2014 Campus Facilities Master Plan

Transcription

2016
CAMPUS FACILITIES
MASTER PLAN
Kirtland Community College
Roscommon, Michigan
1
Contents
1.
Introduction
2.
Summary
A.
Background / Purpose of Master Plan Update
B.
Planning Goals, Guidelines, and Process
C.
Recommendations
3.
KCC History, Vision, Mission &
Guiding Principles
4.
Facility Assessment
A.
Site
B.
Administration Center
C.
Instructional Center
D.
Student Center
E.
Library
F.
Career Technology / Performing Arts
G.
Fine Arts / Physical Plant
H.
Kirtland House
I.
MTEC
5.
Facility Analysis
6.
Master Plan
7.
Cost Summaries
8.
Implementation Strategy
9.
Appendix
.
Facility Assessments
Contents
1
1.
Introduction
Kirtland Community College commissioned TowerPinkster to
develop an updated Campus Facilities Master Plan, last
developed in 2002. This plan is intended to guide the physical
development of the College in ways that respect the environment,
maximize existing assets, and reflect its mission and vision for the
future. It further reflects established priorities at KCC as it strives
toward excellence in educational opportunity for all.
We appreciate and acknowledge the assistance of the KCC
Administration, faculty, staff, and students for their contributions to
this update, including their time, interest, advice and constructive
thoughts. In particular, the leadership of President Thomas
Quinn, as well as the guidance and organization of the Master
Plan Task Force were most appreciated during the entire study
process. Members of the Master Plan Task Force:
Richard “Smoke” Bonk
Jason Broge
Julie Lavender
Kathy Marsh
Evelyn Schenk
Michelle Vyskocil
Instructor, Automotive
Chief Business & Finance Officer
Assoc. Dean of Health Sciences
Dean of Instruction
Director of Facilities
Dean of Students
TowerPinkster Team
Ron Masek, ASLA
Thomas R. Mathison, FAIA
Jim Ross
Tom Van Dam, PE
Don White, PE
Section 1
1
2.
SUMMARY
A.
Background / Purpose of
Campus Facilities Master Plan
In 2002, Kirtland Community College commissioned a master
plan to guide the future physical development of the College.
Since that time, a number of projects have been accomplished,
including:
.
New signs at entrances
.
Roadway and parking lot replacement
.
Expanded Warbler‘s Nest
.
Expanded bookstore
.
Boiler replacement
.
Roof replacement
.
Replacement of pedestrian bridge to INS
.
New, flexible learning labs
.
New facility in West Branch
In order to continue to look forward to meet the needs of students
and improve access to learning, the College commissioned the
development of an updated Campus Facilities Master Plan, begun
in 2011, and completed in 2012.
A primary purpose of this Plan is to recommend improvements
that meet the challenges of change in enrollment, academic
pedagogy, course offerings, physical location and aging facilities /
deferred maintenance – all aligned with the vision, mission, and
guiding principles of the College. Another purpose is to comply
with the requirements of the State of Michigan for a prioritized
five-year capital outlay plan. This Plan recommends specific
projects and budgets within the context of broad strategies for
overall campus improvement. It provides a framework for future
decision-making and a roadmap for academic and financial
management.
Section 2
1
2.
SUMMARY
(continued)
This update is intended to provide Kirtland Community College
with a more comprehensive roadmap for meeting facilities and
deferred maintenance issues over the next ten years. Just as
change has created the need for this master plan, future changes
will continue to make the planning process dynamic. While this
master plan makes recommendations to enhance an attractive,
serviceable physical environment that is responsive to the
changing needs of KCC, it is not rigid or static. To be an effective
consensus-building and decision-making tool, this master plan
should be seen as a flexible document, able to be periodically
evaluated and revised as new ideas emerge.
Section 2
2
2.
SUMMARY
(continued)
B.
Planning Goals, Guidelines and Process
The broad goal of this update is to provide Kirtland Community
College with a more comprehensive roadmap for meeting facilities
and deferred maintenance issues over the next ten years.
Based upon its historic role as the higher education leader in this
part of Michigan, the College wishes to maintain its commitment
to providing open access to education in a student-focused
environment, providing transfer and career technical programs,
development studies, workforce development, personal
enrichment and culture opportunities.
Specifically, there are several goals:
.
Identify sites for new construction or expansion of existing
facilities.
.
Develop a plan for future property acquisition / disposal.
.
Identify strategies to address traffic and parking
conditions, including pedestrian and vehicular traffic
patterns.
.
Recommend a plan to maximize the value of existing
assets.
.
Recommend a plan for responding to emerging and
changing physical needs related to academic offerings
and technology.
.
Maintain stewardship of the natural environment.
.
Identify priorities for recommended projects and budgets.
Section 2
3
2.
SUMMARY
(continued)
This Plan observes several guidelines for shaping future facilities
and environments:
.
KCC facilities, programs and services are focused on the
needs of students, creating the optimum environment for
learning and growth.
.
KCC is committed to making educational services
available and accessible to all, taking full advantage of
emerging technologies, partnerships and networks.
.
Environmental quality and barrier-free issues must be
considered in all facilities.
.
Facilities must be flexible and provide a variety of
learning environments toward the advancement of
lifelong learning.
.
KCC is committed to being responsive to the changing
needs of its component communities.
The process of developing this Plan included several major
component steps:
.
An assessment of the physical condition of existing
buildings and sites, including site, architectural,
mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems.
.
An assessment of current and future programming for
services, courses, programs, etc.
.
An analysis of needs based on the data from the
assessments of physical condition and programming.
.
Development of recommendations for new facilities,
expanded and/or renovated facilities, and deferred
maintenance. These recommendations include plan and
budget components.
Section 2
4
2.
SUMMARY
(continued)
.
Documentation and presentation of the final plan for KCC
approval.
Guided by the KCC Steering Committee, input was solicited
throughout the planning process from every corner of KCC,
including stakeholders inside and outside the College.
Section 2
5
2.
SUMMARY
(continued)
C.
Recommendations
Based upon assessments of sites and buildings, as well as an
analysis of gathered information and data, several
recommendations are presented in the following areas:
.
Site recommendations
.
.
.
Fine Arts Center
.
Physical Plant Building
.
Performing Arts Center
.
Career Technology Center
.
Student Center
.
Library
.
MTEC / Gaylord
Creation of a new New Health Science Education & Training
Center is the top priority project.
Section 2
6
3. HISTORY, MISSION, VISION &
VALUES
History
Kirtland Community College is a public, two-year community
college located in Roscommon County, Michigan. It was founded
in 1966, in accordance with provisions of Public Act 188 of the
Michigan Public Acts of 1955, and upon the vote of the electorate
from six local K-12 school districts (Crawford-AuSable, Fairview
Area, Gerrish-Higgins, Houghton Lake, Mio-AuSable, and West
Branch-Rose City). Classes began in 1968 with one-hundred
sixty students in five portable classrooms.
Kirtland is the largest Michigan community college district, by
geographic area, totaling 2,500 square miles and servicing five
major counties (Roscommon, Crawford, Ogemaw, Otsego, and
Oscoda). The combined population of these five major counties
as of the 2010 census is 93,000. The College is located close to
the geographic center of the College’s district and the area is very
rural. The College is surrounded by the following communities:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Grayling
Fairview
Frederic
Houghton Lake
Mio
Roscommon
Rose City
St. Helens
West Branch
(30 miles)
(40 miles)
(35 miles)
(30 miles)
(30 miles)
(11 miles)
(35 miles)
(8 miles)
(25 miles)
The Higher Learning Commission, a commission of the North
Central Association of Colleges and Schools granted Kirtland
Community College status as a candidate for accreditation in
1972, and the College has been accredited as an associate
degree-granting institution since 1975. Kirtland Community
College holds memberships in the Michigan Community College
Association and the American Association of Community
Colleges. The college is named after the Kirtland Warbler.
Section 3
1
3. HISTORY, MISSON, VISION &
VALUES
(continued)
Today, Kirtland Community College has an enrollment of over
1,900 students, with the main campus location near Roscommon
(approximately 225 acres and 250,000 SF of space), as well as
extension sites in West Branch and Gaylord (MTEC).
The College operates on a semester calendar, with a shorter
session offered during the summer months. The College offers
54 degrees and certificates, as well as eleven transfer degree
programs. The College also competes in intercollegiate athletics
as a member of the Eastern Conference of the Michigan
Community College Athletic Association. The Kirtland Firebirds
compete in men’s and women’s basketball, men’s and women’s
cross-country running, and men’s golf.
In 2000, authors Jon Thompson and Nancy Lemmen wrote a
more complete history of the College in their book, “A Setting for
Success – Kirtland Community College 1966-2000”, available at
the College.
Section 3
2
VALUES
(continued)
Mission
To provide innovative educational opportunities to enhance
student lives and build stronger communities.
Vision
Kirtland will be the first choice for learner-centered education
guiding students and communities toward success.
Values
Excellence: Expectation that all college activities are conducted with
attention to quality and the highest levels of academic and professional
standards.
Inclusiveness: Conducting the activities of the college in a manner that
inspires tolerance and welcomes diversity of people and thought.
Innovation: Addressing challenges and issues from multiple perspectives
to solve problems and advance college processes and knowledge.
Supporting progressive and meaningful research, creative activity and
teaching.
Reflection: Evaluating processes and assessing success through honest
conversation and the use of data.
Character: Steadfast adherence to the principles of integrity, honesty,
reliability, transparency and accountability.
Respect: Respect for the rights, differences and dignity of others and their
contribution to the overall success of the college
Section 3
3
VALUES
(continued)
Purposes
To accomplish the mission, Kirtland:
1. Provides occupational programs that educate learners for the
workforce of the future.
2. Provides transfer courses and programs that encourage learners
to continue education at other colleges and universities.
3. Offers non-credit community and cultural education that enhance
the lives of citizens.
4. Offers education to the incumbent workforce thereby supporting
community economic development.
5. Provides supportive services that mentor learners to become
successful while enrolled in courses.
6. Provides student activities that encourage the development of
community service and leadership skills.
7. Facilitates collaborations with other colleges and schools that
enhance the educational services in Kirtland’s service area
leading to a better educated citizenry.
8. Encourages innovation among employees and community
members for the benefit of Kirtland and its communities.
Section 3
4
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
An important initial step to understanding the existing sites and
buildings of Kirtland Community College is the assessment of
existing conditions. Utilizing a rigorous set of objective criteria, a
team assessed major components of each facility to understand
strengths and drawbacks, as well as to identify costs and priorities
for upgrades and improvements.
Following is a narrative summary of findings for each site and
building, followed by a scoring matrix showing comparison
summary scores for each building. The full assessments can be
found in the Appendix of this Plan.
A.
Site, including other campus locations
B.
C.
D.
Student Center
E.
Library
F.
Career Technology / Performing Arts Center
G.
Physical Plant / Fine Arts Center
H.
MTEC / Gaylord
Section 4
1
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
Site – Main Campus
The main campus site for Kirtland Community College is located
on approximately 60 acres at the corner of St. Helen Road (F-97)
and Sunset Drive in the northeast corner of Roscommon County.
This site was selected as being geographically central to the
service area of the College. The nearest community is St. Helen,
which is about 8 miles south of the campus. The land
surrounding the main campus is comprised of both agricultural
and wooded areas, with sparse population.
The main campus is located on a wooded hill and was originally
designed to integrate with the natural surroundings. The primary
entry drive is on the east side of campus, fronting St. Helen Road.
A formal drive leads to the Student Center and adjacent parking.
Another important entry is located along Sunset Drive, which
leads to the Administration Center and adjacent parking lots.
There is a secondary drive along St. Helen Road leading west to
Kirtland House and former student housing buildings. There is
another secondary drive along St. Helen Road leading east to the
athletic fields, firing range, and observatory building.
The southwest corner of the intersection of St. Helen Road and
Sunset Drive is the location of a natural wooded area that has
been designated as a wetland by the State of Michigan (see map
below). The western part of the main campus remains mostly
undeveloped as wooded area, wetlands, and a bog. A portion of
this area has been engineered to satisfy the wastewater needs of
the campus through broadcast and filtration techniques.
Recently, the college acquired a 20-acre parcel north of Sunset
Drive, near the north entry to the main campus. This land is
intended for possible future student housing or other use as
programs and needs develop.
Section 4
2
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
Parking lots and drives have been developed to form a ring road
around the campus, within which all major campus buildings are
found. Paved surfaces are plowed and salted in winter months.
The lots and drives are repaired and upgraded on a cyclical basis.
Over the past several years landscape plant beds have been
updated around building foundations and building entrances. The
new landscape beds are appropriate for the campus. The
College should continue to remove older overgrown plant material
from building perimeters and update with the same type of
landscape beds that have been installed. Avoid overuse of nonnatural appearing plant themes.
Past campus forestry practices have included keeping the
wooded areas natural by allowing ecological succession to take
place. Fallen trees or limbs remain on the ground allowing the
succession of decaying plants to continue to enhance the forest
floor. This practice of forest management could continue in
surrounding areas away from the central core campus area.
To enhance the main campus aesthetics and to improve campus
security, management of the wooded areas within the main
campus has begun. Management of wooded areas would include
removing fallen limbs and branches, removing dead plants, trees
and branches or poor health trees, and clearing understory brush
plant material. To avoid increased maintenance of lawn
establishment and leaf collecting, the wooded areas can maintain
a leaf cover with low natural groundcovers. Pedestrian pathways
through wooded areas can be a shredded bark mulch material for
added walking stability. To enhance open wooded areas, native
flowering trees, such as flowering dogwoods, amelanchiers, and
redbuds, can be added in plant areas, or areas requiring
screening.
In addition to continuing to create managed landscape beds
around buildings, plant beds should be developed in highly visible
areas, heavily used pedestrian areas and especially around the
