifice
the unity of the elements by providing an alternative bread or drink in order
to accommodate for the health or conscience of all participants so that
everyone can eat and drink together.
Conclusion #4: This accommodation is to be a last resort. This is not an
ideal option and should be considered only after every other accommodation
is pursued. The session must not unnecessarily sacrifice the unity of the
elements simply because of preference or taste, but only because of conviction
or health reasons.
“3.) Does Scripture enjoin strict conformity of practice regarding the
elements among the congregations of our denomination?”
Because we hold to a generic definition of the ‘bread’ and the ‘cup’ or ‘fruit
of the vine’ we must not regulate the specific kind of bread or drink to be used in
every individual congregation of the RPCNA.
Conclusion #5: Every session, following the principles of this study, is to take
18
into account the makeup of their congregation and make the best decision
with regard to the specific elements used in the Supper.
Recommendations:
1. a) That Synod affirm that, as stated in the Committee report, the Biblical
language used for elements of the supper are generic items, not specifically
defined;
b) that the scriptural requirements for the sacramental elements may be
satisfied by bread that is either leavened or unleavened, and by the “fruit of
the vine” that is either fermented or unfermented.
2. That every session make every effort to retain both (1) the singularity of
the elements and (2) the participation of all communicant members of the
congregation.
3. (LOST) If the session is unable to find a single loaf of ‘bread’ or a single
cup of ‘fruit of the vine’ that satisfies everyone’s health concerns or
convictions to the point where members of the congregation have to refrain
from participating in the supper, that the session provide an alternative.
4. That this committee be dismissed.
CJ Williams
Rick Gamble
Titus Martin, Chair
Robert Morrow registered his dissent to the receiving of the previous
report.
The following motion was adopted: that the overture ballots of the
Mukonoso and Higashi-suma Sessions be permitted to be counted among the
ballots although they were turned in to the Clerk after the Moderator had
announced the Committee to Canvass the Overture.
Jim McFarland presented the report of the Stated Clerk. The report was
approved and is as follows:
The Report Of The Stated Clerk
December 31, 2009
Communicant Members
Baptized Members
Total Members
Increases:
By baptism
By profession of faith
MEMBERSHIP
12/31/08
4,726
1,915
6,641
12/31/09
4,785
1,882
6,667
159
75
141
73
19
From other R.P. Congregations
From other denominations
Other
Total Increase
90
181
7
512
213
159
__40
626
Decreases:
Deaths
To other R.P. Congregations
To other denominations
Final removal
Other
Total Decrease
40
93
174
49
87
443
42
198
149
88
_123
600
52
74
CONGREGATIONS
Congregations
81
Mission Churches
4
Teaching Elders
151
Men under care of presbyteries
40
Certified eligible to preach in 2009
4
Certified eligible to receive a call 11
Ruling Elders
278
Deacons
241
Missionaries
6
Sabbath Worship, aver. attend.
5,477
81
5
155
35
6
10
284
236
6
5,507
CONGREGATIONAL FINANCES
2008
Beginning Balances
$4,054,925
Receipts
10,910,360
2009
$3,880,440
11,406,649
Disbursements:
Pastors Salaries & Comp.
R.P. Mission & Ministry
Other R. P. Works
External Ministries
Other
Total Disbursements
Ending Balances
4,711,436
318,382
634,718
182,182
5,238,127
11,084,845
$3,880,440
4,921,924
332,650
815,472
244,768
4,414,036
10,728,850
$4,558,239
$5,044,935
$4,467,738
Baptized children making public profession
Other Assets
20
MISSION CHURCH ORGANIZED
Christ Mission Church (Providence, RI)
Atlantic
01/01/09
CONGREGATIONS ORGANIZED
Grace (Gibsonia, PA)
Covenant (Aurora, OH)
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
01/09/09
12/04/09
CONGREGATIONS DISORGANIZED
Anchor Fellowship
Rimersburg (Reduced to Preaching Station)
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
03/31/09
04/11/09
VACANT CONGREGATIONS AND PREACHING STATIONS
Covenant (Meadville, PA) Alleghenies
Covenant (Aurora, OH) Alleghenies
Cambridge
Atlantic
Berkshire Preaching Station
Atlantic
Hetherton
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
Orlando
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
Westminster (Chicago)
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
Kasumigaoka
Japan
Minneola
Midwest
Topeka
Midwest
Rochester
St. Lawrence
MINISTERS
CONGREGATIONS
Other
2008 2009Church | Mission
Presbytery
Total TotalPastors WorkRetired Other |Cong Church
Alleghenies
46
44
14
6
18
6 |16
0
Atlantic
10
10
8
1
1
0 |7
1
Great Lakes/Gulf
34
37
20
1
11
5 |19
1
Japan
5
4
4
0
0
0 |4
1
Midwest
27
30
17
4
6
3 |17
0
Pacific Coast
7
9
5
0
4
0 | 5
0
St. Lawrence
22
21
13
2
3
3 |13
2
Totals
151 155
81
14
43
17 |81
5
MINISTERS ORDAINED & INSTALLED
Jason Camery
Shane Sapp
Noah Bailey
Nathan Eshelman
Ryan Hemphill
Sycamore (Kokomo)
Westminster (CO)
Stillwater (Enid)
Los Angeles
Seattle
11/06/09
04/22/09
08/07/09
02/14/09
12/05/09
MINISTERS INSTALLED
Jeff Stivason
Paul Brace
Adam King
Joel Wood
STATED SUPPLIES
Daniel Drost
Steve Rhoda
Robert McFarland
Harold Harrington
Grace (Gibsonia)
Hazleton Area
Trinity (Wichita)
Sterling
21
01/09/09
05/09/09
01/09/09
10/21/09
Hetherton
Topeka
Crown & Covenant
MINISTERS RELEASED FROM PASTORAL CHARGE
Paul Brace
Rimersburg
Peter Smith
Anchor Fellowship
Christian Adjemian
Cambridge
David Smith
Orlando
Stan Copeland
Minneola
04/11/09
03/31/09
06/30/09
10/07/09
09/30/09
MINISTERS REMOVED FROM ROLL
Charles Carroll
William Chellis
Midwest
St. Lawrence
01/14/09
10/29/09
MINISTERS RECEIVED FROM OTHER DENOMINATIONS
Frank J. Smith
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
Joel Wood
Midwest
2009
10/20/09
MINISTER TRANSFERRED TO OTHER DENOMINATION
Christian Adjemian
Atlantic
06/30/09
DEATHS OF TEACHING ELDERS
Robert Tweed
Renwick Wright
10/18/09
10/08/09
DEATHS OF RULING ELDERS
William H. Russell
Clarence G. Wilson
R. Waldo McBurney
Robert McCrory
Francis Buck
Norman Goehring
Richard House
Bruce Manwaring
College Hill
Rose Point
Quinter
Sterling
Los Angeles
Fresno
Fulton
Syracuse
05/06/09
04/03/09
07/08/09
10/16/09
03/21/09
01/24/09
04/16/09
02/07/09
22
THEOLOGICAL STUDENTS
Joel Butler
Dan Drost
Keith Evans
Matt Filbert
George Gregory
Adam Kuehner
Patrick Marx
Bill Matthess
Tim McClain
H.P. McCracken
Jason Ryce
David Schwab
Jay Strunk
Alex Tabaka
Grant VanLeuven
James Pellegrini Duran Perkins
Shawn Anderson
Robert Jones Stephen McCarthy
Scott McCullough
Adam Niess
Dempei Takiura
Kihei Takiura
Joe Allyn
Jonathan Haney
Robbie Haynes Patrick Stefan
Greg Stiner
Andrew Wallace
Rob Wieland
Greg Alexander
Scott Doherty
Mark Goerner
Steve Zink
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Alleghenies
Atlantic
Atlantic
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
Japan
Japan
Midwest
Midwest
Midwest
Midwest
Midwest
Midwest
Midwest
St. Lawrence
St. Lawrence
St. Lawrence
St. Lawrence
CERTIFIED ELIGIBLE TO PREACH DURING 2009
Grant Van Leuven
Alleghenies
Kihei Takiura
Japan
Jonathan Haney
Midwest
Rob Haynes
Midwest
Patrick Stefan
Midwest
Rob Wieland
Midwest
23
CERTIFIED ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE A CALL
Dan Drost
Alleghenies
Matt Filbert
Alleghenies
William Matthess
Alleghenies
Tim McClain
Alleghenies
James Pellegrini
Atlantic
Duran Perkins
Atlantic
Noah Bailey
Midwest
Greg Alexander
St. Lawrence
Mark Goerner
St. Lawrence
Steve Zink
St. Lawrence
ADDENDA
MISSION CHURCHES ORGANIZED
Terre Haute (IN)
Enid (OK)
Laramie (WY)
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
Midwest
Midwest
03/04/10
01/01/10
01/31/10
CONGREGATIONS ORGANIZED
Rimersburg (Reorganized)
Christ RPC (Providence, RI)
Northminster (Atlanta)
Shelter RPC (Edmonton, Alberta)
Alleghenies
Atlantic
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
St. Lawrence
01/15/10
04/09/10
04/24/10
04/17/10
CONGREGATION DISORGANIZED
Oakdale
Gt. Lakes/Gulf
2010
VACANT CONGREGATION
Shelter RPC (Edmonton, Alberta)
St. Lawrence
MINISTER INSTALLED
Frank Smith
Northminster (Atlanta)
04/24/10
MINISTER RECEIVED FROM OTHER DENOMINATION
Mauro Silva
Atlantic
04/10/10
STATED SUPPLY
Dan Bartel
02/14/10
Minneola
MINISTERS RELEASED FROM PASTORAL CHARGE
Richard Gamble
College Hill
Greg Cumbee
First RPC (Durham)
William Roberts
Bloomington
2010
05/31/10
07/01/10
24
DEATHS OF RULING ELDERS
Paul D. McElhinney
Charles Shafer
Sharon (Morning Sun)
Coldenham-Newburgh
03/15/10
04/30/10
THEOLOGICAL STUDENTS TAKEN UNDER CARE 2010
Rocco Palmerine
Alleghenies
Kunio Hase
Japan
Robert Hackett
St. Lawrence
Jason Keuning
St. Lawrence
CERTIFIED ELIGIBLE TO PREACH DURING 2010
H.P. McCracken
Alleghenies
Jason Ryce
Alleghenies
James K. McFarland, Stated Clerk
James Faris presented the report of the Business of Synod Committee.
Item 1 was adopted. Item 2 was referred to the committee. Item 3 was
referred to the Nominating Committee.
Mark England directed the Synod in the morning prayer time. Those
present gathered in small groups to pray and concluded the prayer time
singing Psalm 95A.
The Moderator replaced Ian Wise on the Nominating Committee with
Ron Graham and appointed Aaron Goerner to serve as Chairman.
Following announcements, Synod took recess at 12:10 p.m. being led in
prayer by Steve Bradley.
Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 1:30 p.m.
Synod reconvened at 1:30 p.m. singing Psalm 65A and being led in prayer
by Tom Reid.
The minutes of the morning session were read, corrected and approved.
Harry Metzger and Martin Blocki presented the Moderator a bouquet of
flowers in behalf of the North Hills Church and promised him a gallon of his
favorite ice cream when he returns to Pittsburgh.
David Merkel presented the report of the Board of Pension Trustees. Item
1 was adopted. Items 2 and 3 were referred to the Committee on Finance.
Items 4 and 5 were adopted by a two-thirds vote. Item 6 was referred to the
Committee on Finance. Item 8 was referred to the Nominating Committee.
Item 7 was adopted. In keeping with this item Michael J. Rutkowski and
Randy Joyce addressed the court. The report as a whole was approved and
is as follows:
25
Report Of The Pension Trustees
The Board of Pension Trustees has held two meetings since our last report to
Synod. These meetings were held on October 16, 2009 and on March 19, 2010.
Both meetings were held at the First Reformed Presbyterian Church, Beaver Falls,
Pennsylvania.
The officers of the Board, elected at the fall meeting, are as follows: David
Merkel, Chairman; Everett Wood, Vice-Chairman; Don McBurney, Secretary;
and James McFarland, Treasurer. In addition to the regular officers of the Board,
the Board elected A. Wayne Duffield as Executive Secretary pending Synod’s
approval of the Board’s revision of the Constitution of the Pension Trustees.
All correspondence should be mailed to the Executive Secretary of the Board,
A. Wayne Duffield, POB 373, New Alexandria, PA 15670. He may also be
contacted by calling (724) 668-7506, by e-mail [email protected] or by fax
at (724) 668-7252.
Reporting
The Board would again remind the clerks of presbyteries and/or clerks of ad
interim commissions of the importance of informing the Secretary of the Pension
Trustees of actions taken by presbyteries relative to licensures, ordinations,
installations, and any other changes from active to inactive service. This
information is needed for insurance and/or pension purposes.
RECOMMENDATION 1:
That Synod instruct the presbyteries to include in the minutes of each installation
service the date the teaching elder actually started working in the congregation.
This is needed because participants are enrolled in the pension plan on the first
day of the month following the date they actually started working.
Contributions
The Pension Trustees are recommending that employee contributions to Plan
“B” be increased by having employers (as defined by Plan “B”) contribute a
minimum contribution of $975.00 per quarter, through electronic contributions
from the church checking account. The minimum annual contribution must equal
$3,900 ($100 increase) in 2011. Employers are asked to complete the annual forms
authorizing Creese, Smith and Co. to make the quarterly electronic withdrawals
of at least the minimum annual contribution amount. Quarterly withdrawals will
be made on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31. The quarterly
electronic withdrawals are necessary in order the keep administrative costs to
a minimum and to have funds invested quarterly. It is noted that in 2009, the
majority of employers contributed more than the minimum contribution. More
than the minimum was contributed to the accounts of eighty-six (86) participants.
All employers, including boards of the church, are encouraged to contribute over
the minimum. Congregations and boards are reminded that it takes 10-12% of
a pastor’s direct compensation to provide for an adequate pension. Participants
are urged to consider the advisability of working out an arrangement with their
26
employer whereby additional funds may be contributed to their pension account.
RECOMMENDATION 2:
That Synod set the minimum contribution rate of $3,900 for 2011 by each
employer of a participant in Plan “B”.
Assessments
The Pension Trustees are recommending that congregational/presbyterial
treasurers forward $15.00 per communicant member (same as last year), based
on their membership as of the 31st day of December 2010, to the denominational
office. It will be credited to the Current Account of the Pension Trustees and used
to fund the expenses as shown in the Treasurer’s report.
RECOMMENDATION 3:
That Synod set the 2011 assessment for current pension program funding at $15.00
per communicant member based on communicant membership as of December
31, 2010 as reported to the Stated Clerk.
Administration of the Pension Plan
During the past year there have been some organizational changes. Mr.
Michael J. Rutkowski, our financial consultant, is now a Financial Advisor with
MorganStanley SmithBarney. Our Plan “B” Pension Plan account is serviced by
Hartford Retirement Services.
The Pension Plan “B” program is with MorganStanley SmithBarney and
Hartford Financial Services seems to be well received by participants and
employers. The Treasurer and Pension Trustees monitor the program and
important developments. As specified by the Plan Document, the Board also has
a Plan Administrative Committee that is ready to address any concerns or issues
that may arise. Some of the professional administrative fees are paid out of the
Current Account of the Board and some of the cost is borne by the participants
in Plan “B”. Funds are received by the accounting firm of Creese, Smith and
Company and forwarded quarterly to Hartford Retirement Services. The current
annual fee of Creese, Smith and Co. is $4,000.00. All fund families are offered as
class A-shares at a net asset value (NAV) without sales charge or wrap fees.
Proposed Amendment One to our 2009 Restatement of Plan “B”
Even though Pension Plan “B” was restated in 2009 to comply with Internal
Revenue Code regulations, it is again necessary to further amend Pension Plan
“B” to comply with the latest changes in the Internal Revenue Code.
This new Amendment No. 1 largely has to do with the issue of the
denomination’s contributing to the church pension account of ordained and nonordained persons in the military, particularly chaplains. This issue was raised in
part by Midwest Presbytery. It seems that the unwritten practice has been for
presbyteries to contribute to the account of RPCNA chaplains in the U.S. Armed
Forces. This amendment clarifies this issue in that it will require presbyteries to
contribute at least the minimum employer contribution to the account of military
27
chaplains for the period of their active military service during which their
reemployment rights are guaranteed by federal law, which is, generally, the first
five years of active service in the U.S. Armed Forces. Since we are amending Plan
“B” to clarify this situation with respect to ordained chaplains, it was thought that
we would also be expected to clarify the situation with respect to non-ordained
persons who could conceivably be in the U.S. Armed Forces. The employer of a
non-ordained participant who is reemployed after a military leave is responsible
for the required contribution of uniform employer contributions for the period of
the military leave. (See the “Summary of Changes” attached to this report.)
RECOMMENDATION 4:
Whereas, the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America
Employees’ Pension Plan “B” (hereafter referred to as the “Plan”); and
Whereas, the Synod reserved the right in Article VIII of the Plan to amend the
Plan;
and
Whereas, the Synod wishes to amend and restate the Plan effective as of July
1, 2010, except as otherwise indicated, in the attached summary of the changes in
Amendment No. One.
Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the Plan is hereby amended and restated to
make the changes described in the attached summary, effective as of July 1, 2010,
except as otherwise indicated.
Updating the Constitution of the Pension Trustees
The Pension Trustees at its October 2009 began the process of updating its
Constitution. The Constitution had not been revised since October 1994, but since
that time certain changes have taken place and problems noticed. Some time ago
the Board reduced its membership from seven (7) to six (6) voting members to
reduce travel costs. There has also been somewhat of a technical and administrative
problem with respect to when old terms expire and new terms begin. Under our
present Constitution old terms expire and new terms begin at the meeting of
Synod, but there have been times when this has left the Board without officers
and functioning committees between the meeting of Synod and the fall meeting
of the Board. The Board is therefore proposing that this be amended so that old
terms expire and new terms begin at the fall meeting of the Trustees. Given the
impact of the two-term rule of Synod on the smooth operation of the Board, on
the position of secretary, and in the interest of having someone on the Board who
is acquainted with the history of the Board and the issues that it encounters, the
Pension Trustees have decided to add to the Constitution the option of having an
Executive Secretary. He would be a non-voting member, would handle ordinary
matters between meetings, and would execute the decisions of the Executive
Committee.
The Board at its March 2010 meeting has already revised and adopted the
above changes and a few other minor changes by unanimous vote. The Constitution
requires that “all amendments that have been adopted by a two-thirds of the
28
Trustees shall be submitted to Synod for their adoption by a two-thirds vote.”
(See the attached copy of the Constitution of the Pension Trustees as revised and
adopted by the Board at our spring meeting on March 19, 2010.)
RECOMMENDATION 5:
That Synod adopt the revised Constitution of the Pension Trustees as revised and
adopted by the Board on March 19, 2010.
Benefits
As of January 1, 2009, pensions for Plan “A” participants (those over 54 years
of age on January 1, 1974) were being paid out to three (3) couples and nine (9)
individuals. Couples receiving a full pension in 2009 received $600.00 per month
and individuals receiving a full pension received $450.00 per month. In 2009,
$50,430 was paid out in regular benefits to participants in Plan “A”. It is projected
that $48,780 will be paid out in 2010 and $43,000 in 2011.
In 2009, $18,532 was received from contributions and Synod’s Additional
Supplement for the Supplement Fund for participants in Plan “A”. A total of
$16,250 was distributed proportionately according to the pensioner’s payment.
Couples receiving a full pension received $3,000 and individuals receiving a full
pension received $1,500 through the Supplement Fund. As of March 31, 2010,
an additional $1,586.55 has been received for the Supplement Fund. The Board
plans to continue this program and is requesting funds for the Supplement Fund.
Congregations are urged to contribute to this fund and to include it in their annual
budget. The positive response to this program is much appreciated and it is hoped
that even more congregations, individuals, and groups may become involved.
The 2007 Synod approved the recommendation of the Pension Trustees to
establish a new Pension Plan “B” Supplement Program. Step One of this program
was completed in 2008 in which 38 participants (in some cases their spouses if
the retiree has died) who have already retired under Plan “B” received a one-time
supplement. Step Two is to supplement 39 pastors and denominational employees
under Plan “B” who were age 50 or above in 2007. These supplementary payments
began in 2008 and will continue until the participant retires from active service or
has reached age 70. These supplements, ranging from $400 to $1,800, will total
$36,431.96 for this year. These supplements are added to the participants’ pension
funds.
In previous years under Plan “B” annuities were normally purchased for
participants when they retire. While this option is still available, many recent
retirees have been opting to make direct transfers of lump sum amounts to IRA’s.
Funding the Pension Programs
The Pension Trustees had an actuarial study done on Pension Plan “A” in
1999. At that time we were advised that a lump sum payment of $656,000 would
be necessary to completely fund the plan at 7% interest, assuming that there would
not be any additional benefit increases. We were further advised that this would
require a contribution of approximately $87,000 per year for the next ten years.
29
This substantial increase is due to benefit increases and mortality experience.
Furthermore, benefits were increased again as of January 1, 2004. The other option
is to pay as we go. It should be understood that funding for the Pension Programs
of the denomination comes from four sources: 1) employer contributions to Plan
“B”, 2) congregational assessments, 3) unrestricted undesignated funds, and 4)
gifts designated for the Plan “A” Supplement Fund.
Due to the unfunded liability of Plan “A”, Synod in 1993 began to fund
this unfunded liability by granting funds for Plan “A” from the unrestricted
undesignated funds of Synod from the McLaughlin Trust income. It is projected
that at least $60,000 needs to be added to Plan “A” per year. It is estimated that
$43,000 will be needed to fund Pension Plan “A” in 2011 and the balance will be
used to fund Plan “B” expenses and/or Supplement Plan “B”.
RECOMMENDATION 6:
That $60,000 be granted to the Pension Trustees from the unrestricted undesignated
funds of Synod from the McLaughlin Trust income towards funding the unfunded
liability of Pension Plan “A” for the year 2011 with the balance to be used to fund
Plan “B” expenses and/or Supplement Plan “B”.
Canadian Pension Program
In 2001, the Pension Plan Document was amended, effective as of October
1, 2001, to exclude non-resident aliens with no U.S. source income from an
Employer from Pension Plan “B” (Plan Document Section 1.09). This means that
a Canadian citizen who is a pastor of a congregation in Canada is not eligible to
be a participant in Pension Plan “B”. At the same time, the Board committed itself
to the task of working with the congregations in Canada to replace the benefits
provided by Plan “B” with similar or comparable tax favored retirement benefits
in Canada and similar or comparable life insurance. The Board has been exploring
how such a program may be established for our Canadian pastors, but not with
a lot of success. One of the problems that we have encountered is that there are
certain financial requirements in Canada that you have to meet to set up a pension
program. At this point we do not have enough congregations and adequate pension
funds in Canada to establish our own pension program for our pastors. It would
seem that the best solution, at least for now, is for pastors and/or congregations to
set up and contribute to a registered retirement savings plan (RRSP).
Health Insurance
Health Insurance is also part of the work that Synod has assigned to the Board
of Pension Trustees. Due to a number of factors beyond the control of the Board,
there is no longer a denominational wide health insurance program. Congregations
and presbyteries are encouraged to investigate local health care options. The only
health care coverage that is currently available through the Pension Trustees is for
denominational employees only, that is, for employees of the Board of Education
and Publication, the Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary, and the
Trustees of Synod. This policy is through Health America. The Board continues
30
to be concerned about health insurance and continues to look for other options.
Another relatively new option is that of a Health Savings Accounts or HSAs.
HSAs have two parts. The first part is a high deductible health insurance policy that
covers large hospital bills. The second part is an investment account or retirement
account from which you can withdraw money that is tax-free for medical care.
If the account is not used for medical care, the money accumulates with taxfree interest until retirement, when you can withdraw it for any purpose and pay
normal income taxes. In order to be an HSA eligible individual, your only health
insurance coverage must be a high deductible health insurance policy. In order for
you and your spouse to be eligible for family HSA tax deductible contributions to
each of your HSA accounts, the only health insurance each of you have must be a
high deductible health insurance policy. Furthermore, in order to be HSA eligible,
you or your spouse may not be enrolled in Medicare (Part A, B, C or D). According
to current law, you are allowed to deposit tax free up to $3,050 for individual
health plans and $6,150 for families to pay for many health costs, provided both
you and your spouse are HSA eligible individuals. An additional $1,000 catch-up
contribution may be made by an HSA eligible individual who is 55 or older on
December 31, 2010. The employer or the employee can contribute these funds.
There is a list of eligible medical expenses. Withdrawals for routine medical care
are also tax free. If you have a health insurance policy that has a high deductible,
it may already be HSA qualified. You can open an account with an insurance
company that offers health savings accounts or with an HSA administrator like
MSABank (www.msabank.com) or with a local bank that offers Health Savings
Accounts. Further information is available on the web at www.hsainsider.com
including a list of insurers in your state. Congregations, boards, presbyteries, and
pastors are encouraged to investigate this option.
Social Security
It has come to the attention of the Pension Trustees that a number of teaching
elders have opted out of Social Security. It should be clearly understood that the
pension plan was not designed to provide an adequate retirement income without
the help of Social Security. Furthermore, Social Security also provides certain
survivor benefits for a young family. Those who have opted out of Social Security
will need to purchase adequate insurance coverage to provide benefits for their
family that they will not receive from Social Security, such as Medicare. It should
be understood that there are important advantages to being eligible for Medicare
with respect to qualifying for other programs. While the Pension Board recognizes
that it is a family matter for individual pastors to decide for themselves, we think
that opting out of Social Security is financially not a wise course of action and
therefore advise against it.
Section 107 of the Internal Revenue Code
Section 107 of the Internal Revenue Code, regarding “parsonage allowance”,
permits “ministers of the gospel” to exclude (1) the rental value of a home
31
furnished as part of compensation or (2) the rental allowances paid as part of the
minister’s compensation, to the extent used by the minister to rent or provide a
home, and to the extent such allowance does not exceed the fair rental value of
the home, including furnishings and appurtenances such as a garage, plus the
cost of utilities.
The portion of Section 107 of the IRC in italics above was added in 2002 in
response to a Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals case in which the interpretation
of “rental exclusion allowance” was disputed. Congress amended Section 107
of the I.R.C. during the case, which was then dismissed. Distributions from the
Pension Plan may be excluded from the income of a retired minister under Section
107 of the I.R.C. if they are designated as a housing allowance by the employing
church or in the case of denominational plan, the national governing body of
the church (Rev. Rul. 75-22). In our case this is the Synod at its annual meeting.
However, if the retired minister elects a lump sum payment, the amount of the
lump sum payment that will be eligible for exclusion as a housing allowance will
be limited to the fair rental value of the home for the year in which the payment
is received. Therefore it may be to the advantage of a retiring minister to select an
annuity option instead of a lump sum payment.
The Pension Trustees recommended and the 2005 Synod adopted two
resolutions prepared by Mr. Thomas Graves, our legal counsel, relative to the
parsonage allowance exclusion. The resolutions are as follows:
Resolution 1: “Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the Synod designates
100% of the pension received by ordained elders under the Plan as eligible for
exclusion from income under I.R.C. 107 as a maximum rental allowance paid as
compensation for past services, to the extent such allowance is actually used to rent
or provide a home and does not exceed the fair rental value of the home, including
furnishings and appurtenances such as a garage, plus the cost of utilities”(2005
Minutes of Synod, p. 56).
Resolution 2: “ That the Synod recommends to congregations, presbyteries,
and boards of the church that, for teaching elders who are required to file income
taxes to the Internal Revenue Service of the U.S. Department of the Treasury and
who are participants in the Plan, up to 60% of their compensation be designated
as eligible for the maximum exclusion from income under I.R.C. 107 as a rental
allowance paid as compensation for services, to the extent such allowance is
actually used to rent or provide a home and does not exceed the fair rental value
of the home, including furnishings and appurtenances such as a garage, plus the
cost of utilities”(2005 Minutes of Synod, p. 56).
It should be understood by all interested parties that the terms “ministers of the
gospel”, “ordained elders” and “teaching elders” are all equivalent terms referring
to individuals who are (or were, prior to retirement) recognized as ministers or
religious leaders of their congregations and who perform (or performed, prior to
retirement) the types of services set forth in Treasury Regulation section 1.1402(c)5(b)(2), which, in this regulation, are described in part as “the ministration of
sacerdotal functions and the conduct of religious worship and the control, conduct
32
and maintenance of religious organizations.”
Tax Sheltered Accounts
In 1994 the Pension Trustees adopted the resolution “that the Board authorize
employees to participate in tax sheltered accounts as permitted under Section
403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code” (Pension Trustees Minutes, May 6, 1994,
p.3). Any pastor who is less than age 50 on December 31, 2010, who is contributing
more than $16,500 per year in total to all 403(b) tax sheltered accounts, as a group,
should consult his tax advisor. The 2010 elective deferral limit for an eligible
employee age 50 or older on December 31, 2010 is $22,000 (a $16,500 regular
elective deferral, plus a $5,500 catch-up contribution).
Persons are eligible for this program if they wish to pay less income tax, need
to increase disposable income, are in a dual income family, are currently investing
with after tax dollars, or need to save for retirement. A 403(b) account provides
participants with a further opportunity to invest for retirement.
This program is not part of the Pension Program of the denomination as such,
but was set up as an additional option.
Severance Pay Program
Presbyteries and ad interim commissions are reminded that it is the policy
of the Pension Board to pay an allowance toward a three (3) month severance
compensation for teaching elders who are participants in the Pension Plan of
Synod. Certain eligibility requirements must be met for teaching elders to qualify
for this program. Provided that one does qualify, as determined by the Pension
Trustees, funding for this program should be by congregation, presbytery, and the
Pension Trustees in that order. The Pension Trustees will only be responsible for
a maximum of one-third of the total of the three month severance pay package.
Please see the 1991 Minutes of Synod, pp. 23-25, for the details of this program.
This information may also be found in the booklet “Your Pension Plan and Other
Benefits.”
Moving Allowance Program
The Pension Trustees have been authorized to pay an allowance toward the
Once-In-A-Lifetime moving allowance, as specified in the statement of this
program. The amount that will be paid will be an allowance equal to 50% of
the moving expenses, up to a maximum pay out of $2,000. Please see the 1991
Minutes of Synod, pp. 25-27 and the 1993 Minutes of Synod, p. 58, for the details
of this program. This information may also be found in the booklet “Your Pension
Plan and Other Benefits.”
Investments
As of January 1, 2009, there was approximately $4.1 million invested in the
Pension Plan “B” individual accounts. As of December 31, 2009 approximately
$5.4 million was invested in Pension Plan “B” accounts. The average return on the
33
investments of the participants as a group for 2009 was 22.92%. Participants can
decide to invest their account as they choose, or use one of the six (6) allocation
models or strategies. The actual percentage of return is reported to each individual
participant.
A number of participants in Pension Plan “B” have not actively selected an
investment or asset allocation strategy. If you have not made a selection, you
are urged to do so soon. If you are uncomfortable making your own investment
decisions, you are encouraged to consider one of the asset allocation strategies
currently offered that best meets your investment goals and objectives. Participants
are urged to review your risk assessment profile to make sure your current asset
allocation is consistent with your risk profile. It is suggested that participants
revisit their profile questionnaire every two (2) years to see if your score may
have changed. If you are close to retirement you may want to choose an asset
allocation in which there is less risk or more conservative. If you have questions
about making your selection, you can contact the denominational treasurer
James McFarland at (412) 731-1177 or Michael J. Rutkowski of MorganStanley
SmithBarney at 800-533-7037. Copies of an updated “Daily Life: Live for Today,
Prepare for Tomorrow” that provides instructions for determining your personal
asset allocation strategy or for selecting your own investments are available here
at the meeting of Synod. This booklet contains an enrollment form. It is anticipated
that Mr. Michael J. Rutkowski will be available at Synod to answer questions and
meet with interested participants. You will need to notify Hartford Retirement
Services of your investment strategy online at www. the Hartford.com/retirement
plans/access or by telephone at (800) 854-0647.
RECOMMENDATION 7:
That the Synod following this report provide an opportunity of up to fifteen (15)
minutes for Mr. Michael J. Rutkowski to answer any questions regarding Plan “B”
investments that participants in the Pension Plan may have.
Pension Plan Information
The Pension Plan Booklet, “Your Pension Plan and Other Benefits,” updated
as of July 1, 2010 will be available at Synod for new participants and additional
copies will be available from the denominational office. This publication is a
valuable resource that will answer many of the questions that you may have.
Board Membership
The terms of Butch Shoop and Everett Wood expire at the fall meeting of the
Pension Trustees. Butch has resigned from the Board and no replacement was
found to complete his term. Everett Wood has served two terms on the Board
during his current years of service and is therefore not eligible for reelection due
to the two-term rule of Synod.
The Board would like to place in nomination the names of Curt Porter and
_______________ for three year terms on the Board of Trustees in the Class of
2013 and the name of _________________________as an additional nominee.
34
RECOMMENDATION 8:
That Synod elect Curt Porter and _______________to three-year terms on the
Board of Pension Trustees in the Class of 2013.
David Merkel, Chairman
Don McBurney
Luke O’Neill
Aaron Piper
Everett Wood
A. Wayne Duffield, Executive Secretary
James McFarland, Treasurer
SUMMARY OF CHANGES INCLUDED IN
AMENDMENT NO. ONE TO THE
REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH
AMERICA
EMPLOYEES’ PENSION PLAN
AS LAST RESTATED, EFFECTIVE AS OF JULY 1, 2009
(A) Section 3.3, Employer Uniform Contributions, is amended, effective
July 1, 2010, to clarify the source of Employer Uniform Contributions for an
ordained teaching elder serving as a Chaplain on active duty in the U.S. Uniformed
Services with reemployment rights under federal law shall be the Participant’s
Presbytery.
(B) Section 3.6, Reemployment After a Military Leave of Absence,
is amended, effective July 1, 2010, to clarify that (i) this provision shall not
apply to a Participant if his plan account was credited with Employer Uniform
Contributions during his qualified military service and (ii) that the uniform
employer contributions (generally, for a participant who is not ordained) will be
made by his Employer.
(C) Section 6.6, Death Benefits, is amended, effective January 1, 2007,
to provide that if a Participant in qualified military service, as defined in I.R.C.
§414(u)(5) dies, his spouse or other beneficiary will be entitled to receive the same
death benefit that would have been provided had he been reemployed immediately
prior to his death and died after he was an active Employee of an Employer. This
change is made to comply with the Heroes Assistance and Relief Tax Act of 2008
(the “HEART Act”).
(D) Section 6.10, Minimum Required Distributions, is amended, effective
January 1, 2009, to add Section 6.10(f) to provide that minimum required
distributions for 2009 were waived by the Worker, Retiree and Employer Recovery
Act of 2008 and, therefore, absent an election to receive a distribution in 2009 no
minimum distribution needs to be made for 2009.
(E) Section 10.1, Maximum Annual Additions, is amended, effective
35
July 1, 2009, to clarify that compensation for the purposes of Section 10.1 (and the
I.R.C. §415 limitation on contributions) shall include, with respect to a Participant
in “qualified military service,” as defined in I.R.C. §414(u)(5):
the same compensation he would have received from his Employer had he
continued performing services for such Employer (rather than full-time active
duty services in the U.S. Uniformed Services); and
any differential pay the Participant may have received while in qualified
military service.
These changes are made to comply with the Treas. Reg. §1.415(c)(2)(e)(4) and
guidance with respect to the HEART Act in IRS Notice 2010-15.
Proposed Revised CONSTITUTION OF THE PENSION
TRUSTEES
(Proposed 19 March 2010)
I. Name
The name of this Board shall be called the Pension Trustees of the Reformed
Presbyterian Church of North America. Hereafter called the “Pension Trustees”
or “Trustees.”
II. Function
The function of the Trustees shall be to glorify God as a servant in helping
the denomination to fulfill its ministries in providing deferred compensation for
its workers. (An actuarially sound plan is based on the principle that the cost of
providing a pension for a person is incurred while one is still actively employed.
Therefore, an amount is set aside each year during one’s career so that at retirement
there will be sufficient monies to pay the pension benefits in accordance with
the terms of the plan.) The trustees shall be responsible for the development and
supervising of the pension programs of the denomination. 1 Cor. 9:13-14; Gal.
6:6; 1 Cor. 16:1, 2; Matt. 25:14; and 1 Cor. 14
III. Structure
A. Membership
The Trustees shall be composed of seven (7) six (6) voting members divided
into three classes who are elected from the membership of the denomination
by the Synod. Each member is to be elected for a three-year term. Old terms
expire and new terms begin when new members are elected by the Synod at the
Fall meeting of the Trustees. The Treasurer and Executive Secretary (if any) are
consultants and non-voting members of the Trustees.
B. Officers
The Officers of the Trustees shall be the Chairman, Vice-Chairman, and
Secretary, each elected for a one year term at the Fall meeting of the Trustees and
eligible to succeed himself in office. The Chairman and the Vice-Chairman shall
not be from the same class. Synod’s Treasurer is the Trustees’ Treasurer and a
36
non-voting member.
If desired by the Trustees, they can also elect an Executive Secretary at the
Fall meeting. The Executive Secretary is a non-voting member. His task is to
handle the ordinary actions between meetings, such as information requests, and
ordinary payments. If extraordinary actions are needed between meetings, he
would notify the Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer to deal with
the extraordinary action. He would then execute what the Executive Committee
decides.
C. Meetings
The Trustees shall hold two (2) regular meetings annually (one in the Spring
and one in the Fall the date, time and location of each to be decided before
adjournment of the preceding meeting) and special meetings called by the
Chairman. Meetings by teleconference are permitted for the Spring meeting.
Four (4) voting members shall constitute a quorum.
D. Organization
The Trustees shall be divided into committees as determined from time to
time by action of the Trustees. Each member shall be appointed by the Trustees’
Chairman and approved by the Trustees to serve on a committee. Committee
Chairmen shall be appointed by the Trustees’ Chairman. Responsibilities of
committees are outlined in the minutes of the meetings of the Trustees.
E. Executive Committee
The Executive Committee shall be composed of the Chairman, Vice
Chairman, and Secretary, with the Treasurer and Executive Secretary (if any) as a
consultant(s). The Executive Committee shall deal with matters arising between
Trustees’ meetings that need the attention of the Pension Trustees.
IV. Funds
The finances of the Trustees shall be obtained from grants by Synod, investments,
and other special means as approved by Synod. A budget of anticipated receipts
and expenditures for each calendar year shall be prepared at the Spring meeting of
the preceding year for presentation to Synod. This budget shall be reviewed and
revised as necessary at the Fall meeting. A financial statement shall be presented
by the treasurer at each regular Trustees’ meeting.
V. Amendments
Amendments may be proposed by any member or committee. Adoption of
all amendments shall be by a two-thirds vote of the members present at such
regular meeting. All amendments that have been adopted by a two-thirds vote of
the Trustees shall be submitted to Synod for their adoption by a two-thirds vote.
VI. Scriptural Basis for the Work of the Pension Trustees
A. I Corinthians 9:13-14 & Galatians 6:6
Here the principle presented is that those who preach the gospel should live by
the gospel. In the Old Testament period those who ministered in the temple were
37
supplied by the temple offerings of God’s people. In the New Testament times
the people of God present their contributions in various forms. In our culture,
monetary support is provided for the ministers of the gospel. The scriptural
passages do not inform us how to distribute support from the members of the
churches nor what to do with accumulated sums, whether they are collected in a
shorter or longer period.
The funding concept is based on the principle that those who ministered in the
Word should be supported as long as they live, and that the funds for that support
should be in reserve when the workers reach retirement. Those who administer
the fund seek to maintain adequate support for retired workers.
Another principle is that each generation should be responsible for the
obligations assumed by it, and to avoid the development of an excessive burden
of support from future generations.
B. I Corinthians 16: 1, 21 & 2 Corinthians 9:6-15
Three principles are established: 1) Offerings are to be made regularly, 2)
every member contributes, and 3) the contributions are to be made in proportion
to the means of the giver. The funds regularly received were gathered together
and brought to the poor in Jerusalem. Both references reveal a deep concern
for the needy. Obviously, the cause of Christian benevolence went beyond the
immediate congregation.
C. Matthew 25:14
As Jesus’ story goes, before the master left home to go to another country, he
called three of his servants in and gave each of them a definite sum of money. On
returning home, the master called his servants in to settle account.
Obviously the master expected the servants to put his money to good use while
he was away, and this they understood. The duty of the church is to do its business
wisely, whether that be on a congregational or denominational level. Money is not
barren but can be a productive item and should be used accordingly. Sometimes
the “people of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are
the people of light” (Luke 16:8).
D. I Corinthians 14
“For God is not a God of disorder, but of peace,” (vs. 2). God desires that in
His church “everything be done in a fitting and orderly way,” (vs. 40). This is
evident from the fact that God has made provision for the proper regulation of the
affairs of the church. The regulative authority which he has given to the church
includes the power: 1) to enforce the laws of Christ, and 2) to draw up canons or
church orders. Good stewardship should be judged on that basis. Is the funding
concept a fitting and orderly way to support the workers in their retirement?
This is the principle by which we can judge it. The Board of Pension Trustees is
conscious of its accountability on the matter of stewardship. Synod has also been
conscious of its responsibility for good stewardship. Both believe that advanced
funding is good stewardship.
Observations of the ethics of interest are useful because so much of future
benefits will be paid from accumulated interest.
38
In Israel commercial loans were practically unknown. From the sixteenth
century, scholastic analysis (e.g., Luther, Zwingli) condemned interest because
the concept was based on the “sterility” of money. It was unjust to charge for the
use of money.
The New Testament makes no direct statement on the ethics of interest. If we
put the Parable of the Talents and the Parable of the Ten Virgins together, both
teach the church as we watch we must not be idle, that the best way to be ready is
to be busy in the Master’s business.
John Calvin in the book, John Calvin: The Man and His Ethics, distinguished
between loans for production and those for consumption. Where loans were made
for production, capital was productive or quasi-productive. Interest was therefore
justified.
The modern concept of interest is that it is the price for the use of money.
Monies are borrowed from some and loaned to others. Interest is the price you pay
to have money at different points in time. Interest is earned by those who give up
present consumption and invest their excess money at interest.
Summary
Scripture clearly teaches that church workers (pastors, missionaries and
other full-time employees) are to be adequately supported. A pension assures
that this support will extend into their time of retirement. The denomination is
responsible to have funds available to support her retired workers. The funding
concept does assure both the denomination and her workers that these funds will
be available. One could argue that “provided for adequately” means more than
physical assets (i.e., cash). It also means providing for the emotional and mental
well-being of workers who are retired or are close to retirement. Aging and the
prospect of retirement have a way of accentuating everyone’s concern for their
own total well-being. If the certainty of a person’s payment is in question each
year (as it could be in a pay-as-you-go system), workers may be subjected to a
stress which the denomination wants to keep from those who have served her
so faithfully.
Although the passages do not tell us directly what to do with accumulated
sums, Scripture does not forbid charging reasonable interest on money loaned for
productive use (see New Bible Dictionary, page 304, Interest/Usury (b)). Like
all of God’s resources, money must be handled with a sense of responsibility
for good stewardship. Every congregation that has borrowed money to build
a place of worship knows that money can be used to accomplish good things.
Because the money in the pension fund is invested according to a careful policy,
it is not perceived correctly when it is seen as an idle fund. As an investment it is
accomplishing good in society and in the denomination; as a part of the pension
fund, such money is available to the denomination for payment to its retired
workers when it is needed.
39
John P. Edgar presented the report of the Trustees of Synod. Item 1 was
referred to the Nominating Committee. Item 2 was referred to the Committee
on Finance. Synod records here its appreciation for Judy Linhart’s 37 years
of service in the office of the Trustees of Synod and directed the Clerk to write
a letter of appreciation to Miss Linhart. The report as a whole was approved
and is as follows:
Report of the Trustees of Synod
We give thanks to God for providing an increase in giving to the RPM&M
fund, even during the recent recession. Contributions received for RPM&M,
which come mostly from our congregations, exceeded the goal by $70,012. The
minimum goal for RPM&M in 2009 was $300,000 in contributed funds. The
amount that was received above the base goal was distributed to the boards and
agencies according to the Step-Up Plan approved by the synod of 2008. A table
of the distribution is included in the treasurer’s report. It should be noted that
some of the increase in giving comes from the receipt of several years of Japan
Presbytery giving to RPM&M. The board expects to continue to communicate
the needs of the denomination’s ministries by raising awareness of the RPM&M
fund. However, we believe that “grassroots” guidance and leadership from
local sessions will continue to be the most effective means of encouraging the
continued support of the RP Missions and Ministry Fund. It should be noted that
many of the boards and agencies of the church receive a significant portion of
their funding from endowment income. Due to the large loss in the market (and
hence the reduction in the annual dividend), these ministries are in great need of
continued and increased funding from RPM&M. Contributions to RPM&M will
benefit all of the ministries of the church, as determined by Synod. The Trustees
are in agreement with the Finance Committee of Synod in their proposal of
Congregational Giving Guidelines, including the additional assessment for the
RP Home, with the hope that these guidelines will help raise awareness of the
needs of the denominational ministries and the RPM&M fund.
Regarding Continuing Duties of the Board
The Trustees of Synod have held three regular meetings, and a number of
committee meetings and conference calls since the Synod of 2009. We are grateful
to the Lord for His blessings to us as a Board and for His financial provision for
the work of the denomination.
The members of the Board are:
Class of 2010:
Marcia Siebring, Gregory Adams, John P. Edgar
2011: David Coon, David Merkel, James McFarland
2012: Lorrie Meneely, David Ayer, Don Lamont
In the class of 2010, Marcia Siebring, Greg Adams, and John P. Edgar are
completing their first terms on the board and are eligible for re-election for one
more term. All three are nominated by the board. All nine members have been
40
active in the work of the board. The officers during the past year have been
John P. Edgar, President; Greg Adams, Vice President; and James McFarland,
Treasurer.
After 37 years of service in the denominational office, Judy Linhart is no
longer serving as the Assistant Treasurer. The Trustees thank her for many years
of labor in a “behind the scenes” role. The Trustees have created a new position of
Denominational Controller, and have hired Heather Pinkerton to fill this position.
The financial records of the Trustees of Synod for the year ending 12/31/09
have been audited by RC Holsinger Associates.
The Trustees of Synod continue to invest church endowment funds along with
other funds held by them for investment. These funds are invested in a pool of
stocks and bonds using M&T Investment Group, a division of Manufacturers and
Traders Trust Company, as our investment advisor and broker. M&T also manages
investments for the MacLaughlin Trust and a portion of the RPWA investments.
M&T now has full discretion to purchase or sell securities in both our equity
portfolio and in our fixed income or bond portfolio, subject to our investment
policies. Our working relationship with our advisors was modified last year, and
the investment committee of the Trustees is now acting in a monitoring capacity.
Our relationship with M & T is working well, and we appreciate their careful
adherence to our policies, including asset allocation and avoidance of investments
in companies such as alcohol and tobacco that are not permitted by those policies.
The pooled investment funds are managed in a manner similar to a mutual
fund, with the income being distributed annually as a dividend to the departments
and congregations owning the funds. Funds have been distributed according to
a 5.5% total return spending policy, calculated on the average market value of
the previous twelve quarters. The trustees have been concerned for some time
that the 5.5% rate is too aggressive, and that the value of the principal of the
endowments is being eroded over time. Based on various long term studies, and
the practice of other institutions, the trustees last year reduced the payout from
5.5% to 5% for 2010. The rate will be further reduced to 4.75% in 2012. As
of 12/31/09 the Trustees managed a portfolio of stocks and bonds with a market
value of $11,567,318. These funds are mostly donor restricted to use of income
only. There was also $1,078,394 invested in general mortgages.
The value of the pooled unit has generally increased over the years, and the
income has also increased over the long term. After a historic downturn in the
market in 2008, the portfolio of investments with M&T reflected the comparable
market indexes of 2009 with a gain of 8.06%, as well as paying a dividend of
6.12% of the 12/31/09 market value (which is 5.5% of the average market value
of the trailing 12 quarters). Income decreased from the previous year - reflecting
the decline of the market over the past twelve quarters. The average market value
of the pool, and the resulting dividend, will likely continue to decrease, barring a
quick, full, and lasting recovery of the market to pre-collapse levels. As we move
forward, the calculation of the trailing 12 quarter average will replace the high
market levels of 2007 with the current lower levels. The following table shows
the performance of each unit in the pool over the past five years.
2005 2006 2007 2008
Value Per Pooled Unit
Dividend Per Unit
Total Income Distributed
15.578
.855
763,813
15.914
.865
898,973
16.149
.871
913,532
11.519
.836
861,473
41
2009
12.448
.762
755,589
The Building Loan and Grant Fund ended 2009 with a balance of $1,306,163
in loans outstanding or receivable. There were three loans made from these funds
in 2009. These congregations were Grace RPC in State College, PA, for the
purchase of property for the long-term plan of a new building; Los Angeles RPC,
for the purchase of a parsonage; and Immanuel RPC in West Lafayette, IN, for
the purchase of an existing church building. The maximum amount that can be
borrowed from the Building loan and Grant Fund is now $125,000. An additional
maximum loan of $125,000 is available from the General Mortgage Loans.
Bequests continue to come to the Boards and agencies of Synod, for which we
give much praise to God. The bequests and annuity proceeds received in 2009
are:
Unrestricted Funds of Synod
William Metcalfe
C.J.S. MacLaughlin
36,671
185,566
Totals
222,237
The financial report on the Unrestricted Undesignated Funds of Synod is part
of the Treasurer’s Report for the year ending December 31, 2009. Since 1992,
a very large portion of the income available in the Unrestricted Undesignated
Funds has been from the MacLaughlin Trust and most has been distributed to
Geneva College and the Pension Board, mostly for Plan A, as per Synod’s action.
Since the last quarter of 2001, pursuant to action of the Trust’s trustees, funds are
available from the trust according to a “total return” policy of income distribution
on the basis of four and one-half percent (4.5%) of the average market value of
the fund over the trailing sixteen (16) quarters. In 2009 the actual distribution
from the MacLaughlin Trust Fund was $185,566. Mrs. MacLaughlin designated
a portion of the principal to be maintained separately to provide a lifetime income
for Mrs. Chu, the MacLaughlin’s faithful housekeeper. Mrs. Chu passed away
in 2007, so the income from that portion of the Trust fund is now available to
the denomination. The Finance Committee is again recommending $82,000 or
approximately half the income be allocated to Geneva College and $60,000 to the
Pension Board, mostly for Plan A expenses.
The Unallocated Denominational Office financial report for 2009 is printed in
the Treasurer’s Report.
We remind Synod and its boards of these policies:
1. All money actually received for RPM&M will be distributed according to
42
the approved RPM&M Budget and the Step-Up plan, as described in the
Finance Committee report.
2. Boards are not allowed to deficit spend.
Recommendations:
1. That Marcia Siebring, Greg Adams, and John P. Edgar be nominated to serve
a second consecutive term as Trustees of Synod in the class of 2013.
2. That the following items be referred to the Committee on Finance:
a. That the Treasurer’s report for the year ended December 31, 2009, as
prepared by the Denominational Treasurer, be received.
b. That the Unallocated Denominational Office financial report for 2009 be
received and that the 2011 proposed budget be approved.
c. That Boards, agencies and committees of Synod be notified that the Synod
mileage reimbursement rate is the IRS rate as of the date of travel. Also,
individuals traveling for boards and committees should follow the same
travel policy as is used for Synod travel. Reimbursement will be the lower
of the mileage or the lowest published airfare at the advanced purchase
rate.
Gregory Adams (2010, 1st Term)
David Ayer (2012, 1st Term)
David Coon (2011, 2nd Term)
John P. Edgar (2010, 1st Term)
Don Lamont (2012, 1st Term)
James McFarland (2011)
Lorrie Meneely (2012, 1st Term)
David Merkel (2011, 1st Term)
Marcia Siebring (2010, 1st Term)
James Faris presented the report of the Business of Synod Committee
again. The committee presented a substitute for its second item. The new
item was adopted. The report as a whole was approved and is as follows:
Report of the Business of Synod Committee
The purpose of the Business of Synod Committee is to facilitate the Synod so
that its administration and business may be conducted in a biblical and efficient
manner. The committee met immediately at the close of the 2009 meeting of Synod,
and in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on October 20, 2009. These meetings were for
the purpose of planning for this and future meetings of Synod and to discuss the
issue of strategic planning. The Business of Synod Committee anticipates meeting
shortly before the meetings of this year’s Synod to consider the disposition of
papers and communications to the court.
43
PLANS FOR THE 2010 SYNOD
Devotional Theme and Speakers
The devotional theme for this year is Motivations for My Ministry as we
celebrate the 200th anniversary of the Reformed Presbyterian Theological
Seminary. The speakers are as follows:
Tuesday – Dr. Bruce Stewart, President Emeritus of RPTS.
Wednesday – Dr. Jerry O’Neill, President of the RPTS.
Thursday – Dr. Wayne Spear, Professor Emeritus of Systematic Theology,
RPTS.
Friday – Dr. Sinclair Ferguson, Pastor First Presbyterian Church of Columbia,
SC (ARP).
Other Appointments
Mark England, Pastor of the San Diego RPC, Nathan Eshelman, Pastor of the
Los Angeles RPC, and Ryan Hemphill, Pastor of the Seattle RPC are coordinating
the prayer times.
Jon Maginn will serve as Synod’s Travel Agent. This year, to simplify the
administrative process, reimbursement checks will be mailed rather than
distributed at synod.
Dave Willson will serve as conference manager. Jerry Porter will serve as
assistant conference manager.
Other Arrangements
As in past Synods, all new members of the court who are delegates for the
first time are invited to an orientation breakfast on Tuesday morning. Those
introducing these new delegates are also encouraged to attend this breakfast along
with officers of the court and members of the Business of Synod Committee. An
elder delegate manual will be distributed at this breakfast. This manual introduces
the many facets of Synod to new delegates.
Please bring your own Book of Psalms for Worship for use at the meetings.
No psalters will be provided, but they will be available to purchase on site at the
Crown and Covenant book table.
Thursday, Synod will adjourn after the morning session to participate in the
Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary’s 200th anniversary celebration in
Pittsburgh. Transportation is being provided to and from Pittsburgh. Synod will
reconvene on Friday morning to complete its business. The Seminary staff will
provide further details regarding the celebration at Synod.
Presbytery Meetings During Synod
The Synod allows for the meetings of the Presbyteries during Synod.
Please remember that beyond the allotted time provided on Tuesday afternoon,
Presbyteries should only meet for truly urgent business. Presbytery meetings that
fill the afternoon break and extend late into the night exhaust delegates and detract
from their ability to participate fully in the Synod meetings.
44
PLANS FOR FUTURE SYNODS
Future Dates and Locations
The Synod of 2009 approved the recommendation that the Synod of 2011
be held at Geneva College, Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania, on June 20-24, 2011. In
response to calls from many members to move the location of Synod, and to give
the denomination more experience working with Indiana Wesleyan University in
anticipation of the RP International Conference to be held there in 2012, we are
recommending that the Synod of 2011 be moved to Indiana Wesleyan University.
The date will also need to be changed to one week later than was previously
approved by Synod. We have not yet any commitment to Geneva for the 2011
Synod, and so we will not be breaking any contract. The cost to hold Synod at
IWU will be comparable to holding Synod at Geneva. Finally, your committee has
conferred in the past with delegates from Canadian churches who assure us that
having Synod end on Canada Day is not a problem.
Recommendation #1:
That the place and location of the Synod of 2011 be changed to Indiana Wesleyan
University, Marion, Indiana, on June 27-July 1, 2011. This is a Monday-throughFriday schedule. Members of Synod have expressed a desire to see Synod meetings streamlined
on years when we also gather at the RP International Conference. Ruling elders,
in particular, are often forced to choose between attending Synod or the RP
International Conference because of limited vacation time from employers. The
fellowship men enjoy at Synod, which is critical in our unity as a denomination,
is facilitated by the International Conference, making the informal part of the
meetings less important when they are held the same year. Naturally, there are
also cost benefits to shortening the conference, especially if travel costs for Synod
and the International Conference can be consolidated. In the past, Synod has met
as part of the conference, or has been omitted altogether, and the results were
not desirable for many reasons. However, we believe that a shortened Synod
could be held at Indiana Wesleyan University just prior to the conference to deal
with necessary business. The format of the proposed Synod is laid out below.
We propose the following schedule for the Synod of 2012, followed by changes
necessary to accommodate the shortened schedule:
SHORT SYNOD SCHEDULE: 2012
THURSDAY
3:30 – 5:00 p.m.
Typical opening Session items
7:00 – 9:00
Moderator Committees announced
Business of Synod Committee recommendations on Communications
Education Reports
Fraternal Delegates introduced
Interchurch
45
FRIDAY
8:30 – 12:15
Devotional service
Administrative reports –
Trustees of Synod
Stated Clerk
Pension Trustees
Church History
Business of Synod
Woman’s Association
1:30 – 2:30 p.m. Presbytery Meetings
2:30 – 4:00 p.m.
Presbytery Reports
Understanding the times
Prepare for elections
7:00 – 9:00
Elections
Mission Committees/Boards/Agency
Finance Committee
SATURDAY
8:30 – 12:15
Devotions
State of the Church
Judicial
Travel
Nominating Committee
Records of Presbyteries
Resolution of Thanks
Adjourn
1. No study committee will report unless the committee has a progress report
that is merely presented to the Synod with a request for comments to be given
directly to the committee. Comments should not to be made on the floor of Synod.
2. The typical speakers (RPTS President, GC President, RP Witness managing
editors) will likely have a venue during the conference to speak so their boards
should not request time for them.
3. Fraternal Delegates: Prepare a form for fraternal delegates to fill in prior
to the meeting then have them copied and distributed. (Denomination’s name,
size, geographical concentration of churches, year formed, subordinate standards,
distinguishing principles of the denomination, Main issues confronting synod/
GA). Introduce delegates but do not have them address the court. Delegates from
other RP churches around the world will likely have a venue to speak during the
conference.
46
4. Communications to Synod: Have the Business of Synod Committee make
recommendations regarding the urgency of dealing with each communication in
2012 and if sufficiently urgent will recommend its disposal.
5. Records of Presbyteries: At the 2011 meeting, appoint the committees to
review the records to be presented at the 2012 Synod. Clerks of Presbyteries
e-mail a .pdf copy of their minutes to the appropriate committee members before
the 2012 Synod. Clerks bring minute books to Synod for final review.
6. Board/committee/agency reports: Each will be allotted up to 3 minutes
to introduce the report with a bell being sounded by the clerks at 2 minutes 30
seconds and again at 3 minutes. Recommendations should be made only on the
standard motions (nominations, finance, typical Pension Board recommendation
on recording the time a minister begins serving, etc.) and urgent matters.
Your committee will work with IWU and the International Conference
Administration Team to secure housing for families of delegates, along with access
to athletic facilities for those families on Friday and Saturday. We anticipate that
additional room and board costs incurred by delegates’ families for those two
nights will in many cases be offset by having a substantial portion of travel costs
covered by the Synod travel fund.
Recommendation #2:
That the Synod of 2012 be held on July 19-21, 2012. This is a Monday-throughWednesday schedule. The location is to be determined.
MATTERS FOR FUTURE SYNODS
Priorities
Two years ago the Synod assigned the task of strategic planning to this
committee as we seek the health, growth, and multiplication of congregations
as a denomination. We plan to continue working with the Interchurch Relations
Committee to explore how closer union as a global Reformed Presbyterian Church
might impact our priorities as we seek the health, growth, and multiplication of
congregations.
With respect to the question of finances in the RPCNA, we plan to present for
the purpose of discussion in 2011 a model of giving that operates on the principle
of church courts tithing to higher courts as a means of reliable funding for basic
needs. Although we have no recommendations at this time, we are thinking
together how best to utilize our resources to further the mission of the Reformed
Presbyterian Church.
Membership on the Business of Synod Committee
The terms of James Faris and Harry Metzger expire at this meeting of Synod.
James Faris has served two terms and so is not eligible for re-election.
Recommendation #3:
That the vacancies on the Business of Synod Committee be filled.
James Faris, Chairman; Harry Metzger, Class of 2010
Jon Maginn, Kit Swartz, Class of 2011
47
Jerry Porter, Dave Willson, Class of 2012
Bruce Hemphill, Bruce Martin, ex officio
Ralph Joseph presented the report of the Church History Committee.
Item 1 was adopted. Item 2 was referred to the Nominating Committee.
Item 3 was referred to the Committee on Finance. The report as a whole was
Report of the Church History Committee to the 2010 Synod
The Church History Committee of the Synod continues to be the collector and
custodian of a variety of historical resources from various individuals, courts,
and agencies of the Reformed Presbyterian Church. In addition to the collecting
of materials, we are frequently called upon to supply information for those doing
research or writing, not only for those within the denomination, but those without.
John Mitchell and Ralph Joseph continue to be the persons primarily responsible
for the work of the Committee. As has been the custom in recent years, the
Committee has not met formally, but kept in touch via e-mail.
Many, but not all, of the publications of the denomination have been
posted on our web site, www.rparchives.org. We are cognizant of the problems
associated with the document files being too big to download easily. Most of
those files have been reduced in size but at this writing we are waiting for our
new computer consultant, Scott Doherty, to transfer these files to the web. We
are also aware there are a few files which appear to be “lost” and are working to
correct that problem, although one such file which appeared to be lost actually is
included in the previous year’s volume. Unfortunately, the dates of the volumes
do not always correspond with the year in question. Previously, we reported the
availability of the Minutes of Synod through 2006, but thus far no more issues
have been posted.
We noted in our report last year on the work of Nathaniel Pockras, elder son of
Pastor Philip Pockras, in scanning many of the RPCNA session books, plus some
related materials. Even though he is no longer employed by the Committee, he
continues to scan documents and/or transcribe them as he has the time from his
home in Belle Center. We are thankful for his keen interest in the church’s history
and her documents.
Along with a few miscellaneous books and documents scanned this past year,
our major project has been the digitizing of our bound volumes of The Covenanter
Witness. We did 26 volumes in 2009 with the remainder yet to be done. In addition
to our own materials, we are in the early stages of considering how we might help
our “Mother Church” protect her documents. With two of the committee members
being in Scotland for the International Conference, we expect to have something
to report by fall.
Besides the materials which we have digitized (scanned) or plan to scan,
there are quite a number of other documents which we hold in trust but have
no immediate plans to scan. These documents include records from the various
48
mission stations and boards of the church, Sessional minutes, and congregational
records of various kinds.
We continue to be grateful for the contributions of many across the Church
to the Archives in 2009, as well as the provision of space to do our work by the
Seminary administration. Individuals who have donated materials for the Archives
in 2009 were William Cummings and Robert Copeland, and Tom Joseph in 2010.
Donations from Congregations in 2009 came from the now disorganized Oakdale
RPC. In 2010 we received material from the Belle Center congregation and the
long closed Bellefontaine congregation. In addition a second computer has been
donated which should help us greatly with our work, particularly the cataloging
of pictures. Last year, we reported the likelihood of the archives moving to the
Willson Center across the street from the main Seminary building but more recent
developments indicate we will be staying in the main seminary building for the
foreseeable future.
Financially, the Committee has continued to work under the policy that where
expenses total less than $5,000, no formal budget need be submitted to Synod’s
Board of Trustees. However, our costs have risen like everyone else’s, so we have
made a request of the Synod through the Finance Committee to fund a $7,000
budget for 2011.
The term of Tom Reid expires with this meeting of the Synod. Tom has served
three six-year terms and is not eligible for re-election.
Recommendations:
1. The Synod strongly urge Sessions and Presbyteries to forward their minute
books to the Archives as soon as they are finished using them.
2. We nominate Tony Gazo for a six year term on the Committee replacing Tom
Reid whose term has expired.
3. We request authority to spend up to $7,000 for the work of the Committee in
2011.
Philip Pockras
Thomas Reid
Ralph Joseph, Chairman
Mark England directed Synod in the afternoon prayer time. Those
present joined together in small groups to pray and concluded the prayer
time singing Psalm 101B.
prayer by John Bower.
Tuesday, June 22, 2010, 7:00 p.m.
by Adam King.
The minutes of the afternoon session were read and approved as read.
49
Representatives of the presbyteries presented the reports of the
Alleghenies, Atlantic, Great Lakes/Gulf, Japan, Midwest, Pacific Coast and
St. Lawrence presbyteries. The Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery presented an
appeal from Roger Cornejo against actions of the Presbytery’s Durham
Commission. The appeal was received by a two-thirds vote and given to
the Business of Synod Committee for its disposition. The Business of Synod
Committee was excused to prepare its action on this appeal. Following each
report an elder was appointed to pray as follows: Joel Wood for Presbytery
of the Alleghenies; Bob McKissick for Atlantic Presbytery; Kit Swartz for
the Great Lakes/Gulf Presbytery; Greg Cumbee for Japan Presbytery; Keith
Wing for Midwest Presbytery; Jim Carson for the Pacific Coast Presbytery;
and Ken McBurney for the St. Lawrence Presbytery. The reports were
received and are as follows:
Report of the Presbytery of the Alleghenies
“Great is the Lord and greatly to be praised” might well be the theme Psalm
for the Presbytery of the Alleghenies throughout the last year and a half. Although
not without a down side: the dissolution of Anchor Fellowship, the reducing the
Rimersburg congregation to a Preaching Station, and more recently Rick Gamble’s
submission of his resignation as the senior pastor at College Hill. At the same
time, the Presbytery has seen real gains in the work of Christ’s kingdom: Grace
of Gibsonia, which had been a Mission Church, was organized as a congregation
early in 2009, Covenant of Aurora, which had been organized in December 2008,
as a Mission Church, became a fully organized congregation in December this
past year and the Rimersburg congregation was reorganized as a congregation in
January of this year. Covenant of Meadville is looking forward to having a pastor
on site very soon.
We have 14 organized congregations under our care, all of them, with the
exception of Covenant of Aurora have, or soon will have settled pastors and some
have more than one. We have four teaching elders associated with RPTS, two
associated with Geneva College, six are in non-pastoral pursuits, two engaged
directly in missions, and 17 are retired. One of our pastors, Ken Hoffman,
experienced significant health issues during the last part of 2009 and early 2010
so we urge prayer be made for his full recovery. We have certified three men to
preach the gospel since the last meeting of Synod and have four men who have
been Certified as Eligible for a Call whom we commend to the church. In addition
to these seven men, we have two teaching elders who have not been pastoring for
awhile who are seeking to return to the pastorate.
Our total membership stands in excess of 1,450, which is about the same as
a year ago and our finances show that God’s people gave somewhat more than
$2 million in 2009, slightly less than a year ago. However these figures are a bit
inaccurate because Pastor Hoffman’s illness has delayed our receiving Tusca’s
statistical reports. Four of our congregations experienced growth during the past
50
year. Trinity (Beltsville, MD), purchased property early in 2009, the first time in
their history they had owned their own but promptly outgrew the building before
they had a chance to inhabit it. They are considering several options with regard to
its use. Grace (Gibsonia) has nearly outgrown their existing worship facility and is
looking forward to renovating another building on their property for that purpose.
The Presbytery certified Grant VanLeuven to preach the gospel at the fall
2009 meeting and H.P. McCracken and Jason Ryce at the spring 2010 meeting
of the presbytery. We have four men Certified to Receive a Call available to the
church: Dan Drost, Matt Filbert, Tim McClain and William Matthess. All of these
men are graduates of RPTS. Dan is serving as Stated Supply in the Hetherton
congregation, Matt is employed by Global Missions and Tim is a ruling elder in
First R.P. of Beaver Falls and engaged in business. Bill graduated this past May
and earnestly desires a call to a congregation.
Doug Comin is our moderator while Ralph Joseph and Charles Brown serve as
clerk and assistant clerk respectively. The Manchester Session functions as the Ad
Interim Commission. The annual Laurelville Family Conference is July 12-16.
Congregational Snippets
College Hill: The congregation’s membership is made up of 238 communicant
members and 77 baptized members for a total of 315. Our average attendance in
morning worship is 320 which necessitates holding two services during the school
year when Geneva is in session. The average number of participants in the Lord’s
Supper decreased slightly from an average of 252 to 249 during two services, and
decreased from an average of 179 to 175 at one service.
The discussion for an election of additional officers began in February 2009.
By August the congregation was blessed with the election of three elders and one
deacon. Herb McCracken was ordained and installed as an elder. Dean Smith
and Keith Wing were installed as elders, having been previously ordained. Blake
McMahan was elected as a deacon and was ordained and installed in March 2010.
For some time we have deliberated the need for a staff position to manage
administrative matters for our pastors, session and congregation. To address these
needs the responsibilities of the clerk were expanded. In November, Elder Dave
Willson was appointed to the position of Administrator. Dave’s primary role is to
assist Pastors Gamble and Martin with administrative tasks and oversee several
areas of CHRP’s ministry.
Our ministry to students at Geneva College continues to grow under the
direction of Pastor Martin.
Covenant (Aurora): Covenant RPC met as a mission church under the
oversight of our Temporary Governing Body for most of 2009. We met with good
success and the Lord’s provision in the many details of establishing a mission
church in Aurora.
Average attendance at Lord’s Day worship was typically over 30 people.
Several other families worshipped for a time until their husbands’ job situations
moved them away from the area.
51
We met each Lord’s Day for worship, with the TGB scheduling guest
preachers. We heard very fine sermons, and received much spiritual food. Our
souls were cared for well.
We gathered together for Bible Study each Lord’s Day evening. We spent most
of the year in the Sermon on the Mount. Digging in to the finest sermon of all time
was a joy and delight. We learned much.
Significant events included door-to-door literature distribution with a TFY
team, and hosting an evening concert by New Song but the highlight of the year
for us was our becoming an organized congregation on Dec. 4, 2009. We were
surprised and encouraged by the many brethren who came to Ohio for the evening.
Our journey into the RPCNA has been so pleasant. We find brothers and sisters
at every turn who pray for our church, and care about us.
Covenant (Meadville): Covenant RP Church is thankful to God for the body
of believers here in Meadville. We are especially thankful for the number of
children who have been born to families in our church.
In the last three years that we have been without a pastor Dr. Jonathan Watt
has been very gracious in helping fill our pulpit when he has been available and
for presiding over the communion service each month. Also many Pastors and
seminary students have helped in filling the pulpit for us each month.
We are thankful for the men who have served on the session, Bob Copeland,
Vince Scavo, Duncan Lowe, Paul Martin, CJ Williams and Charles Brown.
We are also thankful for the men who served on the committee to counsel and
encourage Covenant RPC, Micah Ramsey, Bruce Hemphill, Martin Blocki, and
John Schaefer.
The average attendance at worship services last year was 35 and we have 25
members on the rolls at the present time. We have two elder-led Bible studies
each week, one at the church building on Wednesday evenings and one at the
Cummings home on Thursday evenings.
Early this year we sent a call to Lucas Hanna to come and lead our congregation
and he has accepted that call and Lord willing should arrive sometime in July.
Covenant Fellowship: Covenant Fellowship membership consists of 131
member (111 communicants and 20 baptized) as of December 31, 2009. The
Session led the congregation in two initiatives this year. A part-time Director of
Youth Ministries position was developed with Joel Butler serving in this capacity.
A new ministry, Wilkinsburg Christian Housing Ministry, has been created with a
governing committee, to oversee our development and management of properties
and houses for ministry to people. Both ministries seek to serve in those areas
where God is leading and where God is blessing.
Eastvale: The Eastvale congregation is a small but growing congregation in a
working class neighborhood on the east side of the Beaver River. The congregation
experienced modest growth in numbers in 2009 and stable contributions during the
same period. In addition to the regular preaching of the gospel on the Lord’s Day,
the after-school weekday program for children in the community has continued as
a means of reaching them and their parents for Christ. Recent changes in leadership
52
include former pastor and more recently Ruling Elder David Carson moving to
the R.P. Home along with his wife, Margaret, a deacon in the congregation.
First R.P. (Beaver Falls): Pastor Bruce Backensto completed preaching
a series from James and completed a series through the “Love” section of I
Corinthians 13. As Pastor Bruce resumes his preaching responsibilities in 2010,
he has begun a series from the Psalms of Ascent in the morning and topical
sermons in the evening.
We have greatly appreciated the Lord’s guidance as we have sought to
discipline with love, encourage those who are facing a number of challenges,
oversee the flock God has entrusted to our care, and, seek to meet a number of
ministry needs with a smaller Session. We greatly miss the wisdom and efforts of
our brother, Dr. Robert Tweed and are so thankful for the many years which Bob
labored in love for the Church of Christ. We also have felt the absence of Joel
Martin and certainly miss the many talents he brought to the Session and that his
family brought to the congregation. The Session sadly excommunicated a man
who was also serving as a deacon following a trial held in his absence after he was
summoned twice to appear before the Court.
First RPC currently has 117 communicant members and of those 18 live out
of bounds, 4 are relatively house bound, 4 reside in the RP Home, 9 are irregular
in worship attendance. In 2009, First RPC welcomed five new communicant
members to the roll and we continue to give thanks to God for the 29 baptized
children in the congregation (3 are over the age of 21).
Grace (Gibsonia): Grace RP Church is thankful to God for His abundant
provision in our first year as a particular congregation. Each year the pastor and
session have tried to organize the year of ministry around a certain theme; this
year’s theme is Christian discipleship. Pastor Jeff started the year preaching
through Titus and he is presently halfway through James. In the evening, he is
teaching through the epistle to the Romans.
We currently have an average attendance of 85-90 people in an auditorium
that seats about 105 people (not so comfortably). There are three buildings on the
property: the parsonage, the existing meeting house, and a large garage. To meet
the current need for more meeting area the church has decided to renovate the
garage. Since having made this decision the church has experienced a wonderful
relationship with the township, financial willingness on the part of the people, and
a volunteerism from among God’s people that can be counted nothing short of
God’s blessing upon us. Please join us in thanking Him for His faithful provision.
Grace (State College): There has been more activity and service among a
broader segment of the congregation. From S.O.W. to Property to Fellowship to
Christian Education, it has been encouraging to see members and friends of the
congregation step up, use their talents and creativity and make us generally more
useful to the Lord Jesus Christ and His Kingdom.
Four of our covenant children came forward and professed faith and obedience
to the Lord Jesus Christ and are now joining us in the celebration of the Lord’s
Supper and we celebrated two baptisms in 2009.
53
The Session has been making a systematic effort to clean up our Roll Book.
Moderator and Clerk are having regular monthly meetings to outline administrative
tasks.
Of particular note was the congregation’s celebration of her 25th Anniversary
with a picnic near the Gray’s Woods property as well as a catered supper on
Saturday, October 3, 2009. Pastors David Hanson, Duncan Lowe and Gordon
Keddie shared prepared remarks. Several members and alumni shared their
recollections. Duncan Lowe preached on Lord’s Day morning October 4, 2009
Gordon Keddie preached in the evening. The congregation, alumni and guests
enjoyed a great fellowship dinner after the morning service.
Manchester: The Manchester congregation is thankful to the Lord for the
worship and fellowship we enjoy in Christ. We have worked through Jonah and 1
Peter in morning worship this past year. We have fellowship lunch after worship
twice a month, with a worship service following. The afternoon services have been
based on Catechism topics. The Lord has graciously upheld our finances. We have
a combined Sabbath School class and several weekly Bible studies, including a
new study for men from the community. We pray for and seek growth in grace,
professions of faith from our covenant children and outreach opportunities in the
community.
North Hills: Following the organization of their daughter in early 2009, the
North Hills congregation has gone through significant changes in its rebuilding. The congregation has adjusted to learn to serve without our friends who have been
beside us for many years. We pray for growth, maturity and opportunity to share
the good news of the gospel. In its commitment to be aggressive in reaching out with the gospel, the church
has been seeking to have a ministry in the Millvale area of Pittsburgh. Part of this
community is economically troubled. Through this outreach, the church has come
in contact with many people who are unemployed and in difficult circumstances.
Pastor Metzger has preached in the morning service for the past year from the
book of Amos, and Proverbs, while Pastor Blocki has preached in the evening
from the Gospel of John. Both pastors have placed the challenge before the
congregation as to how the passage applies to our lives. The adult Christian
education topics during the past year have been: a study of Packer’s Knowing
God, heroes of the faith, marks of the true church, marriage and parenting, and a
class on equipping ourselves for the sharing of our faith.
Providence: Our Lord’s Day worship continues to be the heart and soul of
the church family, and the Session (Pastor Rut Etheridge and Ruling Elders CJ
Williams, Jim McFarland and Jay Strunk) is grateful for a flock who truly loves to
worship and fellowship together. Pastor Etheridge completed preaching through
Ephesians and currently is preaching through the 10 commandments. Lord’s Day
morning worship is followed each week by our fellowship luncheon. We observe
the Lord’s Supper once per month during a 1 p.m. worship service. We also use
our 1 p.m. time slot for catechism classes for all ages, missionary presentations,
Psalm sings, and times devoted to prayer.
54
Currently we have 67 communicant members and 39 baptized members;
worship attendance has consistently been more than 100, forcing us to deal with
the wonderful problems of placing people for Sabbath School classes and parking.
We rejoice in the numerical growth God has granted but more so in the spiritual
growth of the flock.
Beyond Lord’s Days, the church family enjoys other outlets for ministry
and general fellowship. We have a weekly Wednesday evening Bible study,
a biweekly Ladies’ Bible study, a monthly “Dinner and Doctrine” Bible study
geared toward college and seminary students, and an annual VBS program. We
continue to try to reach out to the area where we have our church building, but it
has proven be “hard soil” as it is steeped in Roman Catholicism. Please pray for
our outreach efforts.
By and large, we are very encouraged at God’s work in and among us at
Providence. We thank you for your continued interest in and prayerful support of
God’s work here. We are humbled that God would use such fallible vessels as us
to do His work, and we earnestly seek your continued prayer and support as we
labor in this part of Christ’s kingdom.
Rimersburg: The congregation was left without the services of a resident
elder when Paul Brace resigned to accept the call of the Hazleton R.P. Church
last spring and therefore the Presbytery was forced to change the status of the
congregation to that of a Preaching Station. Throughout the remainder of the year
the saints were overseen by a Commission, but in January, the congregation was
reorganized and Bill Douthett was re-elected to the eldership and Ralph Joseph
was appointed to moderate the Session. When John Monger arrives (see below),
it is anticipated Mr. Joseph will continue on the Session as a provisional elder.
The congregation requested former pastor John Monger, be considered for the
position of Stated Supply, This was done through the Commission on March 15,
2010. John and his family accepted the position the same week, knowing at this
time that it is initially limited to a two-year appointment. It is anticipated he will
officially begin his work July 15.
Rose Point: The congregation marked its 175th anniversary with a weekend
celebration in September 2009. About 150 people participated in the festivities,
which were highlighted by messages from former pastor Robert H. McFarland.
Two new deacons, Ralph McKelvy and Daniel Edmonds, were installed in the
past year.
Trinity: Over the last year, we’ve experienced some transition in our
membership including the sad experience of excommunicating one of our younger
members. We’re becoming well-mixed with a number of children and singles, a
few newlyweds, a good number of young families with newborns, as well as
some older folks and widows. We’ve had an increase in worship attendance. Just
after we purchased our property, we outgrew it having grown from an average
attendance in the mid 70’s to well over 100 consistently. We are thankful for the
progress we are now making with our new building project. We recently held a
training class for deacons and we now have a couple of prospective deacons. As
55
for preaching, we concluded a sermon series in Nehemiah, heard two short series
on justification and sanctification, and we’re currently in the Gospel of John. Tusca: The Tusca Area congregation has had a very difficult year. On the
encouraging side, another ruling elder was elected in the past year, but on the
negative side, our pastor of 27 years, Ken Hoffman, has experienced significant
health issues which necessitated him being hospitalized for a time. Only recently
has he been able to return to the pulpit.
Ralph E. Joseph, Clerk
Presbytery of the Alleghenies
Report of Atlantic Presbytery to Synod 2010
The Atlantic Presbytery now has eight congregations and a preaching station
from the Boston area in the northeast to Philadelphia and Hazleton to the south
and west. Seven congregations have settled pastors. Since the 2009 Synod the
following changes have taken place:
• Christ Mission Church in Providence, Rhode Island, was organized
as a congregation on April 9, 2010. Daniel Howe, the church planter in
Providence, was also elected and installed as their pastor that same evening.
• As noted a year ago, Christian Adjemian resigned from being pastor of the
Cambridge Reformed Presbyterian Church effective the end of June 2009
to take up the position of Dean and Professor of Biblical Studies at Farel
Seminary, Montreal, Quebec and his credentials have been transferred to
the Eglise Reformee du Quebec.
• Rev. Mauro Silva of the Presbyterian Church in Brazil was examined on
April 10, 2010, and received as a ministerial member of Atlantic Presbytery
pending the receipt of his credentials.
Two students of theology remain on presbytery’s roll. Duran Perkins continues
to serve as an elder in the Elkins Park Church and though he has been certified
eligible to receive a call, he believes he should continue to serve with the Elkins
Park church. James Pellegrini is certified eligible to receive a call and is completing
2 years in the Resident-in-training program with the Ridgefield Park church.
White Lake Covenanter Camp continues its usual summer activity as well as
being used by various congregations and youth for retreats. The family camp this
year is to be held August 6-13 with Pastor David Hanson as the main speaker.
The Broomall Church on the west side of Philadelphia has been encouraged
by the addition of several young couples to their membership. Pastors Bill Edgar
and Zach Kail have been sharing pastoral duties while the former also teaches
high school until June 30, 2010, and the latter is involved in doctoral studies at
Westminster Theological Seminary.
The Cambridge session and congregation give thanks to God for the blessed
ministry of Pastor Christian Adjemian, who completed his work in our congregation
in June 2009, as noted above. The session, strengthened by the addition of two
56
dedicated younger elders, Dan Kim (in 2007) and Tim Montgomery (in 2009), has
had to deal with a number of unusually difficult matters in the past year, but God
has blessed the four resident elders and the interim moderator, Charles Leach,
with oneness and strong bonds of love, as they have worked through the issues.
Several members of the congregation have been dealing with long-term illnesses,
including Elder Chris Wright and Martha Fisher, wife of Elder Tom Fisher. The
session also oversees the Berkshire Mission in western Massachusetts. The saints
there are in good heart. They continue to reach out to their neighbors, and are
thankful for a regular monthly preaching schedule provided by OPC ministers
Carl Smith (twice monthly) and David Innes, and Elder Chris Wright.
Christ RP Church became a fully organized congregation on April 9, 2010. The
impetus for this change came from the members themselves without prompting
from the church planter. A committee of Presbytery visited the mission church
and concurred that the group was ready to be organized. Pastor Daniel Howe was
elected and installed as their pastor on the same evening the congregation was
organized. The elders from the TGB have been asked to continue their service as
provisional elders on the session until a local man can be examined, ordained and
installed on the session. They give thanks for the Spirit’s guidance in providing
an elder-elect, David Robson, at the first meeting of the new congregation. They
continue to be supported financially by local giving, presbytery aid, and Home
Mission Board declining funding. The congregation meets for worship in an
Episcopal church building in East Providence.
The Coldenham-Newburgh Congregation continues to serve the midHudson Valley of New York state with the proclamation of the gospel of our
Lord Jesus. The pastoral call upon Pastor Charles Leach by the Kasumigaoka,
Japan, congregation was to begin in August 2010. This has been placed on hold
for at least one year. With six young people in college and two more on the way,
average attendance is down by five from last year. The Congregation is in need
of young families to take up the work of service in this beautiful part of God’s
creation.
The Elkins Park congregation continues to worship God and see children
born, students pass through, and people mature in the faith. Please pray for God to
add to their numbers and help them boldly invite others to worship Him.
Give thanks with the Hazleton Area Church for a year of peace and unity.
Paul Brace has settled in to the work and is much appreciated. Their membership
increased by 8 (7 from the Brace family) and SermonAudio has proved to be a
blessing. They generally hold a fellowship meal each Lord’s Day after the morning
worship service. Certain afflictions (e.g. the sudden passing of a grandchild; a
member fighting cancer; emergency gall bladder removal) have only served to
strengthen their bond in Christ.
The session of the Ridgefield Park Church has held special meetings to
consider vision and goals for the congregation toward their growth in grace and a
greater impact on the New York City metropolitan area. Jim Pellegrini’s ministry
during his residence-in-training has been a blessing and encouragement. He is
57
seeking to be married later this year and wants to stay in the area to continue to
help the congregation.
The White Lake Congregation continues to bear witness to the truth of
God and the grace of His Spirit through worship, fellowship and service to our
community. In addition to maintaining the ordinances of worship and small
group Bible studies, they thank God for His blessing upon outreach through the
Shepherd’s Pantry, youth programs and seniors ministry. They ask your prayers
for additional elders and discipling of believers.
There are no members on the communicant and baptized rolls of presbytery.
The presbytery books have been audited. Bonnie Weir is our representative on the
Geneva College Board of Corporators, Mike Tabon represents us to Synod’s Youth
Ministries Committee, John Edgar is our Home Mission Board representative and
Larry Gladfelter is our representative to the Finance Committee.
Report Of Great Lakes – Gulf Presbytery
Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery has nineteen congregations and one mission
church under its care. The Oakdale congregation ceased meeting for worship in
2009 and, sad to say, appears for the last time in our roster. The North Atlanta
Mission Church was organized as a particular congregation on April 24, 2010, with
the Rev. Dr. Frank J. Smith as pastor, and a new Mission Church was established
in Terre Haute, IN. Excepting the Hetherton and Westminster congregations, our
congregations are served by at least one settled pastor. Hetherton and Westminster
have resident pulpit supply from, respectively, Lic. Daniel Drost, and Rev. Steve
Rhoda. Total membership of the Presbytery stands at 1,685—a slight dip from the
December 2008 figure of 1,693.
Presbytery officers:
Richard Holdeman is Moderator, Ray Morton serves as Clerk and Gordon
Keddie as Assistant Clerk. Jim Bishop is Treasurer and the Assistant Treasurer is
George Shopp. Jared Olivetti is Moderator of the Ad Interim Commission, and
Michael Lefebvre chairs the Candidates and Credentials Committee.
Presbytery activities:
Richard Johnston and John Hanson continue to serve faithfully with the Youth
of the Presbytery. Youth activities include a number of events throughout the year.
The Winter Conference, which extends over four days culminating in bringing in
the New Year, is held at a center near Lafayette, IN. About 100 high-schoolers and
their counselors heard addresses from Micah Ramsey. The second Theological
Foundations Weekend was addressed by David Whitla and Michael Lefebvre
on RP basics. Again, nearly 30 older high-schoolers gathered for an intensive
two days in Indianapolis. The Son-rise Party is a lock-in at Covenant Christian
58
School in Indianapolis in April, also for high-school age, and the ECHO work
trips in the summer take teams to Fort Myers, Florida, to assist that ministry in
their development of plants suitable for productive use in third world countries.
Other events, sponsored by congregations but with Presbytery-wide involvement
include CYA (Second RP) for college and career young people and the OY (Older
Youth) ministry (Elkhart). The Presbytery conference—Covfamikoi—is held at
Asbury College in Wilmore, Kentucky. Rev. Matt Kingswood (Russell, Ont.,
RPC) is the speaker in 2010.
Highlights from the congregations:
Alpharetta, Georgia – Northminster RP Church (Pastor Frank Smith):
The North Atlanta Mission Church was organized as a particular congregation
of the RPCNA by the Atlanta Commission of Presbytery on April 24, 2010, with
24 communicant members and 6 non-communicant members. Dr Frank J. Smith
was installed as pastor, Robert Shapiro as a ruling elder, and Keith Ling as a
deacon. Among the church’s activities are a midweek study, a monthly prayer
meeting, a women’s monthly Bible study, and an outreach to downtown Atlanta. The downtown effort has entailed ministry to the poor, including the homeless
and drug addicts. Door-to-door canvassing takes place near where the church
meets for morning worship in Alpharetta.
Belle Center, OH (Pastor Phil Pockras): The congregation continues to
worship in the building of the local Presbyterian Church. Membership is stable and
finances are tight. The one resident ruling elder, Larry Bump, was able to return
to service after a leave of absence on account of some challenges to his health.
With the one deacon sidelined this year on account of ill health, the congregation
is looking to the Lord for additional elders and deacons. The church building was
sold for development as a home for $10,000—a better result than the expenditure
of $18,000 projected for demolition. The congregation continues to meet in the
property of the local Presbyterian Church. Sermons go out on Reformed Voice/
Sermonaudio.com. They report, “Overall this has been a recovery year, better in
many ways that the last. Pray that God would show us His favor, and that there
would be even more lifting up for us.”
Bloomington, IN (Pastors Bill Roberts and Rich Holdeman): The
congregation’s membership significantly increased in 2009. The congregation
rejoices in a constant flow of visitors and a dynamic ministry reaching into the
IU campus. Although experiencing the effects of the economic downturn in the
nation as a whole, the finances are stable. Weekly services continue in Terre Haute,
IN, where the work has now been established by Presbytery as a Mission Church.
Perhaps the most striking change in the congregation in 2010 is the resignation
of Senior Pastor Bill Roberts after 27 years of ministry, effective July 1. This is
not only a harbinger of change for Bill, but also for the congregation as a whole,
and not least for Pastor Rich Holdeman who will shortly take the helm to lead the
church into a new future. Pray for Bill as he seeks the Lord’s leading for future
ministry.
59
Brownsburg, IN - Christ Church RPC (Pastor Michael Lefebvre): Located
on the west side of Indianapolis, the congregation reports that both membership
and financial support remain stable. The membership loss in 2009 has been made
up in early 2010. The congregation continues to meet in a Seventh Day Adventist
church. Reaching out to the community is a continuing challenge. Outreach efforts
centered on the (third) annual Film Forum series, an evangelistic Bible Study
geared to inviting friends and neighbors, and an emphasis on personal outreach.
They “have not been blessed with any new members through conversion (yet).”
Certain changes are being tried in 2010 that they are viewing as a “step backwards
as a church, and a step forward as a church plant,” in an effort to free up more
of the pastor’s time for community outreach and teaching. A Sabbath School has
been organized for the first time and scheduled in the place of the evening service.
This is to be tried for two “semesters”—one in the Spring and the other in the Fall.
They ask prayer for “the spiritual growth of the congregation” and “outreach into
the community.”
Columbus, IN (Pastor Andy McCracken): The congregation is thankful
for continued growth in its new building. Membership rose from 112 to 118 in
2009, and morning and evening worship attendances have risen significantly.
Two elders and two deacons have been added to the Session and Deacons. The
Session visited the families of the church in a concentrated period of visitation in
the Spring and study of Tim Keller’s Ministries of Mercy by elders and deacons
together is emphasizing the scope and privilege of team work. The many children
are growing up and some are already heading off to college—a new experience
for a very young church! The Youth Group (age 12-17) now numbers 26. There is
a growing need for additional leaders to work with young people. The annual Fall
Retreat was addressed in 2009 by Pastor Jared Olivetti. H.P. McCracken served as
Summer Intern in 2009 and Adam Neiss is to serve as a Summer Intern this year,
following his first year at RPTS.
Durham, NC - First RPC (Pastors Ian Wise and Greg Cumbee): The
congregation reports a steady attendance in the past year, albeit with considerable
turnover in membership. This is their second year in their new permanent church
home in the heart of Durham. Two services are conducted each Lord’s Day,
with a weekly fellowship lunch in between, and there is a Wednesday prayer
meeting. On Feb. 6, 2010, Roger Cornejo was ordained an elder and Don Wallace
a deacon. Since Erich Baum was released as an elder effective March 6, after
over a year of service while resident in Indianapolis, the turnover in the eldership
has meant that there is still only one ruling elder (at time of writing). The past
year has been attended by some difficulties that have resulted in the request for a
Presbytery Commission to address the various issues that are seriously dividing
the congregation. Prayer is asked for the future peace, unity and direction of the
congregation.
Elkhart, IN (Pastor Keith Magill): The congregation reports steady
membership and financial provision, and is especially encouraged by the election
of a deacon for the first time, the expansion of the CE program to three classes,
60
and the growing number of children in the nursery. The “Fresh Lunch Thursdays”
continue to provide meals weekly for many people. Literature was distributed
to c. 250 houses six times in the year. The older youth (OY) ministry in March
featured evangelism training and a day of application at Wakarusa Maple Syrup
Festival. Pastor Magill has resigned from his position as part-time Coordinator of
Church Extension for the Presbytery to devote more time to the expanding range
of local ministries going out from the congregation. They ask prayer for fruit to
follow in the year ahead.
