Exploring the frame of our lives
Transcription
Exploring the frame of our lives
Exploring the frame of our lives Evangelia Georgaki, Mary Kaldi, Evangelia Kyrmizaki Introduction The project “Videomuseums: recording traces of our subjective culture”,1 which was organised by the Directorate of Secondary Education of Eastern Attica from 2009 to 2012 in cooperation with “Karpos - Center of Education and Intercultural Communication”, created a school network in Eastern Attica. The project aimed to invite students from secondary schools via educational procedures to choose and record in short videos those “items” from their daily environment their place, their neighbourhood and their culture – which they believed should be preserved in the future, as if they were in a museum. The teachers who participated in the project were trained on photography and cinema and they collaborated with exterior artists - the filmmakers- who visited the schools many times helping in the creation of the school films. These videos that record a picture of the present through the eyes of students from each school constitute the exhibits of a “Videomuseum”. In the second and third year, schools from Frankfurt, Germany also participated in the project, because it became European. In this article, the most important aspects of the creative process are explored from the side of the teachers, who observe how the teams change as the collective work is created. Creating the team It is a challenge for each teacher to create a group of young people that will work together in unity from beginning to end, in order to reach a goal that they themselves have set. 64 Videomuseums – recording traces of our subjective culture Audiovisual Education for young people Videomuseums attracted not only students that had a personal interest in the camera and those who are attracted to all kinds of group work regardless of the subject, but also introvert students who found a way of expression, as well as overactive students who channelled their energy creatively. The teenagers brought their individuality and their own code of communication to the team. It was impressive to see how they changed in the course of time unfolding new possibilities and how new dynamics, dexterities and talents were revealed when the tide of creativity subsided. School, familial or social facts influenced their relations with each other and their close or loose relation to the collective work. While in the beginning of the group work they focused on their own feelings, they gradually identified with the team. After the end of each meeting, they all longed for the next time. Choosing the themes According to the planning, emphasis was placed on how the students would choose the themes of each school’s film, because from the beginning we set the aim to involve as many students as possible in this phase, so that the film would be more representative. After brainstorming, we discussed which “items” they believed should be preserved from their natural, man-made or social environment and expressed their own view of their personal and collective culture. Each member of the team proposed the possible themes to 3-4 of his friends, and then we had an unofficial voting at school, whose outcome determined the final subject of each film. In the course PART A: Videomuseums: the project & the partnership The group researches, plans, discusses. of time, of course, as the script was shaped, the children’s ideas became clearer, and in many cases emphasis was given to other points, since the initial idea also included other subthemes that came up on the way. The number of team members would decrease due to various reasons, so evidently the final team left its mark on the film. In the second year, we had to relate our film to an object, something that could be photographed, so that the team would focus on making a documentary rather than a fiction film. In the third year, the theme was chosen differently: we had to find a connection to a film of our German partners: its theme, a subtheme, a way of filming, a contradiction to it and so on. In general, our film had to express our view in relation to one of their themes. This cross-cultural connection led to many interesting new films. It is also clear that in many schools, which worked for the third year on the same project, students and teachers had found their own special way of working, their own code that could clearly be seen not only in the themes but also in the final films. The themes of the films varied from general, such as the old factory, the abandoned American Base, my city, or environmental, such as the lack of green, the burned forest, the protest against the rubbish damp in Keratea, to more personal, such as myself, my future. From concrete, like my room, my clothes, my computer, my music, my day, my routes, to abstract, like escape, freedom, and internal, like friendship and love. Pieces of a mosaic consisting of adolescent interests, often repeated from year to year, from school to school and from country to country. We travelled into teenagers’ rooms, classes, schoolyards, city squares, forests, parks, train stations, abandoned