Doctors Don’t Agree on How to Reform Medicare Payment
Transcription
Doctors Don’t Agree on How to Reform Medicare Payment
Doctors Don’t Agree on How to Reform Medicare Payment By Jane Anderson Elsevier Global Medical News Physicians are dissatisfied with the current Medicare reimbursement system and want reform, yet they disagree on what type of reform they would be willing to accept. “Most physicians believe that Medicare reimbursements are inequitable, and yet there is little consensus among them regarding major proposals to reform reimbursement,” Dr. Alex D. Federman and his colleagues from Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, said regarding their national survey of physicians’ opinions on reform. “Overall, physicians seem to be opposed to reforms that risk lowering their incomes. Thus, finding common ground among different specialties to reform physician reimbursement, reduce health care spending, and improve health care quality will be difficult,” the investigators noted. The investigators surveyed physicians between June and October 2009 – at the height of the congressional debate on health reform. Of 2,518 physicians who received a version of the survey addressing reimbursement reform, 1,222 (49%) responded. A total of 78% of respondents agreed that under Medicare some procedures are compensated too highly while others aren’t compensated enough to cover costs, according to the survey results. However, when asked about specific methods to reform Medicare payment, the physicians surveyed showed little agreement. More than two-thirds of physicians said they opposed bundled payments, with surgeons – who have the most experience with bundling – expressing the lowest levels of support for this strategy (Arch. Intern. Med. 2010;170:1735-42). “Because bundled payments are likely to be implemented in one form or another, this mechanism ought to be carefully explained to physicians to promote broad acceptance and smooth implementation,” Dr. Federman and colleagues wrote. Half of the responding physicians said they supported financial incentives to improve quality, and “support for incentives was more common and more consistent across all specialties compared with shifting and bundling payments,” the investigators wrote. “Actual experience with financial incentives to improve quality could have directly informed physicians’ generally more positive views of these types of reimbursement mechanisms.” Physicians disagreed on whether to shift some portion of payments from procedures to management and counseling, with those who conduct procedures saying they were against it and those who do more management and counseling coming out in favor of it, the study said. Still, about 17% of surgeons and 27% of physicians in other more procedurally-oriented specialties said they supported such a shift, “indicating that underpayment of management and counseling even in procedurally-oriented specialties is a concern for many physicians.” The investigators reported no relevant conflicts of interest. “Despite physician concerns about payment reform, failure to change payment systems may be worse for providers,” Michael E. Chernew, Ph.D., wrote in an accompanying commentary to Dr. Federman’s article. “If we retain the current fee-for-service system, there will likely be significant downward pressure on payment rates for all providers … hoping that payment reform (or fee cuts) will not materialize seems overly optimistic.” It’s likely that any payment reform will have significant effects on the basic business model of many physician practices, but providers can find ways to save costs within most of the reforms by Table of Contents Pg 1 Doctors Don’t Agree on How to Reform Medicare Payment Pg 2 High Sodium and Sugar Diet Predicts Vascular Dysfunction in Healthy Black Women Pg 3 Cognition Improves After Endarterectomy for Carotid Stenosis Pg 4 Postop Hyperglycemia Called the Primary Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection Pg 5 Rivaroxaban Scores High Marks for DVT in EINSTEIN Trial Pg 6 Daily Fondaparinux Cuts Risk of Complications, Death in Lower-Limb Superficial-Vein Thrombosis Pg 7 SVS News -Story Continues on Next PageSVS Vascular Specialist: Online Edition | December 22, 2010 | Vascularweb.org ® Copyright © 2010. Society for Vascular Surgery®. All rights reserved. Page 1 reducing redundant and unnecessary care, according to Dr. Chernew (Arch. Intern. Med. 2010;170:1742-4). “Payment reform will surely generate some provider backlash, and surely bundled payments will create tension between physicians and other types of providers, among different specialties, and between primary care and specialist physicians,” he wrote. “Moreover, the transition to new payment systems may not be easy, requiring considerable investment and organizational change.” But failing to act could lead to worse consequences for physicians, he wrote. Dr. Chernew is a professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School. He reported no relevant financial conflicts of interest. PERSPECTIVE When asked to comment on this article, Dr. Russell H. Samson stated: “This article encapsulates why the medical profession has been the voodoo doll for Washington. As long as we remain a house divided our legislators will stick it to us! Bringing us all together, however, may be an insurmountable task. We have specialties that historically have been reimbursed considerably more than others and this breeds jealousy and resentment. There is also the divide between the so-called "cognitive" and procedural specialties (as if surgeons don't think when they treat patients!). There is often disparity in income between academic, hospital employed and community practice doctors which also causes a lack of unity. And we increasingly have a divide in philosophy