Grand Rapids, MI - First RPC (Pastor Ray Lanning): The congregation
is encouraged with increases in membership and attendance at services. Financial
support is also positive, no mean thing given the impact of the economics of
Michigan on the lives of the fellowship. Pastor Lanning had a 16-week sabbatical
in the summer to visit a number of RP churches, to work on his centennial book
on the (UP) Psalter of 1912 and to enjoy some spiritual refreshment. For the
Session there has been a theme of renewal through this past year. They believe
that, as a result, “the congregation recognized a new vigor in the session that
contributed to a renewed stability within the congregation.” They also note that
“many challenges yet lie in our path but with God’s help we labor on and always
covet your prayers and words of encouragement.”
Hetherton, MI (Daniel Drost, Stated Supply): The congregation is rejoicing
that Daniel Drost, a licentiate of Alleghenies Presbytery, began preaching on Jan.
3, 2010, and was subsequently appointed Stated Supply at the Spring Meeting
of Presbytery. The Drost family is now settled in the parsonage. Session reports,
“It was a giant step of faith by the Hetherton congregation and we continue to
pray that friends of Hetherton and the GL-GP will help us. Many hands can
help to lighten the financial load.” Numbers are small but hopes are large. Work
has continued on the property, including a new notice board visible from both
directions on the road to the church.
Indianapolis - Second RPC (Pastor Rich Johnston): The Session reports a
slight dip in membership (285 to 269), but also continuing strong financial support.
Concern is expressed that “we could face the challenge of spiritual complacency
. . .we are 45 years old, which is around mid-life for human beings in America.
The challenge at this stage is to renew our first love and to recommit to the same
Jesus who died on the cross for us.” Session met 25 times, including “many hours
dealing with concerns and problems of some of our flock.” The Lord’s Supper
was observed 11 times. They continue to look for “additional pastoral leadership
to join with Pastor Johnston.” Pastor John Tweed acted as Interim- pastor from
Dec. 2009 through April 2010, while Pastor Johnston was on a sabbatical in order
to complete a book on youth ministry.
Indianapolis - Southside RPC (Pastors Gordon Keddie and David Whitla):
In 2009, the congregation celebrated 30 years since its organization. God has
blessed with a stream of new faces and members, such that, even with considerable
turnover, the membership reached 200 for the first time (141 communicants and
59 baptized). Good finances have again allowed significant retiring of mortgage
61
capital on the new building. New ventures included the successful launching of
two annual events. TFW (Theological Foundations Weekend) is for high school
age from across the Presbytery and is under David Whitla’s leadership. The first
Reformation Indy Conference took place in March 2010 with Pastor Ted Donnelly
as the speaker and was very well attended. Reformation Indy 2011 is planned
for April 1-2, 2011, with Prof. Steve Miller of RPTS speaking on “Reforming
Missions.” Two Sabbath services, a full Church School program, a mid-week
prayer meeting, and four recently established small groups, together with a
plethora of opportunities for fellowship through the year (Women’s Prayer, Men’s
Breakfast, Women’s Book Club, Closeknit Friends) have afforded us a sense of
God’s goodness. Challenges also abound, in the spiritual struggles of young and
old, and, not least, in the trials of many who have lost jobs in the recent recession
and still seek employment. The congregation stands at the threshold of a new
phase in its life and looks to the Lord to raise a new generation to assume the
mantle of those who have founded and led the church hitherto, and take the gospel
forward into the next 30 years of the life of Southside church!
Kokomo, IN - Sycamore RPC (Pastor Barry York): The congregation
reports a drop in membership, but this is largely a correction involving members
long gone. Financial support reflects job losses in a community that is one
of the “black spots” of the current economic downturn. Income is down, but
needs are being met. The Session sees the church as having a “vibrant life” and
“the Lord answering prayers in many ways and growing [their] outreach and
ministries.” Jason Camery was ordained and installed on Nov. 6 as Associate
Pastor, with the aim of developing an outreach in Marion, IN. Two new deacons
have been ordained: Sam Morrow (12/13/09) and Austin Brown (1/31/10). Youth
ministries continue to grow: these include Sycamore Covenant Academy, and the
Sycamore CORPS student ministry. The work of Ron Visser and Robert Jones
with Kokomo Rescue Mission continues with some encouragements. The “chief
focus [in 2010] will be asking the Lord to strengthen Kokomo so she will be able
to mother a congregation in Marion. . .we believe the door is opening once again
to this end.”
Lafayette, IN (Pastor Dave Long): The congregation reports membership
growth and financial stability. In 2009, the Lord’s Supper was held six times and
there were six baptisms. Session held a retreat on Sep. 10-11 in order to ponder,
plan and pray for future ministry. Dave Long was granted a Lilly Foundation
sabbatical grant for June-August 2009. Chris Stockwell was ordained and
installed as a deacon on May 7, 2009. There are four small group Bible Study
groups weekly—East, Church, Central and Wed. Women’s—and an active Youth
Group. The Purdue CORPS ministry (Collegiate Organization of RP Students)
is led by Dave and Jenny Long and Charlie and Beth Moore. Prison Ministry
continues with Bob Bibby in Tippecanoe County Jail. The annual Men’s (March)
and Women’s (October) Retreats were held at Camp Camby. These have become
annual Presbytery-wide events. Stephen McCarthy and Scott McCullough have
served as interns in pastoral work.
62
Oakdale, IL (Pastor Ray Morton): The congregation appears on our roster
for the last time, as it is being officially disorganized in 2010 after serving
Washington Co., Illinois, since 1831. The last service was held on June 28th, 2009
and sale of the church property was finalized on June 30th. It is sad to contemplate
the closure of what has been a long and once-fruitful chapter in the annals of the
Reformed Presbyterian Church.
Orlando, FLA (pulpit vacant): The big change in 2009 was the resignation
of Pastor David Smith and the subsequent establishment of a Pastoral Search
Committee. In the meantime, retired missionary Jim Pennington has been
covering much of the preaching and pastoral duties. The elders met with all the
active members, met for prayer in addition to monthly Session meetings, and
continued a rotational schedule of presiding at services. A Men’s Breakfast has
been started. A Fall Festival in the parking lot drew in neighborhood residents
and facilitated some outreach to them. Prayer is asked for “continued healing,
guidance, wisdom and increasing faith as we journey through this year together.”
Membership is stable and finances sound.
Prairie View, IL - Westminster RPC (Steve Rhoda, Stated Supply): The
congregation is in a northern suburb of Chicago and is presently vacant. Rev.
Steve Rhoda, whose credentials are with the CRC, was appointed Stated Supply
by the Presbytery in Nov. 2009, and is employed part-time in this role. Session
reports, “We need to re-establish ourselves and grow and continue to develop
before we move to seek a full-time pastor.” Morning Worship, Sunday School
and an Evening Bible Study are conducted each Lord’s Day. A Conference on the
“Emergent Church” with Rut Etheridge speaking was held in April. Membership
and involvement is in the 30’s, with encouraging tokens of God’s blessing.
Finances are under pressure and the savings which have balanced the budget so
far will be exhausted by 2011. “Please continue to pray that God would bless us
and use us and keep us here in the Chicago area.”
Selma, AL (Pastor Tom Gray): Regular services continue, The Lord’s Supper
was celebrated three times and Sabbath School is conducted for all ages except,
for want of a teacher, the K/Early Elementary age group. The elders met four
times in the year. Elder Averette Woodson stepped down for personal reasons.
Membership increased by four new communicants and three baptized children.
VBS was conducted for a third year. Three young people went to Echo in Fort
Myers, Fla. Both the pastor and his wife are heavily involved in fellowship,
counseling and hospitality ministry to members and adherents. Pastor Gray serves
on the Pastor’s Council to the Superintendant of Selma Schools, the Children’s
Policy Council and Selma Christian Ministries. He is a part-time employee with
Moody Radio South. Prayer is asked “that the Lord will raise up solidly Reformed
laborers who will share our Beloved’s vision to reach the lost of Selma and disciple
those He adds to our number” (Matt. 28:16-20).
Southfield, MI (Pastor James Faris): 2009 marked the 175th Anniversary of
the congregation and this was celebrated with a number of activities, including a
Conference on the Westminster Assembly addressed by Dr. Wayne Spear. It was
63
also the year of Elder Bruce Adams retiring from both 43 years on the Session and
even longer in medical practice. Membership is stable and the congregation has
been blessed “with faithful givers so that even in a lean year there was a surplus of
funds at the end of the year.” Every Lord’s Day there are two services, except for
the third week of the month, when a Psalm Sing is held at the Evergreen Health
and Living Center. Sabbath School henceforth will run from after Labor Day until
the penultimate Lord’s Day in June. The Session reports, “2009 and the early part
of 2010 have been very full and we have all been blessed in so many ways as a
congregation. It has also been a year of testing and difficulty for many because of
the current financial crisis in our land ... Please pray with us for our members who
are unemployed ... for the state of Michigan and for the various communities in
which our members live.”
Sparta, IL (Pastor Ray Morton): Pastor Morton completed 20 years service
in Oct. 2009. During most of this time Pastor Morton also was pastor of the
Oakdale congregation. Sparta Session acknowledges with thanks the vital role
Oakdale played in sustaining a full-time ministry between the two small churches.
Mr. Morton was given a three-month sabbatical in Aug-Sep., with ‘retired’ pastors
John Tweed and Ralph Joseph preaching in Sparta and St. Louis each Lord’s
Day. The St. Louis worship services began in May 2009 and take place in the
evening. Some Sparta people regularly attend these services. The hope is to secure
a church-planter for St. Louis in the near future. Heather Morton has been most
unwell in recent times and needs someone to be with her nearly all the time.
Prayer is asked for her health and wisdom for the doctors. Session also reports,
“There is need for revitalization here ... Our prayer is that the Lord will build up
his church here in Sparta.”
Terre Haute, IN. – Terre Haute Mission Church: Regular services started
in Feb. 2009 under the aegis of Bloomington Session. The work was designated
a Mission Church at the Mar. 4-6, 2010 meeting of Presbytery. A Terre Haute
Commission has been appointed, with members drawn from Bloomington and
Southside churches. Morning services are now held in a formerly Presbyterian
building on 6th Street. Attendances have averaged 34 since moving there. There
is a Sabbath School and a Fellowship Lunch each week. It is hoped to be able to
call a church-planter as early as July of this year. Indiana State University and the
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology are located in Terre Haute. Several students
from these schools attend the church and it is the prayer of the congregation to
have a growing ministry to these campuses.
West Lafayette - Immanuel RPC (Pastor Jared Olivetti): Immanuel praises
the Lord for passing a milestone in 2009 with the purchase of a church building.
Now three years old and blessed with a young membership (42 communicants
plus 39 baptized children), they have a sense of being planted in a permanent
location and sphere of ministry. The congregation is keenly conscious of being
called to minister to the college community—West Lafayette is home to Purdue
University. They report, “For the training and discipleship of the congregation,
we continue to promote and oversee accountability groups, youth group, Sunday
64
school, and the graduate student fellowship. Recently we have dedicated our midweek meetings to the work of corporate prayer... Finally, we glorify God for his
financial provision through 2009... Soli Deo gloria.”
This has been a challenging year for the Presbytery. Commissions have been
called upon to address difficulties in several congregations. One congregation
has been closed. Others are facing serious challenges. But there are also many
encouragements across the Presbytery and so we look to the Lord, seeking and
expecting blessing in the year ahead.
Gordon J. Keddie
Assistant Clerk
Report of Japan Presbytery to Synod 2010
Japan Presbytery consists of four congregations and one mission church in
the cities of Kobe and Amagasaki in western Japan with four incumbent pastors.
Since the 2009 Synod, the following developments have taken place:
Japan Presbytery
➢ The Covenanter Bookstore, which has been operated for more than half
a century, is now facing a challenge to continue without dependence upon the
financial support from the denomination through Global Mission Board. The new
bookstore’s board members were elected and assumed responsibility from May
2010. We would humbly ask your prayer as we struggle to see a new out-of-thebox vision for the future, where both financial resources as well as workforce are
in demand.
➢
At Kobe Theological Hall, there are RP students such as Mr. Yuuji
Makino (a retired businessman who was finally baptized after forty years of
fellowship with the Spear family) and Mr. Yuusuke Hirata (a third generation RP
who is also a medical student).
➢ Mr. Kihei Takiura, a theological student under care of Japan Presbytery
as well as a licentiate, is to finish an M.Div course at RPTS in May, the Lord
willing. Miss Yasuko Kanamori, on an M.T.S. track with interests in Biblical
Counseling, is also graduating at the same time, DV. Mr. Kunio Hase, who had
been studying at RPTS since 2008, joined Mukonoso RPC and was taken under
care of the presbytery consecutively.
➢ The Creedal Committee is working on the new Japanese translation of
the Westminster Shorter Catechism.
➢ The Psalter Committee is planning to complete its works over all 150
psalms (if partially) by December 2010, DV.
➢
Rev. Takiura is representing our presbytery as one of the translation
committee members at the New Japanese Bible Version, which is a new endeavor
65
by evangelical denominations in Japan.
➢
With the Synod of 2009’s consent, we have been studying possible
amendment to the RP Testimony.
The following clauses, with the proof text to be attached, are in the process of
being submitted to the Synod of 2011 or after, the Lord willing:
[Following the RP Testimony’s chapter 32-1 ]
✤ About the burial of the body, the Bible does not prescribe the
way thereof ; that is, whether it should be by burial or by cremation.
Such burial (or cremation), however, must be filled with the hope of
resurrection of the body in the consummation, and does not always
imply curse upon the dead, as some cremations in the Old Testament
were necessitated by their circumstances.
✤
Due respect should be paid to the responsibilities of the civil
magistrates related to the burial (or cremation).
We are seeking advice from Rev. Greg Cumbee and Dr. Richard Gamble,
who were appointed by the Synod of 2009 as advisors to Japan Presbytery on
this matter. With the Synod of 2009’s consent, we are also studying the possible
appendix to the revised Directory of Worship.
Higashisuma RPC (Rev. Sumito Sakai, pastor)
➢ We rejoice over Kazuki Sakai’s confessing faith in October 2009.
➢ There is a man called Mr. Yamawaki who is now reading and studying the
Bible and its doctrines with the pastor.
➢ Two elderly members (Mrs. Ohnishi and Mrs. Hirao) went to be with Him
this past spring. We need your prayer for the evangelism for their family members.
➢ There are activities for the local people: two evangelistic services in spring
and autumn, evangelistic gatherings for kids, open church, flower arrangement
class, English class and so on.
➢ There is a plan to hold the 50th Anniversary Service of our church in this
coming autumn.
➢ We thank the Lord for providing pulpit supply by Rev. James Pennington,
with the support of RPGM, when the pastor is in the USA to attend the Synod and
to do theological research. We humbly ask your prayer for the pastor’s studies in
addition to your intercessory prayer for our church and its ministry.
Okamoto-Keiyaku RPC (Rev. Shigeru Takiura, pastor)
➢ Mr.Yamada and Koh Takiura (an infant) were baptized.
➢ Evening services are to be held every month from this year at a member’s
home.
➢ We need your prayer for the seekers’ continuous participation in church
activities as well as for the health of members. Prayer points also include: that any
stumbling block for coming to worship be removed, that both session and deacon
66
board be sustained, that the elderly people’s health and those with serious illness
be dealt with by the Lord, and that the pastor and his family be sustained.
➢ We need the Lord’s guidance for the Sabbath School, nursery, kids’
English class, and so forth, as we seem to face a turning point.
➢ We also need your prayer for the youth’s faith as they face challenges in
terms of schools, jobs, and marriages.
Kasumigaoka RPC (vacant)
➢ We rejoice that Rev. Charles Leach has accepted our call last July. We
continuously seek your prayer, as the Leaches as well as those at Kasumigaoka
prepare for the arrival, which might be a little delayed.
➢ We rejoice that three high school boys (Shinsuke Iwata, Kohta Kawasaki,
Shinya Hirata) confessed their faith and were baptized (as adults). They had been
coming to our Sabbath School, Junior High’s Bible class, and Senior High’s Bible
class. We praise the Lord for having guided those youths even during the time
after Rev. Pennington had resigned and retired.
Mukonoso RPC (Rev. Hiroyuki Kanamori, pastor)
➢ We are so grateful that Mr. Kunio Hase has joined our congregation. He
had been studying at RPTS since 2008.
➢ The English Bible Class that had been taught by Dr. Patricia Boyle for
three years was assumed by Rev. Kanamori in April 2009 as the Japanese Bible
Class. Almost all the participants continue to come and are seriously seeking the
truth in the Bible. We ask your prayer for those seekers.
➢ There is a Bible Class especially prepared for seekers and beginners that
are held irregularly.
➢ We need your prayer for our evangelistic service on the fourth Sabbath of
the month.
➢ There is a plan to hold the 25th Anniversary this coming autumn, inviting
Rev. & Mrs. Gene Spear, by having a special evangelistic service and gatherings.
We humbly ask your prayer for the Lord’s blessing upon those activities.
Kita-Suzurandai RP Mission Church
(Rev. Katsunori Endo, pastor
[domestic missionary])
➢ We are so grateful to the Lord that there are kids and toddlers in our
small mission station. Our prayer is that we will humbly and wisely raise them as
covenant children.
➢ Rev. Endo and Mrs. Endo (Yuko) have been involved in a local (public)
elementary school’s English activities as well as PTA. We seek your prayer as we
endeavor to develop contacts with the local residents. (We thankfully recollect the
presence and the assistance of Mr. Rory Cerbus between 2008 and 2009.)
Katsunori Endo, Clerk
67
Report of the Midwest Presbytery
Fathers & Brothers: The MWP met twice since the Synod of 2009: August in
Oklahoma to ordain and install Pastor Noah Bailey, and at Sterling for our annual
Fall meeting, coinciding with the installation of Rev. Joel Wood. Soon, with the
addition of Rev. Brad Johnston at Topeka RPC (D.V.), we anticipate having only
one pulpit vacancy—at Minneola; even there we enjoy the “supply” of Rev. Dan
Bartel.
People: With the wider church, we find ourselves “missing” Bob Tweed and
J. Ren Wright, though they were not officially “with” MWP. In one way, we did
“lose” ruling elders Waldo McBurney, Bob McCrory, & Paul McElhinney—all
now better off, by far. Not too long ago we were gladdened by the addition of
Rev. Jonathan Leach to our ministerial roll, even though Jonathan was living far
to the south of all of us (in San Antonio, Texas); the wider church is surely aware
of the debilitating effects of Jonathan’s stroke. Join us in praying for him, his wife
Mary Lou, and our brotherly response. Pray too for Rev. Stan Copeland, serving
with the U. S. Army in Germany, after we released him from his Minneola call
(09/2009). We are pleased to participate with the progress-toward-ministry of
“students” Patrick Stefan, Rob Wieland, Jonathan Haney, and Rob Haynes (all
now certified to preach). We have seven “students under care.” At these meetings
of Synod (D.V.), we will make progress in a renewed relationship with Rev. Joe
Paul, who worships with us in Shawnee. We rejoice over the part we played in
preparing Ryan Hemphill for pastoral service at Seattle RPC, and will pray for
Lucas Hanna in his plans to serve Meadville RPC as pastor. Joel Wood and Noah
Bailey joined their strengths with ours in the past year. Overall, what can we say? We have asked the “Lord of the harvest” to provide laborers, and He is sending
some to/through us. Former Washington RPC pastor Ron Nickerson died on May
7 after suffering a severe fall at his home. Ron and wife lived in Cedar Rapids. Remember to pray for Ron’s former wife Lorna Olson and 4 daughters.
Planting: We are happy to report steady blessed progress in Laramie, Enid,
and Manhattan. Laramie was officially organized as a mission church in late
January of 2010; Enid was organized earlier that month. Manhattan continues
with their Sabbath evening worship services, midweek studies, outreach activities
(like community canvassing), and searching for a church-planter. All of this
is “Soli Deo Gloria” but God makes mighty use of means, so we are pleased
with His use of diligent workmen, who have no need to be ashamed … like Bob
Hemphill & Noah Bailey; the Stewart Family (hub of the ministry in Manhattan);
busy sessions and commissions; support congregations like Stillwater, the “Front
Range” congregations, and Hebron; and Bob McFarland, our Regional Home
Missionary stirring attention two months per year.
Projects: As one of the widespread presbyteries, summer camps are
important aspects of fellowship. On the “western” edge, we look forward to
annual gatherings at Horn Creek; this July 17-24 we seek to be encouraged by Rut
Etheridge on the theme: “Christ Our Cornerstone: The Church Moving Forward
by Standing Firm.” On the “eastern” edge, the Iowa Family Camp meets from
68
August 1-5 and will learn from Bob Hemphill about “The Christian Family.” Our Camp Curry property is well-kept, but we have a committee looking into its
further development; an annual post-Synod worship service is well attended. The
MWP youth have been enjoying quarterly gatherings/retreats for years, but lately
the attendance has grown from 25 to 55. These weekend meetings encourage
each host church, and we trust they will seal all of us in Christian fellowship for
generations to come. Keith & Jill Mann work hard with a youth leadership team
to make these times edifying and enjoyable. Sterling RPC’s new tradition is an
annual gathering for men called “Lord of Life & Links”; one need not be a golfer
or a Midwesterner to benefit!
Plans: Still in our first cycle of presbytery visits (by three-elder teams) after
a dozen years off, the three congregations to be encouraged in 2010 are Quinter,
Salt & Light (Longmont), and Sharon (Morning Sun). Hosting our annual Fall
meeting of the MWP elders in 2010 are Washington and Sharon (Iowa) together;
Colorado Springs will host in 2011. Of interest to the wider church, with regard to
conversations about presbytery realignment with the Pacific Coast Presbytery,
the MWP voted to establish a three-member committee to join with representatives
of the PCP, “to investigate opportunities to work together.”
Points to Ponder: A perusal of our annual statistical summary reveals these
facts: As MWP, in the year of 2009, we experienced a net gain of thirty members
(a not-to-be-despised growth rate of 2.5%). Worship attendance stood at 78% of
our membership; how much more encouraging would it be to have attendance
greater than membership?! 74% of members of the MWP congregations are
communicants, so 26% are on baptized rolls. Of our 17 congregations, 11
experienced net membership growth in 2009 (from one new member to 13). In
a tough economy, Total Contributions increased from 2008 to 2009—$1,805,000
to $1,868,000—a 3.5% increase; we enjoyed the same percentage increase in
Total Receipts. 10 of 17 congregations experienced increased Total Receipts. For the first time (?), total MWP giving to R. P. Missions & Ministries surpassed
$100,000. If we add in giving to other Reformed Presby. works, that total was
almost $220,000. That said, 13 churches had to dig into balances-on-hand in the
year.
Christ Covenant (Lawrence, KS) RPC is pleased with the recent addition
of new families the Lord led to us through the internet (4 adults, 5 children). This influx has us thinking “expansive” thoughts about our facility and overall
ministry. We are asking God to bless us with an effective VBS ministry in midJune, that we may express love for our own children and spark ministry to new
friends. Members are eager to serve Christ with local evangelical organizations
helping students, internationals, babies, etc. We thank the Lord for forty years
of “life” since our official beginning on July 1 of 1970. Without dishonoring our
faithful past, we plead with King Jesus for even greater fruit in the next generation
of our service to Him.
The Clarinda (Iowa) congregation is thankful for God’s goodness poured
out in the past year. God has given us 5 more communicant members (one by
69
prof. of faith, 4 received by letter). We have enjoyed looking at Paul’s example
in Acts as we seek to reach the lost. We continue to reach out to the Japanese
through an English Bible class. A neighborhood Bible study continues to minister
to the community and build friendships. We were blessed with five students
who help us greatly reach out through the VBS; many children who attended
VBS were without a church. The congregation hosted many activities to serve
our community. Charles taught his math class and hosted a fishing party at his
pond. We had a bonfire, hayride, & three Psalm sings. We were saddened when
our newest baptized member died with cancer this year, but rejoice to know he is
with his Lord. The congregation enjoyed studying together through many of the
epistles on Sabbath evenings. We have also enjoyed fellowship activities almost
every month. Please pray that God will open hearts to the Word of truth in the
Clarinda area.
Denison (Kansas) RPC hosted one of the quarterly gatherings of the MWP
youth, enjoying their presence and the opportunity to minister to them. 3 of
Denison’s own youth graduate from high school in 2010; join in praying about
plans for further education. The church is progressing in use of the new psalter. Significant health concerns for several members weigh heavily upon the members.
Enid Reformed Mission Church (Oklahoma) enjoyed a year of
beginnings. Pastor Noah Bailey and his family arrived the last week in
May. After a summer of settling in, including an ordination and installation
service for Pastor Bailey in August, morning worship began with the first
Lord’s Day in September. The core group grew, both in numbers and in love
for one another. Currently, one man is being prepared for the office of elder. So
far, evangelistic efforts have focused primarily on informal, interpersonal
conversations, but pray for us as we seek to increase our formal, evangelistic
activities. Also, rejoice with us as we were officially organized as a mission
church on the first day of 2010.
Hebron (Clay Center, KS) is active, ministering to visitors from nearby
and long-distance. The church hosts a “Mothers of Pre-Schoolers” group for
members & neighbors, and participates in a ministry to international students at
Kansas State University. A young member reaches out through C.E.F. clubs,
and an older member serves Christ through the Gideons. The entire church works
hard on behalf of many KSU students who worship in Clay Center in the morning
and in Manhattan at night. Pastor Ron Graham and his wife Gay are very busy
with the church, and also in the care of their elderly parents.
Laramie (WY): In July of 2009, the HMB put us on their program of reducing
aid, to last for six years. This extra funding allowed Pastor Bob Hemphill to
stop most outside employment to focus more on the work of the church. On
1/31/2010, a commission organized Laramie R. P. Fellowship as a mission church
and appointed a provisional session to oversee the work. 19 adults and children
became members. Regular activities include Sabbath worship, a bi-weekly meal
and class on the WCF, Thursday night young adult suppers, monthly Sabbath
evening Psalm sing / prayer time, Kids Hours, Fireside Chats, and a monthly
70
Men’s Breakfast. The mission church hosted a group of students from Purdue (IN)
University for Spring Break (March of 2010). In the Summer of 2010 we must
work at increasing our visibility in the community and continuing to seek new
attendees. There has never been a congregation of the RPCNA in Wyoming, but
it is hoped that the one developing in Laramie will be the first of others to come.
Manhattan (KS) is not a congregation or mission church, but an outreach
of the MWP through an active commission which has met monthly for several
years. At the present time, the Manhattan Fellowship is made up of the Mike
Stewart family and 15 mature and energetic Kansas State University students
under the Commission’s oversight, supported by N.E. Kansas elders and
congregations. Sabbath evening worship services are held at the Stewart home
and twice monthly at a hotel. Preaching is supplied by a rotation of N.E. Kansas
pastors; an RE representing the Commission is present. 20-25 attend. A majority
of the students travel to nearby Hebron RPC for morning worship. Annual
expenses are about $10,000. The Commission seeks to call an on-site leader
whose initial responsibility will focus on student ministry, with a goal to use this
as a platform for planting an RPCNA church. A cooperative relationship with
Hebron RPC would be planned to provide appropriate mentoring and support for
this on-site leader.
Minneola (KS) RPC is thankful for God’s continued faithfulness & provision. Our worship and fellowship times together have been times of blessing to
everyone. The past year has brought challenges to the congregation, yet God in
His faithfulness has guided through the course. We have had three families leave
or move (for various reasons) besides our pastor being called back to active duty
as army chaplain. The process of finding our next pastor was worked out by God. Men were willing to come and minister here and we are grateful for their pastoral
concerns. Please pray that our small number will continue to have strength and
boldness for the ministry in Minneola. Men of the congregation have participated
in the study group “Revival on the Great Plains” and have been encouraged in
that study / fellowship time. [Stan Copeland is a family life chaplain stationed in
Germany. This allows Stan & Marilyn to be closer to some of their children &
grandchildren, while Stan counsels many traumatized families, “the highlight of
my life and Army career. … Pray for grace and wisdom while reintegrating into
a resource-poor but opportunity-rich ministry environment.” Stan hosts many
retreats and seminars for Army families.]
Quinter (KS) RPC models faithfulness to congregations and sessions with
more apparent advantages. The small flock gathers for worship twice each
Sabbath, and for prayer 1-2 times midweek. They also work hard to serve their
community. The elders add strength to the western Kansas “reforming” group,
“Revival on the Great Plains.” Quinter’s building turns 100 this month, but got
a much-needed facelift (and more) at 99. Elder emeritus Waldo McBurney saw
Jesus’ face for the first time on July 8 of 2009.
Salt & Light (Longmont, CO) RPC reports God’s continued blessings among
its membership amidst the realities of living in a fallen world. We are thankful for
71
the spirit of love and unity in the congregation and the opportunities God is giving
us to reach out to others. We pray these will continue to bear fruit. We seek God’s
direction in a mid-May elder / deacon election, and pray that we can share with
Synod the election of new officers God calls to service. We anticipate hosting
the MWP’s summer youth retreat in early June. We’re thankful for completion
of major landscape renovations to the church grounds. We seek prayer that Bible
story publication work among Hutterites of the U.S. and Canada (in which Dick
and Susan Mueller of our congregation are actively involved) will continue to
move forward and have great impact. We are updating and improving our web
site; look us up: www.longmontrpchurch.org!
Sharon (Morning Sun, IA) RPC has an outreach study continuing in the larger
community of Burlington, while the ladies of the church draw an ample crowd for
Bible study in Morning Sun. Their mature VBS serves 50 children, many not
from the congregation. God called to Himself Paul D. McElhinney, elder for
nearly 40 years; he will be missed. RE John Smith retired after 45 years as a
comm. college instructor. Pray for us as we continue to “gray” - yet maintain a
faithful witness in this part of the Midwest. Pastor Ron Good entered the presence
of Christ Jesus on June 3, 2010; pray for Ginny and the church.
Shawnee (KS) RPC has seen God’s blessing in 2009. The Lord continues to
bring new children, and some new families. We continue trying to effectively
reach out to our surrounding communities, and to build the saints. This past year
we held a VBS, community Bible studies, “The Truth Project,” and an ESL class. We continue asking the Lord to use us to see churches planted in the greater KCarea. Two members are ministerial “students under care” of MWP. The Session
works to bring theology and history courses to members as well. Monthly prayer
meetings are held specifically for outreach and revitalization, while other petitions
are voiced weekly. Amelia Ward will marry Kihei Takiura, then move to Japan. The congregation rejoices in the good ministry of Assoc. Pastor Lucas Hanna over
the past 3 years, and prays for God’s blessing on him and his family as he takes up
the charge in the Meadville, PA RPC this summer.
Springs (CO) Reformed: In humble reliance on the grace our Lord provides,
we rejoice and are thankful for the many ways He blessed the Springs congregation
in 2009. We are grateful for the men God has added to the leadership of this
church: Elders Jim Ritchhart and Andy Leong, and Deacons Zack LaSavio,
Joe DeBenedittis, and Mark Chantler. The 2009 CO Springs Reformation Day
Conference we hosted in October was a success, well-attended and well-received
by all who were able to come; Dr. Carl Trueman’s lectures on Martin Luther
were challenging. We are thankful two of our young men (Robert Mann and Will
Pinson) were able to attend TFYP at RPTS in 2009; they returned with enthusiasm
and appreciation for the work of the ministry and our part of Christ’s church. We
are thankful for the addition of Jerry and Saundy Milroy, Joseph and Morgan
Friedly, Scott and Diane Marble and family, Andy Leong, and Rose McChesney
to our comm. membership rolls, transferring in. We rejoice God added 2 new
comm. members through profession of faith: Caylene Finnicum (a baptized
72
covenant child) and Cresta Adcock (formerly unbelieving wife of a member). We
pray God will allow and enable us to daughter another congregation in the vicinity
of Monument (CO) early in 2011; much of the preparatory work toward that end
must begin in 2010.
Sterling (Kansas) RPC’s year was highlighted by the arrival of Rev. Joel
Wood and family in July of 2009. The Session and pastor held a retreat to map out
ministry needs and plans to meet these needs. Blessings God is granting SRPC
include wonderful and sound Reformed theological preaching and a much more
visible presence for our church and the Reformed theology in our community. Rev. Wood focuses on ministry to college students and staff one day per week, and
has open doors to serve in the Bible dept. We continue outreach in Hutchinson
and our popular “Lord of Life & Links” golf and Bible study retreat, expanded in
2010 to include non-golfers, serving as MWP’s annual men’s retreat. We praise
God for the powerful relationship between the pastor & people of Sterling RPC! www.sterlingrpc.wordpress.com
Stillwater (OK) RPC, on August 30 of 2009, held a sending service for the
Enid Fellowship as they began weekly worship services. “It was time to send out
dear friends from our midst to a new beginning.” Stillwater RPC misses those
sent out but is excited to see God establishing a new daughter congregation. At the
same time, God is stirring up new ministry opportunities in Stillwater, including
outreach to international students, an active study on the Oklahoma State
University campus, and new efforts in mercy ministry. Pastor Bruce Parnell
concludes his Master of Theology degree through Reformed Theo. Seminary in
Orlando. Stillwater RPC’s Vacation Bible School draws 100 children, most of
whom are not in the congregation; YMCA facilities there and in Enid are ideal. Men and women meet often to pray.
Topeka rejoices in God’s provision for His people! After being without a
full-time pastor for nearly 2-½ years, the congregation met on 02/01/2010 to
conduct an election for a pastor. Pastor Brad Johnston (Walton, NY RPC) was
subsequently called, and in mid-April he indicated his intention to accept the call. He anticipates relocating with his family to Topeka this summer. The congregation
is grateful for the service of interim pastors Robert McFarland and John Tweed
who have served tirelessly & also moderated meetings of session during this time. The congregation remains busy in the work of the Kingdom while we await Pastor
Johnston’s arrival. Planning is underway for the annual VBS, members are being
encouraged to attend summer camps, and several youth look forward to shortterm mission trips or attending TFYP at the seminary. The elders continue to
encourage the spiritual growth of the members. Regular visitation continues, two
new deacons were elected early in 2010, and four new communicant members
have been received by transfer, plus one by profession of faith this Spring. A
church info class is taught by rotation of elders, with expectation of adding a
family to the church roll at its conclusion. The congregation is encouraged by
God’s faithfulness to answer prayers. We eagerly look forward to the arrival of
the Johnston family to Topeka, and the opportunity to introduce them to the MWP!
73
Trinity Reformed (Wichita, KS) enjoyed visits from a number of international
missionaries and were encouraged about outreach endeavors in the presbytery. One ruling elder came back into active service after a sabbatical, while another
resigned his office. Pastor Adam King has settled into the life of the congregation
and presbytery, and serves as chairman of our MWP’s Ad Interim Commission. Occasional gatherings with our Sterling congregation encourage both flocks and
the community of Hutchinson.
Washington (IA) RPC works hard with Faith Keepers (a children’s club during
school year), care-center services, Bible studies, church socials, WMF meetings,
prayer meetings, Psalms sings with Sharon RPC in summer months, Iowa Camp
leadership, and participation in a new Right to Life chapter. Pastor Monger must
continue to work part-time outside the church, but finds opportunities even there
to serve seniors. The congregation has struggled financially due to departures
and retirements; ask God to provide richly. Pastor Monger will transfer to the
Presbytery of the Alleghenies on July 15.
Westminster (CO) RPC is pleased with the completion of one year with Rev.
Shane Sapp as their pastor. Lately Shane has been preaching from the Gospel
of John; previously Shane preached on the Songs of Ascents and other themes,
all available on SermonAudio. Four new families have joined in the past year. Elder John Duke serves the MWP through his role on the Board of Directors
for Horn Creek Conference. John believes that the Horn Creek board and staff
are functioning at a high business and spiritual level. They have made many
financial, management, and operational improvements since the restructuring.
In our Winchester (KS) report to the 2009 Synod, we concluded requesting:
“Join us in praying for … additional younger families to provide encouragement
for the present & hope for the future.” During the latter part of 2009, we saw God’s
provision in answering this prayer as two families from neighboring communities
(one with 3, and the other with 4, children) began attending our morning worship
services. Pray that both families will become increasingly enfolded in the life
of the church. Though we have a number of older members, we are thankful
for God’s protective mercies in the past year, allowing the active participation
of most. Pray for our 2 young men from the congregation presently attending
RPTS, and for seven additional youth involved in higher education. In these
difficult economic times, we give thanks for God’s continuing provision for the
congregation’s ministry through the gifts of His people.
MWP Clerk John M. McFarland
Report of the Pacific Coast Presbytery
The Pacific Coast Presbytery is thankful to the Lord Jesus Christ in the
providing of the gift of Office Bearers. The Los Angeles congregation began its
relationship with Pastor Nathan Eshelman at the beginning of 2009 and the Seattle
congregation began its relationship with Pastor Ryan Hemphill at the end of 2009.
74
And many good and God glorifying occasions fill the time in-between.
The Presbytery Family Conference was held at The Firs Conference grounds
in Bellingham, WA, in July of 2009. Pastor Bob Hemphill (Laramie, WY) was the
conference speaker.
Mark England was elected Moderator of Presbytery for 2010. Nathan Eshelman
was elected clerk. Aaron Piper continues to serve as the Presbytery’s Treasurer.
Each congregation has adopted the Book of Psalms for Worship for the regular
book of praise and is enjoying the incorporation of new tunes and settings into
the worship services. Each pastor’s sermons are also able to be heard on www.
ReformedVoice.org.
Fresno: The Fresno congregation experienced some losses this year with
a few families moving out of state as well as in the death of Ruling Elder
Norman Goehring. The congregation is thankful to the Lord for His continued
faithfulness to them despite these losses. In November the congregation held
its annual “Wawona” retreat which was well attended by members, friends of
the congregation, as well as some from other churches in the Presbytery. The
congregation continues to enjoy monthly lunches, psalms sings, and the occasional
evening worship in member’s homes. Pastor McCracken’s SermonAudio sermons
have seen a good number of downloads.
Los Angeles: Los Angeles has been enjoying their relationship with their new
pastor and his family. Nathan Eshelman began his ministry in January of 2009.
Two ruling elders were elected and installed during the year: Howard Huizing
and David Ashleigh. One deacon was added to the Deaconate; Joel Chairez was
ordained and installed and adds new hands and heart to the deaconal ministry. The
congregation met for a “Ministry Planning Day” in April. Nathan Pino, son of
Elder Hector Pino, experienced great blessing by attending the TFY program. The
congregation experienced the final passing of a generation of office-bearers with
the deaths of Dr. Francis Buck, elder emeritus, and retired deacons Donald Walker
and Wilbur Aikin. Elder Hector Pino was able to enjoy a 6-month sabbatical from
the Session. The congregation continues to serve faithfully in the City of Angels
and prayerfully looks forward to the growth of the Church under the smiles of
God.
First Reformed Presbyterian Church (Phoenix): Phoenix has experienced
the blessing of a number of new adherents to the weekly Sabbath worship times.
This comes as a great blessing after a season of financial trial. Pastor Jon Maginn
has been preaching through the Book of Job and the congregation has been
blessed by his faithful preaching. The congregation hosted an RP Missions team
which was a great boon to the ministry there. The congregation continues to host
monthly psalm sings. The annual “Phoenix camp out” was a great success. The
women’s fellowship remains active. The “newly minted” Deaconate has been a
great help to the ministry in Phoenix.
San Diego: Mark England continues to serve faithfully in San Diego. The
congregation has presbytery appointed provisional elders (Jon Maginn, clerk;
Nathan Eshelman) and no Diaconate at this time. This is a great matter of prayer
75
set before you. Pastor England has been preaching through John’s Gospel as well
as the Psalms. The congregation meets for morning and evening worship and has
a midweek prayer meeting. The congregation hosted an RP Missions team this
year. A monthly joint worship service is held with another Reformed body. The
Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper is administered monthly. In the absence of ruling
elders and deacons, the congregation is quite faithful in volunteering for various
tasks in and around the church.
Seattle: Seattle gives thanks to God for His faithfulness in bringing Pastor
Ryan Hemphill and his family to labor in the Pacific Northwest. Ryan was ordained
and installed in December of 2009. Prior to Ryan’s coming, the congregation’s
pulpit was faithfully filled each Lord’s Day by a number of men from various
Reformed denominations as well as from the RPCNA. The congregation partook
of the Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper 6 times during the year. The Mission in
Sudan was a focus of much of the giving this year. Seattle is thankful for the Lord
“doing abundantly more than we are able to ask or think... according to the power
of Jesus Christ!”
Respectfully Submitted,
Nathan Eshelman
Pacific Coast Presbytery Clerk
Report of St. Lawrence Presbytery
The St. Lawrence Presbytery has met twice since the last meeting of Synod.
We currently have six men under our care. Three are eligible for a pastoral call;
Mark Goerner (Christ Church) and Greg Alexander (Russell) have been eligible
for several years now, and Steve Zink (Ottawa) was licensed for a pastoral
call at our April 2010 meeting. Scott Doherty (Fulton) has completed his first
year at RPTS. Various persons are being trained under the auspices of Ottawa
Theological Hall. Two other men have been received as students under our care.
Jason Keuning (New Creation), a former student of Puritan Reformed Seminary,
is anticipating evangelistic ministry in Kitchener, Ont., and Bob Hackett (Shelter
Church) is anticipating examination for ordination.
This leads us to note the great blessing this presbytery has had in receiving
the Shelter Reformed Church (Edmonton, Alberta) into our Presbytery. After a
little more than a year of discussion, meetings, and plans, the Presbytery voted in
the fall of 2009 to receive this congregation into the St. Lawrence Presbytery. It
formerly was affiliated with the Associated Presbyterian Churches. A commission
of Presbytery met in Edmonton April 16-19, 2010 to receive the congregation.
And it was a great blessing of God! The congregation is earnest in its commitment
to Christ, the gospel ministry and worship, each other, and to see their neighbors
brought to Christ. Bob Hackett and Kevin Neumann continue to serve as the
congregation’s ruling elders. Bob, having been a licentiate to preach, was taken
under care of the St. Lawrence Presbytery at its April 2010 meeting, and is
essentially shepherding the congregation as he was previously. The congregation
76
applied to the St. Lawrence Presbytery, and not one nearer, for the purpose of
Canadian identification. We view this, in part, as God’s answer to long-standing
prayers and initial plans of developing a distinct, Canadian Presbytery.
The following are brief summaries from our congregations’ review of 2009 to
early 2010. They give a fuller picture of life in the St. Lawrence Presbytery.
Christian Heritage: Christian Heritage Mission Church has seen a lot of
changes this past year. The Pastor’s mother went to be with the Lord, Pastor Arthur
Fawthrop has been suffering with a chronic balance and dizziness condition since
the end of August, and one of our members has been diagnosed with Parkinson’s
disease. How thankful we are that amid all our changes, we serve a God who is
“the same yesterday and today and forever.” (Hebrews 13:8)
For all of those who have been praying for us, encouraging us, and financially
supporting us, we are grateful. We thank God for our faithful provisional elder
Bruce Henderson and provisional deacon Renwick Russell. They have been a true
help and support. We are also very appreciative of Deacon Andy Curran’s help
and prayer support. We thank the Lord for the safe delivery of another covenant
child born to Cory and Wendy Valentine, Asher James. We now have as many
children as adults.
March 28, 2010 was our last Sunday to meet at the Boys and Girls Club of
Western Broome. Starting with the first Sunday of April, we will be renting space
in the Endicott Methodist Church, 53 McKinley Avenue, Endicott, NY. We will
have access to their chapel, kitchen, and adjacent room for Sabbath school classes.
We have two of our men taking officer training classes and we trust the Lord will
bless us with the status of a fully established church in the near future.
We continue to search for God’s man to replace Pastor Arthur Fawthrop so he
will be able to retire. Any suggestions as to who may be interested in our work
here would be appreciated. We also covet your continued prayers for the Lord to
bless and increase the work in Endicott, NY, for His glory and the extension of His
Kingdom and the destruction of the kingdom of the evil one.
Crown & Covenant: The past year has brought both satisfactions and
disappointments into the life of Crown and Covenant. We have understood the first
requirement of our mission to be maintaining the pure worship of God in Owego and
the surrounding area. God enabled us to keep the doors open. The members have been
faithful in their attendance and no meeting needed to be canceled because of a storm.
Some members have been called away by economic necessity while several former
members have been able to return. A worship service with preaching of the Word
is held each Sunday morning with Elder Harrington preaching. We are grateful for
men in the presbytery who come to us when Elder Harrington needs to be elsewhere.
After lunch together a second service is held usually led by Elder Hockenberry.
Commonly there is a brief Bible study. The primary activity is far-reaching prayer
for ourselves and others. Often there is exchange of thoughts on the work of the
congregation. Many of Mr. Harrington’s sermons are available on Sermon Audio.
We are gratified by the number which have been heard and downloaded.
Perhaps the highlight of the past year and a source of much satisfaction to us
77
is the completion of our program of repair, improvement, precaution required by
standing in a flood plain. We believe that should a flood occur we could recover
quickly and hold services again in a week or two. Of course we are happy that so
far the floods have been held back. God has blessed us. Also we are very grateful
for the generous help of presbytery and synod as well as the sacrificial giving of
our members.
Planning for our future ministry, presently we are persuaded that a tentmaking pastor is the practical solution to meet our need for pastoral services.
Elder Harrington lives over fifty miles from the village and nearly all members.
His energy and health are in decline. The Session has pursued every lead which
has come to its attention and advertised in the church paper. We have had no
encouragement in this pursuit. Pray for us.
Fulton: The Fulton Congregation continues to give thanks for the Lord’s
sustaining grace in the ministry of the gospel in this part of his vineyard. Session
continues to enjoy harmonious deliberations in our regular meetings as we weigh
the matters confronting Christ’s church.
Our two faithful Elders continue to carry on the work of the ministry with
faithful diligence. Elder Don Pastor continues in his study of the Psalms,
presiding over the worship service while explaining the Psalms as they relate to
the sermons. Our deacon board has been very wise and conscientious in preparing
and implementing our budget and making the best use of our tithes, offerings and
alms. The deacons continue to coordinate their hard work with the direction and
leadership of the Session. Our deacons serve the congregation responsibly and the
Pastor’s needs with great wisdom.
Pastor Iamaio is currently preaching an expository sermon series from the book
of Acts during the morning worship hour. He also continues to teach the Sabbath
school classes on the Westminster Confession of Faith using The Reformed
Confessions as the textbook, as well as teaching through Wayne Mack’s book “To
Be or Not To Be a Church Member.” Pastor Iamaio is also engaged in teaching in
the Theological Hall and theological studies on “The Person and work of Christ”
every Wednesday evening at 6:00 p.m. for 1 hour, as well as teaching through the
book of Samuel during Bible study, also on Wednesday evenings.
The Congregation continues to enjoy harmonious fellowship as they spend time
together after worship, and in prayer for each other’s needs. The Congregation is
sensitive to be watchful for providential ways to evangelize the city of Fulton and
the surrounding communities. We give thanks for the body of believers here who
are continually growing in maturity in Christ Jesus (Eph. 4:13-16). We continue
to give thanks to the Lord for those generous churches and individuals who have
supported the Fulton ministry over the years.
We ask prayer for: 1) Faithfulness to biblical evangelism and outreach in
the community, 2) Wisdom in discerning wolves in sheep’s clothing who would
harm Christ’s sheep, 3) Faithfulness in preaching the full counsel of God, 4)
Faithfulness in administering the Sacraments, 5) Scott Doherty as his studies
continue at RPTS.
78
Hudson - St. Lazare: The Hudson/Saint Lazare Church has had an emotional
year. There have been godly tears of sorrow mingled with godly tears of joy.
Last summer, Asher Dodenhoff came to the end of his long-standing battle with
cancer—touching many hearts in the last month of his passing. In the late fall we
had two couples engaged to be married but, sadly for one of the couples, the man
was not who he claimed to be and the wedding was called off. It has been a long,
difficult time dealing with the aftermath of this wolf-among-sheep’s presence in
the church. Yet we rejoice that, Lord willing, the other couple will be married
just before Synod. There have been some significant issues with our older young
people and with tears of sadness we continue to wait on the Lord’s mercy for
repentance and salvation to come to hard hearts. We rejoice that our junior high
youth are engaging in our young people’s meetings as we focus on the themes of
personal convictions, self control, and respectful obedience.
This winter/ spring Pastor Miller has been focusing on the book of James as we
face trials of many kinds. These trials have been for the testing of the genuineness
of the faith of God’s people. We pray for wisdom that we will be made mature and
complete—not lacking anything. We have prayerful concern for some members
who do not hold to the doctrines of grace—total depravity, predestination, and
the electing love and judgment of God. We rejoice in the renewed attendance of
a family who had dropped their membership from the church more than three
years ago. We grieve over unreconciled differences between various members and
families. We have seen God’s blessing in an infant baptism as well as a profession
of faith and baptism of a young man who was with us for a year and has since
returned home to Alberta.
In April we rejoiced in the ordination and installation of Victor Tochijara as
deacon. We continue to have regular church information classes and expect to
have added more communicant members to our numbers in May. The province of
Quebec, ever more vigilant in demanding tolerance for all, moves ever closer to
enforcing those demands on private schools and homeschoolers. So with mingled
tears of godly joy and sorrow ‘we know that in all things God works for the good
of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose.’
Lisbon: The Lisbon RPC continues to give thanks for the blessings of God’s
grace in our lives. During challenging economic times we are especially grateful
for the Lord’s provision and blessing upon us as He continues to show us ways
to minister to the needs of those in our community. The Lord continues to bless
our small group bible studies, mercy ministry, and our worship and fellowship
on the Lord’s Day. In 2009 Pastor Rockhill preached through Paul’s letters to the
Thessalonians challenging us to keep pressing on in doing what God in Christ
has called us to do as we await with great hope and anticipation the Lord’s return.
In 2010 we are turning our attention to the Gospel of Luke. In the PM services
we have been doing a study of the Heidelberg Catechism. The Lord has many
changes in store for the Lisbon RPC in 2010 as we will be losing several families
who are moving away for various reasons. Please pray for us that the Lord would
encourage us during this time of transition and that He would raise up other
79
families and individuals who are committed to seeing the Gospel spread across
New York’s North Country.
Messiah’s Church: The body of Christ that meets weekly for worship at
Messiah’s Church in Clay, NY, continues to grow in love for one another and for
our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. Our growth in numbers reached a plateau in
2009 with no new members and the sad farewell to our friends from South Korea,
the Lee family who had to return to their homeland as Tae Hee’s student status in
the US had reached its conclusion.
Pastor Coombs and family moved to a new larger home in the summer to
better accommodate their growing family. For our instruction in righteousness
in morning worship Pastor Coombs completed his study series in the book of
Jonah. He followed it up in the fall with a series in the book of the prophet Nahum
continuing to show us the history of God’s dealings with the city of Nineveh and
its inhabitants a generation or two after the time of Jonah. Pastor Coombs began
toward the end of the year a study in the book of Philemon. During evening worship
he has continued to preach on the subject of Biblical Christian Worship. Weekly
Bible studies in the Sermon on the Mount the past 2 years have taken place with a
good attendance mid week and concluded last month. Sabbath school classes for
adult and children have continued each week after morning worship punctuated by
our monthly fellowship lunch on the second Lord’s Day of the month.
The deacon board of the church is active with property improvements as
well as seeking out ways to offer assistance and service. Our new building had
some roof repairs accomplished during the year and the deacon board is currently
seeking to improve the interior of the facility. At our congregational meeting in
November there was concern expressed by several members of the congregation
about whether or not we would experience a budget shortfall before the year end.
The deacon board was happy to announce during the last week in December that
our shortfall had been met giving us all ample evidence of our Lord’s blessing on
the work He has established in this place.
New Creation: It was a busy year at New Creation RPC. A new family took
their vows of membership in February. Pastor Wilkinson, having been assigned
to a commission to oversee the integration of Shelter Reformed Church into the
denomination, traveled to Alberta to visit that congregation. A young people’s
conference was held, with 27 single young men and women attending to hear
teaching by Rev. Henry Bartsch (Pastor of Trinity ARP, Chatham, Ontario)
concerning the will of God. Several forms of evangelistic outreach were carried
out: Pastor Wilkinson participated in a debate at Laurier University. One of
the young men held a soccer clinic for the young children in the neighborhood
leading to new faces at our monthly kids club meeting. Every Thursday evening,
Jason Keuning and Pastor Wilkinson have carried out street evangelism in the
downtown Kitchener area. Vince and Julie Ward also visited the congregation
where they presented their work, as well as their needs in Sudan.
Oswego: We begin with thanksgiving to God for His protections and
provisions for us through another year. Worship was conducted each Lord’s Day,
80
with morning and evening services. We celebrated the Lord’s Supper on the
average of three times per month. Sabbath School classes were provided for the
children and Adults and are now under the oversight of Elder John O’Brien. It
continues to be the burden of the Session that the Sabbath School Program for
our children is so designed that during their formative years they are educated in
Bible, Church History and Biblical & Systematic Theology. The elders are also
desirous of providing timely instruction for covenant children so that they are
prepared for communicant membership. Within the last year, Pastor Swartz has
taught and preached through the Book of Judges and Ruth. At the beginning of
this year, we began a study & preaching series through the Book of Esther. On
the second Lord’s Day each month, the Pastor preaches on an essential of the
Christian Faith, using the major headings of the Confession as a guideline. We
were pleased to provide two scholarship awards to local high school students who
participated in the 2009 Psalm Tune Scholarship Award program. This program
provides an opportunity for high school music students to submit an original vocal
composition for a selected Psalm text, including dynamics, tempo and name of
tune. The submission is judged and awards granted for the best composition and
runner up. Pressing needs within and outside the congregation are provided for
through a very dedicated Deaconate.
Rochester: The Rochester Session gives thanks to God for His merciful
care this past year. We have been blessed with the provision of a variety of
preachers to proclaim God’s Word to our congregation. Rev. Anthony Selvaggio
and Rev. William Pihl provide about half of the preaching, with visiting pastors
and students providing the rest. Rev. Selvaggio is leading a study through the
Minor Prophets in the evenings when there isn’t a guest minister preaching –
this has been well received, and evening attendance has significantly increased
because of this. We celebrate the Lord’s Supper twice each month, and have been
blessed with the opportunity to baptize several infants born during the course of
the year (and look forward to 2 more baptisms later this year). We give thanks
for several families and individuals who regularly visit, and pray that God would
lead them to become members of the congregation. We also give thanks for the
upcoming wedding of Aaron Tabon and Katie Hannigan, and pray for God’s
blessing on this new Christian family. The Session is in the process of resuming
regular family visitations, and has called the congregation to meet on May 19 to
determine our readiness to actively begin the candidating process to seek a new
pastor. Please continue to pray for God’s blessing as we seek His will for the
ministry in Rochester. Please pray that God would continue to bring healing to
the body in Rochester and that any remaining issues from the past troubles would
be resolved in a God-honoring way—pray for the Session as we visit in the homes
that we would be able to discern any remaining issues and lead the people to a
God honoring solution to them. We rejoice in His marvelous grace!
Russell: The Lord Christ continues His faithful care and blessing of the
congregation in Russell. The peace and unity of the Spirit has been evident for
which we are very thankful. We continue to be blessed by the service of our two
81
ruling elders Ernst vanderMeer and Hank Vedder, and our deacons Jerry Herweyer
and Jeff MacDougall. We continue to have regular morning and evening worship
and the preaching of God’s Word along with monthly communion. Baptisms have
occurred as needed.
The congregation continues to grow together in the grace and knowledge
of Christ as well as growing in mutual support and ministry. Adult and youth
Sabbath school takes places after morning worship. Congregational catechesis
takes place before evening worship. A doctrine/membership class is also ongoing
every 3rd Lord’s day afternoon with about 15 youth and adults attending. Midweek meetings continue to include prayer meeting, a women’s study, a growing
and vibrant men’s study and fellowship, boys’ and girls’ group (ages 10-12),
youth group (13-18), and a new college & career group led by Greg and Melanie
Alexander.
Over the past year we have seen a noticeable increase in ministry in the
community and visitor/adherents attending worship regularly, several without
church backgrounds to speak of. Often significant needs in different areas come
along with these friends but this kind of front-line ministry we trust will be a
blessing to many and an encouragement to the saints to keep putting faith into
action.
Outside the bounds of the congregation, three of our members joined a mission
team from the Ottawa RPC to Costa Rica. Another encouraging relationship has
been fostered with several reformed congregations in Cuba through the efforts
and visits to that country of a married couple in the Russell congregation. Ties
with the ERQ (Reformed Church of Quebec) have been strengthened through a
Theology course at Farel Seminary in Montreal taught by Matt Kingswood this
past semester (Professor Ed Robson recently taught an intensive course at Farel
as well).
In terms of accommodations for Sabbath worship, etc., the Lord has graciously
provided another school in the community (with more space and better facilities).
A move was necessitated by the demolition of our previous place of worship (not
by us) last summer. The facilities continue to be provided to us rent-free. We
thank and praise God for his abundant care and provision. Our building committee
continues to work toward the purchase of a tract of land just north of Russell. The
process is in the application stage with local government bodies.
Please pray with us for members in the congregation mourning the loss of
loved ones, struggling with cancer and other physical battles, and for a couple
of our members who have not been attending faithfully for varied reasons. We
also ask prayer for our youth and young adults who are at the stage of important
decisions regarding education, callings, and marriage. We thank the Lord for the
presbytery’s faithful concern and support in many ways. We rejoice in being part
of the one, holy, catholic and apostolic Church, in this particular presbytery of
Christ’s body.
Syracuse: The Syracuse congregation has enjoyed a year of growth and
blessing. A part-time “Children’s Ministries Coordinator” was added to the staff.
82
Three new deacons were ordained in May, and it is hoped that new elders will be
elected soon. Members host an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting, and a weekly
Food Pantry provides an opportunity for connecting with the community.
Walton: The Walton RPC congregation has seen evidences of God’s blessing
this year as well as evidences on the ongoing fallenness of this present creation. This
past year Word and sacrament ministry were faithfully maintained. Pastor Brad
preached through 1 Samuel as well as a series on the Foundations, Disciplines, and
Blessing of Prayer. The congregation received two new communicant members
(+ two covenant children on the way!) and remained active in the local Released
Time program with 85 local elementary school students. One elder and one deacon
continue to serve in support of the Christian Heritage RPC in Endicott, NY. The
congregation is actively involved in fellowship activities. In April we received the
difficult news of our pastor’s acceptance of a call to serve at Topeka RPC. So pray
for us as we seek another pastor-teacher to lead us.
Brian E. Coombs, Clerk
James Faris reported for the Business of Synod the following
recommendation: That a special three-man judicial committee of the day
be appointed by the Moderator to determine the merits of the appeal and
complaint and to recommend any actions Synod may need to take.
Russell Pulliam presented the report of the Understanding the Times
Committee. The report was approved and is as follows:
Report of the Understanding the Times Committee, 2010 Synod
II Chronicles 12:32
We wanted to point out some broad and encouraging developments on
Christ’s Lordship over all areas of life, or His Kingship. We have seen an unusual
outpouring of Lordship efforts and opportunities that were not available 20 years
ago. Some examples:
1) World magazine, and the World Journalism Institute, have opened up a
new range of opportunities for believers to get training in an approach to news
coverage that recognizes Christ’s kingship and practice that kind of journalism.
2) Masterworks Music Festival provides a fellowship of believers committed
to the arts. They gather for a summer festival in Winona Lake, Indiana, where the
Reformed Presbyterian Church used to have synod meetings and conferences.
This ministry attracts top-notch musicians, actors and singers committed to
Christ’s Lordship over the arts. It is headed by Patrick Kavanaugh, whose books
include “Spiritual Lives of Great Composers.” A number of families in the Great
Lakes Gulf Presbytery have appreciated the opportunity to send their aspiring
artists to this summer ministry, which also sponsors student Bible studies in a
number of music schools around the country.
3) The Wedgewood Circle investment opportunities, a means for believers
83
to look for ways to invest in the culture through the entertainment media. This
organization is run by Mark Rodgers, an evangelical Christian who was a top
adviser to Sen. Rick Santorum.
4) The Second Half teaching of Bob Buford, a Texas businessman who
encourages people to find significance in the second half of their lives, often after
committing the first half to success. Many people who embrace this approach
seem to be searching for a kingdom approach to life, to make the second half of
life more consciously useful to Christ. Bob was a major cable TV entrepreneur
until he started giving all his time to help others in this ministry.
5) The Heartland Film Festival, also known as Truly Moving Pictures, has been
used for kingdom purposes in influencing Hollywood toward the good, true and
beautiful, along with Ted Baehr’s “Movieguide.” These are just two examples of
many efforts to bring the influence of Christ to bear on the entertainment industry.
They provide guidance for moviegoers and try to bring honor and awards to films
that reflect scriptural themes. A member of the Second Reformed Presbyterian
Church in Indianapolis, Guy Camara, strives for similar purposes with his Kingdom
Pictures ministry. Mr. Camara is a native of Rwanda and has ten children, some
of whom get to play parts in his films, including a pro-life one he made for a local
crisis pregnancy center. Hollywood has not been fully redeemed for the Kingdom
at this point, but a number of believers are working on it.
6) In Washington D.C. the informal “fellowship” ministry organization has
worked for many years with public officials, including the National Prayer
Breakfast. More recently, commentator Cal Thomas has opened a door of witness
for some of us in the news media, with an annual dinner before the breakfast.
Members of the news media are not permitted entry unless we bring at least one
unbelieving fellow journalist. Cal has demonstrated to the rest of us how to be
alert to sharing his faith graciously with his ideological and liberal opponents. He
befriended Bob Beckel (1984 Walter Mondale campaign) in a hard time in Bob’s
life a few years ago, eventually saw him come to Christ. Now he and Bob are
sparring partners in political debate.
7) The National Christian Foundation has encouraged the development of
generous giving, as well as a Jeremiah 29:7 sense of responsibility for our local
communities with state affiliated foundations.
8) Ken Myers brings Christ’s kingship to bear on literary and cultural issues
through his Mars Hill audio magazine. Ken’s reformed thinking comes through
his interviews in subtle ways, based on his background at National Public Radio
and some time as editor of the old Eternity magazine.
9) A number of public officials have stressed the importance of faith-based
initiatives as more effectiveness in addressing social problems than many
government programs. This idea is most identified with President George Bush
but has been embraced by President Obama in a different version. More than half
the nation’s governors have set up offices designed to work on this initiative as
well. Apart from political differences between the parties, there seems to be some
healthy recognition that faith in Christ is important in building the family, reducing
84
crime, helping people get free of addictions. In its best form, this idea reflects
the doctrine of Christ’s kingdom in Christ’s kingship over both church and state,
with different purposes for each. It also illustrates the church-state cooperation
set forth in the Scriptures and kingdom doctrine. What these government officials
have seen is the beneficial impact of ministries that change lives through Christ.
Examples include Teen Challenge, Prison Fellowship and the racial reconciliation
work of John Perkins in Mississippi. In other instances public officials have
seen how the breakdown of the family contributes to all kinds of social ills and
become very interested in doing what they can to reverse that breakdown, while
recognizing that the church, more than the state, can address the heart issues that
contribute to that breakdown.
10) Across our culture special needs children are often now treated as they are
made in the image of God, in contrast to how they were not in the mainstream as
much 50 years ago. Former Brooklyn Dodgers pitcher Carl Erskine has seen this
shift with his own son. He has Down Syndrome and went mainstream before it
was part of the culture. His son is now 50, working at a restaurant in Anderson,
Indiana. His father has been honored in Indiana as a baseball star, as a Christian
gentleman but also as a parent who has helped other parents learn to embrace their
special needs children as made in the image of God.
Tragically, at the other end of our culture, children with Down Syndrome are
aborted in the womb at an alarming rate, thanks to the legalization of abortion.
11) Theologically we see a continuing growth in interest in Calvinism and
reformed theology, to the point that “New Calvinism” was recognized by Time
magazine as one of ten ideas changing the world. Calvinists usually try to think
beyond the trendy notions celebrated in the news media, but being reformed
seems to be “cool” in some circles these days. Since World War II Banner of
Truth and several other book publishers have seen a substantial boost in interest
in Puritan and reformed books. At a broader cultural level is the perplexing idea of
post-modernism, which seems to open the door to Christian witness, in the sense
that the Christian message is tolerated as a subjective choice. Yet the post-modern
assumption shuts a door at the same time with the assumption that there are no
absolute or objective truths that everyone ought to be pursuing.
In Japan, one of our committee members Endo Katsunori reports to us on the
DPJ landslide victory in the general election, ending a half-century of dominance
by the LDP party. DPJ is less nationalistic than the LDP, which has tried to
revitalize state Shintoism. On the down side Katsunori says the new ruling party
has formed a coalition with the Socialist Party with its unfortunate emphasis on a
gender-free society.
Another trend we see in the United States is the fragmentation of the public
square. The Internet has led to a specialization in the public square. There are
many public squares now, more specialized and more accessible to those who
want to go to public spaces for the discussion of reformed theology; or the
doctrine of Christ’s kingdom; or the best three-point shooter in the NBA. Sermons
are available in a much wider way now. Facebook allows for reconnection to old
85
lost classmates and perhaps learn where they are spiritually.
The advantage of this multiplication of public forums is the capacity to pick
and choose to affiliate in discussion with people of similar interests. One can find
an audience of people who are passionately interested in a discussion of Christ’s
kingship over all areas of life. Or one can find an audience of people intensely
interested in the age of the earth. The disadvantage seems to be a loss of the broad
forum of discussion that Paul found in Athens.
About 20 years ago Ken Smith had a personal application to be more diligent
in sharing his faith with unbelievers. He made a deliberate effort to have more
friendships and relationships with people in need of the gospel. That kind of
application may be timely now in light of how the Internet can isolate people in
small groups less connected to the society we live in.
Russ Pulliam
Endo Katsunori
Zach Kail
Courtney Miller presented the report of the Graduate Study Committee.
The report as a whole was approved and is as follows:
Report Of The Graduate Study Committee
The committee has conducted business by e-mail. We remind you that this
committee is composed of two members whom you elect (one of whom is
chairman), the president of Geneva College, and the president of the Reformed
Presbyterian Theological Seminary. The policy statement that governs the
functioning of our committee is available at http://reformedpresbyterian.org/
images/documents/rpcna_grad_study_policy.pdf
Six people received financial aid in 2009: Tim Duguid, Zachary Kail, Bruce
Parnell, Sumito Sakai, David Smith, and C.J. Williams.
Applicants for graduate study funds should contact the chairman using the
e-mail address [email protected]. The annual deadlines for applying for
financial assistance are April 1 and September 1.
Courtney Miller
Alan Noell, Chairman
Jerry O’Neill
Kenneth A. Smith
David Whitla presented the report of the Youth Ministries Committee.
Item 1 was referred to the Committee on Finance. The report was approved
and is as follows:
86
Report of the Youth Ministries Committee of Synod
David Whitla, Synod Liaison
“For He established a testimony in Jacob, and appointed a law in Israel,
which He commanded our fathers, that they should make them known to their
children, that the generation to come might know them” (Ps.78:5-6).
The psalmist makes clear that training up the next generation in the covenant
is not optional—the “testimony” and “law” which God has entrusted to His
people He has “commanded” to be taught to their youth. Accordingly, the Youth
Ministries Committee of Synod continues to seek to encourage local congregations
and presbyteries in this vital work of “making known” God’s Word to the youth
entrusted to their care. The fruit of these labors, and those of parents, pastors and
youth leaders, is the raising up of a generation that will not only “know them” but
be driven by them to serve in lifelong discipleship to Christ within the RPCNA.
The YMCS’s objectives are:
1. To encourage and support the work of youth ministry throughout the Church
2. To provide opportunity for growth and development of youth ministry skills
3. To develop the theology and leadership of our youth
We have attempted to meet these objectives over the past year through the
following activities:
Our weekend planning retreat was held on November 18-19, 2009. It was a rich
blessing to hear the encouraging reports of what God is doing in each presbytery
among the youth, and to exchange practical ideas for activities and approaches to
youth ministry. There are many encouraging reports of a growing “seriousness”
about the Christian faith on the part of many of our young people, and in particular
a wish to be actively involved in the RPCNA, a commitment influencing their
choices of college destination, and upon graduation, one increasingly reflected in
their decisions about relationships and career locations.
One common cause of concern was the perennial need to encourage leadership
skills, in particular among our young men. To confront this issue, we plan to
sponsor the next Youth Leadership Training Seminar in the Atlantic and St.
Lawrence presbyteries in 2011 on the subject “The Approaching Leadership Crisis
in the Church”. Matt and Heidi Filbert led our previous Seminar for the Pacific
Coast Presbytery at its family conference last summer, offering an introduction
to the many opportunities that exist for fellowship with their far-flung fellow RP
young people.
Preparations are nearing completion for the Youth Leadership Conference
(YLC) to be hosted at Geneva College July 2-5. This event is planned every
four years and we very much appreciate whatever encouragement and financial
sponsorship local congregations can provide to attendees. James Faris will speak
on the topic, “Possess your Possession”, along with multiple seminar speakers
addressing a variety of subjects. We also plan to hold a presbytery youth
committee summit at YLC for young people actively involved in planning youth
events for their respective presbyteries. We trust this will foster a common sense
of purpose as well as a fruitful exchange of ideas.
87
YMCS continues to provide a supporting role in the Seminary’s Theological
Foundations for Youth (TFY) program. TFY continues to provide a unique blend of
intense theological training, thorough practical application in local congregational
settings and enduring friendship and fellowship among young people across the
denomination. This summer’s program runs June 28 – July 16, and to date we are
expecting 26 young people to attend.
The YMCS pays tribute to the many years of faithful service by long-standing
committee member, John Hanson. The Great-Lakes-Gulf presbytery has appointed
Ben Larson (Immanuel RPC) as its new representative, and we look forward to his
contribution in the years to come. We also note that the St. Lawrence presbytery
continues to lack a representative on the committee and we would love to receive
the input and encouragement such an appointment would bring.
We appreciate the opportunity to work alongside you in this labor of love,
“that the generation to come … may set their hope in God and not forget the works
of God” (Ps.78:6-7).
Recommendation:
That the budget for YMCS be set at $9,000 for the coming year.
Bus Archer (Pacific Coast Presbytery)
Matt and Heidi Filbert (RP Missions)
Ben Larson (Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery)
Keith and Jill Mann (Midwest Presbytery)
Will and Sarah McChesney (Alleghenies Presbytery)
Mike Tabon (Atlantic Presbytery)
David Whitla (Synod Liaison)
Harry Metzger presented the report of the Committee on Church
Revitalization Committee. Item 1 was adopted. Item 2 was referred to the
Nominating Committee. The report was approved and is as follows:
Report of the Committee On Church Revitalization
2010 Synod
The Committee on Church Revitalization has met twice since the last meeting
of Synod, in November of 2009 and in March of 2010. In addition, we conducted
a few conference telephone calls.
The purpose of the Committee is to assist elders, pastors, congregations and
presbyteries in locating and effectively using the resources required to create and
maintain a strong spiritual life, a vibrant ministry and witness, and effective local
leadership within their churches.
The Committee has identified several crucial areas that we believe are essential
for a healthy and vital church. These are: Personal and corporate repentance and
renewal, Kingdom-focused prayer, the means of grace for life transformation,
healthy congregational life, effective leadership, discipleship, outreach ministry,
88
promotion of passionate spirituality.
Committee Name Change
In order to more accurately reflect the work of the Committee, we would like
to ask Synod to change the name of the Committee to The Committee for Vital
Churches. We have also developed a logo for the Committee.
Recommendation #1:
That the Committee’s name be changed to The Committee for Vital Churches.
Recent Projects
1) Development of a Web site
The Committee is working on a production of a web site. We hope to keep this
site updated with helpful material for revitalization.
2) Articles Published in The Reformed Presbyterian Witness
The March/April edition of The Reformed Presbyterian Witness was dedicated
to the theme of church revitalization. Members of the Committee were responsible
for three of the articles. Bill Roberts highlighted several of the principles of
revitalization as seen in the books of Ezra, Nehemiah, Zechariah, and Malachi.
Harry Metzger wrote an article about a fictional pastor wrestling with the issues
of revitalization in his personal life and in the church. The third article was an
interview with Dr. Julius Kim of Westminster Seminary California. Dr. Kim
shared several of the principles that he has learned as he has operated The Center
for Pastoral Refreshment.
3) Conferences and Seminars
Members or the Committee are available for conferences and workshops for
the local churches and/or Sessions. These sessions all relate to eight crucial areas
for a vital church. Some of the topics that we have done in the past are listed
here. For information about any of these sessions, please talk to any member of
the Committee.
Overview of Revitalization
Biblical Strategies for Revitalization
A Vitalized Church – The Hope of the World
How to Recognize a Vitalized Church
Personal and Corporate Repentance and Renewal
The Enemy Within
The Enemy Without
The Reinforcements from Above
Jack Miller Video – Sonship
Repentance
The Leader’s Personal Life
Kingdom-Focused Prayer
The Leader’s Prayer Life
Prayer for Evangelism
Healthy Body Life
Dealing with Disagreements/Conflicts in the Church
Mobilizing the Church
Building Strong Families
Building a Strong Team
Outreach
Heart for the Lost and the Mandate
for Evangelism
Joe Aldrich Video – Heart for Evangelism
Essential Elements of the Gospel Presentation
Strategy for Evangelism
The Church without Walls
Effective Leadership
The Crucial Importance of Leadership in the Church
Purpose and Vision
Marks of a Healthy Church
Philosophy of Ministry
Planning and Goals
How to Keep the Dream Alive
Working with Volunteers
Pitfalls for Leaders
How to Cast a Compelling Vision
The Means of Grace as Life Transformation
The Word
The Sacraments
Promotion of Passionate Spirituality
Overcoming the Barriers to Prayer
Developing a Praying Church
89
90
Developing a Love for the Word in the Life of
the Church
Discipleship
LeRoy Eims Video – Discipleship
Personal Follow-up
Assimilation I – Discipleship in the Church
Assimilation II
Building Strong Discipleships
Building Strong Small Groups
Pastoral Support
The Committee believes that one of the keys to church renewal is a renewed
pastor. Therefore, the Committee has spent time trying to encourage and bring
renewal to pastors. A few of the members of the Committee had the opportunity
to meet and hear Dr. Julius Kim, who has done a lot of study and research on the
causes of pastoral burnout and why men leave the pastorate.
It was hoped that we could get Dr. Kim to speak to the RP Church. With this
objective, the Committee planned a conference for May of 2010 with Dr. Kim and
Dr. Ligon Duncan as the main speakers. Dave and Jenny Long were also scheduled
to speak about their Sabbatical experience. We cooperated with The Alliance
of Confessing Evangelicals in the planning and advertising for the conference.
Unfortunately, as the time for the conference drew near, it was apparent that the
number of registrations was not adequate to support the conference obligations.
Therefore, we were forced to cancel the conference. The Committee will be
considering other ways to get Dr. Kim before the denomination.
The Committee has compiled a list of retreat sites that minister to pastors with
special pricing. If members of Synod would like a copy of the list, please see a
member of the Committee.
Revitalization Grant Program
Several years ago, the Committee was asked to develop a plan whereby funds
could be made available from the denomination to churches needing additional
money as they seek to bring about revitalization. For this year, there have been
no requests for these grants.
Currently, there is a little over $38,000 in the Revitalization Grant Fund.
Seeing this amount is enough to fund the requests of four churches almost
completely ($10,000 being the maximum per church per year), the Committee is
not requesting any money from RPM&M to replenish the fund in 2011.
Membership on the Committee
Bill Roberts has asked to be replaced on the Committee. The Synod will need
to elect someone to complete his term. The term of Harry Metzger expires at
this meeting of Synod. He is eligible for re-election and the Committee would
91
like to nominate him for another term. Their successors need to be elected at this
meeting of Synod.
Recommendation #2:
That Synod elect someone to fill the unexpired term of Bill Roberts and that Harry
Metzger be placed in nomination for another term.
Summary of Recommendations
Recommendation #1: that the Committee’s name be changed to The Committee
for Vital Churches.
Recommendation #2: that Synod elect someone to fill the unexpired term of Bill
Roberts and that Harry Metzger be placed in nomination for another term.
Harry Metzger (’10), chairman
Bill Roberts (’11)
Wendell McBurney (’12)
Ken Smith
Dennis Olson
Kit Swartz
The Moderator appointed the following delegates to serve on the special
judicial committee to address the appeal from the Great Lakes-Gulf
Presbytery: Charles Leach, Ch., Craig Milroy, Vince Scavo.
Mark England directed Synod in the evening prayer time. Those present
joined together in small groups to pray and concluded the prayer time singing
Psalm 72E.
Following announcements, Synod adjourned at 9:08 p.m. being led in
prayer by Steven Work.
92
Wednesday, June 23, 2010, 8:30 A.M.
Synod met pursuant to adjournment on the morning of Wednesday, June
23, 2010 in Skye Lounge of the Student Center on the campus of Geneva
College, Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania. The Moderator called the meeting to
order at 8:30 a.m.
Tim McCracken led Synod in the singing of Psalm 48B then Jon Maginn
led in prayer constituting the court.
Jerry O’Neill led in the morning worship. Synod sang Psalm 18A then
Ed Schisler led in prayer. Dr. O’Neill read Philippians 1:8-11 and preached
God’s Word on the theme “Motivated in Ministry by Love that Produces
Righteousness.” He then led in prayer and Synod concluded the service
singing Psalm 31D.
The following men were excused to deal with the appeal and complaint
from the Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery: Charles Leach, Craig Milroy, Vince
Scavo, Andy McCracken, Gordon Keddie.
Chaplain Joe Paul was introduced to the court. He had been received as
an ordained minister of the Gospel by the Midwest Presbytery and is now a
voting member of the Synod.
The minutes of the Tuesday evening session were read, corrected and
approved.
The following fraternal delegates were introduced to the court: Larry
Elenbaum, PCA; Ron Potter, RCUS; Adam Mastris, TCCF; Harry Zekveld,
URCNA; Henry Foster & Kyle Sims, ARP.
The Moderator yielded the chair to the former Moderator, Bruce
Hemphill, for the presentation of the next report. Richard Holdeman
presented the report of the Trustees of the Theological Seminary. Item 1 was
referred to the Nominating Committee. Items 2-4 were adopted. In keeping
with item 4, President Jerry O’Neill addressed the court. The report as a
whole was approved and is as follows:
Report of the Trustees of the
Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary—June, 2010
As the Seminary celebrates its bicentennial in conjunction with this year’s
meeting of Synod, the Board is mindful of God’s faithfulness from generation to
generation. From May 15, 1810, when Dr. Samuel Wylie began training students
for pastoral ministry, until today, the Seminary has been used by God to prepare
men and women for service to Christ’s Church. It is with deep thankfulness to
Almighty God that we look back and reflect on those who have faithfully labored
in bringing the Seminary to this milestone event in its history, and it is with deep
humility that we look forward to the celebration on Thursday evening and to
future generations of those yet to be equipped for ministry by the faculty and staff
of RPTS.
93
The Board is pleased to report about God’s blessings to the Seminary. A
significant issue this past year has been seeking God’s grace in addressing the
financial crisis that arose in 2008 in conjunction with the economic downturn.
Following a dozen years of financial stability, the Seminary had a six-figure deficit
in 2008. 2009 began with a zero balance and, in addition to regular budget items,
the prospect of needing to pay for work on the Willson Center in anticipation of
moving the Biblical Counseling Institute (BCI) into it. Under the leadership of
President O’Neill, the Seminary has been able to balance the 2009 budget. This
was due to faithful giving, a 25% increase in student enrollment, and strategic
reductions in spending.
Dr. Denny Prutow had a very productive sabbatical this year and his textbook for
homiletics, which is being published by the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals,
is near publication. The Board is thankful to those who filled in for Dr. Prutow this
past year. Professor Tom Reid continues to oversee the Seminary’s library and the
opening of the Willson Center will accommodate the library’s growth for at least
a few more years. Dr. Rick Gamble recently resigned from his pastoral position at
College Hill and will be focusing on his teaching and editing of volumes 2 and 3
of his systematic theology. Professor C.J. Williams has completed his dissertation,
and seeks prayer for a speedy approval by the review committee. Lord willing, his
degree will be granted in December.
The Biblical Counseling Institute continues to develop under the faithful and
capable leadership of Dr. George Scipione. The Seminary is seeking a couple of
local pastors willing to get training from Dr. Scipione to help with counseling
needs. Progress on the Willson Center continues and Synod members are
encouraged to visit and see what God is doing in the development of the Biblical
Counseling Institute.
As Dr. Prutow is scheduled to retire in the summer of 2012, the Board is
soliciting nominees for the position of Professor of Pastoral Theology beginning
with this Synod meeting. The goals are to have the new professor elected at the
2011 Synod and beginning service July 1, 2012.
On May 21, the Seminary graduated its largest class ever. Of the twenty-three
graduates, fifteen were M.Div. students and ten were Reformed Presbyterians.
Board President Rich Holdeman was the key-note speaker and the Board profited
from holding its spring meeting in conjunction with commencement.
Fall enrollment was up 25% from the previous year, exceeding prayers and
expectations. The Board acknowledges the good work of Keith Evans, Director
of Admissions, and anticipates, Lord willing, strong enrollment for the coming
year as well. Student morale continues to be high and the varied student body
is unanimous in testifying of growing love for Jesus in addition to growth in
knowledge.
The capital campaign launched nearly six years ago in anticipation of this
year’s 200th anniversary celebration has greatly encouraged the Board and
confirms that God is the One who provides and does so exceedingly abundantly
beyond what we ask or think. The campaign’s status will be announced at the June
94
24 celebration service. The Board thanks Grant Van Leuven and Kim Backensto,
who have worked hard in conjunction with the Board’s Development Committee,
in promoting the Seminary and its ministry to the broader church and community.
Grant is one of the new Seminary graduates seeking service in the church, and
will be replaced by January 2011 by Mark Sampson, who will assume the role of
Director of Development.
The Board looks forward to the 200th Anniversary Celebration on Thursday,
June 24 at Heinz History Center in Pittsburgh. Dinner is at 5:30 PM, followed by a
program at 7:30 PM. The keynote speakers are Dr. Derek Thomas and Dr. Sinclair
Ferguson. The Board thanks the Synod for its cooperation in coordination of this
event so that as many as possible from the denomination can attend.
While Almighty God deserves all the thanks and praise for the Seminary and
its work, He bestows His blessings in large part through the labors of the Seminary
faculty and staff. The Board acknowledges the hard work of RPTS’ full time and
adjunct faculty, in addition to all who do the administrative work necessary for
the Seminary to carry out its service to the Church. The Board especially thanks
President Jerry O’Neill, along with his wife, Ann, for their faithful and untiring
leadership of and service to the Seminary.
The terms of Board members Barry York and Keith Wing expire this year. Both
have served well and are eligible for reelection. The Board strongly recommends
that the Synod reelect them to the class of 2016.
Recommendations:
1. That Keith Wing and Barry York be nominated to serve on the Board’s class
of 2016.
2. That Synod approve the solicitation of nominations to the Board for the next
Professor of Pastoral Theology, said nominations to be submitted to Don Piper by
September 30, 2010.
3. That Synod proceed with the election of the next Professor of Pastoral
Theology at its 2011 meeting.
4. That Seminary President Jerry O’Neill be given ten minutes to speak to the
Synod about the ministry of the Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary.
The Seminary Board
The Moderator returned to the chair.
Matt Filbert presented the report of the Board of Corporators of Geneva
College. Item 1 was adopted. In keeping with this item President Ken Smith
addressed the court. Item 2 was adopted. Geneva College Trustees, Bill
Edgar and Calvin Troup addressed the court regarding the governance of
the college. Item 3 was adopted. The report as a whole was approved and is
as follows:
95
Report of the Geneva College Board of Corporators
to the Synod of the RPCNA
May 14, 2010
The main focus of the Board of Corporators in the 2009-2010 year was the
restructuring of the Boards of the College. A report of the proposed governance
structure is attached, and the results of elections are listed below.
Trustees
Class of 2014 nominated by the Corporators:
Ingrid Birdsall, Joyce Lynn, Mike McDaniel and Sergei Spirydovich
Class of 2014 nominated by the Trustees:
William Kriner and Andrew Marcinko
Class of 2012 nominated by the Trustees (filling a previously unfilled
term):
Alan Rose
Class of 2014 nominated by the Alumni:
Katharine Dennis
Corporators
Class of 2014 elected by the Corporators:
Shana Milroy, William Weir, Matthew Filbert.
Presbyteries have notified us of the following elections to the Board of
Corporators:
Class of 2014:
Peter Howe (St. Lawrence), Donald Piper (Pacific Coast), Bonnie Weir
(Atlantic)
Our recommendations to Synod are as follows:
Recommendation:
1. That the President of Geneva College, Dr. Kenneth A. Smith, be heard by
Synod for up to 15 minutes.
2. That the 2009-2010 report of the Geneva College Board of Trustees be
accepted.
3. That the Synod vote on the following:
“The 2010 Synod of the RPCNA supports the Corporators in proceeding with
the proposed restructuring of the Board of Corporators and the Board of Trustees
of Geneva College”
Respectfully Submitted on behalf of the Board,
Chair, Bonnie Weir
96
Vice-chair, Matthew Filbert
Secretary, Ralph Joseph Treasurer, Ronald Graham
GENEVA COLLEGE Board of Corporators
Report to RPCNA Synod on Proposed Governance Structure
Since 2006, a Joint Committee on Governance has been considering how
Geneva’s two boards can function more effectively. The committee consists
of Corporators, Trustees, and the President and Provost of Geneva College. In
2008, the Governance Committee presented an initial proposal to the Board of
Corporators, making it available to Synod. The committee asked for feedback,
and received input from the Board of Corporators, members of Synod, and
some Presbyteries. The suggestions were very helpful as the committee and the
Corporators worked together to revise the proposal.
At its October 2009 and May 2010 meetings, the Board of Corporators of
Geneva College took votes on a new proposed restructuring of Geneva’s two
governing boards. The votes were almost unanimously in favor of the proposal
from the Joint Committee on Governance. Because the Board of Corporators
bears legal responsibility for the college, the formal decision about whether to
implement the proposal rests with the Corporators. However, the board does not
want to proceed without consulting the Synod on this significant matter involving
the relationship of the college and the church. Therefore, the Board of Corporators
together with the Joint Committee on Governance would like to present this
proposal to the Synod of the RPCNA, asking for an expression of Synod’s support
for the major provisions of the proposal. We seek a motion something like the
following:
“The 2010 Synod of the RPCNA supports the Corporators in proceeding
with the proposed restructuring of the Board of Corporators and the Board
of Trustees of Geneva College.”
The three main points of the restructuring plan are as follows:
1. The Synod of the RPCNA will now elect all Corporators from among
nominees presented by the Corporators and the Presbyteries of the RPCNA.
2. The Board of Corporators will have twelve instead of twenty-two members.
All twelve will be members of the RPCNA. The Board of Corporators will
directly elect all Trustees.
3. The Board of Trustees will have twenty-one members instead of thirtyone. A minimum of eleven will be members of the RPCNA, six of whom
will also be Corporators. The other ten will be members of reformed or
evangelical churches.
If the Synod of 2010 votes to support this proposal, the Joint Committee
on Governance will proceed with its work, which will ultimately include some
97
bylaw revisions and may involve approval by the Pennsylvania Department of
Education. If the Synod of 2010 does not support this proposal, we would again
ask Synod for suggestions to improve our work.
BOARD OF CORPORATORS
Under the current Charter & Bylaws of Geneva College, the Board of
Corporators is the legal public corporation and exercises control for the Reformed
Presbyterian Church of North America over the purpose, policies and property of
the College. The Board of Corporators has sole authority over the college Charter
and Bylaws; elects all board members not appointed by the church; and has power
to veto presidential candidates. The Corporator proposal would reconfigure the
structure of the Board of Corporators as follows:
1. A 12-member Board of Corporators, elected directly by the Synod of the
RPCNA as follows:
a. One member from each North American Presbytery of the RPCNA, to
be nominated by the Presbytery and presented to the RPCNA Synod for
election.
b. Remaining members of the Board of Corporators to be elected directly
by the RPCNA Synod.
2. The Board of Corporators appoints six of its own members to serve
concurrently as Geneva College Trustees for their respective terms.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Under the current Charter & Bylaws of Geneva College, the Board of Trustees
operates the college under authority delegated by the Board of Corporators. The
Corporator proposal would reconfigure the structure of the Board of Trustees as
follows:
A 21-member Board of Trustees (11 RPCNA; 10 At-Large), constituted as
follows:
a. Six Trustees selected from the Board of Corporators, by the Board of
Corporators.
b. Fifteen Trustees elected directly by the Board of Corporators (5 RPCNA
Trustees; 10 At-Large Trustees).
Summary Comparison
22Number of Corporators
4
synod-appointed
6
presbytery reps
12
self-perpetuating
31
Number of Trustees
0
synod-appointed
18
RPCNA
13
at-large
53
Total Board Members
12
12
6
0
21
6
11
10
27*
*Since 6 of the Board members will be serving as both Corporators and
98
Trustees, the total number of Board members for the current proposal is 12+216=27.
Report of the Geneva College Board of Trustees
May 31, 2010
Our faithful covenant God continues to bless us with his presence, his word,
his day-to-day provision, and with challenges. Much has been accomplished this
past year; much is in the process of being accomplished in the lives of students
and the institution as a whole. We give glory to God.
EDUCATION COMMITTEE
In July, President Smith announced a new academic structure moving Ken
Carson to the position of Provost supported by three part-time deans. Other
changes in the Leadership Team were designed to streamline the operation of the
college as well as provide coverage for the campus during times when Ken Smith
is away from campus.
Several new faculty members were added during 2009-2010. The campus
deeply misses Dr. Jack Pinkerton who went to be with the Lord shortly after classes
ended in May 2009. Dr. David Harvey will be retiring in May 2010. Searches
are underway for unfilled faculty and staff positions. Three faculty positions have
been filled: Education position was filled starting with the spring 2010 semester;
two faculty positions have been filled to start in the Fall 2010, Accounting and
Psychology. Three faculty searches are underway, for an Acquisitions Librarian,
in the Education Department, and in the Engineering Department. Searches are
in process for two full-time coaches: Head Coach of Cross Country, Track and
Field, and Head Coach Men’s Soccer, plus a part-time Assistant Men’s Basketball
Coach. A full-time Director of Counseling Services search is underway as well.
At its April meeting the Board voted to approve tenure status for six faculty
members.
Full time tuition for 2010-2011 has been set at $22,236 with $745 per credit
hour. Annual room and board charges will be $8,000 for the 21-meal or 220
block plan, $7,680 for the 14-meal or 180 block plan, and $6,070 for the 7-meal
plan. Maximum for tuition, room and board is $30,236, a 3.7% increase over
2009-2010.
Graduate school and adult education commencement was held on Friday, May
7, 2010 in Metheny Field House with Dr. David Harvey, Professor of Psychology,
Counseling and Human Services as speaker. 108 candidates received master’s
degrees, and 120 DCP candidates received bachelor’s degrees. The baccalaureate
service was held on Lord’s Day, May 9, 2010 with Rev. David Hanson, Pastor
of Grace Presbyterian Church in State College, PA speaking. Undergraduate
commencement was held on Monday, May 10, 2010 with Dr. Terry Thomas,
Professor of Biblical Studies, as the speaker. 261 candidates received bachelor’s
degrees, and 5 received associate’s degrees. At separate ceremonies, 12 candidates
99
received associate’s degrees from CUBM in Pittsburgh on May 10, 2010, and
10 candidates will receive bachelor’s degrees and 20 associate’s degrees from
CUTS in Philadelphia on June 5, 2010. From all these programs, the total
degrees received were 108 master’s, 381 bachelor’s, and 27 associate’s. Of these
numbers nine students received two bachelor degrees, and three students received
a bachelor and an associate degree.
ENROLLMENT COMMITTEE
This committee, formerly known as the Marketing Committee has undergone
some changes. Ed Vencio, who had been functioning as VP of Marketing, served
as VP for both Enrollment and Advancement from July until the middle of April.
At that time Larry Griffith was appointed by President Smith as Executive Vice
President with responsibilities that include this area. A search is underway for
an associate vice-president for enrollment. The Board is very appreciative of the
service of Ed Vencio and is particularly thankful for his contributions in creating
publications that effectively represent the college.
Overall enrollment for the fall semester was 1,925. The traditional
undergraduate enrollment was 1,332 with 1,296 on campus and 36 in Geneva
operated or approved study-abroad programs. This enrollment included 400 new
students, short of the target goal of 450. Of these, 338 were freshmen and 62 were
transfers. Total enrollment for the spring semester numbered 1,876 of which 1,254
are traditional undergraduate students. The marketing and enrollment staffs have
initiated new programs and continue to work hard to recruit and retain additional
students. Financial aid is a significant part of success in this area, and both the
board and administration are studying ways to make it more effective.