houses, we viewed demonstrations, occupations, in Greece in an era of crisis, in the past, in the present and in future… Phases of the creative process Each school followed certain common activities and techniques that brought the students closer as a team and prepared them for creating their film. Ideas that expand - brainstorming: Exploring the theme of the film with ideas by each one written down spontaneously on the same paper. X Free connotations: Games of automatic writing to release thoughts and sentiments of the team. X Audiovisual stimuli: Watching short films created by young people from Greece and abroad. X Role-playing, interrogation chair, improvisations: Theatrical exercises aiming to deepen the selected subject of the film. X Frozen images: The team members are asked to make an “image” with their bodies relevant to the theme: Activation of team - collectiveness - game - spontaneity. X Photographic exercises: We learn the types of shots and how to imprint a theme with a procession of photographs. Then we comment on the photographs. X Storyboards: We learn how to prepare the scenes on paper, how to choose the shooting angle of the camera realising what we actually want to show with each scene. These are small handmade traces of our future work: something like a handicraft of the shots and a forerunner of the film’s editing. X 65 In front of and behind the camera: All students take turns in front of and behind the camera as follows: X 1. Small interviews: Free expression of thoughts on a topic in front of the camera. 2. Presenting myself in 7 shots: Each student draws a storyboard presenting themselves with 4 close-ups, 2 intermediate and 1 general shots. 3. Shooting of small videos for each one: We shoot the previous shots, to which we add music, so that each one creates their own video. 4. Editing the photographs: We try to edit the 7 shots in different ways: with the pictures completely naked, with colour filters and transitions, with music and words in the presentation. Comments on the difference in each version. Scenario – final script: The theme, the film’s story, is finally written into a script that will guide us through shooting. X Shootings: The team meets in the actual space of shootings and experiences the process of filmmaking in real time conditions. It needs absolute collaboration of the team and foresight for all that will be needed. X Editing: This is the final manufacture of the film that places everything in its place: picture, sound and anything additive. What we outlined before is now materialised shot by shot in the succession of images. Incomplete thoughts and actions are completed into a final artistic product that will constitute our identity and our way of communication with the others, a bottle in the sea of Internet. X A photograph of James Dean –by Dennis Stock– provides motivation for creative commentary. The synthesis of collective work The selection of the theme, the synthesis of themes through convergence or exclusion led progressively to collective expression. Students found their own place in the team, sometimes in the front line, playing a leading part in the choice of a subject or “imposing” their own view, and sometimes backstage providing technical support or working for the realisation of the film. Dur- Photographic exercises 66 Videomuseums – recording traces of our subjective culture Audiovisual Education for young people PART A: Videomuseums: the project & the partnership Behind the camera ing the whole process, both teachers and filmmakers often thought that we wouldn’t finally reach a collective result, because of the lack of discipline, the seeming lack of interest and the easing off that the team showed in periods without action. The lack of time, mainly from the students of lyceum, was the biggest hindrance. It is very difficult to find common time at the weekends when students strive to fit in their extra tuition lessons, studying for foreign language certificates or for revision tests and the like. The interaction of teachers and filmmakers with the team was obvious and inevitable and their interventions catalytic. Themes that concerned us were chosen by our team and themes that were in our team’s mind stirred our own interest too. The natural conclusion of a practice that initially struck as chaotic was the production of collective work. The Looking for the perfect frame, video shooting, Acharnes, Athens 2010 magic word: Synthesis. Synthesis of ideas, opinions, themes. It was a collective creation from A to Z. The aspect of communication During the project, the filmmakers visited our schools and we realised in practice how working with them was precious. As an “exterior eye” they function as a link to the world of cinema since they engraft the secrets of their art in the teenagers’ minds. They help the team’s unity, perhaps because, as “enchanting strangers”, they give the students the impression that they are creating something outstanding, that also interests some distant others. The Festival “Talking Images”2 is an occasion for exchanging ideas and creations. The teenagers present their During the editing process 67 work in a common cultural