MGMT 479 DEB Strategic Management
Transcription
MGMT 479 DEB Strategic Management
Columbia College Online Campus Page |1 MGMT 479 DEB Strategic Management March Session (14-54) March 23 – May 16, 2015 Course Description Culminating experience/capstone course for majors in Business Administration. Requires case/report writing and the ability to integrate materials from previous courses to analyze and resolve complete business strategic planning problems. A final grade of “C” or better must be achieved to satisfy graduation requirements Prerequisite: Senior status, completion of at least 33 hours of core requirements and at least six hours of upper-level courses within their identified major. Textbooks Wheelen, T.L., Hunger, J.D., Hoffman, A.N, & Bamford, C.E. (2014). Strategic management and business policy: Globalization, innovation, and sustainability. (14 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. ISBN-13: 978-0-13-312614-3 (Absence of the ISBN, this is in APA format for your reference list. If your reference list does not appear like the above it is not properly cited) MBS Direct offers a Columbia College version of this text, ISBN: 978-1-269-91644-8 No other textbooks are acceptable for this course. Textbooks for the course may be ordered from MBS Direct. You can order: online at http://direct.mbsbooks.com/columbia.htm (be sure to select Online Education rather than your home campus before selecting your class) by phone at 800-325-3252 For additional information about the bookstore, visit http://www.mbsbooks.com. Course Overview This is the culminating course for Business Administration students. This is a demanding course that will teach students how to utilize the skills they have learned during their college and professional careers. This course is about strategic management—the excitement and challenge of providing the vision, developing the mission, and implementing the strategic intent for organizations. Columbia College Online Campus Page |2 Each week we will focus on different aspects of strategic management, from strategic management inputs, to strategy formulation, to strategy implementations; these are reinforced and expanded in our text, Strategic management and business policy: Globalization, innovation, and sustainability, course notes, and case studies. Upon successful completion of this course, you will have a complete understanding of the facets of strategic management and be able to understand top management’s decisions and organizations’ strategies, both domestically and globally. Technology Requirements Participation in this course will require the basic technology for all online classes at Columbia College: A computer with reliable Internet access, a web browser, Acrobat Reader, Microsoft Office or another word processor such as Open Office. You can find more details about standard technical requirements for our courses on our site. Course Objectives To integrate and apply the knowledge gained in earlier business courses. To develop the capacity to think strategically about an organization, its position in its industry and among competitors, and how it can gain a sustainable competitive advantage. To provide hands-on experience using case analyses in crafting organizational strategy, reasoning carefully about strategic options, using what-if analysis to evaluate action alternatives, and making strategic decisions. Measurable Learning Outcomes After you have completed this course, you should be able to: Understand the factors that impact on strategic decision-making, implementation, and evaluation. Conduct an organizational resource-based situational analysis. Conduct comprehensive environmental scanning and assess the volatility of industry position. Develop comprehensive business strategies by identifying strategic options, policies, procedures, budgets, and timelines. Use “what-if” scenario analysis to evaluate action alternatives, make strategic decisions, and choose strategic options. Evaluate corporate competitive position and an understanding of the global marketplace and its impact on strategic analysis and planning. Critically evaluate strategic decisions, findings, outcomes, conclusions, and recommendations. Grading Columbia College Online Campus Grading Scale GRADE POINTS Page |3 Grade Weights PERCENT ASSIGNMENT POINTS PERCENT 150 17% A 810-900 90-100 Discussions B 720-809 80-89 Case Studies 200 22% C 630-719 70-79 Strategic Team Audit 250 28% D 540-629 60-69 Final Examination 300 33% F 0-539 0-59 Total 900 100% Schedule of Due Dates WEEK ASSIGNMENT POINTS DUE DATE Week 1 Discussion #1 50 Sunday/Sunday Week 2 Discussion #2 50 Thursday/Sunday Week 3 Case Study #1 100 Sunday Week 4 Discussion #3 50 Thursday/Sunday Week 5 Case Study #2 100 Sunday Week 6 Team Strategic Audit Assignment Week 7 Team Strategic Audit Assignment 250 Sunday Week 8 Final Examination 300 Saturday Total 900 N/A Additional note: Students are assessed based on the inclusion of theories and concepts learned throughout this (citing the textbook) and other business courses in their assignments. Additionally, students are assessed on proper grammar, spelling, structure and proper citing. Although this is not an English course, this is a college course for which students are expected to adhere to the “English” rules. All discussion responses must be posted to the discussion board. Please do not “attach to the discussion board.” Responses are not to be submitted to the drop box. Note: Students must post his or her respond before they can view and respond to their peers. If a student opens the discussion board (posting a blank) before posting his or her initial response, he or she will earn a zero for that submission. If a student submits the incorrect assignment, the student will not get credit for that assignment and will not be allowed to submit a second assignment. APA format: All postings and assignments must be in APA format (6th edition). Please DO NOT POST IN MLA. To assist in this area or if you are not familiar or need a refresher, I have created a discussion thread that includes both a document and powerpoint presentation on APA. It is the students responsible to review and study the document and Powerpoint presentation. Although you are required to follow the guidelines, you are only citing the textbook and a definition (week two). Therefore, properly citing should not be an issue. Students are required to review (and responsible for adhering to) all announcements and information posted within the Updates and Handouts thread. Please be sure to read often (you might have to stroll down) because there may be additional information for the assignments. Note: Initial Responses are due on Thursday each week, while responses to your peers are due by Sunday each week. If a student does not post his or her initial response by Thursday, he or she will not earn points for the initial post, with the exception of the first week for which all responses are due by Sunday. You will only earn points for responding to your peers. Columbia College Online Campus Page |4 Assignment Overview Each student is required to successfully complete the following: Case Studies/analysis: There are two case studies/analysis that requires a written paper. Each case study must include a synopsis; identification of the organization’s resources, capabilities, and core competencies (at least two each); and three findings of fact (discuss in detail and include headings/subheadings within the paper). Each finding of fact will require a justified recommended solution (in detail). Simply stated, students will discuss the findings (include a heading), the recommendation/solutions (include a heading) justification for that solution (include a heading). Students are expected to support their recommended solutions (DO NOT WRITE CONTINUE OR EXPAND: You are to discuss new ideas) with rational thought learned from the course material (via citations), other courses, and real-life experiences. Students are required to include information from the readings/chapters within the study/analysis and cite with page numbers to support their arguments/opinions; this is not an option. Please do not include outside sources, because it may alter the case study. Each paper is worth 100 points. Each paper must be placed in the D2L dropbox by the required due date. Note: Late submissions are not accepted. If a student submits an assignment after 11:59 p.m. CST it is considered late; no exceptions. It is recommended that students try and submit all assignments one hour before the assignments are due to avoid missing the deadline; this includes the final. If a student starts submitted at 11:59 p.m. it may not transmit within one minute and will be considered late (locked out) for which you will not earn credit. If a student has difficulties accessing the site, it is recommended that the student submit the assignment via email. Any assignments submitted in this fashion (due to problems accessing the site) after midnight will not be accepted; this includes the final. Discussions: Each student is expected to actively participate in each of the three discussion threads and provide “thoughtful input.” Discussion participation is worth 150 points (50 points for each discussion thread). Initial responses are due on Thursday each week, while responses to peers are due on Sunday each week. When answering the questions, students are required to answer within the word length requirement as written below and include headings. When answering the questions, students are also required to include information from the week’s reading/chapters (at least two citations/references from each chapter) within the response and cite including the page numbers. This is not an option. If a student fails to include, he or she will not earn all the possible points. Discussion post are not accepted after the due date. When answering the questions, do not include definitions. Rule of Thumb “less than 25% of the submission should be quoted.” Simply, 75% should be written in your own words. Team Developed Strategic Audit Assignment: Each member of the class will be assigned to a team consisting of 3-6 members for the written Team Developed Strategic Audit Assignment. The grading for this assignment is based on the assessment of a case study, the annual reports, an indepth strategic analysis, and the formulation of a strategic plan for the selected company. The Power Point presentation will include recommendations supported by analyzing the company within the confines of the case study data, course material integration, and consensus of the team as to the company’s recommended best strategic course(s) of action. Additionally, the team will submit an executive summary/case analysis presenting (strategic analysis) in detail, recommendations for the company’s best strategic course(s) of action, including implementation (over the course of five years) and evaluation and control phases. This assignment is worth 250 points. However, based on individual participation (or lack thereof), the instructor has the discretion to lower a students’ grade, in addition to the peer review. Columbia College Online Campus Page |5 Final