between newly minted doctors and those nearing retirement. “However, we now acknowledge that most of us realize that the system is broken and something needs to be done about it, but we either don't know how to change it or are too scared to change it for fear of losing what little we still have left. Vascular surgeons may be even more threatened because we are such a small specialty,” Dr. Samson added. “So, as the article suggests, our professions inertia can only lead to legislative action that will in all likelihood negatively affect our income and our patient's health. So what should we do in the interim as vascular surgeons? I think the answer is obvious become involved in our specialty society and donate to our PAC,” he concluded. Dr. Samson is a clinical associate professor of surgery at Florida State University Medical School and an associate medical editor of Vascular Specialist. High Sodium and Sugar Diet Predicts Vascular Dysfunction in Healthy Black Women By Doug Brunk Elsevier Global Medical News SAN DIEGO – Low adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet, including increased intake of dietary sodium and sweetened beverages, predicted vascular dysfunction and insulin resistance among a cohort of healthy black women, regardless of body weight. Although the reason for the association remains unclear, genetic susceptibility and lifestyle factors may play a role, Dr. Priscilla E. Pemu said in an interview during a poster session at the annual meeting of the Obesity Society. Endorsed by the National Institutes of Health, the principles of the DASH diet are based on a low-sodium eating plan rich in fruits and vegetables, along with low-fat or nonfat dairy products (www.dashdiet.org). “One of the main components of the DASH diet is intake of low-fat dairy products,” said Dr. Pemu, an internist at Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta. In the black population, “there tends to be avoidance of dairy products because of lactose intolerance. Offering people alternatives – things they can tolerate – would be important in this population.” Dr. Pemu and her associates enrolled 52 healthy, normotensive, lean and obese black women (aged 18-45 years) in an effort to determine the contribution of dietary factors to vascular dysfunction. The women completed the Willett Food Frequency Questionnaire, and blood was collected for measurement of endothelial progenitor cells, C-reactive protein, adiponectin, tumor necrosis factor–alpha, and insulin resistance by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), in which a level of 2.2 or greater was defined as insulin resistance. The researchers also used high-frequency ultrasound to measure flow-mediated dilatation and nitroglycerine-dependent dilatation. Study participants had less adherence to a DASH-type diet, compared with a reference population from the Nurses’ Health Study (Arch. Intern. Med. 2008;168:713-20), as evidenced by lower mean dietary intake of fruits per day (1.27 vs 1.4, respectively), as well as a significantly higher mean daily intake of sodium (2,360 mg vs. 2,070 mg) and number of daily servings of sweetened beverages (2.33 vs. 0.26). Lower DASH adherence scores among the study participants were associated with worse nitroglycerine-dependent dilatation, a correlation that was unaffected by age, blood pressure, or body -Story Continues on Next Page- SVS Vascular Specialist: Online Edition | December 22, 2010 | Vascularweb.org ® Copyright © 2010. Society for Vascular Surgery®. All rights reserved. Page 2 mass index, Dr. Pemu reported. Low DASH adherence scores, including higher intake of sodium and sugar-sweetened beverages, also predicted insulin resistance as measured by HOMA. Based on these findings, Dr. Pemu recommends that black women “increase the amount of fruits and vegetables that they consume, as well as nuts, legumes, and low-fat dairy products, because we are starting to see a relationship with vascular dysfunction even in the absence of cardiovascular disease.” Dr. Pemu, who is also director of clinical trials at the clinical research center at Morehouse, acknowledged certain limitations of the study, including its small sample size and the potential for error in the self-reported food frequency questionnaires. “However, our data compared favorably with a much larger data set in the Nurses’ Health Study, giving us confidence in the relationships we have identified.” The study was supported by grants from the National Center for Research Resources. Dr. Pemu said that she had no relevant financial disclosures. PERSPECTIVE When asked to comment on this article, Dr. Cynthia K. Shortell stated: “This work addresses an issue of ongoing concern among all health care providers, but to vascular surgeons in particular – the persistent disparity between African Americans and Caucasians with regard to cardiovascular health and healthcare delivery. In this study, Dr. Pemu presents preliminary data suggesting that non- or reduced adherence to a DASH-type diet adversely impacts vascular and endothelial health as measured by nitroglycerin-dependent dilatation. While the study tests a surrogate marker, rather than a clinical outcome, this is a wellestablished and validated marker, and thus lends credibility to the study. “The real question, of course, is how to impact this issue in a positive way, considering the barriers to improving dietary habits in this patient population. Not only must patients be educated and motivated to develop lasting dietary habits, the DASH-type diet may also be more costly to a group of patients who can least afford it. As vascular surgeons, it is incumbent upon us to help in this process by emphasizing to our patients and there families the importance of healthy habits in preventing the development and