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
The most exciting achievement for this committee and for the whole campus
is the conclusion of the Beyond and Bend campaign and the many physical
improvements associated with it. A special dedication ceremony was held at
Homecoming in October. The committee and administration under direction from
VP of Business and Operations Larry Griffith continue to wrestle with the use of
resources in addressing deferred maintenance issues.
HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE
This committee is working under a newly approved charter and with the
belief that one of the most important things to do in improving an institution is
to develop strong inter-personal relationships with every person on the staff. To
that end, two review/survey processes have been used. The 360 feedback process
was employed as a way of determining the effectiveness of sixteen people in
leadership positions, and the Best Christian Workplaces Survey was used to take
the pulse of other college employees. The results of this survey were shared in
February and indicate reasons both for rejoicing and concern. The Administration
and Board will continue to respond to these results in both discussion and action
100
throughout the coming year.
INSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT
With the departure of Kevin Jean, Ed Vencio was appointed as Vice-President
for this area and served until April. A search has begun for an associate vicepresident in charge of fund raising. President Smith has taken a more active role
in fund-raising and expects to continue to do so. The need for growth in alumni
giving continues to be an area of concern and one that is being aggressively
addressed.
The Geneva Fund total as of May 31, 2010 is $1,068,004.85, plus unrestricted
estate gift income of $437,823.60. Total giving for the fiscal year is $2,857,153.
This includes $13,358 of gifts in kind, and $60,152 present value of a deferred
gift.
BUSINESS COMMITTEE
For the past few years the college has produced a budget with a planned
operating deficit. By the grace of God, in each of these years the fiscal year has
ended in the black. Through hard work on campus and the goodness of God we
are expecting that to be the case again this year.
Larry Griffith has completed his first year as VP for Business and Operations
along with Steve Ross as the new Controller. They have worked hard to streamline
operations in the whole financial area.
The Board approved a budget for fiscal year 2010-2011. Included in this
budget is spending authority of up to $36,250,000, a contingency of $450,000,
and a capital budget of $1,200,000.
ENDOWMENT-INVESTMENT COMMITTEE
The values of the College property and endowment are:
2008
2009
(Audit of 5/31/08)(Audit of 5/31/09)
Land
Buildings*
Furniture and Equipment
Construction in Process
Market Value of Endowment
Endowment held by the
Trustees of the RP Church
2010
(Unaudited)
$ 1,975,260
$1,980,752
$ 1,980,752
22,873,005
28,710,700
28,906,040
5,751,328
6,527,537
5,961,899
3,606,986
650,882
173,969
_________________________________________
$34,206,579
$37,869,871
$37,022,660
$30,040,110
$25,441,711
$22,627,275
$ 2,513,341
$ 1,819,895
$ 2,000,447
Size of Campus - 120 acres
*at cost less accumulated depreciation
101
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Regular meetings were held on October 29 and 30, 2009 and April 29 and
30, 2010. Committees held extended meetings on campus and in Pittsburgh in
January and February with members of the entire Leadership Team. In addition,
many meetings were conducted by conference call.
Giving to the College by members of the Board of Trustees is 97% (30 out of
31) totaling $69,600.
Giving to the College by members of the Board of Corporators is 100% (22
out of 22) totaling $9,900.
(Because of the overlap in Board membership, $2,650 is counted twice.)
Current officers of the Board are Bill Edgar, Chairman, Steve McMahan, ViceChairman, and Joyce Lynn, Secretary. Barbara McKenzie serves as recording
secretary for open meetings.
Officers for the following year to take effect in October 2010, subject to
approval of the Board of Corporators are: Bill Edgar, Chairman, Steve McMahan,
Vice-Chairman, and Joyce Lynn, Secretary.
The terms of the following trustees expire this year and their successors should
be chosen:
Church Nominees:
Ingrid Birdsall
Joyce Lynn
Mike McDaniel
John Mitchell
Mark Schaefer
Alumni Nominee:
Katharine Dennis
Trustee Nominees:
Bill Kriner
Andy Marcinko
The Board of Trustees is nominating Alan Rose.
Bill Edgar, Chairman
Joyce E. Lynn, Secretary
and returned to business singing Psalm 108A.
Courtney Miller presented the report of the Board of Education and
Publication. Item 1 was adopted. In keeping with this item Drew Gordon
addressed the court. Item 2 was referred to the Nominating Committee. The
report as a whole was approved and is as follows:
102
Report of the Board of Education & Publication
7408 Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15208. 412.241.0436
(www.crownandcovenant.com, www.rpwitness.com,
www.reformedpresbyterian.org, www.reformedvoice.org, www.bluebanner.org,
www.psalter.org)
Board Matters
The Education & Publication Board met twice—in the fall at the R.P. Seminary
(October 21-22, 2009) and in the spring by conference call (March 22, 2009). The
board officers are Courtney Miller—president, Robert Bibby—vice-president,
and Brad Johnston—secretary. Eileen Bechtold and Courtney Miller (Class of
2010) have completed their second terms of services and are not eligible for
another term. Gordon Keddie has completed his term and does not seek another
term. The Board recommends selecting from the following candidates for three
open positions on the board: Nathan Eshelman, Rut Etheridge, Linda Parker, and
John Pershe. See Recommendation #2.
Office Personnel
Drew & Lynne Gordon continue to serve as our Publishing house Co-Directors
and as Editors of the Reformed Presbyterian Witness.
Josh Wilsey, our only full-time employee, continues his able work as our
business manager responsible for circulation, product inventory, web site
maintenance, and various marketing and design projects.
We have seen a period of stability in our editorial and office help. Sisters
Ariana Stitzer and Shelley Davis job-share the editorial assistant position so
that Ariana can give plenty of time to her baby. Ariana has more experience in
graphics and design while Shelley has more experience in writing and editing, so
their various strengths are an asset to our work.
Lois Claerbaut (part-time) handles invoicing and shipping of product. The use
of part-time staff continues to keep costs down on salaries and especially medical
benefits—our two greatest expenses.
Reformed Presbyterian Witness
Recent issues have included themes on pastoral and congregational
revitalization as well as historical topics—William Symington, Seminary
anniversary, Witness anniversary, and RPs and slavery. Future issues of the
magazine will include themes on biblical peacemaking in the RPCNA, single
adults, the state of evangelicalism, and an introduction to the ARP Church.
The Publishing Work
Psalms Publications
As of this writing, the new Book of Psalms for Worship has sold (since last
June’s release) 11,200 copies—including over 1,000 mini psalters. We anticipate
some leveling off of RP sales as 52 churches have placed significant or large
103
psalter orders. Please keep encouraging your congregations to consider this new
psalter if you have not yet made the switch.
There is now a large print edition of The Book of Psalms for Worship with
a clear-coil binding. In addition, we offer the psalter in a 3-hole-punched loose
sheets format. We are currently offering personalization of psalters with a person,
church or group name.
Two CD recordings, Abundance and Hallel, based on the Book of Psalms for
Worship have been released. Faithfulness, mostly with new tunes and sung by
Tim and Kaylee McCracken should be available at Synod. We project two more
CDs be released by the end of the summer.
The Book of Psalms for Singing continues to sell and we expect that to
continue. We expect those sales to track downward over time.
ARP Psalter
We are working with the ARP on their new psalter. The ARP Psalter project
awaits final approval at this year’s ARP Synod, so we have been involved in a
variety of pre-press activity. Pending approval, the psalter may go to press in
early 2011. The ARP psalter is a complete psalter based on The Book of Psalms
for Worship, with some additional metrical psalms from the historic ARP psalter
Bible Songs.
The ARP Worship Committee will be covering the music engraving and some
of the pre-press costs. Crown & Covenant Publications will take care of the final
layout, printing and distribution. The psalter will be made available in our web
store, including several copyright-free PDFs for church bulletins and matching
MP3 choral recordings.
Other Publication Plans
Here are a few updates on other publishing endeavors:
Foundational Writing Series—Vol. 1 - James R. Willson, D.D. - Political
Danger: essays on the Mediatorial Kingship of Christ over nations and
their political institutions, 1809-1838 (edited by Gordon J. Keddie). This
book is now available. The series will expand with Vol. 2 (the Lordship of
Christ in Church and Nation) and Vol. 3 (shorter writings— mostly from
the 19th century bearing on various aspects of the RP vision)
Pamphlets: What About Instruments, How Should I Remember the Sabbath?
and The Church’s Perfect Hymnbook are headed to the printer as of
this writing. Copies should be available at Synod. A denominational
introduction brochure is being considered as well as other topics.
Romans by Vos: We are exploring how best to make this book available cost
effectively.
Presbyterian & Reformed Life Series: “The Covenant and Your Life” by
Gordon Keddie is in production. We have future plans to expand the series
with books on worship, the mediatorial kingship of Christ, and possibly a
history of the RP church.
104
Presence on the Internet
We continue to manage six internet sites (listed above). The ReformedVoice.
org at last report has 57 broadcasters on the site, with 53 from the RPCNA and 6
from other RP broadcasters. Traffic on the site continues to grow.
Our psalms web site, Psalter.org now has the capability to compare BOPFW
and BOPFS, so it is functional for both psalters. The only main aspect yet to be
completed is the inclusion of the Trinity Psalter tunes.
We continue to add content and functions to our other web sites as time and
resources allow. As our regular reminder, now is a good time to update and verify
your church’s information on the denominational web site as well as your local
church web site.
Budget & Finance
We give thanks to God for a phenomenal year in 2009, particularly of psalter
sales. The previous annual sales record for Crown & Covenant was $158,000, set
in 2004. That record was topped by $60,000! We are holding a higher than desired
dollar amount of inventory—most of this additional inventory is in psalters, which
should sell fairly quickly, and at a good price.
To that end, our gross sales for Crown & Covenant as of April 15 (about 3
months of our fiscal year) were $45,000—the best start we’ve had in the first part
of our fiscal year.
RP Witness subscription income and advertising income continues to hold
steady. We continue to raise a modest amount of funds to help with publishing
costs—many thanks to those who have made donations to this ministry.
Making accurate 2010 projections is nearly as difficult as making projections
was a year ago. One big question is when the ARP Psalter will be completed by
the ARP worship committee and then printed.
In conclusion, we are again thankful for the ministry God has given us to serve
the body of Christ. We are thankful for the Lord’s sovereign might—doing all he
sees fit as we strive to come along side in the service of Jesus Christ, the King and
Head of the church.
Recommendations:
1. That one, or both, of the directors be given a total of up to ten minutes to
address the Synod.
2. That the names of Nathan Eshelman, Linda Parker, and John Pershe be placed
in nomination for the three open board positions.
The RPCNA Board of Education &
Publication
Eileen Bechtold
Robert Bibby
Mark England
Brad Johnston
105
Gordon Keddie
Courtney Miller
Jared Olivetti
Jim Ritchhart
Harry Metzger and Martin Blocki presented another bouquet of flowers
to the Moderator in honor of his election. No ice cream was promised this
time.
Bob Hemphill presented the report of the International Conference
Advisory Committee. Item 1 was adopted. In keeping with this item Dave
Willson and Don McBurney addressed the court. The report as a whole was
Report of the International Conference Advisory Committee
Plans are well underway for RP International 2012. The dates of the conference
are to be July 21-27, 2012.
A change in venue is anticipated, from Calvin College to Indiana Wesleyan
University in Marion, Indiana.
The Conference Staff has asked Rich Holdeman to take the lead in speaking
at the conference on the theme, “The Lordship of Christ.” Others will join him in
addressing this subject in terms of various areas of life, culture and society.
It is anticipated that a flier with more information will be handed out at synod
time and that further information will be supplied orally by Conference Chairman
Don McBurney.
Recommendation:
That Don McBurney be given up to ten minutes to address the Synod.
Respectfully submitted:
Doug Carson
James Faris
Bob McFarland
Sam Spear
Bob Hemphill, Chairman
Nate Eshelman presented the report of the Board of Home Missions. Daniel
Howe was given 3 minutes to address the court on the work of Christ Church
in East Providence, Rhode Island. Item 1 was referred to the Committee on
Finance. The report as a whole was approved and is as follows:
Report of the Home Mission Board
2020 Vision: The Synod of 2005 adopted the 2020 Vision: that God would
build the Reformed Presbyterian Church from 83 churches and mission works
in 2005 to 100 by the year 2020. God has caused us to grow to 88 works as
of this writing, just under one-third of the way in one-third of the time. Let us
106
pray that God would build his Kingdom through and among us, and let us rejoice
in the following organizations: particular congregations Christ Church of East
Providence RI, and Northminster RP of Atlanta; mission churches in Laramie,
WY, Enid, OK, and Terre Haute, IN; and the newly received Shelter congregation
of Edmonton.
Board meetings and membership: Your board met twice since our last
Synod, on October 28-29 and on April 20-21. The Home Mission Board consists
of a representative chosen by each presbytery and a member nominated by the
Board in consultation with the Women’s Synodical and elected by Synod.
Evangelism: The denominational statistics appear too late to be cited in
this report, but we encourage you to consider the state of evangelism in your
congregation and presbytery, and pray that the Lord may show his grace and
power by bringing sinners to repentance in our midst. The Home Mission Board
continues to solicit articles for the Witness that describe the spiritual need of
specific populations within North America. We welcome your ideas, contacts, and
articles in this effort.
Resources for planting and training: The Home Mission Board’s mission
is to facilitate intentional and strategic church planting and multiplication in each
presbytery by providing Counsel, Encouragement, Resources, and Training. In
pursuit of this mission, the Board spent a total of $191,643 in 2008, with a deficit
of $23,978. $84,000 went to specific churches and mission works: Gibsonia and
Providence completed their second full year of reducing aid, while Laramie, WY,
received its first half-year. After a considerable period (2003-2007) when no new
works requested reducing aid, we now have three in the early years and a couple
more on the horizon. (We note that not all church plants request reducing aid. If a
plant can be supported locally, HMB funds can be reserved for wherever the need
is greatest.)
The HMB spent $78,000 in 2009 to support four men in the two-year
Resident-in-Training program. David Whitla and Jim Pellegrini have now
completed the program, and Noah Bailey and Jason Camery have completed one
year. HMB support is also available for mission-focused summer internships for
seminarians.
Encouragement for Church Planters: Last fall the HMB hosted a
conference to refresh those involved in church planting at the ARP Bonclarken
conference center in North Carolina. Feedback has been very positive. Our next
such conference is tentatively scheduled for the fall of 2012. (But see below.)
Once every three years is not enough to encourage the lonely, so the HMB
has added a line to its application for reducing aid: we ask that a pastor or elder
commit himself to call the church planter regularly and meet with him frequently.
Two are better than one, for if one falls, the other can lift him up. Please assign
and accept this crucial task with care.
Review of Training and Pursuit of New RPTS Class: The Board was asked
two years ago to survey those who have been students of Dr. Steve Childers’
Church Planting Class (aka Boot Camp) and to evaluate if his course is the best
107
option for our church planters. The survey has been carried out and the responses
were mostly positive: one-third of those returning surveys thought the course
“very helpful”, one third “helpful, and one third “of no value or harmful.” Some
(not all) who had a negative view had attended a course specifically meant for
PCA planters, not Dr. Childers’ usual class.
But even some who thought the course helpful asked if the RPCNA might
now have enough church planting experience to teach its own course. The HMB
is intrigued by this possibility and is now actively pursuing an intensive class
(Monday-Friday) to be taught every other year in May or June at RPTS by a
team of two or three RP men with extensive church planting experience (close
involvement with more than one plant). This course would be an elective for
current seminarians, and open to current pastors and residents-in-training at a very
low rate. If successful, this class would replace Boot Camp. The next time-slot
that works for RPTS is the spring of 2012.
In the meantime, the Childers course is thought helpful by most of those who
have attended, so we will happily send those who need training to it. We are also
looking into a couple of other options. The HMB also helps provide resources for
those who wish to gain confidence through Evangelism Explosion training or the
like. See your presbytery representative for applications and further details.
Encouragement for the Denomination: Last year we distributed a DVD to
you to encourage church planting and the giving that supports it. Many of you
participated in it. If you have not yet used it, we ask that you find a suitable
avenue to show this DVD to your congregations and discuss it. If you have used
it, please give your presbytery representative your feedback on its value and how
to improve it. We pray that it will spur us to seek the lost.
Prayer and modern communications: The HMB has established a Facebook
page and asks all church planters to post their prayer requests on it. We request
that RP Facebook members note the requests and bring them to each church’s
prayer meetings. We are also updating our web page, rphomemissions.org, and
will transfer some prayer requests to it. HMB forms will also be available for
download from the web page.
Looking forward:
Please pray for the young church plants: Laramie, Providence, Gibsonia,
Immanuel, Christ Church, Northminster, and Enid. Pray also for the outreach
centers: Christian Heritage, Terre Haute, Hutchinson KS, St. Louis, Manhattan
KS, Berkshires MA and others. Prayer requests are posted first on the HMB
Facebook page.
Recommendation #1:
That the Synod grant the HMB $64,000 for 2011.
Alleghenies Matt Filbert
Atlantic
John Edgar, president
Great Lakes-Gulf
Ian Wise
Midwest
Bruce Parnell, secretary
108
Pacific Coast
Nathan Eshelman,
vice-president
St. Lawrence Matt Dyck
Women’s Synodical Sue Wilkey
class of 2011
The Moderator yielded the chair to the former Moderator, Bruce
Hemphill for the presentation of the next report.
Jerry O’Neill presented the report of the representatives to the
Presbyterian and Reformed Joint Commission on Chaplains and Military
Personnel. Item 1 was adopted. Item 2 was referred to the Nominating
Committee. The Japanese delegates were excused from voting on item 3 and
the report. Item 3 and 4 were adopted. The report as a whole was approved
and is as follows:
Report of the Presbyterian and Reformed Joint Commission
on Chaplains and Military Personnel (PRJCCMP)
Annual Meeting held February 23 & 24, 2010
I. Reports from our RPCNA Chaplains:
A. Report from Our RPCNA Chaplain, Kelly Moore:
Greetings in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. I am writing to you this year
from Ft. Drum, NY.
I had left my position with the Special Forces and was settling in as the
Resource Manager for Ft. Bragg chaplains where I managed approximately 1.8
million dollars in both appropriated (tax dollars) and non-appropriated (chapel
tithe dollars). I had a solid staff under me and we were able to leave predictably
by 1700 (5 p.m.) most days. I was enjoying some relative down time in contrast
to the previous three years of repeated deployments to Afghanistan. I was able
to spend time with family and especially enjoyed some golf now and then with
my son, Alex, who was about to graduate from H.S. In the spring of 2009 it
was announced I had been selected to become the Division Chaplain for the 10th
Mountain Division (Light Infantry). In July, we PCSed (moved) to Ft. Drum, NY,
where I became the Division Chaplain for the 10th Mtn. Division.
It is a great honor for me to be here as the Division Chaplain. For those who may
not be aware, there are only six “numbered” divisions. When I say “numbered,”
I mean those with a number before them (like 10th Mtn, 1st Infantry Division, 3rd
Army, etc.). The Chief of Chaplains personally selects these positions.
I now am responsible for the training and management of 40 Unit Ministry
Teams. The pace and management of six Brigades that are in constant cycle of 1)
prep for deployment, 2) deploy, 3) redeploy, and 4) train is brisk. Most days I feel
like I need more water buckets for all the fires that need putting out. I have to keep
reminding myself that this is a privilege. Too, we recently received word that we
will be deploying as a Division Headquarters to Afghanistan this fall. This has
109
added more work to an already full load and some urgency and intensity to the
pace of life. It is certainly an interesting time to be serving.
There are a number of things I would ask for prayer and remembrance:
1. My youngest, Emily, will graduate from H.S. in June. Her choice of
college is still undetermined.
2. Judy faces a true empty nest this fall with all our children gone and me
deployed.
3. It is a ripe time for ministry. Deployments and persistent conflict have
left our families hurting, confused, and looking for direction. At the same
time, it is easy for ministry to get squeezed out in the hectic pace we are
going.
4. Pray for our chapel. I am the Sr. chaplain in our traditional protestant
service. It has doubled in size over the past 6 months (from average of
@30 to an average of @65). Pray that it will honor Christ and draw
Soldiers/Families to Him.
5. I have a unique opportunity to help shape Jr. chaplains in their philosophy
of chaplain ministry. Pray for my influence in that arena.
6. I need wisdom to manage time and people, and myself.
7. I meet monthly with the Commanding General. I am blessed with an
extremely smart, capable, and supportive CG in MG James Terry. Pray for
him and my counsel to him.
8. Pray for the President and the decision regarding “Don’t Ask, Don’t
Tell.” The implications of overturning this policy could be significant to
chaplains.
Again, thank you for your support, prayers, and encouragement. Please feel
free to contact me in the venue that best suits you. I have included my contact
information below. I am on Facebook, but confess I am not a “Facebook” type
of person.
[email protected]
315-405-8506 (home)
910-728-6612 (personal cell)
315-408-7368 (BB)
315-772-5163 (office)
B. Report from Our RPCNA Chaplain, Stan Copeland:
As the one-and-only Family Life Chaplain for the four installations at Vilseck,
Grafenwoehr, Hohenfels and Garmish, Germany, and having no “assistants” to
help with admin work, I am swamped with needy people and am often working
until 2200 hours and working most weekends as well. No complaints! I asked
for the toughest duty, and got it. Seven of my Chaplains (with seven Chaplain
Assistants) deployed to war with 4,500 or so other soldiers, so now I have over
a thousand wives for whom I am primarily responsible. Incredible needs and
incredible pain of hearts and souls, create incredible opportunities for the gospel. God is making me more bold in evangelism in the therapy / counseling room;
110
people are hearing the good news of God’s provision for their needs. Lots of
seed is sown. I am excited to have the opportunities. Pray the Lord will use my
feeble efforts to convert His elect and strengthen His saints, of whom there are
a few. I am slated to inherit the generic Protestant service for this entire community
—which is a major challenge for several reasons, as you can imagine. Pray for
boldness but also for wise discretion and that the preaching will be so biblical and
Christ-centered and God honoring that the lost will hear the voice of the Lord, see
the Christ of the Bible, and be saved and/or sanctified. Pray the Spirit will give
me utterance and unction, and my hearers, faith. I lead multiple three-day retreats for married couples. I’ll conduct retreats for
the wives of deployed combat troops, trying to help them coalesce into mutuallysupporting “sub tribes” (you might call these groups I am trying to form.)
I am so blessed of the Lord that if He pours out any more, He will have to
make me twins to receive it all! Thank Him for all He has done and continues
to do. Thank him that I have bumped into a lot of people who also know my
children who are soldiers, and have always received strong endorsement for their
applied Christian faith. It is nice to be known and loved as the father of Christian
soldiers! Marilyn is adapting well to the culture: that itself is a real blessing. The young
guys call me a “fossil,” ‘cause that’s about how fast I move by the end of the
average 14-hour work day. We have a lovely two-story home, parquet floors,
three bedrooms, tiny dining area. Currently my greatest concern is for the life, health, ministry, and family of my
friend whom I recruited into the Army Chaplaincy, whose membership is in the
congregation I was most-recently blessed to pastor (Minneola, KS), CH (Colonel)
Jon Leach, brother of my seminary classmate and best friend, Rev. Charlie Leach. I trust that by the time folks read this, Jon will be back to full health and ministry,
but let’s continue to hold him up in prayer.
Stanley Copeland, MAJ MIL USA”
[email protected]
C. Report from Our RPCNA Chaplain, Dan Bartel:
Thank you for your prayers for our February move to Minneola KS. The challenge of relocating to Minneola between snow storms was a wonderful
experience in divine providence. The Reformed Presbyterian congregation in Minneola, though small, has a
great confident perseverance in God’s promises. One of the young mothers in the
congregation has begun a Bible Study for the young girls in the community. The
Lord has opened a door for us to begin a weekly men’s Bible Study for the men of
the community. Since it will be at 6:30 in the morning, Caleb and Jonathan will
be able to attend.
Jonathan and Caleb are enjoying working for their Uncles Reuben and Phil
who are continuing the Water Well Drilling business my father started over 50
111
years ago. The older Bartel brothers enjoy having a younger set of Bartel brothers
working with them.
We are considering their jobs in the drilling company to be the ‘Industrial Arts’
curriculum of their home school program. My brother Reuben is willing to teach
them as much as they want to know about business management. My brother Phil
is actively teaching them to enjoy the thrill of working in the hills and canyons of
the Southwestern Kansas Prairie.
The guys also met their new Civil Air Patrol Squadron in Garden City, KS
nearly an hour from Minneola. They are especially excited about the flight
simulators that may help them in learning how to fly airplanes.
I hope to be teaming up with the local Civil Air Patrol Chaplain and work with
him in his squadron.
Regarding hospital Chaplain Resident positions for which I have interviewed,
Duke and Chapel Hill Hospital Chaplain Resident Positions have already been
filled and I’m waiting to hear from the other two.
Teri Ann is enjoying getting to know the ladies at church and in the
neighborhood as well as being a part of a Rest Home ministry.
Praise the Lord for:
• The provision of a temporary Stated Supply Ministry position in the
Reformed Presbyterian Church in Minneola.
• The provision of a well equipped parsonage.
Please pray for:
• An unfailing trust in the Lord’s direction as we await a response from the
Durham VA and Moses Cone Hospitals.
• Wisdom in working together with the Civil Air Patrol Chaplain in the
Garden City Squadron.
• Diligence in the weekly preparation for the Preaching and Teaching
ministry in the congregation and the community. • Isaiah Daniel as he continues his studies in Physical Therapy at University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Dan
Chaplain (Capt.) Bartel, CAP
Daniel Bartel [[email protected]]
D. Report from Our RPCNA Chaplain, Jonathan Leach:
Jonathan Leach suffered a stroke in early March. On the 10th of March, he
received a cerebral shunt procedure. He was experiencing unmanageable pain.
At the time this report is being submitted, the long term prognosis for Jonathan
is not known. April 5, Jonathan was able to walk with the help of his Physical
Therapists. Jonathan is legally blind (hopefully temporarily). He is having trouble
digesting food and has lost considerable weight. His headaches come and go. Our
prayer is that Jonathan will make an amazing recovery and be further used by the
Lord to minister in the lives of others.
You may e-mail Jonathan at: [email protected]
112
II. Actions of the PRJC at the February 2010 Meeting
1. Stu Sherard reported for the Issues and Concerns (I & C) Committee,
pursuant to items of the 2009 Commission minutes. Messrs. Higgins,
O’Neill and Needham also served on the Committee. The Commission
approved the Committee’s recommendation to revise the Article I, “Purpose
and Duties of the Commission,” of the “Requirements and Duties” section
of the CHAPLAINS’ MANUAL by inserting as paragraph G: “Establish
and maintain methods of liaison with individual congregations of the
member denominations to assist them in providing adequate ministry to
their members while they are separated from the particular church during
periods in the Armed Forces and other institutions.”
2. The Commission approved the I & C Committee’s recommendation
to add the following article to the “Policy and Guidance” section of the
CHAPLAINS’ MANUAL, as amended by the Commission.
“VI. HOMOSEXUALITY
A. BACKGROUND
Until the last few decades, there has been little dispute about how to deal
with members of one of the military services who is discovered to have
homosexual leanings, or to have actually engaged in such conduct. These
members were to be removed from the particular service, with some degree
of consequence, such as an Administrative Discharge or an Other Than
Honorable Discharge. During the process of enlistment or applying for
a commission, it was not the practice of our armed services to probe for
possible moral, social or ethical deficiencies that were not connected to a
criminal record of some sort.
This policy was characterized by the Clinton administration as “Don’t
Ask – Don’t Tell”, implying some sort of moral hypocrisy on the part of
the military for punitively dealing with discovered homosexuals, but who
presumably had turned a blind eye to their admission in the first place.
This, along with several other contributing factors, including the emergence
of formidable political power on the part of the homosexual segment of
American society has increased the pressure to revoke the long-standing,
adequate practice of our military services in dealing with this problem.
This change in public opinion, however, does not relieve Christians from
their responsibility to be informed on this matter, and to stand firmly for
what is right.
B. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PASTORAL GUIDANCE
“Historically, it has been the practice of each Chaplain Corps of the
Army, Navy and Air Force, respectively, to insist that it expects every
chaplain to remain faithful to the doctrinal practices and ordination
vows of his endorsing denomination. For chaplains endorsed by the
PRJCCMP member denominations, this includes the vow, in some form,
113
to be faithful to the doctrines and truths of Scripture. That necessarily
involves both the duty and privilege of calling sin “sin”, whether in the
formal proclamation of the Word of God, or in applying it in solving a
problem in conduct, or thinking, requiring a biblical solution. As in our
guidance on praying in Jesus’ name, and women in combat, we remind
our chaplains of constitutional principles prohibiting government from
imposing upon them substantive moral/religious judgments and beliefs
such as directing them on how to pray. These prohibitions are even more
stringent when attempting to substantively limit chaplains in performance
of their spiritual/moral/religious duties in consensual settings where views
on homosexuality would be typically discussed in preaching, teaching, or
counseling contexts.
“God’s Word specifically addresses the sin of sodomy, and related
homosexual behavior in Leviticus 18:22; 20:13; and Romans 1:26-27, in
addition to the Genesis chapter 19 account of the supernatural destruction
of Sodom and Gomorrah for that iniquity.
“In light of the objective passages on the sin of homosexuality, and the
Scriptural guidelines on the exercise of pastoral grace (1 Timothy 6:1116; 2 Timothy 2:14-26), the PRJCCMP advises our endorsed chaplains to
deal humbly and yet truthfully, when asked about any aspect of this matter,
and to do so in as courteous and kind a manner as possible. A chaplain is
entirely at liberty to disagree with current assumptions, such as the idea
that homosexuality is genetically caused, and yet provide gracious counsel
to an individual who is accused of, or who confesses to, this behavior. A
service member who professes to be homosexual is still entitled to receive
spiritual counsel if he or she so desires. However, this guidance must not
be construed as in any way allowing any PRJCCMP endorsed chaplain to
perform a marriage or union ceremony for homosexual service members,
to provide any counseling in support thereof, or to counsel or perform
programmatic encouragement for homosexual relationships before or after
such a union. It is not unconstitutional to encourage such a service member
to seek the grace of Christ to repent of this, or any other sin, whether he is
an unbeliever, or one professing faith in Christ as his or her Savior.
“If a chaplain is challenged to cease and desist from addressing what
is wrong with homosexual thinking or behavior, or to cover up his belief
that it is wrong, especially if by one who is senior to the chaplain, we
expect our endorsed chaplains to seek God’s strength not to waver, even
if unjustly accused of failing to support the command, or some aspect of
the command’s policies, such as equal opportunity programs. Further, if
placed in such a situation, we encourage the chaplain to promptly contact
the PRJCCMP for such assistance and protection as we are able to provide.”
3. By general consent, the Commission agreed to request the Executive
Director to inform appropriate authorities and all PRJCCMP chaplains of
114
this guidance to chaplains on the subject of homosexuality.
4. Steve Leonard reported for the Committee appointed pursuant to item 32.29
in the 2009 Commission Minutes, “…with a careful recommendation for
amendments to the Constitution.” Messrs. Prichard, Ferris and Kauffman
also served on the Committee. The Committee also recommended changes
and additions to the By-Laws, Requirements and Duties, and Policy and
Procedures sections of the Manual. The Commission proceeded through
the CHAPLAINS’ MANUAL seriatum and individually approved
the language in the following items of these Minutes as the proposed
amendments to be submitted to the respective General Assemblies
and Synod. The Committee corrected a number of minor errors in the
current edition of the Manual. The Commission discussed and approved
substantive changes, additions or deletions to produce the language in the
PRJCCMP Constitution as follows:
PRJCCMP CONSTITUTION
(NOTE: Proposed additions are in shaded font and
proposed deleted words are struck through)
ARTICLE I — NAME
The name of this organization shall be the Presbyterian and Reformed Joint
Commission on Chaplains and Military Personnel.
ARTICLE II — PURPOSES
The Commission is an agent of its member denominations (not an ecclesiastical
commission in the technical sense). It was constituted to assist in carrying out their
ministries to members of the Armed Forces and other institutions. The Commission
is a ministry of member denominations dedicated to obeying Christ’s Great
Commission by providing men to serve as chaplains in military and civilian
organizations. The Commission endorses and ecclesiastically supports ordained,
qualified chaplains; approves chaplain candidates; and helps presbyteries and
congregations in biblical ministry to military personnel and their families. The
Commission was created to assist in carrying out their ministries to members of the
Armed Forces and other institutions. Since the primary structure of such ministries
is through formal chaplaincies, the principal activity and concern of the Commission
shall be involved with chaplains.
In carrying out its mission, the Commission functions in the following ways:
1. By maintaining liaison with the appropriate contact point of each member
denomination, and through their various presbyteries, to:
a. Provide current information regarding criteria, polices and procedures
for the appointment of ministers as chaplains.
b. Provide a technical service to the presbyteries by recommending
qualified candidates to the Chaplaincy.
115
2. By maintaining cooperative relationships with the Armed Forces Chaplain
Board and the leadership of military and other institutional chaplaincies
by:
a. Certifying to the proper agencies the ecclesiastical endorsements and
approvals granted by the member denominations through their various
presbyteries.
b. Serving as a representative body for problems referred by or concerning
chaplains, both individually and collectively.
3. By maintaining contact and liaison with individual chaplains serving
in the Armed Forces and other institutions through regular reports,
newsletters, written correspondence, and personal visits as authorized by
the Commission.
4. By establishing and maintaining methods of liaison with individual
congregations of the member denominations to assist them in providing
adequate ministry to their members while they are separated from the
particular church during periods in the Armed Forces and other institutions.
5. By keeping member denominations informed on significant developments,
trends, issues and problems concerning chaplains and members of the
Armed Forces and other institutions and to report annually on the activity
of the Commission to each member denomination through the proper
agencies.
6. By assisting the presbyteries in the promotion of the ministry of the
Chaplaincy to the member denominations and their particular churches.
ARTICLE III — MEMBERSHIP
The Commission is made up of the following member denominations:
1. Korean American Presbyterian Church
2. The Orthodox Presbyterian Church
3. Presbyterian Church in America
4. Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America
Any member denomination may withdraw from the Commission by act of
its General Assembly/Synod. Any denomination seeking membership in the
Commission shall:
1. Submit a letter of application for membership to the Commission no later
than 1 January of the year in which it desires membership.
2. Be approved by vote of all current member denominations at their General
Assembly/Synod.
Each member denomination or its responsible committee shall elect its
representatives to serve as voting members of the Commission, with qualifications
and terms to be set by the member denominations.
Each denomination shall be entitled to three Commission members for its first
fifty thousand members or portion thereof. One Commission member may be
added for each additional fifty thousand members or portion thereof.
The Commission may serve as the endorsing agency for applicants of associate
116
member denominations that are in doctrinal agreement with the standards of
the member denominations. The Commission will only entertain applications
from denominations that are members of the North American Presbyterian and
Reformed Council (NAPARC) for associate membership in the PRJCCMP.
Formal applications from associate member denominations will be handled on
a case-by-case basis and will be subject to approval at the next meeting of the
Commission.
ARTICLE IV — INCORPORATION
The Commission shall be incorporated under the corporation laws of the State
of Colorado relating to non-profit, religious corporations.
ARTICLE V — RULES OF ORDER
The Commission shall regulate its own proceedings in accordance with its
Articles of Incorporation, Constitution, By-Laws, and Roberts Rules of Order
(current edition). Any portion of the By-Laws and their rules of order, except
Article VII of the By-Laws, may be temporarily suspended by a two-thirds vote.
ARTICLE VI — FINANCIAL SUPPORT
The Commission shall be financially supported primarily through contributions
of member denominations and donations from interested individuals, churches
and groups. Commission income shall be supplemented by the dues of endorsed
chaplains.
A. The financial support of the Commission shall be primarily the responsibility
of the member denominations, for whom the Commission endorses and
supports chaplains .
1. Each denomination shall contribute a specific annual amount for each
active duty, Reserve components, Veterans Administration or civilian
chaplain requiring an endorsement by the employing body. Chaplains
not required to have an endorsement will not be counted.
2. In addition, the Commission shall be free to communicate with and to
receive donations from individuals, churches or other organizations,
both within and outside of the member denominations.
3. Each denomination shall be responsible for all expenses incurred
by its own representatives at any meetings of the Commission or its
committees.
B. Chaplains also have a responsibility to share in the cost of their endorsement
and support. Chaplain dues, as distinct from denominational contributions,
will be assessed and received as follows:
1. Amounts of chaplain dues shall be reviewed by the Commission at
least biennially.
2. Each military and civilian chaplain who requires an ecclesiastical
endorsement shall pay a designated amount of annual dues. Requests for
a waiver of dues shall be considered by the Commission when received
117
in writing.
3. A chaplain may request his church, presbytery, or denomination to pay
some or all of his dues, or a presbytery or denomination may elect to
contribute all or part of their chaplains’ dues to the Commission.
4. If a chaplain’s dues remain unpaid, and a waiver request is not
approved by the Commission, the Executive Director shall inform his
denominational representatives on the Commission. The Chaplain’s
denomination will become responsible for the dues, and will deal with
the chaplain through his presbytery as it desires.
The Financial support of the Commission shall be primarily the responsibility
of the member denominations, and shall be on a fair share basis, as recommended
by the Commission.
Each denomination will be responsible for all expenses incurred by its
representatives at any meetings of the Commission or its sub-committees.
Each denomination shall be asked to contribute a set amount per year per fulltime/active duty chaplain endorsed by the Commission.
Each endorsed chaplain both full and part-time, active duty and reserve shall
be required to contribute a designated amount per year, if able.
Amounts of contributions will be recommended by the Commission for the
approval of the member denominations annually. In addition, the Commission
shall be free to receive donations from individuals and churches, both within and
without the member denominations.
ARTICLE VII — STAFF
The Commission shall have as its chief operating officer an Executive Director,
and may hire such other personnel as it may determine.
ARTICLE VIII — AMENDMENTS
This Constitution may be amended only by written submission of proposed
amendments to each member denomination and by subsequent approval of each
denomination at their annual General Assembly/Synod. Proposed amendments
shall be provided to members of the Commission with at least twenty days prior
notice to the date of the meeting. If a constitutional quorum is present, a 3/4ths
vote shall be required to submit a proposed amendment to member denomination’s
General Assembly/Synod for approval.
This Constitution may be amended only by written submission of proposed
amendment by the Commission to each of the member denominations and by
subsequent approval of each member denomination at their annual General
Assembly/Synod.
Article II of the By-Laws: MEETINGS
The Commission shall meet twice each year at a time set by the Commission. One
meeting will be in-person; the other may be via electronic means. The chairman may
call special meetings (either in person or via electronic means) of the Commission
118
by petition of at least one-third of the membership, representing at least two member
denominations.
Article III of the By-Laws: COMMITTEES
A. The Commission may establish committees as required to facilitate the
business of the Commission. The Chairman will be responsible for
appointing members of these committees.
B. The Commission may establish an Executive Committee to meet as
required during the course of the year between the regular meetings, at
the discretion of the Executive Director and with the concurrence of the
Chairman of the Commission.
1. The purpose of the Executive Committee will be to assist the Executive
Director in making decisions usually reserved for the full Commission
when such decisions need to be made between meetings.
2. The Commission will review and affirm or amend actions of the
Executive Committee at its next stated meeting. The authority to make
or amend Commission policy remains solely with the full Commission.
3. The Commission in consultation with the Executive Director will
select Commission members able and willing to serve on the Executive
Committee and meet as often as required in conducting the business of
the Commission.
4. The Executive Committee will include representation from a majority
of the member denominations.
5. Minutes will be recorded at each Executive Committee meeting and
subsequently reviewed by the Commission at its next stated meeting.
6. The Executive Director will notify the Executive Committee members
when there is a need for them to meet in person or by electronic means.
7. The Executive Director shall retain the authority to consult with some
or all Commission members of a particular denomination in cases
where he believes the personal privacy of a particular chaplain or
military service member needs to be protected.
Article VII of the By-Laws: Quorum
For either regular or special meetings of the Commission, a quorum shall
consist of more than one-half of the Commissioners, with at least a majority of the
representative members of the Commission, with at least one representative from
each member denominations present.
Article I of Responsibilities and Duties (R&D): RESPONSIBILITIES AND
DUTIES OF THE COMMISSION
The Mission Statement was deleted from the beginning of the R&D section
and inserted into the opening paragraph of Article II of the Constitution.
119
Article I of R&B: Informing Chiefs of Military and VA Chaplains
B. Keep these offices appropriately informed as to the developments in and
growth of our denominations as well as any concerns we have regarding the free
exercise of religion or any restrictions proposed thereof that may compromise the
ordination vows of any of our chaplains. (See Commission Constitution, Article
II.2.)
Article I of R&D: Military members and families
G. Establish and maintain methods of liaison with individual congregations of
the member denominations to assist them in providing adequate ministry to their
members while they are separated from the particular church during periods in the
Armed Forces and other institutions.
Article I of R&D: Biennial meetings
H. Meet at least once twice per year and at other times when needed for the
purpose of transacting the business of the Commission. (Commission By-Laws
II.)
Article III of R&D: DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
A. The Chairman shall:
1. Preside at all Commission meetings and regularly communicate with
the Executive Director between meetings. At his request, the ViceChairman shall preside.
2. Appoint members to committees as necessary to facilitate the business
of the Commission.
B. The Commission added the following paragraph to Article III, Church
Gifts:
“D. Funds sent by churches in the name of a particular chaplain, unless
designated for his dues, are used for PRJCCMP Chaplain Ministries. If
a chaplain needs ministry resources, he is encouraged to request the PRJC
Staff to advertise those needs to the Church, but he must not attempt to redirect church gifts from the PRJC budget to his own ministry needs. If a
chaplain has arranged for a church to specifically pay their dues, the PRJC
Administrative Assistant must be notified by him of this arrangement in
writing so that church’s gift for that purpose can be processed correctly.”
Article IV of R&D:
REQUIREMENTS FOR CHAPLAINCY
ECCLESIASTICAL ENDORSEMENT
A. The applicant shall:
7. meet all of the requirements of the Chaplaincy for which he is applying.
In the case of military Chaplaincy, for example, Department of Defense
(DoD) minimum standards include at least 120 hours of undergraduate
credit, the M.Div. degree, a minimum of 72 semester hours of graduate
120
seminary study, plus ordination. It should be noted that member PRJCCMP
denominations may have higher educational standards than DoD. Nonmilitary organizations may have different requirements.
9. submit a nonrefundable processing fee with all new endorsement
requests to defray administrative costs.
B. Non-Military/Civilian Chaplains. In addition to the points in “A” above,
the Applicant shall:
1. submit nonrefundable processing fee with all new endorsement requests
to defray administrative costs.
Article VII of R&D: WHAT THE COMMISSION EXPECTS FROM THE
ENDORSEE/CANDIDATE
A. Attend a local PRJC or NAPARC-related church (assuming one is
reasonably near-by) if not fully engaged in military or civilian chapel ministry. A
PRJCCMP chaplain is expected to lead his family in this regard.
5. On motion, the Commission agreed to petition the General Assemblies and
Synod to petition the appropriate civil authorities to leave in place the “Don’t Ask/
Don’t Tell” policy and supporting laws relating to sexual behavior in the Armed
Forces. (Since there are bills in both the House and Senate to overturn DADT, your
RPCNA Commissioners further suggest that every member of the Synod petition
your own Senators and Representatives.) The Petition and Grounds follow:
We, the members of the Presbyterian and Reformed Joint Commission
on Chaplains and Military Personnel, petition the respective General
Assemblies or Synod of our member denominations to humbly petition
The Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the
service Chiefs and the President of the United States in his capacity as
Commander in Chief, with copies to GEN Carter Ham, Commander,
U. S. Army Forces Europe and Pentagon General Counsel Jeh Johnson, to
maintain the existing policy of “Don’t Ask - Don’t Tell”, hereafter “DA/
DT,” and faithfully to resist its removal, for the protection and meaningful
continuance of the free exercise of religion within the Armed Forces of the
United States.
Grounds:
1. Whereas, believing that the Word of God requires ministers, and other
church officers, to proclaim the whole counsel of God (Acts 20:27), and
that it is a grave dereliction of duty to proclaim “Peace, peace” when there
is no (actual) peace, or to refuse to confront those who “call evil good, and
good evil, who substitute darkness for light, or light for darkness” (Isaiah
5:20); and... 2. Whereas, believing it is the duty of the civil magistrate, “as nursing
fathers, to protect the church of our Common Lord... in such a manner
that all ecclesiastical persons whatever shall enjoy the full, free, and
unquestioned liberty of discharging every part of their sacred function,
without violence or danger...and as Jesus Christ hath appointed a regular
government and discipline in His church, no law of any commonwealth
should interfere with, let, or hinder, the due exercise thereof;” and... 3. Whereas, believing (in light of over a century of our collective military
experience) that any removal, or diminishing of, the well established U.S.
military policy, and high moral purpose, of excluding open homosexuals
from military service will, most certainly, put all chaplains who believe the
Bible to be God’s Holy Word in its entirety gravely at risk of unconstitutional
pressure, and eventual persecution, for upholding the Scriptural truth that
homosexual thinking and behavior is sinful, should be so named, and ought
to be corporately resisted; and... 4. Whereas, believing that any governmental decision to permit acceptance
and inclusion of homosexuals serving openly in our military services, will
most grievously, “interfere in matters of faith”, particularly the exercise of
Christian ministry on the part of our PRJCCMP endorsed chaplains; and... 5. Whereas, it is apparent from the action of the 2009 PCA and OPC
General Assemblies that a number of teaching and ruling elders do not
consider such a situation to constitute a circumstance extraordinary enough
to warrant General Assembly action. (This in part may be because of the
failure to appreciate the difference between a “free civilian society” and a
“hierarchical military society.”) To the contrary the PRJCCMP believes that
silence by the church on this issue endangers the evangelical chaplaincy
in the Armed Services, particularly the continuance of a faithful gospel
ministry by almost two hundred PRJCCMP endorsed pastors (chaplains).
6. Whereas, it is our belief that this is an extraordinary case is
demonstrated by the following examples among others. We believe that
these are predictable and potential results when/or if DADT is repealed
by Congress, based on statements from lobbying groups supporting the
removal of this ban, and similar judicial rulings and/or legislative actions
already enacted or proposed within our country:
a. Unit chaplains may be expected in their preaching, teaching, and
counsel to support the federal military policy of non-discrimination and
will be subject to equal rights complaints and/or charges if there is any
spoken disapproval of homosexual practice and relationships. By way of
contrast, while fornication and adultery are both great evils, neither is a
politically protected behavior.
b. Chaplains who frequently hold command sponsored marriage
retreats to strengthen traditional marriages may be required to include
homosexual couples to avoid equal rights complaints or charges.
c. Chaplains may be required to facilitate sensitivity training classes
for military personnel to foster acceptance of the homosexual lifestyle
within the ranks.
121
122
d. Chaplains may be asked to marry, baptize, administer communion,
and provide other spiritual services to practicing homosexuals (who may
profess to be Christians) which are reserved by Scripture for repentant
and obedient believers. Again equal civil rights discrimination and not
the free exercise of religion will be the complaint.
e. Chaplains may be expected to support excising all anti-homosexual
passages from any Bibles permitted in military chapels until a “homosexual
friendly bible” is printed, which may become the required version for
chapel worship and for distribution to military personnel. Current gifts of
Bibles for service member distribution by civilian organizations would
be ended as well. f. A serious dissonance between scriptural truth and immoral law
supporting sinful behavior will be generated within the ranks jeopardizing
unit cohesion so critical in combat. Again, equal rights and the elimination
of alleged “hate speech” will trump the vital blessing of good order and
discipline as well as religious freedom.
6. In summation, on the basis of already observed pressures against
PRJCCMP endorsed chaplains, we believe that the proposed elimination
of the DADT policy will become catastrophic in the emerging unbiblical
measures which it will bring to bear against all chaplains. Chaplains may be
required to refrain from any identification of any aspect of homosexuality
as sinful.
7. Therefore, we believe, in light of the above, that it is our biblical duty
to recognize the extraordinary danger descending upon the visible church
from this “extraordinary case”, by humbly and urgently petitioning (with
biblical grounds) the involved “civil magistrates” to refrain from repealing
the current DADT policy. (Note: Quotations, unless otherwise indicated, are from Chapters XXIII
and XXXI of the Westminster Confession of Faith) Respectfully submitted, Major General Bentley B. Rayburn, USAF (Ret.)Chairman: Presbyterian
and Reformed Joint Commission on Chaplains and Military Personnel
6. By general consent, the Commission authorized the Chairman to appoint
a subcommittee to draft guidance for military personnel who are not chaplains
in dealing with issues they may face should homosexuality be made legal in the
Armed Forces.
7. By general consent, the Commission agreed to convene the 34th annual
meeting of the PRJCCMP at 1600 hours on 22 February 2011 and adjourn no later
than 1600 hours on 23 February 2011.
III. Other Areas of Interest:
1. On motion, the current officers were re-elected to one year terms by voice
vote: Chairman, Bentley Rayburn; Vice-chairman, Don Prichard; Secretary, Ed
123
Kauffman.
2. Executive Director Doug Lee and the Associate Directors are serving 178
military chaplains, 28 candidates, 60+ applicants, and 70 civilian chaplains.
3. The Commission bade farewell to Beryl Hubbard, thanking him for over
eleven years of service ministering to PRJCCMP chaplains and their wives.
4. On motion, the Commission elected Associate Directors Ron Swafford and
Gary Hitzfeld to one-year terms.
5. In the RPCNA, Stan Copeland is unavailable for duty on the Commission
because of assignment overseas and Jerry O’Neill has completed his two terms of
service. These men should be commended for their years of service.
IV. Recommendations
1. That Synod approve of the changes to the Chaplains Manual, contained in
these minutes. 2. That Synod replace the two vacancies on the commission, left by Jerry O’Neill
and Stan Copeland. We recommend that Synod elect Ron Good and Bill Pihl to
serve six-year terms as commissioners on the PRJC.
3. That the synod petition the appropriate civil authorities to leave in place the
“Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell” policy and supporting laws relating to sexual behavior in
the Armed Forces. A sample letter/memorandum is provided and attached.
4. That our chaplains and military personnel be upheld in prayer.
Submitted by,
Don Prichard for the Synod’s Commissioners
to the PRJC
Commission members: Jerry O’Neill, Stan
Copeland, and Don Prichard
(Letterhead Stationery) DATE: TO: President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Dr. Robert M. Gates
Secretary of Defense
1000 Defense Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301-1000
Admiral Michael G. Mullen
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
9999 Joint Staff Pentagon
Washington, DC 20318-9999
124
General Carter F. Ham
Commanding General
US Army Europe
Unit 29351
APO AE 09014-9351
FROM: The Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America
SUBJECT: Potential Removal of the Military “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT)
Policy 1. Concern: The Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America is
gravely concerned over the potential removal of the current DADT policy that
has essentially in principle, though not specifically named as such, governed
the service of homosexual individuals in our military for much of its history.
The removal of this current ban may go so far as to force the resignation of our
currently serving chaplains from the military as well as the service of military
members from this denomination. 2. Consequences: The removal of the ban opens up the very real potential of
the following ramifications of repealing DADT:
• Chaplains may be vulnerable to the charge of discrimination or command
reprimand if they preach, teach, or counsel in accordance with the passages
in the Bible which directly speak of the sin of homosexual practice.
• Bibles in military chapels and on military bases will be under the threat of
excision of all passages which speak very directly to the sin of homosexual
practice. Whether it will be under the guise of “hate speech” or speech
contrary to the policy of the Department of Defense, the effort may be
made soon after the removal of the ban.
• Marriage retreats conducted by chaplains intended to strengthen traditional
marriage may have to include homosexual couples which may violate
chaplains’ faith tenets and negatively impact the voluntary participation of
married heterosexual couples.
• Homosexual couples may seek union ceremonies or marriages, which are
in violation of the beliefs and ordination vows of a large percentage of
military chaplains, not just those from this denomination. Refusal will
invite the charge of discrimination and command reprimand.
• The “free exercise” and free speech rights of chaplains and military
members may be abrogated as Equal Opportunity policies, “hate speech”
laws, or other legalities trump the First Amendment.
• These potentialities are real examples of or similar to what is already
proposed in statements by lobbying groups supporting the repeal.
3. Appeal: For the above and many other reasons affecting chaplains and
military members in the ranks we humbly appeal to you to not repeal DADT. We
plead this for the good of the nation, for the good of the chaplains who serve the
nation on behalf of their church, for the good of the military members from this
125
church who serve in our armed services, and for the protection of the constitutional
principle of the free exercise of religion.
Sincerely, Moderator, Reformed Presbyterian Church
of North America
The Moderator returned to the chair.
Bill Roberts presented the report of the Reformation Translation
Fellowship. The recommendation was adopted. The report was received and
appears in the Appendix to the minutes.
Ryan Hemphill directed Synod in the morning prayer time. Those present
Psalm 78B.
Following announcements, Danny Olinger, OPC fraternal delegate was
introduced to the court.
Synod took recess at 12:18 p.m. being led in prayer by Bill Pihl.
Wednesday, June 23, 2010; 1:30 p.m.
Synod reconvened at 1:30 p.m. singing Psalm 102C. Ray Lanning led in
prayer.
The minutes of the morning session were read and approved as read.
Faith Martin presented the report of the Woman’s Association. The report
was received and appears in the Appendix to the Minutes. Mrs. Martin
will be retiring at the end of this year and was given a standing ovation in
appreciation of her ministry in leading the Woman’s Association.
David Long presented the report of the RP Global Mission Board. Item
1 was referred to the Nominating Committee. Item 2 was referred to the
Committee on Finance. The report was laid on the table to take up the report
of the Sudan Commission.
Synod took a break from 2:36 to 2:54 p.m.
David Hanson presented the report of the Sudan Commission. He noted
a letter from the newly-formed Reformed Presbyterian Church of Southern
Sudan (RPCSS) requesting fraternal relations with the RPCNA. Item 1 was
declared out of order. Synod agreed to spread the minutes of the Sudan
Commission on the minutes of Synod. The report of the Commission was
approved and is as follows with the minutes of the commission: (Though this
action was taken, the Sudan Commission Minutes were not available for Synod
and thus do not appear here. See the Assistant Clerk’s Report, page 193.)
126
Report of the Sudan Commission
Synod of the RPCNA Summer 2010 Meeting
The Sudan Commission made up of Andrew Stringer, Vincent Ward, and
David Hanson was appointed by Synod in 2008 for “the purpose of organizing
and planting churches and ordaining officers.”
To this end the commission has met 13 times: once in 2008 and twelve times
since Synod 2009.
The following actions were taken by the commission:
• Receiving new members. Over 10 of our 16 pages of minutes are lists
of at least 305 saints who have been received into membership (both
baptized and communicant members). 103 at one meeting alone!
• Establishing churches. We have established 4 mission churches (Mangar
Akuac, Parot, Majang Ajuong, and Lol Mading) and organized 2
congregations (Mangar Akuac and Majang Ajuong).
• Adopting culturally relevant and understandable vows for membership,
baptism and ordination based on the RPCNA vows.
• Ordaining Elders. Three teaching elders, Thomas Deng, Karlo Majok,
and Keribino Hol Dut; and three ruling elders, Peter Akuei, John Akol
Akol, and John Wieu; were examined and ordained.
The Status of the Sudan Commission:
Following the organization of Mangar Akuac and Majang Ajuong as the first
fully organized congregations of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of South
Sudan (Aweil Community Churches), the Reformed Presbyterian Presbytery of
South Sudan was constituted June 5, 2010; made up of 3 ruling elders and 3
teaching elders.
The organization of the presbytery is crucial in the oversight and government of
the churches given the departure of Andrew Stringer and therefore the inability of
the Sudan Commission to constitute with only one member in Sudan. Therefore,
we rejoice that the governing of the Sudan RP Church is under the oversight of
the local presbytery.
The future of the RP Church of Sudan looks bright. The presbytery anticipates
establishing 2 new mission churches at its July 5 meeting, and hopes to have 4
fully organized congregations before the January 2011 referendum.
Motion
1. That the Sudan Commission be dismissed given the establishment of a
presbytery in South Sudan.
In Christ,
Andrew Stringer, Moderator
Vince Ward
David Hanson
127
The report of the RP Global Mission Board was taken from the table. The
following motion was adopted: That the RP Global Mission Board examine
the theological bases of the two governance models that we have followed, for
the sake of future mission work, and report back to Synod. The report as a
Reformed Presbyterian Global Missions
The Board desires to express great thanksgiving to God for the abundant
fruitfulness, grace, and provisions He has showered upon us this year. The bulk
of our work has been focused on four areas: deep financial concerns, the new
mission in Sudan, the work in Japan, and the ongoing work of RP Missions (our
short-term mission program).
Finances
This time last year we were dealing with an immense financial crisis. At one
point we projected a potential shortfall in funds of nearly $240,000. In order to
deal with the crisis we cut over $150,000 from our operating budget, effectively
eliminating all but the bare essentials; and we began our first significant fund
raising campaign throughout the church. We realized that the reduction of our
endowment income meant that we need to have a foundation of regular givers to
Global Missions if our long term calling is to be fulfilled. Our hope is that God will
raise up many individuals and churches who will be committed to regular monthly
giving. Since we do not send our missionaries out to raise their own support, it is
incumbent upon the Board to raise a regular stream of income from God’s people.
We want to report an amazing account of God’s blessing and answer to your
prayers. Within the span of just over six months there has been an outpouring of
regular and one time gifts to such an extent that the financial crisis seems to be
alleviated. It has been a remarkable thing to watch God stir in the hearts of people
to move them to give! We believe we are well on the way to building the kind of
financial base that will keep our missions active for years to come. Please express
our thanksgiving to your congregations and members who have so wonderfully
responded to this need. We hope to continue building a solid group of regular
givers who want to participate in the work of global missions over the long haul.
Sudan
Significant things are happening in our mission in southern Sudan, known
as Cush for Christ. At the beginning of the year, Heather Huizing announced
her intention to come home from the field for personal reasons. Heather did a
remarkable job as the administrator of the team. Her diligence, faith and warm
personality were a tremendous encouragement to the entire team. She finished her
work in Sudan in February and has returned home to California. We wish to express
our deep gratitude for all of her labors for the team and among the Dinka people.
Shortly after Heather’s return, Andrew Stringer announced that he and his
family also believed it was time for them to return to North America. The difficulty
128
of raising a large and young family in such a harsh climate is enormous. Andrew
and Beth concluded that they had completed the work God asked of them. The
Board agrees with that assessment. We are grateful for the significant progress
the work made under Andrew’s leadership. A solid foundation has been laid and
others will continue to build upon it. Andrew, Beth and their six boys plan to be
home by the end of June. Pray for their strength and health as they recover and
resettle in Canada. We are thankful for the sacrificial service of this family as they
provided exactly what the work needed the last few years.
Vince and Julie Ward and their three children, Daniel and Natalie Faris and
their one (soon to be two children), and Scott Brinkerhoff (seconded to us from
the PCA), continue to be used mightily of God. While they will miss Heather
and the Stringers, they are not discouraged by the reduction of team members,
but rather understand that God is working all things according to his plan. They
are faithful to their callings . . . and God is blessing. There are currently over 300
communicant and baptized members in three established mission churches. There
are more worship centers developing. Three Dinka men have been ordained as
teaching elders. Another is being trained. The first ruling elders are also being
trained and equipped. We anticipate the full organization of two of these mission
churches very soon. The new radio ministry is developing. It is our hope and desire
to see God raise up replacement missionaries for those who have come home.
Additionally, the Constitution for this new denomination is almost completed
and adopted. Truly God is building His church. Next January a critical referendum
is scheduled in southern Sudan where the residents will vote on whether or not to
secede from the north. If they do, many speculate that civil war could follow. With
this in mind, we are preparing as best we can for the church to continue on without
a missionary presence if necessary. Please pray for wisdom and God’s leading
that we may lay a solid foundation that can be built upon for generations to come.
Japan
Last summer Charlie Leach accepted a pastoral call from the Kasumigaoka
congregation. His intention was to move to Kobe and begin his work there
sometime this summer. Due to personal family matters, Charlie has decided
that it will be important to remain in the United States for another year. The
Kasumigaoka Congregation concurs with Charlie’s delay, but are praying that his
personal family issues, by God’s grace, can be handled quickly and that his family
can take up the call soon. Please pray for God’s perfect timing and provision
for all those involved. Also continue to pray that God would raise up Japanese
pastors and laborers for the churches in Kobe. We are encouraged that there are
two students who are completing their work at RPTS.
There has also been a good deal of discussion about the future of the bookstore
in Kobe. Ask the Lord to grant wisdom to the Japan Presbytery as they seek the
best ways to minister to the citizens of Kobe through the bookstore location.
129
RP Missions
We continue to thank the Lord for the significance of the short-term mission
opportunities that are available each year. Matt Filbert continues to do a wonderful
job of planning and overseeing these trips each year. Our desire is that all of our
trips will provide encouragement and help to the local mission and create vision
and desire in the hearts of the young people that participate. Plans are underway
to send students to Scotland, Cyprus, Japan, Germany, and France, as well as
many opportunities in North America. We continue to believe these trips are
an excellent tool for raising up the next generation of full time missionaries and
faithful servants in Christ’s church.
Cyprus
Bill and Kalli Sterrett plan to retire at the end of 2010. Pray for the elders of
Trinity Christian Community Fellowship, (TCCF) as they make plans for the future.
Miscellaneous
Again we would like to remind the church about our concerns to protect
missionaries serving as tentmakers in places closed to formal missionaries. We
would like to ask that any reference to missionaries and mission works in such
places as China, Muslim countries and even in parts of Africa such as Senegal be
referred to as “Asia,” the “Muslim or Arab world” and “Africa” (rather than by
nation). We ask that missionaries in such places never be mentioned by name either.
Matt Filbert continues as publicity director for the Board and we are very
thankful for his faithful work in communicating the work of our missionaries to
the local congregations and his work in our fund raising efforts. Jonathan Watt
continues to do excellent work as our Executive Secretary.
Thank you for your great interest in the work of Global Missions. We realize
how much we depend on your prayers and support. We thank our Lord and Savior
for His love and faithfulness to the world. He is building His church.
Recommendations:
1. That Pastor David Hanson be nominated to a 2nd term and ruling elder John
Kim be nominated to replace Donald Cassell who has completed his second term.
2. That the Board be granted $65,000 from RPM&M.
Dave Long, President
Donald Cassell
David Hanson
Paul Ledwell
John McFarland
Boni Piper
Ed Schisler
Carol Wright
Jonathan Watt; ex officio
130
In keeping with the recommendation of the Reformation Translation
Fellowship adopted in the morning session, John McFarland addressed the
court on his recent visit to East Asia.
Ryan Hemphill directed Synod in the afternoon prayer time. Those
present joined together in small groups to pray and concluded the prayer
time singing Psalm 22E.
prayer by Rich Johnston.
Wednesday, June 23, 2010; 7:00 p.m.
by Ray Morton.
The minutes of the afternoon session were read, corrected and approved.
Ian Wise presented the ecclesiastical and fraternal delegates to address the
Synod. He read a letter of greeting from the Canadian Reformed Churches
in which they noted the decision of their Synod not to enter into ecclesiastical
fellowship with the RPCNA, mainly because of the ordination of women to
the office of deacon in the RPCNA. The following delegates addressed the
court:
Adam Mastris for the Trinity Christian Community Fellowship
Henry Foster for the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church
Don Overbeek for the Heritage Reformed Congregations
Danny Olinger for the Orthodox Presbyterian Church
Larry Elenbaum for the Presbyterian Church in America
Ron Potter for the Reformed Church in the United States
Harry Zekveld for the United Reformed Churches of North America
Bruce Martin presented the report of the Interchurch Committee. Items
1-3 were referred to the Nominating Committee. Item 4 was adopted. Items
5 and 6 were referred to the Committee on Finance. Items 7 and 8 were
adopted. The report as a whole was approved and is as follows:
Report of the Interchurch Committee
The Interchurch Committee met in Grand Rapids, Michigan on November
16, 2009, just prior to the annual meeting of NAPARC. Since we are allowed
up to four delegates it seemed appropriate to the committee to bring the whole
committee together at that time rather than to have all members come together
again at a later date. The committee met a second time by conference call on
April 14, 2010. Bruce Martin was elected as Chairman and Ian Wise was elected
as Secretary.
131
NAE (National Association of Evangelicals)
The 2009 Synod voted to remove our membership from the NAE and to write
a letter calling the NAE to repentance. We have written letters both to Roy Taylor,
Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Leith Anderson, President, in fulfillment
of these actions. We are grateful for the work of Dr. Bruce Stewart in his assistance
in crafting these letters.
ICRC (International Conference of Reformed Churches)
The seventh assembly of the ICRC met in Christchurch, New Zealand, October
16-22, 2009. As we informed the Synod a year ago we did not send delegates to
this meeting in light of economic constraints that have been a burden to some of
Synod’s boards and committees. The ICRC assembles every fourth year so the
next meeting is scheduled for September, 2013 in Cardiff, Wales, UK.
NAPARC (North American Presbyterian and Reformed Council)
Our delegates to the annual meeting of NAPARC were Drew Gordon, Matt
Kingswood, Bruce Martin and David Reese. The meeting was hosted by the HRC
at the Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary in Grand Rapids, Michigan on
November 17-18, 2009. The Presbyterian Reformed Church had received enough
votes to be welcomed so that now the member churches of NAPARC are:
Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church (ARP)
Canadian Reformed Churches (CanRC)
Eglise reformee du Quebec (ERQ)
Free Reformed Churches of North America (FRCNA)
Heritage Reformed Congregations (HRC)
Korean American Presbyterian Church (KAPC)
Orthodox Presbyterian Church (OPC)
Presbyterian Reformed Church (PRC)
Presbyterian Church in America (PCA)
Reformed Church in the United States (RCUS)
Reformed Presbyterian Church in North America (RPCNA)
United Reformed Churches of North America (URCNA)
Our delegation met with the delegations from the CanRC and URCNA at their
requests in order to become better acquainted with these denominations whose
roots are planted in the continental reformed tradition.
We continued to meet also with the ARP delegates and considered ways
our two denominations might be better acquainted beyond what has been
done up to this point. One idea was to join together for conferences, but
we learned that the ARP as a denomination does not travel as much as the
RPCNA, tending to stay in the southern Atlantic coast region. Their delegates
were unsure as to how many of their people would be willing to travel to the
upper Midwest for an international conference. Plans are underway for articles
about the ARP to be published in the Reformed Presbyterian Witness, and
for articles about the RPCNA to be published in the ARP magazine. The new
132
ARP Psalter, which features an entire psalter from The Book of Psalms for
Worship, is scheduled for publication in early 2011, and should be a great help in our worshiping together.
The next annual meeting is to be hosted by the FRCNA in Pompton Plains,
New Jersey, November 16-17, 2010.
Fraternal Delegates
Membership in NAPARC is not always considered by member churches as
automatic fraternal relations with every other church in NAPARC. In fact, some
churches have more stringently defined levels of relationship. It is appropriate
for us to receive invitations before assigning fraternal delegates to attend other
synods or general assemblies. We are grateful for the close relationship we have
with Reformed Presbyterian Churches around the world and would be glad to
have elders inform us if they happen to be traveling to such places when their
synods/presbyteries meet.
Our appointment of fraternal delegates for this season is as follows:
ARPC – Drew Gordon (June 8-10, Bonclarken)
PCA – Drew Gordon (June 29-July 2, Nashville)
RCUS – Nathan Eshelman (May 17-20, Shafter, CA)
RPHCC
As noted last year we sent two men to teach in a seminary overseas: Bruce
Parnell and Jonathan Watt. Two translators accompanied them. In recent years a
trip has also been scheduled during the winter holidays. None was scheduled this
year since the scare of the H1N1 virus would have required a week of quarantine
after arrival before going to teach in another city.
Although not sponsored by the Interchurch Committee, Pastor John McFarland
was able to go in March to teach on Reformed Presbyterian Worship and History
at the request of the seminary leader. This was the last class prior to the graduation
of the first wave of students.
Your committee believes that a committee dedicated to this work is needed.
We note that our Global Mission Board has committees devoted to specific fields.
We believe it would be wise to have a committee dedicated to this field to deal
with such matters as a curriculum for the seminary in conjunction with those in the
field, those who would serve as professors as well as other matters of assistance.
They might also consider the possibility of placing Reformed Presbyterian
missionaries in the field. This field could easily take up the whole energy of the
Interchurch Committee.
Covenanter Holiday Tour
The quadrennial convention hosted by the RPCI is to be held in Scotland, July
17-24, 2010. We are grateful for the leadership of Jonathan and Megan Morton in
organizing and leading a North American delegation to the convention.
133
Committee Matters
Last year your committee requested and was granted an executive secretary
position. Bruce Parnell declined the appointment and others have been approached
about serving in this position. We hope to be able to place another name before the
Synod this year. As noted in our report a year ago, “this position would have travel
and other expenses reimbursed but would not receive further remuneration.”
The terms of Matt Kingswood and Ian Wise end with this meeting of Synod.
Ian Wise is completing his second term on the committee and Matt Kingswood is
eligible for re-election. David Smith resigned from the committee at the time he
resigned his pastorate so he also needs to be replaced.
Recommendations:
1. That Matt Kingswood and Bruce Parnell be nominated to fill the class of 2013.
2. That Jerry Milroy be nominated to fill the unexpired term of David Smith in
the class of 2011.
3. That Ian Wise be nominated to be the Executive Secretary for the Interchurch
Committee.
4. That the Synod establish an East Asia Committee, comprised of representatives
of IC, RPGM, RTF, seminary, and an at-large member, the purpose being to
support RPHCC and RPTS-Asia, dealing with curriculum, financing, providing
for teachers, developing policy, considering sending of missionaries, to more fully
embrace the opportunity before us.
5. That the East Asia Committee be granted $25,000 from RPM&M ($10,000 for
mission trips; $15,000 for support of the overseas seminary).
6. That the Interchurch Committee be granted $10,000 for fraternal delegate and
committee expenses.
7. That the Interchurch Committee explore fraternal relationship with the
Reformed Presbyterian Church of South Sudan (RPCSS).
8. That the Interchurch Committee explore fraternal relationship with the
Reformation Presbytery of the Midwest.
Matt Kingswood, Ian Wise
Class of 2010
Drew Gordon
Class of 2011
Bruce Martin, Ch., David Reese Class of 2012
Aaron Goerner led in preparing Synod for elections.
Kit Swartz presented the report of the Committee on Communication
10-1. Synod laid the item on the table to entertain a substitute. The four
motions of Communication 10-1 are substituted for the Synod’s debate.
Ryan Hemphill directed Synod in the evening prayer time. Those present
gathered in small groups to pray and concluded the prayer time singing
Psalm 133A.
prayer by Lucas Hanna.
134
Thursday, June 24, 2010, 8:30 A.M.
Synod met pursuant to adjournment on the morning of Thursday, June
24, 2010 in Skye Lounge of the Student Center on the campus of Geneva
College, Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania. The Moderator called the meeting to
order at 8:32 a.m.
Craig Milroy led Synod in singing Psalm 113A and Titus Martin led in
prayer constituting the court.
Dr. Wayne Spear led Synod in the morning devotions. Since the theme
for the week is “Motivations for my Ministry,” he spoke autobiographically
on this theme noting how four passages of Scripture had affected his life and
ministry: Proverbs 27:1; 2 Timothy 2:2; 2 Timothy 2:24-25 and Acts 20:24.
He then led in prayer and Synod concluded the service singing Psalm 71C.
The minutes of the Wednesday evening session were read and approved
as read.
The written remarks of Adam Mastris on Wednesday evening were
ordered placed in the Appendix to the Minutes.
Aaron Goerner presented another item for the ballot in preparation for
elections.
David Merkel presented the report of the Committee on Finance. Item
1 was divided and both parts were adopted. Item 2-7 were adopted. Item
8 was referred to the committee to report back to Synod in 2011. Item 9
was referred to the Nominating Committee. Item 10 was adopted; in keeping
with this item David Merkel led in prayer. The following motion was referred
to the Committee on Finance: That the Canadian and Japanese churches
be exempted from the assessments for the RP Home and the Pension Fund
Current Account referenced in item 1. The report as a whole was approved
and is as follows:
Report of the Committee on Finance to the 2010 Synod
Synod’s Committee on Finance met at the RP Theological Seminary on April
30, 2010, and a portion of this meeting included representatives from most of
the Boards and Agencies of Synod. We will meet as needed during the week of
Synod. We have sought to address the usual types of financial matters, and are
continuing to focus our attention on more effective ways of raising the funds
needed for Reformed Presbyterian Missions & Ministry (RPM&M).
As we have reviewed the work that the Lord is doing through the RPCNA, we
continue to be thankful for His provision. The willingness of our members to step
up and help RP Global Missions last year was particularly heartening.
We are pleased to note that 2009 receipts for RPM&M totaled $370,012,
which was the best year in RPM&M in over a dozen years. It was an increase of
more than $50,000 over 2008 and exceeding the base goal of $340,000. Once
again, total congregational giving increased, but Synod should note that 19
135
congregations did not contribute to RPM&M at all, which is more than last year.
2009 was the second year of the “Step-Up” plan which provided an additional
$70,012 for distributions. In order to meet as many of the needs as possible
in 2010, we are hopeful that at least $400,000 will be contributed to RPM&M
this year. The Stewardship Committee of Synod’s Trustees is planning a variety
of promotional efforts to better communicate the need for increased giving to
RPM&M. However, the best method is for each person at Synod to take the
message home and promote it personally in your congregations. Synod’s Finance
Committee brings recommendations for 2011 that we believe will strengthen the
denomination through greater unified giving to RPM&M.
Special Financial Need for Assistance with Benevolent Care
Despite increased giving, needs have increased in a tough economic
environment. The best example of that is the RP Home. Their endowment is
down; their reimbursements from the State of Pennsylvania are down as well. RP
retirees in need of care are likely to be more numerous.
The implicit promises of the past—“We will take care of you,” are real costs
in the present environment. Our congregations must be encouraged to support
those who served the church well in the past, particularly those congregations that
have ministers (and their spouses) in the RP Home now. That their congregations
exist today relies on the work of those (and their spouses) in the RP Home now.
This is not a new situation to the RPCNA. Pension plan A has been running
on a cash flow basis for the last 10 years or so, requiring a large portion of the
funds from the MacLaughlin Trust. Just as it was unacceptable to let retired
ministers not receive a pension even though the assets of the plan were depleted,
it is unacceptable to have the RP Home subsidize the RPCNA. It harms the Home
in two ways: 1) directly, and 2) makes their creditors think that we don’t stand
behind them, which weakens their hand in credit negotiations.
I urge you to read the report of the RPWA to get a fuller picture of their
difficulties, and the actions that have been taken to navigate the problems in the
short run. But here is our synopsis:
• The Home provided $104,000 of benevolent (uncompensated) care to 6
RPs in 2009.
• We gave them only $28,000 in 2009, which is close to the average for the
last five years.
• The RP Home has received a reduction in their Medicaid reimbursements
of roughly $180,000 annualized.
• The RP Home has cut salaries, wages, and benefits by roughly $211,000
annualized.
• The RP Home has asked the Trustees of Synod to forego payment of
principal on their loan for one year, which the Trustees unanimously
approved.
• And more, read the report.
Support of the Home for benevolent care reasons is a structural issue, and
136
needs a dedicated base of support. As part of a solution to the economics of the
home, and as a means of doing our duty to our poor retired brothers and sisters in
Christ, that is why the Trustees of Synod and the Finance Committee unanimously
recommend that we create a $20 per Communicant Member assessment to support
the RP Home. Without such a commitment, the Reformed Presbyterian Home
may not deserve to be called “The Reformed Presbyterian Home.” It has been
a part of the fabric of the RPCNA for over 100 years, and deserves our support.
A Long-Term Solution to Financing the Ministries and Missions of the
RPCNA
The Finance Committee has often considered how to better fund the missions
and ministries of the RPCNA. Last’s years report to Synod hinted that we would
bring a proposal to the 2010 Synod. We will describe that proposal in a moment,
but first, a little history. The effort to come up with a better long term funding
solution got a boost in 2009, when a pastor wrote the finance committee telling
us of how the Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland did it. They have a
congregation giving guideline that they call “Targets of Honor.” The amounts
given are voluntary, but express what an average congregation of a given size
should give to the denomination.
We are proposing something similar, though not being as poetic as the Irish,
we are calling it “The Congregational Giving Guideline.” [CGG] The CGG
works off of several principles:
• This is voluntary, aside from the assessments.
• It is minimalist in its construction, taking account of just two variables:
communicant members and gross receipts.
• The CGG is not jealous; it fits over existing giving. We want all of the
missions and ministries of the RPCNA to flourish, and RPM&M does not
discourage direct contributions. The CGG applies to all giving inside the
RPCNA, but outside of your congregation. As examples, giving to your
presbytery and giving to the Home or the Seminary, among others, qualify
for meeting the CGG.
• It recognizes that smaller congregations have fixed costs, and should not
be asked to shoulder more than they can afford. Larger congregations
should give a greater proportion of their gross receipts than smaller
congregations.
• In the Old Covenant, giving to the Lord’s work was both per head (the
half-shekel) and proportionate to income (the tithes). Beyond that,
offerings were an evidence of gratitude toward God’s grace.
• Also, a tithe of the Levitical tithe went to the priests (e.g. Neh 10:38). This
is not meant as a strict parallel to our situation, but as an analogy. The
works of the denomination outside of the congregation require roughly
a tithe to operate, along with whatever free-will offerings God’s people
give out of gratitude for the greater grace extended to them in the New
Covenant.
•
137
It is a fairer system than the one that we currently have. Some congregations
and presbyteries exceed the CGG now, but in aggregate, most don’t. The
load should be spread evenly in proportion to communicant members and
gross receipts.
The CGG is designed to produce roughly a tithe on total gross receipts of the
congregations of the RPCNA. Here are three possible formulas, including the one
that we recommend:
• Recommended: Congregations should aim to give 7.2% of their gross
receipts under $150,000, and 9.2% of their gross receipts over $150,000
to missions and ministries inside the RPCNA, over and above their $55
per communicant member assessment.
• Congregations should aim to give 4.8% of their gross receipts under
$150,000, and 6.8% of their gross receipts over $150,000 to missions and
ministries inside the RPCNA, over and above their $110 per communicant
member assessment.
• Congregations should aim to give 6.9% of their gross receipts under
ministries inside the RPCNA, over and above their $55 per communicant
member assessment.
There are many other combinations that could be tried, and indeed, the
committee has tried many combinations, but these three were chosen because we
think that the recommended formula balances the competing goals of a funding
formula well, e.g., slightly less than 25% of the CGG comes from the assessment
in the recommended formula. The other two show how tweaking the formula
changes the percentages. Each formula results in roughly 10% of gross receipts
going to the missions and ministries of the RPCNA.
In the Appendix to this report, the effects of the formula on each congregation
and presbytery are shown for each of the three formulas, using data from the 2009
Docket and Digest, which is calendar year 2008 data. Different formulas affect
different congregations and presbyteries differently. The main similarity is that
we need to give more, and the CGG provides a target for how to get there, and a
guide to congregational budget committees.
The Finance Committee thinks the recommended CGG is fairer than what we
do now. One member of the Committee did a statistical analysis to try to analyze
how congregations give to the works of the denomination. The formula that he
found that best expressed how congregations give explained roughly 63% of the
variation in giving in 2008 (for wonks only: the t- and F-statistics are statistically
significant at a 95% level), and is as follows:
The average congregation gives 6.6% of their gross receipts under $150,000,
but takes back 3.0% of the gross receipts over $150,000. Beyond that, they
give nothing on the first 50 communicant members, and $212 per communicant
member thereafter.
The main takeaway here is a simple one. Small congregations typically don’t
give much beyond their assessments, and large congregations typically don’t give
138
proportionate to their increased means as measured by gross receipts, but give
proportionately to their communicant membership. This implies two changes:
• Every congregation needs to give something beyond their assessment.
• On average, large congregations need to give more as a proportion of their
gross receipts.
The CGG accomplishes both of these goals, and brings about greater fairness
in funding the missions and ministries of the RPCNA. But away from fairness, we
want to thank the congregations that give more than their fair share as measured
by the CGG, and we ask one simple thing: please don’t stop your generosity. The
CGG is an aid to show what congregations ought to do, but is not meant to restrain
generosity.
Beyond the CGG, we ask that the session of each congregation do three things:
• Promote what the RPCNA does in its missions and ministries to their
congregation, in order to explain the needs and promote support of the
RPCNA through their congregation, and individually.
• Instruct whoever constructs their budget to include RPM&M as a line item
in their budget, and show them this report, including the CGG formula.
• Provide a minimum of at least one opportunity per year to contribute
to a special collection for RPM&M so that there are no longer any
congregations that give $0.
We realize that many congregations donate directly to Boards and Agencies,
but our position has always been that as Presbyterians, congregational support
should primarily be directed through the denomination appointed channel,
currently RPM&M or through the denominational treasurer’s office in special
instances.
Synod Operations and Pension Assessments
Please take time to review the “Synod Operations Fund” report which is
located with other financial reports. The line items in the Synod Operations Fund
fall into three main categories: First is the “Doctrine/Worship/Government”
section, which provides for the “Judicial” aspect of the work of the Synod. Second
is the “Inter-Church Relations” section, which provides for the “Diplomatic/
Fraternal” portion. Third is the “Support/Overhead” section, which provides the
“Administration” needed in order to carry out Synod’s required responsibilities
listed in the first two sections.
We continue to recommend that the first three sections detailed in the financial
report, which we view as “necessary” or “required responsibilities” of the Synod,
be funded by assessments. With the special efforts being made by the Interchurch
Committee to assist the Reformed Presbyterian House Churches of Asia, we
have designated a portion of their efforts as “Ministry”. The committees that
have been designated “Ministry” Committees have at times received part or all
of their funding from Synod’s assessment. We believe that the funding for their
regular committee expenses should come from assessments, and the funding
for their ministries should generally come from RPM&M or other grants. As a
139
result we have allocated $10,000 of the Interchurch Committee and Revitalization
Committee income from assessments, as well as $4,000 of the Youth Ministry
income, and $5,000 for the Church History Committee. $5,000 is also provided
for the Revitalization Committee which, when combined with income from funds
functioning as their endowment, will enable them to carry out their work. The
proposed assessment of $20 per communicant member for Synod Operations
should be adequate in 2011 to cover all these expenses.
With reluctance, both the Finance Committee and the Trustees of Synod
unanimously recommend raising the assessment to $55 per communicant
member. Originally we thought that $60 would be the right figure, but we thought
about congregations that are strapped for resources, and decided that if we were
going to increase the assessment $20 for the RP Home, then we should decrease
assessment for Synod’s operations from $25 to $20, thinking that the whole can
get by on less. As it is, the $15 pension assessment will decline over the next
15 years to zero, by roughly $5 dollars every 5 years. As for the RP Home, the
assessment will vary (roughly) based on the amount of benevolent care provided
to RPs living in the RP Home.
Maclaughlin Trust and Unrestricted Undesignated Fund Update
We give thanks to God that the denomination will be receiving several estate
gifts in 2010, around $28,000 in aggregate. In keeping with Synod approved
policy, one-half of the gifts to the denomination will be added to the funds
functioning as endowment for the E&P Board and the balance has been added to
unrestricted undesignated funds.
We are very thankful for the income from the Cecil S. MacLaughlin Trust,
which is estimated to be $174,000 in 2010 and $164,000 in 2011. We continue to
recommend that Geneva College receive approximately 50% of the MacLaughlin
Trust income as recommended by Synod’s Trustees in 2008, which is $82,000 in
2011.
You should also remember that a few years ago the denomination was blessed
with a sizeable gift from the Mel and Geneva Rutherford Estate, and this along
with other unrestricted gifts and income have been used to fund a variety of needs
the past two years. Some of these include helping to establish an endowment fund
for the E&P Board; providing partial funding to help complete the new Psalter;
assisting the Church History Committee in getting important historical documents
scanned so that they are readily accessible; providing some of the funding to assist
the RPHCC; and among other needs helping the RPWA with the Upper Rooms
project.
Financial Requests Presented for 2011 and Urgent need to “step up” giving
Each Board and Agency has a compelling story to tell. We continue to be
amazed at the extensive work that is being done by this small denomination with
limited resources. We have carefully considered all requests, and have sought to
provide the essential levels of funding each ministry needs through the RPM&M
140
and Step-Up giving and Unrestricted Undesignated Fund grants. We have set
a “base” goal of $325,000 for RPM&M which is about $65 per communicant
member per year. Since over $370,000 was donated in 2009, we are cautiously
optimistic that this goal should be met in both 2010 and 2011. It is essential
that each member of Synod take the message home to his congregation of the
importance of contributing to RPM&M on some level as the Lord leads.
E&P
HMB
FMB
Revitalization
YOUTH
RPTS
GENEVA
RPWA
RPHCC (Asia)
400K
20,000
20,000
20,000
5,000
0
15,000
5,000
5,000
10,000
STEP
100,000
20%
20%
20%
5%
0%
15%
5%
5%
10%
500K
5,000
20,000
30,000
10,000
5,000
10,000
5,000
10,000
5,000
STEP
100,000
5%
20%
30%
10%
5%
10%
5%
10%
5%
600K
0
25,000
25,000
15,000
5,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
0
STEP
100,000
0%
25%
25%
15%
5%
10%
10%
10%
0%
We are recommending the step over $300,000 in 2011 from $300,000 to
$400,000. A total of $325,000 is needed ($25,000 of this step) as a minimum
in contributions to RPM&M in 2010 to meet the real needs of the Boards
and Agencies. We want members and congregations of the denomination to
experience consistent success in meeting the base goal of $325,000, but higher
levels of giving are needed. Since we have recommended distributing all of the
reserves in the 2011 Unrestricted Undesignated Funds, any excess donations over
$500,000 in 2011 would be held for strategic allocation by Synod in 2012. Please
challenge your congregations to significantly increase giving to RPM&M both
now and in 2011. Once the basic needs have been met at $325,000 in 2011, we
have heard from the Boards and Agencies of important projects and opportunities
that could be addressed if funds were available.
Policy Reminders
1. Committees that spend over $5,000 per year must submit a budget to
the Finance Committee by May 1 of each year to be incorporated into
the Synod Operations budget. Committees must pay careful attention to
the amount of funds approved for their use by Synod. Expenses should
be submitted promptly because deficit spending is not permitted, and
communication and coordination with the Treasurer is essential.
2. Each person asking for reimbursement from Synod for travel must make
every effort to travel using the least expensive way possible. We urge
all delegates to make an extra effort to reduce travel costs. The largest
category of Synod expenses after salaries is travel.
3. For Synod travel, use the allowable IRS mileage rate in effect at the date
of travel. When in doubt, check with the Trustees Office or online at
www.IRS.gov.
141
4. In order to better formulate recommendations for Synod in 2011, we
recommend that all requests for Unrestricted Undesignated Funds be
submitted to the Trustees of Synod’s office by April 15, 2011.
Recommendations
1. That Synod’s assessment be set at $55 per member for 2011 based on
communicant membership as of December 31, 2009 as reported to the Stated
Clerk. This consists of $20 for the Synod Operations Fund, $20 for the RP Home
and $15 for the Pension Fund Current Account.
2. That the Treasurer’s Report for the year ended December 31, 2009, as prepared
by the Denominational Treasurer, and the Independent Auditor’s Report of the
Trustees of Synod for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, as prepared
by RC Holsinger Associates, be received as distributed and that the Audit Report
be printed in the Minutes of Synod.
3. That the Unallocated Denominational Office financial report for 2009 be
received and that the 2011 proposed budget be approved.
4. That 50% of all Unrestricted Undesignated bequests received in 2011 be
deposited in the E&P endowment fund.
5. That Synod set the minimum contribution for the employer of each participant
in Pension Plan B at $3,900 for 2010.
6. That $164,000 from the 2011 income of the MacLaughlin Trust (Unrestricted
Undesignated Funds), $60,000 from the remaining Unrestricted Undesignated
Funds, and contributions to RPM&M in 2011 of up to $500,000 be distributed as
follows:
7,000
325,000
Total Budget
3,900
64,000
18,000
7,000
10,000
60,000
1,100
16,000
1,400
9,600
15,000
60,000
10,500
6,400
9,500
57,600
Agency
Pension
E&P
RPHCC (Asia)
HMB
RP Global
Missions
Revitalization
Grants
Youth
Ministries
RPTS
Geneva
RPWA
Graduate
Studies
2011
Unrestr.
Undes.
Grant
2011
RPM&M
Grant
88,000
164,000
82,000
2011
MacLaughlin
Trust
Grant
60,000
22,000
159,950
91,400
Assessments
68,550
779,550
7,000
5,000
80,000
172,000
108,000
10,000
75,000
20,000
64,000
Request
128,550
110,000
708,950
7,000
5,000
80,000
101,400
108,000
10,000
75,000
20,000
64,000
Grant
128,550
110,000
2011 TOTAL
517,000
10,000
7,000
73,000
92,000
28,000
0
73,000
20,000
64,000
2010
Total
Granted
60,000
90,000
100%
15%
5%
5%
5%
20%
10%
20%
RPM&M
Step-UP
Plan
to $400k
20%
100%
5%
10%
5%
10%
10%
25%
5%
25%
RPM&M
Step-UP
Plan
to $500k
5%
142
143
7. We recommend that Synod approve the steps in 2011 from $300,000
to $400,000, and $400,000 to $500,000 for contributions to RPM&M to be
distributed in accord with the percentages shown in the two right hand columns
of the above charts. Any RPM&M contributions in 2011 that exceed $500,000
would be held for strategic allocation by Synod in 2012.
8. We recommend that Synod approve the following congregational giving
guideline: Congregations should aim to give 7.2% of their gross receipts under
ministries inside the RPCNA, over and above their $55 per communicant member
assessment. Every session should promote what the RPCNA does in its missions
and ministries to their congregation, in order to explain the needs and promote
support of the RPCNA through their congregation, and individually. Every
session should also instruct whoever constructs their budget to include RPM&M
as a line item in their budget, and show them this report, including the CGG
formula. Every session should provide a minimum of at least one opportunity per
year to contribute to a special collection for RPM&M so that there are no longer
any congregations that give $0.
9. That Lorrie Meneely and ______________ be nominated as a “Member
Elected by Synod” for the class of 2013 to replace Darik Taniguchi who has
served two terms and is not eligible for re-election.
10.That following the adoption of this report, Synod rise for prayer to give thanks
to God for His provision during the past years and to pray for continued financial
blessings on this branch of His Church.
Synod’s Committee on Finance
Members Elected by Synod
Darik Taniguchi (2nd Term – 2010)
David Merkel, Chairman (2nd Term – 2011)
Dennis Wing (1st Term – 2012)
Members by Position (ex-officio voting)
Chairman, Business of Synod Committee – James Faris
President, Trustees of Synod – John P. Edgar, Lorrie
Meneely, consultative member
Denominational Treasurer – James K. McFarland
Members Appointed by Presbyteries
Alleghenies – David Schaefer (1st Term – 2010)
Atlantic – Larry Gladfelter (1st Term - 2012)
Great Lakes-Gulf – Bob McCracken (1st Term - 2012)
Midwest – Jeff Bechtold (1st Term - 2011)
Pacific Coast – Paul Hemphill (1st Term - 2012)
St. Lawrence - (1st Term - 2012)
144
Financial Statements
TRUSTEES OF THE SYNOD OF THE REFORMED
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA
DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008
CONTENTS.....................................................................................................Page
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT......................................................... 145
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Statements of Financial Position................................................................... 146
Statements of Activities................................................................................. 147
Statements of Cash Flow............................................................................... 149
Notes to Financial Statements....................................................................... 150
145
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Trustees of the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
We have audited the accompanying statements of financial position of the
Trustees of the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America
(the “Trustees”) (a Not-For-Profit Organization) as of December 31, 2009 and
2008, and the related statements of activities and cash flows for the years then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Organization’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, except for the matter described in the following paragraph,
the financial position of the Trustees of the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian
Church of North America as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the changes in
its net assets and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As described in Note 6 to the financial statements, comprehensive actuarial
reports and valuations are not available for Pension Plan “A” maintained by the
Trustees. Accordingly, the information necessary to provide disclosures specified
by Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification
715-20-50 (Formerly FASB Numbers 87 and 88) has not been determined and
such disclosures have not been made. Additionally, pension benefits incurred
under Pension Plan “A” have been charged to expense when paid rather than
determining pension expense using an acceptable actuarial cost method. We
believe that omission of the disclosure of the foregoing information and failure to
determine pension expense using accepted actuarial cost methods are departures
from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
RC Holsinger Associates, P.C.