campus main entrances. Main walks leading from the two large
Section 4
3
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
east parking lots to the center circle walk should have a
landscaped welcoming campus feel. Landscaped areas should
honor the surrounding naturalized forest area with minimum
decorative features. Some landscape improvements have been
made since 2012 at the Student Center, Career Tech Center,
Library, and Instructional & Administration Buildings. Selected
trees were removed from the central wooded area of campus to
create a park-like setting with Wi-Fi, historical landscaped beds
and added lighting.
From a transportation perspective, the College maintains good
transportation links via the Roscommon County Transit and
Crawford County Transit systems.
Section 4
4
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
Other Campus Locations
The location of the main campus near the geographic center of its
service area was originally judged to be the most fair and
equitable to all potential students and constituents of the College.
As higher education has become more market-driven, with
students having multiple options for pursuing classes, certificates,
and degrees, the College has reached out to its service
population and beyond to attract and retain students, staff, and
faculty. The development of satellite campus locations extends
the College’s reach and improves access and convenience for
students. For KCC, current campus locations in Gaylord (MTEC
– adjacent to Gaylord High School) and West Branch have
strategically addressed larger population centers in northern
Michigan, and the College has benefitted through enhanced
enrollment and awareness across the State.
During the course of this master plan, several additional locations
were mentioned as potential satellite campus locations, such as
Oscoda and Houghton Lake. Grayling was consistently
mentioned as a potential site for a satellite campus or as a
potential site for relocating the main campus to a more visible
location along the I-75 corridor, closer to larger population centers
and adjacent to major transportation arteries. The recent
acquisition of 160+ acres along I-75 at an existing I-75 exit ramp
and immediately south of an existing freeway rest area presents
an exciting, bold opportunity for the College to relocate key
programs to a conveniently accessible campus. The successful
development and implementation of this site, of course, depends
on significant and weighty factors, such as property development
and funding for capital improvements and operations, etc. This
opportunity is a strategic opportunity in support of KCC’s Mission
and Vision.
Section 4
5
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
The original Administration Center was built in 1980 and included
a total area 45,323 square feet on two levels. In 1999, an
addition of 11,955 square feet (on two levels) increased the total
square footage to 57,278 square feet. Today, the Administration
Center contains space for College administrative offices, student
services offices (admissions, financial aid, etc.), accounting
offices, Flex Lab and testing center, general classrooms,
developmental classrooms, and police academy spaces.
Because of its proximity to parking and because of its classroom
and student service function, this building is a primary gateway to
the rest of campus. As a result, parking lots fill quickly and there
appears to be insufficient parking capacity. At the lower level, on
the west side of the building, the parking lot allocated for the
police academy has a confusing configuration and should be
redesigned for smoother flow and better efficiency. This parking
lot was redesigned in 2013.
In general, the building exterior lacks adequate overhangs at
entry points, and there are few vestibules at entries. Although the
roofing was replaced between 2000 – 2005, it may be necessary
to reroof all or parts of the roof area before the conclusion of the
ten-year life of this master plan. This building, as in all the
existing buildings, contains some exterior cedar shake siding that
is deteriorating. Windows in the original building are energy
inefficient, as are existing hollow metal doors and frames at the
building’s exterior. Settled and cracked concrete exists at the
north entry and immediately inside. In 2014, a vestibule was
added at the entry point.
Section 4
6
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
At the lower level, there are several classrooms below grade that
are windowless. The absence of natural light makes these
unpopular spaces for teaching and learning. In general, finishes
through this building appear dated and should be replaced,
including new doors, hardware, and casework. There is a general
lack of natural light on the interior spaces of the building. The
original building was built prior to ADA legislation so toilet rooms
and other features of the building are not barrier-free.
Boilers in the building were replaced in 2012 with new propanefueled boilers as a pilot project to test the efficiency and cost
effectiveness of propane as a major fuel source. Up to now, the
campus has been reliant on fuel oil as the primary energy source.
The HVAC system in the original building is in poor condition, and
chilled water piping is absent in the 1999 addition.
The original primary electrical cable feeding this building is a
direct-buried line, and there have been power outages from
similar direct-buried primary lines on campus recently. The entire
fire alarm system is in need of replacement, and the building
should be upgraded to more energy-efficient lighting in specific
areas. There are no automatic light controls in the building. The
exit signs and master clock systems are in need of replacement.
There is no emergency generator.
Section 4
7
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
The original Instructional Center was built in 1968 and included an
area of 27,555 square feet on one floor. A two-story addition of
17,783 square feet was completed in 1999, to bring the building to
a total of 45,338 square feet. Today, the Instructional Center is
the home of most campus classrooms, faculty offices, all science
labs, and the Health Sciences program.
Because of its location on campus, proximate to entrances, the
Administration Center and close parking areas, as well as its
density of teaching spaces, this building is heavily used and
adjacent parking areas are often full.
On the exterior, there is a need for new walks to the north parking
area and to the west of the building. The building includes
extensive cedar shake siding which is deteriorating. There are no
vestibules at entry points. Roofing and roof insulation will need to
be replaced, as should the exterior door and window units at the
original building. Recently a standing-seam metal roof was
installed over the bridge leading from the center of campus to the
upper level of the building.
Generally on the interior, floor and ceiling finishes need to be
replaced, as do the doors and hardware in the original building.
Select casework is worn and dated, and some teaching areas
retain chalkboards.
Laboratory gas shut-off buttons are wired in series requiring a
visual check of all five to turn the system on. The classrooms in
the southwest pod lack ventilation because the air-handling unit
does not work. Some of the building has been converted from
pneumatic temperature controls to AutoMatrix controls.
The building has the original fire alarm panel and devices. There
are no automatic lighting controls or emergency power generator
in the building. The original primary electrical cable feeding this
building was recently replaced following a power outage.
Section 4
8
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
Student Center
The Student Center was the first building constructed on this
campus, built in 1968. It includes 17,870 square feet on one
level. Today it houses non-academic spaces on campus, such as
the bookstore, café, student organization space, and COOR
offices. The center of the building is devoted to open, common
area, with various kinds of seating, a fireplace, and several wallmounted flat-screen televisions.
At the exterior, there is no curbed walk at the east entry. Asphalt
paving is continuous from vehicular drives to pedestrian entry
doors, providing no clear separation of surfaces and, therefore,
confusion as to what is intended for vehicles and what is intended
for pedestrians. There are no vestibules at entry points, making
for uncomfortable interior spaces during winter months. The
exterior includes a cedar shake mansard roof that is deteriorating.
Exterior windows and doors are not energy-efficient, as well as
the hollow metal frame at the mechanical room.
There is little natural light in the interior of the building, and toilet
rooms are not barrier-free. Floor and ceiling finishes are in need
of replacement, as are interior doors and hardware, interior
folding partitions, demountable walls, and casework in the office
areas.
Mechanically, the original HVAC system is at the end of its useful
life, and the part of the building lacks air-conditioning.
Temperature controls should be upgraded to AutoMatrix Controls
throughout.
Electrically, the original primary electrical cable feeding the
building was replaced in 2014. The distribution panel in the Boiler
Room is original. All branch panelboards are outdated.
Section 4
9
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
The entire fire alarm system is in need of replacement. Light
fixtures were upgraded in 2012. Egress lighting is in need of
upgrading, and additional electrical circuits are needed in the
student commons area for student use. Automatic lighting
controls are lacking throughout.
Section 4
10
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
Library
The Library was built in 1968 and contains 15,510 square feet on
one level. It has operated continuously as the campus library,
although it has undergone a number of small internal changes to
accommodate changing needs. Today, it includes space for the
primary library book stack, space for separate circulation and
reference desks, a stand-up computer area for research, a
tutoring area, and space at the perimeter for tables and computer
stations for student use. The building contains a large learning
lab, video viewing facilities, and the eServices department (Media
and Information Technology).
The building is not totally barrier-free, and the main entry to the
building is opposite the side with a parking lot for physicallychallenged patrons and students. The lobby also serves as a
student lounge area, with vending machines.
The road leading from the ring road to the Library was expanded
and re-surfaced in 2013.
The building exterior displays cedar shake siding that is
deteriorating. The warranty for roofing and roof insulation has
expired. Exterior windows, doors, frames and hardware are in
need of replacement.
On the interior, the toilet rooms are not ADA-compliant, and floor
and ceiling finishes are in need of replacement in select areas.
Interior doors and hardware need to be replaced, as does select
casework.
Mechanically, the HVAC system is original to the building, and the
building lacks building-wide AutoMatrix temperature controls.
Section 4
11
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
The entire fire alarm system is in need of replacement. The
primary electrical cable feeding this building was replaced in
2013. Light fixtures were upgraded to in 2012.
Section 4
12
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
The original building was constructed in 1966 and includes 42,084
square feet. The building has served as the facility for
vocational–technical education, as well as performing arts
education continuously since its beginning. The Performing Arts
portion of the building includes an 840+ seat auditorium that is
dividable by means of movable partitions. The career technology
portion of the building contains programs in cosmetology,
automotive arts, machining and manufacturing processes, and
welding. Recently, the College decided to consolidate its welding
facilities to the MTEC facility in Gaylord starting in Fall, 2013.
On the exterior, the building lacks entrance canopies and
adequate signage. Existing cedar shake siding and soffits are
deteriorating. Exterior windows, hollow metal doors and frames,
as well as original overhead doors are in need of replacement.
One of the four original overhead doors was replaced in 2013.
A primary shortcoming of the theater is the lack of convenient
parking to the theater lobby. The lobby is not easy to see from
the campus entrance, and walking from the lower parking lot
uphill to the theater can be a physical challenge. While the
seating capacity may be adequate, the lobby is too small, as is
the backstage and back-of-house facilities for dressing rooms,
storage, scene shop, green room, toilet facilities, etc.
On the interior, there are several interior classrooms that are
windowless. Toilet rooms are not barrier-free. Carpet and vinyl
tile flooring are in need of replacement throughout the facility,
including the auditorium. Auditorium seating, interior doors,
hardware and ceilings are in need of replacement, as is casework
in select rooms.
Mechanically, the original HVAC system should be replaced with
new, including upgrading the entire building to AutoMatrix
temperature controls. The sanitary drain system needs to be
corrected at the car wash area in the Auto Lab.
Section 4
13
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
Electrically, this building needs a new main distribution panel. The
primary electrical cable feeding the building was replaced in 2014.
Light fixtures throughout the building were upgraded in 2012. The
dressing room lights do not have lamp guards. The branch
panelboards are outdated, and egress lighting is in need of
upgrading. The building does not contain lighting controls or
emergency generator capacity.
Section 4
14
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
Built in 2000, this building includes 30,123 square feet. It includes
the entire fine arts department studios, including a graphic arts
studio, metals room, photography, ceramics, kiln, clay room,
glazing room, sculpture, drawing, and painting studios. The
Physical Plant side includes storage and warehouse space,
offices, a print shop, and equipment storage space.
On the exterior, asphalt pavement is in need of replacement.
A canopy was installed over the entrance to the Print Shop in
2012. Cedar shake siding at entrances is deteriorating, as are
exterior windows and all exterior hollow metal doors and frames.
On the interior, toilet partitions are in need of replacement, and
carpet and vinyl tile flooring is in need of replacement in selected
areas. There is a need for repainting existing interior walls and to
replace select interior doors and interior casework.
Mechanically, air-handling units 4 and 5 do not include airconditioning, and the diffusers in ceramics, weaving and
commons area are in need of change. There is insufficient heat
at the north wall of the men’s toilet room and the entire building
should be upgraded to AutoMatrix temperature controls. There is
no capture hood over the kilns, and a clay trap is missing in the
ceramics studio.
Electrically, there are no lighting controls or emergency power
capacity in the building,
Section 4
15
4.
FACILITY ASSESSMENT
(continued)
MTEC / Gaylord
This facility was built in 2001 and was created as a shared facility.
Of the total 46,621 square feet, about 28,000 square feet are
operated by Kirtland Community College. The balance is
operated by the Otsego County University Center. The two parts
of the building operate independently.
The MTEC is an outgrowth of the FLEX program, and it contains
two computer classrooms, a distance learning lab, two general
classrooms, a general-purpose lab, and labs for welding and
HVAC. The building is used primarily by KCC during the day and
by university partners during evening hours, and it is designed to
change with changing programming needs.
Since the building is relatively new, the exterior issues are limited,
such as the need for a canopy at the north entry to prevent
significant snow-drifting during the winter months. Interior carpet
will need to be replaced, and ceilings should be installed in high
volume office areas. Some casework is in need of replacement in
offices.
Mechanically, in 2013, modifications were made to upgrade the
