W NEWSFLASH nr°17 HOSPITHERA,
Transcription
W NEWSFLASH nr°17 HOSPITHERA,
HOSPITHERA, YOUR PARTNER IN DAYCARE W 06/2014 OUNDCARE NEWSFLASH nr°17 CONTENT: p1. INTRO p4. CASE STUDY: POLYMEM p6. PRODUCTNEWS: SANICAST p2. IN THE PICTURE: EWMA 2014 p5. PRODUCTNEWS/ SCARBAN p7. CONTACT Beste wondzorgspecialist, De zomer staat voor de deur en velen onder jullie kijken ongetwijfeld al uit naar een welverdiende vakantie. Wij hebben alvast wat lectuur voor u klaar om de zomermaanden door te komen! In deze 17e newsletter blikken terug naar het EWMA-congres in Madrid, de grootste internationale bijeenkomst op gebied van wondzorg. Als partner in de wondzorg biedt Hospithera u immers een aantal gevestigde waarden aan binnen dit domein, die eveneens allen vertegenwoordigd waren op EWMA. Eén van onze belangrijkste leveranciers, PolyMem, presenteerde er dit jaar twee posters over het gebruik van dit product bij radiotherapie-geïnduceerde huidletsels. Lees de volledige studies op pagina 4. Verder stellen we u in deze newsletter ook nog twee nieuwe producten voor: - Scarban: voor de preventie en behandeling van hypertrofische en keloïde littekens en voor de behandeling van brandwonden. - en Sanicast: voor het reinigen van de huid onder een gipsverband. Veel leesplezier! HOSPITHERA Hospithera, opgericht in 1962, verdeelt medische hulpmiddelen ontwikkeld door betrouwbare leveranciers met een internationale reputatie. Door de jaren heen is Hospithera uitgegroeid tot de bevoorrechte partner van ziekenhuizen en gezondheidsprofessionals, dankzij een toegewijd verkoopsteam en oplossingen op maat. U kan op ons rekenen! 1 IN THE PICTURE: EWMA 2014 Onze partners op het EWMA-congres De 24e editie van het congres van de European Wound Management Association vond dit jaar plaats in Madrid, Spanje van 14 tot 16 mei. Het was één van de meeste succesvolle edities tot nu toe, met meer dan 3400 deelnemers uit 80 verschillende landen en 1150 wetenschappelijke presentaties. Hospithera is dan ook trots om met enkele van de bevoorrechte industriepartners van EWMA te kunnen samenwerken. Een van onze belangrijkste partners, trouwens ook gold sponsor van de EWMA organisatie, is PolyMem. PolyMem was heel zichtbaar aanwezig met een prominente stand, evenals een VIP-area, waar verschillende lezingen en workshops georganiseerd werden. Deze workshops behandelden vooral het gebruik van PolyMem verbanden bij radiotherapie-geïnduceerde huidletsels, de introductie van Nursicare en het gebruik van de nieuwe PolyMem Surgical voor een snellere wondheling en infectiepreventie bij postoperatieve wonden na knie- en heuparthroplastieën. Hierbij alvast enkele sfeerfoto’s: PolyMem verbanden 4 unieke eigenschappen gecombineerd in één verband: hydraterend, reinigend, absorberend, vullend. Finger / Toe Dressings Optimaliseer de genezing! Ideale keuze voor het behandelen van hematomen, verstuikingen, snijwonden, brandwonden, ulcers, matricectomiën. Nursicare Steriel borstkompres voor moeders die borstvoeding geven: Verzacht en beschermt pijnlijke tepels, versnelt de genezing van tepelkloven, absorbeert lekken 2 IN THE PICTURE: EWMA 2014 Onze partners op het EWMA-congres Actisorb 220 Silver, Adaptic, Algosteril, Bioclusive, Inadine, Nu-derm, Nu-Gel, Promogran, Silvercel, Tielle, Tielle Plus, Tielle Xtra Systagenix Levert innovatieve producten voor de behandeling van chronische en chirurgische wonden en de controle van bloedingen. Aldanex Preventie en behandeling van vochtletsels. Microdacyn Geëlektrolyseerde pH-neutrale vloeistof voor het reinigen, uitspoelen en bevochtigen van chronische wonden. Revamil Hydroactieve en zuiverende honinggel om het helingsproces te optimaliseren. 3 CASE STUDY: POLYMEM Het gebruik van PolyMem bij radiotherapie-geïnduceerde huidletsels In België krijgen meer dan 60000 mensen per jaar de diagnose van kanker. Meer dan de helft van deze mensen krijgt hiervoor onder andere radiotherapiebehandeling. Deze behandeling heeft een negatieve invloed op de huid en veroorzaakt dan ook in veel gevallen huidletsels. PolyMem blijkt in veel gevallen een heel doeltreffende oplossing te vormen in de preventie en behandeling van deze huidletsels; Tijdens EWMA 2014 werden hierover 2 posters voorgesteld, vanuit de UK. PolyMem wordt volgens verschillende nationale oncologische guidelines in de UK zelfs beschouwd als het te verkiezen verband bij radiotherapie-geïnduceerde