see it here - Ridge to Reefs
Transcription
see it here - Ridge to Reefs
LA P A R G U E R A GREEN I N F R A S T R U C T U R E M A S T E R PLAN December 2012 LA PARGUERA GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE MASTER PLAN SUMMARY PREPARED BY POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE J.J. TERRASA M. BINGEN L. LUGO RIDGE TO REEFS P. STURM PROTECTORES DE CUENCAS R.VIQUEIRA CENTER FOR WATERSHED PROTECTION K.LINDOW ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION 05 GUIDING PRINCIPLES 08 SW PUERTO RICO CONTEXT ! ! ! 16 LA PARGUERA WATERSHED 19 LA PARGUERA TODAY 15 ANALYSIS 22 3 SITES 3 INTERVENTIONS 1 WORKING LANDSCAPE 25 EXAMPLE PROJECTS 33 THE NEED FOR RESILIANCE CORAL REEFS 36 GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS 37 CONCLUSION 38 APPENDICES 39 --Or : t • - • , ...di tIol tol- y• I:v 07114 *44: trto4F0-zw-st a . tt . 4 ! kno73;t4rui ; 1 n t h 1r . PROJECT DESCRIPTION ! SITE PROJECT La Parguera, a coastal town of 26,000 people, a n d is home to some of the h i s t o r i c a l l y m o s t diverse a n d e x t e n s i v e c o r a l r e e f a s s e m b l a g e s in Puerto Rico (PR). The La Parguera reef system contains significant stands of both Acropora palmata and A. cervicornis, species listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. Acropora palmata is known to be particularly sensitive to sedimentation affecting both reproduction and growth rates. It is also sensitive to human bacteria know to result in Whitepox disease. Parguera entertains a thriving tourism industry with snorkeling, driving and a bioluminescent bay, and receives around 100,000 visitors annually. However, stormwater runoff from the hillside town and streets flows directly into the tidal waters and mangroves carrying high levels of pollutants that are damaging the nearshore coral reefs. NOAA NCCOS has monitored high PAH (Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons -- many of which are toxic and carcinogenic compounds associated with combustion of fossil fuels) levels and heavy metals in the near shore sediments and the data shows a clear signal and plume from the town and its impervious surfaces (Figure 1). Further analysis has determined that automobiles, as opposed to boats engines are the primary source of these PAHs, implying that stormwater runoff from the heavily developed town is the main contributor of this pollutant (Pait et. al., 2007). This stormwater runoff also carries significant loads of nitrogen, sediment and bacteria as well as other pollutants harmful to coral reefs (La Pointe, 1998) (Ramirez, per comm). A recent study by Ramos (2006) a l s o indicated that unpaved roads and disturbed soils from development or d i r t roads on the La Parguera hillside are significant sources of sediment in stormwater runoff.! This project proposes to address land based sources of pollution (LBS) by creating a green infrastructure plan that consists of a set of actions and conceptual retrofit designs for best management practices (BMPs) to address stormwater runoff at specific discharge points to capture and treat or filter stormwater before it enters the tidal waters and nearshore coral environment. This plan will serve as a road map for the future implementation of key projects to decrease nutrient, sediment and other pollutants in La Parguera, ultimately improving the quality of the receiving tidal waters and coral reef areas. Our multi-disciplinary team of engineers, ecologists and landscape architects has identified key project interventions to improve conditions in the near shore environment and have adapted these to the local conditions in La Parguera. The retrofit BMP designs for La Parguera would use native materials and plants and incorporate local community input and engagement, university landscape architects and the engineering community in order to bring the projects to fruition. ! ! Figure 1. Interpreted concentrations of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the nearshore sediments (red=high, blue=low). Green dots represent areas with high coral diversity (top 25%) – Note very few high diversity locations within the red interpolated area. Source: NOAA CCMA (Pait et. al., 2007) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! PROJECT DESCRIPTION MASTER PLAN The Master Plan is a framework to guide the implementation of the green infrastructure p l a n with a coherent language. With this Master Plan, we propose a series of physical and landscape strategies to: overcome physical and ecological fragmentation; enhance the existing sense of place where green infrastructure meets