- See
Transcription
- See
The First Pedestrian Street in Chisinau: Leveraging PPP opportunities for city historical centre revitalization Ghenadie Ivascenco, MA in Local Development Valeriu Chirilov, Arch October 14-15, 2010 Chisinau ViTo Conference 1 Chisinau – the urban symbol of Moldova Moldova = the most rural country of Europe Chisinau = capital of Moldova Chisinau = only large city of Moldova historical city centre – European façade of Chisinau 90% of Chisinau = typical Soviet city Historical city centre = the European ‘individuality’ of Chisinau Historical city centre = ‘slumming’ part of the city Mutilation by inertia of historical centre Poor city administration >10% of historical buildings already demolished [1990-2010] On-going ‘disfiguration’ of historical & cultural value of the city Private sector: potential revitalisation champion Forecasts > in near future Chisinau will remain with poor budget Business interests in historical centre: elite housing, officces & commerce Scale revitalisation require large developers ‘Open Mall’ = feasible offer of private sector for public demand Varlaam: the best alternative ‘Pedestrianisation’ of Varlaam = potential PPP Master Plan proviso Linkage function [business centre - trade centre & administrative centre] Central ‘Bazaar’ = municipal ownership awaiting modernization Varlaam: commercial urban memory Built as commercial street in 1817-1820 Market economy is bringing back the commercial functionality [from 80/20 – to 20/80] Un-guided SME based development = raising huge urban disfunctionalities Varlaam: present development trend Varlaam: present development trend Varlaam: present development trend Varlaam: present development trend Varlaam: present development trend Varlaam: present development trend Varlaam: present development trend Varlaam: present development trend Varlaam: Present Functionalities Varlaam: Residential function Varlaam: 11 BuildingMonuments of Architecture Varlaam: heritage is ‘supporting’ development 1-3 floors urban environment 11 buildings-monuments [of municipal significance] No inside-to-quarter heritage [development reserves] Varlaam: The city is still owning >50% of land Varlaam Buildings: Dominance of Public Ownership Varlaam: ownership over buildings Varlaam: coexistence of traffic and pedestrians Important parallel streets 6 perpendicular streets Territorial possibilities for underground (multi-level) parking areas Varlaam: % of Land Use Varlaam: Coefficient of Land Use Varlaam: Development Opportunties Varlaam: possibility for >25,000 m2 of new commercial spaces Central Bazaar: Possibilities for >200,000 m2 new commercial spaces Possibility for commercial parking areas [milti-level underground] Chisinau needs an adequate public square Chisinau > 30 public squares All public spaces = transport functions Great Opportunity: new European public square instead of evacuated central bus station SWOT: Creation of Pedestrian Street in Chisinau Strengths Weaknesses High ‘public demand’ Very limited municipal budget High proportion of municipal ownership over land in the area Lack of adequate Public-Private Partnership (PPP) experiences The pure commercial functionality of the street (housing almost missing) Poor and fragmented ownership in the area City leadership excessively focused on operational functions Supportive zoning regulation Possible co-habitation within the existing transport infrastructure General perception of city incapacity to promote development YOUR LOGO SWOT: Creation of Pedestrian Street in Chisinau Opportunities : Threats Economic recovery Long-term economic crisis Access for more EU funds National political instability 2011 municipal elections Hostile national legislation development Raising FDI attractiveness of Moldova & Chisinau Strategic business lobby Pedestrian Varlaam: VISION Creation of the pedestriancommercial zone in Chisinau historical city centre Integrated revitalisation of the area based on its historical identity PPP scheme (private investments) Varlaam> New European Image of Chisinau Varlaam: STRATEGY 7 7 7 7 7 7 Pedestrian Varlaam: STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES Settling Traffic problems Public infrastructure upgrading Architectural development Functional enrichment Strategic Objective 1: Settling Traffic Problems Transfer of Varlaam transport function to parallel streets MiniBus traffic on Eminescu str. continued to Alexandru cel Bun str. Parcalab str. closed for traffic on Varlaam crossing (from both sides) Crossing Eminescu and Alecsandri streets: closed on 20:00 – 07:00 & weekends Crossing Armeana & Tighina str: to be solved within the ‘central bazaar’ modernization context 8 new underground parkings Varlaam: Potential for new Parking Strategic Objective 2: Public Infrastructure Upgrading Underground engineering networks Decorative pavement Adequate public lighting Renovation of facades (public buildings) Street ‘furniture’ New greening Strategic Objective 3: Architectural Development Renovations Corrections Improvements Development Strategic Objective 4: Functional Enrichment Souvenir shops [transfer from Stefan cel Mare] New cafés/pubs/restaurants/fast foods/wine houses Brand shops Horizontal Objective 5: ‘Informational Development’ Creation of Personal Legends Creation of Area’s Myths ------------------------ [related to well known persons: Puskin, Brejnev, Sciusev, Kotovski, Antonescu] Varlaam: Implementation Logframe 1st stage: creation of Municipal JSC ‘Chisinau Pedestrian Centre’ [all land and build assets of Varlaam & ‘Central Bazaar’ 2nd stage: selling 51% to strategic business partner Implementation: City = public infrastructure & Private = commercial infrastructure Pedestrian Varlaam: INVESTMENT NEEDS Municipality: 9 € 400,000 [project initiation: JSC establishment, feasibility study, designing, marketing] 9 € 1,750,000 [pavement, greening, furniture, lighting, facades, etc.] Strategic business partner: 9 € 200 million [ + >35% co-finances from existing landlords] National Government: 9 € 1,5 million [new Bus Station + new land plot] Pedestrian Varlaam: Implementation Timeframe M 1-6: Initiation M 7-12: PPP Development M 12-36: Building of ‘pedestrianistion’ platform M 24-36: Pedestrian environment [segment Puskin – Alecsandri str.] M 24-50: Pedestrian environment [segment Alecsnadri – Tighina str.] M 50-62: Finalization upgrading ‘Central Bazaar’ territory M 62-90: 100% functionality of the street Progress in regional cooperation: Chisinau Municipality Initiator Stakeholders involved Strategic planning Chisinau City Hall Main development stakeholders (administrations, civil society, businesses, citizens) Municipal Strategic Committee (non-regular meetings) Economic development Chisinau City Hall Administrations Businesses Commuters Non-regular meetings Task Working Groups (for particular issues) Infrastructure development Surrounding towns/villages Administrations, communal enterprises, residents Infrastructure development projects Field of cooperation Framework for cooperation The results of regional cooperation Actions that supported that progress of your ViTo project: Cooperation within the process of the commercialization of agricultural products by suburban residents in Chisinau The results of those actions: The decision of Chisinau Municipality to restructure the organization of the ‘city agro-markets’ [incl. up-grading and change the function of city centre ‘bazar’ area]