Animal Welfare
Transcription
Animal Welfare
The Dutch meat shopper, animal welfare & Irish beef Margaret McCarthy, Bord Bia Background Power of animal welfare NGO’s in Holland Consumers – Hot topic, but limited interest Media (NGOs) - Hyped & negative reporting Trade - Animal welfare credentials are a key concern Politics - Party for the animals / Meat (dairy/fish/eggs) tax / Animal welfare meat levy Beter Leven (Dierenbescherming) Benchmark - By activists - Retailers BLQAS has not been accepted - castration - housing - de-horning © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 4 Campaign tactics / Result Retailers – name & shame / reward campaigns A list brands have committed to sourcing Beter Leven Chicken & Eggs – Unilever / Domino’s Pizza / Wagner’s Pizza • Consumer behaviour ? ‘Plofkip’ Case (intensively-fed chickens) How retailers have reacted to the Plofkip campaign 6 Research results: Dutch consumers & animal welfare Focus groups 1. Sustainability in general & animal welfare in particular 2. NGO’s & certifications 3. Welfare credentials of Irish beef Summary Low knowledge of farming Unbalanced animal welfare knowledge Two main concerns on animal welfare - Nutrition - Housing More concerned for pigs & poultry The Dutch feel they are ahead of the curve on animal welfare ....Summary of key findings Sustainability - Bucket concept - Low willingness-to-pay - Closer to animal welfare, impacts on eating quality Imported beef - Argentina, Ireland - Ireland: positive associations…green fields, outdoors, free range NGOs & their in-store presence - Low awareness Quantitative research Validation with online questionnaire 35-69 year-old shoppers (1300 respondents) Respondents segmented into - mainstream - light green - eco-green Proportion* of Dutch population Mainstream 14 Light Green 51 36 Eco Green Key concerns 1/4 not able to spontaneously list any animal welfare issues Top three concerns - housing - nutrition - freedom to roam Spontaneously, castration has low awareness 11 Awareness on concerns about animal welfare issues with farm animals (spontaneous) Housing / space / treatment 38 Free to roam outdoors on pastures 27 Nutrition (antibiotics / hormones) 22 Intensive production 20 Chicken industry 16 Animal protection / animal friendly / animal abuse / stress Main shoppers of 60-69 years are relatively more concerned about 'intensive production' (26%). 14 Natural diet 8 Transport Consumers living in the 'Randstad' are relatively more concerned about 'intensive production' (26%) and 'natural diet' (13%) and consumers f rom the Souhtern provincies have more concerns about 'f ree to roam outdoors on pastures' (34%). 6 Diseases 3 Coffin calves 2 Castration 1 Other aspects The main shoppers on average mention 1.7 concerns on animal welf are. 10 Higher educated main shoppers are relatively more concerned about 'housing' (43%), 'nutrition' (32%) and 'intensive production' (25%). No answer 25 0 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 12 Aided: animal welfare issues Average Nutrition (antibiotics / hormones) 71 Housing / space 70 Free to roam outdoors on pastures 68 Transport 58 Natural diet 57 Intensive production 56 Castration 35 0 10 20 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 30 40 50 60 The older consumers (60-69 years) are more concerned about all topics. Main shoppers f rom the 'Randstad' are relatively more concerned about 'transport' (67%). 70 7.33 7.16 7.10 6.60 6.42 6.51 5.42 80 13 Animals vulnerable in terms of poor animal welfare Consumers (main shoppers) 35-69 years (averages on a 1 to 10 scale, n=1293) (question 9) The higher the score, the more vulnerable the animal is according to the consumers. Broiler chicken 7.77 Laying hens 7.56 Pigs 7.13 Veal 7.08 Lamb 6.70 Cattle 6.61 Goats 6.16 Horses 5.99 0 1 2 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 Beef & Ireland Beef & the Dutch consumer Ireland - 3rd most recognised beef producing country, but ranked 2nd for animal welfare & clear / positive associations Solid preference for Irish system versus continental Price key motivator Animal welfare - low spontaneous ranking Spontaneous awareness of beef producing countries (Top-of-Mind) Consumers (main shoppers) 35-69 years (in %, n=1293) (question 3) The Netherlands 67 Argentina 13 Ireland 10 England 2 France 1 Scotland 1 Germany 1 Spain 1 Brazil 1 USA 1 Belgium 0 Poland 0 Turkey 0 Other country 0 No country mentioned Main shoppers living in the Western provinces of the Netherlands, spontaneously mention Ireland more of ten as f irst beef producing county that comes into mind (14%). Mainsteam, Light Green and Eco Green consumers do not signif icantly dif fer in their f irst mentioned beef producing country. 