ventilation in the welding area in anticipation of a consolidated
welding program at this site. Modifications are planned in the
electrical closet in the University Center.
Classroom lighting should be upgraded to achieve a high light
level. Corridor light fixtures should be replaced. The building
does not include automatic lighting controls. The emergency
generator should be upgraded to include the egress lighting.
Section 4
16
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
A.
Instructional Programming
Kirtland Community College lies near the center of a large,
sparsely populated service area. In the context of a marketdriven economy for higher education programs and services, the
college has sustained its service to students and constituent
communities. Through the development of satellite campus
locations and technology-based resources, as well as strategic
modifications to existing facilities, KCC is positioned as the center
of education, culture, and opportunity for the region.
The College has stated a goal of establishing 200 online courses,
as well as an intent to reach out beyond its geographic service
area for students. It is consciously seeking physical locations to
raise its visibility and convenience to students in larger population
centers, as well as to advance community education and
workforce development.
The College is also responding to the changing needs of its
stakeholders as the state and regional economies migrate from a
manufacturing-centered base to a broader base including
services and tourism/hospitality. An aging population requires the
College to adjust its programming and resources to address new
opportunities in health, wellness, and leisure.
Section 5
1
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
Site
The main campus site is accessible by vehicles from St. Helen
Road and by Sunset Drive. While most of the facilities are on the
upland area, there is an open area east of St. Helen Road that
has been developed for athletic fields, observatory, and a firing
range, used by the police academy. Because the College
supports competitive athletics in several sports, this property east
of St. Helens Road has the capacity to be further developed for
use in competitive soccer, tennis, softball and baseball, including
new paved drives and parking area.
The parking lot west of the Administration Center is used by the
Police Academy program. It was redesigned and repaved for
expanded capacity, greater efficiency for programming, and for
greater clarity for drivers using the Ring Road in 2013.
The drive and parking lot leading to the Library was also in poor
condition and was redesigned, repaved and expanded for greater
parking capacity, greater convenience for handicapped patrons,
and more efficient maintenance.
The perceived lack of parking on campus appears to be related to
distribution of parking, rather than parking capacity. The
concentration of classrooms and student services at the north end
of the campus causes the adjacent lots to fill first, with some cars
using off-lot space for parking. An improved distribution of
parking can be achieved by creation or relocation of services to
the Student Center or elsewhere on campus.
It is anticipated that the College will continue to use off-site
facilities for some programming, such as the Roscommon County
Fairgrounds for use as a Regional Fire Training Facility, and
Camp Grayling for use as a driving training facility for the police
academy.
Section 5
2
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
As a primary gateway to the north end of campus, the
Administration Center serves multiple roles as the center of
College administration, student services, developmental
programming, testing services, special programming, and general
instruction.
In response to the facility assessment, a number of items should
be replaced in the Administration Center:
.
Exterior windows
.
Roofing
.
Cedar shake siding
.
Exterior hollow metal doors and frames
.
Interior doors and hardware
.
Flooring and ceilings
.
Casework
In addition, there are opportunities to improve the function of this
building by repurposing and/or modifying some existing spaces.
At the lower level, the fitness center should be repurposed into a
large general teaching space. Small teaching spaces should be
expanded, and all windowless teaching spaces should be
retrofitted to provide natural light.
At the upper level, a vestibule was added to the main entry door
in 2014; a second vestibule should be added to the rear main
entry doors. Also, the existing cracked floor and exterior slab at
the north entrance should be replaced and refinished to help
alleviate the ongoing insect problem there. Offices for Student
Services should be relocated to the Student Center, with the
space in the Administration Center to be repurposed. The
College should consider replacing some brick wall surface with
transparent glass panels to create greater visibility and to allow
more natural light deeper into the space. The College did replace
one brick wall surface with transparent glass panels in 2013. The
College has an opportunity to reorganize the administration
offices, create a location for professional training, and a location
Section 5
3
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
for a café for the convenience of students and building users.
Some of the need for additional testing facilities could be
addressed here by trading spaces between the existing testing
center and the adjacent FLEX lab.
Throughout the building, every attempt should be made to provide
barrier-free improvements. Outside and near the building, there is
also potential for establishing new outdoor seating space.
To improve the comfort and convenience for students and users,
the HVAC system in the original building should be replaced, and
chilled water piping should be installed in the 1999 addition. The
entire building was upgraded to AutoMatrix Controls for energy
efficiency and savings in 2014.
The entire fire alarm system should be replaced. The light fixtures
were upgraded to more energy-efficient lighting in 2012.
Automatic lighting controls should be provided throughout the
building, and the exit signs and master clock systems should be
replaced. The College should provide an emergency
generator for egress lighting in the case of a power failure.
Secondary power needs an isolated ground.
Section 5
4
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
The Instructional Center is the location for most of the classrooms
and specialized facilities related to health occupations and
nursing curricula. While the physics and chemistry labs were
remodeled recently, a number of other existing spaces need
remodeling for improved efficiency and capacity, notably a
simulation lab for nursing, improved labs and storage, expanded
greenhouse, expanded space for nursing offices, and expanded
opportunities for conferencing and group study. An Assessment
Lab was created in 2013.
Ideas for a simulation lab have been developed in the past. The
preferred location is Room 123, which would require internal
renovation.
The existing nursing offices are small and lack privacy and room
to meet with students. The current location does not allow the
development of six private offices and has limited conferencing
options. Developing a new nursing office across the hall to the
south would provide an opportunity for better student service and
professionalism.
On the exterior of the building, there is a need for new walks to
the north parking area and to the west of the building. The
extensive cedar shake siding needs to be replaced, taking
advantage of the opportunity to add building insulation for
increased energy efficiency. Vestibules should be added at every
building entrance, with a new vestibule added to the south side of
the building at the main lobby. Roofing and roof insulation will
need to be replaced, as should the exterior door and window units
at the original building. Recently a standing-seam metal roof was
installed over the bridge leading from the center of campus to the
upper level of the building. This could serve as a precedent for
future exterior improvements across the College.
Section 5
5
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
Generally on the interior, floor and ceiling finishes need to be
replaced, as do the doors and hardware within the original
building. Select casework should be replaced, and chalkboards
should be changed to whiteboards.
The air-handling unit in the southwest classroom pod should be
replaced, and the entire building should be converted from
pneumatic temperature controls to AutoMatrix controls. The
original HVAC equipment should be replaced with new, and airconditioning should be added to the entire building.
The original fire alarm panel and devices should be replaced and
egress lighting should be upgraded. An emergency generator
should be provided for egress lighting, and automatic lighting
controls should be provided throughout the building. Secondary
service requires isolated grounding.
The original primary electrical cable feeding this building was
recently replaced following a power outage.
Section 5
6
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
Student Center
More and more the ability to attract and retain students and
faculty relies not just on the strength of programs and competitive
tuition, but on convenience and facilities that allow students and
faculty to be productive and efficient between classes and to
participate in a range of KCC activities. As the first building on
campus and arguably the “front door” of the campus, the Student
Center is strategically located. Recent improvements to the
bookstore, food service, and open gathering area have somewhat
improved the overall utilization of the building, but it appears to
still lack enough of the services and conveniences that are
sufficiently relevant to be the center of student life at KCC.
As in other buildings on campus, the exterior of the student center
is composed of brick, stone and cedar shake roofing that is
deteriorating and should be replaced. There is no separation of a
vehicular zone and pedestrian zone at the building entrance.
Although the center of the building is sufficient to hold college
banquets for several hundred persons, there is little natural light in
the interior of the building, and there are acoustic conflicts for
students desiring quiet study space. Toilet rooms are not barrierfree. Floor and ceiling finishes should be replaced throughout, as
should interior doors and hardware, interior folding partitions,
demountable walls, and casework in the office areas.
Mechanically, the original HVAC system should be totally
replaced, with air-conditioning for the entire building.
Temperature controls should be upgraded to AutoMatrix Controls
throughout. The kitchen exhaust hood system and fire
suppression system must be overhauled.
Electrically, the original primary electrical cable feeding the
building was replaced in 2014. The original distribution panel in
the Boiler Room and all outdated branch panelboards still remain.
Section 5
7
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
The entire fire alarm system should be replaced. Light fixtures
were upgraded to more energy-efficient fixtures in 2012. Egress
lighting should be upgraded, and additional electrical circuits
should be installed in the student commons area for student use.
Automatic lighting controls should be installed throughout, and the
emergency generator should be upgraded for egress lighting.
There are two primary components to consider for the Student
Center of the future at KCC: Student Services and support /
auxiliary functions such as bookstore, food service, and student
organizations; and a component for recreation, fitness, and
wellness facilities. These primary components can be developed
as separate facilities, or they can be considered a single, multifunctioned facility. In either case, a future center will require a
substantial renovation and expansion of the existing building, or
replacement altogether.
Section 5
8
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
Library
Programmatically, the library building contains several important
functions: the primary repository of books, tapes, CDs,
references, etc.; tutoring services; and the location of the EServices department for the College.
The organization of the book stacks has changed in recent years,
from a location along the perimeter of the primary space in the
building, to a location in the center of the building. The perimeter
area is now populated with tables with computer stations and
spaces for individuals or small groups to work quietly. The entire
library collection is accessible online, and there are no libraries at
any of the existing branch campus locations.
The lobby of the building serves both the library and E-Services.
In addition, the lobby is set up as a small student lounge/study
area, with vending machines available.
In addition to its current function, the library should repurpose
some existing spaces into several small group study rooms.
As at other building on campus, the exterior of the library contains
cedar shake roofing that should be replaced. Exterior windows,
doors, frames and hardware should be replaced. There should
be a new vestibule built at the building lobby.
On the interior, flooring, ceilings and casework should be
replaced, and a new circulation and reference desk area should
be developed. Wayfinding signage should be added from the
parking area to the entrance of the library.
Section 5
9
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
The entire HVAC system should be replaced with new and
upgraded to AutoMatrix temperature controls. Light fixtures were
upgraded in 2012. Egress lighting with lighting controls throughout
the building should be upgraded. The entire fire alarm system
should be replaced. The primary electrical cable feeding this
building was replaced in 2013. The emergency generator should
be upgraded for egress lighting.
Section 5
10
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
Programmatically, the CTC is currently comprised of specialized
space for cosmetology, automotive technology, outdoor power
engine technology, welding, and related curricula. Some needed
changes to the CTC include an expansion of an existing
classroom, the addition of material storage space, a canopy at the
east entry door to the CTC, a more distinct entry on the east side
of the building for the patrons of the cosmetology program, and
the repurposing of the welding lab as it prepares to vacate its
current space and consolidate in 2013 at the Gaylord campus.
Exterior windows, doors, frames and hardware should be
replaced, as should original overhead doors. Cedar shake
material should be replaced. On the interior, existing flooring,
ceilings and wall finishes should be replaced. The addition of
interior spans of glass between the corridors and teaching spaces
would improve visibility within the building, particularly at the
interior classrooms that are windowless. Toilet rooms should be
remodeled to be barrier-free.
The existing PAC is set up to be used primarily as a recital hall,
lecture hall, or auditorium for productions of limited cast and set
size. The ability to offer attractive performance options is limited
by three significant components: backstage area; comfortable
patron seating and accessibility to the stage; and sufficient lobby
space with convenient, accessible parking and walks for patrons.
Backstage, there is need for new dressing rooms, green room,
prop storage, and scene shop. In the auditorium space, there is a
need for barrier-free access to the stage without leaving the room,
as well as new seating, new finishes, and enhancements to the
stage itself for lighting, sound, and minimal fly space. A lobby is
needed to hold large audiences for pre-function, intermission, and
post-function gatherings. The lobby is also an opportunity to
develop a gallery for the Fine Arts Department for the display and
sale of art, as well as the exhibit of special art collections. Equally
Section 5
11
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
as important is the approach to the lobby from a convenient,
barrier-free parking area adjacent to the building.
Mechanically, the original HVAC system of the CTC/PAC should
be replaced with new, including upgrading the entire building to
AutoMatrix temperature controls.
Electrically, this building needs a new main distribution panel. The
