peo thyren
Transcription
peo thyren
VOICE AN INDEPENDENT CHURCH JOURNAL • JULY|AUGUST 2012 VOICE AN INDEPENDENT CHURCH JOURNAL • JULY|AUGUST 2012 Editor. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dr. Les Lofquist Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Jim Connelly Studio Volume 91 Number 4 Direct all correspondence to Voice Magazine P.O. Box 810, Grandville, MI 49468-0810 616/531-1840, FAX: 616/531-1814 Voice, an Independent Church Journal (PSPS 662-140) is published bi-monthly by IFCA International. Subscription Rates: $12.00—1 year; $20.00— 2 years; $28.00—3 years. Bundles of multiple copies to one address $9.00 per copy per year. Any local church may subscribe for 100% of the families represented in its active membership at $10.50 per copy per year (domestic). Foreign subscriptions are $37.00 per year. Please make your payment in US currency or a check drawn on a U.S. bank. Address Change: Send your new address with the old at least 30 days before the date of issue with which it is to take effect. If possible, enclose the address label. The Post Office will not forward copies unless you provide extra postage. Postmaster: Send address changes to Voice, an Independent Church Journal, P.O. Box 810, Grandville, MI 49468-0810. Second class postage paid at Grandville, MI 49468-0810, and at additional mailing offices. Copyright: All material in Voice belongs to IFCA International. Duplication is prohibited prior to approval. Contact the Editorial Office at 616-531-1840 for permission. Articles and advertisements in Voice are the express position of the author and advertiser; publication of either does not constitute official endorsement. © 2012 IFCA International www.ifca.org Contents FEATURE ARTICLES 7 11 16 18 20 28 29 32 35 When they Leave | Les Lofquist How to Split Your Church| Robert Moeller Relationships and the Fruit of the Spirit | Richard I. Gregory When Your Church Loses Its Pastor | Paul G. Thyren New Pastor, New Church | Steve Spacek Measure Your Ministry |Mark Steiner The Church and Educational Choices Genesis, Submission & Modern Wives |Georgia Purdom Ezekiel, The Watchman |Jim Thompson IN EVERY ISSUE 37 38 39 40 41 42 44 Death of His Saints Vision World New Members Community Care Today Women’s Voice Fellowship News Chaplain’s Report When They Leave T Les Lofquist EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Satan wants to divide the local church and bring shame upon the local testimony for Christ. .ension in church, even in the best of churches, is to be expected. The church where the Bible is faithfully taught at every worship service and where the people are serious about their love for Christ and where their commitment to serve Him is unwavering… yes, even those churches go through episodes of tension. The reasons are many and varied, but like every family the local church will experience stressful times. These times may involve differences of opinion (even arguments), financial pressures and hardships, building programs, changes in pastors or changes in programs or changes in the way things have been done, questionable decisions by leaders in various church ministries, differing preferences, sinful choices of people in the church, and many, many other circumstances. There is no doubt that tension in church is to be expected. Satan wants to divide the local church and bring shame upon the local testimony for Christ. Sometimes he stokes the fire of conflict when all that was present was tension. Remember, tension and problems in the church are not the same as conflict. The wise pastor knows the difference and he seeks whenever possible “to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:3). But what is most difficult for every local church family is when people decide to leave the church. That is a unique tension perhaps every congregation has to face. It is especially painful when those people are loved and appreciated, and yet still decide to go to another church. Their departure can be heartbreaking, leaving the congregation with questions and their (former) church family reeling. This is a tension few pastors like to address. Reasons They Leave According to God’s plan we are not called to serve alone, but rather we are called together as a local church in order to serve Christ together, as a body. Yet serving together can be challenging, stressful and often times exasperating. And most of us would acknowledge that often the reasons people in America have for leaving a church are shallow and petty. Some people leave church because they don’t like the new hymn books or singing songs projected on a screen. Others leave because the color of the new paint or carpet was not their choice and they don’t like way the decision was made (“no one listened to me”). I know of people who left their church because the starting times for Worship services and Sunday School were moved half an hour (in one church, the 30 minute change was earlier while in another church the 30 minute change was later). Some left in anger over an issue long forgotten by all in the church, but them. Some were forced out by heavy-handed and tyrannical leadership. Some leave out of boredom. I’ve heard all kinds of reasons for people leaving a church. But are there legitimate reasons for leaving a church? As John MacArthur has written: “There are times when it becomes necessary to leave a church for the sake of one’s own conscience, or out of a duty to obey God rather than men. Such circumstances would include: • If heresy on some fundamental truth is being taught from the pulpit (Galatians 1:7-9). • If the leaders of the church tolerate seriously errant doctrine from any who are given teaching authority in the fellowship (Romans 16:17). • If the church is characterized by a wanton disregard for Scripture, such as a refusal to discipline members who are sinning blatantly (1 Corinthians 5:1-7). • If unholy living is tolerated in the church (1 Corinthians 5:9-11). July|August 2012 7 • If the church is seriously out of step with the biblical pattern for the church (2 Thessalonians 3:6, 14). • If the church is marked by gross hypocrisy, giving lip service to biblical Christianity but refusing to acknowledge its true power (2 Timothy 3:5).” 1 According to those New Testament passages, there are legitimate reasons for leaving a church. For Those Left Behind Speak ing from my own experience as a pastor, I can tell you how I felt whenever people left our church. My emotions ranged from sadness to embarrassment to confusion to a sense of betrayal to feelings of relief to a loss of confidence and a lot of second-guessing. As I quietly listened to the others in our congregation, I know those emotions were shared by many others as well. Why did we feel those emotions, and more? I think it’s because of love. We loved those people, to a greater or lesser degree, depending on who they were and how long we shared our lives together. We counted them as important members of the body. We worshipped together and prayed for each other and worked together in min- 8 VOICE grow. We rejoiced when they rejoiced and cried when they cried, all because of love. And when our love was unreturned (at least that’s how it felt when they left our church), it hurt badly. I suppose we wouldn’t want it any other way, would we? What does it say about a church or a pastor when people can leave the church and no one cares, no one notices? Sadly, that does happen. Stony silence or cold indifference should never mark a Bible-preaching church. But how can pastors, leaders and people respond when the inevitable occurs and folks leave the church? What should we do? Stony silence or cold indifference should never mark a Bible-preaching church. One pastor, after some people left their church, quoted to the remaining congregation 1 John 2:19 (“They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would have continued with us”). Another pastor eloquently recited the Apostle Paul’s sad report regarding Demas (“Demas has forsaken me, having loved this present world, and has departed” 2 Timothy 4:10). Timothy 4:10 do apply to people who leave the church, but often that is simply not the case. They were of us. They didn’t love this present world. They just dropped out and are now attending another church. Do they deserve their former pastor saying “as far as I’m concerned, it’s good riddance to bad rubbish” (as one pastor said to his Deacon Board, characterizing the people who left)? How should we pastors respond in these sad and awkward episodes? A Lesson for Pastors In my first full-time ministry after graduating from seminary, I was a missionary church planter in Utah. Ours was a congregation of less than twenty people when I first arrived, so I had a great deal of work to do in order to see the church become self-supporting. And I had a great deal to learn about being a pastor, so God allowed me to receive a ministry-altering lesson in my second week. It came during an intimate conversation with one of the great young couples of our church plant, Mark and Mary Ann. 2 I went to Mark and Mary Ann’s home for a get-acquainted evening. I was their new pastor and like me, they were in their late 20s and were new parents. We had a number of shared interests and we hit it off immediately! Their story of a rather recent conversion to Christ (about five years earlier) was especially compelling to me since that’s why I was in Utah: to lead people to Christ, disciple them, and establish a vibrant local church. It caught my attention that they heard the Gospel from another church in town. Ours was a suburb of a city with a metro area close to 175,000 people. But despite those numbers, there was a genuine scarcity of Gospel-preaching, Bibleteaching churches. So their testimony caught my attention. I asked some more questions about their involvement in that other church. They not only came to know Christ there, but they ultimately taught a Sunday School class, served in the Youth ministry, sang in the choir, and took their turns as Nursery workers. Ours was a church start-up, with hardly any ministries besides Sunday services. I quietly wondered, “why did they leave their former, established church where they came to Christ and served so faithfully to become a part of our small, little start-up church plant?” Toward the end of the evening, I made a passing comment about how much that other church must have missed them when they left. I said something like, “good people like you are so hard to find, especially out here in Utah.” Mark gulped a few times and Mary Ann just hung her head in sorrow. Mark began, “They didn’t say a thing when we left. We trusted Christ in that church. We were there every Sunday for five years in a row and we did all those things, so we thought they surely would have missed us… But they made some changes in ministry direction and one Sunday we tried another church [the mother church of our church plant]. We liked it and we’ve been gone now for almost two years. We still have heard nothing from our former church.” By that time Mark could hardly talk and Mary Ann gently wiped tears from her eyes. This conversation put me on the other side of church-leaving. I had been a pastoral intern and a Youth Pastor, so I was on the inside of discussions about what to do when people left the church. And those negative emotions like sadness, embarrassment, and confusion were the ones I imagined Mark and Mary Ann’s former church must have felt. So I cautiously defended the lack of communication. But Mark and Mary Ann insisted that somehow, someway their former church should have reached out to them. I asked, “But would it have made any difference in you leaving?” and they said no it wouldn’t. Surprised I asked, “Then why should they have contacted you?” And they said, “Because we wanted to know they loved us and missed us like we loved and missed them.” Then I told them how pastors always feel uncomfortable and awkward when people leave the church and we’re unsure what to do. They said that’s just how they felt too. So I wondered, “Even with all that difficult emotion, you still think your former pastor should’ve communicated, even met with you?” Their response was a quick and simple, “Yes!” A Course of Action Those questions and their answers were burned into my mind and I have never forgotten that lesson over all these years. I promised myself that night in Utah that whenever people left whatever church I was pastoring, I would do everything I could to communicate with them and extend a loving farewell to them. I haven’t always been able to do that for various reasons, but it became one of those pastoral duties I tried my best to faithfully discharge. Often I would show the farewell letter to the elders and deacons so they could be assured how the ending was handled. Over the years the manner of communication varied, and as I matured as a pastor I think I got better at that difficult task. But I learned from Mark and Mary Ann that a pastor is still a pastor even as his sheep wander into another flock. And farewells are important among people who love each other. Words spoken (or not spoken) at farewells are long remembered, even written in granite. After that night’s lesson in Utah, here is the way I usually handled this delicate situation. First, when I noticed or heard about some people’s absence from church, I would usually ask around among the congregation about the status of the missing folks. Friends almost always know when friends are gone on vacation or are attending to family obligations. But if I heard a report that they were thinking of leaving the church, I paid special attention the next Sunday. If they were still missing, I’ d call them on the telephone the next week. Immediately after the surprised (and sometimes cold) initial greeting, I would say (with as calm a voice as I could) that I missed them in church over the past couple weeks and I heard they were thinking of going to another church and I was just checking to see if that was true. After