examination: The final will be available on or by Monday of Week 8 and must be submitted by 11:59 p.m. CST Saturday, Week 8. It will be an essay based on a case study where you will demonstrate the knowledge learned during the course. The examination will be worth 300 points. When answering the questions, students are required to include concepts and theories learned in class (from each chapter) and cite. If concepts and theories learned in class are not included, students will not earn all the possible points. If a student does not submit the final by 11:59 p.m. he or she will be awarded a 0; no exceptions. It is recommended that students try and submit one hour before the assignment is due to avoid missing the deadline. If a student has difficulties accesses the site, it is recommended that the student submit the final via email. If submitted after midnight it will not be accepted. Work done in a previous course, in whole or in part, will not be accepted. If a student submits from a previous course, he or she will earn a zero for that assignment/submission. Other requirements for successful completion of the course: Complete weekly reading assignments and review notes provided by the instructor. Build a strong team that all members’ decisions and inputs are valued for the Team Developed Strategic Audit Assignment. Use the readings, notes, and on-line resources to augment the written papers, discussion threads, and final examination. Updates and Handouts: Be sure to review the thread often. Here, I will post very valuable information for which students are held accountable. Personal Responsibility: Students are expected to take personal responsibility for their success in this course. Some of the more important responsibilities include: dedicating time to reading the course material and understanding the contents; completing and submitting all assignments by the due dates; asking questions and communicating with the instructor; dedicating adequately preparing for assignments; preparing and completing assignments in advance in the event of an “absence”; and, communicating with the instructor to address ANY problems, issues, or concerns you may have. Further, although this is not an English course and it might have been a number of years since attending college, responses per academic standards are expected to be that of a college level student; therefore, responses are expected to be substantive (more than two and three sentence responses) with correct spelling, grammar in paragraph form and APA format. This is not an option. Keep in mind; this is a “Capstone” course, which requires more time devoted to your studies when compared to other courses. Course Schedule Week 1 – Basic Concept of Strategic Management; Corporate Governance Readings: o Text: Read Chapters 1 and 2 o Content material Discussion #1: Based on the Case Study "“Burger King.” Case 18, starting on page 18-1, complete the following requirements: o In an at least 375 word response, identify and discuss separately at least two (2) of Burger King’s resources, (2) capabilities, and (2) core competencies (at least 125 word response for each section); include headings. o In an at least 375 word response identify and discuss separately: Three (3) finding of facts – This would include: strength; weakness, and threats (At least 125 word response for each finding section for a total of at least a 375 word response). Columbia College Online Campus Page |6 Please include headings and cite the textbook (case study and chapters) according to APA guidelines. Do not include outside sources. The response must be confined to the case. Students are required to include information from this week’s readings/chapters within the response (at least two references from each chapter) and cite including page numbers. This is not an option. For an example, please review the partial example at the end of this syllabus and on the Faculty Expectation document. If you do not include the readings to support and validate your responses, you will not earn all the possible points. Do not include “definitions.” All responses should be in complete sentences; no bullet or list and do not attach assignment or submit as a written paper. Comment/respond to at least two classmates’ and instructor’s postings by Sunday; at least 50 words. When responding to your peers, please include an open-ended question at the end of your response; one that requires more than a yes or no answer. Additionally, you are to read at least 75% of the postings. Be sure to include the persons' name on the subject line for which you are responding. o o o o Week 2– Social Responsibility and Ethics in Strategic Management; Environmental Scanning and Industry Analysis Readings: o Text: Read Chapters 3 and 4 o Content material Discussion #2: Based on the Case Study “Dell Inc.: Changing the Business Model" Case 32, starting on page 32-1,complete the following requirements(answer in complete sentences; no list or bullet points): o In a 50--word response, provide an “official” definition for “synopsis.” In addition to the definition, please include your thoughts in your own words. If you do not include, you will not earn all the possible points. Do not use Wikipedia, ehow, ezarticle, ect. as a source. If you obtain the definition from an online dictionary, you want to make sure the source is properly cited both in text and reference list. You do not cite the same way you cite the textbook. There are examples within the information posted on the discussion board on “APA to ensure you properly” Additionally, check the the Purdue Owl Site. Don’t