“Extension” of Al
Transcription
“Extension” of Al
Mediterranean Hot Spot Investment Programme: P j Project Preparation P i and d Implementation I l i Facility F ili (MeHSIP-PPIF) “Extension” of Al-Ghadir “WWTP” 7th April 2011, Athens Sophia h Papageorgiou (PL) ( ) 07/04/2011 MeHSIP-PPIF MeHSIP--PPIF Overview MeHSIP ¾ Geographic coverage: 10 S South th M Mediterranean dit partner t countries ti ¾ Components p of MeHSIP-PPIF: 1. Governance & Support to Horizon2020 Initiative 2. Sectoral Support 3 Management of Hotspots & Project Pipeline (key component) 3. 4. Knowledge Management & Capacity Building 07/04/2011 Allocation of Resources Allocation of Resources Per Component 16% 3% 3% 78% Component 1 07/04/2011 Component 2 Component 3 Component 4 Component 3: ¾ Scope: Management of Hotspots & Project Pipeline ¾ Project pipeline: updated & maintained Develop selection criteria and screening methodology Monitor progress on projects U d t P Update Project j t pipeline i li ¾ Develop for implementation p projects p j p Design Scope and resource allocation for feasibility studies Conduct feasibility studies Pushing forward the project cycle 07/04/2011 Al-Ghadir Al Ghadir Wastewater Project THE CASE OF LEBANON 07/04/2011 [1] Inclusion to 1st Wave is subject to further investigations during first half of 2010. MeHSIP-PPIF Cooperation Focus Al-Ghadir Project j Extension of WW Treatment Plant Sector: Wastewater Aim: improve quality of coastal waters, quality off lif life and d promote t economic i development d l t off the area on the long run. Objectives: Assessing technical, economic, environmental and financial viability i bilit off th the project j t 07/04/2011 AL-Ghadir Project Characteristics (priority project) • • • • • • Listed as a pollution hot spot for the Mediterranean sea stated in Lebanon NAP; Responds directly to Med. Sea De-pollution initiative; Wastewater sector is a priority area of intervention for Lebanon; Existing plant provides inadequate level of treatment (screening + Grit & Scum Removal); Its upgrade was initiated some ten years ago (Feasibility Study, Study in 2000, 2000 no investment followed); Since 2000 the drainage area was subject to various changes (networks, main collectors, and urban development); 07/04/2011 AL-Ghadir Project Profile • Sector Focus: Wastewater • Total Duration: 13 months • Experts Input: approx: 700 man-days • Contracting Authority : European Investment Bank (EIB) • P Promoter: t C Council il ffor D Development l t&R Reconstruction t ti (CDR) • Operator : Beirut & Mount Lebanon Water Establishment • Main Outcome: Feasibility Study March 2011 Progress To date • Completion of Inception Phase in 3 months – Project Background and Baseline Data to Include: 1. 1 2. 3. 4. Legal and Institutional framework Existing situation in water supply and Sanitation in the project area Demand Analysis (future projections) g Criteria Definition of Design – Liaising with ongoing water supply projects in the area • Main Deliverable – Mobilization of 160 man days of experts (20% of total) – Submitting draft Inception report Project baseline • • • • • • Preliminary works and sea outfall (main 2,5 km long, dispersion; emergency 0,5 km long) Capacity: 2,6 2 6 m3/s (currently operating at approx 20% capacity) Design for 2050: 4,6 m3/s (1,8 MPE) Initial assessment: E/M good condition Condition of the sea outfall system not known Inflow quality: – BOD (weak), ( k) – SS (high, open channels) • Evidence of industrial p pollution: metals 07/04/2011 MeHSIP-PPIF Al Ghadir Wastewater Project Al-Ghadir “TECHNICAL” CONSIDERATIONS & CHALLENGES Location of the plant - Drainage area • Location of the plant ¾ Southern Beirut, by the Airport • Drainage area, basic features: ¾ P Partt off 4 casas (districts) (di t i t ) & 47 “Municipalities” ¾ Estimated population of the area approx. 