venue, which helps them see their common points with their peers, measure their possibilities, compare the results and continue. The creation of blogs3 presenting a school team’s work with pictures, films, thoughts, scripts, photographs and comments constitutes a live diary but also a way of communicating this work to many others. Finally, uploading the films on blogs and facebook, on the website of Karpos,4 on the website of the Directorate of Secondary Education of Eastern Attica5 and on the European website of the Videomuseums project6 creates sustainability, so the work of each team is recognised and is not lost nor limited only in the final product. It is equally important to share the experience and to interact with each other perpetually. The films constitute an adolescent diary in action. A real Videomuseum. 7th Student Film and Photocomics Festival, “Talking Images”, Athens 5/2011 68 Videomuseums – recording traces of our subjective culture Audiovisual Education for young people PART A: Videomuseums: the project & the partnership The teacher’s bet Over these three years, we have progressively passed from discreet or absolute control of the technical means of children’s expression –camera, shots, editing–, when everything was supervised by the experts to the stage of absolute confidence in the children’s abilities. The students have progressively developed a sharp eye and a familiarity with the camera and they experimented with everything: shooting angles, shots, moving camera etc. How can you form without deforming, inspire without gaining the game for yourself but letting the children take the lead, and give the call guiding them to discover themselves? This is the bet of the teachers. To set the children’s creativity free, even if they do not know where it will lead – certain that it is worth travelling and that they will be glad with the result. They invest in the natural curiosity of the young, in the freshness of their glance, they cultivate the children’s artistic expression and their only reward is that their own view has also changed. It is much better than finding themselves in a school with bored to death adolescents. Deep down, mischief and delinquency are actually a need that was not expressed, a videomuseum that went lost. Through the Videomuseums project the children discovered a medium of self-expression and communication and brought their ideas forth. They saw the adults taking them seriously, they saw themselves on the screen and they experienced the joy and the game of spontaneous creation. They improved their place in the school team, they collaborated in multiple ways and they left their mark on the school’s “history”. Knowledge. Experiences. Creation. School enthusiasm. Nothing less or more than the students’ words at the end of the festival: “Shall we do it again next year?” Changes in our daily routine “We learnt how to make a film, about directing, about the camera and the scenes. We made the film in order to show our way of thinking. We managed to show what we are worth, to have fun and to come closer to other people. We showed our talents. We all had talent, but some of us did not know it. When we grow up, it will remind us of what we made, when we were young. I understood that the most important thing is to put our imagination to work. It needs a lot of work but it is worth the effort. I learnt that when we begin something we shouldn’t stop it. I met children that I did not know. Now we spend more time together. I learnt that even if they do not want you or if you do not have friends, you can find friends.” From the team which made the film Rendez-vous at the Wall It is very important for the students to project their identity into their school and listen to the comments of students and professors. After the film, we often observe many personal status changes of those who dared to expose their known or unknown side in front of a wider public. Many chil- dren who began timidly, in the end of the year continuously brought new material. Children with problems in verbal expression and low grades acquired a voice and a place not only in the team of Videomuseums, but also in the whole school community. Their smile bloomed, they found their voice and their self-confidence. They even forced some professors to see the unnoticed student, to acknowledge their ability, to observe something that until then remained expressionless and silent in the hostile atmosphere of a formal class. A characteristic example is Nikiforos who was distinguished with the film “Old Factory” and has continued his involvement in photography and cinema even as an adult. Along with the children, we also learnt how to make a film and how to take shots that captivate our eyes. We also changed and became better viewers and creators. We have discovered the power of pictures in a world that is continuously changing. We got acquainted with the children’s way of thinking by looking at the world through their eyes. Each film was a game and an adventure of intense action. The particular sociological importance of cinematographic art into the spectrum of literary-artistic modernism was that it familiarised