progressing of vascular disease. Dr. Shortell is professor of surgery and program director, vascular residency and Vice Chair of Faculty Affairs, Department of Surgery. She is also an associate medical editor for Vascular Specialist. Cognition Improves After Endarterectomy for Carotid Stenosis By Laird Harrison Elsevier Global Medical News SAN FRANCISCO – Cognitive function improved for most patients in the year after they underwent endarterectomy for carotid stenosis, according to the results of an ongoing prospective study. Benefits seem to come gradually from improved blood flow, said Dr. Zoher Ghogawala, a neurosurgeon at Yale University in New Haven, Conn., who reported on the study at the annual meeting of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons. “After 1 month, there was no change in any of the domains we measured,” he said. “However, if we followed these patients for a year, there was significant improvement.” The benefit of surgery also appeared to be most pronounced in those with a right-sided lesion or impairment in middle cerebral artery blood flow. Although carotid endarterectomy is a well-established technique to treat carotid stenosis as a means of preventing stroke, its effects on cognitive function are poorly understood, Dr. Ghogawala said. To learn more, he and his colleagues enrolled 36 patients from three sites. Overall, 61% had right-sided stenosis and 39% had left-sided stenosis; 54% were male, and 14% were symptomatic at presentation. To estimate the extent that these patients’ circulation was compromised, the researchers generated quantitative phasecontrast magnetic resonance angiography (qMRA) flow maps for their internal and middle cerebral arteries. This technology images blood flow in multiple phases of the cardiac cycle and then calculates volume, velocity, and direction. The researchers used this technique because conventional MR techniques usually do not show changes in blood flow. Using these data, they calculated the ratio of contralateral to ipsilateral flow rates. They found that 12 patients had middle cerebral artery (MCA) flow impairment (defined as at least 15% less flow than the contralateral side) and 18 had impairment of internal carotid artery flow. Lower blood flows were associated with a higher rate of stenosis. “It’s what you might expect,” said Dr. Ghogawala, who also is director of the Wallace Trials Center at Greenwich (Conn.) Hospital. Following surgery, new qMRA maps showed improved blood flow in these patients. Of the 12 patients who had preoperative impairment in MCA blood flow, 10 had improved flow after surgery. After a month, there were no significant improvements in cognitive functioning. But in 29 patients who completed follow-up -Story Continues on Next Page- SVS Vascular Specialist: Online Edition | December 22, 2010 | Vascularweb.org ® Copyright © 2010. Society for Vascular Surgery®. All rights reserved. Page 3 at 1 year, there was improvement in executive functioning (as measured by the Trail Making Test, Part B), verbal fluency (on the Controlled Oral Word Association FAS test), and memory (total recall score on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test). The changes were statistically significant (P less than .05). Scores improved on the Trail Making Test in all 9 patients with improvement in blood flow following surgery, compared with 8 of 20 patients with no improvement in blood flow. The presence of a right-sided lesion and impairment in middle cerebral artery blood flow were both significant, independent predictors of improved Trail Making Test scores. Dr. Ghogawala said that patients with those features may have benefited the most because their cognitive function had been most impaired by their constricted blood flow. “Further study is needed to understand the cerebral flow limitations associated with reversible dementia in some patients,” he concluded. Dr. Ghogawala disclosed that one of his coauthors received research support from VasSol Inc., the company that made the technology for producing the qMRA maps used in the study. Another coauthor owns shares in the company. “This is a very interesting study that may become more important as the debate between CAS and CEA continues, as well as further questions regarding intervention vs. medical management for asymptomatic patients. If these findings are reproducible on a larger scale, this might become an important testing modality for asymptomatic patients to determine who is most likely to benefit from intervention. If the technology proves successful, it would also be very interesting to see if there are differences between CAS and CEA with regard to improvement in cognitive function,” commented Dr. Linda Harris. Dr. Harris is an ACS Fellow and vice chair, faculty development, department of surgery, Millard Fillmore Gates Hospital-Kaleida, Buffalo, N.Y. PERSPECTIVE When asked to comment, Dr. Magruder C. Donaldson, chairman of surgery at Metrowest Medical Center in Framingham, MA, recalled anecdotal patients from his practice who claimed they felt “smarter” after carotid surgery. “Beyond anecdotes, this small study must be confirmed by independent peer reviewed, large and carefully controlled research using sophisticated means of correlating improved flow caused by vascular intervention with improved cognitive function. The effect of other variables such as comorbidity and adjustments in medication must be factored in, to say nothing of reassessing carotid territory flow at the time of late cognitive retesting. Such research may even make it clear why right carotids seem to make people smarter than left carotids,” he added. Dr. Donaldson is also an associate medical editor of Vascular Specialist. Postop Hyperglycemia Called the Primary Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection By Maryann Moon Elsevier Global Medical News Postoperative hyperglycemia, independent of the presence of diabetes, appears to be the single most important risk factor for surgical site infection in general and colorectal procedures, according to a report in the September issue of the Archives of Surgery. Hyperglycemia is a recognized risk for infection in cardiac and surgical intensive care units, and intensive insulin therapy is frequently used to prevent infection in those settings. This study found that serum glucose levels higher than 110 mg/dL also increased the rate of surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing general and colorectal surgery and that the risk of infection rose dramatically at even higher glucose levels, said Dr. Ashar Ata and associates at Albany (N.Y.) Medical Center. The investigators examined the relationship between hyperglycemia and SSI using information in the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. They assessed the records of 2,090 surgery patients aged 16 years and older who were treated at the medical center between 2006 and 2009. The rate of superficial, deep incisional, or organ space infection was 1.8% among patients with postoperative glucose levels of 110 mg/dL or less. That rate rose with increasing glucose levels to a high of 17.7% in patients with levels of 220 mg/dL or higher. Compared with patients whose first postoperative glucose level was 110 mg/dL or less, those whose first level was 111-140 mg/dL had 3.6 times the risk of developing SSI, and those whose first level was 220 mg/dL or higher had 12 times the risk. Analysis of the subgroup of patients without diabetes showed similar results: increasing postoperative glucose levels were significantly associated with increasing risk of SSI in a doseresponse fashion. Similarly, analysis of the subgroup of patients undergoing colorectal surgery showed that postoperative serum glucose levels of 140 mg/dL or higher were the only significant predictor of surgical site infection. The rate of infection was three times higher in patients with that level of hyperglycemia (21%) than in patients with serum glucose levels below 140 mg/dL (7%). Initial analysis showed that several other variables – including patient age, severity of illness, need for emergency surgery, need for transfusion, and operative time – also raised the risk of SSI. -Story Continues on Next Page- SVS Vascular Specialist: Online Edition | December 22, 2010 | Vascularweb.org ® Copyright © 2010. Society for Vascular Surgery®. All rights reserved. Page 4 However, after the data were adjusted to account for serum glucose levels, all those risk factors except for operative time ceased to be significant predictors of SSI. This suggests that the effect of these other risk factors may be exerted through the alteration of serum glucose levels, Dr. Ata and colleagues said. In contrast to the findings with general and colorectal surgery, postoperative serum glucose level showed no association with infection risk in vascular surgery. The reason for this discrepancy is not yet known, they said (Arch. Surg. 2010;145:858-64). For vascular surgery, the rates of SSI were relatively high across all categories of serum glucose level, from 13.2% in the lowest category to 20% in the highest category. After adjustment, the likelihood of SSI in vascular surgery patients increased by 6% for every 10 minutes increase in operative time. Patients with diabetes were 1.84 times more likely to develop SSI in vascular surgery than were nondiabetic patients. These results must be confirmed in larger, prospective, multicenter studies, the researchers noted. Meanwhile, “based on the results of this study, a revised protocol targeted at achieving glucose levels less than 140 mg/dL will be considered for a future prospective study.” If the findings are confirmed, it is possible that clinicians may be able to reduce the risk of postsurgical infection by managing perioperative hyperglycemia, they added. “This study supports the conclusion that postoperative hyperglycemia is not benign and dispels the notion that surgical site infections are beyond our control,” according to Dr. Joseph H. Frankhouse, whose invited critique accompanied Dr. Ata’s report (Arch. Surg. 2010;145:864). However, there are two problems with the study design, he pointed out. First, only 75% of patients had reliable data on postoperative glucose levels and in only half of those cases were those levels obtained within 12 hours of surgery. Much of the data was derived from routine lab tests done the day after surgery, so “there is quite a variance as to when glucose monitoring began, how it was performed, and when, or even if, attempts at glycemic control began,” he noted. Second, the failure to find any association between serum glucose levels and site infection after vascular surgery was “striking.” This patient group is the very one that presumably has the highest rates of diabetes. They also had a higher rate of surgical site infection than did patients undergoing general or colorectal surgery. So a lack of association “leads one to wonder whether factors such as hemoglobin A1c level, nutrition, tobacco use, obesity, operative time, and tissue perfusion/oxygenation may be more powerful factors in the equation,” Dr. Frankhouse said. Dr. Frankhouse is with Legacy Health System, Portland, Oregon. He reported no financial disclosures. Rivaroxaban Scores High Marks for DVT in EINSTEIN Trial By Bruce Jancin Elsevier Global Medical News STOCKHOLM — Fixed-dose rivaroxaban is at least as effective as current standard treatment for acute deep vein thrombosis—and far simpler to use, according to the large phase III EINSTEINDVT trial presented in a hotline session at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology. “Results