some awkward silence, they would confirm the report. I would then ask if their decision was final. And if they told me it was, that’s when my pastoral farewell began. I would ask them the name of the other church they were considering attending. If it was a Bible-teaching church, I would tell them how sad I was that they were leaving our church and that I would miss them personally and our whole congregation would miss them. Then I would remind them of the areas of our church ministry where they served and how grateful we were for everything they had done through the years. I would try to be as specific as possible in this recitation of their service: in the nursery or choir or youth ministry or on the Missions Committee or as a Deacon or as Sunday School teacher. Then I would tell them I loved them and encouraged them to continue to grow in grace and serve Christ faithfully no matter where they attended church. I would carefully avoid unkind words and an accusing, defensive attitude. Then I would ask a very important question: “Have I done anything to offend or hurt you for which I should seek your forgiveness?” I did not want them to harbor bitter feelings toward me if there was an unresolved issue between us. I did not want The Chief Shepherd to find me guilty of mistreatment of His sheep. After we hung up (usually with a very positive response on the other side), that day I would write them a personal letter expressing similar sentiments as I did on the phone. But I put those words into writing because I wanted my letter to become a rock of remembrance in their lives. They needed to know they were loved in our church and we would miss them. But as their (now former) pastor, I was sending them off to continue in the lives I had urged them to live all the time that I was their pastor. The practical benefit of such a sendoff is that those left behind will hear about that farewell (and they will!) and they will be content knowing their friends were given a loving farewell. This can dispel lingering doubts about the pastor’s leadership. Often I would show the farewell letter to the elders and deacons so they could be assured how the ending was handled. Everyone seemed to appreciate my efforts and I was satisfied that I was attempting to be a good shepherd of Christ’s sheep. July|August 2012 9 Bad Partings Of course, there are some cases in church when such a loving farewell is not possible. We had our share of church discipline cases and we handled those differently, according to Matthew 18:1518. When those people left, it was due to sin and we prayed for their spiritual restoration. There were other people who left church simply to go fishing or hunting every weekend or sleep all day on Sunday or to pursue other nonspiritual activities. Because such choices demonstrated a genuine spiritual deficiency in their lives, we continued to reach out to those people to bring them back to the flock. Many never returned. But those left behind in church must be certain that they handle the departure process in a godly fashion. Yet I have heard about tremendous anger after some church partings, with all sorts of wreckage caused by the people who left. But it also works both ways. The sheep aren’t the only ones who leave church with a bad parting. One pastor felt wrongfully removed from the church and as his final farewell, he trashed the parsonage. No matter who does the leaving, and no matter the circumstances of the leaving, it never gives anyone the opportunity to dishonor the Lord and disobey His commands. Conclusion Do you have a legitimate, Scriptural reason for leaving your church? Check over that list of reasons as cited by MacArthur at the beginning of this article and see if you are standing on the Bible or on something less in your departure. In an article entitled “Confessions of a (Recovering) Church-hopper,” John Fischer wrote: “In our free-market, commodity-rich society, it’s understandable that we would approach church as we would a shopping mall of spiritual products and services. This is the way our culture operates… As consumers we reserve the right to pass judgment on the products and services we use, and the companies that service us begin to cater to our demands. ‘The customer is always right’ may work well at McDonald’s, but in a church it undermines the authority of the Word of God and the leaders God has called to represent Him. We do not go to a particular church to decide whether that church is doing everything right, but to hear from God and humbly find out where we went wrong that week in our own lives and what we need to do to make it right.” 3 Maybe they’re just church-hopping. That is an American Christian behavior and it is not beneficial for anyone involved. But whenever people decide to leave the church, it is a unique tension. It is especially painful when those people are loved and appreciated, and yet still decide to leave. Their departure can be heartbreaking, leaving the congregation with questions and their (former) church family reeling. This is a tension few pastors like to address. But it nonetheless is an important pastoral duty that must not be neglected. END NOTES 1. John MacArthur, “When Should People Leave Their Church?” http://www.gty.org/Resources/ Questions/QA120 (accessed May 10, 2012) 2. Mark and Mary Ann are not their real names. I have changed them here to protect their anonymity. 3. John Fischer, “Confessions of a Recovering Church Hopper,” New Man, Vol. 3, No. 1 (Jan./Feb. 1996), pp. 60-70. . . . 10 VOICE How to Split Your Church A Robert Moeller Bob Moeller pastored for 25 years and is now traveling the country with a passion to say that marriage is for better for worse for keeps. He is Executive Director of For Better For Worse For Keeps Ministries. church in the southern United States no longer exists, due in part to an incident that took place in the church kitchen one Sunday afternoon. A new family had arrived to take part in their first potluck luncheon. The aroma of tuna casseroles, baked beans, and tater-tot dishes wafted through the building. The unsuspecting wife cheerfully brought her red gelatin salad to the kitchen, then headed back to the fellowship hall to join her family. The moment the pastor said “Amen,” hungry parishioners politely charged for the serving line. There were dozens of dishes to sample. “Where’s our salad?” the woman’s husband asked innocently. “There must be some mistake,” she said. “I’ll find out what happened.” She reached the kitchen door in time to witness the queen of the kitchen ladling the last of her salad into the disposal. “ W hat a re you doing” the newcomer shrieked. “That’s my salad!” Without batting an eye, the woman looked up and said, “You’re new to this church. You’ll soon learn we use only real whipped cream around here, not Cool Whip.” She hit the switch. The garbage disposal rumbled and gurgled and sucked the salad down the drain. That one incident started a significant church battle that escalated into all out war. It illustrates the first of ten secrets in any church conf lict. These ten steps can destroy any congregation. Focus only on your own desires “What causes f ights and quarrels among you?” James asks. “Don’t they come from your desires that battle within you? You want something but don’t get it” (4:1, 2). The most basic way to split a church is to focus exclusively on what you want and then do what you must to get it. Perhaps you prefer praise choruses to hymns, or you believe no church should go into debt for a building project. There’s nothing wrong with expressing differing viewpoints on these issues. The problems begin when we elevate our personal convictions to the level of absolutes. It’s when we insist on having things done our way, and our way only, that factions start. The most basic way to split a church is to focus exclusively on what you want and then do what you must to get it. Listen to every criticism The next step in splitting a church is to give credence to every rumor, story, or criticism you happen to hear. The morsel of gossip doesn’t have to be true to be destructive. You just have to treat it as true. On one occasion, word spread around our church that I owned expensive, imported furniture. The furniture was imported – from the top floor of J C Penney, where all the closeout items were arranged. Though it was a small, silly rumor that eventually died out, it carried a sinister suggestion. It introduced the notion that the pastor was living in luxury at the expense of struggling parishioners. One trip to our home would have dispelled the notion. Solomon, perhaps the wisest ruler ever to live, made this observation: “Without wood a fire goes out; without gossip a quarrel dies down” (Proverbs 26:20). Rumors need oxygen to catch fire. If you deprive them of a listening ear, they quickly die out. But if your goal is to split a church, you should keep circulating the story without ever verifying its accuracy. The longer the rumor circulates, the more emotions become inf lamed, the more groups will form stubborn opinions, and the more hurt can be inflicted on innocent people. Focus on your pastor’s weaknesses, not his strengths One of my favorite “Far Side” cartoons shows two deer standing in the woods talking. A large circular target appears on the front of one of July|August 2012 11 them. The other one says, “Bummer of a birthmark, Ralph.” In a sense every pastor carries around a large target. He can quickly become the focal point of everything that’s wrong with the church. A pastor from the West Coast tells of a woman who arranged for an appointment in his office. She brought several typed pages of complaints: spelling errors in the bulletin, dates and times when the off ice phones went unanswered, and blunders made in the Sunday morning announcements. The pastor’s eyes glazed over. Are there really people out there, he wondered, who make it their life’s ambition to keep track of all these things? Pastors are human, which means they make mistakes. But infallibility has never been part of the biblical job description for a shepherd. The writer of Hebrews understood how difficult it is to be a pastor. That’s why he wrote, “Obey your leaders and submit to their authority. They keep watch over you as men who must give an account. Obey them so that their work will be a joy, not a burden, for that would be of no advantage to you” (Hebrews 13:17). You will find no advantage in continually nit-picking fault-finding, and criticizing your pastor – unless your goal is to divide and demoralize the church. Speak the truth or practice love, but never combine the two If I wanted to undermine the spiritual health of a local church. I wouldn’t begin by introducing false teachings. The more mat ure members would quickly spot the problem. Instead, I would emphasize truth or love, but never balance the two. Pastor Danielson was so concerned about keeping the peace and offending no one that he rarely called anyone to account. If volunteers handled the financial affairs in a slipshod way, he said nothing. He didn’t want them to quit. If a Sunday school teacher led a questionable life, he said nothing. If staff members didn’t do their jobs, he said little. Love, not criticism, is what builds a church, he reasoned. Over the years, problems accumulated like junk in a hall closet. Audits were never done to ensure proper handling 12 VOICE of the money. Parents were never called to investigate their concerns about the sponsors working with teenagers. Staff members were allowed to run their own fiefdoms with little or no accountability. Because Pastor Danielson wanted to be known as a lover rather than a fighter, he decided to take another church rather than face the backlog of problems. The pastor who followed him never knew what hit him. The accumulated problems spilled over like suds from a washing machine in an old I Love Lucy episode. Churches that emphasize love, to the exclusion of speaking truth, will eventually collapse on themselves. Pastor Jacobs, on the other hand, thrived on confrontation. He hadn’t put in a full day until he called someone on the carpet. His sermons often sounded like scoldings. He berated people for their lack of faith, prayer, and service. He said he was preaching truth, but to many people he came across as just plain angry. When the church voted him out, Pastor Jacobs felt betrayed. What he didn’t realize is that he had trained his people to be sharks. Churches that emphasize love, to the exclusion of speaking truth, will eventually collapse on themselves. The weight of unaddressed problems and conf licts will bring the ceiling down. Churches that pound hard on truth, but fail to see the value of love, will eventually devour each other. The solution is to do what the Scriptures plainly tell us: “Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into him who is the Head, that is, Christ” (Ephesians 4:15) Store grievances for future use One effective means of crippling a church is to harbor secret resentments against one another. The longer these grievances are stored, the more powerful they become. One church fight eventually ended up in a state court. Both sides had sued the other to gain title to the building and land. The high court refused to rule on the case and instead referred it to the denominational court. After a lengthy investigation, the cause of the dispute was supposedly traced to a church banquet when one member had received a larger slide of ham than the other one had. Buried resentments can inf lict enormous damage. One church leader believes unresolved bitterness is behind his church’s penchant for chewing up one pastor after another. Somewhere, sometime, someone had allowed an injustice to become deeply embedded in the soul. Like barrels of toxic chemicals hidden in the soil, it poisoned generations to come. Hebrews warns us, “See to it that no one misses the grace of God and that no bitter root grows up to cause trouble and defile many” (Hebrews 12:15). The result