forget to include headings. o In an at least 150--word response, write a synopsis about case study; include a heading (dates/years outlined in the case – here you want to focus on the highlights and main events). o In an at least 300--word response, identify/discuss Dell’s resources (2), capabilities (2), and core competencies (2). Each section must be at least 100 words in length and discussed separately; include headings and cite the textbook (readings/chapters and case study) according to APA guidelines. Do not include outside sources. The response must be confined to the case. o In a response of at least 300 words discuss One (1) finding of fact (Weakness) with at least two (2) fully justified recommendations (including headings). In your discussion, the following questions should be answered/addressed; what you recommend, why you recommended it (heading Recommendation), justification for the recommendation(s), rationale; simply, facts that led you to your recommendation(s) (heading Justification). The recommendations should be something the company “have not” already implemented or initiated. SIMPLY, DO NOT WRITE/STATE “Continue, expand, etc. because you are not including “new ideas.” o Students are required to include information from this week’s readings/chapters within the response (at least two references from each chapter) and cite including page Columbia College Online Campus o o o o Page |7 numbers. This is not an option. For an example, please review the partial example at the end of this syllabus and on the Faculty Expectation document. If you do not include the readings to support and validate your responses, you will not earn all the possible points. All responses should be in complete sentences; no bullet or list Post initial response to the discussion board by Thursday each week. Comment/respond to at least two classmates’ and instructor’s postings by Sunday; at least 50 words. When responding to your peers, please include an open ended question; one that requires more than a yes or no answer. Be sure to include the persons' name on the subject line for which you are responding. Week 3– Internal Scanning: Organizational Analysis; Situation Analysis and Business Strategy Readings: o Text: Read Chapters 5 and 6 o Content material Case Study #1. Due to the dropbox by end of week 3. The case study: “Panera Bread Company (2010): Still Rising Fortunes” Case 16 starting on page 16-1, will include a synopsis (brief timeline of major events; include year/dates); identification of their resources at least (2), capabilities (2), and core competencies (2); and three findings of fact (be sure to include headings, strength, weakness, threat). o Each finding of fact will require a recommendation and justification for the solution/recommendation; each a minimum of one page. The solutions should be something new; added valued, etc. DO NOT INCLUDE or write, expand, continue, etc. You are to include or discuss something new. Be sure to cite the readings from chapters 1-6 (at least two per chapter) within the study and include headings. o Support your recommended solutions with rational thought learned from the course material, other courses, and real-life experiences. Do not include definitions. o The paper will be double-spaced, include a cover page, running header, a major heading, subheadings within the paper, and at least 7 pages and will not exceed 10 pages in length. The assignment will be placed in the D2L Dropbox. Note: The cover and reference page do not count toward the page length requirement. o Do not include outside sources. The response must be confined to the case. The case study must be double-spaced, include a running header and cover page and subheading within the paper. An abstract is not required. Note: Academically, 75% of the submission should be written in your own words. If the Turnitin score is more than 30%, typically this implies less than 70-75% of the submission is written in your own words. If the “Turnitin” score is more than 30%, you will earn a zero for the assignment and will not be afforded an opportunity to resubmit. Please review the video link I provided on the Faculty Expectation document, if you are not familiar with “running headers” Week 4 - Corporate Strategy; Functional Strategy and Strategic Choice Readings: o Text: Read Chapters 7 and 8 o Content material Discussion #3: Based on the Case Study" Best Buy Co., Inc.: Sustainable Customer Centricity Model?", Case 22, starting on page 22-1, complete the following requirements(answer in complete sentences): o In a 300--word response, identify/discuss at least two (2) of Best Buy’s resources, at least two (2) capabilities, and least two (2) core competencies (100 words each); include headings. Columbia College Online Campus o o o Page |8 In an at least 300 word response, discuss two (2) findings of fact; one (1) weakness, one (1) threat (150 words each); include headings and citations. Discuss in detail two (2) recommendations for each of the findings; for a total of four (4) recommendations. Additionally, provide full justification for your recommendations and headings within at least 200 words. Discuss in detail two (2) ways you would implement the recommendations; including headings, within at least 200 words. The recommendations should be something that the company “have not” already implemented or initiated. Simply DO NOT STATE/WRITE, “Continue, expand, etc. because you are not including “new ideas.” o Students are required to include information from this week’s readings/chapters within the response (at least three references