primary electrical cable feeding the building was replaced in 2014.
Light fixtures were upgraded to more energy-efficient type in
2012. Outdated branch panelboards should be replaced, and
egress lighting should be upgraded. Lighting controls should be
provided throughout the building. An emergency generator
should be provided for egress lighting.
Section 5
12
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
On the exterior, asphalt pavement should be replaced, and a
canopy should be constructed over the entrance to the Print
Shop. New overhead doors should be provided at the Print Shop
and Sculpture Lab. Cedar shake siding at entrances should be
replaced, as should exterior windows and all exterior hollow metal
doors and frames. There is need for additional space for material
storage and access by labs.
The Fine Arts Center needs space to display and sell art.
Potential locations for this display gallery could be repurposed
space in the Fine Arts Center, new space in the expanded lobby
of the PAC, or in new space at a new Student Center.
On the interior of the existing building, toilet partitions should be
replaced. Carpet and vinyl tile flooring should be replaced in
selected areas, and interior masonry walls should be repainted.
Select interior doors should be replaced as should interior
casework.
Mechanically, air-conditioning should be added to air-handling
units 4 and 5, and the diffusers in ceramics, weaving and
commons area should be changed. Heat should be added to the
north wall of the men’s toilet room and the entire building should
be upgraded to AutoMatrix temperature controls. A capture hood
should be installed over the kilns, and a clay trap should be added
in ceramics. The water tank system for fire suppression in the
building requires cleaning and decontamination.
Electrically, automatic lighting controls should be installed
throughout the buildings, and an emergency generator should be
provided for egress lighting. Post protection is needed at the
transformer.
Section 5
13
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
MTEC / Gaylord
Since the building is relatively new, the exterior issues are limited,
such as the need for a canopy at the north entry to prevent
significant snow-drifting during the winter months. Interior carpet
will need to be replaced, and ceilings should be installed in high
volume office areas. Some casework is in need of replacement in
offices.
Programmatically, the need here is to renovate a classroom to
serve as a science lab space.
Mechanically, modifications were made to upgrade the ventilation
in the welding area in 2013. The ventilation in the electrical closet
in the University Center should be upgraded.
Classroom lighting should be upgraded to achieve a high light
level. Corridor light fixtures should be replaced. Automatic
lighting controls should be installed throughout the building. The
emergency generator should be upgraded to include the egress
lighting.
Section 5
14
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
B.
Enrollment
Kirtland Community College is experiencing a decline in
enrollment following record high levels of enrollment in 2009. In
2009, during the deepest part of an ongoing nation-wide
recession, the combination of high unemployment and stimulus
funding of education programs through state and federal agencies
drove new students to Kirtland for retraining, new skills, and
alternative careers. As the federal stimulus funding has been
depleted, and as the economy slowly improves, enrollment levels
have trended downward. Also contributing to the enrollment
challenge has been a steadily declining K-12 population in KCC’s
service area, as well as the long-term impact of outmigration due
to the poor economy.
As a counterbalance, the rising cost of higher education and at
four-year institutions is motivating a higher proportion of traditional
high school graduates to seek lower tuition costs and housing
costs by taking core coursework at KCC and transferring to
another institution for advanced education after two years.
The ability of KCC to attract students will rest on factors such as
cost, quality, service, technology, student amenities, community
relevance, consistent marketing and messaging, and effective
recruitment.
Population Size (U.S. Census)
2000
2010
2011
2012
2013
Crawford
Ogemaw
Oscoda
Roscommon
Otsego
14,273
21,645
9,418
25,469
23,301
14,074
21,699
8,640
24,449
24,164
14,014
21,570
8,608
24,414
24,078
13,974
21,430
8,588
24,141
24,037
13,904
21,234
8,379
24,014
24,129
Total
94,106 93,026 92,684 92,170 91,660
Section 5
15
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
Population Age Profile, by Percent( 2010 U.S. Census)
Age
MI
Cra
Oge Osc Ros Ots
0-4
5-19
20-24
25-44
45-64
65+
6.0
20.8
6.8
24.7
27.8
13.7
4.7
17.5
4.1
19.3
33.5
20.8
4.8
17.8
4.3
19.5
31.6
22.0
5.0
17.2
4.2
16.8
33.2
23.4
3.9
13.9
3.5
16.7
33.9
28.0
5.9
19.5
5.0
22.2
23.7
17.1
Median Age:
38.9
47.7
47.6
49.7
53.3
43.2
Unemployment, by Percent
Cra
Oge
2007
7.9
8.3
2008
9.7
9.6
2009
13.1 13.0
2010
13.1 13.1
2011
11.6 11.8
2012
10.6 10.5
2013
10.7 11.2
Osc
10.4
13.2
19.3
20.7
15.6
13.8
14.6
Ros
9.6
11.4
14.9
14.6
12.7
11.5
12.5
Ots
9.1
10.5
14.8
14.2
12.3
10.9
11.1
Enrollment History
Enrollment
Kirtland Community College Enrollment
1995 - 2013
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
1 2 3 4 5
6
7
8
9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Year
Section 5
16
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
Student Age, by Percent
24 and Under
25 to 39
40 to 59
60 and older
2009
41
32
24
1
Student Program Area, by Percent
2009
Art
1.0
Automotive
2.0
Business
4.0
Criminal Justice
5.0
Construction Technology
4.0
Cosmetology
2.0
Education
1.0
General Education
21.0
Health Occupations / Nursing
34.0
Industrial
5.0
Office Information Systems
5.0
Technology
1.0
Transfer
16.0
2011
45.5
33.1
20.0
1.2
2012
44.1
34.8
18.6
2.5
2013
56.7
28.0
14.2
1.1
2014
57.4
29.1
12.7
0.8
2011 2012 2013 2014
3.5 3.1
2.3
1.9
2.8 2.1
2.4
2.6
3.7 5.2
4.9
4.9
5.2 3.6
4.2
5.1
4.0 2.9
3
3.5
2.0 1.6
1.3
1.5
2.6 0.4
0.4
0.3
10.0 16.3 22.7
22
36.1 23.7 20.8
19.6
5.4 3.4
2.8
2.8
4.7
6
6.2
6.2
1.5 2.4
2.8
2.7
18.6 29.3 26.2
26.9
An analysis of the enrollment data supports the continuation of
the profile of the typical KCC student as a female in the late 20’s
or early 30’s, looking to acquire additional job-training skills,
pursue additional degrees or professional certification / licensure,
and attending part-time. Most students drive substantial
distances to attend classes at the Roscommon campus.
It also highlights the duality of the declining number of traditional
high school graduates in the KCC service area and the
opportunity to attract a larger share of this population through
competitive tuition costs and other amenities.
Section 5
17
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
Further, it points out the significant growth of the aging “boomer”
generation. The needs and desires of this age group represent
an opportunity and potential incentive for KCC to develop or
enhance post-graduate curricula, community service curricula,
leisure-related curricula, and fitness/wellness programming. In
addition, the relative under-education of the general population in
the KCC service area, compared to Michigan and national
statistics, provides an opportunity for growth.
Educational Attainment in 2012, by Percent
(People, age 25-34, with Bachelor Degree or higher)
US
31.6
MI
28.9
Cra
13.8
Oge
12.2
Osc
8.2
Ros
10.5
Ots
22.4
Section 5
18
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
C.
Space Utilization
A goal of this master plan is to identify the need for remodeling or
expansion of existing physical assets.
To assess the need for additional classroom and associated
space, we reviewed class schedules for one-week time periods in
three consecutive semesters, as “typical” for each semester for
analysis purposes.
For each teaching space, we documented class hours scheduled
for each space over the course of a typical week. In the campus
plans that follow, composite classroom utilizations are identified.
The utilization category for each is an average of the three weeks
noted above. Each space was placed in one of the following
categories:
0-9
10-19
20-29
30-39
40+
hours of scheduled class time per week
The number of scheduled hours for the selected weeks was
similar from semester to semester within each building. As a
percentage for the weekly total, teaching spaces were scheduled
only 6% of the time on Fridays, compared to 23-24% Mondays
through Thursdays.
Daytime utilization versus nighttime utilization varied depending
on curriculum. As a percentage of the total hours scheduled, the
highest nighttime utilization occurs at the MTEC facility (29% of
scheduled hours are at night), followed by the Administration
Center.
Section 5
19
5.
FACILITY ANALYSIS
(continued)
Room size, room location, and access to technology are apparent
factors in room utilization. Small rooms without natural light tend
not to be preferred. Rooms without air-conditioning and climate
control tend not to be as well utilized.
With the introduction of the larger, technology-rich learning labs in
various buildings across campus, there appears to be a growing
preference by students and faculty members for using these
rooms.
Overall, there appear to be sufficient instructional spaces on
campus to meet the needs of current and anticipated enrollment
and course offerings. However, the location and configuration of
teaching spaces, access to technology and the condition of each
space for 21st-century higher education creates the need to
address infrastructure. Further, access to teaching spaces based
on expanded hours of operation and flexible course schedules
may change the space utilization profile as students request more
efficient class schedules to accommodate their life needs.
Following is a summary matrix of campus teaching spaces,
colored-coded to indicate intensity of weekly use. Spaces are
organized by building. The column “Cap.” identifies the seating
capacity of each space. “Hrs/Wk” indicates the number of hours
the space is scheduled each week. The “D” column identifies
how many hours each week the space is scheduled during
daytime hours. The “N” column identifies night class hours. The
“F” column indicates how many hours the space is scheduled on
Fridays.
General consensus for classroom utilization is that general
classroom spaces scheduled more than 25-30 hours/week or
more would be considered fully utilized. For lab spaces, this
number would be 18-22 hours/week. Specialized spaces, such
as art studios and automotive labs may indicate relatively low
scheduled use, but are often open for student use on an
unscheduled basis for individual or independent work.
Section 5
20
6.
MASTER PLAN
Overview
The Master Plan combines the vision of Kirtland Community
College with the input of stakeholders and the assessment of
existing facilities and sites to identify opportunities to maximize
physical assets. The Master Plan supports the College’s
strategic plan by offering tangible facility recommendations that
give structure and direction for the future development of KCC.
The Master Plan also organizes new, expanded, and renovated
facilities and site projects together in a single vision for the
future. This assures that any single project will be implemented
within an integrated framework that anticipates infrastructure
needed to support the project.
The plans that follow illustrate existing facilities, followed by a
description of recommended projects. More detailed individual
project descriptions are keyed to the site plan. Section 7 includes
the cost summaries for each project. Section 8 describes the
implementation strategy to achieve these projects.
Section 6
1
6.
MASTER PLAN
(continued)
Proposed Projects
A.
Site – Main Campus
Projects related to the existing KCC main campus should retain
KCC’s core value of stewardship and enhancement of the natural
environment. All projects affecting the site and individual
buildings should complement the natural environment, enhance
its quality, utilize the existing terrain, and take advantage of
existing available infrastructure.
The College will be enhanced through proper management of the
wooded landscape to improve user comfort, convenience, and
safety. Reduction of forest floor brush above two feet will improve
sight lines throughout the center of campus and provide a higher
sense of safety as visibility is increased. Selective cutting of
existing older or damaged trees will improve the health of the
entire forest growth and allow more sunlight into the interior parts
of the campus.
Recently, the College began to develop landscaping at selected
existing walks to create more broad walking pathways. This
should be continued throughout campus.
Following are individual site-related projects recommended for the
Roscommon Campus of Kirtland Community College:
1.
Improved (curbed) intersections of drives and parking
lots.
2.
Redevelopment of the Student Center entry drive to
separate vehicular and pedestrian pathways.
3.
Redevelopment of the parking lot west of the
Administration Center for increased parking and clearer
circulation.
Section 6
2
6.
MASTER PLAN
(continued)
4.
Redevelopment and expansion of the drive and parking
lot serving the Library.
5.
Expansion of the parking lot serving the Performing Arts
Center, in addition to the addition of a new pedestrian
entry court at the PAC.
6.
Development of an informal seating area in the center of
campus.
7.
Development of new athletic fields on the property on the
east side of St. Helen Road, to accommodate new
parking, two new tennis courts, a new competition softball
field, new competition baseball field, and two new soccer
fields.
Section 6
3
6.
MASTER PLAN
(continued)
B.
Site – Grayling Campus
The acquisition of 160+ acres at I-75 and Four Mile Road south of
Grayling presents a unique opportunity for Kirtland Community College to
establish a highly visible and accessible presence along a major
transportation artery. The existing site is gently rolling, with trees
covering a portion of the site. In general, there is excellent visibility from
I-75 to the property, providing direct views to future buildings and signs.
Because it is not yet developed, the site will require significant work to
convert it to a branch campus site. The work will include earthmoving,
installation of utilities, and the creation of roads and parking capacity for
an initial building, expandable to accommodate future additional buildings
and facilities.
Section 6
4
6.
MASTER PLAN
(continued)
C.
Buildings
Based upon the facility assessments and stakeholder input for
future KCC needs, following is a description of recommended
projects. For all projects and building improvements, Kirtland
Community College plans to demonstrate its commitment to
environmental stewardship by emphasizing sustainability and
recycling efforts in the planning, design, construction and
operation phases.
It is worth stating here that, although not part of a specific project,
addressing deferred maintenance issues is an important ongoing
activity at KCC. With buildings dating back to the 1960s, it is
important to maintain this ongoing effort. Each year, KCC
budgets for various improvements across each campus location
and the expectation is that the College will continue to fund the
repair and replacement of existing systems as necessary to
sustain proper function and to avoid exponentially higher costs in
the future.
Examples of deferred maintenance items are:
.
HVAC system upgrades
.
ADA improvements
.
Roof replacement / repairs
.
Insulation / carpet replacement
.
Window / door replacement
.
Landscaping
.
Furniture / equipment replacement
.
Athletic field repairs / upgrades
.
Parking lot resurfacing, repair, restriping
Section 6
5
6.
MASTER PLAN
(continued)
1.
New Health Science Education & Training Center
The new Health Science Education and Training Center marks the
relocation and expansion of several of KCC’s signature programs related
to the health professions from the Roscommon campus to the more
accessible campus on I-75 south of Grayling.
The initial building will be 27,000 – 30,000 SF and will include
classrooms, labs, offices and related spaces for health education
curricula, including programs in nursing, pharmacy technology, surgical
technology, cardiac sonography, and others.
In addition to partnering with Saginaw Valley State University, the new
facility will support the College’s partnerships with universities as well as