of storing grievances is the corruption of many people. Forgive only those who ask you to (and only if they deserve it) I once challenged a man to forgive someone he had been holding a grudge against for thirty years. “Why should I forgive him?” he shouted. “He’s never admitted that he was wrong.” “Because Christ tells us to forgive our enemies,” I replied. “No!” he said trembling with anger. “Christ only forgave the thief on the cross who asked Him for forgiveness. I won’t forgive him until he asks me to.” The man had invented a theological argument to justify his hatred. Pastor Friedrich was undergoing an annual review by a church committee. He asked a simple question that turned out to be spring-loaded. “What could I do to better serve you this next year?” Suddenly a man f lushed red, and with a quivering voice said, “Pastor, my sister Margaret had gout last February, and you never visited her. Not once! Is a simple visit too much to ask?” Pastor Friedrich was employed only part-time at the church. He was not told of Margaret’s condition for three weeks. Then he tried to visit her, but unfamiliar with the country roads, he had gotten lost and had nearly ended up in a ditch. “I apologize. I’m sorry I missed her.” “Hmmph,” said the man, his arms crossed and his expression an unrelenting scowl. That’s the type of stubborn unforgiveness that will eventually spread like a cancer through a church. Demanding others beg for our pardon, requiring them to prove they deserve it, are surefire ways to kill love and unity. But if disharmony is your objective, never forgive, never forget. Hide your own sin behind harsh attitudes A number of years ago, a well known evangelist admitted he had battled with lust. Though he hadn’t committed adultery, his thought life was plagued with unhealthy images and desires. By his admission, he railed against sexual sin to hide his problem: “I was trying to shout [lust] out of my life.” It’s not wrong to denounce sin. But when we use harsh denunciations of others to camouf lage our own sin, it’s wrong. This was the case with the Pharisees in Jesus’ day. “Woe to you,” He said, “teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence” (Matthew 23:25). If you wish to divide a church, simply take precious and important truths, wrap them in legalistic behavior and harsh attitudes, then whip your opponents with them until the blood runs down the aisle. It will not only give your enemies what they deserve; it will silence the convicting voice of God in your own life. It’s not wrong to denounce sin. But when we use harsh denunciations of others to camouflage our own sin, it’s wrong. Use prayer to unite discontented people (and spread inappropriate information) Are you looking for the perfect pretext to recruit other discontented people? This method will not only cover your tracks, but will also give you the appearance of spiritual maturity. Start a prayer meeting, preferably in your home or the home of another disgruntled member. Use it as a cover to complain about the pastor or about others in the church. Serve refreshments. Perhaps even sing a chorus or hymn. A brief Bible study might help. But then get down to the real business of the night. Discuss the pastor’s obvious faults and the lack of true leadership in the congregation. Share stories that illustrate the worst in others. Should the tone become too ugly for the faint at heart, refocus the remainder of the meeting on taking prayer requests. That will keep people from getting up to leave. “Let’s pray for Pastor Jones, that God will help him to begin to get his ego under control.” “We should also remember to uphold our elder chairman. He has a lot to contend with now that his wife is in clinical depression.” “I’d like you to pray for Bruce. He says he’s about to quit as treasurer because of the way the youth pastor handles money.” These, of course, are not the only type of prayer requests that can be used to embarrass, belittle, or demean others. But they illustrate the principle of taking something holy and using it for July|August 2012 13 an unholy purpose. Here are the basic rules: 1. Share information no one in the room has a right to know. 2. Discuss details that can’t be immediately verified or denied. 3. Reveal just enough facts to leave a questionable impression of another person’s character. Small groups have the potential to be a vibrant place for people to experience spiritual refreshment, growth, and accountability. But they can be subverted, and when they are, the results can be devastating. Do whatever it takes to win The Persian Gulf conf lict illustrated the strategy of “total war.” We saw missiles fired at random into civilian populations, chemical weapons used to exterminate minorities, oil wells dynamited in revenge. If your aim is to split a congregation, I suggest that you also adopt a total war strategy. It means using every means available, regardless of how ruthless or immoral, to win. If you profess to be a Christian, you will need some justif ication for your behavior. Some Bible verses work well when taken out of context: “Expel the wicked man from among you” (1 Corinthians 5:13). “And one of them struck the servant of the high priest, cutting off his right ear” (Luke 22:50). “I have nothing but hatred for them; I count them my enemies” (Psalm 139:22). Listen to these tactics described by a pastor in Leadership journal: “One Sunday morning, as I walked into the sanctuary to prepare for the worship service, I saw several individuals welcoming the arriving congregation by handing out fliers, urging them to sign the petition [for my removal]. I went out and said to one of them, ‘How can you do this to people who are coming here to worship and hear God’s Word?’ “ ‘This is our church, not yours,’ one of them replied, ‘and it’s about time you realized it!’ ” The pastor soon resigned and left the ministry. How is it that members of a church can reach the point where they will resort to the lowest of tactics? “Rather than recognizing personal motivations and differences, we attribute evil motives to others,” the writer observed. “Chu rch f ights become st r ug gles 14 VOICE over right and wrong, good and evil, orthodoxy and heresy. Opponents are not merely antagonists but are instead Satan’s emissaries.” Of course, waging total war in the congregation is a direct violation of how we are told to act toward one another in the church of Jesus Christ. “Be kind and compassionate to one another, forgiving each other, just as in Christ God forgave you” (Ephesians 4:32). If you really desire to have the blessing and backing of God in the midst of a conflict, adopt the role of a peacemaker. Remember, you are on a mission from God The final step in splitting a church is to declare that you are taking divisive steps because God told you to. First, if you are convinced that you are on a mission from God, you don’t have to follow established procedures. You don’t have to produce credible evidence to back up your claim, verify information, or face appropriate boards with your accusations. Second, you can shame your opponents into silence. If someone happens to ask, “How do you know God told you to do it?” you simply reply, “IF you were walking closer with God, you’d learn to listen for instructions.” Third, your claim is beyond verification. Who can possibly dispute your action if God told you to do it? It is far too easy for us to believe that we are hearing the voice of God, when all we are hearing is our own subconscious selfish desires telling us what to do. If you really desire to have the blessing and backing of God in the midst of a conflict, adopt the role of a peacemaker. Jesus said, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God” (Matthew 5:9). Expend your efforts on restoring grace and truth and unity to the church. Put away your selfish interests, hidden agendas, and need for control. If you do all this, you can indeed say you’re on a mission from God. Otherwise, stif le yourself. God is not on the side of the group who wants blue carpet rather than beige in the sanctuary, nor does He favor gravel over asphalt in the new parking lot. He’s on the side of those who seek to “keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:3). No Secret There you have it. The top ten secrets of splitting a church. Actually, they aren’t much of a secret. They’ve been used in church fights for about as long as the church has been in existence. My hope is that in reviewing them, we all might see how destructive our actions can be when our pride, anger, and need for power blinds us to what we are doing. While I was in college, I was invited to serve on the administrative board of my church. After one meeting that had turned particularly nasty, I began to weep. My heart was broken by what I had witnessed. One of the board members approached me as I had my head bowed. “Bob, I’m sorry about what happened tonight. Sometimes in the middle of an argument, even Christians can get carried away.” I looked up at him, and he must have seen the tears in my eyes. I appreciated his comments, but the only one who seemed to know what to do was my dad, who was also a member of the board. He walked over and simply put his arm around me. “Take as long as you need to, son,” he said. I suspect I wasn’t the only one who wept that night. The problem is, tears in heaven can’t be seen. This is article is adapted from Love in Action (Multnomah Books, 1994). Used by permission of the author. Learn more about Bob Moeller’s ministry at www.forkeepsministries.com Relationships and the Fruit of the Spirit T Richard I. Gregory Dr. Richard Gregory served as IFCA International Executive Director for 13 years from 1987 to 2000. He is now IFCA International Minister at Large. he ministry of the Holy Spirit is essential in the life of the believer and understanding that ministry is vital to spiritual stability. There is great misunderstanding about the Holy Spirit and especially about the granting and administration of the spiritual gifts. When the believer ref lects the character of the Lord Jesus Christ, it is the Holy Spirit who must receive the credit. It is His task to conform every child of God to the image of Christ (Romans 8:28-29) for it is the destiny of every true believer to be like the Lord Jesus. John speaks of this in 1 John 3:1-2 when he says, “Behold, what manner of love the Father has bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God; therefore, the world knows us not, because it knew Him not. Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it does not yet appear what we shall be, but we know that when He shall appear, we shall be like Him.” The Holy Spirit does His job in every true believer and there is of necessity the evidence of His sanctifying work in every true child of God. One of the characteristics of the work of the Holy Spirit is the development of relationships. Paul defines the fruit produced by the Holy Spirit in relational terms in Galatians 5:22. “But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, faith, meekness, temperance…” Relationship to God It seems to me that the character qualities of love, joy and peace are products of the Spirit’s ministry in developing our relationship to God. Love begins with God. In fact it is clearly stated that “love is of God” (1 John 4:7). John clearly identifies the source of love when he writes “Herein is love, not that we loved God but that He loved us” (1 John 4:10). Paul further speaks of the origin of love as “shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Spirit” (Romans 5:5). Our ability to genuinely love God is the work of the Holy Spirit as He builds a loving relationship between a believer and his Redeemer. 16 VOICE Joy is the by-product of spiritual obedience. It is a characteristic of a believer’s disposition. It is an inner warmth produced by the Holy Spirit when one knows that he has pleased the Lord through his heartfelt response to what God commands or desires. It is a relationship of intimacy with God resulting in exalting expressions of praise. As Nehemiah wrote, “the joy of the Lord is your strength.” (Nehemiah 8:10). One of the characteristics of the work of the Holy Spirit is the development of relationships. Peace is obviously a characteristic of an open and honest relationship with God. God declares that there is peace between Himself and the believer “through the blood of His Cross” (Colossians 1:20). When the Holy Spirit assures a believer that he is “accepted in the Beloved One” (Ephesians 1:6) and when he is convinced that no animosity exists between the Lord and his soul, “the peace of God that passes all understanding guards his heart and mind through the Lord Jesus Christ” (Philippians 4:7). It is the ministry of the Holy Spirit that produces a fruitful relationship of love, joy and peace between the Lord and His redeemed child. Relationship to Others The character traits of longsuffering, gentleness and goodness represent a believer’s relationship to others, whether they are believers or unbelievers. There is much teaching in God’s Word about the responsibility of a believer to others. It is through the fruit that is produced in a believer by the Holy Spirit that one is enabled to ref lect the character of Christ in relationships. Vine in his Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words notes that “Longsuffering is that quality of self-restraint in the face of provocation which does not hastily retaliate or promptly punish; it is the opposite of anger, and is associated with mercy, and is used of God, Exodus 34:6 (Septuagint); Romans 2:4; 1 Peter 3:20. Patience is the quality that does not surrender to circumstances or succumb under trail; it is the opposite of despondency and is associated with hope, 1 Thessalonians 1:3; it is not used of God.” Paul urges the Ephesians to walk worthy of their calling by exhibiting “all lowliness and meekness, with longsuffering, forbearing one another in love; endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (Ephesians 