from EINSTEIN-DVT could transform the way physicians treat deep vein thrombosis,” Dr. Harry R. Büller predicted in presenting the data. Congress program chair Dr. Fausto J. Pinto of Lisbon University agreed. Indeed, in a wrap-up session at the close of the conference he singled out EINSTEIN-DVT as one of the meeting’s several top highlights, citing the trial’s likely practicechanging impact for the treatment of a problem that affects 2-3 per 1,000 adults per year in the Western world. EINSTEIN-DVT was an open-label study involving 3,449 patients at 253 centers in 32 countries. All had acute symptomatic DVT but no pulmonary embolism. Participants were randomized to oral rivaroxaban, an investigational direct inhibitor of factor Xa, at 15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg once daily, or to current standard therapy consisting of subcutaneous enoxaparin, typically for about 7 days, followed by warfarin or another vitamin K antagonist at a target international normalization ratio (INR) of 2-3. Treatment duration could be 3, 6, or 12 months at the physician’s discretion. EINSTEIN-DVT was designed to show whether rivaroxaban is noninferior to standard therapy, which is known to be highly effective, reducing the recurrent venous thromboembolism rate by about 90% compared to no treatment. But standard therapy is also quite cumbersome because of warfarin’s well-known shortcomings, explained Dr. Büller, chairman of vascular medicine at the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam. Recurrent venous thromboembolism, the primary study end point, occurred in 2.1% of the rivaroxaban group, compared with 3.0% of those on standard therapy. The resultant 32% relative risk reduction was so robust that it not only established rivaroxaban’s noninferiority, it came within a hair’s breadth of demonstrating statistically significant superiority for the singledrug regimen, he continued. The primary safety end point in EINSTEIN-DVT was the combined rate of major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. This adverse outcome occurred in 8.1% of both groups. -Story Continues on Next Page- SVS Vascular Specialist: Online Edition | December 22, 2010 | Vascularweb.org ® Copyright © 2010. Society for Vascular Surgery®. All rights reserved. Page 5 For the prespecified secondary combined end point of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding, the rates were 2.9% in the rivaroxaban arm compared with 4.2% with standard therapy, for a highly significant 33% reduction in risk. The rivaroxaban regimen was equally safe and effective regardless of patient age, gender, body mass index, creatinine clearance, or the presence of cancer. Monthly monitoring of liver function tests showed no evidence of hepatotoxicity with the drug. In the standard therapy arm, once patients were off lowmolecular-weight heparin and on warfarin they were within the target INR 58% of the time. American physicians often initially hospitalize patients with DVT for 5-7 days or more of therapy with unfractionated heparin. Asked to comment on this strategy, Dr. Büller was blunt: “It’s time to change.” “I visit the United States often, and I am absolutely surprised that so many physicians there hospitalize their DVT patients for unfractionated heparin. In many other parts of the world, 80%90% of these patients are treated out of hospital with lowmolecular-weight heparin followed by a vitamin K antagonist,” he said. Discussant Dr. Harald Darius, noting that the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran is widely expected to be the first of the new antithrombins to receive marketing approval for treatment of acute DVT, observed that rivaroxaban’s performance in EINSTEIN-DVT appeared to be roughly comparable to that of dabigatran in the RE-COVER trial (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:2342-52). Rivaroxaban had a 2.1% incidence of recurrent venous thromboembolism, while dabigatran at 150 mg twice daily for 6 months had a 2.4% rate. However, the use of dabigatran was preceded by at least 5 days of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin or intravenous unfractionated heparin, he noted. Dr. Darius declared, “I’m quite positive that we’re facing a new era of antithrombotic therapy in patients with DVT, but with some questions still to be resolved.” Chief among these questions in his view is the optimal treatment duration using rivaroxaban and the other new agents. Neither EINSTEIN-DVT nor RE-COVER was designed to provide an answer. “If you look at the guidelines, the treatment duration is extended with every new edition,” noted Dr. Darius of Vivantes Hospital, Berlin. Rivaroxaban is also under development for other potential indications, including stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome, treatment of acute pulmonary embolism, and prevention of venous thromboembolism in high-risk hospitalized, medically ill patients. Dr. Büller disclosed having received research grants and serving as a consultant to Bayer Schering Pharma, which sponsored the EINSTEIN-DVT trial. Dr. Darius declared no financial conflicts. Daily Fondaparinux Cuts Risk of Complications, Death in Lower-Limb Superficial-Vein Thrombosis By Kerri Wachter Elsevier Global Medical News Daily fondaparinux significantly reduced the relative risk of symptomatic thromboembolic complications or death by 85% – without increasing the incidence of bleeding – in a study of some 3,000 patients with acute symptomatic lower-limb superficial-vein thrombosis. “Fondaparinux also reduced the risk of symptomatic recurrence of superficial-vein thrombosis and, more important, its extension to the saphenofemoral junction – a finding that is clinically relevant because such extension is considered to increase the risk