public space; enhance the natural resources and to promote ecological resilience, restoration and improvement of near shore habitats including mangroves, sea grass beds and coral reefs. This document is organized to provide the information in a traditional landscape architectural way – making use of pictorial and sketches and includes descriptions of typical interventions, detail on three representative projects, and provides details and anticipated costs and benefits of restoration practices. _ • G R E E N INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN, LA PARGUERA LAJAS PR MASTER PLAN FOR WATER MANAGEMENT • • savnaces • Faweg • • • C re a ...... BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTI CES o - tie L I T Y IMPROVEMENT GUIDING PRINCIPLES I BMP T his pr ojec t pr opos es t o addr es s land bas ed s our c es of pollut ion by r et r of it ing des igns f or best m anagement pr ac t ic es (BMPs) at s pec if ic dis c har ge point s and s edim ent s our c e ar eas in or der t o c apt ur e and t reat s t or m wat er and s edim ent bef ore it ent ers t he t idal wat ers and near s hor e c or al env ir onm ent . W et land Rest orat ion O ut Falls: F ore bays Rain G ardens for t he t reat ment of cont aminat ed or nut rient -enriched wast ewat er; receive discharges from st orm wat er collect ion syst ems and ot her outfalls; make use of nat ural wet land processes: plant s, soil, and associat ed microorganisms; r educ e f low velocit y, capt ure suspended sediment s, and adsorb cont aminant s; t he cost is proport ional t o t he number and sizes of t reat ment cells required ($35, 000 t o $150, 000 per acre f or const ruct ed t reat ment wet lands or about 50%, to 90% less t han convent ional t reat ment t echniques). is an excavat ed shallow surf ace depression plant ed wit h specially select ed nat ive veget at ion to t reat and capt ure runof f and t ypically underlain by a sand or gravel inf ilt rat ion bed. B es t suit ed for areas wit h at least moderat e permeabilit y = more t han an inch/ hour. Cost 5 — 7 dollars per cubic foot. S ur f ac e area is dependent upon st orage volume requirement s but should nor exceed a maximum loading rat io of 5:1. W at er accumulat ion dept h should not exceed 6 inches and should empt y wit hin 48 hours. Veget at ed Swales F ilt ering Pract ices are open, s hallow channels wit h t hick veget at ion covering t he side slopes and bot t om t hat collect and s lowly convey runof f to downst ream discharge point s. B es t suit ed f or resident ial, indust rial, and commercial areas wit h low f low and smaller populat ions f easibilit y of inst alling depends on t he area, slope, and t he cont ribut ing wat ershed. Limit at ions: impract ical in areas wit h very flat grades, st eep t opography, or wet or poorly drained soils. Capt ure and store, t emporarily, t he wat er qualit y volume and pass it t hrough a f ilt er bed of sand, organic matter, soil or ot her media. A r e generally applied to land uses wit h a high percent age of impervious surfaces. S edim ent should be cleaned out when it accumulat es to a dept h of 6' or more. Rain W at er Harvest ing Wet Ponds combinat ion of a permanent pool, ext ended det ent ion or shallow marsh equivalent to the ent ire WC)v; A sediment f ore-bay is import ant f or maint enance and longevit y of a st orm-wat er t reat ment pond. A pond buf f er should be provided that ext ends 25 feet out ward from t he maximum wat er surf ace elevat ion of t he pond. W oody veget at ion may not be plant ed or allowed to grow wit hin 15 f eet of the t oe of the embankment is t he capt ure, diversion, and st orage of rainwat er for a num ber of dif f erent purposes: is pract ical only when t he volume and f requency of rainf all and size of the cat chment surf ace can generat e suf f icient wat er for the int ended purpose. Permeable Pavement allows r ainwat er t o inf ilt rat e t hr ough it , t o be f ilt ered and r ec har ged int o t he gr ound as groundwat er. $ 7 $15/ square foot, including underground inf ilt rat ion bed. C a n reduce overall project cost by eliminat ing t he need for t radit ional st orm-wat er inf rast ruct ure. I deally sit uat ed on s hallow slopes above soils wit h permeabilit y rat es great er t han 0. 25 inches/ hour. TYPICAL PRO VISIO NS F O R ST O RMWAT ER WET L A N D (CONSTRUCTED WETLAND) SITES: Cl , C 2 , C 3 , of0?4, 1 72-_44 , 4 % a http.livoviw.alo.org.euilapapersipapersisymixpertht05_Stormwater-wetland-Zone-l—mitial-detentionjpg 41* . vvrkt'vlAtwuzytce acce , r eg ak Photo by Marcus Gory unit ed States Geologic al Survey A WG ?