healthcare providers to meet hands-on clinical requirements for students.
It will also facilitate the development of new and enhanced health
programs with modern technology.
Section 6
6
6.
MASTER PLAN
(continued)
2.
Instructional Center Renovation (INS)
The existing Instructional Center is one of the most heavily-used
buildings on campus. It is the center point of one of KCC’s
signature programs (Nursing and Health Occupations), and it
serves a significant portion of KCC’s enrollment.
While some of the building has been remodeled in recent years,
much of the building requires renovation and/or expansion of
critical science labs and office areas, as well as the development
of space for a simulation center and increased access to student
small group study space.
Section 6
7
6.
MASTER PLAN
(continued)
3.
Administration Center Renovation (ADM)
Along with the Instructional Center, the Administration Center is
one of the most heavily used existing buildings on the main
campus. The adjacent location of these two buildings on campus
creates parking capacity problems at the north lots as students
seek spots close to one or both of these buildings.
The existing building houses KCC Administration, Student
Services, Developmental Services, Criminal Justice program, and
general classrooms.
The renovation of this building builds on the strategy of relocating
student services spaces and the existing fitness room to a new
Student Learning / Wellness Center. The remaining spaces will
be repurposed for other classroom, administration and
professional development space, and they will be modified to
create more open space with more natural light. At the lower
level, existing windowless classrooms will receive natural light
through the construction of new light wells. The lower level
fitness space will be redeveloped into a technology-rich teaching
space.
At the main level of the building, existing solid walls will be
redesigned for greater transparency and sight lines. A corner
classroom will be repurposed into a café, with available seating,
for coffee and grab-and-go food items.
Existing classrooms without air-conditioning will receive
mechanical upgrades to provide air-conditioning and climate
controls.
Section 6
8
6.
MASTER PLAN
(continued)
4.
Career Technology Center / Performing Arts
Center (CTC/PAC) Expansion and Renovation
Some of the most consistent programs at KCC have been the
Cosmetology program, the Automotive program, and the Welding
program, all located in the existing Career Technology Center.
This project is intended to expand storage for the automotive
program, as well as to reorganize space as the welding program
is consolidated and relocated to the MTEC facility in Gaylord.
It will also include interior remodeling of the cosmetology rooms
and labs to better serve the students, as well as the patrons who
frequent the building from the community.
The renovation and expansion of the Performing Arts Center
includes a major expansion of the front lobby for patrons,
featuring a new art gallery. It also includes the addition of
backstage spaces critical to the future success of PAC, such as
green room, dressing rooms, prop storage, scene shop, and
general storage. It also includes renovation of the existing
theater, as well as existing office and support spaces.
One of the most important parts of this project is the addition of
parking and exterior plaza at the PAC for convenient patron dropoff and pick-up.
Section 6
9
6.
MASTER PLAN
(continued)
5.
Physical Plant / Fine Arts Center (PHY/ART)
Expansion and Renovation
The existing building is used increasingly as the arts programming
expands. With a full complement of course offerings, including
digital design, as well as two-dimensional and three-dimensional
media, the facility requires expansion for the safe storage of
supplies, equipment, and materials. This project expands the
existing building by 3,200 SF, and it remodels the existing space
to improve function and efficiency.
6.
Library Renovation
The intent of this project is to upgrade the quality of the lobby and
to create small group study space within the existing footprint, as
well as address ADA issues.
Section 6
10
7.
COST SUMMARIES
For each KCC building and projected project, the following pages
contain cost information related to the specific recommendations
identified in Section 2. The first spreadsheet summarizes the
construction costs and project costs for all buildings, as well as
the overall campus site. Costs are based upon prevailing wages
anticipating capital outlay funding.
The Construction Cost is the cost one would expect when
soliciting competitive bids for construction from general
contractors or construction managers. It includes the cost of
materials, and labor to install the materials, as well as a
reasonable factor for contractor overhead and profit.
The Project Cost includes the Construction Cost and other costs
required to complete the project for use by the College. These
include budgets for professional design fees and reimbursable
expenses, plan review fees, material and construction testing
services, movable furniture, movable equipment, technology
systems, and a contingency. For planning by KCC, the project
costs should be used.
Section 7
1
Cost Summary - All Projects
October, 2014
Project
Priority
Project Cost
New
1-3 Yrs
4-6 Yrs
7-10 Yrs
Health Science Education & Training Center
1
$ 10,200,000 $ 10,200,000
Administration Center Renovation
2
$
5,784,027 $
491,963 $
1,523,107 $
2,424,957 $
1,344,000
Instructional Center Renovation
3
$
4,570,930 $
210,830 $
1,509,600 $
2,140,600 $
709,900
CTC/PAC Expansion and Renovation
4
$
8,140,438 $
2,456,338 $
1,880,800 $
2,564,300 $
1,239,000
PHY / ART Expansion and Renovation
5
$
1,789,810 $
723,510 $
540,400 $
222,300 $
3,003,600
Library Renovation
6
$
2,040,536 $
70,736 $
756,700 $
1,145,100 $
68,000
MTEC Renovation
7
$
1,076,360 $
191,360 $
687,400 $
138,000 $
59,600
Site - Main Campus
8
$
926,600
Miscellaneous
9
$
396,700
$ 34,925,401 $ 14,344,737 $
6,898,007 $
8,635,257 $
6,424,100
TOTAL
Health Science Education & Training Center
Kirtland Community College - Grayling Campus
October, 2014
Description
Area (SF)
$/SF
Budget ($)
Construction Costs
New Building:
Office/Lab/Classroom
Total for Item ($)
$6,640,000
30,000
Site Development:
Contractor G.C.'s and O.H.&P. (14%):
Construction Total for the Health Science Education & Training Center:
A/E Fees (8%)
Reimbursable Expenses
Local Agency Plan Review
Testing and Inspection Services (by Owner)
Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment (by Owner @ 5%)
Technology Equipment (by Owner @ 89%)
Capital Outlay Plan Review (1.5%)
Contingency (10%)
Project Total for the Health Science Education & Training Center
$148
$4,440,000
$2,200,000
$929,600
$7,569,600
$675,208
$54,017
$4,000
$33,539
$378,480
$614,652
$113,544
$756,960
$10,200,000
October, 2014
Description
Area (SF)
$/SF
Budget ($)
Construction Costs
$315,000
Demolition
None
New Construction
Entry Vestibules
Total for Item ($)
$ -
200
$
160
$32,000
Renovation
Upper Level
3,400
Lower Level
2,260
$
$
50
50
$170,000
$113,000
A/E Fees (8%)
Reimbursable Expenses (8% of AE fee)
Deferred Maintenance Backlog (1-5 Years)(1.5%)
Contingency (10%)
$41,640
$356,640
$34,200
$2,736
$1,500
$7,500
$19,432
$31,091
$38,864
$491,963
From Assessment (See Appendix. Includes full ten-year time frame.)
$5,292,064
Total
$5,784,027
October, 2014
Description
Area (SF)
$/SF
Budget ($)
Construction Costs
$136,000
Demolition
None
New Construction
Greenhouse
Vestibule
Total for Item ($)
$ -
800
250
Renovation
See below
A/E Fees (8%)
Contingency (10%)
$
$
120
160
$96,000
$40,000
$ $16,320
$152,320
$13,404
$1,072
$1,500
$7,500
$7,616
$12,186
$15,232
$210,830
$4,360,100
Total
$4,570,930
Career Technology Center / Performing Arts Center
October, 2014
Description
Area (SF)
$/SF
Budget ($)
Construction Costs
$1,649,100
Demolition
None
New Construction
Backstage
Lobby / Gallery
Auto Lab Expansion
Total for Item ($)
$ -
3,500
6000
680
Renovation
See below
A/E Fees (8%)
Contingency (10%)
$
$
$
165
165
120
$577,500
$990,000
$81,600
$ $197,892
$1,846,992
$162,535
$13,003
$1,500
$7,500
$92,350
$147,759
$184,699
$2,456,338
$5,684,100
Total
$8,140,438
October, 2014
Description
Area (SF)
$/SF
Budget ($)
Construction Costs
$480,000
Demolition
None
New Construction
Additions for Art
Total for Item ($)
$ -
4,000
Renovation
See below
A/E Fees (8%)
Contingency (10%)
$
120
$480,000
$ $58,138
$538,138
$47,750
$3,820
$1,500
$7,500
$27,131
$43,409
$54,262
$723,510
$1,066,300
Total
$1,789,810
Library
October, 2014
Description
Area (SF)
$/SF
Budget ($)
Construction Costs
$41,600
Demolition
None
New Construction
Vestibule
Renovation
Study Rooms
Total for Item ($)
$ -
80
$
160
$12,800
240
$
120
$28,800
A/E Fees (8%)
Contingency (10%)
$4,992
$46,592
$4,100
$328
$1,500
$7,500
$2,330
$3,727
$4,659
$70,736
$1,969,800
Total
$2,040,536
MTEC / Gaylord
October, 2014
Description
Area (SF)
$/SF
Budget ($)
Construction Costs
$122,880
Demolition
None
$ -
New Construction
None
$ -
Renovation
Class Room
1024
A/E Fees (8%)
Contingency (10%)
Total
Total for Item ($)
$
120
$122,880
$14,746
$137,626
$12,111
$969
$1,500
$7,500
$6,881
$11,010
$13,763
$191,360
$885,000
$1,076,360
8.
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Moving forward, based upon the recommendations and the information
gathered during this master plan, we believe the following represents an
appropriate implementation strategy for Kirtland Community College. It
should be stated that though these are listed in prioritized order, the
actual implementation of a specific priority may occur in a different order,
depending on funding opportunities and programs not yet known.
Priority 1:
New Health Science Education & Training Center
Create a new 30,000 SF consolidated health professions
education and training center on a newly developed site
along I-75 near Grayling, Michigan. The new center will
be highly visible and accessible, and it will include
classrooms, labs, offices, and space for university
partners in a high-tech environment.
Cost: $10,200,000
Priority 2:
Administration Center Renovation
Renovate the existing building to repurpose spaces for
expanded classrooms, administration functions and
professional development/training. The renovation will
also include new mechanical and electrical systems, and
energy-saving control systems.
Cost: $5,784,027
Priority 3:
Instructional Center Renovation
Renovate the existing building for more efficient space
use, expanded programming, incorporation of a new
simulation laboratory, new mechanical and electrical
systems, and energy-saving control systems.
Cost: $4,570,930
Section 8
1
8.
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
(continued)
Priority 4:
CTC/PAC Expansion and Renovation
The renovation of the Career Technology Center
includes the reorganization of interior spaces for
better use by the Automotive program and
Cosmetology program. This part of the building
will also be expanded to increase storage
capacity for the Automotive program.
The renovation and expansion of the Performing
Arts Center includes a major expansion of the
lobby and backstage areas to service the theater.
It also includes renovation of the existing theater,
offices and support spaces.
Cost: $8,140,438
Priority 5:
PHY/ART Expansion and Renovation
The renovation includes reorganization of
existing space to improve function and efficiency.
The addition provides new space for supplies,
equipment and materials.
Cost: $1,789,810
Priority 6:
Library Renovation
The renovation will improve the lobby, increase
group study space, and address ADA issues. It
also includes improved mechanical and electrical
systems and energy-saving control systems.
Cost: $2,040,536
Section 8
2
9.
APPENDIX
Section 9
1
Kirtland Community College Facilities Assessment
Administration Building
11/6/2014
Building Rating System
Possible
Earned
Condition
Percent
200
159
80%
Site:
1.0
Total Points
Part I - Condition Score
Building:
2.1
Building Exterior Elements
100
68
68%
2.2
Accessibility
120
83
69%
2.3
Structural
100
80
80%
2.4
Building Envelope
100
62
62%
2.5
Interior / Finishes
120
68
57%
2.6
Life Safety
100
80
80%
2.7
Mechanical
190
121
64%
2.8
Electrical
150
99
66%
1180
820
69%
Poor
30-49%
Borderline
50-69%
Totals:
Percentages
Breakdown
Non-Existent
0%
Very
Inadequate
1 - 29%
Satisfactory
70-89%
Excellent
90-100%
Condition Score - The data above represents the condition score for this building
Part II - Facility Cost Index
Each facility is given a numeric ranking within each category based on current conditions. This ranking system tabulates scores for each
category into a total facility score. The facility condition score can then be compared to every other facility score to provide an objective
ranking of all facilities. The ranking system allows Kirtland Community College to determine the sites with the most critical needs. The higher
the score the better.
ASSUMED BUILDING REPLACEMENT COSTS (BASED ON $225 PER SQUARE FOOT)
$
12,900,000
CALCULATED COSTS OF RECOMMENDED RENOVATIONS
$
4,184,357
FCI INDEX (cost of repair or renovation vs. the cost of replacement)
The data in this section represents the Facility Cost Index for this building
32%
A list of recommended improvements accompanies each building (see Recommendations at the end of this building report). Each
recommended item is given an order of magnitude budget, these budgets are then used to calculate a Facility Cost Index (FCI). An FCI is
the condition indicator that calculates the cost of repair or renovation vs. the cost of replacement of a like facility. A general planning
assumption is that if the cost of repairing or renovating a facility exceeds two-thirds or 66% of the replacement costs, the facility should be
considered for replacement. The lower the FCI the better.
1 of 16
11/6/2014
Building Data Record
Building Name:
Street Address:
Building Data:
Original Construction: 1980
Additions/Renovations: 1999
Number of Floors: 2
Current Students:
Building Area: 57,278
45,323
Types of Construction:
Exterior Surfacing:
Floor Construction:
Air Conditioning:
sq. ft.
+
Site Area:
11,955
Bearing Masonry
Steel Frame
Concrete Frame
Wood
Other
Brick
Metal
Wood
Other
Structural Slab
Steel Joists
Wood Joists
Other
Roof Top
Window Units
X
Split Chiller
Roof Top
Forced Air
X
Central
Room Units
Steam
X
Hot Water
Underground
X
Primary
Stucco
Slab on Grade
Room Units
Heating:
Electrical Service:
Aerial
X
Secondary
Generator:
X
2000A
Voltage: 208/120V
Phase: 3
Wire: 4
Exists
Natural Gas
Diesel
None
2 of 16
11/6/2014
Aerial Photography
0
3 of 16
11/6/2014
1.0 Site
200 Points
Possible
Earned
1.1
Site is large enough to meet present needs and future needs.
25
20
1.2
Separation of car and pedestrian traffic is adequate for the safety of occupants.
25
20
1.3
Site has stable, well drained soil with no signs of erosion. Storm water management is
effective.
25
20
1.4
Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalks with crosswalks, curb cuts, etc.
20
16
1.5
Condition of Pedestrian services include sidewalks, curb cuts, etc.
15
12
1.6
Sufficient on-site parking is provided for all occupants
20
16
1.7
Condition of on-site parking
15
12
1.8
Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow.
20
16
1.9
Outdoor facilities are adequate and accessible, including,athletic fields and accessory
structures
15
11
1.10
Condition of Outdoor facilities, including, athletic fields and accessory structures
20
16
200
159
TOTAL - Site
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
4 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.1 Building Exterior Elements
100 Points
Possible
Earned
2.1.1 Exterior building / site signage is adequate.
15
12
2.1.2 Landscaping is adequate and appropriate.
20
16
2.1.3 Site and entry are well defined.
20
12
2.1.4 Entrances are sheltered from inclement weather.
20
13
2.1.5 Overall curb appeal (Building and Site)
25
15
100
68
TOTAL - Building Exterior Elements
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
5 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.2 Accessibility
100 Points
Possible
Earned
2.2.1 Exterior Walks and drives contain barrier-free curb cuts for building accessibility.
10
8
2.2.2 Barrier-Free parking is provided.
10
8
2.2.3 Outdoor areas and structures are on accessible routes.
20
16
2.2.4 Building entrances and exits are barrier-free.
20
15
2.2.5 Building entrances are equipped with power door operators
20
0
2.2.6 Toilet rooms are on accessible routes and designed to meet barrier-free codes.
20
18