1 million ¾ Mainly urban areas (no agricultural land); some areas without urban plans and with limited sanitaryy provisions; p ; ¾ Sewer networks: mains constructed or under construction or designed ¾ Limited data available on secondaryy and tertiary sewer networks ¾ Limited data available on water supply 07/04/2011 MeHSIP-PPIF Potential for Wastewater Reuse • Fi t screening First i (figure) (fi ) • • Potential areas for irrigation Aquifers “known” to suffer from sea intrusion • Limitations: × × × × Lack of national regulatory framework (at preparation stage) For irrigation: long distance, higher altitude Æ cost! (distribution network and pumping cost) Aquifer recharge: cost (either for infiltration basins or deep well injection); feasibility of this potential reuse method would require detailed hydrogeological survey Limited motivation to promote wastewater reuse (not the case for other areas but in general true for coastal cities) Solid Waste Management (sludge) • • • • • • Sludge Sl d managementt master t plan l (2002) (2002), nott officially adopted (Ghadir, incineration) Sludge on a “case by case” basis Discussions on “Waste to Energy” SWM Plans initiated (MSW, WW sludge included) Review of existing facilities on SWM, first screening (presented in the figure); Naameh landfill already close to its capacity Also in the figure, areas (total per district) available for land application of sludge Limitations for land application (incl. composting): 1. 2. 3. Distance from Ghadir plant Quality of sludge produced (high metals concentrations anticipated) Limited acceptability from competent authorities ((in general) g ) 07/04/2011 MeHSIP-PPIF Industry in the project area • • Industrial areas (previous study, 1996) Lack of data in assessing pollution loads: ¾ Production type, capacity ¾ Existence of sewers, connected or not • • • • Compliance p of industrial discharges g ((with ELVs) reported to be limited (No enforcement) Pre-treatment Pre treatment on site, rarely applies Sampling is scheduled, targeting the identification of major polluters Work on possible synergy with parallel project (GTZ funded) to promote pretreatment (pilot basis, priority areas and polluters) Legal Framework - overview and “gaps” • A comprehensive list of relevant legal acts and ratified treaties/agreements prepared • ELVs (discharges) and Environmental Quality Standards (e g bathing water criteria) are in place (e.g. • Legal “gaps”: – Guidelines and/or standards for ww reuse and sludge reuse and disposal (prepared, not yet adopted) – Soil and sediment standards – Framework Law on ICZM 07/04/2011 MeHSIP-PPIF Institutional Aspects & Shortcomings • Closer coordination among key Stakeholders (e.g. MoEW, MoE, WE, CDR) • A new Strategy on Water Sector Reform drafted in 2010 by MoEW (still to be endorsed) • WW sector institutional responsibilities for networks, treatment, post treatment still vague • Limited Li it d experience i on WWTP WWTPs (especially ( i ll off large l scale) l ) • Operation and Maintenance of WWTPs in Lebanon, is contracted out by either MoEW or the WE (and monitored) 07/04/2011 MeHSIP-PPIF Cost Recovery and Tariff Structure • Currently no tariff on wastewater applies • Water tariff applies per household per year (lack of metering); average US $138 (assuming 1m3/household/day) (not covering O&M in most cases) • New Water Strategy suggests ww tariff to be introduced in 2011 (25% of water tariff tariff, current water tariff US $0 $0,4/m 4/m3, suggested ww tariff US$ 0,1/m3) • WW tariff to apply on customers connected to sewer network and WWTP 07/04/2011 MeHSIP-PPIF Al-Ghadir Wastewater Project DEVELOPING ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS Designing Alternative Options • Inception report is under review; critical aspects highlighted • Considerations in developing of alternative options: – Limited land availability; off shore extension feasible but increases cost (especially if to exceed a certain zone) – Vicinity to the airport (height of buildings, safety, odours nuisance, birds etc ) etc.) – Sludge management (off site, volume – cost, industrial discharges) – Feasibility of the reuse of the total flow of the treated effluent is questionable – Current system of outfalls, suggested to switch function (critical aspect on site’s hydraulics) – Limited experience in WWTPs operation (simplicity of the method) • Comparison of alternatives from a technical, financial and environmental point of view 07/04/2011 MeHSIP-PPIF Thank y you for your y attention! 07/04/2011 MeHSIP-PPIF