of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, thereby prompting escalation of therapy (for example, to full-dose anticoagulation or surgery),” Dr. Hervé Decousus and his coinvestigators reported in the New England Journal of Medicine The results may help fill in knowledge gaps about the appropriate treatment for superficial-vein thrombosis. Currently, therapeutic strategies range from no treatment to the use of antiinflammatory drugs, anticoagulant agents, or even surgery. Investigators in the study, known as the Comparison of Arixtra in Lower Limb Superficial Vein Thrombosis with Placebo (CALISTO) trial, compared the efficacy and safety of the specific factor Xa inhibitor fondaparinux with placebo in reducing symptomatic venous thromboembolic complications or death from any cause. The study comprised 3,002 patients with acute, isolated superficial-vein thrombosis of the legs (N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363:1222-32). Patients 18 years or older with acute, symptomatic lower-limb superficial-vein thrombosis at least 5-cm long were eligible for the study. They were excluded from the study if they met various specific criteria, such as a documented history of SVT within the past 3 months or DVT or PE within the past 6 months. Between March 2007 and May 2009, a total of 3,002 patients were enrolled and randomized to receive 2.5 mg subcutaneous fondaparinux per day or daily subcutaneous placebo for 45 days. Overall, 1,481 patients in the fondaparinux group and 1,467 in the placebo group completed the follow-up visit at day 75, wrote Dr. Decousus of the Centre Hôpitalier Universitaire Saint-Étienne in France, and his coinvestigators. Patients could choose whether to self-administer the injections, -Story Continues on Next Page- SVS Vascular Specialist: Online Edition | December 22, 2010 | Vascularweb.org ® Copyright © 2010. Society for Vascular Surgery®. All rights reserved. Page 6 were encouraged to use graduated compression stockings, and were allowed to take acetaminophen or topical NSAIDs as needed. Concomitant treatment with other thrombolytic, anticoagulant, or antiplatelet agents was prohibited. The primary efficacy outcome – the composite of death from any cause, symptomatic confirmed PE or DVT, or confirmed symptomatic extension to the saphenofemoral junction or symptomatic recurrence of superficial-vein thrombosis up to day 47 – occurred in a significantly greater percentage of those in the placebo group (5.9% vs. 0.9%; relative risk with fondaparinux, 0.15). Twenty patients would need to be treated to prevent one death, PE, DVT, extension to the saphenofemoral junction or symptomatic recurrence of superficial-vein thrombosis. In addition, the incidence of each component of the primary efficacy outcome was significantly reduced in the fondaparinux group, except for the incidence of death, which did not differ significantly. The risk of the composite of DVT or PE was significantly reduced by 85% with fondaparinux, compared with placebo (0.2% vs. 1.3% affected in each group, respectively). To prevent one DVT or PE, 88 patients would need to be treated. “This benefit was evident within the first days after treatment was initiated, supporting the adequacy of the prophylactic dose of 2.5 mg of fondaparinux and in accord with the substantial efficacy data already available with respect to a dose of 2.5 mg of fondaparinux in various clinical settings,” the investigators wrote. In addition, more patients in the placebo group underwent surgery for superficial-vein thrombosis than in the fondaparinux group (3.5% vs. 0.5% by day 77), including ligation of the saphenofemoral junction. Major bleeding had occurred in one patient in each group by day 47. The rates of clinically relevant nonmajor, minor, and total bleeding and arterial thromboembolic complications did not differ significantly between groups. The study was supported by GlaxoSmithKline, which markets Arixtra (fondaparinux). In addition, 8 of the 11 study authors reported significant financial relationships with several pharmaceutical companies, including GlaxoSmithKline. While overall efficacy and safety are crucial information for the approval and widespread use of a new drug, so is cost effectiveness, Dr. Lee Goldman and Dr. Jeffrey Ginsberg wrote in an accompanying commentary. In this study, the researchers determined that 88 patients would need to be treated with fondaparinux to prevent one nonfatal episode of deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;363:1278-80). “We found that in New York City, the price of a 45-day regimen of 2.5 mg of fondaparinux once daily ranged from $2,124 to $7,380 at four major pharmacies. Even at the lowest quoted price and considering the 98.3% estimated adherence rate, the cost of the treatment for 1,500 patients would be about $3.13 million,” they wrote. “On the basis of the incremental 1-year costs for the medical care of a patient with a pulmonary embolus or deep-vein thrombosis, an estimated $250,000 or so in medical care costs -Story Continues on Next Column- would be averted, resulting in a net cost of fondaparinux treatment of about $2.88 million, or about $1,900 per treated patient, without any lives saved.” However, no clinical trial phases currently assess this important information. Likewise, decisions regarding Medicare reimbursement in the United States do not “consider the cost or cost-effectiveness of the agent itself or of the strategy into which it is incorporated,” according to Dr. Goldman and Dr. Ginsberg. “We recommend that the Food and Drug Administration give serious thought to mandating phase 3.5 trials to document the costs, the effects on quality of life, and the cost-effectiveness of new interventions so as to reach a consensus regarding their worthiness. Until such data are