huidletsels. Klik op de poster om te vergroten. Evaluation of a PolymEric mEmbranE DrEssing in thE managEmEnt of raDiothEraPy inDucED skin rEactions in hEaD anD nEck cancEr PatiEnts Aim: To evaluate if; Polymeric membrane dressing was effective in the management of patients presenting with radiotherapy induced skin damage. Method: A bespoke evaluation captured information on the patients’ age, gender, radiotherapy dosage, nutritional status, cancer type and location, RTOG rating, wound pain score and pain at dressing change. Patients were provided with a free text diary to log their pain using a numerical and Wong and Baker Face scale. Pain medication and sleep patterns. Each week, the RTOG rating, wound size, location and description, pain score of wound, pain associated with dressing change and dressing wear time was completed by the clinician, patients or carers. This continued for a maximum of 4 weeks. Results: A total of 20 patients, 17 men and 3 women, with a mean age of 56.8 all had a primary diagnosis of head and neck cancer. 65% of patients had RTOG scale of 2, 25% RTOG rating 2.5. A significant finding in this study included the decline in wound pain scores between week 1-3. By week 4, 15/20 of patients skin had healed. Patient diaries provided valuable data with common themes including: • Increased sleeping hours • Dramatic reduction in pain during wear time of the dressing • Increased healing rates when compared to the standard treatment • Patients and carers were able to change the dressings • Reduction in pain medication P305 Lead Author: audrey scott macmillan head and neck cns mount vernon cancer centre rickmansworth road, northwood middlesex, ha6 2rn. E-mail address: [email protected] The use of patient diaries gave a unique insight into patients with skin damage. The use of advanced wound dressing improved quality of life in these vulnerable patients. Lead Contact & Lead Author Evaluation Leads - Fionnula Hegarty Senior Sister Bart’s Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield London, EC1A 7BE Tel: +44 (0)20 3416 5000 E.Mail: [email protected] Second Author Evaluation Leads - Michele Wong Senior Sister Bart’s Health NHS Trust, West Smithfield London, EC1A 7BE Tel: +44 (0)20 3416 5000 E.Mail: [email protected] Fig 1. Mean patient Pain score using numerical scale 1- 10 over a period of two weeks. Introduction RTOG Grade Management Rationale 0 (no change to skin) Continue with own skin care regime and use of patients own non perfumed, easily absorbed moisturiser. Past practice has been aqueous cream but evidence has shown this can be any non perfumed, easily absorbed cream. Follow general Skin care guidelines. Consider the use of a barrier film if indicated to delay the onset of reactions. Promote hydrated skin and maintain integrity. Assess Weekly. 1 (Faint/dull erythema) Continue with skin care regime and use of moisturiser. Consider appropriate analgesia for pain. Consider the use of anti-histamine to aid with itching. Promote hydrated skin and patient comfort. Management of itch and pain as required. Assess weekly in clinic 2a (bright erythema/dry desquamation/ sore, itchy skin) Increase application of creams as required. Consider commencement of dressings, such as Hydrogels, gels and sheets, foams. Promote hydrated skin and patient comfort. Control pain from skin reaction. Management of itch. Assess weekly 2b (Patchy moist desquamation. Yellow exudate/ pain) Continue moisturiser on unbroken skin. Swab as necessary to check for local infection – consider use of systemic antibiotics if infection confirmed. Apply appropriate dressing to treatment area (Hydrogels, Polymem, foams) Dressing use will be decided by the specialist team depending on the treatment field. Continued use of systemic analgesia. Refer to district nurse (DN) as necessary, especially if patient unable to manage self changes. To promote patient comfort. Reduce further trauma and infection. Reduce pain, soreness and discomfort for the patient. Assess on a more frequent basis. To be decided by the team. 3 (Confluent Moist desquamation, oedema, soreness) Continue as RTOG 2b with use of dressings. Swab as necessary to check for local infection. Ensure patient self management with dressings, refer to DN as necessary. Continued patient comfort as much as possible. Reduce the risk of added complications. 