-Iewo-eA vvA .4v-e,-fre.cA / tl a 4).-wbs , C ti ‘4 C r 3 r W Stormwater wet lands (a.k.a. constructed wet lands) are structural practices similar to wet ponds (see Wet Ponds Fact Sheet) that incorporat e wet land h plants in a shallow pool. As stormwater runoff f lows through the wet land, pollut ant removal is achieved by settling and biological upt ake within the practice. Wetlands are among the mostVeffective stormwater practices in terms of pollutant removal, o and also offer aesthetic value. W hile natural wet lands can sometimes be used to treat stormwater runoff that has been properly pretreated, stormwater wet lands are f undament ally different from nat ural wet land / systems. St ormwat er wet lands are designed specif ically for the purpose of treating stormwater runoff, and typically have less biodiversit y than nat ural wetp 1 stormwater wetland, each design differing in the relat ive amount s of lands both in terms of plant and animal life. T here are several design variat ions of the shallow and deep water, and v dry storage above the wetland. 1 6 " w e ., ,i - (http://www.stormwatercenter. net / Assoned%20F act %20Sheet siT ool6_St ormwat er_Pract ices/ W et land/ W elland. ht m) BIOSWALE (VEGETATED SWALE) SITES: Al -h're-wra T c u A , 104- httplik noLgo*gle cotrid-/-/Wruw3d8fy14etgauarnn/hoswale-seattle jpg ; 4L-0"ikAi.cauzi, 1 1C u t - (>14 -, 1 1 2 W c z k , V r a . hffp ifierrn5 static flid<r com/400714651203085_abl0e85599_7 jpg TYPICAL PROVISIONS F O R G REEN ST REET BIORETENTION SITES: D6, D8, Fl http //Images greatergreaterwashIngton orghmages/2010031b 0 , 4 • 9 Cw/\ eldr4 pw vA l' , 7 6 , . . „ , e r t o r r http F r e s e a r c h m e t A r n a g e s i s t r e e t s w a l e s RAINGARDENS SITES: BI, Dl_A, Dl_B, D3, D4, D5, D7, El, E200, E201, IneLaVevZ ha 46 ,A Raingarden in saipan 41136. ;ak i4 a, - ,U A achve, 407.1 A1e?Vi ,r aAk- E 65 4T o 1r , Ap ( 4 'a' 64 e a r v t r e r o c WV dvy-A,i cr n 'r/ 422'0 -kYcl - Ack) An kat n e iw ' ) d i k, o' k c o h SO i g * . t ) C 7 , 4 . a l • * 7 0 C O r T o • i t C , 1 7 1 l v t s t k A c c o v e A , - hdp //fa r m , ' s ta ti c f i l a r c o m / 3 0 5 8 / 2 8 6 , 1 4 3 8 9 4 8 _ 0 8 2 1 d 5 7 TYPICAL PROVISIONS FOR FILTERING PRACTICES (SAND FILTERS) SITES:83, Di, E200 Infl ow B y pas s F l ow Spl i tter P er f or at ed Standpi pe U nder dr ai n Co i l e obon S y s t c m Fi l ter B e d SCHEMATIC OF A SURFACE SAND FILTER e ttp itw w w mw r r o N te d u r tmd ip til:2 2 20tO_Opc Ilite/D C R _BMP_Spec _N o_12 FILTEtz t G_PR AC TIC ES Ma s t b r a v 1-7_03082010 fi l e s .r te 0 0 2 .g i t TYPICAL PROVISIONS FOR RAINWATER HARVESTING SITES: E4 , j, \Til.".:Z•(;„ 7 , 1 ;j 1 I nlk v k gat) ‘ - nAld/28 e, avows) t t-PlA*Ai roliA4 k) a . c f— A i c A , t t u , c ) o l „ ( A . 4L 1 , 0 . 4 i (otAolcodcs, . ) dAsitia co , t P io - ,r % - http:flbangatore.utizerrnatters In/Om/000 1/16451erv-rain— water-harvesting_small jpg PREFACE FILTER SYS OR ROOF WA NCR ( C. . O TR) PROVIDE CENTINUOS LEAF SCRI M A L M DOTTER ANO / ER e As k Er STRAINER AT HEAD OF DOWN SPOUT 0011.91 SPOUT TRANs iv a l TO SCHEDULE 40 PVC PIPE (EFT CHIVE) --PROVIDE PROPER CONNECTION To STCRACE CONTAINER oveA- o w p A t t l ' e , Ftpc-tce 'f'41 3 ( TO r ov-trtuow , PRO ME m v ir L o w PIPING TO ACOITONAL CONTAINERS OR CiSCHAROE Ap p a a mp An n , AWAY FROM THE MOLISE RAINWATER STORAGE CENTAINER oRArm vg.vE http figroundtec netiwp-contentiuploads12009/08trainwater3 jpg TYPICAL PR O VISIO N S F O R PER MEA B L E PA VEMEN T (POROUS PAVEMENT) SITES: El, E201, E6, E7 0 TYPES Rain p a rk i nlands g l ot on s u rfthlt ac e 0 wat er flows POROUS ASPHALT PERMEABIA PAVEMENTE t h ro u g h ti ny s pac e in the privet:lent ' 4 1 • • • O F m p t it e g m h o t r o p o n o w. c o n v o o , t o n i. o . o 0 , 4 • • • • 8 0 a u c • ia t e k t z • 8 PERVIOUS PAVEMENT • • -4 1eldckgibed bed beridoth 1 the pbItthfJot W I Atitt = g ri . • http.th•ww fiembitwavernents orohrnages•DSCOMT UNI T olotons ta geosyntefics com PUERTO RICO WATERSHED AND WATERBODIES • Co a s t Town La Parguera Cuenca Ri o Guanajibo LA PARGUERA CONTEXT FOR SOUTH WEST PUERTO RICO DIRECT DRAINAGE WATERSHEDS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! LA PARGUERA SUB-WATERSHED LA PARGUERA TODAY La Parguera is a coast al t own of 26. 