4:2-3). Gentleness, or as better rendered kindness, is contrasted with the vices the Holy Spirit “puts away “ from the believer in Ephesians 4:30-32. Paul notes that it is the ministry of the Holy Spirit that removes “all bitterness, and wrath, and anger, and evil speaking. . . with all malice.” The believer is called upon not to resist this work of the Holy Spirit but to cooperate by being “kind, tender-hearted and forgiving. . . even as God for Christ’s sake has forgiven you.” It is in this that the Holy Spirit produces the characteristic of kindness as Christ likeness appears in ones relationship with others. Trench follows Jerome in distinguishing between kindness and goodness in the follow- ing manner. Kindness describes the kindlier aspects of goodness, while the goodness in Galatians 5:22 includes the sterner qualities of doing good. This can be illustrated by Christ denouncing the Scribes and Pharisees in Matthew 23:21-29 and yet being tender with the penitent woman in Luke 7:37-50. It is only the Holy Spirit that enables one to confront sin in another in such a manner that he is doing good. It is only when the Holy Spirit’s ministry has brought one to selflessness that the radiance of the character of Christ can dominate a life. Relationship to Self Faithfulness, meekness and temperance are personal characteristics that describe the disposition of a believer in his relationship to himself. The character of faithfulness is reliability. Men who are faithful are true to their convictions and are focused. They are men of conviction, compassion and consistency. It might be said of them that they are single minded. Paul refers to them in 2 Timothy 2:2, “And the things that you have heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.” Meekness has been described by some as strength under control. It is that inner quality of a man that is closely related to humility. One possesses this inner quality of heart and mind when he does not think more highly of himself than he ought to think but submits all that he is to the controlling strength of the Lord. It is in this sense that it is said of Moses that he is the meekest of all men. Self control is the capstone on the pyramid of the fruit of the Spirit. Self is the enemy of being controlled by the Spirit. It is only when the Holy Spirit’s ministry has brought one to self lessness that the radiance of the character of Christ can dominate a life. Just as it might be said that love is the tree upon which all the aspects of the fruit of the Spirit grow, self control is the all encompassing evidence of the fruit bearing Christian. When I was a child I used to sing a chorus that went like this: Jesus and others and you What a wonderful way to spell joy. Jesus and others and you In the life of each girl and each boy. J is for Jesus for He has first place. O is for others we meet face to face. Y is for you in whatever you do. Put yourself last and spell joy. This chorus illustrates the three fold nature of the fruit of the Spirit as it is manifested in our relationships. When the Holy Spirit is producing in and through the believer the fruit of His control, the character of the Lord Jesus is seen in his relationship to God, response to the needs of others and responsibility with respect to self. The observable fruit of the Holy Spirit in the life of the believer is an evidence of his genuine faith. Originally appeared in VOICE, March/April, 1996 July|August 2012 17 When Your Church Loses Its Pastor A fter the initial shock of hearing the words “. . . and my resignation is effective . . .” confusion is bound to reign for awhile. What do we do after our pastor resigns? Generally, a pastoral search committee is formed to go about the task of finding another shepherd for the flock. But the congregation needs to do more than just seek another pastor. While it’s not as easy as A B C, the information that follows will help address other needs of the congregation. A – Assessment Paul G. Thyren Dr. Paul Thyren is pastor of Grace Bible Church of Adell, WI and a long time member of IFCA International. Assessment comes in the form of asking questions, even the hard ones. Where are we as a congregation? Did the pastor leave under difficult circumstances? Were there moral, ethical or other problems that damaged testimonies? Is the congregation and/or board divided? What are the vital signs of the fellowship? What are the strengths and weaknesses? Does the church need outside help to be objective and put things back into perspective? Are there problems within the congregation that need to be handled? What will be the process? Are there relationships to be reconciled outside the church? B – Budget In many churches, the pastor’s salary and benefit package is a substantial part of the annual budget. The expense budget changes when a pastor leaves. There are now new expense items such as: possible interim pastor, pulpit supply, search committee expenses, expense of bringing in pastoral candidates, moving the new pastor to your community, fixing the parsonage, helping with the down payment on a house, etc. Reasonable effort should be made to anticipate these needs so that money can be wisely used. It is not a time that giving should drop off simply because the need to pay the pastor is temporarily gone. C – Communicate Communication is one of the biggest problems on earth today. Good communication is important 18 VOICE in churches with or without pastors. It is especially crucial in churches looking for a pastor. The leadership must communicate with the congregation and vice-versa. Communicate the following information: who is in charge, whom to call with a problem, what the plans are, in what timeframe will things take place, what changes are being made in plans previously made. Communication of feelings, expectations, ideas, and assessments is important. Ample communication with prospective candidates will help avoid problems. Don’t make assumptions that things are understood or agreed upon without talking about it. While the times for securing a pastor vary, it is a fairly lengthy and tedious process. Good communication is not gossip. Sharing confidential information, pet issues that become divisive, criticism or anything else that does not edify is gossip. D – Development Develop a Biblical plan of action during the time you are without a pastor. The plan should be for a year or two. While the times for securing a pastor vary, it is a fairly lengthy and tedious process. A plan of action for growth, outreach, fellowship and worship will give the congregation direction and security. It will draw people together for common goals and encourage the use of spiritual gifts among the Body of Christ. Obedience brings joy and enthusiasm. Joyful churches are attractive churches. E – Encouragement Encourage one another through prayer and fellowship. Encourage loyalty to Christ, the church and to the Christian walk. Encourage involvement in the church’s ministries. F – Feelings When a church loses a pastor for any reason, “feelings” will be present. People may have mixed feelings. There may be a sense of grief, depression, anger, bitterness, joy, hurt, fear, bewilderment, disappointment, disillusionment or other emotions. People’s relationships to the pastor vary and their feeling will differ accordingly. If emotions are “stuffed”, suppressed or incorrectly handled, deeper problems will develop that will hinder the next pastor’s ministry. G – God God ’s work does not stop with the loss of a person, however important he or she may be. Verses normally applied to individuals are equally true for churches: “. . . My grace is sufficient for you . . . I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me . . . If any man lack wisdom, let him ask of God. . . .” The verses are too numerous to list here. God is sovereign. His goal is a glorious church made up of people who are being conformed to the image of Christ. The process of dealing with the needs and problems of a congregation is as important to God as the goal itself. The commands in Scripture are God’s process to move us in the direction of His goal. During the time your church is without a pastor, allow God to refine you in the process of becoming Christ-like by squarely facing the issues you would not otherwise have to deal with if your pastor were present. July|August 2012 19 New Pastor, New Church A ccording to Ray M. Oswald, in New Beginnings: A Pastorate Start Up Workbook, “Each pastorate start up should be viewed as “a dangerous opportunity.’” 1 Trying to negotiate the first couple of years in a new ministry, we often discover “land mines” that we never expected. There are many things that could be suggested to help a pastor in a new church, but for the sake of being concise the following thoughts are offered. Steve Spacek Steve Spacek is the Executive Director of Help Ministries (www.hm.org) and the IFCA Regional Representative for Eastern Pennsylvania. Adjust Expectations One of the first things a new pastor must do is to realistically readjust his expectations of the congregation and help them readjust their expectations of him. Oswald remarks, “Each [church] member harbors a secret hope that you will walk on water and bring such energy and vitality to the parish that they will have to hold people back at the door. (They may not admit this openly, but they all hope they will be remembered as the group that made the super choice for their church.)” Both church and pastor need to recognize and renounce this secret hope so that both are freed from false expectations. Show Love and Hospitality Building relationships is an active endeavor that you must initiate. You can’t wait for others to reach out to you; you must reach out to them. People can be lonely in a crowd and many are looking for someone that says by word and life, “I care for you.” Since ministry is about people, ask God to give you a deepening love for your people. Love is a self-sacrificing, caring commitment that shows itself in seeking the highest good of the one loved. “If I… do not have love, it profits me nothing” (1 Corinthians 13:3). Learn people’s names and remember each one before the throne of grace. Open your heart, your home, and your office for everyone to visit you – your members should feel you are approachable. Send birthday cards with a personal note. Make 20 VOICE regular phone calls to keep in touch and ask for personal prayer requests. Particularly visit the elderly and shut-ins. They often become your greatest prayer partners. Demonstrate hospitality which is eagerly sharing your family, home, finances, food, and spiritual refreshment with those God brings into your life. “Eagerly pursue hospitality” (Romans 12:13). By inviting folks to your home, sharing what you have with others, and offering spiritual encouragement, you become a model for them to follow. One of the first things a new pastor must do is to realistically readjust his expectations of the congregation and help them readjust their expectations of him. Get acquainted with other pastors of like faith. Yes, you too need the fellowship and accountability of your peers. Build friendships with leaders in your community. Don’t neglect your immediate neighbors – they are your “Jerusalem.” Show genuine interest in others and pray for their specific needs. Be Discerning and Sensitive Learn to be discerning, not judgmental. Discernment is the ability to see people and situations the way they really are, not merely as they appear to be. “For God sees not as man sees, for man looks at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart” (1 Samuel 16:7). A discerning person will examine himself before evaluating the actions of others (Galatians 6:4), check the accuracy of all the facts and related factors before reaching a conclusion (1 Corinthians 2:15), and deal as privately as possible with the situations (1 Corinthians 6:5,6). One who is judgmental forms opinions on first impressions or hearsay and publicly condemns those he believes guilty. Don’t believe everything you hear. In fact, when people start to criticize, gently redirect them by asking if they would like to be part of the solution rather than part of the problem. In time, folks will know you do not encourage gossip. This does not mean you should ignore those who warn you about persistent problems. Show a genuine interest in those who share their concerns, and be careful that you are not influenced by one person or family. You hear that there are two sides to every story; well, actually, there are at least a dozen. Learn all you can from godly believers and consider their insights. Be a listener; do not answer until the other person has finished talking (James 1:19). This demonstrates your concern about the other person’s interests. It also shows your sensitivity which is exercising your senses so that you can perceive the true spirit and emotions of others. “Rejoice with them that do rejoice, and weep with them that weep” (Romans 12:15). Balance Convictions with Deference Some confuse convictions (biblical standards) with personal preferences. Pastors must always uphold biblical convictions – purposing to follow the commands of Scripture, whatever the cost. We should be like “Daniel [who] purposed in his heart that he would not defile himself…” (Daniel 1:8), and our f locks should know that biblical standards must be maintained in our life. However, we can cause dissension and division if we don’t give deference – limiting your freedom so you do not offend the tastes of others. As Paul teaches in Romans 14:21, “It is good neither to eat meat nor drink wine nor do anything by which your brother stumbles [to be tripped up] or is offended [to cause them to fall] or is made weak [without strength].” In other words, we don’t have the right to flaunt our liberty. If there is anything in our lives that draws a brother away from an internal intimacy with Christ then we need to abstain from that practice. Effect Change with