The Academisation of a Musical Tradition
Transcription
The Academisation of a Musical Tradition
Swedish folk music – the Academization of a tradition From kitchen to curriculum – acceptance and resistance > 1500 – pre-history, early forms History 1600-> 1800 – ”Golden age” 1900-1968 – preservation, conservatism, nationalism 1968-1980 – Youth Folk wave, left wing switch, ”back to the roots”/experimentation 1980-> Professionalisation, academisation, ”world music” Sample – Hoven droven, ”Turbo” Academisation & Professionalisation of Folk Music in Sweden Original setting – learning mainly by ear, informal learning environment, masterapprentice, very few professional fulltime folk musicians. Today – learning often in a more formal context (Music schools, courses, camps, high schools, Academies), many (semi-)professional musicians and pedagogues Adaption of Folk music to formal education – adaption of formal education to folk music? Almost all Swedish municipalities has a music/culture school. 1976 – first academical education of folk violinists to become music teachers in Sthlm. 1990-s: First ”real” program for Swedish folk music in Sthlm, 1993 Folk music teacher program in Malmö Now in 4 of 6 academies, 3 musician programs, 4 teacher programs. In Sthlm Swedish/other separate, in Malmö/Gbg together. Quite widely available in music schools nationwide, more or less. Several educations available at ”intermediate” level. Still a lot to wish for concerning the teaching about folk music in the public schools. What can a traditional, non-formal education gain by getting access to the formal educational structures? - wider reach outside the ”initiated” circle - resources - acceptance within cultural bureaucracy - access to jobs and funding only available to ”educated” musicians What risks are there with the academisation of traditional music? Does the differences in learning environment affect vital parameters in the music? Do academically trained musicians want to bring in influences in the music that destroy it’s original character and intrinsic values? (the ”mandola carpet” effect) How does the growth of a professional corps of traditional musicians affect the amateur music environment? Are there some things about traditional music that you cannot learn in a formal educational environment? Sweden today A high level of formal education within traditional music. Despite this a quite vital amateur environment as well, many young amateurs. But often in ”semi-formal” manner, through courses, camps etc. ”Oral family tradition” is a very weak source of traditional preservation today. ”Kitchen jamming”, informal social playing is quite limited. Still great connection between amateurs and pros, but slightly dwindling – pros want to play with pros. What’s the situation in your country? What could you learn and adapt from Sweden? What could Sweden learn and adapt from you?