Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.
Transcription
Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.
7/12/2012 This presentation will probably involve audience discussion, which will create action items. Use PowerPoint to keep track of these action items during your presentation 10 Observations on Ethical Management of Deception in Mediation • In Slide Show, click on the right mouse button • Select “Meeting Minder” • Select the “Action Items” tab • Type in action items as they come up • Click OK to dismiss this box ROBIN CARAL SHAW, ESQ. FL Certified Appellate, Circuit, Family, and County Mediator Tel: 561.477.7800 Email: [email protected] Prepared for: This will automatically create an Action Item slide at the end of your presentation with your points entered. “Truth Be Told – Really? Minimizing Mediator Misunderstandings” Breakout on Advanced Mediation Techniques (Day 1) Presented by the Professional Mediation Institute Wednesday, August 22, 2012 Orlando, Florida 1 Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. (No, it’s not Shakespeare. It’s from the epic poem “Marmion” By Sir Walter Scott.) 2 1. Aspects of Deception • • • • • Fundamental to Negotiation Inadvertent? or Intentional? Zealous advocacy Puffing and Bluffing Little White Lies 3 1 7/12/2012 “[O]ne who lies in negotiations is in a position to capture almost all of the benefits of lying while suffering only a small portion of the costs…” Gerald Wetlaufer, The Ethics of Lying in Negotiations, 75 Iowa L.Rev. 1219, 1230 (1990) 4 2. Deception: Intentional? or Inadvertent? * Attorney who .. .. .. * offers less than the full amount authorized withholds material information overstates/understates a material point A Mediator who .. .. .. enters caucus withholding information enters caucus and infers information enters caucus and misstates information 5 3. Virtues of Deception • • • • • • • • Privacy Flexibility Concessions without “admissions” Control over outcome; voluntary Resolution within agreed-upon limits Evaluation of strengths/weaknesses No adverse consequences Over-powering/persuading to “win” in mediation 6 2 7/12/2012 4. Beneficial Mediator Deceptions * SELECTIVE: ** DISCLOSURE / NONDISCLOSURE ** PRESENTATION OF ALTERNATIVES ** USE OF MEDIATOR EMOTIONS * USE OF: ** EMPHASIS ** TIMING ** DISTRACTION TO AVOID HOT BUTTONS ** ANALOGIES AND HYPOTHETICALS ** PLAYING FRIEND, TEACHER, BULLY ** BODY LANGUAGE / EYE CONTACT 7 5. Attorney’s Need to Find Balance Balance: 1. The opportunities to manipulate, control, introduce, or withhold information with 2. The need to obtain information from the Mediator and the other party, evaluate it, and rely upon it in reaching an agreement. 8 What is the Attorney’s Obligation? Florida Rules -- for illustration The Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, Chapter 4: Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) • FRPC 4-4.1 Truthfulness in statements to others. …a lawyer shall not knowingly: (a) make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person; or (b) fail to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary...unless disclosure is prohibited (by a State rule) • FRPC 4-1.4 Communication. (a) Informing Client of Status of Representation. A lawyer shall: …(2) reasonably consult with the client about the means by which… objectives are to be accomplished; (3) keep the client reasonably informed…;…and (5) consult with the client about any relevant limitation on the lawyer’s conduct… 9 3 7/12/2012 6. Reality-testing Respecting Confidentiality A. “If you don’t settle this matter today, what options exist for you and for the other party to resolve the dispute?” B. “Have you and your attorney discussed the risks of not settling today?” C. “What do you think are the strengths of the other party’s case?” D. “What do you think are the weaknesses of your case?” E. “What if…..” Beware of hypotheticals that say too much!!! 10 7. Understanding Parties’ Expectations A party discloses confidential information in caucus and: * ASSUMES the Mediator understands the importance of information shared; * TRUSTS the Mediator disclosures confidential; to keep * EXPECTS the Mediator to use the information in conversations without violating confidentiality; * And yet CREATE forward movement. 11 8. How Far Can Mediators Ethical Obligations be Stretched? Florida Mediation Rules for illustration and discussion: 10.300 Mediator’s Responsibility to the Parties… includes honoring their right of self-determination; acting with impartiality; …(avoiding) improper influence and conflicts of interest… 10.310 Self-Determination. …(b) Coercion Prohibited…shall not coerce or improperly influence any party to make a decision or unwillingly participate in a mediation…. 10.360 Confidentiality. …(b) Caucus. Information obtained during caucus may not be revealed… to any other mediation participant without the consent of the disclosing party… 12 4 7/12/2012 8…Ethical Obligations…continued 10.370 Professional Advice or Opinions. …(c) …A mediator shall not offer a personal or professional opinion intended to coerce the parties, decide the dispute, or direct a resolution…a mediator may point out possible outcomes… and discuss…merits of a claim or defense… 10.420 Conduct of Mediation. …(b) Adjournment or Termination. A mediator shall: …(4) terminate a mediation entailing fraud, duress, the absence of bargaining ability, or unconscionability… 13 9. When Is It Bad Enough to Terminate a Mediation? • Consult State’s rules • Consider: unacceptable deception, false claim of lack of authority, or use of excessive pressure • Imposition of artificial time pressure 14 “The Truth About Deception in Mediation”* “Simply because the rules are silent as to standards of truthfulness, it does not mean deception is acceptable in every situation.” “The lack of guidance by the professional rules has created a self-policing standard. Deception is tolerated and used, but at what cost?” “While deceptive techniques might initially bring in greater settlement dollars, there are severe consequences to being untruthful while negotiating a litigated case.” * Excerpt from “The truth about deception in mediation” by Jeffrey Krivis, published in www.plaintiffmagazine.com, December 2007. 15 5 7/12/2012 10. Sources of Ethical Guidance for Lawyers and Mediators * State Ethical Obligations, Rules, Standards * ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct * ABA Section of Dispute Resolution, and Committee on Mediator Ethical Guidance * AAA (Mediator Guidelines) * JAMS Mediator Ethics Guidelines * Guidelines/Codes of Mediation Associations * Scholarly articles & mediation websites * Case law (little if any on mediator deception) 16 Articles of Interest • Defining the Ethical Limits of Acceptable Deception in Mediation, by John W. Cooley, published by “Brief”, the Journal of the Dupage County Bar Association, Illinois, and online by mediate.com (December 23, 2002) • Mediation Magic: Its Use and Abuse, by John W. Cooley, published by the Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, 1997 29:1 • The truth about deception in mediation, by Jeffrey Krivis, published at www.plaintiffmagazine.com, December 2007 • Hunting for Deception in Mediation – Winning Cases by Understanding Body Language, by Jeffrey Krivis and Mariam Zadeh, published at www.mediate.com, June 2006 • Informed Consent and Deception in Psychological Research, by Philippe Patry, published by Kriterion, Nr.14(2001) 17 6