available and consensus is reached, it would seem premature to recommend that fondaparinux be used routinely in the treatment of superficialvein thrombosis.” Dr. Goldman is the executive vice president for Health and Biomedical Sciences and dean of the Faculties of Health Sciences and Medicine at Columbia University in New York. Dr. Jeffrey Ginsberg is a professor of hematology and thromboembolism at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario. Both Dr. Goldman and Dr. Ginsberg reported that they have no relevant financial relationships. SVS News SVS’ Journal of Vascular Surgery Ranks 14 Among 166 Surgical Journals Highly respected among surgical journals, the Society for ® Vascular Surgery’s (SVS), official scientific publication, the ® Journal of Vascular Surgery (JVS), is ranked 14 among 166 surgical journals. This ranking is based upon JVS’s Impact Factor, calculated by Thomas Reuters and published in the ® Journal Citation Reports . The JVS’s most recent Impact Factor is 3.517. This means that on average, every article published by JVS is cited more than three times. “The increasing success of JVS is due in part to the dedication of Dr. Bruce Perler, our two associate editors, four assistant editors, and 41editorial board members,” said editor-inchief Anton N. Sidawy, MD. “These dedicated surgeons donate their time and are able to review most manuscripts within two weeks.” In 2010, the volunteers assessed nearly 1,600 manuscripts. Most submissions (40 percent) were either clinical papers or case reports, and 40 percent were submitted by surgeons from Europe, Japan, and the United Kingdom. JVS and corresponding supplements are mailed to nearly 6,000 subscribers including the SVS’ membership of nearly 3,350. JVS was first published in January 1984 by founding editors, Drs. Michael DeBakey and Emerick Szilagyi. Its coverage of clinical and basic science studies, and case reports has expanded to include new sections including Historical Vignettes, Education Corner, and Trans-Atlantic Debates. JVS is available on line at jvascsurg.org. SVS Vascular Specialist: Online Edition | December 22, 2010 | Vascularweb.org ® Copyright © 2010. Society for Vascular Surgery®. All rights reserved. Page 7 AVA Funds Empower Young Vascular Surgery Scientists The Call for Abstracts Deadline is Approaching for 2011 Vascular Annual Meeting The American Vascular Association® (AVA), the charitable foundation of the Society for Vascular Surgery®, has provided US$666,000 in 2010 Mentored Clinical Scientist Development (K08) and Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development (K23) awards to young vascular surgery scientists. The Society for Vascular Surgery® Vascular Annual Meeting® to be held in Chicago, June 16-18, 2011 is accepting abstracts and surgical videos. Submissions will be accepted through 11:59 pm ET on Jan. 3, 2011. Complete information appears on VascularWeb.org®. AVA awards enable young scientists to participate in mentored opportunities to develop into independent investigators. Ultimately, the researchers can develop techniques that reduce the number of deaths and disabilities from vascular disease. “In contributing to the young researchers supported by the AVA, SVS members have demonstrated remarkable leadership and vision,” said Dr. Bruce Gewertz, Chairperson of the AVA Development Committee. “In cooperation with the NIH, we are insuring that the intellectual underpinnings of our discipline will be driven by vascular surgeons with real clinical expertise. Even a brief review of the substantial accomplishments of AVA funded investigators shows that our hopes have been realized.” To continue to advance vascular research, the AVA launched the fundraising campaign, Open the Pathway. The successful 2008 initiative secured five-year financial commitments from many individuals and vascular device companies. The campaign raised US$2.3 million in pledges payable over five years. Of the 224 pledges received from SVS members, the average donation was US$2,470. Despite the success of the campaign, the yearly pledge payments do not cover the cost of the awards. Annual gifts remain an important source of funding for AVA. As vested partners in the future of vascular surgery, the taxdeductible donations (where applicable) from SVS members to AVA will help ensure the continuation of leading-edge research. The names of 2010 AVA donors appear on VascularWeb.org. To make a 2010 donation to AVA: • access the secure portal on VascularWeb.org; • make a credit card payment through fax number 312334-2320; • mail a check to AVA, 35312 Eagle Way, Chicago, IL 60678-1353. For additional information, email the AVA at [email protected] or telephone 312-334-2300. The submission of abstracts will be accepted for four session types: • • • • Plenary Sessions on Thursday through Saturday Rapid Paced Paper Session on Friday and Saturday afternoon Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society (PVSS) Session on Wednesday afternoon Poster Session presentation on Friday afternoon Open and endovascular procedure surgical videos will be featured during each plenary session at the Vascular Annual Meeting. The categories for surgical videos are: • • • • • • • • • • • • • Aortic disease Cerebrovascular including great vessels Dialysis access Educational / training credentialing Peripheral arterial disease Practice management Renal / visceral disease Vascular laboratory and imaging Vascular medicine Vascular trauma: aortic, arterial, venous Venous disease Basic research (poster only) Other Abstracts and surgical videos must be submitted electronically via the official SVS submission site. Paper abstract submissions will not be accepted. The guidelines, policies, and instructions for submitting abstracts and surgical videos appear online. All