000 people and a hub for t ourism all year round increasing t he amount of pollut ant s t hat reach t he coast al wat er. E v en t hough t his project f ocuses on t he reduct ion of st ormwat er runof f we ident if ied several def iciencies: lack of coherent connect ion, f ragment ed ecosyst em and inf rast ruct ure and lack of ident it y, porr qualit y of public space. We believe t hat well designed green inf rast ruct ure can cont ribut e to solve t his challenges t hus t urning t he inf rast ruct ure int o space, int o public space. T heref ore the use of green inf rast ruct ure, f or enhancing wat er qualit y and reducing st romwat er runof f among ot her benef it s, can become an agent for addressing social and economic concerns. LA PARGU ERA TODAY I SITE INVENTORY LA PARGU ERA TODAY I SITE INVENTORY UNDEVELO PED T ERRAI N. EXPOSED SO I LS. RO AD-W AYS. EXISTING BUI LDI NG S. PARKI NG AREAS. O U T F ALLS. ANALYSIS 9 In the process of analysis we put together layers of information to identify the tensions and problems in La Parguera. The tensions and problems identified were lack of coherent connection, fragmented ecosystem and infrastructure and lack of identity. W i t h these significant tensions we pin pointed the subwatershed with the greatest tension and the first areas to implement the green infrastructure. • c c D k •c% • - e r • .,•c • i A • k i o u • . . . c , • o v e g r r u k d t . „ , . . . • atvl . av U••• 4••-y. ro•-r, , e 4 Ko.4411.,• . e, ( . h e . : 1 4 ( .0 ,, , ipm-n r••.t,y01-VcALI•ekvx i••\ ct Akkoo, i. r r v y , 0 , 4 4 . 1 5 1.% AWA&C A er , 0 0 'f A ' it 'p l cAked, / mai/att.:au, _pc v A l o. -, A rwr hkAs , De e , 4 , ,14.tA0 a t i (.r) A ho • v A y A , , CO , " ry - [ 0 6 6, r r 4 4 , , c a t . e A o Tc o v ? '" 1 p 1Le_. . CM - C a, a I C. , , S l • z r IMV I i.• • I• T A ;1cetrAa ime kiky.--a a e .,,d ,h e- izr iw - ( 1 1 2 'CAt L e " . . 3 • Vn AAk 4 . 1 1 4 4 0 4 VI.J3 112a.eorn L A = „ _ Z / D + 4 , , , V t r r , " , M ' Ce(11, Pt Y ' • C' o y f b - A e A t , 'AUe el , e Alt r-, w v a o - d 1 , 3 iitelyoLk201.5 4 t•rwt•- uL cain<trer, 4 ••-f 4 i 5 t •0• i v i v ) 6 CLH- :61) i 4 • toc i mry oi s • eckir,5 4 . 1 , ,v ,diiihizmur i ckcci4o5 4-470 *4.0-4 l AvAT-Axic, , • -Ow-ttrt‘ aty to• - v c 6s A e e 5 k i , c 6 i t 7 S, a C 6 1 , c " X i a l m t t C U - (40••-4-0, ANALYSIS STORMWATER FLOW. biARDSCAPE. A r l e s A y s ' • • • • , / Al w' s% .4 4" 4 ECOLOGICAL FRAGMENTATION. ANALYSIS Sob-WatershedAnalysts ▪ m o s t c r itic a l • • l e s s c r itic a l 3 SITES 3 INTERVENTIONS I WORKING LANDSCAPE SIT ES F O R IN IT IA L W A T ER MA N A G EMEN T A N D Q U A L IT Y IM PR O VEM EN T S Imagefk 2011 GeoEye !ma• • D a t a : So 1 6 . 2010 • 5 8 • 2 8 . 0 3 ' N 6 7 • 0 2 • 5 2 . t W 1 7 SITE D3 + D8 I GREEN STREET BIO-RETENTION SITE D3 + D8 I GREEN STREET BIO-RETENTION Sit e 0 3 • 0 8 Greens treet Bio-ret ent ron Pr e lim in a r y m a t e r ia ls : • grav el • t O ps oil • lime s t o n e vL Im e °/ 4 ti y ri lo A t t c 1 1 5 1 t i e n " ' k(••• nk•itc ilkir;, e A 8 s Pr e lim in a r y p la n t s if e x is t in g p a lm s are re mo v e d : • Conoc arpos erec tus - ma n g le !seem • Su c k la buc eros - s ear • Pe n is e lt u m - v ariet y • Sa n s o m f ia s v a n e t y #4 -- - i m u r n i Isawwwk s k 4 0, 41 m : e _ ot go il k 21 51 11 1 M E M Or r• 4 wow Pr e lim in a r y m a t e r ia ls : • g ra v e l • t o p s o il • lime s t o n e - v a rie t y • p e rme g le pav ement t or s elec t ed areas Pr e lim in a r y p la n t s if e x is t in g p a lm s r e m a in : • Ch o rs o b a la n u s le a v e - loav es • Po n is e f lu m - v ariet y • So n s e v ie d a s - v ariet y SITE E200: SAND FILTER SITE E200: SAND FILTER Sit e ESSO Sandfiher bet ween plaz a and b u ild in g Sit e f igge Pla z a and Kio s k s Plaz a runoff from pla za could be directed to ex is ting planter Suggested grease trap Kios k s Pr e lim in a r y M a t e r ia ls f o r e x is t in g p la n t e r . • lime s t o n e roc k s - dif f erent s iz es Pr e lim in a r y ma t e ria ls : • lime s t o n e rocks - different s iz es • grav el • s and • grav el • s and • t o p s o il in t s o n e x t e 6 5 , f e p t g a t e . Vx Ze s ? a 'd Z i , Pr e lim in a r y p la n t s if e x is t in g p a lm s are re mo v e d : •Sucida buceras - Scar • He rb a c e o u s plant that will h e lp ev aporat ion SITE E3 + E5: MANGROVE RESTORATION + FORE BAY SITE E3 + E5: MANGROVE RESTORATION + FORE BAY Mangrove Distribution According to Distance from Sea to Land Roadside, Parking Area and Mangrove Entrance Trees Rhizophora mangle - Red mangrove GROWING HABI T - Perennial tree, Evergreen. Dist inguished by its erect and aerial roots that forms a dense brush. F or m s pure colonies when i n direct contact with sea in quiet coasts. Reaches heights of 10 meters or more and 30 cm in diameter or more. HABITAT- Common i n m angrove swamps around coast al areas, near river mouths. P r ovides shelt er and nest ing f or aquatic birds. E s t uar ine