4 0 10 20 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 30 40 50 60 70 17 Countries scores on animal welfare conditions in their beef production 8 7 6.67 6.54 6.41 6.37 6.02 5.72 6 5.69 5.22 5 4.94 4.75 4 3 2 1 0 The Netherlands Ireland Germany Austria © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 France USA Argentina Brazil Uruguay Poland 18 Aspects to consider when buying beef (spontaneously) Price Best before date Colour of the meat Fat content Country of Origin General appearance Weight Freshness Type of beef / part of the animal Organic Quality Appearance of the package Method of preparation Quality Mark / 100% beef Animal Welfare Information Promotion offer Package size If the retailer logo is on the package Smell Environmental sustainability assurance Other aspects No answer 55 32 31 30 17 16 On average, consumers spontaneously think of 2.8 aspects when buying beef . 14 13 13 12 12 Main shoppers in the age of 35-49 years, relatively more of ten mention 'price' (60%) en less of ten mention 'f at content'(26%) en 'f reshness' (9%). 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 Main shoppers in the age of 60-69 years, relatively more of ten mention 'f at content' (38%), 'country of origin' (21%) and 'f reshness' (20%). Higher educated main shoppers relatively more of ten mention 'price' (61%), 'organic' (18%), 'weight' (18%) and 'type of beef / part of the animal' (17%). These consumers on average also mention more aspects than lower educated consumers (3 vs. 2.5 aspects). 14 5 0 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 10 20 30 40 50 60 19 Aspects to consider when buying beef (spontaneously) 62 Price 49 43 14 Country of Origin 18 27 As can be expected, Mainstream consumers pay more attention to price than Green consumers. 5 Organic 14 35 About twice as many Eco Green consumers as Mainstream consumers seek f or country of origin when buying beef . Beef being organic is considered by about onethird of the Eco Green consumers. 2 Quality Mark / 100% beef 3 5 Eco Green consumers also seek more of ten f or a Quality Mark or Animal Welf are inf ormation. 1 Animal Welfare Information 2 7 0 10 20 30 40 Mainstream Light Green Eco Green © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 50 60 70 20 Importance of aspects when buying beef (aided) Average Best before date 8.59 92 Colour of the meat 88 Price 8.25 87 Promotion offer 8.10 80 Package size 7.74 63 6.74 Quality Mark 60 6.75 Fat content 60 6.80 Environmental sustainability assurance 49 Appearance of the package 6.25 44 5.90 Except for 'price' and 'promotion' main Country of Origin 44 Animal Welfare Information 42 If the retailer logo is on the package 21 0 20 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 40 shoppers of 60-69 years f ind all aspects more important than main shoppers of 35-49 years, especially 'quality mark', 'environmental sustainability assurance' and 'f at content'. 60 80 5.93 5.91 4.39 100 21 Spontaneous associations with beef farming in Ireland - Top 15 answers (A lot / enough) space 13 Outdoor life 10 Good/positive 9 Freedom 7 Meadow-land 5 Good quality 5 Free to roam 4 Green fields 4 Certain bred (e.g. Angus) 4 Good meat 4 Delicious 4 Green 3 Healthy 3 Nature 3 Good / better treatment 3 0 2 Eco Green consumers relatively more of ten mention 'good meat' (7%), 'good/better treatment' (6%) and 'nature' (5%). 4 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 6 8 10 12 14 16 22 Aided: Associations with beef farming in Ireland Average 58 Cattle outdoor reared for most of life free to roam over extensive areas Consumers of 60-69 years have stronger associations with all items in the top 5. Consumers f rom the western provinces have stronger associations with 'cattle outdoor reared' (54%), 'mixed concentrate diets' (21%) and castration (11%). Higher educated consumers have stronger associations with 'cattle outdoor reared' (64%), 'f ed with grass' (63%) and 'The Greenf ields brand' (53%). 