Wexford, Pennsylvania
June 18, 2010
146
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
ASSETS
December 31,
2009 2008(Restated)
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 547,581 $ 577,358
Investments, at fair value 11,567,318 11,284,441
Accounts receivable
294,243
264,132
Other assets
9,805
19,168
Accrued investment income receivable
48,930
67,113
Inventories
173,354
122,968
Total Current Assets 12,641,231
12,335,189
Property and Equipment, net
1,518,226
1,397,932
Other assets:
Building loans receivable
General mortgages receivable
Deferred student aid receivable
1,306,163
1,075,834
9,757
1,039,711
847,293
10,429
2,391,754
1,897,433
Total Assets $ 16,551,211 $15,630,545
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 499,506 $ 426,117
Payable to denomination-related organizations 2,563,620
2,339,915
Total Current Liabilities
3,063,126
2,766,032
Net Assets:
Unrestricted
Temporarily restricted
Permanently restricted
4,097,590
247,794
9,142,701
3,892,678
299,010
8,672,825
Total Net Assets 13,488,085
12,864,513
Total Liabilities and Net Assets $ 16,551,211 $15,630,545
* The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.*
147
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009
TemporarilyPermanently
Unrestricted Restricted Restricted
Total
Revenue and support
R.P.M.&M.
$ 370,012 $
- $
- $ 370,012
Other contributions
744,606 255,190
76,205
1,076,001
Bequests
227,196
-
-
227,196
Dividend income
59,676
16,078
523,981
599,735
Unrealized gain
1,740,387
47,943
-
1,788,330
Realized loss
(1,202,183) (33,117)
- (1,235,300)
Sales of publications, etc.
306,703
-
-
306,703
Tuition, fees and assessments
834,072
-
-
834,072
Rental income
44,263
-
-
44,263
Other income
149,529
29,610
-
179,139
Net assets released from restrictions:
Restrictions satisfied by payments 497,230 (366,920)
(130,310)
Total Revenue and Support
3,771,491
(51,216)
469,876
4,190,151
78,266
182,191
62,929
378,235
181,937
52,909
126,860
595,182
68,790
47,748
41,874
72,642
50,430
18,577
76,996
4,048
228,358
1,048,339
78,918
118,595
52,755
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
78,266
182,191
62,929
378,235
181,937
52,909
126,860
595,182
68,790
47,748
41,874
72,642
50,430
18,577
76,996
4,048
228,358
1,048,339
78,918
118,595
52,755
Total Expenses
3,566,579
-
-
3,566,579
Change in Net Assets
204,912
(51,216)
469,876
623,572
3,892,678
299,010
8,672,825
12,864,513
Expenses:
Depreciation
Foreign mission operations
Geneva grants
Grants
Hospitalization
Insurance
Maintenance and supplies
Miscellaneous
Other board expenses
Other employee benefits
Payroll taxes
Pension board operations
Pensions
Postage
Presbytery aid
Property taxes
Publications and books
Salaries and wages
Seminary operations
Travel
Utilities
Net Assets-Beginning of Year
(Restated)
Net Assets-End of Year
$ 4,097,590 $ 247,794 $ 9,142,701 $13,488,085
148
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 (RESTATED)
Total
Revenue and support
R.P.M.&M.
$ 319,259 $
- $
- $ 319,259
Other contributions
540,904 282,080
51,096
874,080
Bequests
260,788
-
-
260,788
Dividend income
272,773
16,521
624,238
913,532
Unrealized loss
(3,723,170) (68,573)
- (3,791,743)
Realized loss
(1,278,459) (23,547)
- (1,302,006)
171,546
-
-
171,546
765,212
-
-
765,212
Rental income
36,083
-
-
36,083
Other income
146,873 245,449
-
392,322
Restrictions satisfied by payments 3,505,511 (585,941) (2,919,570)
Expenses:
Depreciation
Geneva grants
Grants
Hospitalization
Insurance
Miscellaneous
Payroll taxes
Pensions
Postage
Presbytery aid
Property taxes
Salaries and wages
Seminary operations
Travel
Utilities
Total Expenses
Net Assets, Beginning of Year
Net Assets, End of Year
1,017,320 (134,011) (2,244,236) (1,360,927)
90,728
187,088
140,963
414,466
182,183
54,568
142,434
223,362
65,266
56,003
41,444
130,352
56,070
26,306
70,428
2,392
130,237
1,024,380
137,210
174,205
60,474
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
90,728
187,088
140,963
414,466
182,183
54,568
142,434
223,362
65,266
56,003
41,444
130,352
56,070
26,306
70,428
2,392
130,237
1,024,380
137,210
174,205
60,474
3,410,559
-
-
3,410,559
(2,393,239) (134,011) (2,244,236) (4,771,486)
6,285,917
433,021 10,917,061
17,635,999
$ 3,892,678 $ 299,010 $ 8,672,825 $12,864,513
149
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS
Years Ended December 31,
2009 2008(Restated)
Operating Activities:
Change in net assets: $ 623,572 $ (4,771,486)
Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to
net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation
77,466
90,728
Contributions restricted for long-term purposes
(462,923)
(267,901)
Realized loss on sales of investments 1,235,300
388,474
Unrealized (gain) loss on investments (1,788,330)
3,791,743
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
(30,111)
18,183
13,199
672
661
Inventories
(50,386)
11,561
Other assets
9,363
(2,419)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
73,389
20,408
Payable to denomination-related organizations
223,705
(232,618)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
(70,100)
(957,650)
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
Purchases of property and equipment
(197,760)
(427,725)
Proceeds from sales of investments 6,260,415
5,923,060
Purchases of investments (5,990,262) (4,279,982)
Principal payments on building loan mortgages receivable
128,548
82,575
Building loan mortgages receivable issued (395,000)
(300,000)
Principal payments on general mortgages receivable
152,459
157,878
General mortgages receivable issued (381,000)
(90,000)
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Investing Activities
(422,600)
1,065,806
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from contributions restricted for investment
in permanent endowment
462,923
267,901
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
462,923
267,901
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
(29,777)
376,057
Cash and Cash Equivalents-Beginning of Year
577,358
201,301
Cash and Cash Equivalents-End of Year $ 547,581 $
577,358
150
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization Background - The Synod is the highest court in the denomination
known as the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America. The Trustees hold
title to property and are responsible to the Synod for managing and reporting on the
financial condition of the denomination. The financial activities are accomplished
through various boards and committees of the Synod. Congregations and domestic
and foreign missions are sanctioned by the Synod through such boards and six
regional Presbyteries. The accompanying financial statements include the assets,
liabilities, net assets and financial activities of the Trustees and of the Synod’s
various boards and committees.
Although sanctioned by the Synod, congregations and mission churches
(domestic and foreign) of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America
do not have financial accountability to the Trustees. Accordingly, the assets,
liabilities, net assets, and financial activities of such organizations are not included
in the accompanying financial statements. Periodically, certain of these assets,
to which the Trustees hold title, are sold. Proceeds from the sale of such assets
are recorded at the time of disposition. Further, funds disbursed in support of
domestic and foreign mission fields are charged to expense in the accompanying
financial statements.
A summary of the Trustee’s significant accounting policies follows:
Basis of Accounting - The financial statements for the Trustees have
been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Consequently, revenues are
recognized when earned and expenditures when they are incurred.
Basis of Presentation - Financial statement presentation follows the
recommendations of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting
Standards Codification (FASB ASC) 958-205-05 (formerly, Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 117), in its Financial Statements of Not-forProfit Organizations. Under FASB ASC 958-205-05, the Trustees are required to
report information regarding its financial position and activities according to three
classes of net assets: unrestricted net assets, temporarily restricted net assets, and
permanently restricted net assets.
Net Assets are classified as follows:
- Unrestricted net assets are neither permanently nor temporarily restricted
by donor or grantor-imposed restrictions.
- Temporarily restricted net assets are net assets resulting from contributions,
grants, and other inflows of assets whose use by the Trustees is limited by
donor or grantor-imposed stipulations that either expire by passage of time
or can be fulfilled and removed by actions of the Trustees pursuant to the
stipulations.
- Permanently restricted net assets are net assets resulting from contributions,
grants and other inflows of assets subject to donor or grantor-imposed
151
stipulations that they be maintained permanently by the Trustees.
Cash and Cash Equivalents - For purposes of the statement of cash flows,
the Trustees consider all unrestricted highly liquid instruments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Trustees maintain
cash and cash equivalents at banks which are insured by the FDIC up to $250,000
at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Amounts in excess of insured limits
were approximately $339,629 and $446,670 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments - On January 1, 2008, the Trustees adopted
Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 820-10 previously SFAS Financial No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), Fair Value
Measurements, including FSP FAS 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active, which defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires enhanced
disclosure about fair value measurements. Fair value is the amount that would be
received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., the exit price). The
adoption of FASB ASC 820-10 did not have a material effect on the Trustee’s
financial statements. See Note 2, Fair Value Measurements, for further discussion
relating to FASB ASC 820-10 and the Trustee’s investments.
Accounts Receivable - Accounts receivable consist of the contributions
received during early January of the following year, when such amounts relate to
the prior year’s budget.
General Mortgages and Building Loans Receivable - The Trustees occasionally
grant credit secured by first mortgages to groups, congregations, and individuals
within the denomination. Typically, general mortgages are granted to individuals
or groups for the purchase or building of churches, houses, camps or other
property. Building loans are granted to congregations for the building or purchase
of a church or parsonage. Interest on the above mortgages is recognized as income
over the term of the loan, and is calculated using the interest method on principal
amounts outstanding. The recognition of income on a loan is discontinued when,
in the opinion of Management, the outstanding principal balance becomes
uncollectible. The Trustees’ practice is to charge off any loan or portion of
a loan when the loan is determined by Management to be uncollectible due to
the debtor’s failure to meet repayment terms. No loan loss allowance is deemed
necessary by Management.
Deferred Student Aid Receivable - Deferred student aid receivable are
recorded as a deferred charge and are amortized to expense, usually over a period
of five years from the date that the graduate seminarian begins service for the
Synod. Repayment of advances must be made only if the student or graduate does
not provide service to the Synod.
Inventories - Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or
market. Inventories are comprised of religious publications.
Property and Equipment - Land, buildings, and equipment are carried at cost
152
or, if donated, at the approximate fair value at the date of donation. The cost of the
property and equipment retired or otherwise disposed and the related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is
reflected in current operations. Fixed assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis
over 7-40 years for buildings and improvements, and 5-10 years for furniture,
fixtures and equipment. Repairs and maintenance which are not considered to
extend the estimated useful lives of the assets are charged to expense as incurred.
Income Taxes - The Trustees is a non-for-profit organization that is exempt
from the income taxes under Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Trustees adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10, “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (previously FIN 48), on January 1, 2009. This FASB
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of tax position taken or expected to be
taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition of tax benefits,
classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. The Trustees record a liability for uncertain tax
positions when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be
reasonably estimated. We continually evaluate expiring statutes of limitations,
audits, proposed settlements, changes in tax law and new authoritative rulings.
The adoption of the FASB did not have a material impact on the Trustees’ financial
position, changes in its net assets, or cash flows.
Subsequent events - During the year, the Trustee’s adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, (“SFAS 165”) (FASB ASC 85510) Subsequent Events. SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting
for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, SFAS
165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management
of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for
potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances
under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity
should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet
date. The adoption of SFAS 165 had no impact on the Financial Statements as
management already followed a similar approach prior to the adoption of this
standard (see Note 11).
Fund Accounting - The accounts of the Trustees are maintained in accordance
with the principles of fund accounting. Under fund accounting, resources for
various purposes are classified for accounting and reporting purposes into
funds established according to their nature and purpose. Separate accounts are
maintained for each fund; however, in the accompanying financial statements,
funds that have similar characteristics have been combined according to the three
classes of net assets.
Contributions - The Trustees account for contributions in accordance with the
recommendations of the FASB ASC 605-10-15 (previously Financial Accounting
153
Standards Board in SFAS No. 116), “Accounting for Contributions Received and
Contributions Made.” In accordance with SFAS 116, contributions received are
recorded as unrestricted, temporarily restricted, or permanently restricted support,
depending on the existence or nature of any donor restrictions.
All donor-restricted support is reported as an increase in temporarily or
permanently restricted net assets depending on the nature of the restriction. When
a restriction expires (that is, when a stipulated time restriction ends or purpose
restriction is accomplished), temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to
unrestricted net assets and reported in the statement of activities as net assets
released from restrictions.
Contributed Services - During the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008,
the value of contributed services meeting the requirements for recognition in the
financial statements was not material and has not been recorded.
Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported
amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Reclassifications - Certain amounts in the prior year’s financial statements have
been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications
had no effect on the Trustee’s reported net assets or changes in net assets.
NOTE 2 - CORRECTION OF AN ACCOUNTING ERROR
The accompanying financial statements for 2008 have been restated to correct
an error made in that year regarding the calculation of R.P.M.&M. revenue, which
was discovered in 2009. The effect of the restatement was to increase accounts
receivable by $172,385, increase R.P.M.&M. revenue and the corresponding
change in net assets by $172,385, and increase unrestricted net assets by $172,385.
The following financial statement line items as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008 were affected by this error correction:
December 31, 2008
Accounts
Receivable R.P.M.&M.
Change in Unrestricted
Net Assets Net Assets
As previously stated
Correction of an error
$
As restated
$ 264,132 $ 319,259 $(4,771,486) $ 3,892,678
91,747 $ 146,874 $(4,943,871) $ 3,720,293
172,385 172,385
172,385
172,385
NOTE 3 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Trustees adopted FASB ASC 820-10 as of January 1, 2008, which,
among other things, requires enhanced disclosures about investments that are
measured and reported at fair value. FASB ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value
hierarchy which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used
in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is impacted by
154
a number of factors, including the type of investment, the characteristics specific
to the investment, and the state of the marketplace (including the existence and
transparency of transactions between market participants). Investments with
readily-available actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured
from actively-quoted prices in an orderly market will generally have a higher
degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in
measuring fair value.
Investments measured and reported at fair value are classified and disclosed in
one of the following categories based on inputs:
Level I - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical investments
as of the reporting date. The type of investments which would generally be included
in Level I include listed equity securities and listed derivatives. As required by
FASB ASC 820-10, the Trustees, to the extent that it holds such investments, does
not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where the
Trustees hold a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.
Level II - Pricing inputs are observable for the investments, either directly
or indirectly, as of the reporting date, but are not the same as those used in
Level I. Fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation
methodologies. The types of investments which would generally be included in
this category include publicly-traded securities with restrictions on disposition.
Level III - Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment and include
situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. The inputs
into the determination of fair value require significant judgment or estimation by
Management. The types of investments which would generally be included in this
category include debt and equity securities issued by private entities.
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different
levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the determination of which
category within the fair value hierarchy is appropriate for any given investment is
based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Trustees’ assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to
the investment.
The following table summarizes the valuation of the Trustees’ investments by
the above FASB ASC 820-10 fair value hierarchy levels:
As of December 31, 2009:
Total
Level I
M&T Investment Group
$ 232,836 $ 232,836 $
US Government Agency Securities 1,259,556 1,259,556
US Treasury notes
1,172,932 1,172,932
Corporate common stocks
7,474,970 7,474,970
Corporate bonds
1,427,024 1,427,024
Total
$11,567,318$11,567,318 $
Level II
Level III
- $
-
-
-
-
-
- $
-
Total
$ 417,368
US Government Agency Securities 2,126,401
US Treasury notes
640,568
6,233,951
Corporate bonds
1,866,153
Total
Level I
Level II
155
Level III
$ 417,368 $
2,126,401
640,568
6,233,951
1,866,153
- $
-
-
-
-
-
$11,284,441$11,284,441 $
- $
-
NOTE 4 - GENERAL MORTGAGES AND BUILDING LOANS RECEIVABLE
General mortgages receivable are due over periods from one to twenty years
and bear annual interest primarily from 4.5% to 10%.
The general mortgages receivable were due from the following groups:
December 31,
2009
2008
Congregations of the denomination $
Commercial
Ministers & members of the denomination
Boards and agencies
535,166 $
281,140
101,170
158,358
385,469
83,823
191,556
186,445
Total $ 1,075,834 $
847,293
The aggregate annual maturities of general mortgages receivable at December
31, 2009 are as follows:
Year Ending
2010 $
2011
2012
2013
Thereafter
Amount
328,984
105,344
105,344
102,130
434,032
Total $ 1,075,834
Substantially all of the building loans receivable at December 31, 2009 have
been granted by the Building Loan Committee at interest rates of 4% to 5% for
the purchase or construction of residences or church buildings. The composition
of the balances receivable were due from:
December 31,
2009
2008
Congregations and denominational boards$
Trustees
1,302,755 $ 1,031,940
3,408
7,771
Total$
1,306,163 $ 1,039,711
156
The aggregate annual maturities of building loans receivable at December 31,
2009 are as follows:
Year Ending
Amount
2010 $ 122,085
2011
118,677
2012
118,677
2013
118,203
Thereafter
828,521
Total $ 1,306,163
NOTE 5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The various components of property and equipment are as follows:
December 31,
2009
2008
Building and improvements $ 2,146,192 $ 1,947,633
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
663,096
663,895
Total
2,809,288
2,611,528
Less: Accumulated depreciation (1,291,062) (1,213,596)
Property and Equipment, net $ 1,518,226 $ 1,397,932
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was
$77,466 and $90,728, respectively.
NOTE 6 - PENSION PLANS
There are two pension plans (Plan “A” and Plan “B”) which were adopted
effective January 1, 1974 and together cover all ministers, missionaries and
employees of the Synod. The provisions of Plan “B” were restated effective
January 1, 1984 and January 1, 1989 and amended in 2001 and 2002.
Plan “A” - Plan “A” is a noncontributory defined benefit plan and covers
basically ministers, missionaries and employees of the Synod who were age 55 or
over on January 1, 1974, the date of adoption of the plan. The normal retirement
benefit for 2009 was $450 per month for single employees and $600 for married
employees. A monthly benefit of $450 is continued to the participant’s surviving
spouse. A minimum of 30 years of service is required to be eligible for the full
normal retirement benefit. Total pension expense for the year ended December
2009 was $50,430. The plan is self-administered and pension benefits, which are
charged to pension expense, are substantially all paid from ordinary investment
income, proceeds of sales of certain investments or funds transferred from the
Pension Board.
157
Current comprehensive actuarial reports and valuations are not available
for Plan “A”. Accordingly, the information necessary to provide the disclosures
required by Statements of Financial Accounting Standards 87 and 88 has not been
determined. Under Plan “A”, the Trustees charge pension benefits to expense as
incurred and credit investment income and net gain on investment transactions to
revenue. Generally accepted accounting principles require that pension expense be
determined using an acceptable actuarial cost method. Plan “A” was substantially
curtailed as of December 31, 1997, as there were no participants still actively
employed by the Trustees and, as such, use of an acceptable actuarial cost method
would have resulted in insignificant expenses for the years then ended. Use of
actuarially determined costs as of the most recent valuation (January 1, 1987) for
Plan “A” would have resulted in an increase in pension liability and a decrease in
the unrestricted-designated fund balance of approximately $225,000. Investments
with a cost of approximately $75,000 and market value of approximately $93,000
at December 31, 2009, included in the financial statements of the Trustees, are
available to satisfy a portion of the Plan “A” pension liability. A 9% assumed
rate of return was used in determining the present value of accumulated vested
benefits. There are no nonvested accumulated benefits.
Plan “B” - Plan “B” is a defined contribution plan and covers substantially all
ministers, missionaries and employees of the Synod who are not covered under
Plan “A”. For each Plan Year the Synod shall contribute to each employee who
became a Participant in the Plan prior to attainment of age 55 or over on December
31, 1988. The normal retirement benefit for 2009 was $250 for participating
employees. A monthly benefit equal to two/thirds (2/3) of the target monthly
benefit would be paid to any surviving spouse of the employee. A minimum of
30 years of service is required to be eligible for the full retirement benefit. Total
pension expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 was $58,548
and $55,983, respectively. During 2008, the assets of the Plan were transferred to
The Hartford. The Hartford is the current plan provider. Each participant makes
directed investment choices.
NOTE 7 - CUSTODIAN FUNDS
Custodian Funds represent funds received by the Trustees from congregations,
Presbyteries, and other denomination-related organizations which are invested for
the benefit of, and are returnable upon request to, such resources. Such funds are
reported as payable to denomination-related organizations.
NOTE 8 - TEMPORARILY RESTRICTED NET ASSETS
Temporarily restricted net assets are comprised of primarily annuity and life
income funds that are subject to agreements whereby assets are made available
to the Trustees on the condition that the Trustees be bound to pay to the donor or
other designated person or organization a stipulated amount or the income earned
of fund assets for a period of time specified in the agreements.
158
NOTE 9 - ENDOWMENTS
The Trustees’ endowments consists of approximately 100 individual funds
established for a variety of purposes. The endowments include both donorrestricted funds and funds designated by the Board of Trustees to function as
endowments. As required by GAAP, net assets associated with endowment funds,
including funds designated by the Board of Trustees to function as endowments,
are classified and reported based upon the existence of absence of donor-imposed
restrictions.
Endowment Net Asset Composition by Type of Fund as of December 31,
2009:
Total
EndowmentUnrestricted
Temporarily Permanently
Restricted Restricted
Net Assets
Net Assets
Donor-restricted endowment funds $ 1,932,665 $
- $
Board-designated endowment funds 4,914,369 307,835
- $ 1,932,665
-
4,606,534
Total funds
- $ 6,539,199
$ 6,847,034 $ 307,835 $
Endowment Net Asset Composition by Type of Fund as of December 31, 2008:
Total
Temporarily
Restricted
Net Assets
Permanently
Restricted
Net Assets
- $
- $ 1,777,203
-
4,270,644
Total funds
- $ 6,047,847
$ 6,272,286 $ 224,439 $
Changes in endowment net assets as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:
Endowment net assets,
beginning of year
Contributions
Investment income
Net appreciation (depreciation)
Net loss on sales
Amounts appropriated for
expenditure
end of year
Total
Net Assets
Net Assets
$ 6,272,286 $ 224,439 $
76,205
-
523,981
-
83,396
83,396
-
-
(108,834)
-
$ 6,847,034 $ 307,835 $
- $ 6,047,847
-
76,205
-
523,981
-
-
-
(108,834)
- $ 6,539,199
159
beginning of year
Contributions
Investment income
Net loss on sales
expenditure
end of year
Total
Net Assets
Net Assets
$ 9,012,462 $307,380 $
70,383
19,287
-
-
(102,228) (102,228)
-
-
- $ 8,705,082
-
51,096
-
-
-
-
(2,708,331)
- (2,708,331)
-
$ 6,272,286 $224,439 $
- $ 6,047,847
Under FASB ASC 958-205-50, the Trustees are required to disclose a
reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of the Organization’s
endowment, in total and by net asset class.
Investment Return Objectives, Risk Parameters and Strategies - The
Trustees have adopted investment and spending policies for endowment assets
that attempt to provide a predictable stream of funding to programs supported
by its endowment funds while also maintaining the purchasing power of those
endowment assets over the long-term. Accordingly, the investment process seeks
to achieve an after-cost total real rate of return, including investment income
as well as capital appreciation, which exceeds the annual distribution with
acceptable levels of risk. Endowment assets are invested in a well diversified
asset mix, which includes equity and debt securities, that is intended to result in
a consistent inflation-protected rate of return that has sufficient liquidity to make
an annual distribution of 5%, while growing the funds if possible. Therefore, the
Trustees expect its endowment assets, over time, to produce an average rate of
return of approximately 8% annually. Actual returns in any given year may vary
from this amount. Investment risk in measured in terms of the total endowment
fund; investment assets and allocation between asset classes and strategies are
managed to not expose the fund to unacceptable levels of risk.
Spending Policy - The Trustees have a policy of appropriating for distribution
each year 5% of its endowment fund’s average fair value of the prior 12 months
through the calendar year end preceding the fiscal year in which the distribution
is planned. In establishing this policy, the Trustees considered the long-term
expected return on its investment assets, the nature and duration of the individual
endowment funds, many of which must be maintained inperpetuity because of
donor-restrictions, and the possible effects of inflation. The Trustees expect the
current spending policy to allow its endowment funds to grow at a nominal average
rate of 3% annually, which is consistent with the Trustees’ objective to maintain
160
purchasing power of the endowment assets as well as to provide additional real
growth through investment return.
NOTE 10 - ASSETS PLEDGED AS COLLATERAL
The Trustees have pledged specific Investments up to $1,000,000 to a bank
as additional collateral for a construction loan for the Reformed Presbyterian
Woman’s Association. The underlying debt had a balance of $1,353,655 and
$1,419,028 as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and matures on April
1, 2026.
NOTE 11 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Management evaluated all activity of the Trustees through June 18, 2010 (the
date the financial statements are available to be issued) and concluded that no
subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the financial
statements or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.
THE REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN THEOLOGICAL
SEMINARY
CONTENTS.....................................................................................................Page
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT . ...................................................... 160
Statements of Financial Position ..................................................................... 161
Statements of Activities ................................................................................... 162
Statements of Functional Expenses ................................................................. 164
Statements of Cash Flows . .............................................................................. 165
Notes to Financial Statements ......................................................................... 166
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
To the Trustees of the Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary
Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary (a not-for-profit organization)
(the Seminary) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements
of activities, functional expenses and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Seminary’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audits.
161
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Reformed Presbyterian Theological
Seminary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the changes in its net assets and
its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
August 5, 2010
ASSETS
December 31,
2009 2008
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $
200 $
600
Investments 1,558,666 1,496,092
Total Current Assets
1,558,866 1,496,692
Deferred student aid receivable Property and equipment, net 9,757 1,460,731 10,429
1,336,190
Total Assets $ 3,029,354 $ 2,843,311
Accounts payable and accrued expenses Accounts payable - RPCNA $ 1,193 110,080 $ 2,038
118,221
Total Current Liabilities 111,273 120,259
Net Assets:
Unrestricted Permanently restricted 1,305,189 1,612,892 1,228,155
1,494,897
Total Net Assets 2,918,081 2,723,052
Total Liabilities and Net Assets $ 3,029,354 $ 2,843,311
162
Revenues:
Gross tuition and fees Less: Scholarships Temporarily Permanently
Unrestricted Restricted Restricted Total
$ 651,799 (251,076) $-
-
$-
-
$ 651,799
(251,076)
400,723 -
-
400,723
Contributions 499,925 152,567 Miscellaneous income 6,044 63,867 Investment income 40,424 17,489 Dividend income 178 -
Unrealized gain on investments 281,454 -
Realized loss on investments (317,605) -
Sale and services of auxiliary
enterprises 59,677 -
Rental income 36,463 -
Bequests 2,010 -
Restrictions satisfied by payments 267,061 (233,923) 76,205 -
-
74,928 -
-
728,697
69,911
57,913
75,106
281,454
(317,605)
-
-
-
59,677
36,463
2,010
(33,138) -
Total Revenue and Support 1,276,354 -
117,995 1,394,349
134,835 11,848 130,401 488,936 359,923 73,377 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
134,835
11,848
130,401
488,936
359,923
73,377
Total Expenses 1,199,320 -
-
1,199,320
Change in Net Assets 77,034 -
117,995 195,029
1,228,155 -
1,494,897 2,723,052
Program Expenses:
Academic support Auxiliary enterprises Development Institutional support Instruction Student services Net Assets - Beginning of Year Net Assets - End of Year $ 1,305,189 $ - $ 1,612,892 $ 2,918,081
163
Unrestricted Restricted Restricted Revenues:
Gross tuition and fees Less: Scholarships Total
$ 607,444 (316,986) $-
-
$-
-
$ 607,444
(316,986)
290,458 -
-
290,458
Contributions 549,806 91,850 Miscellaneous income 50,347 6,472 Investment income (loss) 55,964 16,002 Dividend income 19,338 -
Unrealized loss on investments (477,100) -
Realized loss on investments (42,455) -
Rental income 28,582 -
Bequests 57,785 -
(125,956) 90,247 (297,757) (198,130) 649,026
56,819
(53,990)
109,585
(774,857)
(240,585)
-
-
-
58,247
28,582
57,785
(424,733) -
(948,959) 181,070
Total Revenue and Support Program Expenses:
Academic support Auxiliary enterprises Development Institutional support Instruction Student services Total Expenses Change in Net Assets Net Assets - Beginning of Year Net Assets - End of Year 1,271,839 (141,810) 154,505 34,312 147,666 583,451 338,245 71,666 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
154,505
34,312
147,666
583,451
338,245
71,666
1,329,845 -
-
1,329,845
(58,006) (141,810) 1,286,161 141,810 $ 1,228,155 (948,959) (1,148,775)
2,443,856 3,871,827
$ - $ 1,494,897 $ 2,723,052
164
STATEMENT OF FUNCTIONAL EXPENSES
Program
Academic Auxiliary Institutional Student
Support Enterprises Development Support Instruction Services Conferences $
Depreciation Fringe benefits Insurance Library expenses Maintenance and
supplies Miscellaneous Other board expenses Postage Publicity Salaries and wages Travel Utilities Total Expenses
Total
- $
-
9,959 -
44,314 2,966 $
- $
- $
- $
-
-
-
74,018 -
-
533 21,276 46,240 64,523 16,526 -
-
11,203
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ 2,966
74,018
159,057
11,203
44,314
37,430 -
-
-
-
43,132 -
-
2,679 -
-
-
-
5,670 -
-
90,507
62,814
12,127
6,270
25,695
645,501
22,034
42,814
-
50,398 -
-
11,574 48,113 - 3,127 -
12,127 -
-
-
6,270 -
-
-
25,695 -
-
90,734 159,168 293,073 53,724 6,817 12,890 2,327 -
-
42,814 -
-
$ 134,835 $ 11,848 $ 130,401 $ 488,936 $ 359,923 $73,377 $ 1,199,320
Program
Depreciation Fringe benefits Insurance Library expenses Maintenance and
supplies Miscellaneous Other board expenses Postage Publicity Salaries and wages Travel Utilities Total Expenses Total
- $ 4,282 $
- $
755 $
- $
- $
5,037
-
-
-
75,277 -
-
75,277
9,905 1,221 20,904 46,573 63,064 16,092 157,759
-
-
-
13,106
-
-
13,106
37,999
-
-
-
-
-
37,999
51,207 10,749 -
-
-
44,645
-
-
12,850
-
-
-
-
15,959 -
-
-
51,552 -
-
33,811 84,622 - 3,745 -
24,276 -
-
-
11,884 -
-
-
31,693
-
-
91,557 176,491 272,306 51,829 1,394
17,139
2,875 -
-
50,083 -
-
115,609
132,927
24,276
11,884
31,693
652,787
21,408
50,083
$ 154,505 $ 34,312 $ 147,666 $ 583,451 $ 338,245 $ 71,666 $ 1,329,845
165
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
2009 2008
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Change in net assets $ 230,008 $ (1,148,775)
Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation 74,018 75,277
Contribution restricted for long-term purposes (76,205)
(7,370)
Realized loss on sale of investments 317,605 131,000
Unrealized gains on investments (281,454) 774,857
Deferred student aid receivable 672 661
Accounts receivable -
522,648
Accounts payable and accrued expenses (43,965) 113,982
Total adjustments (9,329) 1,611,055
Net Cash Provided in Operating Activities 220,679 462,280
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Purchase of property and equipment Net change in investments (198,559) (98,725) (424,733)
(44,917)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (297,284) (469,650)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Investment in permanent endowment 76,205 7,370
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities 76,205 7,370
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents (400) -
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Year 600 600
200 $
600
Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Year $
166
General - The Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary (the Seminary)
is organized for the purpose of instructing candidates for the gospel ministry,
and others who may be preparing for special lines of Christian service, in the
scriptures and the doctrines found therein. The Seminary is under the control of
the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America (the Synod)
and is located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Basis of Accounting - The financial statements of the Seminary, a nonprofit
organization, have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. All
accounting functions are performed by the Trustees in conjunction with their
financial responsibilities of the Synod. These financial statements do not include
the financial position of financial results of the Trustees of the Synod of the
Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America (the Trustees). A separate report
for the Trustees has been issued dated June 18, 2010.
recommendations of the Financial Accounting Standards Board in its Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 117, (FASB ASC 958-210-451) Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Organizations. Under SFAS No. 117,
the Trustees are required to report information regarding its financial position
and activities according to three classes of net assets: unrestricted net assets,
temporarily restricted net assets, and permanently restricted net assets.
Fund Accounting - The accounts of the Seminary are maintained in accordance
classes of net assets, mentioned above.
Cash and Cash Equivalents - For purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows,
the Seminary considers all unrestricted highly liquid investments with an initial
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Cash and Investments - The cash and investment amounts for all funds of the
Trustees are commingled and are allocated for financial reporting purposes based
on assets (other than cash and investments), liabilities and net assets. Investments
are presented in the financial statements at fair value based on quoted prices
in active markets (all Level I measurements). Net realized gain or loss on the
disposition of investments is the difference between the proceeds received and the
average cost of investments sold.
Substantially all investments are pooled and allocation of income (ordinary
income and gains and losses upon sale or other disposition of investments) to the
various funds is accomplished using the market value unit method. Substantially
167
all ordinary income from investments of endowment funds is restricted for
support of particular purposes. These purposes are usually broad enough to be
encompassed within one of the designated boards of the Synod.
Property and Equipment - Land, buildings and improvements, and furniture,
fixtures and equipment are carried at cost or estimated fair value at the date of gift.
Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets on
a straight-line basis. The Trustees hold title to all property of the Seminary.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS 157), (FASB ASC
820-10) Fair Value Measurements, including FSP FAS 157-3, Determining the
Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active,
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and
requires enhanced disclosure about fair value measurements. Fair value is the
amount that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e.,
the exit price). The adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material effect on the
Trustee’s financial statements.
Investments, deferred student aid receivable, and accounts payable have been
identified as short-term financial instruments. The related carrying amounts in the
financial statements as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, approximate fair values
because of the relatively short time between the origination of the instrument and
its expected realization/liquidation. See Note 3, Fair Value Measurements, for
further discussion relating to SFAS 157 and the Trustees’ investments.
Contributions - The Trustees account for contributions in accordance with
the recommendations of the Financial Accounting Standards Board in SFAS
No. 116, (FASB ASC 605-10-15) Accounting for Contributions Received and
Contributions Made. In accordance with SFAS 116, contributions received are
recorded as unrestricted, temporarily restricted, or permanently restricted support,
depending on the existence or nature of any donor restrictions.
Contributions received during early January from congregations and
individuals are recorded as receivables when such amounts relate to the prior
year’s budget.
Restricted and Unrestricted Revenue and Support - Support that is restricted
by the donor is reported as an increase in unrestricted net assets if the restriction
expires in the reporting period in which support is recognized. All other donorrestricted support is reported as an increase in temporarily or permanently
restricted net assets, depending on the nature of the restriction. When a restriction
expires (that is, when a stipulated time restriction ends or purpose restriction is
accomplished), temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to unrestricted
net assets and reported in the Statement of Activities as net assets released from
restrictions.
168
Expense Allocation - The costs of providing various programs and other
activities have been summarized on a functional basis in the Statement of
Activities and in the Statement of Functional Expenses.
Pensions - The Synod has two pension plans (Plan “A” and Plan “B”) covering
substantially all employees of the Seminary. Plan “A” is a noncontributory defined
benefit plan and covers basically ministers, missionaries and employees who
were age 55 or over on January 1, 1974, the date of adoption of the plan, and is
administered by the Pension Trustees of the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian
Church of North America who are also responsible for all assets of the Plan.
Plan “B” is a defined contribution plan and covers substantially all ministers,
missionaries and employees who are not covered under Plan “A”. Effective
October 1, 2002, the assets of the Plan were transferred from UBS/PaineWebber
into individual participant accounts. The Hartford is the plan provider. Each
participant makes directed investment choices.
Expenses - Certain expenses paid by the Trustees, which cannot be specifically
identified as relating to the operation of the Seminary are not allocated to the
Seminary and are not reflected in the accompanying financial statements.
Advances made to eligible seminary students for payment of tuition, summer
training fees and living expenses (deferred student aid receivable) are recorded
as a deferred charge and are amortized to expense, usually over a period of five
years from the date that the graduate seminarian begins service for the Synod.
Repayment of advances must be made only if the student or graduate does not
provide service to the Synod.
Income Tax Status - The Seminary is a not-for-profit organization that is
exempt from income taxes under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Seminary adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 740-10, “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (previously FIN 48), on January 1, 2009. This FASB
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be
taken in a tax return. It also provides guidance on derecognition of tax benefits,
classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. The Seminary records a liability for uncertain
tax positions when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can
be reasonably estimated. We continually evaluate expiring statutes of limitations,
audits, proposed settlements, changes in tax law and new authoritative rulings.
The adoption of the FASB did not have a material impact on the Seminary’s
financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Subsequent Events - During the year, the Plan adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 165, (FASB ASC 855-10) “Subsequent
Events,” (SFAS 165). SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting
for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before
financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, SFAS
165 sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management
of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for
169
potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances
under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the
balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity
should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet
date. The adoption of SFAS 165 had no impact on the Financial Statements as
the Seminary already followed a similar approach prior to the adoption of this
standard (see Note 7).
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly,
actual results could differ from those estimates.
The components of property and equipment are as follows:
December 31,
2009 2008
Buildings and improvements $ 2,019,433 $ 1,820,874
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 428,515 428,515
Total 2,447,948 2,249,389
Less: Accumulated depreciation (987,217) (913,199)
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, was
NOTE 3- FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Trustees adopted SFAS 157 (FASB ASC 820-10) as of January 1, 2008,
which, among other things, requires enhanced disclosures about investments
that are measured and reported at fair value. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value
hierarchy which prioritizes and ranks the level of market price observability used
in measuring investments at fair value. Market price observability is impacted by
a number of factors, including the type of investment, the characteristics specific
to the investment, and the state of the marketplace (including the existence and
transparency of transactions between market participants). Investments with
readily-available actively quoted prices or for which fair value can be measured
from actively-quoted prices in an orderly market will generally have a higher
degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment used in
measuring fair value.
• Level I - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical
170
investments as of the reporting date. The type of investments which
would generally be included in Level I include listed equity securities
and listed derivatives. As required by SFAS 157, to the extent that it holds
such investments, does not adjust the quoted price for these investments,
even in situations where the Trustees hold a large position and a sale could
reasonably impact the quoted price.
• Level II - Pricing inputs are observable for the investments, either
directly or indirectly, as of the reporting date, but are not the same as
those used in Level I. Fair value is determined through the use of models
or other valuation methodologies. The types of investments which would
generally be included in this category include publicly-traded securities
with restrictions on disposition.
• Level III - Pricing inputs are unobservable for the investment and include
situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment.
The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant judgment
or estimation by the Trustees. The types of investments which would
generally be included in this category include debt and equity securities
issued by private entities.
The Trustees’ assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to
the investment.
the above SFAS No. 157 fair value hierarchy levels:
As of December 31, 2009: Total Level I Level II Money Market $ 232,836 $ 232,836 $
US Government Agency Securities 1,259,556 1,259,556 US Treasury notes 1,172,932 1,172,932 Corporate common stocks 7,474,970 7,474,970 Corporate bonds 1,427,024 1,427,024 Level III
- $
-
-
-
-
-
Total $ 11,567,318 $11,567,318 $
- $
-
Seminary Portion $1,558,866 $1,558,866 $
- $
-
As of December 31, 2008: Total Level I Money Market $ 417,368 $ 417,368 $
US Government Agency Securities 2,126,401 2,126,401 US Treasury notes 640,568 640,568 Corporate common stocks 6,233,951 6,233,951 Corporate bonds 1,866,153 1,866,153 Level II 171
Level III
- $
-
-
-
-
-
Total $11,284,441 $11,284,441 $
- $
-
Seminary Portion $1,496,092 $1,496,092 $
- $
-
Temporarily restricted net assets were received as contributions whose use
by the Seminary is limited by donor imposed stipulations that either expire by
the passage of time or can be fulfilled and removed by actions of the Seminary
pursuant to the stipulation. All such stipulations were fulfilled and released as of
December 31, 2009.
NOTE 5 - BEQUESTS
During the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Seminary received
bequests of $2,010 and $57,785, respectively, none of which was directed toward
the endowment funds.
NOTE 6 - ENDOWMENTS
The Trustees’ endowments consist of approximately 100 individual funds
are classified and reported based upon the existence or absence of donor-imposed
restrictions.
2009:
Total Temporarily Permanently
EndowmentUnrestricted Restricted Net Restricted Net
Assets
Assets
Board-designated endowment funds -
- $
-
- $ 1,568,529
-
-
Total funds - $
- $ 1,568,529
$ 1,568,529 $
172
2008:
Assets
Assets
Donor-restricted endowment funds $ 1,325,848 Board-designated endowment funds 125,673
$-
-
$ - $ 1,325,848
-
125,673
Total funds $-
$ - $ 1,451,521
$ 1,451,521 Changes in endowment net assets as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:
Assets
Assets
beginning of year Contributions Investment income Dividend income Net appreciation (depreciation) Amounts appropriated
for expenditure Endowment net assets,
end of year $ 1,451,521 $
76,205 -
73,941 -
(33,138) $ 1,568,529 $
- $
-
-
-
-
- $ 1,451,521
-
76,205
-
-
73,941
-
-
-
-
- $
- $ 1,568,529
(33,138)
TotalTemporarily Permanently
Assets
Assets
beginning of year Contributions Investment income Dividend income Net appreciation (depreciation) Amounts appropriated
end of year $ 1,882,893 $
7,370
4,879 109,585 (449,974) - $
-
-
-
-
- $ 1,882,893
-
7,370
-
4,879
-
109,585
- (449,974)
(103,232) -
-
$ 1,451,521 $
- $
- $ 1,451,521
(103,232)
173
Under SFAS 117-1 the Seminary is required to disclose a reconciliation of the
beginning and ending balance of the organization’s endowment, in total and by
net asset class.
Investment Return Objectives, Risk Parameters and Strategies - The Trustees
have adopted investment and spending policies for endowment assets that attempt
to provide a predictable stream of funding to programs supported by its endowment
funds while also maintaining the purchasing power of those endowment assets
over the long-term. Accordingly, the investment process seeks to achieve an
after-cost total real rate of return, including investment income as well as capital
appreciation, which exceeds the annual distribution with acceptable levels of risk.
Endowment assets are invested in a well diversified asset mix, which includes
equity and debt securities, that is intended to result in a consistent inflationprotected rate of return that has sufficient liquidity to make an annual distribution
while growing the funds if possible. Therefore, the Trustees expect its endowment
assets, over time, to produce an average rate of return of approximately 8%
annually. Actual returns in any given year may vary from this amount. Investment
risk is measured in terms of the total endowment fund; investment assets and
allocation between asset classes and strategies are managed to not expose the fund
to unacceptable levels of risk.
each year 5 1/2% of its endowment fund’s average fair value of the prior 12
quarters through the calendar year end preceding the fiscal year in which the
distribution is planned. In establishing this policy, the Trustees considered the
long-term expected return on its investment assets, the nature and duration of the
individual endowment funds, many of which must be maintained in perpetuity
because of donor-restrictions, and the possible effects of inflation. The Trustees
expect the current spending policy to allow its endowment funds to grow at a
nominal average rate of 3% annually, which is consistent with the Trustees’
objective to maintain the purchasing power of the endowment assets as well as to
provide additional real growth through investment return.
The Trustees have evaluated all activity of the Seminary through August 5,
2010, (the date the financial statements are available to be issued) and concluded
that no subsequent events have occurred that would require recognition in the
financial statements or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements.
174
Michael Lefebvre presented the report of the Judicial Committee. The
recommendation was adopted. The report is as follows:
Report of the Judicial Committee
Your committee was asked to bring recommendations concerning
Communication 10-4 coming to Synod from the Atlantic Presbytery. This
Communication proposes that Synod remove the current requirement in the Book
of Discipline (2.2.4; p13-1 1) that a second trial be set and a second summons be
issued when a defendant fails to appear for the initial trial date,
Your committee examined the proposed changes to the Book of Discipline and
the supporting rationale, and while we fully appreciate the sentiments behind the
proposals given and agree with some points, we do not find the reasons presented
to be sufficient for the changes proposed.
The Communication offers four reasons for changing the Directory on this
point, each of which we interact with here:
1. “It creates a heavy burden for the court to bear...” In our view, this is
the strongest of the four reasons provided, but it is not sufficient to warrant the
required changes. It is certainly attractive to find ways to streamline the labor and
cost intensive process of church discipline wherever possible, but we must not
so streamline the process that we remove those opportunities for repentance and
restoration that discipline exists to facilitate.
It is our understanding that the two summons process, while tedious, is one of
the features of church discipline which establishes its fundamentally restorative,
rather than punitive, character (Gal. 6:1). Restoration is, sadly, not always the
fruit of discipline, but that is always its goal—even in the face of defendants
who are stubbornly insisting they will never change. The two summons process
is practiced by the RPCNA—and by other NAPARC churches as well (cf., OPC
Book of Disc. 4.1.e;1 PCA Book of Church Disc. 32.6.a2)—in order to guard that
restorative goal in discipline. Who knows whether a stubborn and unrepentant
individual, who says he will never come, might not experience a change of heart
by God’s grace, as he spurns the courts of the church once and is then extended
yet a second, patient call to appear? The second summons principle honors the
fatherly patience with which the Heavenly Father pleads with his people, and thus
”In a trial before the session if the accused refuses or fails to appear without satisfactory
reason for his absence at the time appointed for the trial of the case, he shall again be cited,
with the warning that if he does not appear, it will proceed with the trial in his absence. The
time allowed for the appearance on a citation shall be determined by the issuing session
with due consideration for the circumstances.”
2
“When an accused person shall refuse to obey a citation, he shall be cited a second time.
This second citation shall be accompanied with a notice that if he does not appear at the
time appointed (unless providentially hindered, which fact he must make known to the
court) he shall be dealt with for his contumacy (cf. BCO 3 3-2; 34-4)”
1
175
ought to be expressed by the courts of his house. In fact, it might be said that it is
the very fact that such efforts are so burdensome upon the church which proves
that the discipline is being implemented in love (cf., Book of Disc. 1.6.7; pE-8,
and esp. the Scripture references provided with that paragraph).
2. “It demeans the authority of the church...” It is our view that the second
summons process actually introduces an escalating weightiness to the discipline
process, strengthening and upholding the authority of the church. Furthermore, if
the defendant resists the court’s efforts to reconcile on two attempts, according
to the principle of Titus 2:10-11 the resistant defendant thereby “self-condemns”
himself and the authority of the court’s verdict (if the finding is guilt) is actually
strengthened.
3. “By changing the basic procedure... the local court is granted the
opportunity to determine whether a second summons may be helpful..” The third
reason provided in the paper is actually not a reason for adopting the paper’s
proposals, but simply a further description of its proposals.
4. “Though the second summons idea is likely designed as a safeguard to
the accused, ensuring every possible opportunity for a defense, Presbyterianism
already has such a safeguard [because of the right of appeal to a higher court...” In
our view, this fourth point actually argues in favor of retaining the second summons
process. Simply because there are other processes within presbyterianism which
offer safeguards is not reason to remove this one.
Your committee understands that the judicial procedures provided in the
Book of Discipline, including the second summons principle, were likely
designed with Session-level cases primarily in view. The burden of calling a
second trial at the Session level is not as great as when the same process is
required at the Presbytery (or Synod) level. It certainly seems desirable, from a
pragmatic standpoint, to streamline the Presbytery-level processes because of
the increased burden on the courts when cases reach that level. However, the
burdensomeness of the process is not, in our opinion, sufficient grounds on its
own to make such a change, since there are important principal reasons behind
retaining the second summons. Indeed, the ultimate censures pronounced by
the church are so severe, with eternal consequences, that we should expend
every effort to save a wayward soul from their errant ways, and from death
itself (James 5:20).
Perhaps, where necessary, presbyteries could think creatively about other ways
to minimize (albeit without alleviating) the burden of a second summons. For
example, if a defendant has made it clear that he is determined not to appear for a
first trial, perhaps a presbytery would consider appointing a judicial commission
to conduct that trial at which the defendant is known to be unlikely to appear (but
ready to try him if he does), and then a frill presbytery meeting could be called for
the second trial. In principle, however, we do not find the burdensomeness of the
second summons requirement as adequate reason to remove it.
Recommendation 1:
That Communication 10-4 be returned to the Atlantic Presbytery.
176
David Hanson
Michael LeFebvre, chairman
Keith Wing
Synod took a break from 10:33 to 10:52 a.m. Synod sang Psalm 125.
The Nominating Committee distributed the ballots and Howard Huizing
led in prayer for the voting prior to the delegates marking their ballots. The
pages collected the ballots for the Nominating Committee.
Andy McCracken presented the report of the Committee to Canvass
the Overture. It was noted that all five chapters received a favorable vote
of a majority of all voting elders and two-thirds of all sessions voting. The
Moderator declared the 2010 Directory for Worship to be the law and order of
the church. The report was approved and is as follows:
Report of the Committee to Canvass the Overture
The tally of votes of the revision to the Directory for Worship are as follows:
ELDERS (275 total)
SESSIONS (70 total)
CHAPTER
FAVOR DO NOT FAVOR
FAVOR DO NOT FAVOR
1
224=81%
51 58=83%
12
2
182=66%
93
47=67%
23
3
206=75%
69
53=76%
17
4
236=86%
39
61=87%
9
5
201=73%
74
56=80%
14
Conclusions:
All of the chapters pass both by number of elders and sessions with the required
51% and 66.7% majority respectively.
It should be noted that one ballot had “X”s instead of numbers in the columns
and therefore it was impossible to include this ballot in the tally of those elders
voting. This ballot was included in the tally of overall session votes.
Jim Curtis
Nathan Eshelman
Andy McCracken
Since all chapters of the revised Directory for Worship have been adopted,
the Committee to Revise the Directory for Worship was dismissed.
A special resolution was received by a two-thirds vote and adopted as
follows:
“Now the apostles and the brethren who were throughout Judea heard that the
Gentiles also had received the word of God…When they heard this, they quieted
down and glorified God, saying, “Well then, God has granted to the Gentiles also
177
the repentance that leads to life.” –Acts 10:1, 18
Upon hearing the report of the Lord’s power at work on the mission field
in Sudan in answer to the many prayers of the church, we believe the Synod of
the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America should celebrate the great
wonders He has done. To that end, we respectfully yet urgently ask the following:
1) That the moderator ask respected fathers of the church to offer corporate
prayers of thanksgiving to God for what He has done with a psalm of thanks being
sung;
2) That the moderator send a letter of greeting to the presbytery of Sudan;
3) That a freewill thank offering, to be arranged by the Business of Synod
Committee, be collected and given to RP Global Missions, with half the proceeds
given to Andrew & Beth Stringer and Heather Huizing in thanksgiving for their
work and to encourage their recuperation, and the other half used for the Sudan
work.
David Whitla
Barry York
James D. Curtis
Dan Webb
Robert Morrow
Michael LeFebvre
Frank J. Smith
Richard Johnston
Jared Olivetti
Robert McKissick
Greg Cumbee
Andy McCracken
Jerry L. Porter
Steve Sturm
Bob McCracken
Jack Rhoda
Richard B. Holdeman
James Faris
Keith Magill
Dean Filson
In keeping with this resolution Synod sang Psalm 117A then Jim Carson
and Rich Ganz led in prayer.
Synod returned to the consideration of Communication 10-1. The
recommendations of the communication were laid on the table to consider a
set of substitute recommendations prepared by the committee to respond to
Communication 10-1. Item 1 was lost. Item 2a was adopted. Item 3 was lost.
Item 3a was adopted. Items 4 and 5 were adopted. Items 6 and 6a were lost.
The committee report was received rather than approved and is as follows:
178
2010 Synod Committee on Paper #10-1 from the
Great Lakes – Gulf Presbytery
Procedural Notes
There are two “Recommendation #3” on page 822. Renumber the second
one, “#4”. Recommendations are summarized in a logical order at the end of
our report in order to facilitate synod’s actions. Our purpose is to help synod to
express its will.
Assignment
Synod asked us to
1. deal with requested changes to future printings of The Book of Psalms for
Worship
2. deal with the request for guidelines for future Psalter revision work.
We will be responding to this paper from the GL-G Presbytery although the
session paper and the committee’s reply to draft of the presbytery paper informed
our thinking. The nature of our report is an integration of majority and minority
opinions enabling synod to exercise their judgment.
Introduction and Initial Recommendation
The work of translation is difficult. A translator does not have the luxury of
a Bible study to explain the text nor a sermon series to give an impression of the
sense, beauty and usefulness of a text. Translators must do as much of this as
they can with only carefully chosen words in well-crafted sentences fitted to the
context. This is difficult enough going from Hebrew prose to English prose. But
when a translator must move from the parallelism, mere rhythms, alien analogies
and unknown tones of Hebrew poetry to the rhymes and not necessarily paralleled
rhythms of English poetry needing accessible analogies and singable tunes, the
task is overwhelming. Therefore, it is right for us to afford our Psalter Revision
Committee the widest possible latitude in their work. We also note that the New
Testament translation of the Psalms makes use of this latitude and the writers did
not even need to form their translations for use with music. Therefore, we will
recommend that the paper be sent back to the GL-G presbytery.
Alternative Recommendations
If this recommendation is not approved, we present the following:
GL-G Recommendation #1: That Synod direct the Education & Publication
Board to remove those Psalm settings in future printings of The Book of Psalms
for Worship which use choruses, refrains, or other obviously unnecessary
repetition. This would include Psalms 19C, 47C, 150C, and 150D and the
hallelujahs and amens in 24B.
Regarding recommendation #1, it seems to us that even wide latitude may be
exceeded in the Psalms listed in recommendation #1 of this paper. Therefore, we
179
will recommend that, in future editions of the new Psalter, like marginal notes in
our Bibles, brief footnotes be included to indicate what elements are not resident
in the Hebrew text and how the Psalm may be sung without these. We will
recommend further that the former Psalter Revision Committee be reconstituted
for this task with their work to be presented to the 2011 synod for approval. If this
recommendation is not approved by synod, the paper’s own Recommendation #1
should be considered.
GL-G Recommendation #2: That Synod direct the Education & Publication
Board to work with the Psalter Revision Committee to include in the next
printing a version of Psalm 136 without omission.
Regarding recommendation #2, it seems to us that the problems identified in
all three selections of Psalm 136 are compressions that the parallelism tolerates.
These compressions are adequate renderings of the sense and acceptable
accommodations in translating from the Hebrew unknown chant to the structural
limitations of western musical forms. Therefore, we will recommend that these
three selections be maintained as they are in future printings of the Psalter.
GL-G Recommendation #3: That Synod officially commit to enacting more
thorough checks and balances when revising the Psalter in the future.
Regarding recommendation #3, it seems to us that committee work itself
involves thorough checks and balances, especially when progress reports are made
to synod each year as with the preparation of the current Psalter. Nevertheless,
we urge future committees to be very careful to arrange for timely and substantial
responses to communications from the church. We will recommend that this
observation and exhortation is a sufficient reply to the request of recommendation
#3. If synod regards this recommendation as inadequate, we will recommend the
following: since our Psalters are worship documents, we recommend that, in the
future, Synod plan to approve the five books of the Psalter book by book and then
send the completed Psalter down in overture.
GL-G Recommendation #4: That Synod, in order to preserve the extensive
work the Psalter Revision Committee has already done to develop policies for
its work translating Psalms for singing, and taking into account the concerns
which have arisen after the new Psalter’s publication as well, Synod appoint
a committee to develop a set of standards for translating Psalms for singing
which, if approved by Synod, would be included in Synod’s minutes for
reference for future Psalter translation projects.
Regarding Recommendation #4, every Psalter revision committee must
work with its own resources and serve the church in the needs of its own time.
Therefore, we will recommend that each Psalter revision committee be left to
develop their own set of standards for translating the Psalms for singing. If this
recommendation is not approved by synod, we will recommend the following: It
seems to us that developing a set of standards could be an additional good fruit of
180
the Psalter Revision Committee. Therefore we will recommend that the Psalter
Revision Committee be reconstituted for this purpose also and that they be asked
to prepare a very brief document from things still fresh in their minds and along
the lines of Larger Catechism Question #99 for interpreting the Decalogue.
Summary of Recommendations(DEFEATED) A. that the paper be returned to
the Great Lakes – Gulf presbytery.
B. If A is not approved,
1. (DEFEATED) that, in future editions of the new Psalter, brief footnotes be
included to indicate what elements are not resident in the Hebrew text and
how the Psalm may be sung without these.
2. that the former Psalter Revision Committee be reconstituted for the task of
preparing these footnotes with their work to be presented to the 2011 synod
for approval and incorporation in future editions. If this recommendation
is not approved by synod,
a. (ADOPTED) (the paper’s own Recommendation #1): “That Synod
direct the Education & Publication Board to remove those Psalm
settings in future printings of The Book of Psalms for Worship which
use choruses, refrains, or other obviously unnecessary repetition. This
would include Psalms 19C, 47C, 150C, and 150D and the hallelujahs
and amens in 24B.”
3. (DEFEATED) that the three selections of Psalm 136 in The Book of Psalms
for Worship be maintained as they are in future printings.
4. (ADOPTED) that future Psalter revision committees be careful to arrange
for timely and substantial responses to communications from the church.
5. (ADOPTED) that, in future revisions of the Psalter, Synod plan to approve
the five books of the Psalter book by book and then send the completed
Psalter down in overture.
6. (DEFEATED) that each Psalter revision committee be left to develop
their own set of standards for translating the Psalms for singing in public
worship. If this recommendation is not approved,
a. (DEFEATED) that the Psalter Revision Committee be reconstituted
to develop a set of standards for translating the Psalms for singing in
public worship along the lines of Larger Catechism Question #99 for
interpreting the Decalogue and that this document be submitted to the
2011 synod for approval.
Bill Edgar
Greg Stiner
Kit Swartz, chairman
The report of the Psalter Revision Committee was taken up again. Since
the committee has been assigned one more task, Synod did not vote on item
2. The Committee was thanked for its work. The report as a whole was
181
Report of the Psalter Revision Committee
The Committee has had no formal meetings since the publication of The
Book of Psalms for Worship. The Committee had no work together other than
the individual and general tabulation of errata found post-publication. Though
this was a smaller scale work, it has continued since the initial publication. The
chairman was involved in receiving and recording these errata for future print
runs of the Psalter. Corrections have been made in each print run so far. Most
of them, being simple errors of capitalization and punctuation, will go largely
unnoticed. But other changes (viz., clear spelling error or musical adjustment
of certain parts) will be noticed accordingly. It appears that all errata have been
noticed and addressed at this time. The chairman additionally was involved in
giving requested radio interviews and answering correspondence that pertained
to the new Psalter.
Recommendations:
1. That the addendum to this Psalter Revision Committee report be included in
the relevant deliberations concerning the 2010 Synod communication of the Great
Lakes - Gulf Presbytery, IF the latter is received and addressed by this Synod.
2. That Synod decide whether the Committee’s work is now finished; and if it is,
that the Committee be dismissed.
Brian E. Coombs, Chr.
Robert Copeland
Franki Fuhrman
Duncan Lowe
Lori McCracken
Andrew Schep
Mike Tabon
Elaine Tweed
Wade Mann presented the report of the committee to address the issues of
Communication 09-2. The item was adopted.
Nate Eshelman directed Synod in the morning prayer time. Those present
Psalm 67C.
prayer by Rick Gamble.
182
Friday, June 25, 2010, 8:30 A.M.
Synod met pursuant to adjournment on the morning of Friday, June 25,
2010 in Skye Lounge of the Student Center on the campus of Geneva College,
Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania. The Moderator called the meeting to order at
8:30 a.m.
Wade Mann led Synod in singing Psalm 100A and Sumito Sakai led in
prayer constituting the court.
The minutes of the Thursday evening session were read, corrected and
approved.
Dr. Sinclair Ferguson, Senior Minister of First Presbyterian Church
(ARP) of Columbia, South Carolina, was the devotional speaker. Synod
sang Psalm 86B. Dr. Ferguson read 2 Timothy 1:1-14, led in prayer, and
ministered God’s Word on the theme “Characteristics of Gospel Ministers.”
He concluded the devotional service by leading in prayer then Synod sang
Psalm 131A.
Synod reconsidered item 1 in the report of the Committee on Finance in
its two parts. The recommendation concerning the $20 assessment for the RP
Home was amended. The amended motion failed reducing item 1 to a $35
assessment. Ray Morton registered his dissent to Synod’s failure to pass this
motion. The remaining item was referred to the Finance Committee to report
back after the break this morning.
Robert Copeland presented the report of the State of the Church
Committee. Since this report is for the purpose of prayer, the report was
written in the form of a prayer and Mr. Copeland prayed it. The report was
State of the Church Report ~ A Prayer (Summer of 2010)
Father, Spirit, Son: You are still doing and teaching. You are blessing all
nations through Yourself, the Seed of Abraham. You are giving life to all the tribes
within the tents of Shem, Your tents. You are crushing the head of our enemy,
under Your heel, through our gospel feet. And Christ, You are in fact building
Your church against all human expectations. We are but near-sighted ministers
in one small denomination, seeking to understand the state of our church, how
we are doing. This is akin to the patient healing himself, so we really want Your
eyes, to discern what You are doing & teaching in our day. This past year, as with
all years, we must confess upon examination of the evidence, anything good and
noble and true we are accomplishing together is ultimately Your work. All failure
and sins and fault lines belong to us. Even this shame of face You cover by Your
blood, but please spur us anew, never to get comfortable with this “of-the-world”
reality.
We join and extend the long-time prayer of our moderator on behalf of the
seminary, that if we in the RPCNA won’t continue to be faithful to Your word and
183
testimony, we would plead with You to remove our lampstand and then raise up
a true one elsewhere. Yet You tarry, and You continue to wrestle with us, and not
just against us, Your spiritual Israel. Since we talk too much, and pray too little,
we bring this report before You:
We praise Your name for blessing mission and ministry among us, for the
effective proclamation of the gospel in North America, Japan, & far beyond. We
honor You for sustaining our Seminary in covenant faithfulness for 200 years,
spreading the sweet savor of Christ all over the world through its graduates. We
laud You for visible fruit in all our fields. Thank You for edifying us in worship
this year, for receiving it through Christ, purifying it by Your Spirit, and leading
us by Your word. Cause us to depend on that word even more for all challenges
we face. Grant faith & repentance, beginning with this house; empower us by
Your Spirit to be Your witnesses everywhere. Grant sincere hearts of praise, and
favor with all, to draw in Your chosen ones. Help us rejoice even over occasions
to suffer for Your name. Many suffer as we work and wait for salvation of those
most precious to us on earth. To exalt Your covenant, name, and mercy, redeem
Your own soon. Thank You for reminding us by fraternal delegates that we are
not alone. Your flock is vast and cherished.
Jesus, You vowed to be God with us, always and forever. You are keeping
Your promise to Synod. Thank You for instructing us this week through Your
word well preached, challenging us to the broadest understanding of mutual
submission, Biblical motivations for ministry, seeking to please You in the first
place in all things, and loving You honestly through a pure undefiled religion. All
cattle on all hills, and the hills, belong to You. Some treasure You place in our
hands, & then You ask us to give some of that away. The financial needs of all
ministries seem great; You poured out on us an abundance in hard times, so we
have blessed missions, seminary, and the combined fund. Broad cultural factors
impact our Home first; sustain our faithful laborers, through our own generous
hands. Some of us are in conflict; Prince of Peace, have Your blessed way as You
prove to us again that “the seed whose fruit is righteousness is sown in peace by
those who make peace.” Lord, we need Your wisdom to rejoice with the angels
when sinners repent, to promote decency and order, to exchange wineskins wisely,
to honor our godly ancestors, yet not be like our stubborn fathers were.
As we approach the end of this Synod meeting, we rejoice in the many ways
in which You have blessed and encouraged this church in the past year. We
thank you for 89 congregations where Your word is faithfully proclaimed and
where Your people minister to each other and their communities. We praise you
for people converted to Jesus, for ministers and elders and deacons called and
ordained to service, for believers married and Christian families established, for
covenant children born, and, yes, for saints called to glory. And yet, O Lord,
we remember the needs and the failures of this church. We are saddened by the
weakness or disappearance of congregations which were once flourishing gospel
centers. We grieve with the families and flocks touched by death or sin. We
lament the congregations and presbyteries where “brethren do not dwell together
184
in unity,” and confess that our lives fail to reflect a pure and genuine faith. Forgive
us, O Lord, for our sins and shortcomings. Bind up the wounds, we pray; heal
the brokenhearted; give us grace to visit the orphans and the prisoners, to minister
to the widows, and to show our love for You by loving each other. Establish the
work of our hands, only for the glory of Your Holy Name. Thank You, God, for
this day. Amen.
Robert Copeland,
Sumito Sakai,
John McFarland
Jon Maginn presented the report of the travel agent. The report was
Report of the Synod Travel Agent for the 179th Synod 2010
This year the cost of travel was more than was last year’s, which totaled at
$28,146.55. Still, if we take into consideration the price of airfares today, and
the fact that many men drove this year at the recommendation of Synod last year
because of the 200th celebration of RPTS, this is a bit expected. So we have given
a bit more latitude in some of the costs.
Over the past few years the Synod has done very well with travel and so I
encourage you to continue taking care in your duty to be careful with the church’s
money. With all the travel vouchers we have at this time the total so far is
$34,356.24. This does not include those who have done things directly through
the treasurer’s office or a travel agency.
As always you are asked to remember that funds although supplied by Synod
for travel are available for all delegates, that it is also your duty to take care not to
waste the Lord’s funds which might also be used for many different ministries. So
please try and get your tickets early. Take some time and look for deals. You are
to take into account whichever means of travel is the least expensive number even
if you choose an alternative means of travel
This year your checks will not be given at the end of Synod but will be mailed
to you soon afterward. This allows Heather Pinkerton time to record all this
information and look at the receipts given to her. You are required to give her
receipts if at all possible as there are laws that require this. If you do not have your
receipts with you please send them to the treasurers office as soon as possible,
and all of them at one time.
Thank you once again for the opportunity to serve as your travel agent.
Jon Maginn
Aaron Goerner presented the report of the Nominating Committee. The
report was approved and is as follows:
Report Of The Nominating Committee
BOARDS:
Education & Publication (2014)
Nathan Eshelman
Linda Parker
John Pershe
RP Global Missions (2014)
David Hanson (Teaching Elder)
John Kim (Ruling Elder)
Board of Pension Trustees (2013)
Curt Porter
Bob Shapiro
Board of Corporators
Phil Pockras
Synod Trustees (2013)
Marcia Siebring
Bill Roberts
John P. Edgar
RPTS Trustees (2016)
Keith Wing
Barry York
COMMITTEES:
Business of Synod Committee (2013)
Harry Metzger
Dave Carroll
Committee on Finance
Bill Sheldrake (2013)
Interchurch Committee (2013)
Matt Kingswood
Bruce Parnell
Jerry Milroy (2011)
Ian Wise, Executive Secretary
COMMITTEES:
Church History Committee
Tony Gazo (2016)
185
186
Committee for Vital Churches
Harry Metzger (2014)
Jerry Porter (2011)
East Asia Committee (2011)
David Reese (Interchurch)
John McFarland (RPGM), Convener
Bill Roberts (RTF)
Jerry O’Neill (RPTS)
Daniel Pu Liu (at-large)
Presbyterian and Reformed Joint Commission on Chaplains (2016)
Bill Pihl
Erich Baum
Committee to Analyze Perspectives on Sexual Orientation
Rich Holdeman
Howard Huizing
Zach Kail
Michael Lefebvre, Convener
Ken G. Smith
Charles Leach presented the report of the Special Judicial Committee to
deal with the appeal and complaint against the Durham Commission of the
Great Lakes – Gulf Presbytery. Items 1 and 2 were adopted. The report as a
Committee of the Day to Address the Appeal and Complaint
regarding the Durham Commission Report
The Judicial Committee’s task was to determine the merits of the appeal and
the complaint, and to recommend any actions Synod may need to take.
RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT
Complaint #1
We find the complaint to be without merit. The presbytery’s Durham
Commission (DC) was declaring its judgment on the issues before it. The right
process to appeal is clearly explained in the BoD.
Complaint #2
We find the complaint to be without merit. We do not find evidence that the
DC was biased in its interviews of the members. The DC invited all interested
parties to meet with them and gave ample opportunity for members to express
their concerns.
Complaint #3
We find the complaint to be without merit. The DC’s conclusions were
187
necessarily presented to the congregation. Judgments deemed critical of session
decisions could not be withheld. The DC, in your committee’s opinion, expressed
its judgments in moderate language, with due pastoral concern for both session
and congregants.
Complaint #4
We find the complaint to be without merit. The DC statement challenged by
this complaint addresses the session’s “less than pastoral” response to a matter of
practical concern (the proper supervision of children in the church on the Lord’s
Day). The DC assertion that the decision to reduce the frequency of communion
was related to the child behavior problem seems to be a reasonable inference
based on verbal testimony as well as examination of session records.
Complaint #5
We find the complaint to be without merit. The session’s decision not to reinstall Charles Saunders rests on the session’s handling of his examination, which
DC judged to be procedurally contrary to the law and order of the church. We find
DC Findings #3 and #4 and accompanying comments are appropriate.
Complaint #6
We find the complaint to be without merit. Your committee agrees with the
DC in its finding that the congregational meeting of Feb. 6, 2010 was acting in
accord with church order.
Complaint #7
We find the complaint to be without merit. While the DC ordered the pastoral
relationship to be dissolved quickly, there were reasonable pastoral concerns
for that decision. It appears that due consideration was given to ensure that the
former pastor’s family should not suffer undue hardship.
Complaint #8
We find the complaint to be without merit. This complaint actually addresses
DC2 Finding #5 (not #6). While your committee is sympathetic with the
complainant’s concern with the rapid nature of the congregation’s decision to
dissolve the pastoral relationship, we agree with the DC that there was no breech
of the church’s law and order or fundamental biblical principles. The lack of unity
evident in the congregation does not in itself validate the complainant’s charge of
“schismatic behavior”.
RESPONSE TO APPEAL
Your committee finds the appeal regarding Findings #2, #3 and #4 of the DC
report to be without merit.
Finding #2
We agree with the DC assessment that the session’s manner of conducting
the examinations was unwise (though not contrary to the law and order of the
RPCNA). Furthermore, we understand the examination of Ruling Elders
described in the DCG 3.1.A includes only 2 parts (Christian character, knowledge
and commitment to doctrinal standards). The final vote to sustain the examination
voting as a whole is not intended to be a separate examination of fitness for office.
Finding #3
188
We agree with the DC that it is contrary to the law and order of the church to
overturn “a previously sustained exam, without proper charges and a trial”.
Finding #4
Given the circumstances, we find that it was appropriate for the DC to overturn
the actions of the Session to delay and prevent Mr. Saunders installation, and for
the DC to order his installation at the earliest opportunity.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. That Synod sustain the committee’s judgment that the 8 items of the Complaint
lack merit and that the Complaint be returned to its author.
2. That the Appeal to Synod be denied for lack of merit.
Craig Milroy
Vince Scavo
Charles Leach
Charles Leach led in prayer for the First Reformed Presbyterian Church
of Durham, North Carolina.
The moderator appointed Charles Leach to communicate with Mr. Roger
Cornejo concerning the results of the appeal and complaint.
Wade Mann presented the report of the Committee to respond to
Communication 09-2 again. Synod voted on the recommendation in the
communication. The recommendation was lost. The report as a whole was
179th RPCNA Synod, June 21-25, 2010
Report of the Special Committee to Address Communication #09-2
This communication was received by the 2009 Synod and considered by the
Judicial Committee of that Synod. The Judicial Committee’s recommendation
“was adopted and the item was referred to the Business of Synod Committee to be
acted on either at this Synod (2009) or in 2010.” (2009 Minutes of Synod, p. 135)
It appears that Synod ran out of time before considering the item which is
recommendation #1 from Communication #09-2. Given the 2009 Synod’s action,
this matter needs to be addressed by the current Synod. Quoted below is the
report of the 2009 Judicial Committee regarding Communication #09-2:
Paper 09-2
At the Fall 2008 meeting of the Presbytery of the Alleghenies, a paper
petitioning Synod concerning the subject of “informal worship” was
returned to its two authors. In communication 09-2 one of the authors, Paul
McCracken, has appealed that action.
Presbytery provided study and counsel upon the matter through the
work of a study committee, and adopted their committee’s report and
recommendation, namely, “that the paper be returned.”
As for how the original paper was handled:
Because your Judicial Committee finds nothing out of order with the
original paper’s first petition, which is:
1. That Synod appoint an Informal Worship Study Committee to
study the issues mentioned above, and other related issues, bring the
issues before the Synod with the goal of providing pastoral counsel to
the Church.
…and in accord with Chapter 7, paragraph 11 of the Directory for Church
Government, which states…
A member has the right to petition any court of the church to whose
jurisdiction he is subject in relation to any matter of reasonable
importance.
…we believe, since the petition was addressed to Synod by a member of
that court, it was the Presbytery’s responsibility to pass it along for Synod’s
consideration. It could have been passed along without endorsement, or
even with reasoning against its proposal.
The original paper’s second, third and fourth recommendations do,
however, seem to be out of order. Recommendations #2 and #3 ask
Synod to take actions on matters yet-unexamined by the requested study
committee, and recommendation #4 is too general to be applied. (Note:
The recommendations of the appeal paper were slightly modified from
the recommendations of the original. These modifications do not properly
belong with the appeal.)
As for the request for Synod to appoint a study committee:
Your Committee would note that in 1972 Synod adopted the report and
recommendations of a study committee dealing with similar questions
regarding informal worship. In particular, that committee asked the
question: “In what situations does the regulative principle apply?” At that
time the Synod concluded:
…in situations in which the church places no obligation upon
anyone to attend, as in musical concerts and social gatherings, the
regulative principle does not apply. It is in such gatherings that
religious music other than the Psalms has its proper place, and in
such gatherings it is not improper for the Psalms to be sung with
instrumental accompaniment, provided they are not used irreverently.
Both in public worship and in non-worship situations, it is important
that the unique character of the Scripture, as compared with human
compositions, be recognized. Psalms and non-inspired religious songs
should not be treated as though they were on the same level, even in
189
190
an artistic or social setting.
We recommend: That recommendation #1 of the original petition be
placed before the Synod for its decision, which is:
(LOST) 1. That Synod appoint an Informal Worship Study Committee
to study the issues mentioned above, and other related issues, bring
the issues before the Synod with the goal of providing pastoral counsel
to the Church.
(End quote from 2009 Minutes of Synod, pp. 136-137)
It is the recommendation of this special committee that recommendation #1 of
Communication #09-2, namely “That Synod appoint an Informal Worship Study
Committee to study the issues mentioned above, and other related issues, bring
the issues before the Synod with the goal of providing pastoral counsel to the
Church,” be placed before the 2010 Synod for its decision.
Dave Carroll
Matt Kingswood
Bill Roberts
Barry York
Wade Mann, Chairman
The offering for the Sudan missionaries as requested in the special
resolution adopted Thursday morning was taken during the break.
Synod sang Psalm 85B.
David Merkel presented the report of the Committee on Finance regarding
the item referred to them. He presented a revised item 1: an assessment of
$25 for Synod Operations and an assessment of $15 for the Pension Fund
Current account for a total of $40. This change in item 1 affects item 8. The
new item 8 was referred to the Committee on Finance.
Jack Rhoda presented the report of the Resolution of Thanks Committee.
The report was adopted and is as follows:
Report of the Resolution of Thanks Committee
We thank the Lord for His gracious provision of blessings, for His direction,
and for His preservation of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America
such that we may bring Christ the glory. Oh, how abundant is His goodness,
which He has stored up for those who fear Him and who take refuge in Him. We
thank the Lord for the inspired and inerrant Word of God that is the only rule for
faith and life that leads us unto Christ. We thank Him for our forefathers who
191
were committed to His service, many unto death and persecution in this life in
anticipation of the surpassing worth of knowing Christ Jesus our Lord. We thank
the presbyteries and local congregations here in the US, Canada and in Japan for
their labors. We thank the elders for their shepherding the flocks, exhibiting care,
love, discipline, and leadership, and we thank our deacons for their service unto
the Lord.
We thank the retiring moderator of Synod, Bruce Hemphill for his challenge to
us to be united in Christ! We thank Bruce Stewart for his charge to the ministers
of the gospel to speak to the hearts of men, to be faithful in our service to Christ,
and to rightly preach the word of God. We thank the moderator of Synod, Jerry
O’Neill for his message that our motivation for ministry should be a love that will
approve what is excellent to the praise and glory of God. We thank Dr. Wayne
Spear for his encouragement to run the race that is set before us in the time that
God has given to us, and to Dr. Sinclair Ferguson who urges to examine ourselves
in light of the characteristics of the Gospel as outlined in 2 Timothy.
We thank the various boards and committees for their diligent work, prayers,
and sacrifice to provide good and proper direction for the ministries of the church.
You have served Christ from the heart in order to help the Synod accomplish its
work. (Blessed shall you be in the city, and blessed shall you be in the field.)
We thank God for answered prayers and the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in
bringing many to faith and the establishment of churches in Sudan and the needed
financial resources. We thank God for leading these laborers who have displayed
the fruit of the Spirit especially the love of Christ.
We thank the Psalter Revision committee and say with the Psalmist: “Let the
peoples praise you, O God; let all the peoples praise you!” By your work you
enable the nations to be glad and sing for joy.
We thank the Clerk of Synod Bruce Martin, and the Assistant Clerk Ray
Morton for your many years of faithful service, we thank the parliamentarians for
your able and diligent work.
We thank Geneva College for hosting the meetings of Synod during this
beautiful June week when we also celebrate the 200th anniversary of the Reformed
Presbyterian Theological Seminary. We thank the staff her at Geneva for being
gracious and hospitable in preparations, and in our time here, and in the wake of
when we leave.
We thank the administrative ministries and thanks to Jim McFarland for his
excellent financial work. We thank the congregations and individuals that have
given mightily to the work of the church, especially in these times of economic
hardship. We will bless the Lord at all times, his praise shall continually be in our
mouths. My soul makes its boast in the Lord. Let the humble hear and be glad.
Oh magnify the lord with me and let us exalt his name together!
We thank our Chaplains. We are thankful for their service, often through
challenging deployments. We thank the Lord for these men who have been called
to minister to families and soldiers so they can receive Christ-centered teaching.
We thank the Lord for the opportunities He provides to each of our Chaplains to
192
minister the gospel, providing the hope of eternal salvation. We especially thank
the Lord for Kelly Moore, Dan Bartel, Stan Copeland, and Jonathan Leach.
We thank the Lord for the work of the committee to revise the Directory for
Worship. We are thankful for the commitment of these men to help us worship
the Lord in Spirit and in truth.
We thank the Lord for the Reformed Presbyterian Women’s Association and
the work of the RP Home. We are grateful for their ministry to the saints who
have and continue to serve the Lord. We are also thankful for Faith Martin for her
many years of service.
Indeed, behold, how good and pleasant it is when brothers dwell in unity! It
is like the precious oil on the head, running down on the beard, on the beard of
Aaron, running down on the collar of his robes! It is like the dew of Hermon,
which falls on the mountains of Zion! For there the Lord has commanded the
blessing, life forevermore.
We thank the Lord for the words of encouragement from our fraternal
delegates; the Trinity Christian Community Fellowship, Orthodox Presbyterian
Church, Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church, Heritage Reformed Church,
Presbyterian Church in America, Reformed Church in the United States, and the
United Reformed Churches in North America.
We thank the Lord for the Seminary’s 200 years of service. We are thankful
for those past and present who have faithfully trained men such that they would
lead your people in worship, preach the word in season and out of season, and
disciple the nations such that God’s kingdom would come and the realm of Satan
crushed.
Know therefore that the Lord your God is God, the faithful God who keeps
covenant and steadfast love with those who love him and keep his commandments,
to a thousand generations.
Glen Chin
Ralph Joseph
Jack Rhoda
James Faris reported that $1,449 was received in appreciation for the
work of the Sudan missionaries.
Ray Morton presented the report of the Assistant Clerk on Records of
Presbyteries. The report was approved and is as follows:
Assistant Clerk’s Report
The Assistant Clerk would respectfully report that the Minutes of six
Presbyteries in North America and the one Presbytery in Japan under the care
of the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America were read
and approved. Nothing substantial was found contrary to the law and order of
the church although some minor matters were indicated to the appropriate
presbyteries. Among these minor matters are: minutes not signed by either the
Moderator and/or the Clerk of the meeting, and some spelling or editorial errors.
193
The Sudan Commission Minutes will be copied and a copy sent to each of the
readers of those Minutes. Those Minutes after being read by the readers will send
their results to the Assistant Clerk. The Assistant Clerk will report to the meeting
of Synod 2011.
The Assistant Clerk renews the request that the St. Lawrence Presbytery
procure a Minute book for the long-term keeping of its records. Such books are
available and used by all other North American presbyteries.
Raymond E. Morton,
Assistant Clerk of Synod
Item 8 of the Interchurch Committee was reconsidered. This item was
referred to the Great Lakes – Gulf Presbytery.
The minutes of this session were read, corrected and approved.
Following announcements, Synod adjourned at 11:35 a.m. singing Psalm
133A and being led in prayer of adjournment by the Moderator.
Raymond E. Morton, Assistant Clerk
Appendix
197
Reformation Translation Fellowship
Report to the R.P.C.N.A. Synod of 2010
The Reformation Translation Fellowship is thankful for the continued
opportunities for ministry that the Lord has given to us. Much of our effort has
been focused on Mainland China. Because of the increased security in preparation
for the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, we had to curtail our activities during 2008.
With the coming of 2009, we were greatly able to expand our publishing activities
producing 235,000 volumes. We have seen 10,000 copies each of J. G. Vos’
commentaries on Genesis, Romans and Revelation done as well as 35,000 copies
of The Westminster Catechism Explained by Vincent, 50,000 each of Today’s
Gospel by Chantry, The Westminster Shorter Catechism, and the Heidelberg
Catechism. The RTF was also able to print and distribute 10,000 copies each of
2 issues of Faith and Life. So far in 2010, we have done 15,000 copies each of 5
Bible study booklets by J. G. Vos (Christ and His Kingdom, Ephesians, Hebrews,
etc.). In addition, we are hoping to have Competent to Counsel by Jay Adams
printed legally in Mainland China. Give thanks for the number of volumes that
have been printed and distributed safely in Mainland China. Please pray for
continued safety for all those involved in these efforts.
Several of our Board members had the opportunity to teach at a seminary
(called Calvin Theological Hall) being overseen by the RPHCC. This group
makes much use of RTF materials. This particular house church group is seeking
closer ties to the RPCNA, Geneva College, and RPTS. We strongly commend
this effort and are encouraged by the ongoing contact that the RPCNA is having
with this particular house church group.
Efforts continue in Taiwan to revise and update some of the previously
translated books as well as continuing to translate new titles. The newest title
to be re-edited and re-published are The Westminster Shorter Catechism with
Study Notes, Walking with God by J. C. Ryle, and Calvin’s Commentary on
Ephesians. New works printed for the first time in 2009 were Philippians by
Sinclair Ferguson, Five English Reformers by J. C. Ryle, From Fear to Faith by
Rose Miller, and a collection of writings by Calvin and about Calvin in honor of
his 500th anniversary of his birth. Works published already in 2010 or nearing
completion are The Rare Jewel of Christian Contentment by Burroughs, The
Teaching of Jesus concerning the Kingdom of God by Geerhardus Vos, Ephesians
by Ferguson, and The Courage to be Protestant By David Wells. Lorna Chao
continues to work part-time for the R.T.F. in order to speed up the translation
and editing process. Rev. Andy McCafferty, a PCA pastor serving in Taiwan, is
heading up efforts in Taiwan. We are very thankful for his diligent efforts.
Dr. and Mrs. Charles Chao continue to live in Southern California. They are
experiencing the health problems associated with advancing age. This spring they
celebrated 77 years of marriage. Please keep them in your prayers.
Like many non-profits, donations have been down for the RTF the last couple
198
of years. We have been able to rely on some savings that were the result of some
special gifts to the RTF in past years. These funds have been exhausted and we
are dependent upon donations to fund the various projects. A RTF web site in
English can be found at: www.rtf-usa.com. It gives basic information about
the RTF and also has a listing of RTF titles (in English only at this time) and
their U.S. prices. Hopefully in the near future RTF titles will able to be ordered
at www.sinimbooks.com using a credit card.
The RTF gives thanks to the Bloomington RPC for allowing us space in their
church building. Special thanks also go to all the various individuals, families,
and congregations that have supported us in prayer and financially. God is doing
some marvelous things in China, and your support helps to make possible the
RTF’s involvement in what is happening.
Recommendation:
That John McFarland be heard for 5 minutes concerning his recent trip to
Southeast Asia.
William L. Roberts, treasurer
199
Reformed Presbyterian Woman’s Association
Report of the Executive Director
Our increasingly critical financial situation has prompted us to take this
opportunity to explain and emphasize the historic responsibilities our denomination
has undertaken to accomplish through the operation of the Reformed Presbyterian
Home. The Reformed Presbyterian Woman’s Association (RPWA) is renewing
its urgent request that the Synod of the RPCNA provide funds to the Home equal
to the amount of benevolent care Reformed Presbyterians receive annually at the
Home. Our responsibilities have not changed throughout the years; circumstances
have. We are at a point where our mission and denominational commitment is in
jeopardy. Two months into 2010, we learned that our Medicaid reimbursement rate will
drop $13 per patient day beginning April 1. This reduced rate will be in effect for
12 months. Since 70% of our patients are on Medicaid, our operating income for
that same period will be reduced by approximately $180,000.
At the same time and without knowing of our sudden drop in Medicaid
payments, West View Savings Bank asked to meet with us. Their FDIC auditors
have concerns about our ability to repay West View Savings based upon our
historic operating losses. To quiet the concerns of the FDIC, West View Savings
Bank asked RPH to produce a management plan that shows how we will continue
to meet our loan obligations to West View.
Management moved quickly to address these issues. We terminated contracts,
cancelled capital upgrades to our campus and obtained temporary relief from
principal payments on a construction loan with the RPCNA. Most difficult of
all was the announcement of across the board wage and salary cuts, disallowing
planned overtime, reducing staff hours, and trimming benefits. The average
Reformed Presbyterian Home employee will see their income drop by $1,700 in
2010 as a result of these cuts. Right now, the already modestly paid employees
of the Home are the ones primarily making a sacrifice to allow our work of mercy
to continue.
Last year, the Home gave $152,500 in uncompensated care to ten persons in
the residential unit. Of that amount, $104,000 is attributable to six Reformed
Presbyterians, four of whom are retired workers of the RPCNA. Not only are they
unable to pay the Home for the care they receive, they cannot pay for their own
health insurance premiums, co-pays for doctor’s visits, and pharmacy bills. In the
absence of family able and willing to help, the Home assumes responsibility for
these outside obligations and also gives them a $85 monthly stipend for personal
items. This amounts to an additional $27,000 in benevolent care.
In recent years, RPCNA support for the Home has been calculated on the
assumption that its responsibility is limited to supporting retired workers of the
denomination. Even by that standard, the RPCNA is falling short. Over the last
five years, Synod has approved on average only $28,000 for the Home—less
than the benevolent care given to just two retired workers of the RPCNA in our
200
personal care unit.
This has been disheartening because the Home is subject to severe and ongoing
financial pressures. Excessive regulatory oversight and increasingly intrusive
compliance requirements drain our resources. We are subject to a capricious third
party payment system that forces us to spend expensive staff time documenting
every element of care. This information is used by the state to establish our
Medicaid rates, but the actual payment is “adjusted” down to fit the amount of
money set aside in the state budget. This portion of the state budget has been
frozen for five years. Meanwhile, our costs and obligations are rising.
In researching the beginnings of the Home it is clear the intended scope of
service envisioned by the founders was one of mercy to the vulnerable members
of society. A member of the Wilkinsburg congregation lost her hand. Unable
to work and therefore unable to support herself, she applied to the United
Presbyterian Home in Wilkinsburg, but was not admitted since she was not a
member of that denomination. Her plight came to the attention of the women
of her congregation and served as a catalyst for action. The women petitioned
the Synod to consider “the necessity of taking steps to provide a Home for Aged
Persons and an Orphanage if found practicable.” At the same time, Mary McKee
Morton of the Allegheny congregation asked her aged father, John A. McKee,
to make financial provision for a home in his will. Acting upon his daughter’s
suggestion, he left $5,000 to the Synod on the condition that a work be started
within five years. Mr. McKee died a month later.
Fearing that the $5,000 would be lost because of inaction, the women again
petitioned Synod in 1895. Synod’s response was to approve cooperation between
the women of Pittsburgh Presbyterial and Synod’s Board of Trustees “in the matter
of establishing a widow’s and orphan’s and aged people’s home.” Soon it became
apparent to the Trustees that it would be appropriate for the women to assume
sole responsibility for the work and they recommended the same to the Synod of
1897, which passed a resolution stating, “that the board of Trustees of the Synod
be relieved from further work, management and responsibility in connection with
the Home, and that Synod, by formal resolution, commit such management and
responsibility from this time forth to the women of the church under the corporate
name of the Reformed Presbyterian Woman’s Association.” In anticipation of
this resolution, the RPWA was chartered in March of that year. The doors of the
Reformed Presbyterian Home were opened that same summer and have remained
open for 113 years.
While seeing the Home as meeting a need within the RPCNA, this work of
mercy has not been limited to members. In the spirit of Galatians 6:10, which
states, “Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially
to those who belong to the family of believers,” the charter specifies the home is
for “widows, orphans, aged and infirmed members of the RPCNA and others.”
The inclusion of “others” was not done lightly. It was preceded by serious debate.
Since its founding, the RPWA has given priority in admission to Reformed
Presbyterians and accepted them regardless of their ability to pay. “Others” have
201
been admitted as there is room and they presently form less than one half of those
in the residential unit. Many of them are close relatives of Reformed Presbyterians
and all of the “others” are from the immediate community.
The finances of the Home have become extremely complicated and there is
no single problem or single solution to the current situation; however, it is vital
to our lenders (and their regulators) that the church demonstrate its commitment
to this ministry. This means putting our money where our commitment is. It is
possible that, in the future, restrictions could be placed upon our admissions policy
which would compromise our commitment to admitting Reformed Presbyterians
regardless of their ability to pay. That condition was actually proposed by a bank
during negotiations for the 1983 building loan.
Many Reformed Presbyterians living in the Home have sufficient funds to
pay for their own care. In fact, they see themselves as recipients of God’s mercy
because of the Home, and show their thankfulness by giving generously to the
Home well beyond our actual charges. For the first 85 years of operation, the
Home was funded entirely with private money. Residents paid what they were
able and the rest was supplied through the generosity of God’s people.
We are to be future minded. But the temptation is to look fearfully ahead,
especially with regard to society. We wonder aloud at our ability to meet the
great human need, which seems to be opening before us. But did the founders
face a task that was any easier than ours? We speak almost nostalgically of the
days when there were no telephones or motor cars. But in 1897 there was also
no public assistance for a person without family or funds. The first annual report
of the RPWA records the gift of $.25 or a dozen eggs with the same dignity that
we record a gift of $1,000 today. Inflation is not the reason. Back when there
was no public assistance, it was sometimes the poor who supported the poor.
Today we have Medicare and Medicaid to assist us in our ministry. But they are
hardly sufficient to supply the needs around us. Public assistance may help keep
the body alive, but it does not feed the soul. It is our mission to go beyond the
essentials and provide help in a way that those who are helped feel the touch of
Christ.
We have mentioned three kinds of people who started the RPWA: the Mary
Mortons who had ideas and gave their time; the John McKees who were generous
with their wealth, and the people who gave $.25 or a dozen eggs. We still have
the same people here, and we still have a great work before us.
Faith M. Martin, Executive Director, RPWA
202
Memorial for Dr. Robert B. Tweed
My first memory of meeting Dr. Robert Tweed was when he and his family
moved to Lawrence, Kan., in 1987, following their ministry in Alaska. I never
could have imagined how moving a few dressers and boxes of books might
significantly change the course of my life…
During high school, my brother and I would travel from Winchester to
Lawrence to attend the youth group and frequently would end the evenings visiting
the Tweed home. We would usually engage ourselves in identifying the problems
in society and then brainstorm about how God’s Word might offer solutions. Many
of these talks didn’t end until the food provided by Elaine was gone…. in the wee
hours of the night. These discussions were used of Bob to challenge us as young
people and to inspire us to see the practicality of God’s Word, and to develop a
better sense of our duty to Christ and His church.