from each chapter) and cite including page numbers. This is not an option. For an example, please review the partial example at the end of this syllabus and on the Faculty Expectation document. If you do not include the readings to support and validate your responses, you will not earn all the possible points. o Do not include outside sources. The response must be confined to the case. o All responses should be in complete sentences; no bullet or list o Post initial response to the discussion board by Thursday each week. o Comment/respond to at least two classmates’ and instructor’s postings by Sunday; at least 50 words. When responding to your peers, please include an open ended question; one that requires more than a yes or no answer. o Be sure to include the persons' name on the subject line for which you are responding. Week 5– Organizing for Action; Staffing and Directing Readings: o Text: Read Chapters 9 and 10 o Content material Case Study #2. Due to Dropbox by end of Week 5. The case study: “Groupon Inc.: Daily Deal or Lasting Success?” Case 11, starting on page 11-1, Students will include a synopsis; identification of their resources (2), capabilities (2), and core competencies(2); and three findings of fact (strength, weakness, opportunities). o Each finding of fact will require a justified solution, each a minimum of one page. DO NOT INCLUDE OR WRITE, expand, continue, etc. Be sure to cite the readings from chapters 1-10 within the study (at least one from each chapter) and include headings. o Support your recommended solutions with rational thought learned from the course material, other courses, and real-life experiences. o The paper will be double-spaced, at least 7 pages and will not exceed 10 pages in length. The cover and reference page do not count toward the page length requirements. o Do not include outside sources. The response must be confined to the case. o The assignment will be placed in the D2L Dropbox. The case study must be double-spaced, include a running header and cover page. An abstract is not required. The case study must be double-spaced, include a running header and cover page and subheading within the paper. Note: Academically, 75% of the submission should be written in your own words. If the Turnitin score is more than 30%, typically this implies less than 70-75% of the submission is written in your own words. If the “Turnitin” score is more than 30%, you will earn a zero for the assignment and will not be afforded an opportunity to resubmit. Please review the video link I provided on the Faculty Expectation document if you are not familiar with “running headers”. Instructor will randomly assign students to their Strategic Audit project group and will open a chat room for each team to communicate. Columbia College Online Campus Page |9 The teams will need to meet often before the submission of the assignment during Week 7. This will take coordination for all teammates since schedules may be difficult to accommodate. This week each team will decide who will be the “project manager” and develop a timeline for completion. This must be completed by 11:59 p.m. Sunday. If a team member does not fully participate this week, 20% will be deducted from his or her grade for the team project. If the time line is not complete by Sunday 10% is deducted from the teams’ final grade. Week 6– Evaluation and Control; The Team Developed Strategic Audit Assignment Readings: o Text: Chapters 11 and 12 o Content material o Students will continue meeting with teammates for the team strategic audit assignment Team meetings: Students will be meeting with their teammates to start the team strategic audit assignment. The team will need to “meet” numerous times before the submission of the assignment during Week 7. This will take coordination for all teammates since schedules may be difficult to accommodate. Note: All members must participate each week. If a team member does not participate each week, he or she will not earn 5 points for any of the sections on the peer evaluation form. Team Developed Strategic Audit/Plan: The groups/teams will develop strategic options for the case study chosen by the professor. They will use the strategic audit in the text as a guide (Figure 12-1, page 374, and Appendices 12.B and C, pages 380-390) to assist in the preparation. Students will include the same heading found in appendix 12.C. Please note: for the group project, the term Executive Summary is the same as the “Strategic Audit/Plan.” In addition to the Audit/Plan, the Teams will submit a Power Point presentation that addresses each of the following: • • • • Their Current Situation (1 power point slide) • • • • Analysis of Strategic Factors (1 power point slide) Strategic Managers (1 power point slide) External Environment (1-2 power point slides) Internal Environment (2-3 power point slides – including their resources, capabilities and competencies) Strategic Alternatives and Recommended Strategy (2-3 power point slides) Implementation (2-3 power point slides) Evaluation and Control (1-2 power point slides) One person in the team/group will submit the final executive summary/plan/analysis, discussing in detail, strategic alternatives and recommended strategy, the implementation phase of the recommended strategy, and the evaluation and control phase of the strategy, etc.. The executive summary/plan/analysis will be no less than 12 pages and no more than 16 pages. The cover/title page, table of content, abstract, and reference list/page does not count toward the required number of pages. Within the plan, the teams will