4 (Ulceration, bleeding, necrosis) Rarely seen. Management should be considered on an individual basis and discussed with the Medical team on all occasions. Fig 1. Management of skin reactions and use of dressings taken from Mount Vernon Cancer Centre skin care guidelines for during and after radiotherapy treatment. Audrey Scott, Macmillan Head and Neck CNS on behalf of Mount Vernon Cancer Centre Radiotherapy Skin Care Group. 2013 p9-10. In England, over 275,000 people per year are diagnosed with cancer and more than half of these receive radiotherapy1. Bart’s radiotherapy department sees approximately 1000 patients per year. A current skin care protocol consists of hydrogels, covered with a non-adhesive dressing secured with bandages. Post treatment, topical anti-inflammatory cream is applied. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute radiation morbidity scoring criteria is commonly used to classify skin reactions, which range from 0 - 42 Most patients with RTOG of 2 - 2.5 will progress onto RTOG 3. With a current average healing time of 4 - 6 weeks3, a clinical evaluation of Polymeric dressing was undertaken to determine its efficacy and potential to improve patient outcomes. Methodology Fig 2. Patient Recorded Sleep Patterns. Full consent was obtained and any patient could withdraw. This study aims to evaluate if a polymeric membrane dressing is effective for the management of patients presenting with a RTOG score of 1 - 2.5 over a four-week period. In particular, to assess it’s performance in: Improving skin integrity, managing dry and moist desquamation, relieving pain and inflammation improving quality of life. An evaluation form used provided information on the patient’s age, gender, dosage, nutritional status, cancer type and location, RTOG rating, wound pain and dressing change. In addition, patients were given a free text daily diary to record pain scores using the Wong and Baker Face scale, type and level of analgesia and sleep patterns. The evaluation consisted of baseline details and continued for a maximum of 4 weeks. Results Fig 3. RTOG 2 Injury A total of 74 evaluations were completed 23 patients with a mean age of 60. Cancer types, 8 head and neck, breast cancer, 7 patients, anal cancer, 3 patients, vulva cancer, 3 patients and lower leg, 2 patients. 48% (11) patients had an RTOG grade 2.5 (moist desquamation with sloughy tissue), 48% (11) patients had an RTOG grade of 2 (bright erythema/dry desquamation with sore, itchy and tight skin) and 4% (1) had an RTOG grade of 3 (confluent moist desquamation). Fig 1. Pain scores. As the study progressed, the documentation of pain scores reduced. It is impossible to state if this was due to the dressing, analgesia or lack of documentation. It is evident the records for the first 14 days were more accurate with an average score of 6.3 on day 1. The total number of patients at week two totalling 18/23 had a mean pain score of 1.8. Fig 2. Patient recorded Sleep patterns. Sleep is an important process that aids healing. Loss of sleep can often be linked to pain and stress. It was felt that if the dressings were able to reduce inflammation and pain then sleep patterns would improve. Fig 2. Shows the individual patient diary sleep patterns of 20/23 patients records. Week one, 6/23 patients were recording sleep patterns of none to 2-4 hours. By day 6, all patients recorded sleep patterns 4-6 to 6-8 hours. It must be remembered that by day six, 8 patients had stopped recording sleep patterns. By day 11, a total of 15 patients had stopped recording sleep patterns. Fig 4. RTOG 1 Injury Conclusion This study into the treatment of radiotherapy induced skin reactions, improved wound management in regards to pain, exudate control and patient comfort. Some of the anatomical areas treated created challenges in securing the dressings and this study highlighted the need for training in this area. The patient diaries gave the authors valuable insight in the management of patients with RTOG damage. Fig 5. RTOG 2b Injury Patient Pain Diaries The Polymeric Membrane dressing in-situ Patient 1 “Wore dressing all day. Found I went to lay down in afternoon and realized I sitting for a little while something I have not been able to do for a long time. Did not sleep v well but did not get any pain until 5pm Took 2 paracetamol at 6.15pm.” Patient 2 “July 16th - going to see nurse today to get clean