Caution Learning to defer without compromising your convictions will help when promoting change in the church. Distinguish between your own pet desires and real biblical needs. If you make changes just to suit yourself, you are being selfish and shortsighted. Change should be made for the good of the ministry, not for the glory of the minister. Unpleasant consequences can develop through incompleteness and rashness. Thoroughness knows what factors will diminish the effectiveness of our work or words if neglected. Proverbs 18:15 says, “The mind of the prudent acquires knowledge, and the ear of the wise seeks knowledge.” Cautiousness knows how important right timing is in accomplishing right actions. “It is not good for a person to be without knowledge, and he who makes haste with his feet errs” (Proverbs 19:2). Time is needed to thoroughly investigate all the details and to be cautious before effecting change. If there is anything in our lives that draws a brother away from an internal intimacy with Christ then we need to abstain from that practice. Work on making small changes that are supported by the leaders and congregation before attempting larger changes. Field your ideas and plans to leaders privately first. This plants the seed idea and gives you a feel for their response. Introduce your plans with “we ought” rather than “you ought,” and be careful of using the big stick. If the sheep are fed, they may be led; but, no sheep likes to be driven. Build Consensus Seek to build unanimity and emphasize consensus. “Consensus” can be defined as “finding a biblical decision, solution or proposal acceptable enough that all can support it – and that no one can oppose it.” “Can two walk together, except they be agreed?” (Amos 3:3). Although your constitution and bylaws may require only a simple majority vote, beware of potential division and dangerous conclusions. Voting by majority to solve a problem sometimes creates new and greater problems. A majority of spies agreed that the land of Canaan was filled with unconquerable giants and refused to enter it. Only two voices contradicted the majority (Numbers 13:26, 14:10). The majority is not always right. Listen to the concerns of the minority as well. This is in keeping with your goal to maintain unity – thinking and going in the same direction together. Be “of one accord [purpose] and of one mind [understanding]” (Philippians 2:2). Lead By Serving 1 Peter 5:3 says, “Don’t lord it over the people assigned to your care, but lead them by your good example.” We lead by love and humility, not by anger and force. Forcing or imposing your way will produce resistance. A pastor should be a servant – one who is selflessly serving others by inf luencing, equipping, and empowering them to accomplish God’s goals. “The leader should be like a servant” (Luke 22:26). This requires a humble attitude that is more interested in the good and success of others rather than yourself. We lead by accepting responsibility and being faithful. Show respect to others by being early to appointments, giving credit where it is due, and admitting mistakes. Be open to the opinions of others, and allow for dialogue with those you serve. It is a good sign when members can feel free to disagree with their pastor in the right spirit. Be a Peacemaker Conf lict and opposition will come sooner than later. The way you respond to the first crisis will set the pattern and expectation for how others will perceive your dealing with problem situations. Be a peacemaker – one who has made peace with God, leads others to make peace with God, and endeavors to maintain peace with others. “Blessed are the peacemakers; for they shall be called the sons of God” (Matthew 5:9). In the name of harmony, you should not avoid facing truth in your own life, nor should you pull away from helping others face the truth. If someone is in serious error about a part of God’s truth, he cannot have a right, peaceful relationship with others until the error is confronted and corrected. As a pastor and peacemaker, you have the responsibility to approach the conf lict in a July|August 2012 21 biblical manner and to uphold truth and righteousness in love – “Speaking the truth in love” (Ephesians 4:15). Learn how to work through conf lict resolution and teach it to your people. This alone could save you and your congregation much heartache in years to come. Exhort With Encouragement Sometimes in their zeal, pastors are too forceful and critical when exhorting people or trying to effect change. Be careful not to be too harsh with your sheep and scatter them in the process. You should be conscious of exercising biblical communication – the process of conveying one’s thoughts, attitudes, and actions to another in a manner that ref lects Christ. “Be an example to all believers in what you teach, in the way you live, in your love, your faith, and your purity” (1 Timothy 4:12 NLT). Communication can be verbal or nonverbal, good or bad. It’s not only what you say that is important, but how you say it. To disarm critical members who want to accuse you of preaching against certain sins in the church, preach expository messages through books of the Bible. Select your book carefully, and consider preaching paragraphs rather than verse by verse and phrase by phrase to cover the book in a sensible length of time. Don’t be lax in your preparations just because you are using sermons you preached before. Study and prepare for each sermon so that it is tailored for your congregation. 22 VOICE Be careful about taking too much time away from your pulpit in your first year. Remember, you need to feed the f lock God gave you. Do invite other speakers from time to time. People need to know you are not threatened by the ministry of others and in the mouth of two or three witnesses is every word established. Honor Your Home Your home is part of your ministry so don’t neglect it. A happy home and a happy church are made up of the same ingredients: love, discipline, sacrifice, the Word, and prayer. Guard your wife from being poured into a mold by the church. Allow her to fulfill the ministry God has given her. Inform your church of your “day off ” for the family and take it! Help your family understand they are part of the ministry, but don’t sacrifice your family for the sake of the church. Teach the church that when you minister to your family you minister to your church for a successful Christian home is the greatest strength of the local church. Protect your home and church by protecting yourself. Be alert to any appearance of evil and “keep thyself pure” (1 Timothy 5:22). A pastor does not have to commit an immoral act to ruin his testimony and ministry; he just needs to be suspected. Be Humble Pride can affect your private and public life. “Take heed unto thyself ” (1 Timothy 4:16) for “God is opposed to the proud, but gives grace to the humble” (James 4:6). Humility is recognizing that God and others are actually responsible for the achievements in our lives. The only way to know God’s enabling grace to accomplish His best is through humility. Always be ready to confess wrong attitudes and actions and ask for forgiveness. When someone gives you praise accept it with thanks, but then def lect it to God and those through whom He has worked. People need to know that God has used them in the ministry and you are just part of the team. “For we are laborers together with God” and it is “God who gives the increase” (1 Corinthians 3:9, 6). Uphold biblical ethics. If you find yourself in opposition to the church’s doctrinal position, philosophy of ministry, historic distinctive, or constitution and bylaws you have an obligation to share your differences with the church leaders. If your differences are not resolved you should be prepared to leave rather than become the cause of dissension and division. The Lord hates those who “sow discord among brethren” (Proverbs 6:19). Keep in mind you are building on the foundation of others and, in particular, the foundation that Jesus Christ has laid. “Take heed how you build upon it” (1 Corinthians 3:10). ENDNOTES 1. N ew Beginnings: A Pastorate Start Up Workbook by Roy M. Oswald (Washington, D.C.: Alban Institute, 1989) DISC I PLI NG CH I L D R E N Measure Your Ministry E Mark Steiner Mark Steiner is Founder & President of DiscipleLand in Fort Collins, Colorado. Visit www.discipleland.com where IFCA members are entitled to discounts. Or call 800.284.0158. Mark led two seminars at the 2012 IFCA Convention. ach week, your ministry team works hard, building into the lives of children. So, how are you doing? Now might be a great time for a spiritual check-up! This article will explain “why” you should periodically evaluate the effectiveness of your children’s ministries. At the end, I’ll direct you to a simple tool (it’s free!) that will walk you through the process—the “how.” That survey has been designed to empower you to assess your kids’ Christian growth. The results will give you focus, direct your decisions, and ensure that you are doing your very best for the Lord. Where Do I Start? When evaluating your ministry to children, begin with the end in mind—the children! Churches often make the mistake of evaluating curriculum before they answer these two pivotal questions: 1. W hat is your goal? It is essential to determine what you want the kids in your children’s ministry to be like when they “graduate” to the teen ministry. What is God’s desire for them? What Bible knowledge, character traits, and behaviors do you expect of them? 2. How are you doing? Figure out where the kids in your ministry are at present. Establish an initial benchmark so you can measure incremental progress towards your goal. After you have addressed those two questions, you are ready to move on and assess your present curriculum. What Do I Measure? Christ commissioned the Church with only one task—“make disciples.” Disciplemaking is the most pivotal ministry that churches can provide. For this reason, it makes sense to measure your children’s ministry in terms of discipleship. That’s the yardstick Jesus told us to use. 28 VOICE In two concise commands, Jesus Christ spelled out the first duty of every human being: “Love the Lord your God with all your heart [emotional], with all your soul [spiritual], with all your mind [mental] and with all your strength [physical]. Love your neighbor [relational] as yourself ” (Mark 12:30-31). As a boy, Christ grew in these same ways: “Jesus kept increasing in wisdom [mental], and stature [physical], and in favor with God [spiritual] and favor with men [relational]” (Luke 2:52). Throughout the Bible and Christian history, three traits have marked God’s people: • Knowledge: Growing disciples know God intimately. [mental, spiritual] They develop a reservoir of knowledge based on a Biblical worldview. • Character: Growing disciples love God passionately. [emotional, relational, spiritual] They display Christlike character in every area of life. • Conduct: Growing disciples serve God self lessly. [physical, relational, spiritual] They demonstrate faithful conduct that honors God and helps people. Effective discipleship interweaves these three dimensions: knowledge + character + conduct. Children’s ministry must measure and reinforce all three components. How Do My Kids Measure Up? Now it’s time to find out how your kids are doing in their Bible knowledge, Christlike character, and godly conduct. To help you assess the spiritual status of your children, download the free resource “Measure Your Ministry” at: www. ifca.org/DLResource May the Lord reward your efforts! The Church and Educational Choices Introduction Editors Note: The issue of educating our children (Christian School? Public School? Home School?) is an important one facing our churches and families. It can also be a divisive issue. This article demonstrates how one of our IFCA churches has addressed this issue. The purpose of this position statement is to address the issue of God’s individual leading in the families of our congregation with reference to what educational methodology they deem best for their children. We do not advance this statement as a comprehensive treatment of each position. The advantages and disadvantage of each choice exceed what can be addressed here. However, our purpose is to provide demonstration that each position has both advantages and disadvantages with reference to seeing God’s purposes fulfilled in our children’s lives. Since children are a blessed stewardship with which parents have been entrusted by God, each set of parents has the individual responsibility before the Lord to fulfill their stewardship in the fear of God. Although God does not require uniformity among His people, He does command that we strive for unity in the midst of our diversities. Thus, regardless of the different choices that individual families make regarding education, there ought to be mutual respect and the diligent preservation of the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. God can use different avenues to adequately prepare His people for their lives of service to Him. Throughout history, He has chosen to bless through a variety of educational methodologies to promote His purpose for individual servants. This statement looks at some of the benefits as well as dangers of each approach and provides a corresponding admonition as to biblically responsible parenting. Christian Education We recognize that there are some believers whose choice of overseeing their children’s education will include utilizing the Christian school opportunities afforded by believers who have established evangelical Christian schools. It is the priority of many of these parents to cooperate with the biblical principle taught in Luke: “A pupil is not above his teacher, but everyone, after he has been fully trained, will be like his teacher” (Luke 6:40). These parents see the advantages of placing their children under teachers who share their values and convictions and who will