systems. Thespeso populnea- Emataguilla (Port ia tree, Spanish cork, Otaheita) GROWING HABIT- Shrub/tree of coastal woods, up to 30 feet high. T runk of 20 cm diameter; dense crown. HABITAT- Coast al woods and SITE E3 + E5 Sit e ES • ES M a n g r o v e Re a r d r a t iO n a n d F o r e b a y G e n e r a l Pla n t Pa le t t e - - • Conoc argua erectus • Button Mangrov e R e - M• Creat e t rans it ion from road to modriat , O • Des ignat e s mall park ing areas v e r o a d s i d e e x i s t Propos ed Ba t t e r i • gleas c es M r a g g e e n • r e e v e s . g e g e n , . - Ern ik a g g illa g v Dr iv e wa y Ent ranc es e • gammas allac eas - & n e m . g • rees pos m nomanea - Ema t a g g illa e t a t Mangrove Restorati on • Lagenc elage r a c e m e . - Wh it e Mangrov e i • I lamennie geranin ans - Blac k Mangrov e o la b ro p h o re mangle - Red Mangrov e n t o r • Creat e t rans it ions in depth of rorehay to a llo w the g ro wt h on different s pec ies • Creat e t rans ilion from road to mudirlat Avicennia germ/ nays - Black mangrove Evergreen tree. S t em s up t o 30cm of diameter, 1 6 meters long. M o r e salt tolerant t han other mangrove species. HABITAT- Coastal lagoons and swamps, es t uar ine syst ems. Provides nesting and shelter of wildlife. Hibiscus pernambucensis - Emajagua GROWING HABI T - Shr ub o r tree: t o 15 m tall. HABITAT- In brackish swamps and inner margins of mangrove, ascending to t he humid mountains. Laguncularia racemosa- W hit e mangrove GROWING HABIT- Evergreen tree, reaches up t o 20 meters high, p r o d u c e s pneum at ophores. HABITAT- Mangrove swamps in coastal areas. Provides shelter for wildlife. Conocarpus erect us • But t on mangrove GROWING HABIT- Evergreen tree: generally up to 3-5 meters high but it can reach 20 meters. HABITAT- Mangrove swamp forests and sometimes on rocky and sandy shores. E s t uar ine systems, P r ov ides shelt er f or wildlife. Stahlia monospenna - Cobana negra GROWING HABI T - Perennial tree. Evergreen. St ems up to 20 meters high. HABITAT- Coast al woodlands and bor der s o f mangroves. Threatened with extinction. EXAMPLE PROJECTS ••••..tg•mw• T 3 /ly_7••• ••••••••••i•Al•••••• STONE cttrelmom •••••••.•tk.••••••••Imi • • . . . w a g e d 1111.1c land r. 1 , 1 • ••••• litolowtotell Sainting lisconitlina Sapifl F.•••••••4••••111,10-mik 1••11 G. W . BUS H P RE S IDE NTIAL CE NTE R DALLAS , TX (2008—ONGOING)E MICHAE L VAN V ALKE NBURGH AS S OC. RESUSCITATING THE FEZ RIVER PR OC ED U R ES FOR N EW PU BL IC SPAC ES IN TH E MED IN A OF F EZ recycled leather canopy EXAMPLE PROJE s ite 021 AN D AL O U S BAN K PL AYGR OU N D cable support system storm water retention wetland , 2 . 0 0 m 0 . 0 0 m 1 .5 0 n 1 VARIES 1.00m , 1.00m benches Ut iliz ing F ez , M o r o c c o a s a c a s e st udy, we env is ioned a s t r at egic plan t hat s i m u l t a n e o u s l y r e s t o r e s a n ur ban r iv er and addr es s es is s ues en- 0 Storm water flow o l ' Z a g l e tq l k r s p 0 W t e 0 Groundwater recharge r r oi u g o lV h playground using recycled tires recycled wood benches dem ic t o aging m ediev al f abr ic s s uc h as t h e s c ar c it y of open s pac e, ov er c r owding, a weak ec onom y , a n d t he des t r uc t ion of nat ur al r es our c es and Una pacers Setting bed Bridge beyond plac es of c ult ur al and his t or ic s ignif icance. W e c hor eogr aphed a phas ed im plem ent at ion s t r a t e g y i n w h i c h m eas ur es f or enhanc ing wat er qualit y bec om e bot h t he loc us and agent f or Pilr ir e U r e t" 25krete retaining e g x P o p T r t i n 9 addr es s ing s oc ial and ec onom ic c oncerns. PLAN L EVEL S' PLAYGROUND PLAN LEVEL +3.5M , C A N O P Y A 2 5 y ear Flo o d L in e 0: Av erage Wat er Lev el First terrace plant spears J im a . 1,01 ontus 1 !metes veleta 1 1.01.1.0111. 1 1 r a g r m t e 0 a u s l m I t s VIEW OF PLAYGROUND Sec md terrace plant species /Rumex 1.011;117411111..vs Ormenis Data Siione unlace A g ro s t . S e i rn a n i l 0 0 1 R 1ap whence 1roitaris -W 111.1tbrwo ver1:011a1 urn p Wu 14111rum Inrysthenocum ma/ 1 m it d a/ p lu s a n t s p a c e s F4 r a cWe t la n d plant s pec ies tLinee cut in existing i E vac x e i p s l ta n tI n g c o n c r e t e EXAMPLE PROJECTS GOW ANUS CANAL S P ONGE P ARK, BROOKLY N, NY I DLAND S TUDIO M T AF G • Smit -g t h St E Rec reat ion L 1 fhlM Mahon ° O e n Space A c Public Place W a t e r t i • De p o sve d F Remedt at on e Breed-use We t la n d s Development Wetlands Park And 0 RD. . . Pe n a l C Co mmu n t t y c ent., C u l t u r a l Passiv eO p e n Space D Rec reat ion R e n o v a t e d OPen Space P E R . ' E D c t P ORI , t r K Do u g la s Green Park :t " Park To rt,,yrecm.tn n u Borne Park h e DIP Store Mouse =PA TPoRancal Site r t n t ' W a r •s• • , : 1.1 1 .:;11 ' ' j : I f • • • • • Open Space Pav rton Es planade Spent End Sponge Park Coat twunch Water Pernediatton Basins PO Espla nade Wid th aoEsplanade Wan LBS is an actionable approach to minimize climate change impacts to coral • quantitative linkage between terrestrially-sourced dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) loading and the upper thermal bleaching thresholds of inshore reefs • concrete evidence for the belief that improved watershed management/nitrogen reduction will increase the survival prospects of coral reefs to global climate change Wooldridge and Done, 2009. Improved water quality can ameliorate effects of climate change on corals. Ecological Applications Wooldridge, 2009. Water quality and thermal bleaching thresholds. Marine Pollution Bulletin LA PARGUERA GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS Recommendation Project Description Project Partners Estimated Project Potential Funding Costs Sources 1. Build 14 Stormwater Treatment Treat the major stormwater outflows from La Parguera – utilize existing Practices throughout the town of public spaces such as un-utilized space in the roadway and on PRASA La Parguera land; improve and create park space while addressing runoff AG Environmental, NFWF, CRCP, NOAA PUPR, PRTC, $560,000 Restoration Center (RC), RTR, Protectores de EPA Cuencas (PC) 2. Construct 6 Ecosystem Projects that address stormwater runoff by providing treatment and AG Env, RTR, $300,000 Gulf of Mexico Foundation Restoration Based Approaches for attenuation of nutrients and other pollutants as well as creating habitat for PRTC, PC, NOAA NOAA CRCP, NOAA RC Mangrove Restoration juvenile fishes and invertebrates. 3. Re-establish vegetation on areas Approximately 10 areas exist where a sizeable amount of soil is exposed PC, RTR, NRCS $100,000 NOAA, NFWF, NRCS with exposed soil to rain events – Use hydroseed with PAM polymers to stabilize these areas Edwin Mas (adapt a seedmix and seasonal planting strategy to provide permanent restabilization of these areas) 4. Conduct Education and Outreach Work to incorporate watershed information into school curricula, and PC, NOAA, School $50,000 NOAA CRCP , NFWF, activities targeted to school groups, involve the schools in planting projects. system, PUPR DNER 5. Increase environmental Educate area merchants on the importance of pollution control (oil and Interamerican Univ $25,000 EPA Pollution Prevention awareness among local businesses grease, detergents) and work to incentivize “green” businesses through (IU), PRTC, Funds and visitors to the town increased advertisement to tourists NOAA, 6. Improve development and Adopt green infrastructure stormwater practices at new development sites. Municipality of $20,000 NOAA Restoration sediment control practices within Enforce erosion and sediment control laws – require rapid stabilization Lajas, PC, RTR Coordination Funding La Parguera and surrounding areas and advanced methods for stabilize soils such as hydroseeding and PAMs especially during dry season. Limit hillside clearing and establish enforceable regulations at the local and Commonwealth level to reduce unpermitted road building and clearing. 7. Monitor implemented restoration Especially during initial implementation efforts to determine effectiveness IU, UPR-Isla $50,000 NOAA CRCP projects of intervention strategies Magueyes 8. Isolate and remediate sources of Conduct outfall and near shore sampling to identify problem areas and to PC, RTR, EPA, IU, $100,000 NFWF, EQB sewage and washwater pollution target remediation efforts PRASA, EPA, EQB 9. Improve sewage infrastructure Consider the installation of grinder pumps and improve plumbing PRASA, Health $100,000 PRASA, Federal which leaks and contaminates connections – determine and abate areas of infiltration of sea water and Department, EPA Infrastructure Funds surface waters exfiltration of sewage – prepare areas for climate change and sea level rise 10. Removal of the PRASA Existing PRASA wastewater ponds were designed to exfiltrate water into PRASA, EPA $200,000** PRASA (appears to be a wastewater ponds the nearby Caribbean Sea – elevated nutrients and other contaminants are requirement that EPA has seen at this location -as a result removal and remediation of these ponds placed on PRASA) are recommended Total $1.2M* *Note: Partial funding has been received by NFWF, GOMF, NOAA CRCP and **Partial/Projects are sponsored by EPA/PRASA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! CONCLUSION