When Bob’s son, James, and I went off to Kansas State University, Bob
worked with us to realize our vision of leading Bible studies on that campus. On
many occasions Bob would drive out and present a lesson, or to help us in our
preparation for those weekly gatherings. He was always available and enthusiastic
to help us. I am so thankful for the opportunities to witness Bob’s passion for
exploring the depths of the Scriptures. It was contagious.
Over the years God used Bob to help me examine the call to ministry and
to explore ways that the denomination might better invest in covenant children.
From conversations around his dining room table, the seeds of a denominational
short-term mission endeavor were planted and tended.
In 1998, soon after graduating from Seminary, I was delighted to learn that
Bob and Elaine were moving back to Beaver Falls, and I considered it a gift
from God that I might once again work closely with Bob. His family became my
family. One of the greatest joys in my time as an elder at Geneva RPC came as
I was given the opportunity to give the charge to my mentor, Bob, when he was
installed to serve on the Session.
As an elder at Geneva RPC and later at First RPC, Bob was a model shepherd.
His love for the people of God was clearly seen and Bob was a regular visitor
to those entrusted to his care. As Bob’s strength lessened, he didn’t reduce his
attempts to visit with the flock, but utilized the phone to know the needs of the
flock and he regularly upheld each in prayer.
One of the greatest joys to Bob was witnessing God’s fulfillment of His
Covenant Promises to his family. His daughters, Jennifer and Andrea were blessed
to marry godly Christian men. His sons grew into able teachers of the Word,
and his grandchildren were being faithfully trained from God’s Word. He would
regularly speak of his anticipation of his weekly phone call with James to hear
what he had discovered in his exposition of the Psalms. And when David would
organize a Bible study, Bob always enjoyed the times the two of them would
spend in the study researching and formulating their lessons.
Bob grew up in Beaver Falls and, in 1951, graduated from the Reformed
Presbyterian Theological Seminary. For 25 years, from 1954-79, Bob served at
203
Geneva College in the Bible Department and was greatly used of God in that
capacity. Bob also pastored the Geneva Reformed Presbyterian Church from
1955-56. Following those years of service, Bob and his family labored at church
planting near Anchorage, Alaska, from 1979-1987. Bob pastored the Lawrence
RP Church from 1987 to 1992 and then began his busy retirement living in
Winchester, Kansas, from 1992-1998.
On October 19, 2009, Bob went to be with his Lord. It is always hard seeing
a trusted mentor depart this life. Yet, it also impressed upon me the need to,
like Bob, be an intentional discipler. Bob’s example brings to mind Paul’s charge
to Timothy, “what you have heard from me in the presence of many witnesses
entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also.“ (2 Tim. 2:2)
Matt Filbert
204
Memorial for Dr. Ronald Vay Good
Death came suddenly into the life of our Sharon, Iowa, pastor on Thursday
evening, June 3, 2010. His death following surgery was a surprise to everyone,
but Jesus.
Ron Good was 61 years of age. He was approaching his major surgery with a
positive note. He wrote the morning of the surgery to our presbytery committee
“I’m off to the hospital this morning for some surgery. I need some colon
repair and my gall bladder plus some stones is coming out. Lord willing, I will
survive the procedures and spend a week to ten days in Iowa City in the hospital.
Won’t make Synod this year, and it sounds like a very good one shaping up.”
In the sovereign plan of God, Ron would make it to Synod the first night in the
presentation of his memorial.
Ronald Vay Good was born August 29, 1948, into the home of Walter and
Elizabeth Good in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Other children in the family:
R. Scott, Barbara, and Toby Lee. He died on Thursday, June 3, 2010, at Mercy
Hospital in Iowa City, Iowa.
As a youth he made his public profession of faith in the United Brethren
Church in Middletown, Pennsylvania. He attended school nearby and graduated
in 1966 from Lower Dauphin High School in Hummelstown, Pa. He entered
Geneva College in 1966 and graduated in 1970 with a degree in Social Science.
During his years at Geneva, he excelled in athletics in track. He also served as
class president both his Junior and Senior years. It was at Geneva, he met Virginia
Ann Farley, his wife-to-be.
From 1970-1973 he attended Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia
graduating with a M.Div degree. He entered the Reformed Presbyterian Church
in 1972, joining the Elkins Park congregation. He was taken under care of the
New York Presbytery as a student of theology.
On June 24, 1972 he was married to Virginia Ann Farley. Born to this union
were Deborah Lynn and Matthew David.
He was licensed to preach the Gospel in the spring of 1973 and entered the
Reformed Presbyterian Seminary in Pittsburgh for one additional year of training.
He was ordained and installed as pastor of the New Alexandria, Pa. Reformed
Presbyterian Church on June 18, 1974 where he served as pastor 1974-1981.
He was called to be pastor of the Washington, Iowa, Reformed Presbyterian
church in 1982. He served in that congregation from 1982-1991. He resigned
the pastoral duties of the Washington congregation and became Chief Jailer in
the Washington Co Jail from 1991-1994 when he accepted the Call of the Sharon
Reformed Presbyterian congregation in Morning Sun, Iowa where he was serving
at the time of his death.
Ron has served the Reformed Presbyterian Synod in several ways including
serving on the Home Mission Board and the Commission on Chaplains and
Military Personnel.
As word of Ron’s death became known, there were many memorials and
memoirs appearing on Facebook. Among them were the following:
205
“I received the news of this sudden loss last night and was so shocked and
grieved. It is indeed a glorious day for Pastor Good, but a sullen one for
those of us who were blessed by his ministry in so many ways. Ron was
such an encouragement and help to us during our time in Washington, Iowa.
He was always joyful in his duties and never failed to have an edifying
word to build up the saints. Like all of you, our prayers are ascending for
Ginny, Debbie, Matt and his family. The Lord is good in all His ways but
his doings are unsearchable. May the God of all comfort surround Ron’s
family and the Sharon congregation with His grace and peace as they
process the sudden loss of this dear brother.” (Doug Comin)
“Ron and I were Geneva College students so I remember him from those
days. I was nourished when he led devotions at Synod. He preached Christ
crucified, buried and resurrected. God bless the Sharon congregation and
use Bob McFarland as he leads in the Memorial service Tuesday.”
“On the basis of Ron’s sincere faith in Jesus Christ and the promises of
God’s Word, we certainly do believe he is with Jesus Christ, his redeemer,
and for that we are joyful. However, for so many of us who knew Ron as a
delightful friend and a caring pastor/presbytery, this is very, very sad news,
and so sudden. I observed Ron to be a faithful and knowledgeable student
and preacher of God’s truth, a loving shepherd to God’s flock and a helpful
counselor in the courts of Christ. Why don’t I take time to tell our brothers
and sisters what I think of them while they are with us? We pray Christ’s
comfort and assistance to Ginny, his children and grandchildren and the
Sharon congregation.” (Bob Hemphill)
In 2004 Ron received his ThD degree at Masters Graduate School of Divinity
in Evansville, Indiana. He has served in Washington, Iowa, as Chaplain for the
Washington Co. Hospital and Washington Public Safety Center. He was appointed
County Court counselor. He was a member of the Morning Sun Lions Club and
was Chaplain of District 9SE.
Those he left behind include his wife, Virginia, of Morning Sun, one daughter,
Deborah, a resident of Winning Wheels in Prophetstown, Illinois, one son,
Matthew and wife Leah of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, two grandchildren, Maizy and
Max, two brothers, Toby and wife Patrice of Elizabethtown, Pa., and Scott and
wife Sharon of Barnegat, NJ, and several nieces and one nephew.
“As long as it is day, we must do the work of Him that sent me. Night is
coming when no man can work. . .” John 9:4
“Why, you do not even know what will happen tomorrow. What is your
life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes.
Instead, you ought to say if it is the Lord’s will, we will live and do this or
that.” James 4:14, 15
206
Memorial for Paul Eugene Faris
Paul Eugene Faris was born June 27, 1916, in Mayetta, Kansas, the second of
six children, to Henry and Alice McCrory Faris. He was baptized in the Denison
RPC, and became a communicant member at age 11. He graduated from Denison
High School in Denison, Kansas, in 1938, and from Geneva College in 1942.
Following in the footsteps of his great-grandfather and grandfather, he enrolled
at the Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary. Though he nearly died
from pneumonia and a reaction to sulfa drugs in his first year, in God’s mercy
he was spared. He was married to Ruth Prosser of Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania,
on September 14, 1944. He graduated from seminary in 1945, and served three
pastorates: Quinter, Kansas (1945-1957), Sterling, Kansas (1957-1971), and
Lisbon, New York (1971-1984). While in Quinter, God blessed Paul and Ruth
with their three children, Eileen, David, and Gwendolyn. Upon retirement, he
and Ruth moved to the Flora, Indiana, community to be close to family and to be
involved in the church plant in Kokomo, Indiana. His happy retirement was soon
saddened by Ruth’s death in 1986 after 42 years of marriage. He served as a ruling
elder in the newly formed Sycamore RPC (Kokomo, Indiana) from 1992-1999.
When he was no longer able to live on his own, he stayed in Lisbon, New York,
where his daughter Gwen and her family lovingly cared for him until the Lord
took him to glory.
Paul was a family patriarch, a faithful minister, a gentle churchman, a fellow
elder, and a chief counselor. One word that binds all those titles together is
covenant. Paul not only taught all his life about the covenant; he lived in covenant.
God fulfilled wondrously in Paul’s life the words of Psalm 25, “The knowledge of
His covenant He unto them will show.”
Because of this covenant knowledge, Paul’s “eyes upon the Lord continually
were set.” He saw the covenant Lord’s hand, working in providence, weaving
everything together for His glory and our good. When Paul prayed, like the
psalmist his prayers were filled with pictures of the earthiness of the created order
around him: plowed fields with their promise of a fall harvest; the sap of the
maple trees being transformed into the syrup he loved; the joy over the birth of
yet another grandchild and concern for the mother’s recovery. Yet his prayers
also quickly moved from earthly tokens of God’s goodness to helping us see the
spiritual realities that lay behind them. Grain growing in the fields a reminder
of the gospel harvest; life-giving sap the need to abide in Christ like a branch in
a vine; a new babe the hope of the new birth in Christ; the labor of a mother the
painful price of gospel work.
Paul lived richly, though without great earthly wealth. He mined the Psalms
and promoted singing them, though he was a self-aware monotone. A generous
benefactor near Sterling, Kansas, supplied Paul with books that deepened his
understanding of reformed theology. His love for reading never ceased. After his
90th birthday, he read over 100 books in one year. The vegetable garden drew his
attention each year, until he had cultivated a crop for over 50 consecutive years.
Green pastures and still waters also attracted him. In Quinter, Kansas, Sterling,
207
Kansas, and Flora, Indiana, he volunteered time constructing the local golf course,
where he would later invest time into the lives of his children and grandchildren.
He thoroughly enjoyed his descendents, and wrote a weekly family letter in which
he related news, recounted history, and imparted wisdom to these whom he loved.
He actively served the presbyteries of which he was a part. As a member of
Synod, he labored for many years on the Evangelism Committee and on the Board
of Education and Publication. In an unprecedented and unrepeated move, Synod
elected Paul as moderator in both 1983 and 1984. He worked for a more peaceful
and loving Synod meeting than he had witnessed in his early years. With others,
he cultivated a spirit of cooperation and love as a member of the court. After
delivering the retiring moderator’s sermon in 1985, he never returned to Synod.
This was perhaps an overreaction, but he did not want to interfere with the work
of the younger men—another evidence of his lifelong commitment to help change
the nature of Synod for the glory of God.
He is survived by his brother Harold, children Eileen, David, and Gwen,
sixteen grandchildren, and nineteen great-grandchildren (not including those soon
to be born). He longed to see the covenant fulfilled in the lives of those God
placed around him. Paul loved Psalm 106 which describes his desire to see with
his own eyes that covenant fulfillment: “That I may see Thy people’s good and
in their joy rejoice, and may with Thine inheritance exult with cheerful voice.”
208
Memorial
J. Renwick Wright
The Reverend Doctor J. Renwick Wright died at the age of 91 years. Born May
18, 1918, in Coleraine, Ireland, he was known on both sides of the Atlantic for his
cordial personality and his godly ministry of the gospel. How can one condense
into a few paragraphs the life of a man of God who from his earliest days was
granted the grace to know Jesus Christ and touched so many, many lives!
Renwick was a son of the manse, as they used to say, that is, his father James R.
Wright was a pastor, as Renwick was to become. He showed me one time his alma
mater Trinity College in Dublin, and both he and his brother Hugh spent a year
at the Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary in Pittsburgh in completing
their education.
When I first met him, he was pastor of the Dromara RP Church in County
Down; but the occasion reflected the spirit and drive of this man of God who gave
himself beyond the bounds of his own congregation. This was an international
convention in 1966 hosted by the RP Church of Ireland at the resort center in
Portrush. Renwick was the organizer and director. He had given himself to help
the youth of his time to know the truth and joy of being a true Christian, wellknown for his leadership and drive, and his love for those youth. In fact, both he
and brother Hugh possessed an enterprising spirit about their faith. We playfully
used to say, “Those Wright brothers know how to get things off the ground!”
Renwick began his ministry in Ballymoney prior to going to Dromara, but an
exchange of pulpits experience with Herbert Hays ultimately led to his coming
to America to pastor the Geneva congregation in Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania.
His wife Maureen and his two sons, Christopher and Jonathan, accompanied
him in taking up residence here. Once again Renwick endeared himself to his
congregation and to all who came to know him. But then a call came to him
from the Winchester, Kansas, RP Church and he felt led to accept the summons
as from the Lord. And there he served until again called by the R. P. Theological
Seminary to become professor of New Testament. It was then that we became
neighbors, for he and Maureen became members of Covenant Fellowship where
I was pastor. Our wives became fast friends… and still are. Renwick served there
at the Seminary until his retirement.
While there is so much that could be said about Renwick, two items in terms of
his work for the Synod stand out to me. First, he served on the committee seeking
to determine the New Testament teaching of the eldership. It was at that time and
under Renwick’s influence the Synod concluded that there are two permanent
offices in the New Testament church: elder and deacon. And a pamphlet authored
by Renwick remains in current use to explain our “two office” view.
The other particular service he rendered came after his formal retirement,
when the Home Mission Board asked him to serve as a “pastor’s pastor.” Some of
this Synod were no doubt visited by him and could tell your own stories of his gift
of encouragement accompanying his wisdom.
209
Renwick loved his wife Maureen. He loved his two sons, their wives and their
multitude of children. He loved the Reformed Presbyterian Church. But above all
he loved his Savior Jesus. One could not be around him long without sensing his
fervent commitment to his Lord. And so he leaves us a commendable example
of a balanced, aggressive, loving man of God who lived under the handicap of
having only one functioning eye, but whose vision for Christ and His kingdom
was 20/20. He died at the age of 91 on October 8, 2009, at the RP Home where
his beloved wife still resides.
Presented to the 2010 RP Synod
Kenneth G. Smith
June 16, 2010
210
Greetings To Synod
Adam Mastris for TCCF
June 2010
Fathers and brothers
At a meeting of the Presbytery of the Alleghenies last night, TCCF was received
in principle under its oversight. The details of this decision will be worked out and
presented for approval at the Fall meeting of Presbytery.
This decision was in response to a petition of session who informed the
Presbytery that due to the retirement of its minister it urgently required leadership
and oversight—which was no longer available from within.
Since the early ’90s elders from TCCF have been giving greetings to this
Synod. Having organised ourselves in 1994 by a joint action of the RPCNA and
RPCI we have sought to labour for the Kingdom of God in Cyprus continuing and
restoring the work of the RPCNA which was started over 100 years prior.
You see, already there were three indigenous congregations in Cyprus, under
the umbrella of the GEC. These were the congregations that the RPCNA left
behind when they departed in a hurry in 1974. However, much work was needed
to assist the GEC to realise and own the confessions which inspired dozens of
your missionaries to travel the thousands of miles and work there.
So, TCCF sought to minister not only to its own members and adherents,
but also to the GEC churches. This was the strategy for building the indigenous
church that we have heard so much about today.
By 2002, the GEC had revised its confessional documents, adopting TCCF’s
own confession.
In a meeting deep in the bowels of a salt mine-cum-university at the RPCNA
Synod held in Kansas the GEC churches applied and were granted fraternal
relations with the RPCNA.
The 2-prong Kingdom work of TCCF has much to show, thus displaying the
Lord’s blessing in our efforts.
God brought a number of asylum seekers and other refugees along our path.
Some were from the persecuted Christian groups of the Middle East. Others were
from the large sea of Muslim nations nearby. But all were hungry for a place in the
West, to escape their plight. Some found Christ and you have heard their stories
from this podium in the past.
A number of local people from English speaking families (usually one
Cypriot married to a foreigner) also gave us great joy as they came to faith and
joined us. Their children grew in our midst, hearing the claims of Christ and
it has been our great joy and privilege to see a good number of them come to
Christ. It is with great joy that recently we have been told that 5 young men
had covenanted to return from the University studies and serve the Lord in
Cyprus.
There are many more such stories of encouragement regarding the young
people of Larnaca. I remember speaking to the regular group of about 70 teenagers.
211
... they were all listening... from this youth group two Christian clubs were set up
one in the AA and the other in another Private school of Larnaca. The kids called
their clubs: The Proclaimers. The RPCNA mission teams were amazingly used
over the years and were instrumental in the success of the work amongst these
young folk.
The GEC churches, from having a mere handful of members when TCCF
started, are now enjoying considerable growth in membership—though still
facing the challenges of being in the midst of a hostile Orthodox culture and in
need of growing in the understanding of their confession.
TCCF cannot claim credit for all these blessings—for only by God’s grace
they have taken place. However, TCCF was enabled to play its own part in this
wonderful display of God’s work, and we believe that what lies ahead is even
more exciting and challenging...
What lies ahead????
PASTORS
None of the 3 GEC congregations of TCCF will have a full time pastor as
of early next year when Bill Sterrett retires. Please, pray with us that God will
provide.
ACADEMIES
Our work with the two AA (the schools started by the Mission) has many
demands:
• The Nicosia AA has been growing and is a great encouragement. It’s run
by a Board of Christians, but we desperately need to build up a Christian
faculty as well as new premises to cater for the growing school.
• In the Larnaca AA, which is run by its Alumni, we need to maintain
the teaching of Scripture to all its students. This year, for the first time
since the missionaries left, we have succeeded to have the Bible taught
throughout the school.
What does all this mean? The seed is sown to nearly 1500 Cypriot children
EVERY YEAR.
SEMINARY
Having theological education and developing a meaningful response to
Orthodoxy seem to be eminently important ingredients in developing real
Reformation in Cyprus. And so for over 10 years now we have been working with
a vision for a Seminary in Cyprus with a number of folk both in the US, Ireland
and Cyprus. This year we had the first series of lectures called “Epiphania” and
only yesterday I was able to share with interested friends here the first draft of the
architectural drawings for the Seminary building. It’s all very exciting!
All these things from one perspective are like unsurpassable walls. But with
our God, we can climb over walls. God used our partnership in Christ to bring
much about. Now, as we turn this corner, I would ask you to remember us in
212
prayer and to continue in your faithfulness, that our God’s name will be glorified
in that far away land.
213
Communication #09-2
On Informal Worship
This communication is from Paul McCracken and is transferred by the Ad
Interim Commission of the Presbytery of the Alleghenies without its approval.
Appeal Paper Through The Presbytery Of The Alleghenies
The purpose of the paper is to appeal the action of the Presbytery of the
Alleghenies at the meeting in November ‘08 regarding Informal Worship.
Because of Synod’s action changing the procedure of handling Synod papers,
it was essential that it first be sent to the Presbytery of the Alleghenies. The Ad
interim commission decided that it should be dealt with by the whole Presbytery,
which decided to appoint a study committee. The study committee’s report was
adopted by the Presbytery, which determined that the paper be sent back to the
authors, Vern Rosenberger and Paul McCracken.
The paper appeals that decision for at least these two reasons: (1) in their
response they say that there are not sufficient Scriptures to deal with informal
worship situations, and (2) It is implied that it could be divisive because “the
detailed regulation of the content of such divergent activities is not a matter that
the Synod can or should legislate.”
Several of the recommendations of the original paper have been revised by
the authors, namely items #2, #3, and #4. In addition to item #1, item #2 will
read: That the chapel service at RPTS be designated a worship service and that it
be conducted under the Regulative Principle. Item #3: That the study committee
weigh Geneva’s decision not to treat Wednesday Chapel as worship, but as a
“devotional period” and the practice of such need not be regulated.
Geneva College is a practical project of the RPCNA. Its student body is largely
“evangelical”, and has not been trained in the practices of biblical worship or the
ramifications of the Mediatorial Kingship of Christ. Geneva has the opportunity
to expose its students to both of these principles. To fail to attempt to do so is to
fail in our educational responsibility. This raises the question whether to try to
maintain a separate Reformed Presbyterian college.
The denomination needs to know what is being done in the chapel periods of
its institutions. In any case, the Synod needs to make these decisions.
Item #4: That ministers, ruling elders and members be instructed not to
participate in any aspect of false worship.
With respect to Presbytery’s claim in its report that “neither the Scriptures nor
the subordinate standards give any clear direction or mandate”, our paper cited
II Samuel 6:1-11 as an example of worship practice in between clearly regulated
worship. (Also Matthew 2:11; 15:25)
We urge Synod to respond to our appeal and appoint a study committee.
The revised recommendations are as follows:
1) That Synod appoint an Informal Worship study committee to study the
issue mentioned and other related issues, and bring them before the Synod with
214
the goal of providing pastoral counsel to the church.
2) That the chapel services at the RPTS be designated as worship, and that
it be conducted under the Regulative Principle.
3) That the study committee weigh Geneva’s decision not to treat Wednesday
chapel as worship, but as a devotional period, and that the practice of such need
not be regulated.
4) That ministers, elders and members of the denomination be instructed
not to participate in any aspect of false worship.
J. Paul McCracken
Paper, 2008 to Synod On “Informal” Worship.
The committee report on worship adopted by the 2003 Synod was excellent, but
the matters covered were mainly “formal” or “public” (sometimes called “regular
stated”) worship situations. No instructions were given regarding “informal”
worship situations, which many of us in our churches face constantly. To our
mind, the report is clear that “formal worship” (the kind authorized and overseen
by the elders for the church, (particularly that held on Lord’s Day mornings) is
clearly under the regulative principle. This paper contends that the report leaves
other worship (we are calling it “informal” worship) open and untouched, and
supposedly unregulated. This would include such activities as weekday prayer
meetings, family worship gatherings, weekday evening prayer and praise and
Bible study periods, camps and campfires, “chapel” periods in Christian K-12
schools, Christian colleges and seminaries, weekday conferences, and many other
meetings which involve worshipful activities.
This paper contends that, pastorally, Synod must guide the church as to whether
all of these informal activities are open to including what seems “appropriate” to
the conductors (note the Lutheran position regarding public worship), or whether
God requires more. It is the contention of this paper that whenever elements
of worship are used in these gatherings, God regulates them, even as He does
in “formal worship” settings. For example, when camp or conference periods
include worship singing, it must be with the Psalms sung a capella. The same
would be true, of course, in Sabbath evening meetings, which are called to meet
by Sessions, but are often conducted in a somewhat more informal manner than
Sabbath morning worship. When “chapel” is conducted, for example, at Christian
schools, Geneva College, or R.P. Theological Seminary, worship elements are
regulated by Scripture as understood by the R.P.C.N.A. What is the alternative?
To include anything that anyone deems appropriate! (Whether it is pleasing to
God, or not!) In other words, whenever we design a meeting for worship, whether
it involves all of the regular elements of worship or not, Synod should require the
church membership to follow the worship regulations.
To see an example in Scripture, (II Samuel 6:1-11) we would call attention to
the incident when David moved the ark from the border of Philistia to Shiloh. It
215
was carried on a new cart (contrary to the Lord’s commandment), and Uzzah lost
his life as a result. But this was not a “worship service”, but did involve the piece
of furniture which was central to the Old Testament gospel and worship. Yet,
though not an occasion of “formal worship,” it was regulated. Our worship must
first ask, “What is pleasing to God . . . what has He commanded?”
Recommendations:
1. That Synod appoint an Informal Worship Study Committee to study the issues
mentioned above, and other related issues, bring the issues before the Synod with
the goal of providing pastoral counsel to the Church.
2. Since the Synod and College have assumed chapel worship to be part of a
normal college life, and has never, to our knowledge, specifically authorized
such worship or its oversight...that the Synod authorize those in the faculty who
are RPCNA elders, plus the present Administrative officers, to conduct public
worship in the chapels at Geneva College and at RPTS, and that the content be
governed by the denomination’s convictions re. the “regulative principle.”
3. That Synod take action now to give the following tentative pastoral counsel
. . . that when any elements of “formal worship” are planned, for example,
singing in God’s worship, it be conducted under the regulative principle, and that
her ministers, ruling elders and members be instructed not to participate in false
worship.
4. That uniformity of practice, therefore, be more firmly sought throughout the
denomination.
Paul McCracken
Leverne Rosenberger
Report of the Special Committee to address the communication on
“Informal” Worship
Presbytery of the Alleghenies
Fall Meeting, 2008
Fathers and Brothers,
While we hold the authors of this communication in the highest esteem, and
while we sympathize in great part with the concerns raised in this paper regarding
the difficulty of understanding how and in what sense the Regulative Principle
of Worship applies to less formal settings where one or more elements of formal
worship may be present, our recommendation to the court is that this paper be
returned to the authors. The reasons for this recommendation are as follows:
1. Recommendation #1 asks the Synod to appoint a committee to study the
question of “informal worship” in order to provide pastoral counsel to
the Church. Included in the list of activities and settings of concern to the
authors are such gatherings as weekly prayer meetings, family worship,
mid-week Bible studies, college and private school chapel services,
216
conferences, retreats and even campfires. It is the opinion of your
committee that the detailed regulation of the content of such divergent
activities is not a matter that the Synod can or should legislate. We do not
believe it is reasonable to expect the Synod to arrive at a consensus on
questions about which neither the Scriptures nor the subordinate standards
give any clear direction or mandate.
2. Recommendation #2 asks the Synod to “authorize those in the faculty
who are RPCNA elders, plus the present Administrative officers, to
conduct worship in the chapels at Geneva College and at RPTS, and that
the content be governed by the denomination’s convictions regarding
the regulative principle.” Your committee respectfully suggests that if
the authors of the paper believe that there are public services of worship
being conducted in the institutions of the church which are in violation
of the RPW, the appropriate response would be to pursue those concerns
through the lower courts of the church and the governance structures of
the institutions. It seems to us that this recommendation implies a judicial
charge, assumes it to be true, and asks the church’s highest court to impose
correction without explanation or justification.
3. Recommendation #3 asks the Synod to impose a particularly rigid standard
of practice upon the congregations—as “tentative pastoral counsel”—
suggesting that whenever any one element of “formal worship” is part
of an informal gathering, the strict application of the RPW is required.
Your committee believes that such a request presumes the conclusion of
the study committee proposed in Recommendation #1, and is therefore
out of order.
4. Recommendation #4 simply expresses the praiseworthy desire
“that uniformity of practice be more firmly sought throughout the
denomination.” While such a resolution is commendable, the simple
expression of a desire is not a valid reference to the Synod.
Titus Martin
Martin Blocki
Douglas Comin, Chairman REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA
217
Communication #10-1
Report of the Committee to Review the Southfield Session’s Paper
on the Psalter Revision
Fathers and brothers,
After reviewing Southfield Session’s paper on the Psalter Revision, we offer
the following observations and recommendations. Both our committee and the
Southfield Session have agreed to include their original paper as an appendix to
this committee’s paper rather than passing it along as is to synod. In doing so,
we are seeking to focus on the most significant problems and the most realistic
resolutions.
First, we are in agreement with the concerns explained in the paper and detailed
in this paper’s first appendix (specifically, addition or unnecessary repetition and
inversion or intermingling of verses).
Second, we believe that the problems with the Psalter revision stem from both
translational issues and procedural issues. After reviewing the Psalter revision
process, we have grown increasingly concerned that problems be identified and
corrected for the future. We would note the following procedural problems:
• The translation was made temporarily available for input by teaching and
ruling elders (following the 2008 synod), but no record has been published
of which suggestions were kept or rejected. Having reviewed some of the
input the Psalter Revision Committee received, we can say with confidence
that most of the concerns of the Southfield Session’s paper were well
known to the Revision Committee before publication. Yet without any
checks or balances, the input could be easily dismissed without public
justification.
• No one outside the committee, save Lynne Gordon, was allowed to proof
the translation of the Psalter before its printing. We recognize that synod
was likely trying to not become a “committee of the whole” and debate
each selection’s merit on the floor of synod. But in the end, there was no
official, authorized oversight to the Psalter Revision Committee. To be
clear, this was the decision of synod and not the Committee.
• Finally, we would note that the Education & Publication Board was tasked
with synod to oversee the printing of a Psalter over which they had no
authority and in which they had no input. If the E&P Board is accountable
for what it publishes—we assume this to be the case—this is a procedural
mistake that ought to be corrected.
Therefore we offer to presbytery the following recommendations.
Recommendation #1:
That Presbytery bring the following recommendation to synod:
That Synod direct the Education & Publication Board to remove those
Psalm settings in future printings of The Book of Psalms for Worship which use
choruses, refrains, or other obviously unnecessary repetition. This would include
Psalms 19C, 47C, 150C, and 150D and the hallelujahs and amens in 24B.
218
Reasoning: For each of the above selections, the revised Psalter has other
selections that enable singing without unwarranted addition. Removing the
specified selections would, hopefully, be the most simple way to make the change.
It follows that the simple removal of certain selections is work that can be done by
the E&P Board without the formation of a new committee.
Recommendation #2:
That Synod direct the Education & Publication Board to work with the Psalter
Revision Committee to include in the next printing a version of Psalm 136 without
omission.
Reasoning: Of the several examples of inversion and intermingling in the
Psalter’s text, the problems with Psalm 136 do warrant more severe action. To
wit, there are currently no versions of Psalm 136 in which every verse of Scripture
is present in the Psalter. That is, each version includes a removal of the common
stanza (“His mercy lasts forever”) along with an abbreviation of two verses of
Scripture. The easiest solution would be to add a fourth selection.
Recommendation #3:
That Synod officially commit to enacting more thorough checks and balances
when revising the Psalter in the future.
Reasoning: As noted above, the review process for revising the Psalter did not
include the usual checks and balances that the church courts use for other changes
to our worship (e.g., Directory for Worship).
Recommendation #4:
That Synod, in order to preserve the extensive work the Psalter Revision
Committee has already done to develop policies for its work translating Psalms
for singing, and taking into account the concerns which have arisen after the
new Psalter’s publication as well, Synod appoint a committee to develop a set of
standards for translating Psalms for singing which, if approved by Synod, would
be included in Synod’s minutes for reference for future Psalter translation projects.
Reasoning: The Psalter Revision Committee labored diligently to establish
many wise and useful guidelines for their work, which we heartily support and are
in full agreement with. They are expressed in many of their reports from the past
8 or so years. We raise some additional concerns here. It seems wise to combine
these into a set of translations guidelines or standards that we as a denomination
could uphold to others laboring in translating the Psalms for singing—a very
challenging task indeed, but one whose good fruits abound to the blessing of us
all.
Respecfully submitted,
Gordon Keddie
Ben Larson
Jared Olivetti, chairman
219
Appendix 1: Detailing the concerns
Use of choruses, refrains, or other unnecessary repetition:
# Concern:
19C
Uses v. 10 as a chorus at the end of each stanza; v. 10 sung
three times while vs. 7-9 & 11 sung only once.
24B Added refrain of 5 hallelujahs and 3 amens to the end of
Psalm 24.
47C Uses v. 6 as a refrain sung four times while vs. 1-5 & 7-9 sung
only once.
150C Inserts refrain of 3 hallelujahs sung with both stanzas.
150D Inserts refrains of 5 alleluias sung with both stanzas.
Inversion or Intermingling:
#
Concern: 6b
Intermingling of vs.
1&2
[2a,1a,1b,2b]
Text from BOSFW: Text from ESV:
Be gracious Lord, rebuke me not
in wrath
Nor in your anger, for I waste
away;
My bones, my soul are
troubled—heal me Lord!
O LORD, rebuke me not in
your anger,
nor discipline me in your
wrath.
2
Be gracious to me, O LORD,
for I am languishing;
heal me, O LORD, for my
bones are troubled.
1
8A /
8C
Compression and
intermingling of
vs. 7 & 8
All sheep and oxen, birds & fish
All beasts both wild and tame
7
22C
Intermingling of
vs. 14 & 15
My life like water is poured out.
My bones have all been pulled
apart.
My thirsty tongue clings to my
jaws.
Within me melts like wax, my
heart.
My strength is dried like broken
clay;
And in death’s dust my soul I lay.
14
[14a, 15b, 14b,
15a, 15c]
All sheep and oxen
And also the beasts of the field
8
The birds of the heavens,
And the fish of the sea
Whatever passes along the
paths of the sea
I am poured out like water,
and all my bones are out of
joint;
my heart is like wax;
it is melted within my breast;
15
my strength is dried up like a
potsherd,
and my tongue sticks to my
jaws;
you lay me in the dust of
death.
220
#
Concern: Text from BOSFW: Text from ESV:
34B
Compression and
intermingling of
vs. 9b into 10b
Revere the Lord, all you His
saints.
Young lions may at times lack
food;
But none who fears and seeks
the Lord
Shall be deprived of any good.
Oh, fear the LORD, you his
saints,
for those who fear him have
no lack!
10
The young lions suffer want
and hunger;
but those who seek the LORD
lack no good thing.
44A
Compression and
intermingling of
vs. 7 & 8
[8a/7a, 7b, 8b]
We’ll boast in the God who
saved us from the foe;
All those hating us You have
brought down in shame,
And so we will ever give thanks
to Your name.
But you have saved us from
our foes
and have put to shame those
who hate us.
8
In God we have boasted
continually,
and we will give thanks to
your name forever.
77B
Compression and
intermingling of
vs. 17 & 18
[17a, 17b/18a, 18b]
From the clouds the rain in
torrents poured,
Across the sky tornadoes roared.
The world was lit when lighting
flashed,
Earth trembled when the thunder
crashed.
17
105B
Expansion and
intermingling of
vs. 11-12
This promise he made, though
they were yet few:
“Behold, Canaan’s land I give
unto you
To be your inheritance where
you may dwell.”
Said while they were few and
were strangers as well.
11
136A
Omission,
compression and
intermingling of
vs. 11-12
Brought our Israel by His might
For His steadfast love endures.
11
136B
Omission of vs.
7b
Great lights He made – the sun
rules day,
His love endures forever!
to him who made the great
lights,
for his steadfast love endures
forever;
8
the sun to rule over the day,
forever;
9
7
The clouds poured out water;
the skies gave forth thunder;
your arrows flashed on every
side.
18
The crash of your thunder
was in the whirlwind;
your lightnings lighted up the
world;
the earth trembled and shook.
saying, “To you I will give
the land of Canaan
as your portion for an
inheritance.”
12
When they were few in
number,
of
little
account,
and
sojourners in it,
and brought Israel out from
among them,
forever;
12
with a strong hand and an
outstretched arm,
forever;
7
#
136C
Concern: Omission,
compression and
intermingling of
vs. 17-18
Text from BOSFW: Kings great and mighty He
struck dead,
His love endures forever!
221
Text from ESV:
to him who struck down
great kings,
forever;
18
and killed mighty kings,
forever;
17
Appendix 2: Southfield’s original paper (for reference purposes)
There are many aspects of The Book of Psalms for Worship that we greatly
appreciate, and we, the Southfield Session, want to be able to support its use
wholeheartedly. We think the modernized language is a necessary and helpful
change. We also appreciate improved translation work in various places and
improved musical settings. We are singing a new setting each month as our Psalm
of the month in Southfield, and we are using them in family and small group
formats.
Change is rarely met with 100% approval, and such is the case here. We find
it an inappropriate and unhelpful solution merely to grumble. So, we bring our
criticisms, with a goal of improving The Book of Psalms for Worship so that
obstacles to wide and timely acceptance by the church might be removed. We
desire this to be the Psalter our children and other new converts know and love
as their first Psalter.
As a courtesy, we have communicated our desires and intentions with the
Psalter Revision Committee and the Board of Education and Publication.
However, given the completed nature of The Book of Psalms for Worship, we
think it is most helpful to bring our concerns and recommendations through the
courts of Christ’s church.
We begin by noting that people will always have minor quibbles with
translation work and the musical settings. So, we have tried to distill our concerns
to principles of translation that we strongly feel need to be corrected. These are
principles that we hope all would agree would be necessary in a prose translation
of the Scriptures and so they also should apply to any translation of the Psalms
for singing as far as reasonably possible. We believe our concerns are in line with
the concerns of Athanasius who wrote:
‘There is, however, one word of warning needed. No one must allow himself
to be persuaded, by any arguments whatever, to decorate the Psalms with
extraneous matter or make alterations in their order or change the words
themselves. They must be sung and chanted in entire simplicity, just as
they are written, so that the holy men who gave them to us, recognizing
their own words, may pray with us, yes and even more that the Spirit,
Who spoke by the saints, recognizing the selfsame words that He inspired,
may join us in them too.’ From Athanasius’ Letter to Marcellinus – On the
Interpretation of the Psalms
222
We notified the Psalter Revision Committee of a number of these concerns by
specific instance in the Psalter when the Synod was given one month to review the
new translation after the 2008 Synod meeting. However, because of the shortness
of the time and because the review was limited to the eyes of elders, we did not
distill our concerns down to these principles. We take issue with two particular
operating principles in The Book of Psalms for Worship:
1. The use of choruses, refrains, or other obviously unnecessary repetition.
Psalms 19C, 24B, 47C, 150C, and 150D embody this problem. Synod
approved of using repetition as padding, but these Psalms either use certain
stanza portions as refrains or use words as extended repetitions. This is
unnecessary departure from the order and emphasis God places in His
book of praise and is significant departure from past Psalters. These uses
of repetition are radically different than simply repeating a phrase at the
end of a stanza as padding. Indeed, the use of choruses focuses the singer
on one particular verse, a verse chosen by the one setting the Psalm. We
wonder what divine warrant the committee found to use Psalm 19:10-11 as
a refrain to be sung three times instead of, for instance, Psalm 109:9-11.
2. The inversion or intermingling of thoughts from different verses (Bible
verses). The selections utilizing this principle are Psalms 6B, 8A, 8C, 22C,
34B, 44A, 77B, 105B, 136A, 136B, and 136C. We understand that there
are places where thoughts within a verse may be inverted to make it fit the
music. The verse divisions are not inspired, and there may be places where
the end of one verse and beginning of another could be inverted. However,
as far as possible, we should leave God’s ordering of thoughts alone. In the
case of Psalm 136, the concern seems to have been that we avoid singing
a half stanza. However, the Psalter Revision Committee utilizes the halfstanza in 98B (The Book of Psalms for Worship), and we have done it
for years with the same tunes for Psalm 136 in The Book of Psalms for
Singing. We can do it here again without disruption in singing and make
the translation more faithful.
We do not want to nitpick at every line we think could be translated or set
better. We have tried to identify the translation principles at issue. These two
issues are major in our opinion. If they are resolved, then our greatest translation
concerns will have been addressed.
[note: to avoid confusion, the original recommendations of the Southfield
Session’s paper have been removed]
The Southfield Session
Jim Curtis
James Faris, Moderator
Jon Hughes
Jon Kim
223
Communication #10-2
2010 Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery request for Synod to provide
a statement of its position on “sexual orientation” in modern
terminology.
The Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery has grappled with the implications of
modern terminology regarding what culture commonly calls “sexual orientation”
through the work of a committee. We believe that the Scriptures and Constitution
speak clearly to the phenomenon of “sexual orientation” and of homosexuality
in general, but not in modern terminology. God’s truth has not changed, but
terms such as “sodomy” and “unnatural lust” used in the Westminster Larger
Catechism no longer have the same clear meaning they once had due to changes
in terminology, especially with the explosion of research and writing in this field.
Given the cultural significance of this topic, we have been amazed at the near
absence of serious attention given to the sexual orientation question by reformed
and presbyterian churches. Therefore, the Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery passed the
following recommendation at its spring 2010 meeting:
“That presbytery ask synod to take up one of the most important cultural
issues of the day and provide the church with a biblical testimony on the
question of homosexual orientation and pastoral guidance for ministry to those
who are being told they have a homosexual identity; and that this Committee’s
paper, ‘Contemporary Perspectives on Sexual Orientation: A Theological and
Pastoral Analysis,’ be forwarded with this recommendation as a resource in that
undertaking.”
Contemporary Perspectives on Sexual Orientation:
A Theological and Pastoral Analysis
Contents
I. Introduction and Terminology.................................................................................. 224
II. Biology, Gender, and the Biblical Doctrine of Man................................................. 226
III. Personality Traits and the Multiplication of Gender Categories.............................. 236
IV. Hermeneutical Issues of the Homosexuality Debate................................................ 239
V. Exegesis and Confessional Statements.................................................................... 244
(1) Gen. 1:27–28; 2:20–25 — The Creation of Man................................................245
(2) Gen. 19:1–29 — Sodom and Gomorrah.............................................................247
(3) Judg. 19:1–30 — The Levite’s Concubine..........................................................248
(4) Lev. 18:22; 20:13 — The Mosaic Prohibitions...................................................248
(5) 1 Cor. 6:9–11 — Paul’s List of Defilements........................................................251
(6) 1 Tim. 1:8–11 — Paul’s Applications of the Ten Commandments.......................252
(7) Jude 5–7 — Sodom and Gomorrah, Remembered..............................................252
(8) Rom. 1:26–27 — Paul on Unnatural Desire.......................................................254
(9a) Gen. 9:20–27 — Ham’s Offense against Noah..................................................256
224
(9b) 2 Sam. 1:26 — David’s Love for Jonathan........................................................256
(10) Confessional Standards (WLC 139; WCF 24.1; RPT 24.2)..............................257
VI. Pastoral Implications................................................................................................ 259
I. Introduction and Terminology
The word homosexuality was originally coined in German (Homosexualität)
in 1869 by Karl-Maria Kertbeny. Kertbeny, an Austrian-born social reformer, first
introduced the term in a pamphlet written to oppose the adoption of Prussian
anti-sodomy laws in the new constitution for the unified German state then being
formed.1 The new term was quickly adopted in German discourse, and was
brought into English in 1892.2 Other European societies followed suit and, by the
early 20th century, medical experts and law-makers across western Europe and
North America were moving away from older terms like sodomy to use the new
word, homosexuality.
But the old word (sodomy) and new word (homosexuality) are not equivalents.
The shift in terminology was not simply a change of words; it was part of a
broader shift in how same-sex issues were coming to be understood. Rather than
viewing a person who engages in same-sex activity as acting against the way he
or she is “sexually wired” (and thus labeled a sodomite) it was now argued that
some people are actually physiologically “wired,” sexually, for same-sex desires
(and thus are, by nature, homosexual).
Some advocates of this new perspective offer the example of a person’s
handedness as an analogy.3 Most people are right-handed; the number of people
who are left-handed has always been a minority. As a result, often throughout
history, society has been prejudiced against left-handed individuals. For instance,
an awkward dancer is said to have “two left feet” (why not “two right feet”?) and,
in some societies, efforts have been made to retrain left-handed children to give
prominence to their right hands. There is no biblical doctrine that exalts either
left or right handedness as innately superior; however, there have been prejudices
against left-handedness through history, because it is a minority orientation.
Modern science has confirmed, however, that handedness is not a matter of choice
nor something which children should be “trained out of.” While most people are
naturally “wired” for right-handedness (roughly 9 out of 10 people are right1
Karl-Maria Kertbeny (originally published anonymously), Paragraph 143 of the
Prussian Penal Code of 14 April 1851 and Its Reaffirmation as Paragraph 152 in the Proposed Penal Code for the North German Confederation. An Open and Professional Correspondence to His Excellency Dr. Leonhardt, Royal Prussian Minister of Justice (Leipzig:
Serbe’s Verlag, 1869). Note that Kertbeny formed the word homosexuality by combining
the Greek homo (meaning “same”; not the Latin homo, meaning “man”) with the Latin
sexualis (meaning “sex”).
2
When Charles Gilbert Chaddock translated Richard von Krafft-Ebing’s 1886,
Psychopathia Sexualis, into English.
3
Chandler Burr, “Homosexuality and Biology,” 132–3; in, Homosexuality in
the Church: Both Sides of the Debate (Jeffrey S. Siker, ed.; Louisville: Westminster John
Knox, 1994), 116–34.
225
handed), some are actually genetically pre-disposed to left-handedness. In 2007,
a group of scientists finally identified the gene (called LRRTM1) which disposes a
person to left-handedness.4 According to the proponents of the new perspective on
same-sex issues, a re-characterization of sexual orientation along similar lines is
required. Same-sex desires are, they argue, not a matter of moral choices, but are
a natural disposition—a legitimate sexual identity. Words like sodomy, sodomite,
sexual perversion, and so forth reflect the traditional presupposition that same-sex
activity is a perversion of a person’s natural gender role. The term homosexual
(along with its counterpart, heterosexual) was coined to convey the new idea that
some people are same-sex oriented by nature and ought not be prejudiced against
simply because it is a minority orientation.
Certainly, even those promoting this new perspective continue to recognize
that there are some individuals who engage in same-sex activities due to their
circumstances and not due to any inner orientation. For instance, men who
lust for sexual stimulation but who are confined in situations where no female
companionship is possible (as in some military situations or in prison), sometimes
turn to same-sex sex against their natural orientation. Such cases continue to be
identified by behavioral terms, like sodomy or pederasty. However, the word
homosexuality was designed to refer to those for whom same-sex interests are
believed to emerge from the individual’s “true” sexual identity. The GLBTQ
Encyclopedia explains,
“Homosexuality and heterosexuality emerged as concepts in late
nineteenth-century European medical and juridical discourse. Their
introduction and popularization occasioned a revolution in the way sexual
behavior was understood by linking that behavior inextricably to social
identity, hastening cultural changes in the organization of sexuality already
underway in urban areas of Europe and North America.”5
This shift in understanding has major implications for the church. Yet
unfortunately, while there are numerous statements from reformed denominations
addressing same-sex practices and, to a certain extent, same-sex desires, we were
unable to find any ecclesiastical papers dealing specifically with the question
of “homosexual orientation.”6 It is our perception that this relative silence on
the matter of “orientation” by other reformed denominations is not because our
NAPARC brothers accept the validity of labeling these experiences as a sexual
identity; nevertheless, we believe that it is a subject which needs to be examined
4
Molecular Psychiatry 12 (2007), 1129–1139.
5
“Homosexuality,” GLBTQ Encyclopedia: Social Sciences (www.glbtq.com/
social-sciences/homosexuality.html; accessed 12/28/2009).
6
E.g., the statements of NAPARC churches at the following web addresses:
OPC statement — www.opc.org/GA/homosexuality.html; PCA summary of statements
—
www.alliancenet.org/partner/Article_Display_Page/0,,PTID23682_CHID125044_
CIID1620134,00.html; ARP statement — www.arpsynod.org/position.html; EPC statement
— www.epc.org/about-the-epc/position-papers/homosexuality. (Accessed: 01/29/2010.)
226
and addressed explicitly by the church. We hope that this paper will offer some
perspective and help for reformed churches striving to understand and respond
to the subject—and to individuals our society is labeling with this new identity.
There are several aspects of the “homosexuality as an orientation” paradigm
which need to be confronted. First of all, this new claim raises a profound challenge
to the traditional understanding of the doctrine of man, specifically in relation to
human sexuality and gender as part of mankind’s reflection of God’s likeness.
Either the church’s traditional understanding of genders and sexual identity needs
to be corrected to accommodate the new perspectives on homosexuality, or the
church’s traditional positions on these matters need to be re-articulated in ways that
show their relevance to the modern claims (see §§II–III, below). Secondly, there
is extensive exegetical work being done by biblical scholars revisiting the biblical
texts on sodomy and how (indeed, whether) they speak to issues of homosexuality.
The church needs to keep her doctrines on same-sex issues grounded in careful
exegesis with discernment as to the hermeneutical presuppositions which give
rise to various counter-interpretations (see §§IV–V, below). Finally, because these
are issues touching on the lives of real people in deep and profound ways, the
church’s treatment of these theological questions must bear the fruits of pastoral
direction for ministering to those with same-sex attractions. Indeed, there has
never before in history been such an immense amount of research into the nature
of same-sex issues, and while the church’s theological stance may not be changed
by this research, pastorally there is much that can be learned from recent research
for better understanding and ministering to “homosexuals” in our communities
(see §VI, below).
II. Biology, Gender, and the Biblical Doctrine of Man
For millennia, same-sex behavior has been viewed as a moral perversion
deserving heaven’s judgment. In the biblical account of Sodom and Gomorrah,
where the same-sex demands of the men of Sodom against Lot’s guests were
answered by a downfall of literal hellfire and brimstone, the church historically
found a most awful warning against such violations of proper sexual order, and
society in general found a name for it—sodomy.
As noted above, the introduction of new terminology (homosexuality,
followed by other neutral terms like gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, queer)
reflects a change in the way society has come to regard same-sex attractions.
Rather than linking them to moral failures, it is now posited that sociological or
physiological factors cause this sexual orientation. By breaking with tradition and
positing a different cause for a “same-sex orientation,” modern science has also
set up for itself a need to demonstrate and identify just exactly what the social or
physiological cause for homosexual orientation is. Once the theory was provided,
scientific research to test and prove the theory has followed in earnest.
Through much of the early century of this research, psychiatry led the way
looking for social influences which might cause homosexual orientation. In fact,
until 1973 homosexuality was listed in the American Psychiatric Association’s
227
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) as a psychiatric
condition. However, decades of psychiatric research to identify social or cultural
factors for the condition produced little convincing results. Furthermore, since
studies of homosexual men and women found that they were otherwise well
adapted mentally and socially, it was determined that regarding it as a psychiatric
pathology was heading in the wrong direction.7 As Chandler Burr explains,
“Psychiatry had succeeded in defining what homosexuality is not—not in
explaining what it is. Questions of etiology ... thus became by default questions
for neurobiology.”8
In the last few decades, biology has been at the forefront of the question,
looking for the “gay gene” or brain structures associated with sexual orientation.
Biologists had already been interested in studying structural differences between
the brains of men and women. Such studies of gender differences in the brain were
now expanded to compare anatomical features in the brains of “heterosexual”
and “homosexual” individuals, with related experiments on laboratory animals.
Several decades of this pursuit for the “gay gene”—or other evidence for “sexual
orientation” in the brain—has produced many intriguing insights (and lots of
impassioned claims on all sides); however, definitive results remain unclear. In
a recent (May, 2009) pamphlet on the subject from the American Psychological
Association, the state of the scientific community is summarized thus:
“Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal,
developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation,
no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual
orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think
that nature and nurture both play complex roles...”9
It would be easy to misread this statement as suggesting no evidence at all
has been found for “homosexual orientation.”10 That is not the result which
scientists are giving to us; the scientific community has not abandoned the claim
that same-sex desires emerge from something deeper in a person than his or
her own, personal choices. Too many of those who wrestle with these desires
experience them from early childhood and in ways that seem, to researchers, to
confirm the presence of causes deeper than personal, moral choices. However, the
7
E.g., Evelyn Hooker, “The Adjustment of the Male Overt Homosexual,” in, The
Problem of Homosexuality in Modern Society (H. M. Ruitenbeeck, ed.; New York: Dutton,
1963), 141–61.
8
Chandler Burr, “Homosexuality and Biology,” 120.
9
“Answers to Your Questions For a Better Understanding of Sexual Orientation
& Homosexuality” (www.apa.org/topics/sexuality/orientation.aspx; accessed 12/28/2009).
10
Some conservative voices have latched onto the apparent failure of modern science to provide a “smoking gun” demonstration of such physiological causation as indication that the whole hypothesis is in error. E.g., A. Dean Byrd, “APA’s New Pamphlet
on Homosexuality De-emphasizes the Biological Argument, Supports a Client’s Right to
Self-Determination” (www.narth.com/docs/deemphasizes.html; accessed 12/28/2008).
228
last century of research has indicated that finding a single, “smoking gun” cause
(e.g., a single “gay gene”) is unlikely. It is now generally believed, as indicated
in the APA statement above, that sexual orientation develops out of some kind of
a “perfect storm” of both natural (e.g., genetic or in utero chemical) and social
(e.g., childhood or developmental) influences. Of course, the conclusions of the
scientific community are in constant flux, and one can never be certain where
future research will lead. But what is the church’s response to this developing (and
ever changing) body of scientific material to be?
We cannot ignore a certain skepticism about the whole endeavor to demonstrate
a homosexual orientation. We must guard ourselves, in the church, from bringing
an inordinate skepticism to the findings of scientists in this arena. The creation/
evolution debates of the last century, for instance, have left many in the church
and in the scientific community carrying a hyper-skepticism of the “traditions”
and “consensus opinions” of the other. It is easy to bring that hyper-wariness into
other fields of controversy like this one. We need to be careful not to be skeptical
without reason. Nonetheless, churchmen have grounds to maintain a certain level
of wariness concerning the scientific claims on this matter.
First of all, the whole endeavor is rooted in the presupposition that there are
physiological causes for every human tendency. That is, the scientific community
today has, for the most part, adopted the presupposition that man is a material
being without any immaterial soul. What we call the “soul” in man is, according
to contemporary thought, simply an expression of physical and chemical (that
is, material) reactions. Therefore, from the very beginning of the scientific
community’s search for causes of same-sex desires, a physiological solution is
expected. The APA statement quoted earlier interprets the lack of clear evidence
for a particular, naturalistic cause for same-sex desires as indicating that there
must therefore be a complex “perfect storm” of causation. However, the reason
for this conclusion is because a materialist view of man presupposes that some
physiological cause must exist. We simply note that this materialist presupposition
is not, itself, without its critics within the scientific community;11 and it certainly
is not a presupposition which we as the church can work from (cf., WCF 4.2;
WLC 86). On the contrary, we believe that the failure of the scientific community
to identify a clear causation for this orientation may actually suggest that the
presupposed materialism behind the endeavor is ill-grounded.
Secondly, we could wish that there was more objectivity and less politically
motivated pressure behind the scientific community’s work in this field. The
presence of so much political and lobbying pressure to prove the validity of
same-sex orientation makes it difficult for theologians, who are generally not
experts in scientific matters, to know what published research to trust and what
is not trustworthy. Ronald Bayer notes, for instance, that the 1973 vote by the
APA to remove homosexuality from the DSM list of pathologies took place under
pressure from disruptive demonstrations and threats from gay rights groups.
11
E.g., Mario Beauregard and Denyse O’Leary, The Spiritual Brain: A Neuroscientist’s Case for the Existence of the Soul (New York: HarperOne, 2007).
229
Based on a follow-up survey of APA members conducted after the vote, Bayer
concludes that the majority of members actually held opinions opposite to the
turnout of the vote and that the decision, therefore, “might have been affected by
sociopolitical considerations.”12 We certainly are not in a position to review such
events, but simply recall that even scientific consensus is not formed in a vacuum,
and the immense political pressure in this field introduces an unavoidable degree
of wariness. Many of those involved in the quest, as the proponents themselves
admit, have a personal interest in proving its existence (being themselves
“homosexuals”).13 Furthermore, as noted at the head of this paper, the effort to
recognize a homosexual orientation was originally launched as part of a social
reform movement in Germany. For all of these various reasons, it is hard for us
to avoid the concern that at least some of the work in this field continues to be
motivated more by social reform agendas than by a truly objective (i.e., scientific)
concern to understand same-sex desires, as though the traditional concern to help
reform the one struggling with same-sex desires (rather than reforming society’s
understandings of gender and sexual identities) is conclusively incorrect.
With these concerns being voiced, we nonetheless do believe that the church
should willingly engage with the insights which scientific research is offering
—even if we do not believe that the church should feel compelled to adopt this
widely held hypothesis, yet. The evidence for this conclusion (that same-sex
desires are caused by a genetic orientation) is still too weak to be regarded as
conclusive. We still have to consider, however, whether it is biblically sound to
allow that an innate homosexual orientation might one day be demonstrated; and,
if so, whether such a finding would require the church to reform her doctrine of
man in any substantial way.
While we admit the aforementioned points of skepticism, we nonetheless
do not believe it is beyond the bounds of a biblical view of man to allow that
some innate “cause(s)” for same-sex desires could be defined. However—and
this is a crucial point—the implications of such a finding for the church would
be primarily pastoral, not theological. That is, if this modern paradigm of sexual
orientation is proven correct, this does not warrant a change in the church’s
doctrines in any substantial manner. Contrary to the claims of liberal churchman
and the assumptions of many scientists, that such a scientific finding would require
the church to change its theological-ethical stance toward same-sex issues, we
believe such a finding would valuably inform the church’s compassion and her
ministry to those experiencing this “orientation;” however, the biblical doctrine
of man (including human sexuality) as historically confessed by the church would
not be “re-written” by such a finding.
Chandler Burr is a gay author who illustrates the posture of many in liberal
churches on this matter. Mr. Burr is best known for his book on The Search for
the Biological Origins of Sexual Orientation, which was published by a Disney
12
Ronald Bayer, Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis [New York: Basic Books, 1981], 167.
13
E.g., Chandler Burr, “Homosexuality and Biology,” 117, 131.
230
subsidiary (Hyperion) in 1996 and prompted the widely publicized boycott
of Disney by Southern Baptists. Mr. Burr illustrates the posture of many in
liberal churches when he poses the question: if sexual orientation is found to
be biologically determined (as he is persuaded it will), “How can one justify
discriminating against people on the basis of such a characteristic?... God made
gay people this way... [and] like it or not..., there are majority and minority
expressions of [sexuality]...”14 Similarly, Dan O. Via (Professor Emeritus of New
Testament at Duke University Divinity School), writes, “We do not know for
certain whether homosexual orientation is essential (biological and genetic) or
constructed (psychological and social) or both; but whatever is the case, even
some who hold very strongly to the traditional view agree that at least some
part of the gay population is immutably [i.e., unchangeably] so... Should then
homosexual orientation not be considered a different sexual order of creation, the
actualization of which in practice would be natural?”15
It is widely believed by such advocates that, if homosexuality is shown to
have biological and/or sociological causes (thereby proving the “homosexual
orientation” hypothesis), that this would be indication that homosexuality is part
of God’s natural order. However, this conclusion would not follow, of necessity,
from such proof. While we believe that such discoveries would have significant
implications for understanding and pastoring men and women with these
struggles, an orthodox understanding of Scripture, and particularly its teaching
on the effects of original sin upon human nature, do not support the logic of men
like Burr and Via.
In chapter 6 of the Westminster Confession of Faith, we confess that, “By
[Adam’s] sin, [our first parents] fell from their original righteousness and
communion with God, and so became dead in sin, and wholly defiled in all the
parts and faculties of soul and body. They being the root of all mankind, the guilt
of this sin was imputed, and the same death in sin and corrupted nature conveyed
to all their posterity, descending from them by ordinary generation.” (WCF 6.2–3
Sexual identity is included in the “all parts and faculties of soul and body”
which have been disordered by original sin. Genesis teaches us that the created
sexual order (which God pronounced objectively “very good;” Gen. 1:31) involves
two genders, sexually designed for one another. “God created man ... male and
female,” and when God brought the woman to the man, the man declared, “This
at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh...” and the inspired theologian
who recorded this event gives us its doctrinal implications, stating, “Therefore a
man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall
become one flesh” (Gen. 1:27; 2:23–24). That this teaching of Genesis 1–2 is
specifically about the sexual identity of the male and female for each other (and
not simply using the man and woman as examples of all kinds of loving, sexual
14
Chandler Burr, “Homosexuality and Biology,” 132-3.
15
Dan O. Via, “The Bible, the Church, and Homosexuality,” 32, 35; in, Dan O. Via
and Robert A. J. Gagnon, Homosexuality and the Bible: Two Views (Minneapolis: Fortress
Press, 2003), 1–39.
231
relationships) is confirmed by subsequent passages throughout Scripture, which
identify other “orientations” of sexuality as corruptions of this one-man-andone-woman creation order, including fornication (e.g., Deut. 22:28–29), adultery
(e.g., Deut. 22:22), polygamy (e.g., Gen. 4:19; 1Tim. 3:2), bestiality (e.g., Exod.
22:19), prostitution (e.g., Lev. 19:29), incest (e.g., Lev. 18:6), cross-dressing (e.g.,
Deut. 22:5), and same-sex intercourse (e.g., Lev. 18:22; 20:13).16
Many of these alternate sexual orientations (both the desires and the associated
behaviors) may genuinely have deeper and more complicated factors influencing
those who are tempted by them than simple “free will” decisions. In fact, taking
a cue from the last century of work to tie same-sex desires to natural causes,
recent studies on “zoophilia” are positing similar biological sources for an in-born
orientation toward sex with animals.17 (Zoophilia is the term which has now been
coined to represent the purported sexual orientation behind animal-sex desires
as an alternative to the old behavioristic term bestiality.) Are we to discover that
there are biological underpinnings to all manner of sexual orientations, including
group sex and animal sex and so on? While skeptical concerning the validity of
such claims (for reasons stated earlier), we nonetheless do not outright deny the
possibility that biological influences for even these other “orientations” (such as
polygamy or “zoophilia” and so on) might be found. The present condition of
human nature is, as Scripture teaches us, disordered from its proper design, and the
true depth of its brokenness is undoubtedly beyond our comprehension (Jer. 17:9).
However, we confess with Scripture that the creation order which God pronounced
to be objectively “good,” before human nature became burdened with many lusts
and confusions of all kinds, constitutes two genders which are sexually oriented
for one another. If science shows us that sexual disorders are more deeply
enmeshed in human biology than the church has traditionally understood, this
ought to stir our concern for even greater understanding and compassion for
those who experience these desires; however, it does not change the fact that
such inclinations are contrary to human nature as God designed it—and as he is
redeeming it.
As Greg Bahnsen explains, “Even if it were somehow shown that this idea
[that some are born with a homosexual predisposition] has biblical warrant,
this fact would not lead in itself to the conclusion that the individual who has
a distinctive sinful bent (say, toward homosexuality) in his inherited depraved
nature is somehow less personally responsible for the corresponding desires
and acts than for other sinful desires and acts. Adherents of the view in question
have to show biblical support for the idea that the individual cannot be held
specifically responsible for those particular sins that are ingrained in his depraved
nature... Everyone must recognize that original sin ... is itself sinful in character
and something for which its inheritors are held personally culpable (Rom. 5:12,
15–19)... The present theory contributes nothing to an ethical evaluation of
16
Cf., pp24–25, below.
17
E.g., Hani Miletski, Understanding Bestiality & Zoophilia. (Bethesda, Md.:
East-West Publishing, 2002).
232
homosexuality.”18
Same-sex behavior is identified in Scripture as an “offense” (hb’[eAT) against
God’s sexual order (Lev. 18:22) and same-sex inclinations are also identified as
“unnatural passion” (pa,qh avtimi,aj; Rom. 1:26–27).19 What the findings of
modern science might be telling us is that such desires, where experienced, are
more deeply tied to the effects of original sin than we may often have recognized.
Sometimes a person brings upon him/herself same-sex experiences that stir up
same-sex desires. However, perhaps in a greater number of cases of same-sex desire
than we have tended to appreciate, the self-blame and intense sense of guilt which
many experience simply over having these struggles needs to be compassionately
addressed, rather than being blamed on the individual experiencing them. There
truly may be those who struggle with same-sex temptations, not due to any
particular choices of their own, but because of the brokenness of human nature.
However, the church’s doctrine of human nature, and our understanding of gender
and sexual morality, remain anchored in the teachings of Scripture which already
provide an explanation for even biological disorders in “all parts and faculties of
soul and body.”
Frankly, a deep-seated propensity to same-sex desires would certainly not be
the only (or even the most difficult) kind of brokenness to bear. As Stanton Jones
and Don Workman point out, “An adult child of an alcoholic may have a biological
predisposition [to excessive drink]”—a physiological disorder experienced
because of ones parents.20 Similarly, many people struggle with mental health
disorders like depression or schizophrenia or ADHD, which (we are told by
medical experts) can also have biological factors beyond the individual’s control.
We are certainly not suggesting that a sexual struggle is comparable to a mental
struggle or alcoholic struggles. However, these and other common afflictions
of mankind remind us that each of us, in different ways, share in the impact of
someone else’s sin as well as our own: Adam’s in particular, as well as the sins of
others whose lives intersect with ours. Furthermore, each of these afflictions leave
a person more vulnerable to certain sins than those with different afflictions. For
example, if indeed ADHD has biological factors, a person with this condition is
more prone to distraction and boredom with his work, may find it more difficult
to pay attention to the words of his wife, and (we are told) may be more prone to
blurt out what is on his mind. There are moral implications for such tendencies,
and a man with ADHD would not cease to be morally responsible because of
these tendencies. He simply would need to realize that he, perhaps on account
of biological or sociological influences which are the result of original sin, is
more vulnerable to certain temptations and must, with great humility and prayer
and full exercise of the means of grace, take hope in the promises of redemption
18
Greg L. Bahnsen, Homosexuality: A Biblical View (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1978),
70.
19
See the exegesis of these passages in §V, below.
20
Stanton L. Jones and Don E. Workman, “Homosexuality: The Behavioral Sciences and the Church,” 106.
233
for every part of the body and soul while striving to honor the image of God in
his own life. The other examples mentioned, depression and schizophrenia, are
likewise matters of much controversy and debate regarding their moral and/or
biological nature. However those questions are resolved, they illustrate conditions
which, in some cases (like schizophrenia), may even be more difficult to bear than
struggling with same-sex desires.
Perhaps we will find, in coming generations, that the tendency of modern
science to trace so many human experiences (physically and psychologically) to
biological influences is a fad which will ultimately be more severely qualified.
Perhaps future scientists will look back on our era and see that our fascination
with functional MRIs and DNA-mapping and other (for us) groundbreaking
technologies were over-hyped in what they were really telling us. We might recall,
for instance, some of the tragic results of lobotomies performed in the mid-20th
century due to the inflated conclusions of early brain-mapping research.21 Perhaps
in future generations, it will be found that the sexual orientation hypotheses of our
age, as well as neurological “causes” of various mental disorders, eating disorders,
and so forth, while associated with real findings, are similarly over-rated in the
meaning of those findings. We may find that these conclusions are too heavily
shaped by the presupposition of current science that all human conditions have
material causes, and we may one day come to realize that the biological features
identified for certain conditions are not really causes but simply coordinate
expressions of something with an even deeper, non-biological, origin. But it is also
possible that future science will more thoroughly demonstrate that the biological
factors associated with such conditions truly are causative. It may even be found
that there is a “gay gene,” so that even homosexuality is congenital. The answers
to these questions are extremely important; however, they do not in themselves
call for a reform of the church’s historic doctrine of man, of human sexuality, and
the impact of original sin.
In fact, while it has often been claimed that the Bible provides no treatment
of socially or biologically influenced homosexuality (and only speaks of personal
choices), we believe that Paul’s descriptions in Romans 1 are far more insightful
on these matters than some have given credit. In that chapter, Paul is not talking
about an individual’s decline into sin through personal choices and behaviors; he
moves systematically in that chapter through a description of how a society declines
from one level of folly (vv18–23) into dishonorable lusts (vv24–25) and then into
dishonorable passions (including same-sex temptations; vv26–27) and finally, if
there is no repentance, to a “debased mind” (vv28–32). We don’t believe Paul
is necessarily providing a mechanical description of a precise sequence of steps
through which a society degenerates, but he is providing a typical description of a
culture’s decline. His use of the plural pronouns throughout that passage, and his
application of this chapter to communities (Jewish and Gentile) in the subsequent
21
Cf., Hernish J. Acharya, “The Rise and Fall of the Frontal Lobotomy,” in, Proceedings of the 13th Annual History of Medicine Days (W. A. Whitelaw, ed.; Calgary:
Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, 2004), 32–41.
234
chapters, indicate that he is not describing the decline of one individual through
various temptations because of his own sins alone. Thus, even the context of
Paul’s reference to same-sex desires in Romans 1 should be a reminder to us (and
to those who struggle with this temptation) that the human race is a community
in which we each bear the scars of others’ sins, not merely our own.22 Within that
context, the Apostle Paul himself points to “unnatural passions” in one generation
as the fruits of the sinfulness of society in past generations. Certainly Paul had no
concept of genetic or biological issues which might naturalistically communicate
the effects of sin from one generation to another, but he clearly recognizes that the
corruption which individuals wrestle with in many aspects of human nature have
more complex causes than the simplistic outlook of Job’s counselors.
To summarize this important point: even if it were to be demonstrated beyond
reasonable doubt that some people possess a same-sex orientation through
biological or sociological factors outside their own control, this would not
indicate that homosexuality is part of God’s intended order. It would (and, even
at the current provisional stage of the scientific findings in this realm, ought to)
increase our awareness of how desperate the human condition is, how utterly
hopeless men are of achieving renewal simply by self-will or behaviorism, and,
frankly, how imbalanced the effects of sin are throughout human experience that
some people experience one area of brokenness more deeply while other people
experience another more heavily.
We recognize that this doctrine of sin, and of human nature’s “total depravity”
because of sin, is a very depressing doctrine, and one which seems unfair and full
of hopelessness by itself. But indeed, that is the tragic nature of sin and the curse
as taught by Scripture. In every age, it is the church’s responsibility to bring this
sad truth to bear on the conditions of that generation. It is also the reason why
the Apostle Paul, with his own experiences of brokenness, cried out, “I delight in
the law of God in my inner being, but I see in my members another law waging
war against the law of my mind and making me captive to the law of sin that
dwells in my members. Wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this
body of death? Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!...” (Rom. 7:22–
25). Only after sharing in Paul’s understanding of the true hopelessness of our
broken condition, right down to that agonizing tension of ones own conflicted,
inner desires so often testified by those who experience same-sex temptations,
can we also realize how glorious the hope of redemption is which Paul leads us
in championing with his exultant cry amidst his struggles: “Thanks be to God
through Jesus Christ our Lord!” The bondage and afflictions of the curse really
do run that deep; but it is against the backdrop of such struggles that the profound
power and immeasurable greatness of God’s grace shines forth with splendor
and stirs our hearts with a yearning for sanctification and hope in heaven. In the
face of such real and even uncontrollable inclinations, our desperate need for a
22
Cf., Richard B. Hays, “Awaiting the Redemption of Our Bodies: The Witness of
Scripture Concerning Homosexuality,” 7–9; in, Homosexuality in the Church (Jeffrey S.
Siker, ed.), 3–17; Greg L. Bahnsen, Homosexuality: A Biblical View, 68.
235
Redeemer who is truly a Powerful Savior (not merely a Wise Teacher) becomes a
focus of our longing and our joy.
Through life, every person will face profound struggles sexually, whether
those temptations be “heterosexual” or “homosexual.” We think for instance of
the many Christians who find themselves married to a spouse who is no longer
sexually satisfying perhaps for legitimate reasons (such as a sexually disabling
illness on the part of the other spouse), and thus find themselves in a position to
honor God with their sexuality with intense difficulty. “Homosexual” men and
women are not the only ones called to honor God’s design for human sexuality
in the face of extremely difficult pressures. And admittedly, such struggles are
not “fairly” distributed, so that the church needs to learn to provide particular
encouragement to those struggling with some of the heavier forms of sexual
temptation such as same-sex desires. Nonetheless, the church’s proclamation has
been reduced to “self-help” mantras if we do not recognize that there are aspects
of human brokenness which really are beyond our ability to “fix” ourselves, yet
which still require faith, prayer, and waiting upon the mercy of the Savior to
redeem.
While left-handedness and right-handedness are examples of biological
orientations which have no moral consequences (there is nothing sinful about
writing with one hand or the other), a same-sex orientation (if biologically caused)
does have moral consequences. As deeply enmeshed in the soul or body as modern
thought posits it to be, same-sex desires call for faith in a Powerful Savior who
created us male and female, and who can be trusted to truly redeem his people “in
all the parts and faculties of soul and body”—even if he does not always complete
our redemption on the schedule that we long for, or even, in his wisdom, within
this lifetime. That kind of trust is what faith (and faithful obedience) is all about.
Liberal theologians seem to lean heavily on those scientists who insist that the
“homosexual orientation” is immutable and cannot be changed or healed,23 yet
even this point is controversial. There is no clear consensus—some researchers
do report successes in “re-orienting” same-sex desires.24 Furthermore, even if
in some cases the desires are so deeply ingrained (and even innately “caused”),
so that reform truly is humanly impossible, it is not the experience of such
individuals that defines the “new nature” into which Jesus is patiently (sometimes
too patiently, it seems to us) renewing his people. In all points of our Christian
struggles, Scripture teaches us to see our “true selves” as being found in the “new
man” which is after the likeness of Christ (cf., the nature of man as created in
Gen. 1–2), and not in the experiences of our “old man” wrestlings (Eph. 4:17–24).
Without denying or belittling the intense, seemingly irresolvable struggle which
same-sex desires genuinely entail for many men and women, the testimony of
Scripture is clear: “... neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers,
23
E.g., the quotation of Dan O. Via on p8, above.
24
E.g., the various studies reviewed by Stanton L. Jones and Don E. Workman,
“Homosexuality: The Behavioral Sciences and the Church,” 103–4; in, Homosexuality in
the Church (Jeffrey S. Siker, ed.), 93–115.
236
nor men who practice homosexuality... And such were some of you. But you were
washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus
Christ and by the Spirit of our God” (1 Cor. 6:9–11). It is the nature of the Spirit’s
transforming power to address even the deepest struggles of the human soul and
to bring the power of the resurrection to bear upon them.
III. Personality Traits and the Multiplication of Gender Categories
One of the sexual reformers in 19th century Germany (and an early proponent
of the new terminology) was a man named Karl Heinrich Ulrichs. In his writings
and speeches on homosexuality, Ulrichs famously spoke of himself as “anima
muliebris virili corpore inclusa” (“a female soul confined by a male body”).25
Ulrichs was careful to qualify his statement, admitting that he saw in himself some
typically female traits and some typically male traits,26 nevertheless, the large
number of traits he found in himself which are commonly associated with women
added to his sense that his “identity” was something other than that of a male. In
addition to his same-sex desires, Ulrichs pointed to these feminine qualities to his
personality, as indication that he was oriented differently than a typical man, thus
justifying what essentially amounts to a new gender category: homosexual.
Ulrichs popularized a perception which is carried on today in the colloquial
expression, “sex is between the legs and gender is between the ears,” and in
the scientific fields of research into the neurological bases, not only for “sexual
orientation,” but also for “brain gender.” Since homosexuality is generally
identified based on both same-sex desires and what is called “gender-role nonconformity,”27 we believe it is also important to address these new trends in
defining ones “brain gender.” Once our society adopted the “sexual orientation”
hypothesis, our entire concept of human gender has become confused. According
to one classification system representative of this modern confusion, every
individual has:
(1)a biological sex (male, female, or intersex) which is determined by ones
physical anatomy;
(2)a gender identity (which can be masculine, feminine, or transgender)
which is based on how a person acts, talks, dresses, and behaves in relation
to the gender norms established by society; and
(3)a sexual orientation (which can be heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual)
which based on one’s sexual attractions.28
That is, a person might have, for instance, the body of a man (biological
25
E.g., the title page of his Memnon. Die Geschlechtsnatur des mannliebenden
Urnings. Eine naturwissen-schaftliche Darstellung. (Schleiz: Hübscher, 1868).
26
Karl Heinrich Ulrichs, Memnon, 115–16, cited in, Hubert Kennedy, Karl Heinrich Ulrichs: Pioneer of the Modern Gay Movement (San Francisco: Peremptory Publications, 2002), 154.
27
social-sciences/homosexuality.html; accessed 12/28/2009).
28
www.plannedparenthood.org/health-topics/sexual-orientation-gender-4329.htm
(accessed: 12/28/2009).
237
sex), the brain of a woman (gender identity), and the sexual orientation of both
(bisexual). While considering a person’s sexuality, mental traits, and physique
in distinct categories might be an interesting way to make categorizations about
various aspects of an individual’s personality in the laboratory, it is troubling
that these categories are being given the weight of literal new gender categories.
We confess, biblically, that God created mankind as male or female, with sexual
orientation and gender identity being one and the same as that individual’s
biological sex. We have already considered the sameness of ones biological sex
and proper sexual orientation in previous sections of the paper; it is the middle
category, gender identity (allegedly determined by a person’s mannerisms and
other gender-typical or non-typical traits) that needs to be addressed next. It has
been common, all through history, to speak about “masculine traits” and “feminine
traits” based on generalizations of human experience. For a recent example, John
Gray’s bestseller, Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, is built around the
discussion of such generalizations as the following:
“Men ... offer solutions... while women offer unsolicited advice...”
“While [men] tend to pull away and silently think about what’s bothering
them, [women] feel an instinctive need to talk about what’s bothering
them.”
“Men are motivated when they feel needed while women are motivated
when they feel cherished.”
[Regarding sexual intimacy,] “A man gets close but then inevitably needs
to pull away... A woman’s loving attitudes rise and fall rhythmically in a
wave motion.”29
This way of classifying personality traits along gender lines has become a
popular theme in Christian marriage books, as well. There is nothing wrong with
such generalizations, so long as we are careful not to become overly dogmatic
that certain sets of traits are the inherent property of one gender or the other.
Such generalizations are no more than that: generalizations based on the kinds
of traits which often appear in men. A careful consideration of an individual man
or woman on his or her own merits, however, will undoubtedly reveal numerous
instances where a particular person has some traits that defy these classifications.
The diagram below (while admittedly simplistic) represents the impact this
new attitude about “brain gender” has on sexual orientation issues. Because
modern society identifies homosexuality based on “the simultaneous incidence
of same-sex eroticism and gender role non-conformity,”30 males with a noticeable
29
John Gray, Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus: The Classic Guide to
Understanding the Opposite Sex (New York: HarperCollins, 2004), 3–4.
30
238
number of gender non-typical traits are not only being told that they have a
“female” brain, but they are being encouraged to regard these traits as possible
signs of a “homosexual orientation.”
Modern terms
Biblical terms
“Unnatural
Affections”
“Natural Affections”
Same-sex
sexual desires
Gender non-
typical traits
“Homosexual”
“Straight”
Gender
typical traits
Nowhere in Scripture are men or women exhorted to question their gender
identity based on tastes and mannerisms—let alone their sexual orientation. A
noteworthy biblical example that warns against being over-dogmatic about
identifying certain traits with certain genders is provided by the brothers, Jacob
and Esau. While Esau was favored by his father and had many “man’s man”
characteristics and skills, Jacob evidently identified better with his mother and, we
are told, was more domestic in his leanings: “When the boys grew up, Esau was
a skillful hunter, a man of the field, while Jacob was a peaceful man, remaining
at the tents. Isaac loved Esau because of his hunting stories, but Rebekah loved
Jacob” (Gen. 25:27–28).31 Physically, even, there were remarkable differences
between Jacob and Esau. While the latter was hairy, Jacob was smooth skinned
(25:11).
Notwithstanding Jacob’s smooth and domestic traits, Scripture never so much
as hints of any reason to regard Jacob as in anyway “not conforming” to his
gender. And it does not appear that Jacob struggled with same-sex attractions,
either: his eyes were drawn to Rachel’s beauty so that he loved her (Gen. 29:17–
18), and he went on to father twelve sons and an undisclosed number of daughters
by two wives and two concubines. Our purpose for citing the example of Jacob in
this place is simply to note the fact that God does not intend for every man to be
a “man’s man” with the traits of an Esau. We might wonder how Jacob would be
counseled if he were attending a public school, today, and his tendency to avoid
the rough-housing boys on the playground was noticed by a teacher trained in the
modern ideas about “brain gender.”
social-sciences/homosexuality.html; accessed 12/28/2009). Italics added.
31
Most English translations render the Hebrew, wypiB. dyIc:-yKi (lit., “for game/
hunting was in his mouth”), in a way that implies that it was Esau’s food which had won
Isaac’s favoritism. This is possible, however, it seems likely that the idiom refers to the
hunting stories that filled Esau’s mouth, rather than the game that filled Isaac’s mouth. In
either case, the translation of this detail is not consequential to the argument of the present
paper.
239
Melissa Hines (Professor of Psychology at City University, London) begins
her book on Brain Gender by stating, “a characteristic that shows a sex difference
is one that differs on the average for males and female of a given species. Thus,
a human characteristic is considered to show a sex difference if it differs for a
group of boys or men in comparison to a group of girls or women.”32 In other
words, as we have already noted above, those traits which are generally found in
one gender rather than another are considered a distinctive mark of that gender.
This seems sensible enough; however, Dr. Hines’ book is about identifying boys
who have a female brain-gender and vice versa. While there may, indeed, be brain
features which psychologists like Dr. Hines can associate with certain “more
commonly male” and “more commonly female” traits, these do not justify calling
a boy’s brain “female” or a girl’s brain “male.” We believe it to be unbiblical
(and unhelpful) to use such observations about tendencies of a given gender to
dogmatically impose upon a person the burden of gender identities which are
the constructs of psychologists and contradictory to the two genders which God
created us to uphold. Men like Jacob and men like Esau have very different
personality traits, but biblically they are both equally and thoroughly male.
The church needs to be aware of these trends in our society, multiplying
gender categories through the separation of sexuality and brain gender from
one’s physical gender. In particular, realizing that gender-typical traits are now
being used to prescribe (rather than describe) gender identities, it becomes
increasingly important that the church be careful not to fall into the trap of treating
“sensitive men” as less masculine or “strong women” as not feminine and thereby
contributing to a sense of gender confusion and the resulting burden of individuals
being given one of society’s new gender identities. While Scripture does prescribe
the sexual orientation of each gender, Scripture does not prescribe the personality
traits which belong to each gender. Furthermore, Christians in the church today
often (following the world around us) describe certain personality characteristics
as being “homosexual,” as captured in the casual expression, “That’s so gay!”
When Christians adopt such stereotypes from the world, even when only used in
casual conversation, it can be very damaging. Such speech can cause a man or
woman to believe that they are objectively “homosexual,” especially if they have
ever faced a same-sex temptation. Rather, they should be affirmed as being wholly
masculine, or wholly feminine, exercising all the particular gifts and personality
traits God has given them. In light of the widespread gender confusion of our age,
the church needs to be reformed even in our casual speech if we are to think and
speak rightly about sexuality and personality.
IV. Hermeneutical Issues of the Homosexuality Debate
The church’s interpretation of biblical texts on same-sex issues seemed
clear and straightforward for centuries. It is only with the new perspectives on
sexuality emerging in the last century, however, that a vigorous re-examination
32
Melissa Hines, Brain Gender (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 3–4
(italics original).
240
of these texts has begun. Such re-examination of the church’s exegesis can be a
healthy exercise of our semper reformanda heritage. However, we note several
problematic hermeneutical presuppositions that seem to be decisive to the new
interpretations which countenance same-sex “orientations” (and even same-sex
practices). It is worth noting these presuppositional issues before engaging with
the biblical texts, themselves.
First of all, some biblical scholars have presupposed that, since that samesex orientation (homosexuality) is a modern discovery, and the biblical texts
were written addressing same-sex activity, the various Scriptures really do not
apply to homosexuality as we now understand it. For example, Victor Paul
Furnish (professor of New Testament at Southern Methodist University) begins
his essay on “The Bible and Homosexuality” by stating, “The question ‘What
does the Bible say about homosexuality?’ is misleading in several ways... It fails
to take into account the fact that the ancient world had no word or concept of
‘homosexuality’.”33 Of course, Professor Furnish is not ignorant of the widespread,
same-sex behaviors of ancient societies. However, as he summarily concludes
toward the end of his essay, “There is nothing in the Bible about homosexuality
understood as a ‘condition,’ since the ancient world had no conception of anything
like sexual orientation.”34
While it is certainly true that Scripture does not speak of same-sex issues
within the categories created by modern psychology, we deny the assumption
which men like Professor Furnish infer from this fact, namely, that the biblical
writings addressing same-sex activities were not also intended to address those
inner dispositions which the modern terminology define as an “orientation.”35
Jesus teaches us an important lesson about how the activity (rather than
psychology) focused texts of Scripture are to be interpreted in his own exegesis of
various Old Testament laws in the Sermon on the Mount. He taught, for example:
“You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder; and
whoever murders will be liable to judgment.’ But I say to you that everyone who
is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment...” (Matt. 5:21–22) Murder
is an activity, but Jesus teaches us that, when Scripture addresses this activity,
we are to understand that the vast and complex array of underlying dispositions
(in this case, anger is the one he identifies) are also being addressed. We are not
suggesting that a person’s inner struggle with anger (which may or may not result
in activities like striking or murder) is comparable to an inner struggle with samesex attraction. All we want to point out from this example of Jesus’ own exegesis
is that texts which address activities are intended to infer a concern for the
underlying, psychological issues related to that activity as well, however complex
they may be.
In fact, it is a general feature of ancient languages like Hebrew that concepts
33
Victor Paul Furnish, “The Bible and Homosexuality: Reading the Texts in Context,” 18; in, Homosexuality in the Church (Jeffrey S. Siker, ed.), 18–35.
34
Victor Paul Furnish, “The Bible and Homosexuality,” 30.
35
Cf., Greg L. Bahnsen, Homosexuality: A Biblical View, 66–69.
241
and dispositions were typically talked about by referring to their concrete
expressions. But, as Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount illustrates, the influence of
Greek ways of discourse throughout the world leading up to the New Testament
period had introduced a need to be more explicit about the abstract issues
behind action-focused texts like “you shall not murder.” The New Testament
writers therefore, while continuing to employ many Hebraic ways of speaking,
also show an increased tendency to address abstract ideas. Thus, in the Sermon
on the Mount, Jesus exegetes the concrete language of various Old Testament
laws to show his Hellenized audience the guidance intended by these passages
for inner tendencies, as well as external activities. Getting more directly to
the subject at hand, we also find the Apostle Paul in Romans 1 instructing his
audience in Hellenistic Rome on the brokenness of mankind’s sexual “nature”
(fu,sij) indicated by same-sex activities, and the “dishonorable passions” (pa,qh
avtimi,aj) and “inner yearnings” (o;rexij) behind the same (Rom. 1:26–27). Thus,
while it is true that neither the Old Testament nor the New Testament writers
discussed homosexuality in quite the same manner as it is defined by modern
psychology, this does not mean the biblical writers were ignorant of, nor failing
to address, the internal dispositions of men and women with same-sex desires.
Actually, as Robert Gagnon points out, there is a fair bit of evidence that some
philosophers and teachers in the ancient world were keenly aware of desires so
deep as to warrant characterization as an innate orientation.36 For example, Plato
famously satired the sexual practices of his fellow Greeks, with a creation myth
depicting the creation of humanity in three types: a conjoined man-woman being,
a conjoined man-man being, and a conjoined woman-woman being; and that an
offended Zeus cut these beings in two, leaving some men perpetually longing to be
rejoined to their female counterpart, while others long to be rejoined to their samesex counterpart.37 Plato’s myth for the origin of sexual dispositions represents an
ancient perception of sexual identity on some level akin to an “inner orientation.”
Likewise, Aristotle believed that some men who are sexually attracted to other
men are so disposed “by nature,” while others are so inclined “from habit” (that
is, from some stimulating event).38 We cite these examples simply to demonstrate
that even ancient thinkers (writing long before the 19th century social reformers
coined their terms) were not naive concerning the kinds of inner, identity-level
36
Robert A. J. Gagnon, The Bible and Homosexual Practice, 384–5.
37
Plato, Symposium, 189C–193D. Notably, a fifth century a.d. rabbinic commentary on Genesis borrowed Plato’s idea and gives a similar interpretation of Gen. 1:26,
“When the Holy Blessed One created adam, God created him/it androginos, for it is said,
Male and female created He them... When the Holy Blessed One created adam, God created it two-faced, then God split it and made it of two backs...” (Genesis Rabbah 8:1.
Translation from, Gwynn Kessler, “Bodies in Motion: Preliminary Notes on Queer Theory
and Rabbinic Literature,” pp402–5; in Mapping Gender in Ancient Religious Discourses
(Todd Penner and Caroline Vander Stichele, eds., BIS 84; Leiden: Brill, 2007), 389–409.
38
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, 1148b, 28–34. Note, however, that Aristotle regarded the natural disposition toward same sex desire as being a disorder “contrary to
nature.”
242
issues behind many same-sex behaviors. With such sensitivity to the depth of
these feelings among non-biblical writers of the ancient world, we certainly ought
not make the mistake of supposing that the inspired prophets and apostles were
naïve concerning the intensity of same-sex thoughts and feelings behind same-sex
activities.
For such reasons as these, we cannot accept the presupposition that Scripture’s
primary focus on same-sex activity means that the biblical texts are irrelevant to
modern questions about same-sex orientation.
Secondly, many of the new interpretations are built upon the view that
Scripture is an evolving collection of religious understandings, with different
generations of ancient believers modifying the faith (and redacting the texts) from
earlier generations. For instance, Dan O. Via posits the following basis for his
handling of the Bible’s texts on same-sex issues: “In the Bible itself the revelation
of God’s Word occurs when some person or community within Israel or the
church reinterprets past tradition in order to give it new meaning in the present.
Revelation occurs as the reinterpretation of tradition. This is how, for example,
the Gospels got written. If the revelation of God is not to remain fixed in the past,
the reinterpretive process that produced the Bible must continue in the life of the
Christian community.”39 Based on this presupposition concerning the nature of
Scripture, Dr. Via is able to acknowledge that various biblical passages do, in their
original setting, regard “homosexuality as sin,”40 but nonetheless conclude today
that, “Sexual desire is a part of being human, and in marriage each partner has
an obligation to meet the sexual needs of the other. On what grounds should this
legitimation of sexual practice be extended to gay and lesbian relationships? This
is where rational scientific knowledge comes in. Recall that the Bible justifies in
principle a critical use of scientific knowledge in theological-ethical discourse.”41
We simply cannot accept this presupposition about Scripture being the product
of men who revise the traditions of previous generations, thereby justifying the
same approach to Scripture today. Therefore, we cannot accept the approach to
these passages that regards their opposition to same-sex behavior as somehow
superseded by the New Testament’s ethic of love informed by modern scientific
insights into the purported biological origins of same-sex tendencies.
A third, problematic presupposition which is sometimes employed when
handling these texts, is a so-called “christocentric” interpretation. We certainly
are zealous for Christ-centered interpretation, but the kind of “christocentric”
hermeneutic advanced in the wake of Barthian neo-orthodoxy is not consistent
with an orthodox view of Scripture. Christ did not present his example as somehow
“trumping” the written Word, but as himself conforming to and fulfilling what
was written.
Jack Rogers represents this neo-orthodox hermeneutic, saying, “Neoorthodoxy’s defining insight ... was that people and God are known by personal
39
40
41
Dan O. Via, “The Bible, the Church, and Homosexuality,” 38–39.
Dan O. Via, “The Bible, the Church, and Homosexuality,” 10.
243
encounter, not by rational analysis. The revelation of God comes not in an inspired
book, but in the person of Jesus Christ, who is God incarnate.”42 Therefore, every
passage of Scripture must be interpreted “through the lens of Jesus’ redemptive
life and ministry,”43 which, as Rogers makes clear, means that the goal of
“reconciliation” between different people groups is the “lens” through which
Scripture must be read: “God’s reconciling work in Jesus Christ [is] the heart of
the gospel in any age and ... the church ... [is] especially called to the ministry of
reconciliation [i.e., between social groups].”44 In Rogers’ view, it was this “lens”
of reconciliation which led his own denomination (the PCUSA) to move beyond
racial discrimination, discrimination against women, and hard line views on
divorce and remarriage.45 He also believes that such a “shift[ing] from legalistic
proof-texting to looking at Scripture through the lens of Jesus’ life and ministry”
will lead to an acceptance of gay marriages by the church. “Jesus did not set forth
immutable laws to break people. Rather, he set forth an ideal toward which we
all should strive—lifelong faithfulness in married relationships. That ideal could
apply to gay and lesbian couples as well as to heterosexual couples.”46 Rogers’
handling of the Leviticus laws against same-sex intercourse are illustrative, where,
after identifying those prohibitions as matters of culturally conditioned ritual
uncleanness (rather than moral violations),47 he writes, “Jesus was concerned
with purity of heart... When we see Jesus as the fulfillment of the law (Matt.
5:17), we understand that our challenge is not meticulously to maintain culturally
conditioned laws, but rather, with Jesus, to love God and love our neighbor (Matt.