promote biblical truth in each discipline being taught. Those who choose to educate their children by using Christian schools must recognize the critical need to be constantly engaged in mentoring their children spiritually. Without such parental mentoring, students in Christian schools can respond to the pressure to conform while failing to internalize the truths that ought to be transforming them. This can contribute to a heart that is hardened to truth. The Bible declares: “Therefore everyone who hears these words of Mine and acts on them, may be compared to a wise man who built his house on the rock. And the rain fell, and the f loods came, and the winds blew and slammed against that house; and yet it did not fall, for it had been founded on the rock. Everyone who hears these words of Mine and does not act on them, will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand. The rain fell, and the f loods came, and the winds blew and slammed against that house; and it fell—and great was its fall” (Matthew 7:24-27). Thus the elders urge parents who feel directed by the Lord to delegate a portion of their children’s academic training to the Christian schools to remain aggressive in providing spiritual leadership to their children. We call on them to remain attentive to the potential hardening of their children’s hearts to the Holy Spirit by keeping Christ Jesus and His Word central in the home – Deuteronomy 6:4-9. An illustration of a biblical character for whom the value of this particular methodology is demonstrated is Saul (who later became known as the Apostle Paul) who was reared in the context of the rabbinical training afforded to the children of the Rabbis and Pharisees. God had a particular purpose for Paul to perform and prepared him for that purpose in the institutions of Israel – cp. Acts 22:3. July|August 2012 29 Home Education We recognize that there are some believers whose choice of overseeing their children’s education will by conviction consolidate the process within their own homes. Many of these parents believe that the biblical principle that teaches that “you shall teach them diligently to your sons and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise up” (Deuteronomy 6:7) limits their freedom to outsource their children’s education. Those who choose to home educate believe that the responsibility to train their children includes academics as they seek to “bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord” (Ephesians 6:4b). Those who choose to educate their children at home must recognize the critical need that exists to preser ve a dependency upon the Holy Spirit to do the work of sanctifying their children. The danger of this choice is a reliance upon protective care and the absence of peer dependency to insure the spiritual safety of their child. Because of the protection afforded by limiting the inf luences of peers and the lures of culture, some parents may relax their concerns for their children’s spiritual well-being, believing the dangers to be external. However, as God’s Word does declare: “God has not given us a spirit of timidity, but of power and love and disciple” (2 Timothy 1:7). As will be demonstrated during the Millennial Kingdom of Jesus Christ, even the most 30 VOICE desirable settings will not produce genuine godliness. Thus, the elders urge parents who feel directed by the Lord to personally educate their children at home to remain sensitive to the dangers of developing an excess in withdrawing from others in order to protect a child from negative inf luences. Such excess can lead to a lack of passion in reaching the lost and thereby hinder the child’s ability to ultimately fulfill God’s purpose for their lives (Matthew 28:19). Throughout most of the world’s history, only the wealthy were able to gain a formal education while the average man gained whatever education was available through friends, parents and self-motivation. Until the modern era, home education was the most common means by which the majority of people were educated. Public Education We recognize that there are some believers whose choice of overseeing their children’s education will include utilizing the public school opportunities afforded by local communities. It is the priority of many of these parents to cooperate with the biblical principle that their family serves the Lord by representing Him within the community through this educational method. The Scriptures teach that it is the heart of Christ Jesus that we serve as salt and light; salt – in that we provide a means by which lawlessness is restrained and morality is preserved; and light – as a means by which the Gospel message is clearly seen in the contrasting lifestyles of believers among those who do not believe. Jesus stated in His prayer to the Father just prior to His crucifixion that His followers would be able to properly represent Him in the world – “I do not ask You to take them out of the world, but to keep them from the evil one. They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world. Sanctify them in the truth; Your word is truth. As You sent Me into the world, I also have sent them into the world” (John 17:15-18). Those who choose to educate their children by using the pubic schools must recognize the critical need to be constantly engaged in mentoring their children spiritually – cp. Deuteronomy 6:4-9. The danger of this choice is for the child to be overwhelmed by a secular culture that is hostile to the holiness of God. The Bible declares: “For those who are according to the flesh set their minds on the things of the f lesh, but those who are according to the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace” (Romans 8:5-6). Thus the elders urge parents who feel directed by the Lord to represent Him in the public schools to remain aggressive in providing spiritual leadership to their children, remaining attentive to the encroachments of the world in the worldview of their children, keeping Christ Jesus clearly central in the home. An illustration of a biblical character for whom the value of this particular methodology is demonstrated is Moses who was educated from his earliest days in the secular institutions of Egypt (Acts 7:22). God clearly had a specific purpose for Moses and therefore had him educated in a secular environment in order to prepare him for that purpose. Conclusion It is the position of the elders that the heart of a child is not shaped primarily by his or her environment. The particular education choice that is made is not the deciding inf luence in the preparedness of a child to serve the Lord. God can and does lead individual families to pursue any of these methodologies depending on His purposes for that family and the individual child. At times, He may even lead one family to utilize an assortment of these methods depending upon the individual needs of the children. The determining factor in all three methods is the attentiveness of the parent to the spiritual well-being of the children that focuses on the Gospel. Thus, the only genuine parental issue that is indispensable to successful parenting and education of a child is the integrity of the parent relying upon God to produce godliness in the lives of their child by pointing them to Jesus Christ. Any methodology that replaces one’s dependency upon God to produce godliness in a child is not of faith and is therefore deficient, regardless of its technical merit. Scripture goes so far to say that “whatever is not of faith is sin” – Romans 14:23b. Therefore, if parents are truly relying upon the Lord and providing spiritual leadership to their children, God can and will bless. The Holy Spirit will do the work necessary to produce godliness in the lives of our children regardless of the specific educational methodology used. Since this is the case, we believe it to be unacceptable for the leading of the Lord in individual families to be called into question by others. If a family feels led by the Lord to utilize Christian education, other families ought to respect God’s leading. If a family is led to use home or public education, God’s leading in their family should likewise be validated. No one method is a guaranteed success. In addition, no one method is a guaranteed failure. Division among believers that is based on educational choices is unacceptable and will be rebuked. We are to accept one another even as Romans 14:10 declares: “But you, why do you judge your brother? Or you again, why do you regard your brother with contempt? For we will all stand before the judgment seat of God.” It is our prayer that the children in all the families of our church will have the benefit of parents who, regardless of their education choice, will seek to fulfill the admonitions of Deuteronomy 6:4-9 with faithfulness relying fully upon the grace of God as they point their children to the hope found solely in Jesus Christ. July|August 2012 31 Genesis, Submission & Modern Wives T Georgia Purdom Dr. Georgia Purdom is a research scientist and speaker for Answers in Genesis. But she is first and foremost a wife and mother. She conducts conferences, called Answers for Women. You can find out more information about her ministry and upcoming conferences at www. answersforwomen.org. 32 VOICE he verses most commonly quoted concerning the wife’s role in relation to the husband’s role are Ephesians 5:22 “Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord” and Colossians 3:18 “Wives, submit to your own husbands, as is fitting in the Lord.” Many women struggle with the concept of submission in marriage because they mistakenly equate being submissive with being inferior. From Genesis we know that men and women are equal in God’s eyes because everyone, regardless of gender, is made in God’s image. Genesis 1:27 states, “So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” Eve was made from a rib from Adam’s side (Genesis 2:21), which also infers equality with Adam. I really enjoy the way the famous 17th century Bible commentator Matthew Henry writes about Eve’s creation from Adam, “Not made out of his head to rule over him, nor out of his feet to be trampled upon by him, but out of his side to be equal with him, under his arm to be protected, and near his heart to be beloved.”1 Galatians 3:28 also makes clear that both men and women are equal in their personal worth before God. Jesus Christ came to save all people who put their trust in Him, regardless of their gender, nationality, or place in society. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. Here’s another way to think about it. John 6:38 and many other passages throughout Scripture show Christ’s submission to God’s authority. If being submissive means being inferior, then Christ, in being submissive to the authority of God the Father, is inferior to God. However, Scripture makes it clear that the Father and Jesus are both equally God. Jesus claims, “I and My Father are one” (John 10:30). Jesus and God the Father have different roles within the Trinity, but in their personhood they are equally God. Likewise, a wife and husband have different roles in marriage, but they are equally loved by God and equally bear His image. Another common misconception is that the role of Adam as leader and Eve as helper was a result of the Fall and not part of God’s original created roles for husbands and wives. Many evangelical feminists, such as Rebecca Groothius, assert this blatant misreading of God’s Word. Many women struggle with the concept of submission in marriage because they mistakenly equate being submissive with being inferior. In fact, there is no mention of either spouse ruling over the other-until after their fall into sin, when God declares to the woman that “he will rule over you” (Gen. 3:16). This is stated by God not as a command, but as a consequence of their sin.2 However, a plain reading of God’s Word makes it clear that Adam’s original created role was to be a leader in the family and Eve’s original created role was to be a helper to her husband and family. God created Adam first and gave him the authority to not only name the animals (which he and Eve were to have dominion over) but also to name his wife [he first called her woman (Genesis 2:23) before the Fall and then later Eve (Genesis 3:20) after the Fall]. In Old Testament times, this was considered a sign of authority for the person doing the naming. God signified that He was going to make a “helper comparable to him [Adam]” (Genesis 2:18). The role of helper would be understood as someone who helps the person doing the leading. Paul considered the order of creation of Adam and Eve significant and used it as a reason insisting on male leadership in the church (1 Timothy 2:12– 13). Paul affirms male headship in the home in 1 Corinthians 11:9 by reminding readers of Genesis 1, “Nor was man created for the woman, but woman for the man.” The original created roles of husband/leader and wife/helper can also be understood from the curse on Adam and Eve as a result of the Fall. God said to Eve: “I will greatly multiply your sorrow and your conception; In pain you shall bring forth children; Your desire shall be for your husband, And he shall rule you” (Genesis 3:16). What does it mean that Eve would “desire” her husband? The same grammatical construction is used in Genesis 4:7 when God says to Cain: “If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin lies at the door. And its desire is for you, but you should rule over it.” God is saying to Cain that sin will want to rule him (“desire is for you”) but that Cain should rule over sin instead. Applied to Genesis 3:16, Eve will want to rule over Adam (“your desire shall be for your husband”) as a part of the curse. So, if the curse is that Eve would want to rule or lead Adam, then that must not have been Eve’s role before the Fall and she was originally created to be a helper not a leader. Otherwise, it’s not much of a curse-Eve originally led and she’s to keep on leading?! In