La Parguera’s unique location, character, diverse ecological values and one of kind natural attractions will continue to draw and captivate the public. For these and many other reasons we believe in the protection of the ecological habitat through the use of different alternatives among them green infrastructure. Therefore, this Master Plan is a vision that describes and identifies the key challenges, opportunities and the possible solutions to enable the established objectives. With correct management and enhancement La Parguera has the opportunity to continue to captivate its visitors and residents while protecting most vital attributes – its mangroves, sea grass beds, coral reefs, healthy and safe water quality and aesthetic beauty. APPENDICES Appendix 1. Priority Pollutants in the La Parguera Subwatershed Appendix 2. Prioritization of Restoration Sites Appendix 3. Nutrient and Sediment Load Reduction Estimates Priority Pollutants in the La Parguera Subwatershed Pollutant Impacts Sources Nitrogen, Phosphorus Eutrophica5on, algae growth, enrichment beyond tolerance of coral reefs. Wastewater, fer5lizers, stormwater runoff, atmospheric deposi5on Sediment Deposi5on on reefs, effects on sediment intolerant reef organisms, sediment par5cles leading to water temperature warming, pollutants aTached to sediment par5cles. Soil erosion, channel erosion, poor erosion and sediment control, stormwater runoff, African dust Bacteria Health related illnesses due to water contact, swimming, beach closures, source of pathogens that effect coral reefs Untreated wastewater, sewage overflows, stormwater runoff, pet waste, animal waste, wildlife PAHs Toxicity to coral reefs Stormwater runoff of automobile related contaminants, boat engine discharge par5cularly 2-‐stroke engines DDT, PCBs Toxicity to coral reefs Legacy contaminants, erosion of legacy sediments PRIORITIZATION OF RESTORATION SITES Site ID Location Wetland/Wet Pond B2 Vistas del Collado B4 Vacant Lot north with Boat Storage area C2 Stream Crossing C3 Private undeveloped Lot C1 Community Park Green Street Bioretention D6 Across from site D1 D8 Roadway along supermercado F1 Various Streetscape Bioretention Practices Outfall and Mangrove Restoration B6 Mudflat south of Camino Puerto Viejo D2 Outfall behind La Casita E2 Outfall Near Baseball field E3 Municipal Lot Outfall E5 Fisherman's Lot E8 Outfall E9 Outfall near David's place G1 Across from Camping Grounds G2 Drainage Channel near Club Nautica Permeable Pavement E6 Isla Magueyes Parking lot E7 Main Road into Town (PR-304) Rain Garden B1 Vistas del Collado D3 Supermercado Ocen View D5 Villa Parguera Parking Lot D7 Flamingo Club D4 La Casita E1 Municipal Lot E201 Yoland's and Supermercado dirt parking lots E200 Plaza Kioscos D1 Vistas de la Bahia Other Projects E4 Baseball Fields/School A2 Vistas del Collado A1 Vistas del Collado B5 Construction of new Home B3 Camino Puerto Viejo Description of Project Assessed By: Ranking New WetPond New WetPond New WetPond Wetland/Park Wetland/Public Park Roberto Roberto KAC KAC KAC Medium High High High Critical Green Street Bioretention Green Street Bioretention Green Street Bioretention KAC KAC PES Medium High High Outfall and Mangrove Restoration Outfall and Mangrove Restoration Outfall and Mangrove Restoration Outfall and Mangrove Restoration Outfall and Mangrove Restoration Outfall and Mangrove Restoration Outfall and Mangrove Restoration Outfall and Mangrove Restoration Outfall and Mangrove Restoration Roberto KAC PES PES PES PES PES PES PES Critical Critical High Critical Critical High Critical High Critical Permeable Pavement Permeable Pavement PES PES High High Rain Garden Rain Garden Rain Garden Rain Garden Rain Garden (impervious cover removal) Rain Garden and Permeable Pavement Rain garden/permeable parking Rain Garden/swale Rain Gardens, Sand Filter Roberto KAC KAC KAC KAC PES KAC KAC KAC Medium High Medium Medium Medium Critical High High Medium Rainwater Harvesting/Cistern Road Stabilization Vegetated Swale Enforcement Filtering Practice PES Roberto Roberto Roberto Roberto High Medium Medium Medium Critical Site ID La Parguera Potential Nutirent and Sediment Load Reductions Location Proposed Retrofit A1 A2 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 C1 C2 C3 D1a D1b D1c D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D8a D9 E1a E1b E2 E200a E200b E201a E201b E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 E9 F1 G1 G2 Vistas(del(Collado Vegetated(Swale Vistas(del(Collado Road(Stabilization Vistas(del(Collado Rain(Garden Vistas(del(Collado Create(WetPond