2.2.7 Occupied spaces are accessible and are on accessible routes.
20
18
120
83
TOTAL - Accessibility
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
6 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
0
5
10
7 of 16
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.3 Structural
100 Points
Possible
Earned
2.3.1 Condition of the roof.
25
15
2.3.2 Condition of the (visible) foundations.
25
20
2.3.3 Condition of exterior and interior walls.
25
20
2.3.4 Structure is non-combustible.
25
25
100
80
TOTAL - Structural
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
8 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.4 Building Envelope
100 Points
Possible
Earned
2.4.1 Wall insulation is adequate.
15
13
2.4.2 Roof insulation is adequate.
15
13
2.4.3 Condition of exterior wall finishes, masonry, siding, etc.
15
10
2.4.4 Condition of exterior windows.
15
6
2.4.5 Condition of exterior doors and frames.
10
5
2.4.6 Exterior glass is insulated.
15
6
2.4.7 Openings / penetrations are sealed.
5
4
2.4.8 Building has proper amounts of daylighting.
10
5
100
62
TOTAL - Building Envelope
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
9 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.5 Interior / Finishes
150 Points
Possible
Earned
2.5.1 Condition of toilet rooms.
20
10
2.5.3 Condition of flooring.
20
10
2.5.4 Condition of ceilings.
20
8
2.5.5 Condition of walls.
15
12
2.5.6 Condition of doors and hardware.
15
8
2.5.7 Condition of casework.
15
8
2.5.8 Condition of visual display boards.
15
12
120
68
TOTAL - Interior / Finishes
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
10 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.6 Life Safety and Security
100 Points
Possible
Earned
2.6.1 Fire alarm system is up-to-date and adequate for building served.
15
8
2.6.2 Fire sprinkler system installed throughout building.
15
11
2.6.3 Security alarm system is installed throughout building.
10
8
2.6.4 Card access control system is installed.
10
8
2.6.5 Security camera system is installed.
15
12
2.6.6 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building.
10
9
2.6.7 Egress stairways are adequate.
10
9
2.6.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware.
5
5
2.6.9 Classroom doors are adequate for egress requirements.
5
5
2.6.10 Corridors lead to an exit or exit stair.
5
5
100
80
TOTAL - Life Safety and Security
Notes:
1
2
3
4
Fire alarm system is a Simplex 4010 and they are having problems with it. Pulls are high and not within 5' of doors.
No visual alarms in the older part of the building.
Stanley card access.
Security system only in Criminal Justice.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
11 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.7 Mechanical
200 Points
Possible
Earned
2.7.1a Heat source type is appropriate for the application.
5
4
2.7.1b Condition of the heating source.
15
12
2.7.2a Cooling source type is appropriate for the application.
5
4
2.7.2b Cooling exists in appropriate spaces.
5
2
2.7.2c Condition of cooling source.
10
6
2.7.3 Condition of the heating and cooling distribution system.
20
8
2.7.4 Condition of the terminal devices.
20
12
2.7.5 Condition of the air handling equipment.
20
8
2.7.6 Condition of controls.
20
9
2.7.7 Ventilation effectiveness.
10
8
2.7.8 Condition of the sanitary system.
10
8
2.7.9 Condition of the storm system.
10
8
2.7.10 Plumbing fixtures are adequate for building occupancy
10
8
2.7.11 Condition of exterior water supply.
10
8
2.7.12 Condition of the domestic water distribution system.
10
8
2.7.13 Speciality areas (labs, shops, etc.) are equipped with the appropriate plumbing fixtures.
10
8
190
121
TOTAL - Mechanical
Notes:
See next page.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
2.8 Mechanical Cont.
12 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
7
1
2
3
1
2
3
11/6/2014
NOTES
The building is only partially protected with fire protection in the lower level only.
BOILER Johnstom 1979 - scheduled to be replaced in 2012
AHU 6 zone MZ unit Existing Equipment serves the original portions of the building
ACCU Trane RAUCC50 serves the MZ unit
CHILLER Trane CGAFC30FARA R22 - the chilled water is cross connected to the heating hot
water distribution system
UV's and small AHU's make up the rest of the HVAC system.
ISSUES
There is some corrosion on the face of the diffussers in the north entrance of the upper level.
What measures were taken to deal with condensate produced in the cross connected chilled water
heating hot water system. Were drain pans added to the heating coils?
R22 cannot be used on equipment manufactured after 2010. R22 will continue to be produced until
2020 for use in existing equipment. Recycled R22 will continue to be available for service of
existing equipment after 2020 until the supply is exhausted.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Upgrade the remainder of the building to AutoMatrix controls
Replace the original HVAC equipment with new
Provide a dedicated chilled water system in lieu of the cross connected system
13 of 16
11/6/2014
2.8 Electrical
150 Points
Possible
Earned
2.8.1 Condition of the electrical service.
25
23
2.8.2 Interior building and exterior building lights.
25
20
2.8.3 Condition / capacity of distribution and branch panels.
20
16
2.8.4 Condition site lighting.
15
8
2.8.5 Emergency lighting is provided and meets current egress requirements.
15
10
2.8.6 Condition of receptacles and circuiting.
10
8
2.8.7 Lighting controls are provided to meet energy code.
10
2
2.8.8 Condition of public address system.
10
8
2.8.9 Condition of clock system.
10
4
2.8.10 Emergency power is provided by a generator.
10
0
150
99
TOTAL - Electrical
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
6
2000A, 208/120V service by Square D.
Clock system is by National Time and not completely working..
Egress lighting is provided by wall mounted battery packs.
No occupancy sensors in the building.
Exit signs are self-powered, radioactive that expired in 2009.
Lower level classrooms are missing egress lighting.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
14 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
3.0 Recommendations
This section is intended to document and quantify recommended items / improvements noted during the building assessment. This section is included as a means of quantifying
improvement cost through a conceptual estimate. These costs are placeholders of potential value to a recommended item. They only attempt to give an estimated dollar value to a
recommended item. This section is designed as a tool to demonstrate the potential costs of recommendations / improvements and provide a comparison based on these costs to other
buildings on campus. These costs area broken down into recommended priorities based on a 1-3 year (Priority 1), 4-6 year (Priority 2) and 7-10 year (Priority 3) timeline.
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
Site Recommendations
1.7
1.9
3
Remove replace expand rear parking lot
Develop outdoor seating area near building
0 sf
1 ls
$
$
6
78,000
Total Site Recommendations
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
$
$
78,000
$
78,000
*Cost per
Total
Architectural Recommendations
2.2.4
2.2.4
2.1.3
2.1.4
2.3.1
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.4.5
2.4.8
Remove concrete stoop at rear door
Develop removed loading dock area
Add signage / lighting at selected entrances
Add canopy at selected entrances
Replace roofing (installed 2000 - 2005)
Replace cedar shakes and metal panel fascia
Replace windows in original building
Replace hollow metal doors and frames
Replace overhead door in storage room
2
2.5.1
2.5.3
2.5.3
2.5.3
2.5.4
2.5.6
3
2.5.7
Add new finishes in toilet rooms
Replace carpet
Replace vinyl composition tile flooring
Repair settling concrete slab and replace terrazzo tile in entry corridor
Replace ceilings
Replace original building doors and hardware
Replace casework in original building
1
2
3
2
1
1
3
3
2
1
3
Add daylighting to lower level classrooms along North and East walls (light wells,
areaways etc…)
Total Architectural Recommendations
15 of 16
0
0
2
1
30,000
2,500
1,200
11
0
5
1,800
23,798
1,500
1
40,000
84
200
ls
ls
ea
ea
sf
sf
sf
ea
ea
ea
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
6,000
10,000
5,000
52,000
16
30
90
2,000
3,900
65,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
10,000
52,000
480,000
75,000
108,000
22,000
330,000
sf
sf
ls
sf
ea
lf
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
65
6
6
13,000
6
1,820
460
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
120,000
140,000
8,800
13,000
234,000
153,000
92,000
$
1,837,800
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
11/6/2014
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
Mechanical Recommendations
2.7.1b Boilers are scheduled to be replaced in 2012
2.7
2
2.7.6
Replace HVAC in the original areas of the building, add chilled water piping in the
newer areas.
Upgrade entire building to AutoMatrix Controls
0 sf
45,321 sf
$
$
43
$
$
1,944,257
0 sf
$
7
$
-
$
1,944,257
Total Mechanical Recommendations
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
Electrical Recommendations
2.6.1
2.8.2
2.8.4
2.8.5
Replace entire fire alarm system.
Upgrade to energy efficient lighting in some areas.
Upgrade site lighting.
Upgrade egress lighting to meet current code.
2.8.5 Replace all radioactive exit signs with wired signs with battery backup.
2.8.7 Provide automatic lighting controls throughout the building.
2.8.9 Replace master clock system.
2.8.10 Provide emergency generator for egress lighting.
1
1
2
1
1
Total Electrical Recommendations
0 sf
0 sf
0 ls
57,278 sf
30 ea
57,278 sf
57,278 sf
57,278 sf
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1.63
6.50
23,000
0.98
1,000
1.30
0.91
1.95
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
$
$
55,900
30,000
74,500
52,200
111,700
$
324,300
$ 4,184,357
TOTAL
* The cost reflect total project costs and include: Architectural fees, Construction Management fees, Building Permit fees, moving costs, abatement costs, etc.
16 of 16
11/6/2014
Possible
Earned
Condition
Percent
200
153
Satisfactory
77%
Site:
1.0
Total Points
Building:
2.1
100
75
Satisfactory
75%
2.2
Accessibility
120
93
Satisfactory
78%
2.3
Structural
100
77
Satisfactory
77%
2.4
Building Envelope
100
58
Borderline
58%
2.5
Interior / Finishes
120
67
Borderline
56%
2.6
Life Safety
100
61
Borderline
61%
2.7
Mechanical
190
125
Borderline
66%
2.8
Electrical
150
99
Borderline
66%
1180
808
Borderline
68%
Poor
30-49%
Borderline
50-69%
Satisfactory
70-89%
Excellent
90-100%
Totals:
Percentages
Breakdown
Non-Existent
0%
Very
Inadequate
1 - 29%
$
10,210,000
$
4,159,100
41%
1 of 16
KCC Instructional Center
11/6/2014
Building Name:
Street Address:
10775 N. St. Helen Road
Building Data:
Additions/Renovations: 1999
Number of Floors: 2
Building Area:
Exterior Surfacing:
X
X
Floor Construction:
Air Conditioning:
27,555
45,338
+
17,783
Bearing Masonry
Steel Frame
Wood
Other
Brick
Metal
Concrete Frame
Stucco
Wood
X
Other (Wood Shakes)
Structural Slab
X
Steel Joists
X
Slab on Grade
Wood Joists
Other
Roof Top
Window Units
X
Split DX
Roof Top
Forced Air
X
Central
Room Units
Steam
X
Hot Water
Underground
X
Primary
Room Units
Heating:
Electrical Service:
Aerial
Generator:
X
X
Secondary
1600A
Voltage: 208/120V
Phase: 3
Wire: 4
Exists
Natural Gas
Diesel
None
2 of 16
11/6/2014
Aerial Photography
3 of 16
11/6/2014
1.0 Site
200 Points
Possible
Earned
1.1
25
20
1.2
25
18
1.3
effective.
25
20
1.4
20
15
1.5
15
10
1.6
20
15
1.7
15
12
1.8
20
15
1.9
structures
15
12
1.10
20
16
200
153
TOTAL - Site
Notes:
1.6
Provide expanded parking lot as part of master plan
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
4 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
12
20
18
20
16
20
16
25
13
100
75
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
5 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
100 Points
2.2 Accessibility
Possible
Earned
2.2.1
Exterior Walks and drives contain barrier-free curb cuts for building accessibility.
10
8
2.2.2
Barrier-Free parking is provided.
10
8
2.2.3
Outdoor areas and structures are on accessible routes.
20
16
2.2.4
Building entrances and exits are barrier-free.
20
16
2.2.5
Building entrances are equipped with power door operators
20
17
2.2.6
Toilet rooms are on accessible routes and designed to meet barrier-free codes.
20
10
2.2.7
Occupied spaces are accessible and are on accessible routes.
20
18
120
93
Notes:
Maximum
Points
Non-Existent
0%
Very Inadequate
1-29%
Poor
30-49%
Borderline
50-69%
Satisfactory
70-89%
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
0
0
0
0
1
2
3
4
2
4
6
8
3
6
9
12
4
8
12
16
5
10
15
20
6 of 16
25
0
5
10
7 of 16
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.3 Structural
100 Points
Possible
Earned
25
12
25
20
25
20
25
25
100
77
TOTAL - Structural
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
8 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
11
15
11
15
8
15
6
10
4
15
6
5
4
10
8
100
58
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
9 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
150 Points
Possible
Earned
20
10
20
8
20
10
15
12
15
8
15
10
15
9
120
67
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
10 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
6
15
0
10
0
10
8
15
12
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
100
61
Notes:
1
2
3
Fire alarm consists of two system (Simplex 4010 and National Time). The National Time system needs to be replaced.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
11 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.7 Mechanical
200 Points
Possible
Earned
5
4
15
12
5
3
5
2
10
4
20
12
20
12
20
12
20
12
10
4
10
8
10
8
10
8
10
8
10
8
10
8
190
125
TOTAL - Mechanical
Notes:
See next page.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
12 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
NOTES
BOILERS Burnham 4PW.154.45.OPF 34.2 BHP, oil, (2000) 1431 MBH in/1135 MBH out,
WATER HEATER STCE3-80-360
ACCU Trane TTA180B R22
The building is not protected with a fire protection system.
Original controls are pneumatic, some conversion to AutoMatrix
ISSUES
Lab gas shut off buttons are wired in series requiring visual check of all 5 to turn the system on.
Documentation of the original building not available
The classrooms in the SW pod are lacking ventilation because the air handling unit does not work
R22 cannot be used on equipment manufactured after 2010. R22 will continue to be produced until 2020
for use in existing equipment. Recycled R22 will continue to be available for service of .
existing equipment after 2020 until the supply is exhausted
RECOMMENDATION
Upgrade the remainder of the building to AutoMatrix controls.
Replace the original HVAC equipment with new.
Add air conditioning for the entire building.
13 of 16
11/6/2014
2.8 Electrical
150 Points
Possible
Earned
25
23
25
23
20
19
15
10
15
10
10
7
10
2
10
0
10
5
10
0
150
99
TOTAL - Electrical
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Egress lighting is provided by wall mounted battery packs and some integral in the fixture.
Exit signs are self-powered, radioactive that expired in 2009 (in the original part of the building).
Need additional "clean" technology power. New Panels.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
14 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
3.0 Recommendations
Priority
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
2.1.2
Provide landscaping along northwest hillside
0
sf
$
6
$
$
-
1.2
Provide concrete walks to north parking
3,600
sf
$
12
$
$
43,200
43,200
1.4
1.5
1.8
Provide pedestrian route up hill to west
Remove replace asphalt walks
Remove and replace parking lot and relocate barrier free parking
1,400
7,000
30,500
sf
sf
sf
$
$
$
59
6
6
$
$
$
$
81,900
42,000
183,000
306,900
$
350,100
Total 1 to 3 years
2
Total 4 to 6 years
3
3
3
Total 7 to 10 years
PriorityCondition Score
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2.1.3
2.3.1
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.4
2.5.1
2.5.6
2.5.8
Provide additional wayfinding signage.
Replace roofing currently out of warranty
Replace cedar shakes at mansard fascia (includes asbestos abatement)
Replace exterior window / door units at original building
Replace greenhouse glazing
Remodel toilet rooms including barrier free access in original building
Replace doors and hardware in original building
Replace chalkboards in select rooms
1
7,000
8,000
12
1
650
50
1
ls
sf
sf
ea
ls
sf
ea
ls
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
6,000
16
34
5,200
26,000
220
1,820