22:36–40) [which Rogers understands to mean affirming homosexuality].”48
There is much kindness and graciousness in Dr. Rogers’ expressions which is
commendable. We simply disagree with this presupposition that the “christocentric
lens” removes the calling of God to seek transformation of sexual brokenness as
a vital (and powerful!) part of Christ’s work of reconciliation. We fully concur
with the urgent pleas of such exegetes as Rogers for greater compassion (and less
fear and prejudice) toward those who experience same-sex attractions. However,
this kind of presupposition that Christ’s ministry is one of acceptance toward, it
would seem, all lifestyles shapes the results of exegesis before one even begins.
42
Jack Rogers, Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality: Explode the Myths, Heal the
Church (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2009), 37–38.
43
Jack Rogers, Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality, 39–40.
44
Jack Rogers, Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality, 46–47. Cf., the PCUSA’s
Confession of 1967 which Rogers quotes as embodying this hermeneutical approach for
that branch of the church.
45
Jack Rogers, Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality, 40–44.
46
Jack Rogers, Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality, 44.
47
That hb’[eAT (“abomination”) refers not only to ritual uncleanness, as asserted
by Rogers, but can describe ethical and other wrongs as well, is seen, e.g., in Deut. 25:13–
16; Prov. 6:16–19; 8:7; Amos 5:10; Mic 3:9. (See, Michael A. Grisanti, b[t [#9493], New
International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology and Exegesis [Willem A. VanGemeren, ed.; Carlisle, UK: Paternoster Press, 1996], 4.314–18.)
48
Jack Rogers, Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality, 69.
244
The question which needs to be determined from the Scripture is whether, in
fact, Christocentric reconciliation with those with same-sex desires involves a
transformation of their “sexual identity” or a legitimization of it.
Such hermeneutical presuppositions—that biblical texts on same-sex acts do
not apply to homosexual identity; that the Bible is an evolving document; or that
all Scripture should be read through a lens of “social reconciliation”—are not
consistent, in our view, with the orthodox reverence for Scripture stated in the
Westminster Confession of Faith:
“Although the light of nature and the works of creation and providence
do so far manifest the goodness, wisdom, and power of God, as to leave
men unexcusable; yet are they not sufficient to give that knowledge of God
and of His will, which is necessary unto salvation. Therefore it pleased
the Lord, at sundry times, and in divers manners, to reveal Himself, and
to declare that [revelation] His will unto His Church; and afterwards, for
the better preserving and propagating of the truth, and for the more sure
establishment and comfort of the Church against the corruption of the flesh,
and the malice of Satan and of the world, to commit the same wholly unto
writing; which maketh the Holy Scripture to be most necessary...
“The Old Testament in Hebrew ... and the New Testament in Greek...,
being immediately inspired by God..., are therefore authentical; so as, in
all controversies of religion, the Church is finally to appeal unto them...
“The infallible rule of interpretation of Scripture is the Scripture itself: and
therefore, when there is a question about the true and full sense of any
Scripture (which is not manifold, but one) it must be searched and known
by other places that speak more clearly.” (WCF 1:1, 8–9).
We would urge ministers and laymen to be alert for these kinds of hermeneutical
errors when encountering those who quote Scripture to contradict the historic
stance of the church on same-sex issues.
V. Exegesis and Confessional Statements
While the whole of Scripture must be considered in this discussion, scholars
regularly focus on seven passages that explicitly address same-sex issues. In this
section of this paper, we will succinctly state the positions of liberal scholars on
each of these seven texts, along with what we believe to be a proper interpretation
of these passages (as they relate to the homosexuality debate). While the exegesis
of biblical texts is our only authority, confessional statements offer us the fruits
of the church’s exegesis in ages past. We will therefore also consider what the
Westminster Standards say to us about same-sex issues.
We recognize that there is a broad range of views with respect to each of these
passages, and we are not going to try to be comprehensive in this paper. When
245
stating the position of liberal scholars, we are stating the views of those who wish
to take Scripture seriously, thus we are not interacting with those who discount its
validity altogether.
Finally, by way of preliminary remarks on this section, we want to
acknowledge our dependence on a number of commentaries and exegetical
treatments of these passages. Rather than providing footnotes to reflect our
extensive reliance on others all through the following exegesis, we simply want to
acknowledge, up front, our dependence on various standard commentaries along
with conversations with various experts in the field, and the following key works:
Greg L. Bahnsen, Homosexuality: A Biblical Perspective; Robert A. J. Gagnon,
The Bible and Homosexual Practice: Texts and Hermeneutics. Key sources for
liberal interpretations of these passages include: Dan O. Via, “The Bible, the
Church, and Homosexuality”; Jack Rogers, Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality:
Explode the Myths, Heal the Church.
(1) Genesis 1:27–28; 2:20–25 — The Creation of Man
These passages in Genesis—as the foundational statement of God’s design for
human gender and sexual orientation—lay the groundwork for all that subsequent
Scripture has to say about marriage and sexuality. Thus, it is imperative to pay
attention to the creation account’s introduction of gender and sexual orientation
before treating those texts which deal specifically with same-sex questions.
Genesis 1:27 states that God “created man in his own image ... male and
female he created them.” The church has traditionally (and we believe, rightly)
understood this to mean that God created mankind in two distinct genders: male
and female. These are not two poles on a continuum—with some people having
100% male brains, some having 70% male/30% female brains, and so on across
to 100% female brains.49 Modern gender theory portrays gender as a continuum
between two poles. However, Genesis clearly intends for us to understand male
and female as two distinct categories of humanity (not poles on a continuum).
This is particularly evident in the appointment God makes of the man and
woman to distinct roles in their relationship as husband and wife. The woman
was presented to the man by God (it was not the man who was presented to the
woman); and then the man named the woman (it was not the woman who named
the man); and the woman is said to be “a helper fit for him” (Gen. 2:20–23). Paul
tells us in 1 Corinthians 11:8–10 and Ephesians 5:22–32 that this example is a
lesson on the two, gender-consistent roles in a marriage. The woman is called to
honor and support the husband, and the husband is called to lead, love, and care for
the wife. There may be many personality differences which vary the way different
couples work out this relationship, and some women may be more decisive by
nature than their husbands and husbands may, at times, be more emotional by
nature than their wives. Nevertheless, biblically, there are two roles within the
marriage and the man is always appointed to the role of headship with the woman
49
Cf., the discussion of gender, biological sex, and sexual orientation continua in
§III, above.
246
in a role of honored support (cf., WCF 4.2; RPT 4.6). There is not a continuum
of marital roles taught in Genesis 2; but two roles which are assigned by gender
(which is, biblically, the same thing as biological sex).
It is in the same context that Genesis also describes the sexual orientation
of the man and woman for one another in the same, two, distinct categories:
“Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife,
and they shall become one flesh” (Gen. 2:24). There is certainly more intended
in that expression than sexual intimacy; nevertheless, these references to physical
bonding (“holding fast” and becoming “one flesh”) certainly include sexual
intimacy.50 Jesus quotes this creation example as the basis for the institution of
marriage and for restricting sexual relations to marriage (Matt. 19:4–12). But the
pattern also shows us the two distinct categories assigned to marry and engage in
sexual communion: a man and a woman. Just as later biblical writers saw two,
distinct marital roles in this passage (not a continuum of marital roles); so, later
biblical writers show us that these are two, distinct, gender-specific sexual roles
in marriage as well. As Paul teaches the Corinthians, “... each man should have
his own wife and each woman her own husband” (1 Cor. 7:2). And in a discussion
about adultery, Jesus pointed to this passage as setting the prescriptive pattern for
restricting all sexual relations to the marriage of, specifically, a male and a female:
“From the beginning of creation, ‘God made them male and female.’ ‘Therefore
a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall
become one flesh’...” (Mk. 10:6–8). It is not simply the monogamy and fidelity
of Genesis 2, abstractly, which Scripture sets before us as prescriptive. It is also
the exclusively “heterosexual orientation” of that marriage which is prescriptive
in Genesis 2.51
To sum this up: Genesis 1 and 2 shows us, not a “continuum” of family
leadership positions marked out by the creation of the man and the woman, but two
distinct roles socially oriented to one another (i.e., head and helper). This social
orientation is determined by anatomical gender (not personality traits). Likewise,
there is not a “continuum” of sexuality introduced in the creation account, but two
distinct roles sexually oriented for one another. This orientation, also, is shown to
be determined by the anatomical gender of the individual.
To evade the force of this passage, some commentators insist (to quote Victor
Paul Furnish as an example) that “this is an ‘aetiological’ account, told in order
to explain why things are as they are, not to prescribe what people ought to do...
The[se texts] are not about God’s will for individual members of the species [e.g.,
that a man should only have sex with a woman, and that only in marriage] but
only about what is typical of the species as a whole [e.g., that mankind is a sexual
50
“‘One flesh’ does not refer to sexual intimacy in a narrow way, but recognizes
that man and woman constitute an indissoluble unit of humankind from every perspective.
Hence the author refers to but does not focus on the sexual relationship...” (Terence E.
Fretheim, “Genesis,” 354; in Leander E. Keck, et al, eds., New Interpreter’s Bible: Volume
I [Nashville: Abingdon, 1994], 319–674.)
51
Cf., pp8–9, above.
247
being].”52 But Prof. Furnish ignores the fact that Paul, Jesus, and other biblical
voices repeatedly point back to this very set of passages as prescriptive for the
social and sexual roles of the two genders which God designed.
Man’s sexual identity and function were determined by God at creation,
and thus any contrary desire, including homosexual desire, can only be rightly
explained as a consequence of Adam’s fall in sin. As Christians, we follow a
Savior who makes all things new as he re-creates a new humanity (Rev. 21:5).
Christ redeems and restores men and women to be what God intended. Thus, the
redeemed will only find true hope, joy, and restoration by delighting in what God,
at creation, has declared to be “very good” (Gen. 1:31).
(2) Genesis 19:1–29 — Sodom and Gomorrah
Proponents of homosexuality suggest that the real sin of Sodom was their
pride, laziness, and lack of care for the poor and needy, not same-sex activity.
They often quote Ezekiel 16:49–50, where Ezekiel rehearses Sodom’s sins in the
following words: “Look, this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: She and her
daughter had pride, fullness of food, and abundance of idleness; neither did she
strengthen the hand of the poor and needy. And they were haughty and committed
abomination before Me; therefore I took them away as I saw fit.” Based on this
commentary on Sodom’s sins in Ezekiel, it is said that Genesis 19 merely recounts
that the men of the city attempted to gang rape Lot’s guests (and gang rape is
evil when committed by “heterosexuals,” too). Thus, liberal scholars suggest
that Genesis 19 has nothing to contribute to the modern discussion regarding
“consensual homosexual relationships.”
We agree that Sodom was condemned for many sins (as Ezekiel makes
explicit) and became a prototype in Scripture for a sinful culture. However, the
longing of the men of Sodom to “know” Lot’s guests is prominently displayed
as an example of their sinfulness, so its character as same-sex rape cannot be too
hastily dismissed. In that account, Lot himself calls their same-sex lust sinful
when he urges them to not “do so wickedly,” and instead offered his daughters
to the men. Lot seems to have regarded the same-sex character of this attack as
sinful.
Furthermore, the Ezekiel passage includes, among the sins of Sodom, their
“abomination” (hb’[eAT). There are several reasons to believe that Ezekiel cited
this word to refer to their same-sex offenses. Some interpreters believe Ezekiel’s
uses of this term is in reference to other economic injustices against the poor
committed in Sodom. However, Ezekiel probably uses this term in a manner which
is informed by the Mosaic laws, where various sexual sins, including same-sex
relations, are called “abominations” (e.g., Lev. 18:22). In fact, in two other places
(22:11; 33:26) Ezekiel uses the term “abomination” to refer to sexual sins, and in
Ezekiel 18:10–13 the word is used to refer to a mixed list of economic injustices
and sexual sins. Given the prominence of Sodom’s sexual sins in Genesis 19, and
the Old Testament law’s repeated characterization of such same-sex sins (but not
52
Victor Paul Furnish, “The Bible and Homosexuality,” 21, 23.
248
of economic sins) as “abominations” (hb’[eAT), it seems likely that Ezekiel’s list
of Sodom’s sins may have highlighted their economic injustices but did not ignore
their sexual sins. But even if Ezekiel was only referring to the economic injustices
of Sodom and Gomorrah, this would only indicate that it was the economic
sins of those cities which found a parallel in Ezekiel’s own society; if he wasn’t
mentioning Sodom and Gomorrah’s sexual sins, he was not thereby denying that
those sins were part of Sodom and Gomorrah’s condemnation.
Finally, Jude 7 confirms that the sexual immorality of the city was one of
the reasons it was destroyed.53 The only example of immorality in Sodom which
Scripture gives to us is their same-sex advances on Lot’s guests, so that it is most
natural to understand Jude’s reference as confirming that the same-sex lusts of the
men of Sodom was regarded as sinful before God.
We readily accept that same-sex behavior was not the only sin of Sodom.
Genesis reports that there were many sins (e.g., economic sins, and so forth) in
Sodom and Gomorrah, “the outcry of which” reached to heaven (18:20). The
reason the two angels were sent was to search out whether their was grounds for
mercy, or if the cities truly were deserving of judgment (18:21–33). That Genesis
puts forward the same-sex lust of the inhabitants as the representative affront
which the two angels encountered on their judicial examination of the cities’
guilt, and based on which Sodom’s fate was sealed, should not be minimized by
observations of other sins which were also widespread in Sodom. Same-sex lust
was not the only sin of Sodom and the surrounding towns, but we cannot accept as
biblically sound those interpretations that minimize the importance of same-sex
lust as part of—and, indeed, representative of—Sodom’s sins.
(3) Judges 19:1–30 — The Levite’s Concubine
The story of the Levite’s concubine in Judges 19 has many similarities to the
account of Sodom. Again, some modern interpreters argue that the real sin in this
account was in the desire for rape, not the fact that it was a same-sex rape attempt.
We grant that rape (whether “heterosexual” or “homosexual”) is condemned by
this passage. However, it seems that the fact that the rape here attempted was
specifically same-sex rape is intended to illustrate just how deeply confused Israel
had become by this time in history. In other words, this text seems designed to
convey the sense of a society where (to borrow a characterization from Jude 15)
“ungodly deeds” are being committed in “an ungodly manner.”
(4) Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 — The Mosaic Prohibitions
Leviticus 18:22 reads, “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is
an abomination (hb’[eAT).” Similarly, Leviticus 20:13 states, “If a man lies with
a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination
(hb’[eAT). They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.”
Liberal scholars generally understand these passages in one of two ways. One
view understands that these passages condemn homosexual activity only as it was
53
See the further exegesis of Jude 7, below.
249
being practiced in a particular way in the land Israel was about to settle. Male
prostitution was sometimes connected with fertility cults in the ancient world, and
(it is said) it was really participation in such sexual, fertility cults which was being
forbidden in these passages. Thus, some scholars hold that this passage does not
condemn all same-sex behavior, but merely that which is illicit, destructive, and
idolatrous.
A second view understands these prohibitions in Leviticus to be ceremonial
(not moral) laws. That is, such commands were given, not because same-sex
activity was immoral, but because same-sex activity (like “heterosexual” activity)
left a person ceremonially unclean. This view equates the “abomination” of samesex behavior with the “abomination” of sexual emissions (Lev. 15:16–30) or
menstruation (Lev. 15:19),54 which no longer make a person unclean since the
ceremonial laws are fulfilled in Christ.
It is true that the Hebrew word for “abomination” (hb’[eAT) is sometimes used
to refer to ritual uncleanness. However, this does not mean that the word refers only
to matters of ritual uncleanness. There are at least ten reasons to understand that
the Leviticus prohibitions of same-sex behavior is a moral injunction forbidding
same-sex activity for all time:
a. In these verses, the word “male” (rk’êz”) is used and not the word for
“male-prostitute” (vdeq’; cf., Deut. 23:17–18). The most prominent
expressions of same-sex behavior in the ancient world may, indeed, have
been found in pagan worship, but Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 forbid men in
general (not just male temple-prostitutes) from lying with other men “as a
man lies with a woman.”
b. The fact that Leviticus describes same-sex behavior by pointing to the
norm of “as a man lies with a woman” suggests that the creation order
of a man joining himself to his wife (Gen. 2:23–24) is here being cited as
normative.
c. This sin of a man lying with a man as a man lies with a woman is uniquely
identified in this list of prohibitions as an “abomination” (hb’[eAT). Other
sins on the list (e.g., bestiality, adultery, incest) are recognized by the
church as permanent prohibitions even though they are not singled out as
abominations with quite the force which same-sex sex is, so it seems that
this sin would likely be permanent if the others are.
d. The penalty is the most severe possible: death (Lev. 20:13).
e. Further, Leviticus 20:13 prescribes capital punishment for both parties to
the act, which contradicts the common liberal argument that consensual
same-sex relations are condoned by Scripture. In other words, this ban is
not simply to prohibit abusive relationships.
54
Some also draw a comparison to the “abomination” of unclean meats. For example, Leviticus 11:13 reads, “And these you shall regard as an abomination (#q,v,) among
the birds; they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, the vulture, the buzzard...” Note, however, that the Hebrew words for “abomination” here is not the same as
used in the passages on same-sex “abominations.”
250
f. The other laws of Leviticus 18:1–30 and 20:1–21 exclude a host of
sexual behaviors such as adultery, bestiality, and incest, all of which
were rigorously punished. Since these prohibitions were not addressed
exclusively to cultic acts of adultery, bestiality, and so on, it is inconsistent
to regard the prohibition of same-sex intercourse as exclusively referring
to ritual prostitution.
g. Of the practices forbidden in these passages, only the ban on a man lying
with his menstruating wife (Lev. 18:19, 20:18) is not forbidden by the
church today. Perhaps an argument could be made that the prohibition
against same-sex practices is ceremonial, too, but the weight seems to be
heavily against that assumption. In the New Testament era, the Leviticus
prohibitions against such sexual sins from these lists as adultery and incest
remain. Jesus declared all foods clean, but not all human activities.
h. The wider context of these passages, seen in Leviticus 18:24–30 and
20:22–24, teaches that these abominations are the reason for which the
Canaanites were expelled from the land. Leviticus 18:25 calls these
activities “iniquity,” and not merely “uncleanness.” The very identity of
the people of God was formed, in part, around a different moral code than
the nations around them.
i. An inspired commentary on these verses in Leviticus appears in 1
Corinthians 6:9, where Paul forbids same-sex relations, saying that
“homosexuals” (NKJV, NASB) will not inherit the kingdom of God. Paul
uses the word avrsenokoi/tai, which is a compound word using the words
“male” (a;rshn) and “bed” or “a place for lying” (koi,th). Both these terms
are used in the Septuagint translation of Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13, so
that commentators broadly recognize that Paul has these Leviticus texts in
mind as he is writing to the Corinthians. In fact, the term avrsenokoi/tai
was not in use in Paul’s day, further indicating that Paul was drawing from
Leviticus to form this word to instruct the church.
j. Finally, Deuteronomy 23:17–18 provides an example of an Old Testament
law which is, specifically, prohibiting same-sex cult prostitution. The
fact that there is an Old Testament law which shows us what a focused
condemnation of temple prostitution looks like, strengthens the likelihood
that the broader language used here in Leviticus is intended to address a
much broader scope of same-sex activity than just temple prostitution.
It is certainly correct that the Canaanite fertility cults (and the male-prostitution
involved in those cults) are included in the purview of these Mosaic injunctions.
But it overly narrows their intended scope to neglect their broader application.
Greg Bahnsen notes that it would be improper to interpret the New Testament’s
general warnings against drunkenness as only referring to drunkenness at the
Lord’s Supper simply because other passages in the New Testament tell us that
this was a particular problem in that time.55 Similarly, it is improper to narrow the
interpretation of these passages from Leviticus to understand them as referring
55
Greg L. Bahnsen, Homosexuality: A Biblical View, 45.
251
only to fertility cult worship.56
(5) 1 Corinthians 6:9–11 — Paul’s List of Defilements
First Corinthians 6:9–11 reads, “Do you not know that the unrighteous will
not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor
idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor
covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of
God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified,
but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.”
The focus of debate in this text revolves around the two Greek words here
translated as “homosexuals” and “sodomites” at the end of verse nine. The first
is the Greek word malakoi. which literally means “soft,” or in moral contexts,
“yielding.” Thus, the word is sometimes translated “effeminate,” and some
interpreters believe Paul is simply condemning over-indulgence in luxury. It is
true that the word can refer to “lovers of luxury” (loving soft clothes, dainty foods,
etc.), but in ancient Greek the word was also used of the passive or penetrated
partner, often the younger partner, in same-sex intercourse. That this word is
paired with the Greek term avrsenokoi/tai indicates it is indeed this latter use
which Paul here has in mind.57
As already noted, avrsenokoi/tai is a compound word not common in Koine
Greek, formed by combining the words “male” (a;rshn) and “bed” (koi,th),
which are both used in the Septuagint translation of Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13.
The word literally means “a man-bedder,” and it refers to the active or penetrating
agent in same-sex intercourse. Consistent with the passage earlier discussed in
Leviticus (where both partners to the same-sex relationship are put under a death
penalty), Paul is identifying both parties to same-sex intercourse (the “recipient”
and the “penetrator”) as excluded from God’s kingdom.
It must be further noted, moreover, that Paul is abundantly clear in this text
that these who are given to same-sex relationships, like the fornicators, adulterers,
and drunkards also listed here, can be redeemed. Paul testifies that he had
witnessed some malakoi. and avrsenokoi/tai in the Corinthian church who had
come to Christ and who thereafter shed their former identity as “homosexuals”
and took on a new identity no longer characterized by such terms. Their identities
had been changed. Paul boldly states that those who are still engaged in same-sex
56
As a further witness to this reading of Lev. 18:22 and 20:33, it is notable that the
Qumran community cited these Leviticus laws in various lists of their community rules.
Although the Qumran documents are neither inspired nor of any particular ecclesiastical authority, they provide a further witness that intertestamental Judaism saw these laws
against “a man lying with a man as with a woman” as relevant even after the Canaanite
cults with their male prostitutes were long gone. (See a list of these citations with brief discussion of them in William Loader, The Dead Sea Scrolls on Sexuality: Attitudes Toward
Sexuality in Sectarian and Related Literature at Qumran [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009],
361.)
57
Besides, it does not seem that loving dainty foods is on the same par with the
other sins here listed as excluding a person from God’s kingdom.
252
relationships should be labeled as such and called to repentance and a departure
from that manner of life. But once such repentance takes place, the old manner
of life and the old identity (for which Paul uses the aforementioned terms) are to
be put away. It is also clear from Paul’s writing, here, that these saints might still
be tempted with the sins of their old way of life (that is the whole reason he is
addressing these former vices in a letter to the saints in Corinth). Nevertheless,
their identities had been forever changed in Jesus Christ such that they were not
now to be known by those same-sex identities anymore than the sober man or the
former thief would be known as a drunkard or thieves.
To limit these verses to prohibitions against male prostitution and indulgence
in soft clothing does not, in our view, square with the sound principles of
interpretation within this text nor the consistent testimony of Scripture as a whole.
(6) 1 Timothy 1:8–11 — Paul’s Applications of the Ten Commandments
In this passage, the Apostle gives another list of sins summarizing the Old
Testament law, saying, “But we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully,
knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless
and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for
murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for
sodomites (avrsenokoi,taij), for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is
any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine, according to the glorious gospel
of the blessed God which was committed to my trust.”
Liberal scholars again relegate the term avrsenokoi,taij, used again here (and
translated above as “sodomites”) to those who engage in sexual relations with
male-prostitutes (or perhaps to those who are abusive in same-sex relationships).
However, Paul states that he is dealing with the law, and then gives examples
roughly following the outline of the Ten Commandments, specifically from the
fifth commandment to the ninth.58 The fact that Paul identifies the prohibition
of avrsenokoi,taij as rooted in the seventh commandment along with reproach
of fornication, and he does not introduce this as a violation of the first or second
commandments, further demonstrates that idolatry (i.e., false worship through
male temple-prostitution) is not the primary force of this word in Paul’s thought.
By using the word-pair, po,rnoij and avrsenokoi,taij, to represent the seventh
commandment, it seems that Paul is using period terms to condemn both
“heterosexual” and “homosexual” lusts.
(7) Jude 5–7 — Sodom and Gomorrah, Remembered
Jude’s short epistle includes a reference to the Sodom and Gomorrah story, in
which he states, “But I want to remind you, though you once knew this, that the
Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those
58
In fact, that Paul again uses the Greek term which he seems to have formed
based on the Leviticus 18 and 20 passages suggests that Paul regarded those Leviticus texts
as rooted in the seventh commandment, and therefore abiding moral laws, not ceremonial
laws.
253
who did not believe. And the angels who did not keep their proper domain, but
left their own abode, He has reserved in everlasting chains under darkness for the
judgment of the great day; as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in
a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and
gone after strange flesh (sarko.j e`te,raj), are set forth as an example, suffering
the vengeance of eternal fire” (Jude 5–7).
Jude uses an unusual expression to identify the nature of the immorality being
condemned toward the end of this passage. The phrase sarko.j e`te,raj literally
means “strange flesh,” which some interpreters take as a reference to the fact that
the men of Sodom lusted after angels who visited Lot. Thus, their lust was after
non-human flesh, which some interpreters take to be the proper force of this term.
They reinforce this interpretation, then, by positing that the preceding reference
to “the angels who did not keep their proper domain” is referring to the “sons of
God” in Genesis 6:2 who “saw that the daughters of man were beautiful and took
as their wives any they chose.” Thus, it is argued, the two examples both refer to
the atrocity of humans and angels engaging in sexual intercourse. Consequently,
Jude’s statement has nothing at all to do with same-sex relationships.
Obviously, this is a very complicated passage, and it is related to other
complicated passages. A thorough treatment is not possible here. However, it is
not generally held among reformed commentators that the best reading of Genesis
6 has in mind the idea of angels copulating with human women. Besides doubting
that it is even possible for angels and women to bear offspring together (there
were offspring from the unions in Genesis 6), most reformed commentators
believe that Genesis 6 refers either to the godly line of Seth (called “sons of God”)
intermarrying with the ungodly line of Cain (called “sons of men”), or to the kings
of the forming kingdoms of the early human race (“sons of mighty-ones,” with
elohim referring to human rulers not to God) taking many wives into their harems
to secure their dynasties (i.e., the beginning of royal polygamy). The passage in
Jude, then, cannot refer to Genesis 6, but instead must refer to the fall of the angels
with Satan (there are numerous parallels between Jude and the account of Satan’s
fall in Isaiah 14). If this is correct, and Jude’s reference to the sin of the angels
refers to their rebellion, and not to intercourse with human women, then the sin
of Sodom and Gomorrah in Jude should not be read as exactly conforming to the
sin of the angels.
Furthermore, Jude says that not only the men of Sodom lusted after “strange
flesh,” but he says that “Sodom and Gomorrah, and the surrounding cities”
indulged in this sin. In Genesis 19, it was only Sodom which was visited by the
angels. If Sodom and Gomorrah, and the other cities of the plain surrounding
them, shared in the guilt which Jude has in mind, it must be the same-sex lust of
the men of Sodom (rather than the unusual fact that, in that one incident, the men
254
they were lusting after happened to be angels).59
Jude also uses the “sexual immorality” (evkporneu,sasai) and lust after
“strange flesh” of these cities as a warning to his own audience. It is highly
unlikely that he would be concerned about his own audience lusting after angelflesh. Since Jude seems to expect that his audience be able to identify with Sodom
and Gomorrah’s sins, it seems “strange flesh” must refer to unnatural passions less
exotic than angel-lust.
Finally, it should be noted that Jude’s language places emphasis on the
lust inside the men’s hearts in a manner that seems to suggest that they
knew what they were doing. The term for “having given themselves over to
immorality”(evkporneu,sasai) is intensive and denotes extravagant lust.
Further, the word for “gone after” (avpelqou/sai) amplifies the fact that they
wholeheartedly gave themselves to their willful desires for “strange flesh.” The
men of Sodom did not know that the men behind Lot’s doors were angels, but
their lust was for men. Jude’s emphasis not only on the fact that the object of their
lust was “strange flesh,” but on the fact that the men so willfully pursued “strange
flesh,” adds to the sense that it was the same-sex nature of their longings (rather
than the angelic nature of the objects of their longings) which Jude has in view.
While the phrase sarko.j e`te,raj (“strange flesh”) is an unusual expression
for same-sex passions, it is not an unnatural way to describe same-sex desires.
Simon Kistemaker explains, “The Greek reveals that in the case of duality (for
example, male and female) the word other can mean ‘a second of two’ and in
the context denote a different of kind. Therefore, when the men of Sodom were
interested in sexual relations with men, they perverted the created order of natural
intercourse.”60 Yes, Jude uses an unusual phrase to describe same-sex intercourse
and this whole passage is full of interpretative difficulties; however, we believe
that the best interpretation is that Jude is indeed warning against sexual immorality
in general and same-sex lusts in particular.
(8) Romans 1:26–27 — Paul on Unnatural Desire
In the opening chapter of Romans, Paul describes a long list of sins which
characterize a society which is falling away from God. Included in that list is his
statement that, “For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their
women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the
men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another,
59
Jude actually says, “Sodom and Gomorrah, and the surrounding cities likewise
... pursued strange flesh.” Some commentators understand the “likewise” to compare the
sins of these cities with the sins of the angels in the previous verse. It may be, however, that
the “likewise” is emphasizing the fact that the other cities of the plain followed Sodom and
Gomorrah into the same sins and thus shared in their judgment, thus contributing to Jude’s
theme of warning his audience against following false teachers and sharing in their judgment. If this reading is correct, then the fact is emphatic: the cities of the plain all lusted
likewise after “strange flesh,” which means Jude cannot have angel-lust in view.
60
Simon J. Kistemaker, New Testament Commentary: James, Epistles of John,
Peter and Jude (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1996), 318.
255
men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the
penalty of their error which was due” (Rom. 1:26–27).
Scholars defending biblical allowances for same-sex relationships have
interpreted Romans 1:26-27 in a variety of ways. It has been suggested, for
instance, that Paul was primarily concerned in this passage with elements tied
to pagan worship, that he was confronting extreme and abusive forms of samesex activity (perhaps even particular historical incidents), or that he was merely
addressing the same-sex behavior he was familiar with which was “unnatural”
(Paul simply was not personally acquainted with “homosexual Christians” who
were same-sex oriented by nature and able to be as faithful and monogamous as
are “heterosexual” Christian couples).
Arguments suggesting that this text is only condemning certain kinds of
abusive and cult-worship homosexual practice are based on a faulty understanding
of Old Testament passages we have already considered. It is this last idea which
is particularly concerning. It latches onto the phrase “against nature” in verse 27
and purports that Paul was concerned with perversion, not inversion. Dan O. Via
states this position as follows: “Paul seems to have agreed with the generally held
belief of the ancient world that there is only one sexual nature, what we would
call a heterosexual nature. Therefore, what he is condemning as contrary to nature
is homosexual acts by people with a heterosexual nature. His implied underlying
principle is that if people choose to actualize their sexuality, their acts should
be in accord with their nature or orientation. If Paul then could be confronted
with the reality of homosexual orientation, consistency would require him to
acknowledge the naturalness of homosexual acts for people with a homosexual
orientation.”61 Other similar interpretations hold that Paul actually was aware that
some “homosexuals by nature” were practicing in a manner consistent with their
orientation, and he could have commended them; but, for the sake of brevity,
he did not. In other words, these commentators hold that Romans 1:26–27 is
condemning any individual engaging in sexual activity contrary to his own, innate
nature, rather than condemning sexual activity which is contrary to the natural,
created order.
This view fails to take into account the fact that the whole passage hearkens
back to creation (vv. 20, 25), where God determined the nature of mankind’s
sexual make-up. He united a man and a woman as biblically natural partners.
The point of Romans chapter one is that humanity has rebelliously twisted God’s
natural order, including the sexual design, hence God has given them over even
further to the sin they crave. The point is not that individuals have different inborn
identities with which they must act consistently (their own sexual nature), but that
the Lord has established the normative identity of male and female for all humanity
to be expressed sexually between only one man and one woman being joined as
one flesh (mankind’s sexual nature). Though some may indeed experience strong
same-sex erotic attractions, God’s people must know from Scripture that such
temptations are sinful and are a result of human sinfulness.
61
256
(9) Other texts —
The previous texts are those which explicitly address same-sex issues, and thus
are the one most prominently discussed in relation to questions about the Bible’s
teaching on “homosexuality.” There are, however, two additional narratives
which are sometimes deemed pertinent to the topic, and so will be briefly treated
here, as well.
(a) Ham’s offense against Noah (Gen. 9:20–27)
This first of these is the account of Ham’s offense against his father, Noah. The
delicacy of the narrator has left unstated just how much Ham did in his violation of
Noah during Noah’s drunkenness. He simply writes, “Noah ... became drunk and
lay uncovered in his tent. And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his
father and told his two brothers outside” (Gen. 9:20–22). The passage obviously
intends for us to recognize that it was a wrong within the general realm of samesex violations, even if it was simply seeing and mocking his father’s nakedness.
In fact, by noting right away that this Ham was “the father of Canaan,” and then
later indicating that Noah placed a curse upon Ham’s son Canaan, specifically,
because of this sin, it is evident that the real focus of this text is on the same-sex
indulgences of the Canaanites dwelling in the land in Moses’ day, and for which
they were being expelled from the land (see our earlier discussions of the sins of
Canaan in relation to Lev. 18 and 20).
Once again, liberal interpreters will tend to focus on one aspect of Ham’s sin
(the fact that his abuse of his father was incestuous in nature) to the exclusion
of any other aspect of his sin being deemed wrong. However, it is common in
narratives like these to show the horror of a people’s sinfulness by piling layers
of sin together, all of which have to be taken into account. In the sin of Sodom,
as we earlier saw, a violation of hospitality and gang rape and same-sex lust are
all being condemned. So here, the incestuous nature of Ham’s offense is piled
on top of the same-sex nature of his offense, along with the mocking or boasting
nature of it, to create a full sense of grief at the presence of original sin even here
amongst Noah’s sons right after the flood.
(b) David’s love for Jonathan (2 Sam. 1:26)
It has often been claimed that David and Jonathan had a homosexual
relationship and that the author merely suppressed references to erotic activity
between the two men. Indeed Samuel did highlight the close relationship between
the two (1 Sam. 18:1-5; 20:14-17, 41-42; 2 Sam. 1:26). However, these passages
serve to demonstrate the loyalty of Jonathan to David as anointed heir to the
throne, in spite of the fact that Jonathan was in line biologically to receive the
throne instead of David. Never is there reference the men “knowing” one another
or “lying” together. The point is that David was not a usurper of the throne but
an advocate of Saul and his family, and that Jonathan wholeheartedly supported
David’s acquisition of the throne at this important transition in redemptive history.
These two were not companions who destroyed one another, but they were friends
257
who were closer than brothers.62
(10) Confessional Standards
The Westminster Standards say very little, explicitly, about the subject of samesex attractions. The only direct reference is in the Larger Catechism, question 139
(dealing with the Seventh Commandment). The entire question is quoted here,
with the relevant phrase and its proof texts highlighted:
“Q. What are the sins forbidden in the seventh commandment?
“A. The sins forbidden in the seventh commandment, besides the neglect
of the duties required, are adultery, fornication, rape, incest, sodomy, and
all unnatural lusts; all unclean imaginations, thoughts, purposes, and
affections; all corrupt or filthy communications, or listening thereunto;
wanton looks, impudent or light behaviour, immodest apparel; prohibiting
of lawful, and dispensing with unlawful marriages; allowing, tolerating,
keeping of stews, and resorting to them; entangling vows of single life,
undue delay of marriage; having more wives or husbands than one at the
same time; unjust divorce, or desertion; idleness, gluttony, drunkenness,
unchaste company, lascivious songs, books, pictures, dancings, stage plays;
and all other provocations to, or acts of uncleanness, either in ourselves or
others.
“Prov. 5:7; Heb. 13:4; Gal. 5:19; 2 Sam. 13:14; 1 Cor. 5:1; Rom. 1:24, 27;
Lev. 20:15, 16; Matt. 5:28; Matt. 15:19; Col. 3:5; Eph. 5:3, 4; Prov. 7:5,
21, 22; Isa. 3:16; 2 Pet. 2:14; Prov. 7:10, 13; 1 Tim. 4:3; Lev. 18:1–21;
Mal. 2:11,12; 1 Kings 15:12; 2 Kings 23:7; Deut. 23:17,18; Lev. 19:29; Jer.
5:7; Prov. 7:24–27; Matt. 19:10,11; 1 Cor. 7:7–9; Gen. 38:26; Mal. 2:14,
15; Matt. 19:5; Mal. 2:16; Matt. 5:32; 1 Cor. 7:12, 13; Ezek. 16:49; Prov.
23:30–33; Gen. 39:10; Eph. 5:4; Ezek. 23:14–16; Isa. 23:15-17; Isa. 3:16;
Mark 6:22; Rom. 13:13; 1 Pet. 4:3; 2 Kings 9:30 with Jer. 4:30 and Ezek.
23:40.”
Of course, the Westminster divines were not acquainted with the modern
distinction between sexual activity and desires on the one hand, and sexual
orientation on the other. Nevertheless, the decision to pair the terms “sodomy”
(deeds) and “unnatural lusts” (desires) reflects an understanding on their part
that both same-sex sex and same-sex desires are violations of the seventh
commandment. While the divines did not have the claims of modern science
before them to prompt any reference to same-sex orientation in their statement,
they nonetheless clearly intend their statement to address the entire internal and
62
Note the thorough treatment of David and Jonathan’s relationship by Markus
Zehnder, “Observations on the Relationship between David and Jonathan and the Debate
on Homosexuality,” in WTJ 69 (2007), 127–74.
258
external scope of human sexuality. We offer the following diagram to illustrate the
overlap of categories represented by the 17th century terminology of the divines
and the terminology of modern science:
External Sexuality
(e.g., acts like “sodomy”)
Internal Sexuality
(e.g., “unnatural lusts”)
God’s natural order (Gen. 1-2):
male/female sexual compatibility
External Sexuality
(e.g., acts like “same-sex sex”)
Conscious internal sexuality
(e.g., “same sex desires”
Subconscious internal sexuality
(e.g., “sexual orientation”)
(no universal, standard orientation
is recognized)
It is a modern convention to divide man’s “inner sexuality” into distinct
categories of conscious thought and subconscious orientations. To interpret
the Catechism as addressing only conscious thought (to the exclusion of
subconscious urgings) by its terminology is to force modern conventions upon
the text, anachronistically. Rather, it should be understood that the intention of
the Catechism statement is to address the entire inner and external life of the one
whose sexuality is contrary to nature as God designed it.
While this statement in the Larger Catechism is the only explicit reference to
same-sex issues in the Westminster Standards, the Confession of Faith’s chapter
on marriage is relevant when it stipulates that “Marriage [and, by inference, all the
privileges of marriage, including sex] is to be between one man and one woman”
(WCF 24.1). Additionally, the Reformed Presbyterian Testimony gives this further
statement of this denomination’s application of that paragraph to the modern topic
of homosexuality:
“Premarital sex relations or promiscuous sex practices as well as
homosexuality and other perversions of the natural order are violations of
God’s law and purpose. All should strive to discipline their sexual desires,
maintain purity of thought and practice, and avoid situations which lead
to sexual temptation. (1Cor. 6:9, 15–20; 1Cor. 5:1–5, 9–11; 1Cor. 7:8–9;
Rom. 1:26–28; Phil. 4:8; Prov. 5).” (RPT 24.2)
We note that this statement does directly address the modern topic of
homosexuality, and it clearly states the RPCNA’s interpretation of passages like
259
Romans 1:26–27 and 1 Corinthians 6:9–11 as, indeed, teaching that homosexuality
is a perversion of the natural order requiring the Christian who experiences the
resulting temptations to discipline their thoughts and deeds through the means of
grace.
VI. Pastoral Implications
In many ways, this final section is one of the most important sections of this
paper. It is also, however, the section on which reformed churches tend to be least
equipped (in terms of experience) to address. Sadly, churches which tend to take
the most initiative to minister to those caught up in the homosexual community
tend to be those which compromise biblical doctrine to do so. We would like to
offer, in these final pages, three major implications which we believe emerge from
the theology and exegesis in this paper for the general guidance of the church in
ministry to those who experience same-sex attractions.
Up front, we confess that the church has not always done a very good job of
ministering the Gospel to men and women struggling with same-sex desires. It
is one of the tragic realities of church history that sodomy has often been treated
by the church with hatred, violence, and cruelty unbecoming the Gospel of
Jesus Christ. Just as modern day Muslims keenly remember the Crusades, and
contemporary acts of violence against Muslims “in the name of Christ” are held
against the whole church; so members of the modern homosexual community are
often more aware than Christians of the brutalities of the Catholic Inquisition, and
of Protestant Europe as well, against sodomites. For example, Louis Crompton
writes in his recent history of Homosexuality and Civilization,
“During the preceding century [in Geneva, prior to Calvin], we know of
six sodomy trials in the city. In the 125 years following Calvin’s triumph
there were sixty—thirty ending in burnings, beheadings, drownings, and
hangings. If we consider the small size of the city—Geneva had only about
12,000 inhabitants when Calvin took office—the actual rate of executions
far surpassed that of the Inquisition in contemporary Spain.”63
Without getting into the details of this or other similar claims, the point we
wish to make is simply that the homosexual community, today, is more aware
of these kinds of details about the church’s sometimes brutal treatment of
“homosexuals” through history than the broader church is. And while some facts
may be questioned, there is certainly much validity to the charges that the church
has not always confronted such sexual sins with the Gospel, but sometimes
with other sins—the sins of hatred and violence—purportedly “in the name of
the Gospel.” And modern day “gay bashing,” sometimes done “in the name of
Christ,” certainly does not help.
63
Louis Crompton, Homosexuality and Civilization (Cambridge, Mass.: First Harvard University Press, 2006), 324.
260
Pastorally, the church must walk a fine line—what we might call a “line of
grace”—in both confronting the brokenness and sinfulness of same-sex attractions
and behaviors on the one hand, and doing so in a manner that stands clear of
godless “gay bashing” on the other. In fact, as offensive as same-sex behaviors
are to God’s design, it is interesting to note that, in the spiral of social decline
described by Paul in Romans 1, such sins as “deceit” (v29), “gossip” (v29), and
“disobedience to parents” (v30) are located further down the spiral than “unnatural
passions” (v26). We certainly should not read too much into Paul’s order of sins
in that place, but we offer this observation as a way of pointing out the fact that
same-sex behavior is not the unforgivable sin, and those who wrestle with samesex temptations are not beyond the power of redemption.
In fact, because the gay community tends to expect Christians to “hate them,”
there is actually a great opportunity for showing the power of the Gospel in our
own lives by responding with a clear testimony of moral integrity, yet with a spirit
of Gospel care which is not what men and women in the homosexual community
expect from Christians. We exhort our congregants to reach out in love to all
other manner of sinful people in our communities, but somehow we fail to make
explicit the need to show the same Gospel grace to those oppressed by samesex temptations and brokenness as well. The first major implication from the
foregoing study which we hope to underscore, is this need to recover confidence
in the power of the Gospel, and compassion in the ministry of the Gospel, for
those whom our society labels as “homosexuals.”
Jude 22–23 exhorts us to “have mercy on those who doubt; save others by
snatching them out of the fire; to others show mercy with fear, hating even the
garment stained by the flesh.” There is mercy to be shown to those caught up even
in the most distressing of sins—hating the stains of sin, but still holding out mercy
to the one caught up in it.
A second and related pastoral implication from this study, has to do with the
church’s response to the growing body of scientific insight into the nature of
same-sex attractions. Never before in human history has so much attention been
given to understanding the nature and influences on same-sex desires. While the
church often finds herself feeling attacked and threatened by the excessive and
politically influenced conclusions which some draw from the resulting science,
we ought not ignore what can be learned from this research.
Modern scientific studies into the underlying biology and psychology of samesex attractions is, as we have noted, inconclusive at present. But it is gathering
more and more evidence to suggest that, whether or not there is a “gay gene,”
it is certainly becoming clear that same-sex tendencies are much more deeply
rooted in some individuals than we have often recognized. Such insights should
motivate Christians to engage in ministry to homosexuals with much prayer and
compassion. But, because we believe the power of the resurrection is now at
work among the sons of men, we also must continue to hold out the hope of true
transformation—even transformation at the deepest levels—of sin’s corruption of
a person’s nature.
261
There is no “other Gospel” for ministering to homosexuals than we bear to
those caught up in other sexual, materialistic, or other sins. But we need to recover
a sense of confidence and conviction that the Gospel is also for those caught up in
same-sex sins, and with an openness to the insights which science can offer to us
about the nature of this tendency’s grip on some people’s core sense of identity.
A second major implication of this study, for pastoral use, is to be less focused
on dismissing scientific claims and more ready to hear (with wise discernment)
what modern research into same-sex tendencies can teach us for more effective
ministry.
Finally, a third major implication emerging from the foregoing study relates
particularly to §III, where we addressed some of the current approaches to
defining gender and sexual orientation based on personality traits. As a result of
these trends, it is common in our culture to label certain mannerisms or interests
as “gay” or as “homosexual.” We particularly need to encourage our young people
to avoid succumbing to this manner of speaking. It is rooted in an unbiblical
notion of gender, and people sincerely begin to wonder about their own gender
identity based on traits.
We must be extra sensitive with our words and attitudes toward men with
gentler personalities or women with a “tomboy” streak, lest we contribute toward
a brother or sister stumbling into the unbiblical gender confusion of our day.
In the 1960s and 1970s, American culture went through the so-called “sexual
revolution,” radically reshaping our society’s view of sexual relationships (and of
marriage and the family, as a result). Sex shifted from being viewed as a marriagebond to become regarded as a recreational activity. Today, Western culture’s
conception of sex and sexuality continues to change, and the issues surrounding
homosexuality are among the most important frontiers of that shift at present.
Rather than ignoring or avoiding these matters, as the body of Christ and his light
to a confused and broken world, it is now more important than ever for the church
to engage with these issues with theological carefulness and pastoral care.
We pray that our Lord might be pleased to use these pages as an encouragement
to others in the church to do just that.
February 23, 2010
Committee to Respond to Paper 09–03,
Great Lakes–Gulf Presbytery,
Reformed Presbyterian Church of North
America
James Faris, chairman
Michael LeFebvre
Keith Magill
262
Communication #10-3
The Presbytery of the Alleghenies met this past week and entertained a paper
asking for the development of a network for deacons. The report of the committee
to consider the paper asked it be sent to Synod so it is below as adopted by the
presbytery. Ralph
Committee to Review Communication 2010-4
Fathers and Brothers,
Having reviewed the content of the paper, your committee finds itself
substantially agreeing with the intent of the author, i.e., that a web site,
administered under the auspices of the RPCNA, which would provide an area for
sharing of information and resources among the deacons of the denomination,
would be of benefit to the denomination in general and the various deacons and
boards in particular. In addition to the subject matters proposed by the author, it
was noted that such a site would be a valuable place to share materials to assist the
Diaconate in their responsibilities for teaching principles of giving and in family
budget counseling (DCG III.B.4.f,g)
It was noted in our review of the paper that the author’s recommendation #2
and the body of the paper recommend the eventual transfer of responsibility for
the site to the Deacon Delegates to Synod, a position that is no longer necessarily
filled every year, due to the changes in the finance committee representation. In
light of this, it seems wise to us to make the following recommendations:
1. That the sessions would encourage their deacons to register for and participate
on the web site at http://rpcnadeacon.net/forums/
2. That presbytery forward this communication to Synod with the following
recommendations:
(1) That the members of Synod likewise encourage their deacons to register
and participate on the web site.
(2) That after a period of one year, the governance and maintenance of the web
site would transition to the Finance Committee of Synod.
David Schaefer
Marlin Klingensmith
Micah Ramsey
263
Communication 10-4
This communication comes from the Hazleton Area Session and is being
transferred to Synod by Atlantic Presbytery with its approval.
Atlantic Presbytery Communication #10-A
3.26.10
Book of Discipline 2:4 (E-11) states the following:
“An official copy of the accusation shall be placed in the hands of the
accused, left at his residence, or delivered by certified mail, accompanied
by a summons, signed by the moderator and clerk, to appear and answer
to the accusation. If the first summons is not obeyed, the court shall issue
another, allowing such extension of times as it deems proper, and serving
notice that if the individual does not appear it will proceed in his absence.
Even though the accused declares that he or she will not obey the first
summons, the court shall issue a second summons.”
Recommendation 1:
That the requirement of a second summons be removed, leaving the question of
the appropriateness of a second summons at the discretion of the summoning
court.
Recommendation 2:
That new paragraph 4 read as follows:
by a summons, signed by the moderator and clerk, to appear and answer
to the accusation, and serving notice that if the individual does not appear
it will proceed in his absence unless he provides clear evidence that he
cannot appear on that date but is willing to obey another summons. If the
first summons is not obeyed, the court may issue another, allowing such
extension of times as it deems proper.”
Background: From 2007-2009, the Presbytery of the Alleghenies wrestled
with the issue of ruling elder who seemed to have embraced the current justification
heresy. This man was summoned to appear for trial at the fall ‘08 meeting of the
POA, but failed to do so. He had already made it clear to members of the court
that he would not be attending this or any other trial. By necessity, a second
trial date was established, but this time conducted by a commission. For several
reasons, POA was not in a good position to call for a second full meeting of
Presbytery. Synod ’09 had to deal with the mess that followed.
264
This was the second time in under 5 years that such a series of events
transpired. Another RE had been discovered as a member of the Masonic lodge.
A commission was appointed, requiring the rental of a hotel conference room, and
significant travel expenses for presbytery members to travel to the rural location
—not to mention the valuable time invested by elders of the RPCNA! In this case
as well, the man made it clear that he would not be attending, but following the
constitution, the summons was re-issued a second time.
No doubt, this same situation occurs on a regular basis at the session level as
well. Members refuse to appear for a summons, and make it clear that they have
no intention to appear. But, our constitution requires the futile second summons.
Reasoning: We therefore seek to allow the court of original jurisdiction the
right to decide for itself whether a second summons is appropriate, or whether the
trial should be immediately commenced in absentia. The reasoning is as follows.
1) It creates a heavy burden for the court to bear. Especially at Presbytery
or Synod level, is it really appropriate for the church to bear the cost of travel
expenses—and more importantly the cost of the distraction from the work of
the ministry—for two meetings? Hasn’t Satan done enough damage by stirring
up these controversies in the first place? Shall we further allow him to siphon
valuable time and money from the church? What could be more desirable than
drawing out the process, sapping resources, while the accused is free to continue
his destructive path?
2) It demeans the authority of the church. Who among us, if summoned by the
civil magistrate—but refused to go—would be issued a second summons? No!
We’d be issued a warrant for arrest! Is the eternal destiny of the soul and health
of Christ’s Body of less importance than the physical body and the health of the
State? Why would we dare imply that its ‘no big deal’ to avoid the courts of the
church?
3) By changing the basic procedure from ‘Shall’ to ‘May,’ the local court is
granted the opportunity to determine whether a second summons may be helpful,
or if the accused is so hardened against the court that such actions will only serve
to encourage the lack of respect for Christ’s Church and His Authority.
4) Though the second summons idea is likely designed as a safeguard to the
accused, ensuring every possible opportunity for a defense, Presbyterianism
already has such a safeguard. Presbyterianism, by its very nature, includes a
system of courts of appeal. These are designed with the goal of ensuring justice,
should a lower court err. If a defendant fails to appear for the first summons, and
believes he has been treated wrongly, there is no need for a second summons.
He has the right of appeal. The second summons concept would be very useful
in a congregationalist system with no court of appeal—but we are Presbyterian!
The current arrangement tends to ignore the hierarchy of courts at the center of
Presbyterian government.
265
We therefore recommend the following:
Recommendation 1:
That the requirement of a second summons be removed, leaving the question of
the appropriateness of a second summons at the discretion of the summoning
court.
Recommendation 2:
That new paragraph 4 read as follows:
by a summons, signed by the moderator and clerk, to appear and answer to
the accusation, and serving notice that if the individual does not appear it
will proceed in his absence. If the first summons is not obeyed, the court
may issue another, allowing such extension of times as it deems proper.”
Signed,
Pastor Paul J. Brace, Moderator
Elder Andy Anderson, Clerk
266
Communication # 10-5
The Presbytery of the Alleghenies petitions Synod to waive its conference and
facility fees for retired teaching elders.
Recommendation (as minuted by the Presbytery of the Alleghenies): “That
Presbytery petition Synod to waive its conference and facility fees for retired
teaching elders.”
267
Report Of The Durham Commission
To the Synod Meeting of Great-Lakes – Gulf Presbytery
Beaver Falls, PA, June 22, 2010
This Commission was appointed by Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery, meeting in
Bloomington, Indiana, on March 4-6, 2010, to deal with a number of complaints
and petitions presented by various members of the First RP Church of Durham,
North Carolina.
The Commission met by phone conference on March 15 and 24, and April
5, prior to visiting Durham on April 15-17. Extensive meetings were held with
the parties to the various complaints. The Commission subsequently visited
Durham on May 21, at which time their findings on the complaints and petitions
were delivered to the congregation, and private counsel given to a number of
individuals. The following public statement was read to the congregation on May
21.
*****************************************************
THE DURHAM COMMISSION
PUBLIC STATEMENT, MAY 21, 2010
A number of Complaints and Petitions signed by members of the FRPC Durham
were presented to Great Lakes – Gulf Presbytery, meeting in Bloomington, IN,
on March 4-6, 2010. This Commission was appointed to act for Presbytery in
these matters both pastorally and judicially, with the goal of resolving conflicts
that have divided the church in recent months and years. The various petitions
have been organized in four groups. They are described as follows, together with
the findings of the Commission. We are thankful to all the parties for providing
all the materials we have requested, including Session Minutes, letters, e-mails
and sworn statements. Most of all we are thankful for the full cooperation of the
Session and the nineteen individuals we have interviewed.
__________
DC 1 – COMPLAINT re THE DECISION OF SESSION NOT TO REINSTALL CHARLES SAUNDERS AS AN ELDER (December 23, 2009,
from Jose M. Gonzales).
This calls for an investigation as to whether Mr. Saunders did in fact resign
on September 30, 2008. It also asks for an investigation of the validity of the
indeterminate delay imposed on his re-installation by the Session, following his
re-election as an elder on December 12, 2009. (This was accompanied by a file
of Supporting Documents (DC 1.1). The Session presented its response on March
13, 2010 (DC 1.2).
1. Mr. Saunders’ resignation from the Session.
The genesis of Mr. Saunders’ declared intention to resign was a concern raised
to the Session about unruly child behavior in the church, particularly with respect
268
to the retrieval and consumption of left-over elements from the Lord’s Table
after the service. The Session’s handling of some initially anonymous letters
on the subject from congregants led to Mr. Saunders declaring his intention to
resign in an e-mail of September 29, 2008. The Session did discuss the matter
on September 30, 2008—in an executive session from which Mr. Saunders was
excluded—and announced acceptance of his resignation. Mr. Saunders lodged no
objection, but subsequently asked to be reinstated on November 10, 2008. This
was denied on January 30, 2009, in answer to an inquiry by Mrs. Saunders (not
Mr. Saunders). This too elicited no objection. Mr. Saunders was re-elected as an
elder on December 12, 2009 and did not insist he was already rightfully a Session
member. Only in his “Sworn Statement” of February 10, 2010, does he assert that
he had decided not to submit his resignation on September 30, 2008.
Finding 1. The Commission finds that there was a de facto resignation, to
which, after asking to be reinstated, Mr. Saunders acquiesced and to which
he did not formally object until after his re-election more than a year later.
Comments: The Session’s handling of the case was less than pastoral as
instanced in two matters in particular:
1. Instead of first speaking to the issues raised in the letters and then
reaching out to the writers, the letters were initially rejected as “illegal.” Further
complications involving an alleged breach of confidence clouded relationships,
without the obvious remedy of talking to the people involved. This resulted in
one family withdrawing from the church. The Session’s response was to reduce
the frequency of Communion and publish a policy statement on the use of the
building, when quiet conversations should have sufficed. The practical import of
the action on Communion was to deprive the whole congregation of a means of
grace on account of the failure of a few parents to keep their children in order.
2. The exclusion of Mr. Saunders from the discussion of his intention to resign
by Session going into executive session is arguably an abuse of the practice. Mr.
Saunders had declared an intention to resign, had not presented a formal letter of
resignation and was not under discipline. He was a member of the Session and
had a right to be seated as such, without being ejected by a vote of the majority,
merely because they wished to discuss the matter in his absence. Furthermore,
a resignation can be withdrawn in the same manner as any motion may be
withdrawn. An intention to resign has no standing whatsoever. Pastoral care for a
brother, who by the Session’s own declaration had served well for some five years,
surely demanded a more measured handling of the issues than is represented in
the Session records. [See the ADDENDUM below].
2. Mr. Saunders’ installation as an elder indefinitely postponed.
Mr. Saunders was examined for office on December 12, 2009. The Session
divided the examination of elders into three parts—doctrine, life, and overall
fitness for office. He was passed on doctrine and godliness, but the Session
269
did “not sustain” him in the “overall fitness” exam. They then decided to delay
installation to allow “a period of time with the fruits of repentance being evident.”
No explanation was given for this action and no charges were ever made.
On February 26, 2010, the Session rescinded the previously sustained
“godliness” exam, thereby effectively denying reinstallation altogether. Pastor
Wise registered his dissent and Elder Cornejo abstained. This action of the Session
was not communicated to Mr. Saunders or to the congregation by the time the
Commission visited Durham on April 15. 2010.
Finding 2: The Commission finds that the Session acted unwisely in conducting
the elder examinations in public and in dividing the exam into three parts.
Finding 3: The Commission finds that the Session acted contrary to the law
and order of the church in overturning a previously sustained exam, without
proper charges and a trial, and without communicating with Mr. Saunders
either before or after the decision.
Finding 4: The Commission sustains the Complaint (DC 1) as to Mr. Saunders’
re-installation as an elder, hereby overturns the actions of the Session to delay
and prevent Mr. Saunders’ installation and orders the Session to proceed
with his installation at the earliest opportunity.
Comments: The Session’s handling of the case violated proper practice in
three matters in particular:
1. The practice of examining officers-elect outside of the Session meeting and
before the public is unknown in the Constitution and in the received practice of
the RPCNA, and is, in our view, pastorally unwise. As with the examination of
candidates for the ministry by the elders in the Presbytery, candidates for the
offices of elder and deacon are examined by the elders in Session. The Session is
enjoined to cease forthwith the practice of public examinations of officers-elect
before the congregation.
2. The practice of dividing the examination of officers-elect into three parts
is an unwarranted elaboration of the provisions of DCG 3.1.A (1-3), and 3.1.E
(1.b-d). The latter views a man’s being “unfit for office” in terms of a lack of
“soundness in the faith and commitment to the Testimony....” These in turn are
respectively defined by 3.1.A (2-3). Fitness for office, in other words, is not a
separate examination, but an assessment of a unitary examination in soundness
in the faith as defined by DCG 3.1.A (2), and commitment to Scripture and the
subordinate standards as defined by DCG 3.1.A (3). The Session is enjoined to
follow the law and order of the church in future examinations of officers-elect.
3. The rescinding of an examination, without informing the examinee and
presenting some supporting evidence, and all in a pastoral context, is an injustice
even by the world’s standards. For the Session to go on record with the Commission
that they are “holding back a discipline case against Mr. Saunders” (DC 1.2, V)
270
without informing Mr. Saunders himself only compounds the injustice and does
so in a way prejudicial to the Commission’s consideration of the Complaint in his
case. Such secrecy in dealing with a church member under the Session’s charge
can only contribute to a climate of distrust between leadership and people, and
lend credence to a charge of heavy-handedness on the part of the Session.
__________
DC 2 - COMPLAINT re THE VALIDITY OF A CONGREGATIONAL
MEETING AND ILLEGAL ACTIONS TAKEN
(February 7, 2010, from various members of FRPC)
This calls for a review of the Annual Congregational Meeting of FRPC
Durham held on February 6, 2010. It requests the Presbytery “to rescind all
illegal actions taken by the congregation in this meeting.” It alleges that for
“most” of the meeting there was no Moderator, no “approved” Clerk, and that
the business “deviated from the approved docket thereby preventing the full and
fair consideration of weighty proposals by the entire congregation.” The alleged
“illegal actions” are not specified, but are characterized as a “divisive, unloving and
illegal ambush by part of the congregation.” The complaint calls for Presbytery to
“remedy this public spectacle that has brought reproach to Christ” It is signed by
18 communicant members, including all the members of the Session at the time.
(N.B.: Mr. Erich Baum, then an elder and the chairman of the meeting, having
moved with his work about a year before, has since transferred his membership to
a congregation where he presently resides.)
DCG 2.12-13 codifies the provisions determining the validity of a meeting
of a congregation. It is clear from the Minutes of the February 6, 2010 meeting
itself that there was nothing on the face of things contrary to the law and order of
the church. The Clerk was clearly acting as the Chair pro tem. While this could
be seen as irregular, it does not rise to the level of illegality, particularly in view
of the fact that no objection was raised from any quarter. The agenda was not
violated by either the motion to ask the pastors to leave or by the motion to ask
for the severance of the pastoral relationship between Pastor Cumbee and the
congregation.
Finding 5: The Commission does not sustain Complaint DC 2, as it finds that
neither the February 6, 2010 Annual Meeting nor any of its decisions, are
invalid or illegal.
Comments:
1. The charge that the motions made by Messrs Gonzales et al constituted
an “ambush” of the Session and congregation is arguably not entirely without
substance, even if our present DCG 2.12-13 permits such motions. Absent an
open notice of motion prior to the meeting—so that all the members might come
with due preparation to discuss the proposals—the whole affair has the air of
a coup. It perhaps inevitably gives wings to the charge it was not love for the
271
unity of the Spirit in the bonds of peace that was primarily in view, but rather a
determination to effect a decisive action with maximum surprise in the face of
potential opposition. We would, however, warn against ascribing such motives to
the movers of the February 6, 2010 motions and observe that charges of illegality
or lack of love are not sufficient grounds to brush aside a legitimate concern on
the part of members or dismiss as invalid even a request for the dissolution of a
pastoral relationship. Disagreements are indeed tests of our Christian attitudes
and consciences.
2. The division in the congregation represented by the vote on February 6,
2010 and echoed from the opposing position on February 7, 2010, proves that
the congregation is deeply divided over the necessity and propriety of employing
two pastors. Had the February 6 motion, instead of passing, failed by two votes,
the effective result would be the same. In the first instance this suggests that there
is every reason to engage in a serious and open review of this policy. Questions
about financial policy raised in 2008 and 2009 appear to have been answered with
the expression of hope that tithes and offerings would increase to close the gap
between income and expenditure. The accounts make clear that the congregation
would be hard pressed to sustain one full-time pastor from the regular offerings.
The 2010 Budget foresees spending at double the level of income from tithes
and offerings, thereby drawing $120,000 from invested funds to meet a budget
of $240,000. At this rate, the capital will be drawn down in five years or less.
We note that in a Session discussion of the use of the “Merrill-Lynch fund,” it
was declared that these funds were given for local ministry and expenditures and
that spending beyond budget, including the second pastor, fell within that rubric
(Session Minutes, Vol. III, p. 22, December 31, 2008). The fact is that having two
pastors shows no sign of closing the gap and, to the contrary, is contributing to
significant division in the congregation.
__________
DC 2.1 – PETITION re UPHOLDING THE PROPRIETY AND
LAWFULNESS OF ACTIONS TAKEN AT THE CONGREGATIONAL
MEETING ON FEBRUARY 6, 2010 (February 26, 2010, from Wayne
Womble, Marcus Allred and Jose M. Gonzalez,)
DC 2.1 is a counter-complaint, calling for the Presbytery to uphold “the
propriety and lawfulness” of the actions objected to in Complaint DC 2. It
also asks for various censures to be applied to members of Session and others
connected with the genesis of the Complaint. This includes a 7pp. argument, a
4pp. narrative of events at the meeting in question, signed by 11 members and
4 adherents, an opinion on the fabric of the building by Wayne Womble, copies
of various motions and e-mail exchanges thought relevant to the request for the
severance of the pastoral relationship with Greg Cumbee; and a copy of the FRPC
2010 Budget.
Since a Complaint is “a written statement made to a higher court by one or
more persons aggrieved by an action of a lower court” (BoD, 4.3), and Petition
272
DC 2.1 is not addressing any action of a lower court, it is clearly out of order.
Nevertheless, it is a collection of materials in support of the validity of the
February 6, 2010 Congregational Meeting and its actions, and as such can be
received for information. In any case, the Commission has upheld the lawfulness
of the February 6 meeting and motions in not sustaining Petition DC 2 (Finding
5 above).
Finding 6: The Commission does not sustain DC 2.1, as it is out of order, but
receives it for information.
Comments: The Commission has pastoral concerns about some of the
assertions and charges contained in this “petition.”
1. We agree that Pastor Wise was ill-advised to call the members together
on the Lord’s Day to hear the Complaint (DC 2) and have opportunity to sign
it. This could only have the effect of clothing a private complaint with the aura
of Session approval. The promoters of the Complaint could have asked for a
simple announcement to be made, that it was available for signing at the church.
Adherents also may sign petitions, so such an announcement could have been
made before or after the service.
2. We deny the implication that authorial anonymity of the Petition is sinful in
this case and deplore the repeated use of the language of accusation in the seeking
of the names of the authors. It is neither here nor there who drafted the original
Complaint (DC 2), since appending a signature affirms equal responsibility for its
contents. It is not an anonymous document. The material point is that the signers
own the document and its content.
__________
DC 2.2 – PETITION re THE DISSOLUTION OF THE PASTORAL
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PASTOR GREG CUMBEE AND FRPC
DURHAM (February 26, 2010, from a Committee appointed by the Annual
Congregational Meeting of February 6, 2010)
DC 2.2 calls upon Presbytery “to dissolve the pastoral relationship of Teaching
Elder Greg Cumbee with the FRPC of Durham.” This Committee (W. Womble,
M. Allred and J. Gonzales) was appointed by the February 6, 2010 Congregational
Meeting for the purpose of transmitting the decision to the Session. They
transmitted their request to the Session by letter dated February 8, 2010. The
Session did not grant the request, but agreed to pass it on to the Presbytery without
endorsement (Session Minutes, Vol. III, p. 53, February 10, 2010). An e-mail on
February 18, 2010 from Pastor Ian Wise to Dr. Jose Gonzales states that this was
“being forwarded to Presbytery.” This was not done by February 26, 2010 when,
to remedy that omission, this Petition presented the request to the Presbytery
directly.
The remit of the Congregation’s Committee on February 6, 2010 was to
request the Session to “petition Presbytery to dissolve Pastor Greg Cumbee’s
273
pastoral relationship with the FRPC of Durham.” The Session apparently agreed
to forward this to the Presbytery without comment. There is no record of this
being acted upon, and Presbytery did not receive any communication from the
Session on the subject. There is a reference in a letter to the Committee that
is spread on the Session Minutes of February 26, 2010 which suggests it was
viewed as subsumed under the general request of the Presbytery for a “pastoral
commission” to address the overall situation. In any event, the request to sever
the pastoral relationship between FRPC Durham and Pastor Cumbee is before the
Commission in the form of Petition DC 2.2.
Finding 7: The Commission sustains the plea of Petition DC 2.2 “to dissolve
the pastoral relationship of Teaching Elder Greg Cumbee and the FRPC of
Durham” and appoints May 31, 2010 to be the date of that Dissolution.
Comments:
1. It is clear that around half of the congregation does not desire to employ
a second full-time pastor. The reason advanced for this is an unwillingness to
continue to spend more than $100,000 per annum over regular income to balance
the budget. The current account of the congregation at the end of 2009, as reported
to Presbytery and Synod, records a deficit of $150,719 accumulated over two
years. This has been met from capital funds—funds that, at the present rate, will
be exhausted in about five years. The policy issue is whether it is a good use
of these capital funds to spend them down to support a second full-time staff
member against the hope that with the Lord’s blessing growth in the congregation
will narrow the gap between regular contributions and expenditure.
2. It is the view of the Commission that the small size of the congregation,
together with its disturbed and divided state, does not justify a second pastor.
While it is a grievous thing for any Pastor to be terminated from his ministry, it is
the right of the congregation to order its financial arrangements in a sound way.
Thanksgiving for Pastor Cumbee’s service has been expressed and mention made
of a severance package to ease his transition to other employment. The need of the
congregation is for a happy unity, mature growth, a spirit of grace and submission
to Christ under a sound ministry and a stable leadership. The Commission will
work with the congregational officers to develop a severance package for Pastor
Cumbee, effective from the date of the dissolution of the pastoral relationship.
__________
DC 2.3 – PETITION re ACTIONS CONCERNING DC 2.1 and
DECISIONS AND ACTION OF SESSION MEMBERS IN CONNECTION
WITH DC 2 (March 13, 2010, from FRPC Session)
DC 2.3 is a statement of the FRPC Session Position regarding Petition 2.1,
which petitions the Commission for two actions: 1. To find Petition DC 2.1 out
of order, and, 2. To uphold the decisions and actions of individual FRPC Session
274
members as being in order.
1. The Commission has already found Petition DC 2.1 (J. M. Gonzales et al v.
Petition DC 2 from various congregants) to be out of order, since, as is correctly
pointed out, it is not valid for some members to petition against a complaint filed
by other members (see Finding 6).
2. The Commission finds the action of Pastor Wise in presenting Petition DC
2 to the members of FRPC after the close of the February 7, 2010 worship service
to be out of order. The petitioners could have asked for the Petition to be made
available for members to sign and it would have been quite proper to ask for an
announcement to that effect. When the Moderator asked the members to remain
and presented it in a quasi-official gathering of the communicants, he was at least
lending the appearance of backing the petition with the position of his office in
an unwarranted way. For all the elders to sign it and still make the claim that the
Session did not endorse it is hardly convincing. The elders do indeed have the
right to sign any petition as individuals, but a wiser and more measured course
would have been for the Session simply to refer the matter to Presbytery and
spare the congregation an occasion which could only deepen division in the body.
Besides, there are issues of conflict of interest for the Pastors when they involve
themselves in matters that may pertain to their employment and remuneration.
Finding 8: The Commission does not sustain the plea of Petition DC 2.3 that
the “decisions and actions of individual FRPC Session members” were “in
order.”
__________
DC 3 – PETITION re: RELEASE OF REQUESTED SESSION MINUTES
(February 15, 2010, from Jose M. Gonzales)
DC 3 requests the reversal of a decision of the Durham Session not to release
the Minutes of Session relative to the call of Pastor Cumbee to Lynchburg and
his subsequent translation to Durham after the closing of the Lynchburg work.
The Session had granted copies of other Minutes—pertaining to frequency of
communion, the resignation, examinations and delayed re-installation of Charles
Saunders—while retaining those Minutes “regarding ... private conversations” that
were deemed “sensitive.” Session declined, however, to “release those extracts
concerning the calls and elections of Pastor Cumbee,” adding, “though there is
nothing to hide.” Two reasons were given: that they were not “constitutionally
bound to provide one with any and all minutes that he may request,” and that to
do so would set “an unhealthy precedent.”
The Commission agrees that it is indeed true that the Session is not
“constitutionally bound to provide one with any and all minutes that he may
request.” This proviso must, however, be seen against the background of the
constitutional fact that ‘Ordinarily, meetings and minutes of the session are open
to members of the congregation except when “executive session” is called.’ (DCG
4.5). On the other hand, the Clerk of Session may only “furnish extracts from
275
the minutes when ordered by the court.” (DCG 4.4). There is a tension between
the public and private, the open and the closed, which has to be bridged by good
judgment. Session “meetings and minutes” are open—unless closed! (See 2006
Minutes of Synod, p.142). The Session is bound to close certain meetings and
minutes of a private nature, but it is bound to be ready to open those of a public
nature. Not being bound to provide anything to anybody begs the question as to
whether what is being requested is restricted by an inherent sensitivity owing to
its private content. By this standard, there was no reason to restrict release of the
record of Pastor Cumbee’s calls and elections. There is indeed “nothing to hide.”
The Commission also fails to see any “unhealthy precedent” in being open with
records of public matters such as “calls and elections.” What was “unhealthy” in
this case was a restriction where no restriction was necessary.
Finding 9: The Commission sustains the plea of Petition DC 3 and instructs
the Session to release the specific Minutes cited in the Petition.
__________
DC 4 – PETITION re ORDINATION AND INSTALLATION OF ROGER
CORNEJO (Feb. 28, 2010, from Wayne Womble, Jose M. Gonzales, Marcus
Allred, Frances Allred, Kim Womble and Carolyn Saunders).
DC 4 calls for a review and the rescinding of the Session’s action in ordaining
and installing Roger Cornejo as a ruling elder on February 6, 2010. The grounds
cited are that Mr. Cornejo failed accurately to recount the books of the Bible and
failed to provide any biblical citations for each of the five points of Calvinism.
The Petition argues that “these two instances alone ... should have sufficed to
disqualify him.”
The Commission is not charged with re-examining Mr. Cornejo, but with
reviewing the validity of the Session’s procedure in the matter. We have already
mentioned that the examination of officers-elect before the congregation in a
public meeting is unwarranted in the RP Constitution, as is its sub-division into
three parts (see above, DC 1: 2, comments 1 and 2).
To the precise pleas of the Petition, we must say that however unsatisfactory
the two answers cited might be to the petitioners and others, including the elders
and perhaps not excluding the examinee himself, the fact remains that “soundness
in the faith” and commitment to Scripture and the standards of the church are the
focus of the examination, and not simple recall of certain answers to prescribed
questions. That is to say, is the examinee committed whole-heartedly to the 66
books of canonical Scripture, whether or not he can recite them without lapse of
memory? Is he convinced whole-heartedly of the doctrines of grace, whether or
not he can produce Scripture proofs on the spot at that precise moment? Does he
reject or accept canonical Scripture? Does he deny or affirm the historic Reformed
Faith? To make the answers to these two specific questions “alone” suffice to
disqualify a man, reduces what is an examination of a man’s whole faith and
life to an exercise in the rote memorization of certain supposedly salient facts.
276
Even one as eminent as the late Professor John Murray often declined to answer
specific questions in a “Q&A” context, because he believed reverence for the
Word required consideration before answering and that answering on the spot
without such consideration could not do justice to the inspired Scripture. The
Session has the responsibility for evaluating the examinee’s overall grasp of truth.
The Commission could have wished for crisper and more impressive answers to
the two questions cited in the Petition, but is obliged to say that they cannot be
regarded as “make or break” issues in the matter of the Session’s final disposition
of Mr. Cornejo’s soundness in the faith.
Finding 10: The Commission does not sustain the plea of Petition DC 4 to
overturn the ordination of Mr. Cornejo.
_________
DC 4.1 – PETITION re ORDINATION AND INSTALLATION OF ROGER
CORNEJO (no date [but probably February 28, 2010], Jose M. Gonzales).
Petition DC 4.1 calls for Mr. Cornejo’s ordination and installation to be
rescinded on the ground of alleged “serious doubts about [his] character
qualifications.” These alleged doubts principally arise from the time of his
involvement in an attempt to plant a church in his home in Reidsville, NC, in
connection with the Westminster Presbyterian Church in the US. The Reidsville
work started in December 2006 soon became mired in controversy and closed
after 14 months in March 2008. Mr. Cornejo subsequently attended the FRPC
Durham, where he became a communicant member on December 21, 2008. It
appears that sometime before December 12, 2009 (the examination of the elderselect) concerns about Mr. Cornejo’s role in the Reidsville situation were brought
to the Session by a member who was aware of that church-plant. This was
apparently in response to a sermon by Pastor Cumbee about the need to know
a potential elder’s reputation in his life outside the church. The Session did not
follow up for almost two months—until prompted by the Petitioner on February
2, 2010 (a few days before the ordination). He had been approached by the same
concerned person, in the absence of any response from the Session. There was a
flurry of e-mail contacts over February 3-5, 2010 and, in the absence of any past
ecclesiastical action against Mr. Cornejo or any witnesses willing to make formal
charges, the Session saw no impediment to his ordination, which duly proceeded
on February 6, 2010.
1. Having reviewed the testimony given in the case, the Commission does
not find compelling evidence of character defects in Mr. Cornejo that would
disqualify him from serving as an elder. The Reidsville work was certainly
fraught with difficulties. Disagreements between various parties were apparently
not well handled. The rigors of hosting weekly services in a private home are
always very testing. The work failed. There is simply no proof that the blame for
this is to be placed at Mr. Cornejo’s feet, or indeed, at the feet of any particular
individual. There are many opinions, assessments, and viewpoints. But these do
277
not constitute a solid ground for overturning an ordination, nor do they justify the
charge that Mr. Cornejo is not “above reproach” (1 Timothy 3:2).
2. Prompt action by the Session to follow up on the initial concern expressed
to them would have gone a long way to avoid the undignified scramble for
information at the last moment. Scripture enjoins us not to “lay hands on anyone
hastily.” (1 Timothy 5:22). The surest way to avoid violating this principle is to
attend urgently to all necessary preparation, including the addressing of legitimate
concerns relevant to the ordinand. It should be noted that the fact that Mr. Cornejo
was nominated for elder within nine months of joining FRPC is not ipso facto
a violation of 1 Timothy 5:22. It is however wise to proceed with the kind of
deliberative caution that obviates any charge of undue haste from any quarter. Mr.
Cornejo was duly elected by the majority required by DCG 3.I (D.4.k).
3. The Commission enjoins the various petitioners and all of God’s people in
FRPC Durham, to refrain from characterizations of others that are tendentious,
prejudicial and not conducive to building the unity of the congregation and
rebuilding personal relationships. We could cite language, employed on every
side that cannot conceivably secure warmer and deeper unity and fellowship.
Correctness on an issue is worthless if it is asserted in the language of disrespect
and contempt. Indeed, such correctness can be most injurious. Let there be real
brotherly love among you all (Hebrews 13:1).
Finding 11: The Commission does not sustain the plea of Petition DC 4.1 to
overturn the ordination of Mr. Cornejo.
__________
CONCLUSIONS
In addition to the findings set out in this public statement, you should know
that private counsel has been offered to the Session and to various parties, where it
has been deemed appropriate. The divisions in the congregation will require grace
in hearts and graciousness in conduct, for them to be healed. The Commission
believes that the central need is for a new emphasis upon the shepherding of the
flock. In our view this has been overshadowed in the recent past by an emphasis
on discipline and legal correctness, which has inevitably sunk into a climate of
contention and distrust, and even fear. This is clearly reflected in the Session
records and the strained relationships among members of the congregation. It
must change radically if the congregation is not to drown in controversy.
The events which have led to the appointment of this Commission have been
painful indeed in the life of the congregation, and not least in the lives of those
most intimately involved in them. The Commission is well aware of the likelihood
that its judgments on the various complaints and petitions will not be pleasing to
all. The implications are far-reaching for some, perhaps most especially a pastor
who must now seek another sphere of employment and service in the work of
God’s kingdom. It is our earnest hope and prayer that the congregation will draw
278
together in love and unity in the truth as it is Jesus (Ephesians 4:21). There is
much reason for us all to be humbled before the Lord. There is also every reason
to expect blessing, if from the heart you do come together and go forward in
evangelical humility. Let us, by the mercies of Jesus Christ, heed the pleadings
of his Word:
“Therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, put on tender mercies,
kindness, humility, meekness, longsuffering; 13 bearing with one another,
and forgiving one another, if anyone has a complaint against another; even
as Christ forgave you, so you also must do. 14 But above all these things put
on love, which is the bond of perfection. 15 And let the peace of God rule
in your hearts, to which also you were called in one body; and be thankful.
16
Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom, teaching and
admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing
with grace in your hearts to the Lord. 17 And whatever you do in word or
deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father
through Him.” (Colossians 3:12-17).
Gordon J. Keddie (Moderator)
Robert W. Bibby
Andrew McCracken
Jonathan Schaefer
****************************************************************
ADDENDUM TO THE PUBLIC STATEMENT: After the preparation of this
Statement, it came to light in connection with DC 1, Finding 1, Comment 2 above,
that Mr. Saunders had volunteered to withdraw from the Session meeting to allow
the other elders to discuss the matter of his resignation in private. He was not
excluded by an action of the Session to go into executive session. The Session’s
record of the meeting only states that the Session went into executive session.
This implies that the Session excluded Mr. Saunders, which was not in fact the
case. We regard their going into executive session, however, as unnecessary. If
anything, Mr. Saunders should have been prevailed upon to remain so that there
could be no subsequent question as to what was discussed in his absence. There
was no reason for Mr. Saunders to exclude himself or be effectively excluded
from the subsequent discussion. Openness among the elders was never more
needed than at this point in the proceedings.
****************************************************************
279
In the course of subsequent interaction between the Session and the
Commission with respect to a severance package for Pastor Cumbee, it came to
light that a motion to adopt the original recommendations of a congregational
committee was made in the Session on June 3 by Elder Cornejo, in spite of the fact
that the Commission had made it known that they would have some comments
and counsel to offer on its provisions within a few days. The motion failed when
the Moderator insisted that no action be taken until hearing from the Commission.
On the following day, June 4, it appeared that a date had been agreed for the
installation of Charles Saunders, but this too ended in an impasse when Elder
Cornejo announced that he could not in good conscience be party to this installation
and gave notice of an Appeal to Presbytery and Synod against the findings of the
Commission concerning Mr. Saunders (Findings 2-4 above). This was a second
impasse between Moderator Wise and Elder Cornejo in two days. In view of the
need for a functioning leadership and the agitated state of the congregation, the
Commission met on June 5, 2010, and appointed two provisional elders (David
Carr and Jon Hughes) and directed that this be announced to the congregation
after worship on June 6. An Appeal against Findings 2-4 of the Commission’s
actions on Petition DC 1 was lodged with the Presbytery and Synod by Elder
Roger Cornejo on June 5, 2010. The Commission stands by its findings and awaits
the final disposition of the Appeal in the courts of the church.
The Commission wishes to express its gratitude for the full cooperation and
generous hospitality afforded by the Session and all the parties in the Durham
congregation as it has sought to discharge the work to which it has been assigned
by Presbytery.
Recommendations:
1. That the appointment of David Carr and Jon Hughes as provisional elders be
continued until the Spring 2011 meeting of Presbytery.
2. That funds be provided to permit the provisional elders to travel to Durham for
up to two visits before the Spring Meeting of Presbytery.
3. That the Commission be continued until the Spring 2011 meeting of Presbytery.
4. That the Presbytery receive the Report of the Commission.
Respectfully submitted
Gordon J. Keddie (Moderator)
Robert W. Bibby
Andrew McCracken
Jonathan Schaefer
280
COMPLAINT To The Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery
Regarding the Durham Commission and Their Actions With
Respect to FRPC of Durham
The purpose of this complaint is to plead that the GLG Presbytery redresses
grievances resulting from the actions of the Durham Commission that was formed
to address concerns from members of the congregation of the First Reformed
Presbyterian Church of Durham, North Carolina.
The essence of the complaint is that the Durham Commission acted unjustly,
unconstitutionally, unbiblically and with unjustifiable haste in many instances
which will be expounded below.
Background and History:
Several matters were before the commission and they are outlined briefly here:
DC1: Complaint re: The Decision of Session Not to Install Charles Saunders
as an Elder
DC2: Complaint re: The Validity of a Congregational Meeting and Illegal
Actions Taken
DC3: Petition re: Release of Requested Session Minutes
DC4: Petition re: Ordination and Installation of Roger Cornejo
Relevant History:
DC1: Mr. Charles Saunders was nominated and the congregation submitted a
favorable vote for his nomination as an elder candidate. The session had a twopart exam and a three part vote in which they concluded him unfit for office. That
decision has been the source of the complaint.
DC2: In a yearly congregational meeting, a member brought to the floor a
motion to form a committee to remove a pastor from office. A slim majority (53%)
of people voted “yes” and the committee was formed of three men whose names
had already confirmed their willingness to serve on this committee. The committee
submitted their request two days later to Session to request that Presbytery dissolve
the relationship between FRPC Durham and Greg Cumbee. The conduct of the
individuals who made and carried the motion during the meeting is the matter of
complaint, as well as their failure to follow proper church government and proper
Biblical order.
DC 3: A complaint that a portion of a request for minutes was not granted by
the Session.
DC4: A request for the rescinding of Mr. Cornejo’s ordination based on gossip
and unsupported statements.
Complaint #1: Improper Procedure on the part of the commission: not
notifying congregants of the lawful appeal process.
There was a meeting of the Durham Commission called for May 21, 2010, at
which the findings of the Durham Commission were read. In opening statements
to the congregation made by the Commission Moderator (given prior to reading
281
the findings), Gordon Keddie stated that although individuals could ask questions
of the Commission, the decisions of the Commission were final. This was
repeated several times during this introduction. At no time, before, during or
after the reading of the findings, was the congregation informed that they had
any avenue of redress or opportunity for appeal. As a result of this, many people
left the meeting weeping out of despair. The Commission’s failure to inform the
congregation of their right of appeal is a gross injustice and is, in my mind, a valid
reason for dissolving the Durham Commission.
Complaint #2: Bias on the part of the Commission [especially relating to DC2, but also regarding comments in DC1 on child behavior].
During the discovery period of their investigation, the Commission indicated
that individuals wishing to meet with the Commission should make a request.
The commission selected those individuals with whom they would meet. An
examination of the witness list will quickly show that just one person from
the group that complained against the validity of the congregation meeting,
excepting the session members themselves, was interviewed and this was because
the Commission was urged to do so by a Session member. The commission
interviewed 19 people. At least one member in good standing who requested an
interview was denied her request to meet with the Commission. Other members of
the congregation were shocked and dismayed that the Commission did not seek to
interview them (or their requests to talk with the Commission were not granted).
Not only did the Commission NOT seek out people from the aggrieved party,
but they would not grant at least one request that was made. The commission
was selective in hearing only half of the story regarding this meeting, effectively
refusing to hear relevant testimony from an aggrieved set of individuals. The fact
that a member in ‘good standing was denied an audience, while at the same time
former adherents were given an audience provides ample evidence of a bias on the
part of the Commission and is reason to request that their decision in this matter
be overturned. Based on this bias, I respectfully request that the Commission’s
DC2 finding 5 (regarding the validity of the congregation meeting) be overturned.
I further request that this bias disqualify the Durham Commission from further
action with respect to FRPC.
Complaint #3: Defamatory comments made by the Commission regarding
the Session promulgate disrespect for teaching and ruling elders and their
office and fosters an attitude of contempt for Session.
In numerous findings or comments the FRPC Session was publicly chastised
for “errors of judgment’, but no specific sins are mentioned and no opportunity for
repentance or reconciliation suggested. This criticism only served to weaken the
Session of FRPC in the eyes of the congregation. It is almost as if the Commission
came to their conclusions with a basic presupposition that the Session had the
intent of being heavy handed with the congregation.
Below are several instances of critical comments made regarding the Session:
282
DC 1: Finding 1, Comment}: “The Session’s handling of the case was less
than pastoral ...”
This is an opinion that was made from a distance and does nothing to
substantiate the finding, but only serves to cast a bad light on the Session.
DC1: Finding 1. Comment 2: “Pastoral care for a brother, who by the
Session’s own declaration had served well for some five years, surely demanded a
more measured handling of the issues than is represented in the Session records.”
The measured handling of the issue by the Session is demonstrated by the
personal testimony of the Session members. A few words from the minute books
are insufficient to convey the depth of attention paid to this matter by the local
Session.
DC 1: Point 2: “They [the Session] then decided to delay installation ... “
The Commission here borrows rhetoric from the petition of Mr. Gonzalez. The
Session cannot legally install an elder-elect who has not been sustained. This was
the case in this instance.
DC 1: Finding 4, Comment 3: “Such secrecy in dealing with a church member
under the Session’s charge can only contribute to a climate of distrust between
leadership and people, and lend credence to a charge of heavy-handedness
on the part of the Session”. The Durham Commission here twists a desire for
confidentiality into “secrecy”. They also, again, borrow language from the
petitions of Mr. Gonzalez. It would be wrong for the session to make accusations
prior to a discovery of all the facts in this matter. Any “distrust” between leadership
and people is only amplified here by the unsubstantiated claims of the Durham
Commission.
DC 2.1: Finding 6, Comment 1: I respectfully disagree that Ian Wise was illadvised to call the members together, since the signers of the petition felt that it
was prudent to make everything public so that they would not be playing the same
games of secrecy, clique-behavior and “surprise attack” that characterized the
offending party (Gonzalez, Womble, Allred, et. al.). Again, this finding/comment
does nothing to substantiate the law and order of the church. The Commission did
not rule that Ian Wise or any other Session members had anything to repent of
here, thus it only serves to casts a negative light on the Pastor and Session in
front of the congregation.
Complaint #4: The Commission’s assertion that children and their parents
were the cause of “depriving the whole congregation of a means of grace,” is
false. This statement caused much injury to the parents of young children
and the children themselves.
The Durham Commission heard testimony from certain individuals who are
notorious for reprimanding young children in the church. These individuals single
out children when their parents are not nearby, and proceed to verbally chastise
and reprimand the child. This is done without bringing the issue to the attention
of the parent(s). For example; a young girl was singled out and told that she was
singing too loudly. This traumatized the child enough to make her stop singing
283
Psalms altogether during worship for weeks until she confided in her parent that
this adult had made these comments to her. There are many other examples of this
kind of behavior among certain adults.
I assert that the testimony of these witnesses, in the absence of any counterbalancing testimony, led the Durham Commission to accept their perspective
and draw biased conclusions. For example, the Durham Commission concluded
that the children were the cause of changing the regularity of the Lord’s Supper.
However, the Session had already taken up the matter of the frequency of the
Lord’s Supper (as documented in the Session Minutes) and was in process of
making changes to Communion frequency before any allegations about child
behavior were leveled.
When the Commission stated that, “The practical import of the action on
Communion was to deprive the whole congregation of a means of grace on
account of the failure of a few parents to keep their children in order,” they laid
blame at the feet of parents and children for the change in Communion frequency,
a change over which the parents had no control. The Commission here made
an erroneous connection between child behavior and Communion frequency.
They also made a public and uninformed assessment of the children as being
unruly, and condemned parents for their parenting “failure” based on prejudiced
information that was not balanced by any counter testimony. One crying child
asked, after the meeting in which the Durham Commission issued their findings,
“What did we do wrong?”
The errors in judgment made by the Commission in this finding/comment
amount to a bias in the witness list, an illogical connection between child behavior
and Communion frequency that is erroneous, and an inflammatory, hurtful
allegation against “a few parents” without any specific charges or examples.
Parents of young children were left wondering if they were the object of those
comments. Instead of fostering a welcoming and child-friendly atmosphere, the
statements of the Commission have caused parents with young children to be
overly anxious while at church, and fearful of others finding fault with them and
their children. I assert that such serious errors are additional valid reasons to
request that the GLG Presbytery disband the Durham Commission and seek some
sort of remedy to the congregation.
Complaint #5: The commission addresses the wrong question in regards to
DC-l.
DC-1 incorrectly lists the Complaint as re: The Decision of Session Not to
Re-Install Charles Saunders. The Session found Mr. Saunders unfit for the office
of elder, and according to the RPCNA Directory of Church Government, is under
obligation not to install him. The original complaint by Mr. Gonzalez is based on
the false supposition that Charles Saunders should be installed. The Commission
should have concluded that the complaint was without proper basis. It is the
responsibility of the Session to determine fitness for office, not congregation
members.
284
Complaint #6: Proper church government was not followed in dissolving the
relationship between Pastor Cumbee and the congregation. Additionally,
Biblical principles were ignored.
The petition filed the day after the Congregational Meeting indicated that
members were grieved by the fact that motions and activities concerning the
severing of Greg Cumbee’s pastoral relationship with FRPC were done secretively
and hastily, making them feel as if they had been ambushed. The Commission
acknowledges that this charge, “is arguably not entirely without substance”, yet
they ruled that the meeting was lawful.
In addition to the overwhelming bias in the testimony heard by the Commission
regarding this complaint, as noted in Complaint #2 herein, the Commission
ignored several important facts. It is obvious that there was much pre-conspiring
that occurred to ensure that the motion to form a committee to recommend the
dissolution of the pastoral relationship would pass by a majority. The following
facts are objective in proving this assertion;
1. Half the congregation knew nothing of the desire of Gonzalez, Womble,
Allred, et. al., to dissolve the pastoral relationship prior to the congregational
meeting.
2. Mr. Gonzalez came to the meeting with the RPCNA blue book in-hand and
a pre-printed paper outlining his motion. He proceeded to hand out printed copies
of his motion immediately after verbally making the motion. He also had preprinted ballots ready to hand out for the vote.