Camino(Puerto(Viejo Filtering(Practice Vacant(Lot(north(with(Boat(Storage(area Create(WetPond Construction(of(new(Home Enforcement Mudflat(south(of(Camino(Puerto(Viejo Outfall(and(Mangrove(Restoration Community(Park Wetland/Public(Park Stream(Crossing Created(Wetland Private(undeveloped(Lot Wetland/Park Vistas(de(la(Bahia Sand(Filter Vistas(de(la(Bahia Rain(Garden Vistas(de(la(Bahia Rain(Garden Outfall(behind(La(Casita Outfall(and(Mangrove(Restoration Supermercado(Ocen(View Rain(Garden La(Casita Rain(Garden((impervious(cover(removal) Villa(Parguera(Parking(Lot Rain(Garden Across(from(site(D1 Green(Street(Bioretention Flamingo(Club Rain(Garden Roadway(along(supermercado((East(side(of(street) Green(Street(Bioretention Roadway(along(supermercado((West(side(of(street) Green(Street(Bioretention Oufall(near(La(Flamingo Outfall(and(Mangrove(Restoration Municipal(Lot Rain(Garden( Municipal(Lot Permeable(Parking Outfall(Near(Baseball(field Outfall(and(Mangrove(Restoration Plaza(Kioscos(_(rain(garden Rain(Garden Plaza(Kioscos(_(sand(filter Sand(Filter Yolanda's(dirt(parking(lot Rain(Garden Supermercado(dirt(parking(lot Permeable(Parking Municipal(Lot(Outfall Outfall(and(Mangrove(Restoration Baseball(Fields/School Rainwater(Harvesting/Cistern Fisherman's(Lot Outfall(and(Mangrove(Restoration Isla(Magueyes(Parking(lot Permeable(Pavement Main(Road(into(Town((PR_304) Permeable(Pavement Outfall Outfall(and(Mangrove(Restoration Outfall(near(David's(place Outfall(and(Mangrove(Restoration Various(Streetscape(Bioretention(Practices Green(Street(Bioretention Across(from(Camping(Grounds Outfall(and(Mangrove(Restoration Drainage(Channel(near(Club(Nautica Outfall(and(Mangrove(Restoration DA 3.54 0.62 2.00 11.91 41.58 18.51 N/A 52.19 109.79 41.68 100.81 0.24 0.32 0.05 26.43 0.48 0.46 0.49 0.88 0.91 0.46 1.53 4.18 1.12 0.02 9.37 1.49 1.49 0.35 0.02 12.36 0.15 6.13 0.77 0.23 4.22 410.18 0.23 21.34 278.41 % IC 10% 50% 15% 5% 30% 25% N/A 10% 20% 5% 20% 95% 95% 95% 40% 100% 95% 95% 80% 35% 95% 35% 45% 90% 100% 15% 75% 75% 50% 100% 30% 100% 30% 50% 100% 30% 5% 100% 10% 1% WQv 1797.03 1117.32 1340.15 4107.00 48297.90 18482.51 N/A 26522.01 91665.00 14372.24 84162.26 777.58 1049.85 148.01 39342.90 1653.76 1523.67 1604.51 2459.81 1209.66 1499.43 2027.17 6905.51 3504.82 79.17 6293.94 3918.69 3918.69 641.92 79.17 14357.38 518.80 7123.32 1391.03 782.72 4898.75 141452.00 795.20 10842.74 59626.36 TN lbs/yr TP lbs/yr 2.77 0.31 4.72 6.79 7.98 30.54 0.55 1.53 2.15 6.87 4.38 12.62 1.98 11.59 1.29 3.7 0.52 6.5 5.83 5.37 5.65 8.67 4.26 5.28 6.12 11.41 2.89 0.27 10.4 13.81 6.47 2.26 0.27 10.94 2.14 5.89 4.52 2.54 8.09 11.69 2.8 8.96 9.85 251.76 0.99 3.41 0.53 3.13 0.35 0.43 0.06 1.46 0.68 0.62 0.66 1.01 0.49 0.61 0.71 2.57 0.78 0.04 2.34 1.6 1.75 0.26 0.04 2.46 0.29 1.32 0.61 0.34 1.82 2.63 0.33 2.02 2.22 49.97 TSS lbs/yr PAH Hotspot Notes 79.67 M M 118.82 M 260.12 M 367.09 H 1170.57 H L 167.97 M 580.53 H 91.01 H 533.03 M 59.13 M 93.1 M 13.12 M 249.16 H 146.66 H 135.13 H 142.23 H 218.13 M 107.2 M 132.92 H 157.06 H 437.33 H 133.16 H 8.41 H 398.57 M 347.41 H 297.78 H 56.93 H 8.41 H 419.34 H 49.31 L 225.6 M 140.96 H 79.35 H 310.22 M 447.97 M 70.49 H 343.34 M 377.67 M 8974.9 Used($10/cf(for(raingardens Assumes(10%(treatment(of(WQv Used($5/cf(based(on(Wetpond(Cost,(Assumes(10%(treatment(of(WQv Assumes(10%(treatment(of(WQv Assumes(10%(treatment(of(WQv Assumes(10%(treatment(of(WQv Used($10/cf(for(raingardens Used($10/cf(for(raingardens Used($5/cf(based(on(Wetpond(Cost,(Assumes(10%(treatment(of(WQv Used($10/cf(for(raingardens Used($10/cf(for(raingardens Used($10/cf(for(raingardens Used(bioretention(costs(($20/cf)(for(street(bioretention Used($10/cf(for(raingardens Used(bioretention(costs(($20/cf)(for(street(bioretention Used(bioretention(costs(($20/cf)(for(street(bioretention Used($5/cf(based(on(Wetpond(Cost,(Assumes(100%(treatment(of(WQv Used($10/cf(for(raingardens,(Assumes(50%(treatment(by(rain(garden Cost(is(per(1000(sf(of(pavement Used($5/cf(based(on(Wetpond(Cost,(Assumes(100%(treatment(of(WQv Assumes(100%(treatment,(does(not(account(for(treatment(train Assumes(100%(treatment,(does(not(account(for(treatment(train Used($10/cf(for(raingardens Cost(is(per(1000(sf(of(pavement Used($5/cf(based(on(Wetpond(Cost,(Assumes(50%(treatment(of(WQv Used($5/cf(based(on(Wetpond(Cost,(Assumes(50%(treatment(of(WQv Used($5/cf(based(on(Wetpond(Cost,(Assumes(50%(treatment(of(WQv Used($5/cf(based(on(Wetpond(Cost,(Assumes(5%(treatment(of(WQv Used(bioretention(costs(($20/cf)(for(street(bioretention Used($5/cf(based(on(Wetpond(Cost,(Assumes(50%(treatment(of(WQv Used($5/cf(based(on(Wetpond(Cost,(Assumes(10%(treatment(of(WQv