authors are required to disclose any conflict of interest when submitting their abstract or surgical video. For the first time this year, abstracts describing basic science research or early translational research under the topic of basic research will be primarily evaluated for poster presentations. For questions about the call for abstracts and surgical videos, please contact: [email protected]. SVS Vascular Specialist: Online Edition | December 22, 2010 | Vascularweb.org ® Copyright © 2010. Society for Vascular Surgery®. All rights reserved. Page 8 Society for Vascular Surgery Launches New Vascular Quality Initiative ® The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) announced a new quality initiative to improve the care of patients with vascular disease. The Vascular Quality Initiative includes a registry and regional study groups to analyze the data collected from the registry. The initiative expands SVS’ focus on clinical outcomes and benchmarked reporting. SVS is partnering with M2S on this project which was originally established by the Vascular Study Group of New England. “The Vascular Quality Initiative enhances SVS’ mission to assist its members in understanding and improving patient outcomes by encouraging the collection, aggregation, and analysis of clinical data,” said Robert Zwolak, SVS president. “Through this partnership, SVS oversees the electronic registry and manages the Patient Safety Organization. This organization has oversight from a scientific advisory board comprised of SVS and regional group representatives, with Jack Conenwett, MD, DartmouthHitchcock Medical Center and former SVS president, serving as its medical director. M2S provides the web-based registry platform for data collection and analysis.” The partnership with M2S positions SVS as the leader in vascular outcomes tracking by providing a platform for its members to analyze outcomes, reinforce best practices, and share quality improvement efforts across regions. Currently the Vascular Quality Improvement Initiative has 30 centers across 11 states and Canada. In addition to the 20 institutions in the New England regional group, there are two new regional study groups in the Carolinas, led by Jeb Hallett, MD of Roper St. Francis, and in Texas, led by Mark Davies, MD at Methodist Hospital, Houston. Additional groups are forming in Florida, California, New Jersey, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. “We are excited to partner with SVS to provide the platform for the Vascular Quality Initiative. M2S has been committed to improving vascular patient outcomes for more than 10 years with our advanced imaging technology. We believe the Vascular Quality Initiative, combined with standardized pre-operative and post-operative imaging, will significantly improve patient care,” said Greg Lange, president and chief operating officer of M2S. The Vascular Quality Improvement Initiative utilizes MDS’s secure, web-based system, Clinical Data Pathways, for data entry and report generation. Through Clinical Data Pathways participants generate real-time benchmarked reports on seven vascular procedures for major outcomes and processes of care to allow for the continuous assessment of them compared to a blinded group of peers based on key performance measures. For more information contact [email protected] or telephone 603-2985509. Get Involved Today with Find the AAAnswers Professional football legend Joe Theismann has teamed up with Find the AAAnswers, an educational campaign designed to educate the public about Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) and encourage screening. In September 2010, Kmart Pharmacies became a partner of the campaign and began offering free screening in select pharmacies. With the help of Joe Theismann and Kmart Pharmacies Find the AAAnswers made national headlines in the Wall Street Journal blog, on “The Dr. Oz Show”, and on “Fox and Friends”. Media coverage reached more than 20 million viewers. Screening events at Kmart Pharmacies continue to reiterate the campaign’s message across the country. Events have taken place at 10 locations. Throughout flu season, AAA risk assessment is offered at Kmart Pharmacy Flu Clinics free of charge. Educational materials are at 900 stores nationwide. More than 800 people were screened between September 10, 2010 to October 31, 2010. During this timeframe 28 AAA were detected. “The partnership with Kmart Pharmacies has been very successful at raising awareness,” Dr. R. Clement Darling said. “The employees of Kmart Pharmacies are excited to take part in this initiative, and I think the pharmacy location is a perfect venue to reach at-risk individuals. Taking part in this initiative has been ® very rewarding.” The Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) is a campaign partner. There are several ways that SVS members may become involved in this effort. • • • • • • Volunteer onsite during local screening events. Doctors may meet with patients to answer questions related to vascular health. If you wish to volunteer at a local screening event, email [email protected]. 2011 screening event dates and locations have not been announced yet; check FindtheAAAnswers.org for the latest screening announcements. Sign up to be part of the DoctorFinder directory. The free directory is found at FindtheAAAnswers.org. It allows patients to search for physicians in their area who are familiar with AAA and its symptoms. Order free educational materials for offices or waiting rooms at FindtheAAAnswers.org/patienteducation. AAA risk assessment quiz Find the AAAnswers toolkit Learn more by visiting FindtheAAAnswers.org. SVS Vascular Specialist: Online Edition | December 22, 2010 | Vascularweb.org ® Copyright © 2010. Society for Vascular Surgery®. All rights reserved. Page 9