cite the case in addition to at least one reference from each of the chapters/readings to validate and support the information and to illustrate the teams understanding of the various concepts and theories learned throughout the course (please do not include definition). Columbia College Online Campus P a g e | 10 The team will be evaluated (up to 200 points) for the Team Developed Strategic Audit/Plan. Each member of the team will be evaluated by his/her teammates (up to 50 points) based on their efforts in the development of the plan. The total points available for this portion of the course are 250. Peer Evaluation- The instructor will post the forms during week seven. The information that you provide is extremely important, especially if there is an issue with someone not fully participating. Students will evaluate their teammates based on: participation in team meetings, quality of preparation, skills in analysis, overall knowledge of company operations, ability to make decisions, caliber of contribution to the strategic project, and carried appropriate workload that is required for the assignment. If a member of the team does not fully participate throughout the course, students must take this in considered when completing the forms. Because schedules vary, please do not take in consideration chat sessions, but, online participation. The evaluation form should be submitted to the drop box. Students are to submit only one document and are not to evaluate themselves. 50 points will be deducted from a students’ final grade, if he/she does not submit a completed peer evaluation form by the due date. Note: The instructor has the discrepancy to modify individual grades based the evaluation and observations of the group discussions. All students are expected to read the discussion board during this time at least every other day and fully participate in the discussions; no exceptions. If a problem arises in which there is limited or no participation from a group member, please notify the instructor. If the instructor discovers that an individual has not fully participated, the instructor has the discretion to award that individual a lower grade. Course Evaluation: You will have the opportunity to evaluate the course near the end of the session. Course evaluations will open on Sunday of Week 5 and will remain open until Thursday of Week 7. A link will be sent to your CougarMail that will allow you to access the evaluation. Be assured that the evaluations are anonymous and that your instructor will not be able to see them until after final grades are submitted. Week 7– The Team Developed Strategic Audit and Submission Readings: o Text. Review textbook o Content material Team Developed Strategic Audit: Assignment due. Place the team assignment and the peer evaluations in the D2L Dropbox. Only one team member will submit the final Audit/Plan and Power Point Slides to the Dropbox. Week 8– Final Examination Readings: o Text: Review textbook o Content material Final Examination: The instructor will provide the final examination question relative to a Case Study assigned on Monday of Week 8. Final examinations must be submitted to the Dropbox by 11:59, CST, Saturday. No exceptions. Exams submitted at or after midnight are not accepted. Columbia College Online Campus P a g e | 11 Course Policies Student Conduct All Columbia College students, whether enrolled in a land-based or online course, are responsible for behaving in a manner consistent with Columbia College's Student Conduct Code and Acceptable Use Policy. Students violating these policies will be referred to the office of Student Affairs and/or the office of Academic Affairs for possible disciplinary action. The Student Code of Conduct and the Computer Use Policy for students can be found in the Columbia College Student Handbook. The Handbook is available online; you can also obtain a copy by calling the Student Affairs office (Campus Life) at 573-875-7400. The teacher maintains the right to manage a positive learning environment, and all students must adhere to the conventions of online etiquette. Plagiarism Your grade will be based in large part on the originality of your ideas and your written presentation of these ideas. Presenting the words, ideas, or expression of another in any form as your own is plagiarism. Students who fail to properly give credit for information contained in their written work (papers, journals, exams, etc.) are violating the intellectual property rights of the original author. For proper citation of the original authors, you should reference the appropriate publication manual for your degree program or course (APA, MLA, etc.). Violations are taken seriously in higher education and may result in a failing grade on the assignment, a grade of "F" for the course, or dismissal from the College. Collaboration conducted between students without prior permission from the instructor is considered plagiarism and will be treated as such. Spouses and roommates taking the same course should be particularly careful. All required papers may be submitted for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers may be included in the Turnitin.com reference database for the purpose of detecting plagiarism. This service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site. Before you post your initial response to the discussion board, you want to make sure you take the Plagiarism Quiz, even if you have taken it in another class. Non-Discrimination There will be no discrimination on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, sexual