dressing nurse said looking good only a little discomfort when I walk and sit down dressing definitely helps when you put a clean one on pain definitely easier.” Patient 6 “By keeping the dressing damp with saline solution relief was achieved when the infection was at its worse the dressing needed to be changed twice a day.” Patient 8 “No pain no soreness or itching relieved.” Patient 9 “I have no problem endorsing the product given that it is essential a product that is truly fit for purpose.” Patient 15 “Soon as dressing applied pain eased.” Patient Comments: Fig 2. Pain, sleep and analgesic diaries kept by patients 1-4 weeks Discussion: Evaluation of Polymeric Membrane Dressing for Radiotherapy Induced Skin Reactions Patient 11, day 3 “When the dressing is removed within a short space of time the burn dries and hurts like hell, when the dressing is applied the relief is almost instant and the pain drops to 0”. Fig 6. RTOG 2b Injury Patient Mean Pain Score 10 8 Fig 7. H&N Patient Patient 19, day 5 “I would highly recommend this dressing, when wearing for more than one day, used a small squirt of saline (2 mls) this cooled the wound right down immediately- great tip”. 6 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Fig 3. Patient mean pain score over 14 days References 1. Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF (1995) Toxicity criteria of the Radiation TherapyOncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organisation for Research andTreatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J RadiatOncol Biol Phys 31(5): 1341–6. 2. Delaney G et al: The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment. Cancer 2005. 3. Harris R et al: Radiotherapy skin care: A survey of practice in the UK. Radiography 2011. Dressing discussed - PolyMem with support from Aspen Medical Europe Ltd. Aspen 426(L)2 04.14 XS454 References: Dressing evaluated: PolyMem®(Polymeric Membrane ) finger/toe dressing (Ferris Mfg Corp) Aspen Medical UK Truman E (2011) Managing Radiotherapy Induced Skin Reactions A Toolkit for Healthcare Professionals Ellen Truman EWMA poster presentation (European wound Management Association) 4 PRODUCTNEWS: SCARBAN Hospithera verdeelt de producten Scarban van ScarPro NV Hospithera is sinds kort de trotse distributeur van de silicone producten Scarban® van ScarPro NV. Dit Belgische bedrijf staat al meer dan 60 jaar bekend voor de kwaliteit en effectiviteit van haar producten. De Scarban® Silicone sheets zijn uiterst geschikt voor de preventie en behandeling van hypertrofische en keloïde littekens en voor de behandeling van brandwonden (in monotherapie of in combinatie met druk). Dankzij de silicone herwint de huid ook haar normale elasticiteit. Dit unieke gamma is beschikbaar in verschillende types silicone en in verschillende vormen. De Scarban® producten zijn: • herbruikbaar van 15 dagen tot 2 maanden • wasbaar (machine of hand) • UV-beschermend • zelfklevend en dubbel elastisch • semi-occlusief Effectiviteit van Scarban®: VOOR NA Case I: Trauma Patiënt:Man Oorzaak:Sportongeval Case II: Chirurgisch litteken Patiënt:Vrouw Oorzaak:Z-plastie Case III: Litteken Patiënt:Kind Oorzaak:brandwonde Contacteer uw Account Manager voor meer informatie betreffende dit gamma! 5 PRODUCTNEWS: SANICAST Reinigingskit voor onder een gipsverband - Innovatieve oplossing om de huid onder een orthopedisch gipsverband te reinigen. - Voor een betere hygiëne en minder geurhinder. - Desinfecteert, ontgeurt en verzacht de huid. Sani-Cast laat toe moeilijk te bereiken plaatsen onder een gipsverband te reinigen en maakt zo het dragen van een gips comfortabel. Sanicast is vanaf heden beschikbaar: VOOR PROFESSIONALS: Hospithera NV Klein Eilandstraat 3 1070 Brussel +32 (0)2 535 03 85 [email protected] www.hospithera.com VOOR PARTICULIEREN: Home-Care BVBA Domien Craccostraat 75 8800 Roeselare +32 (0) 476.20.35.46 [email protected] www.h-care.be 65 Het DayCare team van Hospithera wenst u een prettige zomer! MEER INFORMATIE? Contacteer ons! Marc Lens +32(0)476 86 35 15 marc.lens@ hospithera.com Catherine Chauvin +32(0)477 76 05 01 catherine.chauvin@ hospithera.com Gladys D’Agostino +32(0)483 57 60 24 gladys.dagostino@ hospithera.com Nadine Delhez +32(0)478 25 17 29 nadine.delhez@ hospithera.com Hospithera NV l Klein Eilandstraat 3 l 1070 Brussel Tel: +32 (0)2 535 03 85 l E-mail: [email protected] l WWW.HOSPITHERA .COM 7