response to Eve’s wrong desire to lead, Adam would react sinfully by leading harshly instead of lovingly. Eve would desire to reverse roles of leader and helper, and Adam would react by wrongly distorting his leadership role. 3 A nother impor tant suppor t for the original created roles of husband/ leader and wife/helper is found in the attribution of sin to Adam not to Eve. How many times have you heard someone say, “It was all the woman’s (meaning Eve) fault,” or “We wouldn’t be in this mess (cursed world) if it weren’t for a woman”? I always cringe when I hear statements such as that because they are not biblical! It is true that Eve was the first one to sin but whom did God question first after Adam and Eve sinned? Adam was questioned first because he was the leader of the family. To whom is sin attributed throughout all of Scripture? Adam (see 1 Corinthians 15:22, 15:45; Romans 5:15). Why? Because as the leader, Adam was responsible for his wife Eve; he shirked that responsibility by following her leading in disobedience to God and eating the forbidden fruit. Interestingly, when God tells Adam and Eve His plan to redeem mankind (Genesis 3:15), He says the Redeemer will be “her Seed.” So, even though Eve was the first to sin, through her descendants would come mankind’s Redeemer, Jesus Christ. Sin is attributed to Adam (because of his leadership role), and so spreads to all people, men and women. Redemption comes through the offspring of Eve: the Messiah. So, if the curse is that Eve would want to rule or lead Adam, then that must not have been Eve’s role before the Fall and she was originally created to be a helper not a leader. Scripture makes it clear, beginning in Genesis that Adam was created to be the leader, and Eve was created to be the helper in the marriage relationship. Both men and women are equal before God as His image-bearers. But they have different roles in marriage, much like the differing roles yet equality within the Trinity. Why Do Modern Wives Struggle with This Issue Today? The number one reason is sin. Through Eve, all women bear the weight of the Curse in this specif ic area, so we will always struggle with this issue to some extent. The passages in Ephesians and Colossians instruct husbands and wives on their original created roles in marriage to bring restoration to marriage that has been marred by sin. How many of you ever saw the TV show Jon and Kate Plus Eight? I’m sure many of you did, and even if you didn’t, you’ve perhaps heard about it. The show is part of the reality TV genre depicting the life of a married couple, Jon and Kate, and their children comprised of a set of twins and a set of sextuplets. Jon and Kate decided to divorce, and there was a lot of speculation as to why they were having problems and made this decision. In an episode aired earlier, Jon and Kate discuss whether to continue the show for another season. Kate: “I’m loving what we’re doing so we just have to figure it out.” Jon: “Yeah it’s really difficult, for me, on my end.” Kate: “And I’m very happy.” Jon: “So there you go, there’s your conflict.” 4 The conf lict in and of itself is not bad, but how they were handling it is. Kate makes it clear (in this episode and others) that she wants to be the leader in the family and will not submit to Jon’s authority. Jon tends to be very passive and doesn’t take the leadership role. They have reversed their roles, and as a result they are miserable. Instead of seeking divorce, they need to read God’s Word and understand the cause of their problem and the solution. Another reason women struggle today with submission to their husbands is the differences between the role of women in the workplace and in the home. More women today work outside the home than ever before, and often they are in male-dominated fields like science, engineering, and business. I know the struggles these women face. I was the only woman in my class to complete a PhD. I was the only female biology professor at the Christian college where I taught. I am one of very few female creation scientists and the only one in the U.S. who I am aware of speaking and researching on creation full-time. Women often feel that they have to work hard to be seen as equal to men in many professions. Women have achieved success and leadership roles. However, some of us tend to view life as a continuum and don’t separate our professional and personal lives like men do. The leadership mentality in the workplace tends to carry over into marriage and problems arise. Women (including myself) need to do a better job at recognizing and separating their roles in the workplace from their roles in the home. Wifely submission is not an indication that women are inferior to men, nor July|August 2012 33 is it a result of sin and the Fall. Instead, husbands and wives are equal as imagebearers of God with distinct roles in marriage as leaders (husbands) and helpers (wives). When we accept the authority of God’s Word and fulfill those roles, our marriages can thrive and—for those that need it—can be restored. This article originally appeared in the November 24, 2009 issue of Answers magazine, Copyright © 2009 Answers in Genesis – USA – All Rights Reserved. END NOTES 1. M atthew Henry, “Notes on Genesis 2:21–25,” Commentar y on the W hole Bible, vol. I, (Genesis to Deuteronomy). 2. R ebecca Groothuis, Good News For Women: A Biblical Picture of Gender Equality (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1997), p. 123. 3. Some people interpret this passage differently. 4. Jon and Kate Plus Eight, “Family Outing,” Aired March 23, 2009 (Season 4, Episode 41). 34 VOICE Ezekiel, The Watchman N Jim Thompson Jim Thompson is Senior Pastor of Bible Baptist Church in Wilton, Alabama just south of Birmingham in the Gulf States Regional. Jim has served as a church planter and pastor in two previous churches in Indiana. He is on the IFCA International Board of Directors. o prophet of the Old Testament has impacted my life more than Ezekiel. I first began studying Ezekiel over ten years ago and continue to learn more and more each time I read this prophet. I have taught this book in both ladies’ and men’s Bible studies, out of the USA in Guyana and have preached sermons using insights and passages from Ezekiel. Every teacher of the Bible should find hope in the book of Ezekiel because often times a teacher can be misunderstood by his/her students. Ezekiel was asked to do some strange things, to give some very pointed messages and to sacrifice his personal desires and pleasures so that the message of God could be given. No one today has had to humble himself to the degree that we find in Ezekiel. Ezekiel’s very name, which means God strengthens, should also encourage us. If I have learned anything from Ezekiel, and I have learned much, it can be summarized in one statement: A teacher is only as effective as the people are teachable. This becomes the encouragement for all Bible teachers not to faint and give up. Remember the words of the Apostle Paul to the Corinthians church, “I planted, Apollos watered, but it is God who gives the increase” (1 Corinthians 3:6). As we are faithful to do what God has called us to do, He will be faithful to do what He has promised to do. Background to the Book Ezekiel, at thirty years of age, was a prophet of God during the time of the Babylonian captivity (1:1). Ninety-three times in his book he is called “Son of Man” by God, which was also Christ’s favorite self-descriptive title in the Gospels. Ezekiel was a priest (1:3) but never served in that capacity, probably due to the captivity. From this, we can be assured that the reference to the “thirtieth year” as found in 1:1 is a reference to the age of Ezekiel.1 We know that his father’s name was Buzi (1:3) but we know very little about this man since this verse is the only reference we have of him. Ezekiel was a contemporary to Jeremiah who was twenty years older and a contemporary to Daniel, who was just a few years older. In fact, Daniel is mentioned as one of the righteous men in Ezekiel chapter fourteen. When Daniel was taken captive, he was taken to the palace of the king (Daniel 1:4), whereas when Ezekiel was taken captive, he was taken to the rivers of Babylon (Ezekiel 1:3, cf. Psalm 137:1). We have no record that Ezekiel and Daniel ever met face-to-face. Ezekiel was asked to do some strange things, to give some very pointed messages and to sacrifice his personal desires and pleasures so that the message of God could be given. Ezekiel’s message has been named by some as the most spiritual of all the prophets simply because he dealt particularly with the Person of God. 2 As already noted, Ezekiel began his ministry at the age of thirty, which was the fifth year of King Jehoiachin’s captivity. Jehoiachin came to the throne in December 597 B.C. and after three months he was taken captive by Nebuchadnezzar and deported to Babylon. Ezekiel ministered to the captives during a time when many false prophets were claiming a quick return to Jerusalem. He had to counter the false hope given by these prophets and the indifference and despondency that was prevalent in the days of sin and disaster. Among many discouragements encountered by Ezekiel was that the people would not listen. Ezekiel resorted to new methods of teaching; instead of straight forward preaching, he would “act out” his sermons.3 Many have said that Ezekiel is the most difficult book to understand. John Calvin wrote in his commentary on Ezekiel: “If anyone asks whether the vision is lucid, I confess its obscurity, and July|August 2012 35 that I can scarcely understand it.” 4 H. A. Ironside wrote: “Of ALL the prophetic books, Ezekiel is the one that has been neglected most.” 5 The message is of God’s judgment upon the nation of Israel for their sins. The purpose was to bring them to repentance. What we learn from Ezekiel is that the validity of God’s truth does not depend upon results. As you read through this wonderful book, search your own heart and ask God to reveal any unconfessed sin that would hinder you from fully serving the Lord with all the blessings God has to offer. Standing Firm for Truth When one studies any great battle of history, you find that it is the captain who fights until the bitter end. While others may retreat, the captain is the one who is holding the front line and fights to the death. Like any great captain, Ezekiel is found committed to standing firm for the truth of the Word of God and is holding the front lines. In the days of Ezekiel, the cities were protected by great walls. It was the watchmen who were posted on these walls to watch for approaching danger and to warn both those who are outside the protection of those walls as well as those who were on the inside. According to Isaiah 56:10-11 a watchman was a leader or shepherd. Jeremiah 6:17 tells us their purpose was to warn. Psalm 127:1 states: “Unless the LORD builds the house, they labor in vain who build it; unless the LORD guards the city, the watchman stays awake in vain.” To get a clear illustration of the work of a watchman, read 2 Samuel 18:24ff. Serving As Watchman It was seven days after Ezekiel’s initial vision, that the Lord appointed Ezekiel to be the watchman over Israel. God had appointed Ezekiel to be a watchman for the purpose of warning Israel of their sin and of their need to repent. “His function as a watchman over the city was preeminently to warn of impending disaster; the prophet as a watchman was to call to repentance and faith.” 6 Ezekiel 3:18-19 give us the details of Ezek iel ’s responsibilities to the unrighteous, here referred to as the “wicked.” To refuse to warn not only 36 VOICE meant the wicked’s death, but Ezekiel was to suffer a consequence as well. This speaks wealth to any pastor or church leader in that we have a responsibility to warn those who are unsaved of the eternal damnation they face. It should be noted that the exhortation given here is to warn, not to achieve results. It is comparable to Christians today who are commanded to “preach the Gospel to every creature” (Mark 16:15). We are not commanded to focus on results, only on the going. The results are because of the Lord’s work, not ours (1 Corinthians 3:6). The watchman who neglects this responsibility will be held accountable and in a sense, be considered a manslayer.7 But in a positive note, Ezekiel 3:19 states that when a watchman delivers the message of God, the listener will be held accountable but the prophet will have delivered his own soul. Like any great captain, Ezekiel is found committed to standing firm for the truth of the Word of God and is holding the front lines. There is great responsibility upon the one who delivers the message of God. In 1 Corinthians 4:2 Paul tells us that it is required that a steward be found faithful. Ezekiel reminds us of the consequences we face if we are not faithful to proclaim the message of hope and love from God. It was Robert Murray McCheyne who said, “I preach as never to preach again; as a dying man to dying men.” 8 Other Lessons from the Book Ezekiel 3:20-21 reminds us that the righteous man also needed to be warned of his sin. These verses have been misinterpreted by some as referring to one who loses his salvation. Feinburg believed this man to be one who is an unbeliever merely displaying acts of righteousness.9 This may be hard to prove as the text is clearly showing a distinction between the unrighteous and the righteous. The Lord is teaching Ezekiel that no matter who is in sin, whether they belong to the family of God or not, he was responsible to warn them and there is a consequence for those being warned as well as for those doing the warning. Hebrews 13:7 implies that preachers today are held accountable for what they do with the Word of God. We are clearly to warn the unsaved of eternal damnation (Romans 6:23) and the saved of future accountability at the Bema (2 Corinthians 5:10). God spoke to Ezekiel in 3:22-23 and told Ezekiel to go into the plain and wait