orientation, religion, ideology, political affiliation, veteran status, age, physical handicap, or marital status. Disability Services Students with documented disabilities who may need academic services for this course are required to register with the Coordinator for Disability Services at (573) 875-7626. Until the student has been cleared through the disability services office, accommodations do not have to be granted. If you are a student who has a documented disability, it is important for you to read the entire syllabus before enrolling in the course. The structure or the content of the course may make an accommodation not feasible. Online Participation You are expected to read the assigned texts and participate in the discussions and other course activities each week. Assignments should be posted by the due dates stated on the grading schedule in your syllabus. If an emergency arises that prevents you from participating in class, please let your instructor know as soon as possible. Attendance Policy Attendance for a week will be counted as having submitted a course assignment for which points have been earned during that week of the session or if the proctoring information has been submitted or the plagiarism quiz taken if there is no other assignment due that week. A class week is Columbia College Online Campus P a g e | 12 defined as the period of time between Monday and Sunday (except for Week 8, when the week and the course will end on Saturday at midnight). The course and system deadlines are all based on the Central Time Zone. Cougar E-mail All students are provided a CougarMail account when they enroll in classes at Columbia College. You are responsible for monitoring e-mail from that account for important messages from the College and from your instructor. You may forward your Cougar e-mail account to another account; however, the College cannot be held responsible for breaches in security or service interruptions with other e-mail providers. Students should use e-mail for private messages to the instructor and other students. The class discussions are for public messages so the class members can each see what others have to say about any given topic and respond. Late Assignment Policy An online class requires regular participation and a commitment to your instructor and your classmates to regularly engage in the reading, discussion and writing assignments. Although most of the online communication for this course is asynchronous, you must be able to commit to the schedule of work for the class for the next eight weeks. You must keep up with the schedule of reading and writing to successfully complete the class. There is no extra credit for the course. Late Assignment Policy for this course is as follows: Students will not earn points for late postings (initial responses). Late submissions for the two written case studies are not accepted. If you have difficulties submitting to the drop box, please forward via email to ensure you submit by the due date. Late submissions for the Team Strategic Audit/Plan: Loss of 25 points for each team member the first day and 50 points for each team member, the second day. The instructor will not accept a Strategic Audit/Plan that is three days late. Late submission for the peer evaluation forms: 50 point deduction from your final grade. Late submissions for the final exam: Final exams will not be accepted at or after midnight May 16, 2015 - No exceptions. Extensions are only granted for unforeseen circumstances, such as emergency hospitalization (for the student only), natural disaster and such, not because of business travel, not having access to a computer (it is the students’ responsibility to ensure access to a computer throughout the course), moving, time management, or forgetting the due dates. Course Evaluation You will have the opportunity to evaluate the course near the end of the session. Course evaluations will open on Sunday of Week 5 and will remain open until Thursday of Week 7. A link will be sent to your CougarMail that will allow you to access the evaluation. Be assured that the evaluations are anonymous and that your instructor will not be able to see them until after final grades are submitted. Additional Resources Orientation for New Students This course is offered online, using course management software provided by Desire2Learn and Columbia College. The Student Manual provides details about taking an online course at Columbia College. You may also want to visit the course demonstration to view a sample course before this one opens. Technical Support If you have problems accessing the course or posting your assignments, contact your instructor, the Columbia College Helpdesk, or the D2L Helpdesk for assistance. Contact information is also available within the online course environment. Columbia College Online Campus P a g e | 13 [email protected] [email protected] 800-231-2391 ex. 4357 877-325-7778 Online Tutoring Smarthinking is a free online tutoring service available to all Columbia College students. Smarthinking provides real-time online tutoring and homework help for Math, English, and Writing. The Writing Center can be used for writing assistance in any course. Smarthinking also provides access to live tutorials in writing and math, as well as a full range of study resources, including writing manuals, sample problems, and study skills manuals. You can access the service from wherever you have a connection to the Internet. I encourage you to take advantage of this free service provided by the college. Access Smarthinking through CougarTrack under Students->Academics->Academic