20,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
6,000
112,000
272,000
63,000
26,000
143,000
91,000
20,000
733,000
2.3.1
Replace roofing in remaining building (warranty expires in 2014 and 2017)
31,000
sf
$
16
$
$
496,000
496,000
2.5.3
2.5.4
2.5.7
Replace carpet and vinyl composition floor tile in original building
Replace 2X4 Ceiling
Replace casework in select rooms
24,000
24,000
250
sf
sf
lf
$
$
$
6
6
460
$
$
$
$
144,000
144,000
115,000
403,000
$
1,632,000
Total 1 to 3 years
2
Total 4 to 6 years
3
3
3
Total 7 to 10 years
15 of 16
Item #
11/6/2014
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
2.7.6
1
Upgrade the entire building to AutoMatrix Control
35,338
sf
$
7
$
$
230,000
230,000
Replace the original HVAC systems with new, add AC to the entire building.
35,338
sf
$
43
$
$
1,517,000
1,517,000
$
1,747,000
Total 1 to 3 years
2.7
2
Total 4 to 6 years
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
2.6.1
2.8.2
2.8.4
2.8.5
1
1
1
1
1
Replace original fire alarm panel and devices.
Upgrade light fixtures with T8 lamps and ballasts in some areas.
2.8.10 Provide emergency generator for egress lighting and recircuit as required.
45,338
0
0
45,338
22
45,338
45,333
sf
sf
ls
sf
ea
sf
sf
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1.63
6.50
23,000
1.00
910
1.30
3.25
$
$
$
73,700
-
$
$
$
$
$
45,400
20,100
59,000
147,400
345,600
2.8.6
2.8.9
2 ea
45,338 sf
$
$
19,500
1.00
$
$
$
39,000
45,400
84,400
$
430,000
$
$
$
1,308,600
2,140,600
709,900
Total 1 to 3 years
2
2
Need additional "clean" technology power. New panels.
Replace master clock system.
Total 4 to 6 years
Total (1 to 3 years)
$ 4,159,100
TOTAL
16 of 16
Career Technology Center - Performing Arts Center
11/6/2014
Possible
Earned
Condition
Percent
200
137
Borderline
69%
Site:
1.0
Total Points
Building:
2.1
100
63
Borderline
63%
2.2
Accessibility
120
86
Satisfactory
72%
2.3
Structural
100
80
Satisfactory
80%
2.4
Building Envelope
100
53
Borderline
53%
2.5
Interior / Finishes
120
64
Borderline
53%
2.6
Life Safety
100
84
Satisfactory
84%
2.7
Mechanical
190
120
Borderline
63%
2.8
Electrical
150
74
Poor
49%
1180
761
Borderline
64%
Poor
30-49%
Borderline
50-69%
Satisfactory
70-89%
Excellent
90-100%
Totals:
Percentages
Breakdown
Non-Existent
0%
Very
Inadequate
1 - 29%
$
9,500,000
$
5,684,100
60%
1 of 16
KCC Career Technology Center - Performing Arts Center
11/6/2014
Building Name:
Street Address:
Building Data:
Additions/Renovations: 1987, 1997 & 1999
Number of Floors: 1 (Lower Level Dressing Rms)
Exterior Surfacing:
X
X
Bearing Masonry
Steel Frame
Wood
Other
Brick
Metal
Wood
Floor Construction:
X
Air Conditioning:
X
Concrete Frame
Stucco
Other (Wood Shakes)
Structural Slab
Steel Joists
X
Slab on Grade
Wood Joists
Other
Roof Top
Window Units
X
Split DX
Roof Top
Forced Air
X
Central
Room Units
Steam
X
Hot Water
Underground
X
Primary
Room Units
Heating:
Electrical Service:
Aerial
X
Secondary
Generator:
X
Voltage:
Phase:
Wire:
Exists
Natural Gas
Diesel
None
2 of 16
Aerial Photography
3 of 16
11/6/2014
11/6/2014
1.0 Site
200 Points
Possible
Earned
1.1
25
20
1.2
25
15
1.3
effective.
25
20
1.4
20
14
1.5
15
9
1.6
20
12
1.7
15
11
1.8
20
14
1.9
structures
15
8
1.10
20
14
200
137
TOTAL - Site
Notes:
1.2
1.9
Provide parking closer to hair saloon as part of master plan
Provide plaza at thetre entry as part of master plan
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
4 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
10
20
15
20
12
20
12
25
14
100
63
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
5 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.2 Accessibility
100 Points
Possible
Earned
10
8
10
8
20
16
20
16
20
10
20
10
20
18
120
86
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
6 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
0
5
10
7 of 16
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.3 Structural
100 Points
Possible
Earned
25
15
25
20
25
20
25
25
100
80
TOTAL - Structural
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
8 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
10
15
12
15
8
15
6
10
5
15
3
5
4
10
5
100
53
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
9 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
150 Points
Possible
Earned
20
10
20
8
20
8
15
12
15
6
15
8
15
12
120
64
Notes:
Assessment of food service equipment was not included.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
10 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
14
15
12
10
9
10
9
15
12
10
3
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
100
84
Notes:
1
2
3
Fire alarm system is a Simplex 4010 installed in 2009.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
11 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.7 Mechanical
200 Points
Possible
Earned
5
4
15
12
5
3
5
3
10
6
20
12
20
12
20
8
20
8
10
6
10
6
10
8
10
8
10
8
10
8
10
8
190
120
TOTAL - Mechanical
Notes:
See next page.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
12 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
6
NOTES
BOILERS Burnham 4FPW.311A.45.0.PF (2002) Oil, 69.1 bhp, 2891 MBHin/2313 MBHout
WATER HEATER AO Smith DRE120 917, 119 gal, electric
Building is partially protected with fire protection in the Stage area and basement.
Original controls are pneumatic, some conversion to AutoMatrix
Documentation not available for the building additions
Balcony air handling units are not used
1
2
3
4
ISSUES
Water seeps thru the floor in the Auto Lab during heavy rains
The roof mounted ACCU over the Auditorium is noisey
Much of the original HVAC equipment is either not used or not operational as intended
Much of the HVAC equipment is original and more than 40 years old
1
2
3
RECOMMENDATIONS
Replace the original HVAC equipment
Repair/remedy the drainage issue in the Auto Lab
13 of 16
11/6/2014
11/6/2014
2.8 Electrical
150 Points
Possible
Earned
25
15
25
20
20
8
15
11
15
6
10
8
10
4
10
0
10
2
10
0
150
74
TOTAL - Electrical
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
2000A, 208/120V and 400A, 480V (fused) service by Westinghouse. Service is in poor condition and full.
Clock system is by National Time and not working..
Exit signs in some areas are self-powered, radioactive that expired in 2009.
Dressing rooms need guards on lights.
Lighting in most of the building is T12 fluorescent.
Replace original primary electrical cable feeding the building.
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
14 of 16
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
3.0 Recommendations
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
Recommendations
Area / Qty.
Provide pedestrian walk along building's west side
Remove and replace asphalt parking
Remove and replace concrete at lift station
1
35,000
1,000
*Cost per
Total
1.4
1.7
1.7
3
3
3
ls
sf
s.f.
$
$
100,000
5.50
$12
Total 7 to 10 years
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
$
$
$
100,000
193,000
12,000
$
305,000
$
305,000
*Cost per
Total
Add signage to identify student / department entrances
Replace cedar shakes and soffits at mansard fascia
Replace windows
Replace hollow metal doors and frames
Replace original overhead doors
Remodel toilet rooms including barrier free access
1
2.1.3
2.4.3
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.4.5
2.5.1
2.5.1
1
2.5.6
Replace interior doors and hardware
2
2.1.4
2
2.5.3
2.5.3
2.5.3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
8,000
3,000
27
4
650
1
ea
sf
sf
ea
ea
sf
ls
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,900
30
90
1,950
5,200
220
260,000
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
7,800
240,000
270,000
53,000
20,800
143,000
260,000
60
ea
$
1,820
$
$
109,200
1,103,800
Add entrance canopies
Replace auditorium seating
Replace carpet and vinyl composition tile flooring
Replace carpet in auditorium
4
750
8,000
7,500
ea
seats
sf
sf
$
$
$
$
30,000
364
6
6
$
$
$
$
$
120,000
273,000
48,000
45,000
486,000
Remove and replace overgrown landscape
Replace roofing and insulation (replaced in 2005 and 2006)
Add daylighting to select classrooms
Replace ceilings
1
44,000
2
15,000
200
ls
sf
ea
sf
lf
$
$
$
$
$
8,000
16
20,000
6
460
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,000
704,000
40,000
90,000
92,000
934,000
$
2,523,800
Remodel existing building or build addition to provide barrier free access and exiting at
dressing rooms
Total 1 to 3 years
2
2
Total 4 to 6 years
3
2.1.2
2.3.1
2.4.8
2.5.4
3
2.5.7
3
3
3
Total 7 to 10 years
15 of 16
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
11/6/2014
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
1
2.7.6
1
2.7.8
Upgrade the entire building to AutoMatrix Controls
Repair/remedy the drainage issues in the Auto Lab
42,084
1
sf
ls
$
$
7
26,000
$
$
$
273,600
26,000
299,600
Replace the original HVAC systems with new.
42,084
sf
$
43
$
$
1,806,000
1,806,000
$
2,105,600
Total 1 to 3 years
2.7
2
Total 4 to 6 years
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
2.8.1
2.8.2
2.8.2
2.8.4
2.8.5
Upgrade light fixtures with T8 lamps and ballasts.
Provide lamp guards on the dressing room lights.
2.8.10 Provide emergency generator for egress lighting.
1
1
1
1
750
ft
sf
ea
ls
sf
ea
sf
sf
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
91.00
6.50
130
23,000
0.98
910
1.30
1.95
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
68,300
182,700
2,600
23,000
41,100
22,800
54,800
$
$
82,100
477,400
1 ls
10 ea
42,084 sf
$
$
$
104,000
13,000
0.91
$
$
$
$
104,000
130,000
38,300
272,300
$
749,700
$
$
$
1,880,800
2,564,300
1,239,000
28,100
20
1
42,084
25
42,084
42,084
Total 1 to 3 years
2
2.8.1
2.8.3
2
2.8.9
2
Provide new main distribution panel.
Replace outdated branch panelboards.
Total 4 to 6 years
$ 5,684,100
TOTAL
16 of 16
Fine Arts Center - Physical Plant
11/6/2014
Building Name:
Street Address:
Building Data:
Additions/Renovations:
Number of Floors: One
sf
Bearing Masonry
x
Wood
Exterior Surfacing:
Floor Construction:
Air Conditioning:
Steel Frame
Concrete Frame
Other
Brick
x
Metal
Wood
X
Other - CMU
Structural Slab
Steel Joists
Wood Joists
Other
Roof Top
Stucco
x
Slab on Grade
Window Units
X
Split DX
Roof Top
Forced Air
X
Central
Room Units
Steam
X
Hot Water
Underground
X
Primary
Room Units
Heating:
Electrical Service:
Aerial
X
Secondary
Generator:
X
Voltage: 208/120V
Phase: 3
Wire: 4
Exists
Natural Gas
Diesel
None
1 of 15
11/6/2014
Aerial Photography
2 of 15
11/6/2014
1.0 Site
200 Points
Possible
Earned
1.1
25
20
1.2
25
20
1.3
effective.
25
20
1.4
20
12
1.5
15
12
1.6
20
16
1.7
15
11
1.8
20
16
1.9
structures
15
12
1.10
20
16
200
155
TOTAL - Site
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
3 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
10
20
16
20
8
20
9
25
12
100
55
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
4 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.2 Accessibility
100 Points
Possible
Earned
10
8
10
8
20
16
20
20
16
20
18
20
18
120
84
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
5 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
0
5
10
6 of 15
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.3 Structural
100 Points
Possible
Earned
25
22
25
20
25
20
25
25
100
87
TOTAL - Structural
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
7 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
10
15
10
15
9
15
10
10
4
15
10
5
4
10
6
100
63
Notes:
Daylighting in interior spaces?
Ice build-up at eave ?
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
8 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
150 Points
Possible
Earned
20
15
20
10
20
16
15
10
15
10
15
6
15
12
120
79
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
9 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
13
15
12
10
0
10
8
15
12
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
100
80
Notes:
1 Fire alarm system is Simplex 4100U in good condition.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
10 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
2.7 Mechanical
200 Points
Possible
Earned
5
5
15
12
5
5
5
3
10
8
20
16
20
12
20
16
20
8
10
4
10
8
10
8
10
8
10
8
2.7.12 Condition of the internal water distribution system.
10
8
10
6
190
135
TOTAL - Mechanical
Notes:
See next page.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
11 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
Notes:
11/6/2014
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
NOTES
Boilers Burnham 4FW.127.40.0.PF Oil fired, 31.8 BHP, 1329.0 MBH in/1063.0 MBH out, (xxxx)
Plans are in process to convert to propane.
Water Heater Lochinvar RWL 399 PM
AHU-1, CVSZ Serves Sculpture
AHU-2, CVSZ Serves Kiln Rm
AHU-3, CVSZ Serves Ceramics - cold rooms
AHU-4, CVRH Serves Classrooms - very noisey return air grille
AHU-5, CVRH Serves maintenance offices
AHU-6, CVSZ (1 reheat coil) Serves print shop
ACCU-6, Trane TTA180C300DA
The building is fully protected with a wet pipe sprinkler fire protection system
1
2
3
4
5
7
8
ISSUES
Originial Barber Coleman controls are being replaced by AutoMatrix
The original Barber Coleman control valves tend to leak and should be replaced
The RA grille at AHU-4 is very noisey
There is some structural corrosion taking place in the kiln room
It is hard to heat the Ceramics, Weaving, Commons, and Mens room
Building is too warm in the summer.
There is a corrosion issue with fire protection storage tanks that is presently being resolved.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
RECOMMENDATIONS
Add AC to units AHU-4 and 5
Evaluate the air balance and control sequence of AHU-4 and determine cause of the noisey return air.
Add a capture hood over the kilns to capture and exhaust the generated fumes. Evalute the room air balance.
Add finned tube heat on the north wall of Mens 102
Change the diffusers in Ceramics, Weaving and the Commons from horizontal to vertical throw.
Add clay traps in ceramics
1
12 of 15
11/6/2014
2.8 Electrical
150 Points
Possible
Earned
25
23
25
20
20
19
15
8
15
12
10
8
10
4
10
0
10
5
10
0
150
99
TOTAL - Electrical
Notes:
1
2
3
4
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Not many occupancy sensors in the building.
Master clock system is not working properly.
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
13 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
11/6/2014
3.0 Recommendations
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
Recommendations
Area / Qty.
Provide wider walk on building's west side
Remove replace asphalt pavement
1,000
38,000
*Cost per
Total
1.40
1.70
3
3
sf
sf
$
$
9
6
Total 7 to 10 years
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
$
$
$
9,000
228,000
237,000
$
237,000
*Cost per
Total
1
1
1
2.1.1
2.1.4
2.4.4
2.4.5
Provide wayfinding signage to building entrances
Provide canopy at north entrance to Print Shop
Replace aluminum windows
Replace exterior hollow metal doors and frames
2.1.3
2.5.5
2.4.3
2.5.3
2.5.8
Provide entrance canopy to define Physical Plant office entrance
Repaint interior masonry walls
Replace cedar shakes fascia at entrances
Replace carpet and vinyl composition floor tile in select areas
Replace casework
2.5.1
2.5.7
Replace toilet partitions
Replace select interior wood doors
2
0
400
16
ea
ls
sf
ea
$
$
$
$
4,000
52,000
90
1,820
$
$
$
$
$
8,000
36,000
29,200
73,200
1
1
300
5,000
260
ls
ls
sf
sf
lf
$
$
$
$
$
26,000
39,000
30
6
455
$
$
$
26,000
39,000
9,000
$
$
$
30,000
118,300
222,300
7
3
stalls
ea
$
$
1,300
1,820
$
$
9,100
5,500
$
14,600
$
310,100
Total 1 to 3 years
2
2
2
2
2
Total 4 to 6 years
3
3
Total 7 to 10 years
14 of 15
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
11/6/2014
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
Decontaminate existing fire suppression water tanks
2
Change the diffusers in Ceramics, Weaving, and Commons from horizontal to vertical throw 10
2.7.4 Add finned tube heat on the north wall of Mens 102
20
2.7.6 Upgrade entire building to AutoMatrix Controls
30,001
2.7.7 Fix the excessive noise problem in RA duct of AHU-4
0
2.7.7 Add a capture hood over the kilns, evaluate the air balance
1
2.7.13 Add a clay trap in Ceramics
1
ea
ea
lf
sf
ls
ls
ea
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
30,000
200
100
6.50
6,500
32,500
6,500
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
60,000
2,000
2,000
195,100
32,500
6,500
298,100
2.7.2b Add AC to units AHU-4 and AHU-5
ea
$
26,000
$
$
52,000
52,000
$
350,100
2.6.2
1
2.7.4
1
1
1
1
1
1
Total 1 to 3 years
3
2
Total 7 to 10 years
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
2.8.6
2.8.7
2.8.9
Need post protection for transformer.
Provide automatic lighting controls throughout the building.
2.8.10 Provide emergency generator for egress lighting and recircuit as required.