for the Him to talk with Ezekiel. Wasting no time, Ezekiel went immediately and there saw the glory of the Lord, just as he witnessed in chapter one. His response was the same as everyone else in the Bible when confronted with the glory of the Lord: he fell on his face. Those are two lessons for us today: Ezekiel obeyed immediately. Ezekiel fell in awe at God’s glory. Ezekiel was “speechless” in 3:2627. He was to speak only when given permission by the Lord and he was to speak only the words of the Lord. God caused his tongue to cling to the roof of his mouth. The significance is that Ezekiel was to make sure it was God ’s message that he proclaimed. And neither are Bible teachers today free to say what they will, to embellish or add to the Word of God. They are free to proclaim all that God has spoken in His Word, and so they should. Preachers are to preach the Word as Paul told Timothy in 2 Timothy 4:2. Ezekiel 3:27 ends by telling Ezekiel that whoever hears will hear, and whoever refuses will refuse. The implication is that a person’s reception or rejection of Ezekiel’s message was determined by his openness or lack of it to God. These are similar words as found at the close of each of the letters to the seven churches in Revelation 2 – 3. We do know that Ezekiel was fearful of going to the captives (Ezekiel 2:6). Three times the Lord told him to not be afraid. The Lord also cautions Ezekiel to not be like them (Ezekiel 2:8). It is true, the messenger can kill the message. And if Ezekiel were to be rebellious and refuse to obey, Israel would not hear the Word of the Lord, and Ezekiel would be guilty of being just like them. Conclusion There are many principles to learn from Ezekiel, too many to enumerate in this article. I would leave you with this: we are to obey the Lord’s command, no matter how much it may hurt and no matter who listens, because there is greater joy is obedience and serving the Lord. Results are not the reason we do what we do. We should seek to be faithful to God for it is faithfulness that God desires. “Moreover it is required in stewards that one be found faithful” (1 Corinthians 4:2). Let every believer become a “watchman” for the Lord and remember, A teacher is only as effective as the people are teachable. END NOTES 1. Read Numbers 4:3 for a clearer understanding of the age of a priest. 2. J. Vernon McGee, Ezekiel (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1991), p. viii of introduction 3. Read Ezekiel 4 & 5 for an example of this 4. John Calvin, Calvin’s Bible Commentaries: Ezekiel, Part 1 translated by John K ing. Originally published in 1847. (Forgotten Books, 2007 available online at www.forgottenbooks.org) p. 43. 5. H.A Ironside, Expository Notes on Ezekiel the Prophet (Neptune, NJ: Loizeaux Brothers, 1949), p. xi. 6. Charles Lee Feinburg, The Prophecy of Ezekiel (Moody Press, Chicago, IL), p. 29 7 Feinburg, p. 29 8. As cited by Mark Rooker, Holman Old Testament Commentary, Ezekiel (Broadman & Holman Publishers, Nashville, TN), p. 55 9. Feinburg, pp. 29-30 P 5 Death of His Saints Cecil William Tanner Cecil William Tanner, aged 98, entered the presence of his Savior on September 29, 2001. He was a resident of Kankakee, Illinois at the time of his death. Cecil was born May 10, 1913 and was raised in a Christian home. He trusted Christ as his Savior at the age of 11. He graduated from High School in 1932 and worked in many different farm related businesses. He then moved and took a job at a bank in downtown Chicago for sixteen years before returning to the farm in Lebanon, Missouri. He met his wife while in Chicago. His wife Bess came to know Christ through the ministry of Dr. William McCarrell at Cicero Bible Church and they were married there in 1947. Bess preceded Cecil in death after nearly 53 years of marriage. Together they served in IFCA churches in Kankakee, Chicago (East Side Bible Church), Orland Park, and Lebanon, MO. He was a faithful member of the IFCA Laymen’s League in the 1950s before he was able to join the IFCA as a full-fledged member in 1986. He attended many conventions through the years. Cecil loved to tell others about Jesus Christ and led many souls to Him, even in his advanced age in a nursing home in Kankakee. He wrote a small autobiography entitled “Jesus Led Me All the Way.” It concludes with this quotation from Adrian Rogers: “If you are a Christian and have never led a soul to Christ, you’re missing one of the greatest blessings of the Lord.” He wrote his last letter to the IFCA Home Office at age 94 which included these words: “When I go to heaven, I am not going to have a funeral. I will have a Going Home Celebration. I expect 100 souls to get saved.” Even as he planned his memorial service, he was praying for the salvation of many people. What an example Cecil was for all of us in IFCA International. Joel R ansom Fenn Joel Fenn of Melrose, Oregon, was born June 22, 1910. He passed peacefully into glory on Saturday, March 24, 2012 at the age of 101. He served in church leadership since 1935 and was a member of IFCA since 1985. He was the oldest continuous Gideon member in the world, having joined the Gideons in 1935. And he was the oldest living member of IFCA International. P July|August 2012 37 VISION WORLD A Spark for Missions W Shawn DeJong Shawn is Senior Pastor of Jamestown (MI) Baptist Church and a member of IFCA International Ministries Committee. 38 VOICE hen the bel ievers of ou r loca l assembly perceived their individual responsibility to carry out the marching orders Christ gave in Acts 1:8, their view of missions, evangelism, and other local and global outreach ministries changed dramatically. Beginning with our annual mission’s conference, we accepted a commitment to Vision World’s four basic commitments and embraced the challenge to pray for and train a missionary who would emerge from our assembly. Subsequently, we have seen the Lord set in motion the process that will fulfill these goals. And in doing so, He has been transforming our fellowship. Often the work of missions is confined to a church’s missions committee and is focused on individual missionaries on a global level. However, this tradition is a far cry from the commissioning we read about in Matthew 28 and Acts 1. In our multi-ethnic culture we should not accept such a lazy approach to missions. For our mission’s conference this past year, we decided we would not accept a participationfree weekend. We decided to engage the local community with the wisdom and instruction gleaned from years of faithful ministry by our three missionary families. We did not want the conference to be merely a reunion of missionaries and congregation, so we asked our missionaries to disciple us to reach the culturally diverse people in our own community. We wanted to learn what our missionaries are learning in their cultures. We wanted to know how they witness to their cultures and how they break down the boundaries they encounter. In other words, we wanted to bring missions home, to end the cycle of disconnected prayer support, financial support, and the occasional furlough visit. The result of seriously taking up the challenge of Vision World led to something quite unexpected. By bringing missions home, a renewed passion for cross-cultural ministry was ignited. With the help of our missionaries, we shared the gospel in and to our community through a series of fun and engaging outreaches. This involvement in the community sparked the desire to be engaged in local and global missions instead of simply supporting missions with prayer and finances. Some members of our youth group saw the potential effect of missions internationally. Others saw the potential of staying “home” and impacting our small town with the gospel. As evidence, an interesting ethnic shift has taken place in the youth group. Although our adult fellowship is 95 percent white and the community is 78 percent white, our youth group is now about 55 percent white, 25 percent Hispanic, and 20 percent African American. In other words, we wanted to bring missions home, to end the cycle of disconnected prayer support, financial support, and the occasional furlough visit. Although our congregation is still in the beginning stages of this new perception of missions, our adults, like our youth, are developing a strong desire to reach our community with the gospel. Along with this has come the desire to visit our missionaries across the world. Also, our adults want to be open to opportunities they can seize at home to share the gospel. Obviously, more must be done to honor our Lord’s marching orders, but here, in wheat country, our congregation understands that the fields are ripe for harvest. IFC A COMMUNIT Y C ARE T ODAY Friends of Friends of Trees I Pastor Toby Beck EVERGREEN BIBLE CHURCH VANCOUVER, WA 40 VOICE t started with a phone call from Jesse, a project director with Friends of Trees. They were looking for a place to host a planting day and wondered if we at Evergreen Bible Church would be willing to do so. A week later the church’s Leadership Team talked through the idea at our meeting. “So, what is Friends of Trees all about?” one elder asked, a bit skeptical. There was genuine concern about the possibility of aiding a radical environmental group. But this was easy to answer from their simple and clear mission statement: “To bring people in the Portland-Vancouver metro area together to plant and care for city trees and green spaces.” Nothing wrong with that. They just want to help citizens work together to make our community prettier and healthier. However, the bigger issue concerned purpose. “How does hosting a planting day fit in with our mission to make disciples of Jesus Christ?” At first glance, it didn’t seem to fit at all. They work to save trees and we work to save souls. Those are two totally different goals. But then the idea arose that assisting them with their purpose could give us a unique opportunity to better accomplish ours. What if we hosted this group with the goal of serving them so well in the name of Jesus, that seeds of the gospel would be planted in their hearts? In the end, that’s what we agreed to do. We contacted Jesse at Friends of Trees to say we would be delighted to host the planting day and graciously explained that our ultimate hope was that participants in the event would become interested in finding out more about our church and the Savior we serve. I held my breath a bit as I waited for his response. “That sounds great,” he said. “How about if we give you a few minutes when everyone is gathered to share what you guys are all about?” Deal! We sowed seeds all day as we helped set up tables, serve coffee and thaw some unexpectedly frozen bagels. We sowed as we worked with their promo and registration people and sat in with them to learn how to properly plant a tree. And we sowed seeds as Pastor Corey winsomely shared with the group that Jesus Christ is what makes Evergreen Bible Church “truly green.” What if we hosted this group with the goal of serving them so well in the name of Jesus, that seeds of the gospel would be planted in their hearts? We finished the day with great joy in our hearts. The evidence was overwhelming that The Sower had been very busy in our church and in our community that day. Pray with us for lasting fruit from this opportunity. WOMEN’S VOICE Word Pictures of God’s Care for Us I have the very special privilege of teaching a let go and slowly begin to enjoy themselves. That Sunday School class of special needs adults. I is a picture of how our wonderful, loving God find myself often explaining spiritual truths holds us. by using word pictures. When circumstances come into our lives A truth often taught in my class is that God that make us fear and hold on to Him with holds us, His children, in His hand and He white knuckles, we hear God’s sweet whisper won’t let us go (John to us from His word, 10:29 “My Father, Proverbs 3:5, 6 “Trust who has given them in the Lord with all to Me, is greater than your heart, and lean all; and no one is able not unto your own to snatch them out of understanding. In all My Father’s hand”). your ways acknowlI use my hands as an edge Him, and He illustration, one hand sha ll direct your by itself to show how paths.” And 1 Peter God does not hold us, 5:7 “Casting all your and one hand clasped cares upon Him: for over the other to show He cares for you.” how God does hold Our arms begin to us (Isaiah 41:10 “Fear loosen and our fear not, for I am with becomes faith. Again you; Be not dismayed, God lovingly whisfor I am your God. I pers in John 14:27 will strengthen you, “Peace I leave with Yes, I will help you, I you, my peace I give will uphold you with unto you. L et not My righteous right your heart be trouhand.” God watches bled, neither let it be — Isaiah 41:10 over us and we can afraid.” And f inally trust him. in Hebrews 13:5 He A not her w ay I tells of His always illustrate this truth being with us “I will is through this word never leave you nor picture. We have a forsake you.” swimming pool in our Slowly by fa it h back yard. Our grandkids love it, but when each we loosen our grip on trying to control things of them were little, we would carry them into ourselves and by faith trust God and His the pool. At first they were very scared. Their Word in the mountains and valleys of our little arms would hold us around our necks very lives’ circumstances. tightly with their face buried in our necks. You get the picture. All the while we would be telling them, “It’s ok, it’s ok, I’ve got you, I won’t drop you, I won’t let go.” Slowly they would begin to h Cynthia Beach Cynthia Beach is the wife of Jerry Beach, Associate Pastor at Mayfair Bible Church, Flint, MI. She is mother of four and grandmother of twelve. She loves fishing and hunting with her husband. Fear not, for I am with you; Be not dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you, Yes, I will help you, I will uphold you with My righteous right hand. h July|August 2012 41