56 Cattle fed with grass (their natural diet) 5.42 39 Calves with feeding of their mother for first 5-7 months 21 Intensive feeding 4.54 17 Cattle fed with mixed concentrate diets (not their natural diet) 6.26 5.76 47 The Greenfields brand 6.34 4.32 Kept in indoor houses for most of their life 11 3.74 Cattle indoor reared for most of life in small closed areas 11 3.60 8 Castration 0 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 BottomBox (score 1-4) is 57% 20 40 3.63 60 80 23 Irish versus Continental beef systems Total 86 Mainstream 4 82 Light Green 4 90 Eco Green 10 15 3 93 0% 10% 20% 30% System A 40% System B © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 7 3 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 4 100% Makes no difference * See the next slide for the description of both systems. 24 Dutch consumers & ethical labelling Low awareness & understanding Willingness-to-pay extra, low to moderate Awareness of logos / quality marks for sustainable food (spontaneous) EKO Ik kies bewust logo / best choice / best buy Biologisch Quality Mark Gezonde keuze (klavertje) Bio Beter Leven / Dierenbescherming Free-range meat Fair Trade Max Havelaar AH Puur & Eerlijk MSC Bio + Milieukeur Biologische landbouw UTZ Other logo / quality mark No logo / quality mark mentioned 12 9 6 6 6 6 5 More than half of the main shoppers (54%) is not able to spontaneously mention a logo or quality mark f or of sustainable f ood. The main shoppers that at least mention one logo, on average mention 1.7 logos. Main shoppers of 35-49 years relatively mention 'Ik kies bewust logo' more of ten (11%). Main shoppers of 60-69 years are spontaneously more aware of a (general) Quality Mark (8%). 4 4 3 2 2 Eco Green consumers mention EKO (18%), Beter Leven (11%), Quality Mark (10%) and 'Free range meat' (8%) more of ten. 1 1 0 0 Higher educated main shoppers are spontaneously more aware of EKO (16%), Fair Trade (6%) and Max Havelaar (4%). 13 54 0 10 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 20 30 40 50 60 26 Awareness of organizations concerned with protecting animal welfare (spontaneous) Dierenbescherming* 24 Stichting Wakker Dier 20 Partij voor de Dieren / Hart voor Dieren 17 Greenpeace Consumers of 35-49 years are more aware of Stichting Wakker Dier (24%), Greenpeace (19%), WNF (16%) and WSPA (5%). Consumers over 60 years relatively more of ten mention Partij voor de Dieren (21%). 15 WNF (World Wide Fund for Nature) 10 Lekker dier 5 WSPA 3 Stichting AAP 3 IFAW (International Fund for Animal Welfare) 3 EKO 3 Milieu Defensie Light Green consumers more of ten mention Dierenbescherming (28%). Eco Green consumers are relatively more aware of Milieu Def ensie (6%) and Stichting AAP (6%). 2 Fairtrade 2 Beter Leven 1 Stichting Varkens in Nood 1 Other logo / organisation 13 No logo / organisation mentioned * Also includes Dierenambulance, Dierenpolitie, Dierenwelzijn 41 0 5 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 27 Associations with sustainability in relation to beef Average High(er) retail selling price 50 Animal Welfare 49 Fair Trade 41 Environment 6.14 5.96 35 GMOs 5.10 23 Biodiversity 5.16 21 Organics 5.06 20 Carbon 4.88 18 Water Management 4.51 13 0 10 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 6.75 6.17 39 Local product 6.69 20 30 40 50 60 28 Steaks & price premiums? Factors that determine the good eating quality of a steak Average Taste 92 Tenderness 8.25 90 Colour of the steak 7.85 84 Fat cover / marbling 8.30 7.17 69 Meat comes from animals that led an outdoor/ active lifestyle 65 7.00 Shrinkage 64 7.02 Maturation Beef-bred (e.g. Angus, Hereford, Charolais) 6.36 54 0 © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 6.85 63 20 40 60 80 100 30 Willing to pay extra for steak with certain characteristics Produced under standards of Beter Leven 1* 56 Produced under standards of Beter Leven 2* 32 41 Produced under standards of Beter Leven 3* 33 34 0% Nothing © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 20 26 20% Up to 10% 40% 10-20% 10 11 23 60% 20-30% 51 12 80% 5 100% Over 30% 31 Willing to pay extra for steak with certain characteristics Premium Taste Guaranteed 43 28 US grain fed 71 Irish grass fed 51 Environmentally farmed 25 31 Organic Steak 31 41 0% Nothing 40% Up to 10% © GfK 2012 | Sustainability and animal welfare in relation to beef | October 2012 8 2 19 8 11 16 23 27 20% 19 19 60% 10-20% 80% 20-30% 6 2 11 4 10 4 100% Over 30% 32 Key messages for Irish Beef Irish beef - top of mind awareness & positive associations Limited awareness & understanding of Dutch animal welfare NGO logos Once explained, strong preference for beef from Irish production system Country of origin as a purchasing motivator is ranked significantly higher than animal welfare Next steps New promotional campaign focusing on animal welfare & environmental credentials - consumer & trade In-store communication of origin Ireland Media engagement Dutch NGO communication