Resources. Library Resources It may be helpful for you to become acquainted with Columbia College’s numerous library resources for any necessary research. Accessing the databases from your home computer is straightforward, but may require some practice if you are new to the process. Columbia College's library databases are available at: http://www.ccis.edu/offices/library/resources.asp (You may access them using your CougarTrack login and password when prompted.) Source Citations Please use APA format for all submitted assignments. It is important that you properly cite any sources that you use in your work. Work that is plagiarized violates Columbia Colleges Policy, which I will adhere to in this course, so please make sure you are familiar with that policy. Plagiarism will not be tolerated and the claim of ignorance is no excuse. Those found plagiarizing will receive an “F” for the course. For APA information and resources, please review the following links: Columbia College Library http://www.ccis.edu/departments/WritingCenter/writing.html Purdue Online Writing Lab http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/ UNC University Libraries http://www.lib.unc.edu/instruct/citations/apa/in_text.html Notice that, in the APA reference format, (example below) the author’s names are followed by the date of publication. American Psychological Association. (2013). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Asante, M. K. (2010). The book of African names. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press. Caucus. (n.d.). In Oxford English dictionary online. Retrieved from http://www.oed.com/ Cresswell, J. (2012). Tuttle dictionary of first names. Rutland, VT: Charles E. Tuttle. Exorbitant. (2012). In Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (12th ed.). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster. Columbia College Online Campus P a g e | 14 How to create a running header If you are having difficulties or uncertain how to create a running header for the assignments, please be sure to view this video. You might find it very helpful: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pbUoNa5tyY&feature=related Example: How to Answer the Questions Below is an example of how to respond to the discussion questions. You will note that I have included citations (both in-text citations and the reference list as required). Sample Response EXAMPLE: How to answer the discussion board questions in APA format. If you do not use this format, you will not earn all the points for your discussion postings. Note: For each posting, you are required to cite the case, in addition to the readings (textbook chapters). Subject line: Dr. Avant - Discussion #1 Resources Marvel has a number of resources both tangible and intangible (Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, & Bamford, 2014, p. ?). For Marvel their licensing segment is at the heart of their financial stability bringing in half of their annual sales year over year with 70% coming from sale generated in the U.S. (Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, & Bamford, 2012, p. 15-8). Through the use of their copyrights and patents, Marvel concentrated their efforts with companies that would provide a strong financial outlook. Marvel partnered relations with video and apparel companies to further solidify their brand name. According to Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, and Bamford (2014), “these resources can help them gain a competitive advantage” (p.?). Capabilities As with most organizations, many of Marvel’s capabilities are use to exploit its resources (Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, & Bamford, 2014, p. 15.6). For example, Marvel utilizes all available resources to strengthen and maintain the competitive advantage or regain their advantage. Established in 2008, the Global Media group mission is to capitalize on the digital possibilities and target the ever growing internet (Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, & Bamford, 2014, p. 15.6). One feature was to provide an online subscription to customers that would provide access to their favorite comics via the internet. Also provided are the newly introduced super heroes targeting a new and younger demographic in hopes of capturing an audience for a greater time period. Wheelen, T.L, Hunger, J.D., Hoffman, A.N, & Bamford, C.E. (2014). Strategic management and business policy: Globalization, innovation, and sustainability. (14 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. I include this abbreviated example to illustrate not only a substantive response for one section, but to also illustrate how to properly cite the textbook to ensure this would not be an issue for anyone in the class. Please note, both the case study (Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, & Bamford, 2014, p. 15.6) and information from the readings/chapters (Wheelen, Hunger, Hoffman, & Bamford, 2014, p. 183) have been cited. Subject line: Dr. Avant – Cheryl Hi Cheryl, I enjoyed reading your response. I had not thought about their strategic initiative as a capability. I look at this more as a core competency because………………………… However, in reading your response, I can see where you might include as one of their capabilities. You made some excellent points. That written, if Gap were not able to ……………………………., how successful do you believe they would have become? Note: The above is a partial response. Do not include definitions as your response, but you can use to support your response as illustrate in the example.