LFR fuel overview and perspectives
Transcription
LFR fuel overview and perspectives
IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 LFR fuel overview and perspectives Dario Manara, Rudy Konings, Philippe Raison European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for transuranium materials (ITU) P.O. Box 2340 76125 Karlsruhe Germany Generation IV overall overall mission IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 –Significant advances in: •Sustainability •Safety and reliability •Proliferation and physical protection •Economics –Competitive in various markets –Designed for different applications: Electricity, Hydrogen, Clean water, Heat Argentina Brazil US UK Switzerland Generation IV International Forum (GIF) Canada Euratom France S. Africa Korea Japan Criteria for fuel materials Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 • Low neutron capture cross section of nonnon-fissile elements + good irradiation behaviour • High fissile density • No chemical reaction with cladding or coolant • Favorable physical properties, especially thermal conductivity and melting point (together (together give the margin to melting) melting) • High mechanical stability (isotropic (isotropic expansion, stable against radiation) radiation) • High thermal stability (no (no phase transitions, no dissociation)) dissociation • Compatibility with reprocessing methods. NUCLEAR FUEL OPTIONS Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 • MOX • • • • Metal fuel Nitride fuel Carbide fuel INCLUDING INERT MATRIX fuel and minor actinide--containing fuel. actinide • Coated particle fuel for high temperature reactors • Molten salt fuel Oxide and “Advanced” Nuclear Fuels IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 OXIDES: MORE STABLE AT ROOM T; EASIER TO PREPARE OXIDES METALS, CARBIDES, NITRIDES: NITRIDES POSSIBLE OPTION AS GEN IV NUCLEAR FUEL THANKS TO: • HIGHER FUEL DENSITY U UO2 UC UN •HIGHER MARGIN-TO-MELTING INTEGRAL Melting point (K) 1388 3130 2780 3123 Density -3 (g cm ) 19.05 10.95 13.63 14.32 U-density -3 (g cm ) 19.05 9.6 12.97 13.53 50 ∫ λ (T )dT Top 40 Î/W m -1 K-1 CIM = Tmelt U 30 UN 20 UC 10 UO2 0 300 500 700 900 T/K 1100 1300 GIV - MATERIALS Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Fuel performance indicators Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 LFR SYSTEMS CONSIDERED IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 SSTAR ELSY MYRRHA Nitrides, metals MOX (30(30-35% PuO2) MOX, (nitrides) Schematic Diagram of The Laser Flash Measurements of Irradiated Fuels IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 Fiber Optic 1. Step: HF induction furnace is heating up the sample. Glove BOX Mirror With Field Stop Diaphragm Manipulators Water Cooled Vacuum Chamber Telescope 4. Step: the temperature wave reaches the back sample surface generating a temperature increase. 2. Step: laser shot is fired towards the sample front face. Support Plate HF-Power Supply Sample HF-Heater γ-Shielding Laser power monitor Pulsed Nd-YAG Laser (0.1-1.0 ms, 10J) Dichroic InGaAs PD Mirror u 3. Step: the temperature wave generated by the laser pulse is moving through the sample towards the back surface. Fiber Optic Motorized Filter Wheel System Si PD Logarithmic Amplifiers Personal Computer CW Nd-YAG Laser Beam Mixer Data processing according to the general integral of the heat transport equation DTmax Transient Recorder (14bit, 1MHz) 5. Step: the increasing temperature thermogram is measured by the highly sensitive fast pyrometer. Thermal conductivity of irradiated UO2 IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 Thermal diffusivity at 490K, m2 s-1 (x 10-6) 102 GWd/t LWR UO2 2.0 Fresh fuel 1.8 At end of life (no out-of pile auto-irradiation) 1.0 Degradation by in-pile burn-up degradation by out-of-pile auto-irradiation end of life (model prediction) 0.8 After storage 0.6 0.0 recovery by out-of-pile annealing Annealed at 590 K Annealed at 725 K 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Radial position (r/r0) The white circles along the radius indicate the spots for thermal diffusivity measurements by Laser flash. Predicted and measured thermal diffusivity. After annealing the diffusivity converges to the predicted values. OXIDE FUEL IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 Rather low thermal conductivity, high emissivity High vapour pressure. Non- stoichiometry. Well established U( U(Pu Pu)O )O2 UNCERTAIN UO2+x OBSCURE D.Manara et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 342 (2005), 148. After: C. Guéneau et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 304 (2002), 161. After: Kato et al., JNM 2008 Oxygen potential of (U,Pu)O2 IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 U4+ → U6+ Pu4+ U4+ → U3+ Pu4+ → Pu3+ The situation is even more complex in the presence of MA: NpO2, AmO2-x and CmO2-x have even higher oxygen potential. Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 Experimental data + CALPHAD UO2±x and PuO2-x IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Guéneau Guéneau et al. JNM 2011 High oxygen potential ⇒ O2 losses before melting Cf. well known systems like CeO2!!! THE EXPERIMENTALIST’S STRUGGLE FOR EQUILIBRIUM... N. Dupin In F. De Bruycker et al. JNM 2011 ⇒UO2 melts quasiquasicongruently under an inert atmosphere, PuO2 melts the closest to congruently under an oxidising atmosphere. The UU-Pu Pu--O system IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 At 3000 K Experimental data with HUGE uncertainty ≈ 350 K – O2 losses very important! FUNDAMENTAL FOR THE COMPREHENSION OF ININ-PILE NUCLEAR FUEL BEHAVIOUR!!! More research ongoing on chemical analysis of melted MOX samples: O, Pu distribution Similar research on (U, Th Th), ), (U, Am) MOX + minor actinide fuel F. De Bruycker et al. JNM 2011, C. Guéneau et al. JNM 2011 Fast Reactor (U,Pu (U,Pu)O )O2 fuel Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Source: Olander Mixed oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication methods Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Source: IAEA-Technical Report Series 415 NITRIDES IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 PN2 extremely high. Metal de-mixing under irradiation (NIMPHE2 experience) Quasi-metallic behaviour: low emissivity, high conductivity. Melting point: few experimental data, not always accurate. ? Melting point UN measured under at least 2.5 bar N2: at 1atm, decomposition around 3000 K. Melting behaviour: almost unknown. After: Tagawa, JNM 51 (1974), 78. Phase diagrams Nitrides Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Source: Massalski (U,Pu)N fuel IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 PuO2 UO2 Graphite Blending Compaction MO2(cr) + 2C(cr) → M(cr) + CO(g) M(cr M(cr)) + ½N2(g) → MN(cr MN(cr)) Carbothermic Reduction Milling Additives Pressing Sintering Grinding Fast Reactor (U, Pu)N fuel IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 • 4 at% burnup • 710 W/m • He- or Na- bonded • 85% TD (initial) • No restructuring at same linear heat as oxides (not true in NIMPHE 2) Porosity 40% Porosity 10% Source: Tanaka et al. Fast reactor metallic fuel IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 • Alpha Alpha--Uranium is not suited (swelling) • Stabilisation with Zr (cf. EBR II experience). • Lower smeared density (< 80% TD) and larger pellet pellet--cladding gap to accommodate swelling (about 30% volume increase). • NaNa-bonded Pseudo-binary U0.8Pu0.2-Zr U-15Pu15Pu-12Zr Source: Kittel et al. •2.4 at% burnup •460 W/m •Na Na--bonded Fast reactor fuels: overview Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 • Oxide fuel – Low thermal conductivity, high fuel temperature, restructuring, Pu redistribution. – Extensively studied. • Nitride fuel – Decomposition before melting; phase diagram poorly known. – Am vaporisation – 15N enrichment to avoid 14C production • Metal fuel – Pyrophoric, needs purified atmosphere – Low melting T; huge expansion – Am vaporisation Carbide fuel – Pyrophoric, needs purified atmosphere – Not compatible with aqueous reprocessing – Metastability • IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Fast reactor fuels: perspectives Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 • Oxide fuel – Rich experience. • Nitride fuel – Excellent CIM and fissile nuclide density. – Need to be better studied. – Optimize fabrication. • Metal fuel – Maximum fissile nuclide density and efficiency. • Carbide fuel – Fair experience – Oxidation issue – Difficult recycling: more suited for VHTR fuel. IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 THANKS: - EC FP7 EUROTRANS + FF-BRIDGE + SEARCH - Prof. L. LUZZI (POLITECNICO DI MILANO) - Dr. M. TARANTINO and N. FORGIONE (Università (Università di Pisa) THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION Mixed oxide (MOX) fuel fabrication methods IWINRH Pisa, April 2012 Politecnico di Milano, 19 dicembre 2007 • OCOM (Siemens) Optimised Comilling • COCA (COGEMA) Cogranulation Cadarache • MIMAS (BN, COGEMA) Micronised Master Blend • SBR (BNFL) Short Binderless Route