wide masses with the programmatic and deliberate segmentation and reconstruction of daily experience - and in particular it taught them to like this. Panagiotis Kondylis7 Theatre, cinema and literature have a common narrative code. The technique of narration uses the same materials: the parameter of time, action, alternation and twist, in two different ways, verbal or optical. The familiarisation with the different language of cinema strengthens knowledge that already exists by acquiring hands-on experience in an endless game of feedback. The practice of actively observing a film sharpens the viewer’s look, the perception of sounds, pauses and alternations of pictures and it eventually changes our perspective of the world, ranging from the way we watch cinema to the way we conceive the “frame” of our lives. Notes 1. The “Youth Videomuseums partnership: recording traces of our subjective culture” has been organised since 2009 by the Directorate of Secondary Education of Eastern Attica in the context of Cultural and Environmental Programmes. For years 2010-2011 and 20112012 the project was also approved in the frames of a European REGIO Programme (2010-1-GR1-COM13-03741 1) that was organised by the Directorate of Secondary Education of Eastern Attica and the Regional Directorate of Secondary Education of Frankfurt (Staatliches Schulamt Frankfurt am Main – SSAFFM) in Germany. 2. The Festival “Talking Images” has been organised by the Directorate of Secondary Education of Eastern Attica since 2005 and is held each year in May. Students participate with photo-narrations and short films. Available on: http://dide-anatol.att.sch.gr/perival/ FAKELOS_FOTO/indexFOTO.htm [accessed 4-6-2012]. 3. There are two blogs of the 3rd Gymnasium of Acharnes: a. Videomuseums – 3rd Gymnasium of Acharnes, on the theme of graffiti. Available on: http://Videomuseums-graffiti.blogspot.com/ b. Σκηνοθετώντας τον εαυτό μας – παίζοντας με την εικόνα [Directing 69 Ourselves – Playing with Images], about the way teenagers dress and the students’ work (2010-2012). Available on: http://videomouseia20113gymacharnon.blogspot.com, [both accessed 4-6-2012]. 4. “Karpos” – Center of Education and Intercultural Communication is one of the Greek partners of the Youth Videomuseums partnership. Available on: www.Karposontheweb.gr. 5. The Project Videomuseums is presented on the website of the Directorate of Secondary Education of Eastern Attica. Available on: h t t p : / / d i d e - a n a t o l . a t t . s c h . g r / p e r i v a l / FA K E LO S _ F O TO / Videomuseums/indexVM.htm [accessed 4-6-2012]. 6. All films are presented on this website with English subtitles. Available on: http://Videomuseums.eu/ [accessed 4-6-2012]. 7. Kondylis, P. (1991). Η παρακμή του αστικού πολιτισμού [The decline of urban civilisation] (p.168). Athens: Themelio. Evangelia Georgaki holds a degree in English Literature and a degree in Greek Philology. She took her Master in Archaeology and has been a member of the Akrotiri Thera Excavations since 1989. She was appointed in Secondary Education in 1992. She was in charge of a School Library for 5 years and since 2011 she has been Principal of the 2nd Geraka Senior High School. She has extended experience in organising educational programmes: European, cultural, environmental, of Health and of Active Citizen. Mary Kaldi studied Pedagogy at the Department of Philosophy of the University of Ioannina. She studied the piano in the Hellenic Music School. She played the piano in Nicolas Assimo’s band “Enapomeinantes” (1983-1986). Since 1983, she has been working in Secondary Education and during recent years in the 3rd Gymnasium of Acharnes. She has worked with school theatre groups and has participated in international conferences, meetings and teacher training as member of Organising Committees. She was the Vice-President of the Hellenic Theatre/Drama and Education Network (2008 -2011), responsible for the Editions Committee, and member of the editing committee of the Education and Theatre journal. She films and edits audiovisual resources from TΕNet-Gr’s seminars and conferences. She has been involved in the projects “Literary laboratory” and Videomuseums (2009-2012). 70 Videomuseums – recording traces of our subjective culture Audiovisual Education for young people Evangelia Kyrmizaki studied English Language and Literature at the University of Athens. She has a Master’s Degree on Education with special emphasis on Counselling from the University of La Verne, California. She worked for her master’s thesis on how to teach Drama to children with special needs. She has been teaching in primary and secondary education schools since 1991. She has attended a course on EFL teaching through Drama at the University of Edinburgh, UK. She has organised a variety of cultural programmes and participated in the programme “Pame Cinema” (2000-2003), a pan-hellenic school filmmaking project. She has also participated in the Comenius-Regio programme “Videomuseums: recording traces of our personal culture” for the last two years (2010-2012) and she has been organising a Comenius programme for the 1st Lyceum of Glyka Nera since September 2011.