3. Prior to the meeting, Mr. Gonzalez requested the names of all FRPC
members, and on the day of the meeting, members who had not been in worship
for several months appeared. Some showed up just for the congregation meeting
and not the preceding officer installation.
4. The men on the Committee formed by this vote (Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Womble,
and Mr. Allred) had been pre-selected and agreed to serve on the Committee prior
to the congregational meeting. The men chosen to sit on the Committee formed
by this congregational vote were all inclined in favor of the dissolution, which is
quite apparent by the fact that they were pre-selected.
5. The Committee (Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Womble, and Mr. Allred) submitted
their request to dissolve Greg Cumbee’s pastoral relationship just two days after
the congregational meeting. They did not consider any alternatives and never
spoke to any of the people who signed the petition against the validity of the
congregational meeting.
6. There was no opportunity for members to engage in prayer before making
the decision to dissolve Greg Cumbee’s pastoral relationship with FRPC
Durham. Calling a pastor is a decision that requires much prayer. The situation of
dismissing one requires at least as much. Kicking out a minister without prayerful
consideration is so entirely un-Christian, it is almost impossible to put into words.
The Commission concludes that the 53% acted legally, by the Blue Book, but
they ignore the fact that they have broken the Biblical principle of “Do unto others
285
as you would have them do unto you.”
The Commission’s finding that this was a lawful meeting is not surprising given
the bias in their witness list. Their finding ignores the obviously un-charitable
behavior of the offending party, whose behavior is a clear violation of Scripture
which admonishes us to act lovingly towards one another, and to act in a way
that will bring unity to the body of Christ. Additionally, the Directory of Church
Government instructs that matters of great import should be allowed an adequate
amount of time for consideration. The aggravating party used the element of
surprise to overwhelm the aggrieved party and bring about a change that they
wished to implement at all costs. Most, if not all, of the aggrieved party would
have been willing to discuss the financial implications of having two teaching
elders, but they were never given a proper opportunity to do so. They were not
prepared to address this question during a regular Congregational meeting and
according to the Directory of Church Government they should lawfully have been
given time to consider the matter.
The Commission did not consider the whole of the Directory of Church
Government in making their decision and they ignored basic Biblical principles
of behavior that should be paramount in considering the lawfulness of the
Congregational meeting in question. For these reasons, the finding 5 of DC-2
should be overruled.
Complaint #7: The Durham Commission acted with unjustifiable haste in
dissolving the relationship between Greg Cumbee and the congregation.
On May 21, 2010, the Durham Commission ordered the dissolution to be
effective May 31, 2010, which was only 5 business days from that time. Even
the motion from J.Gonzalez et.al. suggested ending the relationship by the end of
2010. This accelerated cessation of pastoral relationship created undue hardship
for the Cumbee Family and for many members of the congregation. The hasty
dissolution only furthered the divisions already present in the congregation since
the February 2010 congregational meeting.
Complaint #8: DC2 finding 6: The Commission brushes aside a legitimate
complaint against schismatic behavior and minimizes it by ascribing
legitimacy to the object sought.
In their comments the Commission states, “We would, however, warn against
ascribing such motives to the movers of the February 6, 2010 motions and
observe that charges of illegality or lack of love are not sufficient grounds to
brush aside a legitimate concern on the part of members or dismiss as invalid
even a request for the dissolution of a pastoral relationship. Disagreements are
indeed tests of our Christian attitudes and consciences.” If discussion of the
pastoral relationship and financial ramifications thereof is a legitimate concern,
and I agree that it is, then it should be discussed in an appropriate forum with
time given for reflection. Decisions regarding the relationship between a pastor
and the congregation should be done in a Christian manner and with deliberate
286
prayerfulness, not haste. Members of the aggrieved party expressed a willingness
to discuss fiscal concerns, but felt that a decision of this import could not and
should not be made in such a short time. The time between the making of the
motion to dissolve the pastoral relationship with FRPC and the vote was less than
20 minutes. To put this in perspective, the congregation spent around 25 minutes
discussing whether to have a corded or cordless phone in the church, and whether
to purchase a defibrillator. More time was spent discussing these relatively trivial
matters than discussing whether to sever a pastoral relationship.
The aggressive party has clearly violated Biblical principles of love towards
the brethren for the purpose of attaining certain goals and their actions have been
an egregious offense to a much beloved pastor and his family.
The Commission’s finding 6 does nothing to address the aggrieved party’s
complaint or the alienation that resulted from the actions of the aggressive party.
The grief felt by many members by the rapidity with which the congregational
committee was formed and then submitted their findings to the session without
consulting anyone with a dissenting opinion was injurious to the congregation.
CONCLUSIONS:
The Durham Commission has acted unjustly, unconstitutionally, unbiblically
and with unjustifiable haste in many instances with respect to the congregation
of FRPC. This complaint holds that the Durham Commission’s findings with
respect to DCI and DC2 are most particularly egregious. Following the public
statement from the Durham Commission to the FRPC congregation on May 21,
2010, there remains a host of congregants who share the grievances outlined in
this complaint. There has been no healing. A retaliatory attack against an officer
and his family by two of the original complainants of DC-2 and DC-4 has already
taken place. Many in the congregation are wounded and still in tears. Many are
frustrated. Several families have discussed leaving the fellowship.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1) The Commission’s findings which are particularly egregious (in DC-l and
DC-2) should be overturned: Findings 2, 3, 4, 5, 8.
2) The Commission’s hurtful and injurious statements regarding the Session
being heavy handed should be retracted and a statement to the congregation
issued to support the lawful governing of the church by the Session.
3) The Commission’s hurtful and injurious statements regarding the children
and their parents should be retracted and a statement issued to the congregation
explaining that this was a wrong response to the situation.
4) The GLG Presbytery should provide a substantial letter of good standing to
Greg Cumbee which goes to extreme measures to attempt to restore and maintain
the good name of such a fine man and pastor which was, to an extent, injured by
the actions, findings, and comments of the Durham Commission.
5) Given the number and severity of the injustices, the Durham Commission
should be dissolved and disallowed from taking any further action with respect to
287
FRPC. Additionally, since the FRPC session has been augmented by 2 provisional
elders, there is little need for the Durham Commission to continue.
PERSONAL STATEMENT TO THE GLG PRESBYTERY:
Before the Durham Commission started its work, I purposed in my heart to
submit in the Lord to the Commission’s rulings. I hoped and prayed that I would
be able to do so. While I have here taken issue with several of the commission’s
findings, I would like to say that I found no biblical or constitutional issue with
findings 1, 9, 10, or 11. Additionally, my complaint has nothing to do with the men
of the court. I find them to be fine Christian gentlemen and I value them greatly.
I love these men as Christian brothers. I esteem them as individuals; I value their
offices and roles on the Durham Commission.
(signed) Roger D. Cornejo 288
APPEAL
Regarding Charles Saunders Installation - Durham Commission,
DC 1, Findings 2,3,4
Reference: “THE DURHAM COMMISSION PUBLIC STATEMENT, MAY 21,
2010”
This appeal is to respectfully request that:
DC 1, Finding 2: “The Commission finds that the Session acted unwisely in
conducting the elder examinations in public and in dividing the exam into three
parts”,
DC 1, Finding 3: “The Commission finds that the Session acted contrary to the
law and order of the church in overturning a previously sustained exam, without
proper charges and a trial, and without communicating with Mr. Saunders either
before or after the decision”,
and DC 1, Finding 4: “The Commission sustains the Complaint (DC 1) as
to Mr. Saunders’ re-installation as an elder, hereby overturns the actions of the
Session to delay and prevent Mr. Saunders’ installation and orders the Session to
proceed with his installation at the earliest opportunity”,
be overturned by the higher court. I make this appeal for the following reasons:
Regarding Finding 2:
The elder exam was properly and constitutionally structured in two parts
(doctrine and character/godliness). The vote (not the exam) to sustain/not sustain
the elder was structured in three-parts. The first vote matched the Doctrine exam,
the second vote matched the Character/Godliness exam, and the third vote was
to ascertain the Overall Fitness of the elder-elect. As you will probably know,
this vote structure is not uncommon in the RPCNA. This vote structure was
introduced by the Moderator, Ian Wise, on the day of the exam and explained
to the other elders (Erich Baum and Greg Cumbee) just prior to the exam with
instructions to the effect of: “Do not use knowledge of past behavior to decide on
doctrine or character, but only use the answers given to the questions posed during
the exam. If anyone should decide that the elder-elect should not be sustained,
then he should voice his “no” on the third vote of “overall fitness.” All three
elders voted “no” (i.e. not to sustain Charles Saunders) on the third vote regarding
overall fitness. Again, there was no separate overall fitness exam given to the
elder-elect; this vote was a procedural means to provide a ruling as required by the
constitution to determine if the elder-elect is qualified for the office of ruling elder.
The Commission’s ruling that the session acted unwisely in dividing the exam
into three parts is grossly incorrect, as the exam was two parts as set forth in
the DCG. Perhaps the overall vote to sustain (or not) gave the commission the
impression that the session had acted unwisely by having three exams, but this
was not the case; there were two exams and 3 votes. When the Commission ruled
that this third vote was not valid, the effect of the Durham Commission’s finding
289
was to override the sound judgment of the local session regarding the fitness of
elder-elect, Charles Saunders, and change the negative vote to a positive vote.
In the examination/voting of Roger Cornejo, all three parts of the exam were
voted in the affirmative, and therefore, the effect of the Commission’s finding
did not overturn this vote. However, in the vote on Charles Saunders, the Session
unanimously ruled to not sustain the elder-elect Charles Saunders and the
commission’s ruling drastically alters the results. Furthermore, the commission’s
assertion that the session acted unwisely in administering the exam/vote in this
way, ignores the fact that this methodology is used elsewhere in RPCNA church
government, most notably for exams within the Great Lakes-Gulf Presbytery,
without being contested.
Therefore, since the elder exams and young on those exams were conducted
according to the DCG and the received practice of the RPCNA, I respectfully
request that the court hearing this appeal reverse Durham Commission Finding 2:
“The Commission finds that the Session acted unwisely in conducting the elder
examinations in public and in dividing the exam into three parts”.
In session on Feb 26, 2010, Elder Baum and Elder Cumbee formally rescinded
their “yes” vote regarding Charles’ character/godliness, and entered a “no” vote
instead, not because of new sin on the part of Charles, but because they perceived
that this was the appropriate place in which to express their judgment regarding
Charles Saunders’ character and fitness for office. The purpose of this was to
make clear that they did not find Mr. Saunders fit for office. Regardless of the
technicalities, the elder-elect Charles Saunders was not sustained and should not
be installed as ruling elder.
Since Mr. Saunders was determined to be unfit for office and no trial or
charges are required for a Session to make such a judgment in this matter, I
respectfully request that the court hearing this appeal reverse Finding 3 of the
Durham Commission: “The Commission finds that the Session acted contrary
to the law and other of the church in overturning a previously sustained exam,
without proper charges and a trial, and without communicating with Mr. Saunders
either before or after the decision”.
DCG Chapter 3.I.E.1.d says, “If the session shall judge any elder-elect unfit
for the office, it shall not proceed with his ordination and/or installation.” The
local session determined that Charles Saunders was not fit for the office of Elder.
This was the unanimous opinion of the local session of FRPC Durham seated at
the time of the examination. Elder testimony can be obtained to verify that it was
their intent to register a vote which communicated Mr. Saunders’ lack of fitness to
serve as an elder. By overturning the local session’s decision, the Commission, in
effect, tacitly ruled Mr. Saunders ‘fit’ without having an examination of their own
and without considering the opinion of the local session. Further, the Commission
290
ordered the local session to install Charles Saunders, putting Session members in
a position of having to either obey the Commission or obey their conscience and
the Constitution of the RPCNA.
This finding of the commission fails to acknowledge the fact that the negative
votes of all three elders were given for sound Biblical reasons. It also disregards
the fact that the elders who voted “No” have a significant personal history with Mr.
Saunders that gives them valid reasons to vote “No” overall. The Commission’s
decision to overturn the “no” votes is unwarranted, and against the constitution of
the RPCNA since they themselves did not examine the elder-elect, and they are
not constitutionally authorized to do so. Additionally, the finding renders impotent
the rulings, actions and decisions of the local Session relating to their duty to
examine and install the elder-elect. With this finding, the Durham Commission has
bypassed the local session’s authority to examine, determine fitness for office, and
install elders of a local congregation. The net effect of this finding is to “appoint”
an elder without due process being followed. Appointing an elder under these
circumstances is a violation of the RPCNA Directory of Church Government
which outlines the lawful circumstances in which a Presbytery may appoint an
elder [DCG 2.1, DCG 3.I.7]. The practice of Presbytery appointing elders is
limited to those situations in which a disorganized congregation needs assessor
elders and should not be used for the current situation at FRPC in Durham [DCG
2.1]. The decision of the Durham Commission sets a dangerous precedent of an
RPCNA Presbytery changing the outcome of a local session elder examination
and installation.
Furthermore, the RPCNA Directory of Church Government, Chapter 3.I.E.1.f
says, “Public ordination and/or installation to the session will be required of all
elders-elect who have declared their desire to serve and have been examined, and
approved by the session.” As noted elsewhere, the session at the time, did not
sustain Mr. Saunders in the elder exam. Of the three Session members who were
seated at the time of the examination of Mr. Charles Saunders, there now remains
only one. This was a two-thirds change in the make-up of the session. FRPC of
Durham currently has two Session members. The new Session member, Roger
Cornejo, has not had an opportunity to examine Mr. Saunders as required by DCG
3.I.E.1.f.
Therefore, since Mr. Saunders was determined unfit for office by the previous
session and no other ruling body has determined him fit for office, I respectfully
request that the court hearing this appeal reverse Finding 4 of the Durham
Commission where the FRPC Session is ordered to “proceed with his installation
at the earliest opportunity”.
(signed) Roger D. Cornejo, Clerk/Ruling
Elder, FRPC Durham, NC
Date 6/5/10
June 18, 2010
291
TRUSTEES OF THE SYNOD OF THE REFORMED
PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA
CONTENTS.....................................................................................................Page
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT......................................................... 291
Statements of Financial Position................................................................... 293
Statements of Activities................................................................................. 294
Statements of Cash Flow............................................................................... 296
Notes to Financial Statements....................................................................... 297
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
Trustees of the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America,
Trustees of the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America
(the “Trustees”) (a Not-For-Profit Organization) as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, and the related statements of activities and cash flows for the years then
all material respects, except for the matter described in the following paragraph,
the financial position of the Trustees of the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian
Church of North America as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the changes in
its net assets and cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As described in Note 5 to the financial statements, comprehensive actuarial
reports and valuations are not available for Pension Plan “A” maintained by the
Trustees. Accordingly, the information necessary to provide disclosures specified
by Statements of Financial Accounting Standards Numbers 87 and 88 has not
292
been determined and such disclosures have not been made. Additionally, pension
benefits incurred under Pension Plan “A” have been charged to expense when
paid rather than determining pension expense using an acceptable actuarial cost
method. We believe that omission of the disclosure of the foregoing information
and failure to determine pension expense using the accepted actuarial cost methods
are departures from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.
February 18, 2010
293
ASSETS
December 31,
2008
2007
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 577,358 $ 201, 301
Investments, at fair value 11,284,441 17,107,736
Accounts receivable
91,747
264,132
Other assets
19,168
16,749
67,113
80,312
Inventories
122,968
134,529
17,804,759
Property and Equipment, net
1,397,932
1,060,935
Other assets:
General mortgages receivable
Building loans receivable
847,293
10,429
1,039,711
915,171
11,090
822,286
1,897,433
1,748,547
Total Assets $ 15,458,160 $20,614,241
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $
426,117 $ 405,709
Payable to denomination-related organizations 2,339,915
2,572,533
Total Current Liabilities
2,766,032
2,978,242
Net Assets:
Unrestricted
Temporarily restricted
Permanently restricted
3,720,293
299,010
8,672,825
6,285,917
433,021
10,917,061
Total Net Assets 12,692,128
17,635,999
Total Liabilities and Net Assets $ 15,458,160 $20,614,241
294
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,2008
Total
Revenue and support
R.P.M.&M.
$ 103,985 $
- $
42,889 $ 146,874
Other contributions
514,329
91,850
267,901
874,080
Bequests
246,318
-
14,470
260,788
Unrealized loss
(1,607,876) (68,573) (2,115,294) (3,791,743)
Realized loss
(115,995)
(7,026)
(265,453)
(388,474)
171,546
-
-
171,546
765,212
-
-
765,212
Rental income
36,083
-
-
36,083
Other income
146,873
6,473
238,976
392,322
Net assets related from restrictions:
(427,725)
Expenses:
Depreciation
Geneva grants
Grants
Hospitalization
Insurance
Miscellaneous
Payroll taxes
Pensions
Postage
Presbytery aid
Property taxes
Salaries and wages
Seminary operations
Travel
Utilities
Total Expenses
844,935 (134,011) (2,244,236) (1,533,312)
90,728
187,088
140,963
414,466
182,183
54,568
142,434
223,362
65,266
56,003
41,444
130,352
56,070
26,306
70,428
2,392
130,237
1,024,380
137,210
174,205
60,474
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
90,728
187,088
140,963
414,466
182,183
54,568
142,434
223,362
65,266
56,003
41,444
130,352
56,070
26,306
70,428
2,392
130,237
1,024,380
137,210
174,205
60,474
3,410,559
-
-
3,410,559
(2,565,624) (134,011) (2,244,236) (4,943,871)
6,285,917
433,021 10,917,061
17,635,999
$ 3,720,293 $ 299,010 $ 8,672,825 $ 12,692,128
295
Revenue and support
R.P.M.&M.
$ 255,860 $
- $
57,438 $
Other contributions
680,573 112,030
26,100
Bequests
188,928
-
-
Investment income
659,597
7,741
259,784
159,143
-
-
645,445
-
-
Rental income
29,962
-
-
Other income
129,463
39,450
5,000
Net assets related from restrictions:
(218,220)
Total
313,298
818,703
188,928
927,122
159,143
645,455
29,962
173,913
-
3,030,441
95,971
130,102
3,256,514
69,985
287,316
137,072
52,764
106,586
802,445
44,688
49,587
65,070
20,305
97,272
2,392
121,095
968,367
37,710
132,582
46,016
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
69,985
287,316
137,072
52,764
106,586
802,445
44,688
49,587
65,070
20,305
97,272
2,392
121,095
968,367
37,710
132,582
46,016
Total Expenses
3,041,252
-
-
3,041,252
(10,811)
95,971
130,102
215,262
337,050 10,786,959
17,420,737
Expenses:
Depreciation
Grants
Hospitalization
Insurance
Miscellaneous
Pensions
Postage
Presbytery aid
Property taxes
Salaries and wages
Social security
Travel
Utilities
6,296,728
$ 6,285,917 $ 433,021 $10,917,061 $17,635,999
296
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND EQUIVALENTS
2008
2007
Operating Activities:
Change in net assets:$ (4,943,871) $ 215,262
Adjustments to reconcile increase in net assets to
net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation
90,728
69,985
Bad debt expense
-
10,040
Contributions restricted for long-term purposes
(267,901)
(26,100)
Realized loss on sales of investments
388,474 (1,630,556)
Unrealized losses on investments 3,791,743
774,218
Accounts receivable
172,385
(113,321)
13,199
2,275
661
1,398
Inventories
11,561
(1,854)
Other assets
(2,419)
22,399
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
20,408
9,338
Payable to denomination-related organizations
(232,618)
205,478
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
(957,650)
(461,438)
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
Purchases of property and equipment (427,725)
(56,189)
Proceeds from sales of investments 5,923,060 11,831,915
Purchases of investments (4,279,982) (11,524,202)
Principal payments on building loan mortgages receivable
82,575
40,243
Principal payments on general mortgages receivable
157,878
62,763
Building loan mortgages receivable issued (300,000)
(100,000)
General mortgages receivable issued
(90,000)
(67,800)
Net Cash provided by Investing Activities
1,065,806
186,730
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from contributions restricted for investment
in permanent endowment
267,901
26,100
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
267,901
26,100
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Equivalents
376,057
(248,608)
Cash and Equivalents-Beginning of Year
201,301
499,909
Cash and Equivalents-End of Year $
577,358 $
201,301
297
Organization Background - They Synod is the highest court in the denomination
known as the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America. The Trustees hold
title to property and are responsible to the Synod for managing and reporting on the
financial condition of the denomination. The financial activities are accomplished
through various boards and committees of the Synod. Congregations and domestic
and foreign missions are sanctioned by the Synod through such boards and six
regional Presbyteries. The accompanying financial statements include the assets,
liabilities, net assets and financial activities of the Trustees and of the Synod’s
various boards and committees.
Although sanctioned by the Synod, congregations and mission churches
(domestic and foreign) of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America
do not have financial accountability to the Trustees. Accordingly, the assets,
liabilities, net assets, and financial activities of such organizations are not included
in the accompanying financial statements. Periodically, certain of these assets,
to which the Trustees hold title, are sold. Proceeds from the sale of such assets
are recorded at the time of disposition. Further, funds disbursed in support of
domestic and foreign mission fields are charged to expense in the accompanying
financial statements.
A summary of the Trustee’s significant accounting policies follows:
Basis of Accounting - The financial statements for the Trustees have
been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. Consequently, revenues are
recognized when earned and expenditures when they are incurred.
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 117, Financial Statements of
Not-for-Profit Organizations. Under SFAS No. 117, the Trustees are required to
Net Assets are classified as follows:
Unrestricted net assets are neither permanently nor temporarily restricted by
donor or grantor-imposed restrictions.
Temporarily restricted net assets are net assets resulting from contributions,
grants, and other inflows of assets whose use by the Trustees is limited by
donor or grantor-imposed stipulations that either expire by passage of time
or can be fulfilled and removed by actions of the Trustees pursuant to the
stipulations.
Permanently restricted net assets are net assets resulting from contributions,
grants and other inflows of assets subject to donor or grantor-imposed
stipulations that they be maintained permanently by the Trustees.
298
Cash and Cash Equivalents - For purposes of the statement of cash flows,
the Trustees consider all unrestricted highly liquid instruments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Trustees maintain
cash and cash equivalents at banks which are insured by the FDIC up to $250,000
and $100,000 at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Amounts in excess of
insured limits were approximately $446,670 and $159,682 at December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS 157), Fair Value
adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material effect on the Trustee’s financial
statements. See Note 2, Fair Value Measurements, for further discussion relating
to SFAS 157 and the Trustee’s investments.
Accounts Receivable - Accounts receivable consist of the contributions
received during early January of the following year, when such amounts relate to
the prior year’s budget.
Deferred Student Aid - Deferred student aid receivable are recorded as
a deferred charge and are amortized to expense, usually over a period of five
Inventories - Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or
market. Inventories are comprised of religious publications.
Property and Equipment - Land, buildings, and equipment are carried at cost
or, if donated, at the approximate fair value at the date of donation. The cost of the
property and equipment retired or otherwise disposed and the related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is
reflected in current operations. Fixed assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis
over 7-40 years for buildings and improvements, and 5-10 years for furniture,
fixtures and equipment. Repairs and maintenance which are not considered to
extend the estimated useful lives of the assets are charged to expense as incurred.
Income Taxes - The Trustees is a non-for-profit organization that is exempt
from the income taxes under Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Fund Accounting - The accounts of the Trustees are maintained in accordance
funds that have similar characteristics have been combined according to three
299
classes of net assets.
Contributions - The Trustees account for contributions in accordance with
the recommendations of the Financial Accounting Standards Board in SFAS
No. 116, Accounting for the Contributions Received and Contributions Made. In
accordance with SFAS 116, contributions received are recorded as unrestricted,
temporarily restricted, or permanently restricted support, depending on the
existence or nature of any donor restrictions.
unrestricted net assets and reported in the statement of activities as net assets
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements - The preparation
of financial statements in conformity with the accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates
NOTE 2 - FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Trustees adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008, which, among other
things, requires enhanced disclosures about investments that are measured and
reported at fair value. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes
and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at
fair value. Market price observability is impacted by a number of factors, including
the type of investment, the characteristics specific to the investment, and the state
of the marketplace (including the existence and transparency of transactions
between market participants). Investments with readily-available actively quoted
prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively-quoted prices in an
orderly market will generally have a higher degree of market price observability
and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.
as of the reporting date. The type of investments which would generally be
included in Level I include listed equity securities and listed derivatives.
As required by SFAS 157, to the extent that it holds such investments, does
not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where
the Trustees hold a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the
quoted price.
300
or indirectly, as of the reporting date, but are not the same as those used
in Level I. Fair value is determined through the use of models or other
valuation methodologies. The types of investments which would generally
be included in this category include publicly-traded securities with
restrictions on disposition.
or estimation by Management. The types of investments which would
The Trustees assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
the investment.
Total
$ 417,368
US Treasury notes
640,568
6,233,951
Corporate bonds
1,866,153
Total
Level II
Level III
$ 417,368 $
2,126,401
640,568
6,233,951
1,866,153
- $
-
-
-
-
-
$11,284,441$11,284,441 $
- $
-
Total
$ 751,501
US Treasury notes
613,619
10,346,279
Corporate bonds
3,264,781
Total
Level I
Level I
Level II
Level III
$ 751,501 $
2,131,556
613,619
10,346,279
3,264,781
- $
-
-
-
-
-
$17,107,736$17,107,736 $
- $
-
301
NOTE 3 - LOANS RECEIVABLE
General mortgages receivable are due over periods from one to twenty-one
years and bear annual interest primarily from 4.5% to 9.25%. The aggregate
annual maturities of general mortgages receivable at December 31, 2008 are as
follows:
Year Ending
Amount
2009 $ 142,670
2010
119,146
2011
99,255
2012
96,041
2013
95,782
Thereafter
294,399
Total $ 847,293
The general mortgages receivable were due from the following groups:
December 31,
2008
Congregations of the denomination $ 385,469 $
Ministers of the denomination
83,823
Members of the denomination
191,556
Commercial
186,445
Total $
847,293 $
2007
606,176
159,363
63,294
86,338
915,171
Substantially all of the building loans receivable at December 31, 2008 have
been granted by the Building Loan Committee at interest rates of 4% to 5% for the
purchase or construction of residences or church buildings. The aggregate annual
maturities of building loans receivable at December 31, 2008 are as follows:
Year Ending
Amount
2009 $
2010
2011
2012
2013
Thereafter
100,475
98,747
95,723
95,723
95,123
553,920
Total $ 1,039,711
302
Such loans are generally made to either ministers, employees of the Synod, or
congregations. The composition of the balances receivable were due from:
December 31,
2008
2007
Congregations and denominational boards $ 1,031,940 $
Ministers of the denomination
7,771
Total $ 1,039,711
822,285
-
$ 822,285
The various components of property and equipment are as follows:
December 31,
2008
2007
Building and improvements $ 1,947,633 $ 1,522,900
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
663,895
660,903
Total
2,611,528
2,183,803
Less: Accumulated depreciation (1,213,596) (1,122,868)
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was
NOTE 5 - PENSION PLANS
There are two pension plans (Plan “A” and Plan “B”) which were adopted
effective January 1, 1974 and together cover all ministers, missionaries and
employees of Synod. The provisions of Plan “B” were restated effective January
1, 1984 and January 1, 1989 and amended in 2001 and 2002.
Plan “A” - Plan “A” is a noncontributory defined benefit plan and covers
basically ministers, missionaries and employees of the Synod who were age 55 or
over on January 1, 1974, the date of adoption of the plan. The normal retirement
benefit for 2008 was $450 per month for single employees and $600 for married
employees. A monthly benefit of $450 is continued to the survivor. A minimum of
30 years of service is required to be eligible for the full normal retirement benefit.
Total pension expense for the year ended December 2008 was $56,070. The plan
is self-administered and pension benefits, which are charged to pension expense,
are substantially all paid from ordinary investment income, proceeds of sales of
certain investments or funds transferred from the Pension Board.
Current comprehensive actuarial reports and valuations are not available
for Plan “A”. Accordingly, the information necessary to provide the disclosures
303
required by Statements of Financial Accounting Standards 87 and 88 has not been
determined. Under Plan “A”, the Trustees charge pension benefits to expense as
incurred and credit investment income and net gain on investment transactions to
revenue. Generally accepted accounting principles require that pension expense be
determined using an acceptable actuarial cost method. Plan “A” was substantially
curtailed as of December 31, 1997, as there were no participants still actively
employed by the Trustees and, as such, use of an acceptable actuarial cost method
would have resulted in insignificant expenses for the years then ended. Use of
actuarially determined costs as of the most recent valuation (January 1, 1987) for
Plan “A” would have resulted in an increase in pension liability and a decrease in
the unrestricted-designated fund balance of approximately $225,000. Investments
with a cost of approximately $75,000 and market value of approximately $93,000
at December 31, 2008, included in the financial statements of the Trustees, are
available to satisfy a portion of the Plan “A” pension liability. A 9% assumed
rate of return was used in determining the present value of accumulated vested
benefits. There are no nonvested accumulated benefits.
Plan “B” - Plan “B” is a defined contribution plan and covers substantially all
ministers, missionaries and employees of the Synod who are not covered under
Plan “A”. For each Plan Year the Synod shall contribute to each employee who
become a Participant in the Plan prior to attainment of age 55 or over on December
31, 1988. The normal retirement benefit for 2008 was $250 for participating
employees. A monthly benefit equal to two-thirds (2/3) of the target monthly
benefit would be paid to any surviving spouse of the employee. A minimum of
30 years of service is required to be eligible for the full retirement benefit. Total
pension expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was $55,983
and $46,287, respectively. During 2008, the assets of the Plan were transferred to
The Hartford. The Hartford is the current plan provider. Each participant makes
directed investment choices.
NOTE 6 - CUSTODIAN FUNDS
Custodian Funds represent funds received by the Trustees from congregations,
Presbyteries, and other denomination-related organizations which are invested for
the benefit of, and are returnable upon request to, such resources. Such funds are
reported as payable to denomination-related organizations.
Temporarily restricted net assets are comprised of primarily annuity and life
income funds that are subject to agreements whereby assets are made available to
the Trustees on the condition that the Trustees be bound to pay the donor or other
designated person or organization a stipulated amount or the income earned of
fund assets for a period of time specified in the agreements.
304
NOTE 8 - ENDOWMENTS
The Trustees’ endowments consists of approximately 100 individual funds
are classified and reported based upon the existence of absence of donor-imposed
restrictions.
Endowment Net Asset Composition by Type of Fund as of December 31, 2008:
Total
Temporarily
Restricted
Net Assets
Permanently
Restricted
Net Assets
Donor restricted endowment funds $ 1,777,203 $
- $
- $ 1,777,203
-
4,270,644
Total funds
- $ 6,047,847
$ 6,272,286 $ 224,439 $
2007:
Total
Temporarily
Restricted
Net Assets
Permanently
Restricted
Net Assets
Donor restricted endowment funds $ 1,922,715 $
- $
- $ 1,922,715
-
6,782,367
Total funds
- $ 8,705,082
$ 9,012,462 $ 307,380 $
beginning of year
Contributions
Investment income
Net loss on sales
expenditure
end of year
Total
Temporarily
Restricted
Net Assets
$ 9,012,462 $ 307,980 $
(478,434)
19,287
-
-
(2,042,323) (102,228)
-
-
(219,419)
-
$ 6,272,286 $ 224,439 $
Permanently
Restricted
Net Assets
- $ 8,705,082
-
(497,721)
-
- (1,940,095)
-
-
(219,419)
- $ 6,047,847
305
beginning and ending balance of the Organization’s endowment, in total and by
net asset class. This information was not available for the year ending December
31, 2007.
from this amount. Investment risk in measured in terms of the total endowment
endowment funds, many of which must be maintained in perpetuity because
of donor-restrictions, and the possible effects of inflation. The Trustees expect
the current spending policy, which is consistent with the Trustees’ objective
to maintain purchasing power of the endowment assets as well as to provide
additional real growth through investment return.
Management evaluated all activity of the Trustees through February 18, 2010
(the date the financial statements are available to be issued) and concluded that no
306
The Theological Seminary Of The Reformed Presbyterian Church
Of North America
CONTENTS.....................................................................................................Page
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT . ...................................................... 306
Statements of Financial Position ................................................................ 307
Statements of Activities............................................................................... 308
Statements of Functional Expenses ............................................................ 310
Statements of Cash Flows . ......................................................................... 311
Notes to Financial Statements .................................................................... 311
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT
To the Trustees of the Theological Seminary of the Reformed Presbyterian
Church of North America, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Theological Seminary of the Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America
(a not-for-profit organization) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related
statements of activities, functional expenses and cash flows for the years then
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable
all material respects, the financial position of the Theological Seminary of the
Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, and the changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the year then ended
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of America.
February 18, 2010
307
ASSETS
December 31,
2008 2007
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $
600 $
600
Investments 1,496,092 2,357,032
Receivable - RPCNA -
522,648
2,880,280
Deferred student aid receivable Property and equipment, net 10,429 1,336,190
11,090
986,734
Total Assets $ 2,843,311 $ 3,878,104
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $
Accounts payable - RPCNA 2,038 $
118,221 6,277
-
Total Current Liabilities 120,259 6,277
Net Assets:
Unrestricted Temporarily restricted Permanently restricted 1,228,155 -
1,494,897 1,286,161
141,810
2,443,856
Total Net Assets 2,723,052 3,871,827
Total Liabilities and Net Assets $ 2,843,311 $ 3,878,104
308
Revenues:
Gross tuition and fees $ 607,444 $
- $
- $ 607,444
Less: Scholarships (316,986) -
- (316,986)
290,458 -
-
290,458
Contributions 549,806 91,850 Miscellaneous income 50,347 6,472 Investment income (loss) 55,964 16,002 Unrealized loss (477,100) -
Realized loss (23,117) -
Rental income 28,582
-
Bequests 57,785 -
(125,956) (297,757) (107,883) 649,026
56,819
(53,990)
(774,857)
(131,000)
-
-
-
58,247
28,582
57,785
(424,733) -
(948,959) 181,070
Total Revenue and Support Program Expenses:
Academic support Auxiliary enterprises Development Institutional support Instruction Student services Total Expenses Change in Net Assets Net Assets - Beginning of Year Net Assets - End of Year 1,271,839 (141,810) 145,645
34,312 132,383 683,970 275,181 58,354 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
145,645
34,312
132,383
683,970
275,181
58,354
1,329,845 -
-
1,329,845
(58,006) (141,810) 1,286,161 141,810 $ 1,228,155 $
(948,959) (1,148,775)
2,443,856 3,871,827
- $ 1,494,897 $ 2,723,052
309
Revenues:
Gross tuition and fees $ 529,651 $
- $
- $ 529,651
Less: Scholarships (205,275) -
- (205,275)
324,376 -
-
324,376
Contributions Miscellaneous income Investment income Sale and services of auxiliary
enterprises Rental income Bequests Net assets released from restrictions:
Restrictions satisfied by payments 544,157 112,030 49,001 4,450 59,185 16,657 26,100 5,000 49,633 682,287
58,451
125,475
-
-
-
-
-
-
48,209
22,462
37,000
54,093 (52,893) (1,200) -
Total Revenue and Support 48,209 22,462 37,000 1,138,483 80,244 79,533 1,298,260
109,989 51,566 117,950 560,399
260,071 51,789 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
109,989
51,566
117,950
560,399
260,071
51,789
Total Expenses 1,151,764 -
-
1,151,764
Change in Net Assets (13,281) 80,244 79,533 146,496
1,299,442 61,566 2,364,323 3,725,331
Program Expenses:
Academic support Auxiliary enterprises Development Institutional support Instruction Student services Net Assets - Beginning of Year Net Assets - End of Year $ 1,286,161 $ 141,810 $ 2,443,856 $ 3,871,827
310
- $ 4,282 Depreciation -
-
Fringe benefits 1,045 1,221 Insurance -
-
Maintenance
and supplies 51,207 12,850 Miscellaneous 10,749 -
Other board expenses -
-
Postage -
-
Publications
and books 37,999 -
Publicity -
-
Salaries and wages 44,645 15,959 Travel -
-
Utilities -
-
Total
$-
-
5,621 -
$ 755 75,277 117,965 13,106 $-
$-
-
-
- 2,780 -
-
$ 5,037
75,277
128,632
13,106
-
33,811 -
-
51,552 113,749 24,276 11,884 -
-
- 3,745 -
-
-
-
115,609
162,054
24,276
11,884
-
-
-
-
-
31,693 -
-
91,557 176,491 272,306 51,829 1,394 17,139 2,875 -
-
50,083 -
-
37,999
31,693
652,787
21,408
50,083
Total Expenses $ 145,645 $ 34,312 $ 132,383 $ 683,970 $ 275,181 $58,354 $ 1,329,845
Depreciation Fringe benefits Insurance Maintenance
and supplies Miscellaneous Other board expenses Postage Publications
and books Publicity Salaries and wages Travel Utilities - $ 6,562 $
-
-
1,111 2,416 -
-
- $
646 $
-
60,919 5,551 117,649
-
11,434 41,867 94,341 17,657 9,836 - $
-
-
-
Total
-$
7,208
-
60,919
-
126,727
-
11,434
21,658 7,993
-
-
26,733 -
-
-
-
24,525 -
-
-
-
- 4,108 -
-
-
-
90,258
130,967
17,657
9,836
35,142 -
44,085 -
-
-
-
15,855 -
-
-
-
-
-
-
25,079 -
-
86,456 133,652 257,049 47,681 1,418 9,916 3,022 -
-
37,403 -
-
35,142
25,079
584,778
14,356
37,403
Total Expenses $ 109,989 $ 51,566 $ 117,950 $ 560,399 $ 260,071 $51,789 $ 1,151,764
311
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
2008 2007
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Change in net assets $ (1,148,775) $ 146,496
Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation 75,277 60,919
Contribution restricted for long-term purposes (7,370) Realized loss on sale of investments 131,000 Unrealized losses on investments 774,857 110,164
Deferred student aid receivable 661 2,190
Accounts receivable 522,648 (522,648)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 113,982 (5,128)
Total adjustments 1,611,055 (354,503)
Net Cash Provided in Operating Activities 462,280 (208,007)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Purchase of property and equipment Net change in investments (424,733) (44,917) (86,494)
(979,819)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (469,650) (1,066,313)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Investment in permanent endowment 7,370 10,257
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities 7,370 10,257
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents - (1,264,063)
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Year 600 Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Year $
600 $
1,264,663
600
General - The Theological Seminary of the Reformed Presbyterian Church
of North America (the Seminary) is organized for the purpose of instructing
candidates for the gospel ministry, and others who may be preparing for special
lines of Christian service, in the scriptures and the doctrines found therein. The
Seminary is under the control of the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian Church
312
of North America (the Synod) and is located in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Basis of Accounting - The financial statements of the Seminary, a nonprofit
organization, have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting. All
accounting functions are performed by the Trustees in conjunction with their
financial responsibilities of the Synod. These financial statements do not include
the financial position of financial results of the Trustees of the Synod of the
Reformed Presbyterian Church of North America (the Trustees). A separate report
for the Trustees has been issued.
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 117, Financial Statements of
Not-for-Profit Organizations. Under SFAS No. 117, the Trustees are required to
Fund Accounting - The accounts of the Seminary are maintained in accordance
classes of net assets, mentioned above.
Income Tax Status - The Seminary is a not-for-profit organization that is
exempt from income taxes under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Cash and Cash Equivalents - For purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows,
the Seminary considers all unrestricted highly liquid investments with an initial
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Cash and Investments - The cash and investment amounts for all funds of the
Trustees are commingled and are allocated for financial reporting purposes based
on assets (other than cash and investments), liabilities and net assets. Investments
are presented in the financial statements at fair value based on quoted prices
in active markets (all Level I measurements). Net realized gain or loss on the
disposition of investments is the difference between the proceeds received and the
average cost of investments sold.
Substantially all investments are pooled and allocation of income (ordinary
income and gains and losses upon sale or other disposition of investments) to the
various fund is accomplished using the market value unit method. Substantially all
ordinary income from investments of endowment funds is restricted for support of
particular purposes. These purposes are usually broad enough to be encompassed
within one of the designated boards of the Synod.
Property and Equipment - Land, buildings and improvements, and furniture,
fixtures and equipment are carried at cost or estimated fair value at the date of gift.
Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets on
a straight-line basis. The Trustees hold title to all property of the Seminary.
313
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), Fair Value
adoption of SFAS 157 did not have a material effect on the Trustee’s financial
statements. See Note 3, Fair Value Measurements, for further discussion relating
to SFAS 157 and the Trustee’s investments.
Contributions - The Trustees account for contributions in accordance with the
recommendations of the Financial Accounting Standards Board in SFAS No. 116,
Accounting for Contributions Received and Contributions Made. In accordance
with SFAS 116, contributions received are recorded as unrestricted, temporarily
restricted, or permanently restricted support, depending on the existence or nature
of any donor restrictions.
Contributions received during early January from congregations and
individuals are recorded as receivables when such amounts relate to the prior
year’s budget.
Restricted and Unrestricted Revenue and Support - Support that is restricted
by the donor is reported as an increase in unrestricted net assets if the restriction
expires in the reporting period in which support is recognized. All other donorrestricted support is reported as an increase in temporarily or permanently
restricted net assets, depending on the nature of the restriction. When a restriction
expires (that is, when a stipulated time restriction ends or purpose restriction is
accomplished), temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to unrestricted
net assets and reported in the Statement of Activities as net assets released from
restrictions.
unrestricted net assets and reported in the Statement of Activities as net assets
Expense Allocation - The costs providing various programs and other activities
have been summarized on a functional basis in the Statement of Activities and
in the Statement of Functional Expenses. Accordingly, certain costs have been
allocated among the programs and supporting services benefitted.
Pensions - The Synod has two pension plans (Plan “A” and Plan “B”) covering
substantially all employees of the Seminary. Plan “A” is a noncontributory defined
314
benefit plan and covers basically ministers, missionaries and employees who
were age 55 or over on January 1, 1974, the date of adoption of the plan, and is
administered by the Pension Trustees of the Synod of the Reformed Presbyterian
Church of North America who are also responsible for all assets of the Plan.
Plan “B” is a defined contribution plan and covers substantially all ministers,
missionaries and employees who are not covered under Plan “A”. Effective
October 1, 2002, the assets of the Plan were transferred from UBS/PaineWebber
into individual participant accounts. The Hartford is the new plan provider. Each
participant makes directed investment choices.
Pension expense related to Seminary employees is reflected as an expense of
the Synod and is not allocated to the Seminary; hence there are no pension costs
reflected in the accompanying financial statements.
Expenses - Certain expenses paid by the Trustees, which cannot be specifically
identified as relating to the operation of the Seminary are not allocated to the
Seminary and are not reflected in the accompanying financial statements.
Advances made to eligible seminary students for payment of tuition, summer
training fees and living expenses (deferred student aid receivable) are recorded
as a deferred charge and are amortized to expense, usually over a period of five
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
The components of property and equipment are as follows:
December 31,
2008 2007
Buildings and improvements $ 1,820,874 $ 1,396,141
Furniture, fixtures and equipment 428,515 428,515
Total 2,249,389 1,824,656
Less: Accumulated depreciation (913,199) (837,922)
Property and Equipment, net $ 1,336,190 $ 986,734
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, was
NOTE 3- FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Trustees adopted SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008, which, among other
315
things, requires enhanced disclosures about investments that are measured and
reported at fair value. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes
and ranks the level of market price observability used in measuring investments at
fair value. Market price observability is impacted by a number of factors, including
the type of investment, the characteristics specific to the investment, and the state
of the marketplace (including the existence and transparency of transactions
between market participants). Investments with readily-available actively quoted
prices or for which fair value can be measured from actively-quoted prices in an
orderly market will generally have a higher degree of market price observability
and a lesser degree of judgment used in measuring fair value.
as of the reporting date. The type of investments which would generally be
included in Level I include listed equity securities and listed derivatives.
As required by SFAS 157, to the extent that it holds such investments, does
not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where
the Trustees hold a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the
quoted price.
or indirectly, as of the reporting date, but are not the same as those used
in Level I. Fair value is determined through the use of models or other
valuation methodologies. The types of investments which would generally
be included in this category include publicly-traded securities with
restrictions on disposition.
or estimation by Management. The types of investments which would
The Trustees assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value
the investment.
316
As of December 31, 2008: Total Level I M&T Investment Group $ 417,368 $ 417,368 $
US Government Agency Securities 2,126,401 2,126,401 US Treasury notes 640,568 640,568 Corporate common stocks 6,233,951 6,233,951 Corporate bonds 1,866,153 1,866,153 Level II Level III
- $
-
-
-
-
-
Total $ 11,284,441 $ 11,284,441 $
- $
-
Seminary Portion $ 1,496,092 $ 1,496,092 $
- $
-
As of December 31, 2007: Level I Level II Level III
M&T Investment Group $ 751,501 $ 751,501 US Government Agency Securities 2,131,556 2,131,556 US Treasury notes 613,619 613,619 Corporate common stocks 10,346,279 10,346,279 Corporate bonds 3,264,781 3,264,781 $-
-
-
-
-
$-
$ 17,107,736 $17,107,736 $-
$-
$ 2,357,032 $2,357,032 $-
$-
Total Seminary Portion Total NOTE 4 - TEMPORARILY RESTRICTED NET ASSETS
During 2008 and 2007, the Seminary received $91,850 and $112,030,
respectively, in grants for capital projects.
NOTE 5 - BEQUESTS
During the years ending December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Seminary received
bequests of $57,785 and $37,000, respectively, none of which was directed toward
the endowment funds.
317
NOTE 6 -ENDOWMENTS
The Trustees’ endowments consist of approximately 100 individual funds
are classified and reported based upon the existence or absence of donor-imposed
restrictions.
2008:
Assets
Assets
Donor-restricted endowment funds $ 244,145 Board-designated endowment funds 1,207,376 $-
-
$ - $ 244,145
- 1,207,376
Total funds $-
$ - $ 1,451,521
$ 1,451,521 Endowment Net Asset Composition by Type of Fund as of December 31,
2007:
Assets
Assets
Donor-restricted endowment funds $ 312,387 Board-designated endowment funds 1,570,506 $-
-
$ - $ 312,387
- 1,570,506
Total funds $-
$ - $ 1,882,893
$ 1,882,893 Changes in endowment net assets as of December 31, 2008 are as follows:
beginning of year Contributions Investment income Net appreciation (depreciation) Amounts appropriated
end of year Total Temporarily Permanently
Assets
Assets
$ 1,882,893 7,370 4,879 (340,389) $-
-
-
-
(103,232) -
$ 1,451,521 $-
$ - $ 1,882,893
-
7,370
-
4,879
- (340,389)
-
(103,232)
$ - $ 1,451,521
beginning and ending balance of the organization’s endowment, in total and by
318
net asset class. This information was not available for the year ending December
31, 2007.
from this amount. Investment risk is measured in terms of the total endowment
endowment funds, many of which must be maintained in perpetuity because
of donor-restrictions, and the possible effects of inflation. The Trustees expect
the current spending policy to allow its endowment funds to grow at a nominal
average rate of 3% annually, which is consistent with the Trustees’ objective to
maintain the purchasing power of the endowment assets as well as to provide
additional real growth through investment return.
Management evaluated all activity of the Seminary through February 18,2010,
(the date the financial statements are available to be issued) and concluded that no
Directory
Of the
Reformed Presbyterian Church
Of North America
321
DIRECTORY OF THE
REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
OF NORTH AMERICA
INSTITUTIONS
Geneva College
Beaver Falls, PA 15010.
Phone: 724-846-5100
President: Kenneth A. Smith, Ph.D.
Reformed Presbyterian Home
2344 Perrysville Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15214.
Phone: 412-321-4139 or 1-800-RPHomeHello. FAX: 412-321-4661.
E-mail: [email protected]
Administrator: Margaret Hemphill
Reformed Presbyterian Theological Seminary
7418 Penn Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15208.
Phone: 412-731-8690. FAX: 412-731-4834. E-mail: [email protected]
President: Rev. Jerry F. O’Neill , D.D.
OFFICES
Synod’s Board of Trustees
Secretary-Treasurer: James K. McFarland
7408 Penn Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15208. Phone: 412-731-1177. Fax: 412-7318861. E-mail: [email protected]
Board of Education and Publication
Managing Editors of Crown and Covenant Publications: Drew and Lynne Gordon,
7408 Penn Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15208. Phone: 412-241-0436. Fax: 412-7318861
National Reform Association
P.O. Box 91123, Pittsburgh, PA 15221-7223
www.NatReformAssn.org
President: John A Fielding, III
Reformation Translation Fellowship
302 E. First Street, Bloomington, IN 47401.
Phone: 812-339-1922. E-mail: [email protected]
Woman’s Association 2344 Perrysville Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15214. Phone: 412321-4139 or 1-800-RPHomeHello. FAX: 412-321-4661. E-mail: rphome@
rphome.org.
Executive Director: Faith Martin.
Administrator: Margaret Hemphill.
322
Chief Financial Officer: William J. Weir.
Board to Address Disability Concerns President: Mary Balok.
Robin’s Nest Director: Gwen Marcus. 2404 Perrysville Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
15214. Phone: 412-321-5838.
Upper Rooms, Inc. / Upper Rooms Vista: 2334 Perrysville Ave., Pittsburgh, PA
15214. Phone: 412-224-6692. Tom Price, Manager.
OFFICERS OF SYNOD
Moderator: Dr. Jerry F. O’Neill, 7418 Penn Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15208. E-mail:
[email protected]. Phone: 412-731-8690.
Clerk: Pastor J. Bruce Martin, 310 Main Street, Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660.
Phone: 201-440-5993 (O) or 201-837-0202 (H). Fax: 210-440-8586 E-mail:
[email protected]
Assistant Clerk: Pastor Raymond E. Morton, 411 N. Vine St., Sparta, IL 62286.
Corresponding Clerk: Bruce C. Stewart, DD. 7959 Remington Drive, Pittsburgh,
PA 15237. Phone: 412-366-5028. E-mail: [email protected].
Treasurer: James K. McFarland, 7408 Penn Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15208. Phone:
412-731-1177.
BOARDS OF SYNOD
Board of Corporators of Geneva College
Members Chosen by Synod
Term Expires
Jason O’Neill
2011
Josh Lamont 2012
Calvin Troup
2013
Matt Filbert
2014
Members Chosen by the Corporators
Term Expires
David Ashleigh, Vicki Parnell, Samuel Spear
2011
Herbert McCracken, James Tweed, Dennis Wing
2012
Phil Duguid, Christopher Huggins, Ralph Joseph
2013
Shana Milroy, Phil Pockras, William Weir
2014
Members Chosen by Presbyteries
Term Expires
Andy McCracken, Great Lakes-Gulf; Ron Graham, Midwest
2012
Brian Panachelle, Alleghenies
2013
Peter Howe, St. Lawrence; Don Piper, Pacific Coast;
Bonnie Weir, Atlantic 2014
Chairman: Bonnie Weir, Ph.D., 18 Midland Avenue, Bronxville, NY 10708.
Phone: 914-337-2833.
Board of Education and Publication
Members
Bob Bibby, Jared Olivetti, Jim Ritchart
Mark England, Brad Johnston
Term Expires
2011
2013
Nathan Eshelman, Linda Parker, John Pershe
Chairman: Courtney Miller.
323
2014
Board of RP Global Missions
Members
Term Expires
Paul Ledwell, David Long
2011
John McFarland, Carol Wright (WSMS Rep)
2012
Boni Piper, Ed Schisler
2013
John Kim, David Hanson
2014
Executive Secretary: Jonathan Watt, 2907 5th Avenue, Beaver Falls, PA 15010.
Phone: 724-846-5430.
Board of Home Missions
Members Term Expires
Matthew Dyck, St. Lawrence; Sue Wilkey, WSMS
2011
Matthew Filbert, Alleghenies, Ian Wise, Great Lakes-Gulf;
Bruce Parnell, Midwest 2012
John D. Edgar, Atlantic; Tim McCracken, Pacific Coast 2013
President: John D. Edgar [Evniki], 8344 Cadwalader Avenue, Elkins Park, PA
19027. Phone: 215-782-9849. E-mail: [email protected]
Board of Pension Trustees of Synod
Members
Term Expires
Don McBurney, Aaron Piper
2011
David Merkel, Luke O’Neill
2012
Curt Porter, Bob Shapiro
2013
Secretary: A. Wayne Duffield, P.O. Box 373, New Alexandria, PA 15670.
Phone: 412-668-7506.
Board of Trustees of Geneva College
Trustees Emeriti: Wendell F. McBurney, Ph.D., Kenneth G. Smith, D.D., Joseph
Lamont
Members of the R.P. Church
Term Expires
Bruce Backensto, Bill Edgar, Joye Huston, Steve McMahan,
David Schaefer
2011
Robert McFarland, Don Piper, Calvin Troup, David A. Weir
2012
Kendell Chilton, John P. Edgar, Godfrey Franklin, Joel Silverman,
Keith Wing
2013
Ingrid Birdsall, Joyce Lynn, Mike McDaniel, Siarhei Spirydovich
2014
Members Representing the Alumni Association
Virginia Badger, Andrew Bernard
2011
Thomas Yancey
2012
Mel Adams
2013
Katherine Dennis
2014
324
Members Nominated by the Board of Trustees
Reynolds Clark, Charles Pockras
Alan Rose
James D. Roy, Lori Stuckey
William Kriner, Andrew Marcinko
Chairman: William J. Edgar, Ph.D., 332 Riverview Avenue, Drexel
2011
2012
2013
2014
Hill, PA
Board of Trustees of Synod
Members
Term Expires
David Coon, David Merkel, James McFarland
2011
David Ayer, Don Lamont, Lorrie Meneely
2012
John P. Edgar, Bill Roberts, Marcia Siebring
2013
Secretary-Treasurer: James K. McFarland, 7408 Penn Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15208.
Board of Trustees of the Theological Seminary
Members
Term Expires
Don Piper, Don Reed
2011
Harry Metzger, Richard Holdeman
2012
Jack McCready, Robert Koch
2013
Jonathan Schafer, Martin Wilsey
2014
Michael LeFebvre, Bob Hemphill
2015
Keith Wing, Barry York
2016
President: Rich Holdeman, 2634 E. Spicewood Ct., Bloomington, IN 47401.
Office Phone: 812-339-3887, Home Phone: 812-334-7899. E-mail: rholdema@
indiana.edu.
PERMANENT COMMITTEES OF SYNOD
Business of Synod Committee
Jon Maginn, Kit Swartz
2011
Jerry Porter, Dave Willson
2012
Dave Carroll, Harry Metzger
2013
Jerry O’Neill, J. Bruce Martin
Ex officio
Chairman: Jerry Porter (Sharon). E-mail: [email protected]
Members
Ralph Joseph
Phil Pockras
Tony Gazo
Chairman:
Term Expires
2012
2014
2016
325
Committee on Finance
Members
Term Expires
Keith Magill, Great Lakes - Gulf; Jonathan Parnell, Midwest;
David Merkel, at large
2011
_________, Pacific Coast; ___________, St. Lawrence;
Dennis Wing, at large
2012
David Schafer, Alleghenies; Larry Gladfelter, Atlantic;
__________________, at large
2013
Jerry Porter, Business of Synod, Chairman
Ex officio
John Duke, President, Board of Synod’s Trustees
Ex officio
James K. McFarland, Denominational Treasurer
Ex officio
Chairman: David Merkel, 3505 N. Chatham Road, Ellicott City, MD 21042.
Phone: 410-750-7894. E-mail: [email protected].
Graduate Study Committee
Committee Members
Term Expires
Jerry O’Neill, President of the Seminary
Kenneth A. Smith, President of Geneva College
Courtney Miller, at large
2011
Alan Noell, at large
2012
Chairman: Alan Noell, 2723 N. Monroe St., Stillwater, OK 74075. Phone: 405377-0634.
Interchurch Committee
Members
Term Expires
Drew Gordon, Jerry Milroy
2011
Bruce Martin, David Reese
2012
Matt Kingswood, Bruce Parnell
2013
Executive Secretary: Ian Wise [Deanna], 13612 Durant Road, Raleigh, NC 27614.
Phone: 919-844-5255. Cell: 919-740-9553. E-mail: [email protected].
International Conference Advisory Committee for 2012 Conference
Doug Carson, James Faris, Robert Hemphill, Robert McFarland, Sam Spear
Chairman: Robert L. Hemphill, Robert L. Hemphill, 1867 North 15th Street,
Laramie, WY 82072. Home: 307-745-8721. Cell: 307-399-8710. E-mail:
[email protected]
Members
Rutledge Etheridge, Jared Olivetti
Term Expires
2011
Parliamentarians
Members
Ralph Joseph
Term Expires
2012
326
Brian Coombs
______________
2014
2016
Representatives to the Presbyterian and Reformed Joint
Commission on Chaplains and Military Personnel
Members
Don Prichard
Bill Pihl, Erich Braum
Term Expires
2012
2016
Committee on Understanding the Times
Members
Zachary Kail
Katsunori Endo
____________
Term Expires
2011
2012
2013
Church for Vital Churches
Wendell McBurney Jerry Porter Kenneth G. Smith
Kit Swartz Jay Worsham
Harry Metzger 2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Coordinator of Youth Ministries
David Whitla [June], 7206 Chimney Rock Court, Indianapolis, IN
46217. Phone: 317-884-3453. E-mail: [email protected].
CHURCHES IN ECCLESIASTICAL FELLOWSHIP
REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHES
Reformed Presbytery of Australia
Rev. Andrew Stewart
12 Fenwick Street
Geelong
Victoria, AUSTRALIA 3220
Reformed Presbytery of Scotland
Rev. S. Andrew Quigley
Linden House, Westerman
15 Bank Avenue
Airdrie ML6 0HD
SCOTLAND
Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland
Rev. E. M. McCollum
21 Croft Hill, Cairnshill Road
Belfast, BT8 6GX
NO. IRELAND
Trinity Christian Community Fellowship
Mr. Adam Mastris
16 Chlois Street, CY 6301
Larnaca, CYPRUS
OTHER CHURCHES IN FRATERNAL RELATIONS
(* Members of NAPARC)
Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church *
Rev. Donald Beard, Principal Clerk
3132 Grace Hill Road
Columbia, SC 29204
Free Church of Scotland, Synod of North America
Rev. Kent Compton, Clerk of Synod
Box 4907 Crapaud, P. E. I.
CANADA
Korean American Presbyterian Church *
Rev. David Ho Yuhan, Stated Clerk
25522 El Conejo Lane
Laguna Hills, CA 92653
L’Église reformee du Quebec *
Rev. Bernard Westerveld
844, rue de Contrecoeur
Ste-Foy (Quebec) G1X 2X8
CANADA
Orthodox Presbyterian Church *
Rev. George Cottenden, Stated Clerk
607 N. Easton Road, Bldg. E, Box P
Willow Grove, PA 19090
Presbyterian Church in America *
Dr. L. Roy Taylor, Stated Clerk
1700 North Brown Road, Suite 105
Lawrenceville, GA 30043
327
328
Reformed Church in the United States *
Rev. Paul Treick, Clerk of Synod
4005 Masterpiece Drive
Modesto, CA 95357
United Reformed Churches in North America *
Rev. John Bouwers
P. O. Box 279
Jordan Station
ON L0R 1S0 CANADA
OBSERVER CHURCHES
Canadian Reformed Churches*
Rev. Klaas Jonker
207 Rougeau Ave.
Winnipeg, Manitoba R2C 3Z9
CANADA
Evangelical Presbyterian Church
Rev. Michael J. Glodo, Stated Clerk
17197 N. Laurel park Drive, Suite 567
Livonia, MI 48152
329
FORM OF BEQUEST
“I do bequeath and bequest to the Trustees of the Synod of the Reformed
Presbyterian Church of North America the following:_______________________
_______________________________________________________________.”
If one wishes, he may specify where he desires the bequest to go. In making out a
will, it is advisable to get legal advice.
330
Key to Accessibility Services
The accessibility of church buildings is noted following each congregation’s
name and address suing the following key.
BF -Barrier Free (includes restrooms)
PA- Partially accessible (call the church)
SS -Services accompanied by signing
HA - Special Hearing Aids available
PM -Programs available for people with mental impairments
ROSTER OF PRESBYTERY OF THE ALLEGHENIES
Moderator.........................................................................................Harry Metzger
Clerk...................................................................................................Ralph Joseph
Assistant Clerk................................................................................ Charles Brown
Treasurer.............................................................................................Cyrus Biesel
Assistant Treasurer........................................................................... David Hanson
Ad Interim Commission.......................................................... Manchester Session
College Hill—3217 College Avenue, Beaver Falls, PA 15010. Phone: 724-843.
4840. (PA)
Pastor: Titus Martin [Alyssa], 416 30th Street, Beaver Falls, PA 15010. Phone:
412-251-4290. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed: August 2006.
Clerk: Cliff Glovier, 3218 6th Ave., Beaver Falls, PA 15010. Phone: 724-8474403. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: Doug Carson ([email protected]), Bob Copeland (rmc@
geneva.edu), Donnie Hicks ([email protected]), Rick Mason
([email protected]), Don McBurney ([email protected]),
Herb McCracken ([email protected]), Richard Morris (richard.
[email protected]), Dean Smith ([email protected]), John
Stahl ([email protected]), Dave Willson ([email protected]), Keith
Wing ([email protected])
Elders Emeriti: Lawrence Coon, Norman M. Carson, Karl Cunningham, Roy
M. McDonald, Stanley R. Reyle,
Deacon Chair: David Mohr [Kathy], 661 Wallace Run Road, Beaver Falls, PA
Treasurer: Leo Salgado [Morelia], 3508 8th Ave., Beaver Falls, PA 15010.
C.E. Chairman: John Stahl [Jacque], 3217 College Avenue, Beaver Falls, PA
Covenant (Aurora, Ohio)—Currently meeting at The Aurora Inn. Address all
mail to the Clerk.
Pastor: Vacant.
Moderator of Session: Dr. John Bower.
331
Clerk: Bob Concoby, 3766 Fishcreek Rd #277, Stow, OH 44224. Cell phone:
330-554-4260. E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: John Bower, Bob Concoby, Ron Grissett
Treasurer: Jerry Bridge [Paulette]. E-mail: [email protected]
Covenant (Meadville)-740 North Main St. Ext. Meadville, Pa. 16335. Phone:
814-333-6132
Pastor: Lucas Hanna [Melissa], 14409 Foster Road, Conneautville, PA
16406. Phone: 814-587-2125. Cell: 913-484-4598. E-mail: pastorhanna@
windstream.net.
Clerk: Robert Stivason [Sandy], 180 South Smith Street, Cochranton, Pa.
16314. Phone: 814-425-2252
Elders: Mike Clark [Becky], 21790 Center Rd., Venango, Pa. 16440. Phone:
814-398-1692. C. J. Williams (provisional).
Deacons: Andrea Ewing, 641 North Main St., Meadville, Pa. 16335. Phone:
814-724-7736; Linda Cummings [Bill], 2306 Cummings Dr., Cochranton,
Pa. 16314. Phone: 814-425-2164
Treasurer: Laura Cummings [Matt], 3398 County Line Road, Cochranton, Pa.
16314. Phone: 814-425-1895.
Covenant Fellowship—1300 Swissvale Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15221-1836.
Pastor: Bruce Hemphill [Margie], 935 Limecrest Road, Pittsburgh, PA
15221-2507. Phone: 412-244-0605. E-mail: [email protected].
Installed 1995.
Clerk: Louis Beatty [Loraine], 135 Dennis Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15116-3003.
Elders: Drew Gordon [Lynne], Christian Hallstein [Shirley], Joel Butler
[Autumn].
Deacon Chr: Lois Claerbaut [Dale], 137 Betty Jane Court, Pittsburgh, PA
15235, Phone: 412-241-1594. E-mail: [email protected].
Treasurer: Faith Martin [Fred], 100 Denniston St. #48, Pittsburgh, PA 15206.
Eastvale—504 Second Avenue, Eastvale, Beaver Falls, PA 15010. Phone: 724847-2080. (PA)
Pastor: Micah A. Ramsey [Leslie], 502 Second Ave. East, Beaver Falls, PA
15010. E-Mail: [email protected]. Phone: 724-843-2371. Cell:
724-312-9969. Installed 2007.
Clerk: John H. Schaefer [Lois], 149 Dillon St., Beaver Falls, PA 15010. Phone:
Elders: Joseph M. Caskey; John M. McMillan [Marion].
Deacon Chr.: Margaret Carson, 2344 Perrysville Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15214.
E-mail: [email protected].
332
Treasurer: Robert Garvin, 2855 River Road, Ellwood City, PA 16117. Phone:
724- 752-1180.
First R.P. Church of Beaver Falls—209 Darlington Road, Beaver Falls, PA
15010. Phone: 724-846-6877 (PA)
Pastor: Bruce Backensto [Kim], 3303 Seventh Avenue, Beaver Falls, PA
15010. Phone: 724-843-4696. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 1995.
Clerk: Matt Filbert [Heidi], 3004 Fifth Avenue, Beaver Falls, PA 15010.
Phone: 412-901-3553 (cell phone). E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: Glenn Aley, Matt Filbert [Heidi], Kenneth A. McBurney [Virginia],
Tim McClain [Bonnie], David Schaefer [Joy], David Tweed [Melissa].
Elders Emeritus: Robert M. Hemphill.
Deacon Chr.: Wendell Dean, 130 Dean Lane, Rt. 588, Zelienople, PA 16063.
Phone: 724-452-8086.
Treasurer: Matt Thompson [Emily], 1106 Highland Avenue, Beaver Falls, PA
Director of C.E.: Tim McClain [Bonnie], 299 Route 68, Rochester, PA 15074.
Grace (Gibsonia)—3916 Bakerstown Rd, Gibsonia, PA 15044. Phone: 724-4496363
Pastor: Jeff Stivason. 3914 Bakerstown Rd Gibsonia, PA 15044. Phone: 724444-4430. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 2009.
Clerk: Calvin Troup [Amy], 3959 Auld Avenue. Allison Park, PA 15101.
Elders: Bernie Zimmovan; Wayne Spear, 3940 Bakerstown Road, Gibsonia,
PA 15044. E-mail: [email protected]
Treasurer: Tim Kelly, 6074 Morrow Lane. Gibsonia, PA 15044. Phone: 724444-1912. E-mail: [email protected] Grace Presbyterian Church—370 Airport Rd. State College, PA 16801. Phone:
814-237-2637.
Pastor: David Hanson [Ruth], 628 Devonshire Dr., State College, PA 16803.
Phone: 814-235-0410. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 2005.
Clerk: John C. Pershe [Barb]. 102 Ridgewood Circle, State College, PA 16803.
Elders: Jonathan D. Adams [Kathy]. E-mail: [email protected]; Dean McHenry
[Ellen]. E-mail: [email protected]; David Eiseman [Pat]. E-mail:
[email protected]
Treasurer: Cyrus Beisel, P.O. Box 5892, Belleville, PA 17004. Phone: 717935-5335. E-mail: [email protected]
Manchester—204 Manchester Hill Rd., New Kensington, PA 15068. Phone:
724339-1551. Web site: www.manchesterrpchurch.org.
333
Pastor: Vince Scavo [Elizabeth], 200 Manchester Hill Rd., New Kensington,
PA 15068. Phone: 724-334-1775. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed
2001.
Clerk: Brian Panichelle. 516 Spring Street, Latrobe, PA 15650. Phone: 724537-2790; 724-238-2148 (w). E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: Marlin Klingensmith. E-mail: [email protected]; Doug Comin.
E-mail: [email protected]; Randy Johovich. E-mail: randy@
lutherdog.net
Deacon Chr.: Ed Panichelle, 209 Beverly Drive., Lower Burrell, PA 15068.
Phone: 724-339-2949 (h). E-mail: [email protected].
Treasurer: Dorey Panichelle, 209 Beverly Drive., Lower Burrell PA 15068.
Phone: 724-339-2949 (h). E-mail: [email protected].
North Hills—606 Thompson Run Road, Pittsburgh. PA 15237. Phone: 412-486-
1167. (BF, PM)
Pastor: Harry Metzger [Catherine], 1049 Balmoral, Pittsburgh, PA 15237.
Associate Pastor: Martin Blocki [Katherine], 5368 Hardt Road, Gibsonia,
PA 15044. Cell Phone: 412-901-3008. E-mail: [email protected].
Installed 2003.
Clerk: William J (Bill) Weir [Rose], 114 Virginia Rd., Pittsburgh, PA 15237.
Elders: Jerry F. O’Neill, Bruce C. Stewart, Luke O’Neill, Samuel Spear.
Deacon Chr.: Jeff Hall, 111 Richmond Circle, Pittsburgh, PA 15237. Phone:
Treasurer: Rose Weir, 114 Virginia Rd., Pittsburgh, PA 15237. Phone: 412635-8175. E-mail: [email protected]
Youth Dir.: Jeff & Ruth Hall (see above).
Co-Chair. of C.E.: Martin Blocki (see above) and Ann O’Neill [Jerry], 505
Fox Dr., Pittsburgh, PA 15237. Phone: 412-635-7391. E-mail: aoneill@rpts.
edu.
Providence—2001 Pioneer Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15226. Phone: 412-388-1099.
Pastor: Rutledge Etheridge [Evelyn], 336 Fidelity Dr, Pittsburgh, PA 15236,
Phone: 412-884-1363. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed
2006.
Clerk: James McFarland, 11867 Quarter Horse Dr., North Huntington, PA
15642. Phone: 412-445-6537.
Elders: C.J. Williams, Jay Strunk.
Treasurer: Barbara Friend, 836 Rosbury Place, Pittsburgh, PA 15243.
Rimersburg—Box 419, North Main Street, Rimersburg, PA 16248. Phone: 814473-3510. Web site: www.rimersburgrpc.org
Stated Supply: John Monger [Donna], 4 Barber Street, Clarion, PA 16214.
334
Phone: 319-461-0905 (cell). E-mail: [email protected].
Clerk: Bill Douthett [Sara], PO Box 225, Rimersburg, PA 16248. Phone: 814473-3760. E-mail: [email protected].
Elder: Ralph Joseph (Provisional).
Treasurer: Mrs. Carie Engro, P.O. Box 762, Rimersburg, PA 16248. Phone:
814-473-6499
Rose Point—468 Rose Point Road, New Castle, PA 16010 (PA). Phone: 724-9249519. Web site: www.rosepointrpc.org. (PA)
Pastor: Charles Brown [Miriam], 468 Rose Point Road, New Castle, PA 16101.
2008.
Clerk: John M. Mitchell, 1072 Golf Course Road, Volant, PA 16156. Phone:
Elders: Steven Wilson, Roy Bessell.
Deacon Chairman: John Hanninen, 106 Simpson Lane, Utica, PA 16802.
Treasurer: John M. Mitchell. (See above).
S.S. Superintendent: Jack Kaylor, 705 S. Main St., Bessemer, PA 16057.
Trinity—Meeting at Francis R. Fuchs Special Center, 11011 Cherry Hill Rd.,
Beltsville, MD 20705. Web site: www.trinityrpc.org.
Pastor: Steve Bradley [Julie], 2757 Pinecrest Dr., Riva, MD 21140. Phone:
Home: 410-956-3944; Cell: 301-351-2314. E-mail: bygracealone@verizon.
net. Installed 2002.
Clerk: David Merkel, 3505 N Chatham Rd., Ellicott City, MD 21042. Phone:
Elders: Anthony Gazo, Brad Stewart
Treasurer: Amy Ward, 13121 Oriole Dr., Beltsville, MD 20705. Phone: 301937-8024. E-mail: [email protected].
Tusca—Corner of Darlington and Chapel Roads, Brighton Twp., Box Beaver, PA
15009. Phone: 724-495-6811
Pastor: Kenneth Hoffman [Janice], 385 6th Street, Beaver, PA 15009. Phone:
724-774-5798. Installed 1982
Clerk: Fred Nahas, 416 Jefferson St., Vanport, PA 15009.
Elders: A. Dale Carothers, James R. Dobbs, Jeffrey Dobbs.
Treasurer: Glen Detwiler, 870 Canal Street, Beaver, PA 15009. Phone: 724774-3280
Ministers Serving at Geneva College
Dean R. Smith, D. Min. [Nancy], 3600 36th Street Place, Beaver Falls, PA
335
Jonathan M. Watt, Ph. D. [June], 2907 5th Avenue, Beaver Falls, PA 15010.
Ministers Serving the R.P. Seminary
Richard C. Gamble, Ph.D. [Janice], 2828 4th Ave, Beaver Falls, PA 15010.
Jerry F. O’Neill, D.D. [Ann], 505 Fox Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15237. Phone:
C.J. Williams [Sherri], 748 Lafayette Dr., Clairton, PA 15025. Phone: 412-2330603. E-rnail: [email protected].
Paul M. Martin [Janet], P.O. Box 81747, Pittsburgh, PA 15217. Phone: 412731-6190: Cell Phone: 412-370-9960. E-mail: [email protected].
Ministers Serving on the Mission Field
Chaplain Kelly J. Moore [Judy], 11532 A Outlook Pl., Ft. Drum, N.Y. 13603.
Phone: 315-405-8506 (home); 910-728-6612 (personal cell); E-mail: Kelly.
[email protected].
William Sterrett [Kalli], 5 Elassonas, 7101 Aradhippou, Larnaca, Cyprus.
Phone: 011-357-534454. E-fax: 1-708-570-1452. E-mail: sterrett@cytanct.
com.cy.
Ministers Retired
James D. Carson, 143 Crosswynds Drive, Beaver Falls, PA 15010. Phone: 724494-5688. E-mail: [email protected]
Norman M. Carson, Ph.D. [Beverly], 1310 fox Avenue, Beaver Falls, PA 15010.
Joseph M. Caskey, 2818 5th Ave., Beaver Falls, PA 15010-3612. Phone: 724847-2543. E-mail: [email protected]
Clark Copeland, Th.D., D.D., 2344 Perrysville Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15214.
Robert R. Fullerton, 310 Cherrywood Lane, Edgewater, FL 32132. Phone: 386426-2337.
Ralph E. Joseph [Joday], 225 N. Main St., Slippery Rock, PA 16057. Phone: 724794-1429. Cell: 724-968-8800. E-mail: Slipperyrockrprev@zoorninternet.
net.
G. Duncan Lowe [Carol], 2513 Holly Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15235. Phone: 412731-5768. E-mail: [email protected].
Melville W. Martin [Marian], 2344 Perrysville Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15214.
Phone: 412-224-6813.
Paul McCracken [Frances], 2344 Perrysville Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15214.
Phone: 412-224-6778.
Kenneth A. McBurney [Virginia], 149 Patricia Drive, Beaver Falls, PA 15010.
Phone: 724-827-8548.
John M. McMillan [Marion], 121 New Galilee Road, Darlington, PA 16115.
336
Phone: 724-827-8134.
Leverne Rosenberger [Shirley], 130 Coralberry Drive, Beaver Falls, PA 15010.
Kenneth G. Smith [Floy], 429 Fourth Ave., Patterson Heights, Beaver Falls, PA
Wayne R. Spear, Ph.D. [Mary], 3940 Bakerstown Road, Gibsonia, PA 15044.
Bruce C. Stewart, DD., 7959 Remington Drive, Pittsburgh, PA. 15237. Phone:
John H. White, D.Min. [Norma], 110 Klitch St, Beaver Falls, PA 15010. Phone:
724-581-4488. E-mail: [email protected]
Ministers without pastorates
Kent Butterfield [Rosaria], 17372 Hilltop Drive, Purcellville, VA 20132. Phone:
Doug Comin [Amy], 311 Walnut St., Latrobe, PA 15650. Phone: 724-5373050. E-mail: [email protected]
Wayne Duffield [Nancy], P.O. Box 373, 311 Church Street, New Alexandria.
PA 15670. Phone: 724-668-7506. E-mail: [email protected]
Brent England [Meg], 210 Sunrise Terrace, State College, PA 16801. Phone:
814-933-7381, E-mail: [email protected]
Randy Johovich [Priscilla], 4729 Valleyfield Drive, Allison Park, PA 15101.
Peter Smith [Vicki], 5010 Nicholas Rd., Waldorf, MD 20601. Phone: 301-6452315 or 240-210-1539 (cell). E-mail: [email protected].
Ruling Elders On Presbytery Roll
Adam Mastris, 16 Chlois St, CY 6301 Larnaca, Cyprus. Phones: +357-24658068 (home); +357-24-533683 (work); +357-99-630683 (Cell): Fax:
+357-24-531594. E-mail: [email protected]
ROSTER OF ATLANTIC PRESBYTERY
Moderator..................................................................................... William J. Edgar
Clerk............................................................................................... J. Bruce Martin
Treasurer...................................................................................... Joseph Comanda
Ad Interim Commission...........................................................Elkins Park Session
Broomall—25 Lawrence Road, Broomall, PA 19008. Phone: 610-353-1371.
Pastor: William J. Edgar, Ph.D. [Gretchen], 332 Riverview Avenue, Drexel
Hill, PA 19026. Phone: 610-623-0117. E-mail: [email protected].
Installed 1981.
Associate Pastor: Zachary Kail [Liesl], 27 Lawrence Road, Broomall, PA
19008. Phone: 412-508-1937. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 2008.
337
Clerk: George W. Jackson, 3997 Vernon Road, Drexel Hill, PA 19026. Phone:
610- 259-2753. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: Michael Lydon [Linda]. E-mail: [email protected].
Treasurer: Joseph Comanda [Jan]. 629 Tennis Ave., Ardsley, PA 19038.
S.S. Supt.: Mrs. Joseph [Laura] Rizzo, 4 Davis Drive, Apt. D, Broomall, PA
19008.
Cambridge—53 Antrim Street, Cambridge, MA 02139. Phone: 617-864-3185.
Web site: reformedprescambridge.com
Pastor: Vacant
Clerk: Christopher Wright, Ph.D. [Carol], 32 Glen Ave., Arlington, MA 02474. Phone: 781-641-9820. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: Thomas A. Fisher [Martha]. E-mail: [email protected]; Daniel
Kim [Minji]. E-mail: [email protected]
Treasurer: David McKinney, First Reformed Presbyterian Church, 53 Antrim
Street, Cambridge, MA 02139. Phone 781-307-5012. E-mail: singindave@
gmail.com.
S.S. Supt.: Kyle & Violet Finley, First Reformed Presbyterian Church,
Cambridge, MA 02139, Phone: 508-238-6949, E-mail: violet.finley@gmail.
com.
Christ Church—Meeting at 81 Warren Avenue, E. Providence, RI. Send mail to
PO Box 14168, East Providence, RI 02914.
Pastor: Daniel M. Howe [Esther], 69 Brookdale Blvd., Pawtucket, RI 02861. Phone: 401-709-4678. E-mail: [email protected]
Provisional Clerk: Thomas Fisher [Martha]
Provisional Elder: Mike DeSocio [Mary Jean]
Coldenham-Newburgh—469 Coldenham Road, Walden, NY 12586. Phone:
845-564-3924. (BF) Pastor: Charles W. Leach [Susan], 25 Browns Rd., Walden, NY 12586. Phone:
845-778-3704. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 1995.
Clerk: Phillip Shafer [Lesesne], 394 Lake Osiris Road, Walden, NY 12586.
Phone: 845-778-5088. E-mail: [email protected]. Elders: Moderator and Clerk only
Treasurer: Ernie Johnson [Becky], 467 Coldenham Road, Walden, NY 12586.
Phone: 845-567-6922. E-mail: [email protected]. S.S. Supt.: Susan Leach [Charles], 25 Browns Rd., Walden, NY 12586. Phone:
338
Elkins Park—901 Cypress Avenue, Elkins Park, PA 19027. Phone: 215-8879188. Web Site: elkinsparkchurch.com
Pastor: John D. Edgar [Evniki], 8344 Cadwalader Avenue, Elkins Park, PA
Clerk: Michael Jessop [Anna Li], 2629 Susquehanna Rd., Roslyn, PA 19001.
Elder: Duran Perkins [Betsy]. Phone: 215-481-0494. E-mail: duran.perkins@
gmail.com.
Deacons: Bob Allmond, Clara McClay, Emil Nahm
Treasurer: Anna Li Jessop [Michael], 2629 Susquehanna Rd. Roslyn, PA
19001.
S.S. Supt.: none
Hazleton Area—680 Roosevelt Street, Hazleton, PA 18201. Phone: 570-4500148. Web Site: www.hazletonrpc.com
Pastor: Paul Brace [Jennifer], 376 Pond Hill Mt. Rd, Wapwallopen, PA 18660 Phone: 570-379-2148. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 2009. Clerk: Evert ‘Andy’ Anderson [Della]. 43 Heckman St., Quakake, PA 182450128. Cell Phone: 570-401-8819. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: Moderator and Clerk only
Deacons: Seth Olivieri, Joe Davidovich.
Treasurer: Della Anderson, 43 Heckman St., Quakake, PA 18245-0128.
Ridgefield Park—310 Main St., Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660. Phone: 201-4405993. Fax: 201-440-8586. Web Site: www.sermonaudio.com/rpcnj2007. (BF)
Pastor: J. Bruce Martin [JoAnne], 947 Alpine Drive, Teaneck, NJ 07666.
Clerk: Richard B. Weir, Ph.D., 262 Pondfield Road West, Bronxville, NY
Elders: Glen A. Chin [Jewel], David A. Weir [Bonnie], Ph. D.
Deacon Chr.: Mary Jane Park, 2 Godfrey Road, Upper Montclair, NJ 070431310. Phone: 973-744-3179.
Treasurer: Miss Francis Chao, 102 Oak St., Teaneck, NJ 07666. Phone: 201530-9644.
S.S. Supt.: J. Bruce Martin [JoAnne]. 947 Alpine Drive, Teaneck, NJ 07666.
White Lake—Rt.17B and Mattison Rd. (P.O. Box 208), White Lake, NY 12786.
Web Site: whitelakechurch.com
Pastor: David C. Coon [Cathy], P.O. Box 208, White Lake, NY 12786.
Phone: 845-583-7082. Mobile: 914-799-5425. E-mail: [email protected].
Installed 1980.
Clerk: Mike Tabon [Beth], 16 Courtney Ave., Newburgh, NY 12550. Phone:
339
Elders: Mike DeSocio, Mike Klussman, Mike Tabon.
Treasurer: Judy Klussman, 1416 County Rt. 56, Mountaindale, NY 127635118. E-mail: [email protected]
Chr. Deacon Board: Marc Mendelsohn, 91 Perry Road, Cochecton, NY
12726 Phone: 845-583-7040. E-mail: [email protected]
Ministers Without Pastorates
Philip L. Coon, 19 Cedar Avenue, Gettysburg, PA 17325-8531. Phone: 717337-2397.
Mauro Silva, 12 B Sunflower Road, Maple Shade, NJ 08052. Phone: 856-3304303(h); 814-934-3843(c). E-mail: [email protected].
ROSTER OF GREAT LAKES-GULF PRESBYTERY
Moderator....................................................................................... Rich Holdeman
Clerk............................................................................................Raymond Morton
Assistant Clerk............................................................................ Gordon J. Keddie
Treasurer........................................................................................... James Bishop
1541 Connemara Road, Indianapolis, IN 46217. Phone: 317-884-0116
Assistant Treasurer........................................................................... George Shopp
Moderator, Ad Interim Commission..................................................Jared Olivetti
Covfamikoi Conference Director......................................................... Jeff Kessler
Covfamikoi Conference Business Manager....................................... Shane Shoop
Youth Coordinator....................................................................... Richard Johnston
Alpharetta, GA—Northminster RPC—meeting at Hampton Inn and Suites,
16785 Old Morris Road, Alpharetta, GA 30004. Phone: 770-241-3946. Web
Site: www.northminster-church.com
Pastor: Dr. Frank J. Smith [Penny], 5830 Millstone Drive, Cumming, GA
30028. Phone: 770-241-3946. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed
2010.
Clerk: Robert Shapiro, 6470 Bentley Trail, Cumming, GA 30040. Phone: 770714-1008. E-mail: [email protected].
Elder: Mr. Robert Shapiro (See above).
Treasurer: Mr. Robert Shapiro (See above).
Belle Center, OH—Rt. 273 and Center, PO Box 365, Belle Center, OH 43310.
Web Site: www.bcrpchurch.org (PA)
Pastor: Philip Pockras [Judy], 403 N. Elizabeth Street, PO Box 365, Belle
Center, OH 43310. Phone: 937-464-6851. E-mail: covvie@columbus.
rr.com. Installed 1985.
340
Clerk: Larry Bump [Gloria], 493 C.R. 111 East, Rushsylvania, OH 43347.
Treasurer: Greg Probst [Laura], 3468 OH 103, Bluffton, OH 45817. Phone:
419-358-7514; E-mail: [email protected]
Deacon Chr.: Paul McDonald [Jocele], 6404 R.R. 55, Bellefontaine, OH
43311. E-mail: [email protected].
S.S. Supt.: Larry Bump (See above).
Bloomington, IN—302 East First Street, Bloomington, IN 47401. Phone: 812339-1922. Web Site: www.bloomingtonrpchurch.com (SS)
Pastor: Rich Holdeman [Amy], 3202 Kensington Park Dr., Bloomington, IN
47401. Office Phone: 812-339-3887. Home Phone: 812-334-7899. Cell:
Clerk: Wendell Faris McBurney [Jean], 4648 Winterstill Road, Zionsville, IN
46077. Phone: 317-873-5000.
Elders: Wes Archer [Angie], 4207 Morgan Circle, Ellettsville, IN 47429. Cell:
812-325-8262. E-mail: [email protected]; Eric Cosens [Rachel],
3364 W. Sekiu Court, Bloomington, IN 47404. Phone: 812-876-0481.
E-mail: [email protected].; Kenneth De Jong [Carolyn], 3613 Brownridge
Rd., Bloomington, IN 47401. Phone: 812-334-0069.
Treasurer: JoAnn Moore, c/o of the church. Phone: 812-824-4540.
C.E. Chairman: Rich Holdeman (See Above).
Brownsburg, IN—Christ Church RP—(Send all correspondence to Pastor’s
home address.)
Pastor: Michael LeFebvre, PhD [Heather], 5881 Skyward Lane, Indianapolis,
IN 46234. Phone: 317-626-6178. E-mail: [email protected].
Installed 2006.
Clerk: Duane Judd [Anne], 8944 Log Run S., Drive, Indianapolis, IN 46234.
Elder: Duane Judd (See above).
Treasurer: Nathan Enas [Ginny], 4560 Crooked Creek Ridge Drive,
Indianapolis, IN 46228. Phone: 317-290-9092. E-mail: [email protected].
Columbus, IN—550 N. National Road, Columbus, IN 47201. Phone: 812-3783003 (PA)
Pastor: Andy McCracken [Susan], 632 Ridgeview Lane, Columbus, IN 47201.
Clerk: Jeff Jones [Kathy], 1401 Parkside Dr., Columbus, IN 47203. E-mail:
[email protected]
Elders: Edmund Schisler [Lynn], 5770 Treeline Dr., Columbus, IN 47201.
Phone: 812-342-1989. E-mail: [email protected]; Butch
Shoop [Paula], 11850 West 525 South, Columbus, IN 47201. Phone 812342-1909. E-mail: [email protected]; Robert McCracken [Lynn],
341
541 Ridgeview Court, Columbus, IN 47201. Phone: 812-342-6375. E-mail:
[email protected]; Harold Jones [Laura], 4714 29th Street, Columbus,
IN 47203. Phone: 812- 418-3730. E-mail: [email protected]
Treasurer: Lynn Schisler, 5770 Treeline Dr., Columbus, IN 47201. Phone:
C.E. Chairman: Robert McCracken, 541 Ridgeview Ct., Columbus, IN 47201.
Phone: 812-342-6375.
Durham, NC—First RPC. 1316 Watts Street, Durham, NC 27701. Phone: 919844-5255. (PA)
Pastor: Ian Wise [Deanna], 13612 Durant Road, Raleigh, NC 27614. Phone:
919-844-5255. Cell: 919-740-9553. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed
2005.
Clerk: Provisional Elder Jon Hughes [Wendy], 4495 Harold Dr. Troy, MI
Elders: Charles Saunders [Carolyn], E-mail: [email protected]; Provisional
Elder: David Carr [Karen], E-mail: [email protected].
Treasurer: Mrs. Kathie Boone, 7505 Inglewood Road, Burlington, NC 27215.
Elkhart, IN—2323 17th Street, Elkhart, IN 46517-1431. Phone: 574-293-1772.
Web Site: www.elkhartrpc.org
Pastor: Keith Magill [Becky], 23220 Orchard Ridge Drive, Elkhart, IN 465169099. Phone: 574-875-4688. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 2005.
Clerk: Fikre Menbere [Ritva], 57100 Bluff Crest Drive, Elkhart, IN 46516.
Deacon: Joe Moore [Rochelle], 62373 CR 17, Goshen, IN 46526. Phone: 574533-9721. E-mail: [email protected].
Inactive Elder: Joe Moore [Rochelle], 62373 CR 17, Goshen, IN 46526.
Treasurer: John Sawatsky [Julia], 19691 Edgewaters Drive, Goshen, IN
Grand Rapids, MI - First RPC—Meeting at: Puritan Reformed Theological
Seminary, 2965 Leonard St. NE, Grand Rapids MI 49525. Phone: 616-4599530.
Pastor: Ray B. Lanning [Linda], 415 Paris Avenue SE, Grand Rapids, MI
2007.
Clerk: Kent Van Timmeren [Cheryl], 5017, Chickering Road, Belding, MI
Elders: Richard Bonner [Rieta], Doug Nadeau [Barbara], Doug Sikma
[Connie], Kent Van Timmeren [Cheryl].
Treasurer: Jeffrey Wykstra, 4209 Michael Avenue SW, Wyoming, MI 49509.
342
Hetherton, MI—(All mail to Milton Harrington).
Stated Supply: Milton Harrington [Cordelia], PO Box 294, Rose City, MI
Clerk: Milton Harrington
Provisional Elder: Ed Roby
Treasurer: Cordelia Harrington, PO Box 294, Rose City, MI 48654. Phone:
989-685-2707.
S.S. Supt.: Sonja F. Hoy, PO Box 555, Johannesburg, MI 49751. Phone: 989732-5651.
Indianapolis, IN – Second RP—4800 N. Michigan Road, Indianapolis, IN
46228 Phone: 317-255-7557. (BF, HA)
Pastor: Richard Johnston [Beckie], 1701 W. 51st Street, Indianapolis, IN
46228. E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: 317-475-0339. Fax: 317255-7097. Installed 1993.
Assistant to the Pastor: Dean Filson [Pam]. E-mail: [email protected].
Clerk: Russ Pulliam [Ruth], Indianapolis Star, 1025 W. 52nd St., Indianapolis,
IN 46228. Phone: 317-444-6001. E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: Donald Cassell, Jr. [Choi-Ha], E-mail: [email protected];
Dean Filson [Pam]; Ram Rao [Asha], E-mail: [email protected]; Terry
Magnuson [Debbie], E-mail: [email protected].
Inactive Elders: Karl Stoicheff [Joan], E-mail: [email protected]; Don Fulk,
Bob Heimburger; Walt Zebrun.
Treasurer: Jim Bright [Cindy], 4219 Sunshine Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46228.
Deacon Chr.: David Neel, Phone: 317-733-0035.
S.S. Supt.: Terry Magnuson, 35 Monticello Drive, Greenwood, IN 46142.
Indianapolis, IN – Southside RPC—6969 S. Meridian Street, Indianapolis, IN
46217. Phone: 317-787-1211. (BF, HA). Office: E-mail: [email protected].
Phone 317-783-9547. Web Site: www.southsiderp.org
Pastor: Gordon J. Keddie [Jane], 330 Webber Way, Greenwood, IN 461421895. Phone: 317-887-0632. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed
2004.
Associate Pastor: David G. Whitla [June], 7206 Chimney Rock Court,
Indianapolis, IN 46217. Phone: 317-884-3453. E-mail: whitlaboy@hotmail.
com. Installed 2008.
Clerk: James Bishop [Peg], 1541 Connemara Road, Indianapolis, IN 46217.
Elders: Rick Ahlgrim [Rebecca], E-mail: rwahlgrim@comcast.
net; John Hanson [Pam], E-mail: [email protected]; William
343
Sheldrake [Priscilla], E-mail: [email protected];
George Shopp [Bonnie], E-mail: [email protected]; Jerry Porter
[Sharon], E-mail: [email protected]; Steve Sturm [Nancy],
E-mail: [email protected], Phone: 317-784-8462; Don Prichard
[Stephanie], E-mail: [email protected].
Treasurer: Mark Hart [Susanne], 8720 Royal Meadow Drive, Indianapolis, IN
46217. Phone: 317-885-2277
Kokomo, IN—Sycamore RPC—300 E. Mulberry St., Kokomo, IN 46901.