1
1
1
1
2
30,000
30,000
30,000
ea
sf
sf
sf
Total 1 to 3 years
TOTAL
$
$
$
$
1,300
1.30
1.00
3.25
$
$
2,600
39,000
$
$
$
30,000
97,500
169,100
$
169,100
$
$
$
540,400
222,300
303,600
$
15 of 15
1,066,300
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
Building Name:
Kirtland Library
Street Address:
Building Data:
Additions/Renovations: None
Number of Floors: 1
Exterior Surfacing:
sf
X
Bearing Masonry
X
X
Wood
Other
X
Brick
Metal
Wood
Floor Construction:
Air Conditioning:
X
Steel Frame
Concrete Frame
Stucco
Other (Wood Shakes)
Structural Slab
Steel Joists
X
Slab on Grade
Wood Joists
Other
Roof Top
Window Units
X
Split DX
Roof Top
Forced Air
X
Central
Room Units
Steam
X
Hot Water
Underground
X
Primary
Room Units
Heating:
Electrical Service:
Generator:
Aerial
X
X
Secondary
600A
Voltage: 208/120V
Phase: 3
Wire: 4
Exists
Natural Gas
Diesel
None
X
1 of 15
LP Gas
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
Aerial Photography
2 of 15
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
1.0 Site
200 Points
Possible
Earned
1.1
25
20
1.2
25
20
1.3
effective.
25
20
1.4
20
16
1.5
15
12
1.6
20
15
1.7
15
8
1.8
20
16
1.9
structures
15
12
1.10
20
16
200
155
TOTAL - Site
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
3 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
10
20
14
20
14
20
16
25
14
100
68
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
4 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
2.2 Accessibility
100 Points
Possible
Earned
10
8
10
8
20
16
20
15
20
20
8
20
18
120
73
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
5 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
0
5
10
6 of 15
15
20
25
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
2.3 Structural
100 Points
Possible
Earned
25
12
25
20
25
20
25
25
100
77
TOTAL - Structural
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
7 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
10
15
9
15
8
15
6
10
4
15
3
5
4
10
8
100
52
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
8 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
150 Points
Possible
Earned
20
8
20
16
20
14
15
12
15
8
15
9
15
12
120
79
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
9 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
3
15
o
10
0
10
8
15
12
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
100
58
Notes:
1
2
Fire Alarm is original 120V system by National Time. Does not meet current code.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
10 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
2.7 Mechanical
200 Points
Possible
Earned
5
4
15
12
5
4
5
4
10
6
20
12
20
12
20
8
20
8
10
6
10
8
10
8
10
8
10
8
10
8
10
8
190
124
TOTAL - Mechanical
Notes:
See next page.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
11 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
1
2
3
NOTES
Boilers (2) Burnham 4FW.127.45.0.PF 28.2 bhp 1180MBH in/944MBH out oil fired
The building is not protected with a fire protection system
Water Heater electric GE40M6A 40 gal
ACCU Trane RA3004A R22 Original Equipment
AHU-3 Roof top air handling unit - no data available
AHU-2 Newer unit - no data available
AHU-1 Original Equipment
IT room is served by newer ductless splits
ISSUES
The original controls are being replace with Auto Matrix
Much of the HVAC equipment is more than 40 years old and should be replaced
R22 cannot be used on equipment manufactured after 2010. R22 will continue to
be produced until 2020 for use in existing equipment. Recycled R22 will continue to be
available for service of existing equipment after 2020 until the supply is exhausted.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Replace the HVAC equipment with new
Clean the existing ducts and the return air tunnel
12 of 15
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
2.8 Electrical
150 Points
Possible
Earned
25
21
25
15
20
16
15
9
15
6
10
7
10
2
10
6
10
4
10
6
150
92
TOTAL - Electrical
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
600A, 208/120V service and 225A, 480V service installed in 2002. Need additional "clean" technology power.
Mass notification horns.
The generator only feeds the IT department.
Egress lighting is provided by wall mounted battery packs and spaced too far apart to meet code.
No occupancy sensors in the library, classrooms and office areas.
Exit signs are self-powered, radioactive that expired in 2009.
Lighting in most of the building is T12 fluorescent.
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
13 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
Kirtland Library
11/6/2014
3.0 Recommendations
Priority
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
1.60
Remove replace asphalt parking lot
1.60
Remove replace asphalt walk to Arts building
26,000
sf
$
6
$
$
156,000
156,000
540
l.f.
$
5
$
$
27,000
27,000
$
183,000
Total 1 to 3 years
2
Total 4 to 6 years
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
1
1
1
1
1
2.2.4
2.4.4
2.4.5
2.5.1
2.6.1
Provide concrete between rear doors and existing walk
Replace exterior windows
Replace exterior doors, frames and hardware
Remodel toilet rooms including barrier free access
Replace entire fire alarm system.
300
1,200
12
430
15,510
sf
ea
ea
sf
sf
$
$
$
$
$
7
90
1,950
200
1.63
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,100
108,000
23,400
86,000
26,000
245,500
2.1.3
2.3.1
2.4.3
2.5.4
2.5.6
Add signage at main entry
Replace roofing and insulation (warranty expires in 2012)
Replace cedar shakes at mansard fascia & mechanical enclosure
Replace ceilings in select areas
Replace interior doors and hardware
1
16,000
3,000
2,500
27
ls
sf
sf
sf
ea
$
$
$
$
$
8,000
16
30
6
1,820
$
$
$
$
$
$
8,000
256,000
90,000
15,000
50,000
419,000
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.5.3
2.5.7
Add wayfinding signage from rear parking
Provide plant removal and new landscaping
Replace carpet/vinyl composition tile in select areas
1
1,000
3,000
80
ls
sf
sf
lf
$
$
$
$
7,000
6
6
460
$
$
$
$
$
7,000
6,000
18,000
37,000
68,000
$
732,500
Total 1 to 3 years
2
2
2
2
2
Total 4 to 6 years
3
3
3
3
Total 7 to 10 years
14 of 15
Kirtland Library
Item #
11/6/2014
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
2.7.6
1
Upgrade the entire building to AutoMatrix Controls
15,510
sf
$
6.50
$
$
100,900
100,900
Replace the original HVAC systems with new
15,510
sf
$
43
$
$
665,400
665,400
$
766,300
Total 1 to 3 years
2.7
2
Total 4 to 6 years
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
2.8.1
2.8.2
2.8.4
2.8.5
1
1
1
1
1
550
Upgrade light fixtures with T8 lamps and ballasts.
2.8.10 Upgrade emergency generator for egress lighting.
15,510
1
15,510
16
15,510
15,510
ft
sf
ls
sf
ea
sf
sf
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
91.00
6.50
23,000
0.98
910
1.30
1.95
$
$
$
$
$
$
50,100
100,900
23,000
15,200
14,600
20,200
$
$
30,300
254,300
2.8.6
2.8.9
1 ea
15,510
sf
$
$
19,500
0.91
$
$
$
19,500
14,200
33,700
$
288,000
$
$
$
756,700
1,145,100
68,000
Total 1 to 3 years
2
2
Need additional "clean" technology power. New panels.
Replace wired master clock system with a wireless system.
Total 4 to 6 years
$ 1,969,800
TOTAL
15 of 15
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
Building Name:
UC-MTEC
Street Address:
Gaylord, Michigan
Building Data:
Additions/Renovations:
Number of Floors: 1
46,621 SF (28,000 SF is KCC's)
Exterior Surfacing:
X
X
Floor Construction:
Air Conditioning:
Bearing Masonry
X
Steel Frame
Wood
Other
Brick
Metal
Wood
Other
Structural Slab
Steel Joists
Wood Joists
Other
Roof Top
Concrete Frame
Stucco
X
Slab on Grade
Window Units
X
Split DX
Roof Top
Forced Air
X
Central
Room Units
Steam
X
Hot Water
Room Units
Heating:
Electrical Service:
Aerial
X
X
Secondary
X
Primary
2000A
480/277 Voltage:
Generator: (For Data Center only)
Underground
3
Exists
None
1 of 15
Phase:
4
Wire:
Natural Gas
X
Diesel
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
Aerial Photography
Gaylord, Michigan
2 of 15
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
1.0 Site
200 Points
Possible
Earned
1.1
25
20
1.2
Separation of bus, car and pedestrian traffic is adequate for the safety of occupants.
25
18
1.3
effective.
25
20
1.4
20
16
1.5
15
12
1.6
20
16
1.7
15
12
1.8
20
16
1.9
structures
15
0
1.10
20
0
200
130
TOTAL - Site
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
3 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
12
20
12
20
16
20
12
25
20
100
72
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
4 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
2.2 Accessibility
100 Points
Possible
Earned
10
8
10
8
20
16
20
16
20
20
18
20
18
120
84
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
5 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
0
5
10
6 of 15
15
20
25
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
2.3 Structural
100 Points
Possible
Earned
25
22
25
22
25
20
25
25
100
89
TOTAL - Structural
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
7 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
12
15
12
15
9
15
12
10
12
15
12
5
4
10
8
100
81
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
8 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
150 Points
Possible
Earned
20
18
20
12
20
15
15
12
15
12
15
10
15
12
120
91
Notes:
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
9 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
100 Points
Possible
Earned
15
14
15
15
2.6.3 Security system is installed throughout building.
10
9
10
9
15
12
10
10
10
10
5
5
5
5
5
5
100
94
Notes:
1.
2.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Fire Alarm is Simplex 4010.
Security system is by Honeywell.
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
10 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
2.7 Mechanical
200 Points
Possible
Earned
5
4
15
12
5
5
5
5
10
10
20
16
20
20
20
15
20
12
10
9
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
190
168
TOTAL - Mechanical
Notes:
See next page.
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
11 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
UC-MTEC
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
11/6/2014
NOTES
Boilers Lochinvar CBN0985 (2000) Copper Fin atmospheric fired nat gas
Air Handling Units York
ACCU York YCUL00865CA6 R22 (2000)
Return Fans Woods
Barber Coleman controls with some migration to Auto Matrix
The building is fully protected with a wet pipe sprinkler fire protection system
ISSUES
R22 cannot be used on new equipment manufactured after 2010.
R22 will continue to be produced until 2020 for use in existing equipment.
Recycled R22 will continue to be available for service of existing equipment after 2020 until the supply is exhausted
The return fan motors are not accessible. The motor bearings on RF-2 are failing and will need to be repaired.
The air handling units need to run 24/7 to prevent nusciance trips by the freeze stats on start up
There is concern about the Weld Lab dust getting into the HVAC system
The elec closet in the University Center lacks ventilation
There is a problem with the paint on the HVAC sheet metal in the labs.
There is a general problem with piping leaks from poor workmanship
The boilers have required frequent repairs and are being replaced.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Upgrade the remainder of the building to Auto Matrix controls
Periodically monitor the air quality in the Welding Lab
Add motor bearing protection on motors controlled by varible frequency drives.
Install external motor bearing grease fittings on the return fans
Add controls to the air handling units to keep the outdoor air dampers closed and full heat
at the terminal boxes during morning warm up.
Add ventilation to the elec closet mentioned above.
Welding Lab ventilation does not meet code.
12 of 15
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
2.8 Electrical
150 Points
Possible
Earned
25
24
25
15
20
19
15
13
15
12
10
9
10
4
10
0
10
9
10
7
150
112
TOTAL - Electrical
Notes:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Maximum
Points
5
10
15
20
25
2000A Siemens fused service disconnect with fused distribution section.
Clock system is Simplex #6351. No PA system
The generator only feeds the new data center.
Low light level in classrooms.
Ballast are burning out in the metal halide fixtures in the corridor.
No occupancy sensors in the classrooms and office areas.
Labs have metal halide light fixtures.
Non-Existent
0%
0
0
0
0
0
Very Inadequate
1-29%
1
2
3
4
5
Poor
30-49%
2
4
6
8
10
13 of 15
Borderline
50-69%
3
6
9
12
15
Satisfactory
70-89%
4
8
12
16
20
Excellent
90-100%
5
10
15
20
25
UC-MTEC
11/6/2014
3.0 Recommendations
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
$
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
1
1
1
1
2.1.4
2.4.3
2.5.4
2.5.4
Add canopy at corridor entrance on shop end
Revise exterior soffit to minimize ice build-up at the eave
Add ceiling in high volume office areas
Repaint ductwork in shop areas
1
1,000
420
1
ls
lf
sf
ls
$
$
$
$
65,000
130
6
52,000
$
$
$
$
$
65,000
130,000
2,600
52,000
249,600
2.5.3
Replace carpet
23,000
sf
$
6
$
$
138,000
138,000
2.1.1
2.5.7
2.5.7
Add appropriate landscape enhancements near main entrance
Replace casework in office areas
Repair casework in reception / office area
1
100
1
ls
lf
ls
$
$
$
11,000
460
2,600
$
$
$
$
11,000
46,000
2,600
59,600
$
447,200
Total 1 to 3 years
2
Total 4 to 6 years
3
3
3
Total 7 to 10 years
14 of 15
UC-MTEC
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
11/6/2014
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
1
2.7.5
1
2.7.5
1
2.7.7
2.7.7
Add motor bearing protection on motors controlled by VFD's
Install external motor bearing grease fittings on RA fans.
Add ventilation to the elec closet in the University Center
Modify Welding Lab ventilation to meet code.
4
2
1
1
ea
ea
ls
ls
$
$
$
$
325
650
6,500
78,000
Total 1 to 3 years
Priority
Condition Score
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
$
$
$
$
$
1,300
1,300
6,500
78,000
87,100
$
87,100
*Cost per
Total
2.8.2
2.8.2
2.8.2
2.8.7
Upgrade classroom light fixtures to achieve a high light level.
Replace corridor light fixtures.
Replace the Lab light fixtures with high bay fluorescents.
Provide automatic lighting controls throughout the building.
2.8.10 Upgrade emergency generator to include egress lighting.
1
1
1
1
1
17,000
55
9,750
46,621
46,621
sf
ea
sf
sf
sf
Total 1 to 3 years
$
$
$
$
$
6.50
1,105
5.85
1.30
1.30
$
$
$
$
110,500
60,800
58,000
60,700
$
$
60,700
350,700
$
350,700
$
$
$
687,400
138,000
59,600
$
TOTAL
15 of 15
885,000
Miscellaneous Areas
11/6/2014
3.0 Recommendations
Priority
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
1
1.10
Remove and replace perimeter target range fence and grub
Replace parking lot asphalty and curbing at Kirtland House
1.5
Remove and replace House #25 front walk
1
2,400
lf
$
52
$
$
$
124,800
20,000
144,800
200
sf
$
8
$
$
27,000
27,000
$
171,800
Total 1 to 3 years
2
Total 4 to 6 years
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
1
1
Seal/tuckpoint basement of House #25
Paint exterior of Observatory Building
$
$
$
8,000
4,000
12,000
Replace roof of House #25
Replace windows of House #25
Repair garage floor cracking of House #30
Repair garage floor cracking of House #45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
10,600
10,600
10,600
10,600
6,400
12,100
12,100
7,300
80,300
Miscellaneous repair at Waste Water Treatment
Replace roof at Switch Gear Building
$
$
$
14,000
14,000
$
106,300
Total 1 to 3 years
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Total 4 to 6 years
3
3
Total 7 to 10 years
1 of 2
Miscellaneous Areas
Item #
11/6/2014
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
*Cost per
Total
1
Total 1 to 3 years
Sand filter replacement and pump replacement at Waste Water Treatment
2
Total 4 to 6 years
Item #
Area / Qty.
Recommendations
$
$
-
$
$
100,000
100,000
$
100,000
*Cost per
Total
1
1
Fiber for data line at Waste Water Treatment
Interior and exterior lighting at Storage Building
$
$
$
6,100
10,000
6,100
Emergency lighting at Switch Gear Building
$
$
10,000
10,000
$
16,100
$
$
$
162,900
217,300
14,000
Total 1 to 3 years
2
Total 4 to 6 years
$
TOTAL
2 of 2
394,200

2014 Campus Facilities Master Plan

Transcription

Similar documents

Iluminate Your Style

Eastern Washington University Finds NexLight Controls Simple To

Whispering Pine - The Villages

BevMo! - Bill Brown Sales

Alfredo De Vido Architects Kate`s Paperie

2005 Haulmark This Motorhome is amazing as the pictures will

A Whole New World: Welcome to Michigan Tech

Quality Features Les Jardins Sur Laurier

Thorold - Great Gulf

PEWITT CISD - pewittfpc.net

2015 Winter Newsletter