Phone: 765-854-0850.
Pastor: Barry York [Miriam], 1104 W. Walnut, Kokomo, IN 46901. Phone:
Associate Pastor: Jason Camery [Jenny], 1015 Springwater Road, Kokomo,
IN 46902. Phone: 765-219-2700. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed
2009.
Clerk: Greg Fisher [Pam], 1388 S. 200 E., Kokomo, IN, 46902. Phone: 765868-9774. E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: Tom Dinkledine [Susan], Phone: 765-566-3602. E-mail: TomDink@
aol.com; Robert McKissick [Sharon], Phone: 574-753-0569. E-Mail:
[email protected]
Treasurer: Scott Hunt [Allison], 916 W. 5th St., Marion, IN, 46953. Phone:
Lafayette, IN —1723 S. 9th Street, Lafayette, IN 47905. Phone: 765-474-3307.
(PA, HA)
Pastor: David W. Long [Jenny], 401 N. Brookfield Dr., Lafayette, IN 47905.
1984.
Clerk: Dan Webb [Joanne], 1445 Warren Place, Lafayette, IN 47905. Phone:
Elders: Jeff Kessler [Karla], 7695 W 650 S, Rossville, IN 46065. Phone: 765379-2229. E-mail: [email protected]; Robert Bibby [Marlene], Phone:
765-296-8223. Cell: 765-427-3183. E-mail: [email protected]; Jack
Rhoda [Karen], 1227 Catula Avenue, Lafayette, IN 47905. Phone: 765-4770240. E-mail: jack [email protected].
Deacon Chr.: Les Walker. E-mail: [email protected]
Financial Secretary: Janet Wagner [Buck], 5216 E. 600 South, Lafayette, IN
47909. Phone: 765-296-2521.
S.S. Supt.: Jack Rhoda [Karen], 1227 Catula Avenue, Lafayette, IN 47905.
Phone: 765-477-0240. E-mail: jack [email protected].
Orlando, FL - 324 East Livingston Street, Orlando, FL 32801. Phone: 407-8434361. Pastor: (Vacant).
344
Clerk: Jonathan Schaefer [Dianne], 4529 Fontana Street, Orlando, FL 32807.
Elders: Ed Forest (emeritus), Joe Worsham, James Pennington (Moderator Pro
Tem)
Treasurer: Robert Terry [Peggy], 2047 Howell Branch Road, Maitland, FL
32751. Phone: 407-648-0877.
Deacon Chr.: David Tacey [Kim], 3156 Touraine Ave., Orlando, FL 32812.
Phone: 407-888-3408.
S.S. Supt.: Robert Terry (see above).
Prairie View, IL—Westminster RPC—16670 Easton Ave. Prairie View, IL
60069. Phone 847-634-3333. Web Site: www.westminsterrpc.org.
Pastor: Vacant
Interim Pastor: Steve Rhoda; E-mail: [email protected].
Treasurer: Richard Kairelis, 22158 Concorde Court, Kildeer, IL 60047.
Provisional Moderator: Keith Magill. E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: Robert Koch [Pam], 103 Hamilton Place, Vernon Hills, IL 60061.
Phone: 847-367-9188. E-mail: [email protected]; (Provisional) Jim
Ritchhart [Connie], E-mail: [email protected]
Clerk: Robert Koch [Pam] (See above).
Selma, AL—627 Jeff Davis Avenue, Selma, AL 36701-5576. Phone: 334-8757692. (All mail to church address.)
Pastor: Tom Gray [Caramel], 815 King Street, Selma AL 36701. Phone: 334875-9817. E-mail: [email protected].
Clerk: George P. Evans (Jeannie), 328 Kingsley Drive, Selma, AL 36701.
Elders: Greg Woodson [Aretha], 1420 Pollard Street, Selma, AL 36701. Phone:
334-875-2937.
Treasurer: Ruth J. Brooks, 810 Minter Avenue, Selma, AL 36701. Phone: 334872-1885. E-mail: [email protected] .
Assist. Treas.: Juanita Jones, 2504 Parkway Dr., Selma, AL 36701. E-mail:
[email protected]
Deacon Chr.: Greg Woodson [Aretha] (See above). Bertrand Woodson
[Regina], 1420 Pollard Street, Selma, AL 36701. Phone 334-875-2937.
S.S. Supt.: Ruth J. Brooks, 810 Minter Avenue, Selma, AL 36701. Phone: 334872-1885. E-mail: [email protected].
Southfield, MI—26550 Evergreen Road, Southfield, MI 48076. Phone: 248-3563932. Web Site: www.reformed.com and srpc.sermonaudio.com. (PA)
Pastor: James Faris [Elizabeth], 26580 Evergreen Rd., Southfield, MI 48076.
Clerk: Jon Hughes [Wendy], 4495 Harold Dr. Troy, MI 48085. Phone: 248-
345
680-1959. E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: James Curtis [Colleen]. E-mail: [email protected]; John Kim
[Laura], E-mail: [email protected].
Elder Emeritus: J. Raymond Stevenson [Ruth]; Bruce Adams, D.O. [Charlotte].
Treasurer: Wendy Hughes [Jon], 4495 Harold, Troy, MI 48085. Phone: 248680-1959. E-mail: [email protected].
Deacon Chr.: Jeff Manring [Becky], 13287 Grand Haven Dr., Sterling Heights,
MI 48312. Phone 586-978-1847. E-mail: [email protected].
S.S. Supt.: Laura Kim [John], 25756 Cheyenne Dr., Novi, MI 48374. Phone:
Sparta, IL—605 North Market Street, Sparta, IL 62286. Phone: 618-443-4435.
Church Office is in the parsonage. Phone: 618-443-3419. (BF).
Pastor: Raymond E. Morton [Heather], 411 N. Vine St., Sparta, IL 62286.
Phone: 618-443-3419. Cell: 618-317-6157. E-mail: revmorton@frontier.
com or [email protected]. Installed 1989.
Clerk: Robert Morrow [Shirley], 414 N. Vine St., Sparta, IL 62286. Phone:
618-443-3133. Cell: 618-317-4180. E-mail: [email protected].
Treasurer: Eric Morrow, 414 N. Vine St., Sparta, IL 62286. Phone: 618-4433133.
Terre Haute, IN—Mission Church—Meeting location: 1400 South Sixth St.,
Terre Haute, IN 47802.
Church planter: Bill Roberts [Rachel], 2936 Terri Lee Ct., Terre Haute, IN
47805. Phone: 812-327-5296 (cell), 812-229-4980 (church), 812-244-9606.
Provisional Clerk: Jerry Porter [Sharon]. E-mail: [email protected]
Treasurer: Donna Smith, RR3, Box 1915, Linton, IN 47441.
West Lafayette, IN - Immanuel—1893 E. 600 N., West Lafayette, IN 47906.
Phone: 765-320-0077. Web Site: www.immanuelrpc.com
Pastor: Jared P. Olivetti [Lisa], 2103 Old Oak Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47906.
Clerk: David Carr [Karen], 103 Elvernan Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47906.
Elders: Benjamin Larson [Anna], 325 Smiley Street, West Lafayette, IN 47906.
Minister Serving the R. P. Seminary
Tom Reid [Genevieve], 110 Ivy Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15218-1618. Phone:
412-731-3818 (home), 412-731-8690 (work). Fax: 412-731-4834. E-mail:
[email protected] or [email protected].
Retired Ministers
Robert A. Henning [Esther], 5059 Countess Drive, Columbus, IN 47203. Phone
346
Robert W. Morrow [Shirley], 414 N. Vine, Sparta, IL 62286. Phone: 618-4433133. E-mail: [email protected].
Robert B. McCracken [Lynn], 541 Ridgeview Ct., Columbus, IN 47201. Phone:
M. L. McFarland, D. Min. [Shirley], 850 East Gallagher Rd., West Branch, MI
Jim Pennington [Ruth], 14553 Bluebird Park Road, Windermere, FL 34786.
James M. Wright [Judy], 9813 White Road, Ocoee, FL 34761. Phone: 407-2912300. E-mail: [email protected]
Ministers without Pastorates
Roger Adams [Joann], 4795 Minden Rd, Ruth, MI 48470. Phone: 989-8643756. E-mail: [email protected].
Roy Blackwood, Ph.D. [Margie], 2460 Glebe Street, Apt. 175 Carmel, IN
46032. Phone: 317-873-4775. Fax: 317-873-0328. E-mail: Blackwood@
secondrpc.org.
Greg Cumbee [Rebekah], 11 Guilford Place, Durham, NC 27713. Phone: 919475-5751. E-Mail: [email protected]
Godfrey Franklin, Ph.D. 5625 St. Adamnan St., Pensacola, FL 32503-7916.
Phone: 850-478-6552 (home), 474-2851 (office). E-mail: [email protected].
Milton Harrington [Cordelia], PO Box 294, Rose City, MI 48654. Phone: 517685-2707. (See Hetherton).
R. Paul Mathews [Janet], 543-E Clover Ridge Circle, N.W., Grand Rapids, MI
Frank C. Schutz [Leslie], 5650 North Meadow’s Blvd, Columbus, OH 43229.
Phone: 614-848-8414. E-Mail: [email protected].
ROSTER OF JAPAN PRESBYTERY
Moderator ..........................................................................................Sumito Sakai
Clerk ............................................................................................. Katsunori Endo
English Clerk................................................................................................vacant (Assistant: Yuko Shiotsu )
Treasurer ...................................................................................Hirokazu Enomoto
Auditor ............................................................ ...Hiroyuki Kanamori, Kazuo Ishii
Young People’s Secretary ............................................................. Katsunori Endo
Secretaries for the presbytery’s website ( http://www.rpjapan.org ).
Manabu Torii, E-mail: [email protected]
Yuko Shiotsu, E-mail: [email protected]
Higashisuma—4-2-26- Oote-cho, Suma-Ku, Kobe 654-0013, Japan. Phone &
Fax: 078-731-5702 [From USA: 011-81-78-731-5702]. E-mail: rpkp99124@
maia.eonet.ne.jp (SS, HA)
347
Pastor: Sumito Sakai [Reiko], 2-7-3, Takakuradai, Suma-ku, Kobe, 6540081 Japan. Phone: 078-732-0405 [from USA: 81-78-732-0405]. E-mail:
[email protected]. Installed 1995.
Clerk (Elder): Akira Funahashi [Yoko], 6-1-33 Nishi Maiko, Tarumi-Ku,
Kobe 655-0048, Japan. Phone & Fax: 078-783-3989 [From USA: 011-8178-783-3989].
Elder: Kazuo Ishii　Treasurer: Yoko Funahashi, 6-1-33 Nishi Maiko, Tarumi-Ku, Kobe 655-0048,
Japan. Phone & Fax: 078-783-3989[From USA: 011-81-78-783-3989].
S.S. Superintendent: Kazuo Ishii, 1-26-4, Takakura-dai, Suma-ku,Kobe, 6541181. Phone: 078-733-894 [From USA:011-78-733-3989]
Youth Leader: Takashi Sato, #302, 1-1-22, Tobimatsu-cho, Suma-Ku, Kobe
654-0012, Japan. Phone: 078-734-7474 [From USA: 011-81-78-734-7474].
Kasumigaoka—6-8-10, Kasumigaoka, Tarumi-Ku, Kobe 655-0039, Japan.
Phone/Fax: 078-707-2155. [From USA: 011-81-78-707-2155 ]. (BF, SS, HA)
Pastor: vacant
Clerk (Elder): Kozo Kato [Yoshiko], 1-4-15, Midorigaoka Higashi, Miki
673-0533 Japan. Phone & Fax: 079-485-0592 [From USA: 011-81-79-4850592]. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: Seigo Kitani, E-mail: [email protected]; Hikoshi
Yamaguchi, M.D.
Treasurer: Toyoki Hamada. (Assistant: Yoshiko Kato)
S.S. Supt.: Yoshiko Kato [Kozo].
Youth Leader: Yusuke Hirata.
Okamoto-Keiyaku—6-17-31, Motoyama Kita-Machi, Higashinada-Ku, Kobe
658-0003, Japan. Phone & Fax: 078-452-5310 [From USA: 011-81-78-4525310]. (SS, HA, PM).
Pastor: Shigeru Takiura, D.D. [Masako], 6-17-31, Motoyama Kita-Machi,
Higashinada-Ku, Kobe 658, Japan. Phone & Fax: 078-452-5310 [From
USA: 011-81-78-452-5310]. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 1977.
Clerk (Elder): Hirokazu Enomoto [Chie], Okamoto Century Mansion 316,
4-9-30 Okamoto, Higashinada-ku, Kobe 658-0072, Japan. Phone & Fax:
078-431-2613 [From USA: 011-81-78-431-2613].
Treasurer: Hajime Nakamura [Hiroko], 1-9-2 Daiwa-Higashi, Kawanishi,
666-0111, Japan. Phone & Fax: 0727-95-[From USA: 011-81-727-95-0182]
Youth Leader: Dempei Takiura
Kita-Suzurandai (Mission Church)—1-4-10, Izumi-dai, Kita-Ku, Kobe 6511141, Japan. Phone/Fax: 078-592-6519 [From USA: 011-81-78-592-6519]
Web Site: http://www.geocities.co.jp/kitasuzurpc/
Pastor: Katsunori Endo [Yuko], #204, Hapinesu Plaza Kitamachi, 10-5
Desakayama, Yamadacho-Obu, Kita-ku, Kobe, 651-1101 JAPAN. Phone
348
078-592-5086 [From USA: 011-81-78-592-5086]. E-mail: katsu_rpts@
hotmail.com. Installed 2005
Provisional Session (Kita-Suzurandai Commission) Moderator: Katsunori
Endo (domestic missionary)
Provisional Clerk: Hiroyuki Kanamori (pastor, Mukonoso RPC)
Provisional Elder : Sumito Sakai (pastor, Higashisuma RPC)
Treasurer: Akira Sato
Mukonoso - 3-26-5, Mokonoso Honmachi, Amagasaki 661-0031 Japan. Phone
& Fax: 06-6432-5343 [From USA: 011-81-6-6432-5343].
Pastor: Hiroyuki Kanamori [Junko]. E-mail: [email protected]
Installed 2001.
Clerk (Elder): Youichiro Fukuya [Atsuko], 9-33-9, Mukonoso, Amagasaki
661-0035
Treasurer: Shigeki Komuro
Kobe Theological Hall (KTH)—Covenanter Center Building, 1-25-2,
Nakayamate-dori, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0004 Japan. Web s\Site: http://www.
rpjapan.org/English/KTH/ Phone: 078-230-1199 [From USA: 011-81-78230-1199 ] * Main facility & Guest room. Phone & Fax: 078-452-5310 [From
USA 011-81-78-452-5310 ] * Rev. Takiura’s residence (representative)
Chairman of the Faculty: Hiroyuki Kanamori, S.T.M.
Representative: Shigeru Takiura, D.D.
Other Faculty Members: Sumito Sakai, Katsunori Endo, M. Patricia Boyle,
Ph.D.
Librarian: (vacant)
Treasurer: Yuko Shiotsu
[* Note that there is no full-time staff at KTH.]
Covenanter Bookstore—Covenanter Center Building, 1-25-2, Nakayamate-dori,
Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0004 Japan. Phone & Fax: 078-242-7003 [From USA:
011-81-78-242-7003]. E-mail: [email protected]
Board Members: Youichiro Fukuya (board representative), Shigeru Takiura,
D.D. (board chairman), Toyoki Hamada (manager of the bookstore), Shigeru
Yamaguchi, M. Patricia Boyle, Ph.D.
Staff: Jung-Im Park
349
ROSTER OF MIDWEST PRESBYTERY [updated
05/13/2010]
Moderator......................................................................................... Martin Wilsey
Clerk................. .............................................................................John McFarland
Assistant Clerk..................................................................................Shawn Stickel
Treasurer.........................................................................................Barry VanHorn,
12407 W. 52nd St., Shawnee, KS 66216. Phone: 913-488-6644. E-mail: [email protected]
Ad Interim Commission Moderator......................................................Adam King
Iowa Conference Secretary.....................................................................Ron Good
Kansas Conference Secretary..................................................................................
Western Conference Secretary........... Keith Mann. E-mail: [email protected]
Youth Leaders ........................................................................... Keith & Jill Mann
Christ Covenant Church—2312 Harvard Road , Lawrence, KS 66049. Phone:
785-842-5797.
Pastor: John M. McFarland [Lisa], 3018 Tomahawk Drive, Lawrence,
KS 66049. Phone: 785-841-2276; Cell: 785-766-7796. E-mail:
Clerk: Carl Mathews [Sharon], 818 Missouri St., Lawrence, KS 66044. Phone:
785-843-7537; Cell: 785-218-3085. E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: Phil Beard [Eileen]. Phone: 785-842-9262. E-mail: epbeard@gmail.
com; Ron Stegall [Kathy].
Deacon Chm.: John Huston [Mindy], 1649 Illinois Street, Lawrence,
KS 66044. Phone: 785-842-3914.
Treasurer: John More, Eudora, KS. Phone: 785-542-1193. E-mail: johnmore@
sprintmail.com.
C.E. Chm.: Christie Stegall [Micah], 1005 College Boulevard, Lawrence, KS 66049. Phone: 785-843-8895. E-mail: [email protected].
Clarinda—2702 250th Street, Clarinda, IA 51632. Phone: 712-542-3257.
Pastor: Jack Baumgardner [Karen], 1101 North 16th Street, Clarinda, IA 51632. Phone: 712-542-3169; Cell: 317-989-8769. E-mail: abraham-faith@
juno.com. Installed 2008.
Clerk: Steve Falk [Ruth], 2045 Willow Avenue, Clarinda, IA 51632.
Elder: Renwick Adams [Norma]. Phone: 712-542-5841. E-mail: renwicka@
mchsi.com.
Treasurer: Norma Adams [Renwick], 600 West Main Street, Clarinda,
IA 51632. Phone: 712-542-5841.
Denison—702 7th Street, P. O. Box 76, Denison, KS 66419-0076. Phone: 785935-2348. (HA)
Pastor: J. Edward Hindman [Cindy], P. O. Box 76, Denison, KS 66419-0076.
350
1977.
Clerk: Steve VanHorn [Mitzie], 19166 W. Road, Denison, KS 66416-9626. Phone: 785-935-2372. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: Dale Blackwood, Lloyd Copeland, James Scoby (E-mail: jim.scoby@
gmail.com).
Deacon Chm.: Theodore Hamer [Yvonne], 306 Highland Avenue, Denison,
KS 66419. Phone: 785-935-2305.
Treasurer: Lisa Haverkamp [Francis], 19600 K-16 Highway, Holton, KS 66436. Phone: 785-935-2302.
S.S. Supt.: Eric Scoby, 226 K 246 Highway, Sabetha, KS 66534. Phone: 785285-1995. E-mail: [email protected].
Hebron—1328 Goodin Drive, Clay Center, KS 67432. Phone: 785-6325861. (PA)
Pastor: Ron Graham [Gay], 825 Court Street, Clay Center, KS 67432. Phone:
Clerk: Harold Milligan [Margaret], 1214 Hackberry Road, Clay Center, KS 67432. Phone: 785-632-2009. E-mail: [email protected].
Elder: Steven McMahan [Sheryl], E-mail: [email protected].
Elder Emeritus: Russell James.
Deacon Chm.: Norman Milligan [Gwen], 1301 Sherman Street, Clay Center,
KS 67432. Phone: 785-632-3613.
Treasurer: Bessie Van Kirk, 1038 Huntress Street, Clay Center, KS 67432. Phone: 785-632-3794.
C.E. Chairman: Steven McMahan [Sheryl], 1807 Pogue Road, Clay Center,
KS 67432. Phone: 785-632-3043.
Minneola—(Locust & Maple) P. O. Box 197, Minneola, KS 67865-0197. Phone:
620-885-4346. (BF)
Pastor: Vacant since 10/2009.
Clerk: Wayne D. Curry [Anita], 497 CR G, Minneola, KS 67865. Phone:
Elder: Reed Hindman [Carol]. E-mail: [email protected].
Deacons: Bruce McKissick (Chairman); Tom Long; Carol Hindman.
Treasurer: _______.
Quinter—719 Gove Street, P. O. Box 280, Quinter, KS 67752. Phone: 785-7543406.
Pastor: Steven Work [Jeannie], 711 Gove Street, P. O. Box 280, Quinter, KS 67752. Phone: 785-754-3406. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 1999.
Clerk: Max Mann [Fran], 2551 Castle Rock Rd., Quinter, KS 67752. Phone:
Elders: Fred Irwin [Suzanne]. E-mail: [email protected]; Joe Copeland
351
[Edie]. E-mail: [email protected].
Deacon Chm.: Sam Chestnut [Norma], P. O. Box 313, Quinter, KS 67752. Phone: 785-754-2315.
Treasurer: Suzanne Irwin [Fred], P.O.B. 414, Quinter, KS 67752. Phone:
Cell: 785-769-4663. E-mail: [email protected].
Salt & Light—9498 Anhawa Avenue, Longmont, CO 80503. Phone: 303-4856463. Web site: www.longmontrpchurch.org
Pastor: Martin J. Wilsey [Barbara], 611 Clarendon Drive, Longmont, CO 80501. Phone: 303-684-2975; Cell: 303-888-5156. E-mail: wilseyandsons@
hotmail.com. Installed 2004.
Clerk: Mike McDaniel [Alice], 1273 Brookfield Drive, Longmont, CO 80501. Phone: 303-775-2059. E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: Dick Mueller [Susan]. Phone: 303-460-7067. E-mail: dick_mueller@
juno.com.
Deacon Chairman: John Hindman [Angi], 211 Grant Street, Longmont, CO 80501. Phone: 303-682-9829.
Treasurer: John Hindman. E-mail: [email protected].
Sharon—P. O. Box 483, Morning Sun, IA 52640. Phone: 319-394-3382. (BF)
Pastor: Vacant
Clerk: John W. Smith [Roselea], 11573 Northview Drive, Burlington, IA 52601-8611. Phone: 319-754-8720. E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: James Pilling [Sharon]. E-mail: [email protected].
Deacon Chm.: Robert McElhinney, P. O. Box 131, 301 N. W. 1st, Morning
Sun, IA 52640. Phone: 319-868-7865.
Treasurer: Kim Robb [Christy], R. R. #2, Morning Sun, IA 52640. Phone: 319868-7852.
S.S. Supt.: Roselea Smith [John], 11573 Northview Drive, Burlington, IA 52601-8611.
Shawnee—6835 Pflumm Road, P. O. Box 3427, Shawnee, KS 66203. Phone:
913-631-1991. Web site: www.shawneerpc.org (BF)
Pastor: Wade R. Mann [Barbara], 8826 Park Street, Lenexa, KS 66215. Phone: 913-599-4427. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 2002.
Clerk: Ron Patterson [Mary Lou], 4815 Perry Lane, Merriam, KS 66203. Phone: 913-722-5474. E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: William Boyle [Carol]. E-mail: [email protected]; Greg Stiner
[Janis]. E-mail: [email protected]; Dennis Wing [Debbie]. E-mail:
[email protected]. Emeritus: Harold Faris [Margaret].
Deacon Chm.: Barry VanHorn [Jenia], 12407 West 52nd Street, Shawnee, KS 66216. Phone: 913-488-6644. E-mail: [email protected].
Treasurer: Curt Porter [Sandy], 6929 Stearns Lane, Shawnee, KS 66203. Phone: 913-631-2913. E-mail: [email protected].
352
C. E. Chairman: Dennis Wing [Debbie], 6104 Hallet, Shawnee, KS 66216.
Youth Leaders: Joe and Marla Paul. E-mail: [email protected].
Springs Reformed Church (RPCNA)—229 South Weber, Colorado Springs,
CO 80903. Phone: 719-577-4157. E-mail: [email protected].
Web site: www.springsreformed.org (PA)
Pastor: David Reese [Elke], 1210 Whitehouse Drive, Colorado Springs,
CO 80904. Phone: 719-632-9119; Cell: 719-439-7235. E-mail: david.
Office Manager / Pastoral Assistant / Clerk / Treasurer: Shawn Stickel
[Cindy], 13395 Pawnee Trail Court, Elbert, CO 80106. Phone: 719-4948288. E-mail: [email protected].
Pastor Emeritus: J. Paul McCracken [Frances], c/o R. P. Home, 2334
Perrysville Avenue, #305, Pittsburgh, PA 15214. E-mail: francesmccracken@
gmail.com.
Elders: Dean Chaney [Shirley], Andy Leong [Amy], Craig Milroy [Shana],
Tom Pinson [Jacqueline], Jim Ritchhart [Connie], Shawn Stickel. Emeritus: Robert J. Mann [Ruth], Phone: 719-635-8628.
Deacon Chairman: Will Carter [Tammy]. Phone: 719-591-2056. E-mail:
[email protected].
C. E. Chairman: Jim Ritchhart. E-mail: [email protected].
Sterling—421 North 8th Street, P. O. Box 153, Sterling, KS 67579. Phone: 620278-3507. (BF)
Pastor: Joel Wood [Emily], 510 North Broadway Avenue, Sterling, KS 67579. Phone: 620-204-0222. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 2009.
Clerk: Don Reed [Linda], 425 North 7th St., Sterling, KS 67579. Cell: 620204-0699. E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: David Klaassen [Margaret]. E-mail: [email protected]; John
Wilkey [Phyllis]. Phone: 620-278-3182. E-mail: [email protected]; Sam Wilkey [Sue], Phone: 316-729-4643. E-mail: [email protected].
Treasurer: Pat Smith [Ralph], 404 North 6th Street, Sterling, KS 67579. Phone: 620-278-3243.
Stillwater—P. O. Box 531, Stillwater, OK 74076-0531. Phone: 405-377-1689.
Meeting at: 9th & Duck (Stillwater Community Center). Web site: www.
stillwaterrpc.org
Pastor: R. Bruce Parnell [Vicky], 1011 South Duncan, Stillwater, OK 74074. Phone: 405-372-4910. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 1991.
Assoc. Pastor: Noah M. Bailey [Lydia], 605 Circle Drive, Enid, OK 73703. Phone: Cell: 580-484-2160. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed
2009.
Clerk: Alan Noell [Liz], 2723 North Monroe St., Stillwater, OK 74075.
353
Elders: David Carroll [Margaret], Jeff Spitler [Melody].
Treasurer: Bill Wagner, P. O. Box 531, Stillwater, OK 74076. Phone: 405377-1689.
Topeka—8345 S. W. 33rd Street (33rd & Auburn Road), Topeka, Kansas 66614. Phone: 785-272-1940. (BF)
Pastor: Brad Johnston [Sue], 7203 SW 23rd St., Topeka, KS 66614. Phone:
Clerk: Dean O’Neill [Debby], 7732 SW Huntoon St., Topeka, KS 66615. Phone: 785-478-1689. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: Larry Copeland [Karen], Philip Duguid [Eleanor], William McFarland,
Darrell Parnell [Esther].
Deacon Chm.: Gene Schott [Jean], 135 N. Main St., Rossville, KS 66553. Phone: 785-584-6369. E-mail: [email protected]
Treasurer: Duzel Yates [Marjorie], 4355 SW Twilight Drive, Topeka, KS 66614. Phone: 785-273-4012.
Trinity Reformed Church (RPCNA)—Meeting at: 820 West 27th Street
South, Wichita, KS 67217. Office Phone: 316-721-2722. Web site: www.trinityrpcna.org.
Pastor: Adam King [Jessica], 8525 West 17th Street North, Wichita,
KS 67212. Phone: 316-729-2881. Cell: 316-633-2406. Office: 316-7212722. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 01/2009.
Clerk: Rob Haynes [Kerry], 6869 29th Drive, Udall, KS 67146. Phone: Cell: 316-393-6238. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: Eric Lamp [Michelle]. Phone: 316-773-3755. E-mail: ELamp@
wwfoks.com
Treasurer: Jeff Bartel, 1210 Aksarben, Wichita, KS 67235. Phone: 316-3041119. E-mail: [email protected]
Washington—500 South Avenue “D”, Washington, IA 52353. Phone: 319-6533101.
Pastor: John Monger [Donna], 305 South Avenue “C”, Washington, IA 52353. Phone: 319-653-7929. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 1998.
Clerk: Michael Todd, MD [Lana], 103 Hickory Street, Columbus Junction,
IA 52738. Phone: 319-728-7718. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: George F. Masson, Jr. E-mail: [email protected]. Donald
Wilson [Judy].
Deacon Chm.: Greg Skubal [Nancy], 3189 223rd Street, Ainsworth, IA 52201. Phone: 319-657-2315.
Treasurer: Dorcas Jarrard [Rob]. Phone: 319-653-3481. E-mail: andre@
lisco.com
S.S. Supt.: Donald Wilson [Judy]. Phone: 319-728-2081.
354
Westminster—4455 West 112th Avenue, Westminster, Colorado 80031. Phone:
303-469-0761. Web site: http://www.westminsterrpchurch.org/ (BF, PA)
Pastor: Shane Sapp [Kelly], 2684 Bryant Drive, Broomfield, CO 80020. Phone: 303-404-9064. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 04/2009.
Clerk: Bill Van Sciver [Vicki], 11748 Grant Street, Northglenn, CO 80233. Phone: 303-853-9315. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: Greg Adams [Janis]. E-mail: [email protected]; Robert Buck
[Anna]. E-mail: [email protected]; John Duke [Kathy]. E-mail:
[email protected]
Deacon Chm.: James Hindman [Melissa], 12921 Monarch Court, Broomfield,
CO 80020. Phone: 720-887-4669.
Treasurer: Eric Martinez [Shannon], 9697 Ironton Street, Commerce City,
CO 80022. Phone: 303-286-3816. E-mail: [email protected]
C.E. Chairman: Melissa Hindman [James], 12921 Monarch Court,
Broomfield, CO 80020. Phone: 720-887-4669. E-mail: ourside@gmail.
com.
Winchester—306 Delaware Street, Winchester, KS 66097. Send all mail to 308
Delaware. (PA)
Pastor: Paul W. Finley [Elizabeth], 308 Delaware Street, Winchester, KS 66097. Phone: 913-774-4585. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed
1993.
Clerk: Jay O’Neill [Cindy], 16657 150th Street, Winchester, KS 66097. Phone: 913-774-8791. E-mail: [email protected].
Elders: David Huston [Joye], Bob Lyon [Rita], James Tweed [Jill]. E-mail:
[email protected]
Deacon Chm.: Gail O’Neill [Sheila], 14439 Wellman Road, Winchester, KS 66097. Phone: 913-774-2030.
Treasurer: Eileen Filbert [Ed], 13911 Washington Street, Valley Falls, KS
66088. Phone: 913-774-8681.
C.E. Chm.: Justin Finley, 308 Delaware Street, Winchester, KS 66097. Phone: 913-774-4585.
Ministers Serving on the Home Mission Field
Robert L. Hemphill [Cheryl], church-planting in Laramie (Wyoming) since
01/2007, 1867 North 15th Street, Laramie, WY 82072. Phone: Home: 307745-8721. Cell: 307-399-8710. E-mail: [email protected]
Ordained Men Without Pastorates
Stan Copeland [Marilyn], in Germany, CMR 411 Box 3198, APO AE 09112. Phone: 011-49-9662-330-2181. E-mail: [email protected] or
[email protected]
T. Richard Hutcheson, 4712 SW 6th Street, #282, Topeka, KS 66606-2296. REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA
355
Phone: 785-272-6107.
Robert La May [Kay], 432 East Van Buren Street, Washington, IA 52353-1550. Phone: 319-653-9929. E-mail: [email protected] or lexrex107@
iowatelecom.net
Jonathan Leach, Colonel [Mary Lou], 9567 Autumn Shade, San Antonio, TX
78254. Phone: Cell: 210-347-5116. E-mail: MaryL@hookercontracting.
com
Robert H. McFarland [Georgia], MWP Regional Home Missionary, 5460 SW
53rd Street, Topeka, KS 66610. Phone: 785-862-1835. E-mail: BGMcF58@
aol.com
Jerrold S. Milroy [Saundy], 2028 Downing Drive, Colorado Springs, CO 80909. Phone: 719-694-9081. Cell: 913-488-0005. E-mail: jsmilroy@
gmail.com.
Robert More, Jr., Ph.D. [Ruth], P. O. Box 117, Waddington, NY 13694. Phone:
Dennis Prutow, Dr. [Erma], RPTS Prof. of Homiletics & Pastoral Theology, &
Dean of Faculty, 113 Overdale Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15221-4431. Phone:
412-901-2608. E-mail: [email protected] & [email protected]
Gene W. Spear [Ruth], 714 South Church Terrace, Olathe, KS 66061. Phone:
Ronald H. Stegall [Kathy], 3386 Linn Rd., Perry, KS 66073. Phone: 785-5975382. E-mail: [email protected]
John H. Tweed [Alta], 300 Poplar, P. O. Box 237, Winchester, KS 66097. Phone: 913-774-2529. E-mail: [email protected]
Jeffrey Yelton [Susan], 903 E. Benton St., Linn, MO 65051. Phone: 573-8972292. E-mail: [email protected]
2010 Roster of the Pacific Coast Presbytery
Moderator......................................................................................... Mark England
Clerk............................................................................................ Nathan Eshelman
Assistant Clerk................................................................................ Ryan Hemphill
Treasurer ...........................................................................................Aaron Piper
Assistant Treasurer . ........................................................................... Don Lamont
Conference Coordinator . ............................................................ Danny Gathright
Young People’s Secretary .................................................................... Bus Archer
Co-Assistants to the Young People’s Secretary............ Paul and Megan Hemphill
Moderator of Ad Interim Commission.......................................... Tim McCracken
Fresno—380 North Maple Ave., Fresno, CA 93702. Phone: 559-251-4176.
Web site: www.fresnorpchurch.org (BF)
Pastor: Timothy McCracken [Lori], 4614 East Grant Ave., Fresno, CA 93702.
Ruling Elders: Bus Archer [Cheryl]. E-mail: [email protected]; James
356
Holly [Nancy]. E-mail: [email protected]
Clerk: Danny Gathright [Kathy], 1073 North Filbert Ave., Clovis, CA 93611
Elder Emeritus: Bill Copeland [Willa]; Lewis Keys [Lorena]; Donald Gouge
Treasurer: Paul Hemphill [Megan]. E-mail: [email protected]
Los Angeles—3557 Fletcher Dr., Los Angeles, CA 90065. Phone: 323-255-8757.
Web site: www.rpcla.org (BF)
Pastor: Nathan Eshelman [Lydia], 3252 Shasta Circle North, Los Angeles, CA
2009.
Ruling Elders: Howard Huizing [Irene]. E-mail: houseguardorange@yahoo.
com; Hector Pino [Dottiann]. E-mail: [email protected]
Clerk: David Ashleigh [Sarah], 1130 Magnolia St., South Pasadena, CA
Treasurer: Priscilla Luther-Heft [Mike], 4576 Rockland Pl., La Cañada, CA
Assistant Treasurer: Joel Chairez [Maria], 8971 Dearborn Ave., South Gate,
CA 90280. Phone: 323-563-2746. E-mail: [email protected]
First (Phoenix)—1117 East Devonshire, Phoenix, AZ 85014. Phone: 602-2773497. Web site: www.firstphoenixrpc.com. (BF)
Pastor: Jon Maginn [Bonnie], 3827 North 73rd Dr., Phoenix, AZ 85033.
Ruling Elders: Nathan Anseth [Jenifer]. E-mail: nathana@arizonabiltmore.
com; Jason Walsh [Holly]. E-mail: [email protected]
Clerk: Harold Reyburn [Dawn], 106 West Camino Vista, Phoenix, AZ 85021.
Treasurer: Wade Borg [Karen], 4125 North 41st Place, Phoenix, AZ 85018.
San Diego—3495 College Ave, San Diego, CA 92115. Phone: 619-582-0940.
Web site: www.sandiegorpc.org (Not fully handicap accessible)
Pastor: Mark England, 2519 Camino de Las Palmas, Lemon Grove, CA 92115.
Provisional Elder: Nathan Eshelman (see Los Angeles)
Provisional Clerk: Jon Maginn (see First RPC, Phoenix)
Treasurer: Kelli Sullivan [Bill], 3248 Atlas St., San Diego, CA 92111. Phone:
Seattle—6554 20th Avenue North East, Seattle, WA 98115. Phone: 206-5223187. Web site: www.seattlerpchurch.org (BF)
Pastor: Ryan Hemphill [Alicia], 1915 North East 68th St., Seattle, WA 98115.
357
2009.
Elders: Dennis Olson [Karen]. E-mail: [email protected]; Paul Perkins [Pat].
E-mail: [email protected]; Darik Taniguchi [Jo]. E-mail: DarikTaniguchi@
msn.com; Richard Buck [Leah]. E-mail: [email protected]
Clerk: Don Lamont [Karen], 5636 North East 200th Pl., Kenmore, WA 98028.
Elders Emeritus: John B. Lamont [Mary]. Phone: 206-632-6886; Joseph
Lamont, Jr. [Beth]. Phone: 206-524-2052. E-mail: [email protected]
Treasurer: Aaron Piper, 19209 1st Avenue West, Bothell, WA 98012. Phone:
Retired Ministers
Charles Chao, DD. [Pearl], 1358 Calle Rosamaria, San Dimas, CA 91773.
Phone: 626-331-7470.
Kenneth Orr [Michelle], 2231 Mira Vista Ave., Montrose, CA 91020. Phone:
Donald Piper [Boni], 2529 Elm Dr., Brier, WA 98036. Phone: 425-778-1981.
Roster of the St. Lawrence Presbytery
Moderator.......................................................................... E. Matthew Kingswood
Clerk.............................................................................................Brian E. Coombs
Treasurer, United States...........................................................................Ev Wood,
RR 3 Box 2042, LaFayette, NY 13084. Phone: 315-677-3711.
........................................................................... Also: [email protected]
Treasurer, Canadian............................................................................. David Ayer,
31 Henfield Ave, Nepean, Ontario, Canada K2J 1J5.
Ad Interim Commission.................................................... contact Clerk, if needed
Almonte—273 Almonte St. Almonte, Ontario, Canada K0A 1A0. Phone: 613256-2816
Pastor: Matthew H. Dyck [Jennifer], 951 Ramsay Con. 4A, Mississippi Mills
Ontario, K7C 3P1. Phone: 613-253-7337. E-mail: [email protected].
Installed 1998.
Clerk: Gerry deHaan. E-mail: [email protected]
Treasurer: Tony Welk. Phone: 613-256-0842. E-mail: [email protected]
Christ Church—(New Hartford, send mail to Pastor, below). Web site:
www.christchurchreformed.com
Pastor: Aaron M. Goerner [Heidi], 3 Proctor Blvd., Utica, NY 13501. Phone:
Study: 315-734-0568; Home: 315-733-0530. E-mail: agoerner@adelphia.
358
net. Installed 1997.
Clerk: George Goerner, 1 Huntington Pl., New Hartford, NY 13413. Phone:
Treasurer: Bob Sleys, 1432 Genesee St. Utica, NY 13501. Phone: 315-2926852. E-mail: [email protected]
Christian Heritage—send mail to Pastor, below
Pastor: Arthur Fawthrop [Ellen], 419 W. Franklin St. Endicott, NY 13760.
Crown & Covenant—28 Main St. Owego, NY 13827
Teaching Elder: Harold Harrington. E-mail: [email protected]
Clerk: Vernon Hockenberry, 215 Baker Hill Rd. Vestal, NY 13850. Phone:
Treasurer: Mrs. Carol Visscher, 1400 South Main St. Nichols, New York
Fulton—207 South First St. Fulton, NY 13069. Phone: 315-402-8727. Web site:
www.fultonrpc.org
Pastor: Nick Iamaio [Kathleen], 162 County Route 24, Oswego, NY 13126.
Clerk: Don Pastor, 15080 US Rt. 11, Adams Center, NY 13606. Phone: 315771-7457. E-mail: [email protected]
Treasurer: Rachel Tumbry, 118 Batavia Ave, Fulton NY 13069. Phone: 315593-6691. E-mail: [email protected]
Hudson – St. Lazare
Pastor: Courtney Miller [Barb] 2693 Appaloosa, St. Lazare Quebec, Canada,
J7T 2B1. Phone: 450-458-2975; (c) 514-618-4216. E-mail: cjmiller80@
hotmail.com. Installed 2001.
Clerk: Brian Brodie, 22265 Brodie Rd., Dalkeith, Ontario K0B 1E0. Phone:
Treasurer: Gwen Brodie (see Clerk address, above)
Lisbon—Cemetery & Tuck Roads, PO Box 88 Lisbon, NY 13658. Web site:
http://lisbonrpc.org
Pastor: Steve Rockhill [Maria]. Phone: 315-393-9041. E-mail: revrock@
twcny.rr.com. Installed 2002.
Clerk: Don Smith, 420 Dezell Road, Lisbon, NY 13658. Phone: 315-3932179. E-mail: [email protected] Elders: Webster Fields, Donald Smith, Brian Bond (E-mail: brianbond@juno.
com)
Treasurer: Doreen Sweeney, 1594 Old DeKalb Rd., Canton NY 13617. Phone:
315-386-1489
359
Messiah’s Church—8181 Stearns Rd. Clay, NY 13041. Phone: 315-288-5344.
Web site: www.messiahschurch.org
Pastor: Brian E. Coombs [Dorian], 6068 Rose Arbor Ln, Cicero, NY, 13039.
Phone: Study: 315-288-5344; Home: 315-451-4032. E-mail: bcoombs@
twcny.rr.com. Installed 1996, 2005.
Clerk: David McCune, 3956 Pawnee Dr., Liverpool, NY, 13090. Phone: 315652-1787. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: George Hueber. E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: 315-4986204; Peter Howe. E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: 315-458-0829.
Treasurer: Gerard Beckhusen, 7925 Haddon Hall Way, Baldwinsville NY
13027
New Creation—(send mail to Pastor, below) Web site: www.newcreationrpc.net
Pastor: J. Scott Wilkinson [Elineke], 154 Martinglen Crescent, Kitchener,
Ontario, Canada N2E 2A1. Phone: 519-578-7588. E-mail: wilkinson@
rogers.com. Ordained 1995.
Clerk: Rob Somers, 301-350 Regina St. North, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada,
N2J 3B7. Phone: 519-880-0593. E-mail: [email protected]
Oswego—154 City Line Rd. Oswego, NY 13126. Phone: 315-343-7112. Web
site: www.oswegorpc.org
Pastor: Walter “Kit” Swartz [Karen], 119 East Third St., Oswego NY 13126.
Clerk: John W. McGrath, 216 Duer St., Oswego, NY 13126. Phone: 315-3421682. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: Kevin Plummer. E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: 315-3430109; John O’Brien. E-mail: [email protected]. Phone: 315-3420302
Treasurer: Billy Bock, 14 North Division St., Oswego, NY 13126. Phone:
Ottawa—Box 23139, Ottawa, Ontario K2A 4E2. Phone: 613-596-5566. Web
site: www.rpcottawa.org
Pastor: Dr. Richard L. Ganz [Nancy], PO Box 23139, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
K2A 4E2. Phone: 613-257-1650. Fax: 613-257-4900. E-mail: richganz@
xplornet.com. Installed 1981.
Clerk: Paul Ledwell, 111 Sunnymede Ave., Ottawa, ON, K1Y 2L6. Phone:
613-729-4743. E-mail: [email protected] Elders: Iain Campbell. E-mail: [email protected]; Aubrey Ayer. E-mail:
[email protected]
Treasurer: Dr. Pieter Trouborst, 1 Midpark Way, Nepean, ON, K2G 6M9.
360
Rochester—115 East Avenue, East Rochester NY 14445. Web site:
www.rpcrochester.org
Pastor: vacant
Clerk: Greg Moberg, 186 Ashbourne Road, Rochester, NY 14618-1702.
Elders: William Pihl, Moderator of Session, 123 Brentwood Lane Fairport, NY
14450. Phone: 585-377-0875, E-mail: [email protected]; Peter Robson.
E-mail: [email protected]; Geoff Shaw. E-mail: gshaw@
pharos.com
Treasurer: David Ladwig, 117 East Avenue, East Rochester, NY 14445.
Russell—Concession Street, Russell, Ontario, Canada K4R 1C9. Mail address:
P.O. Box 222, Russell, ON, Canada K4R 1C9. Web site: www.russellrpc.org
Pastor: E. Matthew Kingswood [Tara], 672 McLaren Lane, Russell, Ontario,
Canada K4R 1E5. Phone: 613-445-1937. E-mail: [email protected].
Installed 1997.
Clerk: Ernst van der Meer. E-mail: [email protected]; Hank Vedder .
Shelter— # 121, 11033 127 Street, Edmonton, AB T5M 0T3. E-mail:
[email protected]. Web site: www.shelterchurch.com Pastor: (Bob Hackett) [Tobi], # 121, 11033 127 Street, Edmonton, AB T5M
0T3. Phone: 780-278-8778. E-mail: [email protected]
Clerk: Kevin Neumann, 9809-101 Street, Morinville, Alberta, Canada, T8R
1G2. Phone: 780- 939-0330. E-mail: [email protected]
Syracuse—2517 South Salina St., Syracuse, NY 13205. Phone: 315-476-5618.
E-mail: [email protected]. Web: www.syracuserpc.org
Pastor: Andrew Schep [Joanna], 312 Goodrich Ave., Syracuse NY 13210.
Clerk: Robert Pinkerton, 4705 Gee Brook Rd. Cincinnatus, NY 13040. Phone:
Elders: Bruce Trexler. E-mail: [email protected]; Robert Rice. E-mail:
[email protected]; Jonathan Wright. E-mail: [email protected];
Jeff Bulow. E-mail: [email protected]
Treasurer: Shari Huggins, c/o church addresses above. Phone: 315-696-6451
Walton—34 Bruce St., Walton, NY 13856 (no mail). Phone: 607-865-6481.
Web site: www.waltonrpc.org
Pastor: Vacant.
Clerk: Jack McCready, 495 Munn Rd., Walton, NY 13856. Phone: 607-8655966. E-mail: [email protected]
Elders: Bruce Henderson . E-mail: [email protected]; Karl Meeker; Hartley
361
Russell. E-mail: [email protected].
Treasurer: Renwick Russell, 4919 County Highway 21, Walton, NY 13856.
Ottawa Theological Hall—466 Woodland Ave. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mailing address: PO Box 23139, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K2A 4E2. Phone:
613-596-5566. Web site: http://www.rpcottawa.org/oth
Retired Ministers
Pastor Edward A. Robson, Th.M., Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, RPTS [Gretchen],
5370 Richland Rd. Gibsonia, PA 15044. Phone: 724-444-6705. E-mail:
[email protected]
Harold B. Harrington [Ena], R.D.1, Box 29, New Albany, PA 18833. Phone:
Ministers Serving in Various Occupations
Jim McMahon [Laura], 255 Ox Bow Hollow Rd. Walton, NY 13856. Phone:
607-865-4901; 267-625-8520 (Indiana). E-mail: [email protected]
William H. Pihl [Beverly], 123 Brentwood Lane Fairport, NY 14450. Phone:
Robert G. Rice [Vivian], 416 Crawford Ave., Syracuse NY 13224. Phone: 315446-0768. E-mail: [email protected]
Anthony Selvaggio [Michele], 4 Grouse Pt., Webster, NY 14580. E-mail:
[email protected]
Kiernan J. Stringer [Wendy], 45 Enderby Rd. Toronto ON, M4E 2S4. Phone:
416-519-4989. E-mail: [email protected]. Issued letter of standing
4/2008.
Andrew Stringer [Beth]. E-mail: [email protected]. Installed 1997.
Vince Ward [Julie], 854 Melfa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K2C 0P3. Phone: 613225-7557. E-mail: [email protected]
Students under Presbytery’s Care
Greg Alexander [Melanie], 48 Promenade de la Rive, Embrun, ON, K0A 1W0.
Scott Doherty [Andrea], 105 Carnegie Place, Pittsburgh, PA 15208. Phone:
Cell: 447-3099. E-mail: [email protected]
Mark Goerner [Debra], 7504 Alvord Rd. Stittville, NY 13469. Phone: 315-7370524 (h); 315-404-6499 (c). E-mail: [email protected]
Bob Hackett - See Shelter, under churches
Jason Keuning. E-mail: [email protected]
Steve Zink, [Kimberly], 5 Emily St. Carleton Place, ONT K7C 1R9. Phone:
362
MEMBERSHIP STATISTICS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2009
Presbytery’s Roll
Totals, Alleghenies
By Profession of Faith
0
238
18
25
111
35
117
59
82
38
122
67
24
67
84
48
0
77
5
8
20
10
29
27
44
13
37
40
0
10
43
12
0
5
0
0
0
0
1
3
4
0
8
0
0
1
2
0
0
2
0
2
2
2
4
2
2
0
1
4
0
0
3
0
0
3
0
0
1
3
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
0
29
0
19
1,530 1,539 1,300 1,154
10
385
0
24
0
24
0
18
ATLANTIC:
Broomall
73
Cambridge
122
Coldenham-Newburgh
44
Elkins Park
48
Hazleton
31
Ridgefield Park
33
White Lake
104
MISSION CHURCHES
Christ Mission Church (RI)
0
Presbytery’s Roll
Totals, Atlantic
By Baptism
0
325
32
35
75
49
87
87
97
40
150
100
15
53
104
51
Baptized Children
Professing Faith
0
315
23
33
131
45
146
86
126
51
159
107
24
77
127
60
Baptized Members
40
325
0
40
138
42
155
0
125
52
241
98
24
78
112
60
Communicant Members
Average Worship
Attendance
ALLEGHENIES:
Anchor Fellowship (DC)
College Hill (Beaver Falls)
Covenant (Meadville, PA)
Covenant Fellowship (Pgh.)
Eastvale
First Reformed (Beaver Falls)
Grace (Gibsonia, PA)
Grace Presby. (State College)
Manchester
North Hills (Pgh.)
Providence (Pgh.)
Rimersburg
Rose Point
Trinity (DC Area)
Tusca Area
Total Membership
12/31/09
CONGREGATION
Total Membership
12/31/08
INCREASE
0
455
80
82
40
50
39
33
100
65
75
26
50
35
27
90
71
62
32
33
27
28
83
9
20
8
17
12
5
17
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
2
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
43
45
24
19
0
2
0
0
467
0
413
0
360
0
107
0
3
0
11
0
2
363
6
0
0
9
4
0
1
0
1
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
40
26
0
9
16
2
19
2
11
1
88
1
0
4
19
0
0
17
3
2
4
4
6
3
4
4
8
3
2
3
3
3
0
9
1
2
6
4
7
0
3
3
6
5
0
6
0
4
29
113
0
66
0
26
29
247
0
10
0
119
0
44
0
20
0
45
0
238
0
69
0
56
3
2
0
0
6
0
0
2
0
0
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
3
1
8
9
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
4
6
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
43
5
6
1
0
6
2
4
2
2
1
3
3
5
3
1
3
2
5
6
31
10
0
43
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
42
0
18
0
0
0
73
0
0
0
31
0
22
0
6
0
2
0
61
0
17
0
25
Deacons
0
2
0
0
0
0
6
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
9
0
Elders
5
13
0
0
9
0
2
0
4
1
0
1
0
0
9
0
Total
29
6
0
0
2
2
9
2
4
0
61
0
0
3
1
0
Other
0
5
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
Final Removal
0
16
23
2
9
5
10
88
12
0
6
10
0
3
34
0
To RP Churches
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Deaths
0
4
23
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
5
6
0
0
24
0
TOTAL
Other
0
7
0
0
5
0
1
61
5
0
0
0
0
2
3
0
From RP Churches
From OtherFrom Other
Denominations
Denominations
To Other Denominations
DECREASE
364
Baptized Members
32
86
43
73
40
40
43
8
42
107
0
80
192
39
41
141
33
58
27
13
50
22
45
16
22
16
0
39
53
0
28
77
7
25
59
22
33
9
0
2
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
1
3
0
0
0
1
5
0
6
1
2
3
0
3
5
0
0
3
0
2
2
2
2
0
0
10
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
18
20
13
5
0
0
0
Presbytery’s Roll
6
6
0
6
Totals, Great Lakes/Gulf 1,693 1,685 1,436 1,144
0
541
0
23
0
37
0
20
By Baptism
36
137
55
105
55
60
46
8
66
142
0
55
210
33
58
185
42
90
33
GREAT LAKES/GULF:
Belle Center
46
Bloomington
116
Christ Church (Brownsburg, IN) 71
Columbus
112
Elkhart
55
First RPC (Durham, NC)
65
First RPC (Grand Rapids)
51
Hetherton
17
Immanuel (W. Lafayette)
76
Lafayette
152
Oakdale
24
Orlando
108
Second Indianapolis
285
Selma
46
Southfield
69
Southside Indianapolis
192
Sparta
53
Sycamore (Kokomo, IN)
101
32
MISSION CHURCHES
Northminster (N. Atlanta)
16
Baptized Children
Professing Faith
Average Worship
Attendance
Communicant Members
Total Membership
12/31/09
45
136
65
118
56
62
59
8
81
160
0
108
269
46
66
200
55
91
36
CONGREGATION
Total Membership
12/31/08
INCREASE
365
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
24
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
7
0
1
10
2
9
2
4
24
0
19
0
5
4
0
14
0
1
4
1
6
1
2
4
3
2
5
0
6
6
3
5
8
2
5
1
1
3
0
5
1
0
1
0
2
3
0
3
5
2
2
6
0
5
0
0
9
0
9
0
0
0
0
7
7
0
0
0
20
0
24
0
4
0
105
0
5
0
15
0
39
0
21
0
33
0
113
0
65
0
39
Deacons
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
7
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
Elders
0
1
7
0
0
1
2
0
0
2
0
0
15
0
5
1
0
5
0
Total
1
2
0
0
0
4
0
0
2
1
0
0
2
0
0
3
0
0
0
Other
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
Final Removal
1
23
1
6
2
7
10
0
7
12
0
0
3
0
2
12
2
4
4
To RP Churches
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Deaths
0
0
0
0
0
3
5
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
TOTAL
Other
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
1
0
From RP Churches
Denominations
Denominations
DECREASE
366
Baptized Members
72
29
69
49
30
46
64
80
129
161
81
85
82
55
58
115
74
50
20
51
50
25
15
48
50
93
142
70
78
82
48
35
79
56
55
23
57
39
23
39
44
62
97
103
54
58
70
35
45
75
63
17
6
12
10
7
7
20
18
32
58
27
27
12
20
13
40
11
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
4
1
2
3
1
0
4
5
8
1
4
1
1
1
1
4
0
2
1
4
1
0
0
2
2
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
2
0
3
3
1,254 1,282
0
992
3
945
0
337
0
10
0
41
0
18
By Baptism
71
22
59
50
29
46
59
78
116
167
83
78
81
66
57
114
75
Baptized Children
Professing Faith
Average Worship
Attendance
Presbytery’s Roll
Totals, Midwest
Total Membership
12/31/09
MIDWEST:
Christ Covenant (Lawrence)
Clarinda
Denison
Hebron (Clay Center, KS)
Minneola
Quinter
Salt & Light (Longmont, CO)
Sharon
Shawnee
Springs (Colorado Springs)
Sterling
Stillwater
Topeka
Trinity (Wichita)
Washington
Westminster (CO)
Winchester
Total Membership
12/31/08
CONGREGATION
Communicant Members
INCREASE
PACIFIC COAST:
Fresno
Los Angeles
Phoenix
San Diego
Seattle
102
74
38
38
77
87
64
37
39
82
80
51
48
30
65
67
46
21
24
68
20
18
16
15
14
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
Presbytery’s Roll
Totals, Pacific Coast
0
329
0
309
0
274
0
226
0
83
0
1
0
2
0
2
367
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
2
6
1
1
3
5
2
23
8
7
1
12
1
10
2
3
2
5
3
2
3
2
4
6
6
5
3
8
2
3
4
4
5
3
5
3
3
3
3
0
4
5
4
0
6
0
1
7
4
0
24
0
34
0
0
0
117
0
10
0
21
0
22
0
29
0
7
0
89
0
65
0
56
0
5
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
7
0
1
5
2
3
1
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
7
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
16
17
1
0
0
6
4
3
0
7
4
3
3
0
4
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
6
0
7
0
10
0
1
0
10
0
34
0
20
0
14
Deacons
2
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
1
15
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
Elders
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
7
0
7
0
2
0
Total
2
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
5
2
0
0
5
0
2
2
Other
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
3
0
1
0
1
1
0
Final Removal
6
7
12
5
2
1
8
7
15
17
6
14
2
1
2
11
1
To RP Churches
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Deaths
0
5
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
12
2
6
0
0
0
3
0
TOTAL
Other
0
0
6
1
1
0
2
0
2
3
0
5
1
0
0
2
1
From RP Churches
Denominations
Denominations
DECREASE
368
JAPAN:
Higashisuma
Kasumigaoka
Mukonoso
Okamoto-Keiyaku
MISSION CHURCHES
Kita-Suzurandai
Presbytery’s Roll
Totals, Japan
Baptized Members
51
41
13
21
40
32
56
63
105
55
80
129
50
28
9
11
5
25
29
17
16
61
33
72
33
8
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
5
1
0
3
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
3
1
2
0
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
2
24
37
20
31
12
22
12
15
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1,142 1,144
0
966
0
770
0
374
0
12
0
20
0
12
By Baptism
60
60
24
26
55
55
75
75
110
61
150
120
44
Baptized Children
Professing Faith
Average Worship
Attendance
79
50
24
26
65
61
73
79
166
88
152
162
58
ST. LAWRENCE:
Almonte
87
Christ Church (New Hartford) 47
Crown & Covenant (Owego) 24
Fulton
26
Hudson-St. Lazare
65
Lisbon
59
Messiah’s Church (N. Syracuse) 80
Oswego
86
Ottawa
157
Rochester
89
Russell
151
Syracuse
166
Walton
56
MISSIONS CHURCHES
Christian Heritage (Endicott) 23
New Creation (Kitchener)
25
Presbytery’s Roll
Totals, St. Lawrence
Communicant Members
Total Membership
12/31/09
CONGREGATION
Total Membership
12/31/08
INCREASE
83
47
21
64
82
49
22
65
47
25
16
20
59
39
22
46
23
10
0
19
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
2
1
0
0
0
22
23
18
20
3
0
1
0
1
238
0
241
0
126
0
186
0
55
0
1
0
6
0
1
369
11
3
1
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
4
0
0
17
3
2
1
0
1
7
7
1
5
4
10
0
4
1
1
2
1
3
3
3
2
4
2
5
3
3
1
1
4
1
3
3
6
1
1
2
5
3
0
0
0
5
1
6
2
12
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
2
1
0
4
0
16
0
10
0
62
0
7
0
5
0
12
0
11
1
25
1
60
0
37
0
37
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
1
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
3
3
2
2
5
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
8
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
5
0
11
0
9
Deacons
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
8
0
Elders
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
4
0
0
0
Total
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
Other
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
Final Removal
9
6
2
1
0
3
0
0
10
4
5
6
2
To RP Churches
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Deaths
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
2
4
0
TOTAL
Other
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
From RP Churches
Denominations
Denominations
DECREASE
370
By Baptism
Baptized Children
Professing Faith
Baptized Members
Communicant Members
Average Worship
Attendance
Total Membership
12/31/09
CONGREGATION
Total Membership
12/31/08
INCREASE
PRESBYTERY TOTALS
Alleghenies
1,530 1,539 1,300 1,154
385 24
24
18
Atlantic
455
467 413
360
107
3
11
2
Great Lakes/Gulf
1,693 1,685 1,436 1,144
541 23
37
20
Midwest
1,254 1,282 992
945
337 10
41
18
Pacific Coast
329
309 274
226
83
1
2
2
St. Lawrence
1,142 1,144 966
770
374 12
20
12
Total Home Field
6,403 6,426 5,381 4,599 1,827
73
135
72
Japan Presbytery
238
241 126
186
55
1
6
1
GRAND TOTAL
6,641 6,667 5,507 4,785 1,882 74 141
73
Note: Congregations in bold type did not submit complete statistical reports for 2009.
To more accurately reflect the totals for the denomination, statistics from 2008 or earlier
have been inserted instead of blanks.
371
113
66 26
42
18
0
20
24
4
24
34
0
10
0
0
4
16 10
Deacons
Elders
Total
Other
Final Removal
To RP Churches
Deaths
TOTAL
Other
Denominations
Denominations
From RP Churches
DECREASE
247
73
105
117
14
62
10
0
5
10
6
7
119
31
15
21
7
5
44
22
39
22
10
12
20
6
21
29
1
11
45
2
33
7
10
25
238
61
113
89
34
60
69
17
65
65
20
37
56
25
39 56
14
37
227
213
158
40
618
38
198
149
88
122
595
273
0
1
0
8
4
0
0
0
1
5
11
9
213 159 40 626
42 198 149 88 123
600 284 236
372
FINANCIAL STATISTICS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2009
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21,833 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pastor’s Total
Compensation
TOTAL RECEIPTS
Other
Contributions
ALLEGHENIES
Anchor Fellowship (DC) 7,788
College Hill (Beaver Falls) 8,496
0
Covenant (Meadville, PA) 28,201
Covenant Fellowship
48,604
Eastvale
122,758 First Reformed (BF) 10,011 Grace (Gibsonia, PA)
0
Grace (State College) 13,122 Manchester
(971)
North Hills (Pgh.)
86,437 Providence (Pgh.)
28,201 Rimersburg
112 Rose Point
26,534 Trinity (DC Area)
179,157 Tusca Area 4,612 Presbytery’s Roll
Totals, Alleghenies
563,062 ATLANTIC:
Broomall
29,455 Cambridge
150,765 Coldenham-Newburgh
196 Elkins Park
8,701 Hazleton
89,709 Ridgefield Park
28,754 White Lake
13,139 MISSION CHURCHES
Christ Mission Church (RI) 0 Presbytery’s Roll
Totals, Atlantic
320,719 Supplemental Aid
Presby & HMB
CONGREGATION
BALANCE
12/31/08
RECEIPTS
0
0
0
405,830
7,906 413,736
22,139
4,050 26,189
54,332
455 54,787
147,171
764 147,935
60,792 1,562 62,354 155,273 51,441 206,714 180,006 7,822 209,661 114,477 75 114,552 92,408 115,564 207,972 278,156 35,193 313,349 117,675 2,979 120,654 35,826 9,801 45,627 94,923 0 94,923 268,633 46 268,679 56,416 0 56,416 0
135,013
0
0
59,748
45,684 71,169 85,218 55,427 55,466 164,556 55,560 20,500 45,563 80,159 41,540 21,833 2,084,057 237,658 2,343,548 915,603 0 129,068 0 183,615 0 66,567 0 66,288 3,500 41,534 26,000 105,946 0 90,825 135,291 192,403 74,546 66,288 56,477 166,932 105,319 72,751 51,036 48,448 44,130 34,879 73,018 43,600 95,843 100,716 230,249 72,255 63,190 779,686 184,629 1,027,505 440,117 33,690 6,223 8,788 7,979 0
11,443 34,986 14,494 REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA
373
Pastor’s Salary 2010
Other Assets
Balance 12/31/09
TOTAL
DISBURSEMENTS
Other
External Ministries
DISBURSEMENTS
Other RP Works
RPM&M
Parsonage
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
Y
N
N
0
32,000
0
1,000
4,911
5,646 11,100 2,000 4,800 500 5,000 750 100 12,000 15,700 100 4
95,607 163,111 30,122 912,838 2,117,281 789,329 1 ,270,324 913,077
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
N
N
3
0
0
7,788
7,788
0
0
0
28,030
4,515 216,673 416,231
6,001 331,673 107,462
900
0 18,559 19,459
6,730
0
0
3,204
0 39,861 44,065
38,923 65,271
0
23,539
0 57,123 145,321
51,218
0 61,458
2,833 1,912 26,406 82,481 102,631 0 51,630
27,085 1,200 50,782 161,336 55,389 183,041 72,382
6,000 10,750 60,985 164,953 44,708 0 90,825
6,120 5,445 32,566 104,358 23,316 13,692 63,900
7,605 500 29,135 93,206 113,795 11,781 58,808
15,433 2,400 145,783 333,172 66,614 586,456 166,650
9,440 0 43,388 109,138 39,717 23,040 62,278
1,510 0 16,467 38,577 7,162 55,370 0
9,452 700 40,876 108,591 12,866 0 48,800
20,460 2,700 113,170 232,189 215,647 0 83,884
1,500 0 13,276 56,416 4,612 0 45,000
5,000 12,325 5,259 111,150 245 3,240 1,500 2,840 2,610 2,605 4,005 22,576 1,910 8,325 0
2,020 5,056 907 434 0
0
1,961 2,008 49,374 77,735 17,939 14,188 19,095 91,441 51,683 144,506 246,087 70,306 62,658 59,189 193,001 107,526 20,240 14,792 97,081 3,103 4,436 0
12,331 8,450 86,997 0
2,685 0
10,932 5,000 2,750 24,099 101,124 129,125 0
69,700
46,100
50,448
46,832
50,200
73,018
44,400
79,341
20,529 165,081 13,116 345,554 984,397 363,827 31,345 460,039
374
0
7,200 0
0
316 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20,000 1,000 12,000 0
28,500 44,260 104,585 148,845 228,686 10,879 246,765 102,240 95 102,335 214,390 61 214,451 100,573 0 100,889 123,717 16,937 140,654 67,728 6,701 74,429 12,553 1,908 14,461 114,030 112,991 227,021 254,705 7,090 261,795 0
0
0
107,167 932 108,099 394,794 10,179 404,973 43,911 38,049 81,960 129,606 1,793 131,399 430,358 1,189 451,547 37,486 11,417 49,903 95,857 53,807 161,664 29,733 50 29,783 Pastor’s Total
Compensation
TOTAL RECEIPTS
Other
Contributions
GREAT LAKES / GULF:
Belle Center 10,935 Bloomington
198,599 Christ Church (Brownsburg) 82,348 Columbus
38,664 Elkhart
34,453 First RPC (Durham, NC) (61,244)
First RPC (Grand Rapids) 14,344 Hetherton
26,712 Immanuel (W. Lafayette) 41,196 Lafayette
103,805 Oakdale
1,768 Orlando
68,287 Second Indianapolis 447,921 Selma
3,455 Southfield
81,689 Southside Indianapolis 5,000 Sparta
10,950 Sycamore (Kokomo, IN)
0
Westminster (Chicago) 62,754 MISSION CHURCHES
Northminster (N. Atlanta) 3,626 Supplemental Aid
Presby & HMB
CONGREGATION
BALANCE
12/31/08
RECEIPTS
47,775 151,850 64,156 84,135 53,972 146,212 46,995 0
64,900 106,368 0
55,302 94,473 44,889 69,082 159,508 26,955 92,516 12,134 33,860 500 62,860 47,717 Presbytery’s Roll
Totals, Great Lakes/Gulf 1,175,262 69,016 2,565,654 379,163 3,013,833 1,368,939 REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA
375
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
Y
N
Y
0
2,400 257 19,000 4,095 0
0
1,255 1,800 6,500 0
3,000 10,000 2,500 5,208 8,000 0
2,318 0
N
0
5
0
92 7,925 55,792 103,988 0
8,235 3,848 86,969 253,302 192,062 10,000 7,229 0 21,316 92,958 91,725 0
4,927 1,000 85,331 194,393 58,722 169,974 5,992 900 41,782 106,741 28,601 1,214 19,330 0 64,587 230,129 (150,719) 581,978 2,662 5,305 13,196 68,158 20,615 8,703 944 0 13,094 15,293 25,880 0
3,555 903 167,160 238,318 29,899 0
30,015 16,950 69,805 229,638 135,962 0
0
0
1,768 1,768 0
0
5,130 1,654 50,966 116,052 60,334 0
18,036 30,177 316,281 468,967 383,927 32,294 2,566 1,473 29,370 80,798 4,617 55,144 12,137 900 57,191 144,518 68,570 10,000 10,285 3,550 270,204 451,547 5,000 177,905 2,836 0 26,681 56,472 4,381 0
6,976 7,013 52,841 161,664 0 1,949 3,071 0 35,132 50,337 42,200 0
0
66,333 143,926 0
15,471 63,188 3,298 35,847 Pastor’s Salary 2010
Other Assets
Balance 12/31/09
TOTAL
DISBURSEMENTS
Other
External Ministries
DISBURSEMENTS
Other RP Works
RPM&M
Parsonage
43,340
113,900
65,696
88,005
56,120
150,732
48,650
0
63,300
109,825
0
55,302
98,620
47,975
71,706
169,602
9,500
102,400
0
47,754
73,765 1,427,070 3,080,033 1,109,062 1,085,008 1,342,427
376
188,557 45,753 79,578 78,467 72,213 62,298 91,408 79,855 251,514 243,090 159,664 150,349 144,202 77,042 68,167 151,440 92,234 75,634 23,600 54,460 52,412 26,300 47,773 32,000 44,532 160,538 77,080 29,527 108,914 28,621 52,000 60,278 48,450 59,500 28,000 1,867,756 140,075 2,035,831 981,619 0 61,676 0 92,850 0 50,661 0 80,253 0 146,267 0 431,707 2,096 11,578 14,475 1,579 15,942 9,415 4
0
40,102 47 26,440 23 6,917 22 1,690 9,745 0
Pastor’s Total
Compensation
186,461 34,175 65,103 76,888 54,271 51,883 91,404 79,855 211,412 243,043 133,224 127,326 137,285 77,020 64,477 141,695 92,234 TOTAL RECEIPTS
0
0
0
0
2,000 1,000 0
0
0
0
0
23,000 0
0
2,000 0
0
Other
Contributions
MIDWEST:
Christ Covenant (Lawrence)17,675 Clarinda
8,604 Denison
11,438 Hebron (Clay Center, KS)
5,404 Minneola
72,820 Quinter
15,704 Salt & Light (Longmont, CO) 96,637 Sharon
408 Shawnee
1,470 Springs (Colorado Springs) 67,756 Sterling
33,696 Stillwater
28,430 Topeka
65,976 Trinity (Wichita)
32,796 Washington
43,705 Westminster (CO)
83,649 Winchester
36,930 Presbytery’s Roll
Totals, Midwest
623,098 PACIFIC COAST:
Fresno
80,811 Los Angeles
27,850 Phoenix
(680)
San Diego
50,406 Seattle
Totals, Pacific Coast 245,274 Supplemental Aid
Presby & HMB
CONGREGATION
BALANCE
12/31/08
RECEIPTS
958 0
4,713 7,272 210 62,634 92,850 55,374 87,525 146,477 47,977 56,280 32,980 52,233 14,400 13,153 444,860 203,870 REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA
377
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
16,000 8,134 14,493 75,689 189,950 400 3,116 300 26,036 53,452 0 5,148 0 28,533 88,141 5,280 5,375 100 17,509 80,676 1,500 8,301 650 24,201 60,952 500 3,588 0 23,777 75,638 500 6,060 11,403 90,904 140,867 0 6,084 0 29,716 80,332 21,090 7,772 1,135 62,431 252,966 24,309 9,292 8,600 112,745 232,026 7,000 6,800 3,729 94,886 141,942 1,000 7,668 2,833 37,343 157,758 8,530 9,309 0 69,635 116,095 1,201 10,169 842 13,542 77,754 775 1,800 0 17,789 80,642 7,175 8,056 10,014 81,146 154,841 6,675 10,012 0 29,402 105,589 Pastor’s Salary 2010
Other Assets
Balance 12/31/09
TOTAL
DISBURSEMENTS
Other
External Ministries
DISBURSEMENTS
Other RP Works
RPM&M
Parsonage
16,282 185,667 75,700
905 24,464 22,600
2,875 154,200 55,660
3,195 22,619 54,832
84,081 0
0
2,364 1,013 47,173
47,178 0 32,800
(69)
0 44,732
18 342,510 164,989
78,820 18,371 76,415
51,418 65,037 60,100
21,021 101,574 131,000
94,083 0 28,621
32,084 0 53,560
31,230 2,418 57,238
80,248 411 66,800
23,575 47,153 60,000
7 101,935 116,684 54,099 835,284 2,089,621 569,308 965,437 1,032,220
Y
Y
N
N
Y
0 4,520 4,969 0
0 4,480 500 1,437 16,885 23,210 0
0
0
535 0
0 52,497 90,948 0
0 61,249 59,451 0
0 37,460 17,234 0
34,209 88,914 49,017 0
75,207 129,702 103,662 57,558 58,977
65,600
34,380
53,966
58,800
3
22,354 33,647 535 109,416 369,822 320,312 57,558 271,723
378
ST. LAWRENCE:
Almonte
13,488 Christ Church
47,710 Crown & Covenant
68,268 Fulton
5,018 Hudson-St. Lazare (16,430)
Lisbon
7,385 Messiah’s Church 51,985 Oswego
61,469 Ottawa
173,158 Rochester
(7,789)
Russell
215,865 Syracuse
1,217 Walton
1,332 MISSION CHURCHES
Christian Heritage 0
New Creation
Totals, St. Lawrence 765,607 JAPAN:
Higashisuma
11,015 Kasumigaoka
163,272 Okamoto-Keiyaku
4,212 Mukonosou
4,493 MISSION STATIONS
Kita Suzurandai
Totals, Japan
187,418 0
750 6,550 8,658 13,763 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,000 6,580 153,622 48,710 202,332 86,785 0 87,535 23,164 1,172 30,886 62,879 0 71,537 55,251 2,036 71,050 74,940 8,267 83,207 139,452 14,563 154,015 132,740 4,523 137,263 270,000 4,000 274,000 69,842 45,606 115,448 198,229 156,803 355,032 266,033 0 266,033 82,092 26,628 108,720 38,657 99,313 Pastor’s Total
Compensation
TOTAL RECEIPTS
Other
Contributions
Supplemental Aid
Presby & HMB
CONGREGATION
BALANCE
12/31/08
RECEIPTS
63,680 69,688 0
52,989 56,486 48,561 69,062 89,795 115,600 0
71,000 81,105 61,078 27,551 72,208 92,294 198,187 37,408 64,589 42,301 1,752,999 432,153 2,227,453 881,041 0 111,016 0 82,146 0 42,324 0 54,324 111,210 82,460 42,330 58,346 66,143 0
18,127 35,407 18,944 4 19,274 11,058 325 308,754 4,540 313,619 130,735 325 194 314 5
4,022 REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF NORTH AMERICA
379
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
2,006 0
500 0
0
2,000 0
2,625 1,200 50 636 8,000 7,202 N
N
260 1,088 3
Pastor’s Salary 2010
Other Assets
Balance 12/31/09
55,514 15,229 22,671 159,100 56,720 0 64,909
2,025 2,345 18,442 92,500 42,745 6,975 72,092
0
0 63,989 64,489 34,665 43,570 0
5,369 0 15,864 74,222 2,333 0 54,282
5,324 500 8,740 71,050 (16,430) 74,585 58,098
5,706 681 18,232 75,180 15,412 38,308 52,800
13,368 800 100,101 183,331 22,669 0 71,173
17,300 3,320 55,775 168,815 29,917 60,000 91,465
43,100 16,200 115,400 291,500 155,658 95,000 120,800
735 0 56,141 56,926 50,733 0
0
8,786 19,093 29,099 128,614 442,283 381,989 91,400
0
0 148,265 237,370 29,880 0 83,905
13,952 2,450 19,036 103,718 6,334 51,421 59,871
0
1,200 0
0
6,204 14,432 43,872 28,336 81,309 259,809 0
0
39,800
64,588
25,567 172,379 60,618 692,391 1,831,996 1,161,064 751,848 925,183
N
Y
Y
Y
0
0
0
325 9,020 3,567 2,355 3,881 7,255 3,252 650 1,193 N
0
1,821 163 3
TOTAL
DISBURSEMENTS
Other
External Ministries
Other RP Works
DISBURSEMENTS
RPM&M
Parsonage
325 20,644 12,513 28,287 110,705 11,520 111,198 28,190 35,009 210,722 0
15,922 37,054 9,488 78,072 15,204 56,010 6,828 84,808 3,880 16,922 6,778 32,139 51,171
0
13,010
35,407
9,757
91,483 255,700 245,337 306,218 109,345
380
PRESBYTERY TOTALS
Alleghenies
563,062 Atlantic
320,719 Great Lakes/Gulf
1,175,262 Midwest
623,098 Pacific Coast
245,274 St. Lawrence
765,607 Total Home Field
3,693,022 Japan Presbytery
187,418 GRAND TOTAL
3,880,440 21,833 63,190 69,016 28,000 0
42,301 Pastor’s Total
Compensation
TOTAL RECEIPTS
237,658 2,343,548 184,629 1,027,505 379,163 3,013,833 140,075 2,035,831 13,153 444,860 432,153 2,227,453 915,603 440,117 1,368,939 981,619 203,870 881,041 224,340 9,481,859 1,386,831 11,093,030 4,791,189 325 2,084,057 779,686 2,565,654 1,867,756 431,707 1,752,999 Other
Contributions
Supplemental Aid
Presby & HMB
CONGREGATION
BALANCE
12/31/08
RECEIPTS
308,754 4,540 313,619 130,735 224,665 9,790,613 1,391,371 11,406,649 4,921,924 Note: Congregations in bold type did not submit complete statistical reports for 2009.
To more accurately reflect the totals for the denomination, statistics from 2008 or earlier
have been inserted instead of blanks.
381
4
3
5
7
3
3
25 3
28 95,607 20,529 66,333 101,935 22,354 25,567 163,111 165,081 143,926 116,684 33,647 172,379 Pastor’s Salary 2010
Other Assets
Balance 12/31/09
TOTAL
DISBURSEMENTS
Other
External Ministries
DISBURSEMENTS
Other RP Works
RPM&M
Parsonage
30,122 912,838 2,117,281 789,329 1,270,324 913,077
13,116 345,554 984,397 363,827 31,345 460,039
73,765 1,427,070 3,080,033 1,109,062 1,085,008 1,342,427
54,099 835,284 2,089,621 569,308 965,437 1,032,220
535 109,416 369,822 320,312 57,558 271,723
60,618 692,391 1,831,996 1,161,064 751,848 925,183
332,325 794,828 232,255 4,322,553 10,473,150 4,312,902 4,161,520 4,944,669
325 20,644 12,513 91,483 255,700 245,337 306,218 109,345
332,650 815,472 244,768 4,414,036 10,728,850 4,558,239 4,467,738 5,054,014
382
Index
A
B
Addresses to Synod
Editors of the Reformed Presbyterian
Witness 101
Fraternal Delegates 130
Trinity Christian Community Fellowship 130
President of Geneva College 94
President of the Reformed Presbyterian
Theological Seminary 92
Adjournment 8, 91, 133, 181, 193
Alleghenies, Presbytery of the
Report of the 49–54
Roster 330–336
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Allowance, Moving 32
Allowance, Severance 32
Appendix 195–318
Items to appear in 8, 125, 134
Assessments
Communicant Member 26
Pension 26, 138
Synod Operations 138
Assistant Clerk
Address 322
Election 7
Report on Records of Presbyteries
192–193
Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church,
Address 327
Atlantic Presbytery
Report of 55–57
Roster 336–339
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Auditor’s Report
RPCNA 2008 291–305
RPCNA 2009 144–160
RPTS 2008 306–318
RPTS 2009 160–173
Australia. See Reformed Presbytery of
Australia
Bequest, Form of 329
Boards of Synod, Reports of
Education and Publication 102–105
Geneva College
Corporators 95–98
Trustees 98–101
Global Missions 127–130
Home Missions 105–107
Pension Trustees of Synod 25–34
Trustees of Synod 39–42
Trustees of the Theological Seminary
92–94
Business of Synod, Committee on the
Report 42–46
Report on Communications 11
Roster 324
C
Canadian Pension Program 29–30
Canadian Reformed Churches, Address
328
Chaplains. See Joint Commission on
Chaplains
Report 47–49
Roster 324
Church Revitalization. See also Vital
Churches
Church Revitalization Committee
Report of 87–89
Clerk
Address 322
Election 7
Report of 9–10
Committee on Communications 11
Committee on the Contents of the
Communion Cup, Report 13–18
Committee Reports, Committees of the
Day
Judicial Committee 174–176
Nominations 185–186
Records of Presbyteries 192–193
Resolution of Thanks 190–192
Special Judicial Committee 186–188
State of the Church 182–184
Travel Agent 184
Understanding the Times 82–84
Committee Reports, Standing
Business of Synod 42–46
Church History Committee 47–49
Church Revitalization 87–89
Finance Committee 134–143
Graduate Study 85–86
Interchurch 130–133
International Conference Advisory 105
Joint Commission on Chaplains 108–
124
Youth Ministries 86–87
Committee Reports, Temporary.
See Unfinished Business
Committees Appointed by the Moderator
9, 12, 91
Committees to Review Presbytery Records
Appointment 9
Committee to Canvass the Overture
Appointment 9
Committee to respond to Communication
09-2
Appointment 12
Report of 188–190
Committee to respond to Communication
10-1
Appointment 12
Report of 178–180
Communications
#09-2: On Informal Worship 11, 181,
188, 213–216
#10-1: On Psalter Revision 11, 133,
177, 217–222
#10-2: On statement of position on
“sexual orientation” 11, 223–261
#10-3: On developing a network for
deacons 12, 262
383
#10-4: On a Second Summons 12,
263–265
#10-5: On waiving facility fees 12, 266
Congregations
Almonte
Roster 357
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Anchor Fellowship
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Belle Center 58
Roster 339
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Bloomington 58
Roster 340
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Broomall 55
Roster 336
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Cambridge 55
Roster 337
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Christ Church (IN) 59
Roster 340
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Christ Church (NY)
Roster 357
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Christ Covenant 68
Roster 349
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Christian Heritage 76
Roster 358
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Christ RP Mission Church (Providence,
R.I.) 56
Roster 337
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Clarinda 68
Roster 349
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Coldenham-Newburgh 56
Roster 337
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
College Hill 50
Roster 330
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Columbus 59
384
Roster 340
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Covenant (Aurora, Ohio) 50
Roster 330
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Covenant Fellowship 51
Roster 331
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Covenant (Meadville) 51
Roster 331
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Crown & Covenant 76
Roster 358
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Denison 69
Roster 349
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Eastvale 51
Roster 331
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Elkhart 59
Roster 341
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Elkins Park 56
Roster 338
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Enid Mission Church 69
First RPC (Durham, NC) 59
Roster 341
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
First RPC (Grand Rapids, MI) 60
Roster 341
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
First RPC of Beaver Falls 52
Roster 332
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Fresno 74
Roster 355
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Fulton 77
Roster 358
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Grace (Gibsonia) 52
Roster 332
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Grace Presbyterian (State College) 52
Roster 332
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Hazleton Area 56
Roster 338
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Hebron 69
Roster 350
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Hetherton 60
Roster 342
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Higashisuma 65
Roster 346
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Hudson/St. Lazare 78
Roster 358
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Immanuel 63
Roster 345
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Kasumigaoka 66
Roster 347
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Kita-Suzurandai RP Mission Church
66
Roster 347
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Lafayette 61
Roster 343
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Laramie (Wyoming) Fellowship 69
Lisbon 78
Roster 358
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Los Angeles
Roster 356
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Manchester 53
Roster 332
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Messiah’s Church 79
Roster 359
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Minneola 70
Roster 350
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Mukonosou 66
Roster 348
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
New Creation 79
Roster 359
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
North Hills 53
Roster 333
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Northminster (Atlanta) 58
Roster 339
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Oakdale 62
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Okamoto/Keiyaku 65
Roster 347
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Orlando 62
Roster 343
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Oswego 79
Roster 359
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Ottawa
Roster 359
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Phoenix 74
Roster 356
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Providence (Pittsburgh) 53
Roster 333
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Quinter 70
Roster 350
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Ridgefield Park 56
Roster 338
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Rimersburg 54
Roster 333
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Rochester 80
Roster 360
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Rose Point 54
Roster 334
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Russell 80
Roster 360
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Salt & Light 70
Roster 351
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
San Diego 74
Roster 356
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Seattle 75
Roster 356
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Second RPC 60
Roster 342
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Selma 62
Roster 344
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Sharon 71
Roster 351
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Shawnee 71
Roster 351
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Shelter
Roster 360
Southfield 62
Roster 344
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Southside RPC 60
Roster 342
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Sparta 63
Roster 345
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
Springs Reformed Church 71
Roster 352
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Sterling 72
Roster 352
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Stillwater 72
Roster 352
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Sycamore 61
Roster 343
Statistics 365–366
Syracuse 81
Roster 360
385
386
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Terre Haute Mission Church 63
Roster 345
Topeka 72
Roster 353
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Trinity 54
Roster 334
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Trinity Reformed Church 73
Roster 353
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Tusca Area 55
Roster 334
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Walton 82
Roster 360
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Washington 73
Roster 353
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Westminster (CO) 73
Roster 354
Westminster (IL) 62
Roster 344
Statistics 365–366, 374–375
White Lake 57
Roster 338
Statistics 362–363, 372–373
Winchester 73
Roster 354
Statistics 367–368, 376
Constitution of the Court in Prayer 3, 9,
92, 134, 182
Corporators of Geneva College, Board of.
See Geneva College
Corresponding Clerk
Address 322
Report of 10
Covenanter Bookstore 64
Address 348
Crown and Covenant Publications
Address 321
Cyprus. See Trinity Christian Community
Fellowship
D
Deaths 7, 21
Delegates to Synod for the first time 7
Denominational Web Sites 102
Devotional services 3, 9, 92, 134, 182
Directory for Worship
Adoption 176
Directory of the Reformed Presbyterian
Church 319–362
Disorganizations
Congregations 20, 23
Dissent 18, 182
Durham Commission 267–290
E
Editors, Managing, Reformed Presbyterian
Witness, Address 321
Education and Publication, Board of
Report of 102–105
Roster 322
Elections 133
Board and Committee vacancies filled
176
Synod officers 7
Evangelical Presbyterian Church, Address
328
F
Finance Committee
Referrals 24, 39, 85, 105, 125, 130,
134, 182, 190
Report of 134–143
Roster 325
RPCNA 2008 291–305
RPCNA 2009 144–160
RPTS 2008 306–318
RPTS 2009 160–173
First-time delegates 7
Flowers honoring the moderator 24, 105
Foreign Missions, Board of. See Reformed
Presbyterian Global Missions
Fraternal Delegates and Greetings 92, 125
Free Church of Scotland, Synod of North
America, Address 327
Friday 182–193
G
Geneva College
Address 321
Report of the Board of Corporators
95–98
Report of the Board of Trustees 98–
101
Roster of the Board of Corporators 322
Roster of the Board of Trustees 323
Global Missions. See Reformed
Presbyterian Global Missions
Graduate Study Committee
Report of 85–86
Roster 325
Great Lakes / Gulf Presbytery
Report of 57–64
Roster 339–346
Statistics 370–371, 380–381
387
J
Japan Presbytery
Report of 64–66
Roster 346–348
Statistics 378–379, 380–381
Joint Commission on Chaplains
Report of 108–124
Roster 326
Judicial Committee
Appointment 9
Report of 174–176
K
Keynote address 3
Kobe Theological Hall 64
Address 348
Korean American Presbyterian Church,
Address 327
L
L’Église reformee du Quebec, Address
327
H
M
Health Insurance 29
Home. See Reformed Presbyterian Home
Home Missions, Board of
Report of 105–107
Roster 323
Memorials 8
J. Renwick Wright 208–209
Paul Faris 206–207
Robert Tweed 202–203
Ron Good 204–205
Midwest Presbytery
Report of 67–73
Roster 349–356
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Ministers
Installed 21, 23
Ordained & Installed 20
Retired 335, 335–336, 345, 357
Serving at Geneva College 334
Serving at the RP Seminary 335, 345
Serving on the mission field 335, 354
Stated Supply 21, 23
Without pastorates 336, 339, 346,
I
Institutions of the Denomination 321
Interchurch Committee
Report of 130–133
Roster 325
International Conference Advisory
Committee
Report of 105
Roster 325
Ireland. See Reformed Presbyterian
Church of Ireland
388
354–355, 361
Ministers, General Statistics on 20
Mission and Ministry. See RPM&M
Moderator
Address 322
Appointments 9, 12, 24, 91
Election of 7
Flowers honoring 24, 105
Retiring 3
Monday 3–8
Moving Allowance 32
N
National Association of Evangelicals
(NAE) 131
National Reform Association
Address 321
Appointment 9, 24
Referrals 24, 39, 47, 87, 92, 101, 108,
125, 130, 134
Report 185–186
Roster 325
North American Presbyterian and
Reformed Council (NAPARC) 131
O
Officers of Synod
Addresses 322
Elections 7
Organizations
Congregations 20, 23
Mission Church 23
Orthodox Presbyterian Church, Address
327
Ottawa Theological Hall
Address 361
P
Pacific Coast Presbytery
Report of 73–74
Roster 355–357
Statistics 367–368, 376–377
Pages 7
Parliamentarians
Roster 325
Pension Plan
Summary of changes 34–35
Pension Trustees, Board of
Assessment 26, 138
Constitution 35–38
Minimum Contribution 25
Report 25–34
Roster 323
Prayer
Adjournment 8, 91, 133, 181, 193
Constitution of the Court 3, 9, 92, 134,
182
Devotions 9, 92, 134, 182
Memorial 8
Recess/reconvene 12, 48, 125, 130
Seasons of 24, 48, 91, 125, 130, 133,
181
Specific Concerns 49, 134, 176, 177,
182, 188
Presbyterian Church in America, Address
327
Presbyteries
Reports 49–82
President of Geneva College 321
President of the Reformed Presbyterian
Theological Seminary 321
Priorities of Synod 46
Psalter Revision Committee 181
Psalter Revision Committee Report 181
Publication. See Education and
Publication, Board of
R
Records of Presbyteries Report 192–193
Reformation Translation Fellowship (RTF)
Address 321
Report 197–198
Reformed Church in the United States,
Address 328
Reformed Presbyterian Church of Ireland,
Address 327
Reformed Presbyterian Church of
Scotland, Address 326
Reformed Presbyterian Global Missions
Report of 127–130
Roster 323
Reformed Presbyterian Home
Address 321
Administrators’ Reports 199–201
Reformed Presbyterian Theological
Seminary
Address 321
2008 306–318
2009 160–173
Report of the Tustees Of 92–94
Reformed Presbyterian Witness.
See Crown and Covenant Publications
or Board of Education and Publication
Reformed Presbytery Of Australia,
Address 326
Resolution of Thanks Committee
Appointment 9
Report of 190–192
Roll 4–7
RPM&M 39
Ruling Elders on Presbytery’s Roll 336
S
Scotland. See Reformed Presbyterian
Church of Scotland or Free Church of
Scotland
Seminary. See Reformed Presbyterian
Theological Seminary
Severance Allowance 32
Social Security 30
Special Judicial Committee
Appointment 91
Report 186–188
Special Resolution 176–177
Stated Clerk
Report of 18–24
State of the Church Committee
Appointment 9
389
Report of 182–184
St. Lawrence Presbytery
Report of 75–82
Roster 357–361
Statistics 368–369, 378–379
Students Under Care 22, 24, 361
Synodical Missionary Fellowship,
Women’s
Representation on Mission Boards 323
Synod Operations Assessment 138
T
Theological Seminary, Board of Trustees
of the. See Reformed Presbyterian
Theological Seminary
Theological Students 22–23, 24
Certified Eligible to Preach 22, 24
Thursday 134–181
Time and Place of Synod Meetings 44
Travel Agent, Report of 184
Treasurer, Denominational, Address 322
Trinity Christian Community Fellowship
Address 327
Greetings from 210–212
Trustees of Geneva College, Board of.
See Geneva College
Trustees of Synod, Board of
Address 324
Report 39–42
Roster 324
Trustees of the Theological Seminary. See Tuesday 9–91
U
Understanding the Times Committee
Report 82–84
Roster 326
Unfinished Business Committee Reports
Committee on the Contents of the
Communion Cup 13–18
Psalter Revision 181
Revise the Directory for Worship 176
United Reformed Churches in North
390
America, Address 328
V
Vacant Congregations 20, 23
Vital Churches, Committee
Roster 326
W
Web Sites, Denominational 102
Wednesday 92–133
Woman’s Association
Address 321
Reports 199–201
Y
Youth Ministries Committee
Coordinator 326
Report of 86–87

Reformed Presbyterian Minutes of Synod 2010

Transcription

Similar documents

Radio Silence - WSJ

synod 2011 - The Anglican Diocese of West Malaysia

Epistle - First Presbyterian Church in Valatie, NY

Jun 04/Jun 05 Newsletter

August 2016 - Saskatchewan Synod

Reports of the Auxiliaries

The Messenger - St Stephen Evangelical

Practicing What We Preach - The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST FIRSTS

May 2013